This is an official announcement that I have resolved my uncertainty and now I am certain and now
when I say my 2006 article, I mean the fresco article and
when I say my 2007 article, I mean my main article, in which I combined my 1997 Core theory specification with myth — and images incl branching motifs I didnt recognize,
myth & images; mythemes & art motifs.
I was not branching-literate yet — despite writing at some length about branching versus non-branching — within the domain of Physics!
and had not yet connected that with religious myth.
voice transcription:
A month ago , I finally had the opportunity — or invested the time, to do the research in the amazing Max Freakout archives of the Egodeath Yahoo Group to determine and remember that the core of the 2007 main article was finished and announced in September 2006, but it lacked the introduction, which was separated into the top of the homepage of egodeath.com
whenever I picture the 2007 main article, I always prominently mentally picture the wonderful introduction, which I copied from the homepage into the actual article around maybe June 2007
see my postings on this here perhaps one month ago perhaps February 2023
it was very interesting to find that September 12, 2007 was the first time I posted the word eternalism
and immediately after that I posted my announcement of the final revision of my 2007 main article, in which I copied the broken-up sentences from the mobile version
which I remember that I had used to read aloud the article
I think the zip file is working maybe or the individual MP3 files are working at the homepage of egodeath.com reading aloud the main article –
I have definitely concluded that that mic does not have the most “clarity” — which might explain why it was discontinued
and it had other issues as well , that I had to fix and repair
Read Aloud from Mobile Version of 2007 Main Article
I did not read aloud the article from the main messy academic copy of the article but rather from the mobile streamlined copy of the article
That’s where I first tried to read aloud the article and determined:
I did my bad habit of putting sentences within sentences to make everything really clear
so in that mobile the webpages which are a set of five webpages including the introduction as a separate dedicated webpage
and so this is interesting from a communication point of view:
that I first wrote the body of the article in a messy awkward academic long webpage, then I copied that into streamlined mobile webpages a set of 5 shorter webpages
then I copied the resulting streamlined version of the article from the five mobile webpages back into the long awkward academic single-webpage article
messy academic long webpage
that’s how I leveraged the more polished and streamlined mobile presentation back into the long article
as I announced just after my first posting all about Wikipedia articles about block universe eternalism, I posted that I had broken up the sentences in my long article just like in the mobile pages
then after that announcement I posted the —
the Egodeath community gave me a tip about a superdeterminism article in physics, bracketing my announcement of the final version of the main article which turns out to genuinely be 2007
not , as I have been writing, because of uncertainty, I have been writing “2006/2007 main article”
but now I have done the research to determine exactly what was the difference
And what exactly the dates are, and what changes were made at what dates.
I posted those archive links here about a month ago for all that research, maybe perhaps in idea development page 18 – i probably made a dedicated post.
and now I have determined that the reasonable truth of the matter is that it is not 2006, but rather 2007.
the proper version that I certify, the director’s cut that I authenticate, the real version, the genuine main article is September 12, 2007
and it has not changed one single character since then
A good litmus test is:
how would I feel if salvia divinorum magazine had published in print my September 2006 version of the article?
I would not be very satisfied by that
that is not the real version of the article
but I would completely agree if they published in print my September 2007 final draft , which really in every sense of the word truly was the final draft , because I have never changed a single letter
in fact the worst complaint I have about it it’s not with any of my writing; it’s that I went along with the stupid brain-dead academic counterproductive convention of giving the person’s first name initial only
it would have been a much more useful and Unpretentious
this is the worst thing about it
it’s both a pretentious format
the worst thing about my references section is it is simultaneously pretentious and counterproductive and unuseful , because I fail to give the first name of the author
and that really is the only thing I wish to change other than the and the way that the
the content of the article
dammit I believe that a couple paragraphs were lost here thanks to the flaky app
you are on the leading edge, I am sorry to say , of altered state theory
article on both of these were I feel well beyond my decoding level of
My complaint about the contents of the article I have listed it at the copy which is at this website egodeath theory.wordpress.com ego death theory I have listed my Arata their errata there.
The great news is that the images I provided are really excellent I’m thinking of the Eustace window crossing the river And the Dionysus A
rticle on both of these were I feel well beyond my decoding level of
Motifs and mythemes I am not too sore about that they really were pretty far above are pretty far above my level of literacy motif literacy and maybe perhaps miss theme literacy because the word branch does not appear in the article although interestingly at the beginning of the 2001 discussion group which was five or six years before the main article I did post a lot about Branching and nonbranching but not in the context of mythology, but rather, Physics!
metaphysics of time
I determined this also about a month or two ago and posted about it here
So now I’ve done the research on the exact dates of the main article, and what was changed in the final few revisions
and I have learned that it does contain awesome images , but they were above my decoding level they were above my translation level and I had not yet–
Although I had written in some detail about Branching versus nonbranching within the domain of physics and block universe and Freewill branching, I had not connected those ideas at all systematically to religious myth , but merely had the roots of myth in the Egodeath Yahoo Group posts (copied to egodeath.com if before valen 2004) that would later, like 2010, start to become/ develop into my theory of mythology Branching versus nonbranching , which I finally connected to models of time in physics , for example postings of November 2011 and November 2012 , and then the big November 2013 , and then in Christmas 2015 postings about Thomas Hatsis especially salamander and fire
and today I learned something about my half correct interpretation of Christmas 2015 posting at Egodeath Yahoo Group archives
I was half wrong I was not really getting it when I said in 2015
{Fire} means the altered state.
I don’t know why voice dictation is incapable and stupid when it comes to the phrase
I don’t know why voice dictation is incapable and stupid when it accurately transcribes the word ‘altered’, and then changes it to a bizarre garbled non-word instead.
it’s annoying AF.
altered state of consciousness
altered state of consciousness correct.
You enter an altered state of consciousness when ingesting mushrooms.
that was a successful voice transcription
although the app is screwing up now and deleting entire groups of paragraphs oh joy
POS tech
I was misinterpreting or it was a short coming I was falling short when I said in Christmas 2015 and have maybe said this for some years after that that fire means that roasting the salamander and fire means being in the altered state that’s not wrong like so many theories in the world it is not wrong but it is not sufficient or useful either you’re not getting it
you get only partial credit
You don’t really understand although you’re on your way towards understanding but you do not yet understand if you think that fire vaguely means the altered state of consciousness you’re missing the real point —-
the real point is that fire means loss of control the threat of loss of control and a kind of a real actual loss of control
I am restricted and having to do some wonky editing in this half-working mobile app
like I warned you, you are on the leading edge of altered state theory 💥😵
Buildings collapse when you only recognize, half comprehend that fire means something about processing the salamander to make it imperishable
but it is not just unspecified vague immersion in the loose cognitive state, but very specifically, as we see in the villa of the mysteries, the maiden being
scorched and instructed scorching scorched A scorch on society scorch scorch with a whip the prisoner was scorch with a whip
for example, after my September 12, 2007 announcement of my final draft, which was interleaved with postings about eternalism / superdeterminism
The really good news with this as an outcome of that fact factual finding , the good side effect is that now I can say :
Cybermonk 2006 means my allegro Wasson plane crawled fresco of the town of Plaincourault France and
when I say Cybermonk 2007 article, this means my main article
that it is now much easier to differentiate which article I mean
This is an official announcement that I have resolve my uncertainty and now I am certain and now
when I say my 2006 article, I mean the fresco article and
when I say my 2007 article, I mean my main article, in which I combined my 1997 Core theory specification with myth and images.
theory specification and I combined it and interleaved it with two things really:
myth, & images; mythemes & art motifs
(because 1997 did not have images)
and some commentary about those images in 2006/2007 , but not yet with literacy about {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs.
my theory of being radical was shattered and BTFOd
since Nov 2020, especially peak total fail during February 1, 2023 through and February 14, 2023 when I explained how I was obliged to take the radical extreme position of asserting that the Canterbury Psalter image F134 row three middle blue crater is to collect psilocybin
— BUT I colossally totally failed to coherently also say that Therefore the grain dispensary bin bin the two bins filled with grain and bucket distributing pouring grain must be cubensis
which it turns out that it explicitly blatantly is
I had between November 14, 2020 and March 19, 2023 — two years and four months of failure to be radical
I was only inconsistently radical
and in fact left not just a quarter inch gap but I left an 8 feet wide massive giant gap for evil future me to completely demolish and utterly humiliate dumb present me at the time
and so evil future me of March 19 (give or take a day , see the date I announced that the grain bins and bucket explicitly depict liberty caps and cubensis )
which I embarrassed announced that the dumb guy happy at the grain dispensary green dispensary grain wheat grain dispensary was no such thing , and I fallen into Eadwine’s pit of falling for the trap of the initial surface impression
and my gullible way off-base misreading of dumb guy between November 2020 through into March 2023 yesterday was totally and completely wrong and off and it utterly failed to be had utterly And totally failed to be radical Or esoteric by any measure
it was the most rankest of exoteric uninspired outsider those on the outside
I had read it exactly as those on the outside were to be tricked into reading
and I had fallen into the pit set for me for two years and four months despite being The definitive leading edge model of radicalness but
but I turned out to be the model of inconsistent incoherent radicalness instead , because I should not have been aiming to be radical; I should’ve aimed to be the model of being principled consistently thus coherently extreme radical
to do : copy to here my communication with Cyberdisciple November 2020 where I said I’m not going to analyze rows two and three of image F134 because they’re stupid and mundane and just merely show grain
and cyberdisciple replied something like you’re a fool , you have let me down you poser you uninspired exoteric esotericist
either:
black and white absolute assertion that psilocybin is the only way; transformation from possibilism to eternalism (while in the loose cognitive altered state eternalism experiential mode)
or else, the alternative is:
perpetual dead-end, status quo, vague model forever in perpetuity
And sprinkle on the casual incidental assertion of the ahistoricity of religious founder figures to top it off for good measure
no free will also by the way but don’t let on about this part of it Keep it on the down low; in the Unpleasant Experiences secret high-level dimension, in Shadow factor 13 (SHA) (which doesn’t exist),
with the shadow dragon monster item 54: “I was afraid to lose my self-control”;
and: “It was difficult to control my thoughts”, from the Rick Strassmann hallucinogen rating scale (HRS)
I created the Field of Cognitive Anti-Neuroscience
cognitive anti-neuroscience which is the Egodeath theory ; the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence : the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
is my approach
because the alternative is deleting cognitive replacing it by neuroscience
I am listening to the podcast episode , that’s a bit of transcribing number 236 at 50:00
non-integrated exoteric esotericism advocate Jan Irvin 2008 Deathmatch against exoteric exotericism Jan Irvin 2022
Jan Ervin at the end of day last night this morning new book 2022 takes a very lopsided scorched earth anti-drug approach he pours it on the heavily totally pours it on the most rank vulgar anti-drug Christian attitudes never mind did it totally contradicts his other book his companion book
his two books destroy each other he is in consistently radical
just like me
I am in the worst possible position to criticize him for marketing his positive radical assertion of logos equals Eucharist equals mushrooms in 2008 holding that book in my left hand while also Irvin 2022 logos equals Eucharist not equals mushrooms because deliver the most vulgar exoteric common place anti-drug attitude now is his new brand never mind that is directly self contradicting himself
no-free-will, but Keep this on the down-low and consistently only assert it during the altered state
And be low-key about this but also this means that during altered state there No free will is the case
but during the ordinary state Freewill is the case
metaphysically flip-flop inconsistent: i assert state-specific metaphysics, destroying and demolishing Chris Letheby’s one-dimensional, static, ordinary state based ; ie, what William James calls ‘pragmatism’ — see the book by Jonathan Bricklin: the illusion of will, self, and time: William James’ reluctant guide to enlightenment,
by which Brooklyn specifically means Jonathan Bricklin Specifically means enlightenment means eternity thinking ; eternalism-thinking
or else, the alternative is:
perpetual dead-end, status quo, vague model forever in perpetuity;
these are the options open to us.
Pick One and be consistent for God sake
The highest value is spiritual religious regeneration as 100% of everyone has always asserted
and
the only way for regeneration is Psilocybin
Voice dictation dictates to me that I am not permitted to use the word that begins with the letter C
or possibly I could be more narrowly hyper specific more narrowly narrowly Nero hyper specific by saying cubensis
this piece of sht voice transcription is going to help me stay with everyday language because it fails to transcribe that word that starts with the letter C and it successfully transcribes the word psilocybin
so that pretty much settles that
it says that that word which starts with the letter C is a typo so that settles that
Self contradictory Jan Irvin lectures us about logos which means consistent avoidance of self-contradiction
contradict yourself much, Jan Irvin , king of self-contradiction 🤡👑 easy to do when you have been a poser pseudo esoteric ; exoteric esotericism all he ever had and that is why it is so easy to ditch and contradict his 2008 book or his earlier mediocrity sterling mediocrity, uninspired
his childish kiddie Amanita powered airplane cannot get off the ground — see the book Astrotheology and shamanism
Jan Irvin lectures loss Jan Irvin lectures us about the word W word which means logos which means
reason logic and truth
Egodeath Mystery Show podcast episode 236 at 1:05:00
Irvin accuses Wallace enough asserting a falsehood when Wasson sometimes inconsistently says equates Eucharist and logos and with Mushrooms in this context 2022 book specifically psilocybin mushrooms yet somehow we are supposed to excuse and ignore the fact that Irving in 2008 book the holy mushroom asserts precisely explicitly and emphatically that which is the entire purpose of the 2008 book is to assert precisely that which he now
do you know expects us to find Wasson he now expects us to find Wasson guilty for having the audacity to equate and that Wasson is guilty of asserting a falsehood when Wasson asserts and equates that Eucharist equal and logos equals mushrooms which is precisely exactly what Irvin himself asserts in 2008 now I do allow him to change his mind as long as he meets my condition that he must explicitly discussed the fact that he has changed his mind
how can you now take
the rank vulgar outsider
He fails to reconcileThose on the outside anti-drug position without even mentioning that you’re in direct self-contradiction of yourself so so much for your logos again you are allowed to change your position but Irving in 2022 book the beginning of the book the recounts his changing trajectory got his religious conversion
But he fails to reconcile really the truth but may be in his hands the shallow truth in 2008 book THM The holy mushroom that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
yet in 2022 book he asserts that Wasson is guilty of asserting a falsehood in asserting that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
2022 book demands of us demands of the reader that the reader must hold a rank exoteric run-of-the-mill Christian moralist anti-drug perspective attitude never mind that does exactly 100% contradicts the truth which is presented by his 2008 book which correctly asserts that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
My reaction and my response is to triple down and be an absolutist by principle, on principle
be consistently radical; be radically clear, and be radically consistent
please accuse me of being wrong, but for god sake never accuse me of being unclear or inconsistent!
although — here’s the rub — I totally was inconsistent and failed to be consistently radical in November 2020-Mar 19 2023 and esp in February 1-14 2023
my consistently radical clear-cut position statement that I marry and wed : call me wrong, but do not call me inconsistent, and do not call me unclear
The ultimate and highest value is religious regeneration from possibility branching model to pre-existing eternity model
and the only way to do this is through psilocybin
and this means what the Bible says, those who have been turned and converted; those on the inside ; the elect ; the chosen; fished out by God
cyberpunk who is Cybermonk the inconsistently consistent radical who never lets the evil future may get a little toe in — but instead throws the door wide-open 8 feet wide gigantic opening for the evil future me to come waltzing right in limbs fully splayed and completely to come waltzing right in and completely BTFO the dumb present me
Irvin as inconsistent as king David
Cybermonk Teaching the Pure Eternalism Control-Stability Eucharist to the Cubensis Providers
Cybermonk 7:34 a.m. March 24, 2023
Addendum March 23, 2023
18:00 4824.wav I have the following quite a good voice recording– I have the following text that,
I did this voice transcription in parallel with doing a voice recording of all of the below
The second phrase of the title of the article my 2023 main article is psychedelic eternal of the eternal living eternity
pre-existence of control thoughts
this means punchy definition of that phrase that term means:
no Freewill and
pre-existence of future control thoughts and
you don’t control the source of your control thoughts and
ADDED LATER: you are vulnerable naked exposed and {you see that you are naked} ; you see that you are vulnerable to thoughts being thoughts being {forced into the female mind} from a hidden external higher uncontrollable source of control-thoughts, {coming into the walled city gate of its own volition from outside the local system.}
That smells like a major important key breakthrough I’ve got a hook into something I’ve got a fish on the line I’m fishing for thoughts I’m fishing upward and I’ve caught some thing I’ve caught an idea the Jesus enters into Jerusalem the political leader savior epiphany appearance outside the city gate wall
The political savior comes to the town of his own initiative saving from outside the system and then the people are brought out from their insular wall boundary through the gate transformed removing the garment removing their ego like possibility branching mental model garment and made to place that garment under the feet
midday addend cont:
you are vulnerable to overpowering déjà vu ; here is where you lose control and die as a control agent and now you perceive the hands crossed with the right wrist no visible no longer hidden by the left limb branching illusion
In other words
triple down on my most controversial and offensive concepts BUT they have to sound distinctive they can’t sound familiar familiar Arity is deaf they have to sound familiar in an otherworldly not that this sounds boring Lee familiar stupid questionnaires from the dumb big Pharma psychedelic industrial complex very boring and downer ideas not that kind of familiarity but rather an otherworldly kind of familiarity that this is ringing a bell from an altered state forgotten
I am thinking that the phrase no freewill is poison and the word determinism is poison because they are overly familiar in a very bad way
and do the same thing with the poisonous bad lexicon that all of the big Pharma psychedelic industrial complex
all of them use their hip to the lingo jargon that is instantly tiresome and a bummer, their stupid phrases their annoying phrases
familiar and frustrating and unsatisfying phrases
these are phrases that are used to delete cognitive psychedelic affects
these are phrases that are an attack that’s trying to remove Dionysus from Psilocybin experiential state state of consciousness
Their soul-killing lexicon
Get Real
A Complete Mystical Freakout
You Had an Authentic Complete Mystical Freakout
the soul killing term bunk terminology thats used to replace and delete and eliminate everything good in the Freakout peak true mystical Freakout break Roland Griffiths stupid Walter Stace 1960 book
break their wrong lexicon
their conceptual vocabulary is crap
They bring us a incomplete, non-mystical experience
and when they say “mystical”, every time they said they ruin the word , because what they mean by the word is not what real people mean by the word
real Mystics have nothing to do with this word mystic mystical experience as used, as Misused, as abused by Walter Stace 1960
And then taken up by Timothy Leary when he converted the book Mysticism and Philosophy into a bunk questionnaire or a set of 38 questionnaires Walter Panki 1962 April 20 became 1963 dissertation which you can read all 38 1/2 questionnaires in that dissertation which became the godforsaken so called mystical experience questionnaire
which is no such thing
in which no mystic whatever recognize
unicorns and rainbows
And Studeris 2010
refers to this single book but they do it in a dishonest way
they say “the scientific literature” such as end note reference citation number 20
this construction in the article is a way of hiding the fact that what they call it what they sell and what they falsely market with false advertising as the so-called “scientific literature”
when they say such as citation number 20 they’re hiding the fact that they only got one flimsy wrong bad book
We’re trying to sell this flimsy book and
they are trying to sell this flimsy book as this so called “the scientific literature on psychological experiencing including Mysticism”
scientific literature? get out of here!
scientific the
here’s our list of scientific literature such as this one book , 63 years out of date
some “scientific literature foundation basis” they have there:
the only way through which we have salvation regeneration and entering into heaven is through psilocybin
define in a crystal clear hard-core to the wall unsurpassable extremist radical pure
speak with purified lips
do not let Evil future me make more pure more consistent more firm tripling down assertions
no compromise
no weakening
no prevaricating
no watering down
no sugarcoating
but the more of the opposite, the better it will work and cohere
and I have learned my lesson from failing to look at row two right and only saying row three middle is a blue crater to collect cubensis
— but we’re still going to assert that Row 2 Right in image f134 Great Canterbury Psalter is merely grain
this is failure — failure to be consistently extreme radical
relevant to add the above to this morning’s post [done here now]
psychedelic eternalism : The second phrase in the article title is the excellent ultra powerful phrase Psychedelic Determinism — psychedelic eternalism.
in the article the solution to whether I should introduce con controversial topics assertions is to make them more concentrated, more condensed
in my definition of psychedelic eternity model —
aside: I need an alternative to the word a every day language alternative to the word eternal ism
Block universe eternity
preexistence of control thoughts
no Freewill
although I do feel that no free will connotes domino chain determinism
it is I feel I have this gut sensation
something has gone wrong when I open up an opening in my article to let in the unwashed outside world
for example if I were to even mention the phrase fatalistic determinism, I am welcoming now I’m bringing in polluted unclean concept labels and network connotations and this is harmful
I can feel it in my gut I can feel the harmful in my gut a harmful modes of thinking the ruts of thinking ruts the rut caught in a rut of thinking of thinking
and I have these meters I have these detection meters and I’m there meters of telling me bad things are happening when you say the phrase no free will
bad things are happening because you’re you’re alluding to an old unproductive failed dead-end cul-de-sac debate , when you bring in that concept label , you’re also importing an entire raft of confusion
this might make it into it this is in a voice recording I just made it might make it into an episode of
come on broken voice recording work voice transcription
I just recorded a great point that might make it into an episode of Egodeath mystery show and this page is a placeholder for that because I think it’s a very good point
Every entheogen scholar is dysfunctional and self defeating and foolish regarding strategy
they love to leap upon and quickly embrace with enthusiasm the most stupid lunkheaded unimaginative zero-imagination reading of Genesis chapter 2 verse 16-17 and Genesis chapter 3
they positively love and enjoy taking a stupid low IQ exoteric Reading to deliberately project, committing the massive error of presentism
they love to depict and they enjoy describing Genesis as drug prohibition modern 20th century drug prohibition
and this is dumb this is incredibly dumb incredibly stupid and
they are putting people in jail through their lack of engaging their brain
they are this kind of reading that they use, which is the low one the most vulgar people in society, the most unwashed masses of people with no imagination at all, “those who are on the outside”, those who cannot or refuse to think of the Bible in anything except a literalistic way
this seems to include entheogen scholars
who Positively enjoy projecting into Genesis modern drug prohibition
and thus they encourage the Supreme Court to read the Bible as prohibiting psilocybin, when it does no such thing
Yes if you’re a stupid person, yes in that case yes the Bible does say you are not allowed to ingest psilocybin
but if you are among the elect and if your IQ is above 80 and you actually turn on your brain and stop reveling in prohibitionist reading, misreading of the Bible
there is plenty of room for esoteric reading
but your inferior exoteric reasoning/ reading is incapable of addressing the obvious conundrum puzzle that obviously genesis three poses for us
how is your lame-brain misreading of the Bible going to explain where God tells a falsehood:
when God says you are not allowed to ingest psilocybin because if you do , you will certainly die on that day , and yet the snake says no you will not die on that day
so which one of them is correct
you can’t even consider this question until you grow up out of your immature literalist exoteric outsider clueless reading,
dumb as a rock = entheogen scholarship , with extra low intelligence when it comes to strategic strategy of repeal psilocybin Prohibition For God sake
People who talk about “ego dissolution” all day — and they reject the idea of Egodeath
half of them reject the idea of ego death as an appropriate descriptor, but every tradition says that they are dead wrong
they appear to have never heard of the idea of Ego death, and so it doesn’t even register when God says “you will certainly die that day” and the snake says “you will not die but you will gain wisdom knowledge of good and bad”; knowledge of left foot and right foot
but these scholars act like they’ve never heard of the word Ego death before
they act like they’re not capable of thinking
there they act like they’re not capable of taking an esoteric reading
and the book of Gospel of Mark and the gospel of John are filled with such mocking of outsiders who stupidly take a literalistic exoteric reading
which is typical of entheogen scholars, and it leads people to prison, because the outsider exoteric view, that reading, says that the Bible equals drug prohibition; throw people in prison
The infantile, uncritical, unthinking, self-defeating and defeatist mentality of approaching of the way that entheogen scholars approach reading Genesis 3 is part of the problem
it helps to prop up Prohibition
stop reading in an idiotic and self-defeating way
it’s causing people to be behind cages
get a clue
wake up
Stop acting like you’ve never heard the analogy description of ego death and the experience of dying in the altered state
you act like you guys have never heard of the idea
“wow I’ve never heard of that completely strange brand new idea”
why the hell don’t you apply that idea to reading Genesis?
let’s see some engaging of brain , people!!
stop reveling and stop enjoying applying the most stupid interpretation that you can think of, just like every unwashed masses of unimaginative people
they have a good excuse.
you entheogen scholars do not have a good excuse for acting stupid in your self-defeating misreading of the Bible
get a clue! read it in the proper psychedelic esoteric way, obviously!
wtf, dumasses; = entheogen scholars
Please ignore the stupid heading that some moron added that says the fall — This is not in the Bible
the Bible does not say “the fall”, so this is a False translation of the Bible
just like Dittrich falsely in 1985 names his high-level dimension dread of ego dissolution
OK you’ve already just lost the game
you’ve already made a fundamental misinterpretation before you even began
it is not fear of ego dissolution, and this is not the so-called “the fall “
Stop importing your misreading into the Bible, its sending ppl to prison
great episode and I am really really glad — that’s two reallys on the Max Freakout Really scale — that the book is everything I hoped for
it clarifies Jan Irvin’s latest position which is a wrong incorrect or partially correct position that mixes together truth and confusion and misrepresentation of the potential of psilocybin and the role of Psilocybin in western religion
I have been wondering ever since Jan Irvin’s religious conversion from gnostic media to logos media and
he recounts the very useful he
he recounts his conversion and
I have been wondering ever since then what is his view on psilocybin in western religion and the relation between revelation , The relation between Psilocybin and Christian religious regeneration and salvation , which he does not discuss enough in this book
but he does discuss it enough that it is clear which of the two directions he went
because I was wondering which of the two directions is he going to go
I have been wondering that since 2014 or since a few years after that when I learned that he had changed direction
I followed him somewhat but there was a gap during which he changed direction which I determined a little bit later
been burning with curiosity since sometime after his 2014 religious conversion do you know
what is his story now what is this official position statement which he has finally delivered in this book finally , which of the two moves is he going to do ??🤔
I reasoned around 2016 is he going to become a sophisticated balanced thinker and give a full fleshed flushed out rounded account of the pros and cons and capabilities and risks of Psilocybin? highly unlikely
more likely Jan Ervin I reckoned more likely he would flip from an absolute positive view Join absolute simpleton to an absolute simpleton negative view of Psilocybin as I predicted
though it is it is a difficult guess
either approach that he takes it has a certain difficulty to it
either I would expect him to do the very hard work of becoming a sophisticated balanced thinker , which is kind of improbable
or else I would expect him to take a simple minded purely negative view of psilocybin, which is what he did as he states in this book That psilocybin is the enemy of logos and Christianity but that is a very difficult position for John Irving to hold it is not a tenable position
This is a harm of the Amanita Primacy Fallacy is that he has ended up with no comprehension of mushrooms because he equated in the past the word mushroom is an exact synonym with the word Amanita
or at least on the whole, that’s what the field did
that was the wrong bet that they made
that was the myopic shortsighted Short that this field did
and so he ended up with no real no actual comprehension of mushrooms, because he didn’t pay attention to psilocybin but mistakingly bet everything on Amanita instead
and so he ended up with no comprehension of how mushrooms transform the mental model and cause religious regeneration
and so we can see since he had no decent theory of mushrooms , we can imagine how easy it was for him to flip from a simple minded positive view to a simple minded negative view, because he has no idea about the ultimate effects of psil mushrooms
so there’s a certain difficulty in him taking that route which is why it was difficult for me to guess which of the two positions would you take either the difficult position of delivering a rounded comprehensive
Take which is difficult to do and takes a special kind of vigorous work different than the kind of vigorous work which he specializes in
or else would he take a purely negative you which is difficult to do it is a simple easy move to make but a very difficult move to defend , given that it is false and out of touch with reality about Psilocybin
And fails to have any explanatory power to explain how we get logos and explain how we experience mystical religious revelation conversion
his simple minded negative stance that he chose to take that fork in the road is highly untenable add difficult and impossible to defend
so either of the two options is difficult in some way for Jan Ervin to pull off, its difficult in someway for Jan Ervin to pull off
Difficult in some way for Jan Irvin to carry out
either he has to carry out the hard word work of delivering a broad-minded full featured analysis and assessment and accounting of the broad Rich roll of psilocybin in religious conversion and mythology history,
or else he asked to conduct the hard work of the impossible task of defending a simple-minded absolutist negative read on psilocybin
he has to Defend, he has committed himself to defending an impossible -to-defend, indefensible position, that psilocybin is entirely harmful and not the source of religious regeneration conversion salvation transformation enlightenment etc. — the very source of the logos, which he pretends to be the figurehead representing
as if he knows anything about logos — He says Logos is the enemy of psilocybin — he might as well be hanging upside down in a tree
Did not follow his changes in real time but I checked in periodically
But it became increasingly unclear he is painting himself in a corner so what is his current view has he switched from saying psychedelics are entirely positive to saying they’re entirely negative it sounds like he has made that flip and I would expect him as a one dimensional black and white thinker I would expect him to make a absolutist flip like that because the simple minded thing to do
not saying that he is intellectually lazy rather than being vigorous , but he is intellectually lazy in that he is narrow and simplifying and oversimplification of the nature and historical role of psilocybin
A distinct discussion analysis is the identify already identified topic that’s challenging to approach is the question of given that our ancestors in mythology held that the greatest good is to use psilocybin to transform the mental model and that the greatest value was to be religious in this way is that true in fact is that objectively true that using that transforming the mental bottle to be aware in relationship with God is the highest value were they were the wrong
transforming the mental bottle model to be aware of God and of two level control end of the block universe pre-existence of future control thoughts and everything that’s in mythology our ancestors held those are the highest value but objectively speaking how can we assess whether they were correct
on what basis can you say that the the greatest good in life is for you to have religious regeneration and transformation of your mental world bottle (and that this happens to be done through psilocybin which is kind of distinct point)
on what basis can we judge whether the tradition is correct or incorrect given that the tradition the religious mythology tradition and art motifs of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs All assert they definitely assert that the greatest good is relationship with God and religious salvation religious conversion from possibilism to eternalism
Can we prove that objectively speaking the greatest mature adult developmental form of the human is transformation to block universe religious awareness in the altered state in the mystic state
My strategic approach of how should I move forward is that I am going to assume that the tradition is correct I am going to affirm and axiomatically assume I am going to affirm and assume that the religious mythology tradition is correct in its report and claim and assertion that transformation from possibilism to eternalism Mental world model is the greatest good mental world model is the greatest good how can you reboot me when I say that you are only in a childish form of development of mental development or can Wilbur psycho spiritual development if you are still within your sin still stuck retarded and stunted and you have not completed your proper well form development but you are in an incoherent self contradictory dysfunctional unhealthy incompleted state a tadpole not a frog
if we have a bunch of creatures that are stuck in their chrysalis stage they are stuck in a warm stage instead of becoming a butterfly that group of creatures would be considered objectively scientifically immature incomplete incorrect merely useful and not in the proper well formed adult form they are in fact dysfunctional objectively speaking
this is what every religion says
this is what every mystic says
this is what every religious mythology says
they all agree unanimously that we are to develop into our mature form and that we are sinful and self contradictory and unhealthy and dysfunctional when we are stuck in the childish form which is possibility thinking instead of block universe thinking
(and it happens that we achieve this transformation through psilocybin, as a distinct point) as backed up by the new book by Jahan Khamsadadeh , Psilocybin Connection
So I am on extremely solid ground when I assert that we must comprehend this transformation from possibilities thinking to block universe thinking with two level control instead of autonomous monolithic ego control model and I am also strongly asserting that there is only one place the logos comes from and that salvation comes from and religious revelation etc. enlightenment Satori and that is from Psilocybin
yes I am willing to commit and marry and wed and sleep with and carry the burden of being the single plant fallacy , limited to only 300 species of psilocybin-containing mushrooms — this is speaking in a shorthand way
I am not going to insert an 800 word essay here explaining that ergot is equivalent but there are complicated social cultural assumptions and presupposition confusion etc. blah blah blah
it boils down to executive elevator speech the simple anti-confusion word the anti-evasion word Psilocybin is the keyword that will set things straight it will work all will be good and if you want to use for Ace for HODIPT obviously that’s equivalent but here we’re talking about the history of mythology in which it is extremely appropriate and a huge the biggest gap the gigantic gap in Entheogens Scholarship right now is the egregious lack of respect for the main most important and most definitive chemical plant , psilocybin
I am on the most solid ground that one could possibly be on when I am the evangelist of the Uber one and only against a Amanita
you see all I’m doing is I’m switching from the Amanita Primacy Fallacy to the Psilocybin primacy truth
So every statement has a degree of truth and the degree of limited accuracy and in such fashion I am certain that the one and only source of religion is psilocybin which is far more true than falls and
making this a surgeon is far more helpful than harmful
making this assertion far more true than falls
Jesus Christ ! voice transcription cannot even handle the word false false falsehood falsehood
As I have explained it is a you guys (everyone’s intensive evasion they’re always trying to evade Psilocybin
my commitment to the Psilocybin 300-species single-plant fallacy is a required and highly effective, correct winning move, appropriate, fully justified corrective, an anti-evasion strategy given that everyone in the world their top move is to evade psilocybin, because it’s the one thing that actually works and is not bullsht — And are you going to say I have not been successful with this strategy
I have won the Internet by employing the highly successful strategy
so if you complain and because I grouse because I single-plant, grouse — if you grouse because I have single-plant fallacy overly-emphasized Psil, boo-hoo 😭 — I won everything by betting rightly everything on Psilocybin against the market invested in Amanita cannabis scopalamine– losing bets
that’s the top move their standard number one move that they always do is to evade psilocybin
so I have to do the countermove you made me do it , you made me do it it is a strategic requirements
I have no choice but to emphasize psilocybin given that everybody’s top goal in life to put the spotlight on anything in the world other than psilocybin
even Paul Steinmetz fell into this in his 1996 book where he was incapable of directing his attention to the topic of Psilocybin in Europe
And then later he complains the people falsely spread the falsehood that there was no psilocybin in Europe — but it’s a topic that he himself was incapable of thinking about
Motivation for this posting is that I think this idea has a huge amount of potential and so I want to make sure to hang onto this idea prominently and move forward with it and develop it
because my poor way of expressing in the past was every author our work as critics as scholars our work is to identify how each author has and each book brings contributions and each scientific paper rings contributions and limitations brings contributions and look and limitations
my idea my expression there brought contributions and mixed together with poison because that word limitation has very misleading and a gigantic vulnerability
Each article and book and scientific paper and online Egodeath theory assertion theory assertion brings contributions and but also it brings not merely limitation but outright harmful misleading lexicon and presuppositions and liabilities built into it that are interwoven with the contribution and so you’re real work as a scholar is the disentangle
The interwoven contributions which are interwoven with poison with harmful miss leading burdensome liability error and confusion heading in the wrong direction and commitment commitment to heading in the wrong direction is baked into and deeply interwoven and fused interwoven and fused with the contributions so you’re at work as a scholar is two un-weld And disentangle and forcibly filter out and tear apart the contributions from the poison
This book is a must have you have to get it if you’re doing work in this field of visionary plants he makes invaluable definitive position statements which are incorrect a lot of incorrect position statement and it is a poor analysis and all kinds of things are wrong with this book but it is mandatory it is packed with information and it is packed with information about the Jan Irvin trajectory of analysis and exposes
it is filled with extremely valuable information mixed together with poison misleading reductionism narrowing and exclusionary approach
misrepresenting logos as if it is the enemy of Psilocybin which is the opposite of the truth
Jan Irvin 2022 book brings valuable truth and poison
Same with who he critiques, he exposes entheogen scholars Wasson especially , for fabricating the deceitful misleading claim that psil in americas was religious / spiritual/ mystical; it wasn’t.
echoing refrain about Irvin’s reasoning in this 2022 book: IT DOES NOT FOLLOW, he who lectures on Logos, IT DOES NOT FOLLOW. ✋
It does not follow but the one and only aspect or story or dimension of psilocybin is that it is a suggestion chemical or that it is all about lies or did it has no mystical potential or that it is the enemy of logos in fact psilocybin is the
source of logos and psilocybin is tantamount to logos and psilocybin in fact is the Eucharist despite the fact that malicious social engineers lied about the use of Psilocybin in America the Americas for mystical experience also I believe that they did use psilocybin in the Americas for mystical experiences though it is a more complicated story
Figure 1. Entry into Jerusalem. Das sogenannte Evangeliarium Kaiser Ottos III (The so-called Evangeliarium of Emperor Otto), Latin Codex 4453, Munich, around 1000 CE.
OMG brinc plate = YI! id’d by Cybermonk [6:17 p.m. March 23, 2023] – i f’d up, didn’t note or perceive in draft article branching-message mushroom trees – I QUIT – TOO HUMILIATING 😞
Added discovery to article
Irvin’s Incoherent Positions
SO WTF IS IRVINS POSITION????? RE: PSILOCYBIN IN Christianity.
THM 104: “there is enough compelling evidence to show that Christianity itself is based on entheogens.” – Irvin
Gold (Valuable) In THM
I’m featured in THM, eg ‘Hoffman’ discussed eg p 102
p104 top: Irvin criticizes Ruck as “feeble” for limiting mushrooms in Christianity to mysticism and heretical sects. I applaud this spot-on criticism.
Ruck — like Lash — is so noxious, falsely giving credit to Wasson for asserting mushrooms in Christianity when he did exactly the opposite! p. 104, Irvin nails it here.
Wasson is a major jerk obstructionist attacking everyone rudely for decades, insisting no msh in Christianity, calling them ignorant of the art authorities — and then we’re supposed to credit Wasson with discovering and asserting msh trees in Christianity?
WTF RUCK!! FISHY AF. Irvin’s right, this STINKS! TOTAL B.S., RUCK!!
This is maddening, Ruck, writing “Wasson’s conclusion”?! WTF do you mean, “Wasson’s conclusion”?
Wasson concluded that there’s NO MSH TREES.
Irvin’s accusation here is that Allegro ASSERTED msh trees [i disagree; overcredits Allegro], and Wasson REJECTED msh trees, then Ruck robs Allegro of his discovery and attributes it to Wasson.
Problem: Cyberdisciple points out that Allegro’s book is not about msh trees.
I say we should not use Plainc as proxy for countless thousands of msh trees (or we should realize the risks if we do that).
This is rewriting history, Ruck! No wonder Irvin 2008’s pissed off at the whole field of entheogen scholarship.
Song Title
“Ep236 🍄🔍🔬🧐 A Myopic View of 1% of the True History of Psilocybin”
“myopic – lacking imagination, foresight, or intellectual insight”
A 1-dimensional mis-assessment of the fullness of histories domains multidisciplinary perspective.
The rich Human History of Psilocybin reduced to 1 domain, deleting all the rest. Good job.
Thanks again, entheogen scholarship. Status fkking quo.
Filename
“Ep236 🍄🔍🔬🧐 A Myopic View of 1% of the True History of Psilocybin.mp3”
Content/Timestamps
0:00 – Intro, moved from start of 4814.wav
0:30 – 4811.wav
9:40 – 4812.wav
25:55 – 4813.wav
51:22 – 4814.wav
55:56 – 4815.wav
1:55:09 – 4816.wav
2:24:08 – Outro.
2:24:49 – End.
Largely about Jan Irvin’s new book, a highly incomplete narrative/assessment/ accounting, and highly prejudiced or biased against Psilocybin in relation to Logos & Christianity & Bible & Eucharist & religious expirience & mystical experience.
A grossly incomplete accounting that claims to be “the” true history.
Book Citation
url https://www.amazon.com/dp/0982556225 – false title; the book only gives PART OF the true history; the book is an exercise in narrowing reductionism and deleting huge areas of Psilocybin history.
Episode Title
1% of the True History of Psilocybin
Logos is Psilocybin is Eucharist
Irvin is a blind man describing an elephant, this is not a sophisticated error; this is an extremely elementary, childish error on Irvins’ part but this is standard for this stunted field.
I explain why Irvin takes and gets such a narrowed, reductionistic (exclusionary, narrowing) perspective, telling THE LIE IN THE VERY TITLE, “THE” TRUE HISTORY:
The book actually only covers 1% of the true history, and deletes and omits the rest as if it doesn’t exist.
It conflates one part of the elephant with the entire thing – a very crude, elementary error, all too typical of this extremely charged field of entheogen scholarship.
Status quo; same as ever, business as usual for this field.
Also the poison aspect of this book can be seen in terms of an overreaction like Hatsis.
Just because Ruck and Wasson and Allegro etc. committed the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, it does not follow, that no Christian ever ingested a Psilocybin mushroom.
No Psilocybin, No Logos, Eucharist, Christianity, Salvation, or Regeneration
Fantastic show I read Jan Irvin book at critique his narrowing reductionism and false dichotomies. Yes, Irvin, psilocybin was abused, but this does not at all affect its positive use. Logos is Psilocybin is Eucharist.
Gallery Completed! 🎉 👑 Great Canterbury Psalter — All Images
Charles Stang Says “Evidence for the Eucharist”(?) Doesn’t Exist
Webinar Video: Are Psychedelics Theologically Significant for Judaism?
7 instances of {balance scale} in Great Canterbury Psalter: dosage for optimal borderline control stability
7 Instances of the {balance scale} Motif
Protected by White Clean Cloth in Building Bus Window Openings in the City/building/ Gateway/ Doorway/ Entryway/ Window/ Arch/ Tower = Stability
Instances of Stability Depiction in Great Canterbury Psalter gallery of all images
Cross-Behind Branch = Cut Right Trunk
Moved Out from Page “The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a Virtual Environment (Hoffman 1996)”
What Exactly Are They Harvesting and Carefully Storing and Measuring Out? 🤔🤔 LBMs
The Diamond Hammer of Interpretation Is Victorious Yet Again
Tree of Knowledge (Great Canterbury Psalter)
Image 22 row 2 left: Eating from the Tree of Knowledge
Hatsis’ Retitled/Truncated/Mis-dated article Roasting Foo an Exercise in Tilting at Windmill, All Authors Are Unprofitably Debating the Wrong Thing: “Was there a Secret Christian Amanita Cult?”
Webinar Video: Are Psychedelics Theologically Significant for Judaism?
Charles Stang of Harvard Divinity School, April 27, 2023, re: Muraresku’s book The Immortality Key, “I don’t think there there’s any good evidence yet for the Eucharist, and I don’t think there will be evidence.“ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQPTb5u9F-U&t=3978s (1:06:18) “Are Psychedelics Theologically Significant for Judaism?” Check what exactly the Eucharist question is, per TIK. “evidence for the Eucharist” (?)
“Throughout millennia, Jews have explored individual and communal consciousness through a variety of techniques and traditions. More recently, Jews have played an outsized role in the “psychedelic renaissance” as researchers, practitioners, and advocates, including prominent leaders. A surge of interest in these substances creates an opportunity to reflect on non-ordinary experiences in Jewish life and theology more broadly. To what extent have altered states of consciousness been theologically significant for Jewish theology and practice?
“In what ways, if at all, have ingestions of psychoactive substances transformed Jewish theology? And how might this all relate to contemporary Jewish experiments with psychedelics?
“In this panel, such questions will animate discussion among leading scholars of Jewish mysticism. Through considerations of historical, phenomenological, and hermeneutical dimensions of Jewish theology, these scholars will reflect together on the cultural significance of Jewish psychedelia today.
“Sam S. B. Shonkoff is the Taube Family Assistant Professor of Jewish Studies at the Graduate Theological Union. His research focuses on modern Jewish modes of spirituality, particularly in German-Jewish, Hasidic, and neo-Hasidic contexts. He is co-editor (with Ariel Mayse) of Hasidism: Writings on Devotion, Community and Life in the Modern World, editor of Martin Buber: His Intellectual and Scholarly Legacy. Learn more at https://www.gtu.edu/faculty/sam-sb-shonkoff
“Melila Hellner-Eshed is a professor of Jewish mysticism in the Department of Jewish Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, as well as a senior research fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem. She is a member of the faculty of the Institute for Jewish Spirituality and is active in Sulha, an Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation project. She is the author of A River Flows from Eden: The Language of Mystical Experience in the Zohar. Learn more at https://www.hartman.org.il/person/melila-hellner-eshed/
“Jay Michaelson is an affiliated assistant professor at Chicago Theological Seminary and the author of nine books on Judaism and contemplative practice. His most recent, The Heresy of Jacob Frank: From Jewish Messianism to Esoteric Myth, won the 2022 National Jewish Book Award. Outside the academy, Jay has been writing about Judaism and psychedelics for fifteen years and taught meditation in Jewish, Buddhist, and secular contexts for twenty years. Learn more at https://www.jaymichaelson.net/ “
7 instances of {balance scale} in Great Canterbury Psalter: dosage for optimal borderline control stability
And many instances of {stable building entrance}. Viable structure doesn’t fall down.
Protected by White Clean Cloth in Building Bus Window Openings in the City/building/ Gateway/ Doorway/ Entryway/ Window/ Arch/ Tower = Stability
Instances of Stability Depiction in Great Canterbury Psalter gallery of all images
2 functions (referents) of the {balance scale} motif:
dosage for optimal borderline control stability
the open-scroll message is about balancing between terror dread of what control-thoughts will arise, taking desperation action (physical and mental) to avoid catastrophic control-loss, depicted as angels throwing arrows down at cowering guys covering eyes, desperately trying to avert their gaze. Or one group of guys spears the group of guys in a furnace.
Repeated exposure to alternating betweeen trying to sttay calm and don’t panic and bregging for mercy and pleading and thinking up deal, how to make a deal: if I make it through this, will never violate the …. you’ve
You broke (the rules) You’ve been (a fool) The little doll is you, yeah Nowhere to hide (your fate is in his hands) Your time has come (you’l live to his commands) I’m warning you The killer who remains a mystery When it’s your time I wonder how you’ll do Yor kind of trouble’s running deeper than the sea — Bob Daisley
What is a successful trip? Succesful dread, panic, washing of the garment, looking for a thicket-caught ram to take the brunt of {wrath} — lower controller avoiding is made to avoid going against the uncontrollable higher controller.
Busy housekeeping cleaning house to avoid thinking about vulnerability to catastrophic loss of control, indicates overdose.
One should have to REACH for instability, not be fully occupied in struggling to avoid thoughts being led to catastrophe — being led and force forced to panic and fall over and lose balance.
The dragon terrifies the sages and demands {washing the garment clean} (mental worldmodel).
Isaac needs a lamb to take the blow, to deflect to or consume the wrath of transgressing control limits. Like a heat sink or a lightning rod. Demonstrate non-conflict against the uncontrollable source of thoughts.
Cross-Behind Branch = Cut Right Trunk
[6:41 p.m. April 17, 2023] while listening to Egodeath Mystery Show Ep245f near 55:00 discussing image f134 Great Canterbury Psalter row 1 left, the cut branch of pink key tree matches the cut lower part of pink-capped branch:
my new point/ grasped: THIS IS WHY YOU PUT THE RIGHTMOST, I BRANCH CROSSING BEHIND THE RIGHT-HAND Y BRANCH: BECAUSE THIS CAUSES THE CUT BRANCH TO BE THE I BRANCH; EVERY TIME YOU DO THIS, YOU CREATE A CUT RIGHT TRUNK MORPHOLOGY; A CUT BRANCH. Make the best, “I” branch, have the visual cut. We see this fully explored/demonstrated in image f177 row 1 left.
the key was that the right cut trunk of the pink key tree exactly matches the lower part of the pink-capped branch; we are to read the lower segment of any crossed “I” branch as “equivalent to cut trunk”.
Motivation for Page: told publisher Bubble is at both sites, its not
compare Metzinger books 2003 – did he read Crash Collusion? 🤔 or my Prin Cyb site 1997 theory spec – or maybe he got the idea from, every 2-bit Newage book in 1985
/ start of move:
What Exactly Are They Harvesting and Carefully Storing and Measuring Out? 🤔🤔 LBMs
lol just got a candidate for whats the flush harvest
Hatsis’ Retitled/Truncated/Mis-dated article Roasting Foo an Exercise in Tilting at Windmill, All Authors Are Unprofitably Debating the Wrong Thing: “Was there a Secret Christian Amanita Cult?”
The title of the article is wrong at Hatsis’ later websites. It’s Roasting the Salamander, not Roasting Jan Irvin.
The new title of the article is TOO AMATEUR AND INSULTING TO PUBLISH/CITE. It’s a puerile childish personal attack, even the original title was too insulting.
The date of the article is wrong at Hatsis’ later websites. It’s 2013, not 2017.
I could INSTANTLY pound out a valuable article explaining everything worng with the field and how that’s reflected in the Ruck / Irvin/ Hatsis thread of argumentation.
THAT is the article to cite Hatsis — NOT in my article on branching-message mushroom trees. Hatsis contributes nothing but … the exchange and debate between Ruck/ Irvin/ Hatsis , all discussion around Dancing Man image, is nothing but confusion and pulling … in the wrong paradigm of Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
The Ruck/ Irvin/ Hatsis trajectory of treatment of these topics is nothing but an excercise in Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
An article would be very interesting, about that, a different article, “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE PREVIOUS REPLACED QUASI-PARADIGM THAT RUINED THE FIELD OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP”
Hatsis’ article (& the surrounding publications by Irvin/ Ruck/ this field’s confused authors) is INTERESTING AND HISTORICALLY VALUABLE FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS.
I’m actally having to hold back from spending time writging a very interesting article that’s trying to come out while I write my OTHER article on the OTHER topic: branching-message mushroom trees.
Roasting Entheogen Scholarship: How the Field of Entheogen Scholarship Was Malformed by the Amanita Primacy Fallacy
I recommend the article WHEN we are discussing the folly of the field of entheogen scholarship.
If I write an article about what WAS wrong with the OLD, REPLACED, Ptolemaic, non-theory, where Plainc fresco is mis-treated as defining the paradigm of the field’s explanatory framework,
if my project in this article is to explain why Samo Figure 20 1998 is a total disaster,
if my article’s purpose is to explain why folk sub-science is garbled harmful confusion,
and how the authors are confusing each other in their debate over Phrenology and Wm James’ scientific research in e.s.p., and 1904 theories of Phlogiston,
… then I recommend we must discuss the trajectory and revisions of Hatsis’ Roasting the Foo article where he deleted the appendixes and says “see appendix”.
Where he changes the date from 2013 to 2017, and what that reveals about this would-be “historian”/”scholar”.
April 2 2023 the wetransfer upload site is very slow now. Big mp3, for Ep240, good content so far, glad I listened, control stability description of upside down guy.
Ep239 good too
[8:19 p.m. March 26, 2023] you wouldn’t believe what the cubensis krater collector Row 3 Middle f134 is looking at: the mushroom dispensary bins
The Jesus Wars: 3-4 shapes with right hand two fingers
In between splayed and held together. I’m NOT holding my two fingers together. I am NOT splaying my two fingers.
Holding two fingers together
Splaying two fingers apart
Neither holding two fingers together nor splaying them apart
tbd
Left Hand Fingers Splayed and Right-Hand Fingers Held Together (Golden)
new photo of a portion of Irvin’s copy of pic, very low res but the broadness of the feathers comes out. just like overlay Jesus’ right two fingers in middle of Jesus’ left 3 fingers; = sticks in front of features splayed.
2:30:00 — Egodeath Mystery Show Ep238 – fingers — I should have mentioned this in-between gesture. What is the frequency s
Does Irvin 2022 Every Explicitly State the Falsehood that Logos/Eucharist != Psilocybin? Such a Claim Would Claim that Irvin 2008 (THM) Is False
Irvin directly accuses Wasson of misrepresenting Mex views of psil.
Irvin directly accuses Wasson of malice as motivation.
Does Irvin directly accuse Wasson of asserting falsehood when Wasson asserts Logos/Eucharist = Psilocybin? Wrinkle: If Wasson asserted Logos/Eucharist = Psilocybin, that would contradict Wasson’s claim that Msh trees != msh.
Further wrinkle: Ott & Ruck very falsely claim that Wasson asserted msh trees = msh.
Bernward Doors (Samo 98)
Features:
YI morph’y. Fully recog/Perceived by Cybermonk [7:15 p.m. March 23, 2023]
Samo 98 writes “The next item we shall consider was located by the German chemist JOCHEN GARTZ (1996). It is a bas-relief from the bronze doors of the cathedra.l in Hildesheim close to Hannover (northern Germany) by an artist named Bernward, dating back to circa 1020 (fig. 19). “
The Egodeath Mystery Show is working-session idea development. You are on the leading edge of altered state theory.
Cybermonk 11:42 p.m. March 21, 2023
Contents:
Download Link
Filenames
Song Titles
Content/Timestamps Ep235a
Content/Timestamps Ep235b
Voice Transcription During Recording, Caught Some Content the Recording Missed
Web Search: Psychedelic Pseudoscience
Tech Notes
See Also
Download Link
Download for 1 week starting March 22, 2022: https://we.tl/t-uZRlYlJ0BP There’s an in-browser Preview link on desktop, and probably an equivalent on mobile. d/k if can listen to entire episode that way.
0:44 – Content 4799.wav – on Citations in “Science Papers”
10:00 – the less said about poor non-theories and failed articles, the better. Trick Bricks (a main idea in this episode): Science consists of “papers” that form building-block bricks that you cite and build up into a towering ediface, that falls over and collapses when it turns out these are TRICK BRICKS, forming a COLLAPSING FOUNDATION.
11:20 – Content – 4801.wav-4809.wav – Errata – feedback ringing (2:00 clip). Reductionistic: reducing away the psychedelic-specific effects, replacing them by ordinary-state Grief couch psychotherapy.
My approach is that we combine and integrate and smoothly move between possibilism-thinking and eternalism-thinking; two experiential modes. Letheby tries to negate the altered-state metaphysics mode of functioning; the eternalism experiential mode and commit by sheer force to ordinary-state based metaphysics.
20:00 – The weakest part of Paul Thagard’s book Conceptual Revolutions is too prominent treatment of a scenario where there’s a well-formed “old theory”; replacing a neat, highly developed and specified “old theory” vs. a “new theory”. In practice, ESPECIALLY in this field, we have an other extreme scenario: a pile of non-theory, vs. a bona fide actual theory that’s “new” (1988/1997/2006). the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism.
22:30 – Mr. Buddha invented meditation enlightenment, we venerate and worship like we did badly with Aristotle. … we had do ditch worship of Aristotle to give birth to modern science. It’s a half truth to say science = experimenting; remember the context/alternative: authority-worship of Aristotle. Science means moving away from authority-worship of Aristotle, to independent thinking, of which experimentation is part. Modern science more about new theory construction untrammeled by citing and aligning with Aristotle, and good communication — not “experimentation”. Experimentation is not the essence; independent fresh figuring things out, and clear communication, is the essence.
Citation of previous “peer reviewed”, “tried and true” bricks , building blocks, is backwards.
A new theory needs to NOT be referenced to and based on the past heap of non-theory.
We cannot steer forward by making Allegro our go-to point of reference, centering all discussions around “Allegro’s theory” — or “the Wasson theory” per John Lash.
Is looking to the past attempts to understanding Psychedelics helping us, or dragging us down?
Apple didn’t make the breakthrough, breakaway iPhone UX by shackling it to the desktop UX.
30:00 – Chris Letheby doesn’t cover Philosophy of Psychedelics; he covers ordinary-state metaphysics within a couch-psychotherapy context. 1 to 3 sessions for rank newbies.
32:00 – I’m mean to psychedelic pseudo science in my expose — and everyone is onboard with my criticisms. I’m part of a huge/widespread, broad, popular semi-backlash against BIG PHARMA PSYCHEDELIC/INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX – the bunk “therapy” fake “complete mystical experience” — AN INCOMPLETE NON-MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE.
Maybe I’ve been too harsh to the Big Pharma Psychedelic Industrial Complex — nah, 🔥 BURN IT DOWN! 🔥
“We’ve been hiring incompetent people who cause more problems than value — it’s ok, we’ll make up for it by hiring more of them.” = today’s “psychedelic science papers”.
38:00 – I did some voice dictation into page “Purpose and Requirements of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism”, I am moving that to below. So that text matches the voice recording,
41:00 – I explain that the voice recording was accidentally off for about 8 minutes, but was caught by the voice text transcription below.
The only book is Brinckmann.
The only book is Walter Stace’s lone book. THAT’S ALL YOU GOT?! You call THAT “the scientific literature” (Studerus 2010 p. 2, “citation 20” = Stace: Studerus writes: TOTALLY WRONG AND BUNK PRESUPPOSITIONS = “THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE”:THIS IS GARBAGE! –> 🗑
“The OBN scale basically includes items measuring positively experienced depersonalization and derealization, deeply-felt positive mood, and experiences of unity. High scores on the OBN scale therefore indicate a state similar to mystical experiences as described in the scientific literature on the psychology of religion (eg, see [20] [20 = STACE, OF COURSE, ONLY; A SINGLE, 63-YEAR OLD, OUT-OF-PRINT BOOK, = “the scientific literature” 🤡]). The DED scale includes items measuring negatively experienced derealization and depersonalization, cognitive disturbances, catatonic symptoms, paranoia, and loss of thought and body control. High scores on the DED scale therefore indicate a very unpleasant state similar to so called ‘‘bad trips’’ described by drug-users.”
1:02:00 – Do not open the lid and see how the Psychedelic Science Sausage is made: I did; it’s all worms & snakes! 🤢 😱 😵
1:07:00 – 11-Factors is just a phantom marketing campaign concept, not a concrete actual questionnaire. “Figure 1 shows all 11 of the factors, not a single item missing, that are in the 11-Factors questionnaire.” Misleading! There are 15 factors, not 11; Figure 1 is missing 24 items of 66 (36% of the OAV items are missing from Table 1).
1:09:00 – My webpage communicates what 11-Factors actually concretely is, the tally counts of items, way more clearly and less misleadingly than the awful presentation of the 11-Factors article. How many damn items are there? 66! Not 42 like Figure 1! how many factors are there? 15, not 11 (2 hi-level Un/pleasant + Virtual factor 12 + Shadow factor 13).
1:12:00 – Memorizing author names of 11-Factors (Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, Franz Vollenweider) (that’s from memory) & CEQ articles (5 authors) (Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, & Roland Griffiths).
1:41:37 – Guitar/Outro
1:42:02 – Guitar gtr 2924.wav from Ep110 Mythemeland
1:42:50 – End.
Psychedelic Science and Entheogen Scholarship: This field is #1 at baloney, prejudice, presupposition, and pretense.
Content/Timestamps Ep235b
0:00 Intro short clip
0:19 – Content. 4810.wav
1:55:40 – Outro
1:55:53 – Guitar (0:25)
1:56:32
Voice Transcription During Recording, Caught Some Content the Recording Missed
which I consider I do not advocate science and I do not advocate conducting experiments and I do not believe that science is essentially about conducting experiments science is actually for one thing it is about throwing Aristotle off of a cliff just like we need to throw a John Allegro and Wasson off a cliff and stop being stunted stop being hung up and retarded back in the year 1970
to form modern science it was not just about doing experiments in isolation do you have to consider the context we switched away from obsequious stunted worshiping of Aristotle to experiments this doesn’t mean that experiments are our savior this does not mean that experiments are the essence the real lesson take away there is that instead of authoritarianism we need to make explanatory frameworks independent of previous authorities that is the lesson the lesson is not experimentalism
Modern science is not experimentalism that is missing the point modern science is rejecting the previous approach of authoritarianism meaning that every conversation was expected to be based on the authority of Aristotle and so we could never move beyond that and this is the same issue I’m confronted with now when deciding who is Who is unenlightened failed science article paper am I supposed to cite to build my castle on top of their broken foundation what is the point in citing kindergartners work ?
this is counterproductive.
The previous directions go ahead in the wrong direction for example CEQ questionnaire you can’t build anything on this it’s headed in the wrong direction we don’t need to correct it we need to replace it by a Correct foundation
You do not correct the Ptolemaic earth centered cosmology model
you replace it by the correct model nothing is to be gained and
it is completely inefficient to try to describe or authorize the new sun-centered model by 100 citations of wrong wrongly misfocused wrongly focused and wrongly centered previous science article citations
this doesn’t work this is very inefficient
it’s a net loss citing and referring to and giving the time of day and acknowledging the existence of the previous articles is a net loss
you would’ve been better off just saying how things actually work
it’s just pure waste of time and counterproductive to give the time of day and acknowledge the existence of the articles headed in a completely wrong direction
when we think that it is reasonable to cite previous articles within the field
look at how many assumptions are lying behind that judgment
we are judging that there exists the field
we are judging that these articles provide more light than error
and what if those assumptions are false
What if there is no old theory
what if what little articles are published the past that are foisted off on us as if they were theories, are completely confused and worthless and headed in the completely wrong direction
and worst of all they put forth a conceptual lexicon that provides more harm than help
like some of the later Catholics said about the pagan knowledge base the less that we have of it the better off we are
The earlier Catholics had a shockingly very pro pagan attitude , a very different mentality:
the way they saw it , we should cite and base our work , and integrate our work with the past thinkers, because the past thinkers brought a lot more truth than falsehood
So whether you should whether my article ought to have citations of the previous building blocks of solid science is dependent on the quality of these building blocks if these building blocks are worthless mud
it’s nothing but a burden , nothing but misleading
They’re more of a setback then I help if I offer you building materials that are rotten
If I offer you a set of conceptual lexicon that has era running all throughout it in that case in that scenario does it make any sense to try to build upon that rotten foundation or should we raise the whole thing to the ground and start from scratch?
we’d be better off — in that case
So people take a much too favorable approach
they give undue respect to the worst field of all, the most backwards, most prejudiced field of all, filled with prejudice, is this field of psychedelic science
it is an extreme case
it is almost the exact opposite extreme of when you had a very organized Ptolemaic cosmology
Which was a bona fide theory
the Ptolemaic cosmology was a bona fide theory
it was at one end of the extreme of the spectrum of scenarios
but now we have a very different situation , in the case of psychedelic pseudoscience, where we do not have any scientific bricks
these are all bunk
Trick Bricks & Collapsing Foundations
we cannot build with these
These are Styrofoam built to disintegrate
these bricks there they’re designed to crumble
articles like the MEQ article and the CEQ article
you cannot build a sturdy structure from these broken building materials that pull you in the wrong direction
“We lose money on every product we sell, but we’ll make up for it and quantity.”
This is like hiring an incompetent person: do you think well they’re incompetent? We’ll just hire 100 incompetent people.
The person is bringing more detriment then help.
when I mention pseudo explanatory noises like default mode network and neuroplasticity and ego dissolution
What if every article that you cite is more of a detriment and the more that you mentioned ideas
for example is the quick sand trap the allegro trap: the more that you mention allegro, the more you get trapped and locked forever within allegroism thinking
and this is what has happened to this is
This is the pit Thomas Hatsis fell into that ate him up
the harder that he tries to fight against allegro the more that he reifies his allegro limited horizon of thinking
he can’t escape the gravitational force that he Thomas Hatsis himself as built up
he’s trapped within his own orbit of permanent negative fetishizing Of allegro
as he says my favorite book is sacred mushroom & the cross —
and then he turns around and goes persecuting and harassing a name-calling and misrepresenting and forcing everybody else to play the role of a Allegro Advocate , which is all pure projection
he is the what time is
Hatsis is the one who is obsessed and fixated on Allegra and then projecting Onto other people such that when other people not only they don’t they don’t “leave from allegro” ; rather , they never were stuck in Allegro
they we’re never in the allegro orbit in the first place
and he sees those people Who have somehow escaped from his allegro jail that he’s stuck in and he says you’re not allowed to be outside of my Allegro jail because you are operating from within the allegro foundation, and you are self contradicting yourself by asserting psilocybin because you are based in the allegro foundation I am sorry listener but I can’t even
Mark because is thinking is irrational it doesn’t make sense I guess I have learned with a Erwin Panofsky how to get inside of his irrational headspace so that as to represent his crazy arguments and reveal in the process of just how crazy they are and I can that way flush out and expose and bring out into the light what his insane wrong erroneous assumptions are that enable him to make such garbled assertions
Here I mean what how can we clean and read the mind of Thomas Hatsis when he says when he argues in a strange way saying Seema see the email Hatsis his reply to me and try to make sense out of what is underlying assumptions are that would enable him to put forth this argument
of course citations are available for everything I’m saying — you can see the insane email yourself
Thomas Hatsis reasons and argues to persuade me he says you and Brown are not allowed to assert psilocybin because you would be contradicting yourself because allegro is your basis that’s pretty much what he argues but I I’m baffled I don’t understand how this is supposed to constitute an argument what he puts forth as persuasive argument or just plain baffling it is the same as with a Erwin Panofsky and I continue seeing so many strong parallels between the bogus argumentation put forth burped forth by Erwin Panofsky and the
At egodeaththeory.wordpress.com you can search why I see it got it got the domain correct and then I undid it’s correct transcription
you can search how to reply to me I believe is the name of the sub section within the page I did development page maybe 13 when he finds out about people who are who have the audacity to not be trapped in a Lego jail that he himself is trapped in he says you’re not if you’re being inconsistent the foundation of everything that you think is Allegra your foundation of all of
your thinking is allegro he declares falsely and ignorantly revealing his ignoranceyou can search how to reply to me I believe is the name of the sub section within the page I did development page maybe 13 when he finds out about people who are who have the audacity to not be trapped in a Lego jail that he himself is trapped in he says you’re not if you’re being inconsistent the foundation of everything that you think is Allegra your foundation of all of your thinking is allegro he declares falsely and ignorantly revealing his ignorance
We are too charitable when we think surely it would be reasonable to “the good solid established scientific articles that have built up the foundation thus far what if they’re all garbage dump what if they’re all misleading and pulling us just into confusion then the last we’re here of these articles the last confused will be every article that you bring into the picture
Do not assume that each “so-called scientific article just brings positive contributions
and especially do not assume
you are in no position to assume that each “peer reviewed”, “validated” scientific article as they claim
you cannot assume that it’s bringing 99% positive and only one percent detrimental
what is the article is bringing in 99% detrimental and only one percent potentially beneficial
for example Thomas Hatsis and his writings in some cases for example in the case of Psilocybin in Europe
I am really not sure whether I should applaud his book psychedelic mystery traditions
this book might bring more harm than good
I’m not planning on it
I’m certainly not planning on citing it in my list of references
why would I?
it would be interesting to identify why I would not list Hatsis’ book in my list of references
I’m not necessarily saying that it has more harm than good because 50% might not be very critical figure
it might be that if a science article provides 2/3 potential benefit and 1/3 potential harm
it might turn out that it is more detrimental then beneficial to acknowledge the existence of that article
we need to reject the misnomer of ‘psychedelic’ and embrace the appropriate accepted medical terminology of ‘psychoplastogenic medicine’. Psychedelic pseudoscience dilutes our standing in best-practice medical communities.
wrmspirit commented on the branching-message mushroom trees draft article, these questions.
Crop by Cybermonk — person who knows transcendent knowledge of control stability instructs the cubensis traders. Canterbury Psalter image F145 row 1 left
Purpose and Benefit of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
What is the purpose and benefit of the theory of Psychedelic Eternalism for the ordinary state world?
mytheme answer: become adult imperishable perfected immortal ; be able not in the ordinary state but be able to enter the altered state. be reconciled with the gods , show reverence , honor them for good fortune good relationships with the stable well formed society according to traditional religious mythology-based societies
, these are benefits of people being completed initiates into transcendent knowledge into the proper well formed adult form.
I start by removing all expectations and marketing promises and saying that we don’t know and we cannot assume and should not assume as in the book way of Zen by Alan Watts:
first you live normal life, and then you get enlightened, and then you live normal life.
The mind matures from the child form to the adult form so what is the benefit of the adult form which is enlightenment which is completion of initiation which is a Transcendent Knowledge Witches Psilocybin which which is psilocybin transforming the mind the mental world model of the world not just of “the self “.
Learning the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism is identical with moving from the immature form to the mature form this is all certified by all traditional mythology.
ask the Greeks what is the benefit of Mystery religion completion of initiation
that is the benefits of knowing this theory.
Means being in relationship with the gods with the higher knowledge
it means knowing what an adult is supposed to know by design
A great other vector another strategy to answer the question is what are the harms of not knowing transcendent knowledge
What are the harms of not knowing adult-level transcendent knowledge; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism?
knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism means coming to your proper form
it means being healthy and correctly well formed in development, whatever the benefits of that are, instead of being developmentally blocked and stunted and childish and limited and immature and failing to understand.
by knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism, we get to comprehend our own religious mythology legacy, instead of being stupefied and incapable of understanding our own religious mythology traditions.
The benefit is comprehending standard knowledge by the standards of religious mythology,
collectively we will no longer be stupid and uncomprehending of our own previous adult level accomplishments and explorations and knowledge
Look at the leader Wouter Hanegraaff fails to comprehend the most basic elementary things and completely gets backwards how the mind develops
he has to delete all the stars in the skies rather than rising up through the Saturn rebirth gate and landing in the stars, which is heimarmene, which is eternalism-thinking
His backwards model of mental development that he’s trying to force onto astral ascent mysticism
he got confused by the complexities and advanced tricks that they did in late antiquity, where they twisted around the basic religious mythology to try to give the false impression, which they did give Hanegraaff the false impression that we move from eternalism to possibilism, giving amplified “freedom” and “personal empowerment”.
That tells you how 100% oblivious academics are and utterly failing and doing massive category errors.
we will no longer be at a childish incomprehension, completely uncomprehending of adult-level things, as we have been all during the 20th century.
so what are the benefits of no longer being at a childish level, with incomprehension of all higher knowledge?
what is the benefit of adult higher knowledge, rather than being limited to childish level of understanding philosophy and religion and mythology?
personally for me it meant that I could relax and avoid perfectionism and stop expecting with a tendency of expecting perfect control.
not that I necessarily ever expected perfect control, but I expected best case —
a good example of people who have and exercise self-control throughout their lives
and my own ability, my proven ability in high school and college to date: I expected to have a familiar level and degree of non-problematic control all the time.
But I did expect a certain kind of “non-dysfunctional cross-time control”, my best phrase.
In high school with homework responsibilities and early college with regarding homework responsibilities I really loved schoolwork but other things to and I was having serious difficulties with cross time self-management by October 1985
But I was in a theoretically ideal very ideal situation where if I could just coordinate myself across time everything would be going as well as possible very excellent
and so that was the project that I said about with to repair this bug and my father gave me all of the knowledge from newage self-help personal transpersonal psychology.
and I was still it was a race between my continued failures with my continued dysfunctional Pour across time self control and a lot of friction
but I had a part of the problem part of the mix was my keeping a positive attitude and believing that things could work out and that I could harness ego transcendence and the knowledge of satori Alan Watts’ “other way of thinking” that he wrote about
that we could discover when the Zen master Brad hit you on the head with a stick while I wasn’t so impressed with Alan Watts’ overuse overreliance on making mystical vague poetry his foundation for explanation —
but in the Way of Zen by Alan Watts did not always use vague poetry as his foundation
sometimes he also wrote in a clear way
he was a mix of clarity and mysticism
the bad awful dysfunctional positive valuation of the worst traits of Mysticism which revels in incomprehension and fog and vagueness and enjoys that and promotes and advocates that
and which is the very exact opposite of stem STEM
in January 1988 when I discovered the essence of this theory this theory was a big complete clearing the blackboard clearing the slate and resetting my expectations regarding cross- time control and removing any particular expectation about this theory delivering cross- time control and becoming non-dysfunctional
I no longer expected the theory to make me non-dysfunctional
that was a relaxing positive development knowing that life will inherently have limited ability
and then it just became a brand new fresh problem for me :
“how then are we to live”
how am I to conduct myself knowing that my future thoughts already exist yet I have a burden to carry of assignments, major extreme heavy Advanced level engineering assignments to do
Upper level advanced heavy academic responsibility workload to execute
and no philosophy arm waving is going to change that
I am having to steer my way and exert control effort and control myself across time remained a extremely real situation
and my new theory that I possess eg May 1988 and I have a good cassette here, voice recording of my grappling with these realities after enlightenment About limited, the inherent inability to reach across time and do posi-control.
there can be no posi-control in that sense.
I did not need to expect that, if I expected it before.
I don’t need to expect and demand that out of myself now.
and so that was a healthy relaxing, even though it did not answer all my practical questions about my very heavy workload that I had to conduct and control and manage and execute and exert.
we need to get real
like Cyberdisciple I ridicule the so-called benefits and
the whole concept of benefits needs to be mocked and rejected,
I mean the way that benefits are thrown around all these promises and all these kinds of promises that are made and these preconceptions and expectations and wishful thinking
I reject and I ridicule the kinds of promises that are made from Transcendent Knowledge
knowing this theory will measurably reduce the size of your ego by as many as several percentage points, and you ought to be proud of that.
knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism will measurably reduce the size of your ego compared favorably over the size of the egos of other, inferior, ignorant people,
Requirements
What requirements, limitations, restrictions, and precautions are noted in the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism as related to the stability and health of the mind prior to experiencing Psychedelic Eternalism, such as for those with chronic depression, suicidal ideation and anxiety?
psychedelics cause manic depression they cause depression and
I don’t see the logic of the Psychedelics Science knows that these effects can occur commonly even typically
and why then would psychedelics be useful for treating depression when psychedelics cause depression, they cause manic depression and throw the psyche left and right all over the place
how is that automatically going to be a useful thing
the jury is out
Deceitful Terence McKenna miss lead and misrepresented himself as high dose psilocybin for years after he had stopped using it because of intensive vertigo existential vertigo
that is a self control problem to be taken most seriously
I do not claim that the only challenging experience from caused by Psilocybin is positive control-Chasing whirlwind seizure/ instability.
Another problem that can be as intense is the existential vertigo and manic depression as Terence McKenna experienced to the degree that he stopped taking mushrooms but pretended that he continued
Medical
What medical conditions and medications are listed as possible risk factors and contraindications for experiencing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism, i.e. chronic hypertension, heart disease, and respiratory insufficiency.
What I have to say here would be no different at all then what all the psilocybin Oregon & Colorado psilocybin clinics say.
A big wrinkle for Michael Pollan — How To Change Your Mind – was his heart condition
that was a big concern of his entering into the altered state sessions, but he assessed the risk to be minor.
Search Oregon Health Authority psilocybin
Academic
What academic requirements are necessary for the meaningful understanding of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism as related to ordinary world state of western religion and its religious archetypes?
my writing style targets 8th grade level.
the standard abstracted ideal concept of reading at eighth grade level so-called
ideally everything I write and polish ought to be readable by eighth graders.
this means using every day words and especially means short sentences, short words, short paragraphs, short sections.
complicated by the fact that Apple founder electrical engineer the Woz re-designed computers in seventh grade to reduce the chip count
and complicated by the fact that by my standard I always thought that seventh graders are incapable of reading, and I was officially measured and tested and described as reading at a high school senior level when I was in fifth grade 🤷♂️
Age
What age requirements are there for experiencing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism?
my point of reference is what age are people interested in and drawn towards exploring this realm.
the tradition in mythology is onset of Beard age.
Child equals not knowing transcendent knowledge, adult to be an adult is to know Transcendent Knowledge , aka The mature form of the human
psilocybin is considered integral to human development as is supported by the new book psilocybin connection , a solid book, articulate and directly emphasizes this point, which worked out perfectly for me with good timing.
I rejected this book for my references section just because I’ve run out of word count
but I will consider and
limited word count means that I could only write one sentence about any of these questions
and have to stay focused on the very most core very most interesting and distinctive points that I have to deliver, and not be expending word count discussing other peoples ideas
not even connecting their ideas to my ideas, but the article needs to really just only exclusively be my ideas, because I need to use most of my word count to discuss the features of the art images, more than discussing interaction of my theory with other people’s ideas.
Additional Points from Wrmspirit
Wrmspirit posted a comment to the present page after posting the orig comment on the branching-message mushroom trees article page.
Wrmspirit wrote:
“It’s good when writing a theory that requires a mental shift from the ordinary state into the mystic altered state, to note the purpose and benefit.
“The benefit of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism is primarily for the mystic altered state itself, in avoiding failure of mental transformation.
___
“Regarding the question about what academic requirement is necessary for a meaningful understanding of western religion and its religious archetypes is not about what grade level of writing the theory uses.
“But rather how can the characters within the story of Christianity, used for transformation in the mystic altered state, be understood, if their original role is not familiar.
___
“There is an assumption in the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism of everyone knowing the details of Christianity, which is not true.
Thus, the question of what academic requirement might be necessary for meaningful understanding of transformation through the metaphor of Christianity, remains a valid question.
___
“Not everyone knows about Christianity so how helpful is it to use the characters of Christianity if the entire plot isn’t familiar?
That is the meaning of the question.”
Yes I have been wondering about that; Hatsis had to go hunt down and I have too, non-canonical stories in Christendom – eg stories of saints. Semi-Biblical figures: Enoch, Lamech. Eustace. Martin window two panes, pages 122-123 The Holy Mushroom, color edition.
___
“Also, the critical analysis of vague poetic writing as expression of the experience of the mystic altered state, might reveal a higher level of importance for poetic writing, when remembering the vast amount of reflective metaphor used for expression of the mystic altered state throughout the history of literature and religion.”
I differentiate and integrate two legs of the Egodeath theory: Core theory (no reliance on mythic analogies), and distinctly, religious mythemes and art motifs, as analogies.
The two legs bolster each other, if kept distinct and not conflated.
“When poetry sneaks its way into the intellect, not even the guard on duty can deny its entrance.
“Enchanted by the magnetic sound of light dancing its way into the shadows of dark, in rhythm of soulful spirit, gives life to breath and birth to death, throughout the foundation of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism.”
totally unrelated note 2:55 i grasp canterbury f134 sword is the threat of loss of control or simply loss of control. 🔥 🗡🐉🚪 fire is loss of control aka the threat of loss of control = angel gate guard flaming sword, blade = arrowhead (psalter viewer) = spear = affliction not epilepsy, but the threat of loss of control aka loss of control. PAUL’s affliction on road to Damascus fall from “horse” Balaam donkey angel blocking path is the threat of loss of control = the challenging dread experiencing the threat of loss of control is the challenging experience is the negative mystical experience – I steer my horse donkey that I ride but it lies down on the path of control instability, donkey lie down = the threat of loss of control = sword that the msh tree guy hangs– just a sec–
HEY YOU IN THE TREE! GET DOWN FROM THERE!! IM TRYIN TO THINK HERE, WTF!!
Crop by CybermonkCrop by CybermonkCrop by Cybermonk
floating sage with limbless looker means advanced recognition of the wrong hands which (skipping the feet, 1 level of analogy indirection) is wrong basis of ctrl as he receives = ingests the msh from bucket
f134 Row 2 Right
Because his eyes are attached to the floating guy who represents definitely advanced comprehension in contrast to the simple red guy the red youth who has simple basic understanding
given that the funnel hat floating guy his feet are isomorphic with the floating feet of the guy in the tree , that means that the Limbless Looker who is attached as an extra set of eyes — he has no function with his feet or hands, but he serves purely as a pointer to look to point to the {wrong hands} receiving the cubensis
this looking represents the advanced knowledge about the ramifications of having the wrong hand position when receiving the cubensis
Crop by Cybermonk
The limbless youth’s pointer-eyes look at the newbie enthusiast psychonaut’s hands, which has the left hand down
and then the next level of analogy is that the given that the left hand is down
that means that the left foot is down
and the next level of analogy is that the left foot down means relying on possibility branching thinking as the control foundation, which is known by the advanced interpreter of this image to be unstable control, which amounts to the loss of control until the mind is driven and taught and instructed to put the right foot down instead, which means to rely on eternalism thinking world model with two-level dependent control
I see this instruction the session guides in a very intimate a charming relatable and realistic seen an F145 image number F145
Crop by Cybermonk
solved: I have now proved through ESP that the limbless looker in Canterbury image F14501 left is looking at the guy who is floating on the two demons
and this is used to meaningfully–
this pointer is used to connect two appropriate items :
the scroll in row two, and the msh importer’s feet
and also to look simultaneously , so as to connect so as to connect the guy who is floating on the animal-thinking demons, one of them holding a branching pitchfork standing on the left leg, and the other one holding a non-branching rope who is standing on the right claw.
The people who are in charge of stocking the Mushroom lockboxes through foreign imports are teaching the traders advanced knowledge of the two mental models including the instability — see the handheld balance scale — the instability of the Possibility branching mental world model, in contrast with:
The stability of the second, mature mental world model, which has instead of autonomous monolithic ego mental model in a branching world instead has a two-level model of dependent control in a non-branching world, per the eternalism mental model.
The most frequently useful names of the Egodeath Theory
also a correction to my draft of branching message Mushroom trees article
regarding settling the names of my theory I do not think that a good main name is the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism — intuitively I feel that the better trade-off is a shorter name without the problematic awkward heavy word ‘cybernetic’ i
nstead I would rather define
for the purposes of efficient name of theory I would rather redefined the word eternalism and redefine it to focus on cybernetics and to fold the self control topic into it
because yes we do need to emphasize control transformation of mental model more than the word eternalism can bear , BUT:
here’s the problem
does the word ‘cybernetics’ actually succeed at supplementing the word eternalism regarding control?
it brings confusion and alienation without earning it’s wordy word count
it is not a net gain
a Long wordy name is like a formal living room that nobody uses it is maybe technically technically it is the correct name technically but that is distinct from every day practical naming
in naming products you always want to have a long formal verbose name which nobody ever uses and then more practically everyone makes up a short name which might even conflict with the legal formal full long name but everybody ignores the legal formal long name of the product and everybody even the official product in practice everybody uses a shorter name the long name is impractical here is an impractical although technically correct name of the theory:
the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism
awkward technically correct and will never be used it has poor meme propagation it is not nimble it is not agile it is not fast it is a slow name
really is kind of it reminds me all too much of my domain name “CybTrans.com” – Tone deaf as far as practical marketing
it is technically accurate, but and I come back to again a better performance
better performing name that has a better score on word count versus meaning and ease of use is the shorter name from which you can I believe reconstruct the entire theory even without the word cybernetics:
the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
which is so much snappy like “Egodeath.com” quick to write quick to say it is not incorrect and in theory you could reconstruct the entire theory from this short name even without the word cybernetics A proof of that is that William James complained about block universe because of such control agency implications that the ego kubrrnetes is an illusion
My gut feeling with all things considered an carefully weighing scale of balance regarding the delicate trade-off of the word count of the name of the theory versus what is communicated in that name I I’m really leaning towards favoring the short elegant term this is kind of a compromise
The theory name:
the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
is an objectively better tradeoff of word count versus meaningfulness than the theory name:
the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism
there is nothing gained there’s not a net game by adding the word cybernetics because although it adds clarity it also brings a lot of cost and so I am thinking of having the long name as a auxiliary miner name but have the short name as the primary main name I feel my gut feeling is that the shorter name has a better market value better utility it is a more useful name in practice we’re not going to have everybody throwing around a long name we will easily have everyone throwing around the short name t
he long name is simply too long , and that’s that; yes it is in fact the name the formal name but it’s not a name that anybody will ever use very much or employ very much in terms of frequency of use it is really sufficient to simply say the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism —
And here’s an interesting argument in favor of that
I’ll bet that you could reconstruct if you did not know anything about the Theory I’ll bet that you could reconstruct it from the short name and you would not need to throw in the word cybernetics
After you show me the 11-Factors, put it in my hands, give me the URL that is the questionnaire, cough it up, hand it over, LET US SEE IT, this is not Science.
Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, and Roland Griffiths were unable to obtain the concrete Studerus 11-Factors questionnaire and misunderstood it to only consist of 42 items instead of the full set of 66 OAV 1994 items (psychedelic effects questions).
That explains why they didn’t see the concrete set of all 21 high-level Unpleasant Experiences dimension items, including item 54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.
ICC + ANX + SHA = DED
Why would we trust the obfuscating, complicated blob of math (cluster F analysis) that’s attached to the poor reasoning of a group of people who can’t even do basic adding of numbers up to 21?
Psychedelic “Science” soundly based on unavailable, vague, rumored, mythical psychometrics questionnaires: is this STEM?
Matthew Johnson is unable to add the numbers 7+6+8 = 21 when forming CEQ’s Initial Item Pool 😞
The shadow dragon monster item, the hot potato, behind closed doors in a dark room playing a shell game, Item 54 goes missing.
The Vanishing Dragon Trick
🎩🪄💨🐉 🤷♂️
You cannot get a college textbook specifying these mythical phantom questionnaires.
I don’t believe these questionnaires even exist.
There are no wikipedia articles.
Everything is behind closed doors.
nothing is available for you to look at
the articles are so incomprehensible that Roland Griffiths himself misread the 11 factors article and didn’t realize that there are 21 rather than 13 items in the high-level Unpleasant (= DED) dimension.
Do you even realize that there exists a high-level Unpleasant Experiences dimension in 11-factors q’air?
Evidently not, or else Roland Griffiths would have added all 21 Unpleasant experiences (DED) items to the initial item pool for the CEQ.
and would not have been able to make the “accidental” mistake of omitting eight out of the 21 dread “Dread of Ego Dissolution” (DED) Dittrich OAV items.
btw Dittrich in 1985, why did you simply assume , baked right into your name of the dimension, that what we dread is so-called “ego dissolution”?
How do you know, before you’ve even done the research, that what we dread is so-called “ego dissolution” — which a recent article says stop using that term, because it’s too vague to be scientifically useful.
Per the Egodeath theory — the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism — what we dread above all. most gloriously, is the threat of loss of control (control-instability, which is effectively no control) because we are, firstly, control agents — so much so , that we don’t even realize that that’s what we are.
The threat of loss of control = 🔥 = 🐉 guarding the 🏆🏅 treasure of Transcendent Knowledge brought back and enabling you with the correct requisite psychonaut spacesuit new garment to {be able go in and out through the gate} 🔥🗡🚪🍄🌳 as the Bible promises as the reward at the end of time
and when “the ego dissolves”, that means control agency dissolves — along with the world in which it has the power to steer collapses into non-branching, and all the branches get cut off
we are afraid and paranoid our future control thoughts already permanently exist and are created for us and forced upon us
Canterbury f177 Row 2 Left: Left-Leg-Relying Rams in Control-Instability Fire Dragon Mouth
I’m Paranoid About this Cluster F Analysis Scientistic Process
speaking of paranoia Roland Griffiths CEQ article says do not use the paranoia factor that we seat-of-the-pants added out-of-band at the last minute, and we put in an item that doesn’t belong there so don’t use it the aggression item
Some science this is ; real “science” here, that delivers a Paranoia factor while telling you don’t use it because it’s bunk
There is only one paragraph in the 11 factors article admitting the existence of the two high-level scales
Studerus confusingly explains how they “dropped” items 3, 14, 26, 54, & 66-1/2 for either cluster F analysis reason A or reason B,
and that is what is foisted upon us as an explanation for how they magically made the shadow dragon monster vanish into thin air, of item 54: I was afraid to lose my self control and it’s a similar story with HRS questionnaire item: it was difficult to control my thoughts.
but shine the marketing spotlight over here, onto only the low-level 11 factors only which conveniently Photoshops-out the eight undesirable items and the 16 unaccounted for Pleasant items too – the 16 items in the Virtual factor 12 (VIR) and the 8 items in Shadow factor 13 (SHA).
How does it make any sense mathematically according to cluster F analysis (F stands for factor) To confabulate a low level factor named the compound named jumble things together “impaired control and cognition (ICC)”
I have improved the name of the ICC factor by clarifying that its name is “impaired control and impaired cognition (ICIC).
you won’t allow me to see 11-factors questionnaire in your psychedelic pseudoscience
and you won’t even allow Roland Griffiths to see it so that he can conveniently make the “accidental” mistake of deleting and omitting and never seeing in the first place 8 out of the 21 Dread/ DED/ Unpleasant items (38%)
maybe you can do the complex mathematics to tell me what percentage of unpleasant items does that make — 38%
presto-chango, vanished into thin air , because he didn’t have his hands on the concrete, slap it down on the table, 11 factors questionnaire, with count them
meet my tally challenge my tally test:
how many items are in the high-level Unpleasant experiences dimension of the 11-factors questionnaire and tell me the tally count
how many negative experiences items are not a member of any factor within the high-level Unpleasant dimension?
The correct answer is 8 out of the 21 dread angst OAV classic 1994 questionnaire from Dittrich.
See my tables of contents of my pages about these questionnaires for the secret tally counts to track and inventory and keep track of all 21 of the Dread items so that none of them can “accidentally” go missing — to the convenience of people who are trying, more interested in marketing their ordinary-state Grief counseling services, by deleting altogether the entire Dread category of negative challenging psychedelic effects, through sleight-of-hand shell game in the dark; you’re not allowed to look at the questionnaires, you little people.
Stand back, because we, behind closed doors playing shell games in the dark, are not allowing you to see the questionnaires which are the muddy, tottering , unstable foundation of this psychedelic “science”, as Studerus says:
S’s 2010 article page 2 covertly cites, using a mysterious obfuscating citation number 20 claiming that item 20 is the sound solid, tried and true (like the great historian Thomas Hatsis) scientific foundation basis for this tottering tower of mystical psychedelic science
well what is item 20 , secretly obfuscated 🤔 ??
Walter Stace’s 1960 book, Mysticism and Philosophy (out of print).
which says that mystical experiences are purely positive;
no mystic ever had a negative experience
see that reasoning on page 2 of Studerus article 2010 , that a positive experience is “therefore” mystical and a negative experience is “therefore” not mystical but rather a bad trip instead.
item 54, The shadow dragon monster; I was afraid to lose my self-control.
The scientific mysticism basis of this Science, citation 20, dated by 63 years, severely criticized by Charles Stang of Harvard Divinity school saying it fails to match the historical older historical mystics archives of negative experiences, which Studerus p. 2 reasons that these are negative experiences and “therefore” they are not mystical
and that this is “vouchsafed” — to use Erik Davis’s words he says “it must be acknowledged that all of this dubious tottering tower falling over a Psychedelics science vouchsafed by research from Walter Stace that’s 63 years out of date”
(and probably doesn’t even cover psychedelics, I’d have to double check)
and if you doubt the soundness of the foundation basis of our mystical science, the psychedelic science of mystical “complete mystical experiences”, then we’ll hit you with the intimidating citation of William James 1902, hot off the press!
just like Erwin Panofsky giving us the list of all the discussions which the art historians of covered mushrooms — which consists of a single book he calls “little”, that was already 50 years out of date in 1952, a single, 86-page book that only lists the word ‘pilzbaum’ five times
Remember there are so many ways which we are reminded that the most prejudiced, biased and anti-scientific and in-denial field filled with the most bluster and fallacious argumentation
it’s the veritable gallery of , the best place that you can find all fallacious argumentation and posturing and bluffing, is in the field of psychedelics and entheogen scholarship
everyone is shaking in their shoes in terror and fear having a challenging experience of dealing with the name the secret bad guy in John Allegro it’s so everyone is dancing around dance dance trembling in fear –
We need to Photoshop out allegro and ideas that resonate with his ideas for marketing purposes photo shop out John allegro and his book cover
at least the book cover proposes that we can look and see mushrooms in our own religion
so no one’s supposed to propose that now , because that is the third rail, the allegro third rail
and so what kind of a travesty of “science” is going to result?
what kind of a scientific historiography is going to is bound to result from such a situation?
it’s all bluster, it’s all prejudiced, nobody can think straight
So you have Robert M Price , grand editor of the journal of higher criticism, making all kinds of sixth-grader errors when he goes to critique Acharya S’ The Christ Conspiracy book for favorably mentioning Allegro. Price opened his mouth and said something about psychoactives in case you were wondering whether he’s clueless as a rock now you know for sure the answer.
No surprise, since his wife wrote a psychedelics-oblivious book about the rock band Rush, which is a Philosophy band and therefore obviously would never use psychedelics.
but after my 64-page article set Price straight about Allegro, he is so reconciled with Acharya ( as she thanked me for) that Robert Price now has done a super editor re-writing of her book to make it more scholarly and has produced a deluxe version of her book.
and another thing why is there no name of the 11-factors q’air? every time anyone refers to it they refer to that questionnaire by a different name because nobody can get their hands on it
it doesn’t exist
dream: he knows too much! why does he know so much and articulate it so well?
I just remembered a dream that I had again type of dream I had again
I heard a random guy , presumably not very informed, articulately and elegantly reciting my Egodeath theory – Why the hell does this well-spoken guy know literally everything I know?
the answer is: because I was playing recordings of my podcast while sleeping
this has happened to be about three times now
The Shell game, dark-of-night, Magic vanishing dragon trick 🎩🪄💨🐉
it’s a Myth
Psychedelic Science is a myth, it doesn’t exist; you are not allowed to see it, you little person, you are not allowed to see our “science”.
You’re not allowed to give me a URL to concretely see these alleged nonexistent questionnaires.
There is only one paragraph in the 11-factors article by Studerus 2010 that mentions and admits that — despite their marketing of the shiny sparkly new 11 factors– there are actually two secret high-level factors which encompass all 66th of the OAV questionnaire items
hot potato item 54 shell game move 1: 🐉 exists:
Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 Figure S1, banished to a completely separate document by the marketing department, to hide the existence of the high-level dimensions– all 21 items of Studerus Unpleasant dimension = OAV’s Angst/Dread (DED) dimension.
hot potato item 54 shell game move 2: 🐉 still exists:
Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 supplemental separate document Figure S2
Magicians Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 main well-lit Figure 1 on prominent display in the showroom floor, sparkling polished floodlight lit – shows every single item within the ICC category factor /scale /subscale AND also comprehensively includes every single item within the anxiety (ANX) factor/ scale/subscale — missing not a single item of all two factors of the Unpleasant high level dimension 😑
they are all accounted for, every one, and none of them are missing — and yet, Item 54 is gone! 😯
somehow now there are only 13 instead of 21 Dread (DED) Unpleasant psychedelic effects items, and 54 has successfully gone missing
(takes a bow)
(APPLAUSE) by Psychedelic (Pseudo) Science
The shell game vanishing dragon trick to make item 54 vanish into thin air, so that Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, and Roland Griffiths can conveniently “accidentally” not see the eight non-factor Unpleasant items, including item 54 , when confabulating the mythical, nonexistent CEQ, which you, little person, you are not allowed to see these q’airs, because this is Science, and we don’t allow you to concretely see our Science.
🚫🤚😑
Sorry, it’s a behind-closed-doors only , private event.
But you’re not allowed to see them, not even Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, and Roland Griffiths are allowed to see them, no one’s allowed to see all 66 items in the Studerus 11-factors questionnaire — which has eight different names, and everyone refers to it differently, because it does not exist, it’s a Myth.
This phantom “Psychedelic Science” doesn’t even exist.
“See Carbonaro article for details” , and the lack of basic explanation of how the CEQ Initial Item Pool relates to Study 1 & Study 2 is even more evident.
you show me the concrete 11 factors questionnaire — whatever the hell it’s name is because it doesn’t have an even have a name and everyone refers to it as the “the 5DASC which has 11 factors” ; it’s all garbled — and maybe I could call this an actual science.
Can’t get any intelligible consistent articles about these questions because nobody is able to get a hold of them nobody is allowed to see them
it’s all behind-the-back, behind closed doors
and even these scientist the pseudoscientists or confused about what the Studerus q’air contains
what its scope is
how many items?
this is my tally test, and you failed this
this science fails the tally test
Tell me, if psychedelic psychometrics science is a science , then tell me the tallies:
how many items are in the Unpleasant experiences high-level dimension of the Studerus 2010 11-factors questionnaire, which has 10 different names and so doesn’t even have a name
what is the Url where I can see and get my hands on Studerus 2010 11-factors questionnaire that doesn’t have a name
The 11-factors actually has 13 factors at the lower level + 2 high-level factors or scales or dimensions on the instrument pretentious bluster jargon jargon using cluster F analysis
The circle journal citation fest , throwing around the stock pseudo-explanation magic words: neuroplasticity, default mode network, ego dissolution, nondual unity oneness 😑
there: we have just explained everything, and can I be a member of your club now pls??
Why is it a great idea according to the mathematics science to have a set of eight unpleasant questions that are not a member of any of one of the 11 factors, and 16 items that are a member of the Pleasant experiences high-level dimension, but are not a member of any factor?
please explain this at a kindergarten level because I’m kind of stupid, I want some basic answers– but none are forthcoming.
what textbook will provide me with these answers? there isn’t any.
The 16 Pleasant experience items which are hidden and in denial that they exist, because the marketing department doesn’t want to shine the spotlight on the high-level dimensions but only wants to advertise and promote promote and market their shiny new sparkly low level 11 factors
and so there are 16 pleasant experience items which are not a member of any low level factor but they do and in fact constitute a set
which I have named since they failed to name it
I have named that set of 16 non-factor member items in the Pleasant Experiences high-level dimension Virtual factor 12 (VIR) 😇😊🦄
and I have named since they have neglected to name, their marketing department neglected to name the eight Unpleasant items which are not part of any of their highly touted advertised 11 factors, I have had to do their work for them in this pseudoscience
and I have named that set of 8 non-factor member items in the Unpleasant Experiences high-level dimension Shadow factor 13 (SHA) 😱😵🐉
well-lit with floodlights on the showroom floor is Figure 1, prominently displayed in the body of the Studerus 11-Factors article which Roland Griffiths was permitted to look at, which conveniently lists only 13 out of the Dread (DED) OAV items, so that the shell game could be successful in bluffing and magically making item 54 vanish into thin air through the smoke and mirrors which is the Psychedelic pseudo Science of psychedelic psychometrics questionnaires
(which are not available for YOU to look at, little person — or for anyone to look at concretely, not even Roland Griffiths).
🦄💨✅ VALIDATED 👍
No one actually has these questionnaires, they’re never published anywhere, they’re not available
all we have is articles about articles about validation of the rumored foggy myst.
we have validated our smoke and we have validated our mirrors too
I ate a can of beans, and after a couple hours they were validated 💨 😑
Presto-chango the magician makes the dragon disappear, the shadow dragon monster: item 54, I was afraid to lose my self control
it’s not a problem, because it doesn’t exist anymore, because you are not able to get your hands on and you are not allowed to see the 11 factors questionnaire which has eight names and has no name
it is “the 5DASC questionnaire which has 11 factors” which how many it fails my Tally Test: tell me, if you say this is a Science, a simple number:
how many items are in the high-level Unpleasant experiences dimension in Studerus 2010 questionnaire?
that spawned the offspring from hell, the CEQ monstrosity malformed Yaldabaoth
The CEQ is the broken wastebasket for the failures of the MEQ.
Timothy Leary’s MEQ. That people claim is from Walter Pahnke. But even Leary would have made a more negative set of items, going by the Tibetan book of the dead.
1.5 hours of voice, then 14:18 minutes of guitar at 1:30:00.
0:00 – Intro.
0:34 – Content. Houot’s dissertation
5:00 – Houot puts a negative spin on mystics, and a positive spin on shamans.
10:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
20:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
30:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
40:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
50:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
1:00:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
1:10:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
1:20:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
1:29:04 – Outro for voice content.
1:29:25 – Guitar. Star 40xx 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars. (14:18)
1:43:43 – Outro again, marking end of guitar & episode.
1:44:33 – End.
Guitar
Star 4047 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars Star 4055 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars Star 4056 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars Star 4065 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars
Discussion of this planned episode:
Planned Egodeath Mystery Show episode: Read-through of “surrender” hits in Houot’s dissertation
Reading Houot dissertation hits on “surrender”
done: Produce at least recording VOX_TK_4741.wav (Jan 29 2023).
Upload .mp3 to WeTransfer.com and maybe to Egodeath.com.
Update section in Idea Dev p 16 to point to new dedicated episode page.
Post a page dedicated to the new Ep234 – pretty much done. Any notes will go here.
Update present section about this, Huot, in Idea Dev p. 18. Point to the new dedicated page.
Holy Sh*t — 23 .wav files recorded that day. This was the final, longest recording one of all day recording/speaking.
The Longest is this 4741, next longest is 4740, lots of other long ones that day –
BASICALLY WE’RE LOOKIN AT 16 HOURS STRAIGHT OF TALKING/ SPOKEN IDEA DEVMT ALL RECORDED ON TAPE THAT ONE DAY, a Sunday following an all-day Saturday reading of journal articles.
Voice was getting locking up, after standing for hours talking loud, but then my voice came back notably well after I sat down for for this 4741 recording.
haha so it seems I have to balance overuse of my hands typing, vs. overuse of my voice.
todo note: I still haven’t done the final polish of reading aloud Mark Hoffman’s Toxicology article 2015, my take 2 that came out professional voiceover quality:
Ram Standing on Left Foot Causing Control Instability Loss of Control
Crop by CybermonkCrop by CybermonkCrop by CybermonkCrop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Sacrifice of Child-Thinking Which Escalated to Non-Control Caused by Ram’s Left-Foot-Based Effort to Assert Control
Crop by CybermonkCrop by CybermonkCrop by Cybermonk
NEVER SURRENDER: BRING BACK THE ETERNALISM-THINKING TREASURE THROUGH THE PSILOCYBIN LOSS-OF-CONTROL DRAGON-GUARDED GATE
Tip for Loose Cognitive Scientists: you may have to sacrifice a thicket-caught ram —
saw a nice one with golden fleece, in a tree with golden apples of immortality, in the garden of the hesperides, btw: guarded by Ladon drakon with zillion eyes who sees too much the loss-of-control vortex vulnerability hole in the side
Tech Notes
Recordings used: 1 only:
VOX_TK_4741.wav Jan 29 2023 1.11 GB
Miking
AT2020 “L” and CAD M39 “R” turned around, sitting below them. L / R switched then.
The Egodeath theory 