the Egodeath theory is a binary system/ model /explanatory framework

expect the esotericism message to be two contrasted sets of views. with the psilocybin loose cognitive state driving moving to the later view. this is higher knowledge, that’s the given thing that the artist has to try to represent in art. 🍄 is useful to represent that, just add branching & serpent, right foot on ground, holding onto branch with left hand.

how does image X convey :

snake vs tree – serpent winding up tree

left vs right – cap-supporting ramification arms. the cap is held up by both arms: by the left arm and right arm together

branching vs nonbranching

message to dull-witted idiots (ie CYBERMONK): which hand

i know you’ll need a little time to answer.

like 15 $&%#@*! YEARS!! 🤨 😵 ⚰️ 💀

The above is an example of the tolerance problem: you can read Dionysus’ left hand is being affirmed; so here we are affirming “left hand = correct”

Above, we have a message that: The {left hand} is so powerful, it’s in charge of {steering} the mushroom tigers, and his left hand is affirming {branching}, because it’s placed over Ariana’s branch that she holds. 😑

but then all of the mystics say “no no no you can’t interpret it that way, that’s the incorrect view/reading!!” 😠 👎 😖 ✋ 🛑

however, the chariot does express the theme of harmonious wedding, of the higher mode of thinking loving and desiring and appreciating the lower, branching way of thinking

the two modes in life, like the super-enlightened Alan Watts guy in Canterbury Psalter with both feet off the ground, relying on neither naive branching thinking nor on non-branching thinking; he uses qualified branching thinking.

or to the left of him, Hatsis’ left foot touching Cyberdisciple’s right foot: foolish & wise together.

the marketplace needs both states of consciousness, and life is based on the left foot and the right foot working together.

In practice, life is lived in the possibility-branching model, not in the non-branching, esoteric model.

The non-branching, eternalism model is of no worldly use, but floats above the world, disconnected from the world, and has no relevance, no use for practical daily life, of actual life as it is given, as we experience it all of the time, given that ~0% of our time is in the loose cognitive state.

original branching possibilism vs later enlightened non-branching eternalism

original sin vs later regeneration

ordinary state vs altered state – mushrooms, branching tree made of mushrooms

tight cog vs loose cognitive assoc’n – ribs visible, not joined

illusion vs reality

exotericism vs esotericism

Psychics vs Pneumatics

Unstable vs Stable

youth vs bearded

female vs male

bound hair vs loosened hair

tightcog vs loosecog

massive body of knowledge -> artist encodes in a small simple art image -> interpreter decodes the small simple art image -> massive body of knowledge

The body of knowledge is specialized; it is standardized as well, but it is mode- specific or state-specific, such that no amount of interpretation in the ordinary state would ever reconstruct it because it’s a realm of experiencing outside of the ordinary state domain and then even if you do assume it’s based in a altered state even if you specifically assume that it’s based in the Psilocybin Loose cognitive state it is still tricky to get to understand the whole convention language of analogy.

Compare my 2013 formula:

tree vs snake = possibility thinking vs eternity thinking

Now consider the different, equivalent formula:

left vs right = branching vs nonbranching

thats my 2020 or fully grasped 2022 formula

how can I create art Image that expresses the ego death Theory the two ways of thinking the two modes of consciousness then we need to assume that that’s what is being described and then the question for us as interpreters but also now the question for us as artists because we are now artists who are now able to do the encoding and we are no longer struggling to decode but now we become encoders so interpreting this plain grilled image

now read this plane crawl fresco image as an artist, as a creator, given that you know that your job is to express through analogies the ego death Theory, Witches a Binary Theory:

how are you going to represent, in your art piece, analogies to map this binary Egodeath Theory system?

given that it’s a binary system, you can take advantage of things like left versus right, the fact we have two limbs called left and right, and it is easy to depict Branching and to depict nonbranching

we can use, we can depict cut branches then we can depict Mushrooms

and then if we depicting Mushroom as a tree , then we can add branching and non-Branching, and make statements about left versus right , and we can assign left to be one mental model and one state of consciousness, and assign right – right hand, right arm, right leg – to map to the other mental model / experiential mode, because what we need to convey is a contrast between two different systems, two different states, two different ways of thinking, and we have two different arms, we have two different legs , and it is easy and viable to depict Branching

and so what we can do is create Branching tree Mushroom tree, and then stick a snake in the tree

oh that’s what I was going to mention again:

in the Plaincourault Fresco, we have a snake versus tree contrast, and we also have left versus right, both in the ramifications holding up the main cap and Eve standing with her left foot on top of her right foot

so I am in one “dimension” , we have the non-Branching Snake contrast against the branching tree

and then we have the left ramification and the right ramification

and the left arm and the right arm the left foot and the right foot of Eve

and so we have these various contrasts.

then we can map the contrast to each other.

we can see that binary contrast number one , is like binary contrast number two, is equivalent to binary contrast number three.

so we get the three-part formula:

tree versus Snake =

Branching Versus nonbranching =

left versus right.

And this is the combination that we see in many art pieces in antiquity and Middle Ages

people , the artists took advantage of this to transmit the ego death Theory; Transcendent Knowledge; possibilism Versus eternalism.

in so far as Transcendent and Knowledge is a binary system, we can depict contrasts:

Branching Versus nonbranching

left versus right

snake versus tree

to represent what we are really concerned about, which is more abstract than strictly Branching

and that is possiblism versus eternalism – those two words taken in their broad sense, to include the control aspect, of moving from autonomous control to dependent control – all done through the Mushrooms.

so that if we not only depict Branching in nonbranching , but if we choose to do that through a mushroom, that gives us kind of a fourth element: the transformation causal element

or you could associate the mushroom with the altered state in contrast to the ordinary state for example imagine if a vine leaf tree paired with a Mushroom tree or we have contrast like non-Branching Spear versus and Branching Branch then hold those with the left and right hand and then show mushrooms in the hem.

The nature of esoteric art is that the artist has the entire, completed Egodeath theory of analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control, & literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control, and Psilocybin mushroom loose cognition.

The task of the artist’s drawing (roasting salamander dancing man) or masterpiece (Dionysus mosaic, Canterbury F134 comic panel with mushroom tree with two men and sword) alike, is to elegantly communicate and represent the entire whole body of Transcendent Knowledge in an image.

Underestimate this art at your peril! but there is a subtle misrepresentation there in saying that on the one hand you can describe this is very advanced knowledge or on the other hand you can describe it instead as very specialized knowledge this is sort of like basic knowledge of the loose cognitive state the reason that modern people are so stupid that they take all the way from 1985 until 1922 to figure it out 2022 to figure it out is that in order Innoway yes it is advanced and complicated and difficult is that in order Innoway yes it is advanced and complicated and difficult

but on the other hand the reason that it’s hard to figure out is that it’s because it state specific it is specialized specifically in the sense of that it is state specific and then we have lots of metal bands metal artists almost routinely are saying the same thing because it is mud specific mode specific specific to the cognitive mode we have been saying things like there’s no one there to stay

steering in a tree

there’s no one there to steer

we have another band saying “the path for you is decided”

and another band saying “help”

and another band saying and another band sing saying “the little doll is you, nowhere to run”

so it is I guess you could say it’s a mixture of mode-specific knowledge and “advanced” description of mode-specific knowledge, so that’s a double barrier

because even the people who do access the correct mode such as Metal artists do not automatically understand the ultra efficient conventions developed since antiquity and middle ages of “left Limb equals initial Branching-Thinking; Right Limb Equals eventual nonbranching Thinking”

that is a very advanced, efficient standardized convention that is also hard to access because it is state-specific, mode-specific

its thus

A description of a realm of experiencing, a mode of experiencing, that is specialized – or at least, not what people in the ordinary state experience.

On the Ineffable

people in the modern age then say that the loose cog state is “ineffable” , and they write lots of books with lists of the top 12 standard experiences – at the same time as they say it’s “ineffable”, which is pretty much completely meaningless.

I stumbled today and it was ineffable.

I couldn’t describe the experience in words,

words are no good; words are no use to describe any experience. Especially if you write in Alan Watts zen poet mode, and revel in not mastering language and specificity.

so everything is ineffable

sex for example is ineffable

it’s sort of an untestable descriptor, “x is ineffable”

I had a good omelette today that I made and it was ineffable, it was so good, words cannot describe experiencing – buy my book to read all about it

and then I had kind of just a weird mood today, and it was ineffable

and I wondered what Miss Reyes him was like , mithras , initiation into the cult of Mithras , and I decided that it was ineffable.

then I had to take an exam on advanced physics, and I saw the questions and they were ineffable.

then I saw an explanation of why mushroom trees were not mushrooms, by Erwin Panofsky, and I found his argumentation to be ineffable.

then I received an email from Thomas Hatsis saying something incomprehensible and sloppily expressed about “the shape of liberty cap is anachronistic” and I found his email communication to be ineffable.

Next topic : “X is an illusion.”

Art Interpretation

The successful esoteric art interpreter MUST bring this most-lofty expectation & understanding of the artists’s communication context:

1. given/assume: the artist has the entire Egodeath theory, including the fully mature May 1, 2022 full comprehension that left limb = possibilism, right = eternalism.

2. given /assume: the artist knows the standard ways & the established efficient conventions to convey Transcendent Knowledge.

Those are the KEY expectations for reading / interpreting esotericism art images.

🤔 😟 🙂

Forcing Your Interpretation as an Artist, to Maximally Transmit Transcendent Knowledge

We are used to my forced vigorous commitment to decoding mythemes – but consider the complementary persoective of the encoder, the message sender: suppose you have studied the Egodeath theory findings produced by 1985-2022, and you know left vs right = tree vs snake = possibilism vs eternalism

that is precisely specifically what I was missing what I failed to grasp and perceive Thanksgiving 2013 because soon after that I made the brilliant formulation extremely ergonomic very effective of tree versus Snake Equals eternalism Versus possibilism Versus a eternalism but if only I had said this little bit to add another = as I am always grouping things together like

Such as you can continue the equation as

egoic Versus Transcendent

literalist versus analogy

ordinary state versus Altered State

autonomous control versus dependent control

those on the outside those on the inside

mortals versus immortals

non-initiates versus initiates

LEFT VS RIGHT

those who he ahead of time during creation he puts on his left versus on his right

The psychics versus the pneumatics

exoteric versus Esoteric

But I feel that the more important part of the equation I did identify :

tree versus snake equals Possibility versus eternity thinking

Branching Versus nonbranching

left versus right

delusion versus enlightenment equals

illusion versus reality Equals

clothing versus naked Equals

flesh versus skeleton

spear = non-branching possibility, seeing it kills the king-egoic claim to wield the power of steering within a supposedly branching-possibility world.

decoding early cadeceus – take non-branching snake, cross it over itself.

don’t look at the transcendent control destabilizer while you harvest sacrifice it.

Mithras looks away while trigger the seizure vulnerability bull’s wound of control-violation.

don’t look directly at gorgon else helplessly turned to stone.

5:42 AM May 1, 2022: one never knows at the moment of grasping & crossing the threshold of sufficient strength of connections, but I’m going to immediately create a timestamp and new page, because sufficient themes have come together in this painting and others to warrant sticking my neck out and venturing an interpretation, putting forth an argument that just crossed the threshold of plausibility for me.

The mushroom cap hides and negates the branching of Eve’s legs, which is more meaningful than a fig leaf.

yesterday i wrote and said that her legs were pressed together, negating branching.

I also asserted that the reason why the salamander tree and the planecurled tree have two mushrooms left and two mushrooms right is because they are serving as analogy for branching of the human & animal limbs.

And the left ramification holding up the cap equals our possibility way of thinking and the right ramification holding up the top cap is analogous to the eternity way of thinking and experiencing.

Lucas Cranatch covers her leg branching by another branch, and that is more significant than fig leaf

then compare the Golden fleece covering the branching on Douris’ kylix if you follow the rock school and try to read the Golden fleece is amanita I have always said probably I posted November 29, 2013 that the golden fleece obscure is the one spot where you would be able to see branching in the vine leaf tree a

nd if we read the kylix that way then again we have the theme of mushroom covering branching and hiding it from view and thus negating branching

my inventory of the count of caps on this tree was a little bit slightly wrong

I counted five but the number is seven in the picture

the size of the cap covering the branching point of their legs is the same as on the tree.

this would be the golden white underside of the amanita cap.

through comparison with other images, I have established that the mushroom tree is indicated as having limbs , limbs that are comparable in parallel to the human limbs

and so the morphology is being compared

we are being presented with a morphology diagram regarding branching

we are to therefore think in terms of the side ramifying mushrooms equals limbs

we have the phrase: limb of the tree

legs and arms of the mushroom tree and the branching of the tree is to be compared with the branching limbs of the human body

by the same token that we describe the tree morphology as branching, so are we therefore to treat and think of the human limbs in terms of branching

this analogy is conveyed through this genre that human limbs and the branching specifically the branching of the human limbs

or the branching of the leg on the snake that

we are to apply the word branching to the human body and limbs and we are to compare specifically the branching morphology across the tree and human limbs

the human limbs are being used to express the parallel branching and nonbranching ideas that we see on the tree which is placed in parallel with the human body and placed in parallel with the serpent and the snake with legs; Salamander

we see this analogy consistently throughout this genre, that the branching of the human body limbs is being directly compared to analogous with the branching of a tree

that’s the whole point and theme of this myth theme

branching of a tree equals (is like, is analogous with) branching of human limbs, therefore it is consistent to read her pressed-together legs as negating possibility branching.

it is a message about Branching expressed by the morphology of her body limbs

Angle of Arms of Cap, Trunk, & Eve

8:26 AM May 1, 2022 oh my god – the angle of Eve’s arms and Adam’s arms match the angle of the ramifications holding up the mushroom cap and of the tree’s arms.

i’ve already established in the genre this is genre left arm equals possibility thinking right arm equals eternity thinking and there I have just proved that the left arm holding up the cap as I speculated yesterday holding up the mushroom cap means possibility thinking and the right arm holding up the mushroom cap means eternity thinking

There is similarity of the arms left and right holding up the round cap and Eve’s angle of her arms holding the round cap.

this similarity drives home my point that the morphology of the tree is being compared to the morphology of Eve’s body regarding branching limbs and regarding two ways of thinking and two states of consciousness:

the non-mushroom, left-arm state of consciousness is branching thinking

and the mushroom-induced right arm is the loose cognitive state of experiencing, which is non-branching thinking.

The initial, branching way of thinking, which is left leg & arm /limb, ultimately rests on the the non-branching underlying reality which is revealed in loose cog state (ribs), regardless of whether you’re conscious of that underlying non-branching reality or not.

the left foot stands on, is based on, the right foot.

the serpent bringing the mushroom with its revelation of underlying non-branching is looking at Eve’s right arm.

I read this out on tonight’s recording of the ego death mystery show it’s 10:12 PM April 30, 2022 I read this out on tonight’s show recording as I realized it in real time :

I caught Panofsky saying falsehoods to Wasson.

Panofsky’s second letter brought to us by Brown , Brown, & Brown:

even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification; if the artists had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree he would have omitted the branches altogether.

Erwin Panofsky, 2nd letter to Gordon Wasson, May 12, 1952

Artists SOMETIMES cut off branches, at Panofsky’s request, to form proper, branch-free Pilzbaum. that is:

Panofsky failed to account for cut branches, a definitive theme of Pilzbaum, all fully explained by the Egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control).

But I did a quick inventory of Canterbury Psalter and determined that about 10 out of 75 mushroom plants lack any branching or cut branches.

and my explanation of this is :

the mushroom imagery Christian artists do this to establish that, yes we are really talking about psychoactive Psilocybin Mushrooms, but the primary by far is ramifications, which Panofsky brittlely overstates.

and also the 2006 main Article begins with a literal mushroom Cubensis in a cathedral stained glass window that has no ramification traces, thus providing another example of how Erwin Panofsky is simply wrong and is making false assertions, when he says that every mushroom tree has ramifications to some extent.

that is simply not true

and these are all coherently artistically classified together, so you cannot claim that there’s a different type of image or object in the artwork; these are consistent subvariations within a generally uniform class, of mushroom plants in Christian art.

we consistently see

some 37% of mushroom plants have cut branches and

some 10% of mushroom plants have neither cut branches nor branching features added, but are morphologically literal mushroom shapes.

May 4, 2022 addendum

Pilzbaum Pairs (TM Cybermonk)

what the templates desire to show, which all the artists agreed which the artist wanted to show, was not “mushrooms”; what the templates and the artists wanted to show is the *combination of mushrooms and branches and cut branches*, in order to convey that mushrooms bring the state of consciousness (which Panofsky mentions as the mushrooms induce ecstasy despite him saying Christians in the middle ages would have no reason to want to show mushrooms, yet he contradicts himself saying that witches might want to ingest toadstools to induce ecstasy).

also Pulaski draws a false dichotomy between wanting to depict tree versus wanting to depict Mushroom.

in fact the artists and the templates wanted to depict mushrooms to induce ecstasy which reveals a move of experiencing from branching to nonbranching.

also if Panofsky argues that if artist want to depict mushrooms, they would leave off the branches

thats proven false, because why do art historians call these Pilzbaum ; Mushroom Trees?

Clearly the Mushroom Trees can have do have branches, and yet still looks so much like mushroom trees, that we art historians called them “Mushroom Trees”,

thus proving that it is not necessary to omit branches to still convey a Mushroom image

furthermore we have instances like Eustace window of the lion carrying the youth off , where are depicted pointedly and expressly depicted for us by the artist is what I have designated today a new discovery concept called which I call “Pilzbaum Pairs”.

“Pilzbaum Pairs”, Concept discovered yesterday and phrase coined by Cybermonk, May 4, 2022 , which against Panofsky’s final argument, shows that Mushroom artists depicted Mushroom Trees both with Ramifications and ALSO deliberately with no ramifications added in sharp contrast against each other because they wanted to show that contrast, like showing cut branches on a branching mushroom tree.

Panofsky fails to mention that the distorted templates schematized tree schematizations don’t only have added branches .

he failed to mention that they also have added cut branches as a defining feature these trees by definition the definitive feature is the contrast of branching versus not branching in conjunction with the Mushrooms

that is what the artists wanted to depict and that is what the artists freely chose to depict, by employing the distorted Diagrams Witch were deliberately distorted to look like mushrooms with both added branches and with cut branches in sharp contrast

that was the whole message was the experiential contrast which is revealed by the Mushrooms. – Cybermonk

End of May 4 2022 addendum

Michael Hoffman, April 30, 2022

Contents:

links work on desktop Edge/Chrome:

• Dionysus & Ariadne in Chariot
• Hand Hold Branch
• Feb. 2026 Commentary
• May 2022 Commentary
• Panofsky Wrong (News Flash)
• Hatsis is the Ultimate Committed Skeptic Dogmatist Ideologue
• Spear of Destiny Right Side Wound
• See Also

Dionysus & Ariadne in Chariot

Hand Hold Branch

Feb. 2026 Commentary

Feb. 10, 2026 – in Apr-Aug 2025 I did hard work, revising my Core theory – like I did per Coraxo in 2000 who corrected my myth Gnostm theory and core theory to cover not only a basic 2-level model (mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism) but 3-level:

1. basic possibilism-thinking
2. basic eternalism-thinking
3. qualified possibilism-thinking + eternalism-thinking; integrated possibilism/eternalism thinking – thanks to Dionysus and Ariadne victory wedding procession mosaic. & Y-holding rebis.

May 2022 Commentary

May 2022:

now I cringe when I hear my recordings of me only saying that she “holds” the branch, and I failed (for a day) to say which hand, so now I’m yelling at myself yelling “in which hand you idiot, in which hand, you idiot; you’re supposed to say holding it in her left hand!!

9:35 AM May 1, 2022 Dionysus left hand which steers the mushroom tigers also is in control of the branch which Ariadne presumes to hold and steer. 9:36 AM this means Dionysus’ left hand and Ariadne’s left hand are both on the branch that she holds, thus associating Dionysus’ left hand with branching.

major update to this page to add the handedness point that I was too blind to see before – even though I “deliberately looked” for it! 🙈

[🙄 skipping straight to the damn point: I was stupid until just now, I failed to see that: ]

Ariadne holds a branching branch in her left hand, and Dionysus holds a non-branching spear in his right hand.

even after deliberately looking at the mosaic specifically to look for handedness but I looked through a Carl Ruck type negative lens of negativity , or a hatsis mentality saying to myself something like “handedness would be anachronistic”

I was in that kind of a negative mood of “I don’t see their feet”

I just I didn’t look hard enough

the short story is, I didn’t look hard enough.

LOOK HARDER

I looked deliberately, but I did not look long enough.

I did not systematically inventory all of their hands and feet, and I missed out on the most important hand of all!

of course, obviously, what an idiot, how can I be so stupid?!

why did I not look to see what hand Ariadne is holding the branch with?!

and this is just after focusing on “Eve tempted by the serpent”: which branch is she holding her hand in ; which hand does she hold the branch with?

and then in that context of that first discovery (that Ariadne is holding a branch and that Dionysus is holding a spear

but why did it not yet occur to me to ask obviously which hand is she holding the branch in ?

how could I not think of that, given the context of my recent discoveries?

it doesn’t make any sense

why It would not occur to me to think of that

I talked about and I joked about and I showed image crops of Ariadne and her stupid branch

and yet it didn’t even occur to me , it didn’t even occur to me to ask , of course obviously: what hand?

are we able to see the hand ?

and the answer is yes , we are able to see the hand

we are able to see Ariadne’s hand

And it is her left hand.

are we able to see Dionysus hand?

the answer is yes.

which hand is it , guess which hand it is

it is his right hand, of course.

EGODEATH MYTHEME THEORY TESTED AND CONFIRMED YET AGAIN

after deliberately looking at the mosaic specifically to look for handedness – but I looked through a coral rock type negative lens of negativity or a hatis saying that “handedness would be anachronistic”

I was in that kind of a negative mood of “I don’t see their feet”

I just I didn’t look hard enough

the short stories I didn’t look hard enough

I looked deliberately but I did not look long enough

I did not systematically inventory all of their hands and feet

and I missed out on the most important hand of all

of course obviously what an idiot , how can I be so stupid

why did I not look to see what hand she was holding the branch with?!?! 😞😵

DUH!

Ariadne holds the branch in her left hand, and Dionysus holds the non-branching spear in his right hand.

– that’s this follow up announcement now after may be a day ago I noticed and announced that she’s holding a branch in contrast to the spear. it all seems so obvious now]

after I created this page just for no great compelling reason but just as a follow up having made the great breakthrough yesterday

but then as soon as I created this page, all of a sudden, I saw a major , major thing that I had completely screwed up and totally failed to perceive before, just after I finished complaining about how blind I’ve been and I realized –

I was taking an inventory Of each days breakthrough this week to see the trajectory

and this little mosaic slipped through the cracks because I had not created a page and I was complaining bitterly about how I had failed to see that she was holding a branch, all between 2006 and 2022 is the extent of my stupidity and blindness & cluelessness and imperception

and so a day afterwords after mentally grasping the import of the branch which means possibility thinking expressed with with the emphasis on the branching aspect, I realized that yes this was a significant interpr gap and therefore yesterday’s realization that she was holding a branch is major & does warrant a page

this is on the same order of magnitude as my other breakthroughs this week. BUT that was only regarding the branch versus Spear contrast; I still when I created “too late to catch the realtime breakthrough”, created this page a few minutes ago, I still – to this point a- had failed to even think of asking which hand she holds it in or whether we can see that – even though , even though I had deliberately looked at this mosaic maybe yesterday.

but I did a really sloppy job of that, a real failure of perception , which should really cast a strong doubt on my ability to assess these images – even though I am the expert 🤯

and after I created this page retroactively a few minutes ago for retroactive purposes then it struck me and I took another look and I am sad to say that I made a big discovery 9:34 PM April 30 2022 that even when I looked, and even when I’ve been telling you about this mosaic, how happy and mad I am that I saw this branch and failed to see it before, even when I’ve been telling you that for the past day or whatever, I still failed – I even looked at this –

get this:

I even deliberately looked at the picture the other day; I even did a deliberate handedness assessment of this mosaic the other day, and I came up empty-handed, because that is how embarrassingly blind and unperceptive I am

I said that “Alas, this favorite mosaic fails to employ the language of handedness ☹️”

I falsely concluded that after looking at the mosaic 🤯😞😵

now explain to me how in the hell, how in the HELL did I fail to see the crucial, central, important fact that the maiden is clearly, visibly, explicitly, holding the branch in her left hand??

9:34 PM April 30, 2022:

Ariadne holds branch in left hand & Dionysus holds non-branching spear in right hand

– there, I was full of sht : I said that “this mosaic…” a few hours ago and maybe the past day I said to myself that “this mosaic has no handedness theme 😢”.

I was wrong wrong wrong very wrong, obviously wrong, as wrong as I’ve been!

typing in timestamp here I just noticed handedness , at 9:34 PM April 30 , 2022

you have got to apply make yourself and force yourself to draw a grid over the image and don’t give me this casual sloppy eyes shut careless glossing over it

no you have to make a list , an inventory list

I want every damn foot, every damn hand,

every damn leg every limb every paw what an embarrassment the other day like yesterday I looked at this mosaic and came away empty

Panofsky Wrong (News Flash)

I wanted to tell the falsehood

I revealed Panofsky said something very very extremely false and extremely wrong I caught him in a major major error

Panofsky asserts in his second letter that all pilzbaum, all mushroom Trees PILZBAUM have ramifications

and I did a quick stats inventory a Canterbury Psalter 75 mushroom trees and determined about 10 of them have no branching attributes no ramifications 10 out of 75 which says that were Panofsky is 13.33% false and full of it telling a falsehood that all mushroom trees have ramifications that is not true

13 1/3% have no room ramifications and in fact the worlds least flawed Article my main 2006 article begins with a mushroom plant in Christian art, impeccable Christian Art –

Hatsis is the Ultimate Committed Skeptic Dogmatist Ideologue

There were no psilocybin mushrooms in England before 1975.

Letcher Hatsis

and Thomas Hatsis cannot do his dirty sleazy tricks to try to dismiss it is saying well this particular cathedral stained glass window doesn’t count because of some dumbass reason excuse I pulled out of my azz two seconds ago, post hoc, making up rules to desperately try to delegitimate one by one each isolated instance

1500 examples of psilocybin mushroom and he says

instance number 123 doesn’t count because some reason I just made up

and instance number 124 doesn’t count, because of this other reason that I just made up , that I’m going to arbitrarily label as “sound, tried and true historical method”.

and this post-hoc, make sht up as you go, continuously change the rules as needed, and set the rules for, 1500 individual rules fabricated on the spot, as needed, to dismiss each of 1500 instances of mushroom imagery in Christian art.

This is the “sound tried-and-true” level of quality that a Psychedelic Witch – or beginner fake witch, rather – tries to bring to, the extremist Dogmatist, the most dogmatic Dogmatist Ideologue of them all, Thomas Hatsis.

https://psychedelichistorian.com/the-dogmatists-debacle/

no matter what mushroom imagery you give him in Christian art, he will always be dedicated and fully devoted, fervently, dogmatically devoted to making sht up excuses & invent new rules one by one

invent and fabricate rules on the spot on a case by case, willy-nilly, arbitrary basis –

that this mushroom tree doesn’t count, because it’s not deemed by him as devotional,

and this one doesn’t count because that cathedral was too out-of-the-way,

and this other mushroom doesn’t count, because it’s in a cathedral, but the story that it’s telling isn’t of a relevant type of theology

and this other mushroom doesn’t count Because it’s shape is liberty cap – as I have already inserted in email personal communication to Cybermonk:

The shape of the Liberty Cap is anachronistic. You want to play with the big kids, so please consider that the “holy mushroom” fails all the safeguards of history that protect good ideas from ridiculous ones. If not, please explain your hypothesis in the following terms. 3. Anachronisms (y’all got a BIG problem here!)

Thomas Hatsis personal communication to Cybermonk, 2021, Idea Development Page 12 https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#Tom-Hatsis-Reply-to-Me

in case you were wondering what the “sound, tried-and-true historical method” exactly is, that’s it right there: it means make sht up on an ad-hoc, case by case basis, driven by dogmatic ideologue fervor at any cost.

the new instant-rule doesn’t even have to make any sense, in order to strive to delegitimate and neutralize and remove Psilocybin from the Eucharist at any cost.

be as dogmatic as possible and never accept any mushroom imagery, no matter what, because if are a true devotee of Carlos Ginzburg, if you’re a true follower of Hatsis, this means adhering to a fervent, absolute commitment, a committed skeptic,

that you will do absolutely anything necessary to individually isolate each instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art

and do anything you can dream up, on an individual, make it up on a case-by-case basis, and label that intensively fanatical, doctrinaire, prejudiced bias as “sound, tried-and-true historical method”.

as long as you achieve the goal, the Great Mission of amateur, beginner Psychedelic Witch Thomas Hatsis: to delete Psilocybin mushrooms from the Eucharist, and replace them by scopolamine deliriants instead.

come up with any excuse you could possibly think of

spare no expense

don’t be embarrassed about the worst flimsiest excuses and pretexts

be extremely dogmatic and absolutely close minded

The motivation for creating this webpage is that in retrospect I feel that the magnitude of this comprehension and grasping and realization and perception is significant enough to warrant a tracking webpage to place the date timestamp and arrange to help arrange and track and keep track of these the sequence of breakthroughs about handedness and about branching versus nonbranching

Because it is a real head scratcher very puzzling to me

I thought that I figured out branching versus nonbranching hypothesis completely figured out October 2010

what did they announce in Thanksgiving 2011 if not this?

ditto 2012 and 2013 and 2015 and 2020 and March 2022 and

how have I gotten all the way here since 2003 building out my Mytheme catalog of comprehension and literacy

it is kind of kind of frustrating and puzzling and baffling and mystifying

I don’t understand how I didn’t perceive and realize and comprehend all of this

why are the scales still falling from my eyes at this late date?

how have I not figured out all of these things and perceived and comprehended all these aspects?

aren’t all of these aspects simply directly implied already from my breakthroughs of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2020, early 2021, March 2022,

and yet five hours ago, I finally grasped the main stump cut trunk

and this morning that eve holds branch in left hand, only finally at this very late day 36 years after the very late too late date when I begin Transcendent Knowledge development on back to the future day, October 26, 1985.

I don’t understand how I didn’t grasp the branch* with the left hand already November 2013 and October 2010 etc.

(*HUGE massive irony right here – the above sentence/ joking turn of phrase refers to “why didn’t I understand painting Eve tempted by the serpent where Eve is reaching up to hold the branch with her left hand”. You see, this section of this page was my initial pass of commentary, about a day after I recognized Dionysus’ victory ariadne is holding the branch. but the above & paragraphs were was written a few minutes before I realized “oh my God “holding a branch left hand” exactly describes Dionysus mosaic; the PRESENT art piece, as well! Ariadne holds (her own) branch with her left hand, just as Eve holds the branch of Tree of Knowledge! 🤯 so then I had to rush to truly make good use of this new webpage by adding the huge rest of the story to yesterday’s realization , yesterday’s half half-baked realization, the half of the half breakthrough, and I had to hasten to complete it now. )

I don’t understand how you can know so much and be so literate at the language of methane is Mythemese and yet fail to grasp these elementary basic fundamental observations

im praying to Paul Thagard Model: what the hell is going on ?

I don’t understand

what is involved when you build out a theory

what does it mean to revise Theory connections and strengthen theory connections

and it seems like I’m just discovering the same things over and over again trapped in a déjà vu loop , stuck condemned and cursed forever for making basic elementary Breakthroughs in mytheme Decoding

which all proves that I have not been basic literate; I have not achieved basic literacy

this kind of a

I should be discovering little details at this point; I should not be discovering major gaps that I was at fault for

anyway this immediate creating this page is because this Dionysus mosaic which is included in my 2006 main Article main article “the complete explanation of all transcendent knowledge” circa 2006

the ego death community contributed the Dionysus mosaic with ariadne holding a branch, right next to an exact parallel with in an exact parallel with Dionysus Dionysus holding a double tipped spear nonbranching

how did they go well what

first of all what is the date timestamp? it’s probably in one of the recent weblog postings and I need to copy it to here.

and then I need to update my discovery log my mobile version of my discovery log , webpage, and make a whole bunch of entries and

eventually what I would like to have and what I need to have:

I need to differentiate what is the difference between my breakthrough of say 2003, 2006 regarding Mythology Interpretation image art , 2010 Branching paths in the forest preserve ; branching paths, walking on the path

what is the difference in my November 2011 announcements and my 2012, 2013, 2015,; November 7, 2015 versus Christmas 2015

what did I not understand, and how did I not understand that , given the other things that I understood?

this is unclear

but I should be able to – and anybody should be able to explain it to me

what I didn’t know and why I didn’t know that particular angle, that connection, that aspect

Paul Thagard can help me out in his Models of Theory build out , Theory Development, Theory expansion, and theory revision, especially theory

especially the broad concept and model of theory revision

Paul Thagard the book conceptual revolutions is pretty much ideal for helping me in this head scratcher

I am undergoing Theory Development or rather he would say theory revision

I am experiencing firsthand theory revision , which is a very broad general term

and this is a puzzling experience

how can I know these ten equations That I discovered and yet it turns out that there’s 10 more elementary equations that go hand-in-hand that are almost just different angles on those very same elementary equations

this is puzzling to me

Isn’t handedness Mythology theme the same thing tantamount to the two mental models

didn’t i already literally announce everything ; “all about branching versus nonbranching and how that’s connected to handedness “?

didn’t I already cover all the main angles?

this is all elementary stuff

how is it that I’m still making elementary, beginner, basic observations at this late date ?

I don’t understand

I’m getting more signaling indicators that I’m illiterate, than that I am literate

but because I’m able to formulate this question, I do believe that there are straightforward answers that I can readily investigate, through Egodeath Yahoo Group posts for example

Spear of Destiny Right Side Wound

8:56 AM May 1, 2022 – the {spear} is to be understood in mythology as non-branching and ego death through experiencing non-branching in the Psilocybin mushroom state.

this includes Douris’ kylix (mushroom drinking saucer) of Jason serpent tree of the Hesperides of golden apples of imperishable immortality guarded by many-eyed Python,

with Athena holding the spear in the middle of the scene, gorgon breastplate aegis with bearded serpents. holds owl of Minerva (in left arm).

Sacrificed ram of golden fleece isomorphic with the sacrificed Jason steersman’s possibility-branching thinking.

Remember always inventory the hands of what they are touching and the feet and what they are touching:

Athena’s right hand holds the nonbranching spear and also Jason’s right hand touches that non-branching spear – 9:09 AM May 1, 2022

the spear does not mean time so much as the Morphology of the spear is non-Branching

so don’t think of the spear firstly as time, because that’s a little bit too abstract but emphasize instead the spear’s plainly visible morphology equals that of the vine and serpent.

What causes a fatal wound in the right side and the new rebirth is not time, but rather, specifically, non-branching of personal steersman control and of possibility in the world.

the snake is non-branching; the spear is non-branching; time and control and possibility are non-branching, and our future control thoughts are single and stationary and already always exist.

See Also

• 2 POVs Married: End Up Permanently Having Two Vantage Points of View, Across Both States of Consciousness

unfortunately I didn’t state a timestamp but the present time is 7:18 PM April 30, 2022 and my authoring app tells me that I created this page 3 hours ago which would make it approximately 4:19 PM and probably earlier than that, I realized that the trunk was cut not nearly like I mentioned Christmas 2015 not merely that the site ramifications were cut (in the statue-supporting trunks. but believe it or not , it wasn’t until three hours ago that I considered the meaning of the main trunk being cut

I had simply unthinkingly assumed that was for practical reasons of supporting the statue) but that the whole damn tree was cut!!

Although I wrote about cut branches it probably December 2013 in the wake of the Lucas Cranach “eve tempted by the serpent”, breakthrough , my branching formula breakthrough tree vs snake = possibilism vs eternalism (sans left vs right limb recog yet alas 😞😞 – my present reconstruction is that I got one step closer to that when I Christmas 2015 Roasting Salamander Dancing man I said Right equals eternity left equals possibility but I do not think I quite connected that with branching specifically the word Branching in the mental picture of branching like I don’t think I connected that to the tree depicting the mysterious meaningless anomalous Branching of the defective Mushroom Trees which I did not comprehend yet)

but I don’t think I quite saw the connection of the idea of the cut stump, the cut across the top of the stump that the statues lean against

I gained partial understanding of the anomalous frivolous meaningless Branching defect of mushroom trees in November 2020 and I pretty much fully decoded Canterbury main climactic image and yet still I feel my gut assessment it was only 2022 when I really actually truly got it that the branching frivolous meaningless defects of the trees were the entire message of the branching Message Mushroom Trees then I immediately discovered Branching

mandrake in the general theme of branching Message Trees and I did not get that all at once on Christmas 2015 even though I identified left equals possibility and right leg equals depending on eternity thinking but I did not surprisingly you would think that these are all the same thing but they’re not I did not understand the formula Christmas 2015 I believe I did not discover the formula which I discovered November 2020 that “left equals Branching illusion and right equals nonbranching revelation”. these are some reasons why only today or what was it an hour ago was it yesterday [ans: it was < 12 hours ago today, just this morning, 6:15am! At this point it feels as if I have known for a long time realized in comprehend it you will say it’s obvious now that I have done the hard heavy lifting work the Eve is holding onto the branch with her left arm which fits the pattern that {left limb equals Branching Thinking}] I think the time is a blur only today[true!] or yesterday or whenever

i finally recognize that Eve tempted by the serpent – I always said “she holds onto a branch, so thats a count of 4 branching signals” – but only today[true] or yesterday[no] did I say specifically, “she holds onto the branch with left hand, because left Lim equals Branching Thinking”

this explicit, pointed comprehension is a couple of steps beyond what I knew what I discovered in my great 2013 but limited – yes , limited incomplete – Breakthrough of 2013 November

And by likewise limited and still incomplete Breakthrough of Christmas 2015 dancing man right foot equals eternity thinking announcement, but still still did not pull all the pieces together

and even the Thanksgiving 2020 Canterbury Miracle Decoding, even then, I still did not pull all the pieces together!!

And so the saga continues, that I keep re-discovering the same thing/ breakthrough over and over every year, but deeper and I looked back and I say “oh I got it , but I did not adequately fully comprehend/get it yet”

I think I thought of that I know I –

This connection, this realization is comparable to my recent grasp of the lizard as a snake with legs in contrast to my December 2013 realization of that the lizard was vaguely equivalent to a serpent but I did not think of lizard, I believe, as a “snake with branching-off legs” back then.

offhand, (I think a few days ago late April 2022 , I got a really good grasp of “serpent as snake with legs”, although you could trace that back to maybe when I first observed lizard on statue stump , first noted that, maybe November 2020 in the Canterbury Psalter tree of knowledge with the snake with the snake with the rear leg

I have a picture here on a Post-it note from Egodeath Yahoo Group Where I discussed and I explained to a medical student the cut side branches off of the staff of Aesculapius the healer

but I do not think, as far as I know, I don’t remember grasping and comprehending why a statue leans against a stump, and the cut of the entire stump means an altogether elimination of branching.

https://entheomedia.net/Mithras_notes.doc – entheos: the journal of psychedelic spirituality: the cover with the awful reversed screwup image on the cover: YOU CANT DO THAT! 🤦‍♂️

✋🚫:

“A Roman relief in the National Museum of Copenhagen depicts him in his customary Phrygian attire, with the Mithraic Sol and Luna; he holds the pinecone in one hand, a staff, growing as a sheaf of grain, in the other. To his right, is the raven, with a fillet in its beak, perched atop a stump, up which coils the serpent, so essential for his cult, and also a lizard and a frog; a turtle nearby is between the god’s legs. Beside the raven is a caduceus, and the whole stump, raven, etc. culminate in a multi-branching vine with grape clusters like pine cones and strange funnel-shaped flowers, above which is the bust of Sol, with the Eucharistic cup in his solar aura. Balancing this configuration, on the left side, is the bull, pouring his blood into vessels and a ‘fiery’ drinking horn; above him is the Phrygian cap beside chiastic crossed rods or torches and the thunderbolt of Zeus, with whom Sabazios was also identified; and above that is Luna. On either side of the god’s head are additional caps surmounted by horns and a cross. In the gable is the solar charioteer, with the Dioscouroi and their stars on either side. Florets above the head of Sol and a balance scale above the head of Luna hint at an herbalist apothecary, as does the fungal object, perhaps a pestle, beside, or possibly in the hand, of Luna, as well as the additional floret beneath the vessels filling with bull’s blood at the bottom. There is a fly (not a bee) above the turtle between the god’s legs, and another one beside Luna’s fungal object, identifying it as the fly-agaric. Inverted cups or fungal caps are seen beside the raven’s stump. They may be both, an overturned cup and a (drained) cap, something that may have a parallel in the Liberty Cap used to collect food/alms (herbs?).”

The footnotes about the Mithras article also discussed pruning and pruning hook pruning and cut trunk – axe

oh yeah I was gonna say axe- the article notes talk about the axe in Mithras iconography

an axe to cut the tree stump cut stump with axe ; sword and blade to cut branching, and the youth cutting the mushroom tree branching

See Also

Webpage at the site

http://egodeathTheory.wordpress.com

Webpage about

sacrifice knives

one or two webpages

ready for the harvest

I don’t even have any pictures of vine-leaf trees from Canterbury Psalter ready to go

as if im not worn out from msh trees,

all kinds of ideas for first-class treatment of vine leafs

the Maximal vine leaf theory of religious art

to do: spend the next year cataloging every vine leaf tree in Canterbury Psalter 😵⚰️💀🕰

or you could just refer to Dr. Rut’s conjecture that the Greeks must’ve had psychoactive ivy, and that’s why they showed it in their mythology. 👍

there’s a nice & concrete, tangible theory that even a child could understand and appreciate.

Canterbury has leaves in the caps of the msh trees

so why would you have a leaf or leaves in the cap of the mushroom trees?

because the leaves are to be understood as vine leaf non-branching; branching-averse; tendency to not branch, leaves.

I speak on behalf of all clueless entheogen scholars when I say, when I express our feelings: This art is really letting us down. 😞

this is not what we signed up for

we did not sign up for stupid branches and stupid vine leaves and vines, and snakes

we’re not here for snakes, darn it (unless ingesting their toxin is really good).

That was totally the state of entheogen scholarship when I joined the field in 1999 to read the state of the literature.

why are vine-leaf trees in parallel with mushroom trees, when nobody wants stupid leaf trees, any more than people want Ariadne in the chariot with Dionysus is holding a stupid branch

🤔 what, did the Greeks have psychoactive branches?? Check Ruck to identify what type of psychoactive branch she’s holding.

what are all these stupid branches doing cluttering up our religious art, diluting our mushrooms 😠

I’m not finding the full complete mosaic through this view. I’ll have to switch to a different view to get the mosaic, the big complete picture, to appear.

We brilliant scholars (learned, learned!) have figured out the savage forebears’ crude, superstitious taboo, just like our latest theories of 1880 have carefully explained that they must have worshiped:

The Holy Branch

The Sacred Branch

The Holy Branch (the ancient Greeks must’ve had an extinct, special psychoactive variety of branch – that explains it!)

people want mushroom caps

why all these dud leaf trees in place of msh trees, same style?

why every time you see a mushroom-cap tree in the Canterbury Psalter, it’s always paired with a stupid, dud failure of a vine-leaf tree too?

very disappointed in Eadwine

vine leaves have nothing to do with Dionysus, fruit of the vine, I am the true vine

there is no grapevines in religious art nor is there any ivy vines in any Greek mythology

but if there were, it would indicate definitely the Greeks must’ve had psychoactive ivy.

If the ultimate meaning and reference of Greek mythology is the Mushroom 🍄 then we can just copy and paste our ingenious decoding and decipherment of the mushroom as the ultimate referent of mythology, to realize that every object in mythology must refer to a physical plant object that the ancients primitives worshiped this object:

The Mushroom 🍄.

or equivalently, because our theory of entheogens is so broad: the Datura plant object, Lilies for the Virgin: the sacred holy Lily object (considered in the crude, concretistic Ruck paradigm theory, dressed up with language that’s turgid, effusive, florid, not-even-English, to hide the fact that the Moderate entheogen school’s got no substance).

Entheos: the journal Of psychedelic spirituality, where ‘spirituality’ ultimately means:

SPOT THE MUSHROOM 🍄

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=where%27s+waldo+books+for+kids&crid=OASD2IQTJ8OK&sprefix=where%27s+waldo%2Caps%2C127&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_2_13

Entheos toc’s 4 issues:

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/24/entheos-issues-1-4-mark-hoffman/

and also the same school of art Interpretation explains that the reason why the snake is the number one religious myth theme is because of shedding its skin and because of its toxin – which shedding & toxin has been represented throughout religious art zero times.

despite the shape of the snake universally ubiquitously everywhere, and vine leaves and vine trees and vine grapevine Madness , Dionysus is overgrowing the ship of pirates, completely taking over the artwork

Dionysus’ victory wedding procession with ivy vines grapevines growing from the wine mixing krater

Vinefest 2022

☘️-☘️-☘️-🍄-☘️-☘️-☘️

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/20/vine-leaf-trees-depicting-non-branching/

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/04/21/forget-mushroom-trees-vine-leaf-trees-are-what-its-really-all-about/

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/

I forgot how many half hearted half-baked avoidance web posts webpages I’ve already made trying to avoid engaging with this extra burden

these damn vines growing all over the place taking over the whole ship

and they’re not even psychoactive 😠👎

But it’s as certain as Wasson and Ruck have deduced that the ancients must have had special, water-soluble ergot, that’s an extinct strain – yeah, that’s the ticket – just with that amount of certainty, we can be sure that the ancients must’ve had psychoactive ivy.

that totally explains why there’s ivy throughout religious art 😑

🔪🗡

Hypothesis, of interpretation of mushroom imagery in Christian art:

in Plainc fresco, we are to mentally contrast, holding up the mushroom cap, contrast the left ramification versus the right ramification.

The serpent head, and fruit that the non-branching serpent inevitably brings, are near the right ramification, and the left ramification is placed behind.

From bottom panel of same picture as above, establishing the mushroom altered-state context of the green canopy tree above.

Against Letcher Hatsis’ assertion that we have no way to tell whether this is a dinner mushroom – that’s false, because we are shown John Rush’s celestial erection/ lifted garment, proving that Moses is indicated as in an altered state from Psilocybin, plainly depicted/indicated, together with three uniform mushrooms in Moses’ hem folds, but not in the other guys’ hem folds in the same panel, proving deliberate signification of psychoactive, Psilocybin mushroom.

8:14 AM April 30, 2022 this gives me an idea, reading the posting that I just published Eve holds branch with left hand. Reading that paragraph in the previous post give me an idea a mental picture of the three ramifications there is a added left and an added to write the artist has added a pair of ramifications which consist of left versus right contrast the two to represent the two mental models and then the third the stem can represent nonbranching reality as well as the right ramification also representing that but more in a contrast so first mentally picture a non-Branching Trunk stem and then in contrast visualize the mushroom tree Mushroom caps which are held up by a Y configuration morphology

now overlay a Y configuration , which contrasts {left versus right} theme, overlaid on top of the simple non-branching Trunk/ stem/ pole.

regarding in that post i was reading my paragraph my paragraph in which I wrote that from memory you have to be able to describe the plaincruel msh tree else you are a loser and outsider and you understand nothing unless you are able to describe from memory you have to draw from memory

can you draw from memory the planecorral fresco mushroom tree

in fact if I really challenge you :

draw from memory …

you are not a genuine Mushroom arguer you are not

you are not participating in this scholarly slap fight for real in a serious way unless you are capable – but you are not, because you’re a poser – you are not capable of drawing the planecrop fresco from memory. 👎😠

I challenge to you losers you fake posers who pretend to slap fight each other but you do a terrible job of it

prove that you’re not a fake

prove that you know how to draw a Plaincourault fresco from memory

and when I’m grading your papers, here’s how I’m going to grade you:

did you show Eve standing on her right foot?

did you draw the three ramifications holding up the cap?

With the left ramification hidden behind the pole stem – Or does the snake head hide it?

because here Brown puts forth his incorrect Interpretation which has pushed me to one up him to show him who is the boss of art Interpretation Mushroom Christian Art and show that every time he makes interpretation I make the correct one that all he does is point in the correct direction unlike everyone before him he sets up the shot and then I get the ball in the hole or whatever shot and then I get the ball

Brown sets up the shot and then I score of the goal he talks about her ribs he makes the correct effort he makes the correct type of analysis unlike Carl rock with his stupid 1880 era outdated anthropology C cyber disciple.wordpress.com regarding the titles of webpage titled anthropology theories outdated equals John allegro John Allegro equals 1880 theory of fertility philosophy plus just add stupid jumbo kitty Mushroom Of infantile children’s books Ruck-level concretistic thinking Based on rocks crude primitive superstitious and taboo driven thinking that he employs and that he’s limited to

this was how the primitives tried to reason about how our bettors our ancestors created religious Mythology before we went Idiocracy mode and lacked inspiration from The Mushroom, Devo de-evolution, before the decline of IQ which produce the likes of Carl Rut with his primitive superstitious taboo 1880-era backwards crude concrete attempted explanation of what our superiors in the pre-modern era all knew, unlike us

and so I had to struggle for 1999 through 2022

that’s 23 years of my having to struggle to understood what all of our superiors earlier in history knew, that left hand equals branching = possibility thinking, and right hand equals nonbranching equals eternity thinking; pre-existence of control thoughts; the narrow way of Jesus the disappoints his followers they leave him and no longer follow him

but have I got to my point yet I doubt it

the three ramifications holding up the cap are left, middle ,and right

against Brown and his primitive Taboo superstitious backwards concrete childish thinking as we see manifested by the crude attempts of 1880 anthropology PhD professors in there backwards crude primitive and superstitious theorizing in the universities with John allegro says just add mushrooms and you’ve got the perfect witches brew of backwards superstitious misreading of our ancestors’ superior knowledge and comprehension and sophistication.

See cyberdisciple.wordpress.com Articles: John Allegro anthropology outdated theories of mythology

One day I will get to the point

the last ramification of the planecrawl Fresco Mushroom tree equals the left ramification equals possibility thinking, and the right ramification equals eternity thinking

because Brown, together with Brown & Brown, speculates on the meaning of the ramifications holding up the cap

And their meaning is wrong; Brown & Brown & Brown speculate that the ramifications holding up the cap represent the three dimensional perspective which these inept artists (or “some especially ignorant craftsman” per Art Historian Erwin Panofsky’s 2nd letter to Wasson) were incapable of representing, because they are crude and primitive and backwards and superstitious, and could not have understood anything as sophisticated as we do , that the left ramification represents the egoic delusion of possiblism; possibility-branching thinking, and that the right ramification represents eternity thinking

and whenever we have a trident or whenever we have a Y branching, which is very popular to hold up the mushroom cap of the mushroom tree with a Y branching

whenever we have a Y, we have the opportunity to say that the left – as in the Canterbury mushroom tree with two men and sword – left equals branching, and the right branch of the tree …

which is entirely cut off as well in the dancing man salamander Roasting Hatsis’ image, the right trunk is completely cut –

non-branching; the right ramification holding up the cap of the planecorral fresco mushroom tree atop the stem

and we know that the stem is not added

here’s a good point:

we know that the central stem which holds up the mushroom cap of the tree is natural

so then what has been artificially added, tacked on in an artificial way onto this tree, is the left ramification and the right ramification

what is the meaning, then, the artist asks us ; I have added a left ramification and I have added an artificial right ramification.

what is the meaning of the left and right ramifications which I have added to the natural stem of this mushroom tree

the answer is :

the left ramification represents egoic delusional ordinary state experience of the overlay the appearance which overlays the reality, the appearance of king steering in a tree; the possibility branching mental world model of self-in-world.

whereas in contrast, the right artificially added ramification represents the other, non-branching experiential mode & non-branching cognitive mode of thinking, eternity thinking, pre-existence of future control thoughts. witch most pointedly ergonomically and distinctively comes from ingesting Psilocybin mushrooms, far more than any other way, or alleged way.

6:16 AM April 30, 2022 breakthrough realization observation by Cybermonk: Eve holds on to branch ( = {branching} ) with LEFT arm/ hand/ limb (which equals branching-thinking; possibilism: the egoic mental model of {king steering in tree})

Major breakthrough discovery realization that seals my theory and proves everything; proves that branching equals left and then non-branching equals right.

if there were any doubt about that handedness association, it has died this moment. I failed to note handedness in November 29, 2013 and that is understandable, but there is no excuse really that I failed to note that immediately as soon as I posted on Christmas 2015 Decoding the Roasting Hatsis’ image from Bennett 1995 Green Gold book essay covered in Samorinis msh tree article 1998. I failed in that I did not on Christmas 2015 I should have returned to the book the power of myth Lucas Cranach painting Eve tempted by the serpent and I should have noted that she holds onto the branch with left arm not right hand 😞

I I have been carrying failure with me from Christmas 2015 until finally opened my eyes and got a clue April 30, 2022 that is 2021-2015 = 6 years January February March April equals four months totals of six years and four months equals 6 1/3 years Of failure to ask the ultra obvious question:

which arm is holding the branch?

🤔

But let’s see, did I actually understand specifically – Christmas 2015, did I specifically post in terms of saying ” left limb equals branching and right limb equals non-branching “?? 🤔

no I don’t think that I made that connection in terms of branching until the Canterbury miracle of November 2020.

if this is how my progress my progression of decoding proceeded then I have only been caring this particular stupidity and blindness from November 2022 April 2022 which is about a year and a half of failure to fold back my connections Discoveries into earlier art I have been failing to go back to earlier art to fold back the connections to revisit I’ve been resting on the laurels and failing to go back to that fruit of knowledge and squeeze that fruit more and get more meaning out of that picture

because it’s not enough

you didn’t finish decoding it

you didn’t finish decoding it !

you didn’t finish decoding it!! 😠

…

we have just received a very firm affirmation that this genre consistently asserts that:

branching equals left ramification limb, and non-branching equals right ramification limb

in this image, we do not rely on the legs, but rather on the arms, to convey the payload message – well or a portion of it – the portion of the message which associates Branching with left limb and non-Branching with Right limb

my speculations have been paying off asking why does the dancing man salamander Roasting image tree have four hands

and why …

a day or two before that I asked

look at a week ago when I asked, from memory

tell me from memory: how many caps does Plaincourault have?

and I failed to know

I had to guess

only a week ago, I failed to know the basic elementary answer to the question “how many caps”

tell me from memory, without looking, without cheating, no web search cheat allowed:

how many caps, or rather how many limbs

How many ramifications does the Plaincourault fresco tree have?

how many caps does the Plaincourault tree have?

which amounts to the question, it really is the question:

how many mushrooms jutting off to the side does the Plaincourault tree have??

are you too stupid to know how many limbs God created humans and animals with?

how many side caps does the Plaincourault fresco have?

you’re pretty damn clueless if you don’t know the answer

it’s four of course

Do you not know how many limbs the human has, how many limbs God created animals with, how many limbs a salamander has?

and so ideally if I can be greedy and say that November 29, 2013 only merely had me trembling for a week in breakthrough of realizing what people knew, both in Greek and Christian (Fritz Graff Greek mythology book and the power of myth Joseph Campbell ) well not Joseph Campbell, he didn’t know anything, but Lucas Cranatch , Painter of Eve tempted by the serpent,

Our superiors before us before the modern period knew about moving the mental model from branching to non-branching, and they associated that contrast, by convention, with moving from the left limb to the right limb.

and if I could be greedy now, I would say:

why did I fail, in my own hand writing I can see that I failed to note in 2013, I failed to take an inventory of HANDEDNESS

you’ve got to inventory the hands

inventory the limbs

you have to inventory the limbs

you have to inventory the limbs!

why could I not have had a total breakthrough November 29, 2013?

why couldn’t I have decoded the {handedness} mytheme at the same time? That waited until my Roasting Salamander Hatsis dancing man Bennett Chris Bennett image Chris Bennett 1995 the book green gold the essay which Samorini a Giorgio Samorini Article on Mushroom Trees mentions and depicts in the amanita column in Figure 20 , the table with two columns and four rows, Of the alleged two types of mushroom trees although my ego death theory enables a far my methane theory theory of myth themes Mythology themes enables us to move far far past Georgios Samorini typology of mushroom tree attributes and classifications for example I do a much much better job than Brown, Brown, & Brown in coming up with a classification scheme that makes sense there’s doesn’t even make sense it fundamentally doesn’t make sense it’s just a random uneven list it’s not symmetrical it’s not it’s not a usable they failed to even and they failed to provide a usable for category uniform buckets and it’s because of their terrible riding looked insane the brown and brown or crazy see what I mean that the old theory is always a train wreck mess and not even a Theory look how they list they go from right to left what the hell what the hell Brown no wonder you come up with a terrible classification scheme that’s not even a sensible uniform agrees why the hell do you inventory the trees from right to left that’s stupid and the result is stupid to my system is actually sensible left to right of course obviously and you provided with this terrible verbose paragraph awful format why don’t you use a bullet list , obviously; what a terrible, less-than-Theory!

great example of how the old theory is poorly expressed, poorly considered – you didn’t think it through

why the hell did you list the trees from right to left ?!

and never both super verbose ,messy very highly messy or too many words a terrible presentation

why didn’t you simply list your categoryagrees

why the hell do you inventory the trees from right to left , that’s stupid, brown, wtf

and naturally, the result is stupid too

my system is actually sensible: left to right, of course, obviously

and you provided with this terrible verbose paragraph , awful format –

why don’t you use a bullet list , obviously?

what a terrible less than Theory

great example of how the old theory is poorly expressed, poorly considered

you didn’t think it through

why the hell did you list the trees from right to left

and not the reverse??

super verbose, messy, very highly messy , too many words

a terrible presentation why didn’t you simply list your category scheme?!

We have very poor writing/formatting from brown, brown & brown, and of course together with that, naturally, hand-in-hand we have very poor classification scheme that doesn’t make basic sense at all as a classification scheme.

referred

I censored myself before, but I’m gonna say it now :

what Brown and Brown present us with is a so-called Chinese encyclopedia or what’s the expression the Chinese dictionary, where you have crazy asymmetrical classification scheme that doesn’t make any sense, and has no uniformity at all

they say mushroom type one is amanita Mushroom type

two is some Kinda Psilocybin

in contrast Mushroom type three is some kind of psilocybe,

meanwhile the spear shaped mushroom tree type is commences Cubensis (!) wtf

It’s a foolish less-than-scheme that brown brown and brown put /cobble sloppily together

more like a 2016 book & 2019 article by Clown, Clown, & Clown 🤡 🤡 🤡 – The SECRET history of HALLUCINOGENS 🍄 in Christianity 🤦‍♂️

my Canterbury Psalter Mushroom plant classification actually makes sense

Left to right (not idiotically sloppily listed right to left, like clown, clown, & clown do):

let’s see if I can do this from memory

yes I can

number one on the left is a Panaeolus and I have specimen photographs to prove it and Paul Stamets book correlates this to to prove that I’m right and they are wrong

number two is liberty cap Because they are spear shaped triangles especially if you look at that pattern in all 75 mushroom plants in the Canterbury Psalter

number three is Cuban sauce, of course because it’s blue and has the rounded cap

And mushroom tree plant number four which God created the four classes of sacred plants plant number four on the right of course is Amanita , which is

the only psychoactive 🍄 that existed in England, before it was artificially brought there in 1975, according to the great psychedelic historian Letcher Hatsis, who assures us that “the Liberty Cap shape is anachronistic” – that’s actually a direct quote of his inarticulate email; See my idea development page 12 for the incomprehensible quotes

articulate, comprehensible corrections invited, (don’t hold breath) – Looking forward to the for sure large huge insight that will arise once I’m corrected on exactly what they wrote; I’m sure it’s not just a varying, indeterminate blob of incomprehensible gibberish ha ha Ha ha ha

which is the jumbo oversized semi tractor truck of mushrooms jumbo kiddie-size infantile childrens book look mummy theres a 🍄 Ruck-level, Dr. Rut concretistic level of theory of crudeness physical object, “the sacred mushroom” as they clumsily say 🤦‍♂️, 1000 times more massive than a Liberty Cap mushroom, which is why the Amanita is the face of Psilocybin mushroom ingestion, and always will be.

Panaeolus

Liberty Cap

Cubensis

Amanita

it takes me to simply , elegantly, and correctly identify the mushrooms on the cover of Brown, Brown, & Brown’s book The psychedelic Gospels , using one hundredth of the word count that they use , in their insane, right to left, garbled, over-verbose, Chinese encyclopedia useless non-classification scheme, in which they get everything wrong

except Amanita 🍄 😞

it’s My idenitification classifivcation scheme is a genuine scheme, unlike their random, Chinese encyclopedia that they present us with, it’s of no use at all, and it’s completely vague, and they completely swap obviously the liberty cabs you see now

I have inventoried in my private-stock web post draft I have categorized every Individually to prove that the breakout is:

the triangle umbrellas of course our liberty And brown, brown & brown completely botched this

they say that the Liberty Cap is a Panaeolus

but when you inventory the whole Salter, as I have done for Over the course of A year maybe February 2021 through February 2022 ( because there are too damn many mushroom trees)

, clearly the triangle umbrellas are liberty cab, not paniolos

Why do I not know offhand how many caps on left and right tge plainc tree has??

oh I remember what I was going to ask here next:

why do I not know from memory whether my catalog of key Mythology themes has left hand and right hand?

but I’m pretty sure

from memory

but I’m pretty sure it does have that … whether my key concepts…

surely, certainly my key concepts catalog must have {right hand} /limb/ leg/ foot/ arm

and I hope the older realization that is there turning to look to the right equals remembering the vision of and retaining the vision of timelessness and mono-possibility, eternalism, lack of metaphysical steering power.

why did I fail to write on the power of myth page of the book

look what is not there

what is not there is my writing ” Eve is holding on to the branch with her left hand left arm”

LEFT HAND

LEFT ARM

LEFT ARM

LEFT ARM

imagine if I had come to the Canterbury main climactic comic panel in November 2020 knowing the mega import key ramification of handedness, the key meaning-convention of left limb vs right limb…

and imagine if I had seen the dancing man roasting Salamander image in leading up to Christmas 2015

imagine if I had already bothered opening my eyes in November 29, 2013 to ask a question:

“which arm is holding onto the branch???”

WHICH ARM IS HOLDING ONTO THE BRANCH

but in our culture, our conceptual lang vocab, metaphors, we have no concept of significance of handedness orientation

in fact we have the opposite

except that we do have the idea in our culture that right handedness is normal

but we try not to be biased

we try not to say the right hand is truth and left-hand equals foolish ignorant falsehood, assertion of a fundamental metaphysical falsehood

left hand guitarists

I swear 50% of top electric guitar us are left-handed

I think it might be 2/3

how come every top electric guitarist is left-handed

Actually, come to think of it, I can’t think of a single electric guitarist who is right-handed; they all play left-handed 🤔 🚫🎸

The theory of art interpretation: Rule #1: you have to inventory the limbs.

This Rule #1 of interpretation of mushroom imagery in Christian art: “Inventory which limbs”, is my total sum contribution to the Jerry Brown Committee of neutral, neutered, non-committal, passive, wimpy, ineffective, wussy, fair-playing, unbiased, being sure, above all, to avoid any whiff of Ardent Advocacy and taking a position.

In the section The Ardent Advocates, the first thing that Brown & Brown list in their 2019 article in the Journal of Psychedelics Studies: “Special Issue on Psychedelics and World Religious History”, the first thing they mention is Egodeath.com.

God fcking forbid we take a committed position, adhere to a Dogmatist Declaration, and stick to ours guns, AS DOGMATIC AS THE KING🛼👑 OF DOGMATISM HIMSELF, PSYCHEDELIC SCOPALAMINE-PUSHING, ANTI-MUSHROOM FANATICAL PROHIBITIONIST PSYCHEDELIC WITCH AND FABRICATOR OF PSEUDO-HISTORY THOMAS HATSIS and force the data to fit our theory of interpretation by sheer force 💪 🖼️🎨

The diamond hammer of interpretation WINS YET AGAIN.