Academia forces scholars to cripple their assertions, downplay their assertions and evidence, and toe the “Moderate entheogen theory” party line, even though they want to assert and mentally grasp the Maximal entheogen theory of religion.
extending a little bit listening to my raw voice recording today April 21, 2022, there are so many instances that come to mind of why Carl Ruck is coerced to Think Small & Think Suppressed.
Cyberdisciple says that Carl Ruck in the 1978 book The Road to Eleusis says that Mirceau Eliade in his book on Shamanism which Wisen’s book soma criticizes the unbelievable waffling of Eliad and then goes on to do that
Extreme waffling himself five seconds after he describes how Eliade does that waffling, Wasson does the identical exact same waffling himself.
The waffling & self-countering equals the Moderate position .
We have talked about this and joked about this before, about waffling back in February 2021
Dr. Secret Amanita Carl Ruck’s waffling equals the academia forced position
you are forced to waffle
you’re not allowed to assert plain and straightforward that religion comes from entheogens
this is exactly specifically why I had to formulate the Maximal entheogen theory of religion in 2002, because academia forbids asserting in any historical period /Era
in academia , you are not allowed to say that visionary plants were normal, main stream
and this breaks and destroys my forgot plot assertion
in academia you are not allowed to say that middle ages Christianity forgot their original use of visionary plants which was originally normal in public and standard and ordinary and widely understood
you are not allowed to assert that
that they ever had above board Knowledge
and so the whole concept of forgot plot is kind of shattered
given that in academia you are not allowed to assert that there ever was a time when visionary plants were normal in religion
and therefore you can’t talk in terms of that they forgot *this original full-fledged knowledge*, because you’re not permitted to admit that they *ever* had this normalized visionary plants and normalized metaphoricity non-literalist thinking
you are forced to assert like Carl rock, obedient lapdog Carl rock never can allow himself to assert that all mixed wine was psychoactive mushroom wine.
he is not allowed to make such a positive statement.
and that is why
whenever you hand Carl Ruck your evidence, he will destroy it , because he is forced to destroy it by putting it in his cage and putting shackles around your evidence and clamping on an intensive negative framing around your evidence to neutralize your positive evidence
and he will invert and destroy and eliminate your positive findings of visionary plants in our religious history
because academia and the establishment paradigm is forcing coral rock to neutralize every piece of evidence and in fact invert it
so when you hand him –
the more evidence you hand Carl rock, …
you see we don’t really have Carl rock, we have a corrupted version of Carl rock
academia forces us to have a substitute Corrupted version of Carl rock
and per the Hoffman uncertainty principle, we don’t actually know what Carl rocks actual position is regarding how normal was visionary plant use
we cannot know what Carl rock believes; we can only know what he *wrote*
publicly, when we observe his position, The results from our throwing a Taboo particle question at him: “was visionary plant use normal?”
and we observe his publicly stated faith position statement, hand on the Bible “I, coral rock, solemnly swear & assert that it was never normal to use visionary plants [even while I pile on book after book year after year asserting visionary plants I must always frame it as negative], no, there was no normal visionary plant use ever, in our religion, ever.
– signed, Carl Ruck”
everyone in academia who has written about Entheogen Scholarship has always been forced to assert the moderate position, which is “yes, but no; the visionary plants were present, but therefore they were absent.”
this self-contradictory, Moderate Position is not invented by Carl rock , but it is a move that he is forced to make because he is an academic
and this was my 2002 revolution, my declaration of revolution against this waffling this enforced, pretended stance
Cyberdisciple has recounted that coral rock in the book the road to Eleusis complained about this and revealed the prejudice and bias that academics are forced to pretend and
curl Ruck’s in the book of the road to Eleusis explains how m. Eliade had to lie about his own views on shamanism, the use of visionary plants by shamans
and similarly we can see how Carl rock is forced to contradict himself by assuring the establishment that “yes, although there was visionary plants in ancient Greece 500 BC at Eleusis , which is equated with the entire subject and in fact replaces the entire subject every single mystery Religion
it’s replaced by the single instance of Eleusis as proxy, exactly the same as Plaincourault fresco replaces completely looking at any other mushroom Trees or Mushroom imagery and Christian Art
similarly as cyber disciple has elaborated, Eleusis is abused to replace rather than to explain the entire hundreds of mystery religions and banqueting tradition instances
they are made to go away by Brian Muraresku book the immortality key, we eliminate the nuisance data
academics are forced to replace the problematic reality
eliminate
we are forced academics are forced to replace the problematic reality
that all mixed wine was psychoactive Mushroom wine, and the problematic reality that all mystery Religion Initiation was psychoactives Mushrooms
and we must contradict ourselves like Wassen when Wassen eventually conformed to Acadamia’s dictates, and he switched his cover story his cover-up story from Mushrooms equals kykeon at Eleusis , to extinct ergot cover-up story, to come into compliance with academia Strategy:
1) first replace all mystery religions by Eleusis and distract from all banqueting mixed wine rounds of mixed wine, by putting all spotlights exclusively on Eleusis.
and then, step 2) Wasson you have to change from your problematic assertion that kykeon is mushrooms, that Eleusis kykeon drink is mushrooms, and change your story
to become in compliance, you must contradict yourself and say that they one single instance of psychoactive plants in Greek religion, which is Eleusis , was an extinct strain of ergot, which no longer exists, and there:
we have thereby eliminated the problematic reality that all mixed wine banqueting was mushrooms, and that all mystery religion was based on mushrooms
and so we see this exactly precisely is the moderate entheogen theory of religion which I declared revolution against in 2002.
I very much noticed in 2001 , reading the book apples of Apollo, I noticed how every single academic was forced to counter-signal themselves
and I said fck this shiite I refuse to f’ing counter signal myself
I’m not gonna counter-signal my assertion per the Establishment’s enforced, Moderate entheogen theory.
go f yourself, I’m going to assert a Maximal Entheogen Theory of all religion.
I’m not going to toe the line and contradict myself per the Moderate Theory
this is exactly the heart I have identified now here and now I have identified and put my finger on it
exactly precisely what the hell is going on with this moderate theory that every single stupid dumbass academic pushes?
why in the hell are every single academic adhering to the moderate entheogen Theory of Religion which asserts that never, ever were religions normally based on visionary plants – not in the middle ages, not in antiquity, and not in the archaic era ;
we must always counter-signal ourselves and contradict ourselves and do the coral rock Waffle Dance move of converting every single piece of positive evidence for visionary plants, deflect through inversion; deflection of evidence through inverting it,
to transform every proof of presence of visionary plants into the proof of absence, through inverting inversion framing; aggressive inversion framing.
just like moreso Eliade did regarding shamanism
and just like Wasson did by converting from the mushroom exclamation to the extinct ergot strain explanation!
the Moderate Entheogen Theory of Religion is all about deflecting and inverting Evidence, together with a crappy Carl Ruck ineffective, irrelevant, Wrong Theory of Mythology Interpretation by applying stupid and obsolete anthropology ordinary state-based theories, as cyberdisciple points out.
The Egodeath theory 