I rarely and only recently posted a page for each episode of Egodeath Mystery Show. So it’s not exactly an error that there’s been no such page. I did announce this episode, at Idea Development page 16.
I’m doing a refresh 2nd upload of this episode (just b/c I’m shifting my approach to make 1 post per episode, and I’m researching.
I’m actually looking for which episode is at Egodeath.com long-term, maybe Ep227?) found them. at the moment available there are … oh i think it’s choking on emoji in filename of Ep233 — removed them, seems working now. Available there are 226, 227, 228 now.
I found this episode very difficult to find, b/c of my previous lack of posting a dedicated page for each episode. B/c of my change of announcement approach.
Instead of only announcing in Idea Dev p, I should post a page for the episode also.
🤔 OPINION; SITE DESIGN DECISION: Yes it was an error that for episode 1-22x, I did not post a page for the episode, but only posted a section within I.D.P. # 1 – ~17.
Each page is a lot of text summary of the episode. An episode is a recording of an idea development working session.
0:16 – 4788.wav – i just solved the eyes of 134 Row 2 right what are they looking at? Need to draw looking-lines on all of f134 image.
Must zoom into FULL high resolution and prove exactly what is each person looking at. 5 sets of eyes there.
Funnel Hat is looking at per a.m. March 19, 2023, the feet and knees of leg-hanging guy.
attached to Funnel Hat is limbless looker per March 18 2023 yesterday and a few days before, looking at the wrong hands of Psychonaut newbie enthusiast receviging Cubenesis from dispensary and looking at the bucket pouring (is he looking at the two Cubensis bins?? …
TODO: see if Limbless Looker (Row 2 Right) is looking at the pouring Cubes, or also possibly angled to look at the Cubensis bins.
he connects the feet of hanging guy to the pouring cubes, by attaching the limbless looker to Funnel Hat (two sets of eyes connect the two looking-targets) – 11:29 a.m. March 19, 2023 analysis that extends the points in the recording w/ latest thinking of past couple days]
6:00 – Hanegraaff’s Worst Idea of Any Academic Ever: non-drug entheogens. In the recording I employed the word “mushrooms” and then I WENT OFF I DON’T MEAN FKKING AMANITA!! CARL RUCK!
F-you Ruck for forcing me to have to specify idiotically to prevent your retardation, PSILOCYBIN mushrooms else, thanks to YOU, when I say “mushrooms” all my stupid listeners will say “Cybermonk said Amanita”.
No I did not say “Amanita!”, dammit! I said “mushrooms”! PSILOCYBIN mushrooms!
F*ck Amanita and your old RUCK DEAD-END INFANTILIZATION PARADIGM substitute for my actual adult theory of entheogen scholarship.
Principle & Axiom of the Egodeath theory: Amanita in art always means ingesting Psilocybin. No matter how many pitchers of urine Ruck enjoys titillating about. Alchemy/alchemists always ingests Psilocybin, never Amanita, as a matter of principle to enable superior theorizing.
10:00 – the great metaphor of MIS-AIMING THE SPOTLIGHT OF ATTENTION eg onto ergot, onto amanita, onto ANYTHING BUT PSILOCYBIN.
Even Psilocybin books spend more time spotlighting Allegro and Ergot and Kykeon and eleusis and Amanita, NEVER AIMING THE SPOTLIGHT AT PSILOCYBIN.
13:00 – They’re all, the entire field of entheogen scholarship is intent onPHOTOSHOPPING-OUT PSILOCYBIN, very much including Paul Stamets, who can barely trouble himself to lift a finger to write a full sentence about Psilocybin in Europe.
Why did Stamets let this happen, folk narrative impressionistic painting that led EVERYONE to assert “MYCOLOGISTS REPORT THAT THERE WERE NO PSILOCYBIN IN EUROPE/ENGLAND.”
A well-established folk factoid, more example of how this field is — like Hatsis charges — folk myth, not Science; it’s an … entheogen scholarship is an EXTREMELY PREJUDICED field, especially against Psilocybin.
17:00 – “they are awkward inept character faces aiming in random directions, meaningless” – huge fallacy I fell into.
[errata: mild brief siren at 17:30 🚨]
18:00 – diagrammatic medieval art is awesome in these features, to convey more meaning than “better” later art uninspired.
20:00 –
23:00 – 4789.wav – once we establish simple rules: right foot on ground means eternalism-thinking. Simple right? BUT TEACHER, WHAT IF… WHAT IF… WHAT IF HANGING FROM TREE BY RIGHT KNEE, THEN YOUR RULES ARE WRECKED.
What if…. Row 1 Right: Table Banquet AWKWARD HANDS ON TABLE back of right hand pressed down on table – SOLVED! recently before this March 14 2023 recording.
Took me all the way from Nov. 2020 to March 2023 (an entire 2.x years!! As an extremely advanced decoder!) to solve What’s Up With {Awkward Hand on Table}????
30:00 –
32:03 – 4790.wav – you have to discuss all these elements in image f134 [funny, note: it was several days after this recording that it occurred to me to solve/ask / think about {closed scroll in her left hand; open scroll in his right hand} – 11:50 a.m. March 19, 2023 ]
40:00 – gravity will pull down his left leg when hanging by his right leg, therefore it is NOT arbitrary which relative height he holds his left & right hands, from his upside down frame of reference.
The Funnel Hat guy is given a challenge: he’s looking at mushroom tree, feet, and analyzing: WHY is the guy’s hand positions correct?
You cannot simply apply right-side-up, “standing on right foot” patterns; you have to re-analyze the core points to argue anew why his left hand should be lower closer to ground than right hand.
Solution/Answer: His left knee is forced to droop by gravity, therefore (that is the REAL reason) he must droop his left hand (compared to right hand), to be isomorphic.
46:01 – 4791.wav – floating feet guy is looking at floating feet in tree: My latest opinion (as of this speech recording/ analysis session; this idea development recorded session) [REMINDER FROM START OF EGODEATH MYSTERY SHOW FEB 2021: THIS Egodeath Mystery Show IS A WORKING-SESSION, THEORY DEVELOPMENT SESSION, NOT JUST A REPORT OR POP PRESENTATION] is that Funnel Hat, his eyes are aimed at the feet and right knee, more than at Red’s left drooping knee 1 degree lower. It makes sense that Floating Feet Funnel Hat guy is looking at specifically the floating feet of Red in the tree.
50:00 – floating feet guy is looking at floating feet in tree to analyze correct hand positions. = Advanced reading of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching}, as opposed to simple Red guy in Row 2 right.
53:25 – End.
Images
Canterbury Psalter image f134 Row 1 Left: Pink Key Tree and Mushroom Tree
Filename (removed emojis for Egodeath.com long-term upload)
“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.mp3”
To upload to Egodeath.com, I had to nuke emojis 😭:
“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg Theory Makes Sense.mp3”
Song Title
“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.aup3”
Playback Tips: Mute Treble
I brickwall’ed the treble but STILL it can be fatiguing with bright speakers.
I play back using music player EQ settings: Settings > Music > EQ > Small Speakers or try Treble Reduce
Errata
Away from mic sometimes, boosted, should be ok (experiment)
Tech Notes
Recording Numbers Log
All are March 14, 2023:
VOX_TK_4788.wav
VOX_TK_4789.wav
VOX_TK_4790.wav
VOX_TK_4791.wav
Project Name
“Ep233 Hanging from Right Knee 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.aup3”
Miking
same as many previous: AT2020 L, CAD M39 R, treble brickwall, Limiter, 80Hz cut. eq 4.5, 3, -15 L, -10dB R
The Egodeath Mystery Show Is Spoken Theory-Development Sessions (even, God forbid, possibly some typing)
… not pop entertainment of presenting the polished final results.
The activity during recording is to develop ideas during the recordings. I upload the recordings of my developing ideas.
However, OTOH, people have asked for summary episodes where I develop ideas by summarizing them, and yes this sounds exactly what I’ve been needing, so announce idea:
Forthcoming Series of Introductory Episodes Intro to the Egodeath theory
project is totally finished in the Platonic realm in future region of the block universe
History of My Developing and Discovering and Formulating and Announcing This Theory
Links Where I Figured This Out Today & Yesterday & March 2022 (with earlier roots going way back, traceable)
See Also
Intro
Original Theory/Discovery by Cybermonk March 19, 2023 based on “branching” work back to around 2010 — and back to 2001 without myth integrated, I was posting about “branching” vs. block-universe “determinism” (eternalism) in the Egodeath Yahoo Group (searchable), copied to Egodeath.com.
Mâle, p. 3, The sky, water and trees. From the Legend of St. Eustace. Window at Chartres.
There are many fractal levels of analysis required to comprehend this YI moph’y instances:
Zoom in within a tree.
Consider a pair of trees.
Consider an isolated tree.
Consider POV: his vs. ours.
Consider tree 4 in isolation.
Consider upper level of tree 4.
Zoom into upper level of tree 4.
… and independently analyze YI contrasts at/within that scope.
In a Y, the right-hand branch is “good” ie. is mapped to eternalism-thinking; left is “bad” ie is mapped to possibilism-thinking. But you must re-analyze assignments within each scope of consideration; they are not static or single.
A given point in an image is considered as “bad/left-hand”, within one particular scope of consideration, and yet is also considered as “good/right-hand”, within a different scope.
On Christmas 2015, I conjectured {stand on right leg} = eternalism-thinking using this image from Hatsis’ webpage version of his article at PsychedelicWitch.com.
I used that Christmas 2015 hypothesis to successfully decode John Lash’s 2008 f134 Row 1 Left blurry yellowed, with tremendous resounding success.
In March-May 2022 art jackpot decoding, I did a full analysis of all branching and non-branching zones of the entire tree & salamander roasted by the threat of loss of control ({fire}).
Actually Canterbury Ps. image f177 Row 1’s two trees made me understand the fractal scopes principle.
I Am the Provider of the Image-Processed Eustace Crossing River Image
I am the one who provided to the world wide web the awesome (extremely under-appreciated by me until 2022) image — image processing by me — I photographed in Male book on Medieval art around 2005 and uploaded it with grainy low contrast to my Egodeath.com gallery, then I did image processing on it, and also uploaded that to that gallery/site.
In March-May 2022, milestone date: discussing Kupfer and branching-message mushroom trees for first time with Professor Brown on March 21, 2022, where I realized the bug is the feature/point/message
I at that point in time, switched away from “the whimsical meaningless”[sic] branches added and cut branches added, to grasping at a elementary-only, non-fractal level, “branching-message mushroom trees” when I coined that most-excellent term.
In isolation, comprehend YI pair of trees.
As a completely separate thing, later figured out YI within a single tree (failed to connect to the above formally as principle of fractal-scope equivalence)
Finally because of while decoding Canterbury f177 Row 1 tree L & tree R, then applied to f134 pink key tree, yesterday March 18 2023 or very recently — really, right now I continue that very discovery/deepening, days several days of “theory revision” is NOT INSTANTANEOUS as the jackpot spreads across instances and articles. Paul Thagard book Conceptual Revolutions.
Only now, minutes ago and continuing: last night end of day, BEGAN TO REALIZE that tree 4 in Eustace is a self-contained YI in addition to considering it — like ~March 2022, as the “Y” when considered within the tree pair trees 3+4.
I was only capable of thinking about Eustace Crossing River image in isolation: tree one is Y, tree two is I.
Later, much later, feb 2023???? I still didn’t at all formally connect all the dots. I found myself in a isolated separate context (not integrating my understanding) of a single self-contained tree expressing YI morph’y. BUT didn’t think yet, HEY THIS MEANS THERES A PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE of two sep trees or 1 tree.
In the past couple days, explosion of breakthroughs about applying horizontally and vertically, separate trees or combined trees, and suchlike permutations.
ALL POSSIBLE PERMUTATIONS SPREAD THROUGHOUT A TREE, A PAIR OF TREES, LOWER LEVEL OF A TREE DISTINCT FROM UPPER LEVEL, ETC. Branch out this YI theory in all geometrical directions, a field of branch morphology mathematics.
Links Where I Figured This Out Today March 19, 2023 & Yesterday (Distinct Upper Level Pink Key Tree & Distinct Upper Level of f134 Tree) & Basic, Halting Limited Concept in March 2022
FAD-Plus only recently added “Fatalistic Determinism” which is like Eternalism except with zero comprehension of anything relevant — it’s warmed-over freewill thinking; “determinism” per egoic thinking. FAIL.
Middle ram doesn’t touch ground. Middle tree crown, same. VOX_TK_4792.wav – March 16, 2023
20:00 – very good (probably not long) discussion of RUNAWAY CONTROL EFFORT: the harder you assert possibilism-thinking in loosecog state, the more you reach effective cancellation of control.
30:00 – empty ossuraries in Canterbury f177 Row 2 Left, con’t. Good topic.
36:00 – After uploading the episode, I solved botched cross-under, solution is in f177 page, see right wrist of shroud is visible, guy holding right ankle with left hand blocking is looking at cross-under of simple key tree and at the two — not three (artist demonstrates intention/ control) hidden right feet of rams; {branching veils non-branching, until egodeath sees rightly} <– q.e.d. Botched Cross-Under of Mushroom Tree. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/12/4-horses-mushroom-tree-right-foot-balancing-great-canterbury-psalter-f177/#Botched-Cross-Under
48:00 – key concept: local scope relative non-branching. branching-message mushroom trees advanced theory of morphology.
1:14:00 – artists were highly attuned to releative scope of analysis. The “good” ram is the middle one which maps to the semi-middle cap of the key tree which is the I not the Y branch.
The true nonbranching branch is occluded like the ram’s right foot; Transcendent Knowledge is hidden from egoic thinking, not “unfurled” yet. The good, nonbranching branch in a YI tree config’n is hidden by the branching; ie, possibilism-thinking “hides” or “veils” eternalism-thinking.
1:21:11 – VOX_TK_4793.wav – March 16, 2023. my work needs to NOT come into alignment with the malformed field. Field needs to jump to my theory, and burn the CEQ.
1:22:36 – VOX_TK_4794.wav – March 17, 2023 mocking Letheby’s dead-end dissertation thesis. “The mind has a model of itself. Now you are enlightened.” Same dead end limitation as Metzinger – GOES NOWHERE. My 1996 Bubble of Simulation article probably covers Control Agent model, but, what about model of world? Check. The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a Virtual Environment — Published in Crash Collusion, 1996. — Find “control”.
1:22:56 – VOX_TK_4795.wav – March 17, 2023 – my ideas are developed so I don’t need to write anything verbose, just present anything, Transcendent Knowledge will get conveyed. No need to belabor. Write in a classic timeless way, like Samo’s 1998 article on mushroom trees in Christian art. Less [text] is more, for my branching-message mushroom trees article.
Am I supposed to apply my Copernicus, to repair Ptolemy (repairing fundamentally broken CEQ).
1:30:59 – “surrender to the experience” — I’m here to replace that folk knowledge by Actual Science/ STEM explanatory fwk.
1:38:00 – too much time needed for art; no time for text. Since I’ve written articles about everything EXCEPT this set of 3 motifs, TEXT OF ARTICLE SHOULD JUST FOCUS ON THE 3 MOTIFS, NOT ENTIRE Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism. THE ARTI The article is not the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism; it is about the 3 motifs ({branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching}) from POV of the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism.
1:40:00 — Question: How does the eternalism experiential mode engender eternalism-thinking? Answer: Through a left-foot demon with trident poking you with possibilism-thinking & a right-foot demon with a rope pulling toward eternalism-thinking.
1:41:52 – INTEGRAL GOSSIP: VOX_TK_4796.wav – March 18, 2023 – Integral theory is falling over. To win this roller derby I just have to not fall, while they are fall. I don’t have to push them over; they are falling themselves over. Integral Theory has nothing but “how small is the size of your ego”? Integral Theory has no substance. So, it falls due to petty scandals. Guru Worship Clubs. It’s all they got. A buncha BS “mindfulness meditation” that accomplishes nothing that the oversold marketing claims.
A network of competing egoic guru worship clubs.
All I got is transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
All they got is guru worship clubs falling down ‘cos got no substance, no basis of Transcendent Knowledge. Measuring the size of each others’ egos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDOfH1IzQgs – “Things That Integral Has Not Done Well“, channel: The Integral Stage. (good for wasting time)
1:48:03 – VOX_TK_4797.wav – March 18, 2023 – mentioning “allegro” is a way of eliminiating substantive subject matter.
1:48:21 – VOX_TK_4798.wav – March 18, 2023. Studerus Shell Game, stage magic spotlight indirection, Figure S1 in a separate document. #54 hot potato mysteriously went missing 🤷♂️ “we got it covered: all ANX & ICC items” (nvm the 8 SHA (Shadow factor 13) subscale, which doesn’t exist, and contains #54. Who designed the “Impaired Control and also Impaired Cognition” factor? How arbitrary these “factors” are! But we attached the blob of math to this NONSENSENSICAL OUTLINE, so it’s “Scientifically Validated”. 🦄💨<– VALIDATED 😑👍✅
ON A FIRM FOUNDATION OF TIMOTHY LEARY’S MEQ BASED ON WALTER STACE’S OUT OF PRINT BOOK 63 YEARS OUTDATED 😑👍✅
NOW I AM GOING TO ASSESS ON THAT SCIENTIFIC BASIS WHETHER YOU HAD A “COMPLETE [STACEAN] MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE“
MEANWHILE, 40% HIGH DOSEBAD TRIPS UNDER GRIFFITHS’ OPTIMAL CONDITIONS so you see everythings under control what could possibly go wrong
we’ll just DELETE entirely the Dread (DED) category of psychedelic effects, replace it by OSC-based “Grief”, and do some math trickery to recast our 39% failure rate as only a 30% failure rate – Shadow problem SOLVED! — Psychedelic Science
Skipped a Million Voice Recordings
Con: Out of order. Might never hear my previous high-quality recordings of the past couple months.
Pro: The latest theory discussion, immediately. I look forward to hearing the assorted set of recordings from past 3 days, which have been highly productive.
Images
Title Is “Chef’s Surprise” 🤔 🤨 😱 🤷♂️ Fake/ Aspirational-Lookahead
I did quick production, so I don’t know yet what to title this set of varying-length recordings.
I’m probably saying: EVERYONE ELSE’S COVERAGE IS TRASH, BURN IT WITH FIRE. Maybe I should title the episode that?
I AM HERE TO REPLACE, NOT REPAIR, YOUR PARADIGM.
The Egodeath theory is not here to make your POS failed less-than theory work and reify your reductionist-away monstrosity
Add a Control-Challenges Subscale to the CEQ
I DON’T LIKE THIS. F THE CEQ, 🔥BURN IT WITH FIRE 🔥 .
I’M NOT HERE TO MAKE YOUR POS YALDABAOTH MONSTROSITY SOMEHOW “WORK”
DO NOT: Add a Control factor to the CEQ, containing these standard, established items:
I was afraid to lose my self-control.
I had the feeling of being connected to a superior power.
I felt like a puppet or marionette.
I had the feeling that I no longer had a will of my own.
I felt threatened.
Sense of being trapped and helpless.
It was difficult to control my thoughts.
Instead of adding the above Control subscale to the CEQ,
Debate: Put out a good thing (the Egodeath theory) and only put attention on my Good Thing — or dwell on “Their Thing [wanna-be, less-than theory] Sucks”??
The title is False Advertising (it is aspiration), just like MEQ & CEQ and the field marketed as “Psychedelic Science”. Read it as: “I wish there were less on questionnaires and other people’s BS misconceptions, and more explaining the heart of the Egodeath theory and how exactly — in 7th grader plain lang – how self-control instability works.
Why Loss of Control Ego Death?
I have so strong self-control, that I cannot control myself, and so I FALL DOWN battling against my own control.
And also b/c control-thoughts pre-exist.
And also because helpless puppet of 2-level control.
And also because overpowering deja vu: here is where you fakely remembered being forced out of control.
Input Recordings
VOX_TK_4792.wav – March 16, 2023
VOX_TK_4793.wav – March 16, 2023
VOX_TK_4794.wav – March 17, 2023
VOX_TK_4795.wav – March 17, 2023
VOX_TK_4796.wav – March 18, 2023
VOX_TK_4797.wav – March 18, 2023
VOX_TK_4798.wav – March 18, 2023
Actual Dates of Recording
Spot-Errata: beginning says “14”, should say “16”.
Date is not consistent, but close. The Beginning is borrowed and says “mar 14” but these segments are in order recorded March 16 (a.m.) through March 18 (a.m.) 2023.
The end artificially lowers a god via machine to say today’s date, March 18, which is accurate for the last 3 segments.
same as many previous: L AT2020, R CAD M39, treb cut, Limiter, bass cut. No guitar.
it would be really great if my crops were cataloged so neatly that I could write URLs from scratch to navigate/ x-link them. Get the above section-links via Site Map. ... one million clicks later …
ok i used the links after editing those pages, so:
[DECODING ATTEMPT 2:] There is nothing at all to analyze other than a pointing mechanism. The artist just wants you to determine what the eyes are aiming at. So list that on the list of {limbless looker behind a person} above.
Critique of about the red-flag filled “Science” of Psychedelic Psychometrics q’airs.
Some parts on other topics, I want to find & emphasize, like maybe self-control seizure.
0:00 – Intro ID
1:00-10:00 – good summaries of control transformation driven by Psilocybin.
x:xx – Interesting other topic.
x:xx – Interesting other topic. Middle portion is in-depth review of 11-Factors (esp. Studerus’ very poorly presented description of what the hell exactly tangibly, 11-Factors IS (the secret two high-level dimensions only get 1 paragraph, “it’s not in our marketing plan”; the weak poor foundation setup for the CEQ bellyflop.
~23:00 The marketing-narrative *appearance* that Studerus “deleted” item 54 when they merely “dropped” it from their (official) factors — so 54 in practice ended up hidden in Shadow Factor 13 (SHA) which Griffiths “accidentally” therefore didn’t see – PROBLEM 54 (DRAGON PANIC) “SOLVED”: BY SILENTLY OMITTING IT.
~14:00 – The Ruck committee, whose weird writing style is this? 5 authors wrote one chapter, same problem as psychometrics: who is dumb: who screwed up, if there are 6 authors of CEQ? NO ACCOUNTABILITY. WHO APPROVED THIS ARTICLE? ZERO CHECKS AND BALANCES. BUNK ARTICLE NO EFFECTIVE PEER REVIEW AT ALL, total joke!
THEY JUST DELETED THE ENTIRE CLASIC DITTRICH’S 1975-BASED “DREAD (DED)” CATEGORY, WITH NO PUSHBACK! WTF!!!
HOW the f did the CEQ get approved? It’s a smoking pile of trash, wtf! A model of Exactly how NOT to do Science. Comittee-written vague SMOKE & MIRRORS posing as “Science”.
~23:00 – Monkey business under the veil of darkness of night in the two phantom categories: turn on the light and direct the spotlight where the dragon shadow lies: Virtual factor 12 (VIR) [16 items] & Shadow factor 13 (SHA) [8 items incl #54]
The 11-Factors Shell Game w/ item 54 “I was afraid to lose my self-
Griffiths CEQ and “see Carbonaro for details” (you mean, for obscurantist bluff and no simple explanation of relation of Study 1 vs Study 2 vs. Initial Item pool – THEY DON’T EVEN HAVE AN INTELLIGIBLE STORY NARRATIVE of their trajectory. Why did — what was your LOGIC for doing a study 1 with one group, then a study 2 with a opposite group, and somewhere in there is the Initial Item Pool, HOW DO THESE PIECE FIT TOGETHER; WHAT WAS YOUR STRATEGY ARC??
Nothing makes sense, nothing coheres. Just a pile of details with no driving coherent strategy narrative: A study 1 appears. A study 2 appears. At some unspecified time, an Initial Item pool materialzies. Why? When? What relation? INCOHERENT “Science”.
PLEASE WRITE a TEXTBOOK, “PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE METRICS 101”, CHAPTER 1: EXPLAIN THE LOGIC OF CEQ STUDY 1, STUDY 2, CARBONARO, AND INITIAL ITEM POOL, AND HOW YOU DISCARDED DED, AND WHY AND WHEN ….
Do you guys even HAVE a coherent story behind this heap? I “See Carbonaro for details” and it just raises 20 more elementary questions that aren’t answered.
NO ONE CAN MAKE ANY SENSE OUT OF HOW 11 FACTORS PROCESS OF “DROPPING” #54 WAS DESCRIBED AND CEQ AND CARBONARO.
It is incomprehensible, this whole development, from Studerus 2010 to CEQ 2016 together with “See Carbonaro’s article for details” — ie, for piling even higherthe smoke and mirrors of conjuring-away Dittrich’s Dread (DED) dimension ENTIRELY and replacing it by the totally ordinary-state based “Grief” category. Perfect example of reductionism-away of the explanandum. Magic. Not Science.
I have a TON of ELEMENTARY extremely basic questions, no textbook explains this under-cover-of-night “Science”; Griffiths & Johnson’s CEQ answers none of them, even if you add Carbonaro article, they give no intelligible story; no college freshman can track and make sense out of and answer my basic questions (I have have read such attempts; they are garbled).
33:45 – opening the lid on the unlabelled box (Shadow factor 13 (SHA)) — THIS UNLABELLED BOX DOES NOT EXIST, DO NOT OPEN THIS LID — in the dark, unlit part of the 11-Factors Storage room, what’s in this box? —
Item 54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.
44:12 – Dittrich falsely in 1985 labeleled bad trip experiences as explaining them as fear of what? Dread OF EGO DISSOLUTION. “What you fear is: ego dissolution.” According to Dittrich. For one thing, that’s no explanation, because it is entirely vague (reminds me of Sanders & Zijlmans’ article Moving Past Mysticism as a methodology: “too vague!“, they charge.
According to Petter Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell (in Journal of Psychedelic Studies), your bad trip is your fault, caused by your resisting ego dissolution. There, we have “explained” bad trips. 😑 with our totally vague, totally useless pseudo-“explanation”, while the 40% bad trips continue on.
1:53:50 – near end: Why this branching-message mushroom trees article I’m drafting is the most awesome thing.
Why is Eadwine & branching-message mushroom trees the perfect Antidote to BS about psychedelics, and the perfect explanation to map out uncharted “here be shadow dragon monsters”.
In lineage of Petter Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell and CEQ: when you cite those, you have to cite my article about branching-message mushroom trees, because why?
Need to talk through that explanation…
Panic control ram seizure caught in a thicket.
Why is this our mind’s most interesting atttractive interesting dynamic.
Why does it make perfect sense to depict this dynamic via {handedness/ rightfoot}, non/branching,
how does that map to what Johnstad call for? and “Moving Past Mysticism” calls for.
Those authors call for mental model ego dissolution of self but they fail to say:
steering branching through world by control agency.
My theory agrees with Matthew Johnson & Letheby vector he calls for, exactly: they are aimed at my theory.
They are in right direction roughly but I’m way up ahead on the path , non-branching path, angel of death = self control loss & transformation of mental worldmodel , my article takes their direction (CEQ, Petter, S&J Moving Past Mysticism, puts in light speed turbocharged with by Eadwine:
Eadwine is moving the field WAY ahead through my theory/ article.
Law of universe: session guides have to understand these 3 motifs, as Christian art reports, by making sense out of branching-message mushroom trees genre, how source of control works to get the ram caught in a thicket and instructing you at the same time.
against Letheby & Johnson, it’s Not about you choosing an epistemology; the 1st epistemology BLOWS ITSELF UP in a furnace; it’s self-destroying;
the “possibilism” mental worldmodel is a self-destroying mental worldmodel.
The more you advance it, the more it blows itself to pieces.
Contrast against… opposite of Letheby: you are made to change your epistemology because the first epistemology tears itself to pieces;
The more you assert possibilism-power, the more it goes unstable, leaving you with the new mental model.
[THAT’S A GOOD (despite quick) TRANSCRIPTION OF THE VERY GOOD END of recording]
~2:00:00 – Outro ID.
2:01:06 – End.
Tech Notes
Recorded March 14, 2023. Produced/uploaded March 18, 2023.
I don’t think {rock} = [frozen block-universe eternalism] is the active main primary foreground mytheme referent in the St. Martin’s Church scene Browns’ Entry into Jerusalem.
In addition to noticing the broad theme of blue and gold confirming Psilocybin in Canterbury] at about [6:30 a.m. March 17, 2023], I am affirming recent intepretation (with roots in Nov. 2020 re: stable column base motif throughout Eadwine), rapidly now because specifically of f145: doorway gate conditional into stable buildings that don’t fall down into loss of control instability solid right foot foundation.
This deepening of my reading of “blue” and stronger affirming now alot strong that the blue krater in f134 DEFINITELY is Cubensis, is alternating with now (a first-time point, now) observing the blue and tawny colors of the f134 dispensary bins.
2-3 interleaved points I’m stumbling to make:
1) My “history” of blue color reliance/ argumentation/ having a clue: let me try to remember my history of working with this color-based interpretation factor: it all started at 6:30 am this morning! 😅
2) Buildings / towers = viable stability of control.
Answer to: Why a Mushroom Tree (when Cutting Branches) Grows on a Stone Tower
Expanding this morning’s idea in the evening:
What’s the history of that interpretation? (that {buildings/towers} = control stability in peak Psilocybin state)
First, I thought about it in St. Martin when a couple weeks ago like April 2023 when I was saying “where’s the gate” and eg Golden psalter’s Entry into Jerusalem shows…
and Lorenzetti’s version of Entry into Jerusalem shows “town walls” and “gate” and structures.
Also, Brown says eg March 2022 “towers of Jerusalem”, why towers… why [7:51 p.m. March 17, 2023] — I maybe have an answer for Brown’s question.
We can only speculate why a mushroom tree is growing on top (or out of) the roof of a stone tower.
Why Do Mushroom Trees Grow from Rock Stone Tower? Answer: {tower over gate} = Viable Stability of Self-Control in the Psilocybin State by Removing Possibility Branching
Why do mushroom trees grow from rock stone tower? Answer: Viable Stability of Self-Control in the Psilocybin State by Removing Possibility Branching
Next, a few days ago, March 2023, I re-looked at 4 horses image f177, which has towers, several, and while decoding that motif, initially, I conjectured: Transcendent Knowledge must be built up, it is civilization. NOT WRONG…. that *is* included in new f145.
WE are civilized, WE are able to build towers, YOU travelling traders are ignorant, you fall down, uncultivated self-control, untransformed, you are not able to build buildings.
But I hadn’t yet nailed, when started by pass on decoding 177, didn’t yet see that all motifs considered in tandem, meant that — it is crucial requirement that you must correctly identify the MAIN motif AS SUCH.
Not FALSE MAIN MOTIF.
The true main motif is “stable, enduring, doesn’t fall over/ crumble.”
Also that is treated as interchangeble with “balance”, so, TOWER IS BALANCED AND STABLE/ STURDY like Nov 2020 decoding “stable column base”.
Thus Nov 2020 f134 is maybe start of history of decoding “buildings towers = stable self-control” = scales balanced.
The artists through their motifs are saying this analogy ismorphism: In the peak advanced Psilocybin state (I have SO left Amanita behind in the rear-view mirror!), stable viable control is like being balanced and a stable tower.
Balanced and stable — having a durable sound well-based mental model of control, is like being balanced and stable like towers.
blue stem msh tree identifies blue fruit precious in lockboxes
foreign import traders
Canterbury Image f145: King Orders Incoming Shipments of Blue Fruit to Storage Lockboxes with Blue Stemmed Mushroom Tree
found (more deeply than before) last night p.m. March 16, 2023 by Cybermonk
mobile app announcement
3rd good mushroom tree scene in Canterbury Ps: F145
History of Decoding {column, base, tower, building}
Since I started working on decoding Canterbury image f145 five minutes ago (actually 2 days(?) ago), which extends my f177 decoding that started a couple weeks(?) ago, which applies my Nov. 2020 decoding of Eadwine’s {column} = control stability in f134
Nov. 2020: I decoded Eadwine’s {column} = [control stability] in image f134.
~April 2023: I decoded image f177, which has several towers and a building, and Eadwine’s standard {column} motif often used as a panel divider.
~1 day ago: I decoded image 145, which has buildings and several towers, and Eadwine’s standard {column} motif often used as a panel divider.
(Those dates are fairly easy to find at this site, I kinda need them; too busy.)
God Has Closed Our Eyes and Aimed Them Away from Explicit Mushroom Imagery
This art decoding business is the most humiliating endeavor because always one fails to see the explicitly obvious, precisely as Brown describes … in fact, pointedly, specifically, regarding Marcia Kupfer —
Brown says in 2016/2019 Kupfer so badly fails to see mushrooms, that she completely mis-identifies St. Martin Church’s Entry into Jerusalem’s Tower and Gate scenes as youths in trees cutting branches(!!!!!), which passage (with his more potent added highlighting to drive his point home) he showed to me the 3rd time to hit me hard over the head to open my tightly closed eyes (about the more-sophisticated-than-Brown theme of mushroom-induced branching experiential insight).
Brown thought her error was a failure to see mushrooms.
My failure was on a sophisticated level: failure to comprehend & recognize the meta-ramifications (I’m branching out into comedy there 😐).
At the moment, I’m working over in other page re: this morning’s work [~ 6:30 to 7:33 am March 17, 2023] interleaved two issues: blue color suddenly proves Psilocybin, and buildings mean control stability
Blue Proves Psilocybin, Providing Consistency
I started tentatively conjecturing blue krater for Cubensis, with no reliance as far as I remember I DONT’ THINK MY ARG A MONTH AGO WAS … TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION AT ALL THE BLUE COLOR AS HAVING ANY POSSIBILITY/ POTENTIAL FOR BEING SIGNIFICANT.
I had become overly dismissive of color-based arg’n b/c of Ruck’s fault, any speck of white or red — even imagined like Hatsis hugely caught Ruck mis-asserting for roasting salamander bestiary tree).
In my mind, color-based indicators were a no-go.
“It cannot have any significance, that the krater is blue.”
— I FALSELY reasoned, OVERCORRECTING FOR Ruck’s fallacious red-and-white argumentation.
Buildings and Towers and Columns with Base Mean Control Stability Instead of Loss of Control Like Ram Seizure
Buildings, towers, but firstly, columns: I definitely, distinctly started toward root of decoding {tower, building} in Nov. 2020 re: Canterbury image f134’s {columns} (which I just figured out today or yesterday, it turns out, these are equivalent: column = building [= scale balance too].
I never considered decoding “buildings” motif until like 1-2 days ago when I started … before starting to decode {buildings} in the “newish-to-me” image f145 last night, very recently a cpl weeks ago I started decoding 4 horses f177 image, which has several towers & a building.
[I REALLY WISH TO KNOW WHEN I STARTED DECODING F177 4 HORSES A CPL WKS AGO – see timestamps and URL dates.]
my history of increasing certainty of interpreting blue and tawny as Cubensis (I nailed blue krater 1-2 months ago yet inconsistently FAILED to look in the damn dispensary bins —
I bragged about being able to see inside , see what’s in the blue Krater by reading Eadwine’s mind b/c I know how he thinks
BUT my E.S.P. had a mega failure to be consistent and say, THEREFORE IF I WERE TO ANGLE MY EYES 15 DEGREES AND STOP SQUEEZING MY EYES TIGHTLY SHUT AND OPEN THEM AND FRIKKIN LOOK INSIDE THE BINS, IT WOULD CONFIRM blue krater = collect Cubensis,
and especially, would provide a boost, an INCREASE of consistency; would effect a jump from consistent “= grain” to consistent “= Cubnesis” .
I’m always telling other people, mental model transformation is about WHOLESALE SYSTEMIC REINDEXING OF EVERYTHING, *not* piecemeal rethinking!
The *worst of all* assertion-combinations is my February 1, 2023-March 16, 2023 assertion, oil & water, “blue krater = collect Cubensis AND bins/bucket = grain.
Had I gone to the massive trouble of OPEN THE EYES and AIM AT BINS, it would have confirmed a couple months ago my claim that I have Julie-Brown level of X-Ray vision to see inside the blue collection krater:
she strictly reports only what she sees (while doing field work in Church of St. Martin), which is that the tops that are above the stems have been somehow painted over or obscured.
Browns’ Writing Is Tops at Pretending to Not Assert the Same Hallucination as Rush [move to St Martin p.]
[“tops” is tricks with words to hide that she’s asserting mushrooms just like John Rush, attempted “plausble deniability”, but indirectly definitely she’s asserting mushroom, b/c phrase “mushroom stem” same page.
She WANTED to write “caps” but KNEW would be caught fabricating shiite that’s NOT THERE, so, she danced around that, by obscuring the unsupported assertion by writing the fake locution “tops” (strange & suspicious term!) – red flag, trying to mislead the reader.
“I never asserted mushrooms, b/c that would be unjustified.” Yeah right. “Tops” 🙄
I merely asserted “plant like gifts”, “stems” (on a page about msh’s) and “tops” (ditto). Reality: Asserting like Rush, that we are shown mushrooms — when in fact, we’re shown sticks, and didn’t even mention feathers, but asserted “tops” …. though “not visible”.
Results in a Wasson-level mess of, what EXACTLY are you asserting, and what EXACTLY are you not asserting, and what EXACTLY are you reporting seeing?
Fishy writing, thoroughly – dancing-about, trying to paint an impressionistic picture of what was asserted, instead of straight-talking.
Who would ever write “stems and tops”, I have never heard caps called “tops”.
Why would you write “tops” unless you’re trying to hide the fact that you’re trying to INSINUATE mushroom caps, without SAYING “caps”.
con’t:
People who lack the John Rush level of perception (he wrote about this fresco feature, “We clearly see mushrooms being handed out here” 😑 ) and Julie Brown, while yet criticizing Rush’s hallucinogens, followed him right into that pit.
For people lacking the hallucinogen vision of John Rush and the X-Ray vision able to see under the paint like Julie Brown, what’s shown is sticks and feathers, which utterly lack any significance. (other than being isomorphic with the contrast between the possibilism & eternalism experiential modes from high-dose Psilocybin)
Like Jesus’ finger-shapes.
Blue Color of Krater & Bins Breaks Through to Radical Consistency
Failure to Simply Look, wtf?!
How I would have needed to formulate that scientific hypothesis and conduct the experiment to disconfirm:
Open eyes.
Look.
Aim eyes at bin.
Stop using Julie Brown X-Ray vision to project grain into the bins.
Stop IMAGINING what i would see IF I were to aim eyes at bins. Science by conjecture? First ought to try LOOKing.
Perceive mushrooms explicitly shown in bins (remember i been lecturing people to stop writing the forbidden word hidden or secret and i retitled my Proof Canterbury Psilocybin article as “explicit mushrooms”).
Register the data input readings from eyes: Mushroom images.
Say “Oh.”
Say “I am blind idiot.”
Engage brain.
ANNOUNCE WITH GREAT FANFARE THE PLAIN AND EXPLICIT MUSHROOMS OPENLY AND OBVIOUSLY DISPLAYED ON THE “GRAIN DISPENSER” BINS
Declare myself the most brilliant and insightful art interpreter EVAR 😑
Row 3 Middle
I’ll announce the conjecture, just so Evil Future Me can’t get a toe in to be more radical [that failed nevertheless! haha on you, Dumb Past-Me — weak! even w/ that conjecture!] but it’s an extremely unlikely long shot that this blue krater collects Cubensis, because we know that grain is shown being distributed in Row 2; and we know blue is proved to be meaningless, because Ruck and Rush err in fetishizing red and white as if meaningful. And there is a guy being shown as so dumb simpleton (not a supersmarty like us moderns) as to be happy about getting grain. Look away from such doltishness.
Cybermonk, yelling out wisdom on world wide web Nov. 2020-March 2023
So dumb, he’s excited about grain – Cybermonk (the smart guy)
Row 2 Right
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Cybermonk (actual unretouched photo)
Cybermonk (artist’s impression, contents may not match product packaging)
to do copy paste again Canterbury blue containers and stems: done below
Are You Hip to Our In-Group Club’s Trendy Lingo? (Nvm that it explains NOTHING)
to do in my article add to this list of earth centered cosmology Terminology versus sun centered cosmology Terminology lexicon
Column headings:
old failed theory
new successful theory the Egodeath theory the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism
to do : copy paste my forbidden words list from the notes for the article my article branching message Mushroom trees. it gives all of the forbidden words , that are out; and all the correct replacement words , which are in
section : Incorrect Word List (Anti-Lexicon) and Correct Effective Egodeath Conceptual Vocabulary/ Lexicon ,
neuroBS neuroscience cognitive neuroscience cognitive delete deletion of cognitive while pretending to do cognitive, you delete the cognitive, good job. Cognitive Neuro-Reductionism Cognitive Neuro-Reductionism
The four pillars of pseudo explanation: eliminating, replacing that which is to be explained; explaining away.
How will we deal with the problem of the shadow dragon monster we will explain it away and do our shell game the shell game which is 11 factors questionnaire and CEQ questionnaire
We’re gonna shuffle question 54 here and there and put in ANX vague Anxiety factor where it doesn’t belong, instead of Impaired CONTROL (ICC), and then we’re gonna move it , we’re gonna have our Supplemental figure S one hidden separate document and then we have a hidden separate document supplemental figure ass too and which is a separate hidden document from 11 factors article
Shell Game 54 move 1
Studerus 2010 secret hidden Supplemental Figure S1, not part of Studerus article; doesn’t exist
Shell Game 54 move 2
Studerus 2010 secret hidden Supplemental Figure S2, not part of Studerus article; doesn’t exist
Shell Game 54 move 3 presto changeo shadow dragon monster vanished! 🎩🪄🐉 by Psychedelic 🍄 “Science” 😊👍
Table 1 in Letheby: Psychedelics Alter [Chis Letheby’s when he’s tripping] Metaphysical Beliefs, 2021.
See the Eternalism row in this Letheby-created table.
Article Presents the MBQ Metaphysical Beliefs Questionnaire, which incorps also some FAD-Plus items inclg all the Fatalistic Determinism items (which competes against the superior Eternalism)
~1994 v1 FAD freewill and determinism questionnaire article, which did not have a subscale /factor called “fatalistic determinism” at all.
~2010 FAD-Plus article: The fatalistic determinism subscale was only added there later as an afterthought in version two, called FAD-Plus. part of The Rock Solid foundation for Chris Letheby.
and finally in our shell game we end up presenting with a big spotlight put on it drawing all attention to the stage trickery of attention
we’re going to draw your attention away from the shadow dragon monster, the high level categories unpleasant experiences item 54
don’t look that direction, look over here at our new sparkling shiny new 11 factors!!
— never mind virtual factor 12 (VIR) and shadow factor 13 (SHA) 😱😵🐉 which doesn’t exist
it’s hidden in a box with no label in the darkest corner of storage, not listed in the accounting books .
what’s in the box ? 🤔🧐 lift the lid its item 54 I was afraid to lose my self control
Along with seven other suppressed and repressed items what a good idea for science lets suppress and repress item 54 and deny that it exists and ditto for the other HRS questionnaire negative items and SOCQ questionnaire negative items like HRS item it was difficult to control my thoughts that doesn’t sound challenging enough to even put in our initial item Paul says role in Griffiths says Matthew Johnson highly qualified expert at complete newbie mystical experiences
just the perfect people who are experts at writing unicorns and rainbows revised version of the so-called mystical experiences not recognized by any authentic mystic in history according to Harvard Divinity school Charles Stang
The king of all reductionism when you reduce the dynamics that are uniquely distinctive of the Psychedelics Psilocybin state and you replace them by Roland Griffiths CEQ questionnaire grief category which sounds nicely familiar it is reductionism to the ordinary state of consciousness to eliminate while pretending to explain the actual bona fide psychedelic experiences we’ll just replace them buy something that sounds as if it is familiar : ordinary state based reductionism,
reductionism on a grandest magnitude, of the first order
the king of all reductionism
CEQ represents the ultimate pinnacle of perfect reductionism : total elimination of that which it pretends to explain
motivation for this page is that as good as it is to say the plane crawled is out and that the plane coral fresco is out and that Canterbury is in plain coral fresco the fresco at the town of Plaincourault France
stupid voice transcription
Plane crawl France is out plane corralled France is out you just got it right stupid voice transcription and now you can’t comprehend what I’m saying
the town of Plaincourault in France is out
The town of Canterbury in England is in
you see this bug a voice transcription approves my point by point I was trying to make is that it is simpler and clear for everybody to say the slogan red and white is out blue and gold is in the voice transcription was 100% successful on the first try which proves my point this is the motivation for this post is that it struck me
I am calling for a paradigm shift I am not here to make slight repairs on a completely totally 100% broken filled psychedelic science
and as Letcher hatsis complains a Malformed embarrassment of a childish infantilization of the field of entheogen scholarship which they correctly identify as the cause is the fixation the allegro red and white kiddie mushroom 🍄 fixation is a gigantic dead-end cul-de-sac that we need to jump out of it onto a proper foundation of adult level thinking
Multiplier/ Parity-Check Effect; When there’s Multiple Instances of a Motif Increases, it Rapidly Multiplies, Exponentially Multiplies the Tentative Reading
Update: we’re seeing a cross-amplification effect or multiplier effect across 3 major Canterbury images: f134, f145, f177. That increased the certainty this morning, now [6:48 p.m. March 17, 2023], of the MODE of reading, the type/ genre of reading that the artist expects.
More obviously now, including a mushroom tree instantly makes a firm, extreme statement: THE CONCERN HERE, FOR EVERYTHING IN THE IMAGE, IS THE INTENSE MYSTIC PEAK PSILOCYBIN STATE.
I first wrote a few months ago “I can see into the blue krater, because I know Eadwine’s humor/meaning.” That’s true by reading across the images.
Mobile app voice mis-transcription
I have deciphered the language of Branching message Mushroom trees including handedness and non-branching and I am summarizing my language deciphering in my article for journal of psychedelic studies
we are now able to read this language and perceive the mushrooms but warning together with it we learned about both the bad loss of control and the good solution and the good enlightenment completion of mental transformation mental models conversion
I do not want in the article to lecture and pontificate so much though I really do think that anyone would certainly expect in the situation that I would give some kind of a direction some kind of a saying contextualization of what we should do just to at least a very extremely condensed list of do this do this and to do this
For example I kind of do want to make the point that this is not a situation that I need to come into conformity with the mob the club are you I refuse to join your stupid ignorant club the club needs to join me and here’s how to do that for a starter I am not here to repair your broken bottle and make your bad ideas work with your bad lexicon like default mode network ego dissolution I’m going to explain why these are poor failed attempts
The right way to frame to understand what I bring is
I am not merely helping to repair your broken CEQ questionnaire that’s all on a miss guided foundation
you need to use my correctly founded ECQ questionnaire instead is the correct way forward
I am not here to repair the Ptolemaic earth centered cosmology
I am here to provide the replacement sun centered cosmology
I am not here to provide Band-Aids and corrective epicycles to make your bad model carried forward we should abandon we need to abandon and switch away from your bad force model everybody agrees with all these falsehoods the falsely say that the default mode network causes a Reduction Myth Cognition that’s false
and they falsely say that the cause of bad trips is set in settings that has been proved to be false by the research done by journal of psychedelic studies Petr Johns dad Article day trip to hell
they falsely utter the words ego dissolution as if that explains anything that’s only the beginner newbie phase one and it has nothing to do with ego self canceling active intelligent self canceling of ego Which is the advanced version not just a cessation but a transformation and replacement and a demonstration of the vulnerability the wound in the side the seizure loss of control capacity capability that the Branching ignorant child mode experiential mode resulting mental world model of self control steering in world and it is not beginner Unity nondual ones that we should be talking about and focusing on but advanced cybernetic control to level dependent control
The club of the circle journal citation fast fest festival puts forth a heap of phony pseudo explanations and they can join a few four phrases and then declare themselves to have explained. they have explained jack shit ha ha ha ha
Default bullshit Network
ego dissolution
non-dual unity oneness
you need to surrender to the experience they say — this is not science this is crude folk pseudo explanations that barely accomplish anything except avoiding enlightenment and we need to not Move forward with these crude pseudo-explanations we need to replace them essentially and fundamentally replace by an actual science-based and stem style of communication explanatory model framework a true proper theory I am not affirming and condoning and reifying the confused folk folk story time that goes on under the guys of psychedelic science in the guise of psychedelics lights
I am about to produce a few days ago voice recording mostly focused on lifting the lid and seeing the wormy slithering terrifying you don’t want to see how the sausage is made under the hood I’m gonna lift the lid and look under the hood of what passes for psychedelic science I will have none of it thank you keep that crap away far away from me my theory replaces all that bullshit it is not repair or make wrongness work I refuse to join in reify your stupid club you need to join my club that has a proper Science & STEM foundation, My town and I want to announce this decoding 9:06 AM March 17, 2023 the town in the Canterbury Psalter buildings and this is true of Saint Martin town church images of buildings is that they don’t fall down they don’t have loss of control seizure because they have a proper foundation so we have all the Bible passages about building on not on Sand bar on solid foundation corner Stone by ego death theory has provides
And serves as a proper foundation for actual science actual psychedelic actual science not this folk parenting in a circle journal citation fast parenting non-explanations as if their explanations when they are no such thing and get the hell out of here And the miss marketing the the false marketing of so-called falsely so-called 11 factors questionnaire which role and Griffiths and Matthew Johnson fell into the big ditch that’s the false marketing of the 11 factors which fails to even give a concrete questionnaire so that Griffiths can see question 54 I was afraid to lose my self control and see the virtual factor 12 and the shadow factor 13 ( SHA ) in the dark darkest part of the storage room where they have the unpleasant experiences questionnaire items there is an unlabeled box that they say doesn’t exist it is shadow factor 13 which contains question 54 I was afraid to lose my self control
Then building on top of the soggy mud foundation of 11 factors questionnaire that even miss represents what it is Studer as Miss represents and these people have names Eric Studer us and Alex Gama and friends Vollenweider misrepresent and falsely market there 11 factors which Ashley contains 13 factors and actually contains to high-level factor called unpleasant experiences and pleasant experience and actually contain 66 items Not 45 items as they give the false impression by marketing they’re stupid 11 factors
they give the false marketing impression it’s false advertising the so-called 11 factors and for another thing what the hell is the name of 11 factors every single article that mentions these questionnaires uses a different name!! this is no science ; this is a joke! So then Roland Griffiths and Matthew Johnson built on that false marketing which enabled them to fall in the pit that Studer is set up for them to fall into and they missed out on eight negative experiences including number 54 I was afraid to lose my self-control and so they produced Yaldabaoth The
malformed monstrosity offspring that they gave birth to the CEQ which has managed to attain 100% bunkness Congratulations and I couldn’t believe it they’re in the psychedelics today podcast the other day they mentioned that someone actually used the CEQ I couldn’t believe it or you this is a completely broken instrument there’s a hole in the side that a dragon whole fleet of dragons gonna come through loss of control
HRS questionnaire item it was difficult to control my thoughts but stertorous or rather role and Griffiths doesn’t even perceive that as a potentially challenging experience totally out of touch completely the worst people to be formulating this kind of question are they have zero they’re completely tone deaf
they have zero feel for bad trips
leaving Dittrich seeming highly astute in 1975 caress of steel by Rush good foundation for the OAV questionnaire angst dread category — though it is not “of ego dissolution” , as it is falsely labeled
Admitted to go above a minute ago above I was trying to recite from memory the four I’m going to make this official the four bunk pseudo explanation the four pillars of false pseudoscience number one default mode Netwerk and its alleged falsely alleged reduction of cognition number two ego dissolution
Number three non-dual unity oneness which is merely beginner trespassing on the sacred and will get thrown out by loss of control out through the gate guarded by the angel of death which is flaming which is fire which is loss of control threat
Number four is neural plasticity your brand sucks your branding my branding is on point because what your guises stupid club of psychedelic scientists you are doing cognitive Nuro reductionism neural neural science cognitive neuroscience reductionism which illuminates the explanandum while pretending to be explaining it this is reductionism this is the ultimate paradigm and best possible instance and example of reductionism is precisely this particular reductionism is the mother of all this is the king of all instances of reductionism is by reducing the Psilocybin experiential state by neuroscience falls
Pretended explanations that do not explain anything at all and serve as a substitute for any actual explanation by eliminating that which they pretend to explain so this lexicon of yours is toxic and I will have none of it you need to use my Termanology instead that is bona fide genuine actual cognitive approach not your pseudo cognitive approach which you instantly switch instead in reductionistic the worst reductionism replacing cognitive by neuroscience stop talking about
neuroscience we need to be talking exclusively about cognitive at about the cognitive model and its dynamics what are the dynamics of the cognitive model of self and also you guys always forget to say the model of the world the branching versus non-branching world has nothing to do has jack shit to do with neuroscience stop talking about neuroscience you are substituting and preventing explanation
loose cog l m loose mental functioning binding mental construct processing loose cognitive association binding BTFO Nuroplasticity “neuroplasticity”
the rough folk wisdom as it barely works and fails to bring back the treasure of Transcendent Knowledge
I am not here to make your bad language lexicon succeed at ego dissolution allegedly we what we fear the cause of bad trips is the resisting ego dissolution and supposedly the APZ questionnaire reanalysis in 1985 creating the OAV questionnaire version one and then the official 1994 version to the real OAV questionnaire
Has baked into it the false explanation too quickly already the label of the dread category the angst category dread category DED acronym is false: it says that what we dread is ego dissolution.
What we dread is loss of control as the world Model transforms out from underneath us the model Not just of self as Thomas messenger falsely says and as Chris Leatherby falsely says 99% of the time he forgets to say the model of the world and he only says the model of the self.
but put aside your whole dead-end cul-de-sac stunted approach and Leap ahead by light years by completely switching to the Egodeath For Theory
8:33 a.m. March 17, 2023] blue krater collecting ccubensis behind oxen – Cybermonk – It just struck me reflecting on Canterbury image F145 and the blue and tan color of the distribution bins the two bins filled with liberty cap Cubensis
And the use of the blue stem mushroom tree in F145 and the blue fruit this is sufficient evidence to prove or corroborate the blue color of the collection krater in Canterbury image F134
I don’t think that I pointed that out before the blue color though I might possibly have mentioned it
but now though it is different because I feel confident I have more evidence of the use of the blue color and things cohere better this way
This is pattern recognition
this is language visual language translation and often it really hits me per deepening of network connections per Paul Thagard book conceptual revolutions and I’ll suddenly see a set of connections from a different angle than before where I get a better look at some reading and recognizing the Merit , The full goodness of the reading
I MISTAKENLY didn’t place ANY weight on blue color, when I announced a month ago that radical, unthinkable interpretation of {blue krater} as for the purpose of [collecting Cubensis]; because I overreacted against Ruck & Rush relying too much on red & white.
Yes, I only just now [this morning, ~6am Mar 17 2023] thought of f134’s dispensary bins as blue and tawny, but, I identified the blue krater 1-2 months ago, as for collecting Cubensis harvest — happens to be blue BUT I tried to not at all make any significance of the blue color; I made a point of not basing my arg at all on blue color.
I ERRED IN DISMISSING THE BLUE COLOR as having any possible significance, when I announced that I was able to see by E.S.P. what’s in the blue krater.
Strange that I didn’t at that time close the circle and start asserting that the grain dispensary bin is Cubensis.
How the fck did I nail blue krater as being for Cubensis in f134, yet FAIL to say THEREFORE ALSO the grain dispensary bins TOO *must be* Cubensis, for consistency? MY CLAIM ABOUT BLUE KRATER BEING FOR CUBENSIS WAS IRRATIONAL GIVEN THAT I FAILED TO ALSO IN CONJUNCTION ASSERT — AND OPEN MY EYES AND SIMPLY LOOK — that the grain bin bucket dispensary MUST also therefore, for consistency, be interpreted NOT as grain, but as Cubensis.
But even after improving the image crop to show the full harvest sequence, I still FAILED to EXTEND the idea; WHY DID I TREAT BLUE KRATER IN ISOLATION FROM GRAIN BIN & BUCKET ROW 2 RIGHT???
Doesn’t make any sense! Why didn’t I fkking LOOK at the grain bin? BLIND!
I am as blind as Marcia Kupfer, who wrongly (mis-thinks Brown) sees “youths intrees cutting branches“, when, in reality (according to Beginner-Level Brown), “theres mushrooms”.
Browns’ Deep Analysis: There’s Mushrooms.
There’s mushrooms.
Browns’ analysis to BTFO Kupfer’s “youths in trees cutting branches”
crap, THERE’S NOTHING THERE (at my two links above); YA DIDN’T THINK IT THROUGH, STUPID PAST-ME!
Valentines’ Day, I improved the crop, in Idea Dev p 18.
But again, YA DIDN’T THINK IT THROUGH.
You CANNOT say “blue krater collects Cubensis” without ALSO saying “THEREFORE ALSO THE GRAIN BINS MUST BE CUBENSIS.” OBVIOUSLY.
It should INSTANTLY be clear, that:
TO ASSERT THAT BLUE KRATER = CUBENSIS IS TO ASSERT GRAIN BIN & BUCKET = CUBENSIS TOO (of course, OBVIOUSLY!)
How did Dumb Past-Me think “blue krater” without ALSO instantly thinking “[BLUE!!!] grain bin & bucket”??? STUPID!
I remember my headspace: you can see that in my first post of the two, I was in the midst of creating page listing many images of Stand Right Foot, and Brown and I discussed Eadwine Leper image:
I was busy defending this: Jesus is standing on left leg because he’s taking on the impurity and uncleanness and disease of the leper.
and so this is often my defense for blindness, eg Lorenzetti’s Entry into Jerusalem:
WHAT THE HELL IS BROKEN WITH MY MIND THAT I DIDN’T INSTANTLY SEE the {heimarmene stars gate}, which is ONE OF MY MAIN MYTHEMES?
Answer: Where’s Waldo? ie, that image has too much going on that I was busy analyzing, and, specifically, what I learned from that failure was, PAY WAY MORE ATTENTION TO the {gate} mytheme/motif.
So I can tell you: I didn’t think it through, because busy on other stuff, juggling.
“Why didn’t you see that thing go by, when you were juggling?”
Score: Dumb Past-Me 0, Evil Future Me 1
tho it’s hard to condemn Dumb Past Me for first baby step 🤷♂️ – most ppl don’t have the guts to think of blue krater to collect msh. OTOH, my proposal felt long-shot unlikely, BECAUSE I became in a state of self-contradiction: I was in effect then claiming that:
1. Blue krater = collect cubensis AND 2. Grain bin & bucket, dumb guy excited; the image is to mock him for being excited about stupid grain; simpleton.
Row 2 right shows a simpleton happy to get grain.
WHAT A SIMPLETON he is, BLIND TO HIGHER THINGS
WE WISE PEOPLE KNOW TO AVOID LOOKING AT DUMB GRAIN AND TURN/AIM OUR EYES ELSEWHERE, AT THE GOOD, MUSHROID PARTS OF THIS IMAGE, NOT AT THE GRAIN BINS AND BUCKET WHERE THE DOLT IS HAPPY TO BE
🤦♂️
I QUIT. THIS ART DECODING IS TOO HUMILIATING.
SCORE: DUMB PAST-ME 1 POINT, EVIL FUTURE-ME 10 POINTS
I Fell into the Pit of the Fatal Premise of “Mixed Themes” of OSC+ASC
of Inconsistent Mixture of Mundane and Peak Psilocybin in Same Image – Do not do that! STOP DOING THAT, IDIOT.
Like Max Freakout pointed out inconsistency to Kafei: who held “Jesus was a mundane person AND his life HAPPENS to match mystical analogies”
“This Scene Is Motivated by Grain Cultivation AND a Separate Side Interest Dabbling in Mushroom” – WRONG ANSWER, FAIL 💥😵
To Increase a Radical Position, Be Consistently Radical
not sure if made this point thought of few minutes ago: (I “felt” this point then): find “self contradiction” here. I started to say:
State 1: Jan 31, 2023: Dumb Past Me holds: The blue krater is grain. AND The grain bins and grain bucket is grain. CONSISTENCY: YES.
State 2: Feb 1 & 14, 2023: Half-wit (“Jesus led a mushroom cult; I is smart“) Dumb Past Me holds: The blue krater is to collect Cubensis. AND The grain bins and grain bucket is grain. CONSISTENCY: NO — clever bold aggressive assertion, but, now you just broke consistency, without even even thinking about it, because you failed to think about the branching ramifications.
And that is how I felt: Bold, hyper assertive, but not consistent; not supported well at all.
State 3: March 17, 2023: Evil Future Me (this morning) smartly realizes: The blue krater is to collect Cubensis. AND The grain bins and bucket are to distribute Cubensis. WINNER!!! 🎉 🏆 👑 🎶 CONSISTENCY: YES; it is actually STRENGTHENED, a lot!!
The Egodeath theory 
