There were no Psilocybin mushrooms in England before 1975.

Letcher Hatsis

here is Hatsis’ reply to me, my email to him a few sections below that. LITERALLY TOTALLY UNINTELLIGIBLE use of ‘anachronistic’ and ‘anachronisms’:

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#Tom-Hatsis-Reply-to-Me

I advocate since 2002 the greedy entheogen theory of religion and I was disappointed and surprised, even shocked to realize in 2002 that what Clark Heinrich and the evil M. Hoffman and Carl Rut are pushing is not greedy entheogen theory, but rather, they are substituting it with the false and bogus negative defeatist planned failure, designed to fail

The Carl Rut paradigm is like McKenna declaring and robbing us – just like Andy Letcher and Thomas Hatsis are robbers they are anti-entheogen scholars, they are fake entheogen scholars pretending to assert visionary plants, when –

look at what they’re actually doing, is they’re doing everything possible to minimize the most important type of visionary Plants in the most important, relevant religion.

they’re trying to block entheogen scholarship at precisely the point where it matters the most

they are trying to give us low priority and unimportant irrelevant entheogen scholarship,

they are trying to be prohibition compliant

they are trying to be compliant flunky henchmen of prohibition, in service of the salvation Salesmen

we have Hatsis the supposed “Psychedelic Witch” & supposed “psychedelic historian”, who is actually in cahoots with the Pope.

Hatsis is in cahoots with the Salvation Salesmen, approving of explicit coverage of scopolamine plants in texts, while doing everything possible to deny and cover up the plants that actually matter: the Eucharist, Psilocybin mushrooms.

The Prohibitionist establishment laps up Thomas Hatsis’ bullsht , lying, fake, fraudulent “history”.

They give him a little reward pellets, and little lapdog that he is , he goes right along with their ruse, their deception.

He eagerly takes their reward pellets.

The Prohibitionist Establishment loves it when Letcher Hatsis publishes the entheogen-diminishing, stingy story.

They permit him to write half of the truth, and then steer the rest of it into the ditch, along with Wasson and all the Prohibition-compliant, fraudulent, fake scholars in the cover-up operation, complicit servants & flunkies of the Salvation Salesmen.

He’s just another fcking cover-up operator.

Letcher Hatsis is nothing but a Prohibition-compliant cover-up operator, who is intent on doing everything he can think of, & all the specious, nonsensical, and inarticulate “arguments” that he can pull out of a dark place, to prop up his lie that there’s no Psilocybin mushrooms in Christian history.

Which one is he: an idiot, or a liar? or is it a combination? 🤔 Letcher Hatsis is functioning as a “useful idiot”.

The Prohibition establishment rewards him for being stupid & ignorant.

He doesn’t even know what he’s doing, but he knows he gets his little stupid reward pellets from the Prohibitionist Establishment to write his bullsht half-false books,

he doesn’t even have to articulate a coherent position statement, or define exactly who is pushing against.

they’re telling all kinds of nonsense, popular notions such as “Psilocybin is only in South America not Europe there was no psilocybin in Europe until 1975”, according to Letcher Hatsis.

Hatsis asserts falsely, copy/pasting Letcher, that there’s no psilocybin mushrooms in England until 1975.

My main point that I’m yelling at you here is:

if that’s not what your flimsy cover-up story is, to (as you BRAG about) “easily explain away” “mushrooms” (🍄) in Hellenistic religion & in Christianity, then what the hell exactly is your story?

be clear this time.

be specific this time.

write in clear black-and-white clear ink, make a position statement.

what in the hell is your position, when you claim “anachonism”?

what in the hell are you talking about, “anachronistic”?

be clear, be articulate;

specify what your exact position is, you stupid, inarticulate, mumbling, muddled thinker.

I’m going to accuse you of asserting what you asserted to me in email (personal correspondence) : you use the word anachronistic.

I need to provide a link and I need to add that to the hall of shame, the scholarly fail quotes hall of shame: see my idea development page 13 I think is where I quoted it; I need to go copy paste that here.

written by Thomas Hatsis: “There was no psilocybin in England before 1975.” – signed, Thomas Hatsis

after all he said to me that psilocybin in Christian history would be “anachronistic”

so make him own his massive claim; put that, quote that in gigantic billboard letters, signed Idiot Letcher Hatsis, Prohibition-compliant lapdog slave, servant of the Prohibition establishment.

oh you say I’m strawmanning Tom Hatsis’ position?

well for one thing, yes , we do indeed need to talk about strawmanning

you bastard, trying to lie and tell lies that that Brown and I assert the John allegro position – what a lie, what a liar! so much for your historical sound tried and true historical methodology”, manifestly equals lying and strawmanning , at a industrial-level scale

well I’m going to strawman you right back, – Except that I’m not Straw Manning you; I’m accurately stating your incoherent stated position:

you asserted that psilocybin is “anachronistic” in Christian history, hand-in-hand, holding hands with Andy Letcher , the other lapdog flunky servant slave spreading the lies of the prohibition Establishment;

Letcher said there is no Psilocybin Mushroom Existed in England before 1975

please please please prove me wrong, and state CLEARLY what your damn position is, you inarticulate, mumbling, sorry excuse of a writer, failed example of a “historian” writer, who can’t even state clearly what his position is.

and, you completely grotesquely misstate the position of other historians – of actual historians.

I am more of a historian than you are, and I’m not even trying to be a historian. (I’m a cognitive theorist of the altered state including interpreting analogies.)

so much for being the “psychedelic witch”; you mean deliriant flunky slave propagandist for the Pope, more like.

they are robbers, they are trying to remove Psilocybin from Europe before 1975

Andy Letcher and Thomas Hatsis are robbers who are trying to remove psilocybin from European history.

They pretend to be entheogen scholars, but look at what they’re pushing: they’re pushing the denial that our religion and our history has Psilocybin.

These half-baked entheogen scholars are more driven by The Agenda (they are complicit in the Prohibition agenda) than by a sincere desire to reveal the truth, to plainly and loudly tumpet the truth, out and out plain and simple, no if’s and’s or buts, no goddmn word “secret secret secret secret secret”; every other word in every title, in every subtitle, always amanita, always “secret” , every single time.

It sure must be easy writing so-called “entheogen scholarship” books, when you toe the Prohibitionist party line, like a compliant lapdog and tell the lying, bogus story that they want you to tell – sure makes life easy, doesn’t it, Letcher, Hatsis, & Rut.

These are fake, fraudulent, phony, anti-entheogen scholars, who pretend to be entheogen scholars, when their real purpose and function that they serve is, they are willing, complicit slaves.

Letcher Hatsis is a compliant, complicit slave of the Prohibition Establishment, a flunky; a henchmen for the Prohibitionists, cover-up operators.

A main part of Hatsis’ fake stage act is the claim and statement that he wishes there were mushrooms in Christian history.

Yet, he is devoted to doing everything he possibly can to contribute to the cover-up operation and deny and minimize and remove Mushrooms from Christianity.

He’s an actor, a phony, and he is trying to harm and destroy and eliminate the scholarly field of mushrooms in European history, including removing Psilocybin Mushrooms from European history & from the Eucharist.

Hatsis the fake “witch” is anti- ethnomycology, an anti-scholar pretending to do scholarship, for the purpose of covering up and hiding the truth.

“Ethnomycolgy”‘s purpose is a cover-up operation to delete/ remove/ hide the Psilocybin mushroom basis of european and ancient mediterranean & ANE religion.

The purpose of the Moderate entheogen theory of religion is to hide and diminish and reduce the amount of prominence and presence of visionary plants, particularly Psilocybin Mushrooms in European religious history, including ancient Mediterranean, including ancient Greece.

The purpose of the Moderate entheogen theory of religion is to cowtow and toe the line and be stingy and downplay and emphasize the absence, rather than the presence of Psilocybin mushrooms in Greek & Christian history.

While pretending that the purpose of their “entheogen scholarship” is to emphasize the presence of these visionary plants, the actual function of the evil, false, Moderate entheogen theory of religion is to diminish as much as possible the effective, Psilocybin Eucharist.

What passes for “entheogen scholarship” is actually the opposite of what it pretends to be

it’s a cover-up operation , anti-entheogen scholarship

it’s the phony , fraudulent Moderate version for what passes for entheogen sholarship, designed expressly to *not* reach the true conclusion, but obscure and drive it underground and hide it and deny it

the purpose of the Moderate entheogen theory of religion is to deny the normal presence of visionary plants in religion – that’s the function that it serves, compliant with Prohibition – good job, losers.

The Moderate, ersatz, substitute, phony version of “entheogen scholarship” is the opposite of what it pretends to be.

Terence McKenna robbed us of our Psilocybe in history – jerk , idiot, claiming that to recover Psilocybin we would have to regress to the archaic lack of civilization – an evil idea.

These robbers, the Moderate entheogen theory robs us of our Psilocybin history.

The Moderate entheogen theory of religion is anti-entheogen scholarship, pretending to be pro-entheogen scholarship.

The Moderate entheogen theory of religion is as disastrous of a strategy as the psychedelic 60s saying “we have a brand new technology that was never used before”.

Good job, dimwits, morons, self-defeating

you’ve already declared defeat before you even started by saying that nobody before us used visionary plants.

… which is completely false and awful and harmful, and a defeatist, self-defeating strategy that’s guaranteed to fail and lose.

Good job; now your wrong presuppositions that you didn’t even give any thought to at all , together with nonsense lies like “the traditional non-drug methods of the mystics” – what baloney, complete baloney!

Now thanks to your disastrous catastrophic stupid strategy and presuppositions , now your incorrect presuppositions are baked into international law.

good fcking job, dumbasses – the fcking Moderate Entheogen Theory is anti-entheogen theory.

it’s helping to limit and stunt and retard and drive into a dead end instead of opening up

it’s designed to fail

it’s a stingy rather than greedy Scholarship

I’m disappointed in you guys

I thought, I expected from you in your book Apples of Apollo in 2000, I expected you to take a greedy, assertive, manly vigorous stance

grow some fcking balls you fcking UNIX Ha ha ha

A greedy approach is the definition of the Maximal Entheogen Theory

a stingy approach is the definition of the moderate entheogen theory

this really is the contrast in a nutshell

this is how to define the two positions against each other

stop being stingy, be greedy – that is my message of 2002 October, in the wake of the stingy book Apples of Apollo, that leaves everything all the winnings are left behind on the table

they come away with nothing but worthless dross, the stupid dirty inefficient Amanita – and only secret use, at that.

🍄 -> 🗑

my technical definition of the difference between my maximal entheogen theory versus the sucky, suck-azz , self-defeating losers’ Moderate Entheogen Theory:

the Moderate Entheogen Theory of religion is for losers

it’s designed to lose and fail, dead end, go nowhere and be a Prohibition-compliant Moderate view – good job, losers

Wassons job was to create a new field, “ethnomycology”, in order to steer it into a ditch and steer it away from the truth and to prevent revealing the mysteries, which is that our own religions come from visionary plants, at their origins and throughout their history.

Wasson constantly insulting mycologists and “commanding” them to stop asserting that mushroom trees mean mushrooms – as if he had any credibility on this matter, which he does not.

Wasson has zero credibility on this matter, and Dr. Brown does cover that in his article, and so does Jan irvin in his book, the Holy Mushroom.

Pope Wasson/Panofsky, the Salvation Salesmen, just like the Meditation Hucksters of the East, are selling a fraudulent, false product, in place of the real deal, which has always been psilocybin mushrooms.

Gordon “Conflict of Interest” Wa$$on

Psilocybin Mushrooms is:

the Eucharist

the mushroom trees

mixed wine

“contemplation” (give me a break)

kykeon

the initiation Sacred meal

see Jerry Brown’s article in journal of psychedelic studies, which states that its purpose is to reveal the financial conflict of interest that Wasson had.

and Jan Irvin; I need to buy his book.

I have to buy his book with color plates, the expensive version

I can’t avoid this tiresome, very tiresome topic, of all the lies and deception.

Wason is a liar; he is a deceiver, he’s dishonest, he strives to spread deception.

his purpose is to spread lies and falsehoods and prevent us from knowing the truth.

Go to Hell Wasson, trying to replace – how dare you replace the authentic psilocybin Eucharist by wine, crackers, and priestcraft; magical thinking!

spreading egoic delusion – thanks a lot Wasson, lots of “contributions” you’ve “contributed”: they’re contributing to driving the field into a dead-end ditch, together with Carl Rut 🍄⚰️🛑⛔️🚫

it’s the age-old battle between exoteric versus esoteric;

between what Elaine Pagels calls Orthodox versus Gnostics sets of views,

between the (lower) Psychics versus the (higher) Pneumatics;

between literalist ordinary state possibilism with autonomous control versus analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control

Miracle occurs: voice transcription got the above correct – even the casing.

The two legs, the two views, the two interpretations of religious mythology, the two presupposition matrixes about visionary plants in the origin and ongoing inspiration wellspring of our own religions.

right limb = possibilism = unstable (during Psilocybin-induced loose cognition), branching-thinking

left limb = eternalism = stable (during Psilocybin-induced loose cognition), non-branching thinking

tree’s branching-assocd hand doesnt touch the post roast salam snake-w-legs

Oh my God I’m embarrassed to be adding another one that when I created this draft posting a few days ago I didn’t and couldn’t have thought of it because I was too stupid at the time to include the reversed Lucas Cranach painting “Eve tempted by the serpent” (yeah but what about the subsequent 15-year-delayed images i realized in the next day 😨 ):

What in the World? Dukes of Stratosphear https://youtu.be/MfDNP9El2qM

Fixed

see list of art pieces to explain in webpage Branching-Message Trees. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/branching-message-trees/

podcast challenge: in a segment, summarize interp of a art piece eg

tauroctony or

diomysus victory mosaic

moses Y branching john rush upper & lower panels:

brinckmann Y branching tree of knowledge:

canterbury msh tree w 2 men & sword comic panel or

dancing man salamander

Segment Length

segment in my context i suppose connotes maybe 20 minutes or 15 minutes

10 min short segment

15 minutes

20

30 longish

Episode Length

tend to target 1.5 hour episode,

for me this has seemed a good unit for playback but not clear why, or if true

pros & cons of 10 min or

1 hr

12:27 am April 26 2022 – the {bound hair} of Ariadne riding (not steering) in Dionysus’ chariot is like mental model #3; qualified possibilism thinking, after tightcog returns but mental model retained but egoic freewill mode returns (qualified).

i abandoned the idea of a v3.

v1 1:06:00 is poorer & longer, v2 46:00 is quite good & tight.

to hear the missing segment that I intended to add to v2 but got distracted, listen to the next episode: “Ep136 Third Foot”, starting 1:34:12, maybe main part starts 1:50:00 . info: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-Episode-126

no plan yet to make old episodes available.

I think it was the reading aloud next episode to hear my read aloud Brown’s question to me “where is my evidence what is my evidence that amanita in art means ingesting Psilocybin not Amanita” .

in my joke errata below, I wanted to include a mention: Panofsky calls any student who disagrees and any art historian who disagrees is implicitly smeared and slurred and defamed by Erwin Panofsky,

he is calling them, those who reveal the Mystery, he will impugn you as “some especially ignorant craftsman”.

so if you disagree with the (unfortunately) most influential (sorry to hear it) art historian Erwin Panofsky

and if you go against him and declare the truth and state the truth, which is that Mushroom Imagery Means Mushrooms then he says – he is announcing here in the letter to Wasson, he will smear and slur and defame you as a “some especially ignorant craftsman”.

You must conform to our professional standards and toe the line and tell the party BS fabricated false history.

you must comply; you must conform; you must assert our coerced conclusion.

iirc, in the next episode, i read my initial assertion *after* reading my final explanation that I immediately composed and sent to Professor Brown, invented on the spot, just like Hatsis “easily explaining away” and inventing specious arguments (aka “sound, tried-a-true historical criteria”, aka dogmatically just make sht up) one by one to dismiss each instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art –

remember, it only counts if hatsis makes up a rule on the spot, pulled out of his ass on a case by case basis as needed, that now suddenly it only counts if it’s what Thomas Hatsis, the greatest historian of all time, deems to be “devotional”.

see, you didn’t know , but we are strictly exclusively now talking only about devotional art.

art images in devotional documents, only.

that’s the new rule you have to follow because I just now made it up to save my pathetic failing case

and the salamander bestiary does not meet my brand new criteria I just made up two seconds ago, called “only ‘devotional literature‘ counts”.

therefore I have easily explained away your mushroom in Christian Art yet again

Also please note that your Canterbury Psalter doesn’t count either, because it doesn’t meet my theological criteria for typical Christian art documents , because it is an illuminated Manuscript thus neither fish nor foul; and it fails to meet cyberdisciple’s categories that you have committed to , which is a sharp distinction between texts versus art , but the illuminated manuscript is neither text nor art, so it doesn’t count. 😑

so subtract those 75 mushroom trees that you proved, because they don’t occur in authorized Christian art , but rather, in unauthorized illuminated Manuscript Witch doesnt count, because of the new rule I just made up two seconds ago on the spot on a case-by-case basis, as needed to bolster my failed case and try to save my sinking ship as my Hatsis Industries Witches Scopalamine Supply stock corporate value plummets into the ocean bottom

this is the great achievement and accomplishment & methodology of the Moderate entheogen theory.

I was as quick as that, in fabricating a response for Professor Brown, based on evidence from mushroom hunt and based on evidence from our contemporary experience ingesting both types of mushroom.

I did not yet have the head shop art analogy, when I replied to Professor Brown.

nd I read aloud my … actually I don’t remember if I read aloud my posting where I asserted as much and then I did read his no I don’t think I read his posting all of them mixed up all but anyway that’s in the next episode

aggh ERRATA – joke error !

I said that Wasson claims that “every flunking-out art student, beginning first semester flunking out art student knows that mushroom trees do not mean mushrooms”

that was a joke error

that was incoherent because I should have made the point that it is the A students, the passing students are the ones who “know” mushroom trees don’t mean mushrooms.

it is precisely the flunking students who assert that mushroom trees mean mushrooms (truth).

this is how the Persephone’s winnowing and filtering process works.

the students & the academics who assert that mushroom tree equals Mushroom are not employed, and the students to assert that do not pass.

only the art historians who toe the party line are allowed to be art historians

and only the art students who toe the party line are allowed to continue on to further classes

you’re not allowed to complete your degree if you tell the truth and reveal the mysteries

because remember, hint hint, “the punishment for revealing the mysteries is death”, which means, flunking and not getting the professorship.

maybe dup below:

– there’s a totally believable conclusions that the intellectual academics reach the conclusions that they are coerced and forced to reach which is why Panofsky brags to Wasson go ahead, ask any (employed, approved) art historian , ask any (passing) art student.

but please do not speak to the unemployed art historians and the failing students, who we are failing because they do not toe the party line and reach our coerced conclusions that we force them to reach.

joke error: I said that Wason claims that every flunking out arts to beginning first semester flunking out art student knows that mushroom trees do not mean mushrooms

that was a joke error that was incoherent because I should have made the point that it is the A students the passing students are the ones who know mushroom trees don’t mean mushrooms

it is precisely the flunking students who assert that mushroom trees mean mushrooms

this is how the Persephone’s winnowing and sorting

update: 11:52 AM April 24, 2022

my present feeling is that it’s the least work is to create a new episode 126 I have a ton of new fresh material this morning recorded and instead of ending it adding it to the end a pending it to episode 125 I have to just see how many hours of material it is though I do feel like my

Reading aloud of my response to Professor Jerry BrownProfessor Jerry Brown is kind of missing fromintended Reading aloud of my response to Professor Jerry Brown is kind of missing from

episode 125 above all out of the five to eat five or six or seven or eight segments that I recorded this morning , the one that seems missing from episode 125 is my reading of my reply to professor Jerry Brown explaining why amanita is the face of ingesting Psilocybin.

so I am deciding whether[no] to do official v3 release of episode 1 to 5 maybe just adding my reading and commentary about my reply to Professor Jerry Brown answering his question on what Evidence do I have for my conclusion that Amanita in christian art means and indicates the presence of ingesting Psilocybin.

if I add that segment[no] I will probably end up with a 1 1/2 hour episode 1 to 5 which I feel is more worthy

it’s a great great episode but a little bit on the short changed

Next Episode: The Series of Three Mental Models

Episode 126: Third Foot – segment starts ~55:00 https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-Episode-126

my next material coheres very well with the 126 v2 short episode, and also has a heavy coverage of Canterbury Decoding, and advanced three-level model of , the three mental models, the series of three mental models.

I will now announce that , which I announced with an earlier time stamp in the voice recording a few minutes ago, but I will make another timestamp here in text form 11:57 AM April 24, 2022 a little bit different way of thinking of it then before the mind undergoes a series of three mental models which way we may describe as a sequence of three legs or three mental models in a series as follows

number one : NAIVE Possibility thinking

number two: eternity thinking; eternalism

NUMBER 3: QUALIFIED possibility thinking. I discovered during this voice recording a few minutes ago that we are posed with a second class exam instructor testing the student in row two of F134 image of Canterbury Psalter right side of row two we again have a exam scene in the marketplace the red initiate is being examined by the instructor you must interpret both of my feet above the ground well I have a John Rush while I have a John Rush celestial erection lifted garment and I have a solid good mushroom folded him per John rush which is as if growing out of the column base for control stability and the initiator says displays his left hand not his right hand this time and says interpret my left hand higher than my right hand displayed to you this time in this exam if the correct answer was right hand displaying the right hand in row one left exam scene scenery then what does displaying my left hand mean during the ordinary state after advanced initiation how is my left hand a good positive statement combined with having both feet off the ground and not having my right foot on the ground how am I in lightened given that I don’t have my right foot on the ground the answer is transcending eternity thinking

persephone lives after revelation of enlightenment when we return to the ordinary state persephone Queen of our underworld where we live as shadows and we continue to control and rule and reign and steer through virtual possibility branching in the ordinary state after full completed enlightenment and initiation the rest of our lives are entirely spent see Ken Wilber regarding states versus stages and regarding the pre-trans fallacy although we rely on possibility thinking in the ordinary state after enlightenment

no longer do so naïvely like before we were in lightened and redeemed out from the prison block rock universe and restored to the ordinary state like the bottom 2/3 that I didn’t finish cleaning up Max Freakout episode end of the episode debate about episode 28 summarizing the core Egodeath Theory debate about why cyber disciple restored to stable control upon prayer was it during the peak the answer is yes or was it because of

loose cognition wore off The loose cognition wore off and what do we do with the reality that we experience free will for the rest of our life in the ordinary state for the rest of our life steering like a king steering in a branching tree are we just naïve are we wrong because we ought to be experiencing in a way that is other than how the mind works are we saying that the mind is incorrect in the ordinary state?

orig; earlier

Notice: Scheming to create v3 of Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 125 – Leading Edge of Hallucinogens

I totally meant to read this good post and add it to the episode, and now that I found & brifly read it, it adds good points:

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Amanita-Imagery-Indicates-Psilocybe-Use

v2 of ep125 is NOT what I intended – I got distracted by phone call and forgot to locate that explanation writeup and record reading it.

I do like the resequencing and intensive fixes in v2 of short solid ep 125, but it is missing the intended segment. it’s good, but incomplete & too short. i prefer 1.5-hour episodes.

I also think that now that the sequencing is fixed, I could reinstate Cyberdisciple Autobio reading, which describes his long-standing passion for anthropological theory of Rock and Roll lyrics (due to its fascinating shamanism primitive beats 🥁 ); & Hallucinogens, esp. The Mushroom 🍄

& it would be nice to read his page asserting that the only mystery religion we should study is Eleusis – a strong, Hatsis-level sound, tried-and-true argument for the exemplary historiographical methodology of applying the Proxy Principle:

Instead of complicating the field, the effective approach is to cover only a single place location instance eg Plaincourault, or Eleusis, to efficiently cover-over & easily explain away the data which we study, so that we dont get our theorizing confused by introducing data, which just complicates the field of entheogen scholarship aka Psychedelic History, by which we mean the History of Deliriants.

We can just repeat & re-write the Witches Ointments book, as if it’s coverage of Greek & Christian mystical esoteric practices & traditions. it’s how we historians work.

1) add the above leadin to Cyberdisciple for context integration thematic

2) re-add the Cyberdisciple bio

3) add reading of https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Amanita-Imagery-Indicates-Psilocybe-Use

4) could finish up by reading Cyberdisciple: Over-coverage of Eleusis , which he wrote for evil M. Hoffman, bc episode 125 is a roasting of trigger words way overemphasized ultra narrow Brian Muraresku

5) read the present page eg trigger words

I feel like I could really go off on the stupid ridiculous field, this comedy clown show of a field of entheogen scholarship

the field of entheogen scholarship is become reduced to a comedy routine, but don’t worry, Witch Hatsis is here to help 🤡

houston we have a problem

3:20 am April 24, 2022

this morning, less than 24 hours ago, about 6 AM April 23, 2022, I realized that:

my traditional fault-finding (since about 2006?) with the Mithraism book by Manfred clause fell quite short, because I only criticized Mithras’ head being made to turn to look to the left instead of the right – but I failed to criticize him for the huge massive extreme error of making Mithras stand on his left leg instead of on his right leg – a major violation of meaning!

yes, that error is along the exact same line as turning left versus right with the head, but the image is emphasizing everyone’s legs, not everyone looking to the right.

all five pairs of legs are what’s being presented, especially in this particular high-resolution image that I like of the bull slaying scene.

in this morning’s April 23 episode 124 of Egodeath Mystery Show at ~~25:00 (unreli timest) I discuss this increase of scope

in terms of… this increase of scope of theory revision and correction;

see the book conceptual revolutions by Paul Thagard regarding types of theory revision.

this would be a kind of example of increasing a point and increasing a correction of an old theory.

instead of just finding a smaller flaw with the old theory, I’m finding that it is 10 times bigger of a flaw.

The author of the book, right on his front cover, proves 10 times more than I thought/ previously realized, until April 23 (or essentially April 22, the initial breakthrough day), that Manfred Clauss doesn’t get it at all, and he has big-time grotesquely failed to interpret the iconography of the bull slaying scene – unlike my superior, successful theory, the new theory.

A similar idea is that the people describe the twins as having “crossed legs”, when the crossing is not really the point, and they have the legs crossed in such a way that their weight is entirely on one leg it is not symmetrical as is implied falsely by the term “crossed legs”.

Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 124 ~~38:00 (but totally not trustworthy timestamp from this app), I mention and discuss “legs crossed”, how that’s not the correct interpretation.

“equally /symmetrically crossed legs” is not depicted and is not the theme.

throughout the five pairs of legs, rather, the theme throughout the five pairs of legs is the question of which leg your weight is resting on; which leg is carrying you, that you are based on as your basis, which is to say, which mental model of time and control and possibility branching you consciously hold and are relying on.

that gives me an idea…

Academia forces you to write in a self-canceling way – this is total BS!

my God it is so tired, the Carl Rut approach

just like Andy Letcher says and just like Thomas Hatsis says, the field of entheogen scholarship, led by his good buddy Carl Rut is a joke and a laughingstock, it is a self-parody (it’s Jan Irvin’s fault – he’s left the field, but thats ok, we can just use Jerry Brown & Cybermonk as proxies for Jan Irvin, to keep deflecting attention from the real culprit, Carl Rut)

we have Jan urban exposing the agency is all directing these clowns to get stuck in a rut

steering us into a ditch, going around in circles, circling planet Amanita stuck trapped locked in trapped in orbit around planet Amanita forever and ever stuck in antiquated 1906 anthropology theories which are as primitive as the savages that they tried to study when they talk about “the Mushroom”

🙄

after 30 years of scholarship, he managed to accomplish switching the little amanita and the big amanita in the lower left corner of the popular children’s book from 1976 , A golden guide: Hallucinogenic Plants, recast as the 2006 book titled The Sacred Mushroom: Secrets of Eleusis 🍄🍄 by Carl Rut

Trigger Words 😱

Eleusis

secret

Amanita

Good Friday Experiment Good Friday Experiment did we mention Good Friday Experiment be sure to summarize Good Friday Experiment

every article ever written about visionary plants has to be sure to recount yet again Good Friday Experiment

did we mention Good Friday Experiment

Good Friday Experiment, Good Friday Experiment

like a parrot

🦜

the mushroom

Allegro

Plaincourault

Wasson

Carl Rut

hallucinogens

the traditional methods of the mystics

marijuana (speak English!! the word is ‘cannabis’, not “maria juan”, an ethnic slur, lunkheads!

12:16 PM April 24, 2022

row two, second from left :

the guy only has one leg, which is not unique in this image, but he has one leg in the middle of his body, with gray legging sock

and it is implied that it’s a correct right foot , because it is resting on the other guys right foot

but no left foot is showing for him,

and we can deduce that the flesh colored ankles on the left guys right foot is behind the column base , thus is considered touching

and then the bare Ankle, which must belong to the left hand guy, because the ankles match, is floating.

and so the joke of the second guy is that he has he only has a right leg ; it’s a bit of a puzzle/joke.

3:36 AM April 24, 2022

it’s clear or there’s certainly more to be found significant more

there are additional significant discoveries in this F134 canterbury picture

but I graciously may leave some

I’ve had my fill with this rather overwhelming picture decoding

big enough of a jackpot for me

it’s already the world’s biggest jackpot

and it’s a big todo list is now you’ve got to

what has to happen now is that we have to develop the grid analysis:

you overlay a grid on top of these several images that we’re discussing:

• the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ balancing/ hanging/ touching sword” image
• the bull slaying scene tauroctony
• salamander roasting “dancing man”

The purpose of the grid is to force yourself to give diligent vigorous aggressive analysis of each every square inch of the image

don’t let anything slip by without analysis

analyze every hand

every foot

every leg

every hem

which direction everyone is looking

Who has a beard or not

every mushroom hem

Every raised garment lifted garment

every column base

every branching or non-Branching feature, or snake-like feature, or ivy leaf feature

every sword

every blade

the relative height of each hand

the relative height of each foot

the angle of every leg

list everything that’s touching anything else

Make a complete list of every item that’s not touching every other item in the whole image;

a combinatorial explosion, that I was struggling to hold back in order to decode this Canterbury Psalter mushroom tree image in November 2020, I had to block out the image, it was too much at once.

😓

11:34 pm April 23,2022

highly improbable # of left hands higher than right hands in comic panel

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom

1) Hatsis-type figure, left hand 2:56am April 24, 2022 is lower than right hand

2) left hand up, right hand down, like God

3) ” & compare bearded’s lifted garment to that of the passing student in upper left [2:40 am April 24 2022] also msh hem touching stable colume base, & both feet lifted, indicating transcending eternalism-reliance.

4) no limbs.

who lacks limbs? top right – trip guide & father. mid row far right side.

who has left hand higher than right? Nearly everyone; it’s easier to list who doesn’t.

I have to come up with a better way of tracking what time stamped and day each paragraph in this page, to track breakthroughs hour by hour.

9:36 PM April 23, 2022 addendum

given that both of the twins are presented in a positive light the left leg does double duty allow Ken Wilber pre-trans fallacy the left leg represents both naïve possibilism and also qualified possibilism which maps to transcending eternalism and transcending the rock cosmos entrapment that comes along with enlightenment about no free will and pre-existent control thoughts

how can we see the left leg as positive, to come away with a balanced view that respects both the left leg and the right leg?

solution: the ultra transcendent aspect of ordinary state consciousness after enlightenment is completed

it is imperative that we have an ultimate extremely positive judgment of the experience of freedom free will when the ordinary state permanently returns after complete enlightenment about no free will

and this is how we could elevate the left leg standing guy twin, Cautopates.

Advanced question:

how is the right leg relying twin ( cautes) superior to the left leg twin (cautopates)?

& vice versa? very adv q. ans: 10:26 PM April 23, 2022: to see the left leg standing twin as more glorious and superior and more transcendent than the block universe twin who stands on the right leg for stability we have transcended control system stability we have transcended our embeddedness in the block universe lifted up by Mithras who is born from outside of the rock and who makes the entire cosmos rock move like the creator

this ties into gnostic demiurge ideas of we awaken to our entrapment in the cosmos and then we can negatively value the block universe enlightenment and seek to transcend the block universe eternity prison that is revealed in the altered state and then we are lifted up by the God the rescue or the redeemer to pull us up from outside of the rock imprisoned in the cosmic rock

and then the Orthodox had objections to disparaging eternalism as a Wm James [Iron Block Universe] prison of rock.

we have to beware of duality Dualism and demonizing the demiurgic creator of the block universe, the dreaded puppetmaster, unseen and hard to trust, and who has created this broken world of rock prison that we are frozen in.

Be sure don’t think heretical thoughts here, you gnostic heretics.

dont demonize Cautes eternalism prison nor Cautes return to possibilism thinking (qualified now, no longer naive).

Per Ken Wilber do not demonize the lower level

you will never transcend it that way

you have to differentiate from the lower level

and when you return to using the lower level, you do not fall down embedded into possibilism thinking, but you stay positioned above the lower level child thinking, even while you utilize that child thinking for the rest of your life, in the normal tight cognitive binding state, but now, qualified. Transcended.

This is not the childish Cautopates but rather the final completed Transcendent usage of the left leg possibility model to depend on it during day and day out forever for the rest of your life retaining completed Initiation enlightenment and transfiguration, returned to the flesh yet not of it, with wounds, having been bodily reborn glorified, blessed like Cautopates’ hypercosmic emancipation, after Cautes’ block-universe enlightenment.

we do not demonize the right leg twin, nor the left leg twin, but glorify them both together, in their right-balance roles. 10:34 PM April 23, 2022

wisdom lifts left leg and then right leg, relying on neither, prisoner of neither; redeemed out from the created world by the god.

Some of that caption is new connections, 10:53 PM April 23, 2022, but I’m not gonna tell you which

Glory to Persephone, Queen of Hades’ realm of revealed shadows, who lives, though died.

April 23 2022 am

(date = April 23 2022: )

consolation Breakthrough Recording [published within Egodeath Mystery Show ep124 ]: Since my backstabbing technology trashcanned my realtime breakthrough recording 7am 4/22:

working out ideas about the legs of the Cupid pair enabling me to solve interpreting the leg pairs of the Mithras scene TAUROCTONY

Warning: today’s recording and webpage includes cussing, because this voice transcription cannot handle the most trivial, elementary, commonplace words but to produce the word ‘bull’, I have to say the ‘bs’ word 🤷🏼‍♂️

The words ‘fad’ & ‘bull’? forget it: impossible for today’s technology. 👎👎

Since my backstabbing tape deck decided to trashcan my realtime, hour-long decoding discovery based on the two- cupids bull sacrifice scene, which led me to consider the leg pairs, the five leg pairs in the Mithras scene tauroctony.

left leg bulls hind leg pair – hind left leg means both naïve and qualified possibilism thinking

I did an even deeper analysis of my November 7, 2015 comment, as consolation (omg that was just this morning, Saturday morning 4/22/2022, that I’m referring to here today, it’s the same day right now; Sat Apr 23, 2022, and I can hardly keep track! anyway, one of the raw recordings that fed into Egodeath Mystery Show ep124 )

voice recording and assuming that it doesn’t throw in the garbage can this morning half hour deep analysis of my multi Interpretation posting of November 7, 2015 today [4/23 am] I realized that I posted and considered two different approaches, differentiated in my comment, showing how I was trying multiple sophisticated readings of pairs of legs, but enough but in November I failed to even mention or consider at all the question of which leg,

the interesting thing is that although I resolved that on Christmas 2015 regarding the two-level analysis and so I resolved the two-level paragraph of November 7 2015 Comment at Cyberdisciple’s 2-cupid page, but today [4/23 am, provable by .wav recording timestamp, time flew today] I realized that as great as the Christmas 2015 resolution of “the question of which leg” was, I failed to address the question of a three-level interpretation, where we run out of legs —

IF we are human!

🐮

left leg equals Possibility Branching delusion

but if we are a bull, then we can have enough leg pairs, two leg pairs, two of them, so that one leg pair, the front leg pair, can represent the two-level system:

right leg equals enlightenment equals trapped frozen in rock – as if that’s a good thing!

and then the rear pair of legs

we didn’t have

the question which I failed to resolve Christmas 2015

regarding coming back to the November 2 part of my analysis potential readings that I offered

On Christmas 2015, I should have come back to the three-level analysis (in the 2nd part of my November 7, 2015 Comment at Cyberdisciple’s 2011 2-cupid page) and answer the question: which leg for the three-level system?

and the answer is regardless of how the ancients in the post-determinism era of 250 aD, this happens to map very well to my saying that :

The mind moves from [naïve possibilism thinking], to the combination of [eternalism thinking] plus [qualified possibilism thinking] –

10:06 pm 4/23/2022

in summary[10:06 pm 4/23/2022:], treat [Qualified Possibility Thinking] as ultra-valuable and transcendent the same as your ordinary state experience of free will after complete enlightenment. equate that with the twin who stands on the left leg and bends the right leg

and this is how we can think of each twin as representing a higher level of enlightenment as contrasted with the Naive starting State and avoid Ken Wilber is pre-trans fallacy.

and I go into this in today’s Egodeath Mystery Show episode 124 from this morning [4/23/2022 am], which is kind of a consolation prize for losing the two-cupids breakthrough recording of yesterday am, April 22. although I talk it through in the episode which I just now released which I recorded this morning but even right now I still jackpot make more connections to revise the theory to improve its explanatory power I am learning how they read the left leg twin as sacred and very lofty very high up and not just stupid ignorant naïve possibility thinking but rather possibility thinking in its elevated trans

I Wilber with labeled as trans rational Ken Wilber would label it as trans rational if we call eternity Thinking equals rational then what do you call it when the Mushrooms Psilocybin wears off and the loose cognitive binding goes away and we retain complete enlightenment yet we return to the given the fact of the experience of free will but it is not naïve free well Persephone lives on in her glorified role as queen of the underworld we read return to the usual very familiar tight cognitive binding work a day experiential mode yet like Alan Watts explains in the waves in the book the way of Zen Chopwood carry water before enlightenment I expected to end up in a different state but instead I ended up in the same old state but in a different stage therefore no pre-trans fallacy. The freedom that I now have Christ has set me free but this is not naïve possibility thinking although it is the mode of possibility thinking but I don’t believe in it yet here it is it has the mode of experiencing in workaday tight cognitive binding we experience free will and we are set free from the shackles of enlightenment about frozen in rock eternity our control thoughts frozen and given to us helplessly reduced to a statue king frozen and rock yet we call this a kind of hypercosmic freedom that Mithras has been born outside of the rock and the twin who stands on left leg just as we began when we were a child and when we thought like a child we return to Persephone Thinking but it is different we have transcended the experiencing of free will in the tight cognitive state of ordinary state consciousness for permanently the rest of our life.

– [10:15 PM April 23, 2022 Cybermonk]

April 23, 2022 AM

then a good answer is that now the left leg is considered in it’s positive aspect of possibility thinking mapped to the third level, where we transcend in the hyper cosmic realm outside of the fire at the edge of the cosmos (see David Ulansey Article) hypercosmic.

Here we could see that the hind pair of legs of the bull

The rear leg the rear hind legs of the BULL can represent and carry both positive connotations and negative connotations carry both the positive and negative connotations

the good thing about the rear right leg is it is enlightenment and stability of control

but the bad thing is that you were no frozen in the iron block universe trapped in rock

and then we can look at the positive aspect of the rear left leg A form of possibility thinking that now takes into account enlightenment and the limitations of stability of the left possibility way of thinking

and now we can treat as a good thing emancipation is the qualified possibility thinking which can be mapped to transcending the rock, transcending our entrapment frozen in the iron block universe, answering William James objection, and mapping to Ken Wilber his trans rationality level.

The question of which leg is mapped to the 250 A.D. fad of transcending determinism.

Wow, look at all these hallucinogenic mushrooms 🍄 in art. People sure like these pictures of hallucinogens.

It is remarkable how much Amanita these trippers are ingesting, as plainly evidenced by all of this hallucinogenic mushroom 🍄 art.

Conclusion: The popularity of magic mushroom art indicates that everybody is ingesting large quantities of Amanita 🍄.

This is impressive evidence of the great copious supply of hallucinogenic magic mushrooms 🍄 (Amanita) on the market.

The youngsters these days must be learning about The Mushroom 🍄 through Rock and Roll music, with its primitive and shamanic beat.

https://www.rush.com/albums/feedback/ album

Amanita has dirty cognitive effects (failing to target loose cognitive association), combined with great visual appeal, and that is why Amanita will forever be the face of ingesting Psilocybin.

🍄

Even Terence McKenna, the great advocate of Psilocybin mushrooms, has a gigantic Amanita image on his audio reading of his book on mushroom History:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B08XL9QGJT/

todo: study all myth through the {legs} mytheme lens.

why did I not figure out to do this aggressively on November 7, 2015 when I commented on cyberdisciple’s image of the two cupids in a bull sacrifice type of scene??

why didn’t I go running out to all the myth images and say look at there legs, at all those legs

let’s look at all their legs

which leg is it, left leg right leg ?

inventory the legs

write a 70-page academic article that nobody reads:

A full study of all legs in every single, inventory of every leg in every myth in every religious image

stop seeing mushrooms everywhere, you fools, you’re supposed to be seeing legs everywhere

one legged standing on one leg coral rock the mushroom people who stand on one leg

see one leg everywhere

🍄

Secret Amanita standing on its right leg – since it’s the only real basis/leg, it must be the right leg (post-hoc revelation explanation)

this morning is perfect proof of why it is impossible for me to read websites of mythology or cyber disciples site map (or the Egodeath Yahoo Group ,) listing interesting webpages some of which I forgotten seeing before and already commented partially:

the two Cupids standing on the different legs led to a major top magnitude Breakthrough in Mystery Religion explanation for late modern figuring out and comprehending the meaning of Mystery Religion imagery.

this has happened to me, I demonstrated this before, back in November 2020, that I literally can’t go to mythology website, because I am overwhelmed by too many connections, too many breakthroughs

and that was a big theme while Decoding Canterbury top row, was that I was overwhelmed by the top row, by too much jackpot success, and I did not permit myself to look at rows two and three of the comic panel, for fear of too many connections and too many breakthroughs pulling me in every direction

the problem of plethora of decodings

it’s too many, too successful, so that I literally cannot scan a mythology website, because I will immediately be prevented, because I will encounter Decoding breakthroughs that I am embarrassed that I didn’t obviously perceive before already

And so then I have to hasten to write the Decoding that is embarrassing that I didn’t already figure out before, by this late date

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/cupids-performing-tauroctony/

The breakthrough started here after last night April 21, 2022, I made a site map of Cyberdisciple’s site, and I noticed this cupids Tauroctony-like page, which I read aloud while recording the lost voice recording this morning April 22 , and

I had really literally completely forgotten about this image, but it turns out that there was a important November 7, 2015 interpretation comment posting by me that was a pretty important step in decoding, like, everything (Hephaestos; roasting salamander dancing man; Canterbury; & Tauroctony).

this morning, I at first casually looked at the picture and did not inventory left and right legs then in my mind’s eye, I started wondering : let’s go back to that picture and look at it again, which leg do they stand on?

The “favored” / “affirmed” positioning depends on the components of the individual image; symmetrical twins are not always on the same, left or right side of an image.

The Cupid image is strange, atypical, because the bull is mirrored to have a head on the left as well as on the right, in an exact mirroring.

but what we really see very sharply in that image is twins, where one is standing on one leg, and the other is standing on the other leg.

and that was enough to get me to think about the twins in Mithras scene.

also relevant and keeps coming to mind, is my exchange with Max Freakout regarding the mytheme {turning to look to the right}, which was probably the most to credit with my specifically identifying the *right* leg as the stable mental model, between November 7, 2015 and Christmas 2015 – why right is better than left & maps to the superior mental model.

bonus announcement: 8:28 a.m., April 22, 2022: I just grasped mentally and realized; I’m announcing:

Mithras is shown standing essentially on his right leg, not left leg, meaning that he’s confirming eternalism thinking, not possibility branching thinking.

The Key: Legs Inventory

The key (7:33 pm 4/22/2022): leg pairs, from right to left in the image:

Cautopates (right): Left leg straight, right leg bent (bad)

Bull front legs: Left leg straight, right leg bent (bad)

Mithras: left leg bent, right leg straight (good)

Bull hind legs: Left leg bent, right leg straight (good)

Cautes (left): Left leg bent, right leg straight (good)

7:37 pm Observation:

All the “bad” leg-pairs are on the right side of the picture; all the “good” leg-pairs are on the left side of the picture.

the “good” twin stands near the straightened, “good” right hind leg of the bull and Mithras’ “good” legs; but the “bad” twin stands near the “bad” front legs of the bull – Cybermonk

8:28 am con’t:

I don’t think that in the past I pointed out Mithras “standing” on right leg, because he’s not exactly standing, but his right leg does match the right leg of the small man, who is definitely, pointedly standing on his right leg.

as far as I recall, and I could be wrong, I don’t believe I’ve ever connected and

I don’t believe I’ve ever discussed or mentioned or pointed out that:

Cautes and Cautopates are standing on one leg, and those are opposite legs: one standing on left leg, one standing on right leg, and then compare Mithras leg (note 10 min later: & bull’s leg!! ) note which leg!

I do not believe I have comprehended and discussed and focused on and drawn attention to this subject, pointed out the question of interpreting their legs before.

just like I did a leg inventory of Canterbury Psalter, you have to do a “leg folded versus non-folded/straight” inventory of the Tauronctony.

and now when I come to the Tauroctony again, –

I do think I did a lot of interpretation after November 2020 Canterbury miracle Breakthrough, and yet I don’t recall directing my attention to the *legs* in the famous bull sacrifice scene.

Super obvious, how did I not think of this – assuming I didn’t think of it- in November 2020??

obviously the bull sacrificing confirms and corroborates my left and right leg interpretation of November 7, 2015 and Christmas 2015, which was the key to the gaining traction to decode the entire Canterbury comic panel F134 mushroom tree with two men and a sword.

This is actually a pretty big breakthrough in Tauroctony interpretation.

(translation: I am stupid, an idiot for not pointing this out and perceiving/grasping this before.)

this is “super obvious” 😞

this is as major of a discovery realization as the magnitude of my blindness and stupidity and mental denseness, as mentally slow as a psychedelic witch with a scopolamine-addled mind.

note that Cautes & Cautopates, the two small Mithras-accompanying men, one stands on left leg, the other stands on right leg, the latter matching Mithras.

12:18 pm I now propose that a major function of the two small men is to depict explicitly the mytheme of standing on left leg versus standing on right leg contrasted this is the reason for the so-called twins one twin stands on left leg one twin afterwards stands on right leg. April 22, 2022 –

Now this is a useful date, because this is a example of a point in time breakthrough because they are not always so much of a point in time breakthrough a famous date damn near a holyday for the ego death community/religious cult.

when did I make the top magnitude Mystery Religion Tauroctony biggest breakthrough of all time , of all the people who have tried to decode such as David uLancey? ans: April 22, 2022.

because everyone knows there are no Texts for the Mithras religion of Roman

Canterbury Psalter images seem to be the same, except I assume – maybe cyberdisciple can help me find where in the hell are scholars writing about the images, interpreting the images – what is their interpretation of the two men balancing and hanging in the tree with the sword Mushroom tree F134 in Canterbury Psalter?

where are all the artist historians interpreting this mushroom tree

but from my point of view the Wikipedia says the thing is these images are very difficult to interpret, and I am good at interpreting such images, because I in fact did

I completely decoded the Canterbury image comic panel all by myself with no help whatsoever from any other scholar and then

the situation is a little bit different with Roman Mithras, because I have read books, and there are easy to find books that try to interpret this imagery, which I have read, and which are easily available, unlike the Canterbury Psalter comic panel F134 mushroom tree with two men and sword.

in any case, I am good at interpreting such images, because of my success that’s been proved in both images, both scenes, which both include – the key decoding aspect is right leg versus left leg, what does that mean?

I explain: the possibility model versus the eternalism, nonbranching Model of control, time, and possibility.

Everyone knows that the challenge in explaining the Roman Religion of Mithras is that we have to rely and (so Thomas Hatsis’ Latin expertise will be of no use here) we have to rely purely on visual image Interpretation, which I today April 22, 2022 Have made the greatest Breakthrough in Interpretation of the Tauroctony.

12:38 PM April 22, 2022: I just confirmed that Mithras’ is straight right leg is forcing the right leg , hind leg, of the bull to be straight.

compare the front left leg of the bull, which is not folded: first, the front of the bull was trying to stand on left front leg, but then later, the right rear leg of the ball is forced to be straight by Mithras’ right leg. – Cybermonk

translation: Decoding; ultimate referent:

initially, the mind tries to rely on the possibility-Branching model of control and time

but then in the loose cognitive state from the Banquet with Mithras, drinking mixed wine Mushroom wine,

then the mind transforms the mental world model, when the possibility Branching model fails and turns out to have no power, and branching possibility is experienced as an illusion, together with the kind of apparent experience of steering control power is experienced as an illusion now, and the mind switches

The mind perceives that underneath the illusion, the solid remaining reality is non-branching

and so the mind is forced by instability threat of control loss:

the more that the mind attempts to rely on the possibility Branching model, the more the mind control becomes unstable unstable, until control becomes completely not viable and chaotic, and total overcoming of viable self-control is the result.

the harder you try, the more you go unstable and override your own control ability.

and then the mind forms the alternative model of control, of dependent control instead of autonomous control, and a new form of control stability is reached this way, all forced upon the mind by the God, in the loose cognitive Association state.

/ End of 12:18 PM insert; the below is from this morning:

jackpot continues : the bull being sacrificed is depicted standing on left leg, corresponds to one of the small men, and Metras standing on right leg corresponds to the other standing man small man

the standing on left leg is what is sacrificed in the Tauroctony – this is a pretty big breakthrough.

Final note for now , connection:

interpret in terms of folding put emphasis on folded leg , because it is easy to depict the bull’s folded leg

don’t just discuss standing leg; discuss folded leg, as a strong sign

inventory all of the folded legs

& inventory all of the non-folded legs, equals “standing” legs.

the non-folded legs are to be considered as standing on, relying on, that mental model.

On November 7, 2015, I posted a preliminary step of my leg mytheme decoding which led to the Canterbury Miracle decoding of November 2020.

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/cupids-performing-tauroctony/

New corroboration while recording Egodeath Mystery show today note that:

the Cupid who is standing on the left leg is not in the position of sacrifice stabbing the shoulder of the bull

and the Cupid who is standing on the right leg is in the position of sacrifice stabbing the bull’s shoulder with knife, vulnerability wound in the right side, through which new birth.

thus the image confirms my hypothesis Theory prediction, that art that shows both standing on the left and the right leg would give preference to the right leg.

thus my theory is further confirmed by this art find, combined with coming back, circling back around after 2015.

now in 2022 I return to interpret again this art find, and it gives confirmation of the intervening Discoveries and Interpretations and Theory,

further bolstering my interpretation Theory of the meaning of two legs in art tradition.

on Christmas 2015, I posted my successful Decoding, Against Hatsis failed decoding.

Chris Bennett’s 1995 essay in the book green gold Bennett presented the what he called dancing man image.

then in 1998 Samorinis article showed that image in black-and-white.

and then maybe Jan Irvins 2008 book the holy Mushroom showed that image.

and then around 2013 or 2015 or later redated as 2017, Hatsis website number one or two or three Hatsis interpreted the salamander Roasting image in the Article Roasting Jan irvin.

then on Christmas 2015, I posted the announcement, with a great self certainty, of the meaning of standing on the right leg.

how did I have such such certainty and clarity at that point in time, is because on November 7 2015, I interpreted cyberdisciples art find of two Cupid’s performing the Tauroctony-type bull sacrifice.

see my comment on that page and probably also find a copy of that comment in the ego death Yahoo Group

I don’t know if I have done real research to determine on what date or my trajectory of gradual Decoding but here’s a good solid date.

I think what’s missing at this November 7 2015 Interpretation by me is specifically saying:

*left* equals left leg equals possibility model Possibility Branching Model of time and control and possibility

and that the *right* leg specifically represents the eternal of them pre-existing eternally control thoughts mental model of time self control and possibility

My November 7 2015 comment on cyberdisciples art find interpretation just points out that because there are two legs, we can map those to the two mental models

but on the left the Cupid stands on left leg and on the right in the favored knife right shoulder position the other Cupid stands on right leg.

they are babies, it would be suitable to show a baby standing on left foot and then a bearded adult

The November comment on cyber disciples art find interpretation just points out that because there are two legs we can map those to the two mental models

on the left the Cupid stands on left leg and

on the right the other Cupid stands on right leg

and there’s a clear preference shown

they are babies it would be suitable to show a baby standing on left foot and then

a bearded adult could Be shown on standing on right foot

that would be consistent

I don’t know if I have done the research to find the original dates trajectory of decoding standing on right leg mytheme

but anyway here’s a convenient evidence that I stumbled upon of how I announced in such a clear definitive fashion Christmas 2015 my leg Decoding which was instrumental and crucial in decoding Great Canterbury Psalter F134 image of The mushroom tree with two men and sword

and then decoding the entire surrounding image including for example lower left cyber side red man standing right foot on column base while sword penetrating wound in right side from inside of the body outward smiling and turning to look to the right

Song: Drop Dead Legs

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cautes_and_Cautopates

more systemic corrobn of the Egodeath theory prediction patterns that are predicted as coherent set:

sunrise = good = new mental model = right leg = torch up = Cautes = eternalism = adult

Cautopates = torch down = bad= child= sunset = snake basket = left leg = possibilism = old initial mental model

7:10 pm summary: 4/22/2022:

accidental major/huge breakthrough on interpreting Mithraic Tauroctony today.

It’s all about the legs!

The key is to inventory which legs are more bent vs straighter.

Mithras, 2 twins, bull front, bull hind; 5 pairs of legs to correlate/contrast.

Which leg is relied on, R leg is good, L leg is childish (gives control instability & powerlessness after 🍄 banquet).

A more-bent leg means “not relying on that mental model”; a straighter leg means “relying on that mental model”
(L = egoic; R = transcendent).

This is the biggest scholarly decoding of solving the Tauroctony (bull sacrifice scene) mystery. our evidence mainly consists of: every single religious cultic initiation site has this scene.

No texts available, only art images are available, so we had to be really good at art interpretation; like wiki says re: Canterbury Psalter, “Images that are difficult to interpret” – done.

– Cybermonk

history of working on the Jesus Kosmokrator (cosmos ruler) images with 1 foot lifted, compared to the other – my history of analyzing the mytheme {one foot higher than the other} began there, maybe 2003.

and so you can see both in cyberdisciples presentation of my first generation Interpretation and then November 7, 2015 my comment which describes my working towards a different interpretation, not yet identifying the right leg is preferred

I remember that when I saw cyberdisciple quoting my v1 decoding attempt in his web log posting webpage – I remember that on November 7, 2015, I thought my latest interpretation is better than that.

cyberdisciple described my original interpretation this way:

“The Cupids pictured here also stand with one leg on the ground and the other in the air. This represents the enlightened mind with one foot rooted to the ground, the determined world, and one foot floating free in the transcendent world. This image also suggests the one ‘footed’ mushroom.”

yeah but which foot?! it changes! The above type of explanation doesnt take into account the question of which foot is raised & which foot is on the ground.

I saw that interpretation of mine, and I didn’t feel very good about it , didnt feel it was very solidly-based; I did not feel solidly Based on November 7, 2015, and that’s why I felt obligated to post a fresh interpretation comment at his page, this time, interpreted in terms of:

which leg you depend on is the leg that’s down on the ground, and lifting the other leg means not depending on that leg (mental worldmodel).

however, on nov 7 2015, I had not yet specifically mapped the right leg to the superior, more stable mental model, until I asserted the latter on Christmas 2015.

all of this constitutes some very important history behind the Canterbury miracle Decoding, which on 4am April 13, 2022 came back to clarify the Mushroom tree in the Salamander Dancing image (finally recognizing the mound on the right as a cut major right branch trunk, then a few hours later, noticed his right foot touches that cut branch), and now on April 22, 2022 I came back, through revisiting cyberdisciple’s image and my two interpretations at that webpage, which finally led me back to great breakthrough of interpreting all five pairs of legs in the famous Tauroctony scenes. – Cybermonk