Easter, April 17, 2022

the immature, childish, irrelevant form of entheogen scholarship = descriptions of plants, debate about plants

the mature, adult, relevant form of entheogen scholarship = descriptions of experiences from plants, debate about experiences from plants

Interpreting descriptions of experiences from plants : how is this (branching) image of a plant used to describe the experiences from the plant, and how do we interpret that?

this is a mature, adult interpretation, not stupid, pointless arguing at a children’s level, about “spot the mushroom” – Is it a 🍄?? Yes, or No?? 👍💥👎

in this episode I plan to maybe do an adult Interpretation of the salamander image probably referencing canterbury’s tree 71

and probably mentioning the snake with legs in the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the Canterbury Psalter, comparing it with the shape and morphology of the salamander

explain what the salamander is touching and especially now latest news is describe what the salamander is not touching what the salamander is avoiding touching

and describe the pink initiate balancing in the tree is avoiding touching

although the red hanging hanging initiate does touch the sword of God , but it is understood that to do so is control instability death.

so demonstrate adult level mature sophisticated not crude but actual bona fide Interpretation

the appropriate type of interpretation

not some inarticulate some up or like Sam Renee saying that mushroom tree which has all kinds of branching features and strangeness going on , because it has spots in my black and white photo, we’re going to instantly label it as Amanita, and then we our interpretation is finished.

the mushroom in the children’s book has spots, therefore our interpretation is that it must be Amanita, end of discussion. 🍄

My critique is scathing that all three of the other teams are interpretations other than the Maximal eternalism theory of Eucharist Christian art religious art all three of them together amount to because none of them are eternal of them paternalism because none of them are the maximal eternalism Theory they are all by default they remain all in the same childish undeveloped state state they are just three different expressions of the same childish undeveloped state of the field regardless of whether it’s

1) to maliciously replace the Eucharist with a placebo for profit as a dishonest busy Business model

or 2) whether it’s because of a infantile fixation on secrecy like Dr. Secret and a childish fixation on toy red and white children’s book mushrooms and where’s Waldo, spot the mushroom

or 3) whether they want to replace the Eucharist by witching scopolamine plants

it’s all the same: they’re replacing Psilocybin by something that’s not psilocybin,

regardless of 1) wine or 3) henbane or 2) amanita, the result is the same: you have something other than the real deal ; you have something other than the Psilocybin which transforms the mind to reveal nonbranching

so you just have three different versions of {literalist ordinary state possibilism thinking premised on autonomous control}

you have egoic delusion and the rest is details: the difference between 1) Salvation Salesmen team, 3) the witches team, and 2) the doctor secret team.

by virtue of not being the {eternalism non-branching}, enlightened view, they all default to being based in the same egoic dilusion, those on the outside, on transformed conventional childish thinking about this subject about this field

then I can discuss the different the futility of Santorini trying to have two columns: one column is Amanita Trees & one column is …

they’re not even labeled columns, are they

they’re not even clear

he just says vaguely And to concretely like a child who has no abstraction ability “Trees of the Plaincourault type”

these are not proper, abstracted, labelled classification categories

but his approach won’t work anyway, because Canterbury shows us that the artist combined 4 defined Mushroom families, four of them, kept mentally distinct and yet recombined.

and Sam Renee’s approach is not going to work, it’s too crude because it assumes That all aspects of a given Mushroom will consistently be of a single one of the four types or the what he says are the two types but he doesn’t even label his to type so it’s not even clear what he’s asserting it’s not even clear what his classification scheme is it’s to concrete it’s too crude and concrete ; his table falls short of being a classification system.

it’s just too crude of a classification scheme.

he doesn’t even have clear labels.

he doesn’t even do a good job of labeling his own crude inadequate 2- column scheme, two-column table of the three examples of the vaguely classified “Plaincourault type” and three instances of the vaguely classified- I don’t know what he calls right-hand column.

so I will take another look at that table.

I went to print out my enhanced version of his article, and I didn’t print it , because it’s 81 pages!

ep 118 Egodeath Mystery Show – Legs on a Snake

DONE- I need to remember to produce last night’s recording for April 16 – I think that will be episode 118. see idea devmt pg 13

I have just printed out two articles pdfs from Samorini: the one about Plaincourault and the one about Mushroom Trees in christian art.

They are extremely dense PDFs, very hard to read and meditate on, because they are just awkward to work with, like microfiche.

After I did about 75% of the work to make a readable webpage, December 20, 2020, of Samorini’s article on Christian Art Mushroom Trees, I was so worn out, I only did a little bit of reading and commentary of that result.

and I didn’t even comprehend some important things because I never really read my webpage that I made.

And I would not have read my webpage, because it was not ready to read, because I had not finished doing the basic formatting to produce a readable version of Samorini’s article.

His articles’ formatting is very far from being readable.

So it is no wonder, when people discuss Samorini’s article, their discussion is very limited, because the article is formatted in a very unreadable way, with no headings, no Contents, gigantic paragraphs, no white space at all, distracting Italian on the left column, very tiny font, etc.

He is even missing- he forgot to add the Bibliography entry for Clark Heinrich’s book strange fruit (1994)!

April 6, 2022

Egodeath Mystery Show: the leading edge

this is a podcast with a very latest leading edge entheogen drug policy reform

and repeal of prohibition returning to 1913

for centuries and centuries and millennia there were no prohibition laws and we lived just fine

until this racket, this pestilence, landed & descended

these fraudulent racket racket scam evil antichrist dishonest fake laws that we don’t need and we never needed them

get them out of here

they’re not handed down from God, they’re handed down from Satan

this bunk fake fraudulent prohibition version 2.0 scam racket is just the same as the Salvation Salesmen and the Meditation Hucksters are all in cahoots.

It’s all the same junk.

The really Maximal entheogen theory:

new 2022 version after 19 1/2 years since version one in 2002 , but this time around, it’s being defined now with full complete knowledge of mytheme decoding, including non-branching, and including, very importantly, non-branching, or branching-message mushroom trees, in particular.

but also with full mapping of Eucharist, recognized as re-dosing Psilocybin.

And strong emphasis on specifically mixed wine as rounds of re-dosing Psilocybin.

Not just saying the stupid brainless word “mushroom” – by which everybody (exactly the same as Hatsis) pictures wildly irrelevant Amanita, instead of the correct thing, re-dosing Psilocybin.

It’s like if I tell you the words “Italian umbrella Pine” and you picture a Christmas tree: No! you’re picturing the entirely wrong thing.

Mobile Page

Short simple mobile mobile version page, in contrast to the long heavy structured page that’s edited using computer

I have a official page for this, podcast ideas, but I need a fresh page – or maybe more to the point is that I for mobile page editing I need a short simple page not the podcast ideas page which is relatively complicated and heavy weight plus there is some data risk of data loss if I mix if I edit a page both through the computer and mobile device that’s bad so things need to be split into long complicated pages edited on the computer versus short simple pages made edited with mobile device

don’t cross The two streams; keep them separate

The day we throw Amanita in the garbage, is the day we legalize Psilocybin.

Cybermonk, Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 102b – It’s a Package Deal, 42:00, April 5, 2022

The episode explains how the Ruck (Dr. Secret) gang’s directionless, non-activist, unfocused, regressive, 🍄-fixated, immature, non-strategic approach to entheogen scholarship is worthless and irrelevant for repealing Psilocybin Prohibition.

Amanita is the false king; Psilocybin is the true king.

To repeal Psilocybin Prohibition, the following are MANDATORY:

Learn the mytheme language per the Egodeath theory; learn the Egodeath theory including mytheme theory; this is REQUIRED, to even just perceive the massive evidence & prove that our own religious tradition is strongly and primarily Psilocybin based, Greek Roman Jewish & Christian, Western Culture, so give us our damn Religious Freedom, NOW!!

Ditch Amanita 🍄–>🗑; put all 100% of investment on focus on Psilocybin. Make your scholarship useful and relevant, Ruck gang, & Letcher Hatsis too.

You claim to be a historian – then damn it, make yourself useful!!

Carl Ruck, you call yourself a professor of mythology, and you’re failing to leverage it to actually make yourself useful and do something with this scholarship.

Learn how to read mythology, to read its message from re-dosing Psilocybin, not your stupid retarded defeatist message of “secrecy” and absence of entheogens.

Mythology is trying to get through to you: it’s trying to tell you that “we all use rounds of psilocybin”.

That’s what Hellenistic, Western. Christendom’s religious mythology is all about, centrally: re-dosing psilocybin.

Trashcan your stupid worthless irrelevant sideshow distraction of stupid amanita – my God, let it go!

Make yourself relevant, make yourself useful.

Have a purpose behind your scholarship, your random directionless piling up of pointless books year after year accomplishing nothing and not even *trying* to accomplish anything!

Start trying to make this scholarship accomplish something.

Change the world.

Leverage your mytheme & entheogen scholarship to do something that affects the world.

The mythology is trying to tell you to, listen to the mythology, it’s telling you you’re supposed to accomplish something with this scholarly investigation work.

Leverage your scholarship, adopt a goal, take on a mission: Repeal Prohibition of relevant Psilocybin, not stupid, already-legal amanita!

see podcast ideas page

bringing together the Egodeath theory with entheogen scholarship, is required, to do entheogen scholarship correctly. if the Egodeath theory is lacking, you’re doing E S incorrectly and not in accordance w the msg of the entheogens , you are an intruder in the field of intelligence Scholarship razz I am a native in the field I have given up I have paid obeisance and I have legitimately entered this field I am in conformity with this field you are out of compliance with this field and you will be kicked out through the gate until you conform to what the plants teach for all your beginner talk about plant teachers ha ha

This implies that I am the only real Entheogens Scholar; the other guys aren’t actually real actual genuine entheogen Scholars 🤔

summarize more tightly this time invoice recording lead with the payload summary first that by Panofskyhis argument from consistency this means to be correct we must win on all four fronts at the same time for consistency this is the correct way the only correct way to make an Oski’s argument from consistency blow up in his face is if we have a total occurrence of that. it won’t work if we only merely try to make all mushroom trees become recognized as Mushrooms that’s not enough to so cold make it blow up in his face to make that happen we must follow the principle of Panofsky argument from consistency we have to be more consistent than that

that is two to hit the target in the death star and ignite it it won’t work if we only aim for all mushroom trees being mushrooms we must instead aim for the entire enchilada on all four fronts at the same time simultaneously after all Panofsky says we have to be consistent

to put that negatively like he does and skip skip a couple of steps like he does he would say he would argue if you expand the scope of his letter to Wassen Panofsky would write as follows he would argue as follows then let’s flip that and win the whole casino:

The reason why the Eucharist cannot be Psilocybin is because it is not unique there are hundreds more instances of the equivalent thing such as meditation and Mushroom Trees and mixed wine therefore the Eucharist cannot be psilocybin because it’s just like these other things QED

and here’s what the Panofsky shaped argument above implicitly leaps and jumps across the above argument takes it for granted or it does a covert strawman move covert strawman strategy it attributes to you the position he forcefully attributes to you and covertly so he says holding out his Obi-Wan Kenobi finger he hypnotizes you and silently covertly

tells you what your position is that you are defending he tells you and commands you by Jedi mind trick as follows

you are not willing to defend the position that meditation and Eucharist and mushroom trees and mixed wine are all psilocybin therefore your position for consistency on the argument from consistency your position is that none of them are psilocybin none of them can be psilocybin because otherwise and he goes very silent here and jumps quietly over this chasm of logic:

you are not willing to hold the position that all of these things are psilocybin because everyone knows that that they are not psilocybin and everyone knows that you are not willing to assert that all four of these things are sold Simon Psilocybin therefore you cannot assert that the Eucharist Psilocybin because it would require you to hold the position that all four of these things are psilocybin for consistency therefore none of these things are psilocybin

no just copy and paste and repeat that same argument for each of the four things all interlocked together then

The reason why mixed wine cannot possibly be so Simon is because it is of the same type as Eucharist and mushroom Trees and Meditation and we all silently know that you are not willing to assert that all four are psilocybin therefore mixed wine cannot possibly be psilocybin because it is of the same type as the other 4QED you have a choice and I have just silently taken away that choice from you by my lips of strawman attribution to you to hypnotize and assert you what your position is because we all know

that you’re not some crazy person who would simultaneously assert that all four of these things are slow Simon Psilocybin

speaking seriously now my payload point is this my take away strategic summary is this here is how you have to win the entire world or else you cannot win anything

The only way to win any one of the four bottles as you have to fight to win all four of them in synchronized with each other don’t let them win one front at a time it’s the same thing on a simpler scale as they do not allow you to simultaneously say no Jesus and say Christianity came from mushrooms

we know that you are not willing to assert both of those things at the same time there is no reason to state this explicitly because obviously you are not willing to assert both of those taboo positions at the same time

similarly we all know that you were unwilling to assert all for taboo radical proposals all at the same time you don’t have the balls as we all know you don’t have the guts and the vision and the boldness to assert all four of the following things at the same time and this is why you are not permitted to have victory in any one of these for fields:

you don’t have the guts to assert like a crazy person all six of the following things all at once interlocked together:

don’t worry too much about the particular items that I’m about to list but look at the shape of my argument notice hell it depends on systems thinking, multiple Interlocked things and I’m playing gotcha that I don’t permit you to change anyone of these things and I have you roped in and I have you trapped in orthodoxy an entire set of use interlocked I have you trapped

you have to preserve the status quo on all 10 interlock fields or fronts or positions because you would have to change them systematically all together and you don’t have the balls to do that because I say so because of my Jedi mind trick

asserting that meditation Psilocybin is exactly as ridiculous as asserting that the Eucharist is psilocybin which is exactly as ridiculous and unthinkable and out of bounds and you don’t have the balls to think these ideas because you would have to assert all four insane proposals and we know you don’t have the guts to do that you don’t have the vision to do that:

you are not allowed to propose Eucharist is psilocybin because to do that the only possible way you could do that is if you were also willing to defend the position and we know you are not because I say so covertly that also by the very same token Mushroom Trees also are psilocybin

and you would also have to assert following Allegro as a follower of allegro disciple of allegro you would have to assert there’s no Jesus you would have to assert that is the confluence model of origin of Christianity rather than big bang model

and you would have to make the outrageous unthinkable claim that meditation and Psilocybin and we know you don’t have the guts and balls and vision to do that and this is why you have to deny that meditation is all Simon Psilocybin

because the only way that you could coherently make that assertion is if you were simultaneously willing which we know that you were not willing to assert also by the same token that mushroom trees are also psilocybin and this is why I have you trapped and locked into the status quo

because you are not simultaneously willing to assert that mixed wine is psilocybin and the Eucharist is psilocybin and mushroom trees are psilocybin and meditation is still Simon and maybe we will even throw on {the gradual confluence of Jesus figure} to boot, just to make sure we’ve got you trapped , as we dictate what you are and are not willing to go for and to aim for total victory on every front simultaneously

but we all know that you are not willing to demand victory on all four fronts at the same time , therefore you have to hold the position that none of them are psilocybin

QED, suckers!! 😈👹

– The Salvation Salesmen roller derby team

A productive approach for this classification scheme: don’t only look at the field of altered states; combine it with the field of esotericism: four levels.

motivating main idea for starting this page: realization that the Moderate entheogen theory, which is the elevated branch… of merely the *Minimal* major branch position, = 🍄

the Moderate entheogen theory of religion = 🍄

The lameness of the Ruck school approach is perfectly represented by 🍄 the “secret cult of Amanita” that Letcher Hatsis rails against – while at the same time defensively saying in sep 2021 livestream w Mura Benn, & McK “i AGREE with Ruck! 🐍 forked tongue, sure u do.

“i agree w the guy who is driving & pushing the secret aman cult propagation premise that I’m taking down” – makes sense.

Dr. Secret isn’t an opposing derby team against the Witches.

“We’re besties” – while Ruck says Hatsis clearly dont know sht about Latin, this is sub-amateur slop, the image plainly says “THIS IS A SPEAR” not a parasol of victory, (whatever the f thats supposed to be).

“Historian”: maker of sh!t up.

Levels of entheogen theory sophistication & adequacy

4.

grade level: advanced university upperclassmen, grad school, post-grad

very best:

redosing psilocybin to control intensity & duration

the maximal {re-dosing psilocybin} theory of religion, integrated with the Egodeath theory, which is analogical psychedelic eternalism & dependent ctrl, incl {non-branching} mytheme

maximal psil is re: antiqy & pre-modern history studies

late 20th C tools eg 1-hour 4 HO-DiPT / 4-ACE w re-dosing

6-hour psil w/ re-dosing is the benchmark Gold Standard of Timeless High Culture

3.

grade level: upper classmen high school & undergrad college

2nd best: psilocybin (assumed low-skill, unrefined, 1-time dose non-technique), acacia + rue

the maximal entheogen theory of religion

The 2006 Egodeath theory, lacking the {non-branching} master mytheme, employing the term ‘determinism’

2.

grade level: grade school

Ruck school: Amanita & scopalamine, ancient ivy must have been psychoactive

ignorant of mytheme decoding, despite being professor of mythology

cannabis (eg) , pop sike 🍄 , Astrotheology & Shamanism.

1.

grade level: preschool

straight; osc-premised. regular wine + stupid clueless dictionaries of myth; Wouter Hanegraaff Dictionary of gnosis – good luck finding any mention of visionary plants. plants as symbols.

See any uninspired, non-altered state book on magic, witchcraft lore or esotericism. exoteric esotericism.

Left Leg Bad Leg Limping King Hephaestos Limping God

lifted garment

left leg = initial naive possibility branching thinking about control and time, having power to steer

https://religion.fandom.com/wiki/Hephaestus

you cant put any weight on your left leg, it cant bear any weight

Egodeath Mystery Show episode 66 Entheogens BTFOd 28:30 –

merry go round

tripppimg along

stumbling over a skyscraper

you can touch the sky with your elastic mind

don’t fall down

– Enjoy Yourself, by Legend:

https://youtu.be/Su5LBwKPKQI

possibilism thinking cant bear any weight

Oedipus the limping king – what is Freud’s lame interpretation that can’t stand up to scrutiny, can’t bear scrutiny?

Max Freakout: Freud gets no respect, but people can take away some weighty ideas from him that bear weight.

Cyberdisciple: I wouldn’t put any weight on it. 😅🙃

Hatsis’s regal claim collapses under the weight when tested, can’t bear any load of scrutiny.

I wouldn’t place any weight on Hatsis’ claim of no msh in Christianity; that claim can’t stand.

When tested, Hatsis’ claim can’t stand up to testing, but collapses under the weight of scrutiny.

The foundation carries no weight, cannot sustain

no basis that can carry the argument

That argument can’t hold up, but collapses under the weight of testing.

there’s no one there to steer

link to my 2016 yahoo thread salamander roasting “dancing man”

The wise man puts his argument on a firm basis that can hold up as a stable basis.

Consider a hypothetical wise man and a fool; wisdom and folly. (Let’s call them Cybermonk & Psychedelic Witch, aka dumber than an ox.)

OMG look what a tiny scene of Lucas Cranach’s painting led to my massive breakthrough! Entire image? compare how I decoded the entire canterbury’s Psalter by starting with John lash severely cropped image of only the mushroom tree number 71 with no surrounding context and I did a pretty fairly thorough Decoding of that tree with no context just by importing my 2016 hypothesis of the roasting Salamander dancing man standing on right leg foot.

not only did I gain the decoding of Canterbury but the benefit flows the other way to it’s always a two-way correlation when the different departments of the explanatory theory cross correlate corroborate each other so also my reward the fact that I was successful at decoding the tree 71 was also served looking the other direction looking back behind me provided the corroboration that I had wanted that I have been looking for ever since I decoded

tentatively the roasting Salamander dancing man in 2016 so if I only have one picture and come up with a hypothesis I can’t really draw conclusions but when I see the same pattern across two pictures now we’re talking now I can cross correlate and increase my proof level B and become more compelling evidence and become stronger Proof by cross interpreting do not do

we take away point when we speak about interpreting one mushroom tree just as Panofsky told us do not interpret one isolated mushroom tree instead interpret the entire set of them and while you’re at it throw in interpreting of all Hellenistic art side-by-side with all Christian art then add in a giant Theory to and all these big things all add up and all cross corroborate each other to reach highly compelling extremely compelling and Proof approaching certainty.

Compare my decoding of the cropped off color blurry no context John lash Hanging and Mushroom tree compared to my black and white Lucas Cranatch’s paintingwhich I’m not sure I thought that the body of the book said that it was that one part of a two part or three part painting and believe it or not I can’t find the original I can’t find a picture of that painting online w

I thought that the body of the book The Power of Myth said that was just one part of a two- or three-part painting

I can’t find a picture of that painting online

in other words the breath of explanatory power breath the broad breath of explanatory power makes one interpretation better than the other interpretation which only has narrow parasol victory explanatory power

Given two competing Interpretations, the more compelling interpretation is going to be the smaller, more elegant theory, that explains a broader range of things.

How the 2013 breakthrough was received and signaled and signal recognized: three anomalies, all regarding {branch}:

Eve holds onto a branch – that’s an anomaly signal.

There is a branch instead of fig leaf in front of her – that is an anomaly signal.

There is a stag with branching antlers behind her – that is an anomaly signal behind her branching legs.

This artwork is absolutely explicit: it might as well have the Bat-Cave sign on it that says “branching equals meaningfulness”.

Just like how the other day I had a big mental headspace reconnection per the conceptual revolutions book, when I stopped seeing mushroom tree branches as “meaningless anomalies and random flaws”, and instead recognized them as the very carrier of the meaning – that changed everything.

In terms of the book Conceptual Revolutions, my recognition of the meaningfulness shifted the whole- that recognition re-contextualized the mushroom trees; a wholesale recontextualization happened.

Eve is standing on rock.

Cranatch painting b/w in conjunction w fritz graf’s aesthetic cover:

jason, Python guarding golden apples of immortality in tree in garden of the Hesperides, non-branching vine tree, sacrificed ram golden fleece, Athena

April 5, 2022 Egodeath Mystery Show, I announced I think a new point about the above from Canterbury:

The sword is coming from inside; he is stabbing his traditional {wound in the right side} from inside of his body pushing outward.

the “control-seizure vulnerability in the {right side}”

perceiving and comprehending the nonbranching worldline of control thoughts pre-existing, is the {spear in the side that kills the king / steersman}.

lifted garment

7:42 am apr 5 2022 doh just noticed lift left leg

The fool erects his argument position entirely on a false basis which collapse when put under the weight of testing.

both feet down God dances you on clouds on both feet when lifted garments, Jesus and Sophia

Amanita is the Fools’ Gold of entheogens.

In Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 99c, Eadwine gives the field of entheogen scholars a severe tongue lashing.

We must put all efforts on psychologically jettisoning, repudiating, and abandoning Amanita, except to frame it as, we’re going to just turn it into a sign; we’re gonna turn it into nothing but a pointer; a symbol of what it wishes it could be, which is Psilocybin, including Re-dosing-Psilocybin.

My official interpretation, as the leading entheogen scholar and the top theorist of the intense mystic altered state:

The Plaincourault branching-message Amanita tree represents Amanita – where Amanita is fully correctly and truly recognized for what it actually was thought to be:

Amanita is a sign, an indicator, a pointer to Psilocybin.

Amanita is a curiosity, a sideshow; and it was understood as such, and everyone who ever went on a mushroom hunt and brought back the good kinds of mushrooms and the bad kinds of mushrooms, there was no uncertainty about this: obviously the Amanias are for desperate fallback that you don’t want.

The object of desire and the benchmark is certainly recognized to be Psilocybin.

Everybody understood that the benchmark – no contest at all – is Psilocybin – that’s why all mushroom trees are depicted as Psilocybin.

To prove that that’s a fact: the exception proves the rule:

There is only one branching-message Amanita tree, and that is Plaincourault, which is deviant, abnormal, atypical, an exception.

Amanita stands in the same subservient pointer function, a mere pointer to something greater than itself, exactly the same as the branching-message Mandrake tree of the Montecassino manuscript, with its *borrowed* non-branching message that’s borrowed from Psilocybin mushroom trees, bows down in imitation of what it wishes it could be.

The Psilocybin-hearkening Mandrake tree, which is in the double painted repetition scene that appears twice in the Monte Cassino Manuscript, Mandrake is pretending it is Psilocybin; giving tribute.

Amanita gives tribute to Psilocybin.

The branching-message Amanita tree of the Plaincourault fresco, with its *borrowed* non-branching message that’s borrowed from Psilocybin mushroom trees, bows down in imitation of what it wishes it could be.

The Plaincourault fresco is Amanita bowing down in tribute to the incomparably greater, one and only benchmark, Psilocybin.

Redosing-Psilocybin is the King of Entheogens 👑, by a long mile.

Greek mythology was invented in the context of the mixed-wine banqueting rounds of mixed wine served in saucer cup kylix with mythology painted on them.

Greek mythology comes specifically from redosing Psilocybin.

Everyone knew, and everyone knows, and everyone today knows fully well that amanita is fourth-rate.

As I said, fifth-rate.

To repeat myself: sixth-rate.

Everybody knows this.

Absolutely nobody wants Amanita.

AMANITA IS FOR LOSERS

PSILOCYBIN IS FOR WINNERS

– in drug policy reform, historical precedent for our Freedom of Religion, and in entheogen historical scholarship.

No one actually wants Amanita, any more than anyone wants to drink urine, because that’s what Amanita is all about.

Amanita is nothing but a beautiful curiosity, and it is its proper role in the light of clear-cut truth, the proper role of Amanita is to point to the real deal, which is Psilocybin.

I officially publish here my interpretation of the Plaincourault fresco: it is a branching-message tree that represents Amanita giving honor and giving tribute to the real thing, which is Psilocybin.

All of the mushroom trees, as a rule, are Psilocybin, *not* Amanita – and not Mandrake.

Everybody understands this.

This is my proof,

This is my battle flag.

This is my battle cry.

This is my allegiance.

This is the team I am on.

this is my philosophy of life:

Everybody knows that Amanita is highly undesirable compared to Psilocybin, which everybody knows is highly desirable.

The situation could not be more black and white, plain and clear, clear-cut, and very simple:

On a scale of 1 to 10, everybody rightly and correctly gives Amanita one 1 of 10.

Everybody rightly and correctly gives Psilocybin 10 out of 10.

Everyone knows that; you know it.

Don’t let any witches confuse you about this any more than you would let a witch persuade you that the deliriant hallucinogen, Mandrake, is the equal of Psilocybin.

In the Montecassino Manuscript in both scenes which show in exactly parallel a Psilocybin tree and a Mandrake tree, we all know which tree is mimicking the other and paying tribute and giving honor and tribute to the other one:

It is the Mandrake tree bowing down and giving tribute and giving honor and serving as a pointer to point to the benchmark, which is everywhere clearly understood to be Psilocybin, of course.

The Montecassino, borrowed branching-message Mandrake tree (doubly portrayed, in both scenes) is crystal clear on what the benchmark is:

The benchmark, obviously, everyone knows the benchmark is branching-message Psilocybin trees; definitely not branching-message Mandrake trees.

Graduate Level Mystery Religion Hierophants Clinic Session Guides Mix the Wine

Egodeath Mystery Show episode 100b ~55:00 poses a big question for the ⚡️ hubristic modern science braggarts who claim already that they are greater than the mixers and servers of mixed wine kraters in kylix saucers with images of Jason Python vine tree & Demeter and the Madness of Heracles driven by the snubbed godess to pile up the banqueting furnature to light on fire and sacrifice his future progeny

🔥🍾🍸🪑🔥⏳👶🛏🥣🍄🕰👶🔥

WHAT SAY YOU, MODERN SCIENCE CLINICIANS, PROFESSIONALLY LICENSED SESSION GUIDES??

https://www.bing.com/search?q=madness+of+heracles

What is the “interpretation” given by the four derby teams re: each of these trees?

Interpretation Teams

The Monks -> The Ardent Advocates

The Salvation Salesmen

The Witches

Dr. Secret

Mushroom trees do not represent mushrooms; rather, mushroom trees represent Psilocybin mushrooms communicating a transformed mental model as and experience of non-branching and a new, stable form of control after being made to relying on the non-branching model of time, possibility, and control.

Branching-message trees normally are Psilocybin trees with added branching features and branching imagery and cut branches features or imagery.

Deviant, atypical exceptions are Amanita tree, mandrake tree, or photorealistic tree.

Eustace Window Pilzbaum Pairs Clover Pairs Water Feet Problem Child Mountain Valley

Serpent with Legs Canterbury

Plaincourault

Brinkmann Y Tree of Knowledge

Canterbury tree 71

Cranach tree in Power of Myth

John Rush – Moses’ Y branching trees

Mandrake tree – Manuscript Double Image of Parallel

Jason Serpent Kylix Vine Tree with Athena

Tree: Roasting Salamander Dancing Man in Bestiary

Heading

During Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 100 last night, I formed the phrase “branching-message tree”, which nicely connects back to the later art by Cranach, in which Eve knows about branching vs nonbranching, which knowledge she communicated to me in the great breakthrough of Thanksgiving week 2013; that was my great breakthrough number two, as I have designated.

See my photograph here at this website of the black-and-white page of Joseph Campbell’s book where I have handwritten date timestamp at which the branching message tree communicated to me the great breakthrough

My receiving of Cranach’s branching message also was communicated side-by-side via the Hellenistic art of Jason serpent vine tree Athena on the cover a Fritz Graaf book photograph at this website.

I think at the same webpage as my photograph of my handwritten notes within Joseph Campbell book

What is not there is the cover of the Joseph Campbell book.

What is there is a photograph of the cover of Fritz graph book Greek myth and a photograph of the black-and-white Cranitch portion of his painting with my notes written on it ; handwritten date time stamp to know the exact time at which I had a great breakthrough number two.

My January 11, 1988 great breakthrough #1 was that the real nature of ego transcendence (against the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology / Wilber) is loose cognitive association to transform the mental model to block universe with pre-existing control thoughts.

My great breakthrough number 3 was November 17 +/- a day, 2020: I decoded mushroom tree number 71 balancing and hanging initiates in Great Canterbury Psalter.

My Idea Development pages eg 1-11 here at this site have many dates/time stamps as I proceeded to decode the top row of that panel of the Great Canterbury Psalter.

salamander roasting partial decoding , of Right Leg = eternalism stable control around 2016, decoded msh tree 2020/21

For all practical purposes, I received the salamander roasting dancing man image from Hatsis’ article, and I decoded at least the “standing on right foot” aspect around 2016.

I tentatively decoded some aspects of the salamander roasting image in 2016.

Find “salamander” at egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com to see how far I got in decoding the salamander roasting back then in 2016, because I must have known about fire, that fire is light, which transforms the mental model.

In 2020, I finished decoding the salamander mushroom tree image, especially on how the straightened salamander after roasting was able to contrast himself against the branching tree.

We have non-branching snake contrasted against branching mushroom tree, which I decoded in the era November 2020 – February 2021, decoding on the tree itself and not focusing as much on the dancing man, but matched with Dionysus’ lifted garment per John Rush.

Standing on the right foot equals comprehending the contrast between the non-Branching snake versus the branching mushroom tree.

Decoding flows two ways between two different branching tree images: first I decoded the Salamander image, concentrating on the right foot decoding, then I applied that hypthosis four years later to decode Canterbury’s branching, non-branching, L & R feet & hands.

I proved that the dancing man mushroom tree is proved thereby to be mushrooms, by now reimporting or back-importing or maybe “cross-importing” my decoding from Canterbury, which the salamander image right foot hypothesis enabled decoding.

Through decoding Canterbury tree #71, I have proved that every branching-message mushroom tree by all the artists all of the hundreds of them are hereby proved to be psilocybin mushrooms across Panofsky’s entire type (Including the lone Amanita branching message mushroom tree so not all trees depict Psilocybin even though they all are based in the Psilocybe and Revelation and they serve to communicate and reflect that.

somewhat against Panofsky, not all mushroom trees are the same, because they’re all psilocybin except for Plaincourault

and theres a Mandrake pair exception as well in Montec.

And in Cranatch’s Eve painting, we see no psychoactive plant explicitly indicated, but only a photorealistic tree, serving to communicate the same message I’ve psilocybin state-based experience of non-branching as the condition for reaching stable control in the Psilocybin altered state of loose cognitive binding.

I have proved it for the entire category of all mushroom trees including the salamander roasting dancing man in agreement with my other entheogen scholars before me, Samorini, Bennett and Irvin, I have proved that their identification of the bestiary’s mushroom tree as mushroom is correct.

I have proved that their *identification* ( or inarticulate thumbs up on that “yes it is a mushroom” vote, sans Transcendent Knowledge comprehension of the carried message of nonbranching/ per eternalism model ) is correct ; however, they have not done any actual interpretation.

Dr. Brown needs to raise the criteria for so-called “interpretation”, or differentiate between mere identification assertion (“it’s a mushroom”) vs. adequate interpretation of the message of non-branching and conditional control stability if you adopt as your basis the non-branching model of time, possibility, & control.

The only way to have a sound interpretation that really is an appropriate & adequate type of “interpretation” in the strong sense, in the broader sense, you have to have to have an adult level of interpretation indicating comprehension, and not just a stupid thumbs up vote sans comprehension that “yes it is mushroom”;

you have to descend from the land of the gods, at which point you not only achieve merely certainty that this art depicts a mushroom, but you also have wisdom, gnosis, satori, enlightenment, revelation, unveiling, making mind perceptible, transmogrification, completion of initiation, regeneration, salvation, etc.

to prove the little point – that the mushroom tree represents a mushroom – in fact it does not just represent mushroom; it represents the principle of non-branching, which is ultimate profundity,

you have to comprehend all about non-branching for stable control, and only then you have proof that the entire set of branching-message mushroom trees, every one of them is represents and is equal and in fact symbolizes we have proved that the motif of the branching message mushroom tree symbolizes none other than transcendent knowledge.

Only then can you come down from the heavens and prove the seemingly trivial or small upward thumb that “yes this is mushrooms”.

I have proved that anomalous branching imagery on a mushroom tree specifically represents knowledge of psilocybin changing the mental model to the non-branching model.

I know that it is mushrooms for a fact, because it has anomalous branching imagery, combined with other motives from this cluster including standing on right foot fire and non-branching or salamander placed side-by-side with the branching mushroom tree – the cluster of typically ASC associated features proves that it is a psilocybin msh.

QED, mofos!

I need to read my 2016 decoding of the dancing man how reconstructed

did I use the mushroom to figure out that his right foot I feel that I use the contacts of mushroom so here’s how I read it back then I did not probably have a good reading of the branching of the Mushroom tree but the sheer existence of mushroom indicated to me standing on the right foot would probably mean your basis of control and so given that you have 2 feet it maybe it was a hypothesis in 2016 maybe

here’s how I generated the hypothesis but note that that hypothesis was held gently and

I did write about Hephaestos the god of the smith of the underworld the limp God limping guard with one leg and … as of today and as of November 2020 I can tell you with more certainty than in 2016 but I probably posted it which leg of the guard is limp it would be the bad leg is the left leg your left leg is your bad leg because it is your possibility Branching premised basis for personal control which is unstable so a bad leg bad leg

there’s a little bit new there this is today is April 4 2022 , so the above paragraph has a little bit of new , maybe one or two Paul Thagard connection points that I get granted there. However if I go look at the archives I probably posted that all those points in 2016 when I first decoded that image that I got from Tom Hatsis the salamander Roasting dancing man image but I guess what’s new definitely is a stronger feeling I I speak now with the great certainty see that’s the difference in 2016 I posted that as a tentative hypothesis but now in contrast I state that with a very routine matter of fact certainty everybody knows his left like it’s a bad leg of course your left leg is your bad like everybody knows that just like everybody knows that a branching Message Mushroom tree means psilocybin switching from unstable Branching premised control model to reality-based nonbranching premised control model to get control stability in the altered state from Psilocybin, duh

you’d have to be a fool not know that, but anyone who is wise knows the above

anyone who has wisdom and is no longer foolish

like foolishly declaring that these mushrooms aren’t mushrooms, the same mushrooms which have left and right foot imagery and which have anomalous branching features which prove and definitely indicate that they certainly are Psilocybin mushrooms.

but identifying them as Mushrooms is kind of the small story that’s the cat stuck in the street in a tree story the real story is cat stuck in a tree leads to enlightenment and revelation and wisdom and knowing all things becoming one of those on the inside becoming like god so you become like a God and know all things and then Tom ask you is it a Mushroom by the time you can answer definitively yes

The question feels almost like it’s been transcended and becomes kind of unimportant in a way by the time that you’re able to prove that yes obviously of course

the Tom Salamander picture might as well have big text on it that says “Psilocybin Mushroom” ; that is how strong the indicators are

this is the language but Tom like entheogen scholars is illiterate so far, or has been illiterate of this, which is the standard coherent language

we consistently decode and receive the message coherently intelligently consistently transmitted and received and labeled

The tree in the salamander image, because if it’s the image depicts the genre-standard themes of based on / resting on your right foot, and fire (altered state) , and snake compared to the tree that has added branching anomalies, the tree and image scene might as well have a big Bat Cave sign on it that says “Psilocybin Mushroom and non-branching mental model to achieve stable control”.

You simply read the text right off the picture, explicitly communicated in the standard language of ASC pictures.

you simply read the picture: does it have non-branching contrasted against branching?

does it have mushroom Imagery?

does it have standard language of standard themes of right foot stable, left foot powerless?

if so , that is the same as it say you have a spear in a picture with Latin text that reads “this is a spear”.

that is the degree of plain workaday routine certainty that the picture depicts a Psilocybin mushroom, together with the message about branching control and conditional stability, as surely as you can see a three dimensional picture encoded –

But easier because you don’t have to focus your eyes strangely it’s just explicitly labeled this is the language this is how you read the language these things explain what they are by their use of the standard motives like for example the John Rush’s lifted Garment says “loose cognitive association state”.

Read the signs in the bat cave and don’t get hung up on Robin the amanita sideshow minor distraction.

I posted several posts about this in I guess 2016 and I reasoned given that there’s a Mushroom an Tom Hatsis picture and he is the fourth Entheogens scholar to analyze the picture and all three entheogens scholars before him assert that it is mushrooms and he says that it is not and I am the fifth Entheogens scholar to attempt to interpret the salamander image.

but I am so much more than that I am the theorist of Transcendent Knowledge, and so entheogen scholarship is only one of my fields that I have integrated successfully and powerfully.

Against Hatsis, I have proved that Samorini was right about the salamander mushroom tree, and I proved that my colleague Chris Bennett whatever he said is probably right, and I’ve proved that my colleague Jan Irvin is right, and I proved that Hatsis is wrong.

Hatsis status: ⚡️ROASTED⚡️to completion.

the decoding sequence went:

1) decode the right foot of the dancing man then (held as the kind of a weak but sensible hypothesis interpretation awaiting more instances in art to corroborate the hypothesis, which would come four years later, in Canterbury).

2) 4 years later, decode the Canterbury Hanging Balancing tree.

3) use that proof in order to come back to hatsis’ salamander mushroom tree dancing man picture and prove that it to therefore follows the same pattern as canterbury especially tree number 71

given that I proved that Canterbury is Cubensis and I go very deep and also prove the transcendent meaning of non-Branching for stable control.

then I brought that proof and I am right now April 4- fourth 2022 announcing that this constitutes Proof the Thomas Hatsis is picture of the mushroom tree salamander dancing man is hereby proved through evidence combined with reasoning combined with experience combined with Christian art art crossing between multiple pieces of art with some Hellenistic art thrown in there as well Hellenistic.

I am now announcing that this constitutes proof

I have now proved and reasoned out

here is how I have proved that Thomas Hatsis’s picture is definitely confirmed to be psilocybin psychoactive Mushrooms in the salamander dancing man image.

QED

Gaslight that, mofos!! 💪

The mushroom that you see is not a mushroom.

Gas & Light Inc.

it happens that I most vividly really for all practical purposes received the salamander roasting dancing man image from Tom Hatsis by reading his articles and I decode it at least the dancing right foot aspect around 2016 but but really I think I think I believe that I decoded the tree and branching and I don’t know check my post from 2016 to see if I that’s how far I got in decoding the salamander roasting back then because I am I must have known about fire that fire is light which transforms the mental model

plainc fresco I followed Dr. Brown’s lead a couple days ago and made some bona fide interpretation not the stupid thumbs up that it means mushrooms but real adult level interpretation of her Branching rib cage and her bones equal underlying now perceived now perceptible eternalism/ thinking But I also did as soon as I read his book the day that it came out the date of that shipped of course when I read his interpretation or he’s pointing down the correct path he says to us we need to interpret down in this direction and he lead the way a little bit and even back then I started critiquing and expanding on his I started expanding Dr. Brown’s Decoding and then a couple days ago I did more

John lash I believe uploaded Mushroom tree number 71 of Canterbury we call this Canterbury the word canterbury is exactly parallel to the word Plaincourault this is one of our five trees though I really would want to add another tree from John Rush the awesome awesome Moses burning bush why why oh why God Hawaii branching Y shaped Mushroom Trees awesome picture like this webpage could be the top 10 branching Message tr TreesJohn lash I believe uploaded Mushroom tree number 71 of Canterbury we call this Canterbury the word canterbury is exactly parallel to the word Plaincourault this is one of our five trees though I really would want to add another tree from John Rush the awesome awesome Moses burning bush why why oh why God Hawaii branching Y shaped Mushroom Trees awesome picture like this webpage could be the top 10 branching Message Trees

then another extremely valuable Branching Message Mushroom tree is the mandrake tree double picture of double trees double proof of compelling evidence Montecassino manuscript a failed Tom Hatsis Mandrake Trees with Branching defects and mutated failure of a mandrake tree because everybody knows Mandrake does not have a tree trunk side-by-side with my identified by the Carl rock gang on the left but the car working failed to identify Mandrake tree on th right

thethen another extremely valuable Branching Message Mushroom tree is the mandrake tree double picture of double trees double proof of compelling evidence Montecassino manuscript a failed Tom Hatsis Mandrake Trees with Branching defects and mutated failure of a mandrake tree because everybody knows Mandrake does not have a tree trunk side-by-side with my identified by the Carl rock gang on the left but the car working failed to identify Mandrake tree on the

and the Carl rock gang failed to even try to identify as a Mandrake tree on the right

so I am the one who read their published work and identified Mandrake tree on the right

and then a couple days ago had my breakthrough the very highly significant standout breakthrough and very memorable

when I said I am better than Tom Hatsis at identifying Mandrake and then I thought wait a minute hold up hold on wait doesn’t include cut branches

Eureka Branching Message Entheogens tree and then last night April 3 2022 generalized even more “branching message tree” which closes the loop back to Lucas Cranach painter thanksgiving 2013 in the book power of myth by Joseph Campbell and Fritz graph book Greek myths cover art Jason serpent Athena and Charlie Brown pathetic scrawny vine nonbranching tree

and that tree that tree may be a candidate for the top 10 branching message trees

I was disgusted/ dissatisfied/ fed up with entheogen theory Ruck’s gang’s December 2000 book Apples of Apollo – “what the fck is this sht?!”

What I wanted in 2000 is Dr. Jerry Brown’s book The Psychedelic Gospels, not the Apples of Apollo by the Ruck gang paradigm, because Brown says that the middle ages did *not* forget, or 50% forget.

Dr. Brown draws a high Forgot Plot in the middle ages, like I do.

but Carl Ruck and gang draws a 50% down forgot plot in the middle ages.

he’s wrong they are wrong

Dr. Brown is right.

My 2002 division into maximal, Moderate, and Minimal theories was done correctly, but it was done confusingly.

The book in which i’m pull-quoted in big font saying like mixed wine is “mushroom” wine, i failed probably to say “psilocybin” wine:

I discovered last night an opportunity to make it – to replace that model by a clearer model where you have two main branches and then after that, 4 sub- branches.

Last night I made a major historical switch to the 1,2,4 branching morpholgy; see msh tree #123, which will instruct you of this taxonomy.

just as I placed the half-baked entheogens Scholars on the upper half of the Minimal entheogen theory and I called that the “moderate” theory, which (the Ruck theory premises) was ultimately a failure of a theory.

similarly, last night I placed my 2007 version of the maximal entheogen theory on and correspondingly my 2007 version of the mytheme theory on a newly bifurcated, lower branch of the upper main branch.

in 2010, I began the superior version of the mytheme theory by forming the hypothesis tentative hypothesis that branching versus nonbranching was a major important key theme in Hellenistic mythology I I resumed posting to ego death Yahoo group in September 2011.

i used inferior term “determinism” in 2006, superior term “eternalism” in the 2010-2020 era.

I started my ego death theory.wordpress.com website in 2016 but started it for real in 2020 , all informed by –

that entire period was informed more or less thoroughly by grokking recognizing comprehending and developing mytheme and theory of nonbranching ; the contrast between branching versus nonbranching

all of that stands strikingly separate from Egodeath.com 2007 main article website and theory which wholy pretty consistently lacks the word ‘branch’ and probably has the roots of the idea, but does not explicitly have a focus spotlight on the master mytheme of branching versus nonbranching.

also egodeath.com presents a version of the maximal entheogens theory which is the inferior version, as I recognized last night

there a good thing about this realization is I discovered the opportunity to clarify a confusing aspect of my 3-level scheme of maximal /moderate / minimal entheogens theories

In 2002 I only bifurcated the lower, Minimal Branch (into the moderate, Carl Ruck version versus the minimal, T-total abstinence theories)

I did not bifurcate yet the upper, maximal branch of the entheogen Theory of religion.

so my scheme was confusing but also kind of appropriate

my thinking was indeed fuzzy between 2002 until 2007 and indeed,

until last night April 3, 2022, my thinking was hazy or rather ,

until I gave my stern lecture against Amanita the night before last, until that point, my thinking was too fuzzy about the maximal entheogen theory

I permitted too much non-targeted visionary plants that were distracting and inferior and did not have the correct targeted effects of loose cognitive binding

when I became hard-core insistent and we specifically want that-

we specifically demand targeted cognitive loosener Psilocybin, not a bunch of garbage inefficient side effects

as certainly as I reject inefficient meditation I rejected two nights ago Amanita and Acacia and cannabis and on and on and on , all this confusing junk noise garbage , dilution of our energies

a dilution of our focus

a dilution of our mission of

what the hell are we trying to accomplish here

get it straight guys

are we trying to accomplish Amanita

and what are we trying to accomplish Psilocybin

Clearly we need to make up our damn minds and focus on what deserves focusing.

and that is definitely psilocybin and very definitely not Avenita and not cannabis and not acacia Syrian rule and not 10 million other irrelevant distracting confusing weak-ass inefficient unfocused distractions, burdens slowing us down and preventing victory and making us forget what we want.

our greedy attention to the whole set of all entheogens caused us to forget and lose sight of our mission.

we cannot succeed with such a diffuse attention and carrying a confusing burden.

We have to jettison the broad entheogen theory.

reject entheogens; concentrate all of our investment / attn on psilocybin exclusively if we want to succeed at revealing to the world that:

mixed wine equals Eucharist equals Mushroom Trees equals Meditation equals Psilocybin

not all of that inferior vague distracting burden of all the other random effects that do not target loose cognitive association binding like psilocybin does with its excellent and ideal amenable to reducing quality better than One hour or 12 hour substances the six hour is optimal and ideal

the 6-hour duration of psilocybin’s cognitive loosening inherently involves or invites redosing: the rounds of mixed wine at Banquet.

“rounds of mixed wine” – look that up, rounds of mixed wine –

The ancients did not use a round of mixed wine

what the ancient ingested was rounds of mixed wine

you have to have their redosing technique to flatten and broaden the peak window to be efficient ,

to have practical ideal optimal control over the height and duration the intensity of loosening and the duration of loosening to be in control of it

the one entheogen that does that that facilitates reducing on the optimal scale is psilocybin.

not amanita

I always demoted Carl Ruck in 2002 to the upper half of the lower half, but I did not bifurcate the upper half, which is the maximal entheogen theory.

but last night I finally bifurcated the upper half.

I bifurcated the maximal entheogens theory into a superior and an inferior sub-branch.

which is far clearer and wonderfully gives me a place to demote Amanita and demote acacia Syrian Rue and demote cannabis onto that lower half of the upper branch.

so now we clearly see exactly where Carl rock sits; I always placed him sitting balancing on the upper subbranch of the lower branch ; the upper part of the minimal entheogen Theory of religion.

The superior branch of upper branch equals the Maximal entheogen theory, which is the specifically Psilocybin version of the entheogen theory, the upper part of the upper branch.

Newly differentiated from that branch or bifurcated is the lower version of the maximal entheogen theory and corresponding to the inferior version of the myttheme theory of 2007 which fails to grok nonbranching.

I merely said in Carl rocks book “mixed wine is mushroom wine” , that’s bad, I failed to say the superior pronouncement that mixed wine is Psilocybin wine.

below that, we have the superior sub-branch of the inferior main branch we have coral rock’s Moderate entheogens Theory , which is the upper half of the lower half

we could possibly number this branch number two out of four in a one, two, four branching morphology

please see mushroom tree diagram this tree this tree this mushroom tree number whatever out of 75 from the Salter will demonstrate and instruct you on the morphology of the old version of my maximal entheogens Theory break out into maximal moderate and minimal

this mushroom tree will instruct you by its shape

notice how it first the main stem branches into two , and then notice the inferior branch branches into two.

1 of 4 (lowest) Finally the most inferior branch is the t-total abstinence

the total naysayers say that religion has nothing to do with visionary plants

this is the inferior branch of the minimal entheogens theory which contrasts with Carl Ruck but but both it and they are two versions of the minimal entheogen theory.

announcing a new branching of Maximal entheogen theory of religion: this matches how in 2002 , i branched the Entheogens theory into the MIN major branch (t-total naysayers and Ruck gang) & the Max branch.

now apr 3 2022 i discovered the merit of similarly branching the Maximal entheogen th into Superior & Inferior lvls. Psil superior, vague Entheogens /Amanita/ AcaciaRue too diffuse.

The Mytheme theory of Egodeath.com = 2007 main article fails, it is Inferior, it fails to grok non-branching, which is the Master Mytheme.

my beloved episode covers this puzzle of In which way is the Egodeath theory binary vs a kind of seeming trinary?

it was never trinary; it was binary and then the lower branch, only, split into superior (Ruck) versionof the Minimal entheogen th vs the t-total ,

Inferior version of the Minimal entheogen th.

my beloved episode 2021-02-07 Plastic cloud at 47:00 discusses 3 positions as: McKenna lowest Forgot Plot; then Ruck middle Forgot Plot falloff curve; then Cybermonk is highest Forgot Plot.

Against Ruck’s Carl Ruck says we forgot our infusions and historical period before middle ages and by the middle ages we only had 50% remembering of our intelligence; I sharply disagree w Ruck!

I proved that in the middle ages we retained complete understanding of entheogens and that we only forgot our entheogens after the middle ages

so my Forgot Plot is high in the middle ages , but Carl rocks forgot plot is 50% in the middle ages.

RUCK IS WRONG!

important :

I was disgusted dissatisfied fed up with entheogen theory Ruck’s gang’s DECEMBER 2000 book Apples of Apollo – “what the fck is this sht?!”

That book is the reason why in October 2002 I created the Maximal Entheogen Theory Religion and now, April 3, 2022, I define the Maximal Psilocybe Theory of religion.

every time I try to read this book I try to pinpoint: why does this book suck ?

why is this book a massive failure?

in 2002 I was disgusted and I rejected the book the apples of Apollo and I rejected the Carl Ruck paradigm and I demoted him to become the upper branch of the lower main branch

I demoted him to a version of the Minimal entheogen theory called the “Moderate entheogen theory”.

last night I divided, I branched the 2002 through 2007 maximal entheogen theory similarly into 2, where the superior branch of the maximal theory is Psilocybin focused strongly exclusively

for example Mushroom trees in the middle ages and rejecting Amanita firmly

Amanita is strictly honorary only

amanita is only valuable as a pointer to Psilocybin , no more

it is only a symbol

then last night, I divided the Maximal entheogen theory into also a more inferior branch which is where I demote Amanita and Acacia and Syrian Roo acacia with Syrian Roo and random Chris Bennett a Cannabis all get demoted and Mandrake gets demoted into the inferior branch of the maximal entheogen theory of religion.

similarly last night I split the mytheme theory in 2

2007 main article is inferior it lacks nonbranching

egodeath.com lacks non-branching

it sits on the inferior branch

the part of the upper branch where we have a one, two, four branching morphology taxonomy scheme

just as that mushroom expert Paul Stamets discusses the debates about psilocybin genus taxonomy categorization schemes

the word ‘Psilocybe’ is problematic and ambiguous because there are multiple different taxonomy schemes

many mushrooms which contain Psilocybin are not a member of the Psilocybe genus branch.

failure to be maximal in 2002 that’s why I formed the maximum theory

I always placed current rock within a branch of the minimal entheogen theory

I called that upper branch of the lower main branch sotthey “moderate”.

important:

the moderate entheogen theory was always part of the Minimal Major branch; it was never in the middle of a trident morphology

my overall model the inclusive system called the maximal entheogens and Theory was never a trident

The moderate entheogens and Theory was never the middle tine (branch) of a trident Branching.

my scheme when i created the Max entheogens th was never 3 equal branches; it had a primary bifurcation branching into Max vs Min and then Min branched into Moderate Ruck theory vs Minimal entheogen theory

Corrault Ruck’s was always demoted into a sub branch sub branch of the minimal entheogens and Theory because I rejected the coral rock gang paradigm when I was disappointed with the book apples of a polo because it failed to try to succeed I asked why is Carl rock failing to aim high?? I am going to have to contrast against him he is like exoteric esotericism

in an exactly parallel way remember recently I said that popular esotericism is not at all esoteric but it remains Exoteric but now with last night new branching into each one, two, four classification scheme it is clear a clear classification scheme clearer than 2002 confusing break out into Maximo versus Minimal

and then bifurcation only of the lower branch and not bifurcating the upper branch but last night I clarified it and got rid of the confusion by bifurcating the upper branch as well giving a one, two, four much clearer Branching and also that gives a way of demoting Egodeath theory of 2007 with its feeble hazy unfocused

use of the bad word in the Hudgins instead of the good word the superior word Psilocybin and 2007 failed to cover and grok nonbranching which is the master mytheme so egodeath.com is inferior entheogens theory and inferior mytheme theory so it sits on branch number three of four counting from the bottom of a “one, two, four” mushroom Branching tree morphology

Number 4: the superior branch of the maximal entheogens theory, grokked last night, is the Psilocybin theory of religion. and corresponds with the discovery of non-Branching as the master mytheme which began 2010 on this side of the dividing lineseparatingegodeath.com 2007 versus Egodeath theory.wordpress.com which kind of started 2016 and 2020 and lead to the mandrake tree breakthrough a few

days ago March 2X 2022 when I created the breakthrough phrase ” Branching message mushroom tree” then immed ” Branching Message Mandrake tree” then ” Branching message infusion tree” then April 3 the breakthrough phrase “Branching message tree” , which elegantly beautifully connects back loops back to Thanksgiving 2013 Cranitch painting Eve serpent stag apple branches holding branches non-Mushroom tree enlightenment

1a 1b 2a 2b

1a 1b 2; Max Mod & Min entheogen th’s BUT not trident!! <– key! Moderate & Minimal entheogen th’s were ALWAYS grouped together & contrasted against Max entheogen th. then on fateful providential day a few hours ago April 3 2022 holyday grokday i for the first time while recording Egodeath Mystery Show ep100 assigned the Max entheogen th of 2007 Egodeath.com to a LOWER branch (a new branching!) of the Max entheogen theory, the newly freshly branches higher superior branch of Max entheogen th = Exclusive focus on THE MAXIMAL PSILOCYBIN THEORY OF RELIGION as contrasted against I FERIOR, “entheogen” theory of rel that i ignorantly used to hold when i ALSO was ignorant of nonbranching mytheme.

heres shape of max entheogen theory 2002-2021: 2 1b 1a

4/2022 – levels 1a 1b 2a 2b – solved last night the jan 20 2021 “my followers” question of is the Egodeath theory 2-lev or 3-lvl??

solved during Egodeath Mystery Show ep100 last night

onion of relevance is 4-level scale yet actually binary too – flexible. core vs periph then subdiv core into two, peri into 2. inner CORE, outer CORE, i PERI, o PERI

mushroom tree branching morphology ies – 1,2,4 vs 1,4 . max entheogen theory 2002-2001 wasnt 1,3 it was 1,2,asym3

now for useful clarity subdivide the Max branch into two, easy to express and avoid the confusion.

lower Max theory = egodeath.com 2007 (failed to focus Psil, failed to grok nonbranching).

upper Max theory branch started Oct 2010 and fruition April 3 2022 last night when i went … “branching-msg tree” eg thx 2013 Cranach non-msh tree + Jason ivy tree

might designate Apr 3 2022 ep100 as holyday for egodeath community to represent the day i figured grokked Mandrake tree branching-msg entheogens tree motif in dbl Montecassino. that was the march 2x, 2022 Montecass breakthrough was the distinctive memorable surprise DOH OF COURSE MANDRAKE TREE HAS CUT BRANCHES!!! realization immed after i formed the “BREAKTHRU PHRASE ” “branching-message msh tree ” announced at fbk

like thx 2013 vs dec 3 2013 , a multiday holyday season for the Egodeath theory

one fateful providential day mar 2x 2022 i grokked motif “brch-msg msh tree” then immedly jackpotted as “brch-msg MANDRAKE tree” along w montecass’s concept “br-msg entheogen tree” then apr 3 2022 “br-msh tree” (no msh req’d; nov thx 2013 involved no msh, cranach’s photoreal tree with eves knowing smile holding branch over crotch branching legs w stag behind

and if i designate the grokkiday as mar 2x 2022 / Apr 3 2022 that can include the high brkthru consciousness of past few days getting SUCH CLARITY on “we must go ALL IN on Psil-only” & win all fronts, go big (go narrowly Psilocybin theory history, reject Aman etc) or go home

in the midst of a jackpot week u never know which day to singlecout as the grokkiday if it involvesmt mult days – here is perfect example: was canterbury psalter, on what day did i have my Canterb brkthru???? a smear across 2+ weeks

Cybermonk, Apr. 3, 2022

Contents:

• Intro
• The Monks
  • Complicated, Long-Shot Strategy: If It Looks Like Mushrooms with Non-Branching Eternalism, It Means Mushrooms
• The Salvation Salesmen
  • Business Model
• The Witches
  • Startup Business Plan
• Dr. Secret
  • The Driving Priorities
• The Indigenous Shams
  • A Front for the ABD Academics
  • Scheme to Easily Make a Name for Yourself in this Trendy Topic
• Rules of Academic Debate Roller Derby 🛼🤜💥🤛🛼

Intro

Competing interpretations of mushroom imagery in Christian art

Author: Cybermonk. These characterizations are sketchy and extremely unapproved.

Here are the groups who are submitting one actual interpretation (the Monks) and two bunk cover-up stories (the Salvation Salesmen & the Witches) in support of a crooked business plan, along with one interpretation (Dr. Secret) that shows how the presence of mushrooms all throughout Christendom proves that there’s no mushrooms in Christianity.

The Monks

• Cybermonk
• Max Freakout
• Cyberdisciple
• Dr. Jerry Brown
• Religious artists (Eadwine)
• The mycologists (A Curious Fungus: Ramsbottom, Rolfe, Brightman).

The interpretation they put forth: mushrooms in Christian art mean Psilocybin. Amanita is a pointer to Psilocybin (“honorary”); Amanita is merely a symbol for Psilocybin but is not important in itself.

Complicated, Long-Shot Strategy: If It Looks Like Mushrooms with Non-Branching Eternalism, It Means Mushrooms

The Monks team holds that the Psilocybin referent is proved by anomalous branching and cut-branch features.

The Monks provide an elaborate, yet simple and compactly summarized theory that added 80 more art pieces to the database just during the course of writing their interpretation article submission, including positive identification of a balancing Amanita fountain in a heavily Psilocybe-filled Hellenistic mosaic, as proved by their own specimen photographs of a double Holy Grail fountain configuration (along with two branching-message mandrake trees).

We had to duck out when they wouldn’t stop spinning out their interpretation theory in exhaustive (and exhausting), endless detail, showing isomorphism among an endless stream of Christian and Hellenistic art images that their theory enabled perceiving, collecting, and organizing.

They also hold that mixed wine & the Eucharist are Psilocybin, and that meditation is based in Psilocybin.

Also they hold a view regarding the other teams’ interpretation: this team’s thesis explains why the other teams’ (the Salvation Salesmen & the Witches) interpretation is transparently obviously a bad-faith cover story, not actually a sincere interpretation, but rather, an interpretation designed to hide and obscure the real, true interpretation, so it’s kind of a pseudo-interpretation, used as a smokescreen.

The Salvation Salesmen

• The pope
• His bankster Wasson, head of megacorp Public Relations
• The art historians (Brinckmann, Panofsky)
• The Meditation Hucksters

aka the Presupposers, the Question Beggars.

Business Model

Business plan; business model, mission statement, and conflict of interest strategic product plan:

Hide the fact that mixed wine, the Eucharist, mushroom trees, and meditation are psilocybin, and replace that by our placebo salvation by installment plan.

This team’s submitted interpretation is that all of the mushroom trees in Christian art are intended to mean Italian umbrella pines that grow in Italy and happen to be the trees which we managed to post-hoc scrape together that happened to look down closest like mushrooms that we were able to find to prop up our bullsht cover story in order to hide and obscure the obvious truth that the mushroom trees (only one of which is Amanita shaped) obviously refer to Psilocybin mushrooms, and also they are trying to cover over the awkwardly explicit artists’ term that comes from the artists, the term “mushroom trees”, which has to be somehow twisted to mean not mushrooms.

We never actually meant mushrooms when we said “mushroom trees”; we merely meant that all of these mushroom trees look exactly identical to mushrooms all around all of the regions in which they were drawn.

But of course all of these regional artists intended to draw Italian Mushroom Pines I mean oops I mean to say Italian umbrella pines which look the most like mushrooms that we were able to post-hoc patch together our flimsy cover story and try to foist and frame it as a so-called “interpretation” a.k.a. a criminal’s lie, to speak frankly.

Because most of these regional mushroom tree art shops had zero Italian umbrella pines in their region, that explains why they had to import distorted templates that, on the long journey from Italy, always consistently came to look exactly like the mushrooms, which do grow in every region of every one of these mushroom tree art shops, in fact they’re growing right in the backyard of each of the shops, but that’s not what they were trying to draw.

All of these art shops and all of these widespread regions were specifically trying to draw the kind of tree in Italy which is famous for looking the closest like a mushroom to any kind of tree.

So you see, it all makes sense.

But the mushroom tree artists were not trying to draw their local mushrooms which grow right out behind the Christian artists’ shops, but rather, they were trying to draw the italian trees from 1000 miles away that are widely renowned for looking just like mushrooms; therefore, they did not intend to draw mushrooms.

QED

The Witches

• Letcher Hatsis

Startup Business Plan

Cover over and hide and replace Psilocybin in the Eucharist and in Christian art by the cheap high, mind-scrambling hallucinogen deliriant scopolamine plants, and become famous as the disprover of mushrooms in Christianity, which is easy because all you have to do is show there was no secret Amanita cult propagation, and then you’ve covered the entire theory.

If there are any other minor little aspects which we have not found yet, in our several hours of researching the mushroom theory of Christianity, it’ll be easy to extend our same story to cover any other little details of perspectives in the little pop theory that we’re taking down.

Basically if we can just attack Jan Irvin who has left the field only a couple decades ago, personally attack him hard enough, and there’s really no one else on the horizon in 2016 that you need to appear to disprove.

So we have a very high expectation that this business plan is sound, because we spent several hours researching it.

Our startup company is presently going through a re-branding from Psychedelic Witch to “Psychedelic Historian”, but no one will notice this superficial re-branding – just be sure to aggressively personally attack and taunt everyone (the standard ways of conducting yourself among professional historians and in roller derby) and lecture them and burn up all your word-count lecturing them about our sound, tried-and-true historical criteria exemplary historiographical methodology, rather than actually delivering any great method, or bothering to state specifically what our historical criteria are; just go see somewhere(?) in our online amateur blogger articles that we threw together.

We also worked equally carefully on the timing of our going public; we timed it exactly so that our online amateur blogger articles would come out just before Dr. Brown publishes his book The Psychedelic Gospels which we are unaware of, that’s coming out from the same publisher, Park Street Press, that published our work on deliriant scopolamine plants.

We don’t think there will be a gigantic freight train collision trainwreck; we expect to come out looking great, because we checked for several minutes as soon as we released our articles in 2015.

We checked and saw that there were no books on the horizon such as by a entheogenic cultural anthropologist teaching college course on that subject since 1975 who’s about to release a book called The Psychedelic Gospels, so everything’s looking great and green-light for the new rebranding, to appear to be a historian.

His submitted interpretation is: Anything But Mushrooms.

When pressed for specific referents for various instances of the hundreds of mushroom trees, Letcher Hatsis mumbles something lackadaisical and half-hearted like “parasols of victory, or whatever; stop being anachronistic”.

The top historian of art, Panofsky, wrote that the #1 historiographical consideration for interpreting the Plaincourault fresco is that there is nothing special or unique about this instance of the commonplace “mushroom tree” motif in Christian art.

Therefore, our high-profile attack article that will make our corporate brand famous at the Graham Hancock site is going to restrict itself to exclusively talking about the Plaincourault fresco in complete isolation and avoid mentioning the existence of the hundreds of mushroom trees which the top historian emphasized is the #1 consideration for interpreting this fresco.

The Monks expect this team to steal credit from the Monks’ discoveries that are due to the Monks’ superior interpretation and authentic interpretation: “mushroom trees” are actually branching-message mandrake trees, like with cut branches, shown parallel to the parasol of victory that’s shown twice in the Montecassino manuscript.

Dr. Secret

• John Allegro 1970
• Ruck 1975
• The evil M. Hoffman
• Jan Irvin 2005-2015

The Driving Priorities

1. Motivating purpose: To crybaby about the Big Bad Church that suppressed our precious mythic-realm symbol, magical kiddie Amanita.
2. Strategy: Take up entheogen scholarship to use it toward this ulterior motive. Follow the path set by Allegro.
3. Perpetuate and reify Prohibition, it is inherent and permanent. Shape entheogen scholarship to fit with and not challenge Prohibition.
4. Ruck’s line: “Thank you for yet more evidence of psychedelics within heretical Christianity, giving evidence of heretical groups/ cults/ communities.”

These imagined out-of-thin-air “communities” or “groups” are pictured as closed and walled off, to protect Prohibition from being challenged.

Can’t let the bad guys get access to myth-realm Amanita gnosis.

Gnosis = being in on the Sacred Mushroom, ie., kiddie Amanita in the myth-realm: the world’s most potent psychedelic.

Gotta use entheogen scholarship in crybaby mode, to build up that wall to separate “the good groups that have the mushroom, ie Gnosis of Amanita” vs. the mainstream, who (it’s a given) is permanently, inherently Prohibitionist, and so we are helpless to ever change that.

Gotta work hard to keep the friend/enemy barrier high and strong – build that wall.

Their submitted interpretation of mushroom shapes in Christian art is that they are actually hidden & secret, designed to prevent communication, and proves that the normal, real Eucharist is separate from & alien to Psilocybin.

The presence of mushrooms all throughout Christendom proves that there’s no mushrooms in Christianity, but that mushrooms are completely alien to real, normal Christianity,

as proved by writing a couple additional books each year, adding to the tower of books proving the presence of evidence for the absence of mushrooms in real Christianity and that mushrooms only appear exclusively in pseudo-Christianity, impinging on real Christianity from a secret, alien, outside source.

This team holds the the secrecy premise, which implies that “normally” the Eucharist is not Psilocybin –

in sharp opposition to the Monks’ interpretation, which is that the normal Eucharist was understood to be Psilocybin and that mushrooms were explicitly, openly depicted and were intended to be recognized as mushrooms,

along with efficiently and elegantly communicating their “non-branching” message, representing mental transformation to the non-branching model of time, possibility, and control.

The Indigenous Shams

A Front for the ABD Academics

• Sharday Mosurinjohn
• Christian Greer
• Richard Ascough
• Ronald Huggins

Anything-but-drugs academics

Sharday Mosurinjohn:

“If you try to find psychedelics in Western religious history, you are religious fundamentalism & colonial violence.”

“To redeem yourself, I require entheogen scholars to switch to making Indig Shams the central focus and boundary limit of their research.

Now excuse me while I write my book asserting psychedelics in Western religious history.”
Entheogenics: Psychedelic Experiences as Revelatory Events in the History of Western Esotericism (Mosurinjohn, 2026)

Scheme to Easily Make a Name for Yourself in this Trendy Topic

Mosurinjohn & Ascough: “Ruck sneakily shifts from possibility to fact, of psychedelics in mystery religions.”

Also Mosurinjohn & Ascough, sneakily shifts from possibility to fact:

“There’s no chemical evidence of LSA in kykeon in the vessels that anything-but-drugs academics carefully washed the dirt out of.”

Magically becomes:

“There were no psychedelics in mystery religions.
Ruck’s BEEN DEBUNKED.”

“Entheogen scholars ought to learn about indig shams.”
Entheogen scholars CREATED that field, so STFU, ignoramus Shardog.

Citations:

Jan Irvin’s 2022 book God’s Flesh: Teonanacátl: The True History of the Sacred Mushroom, August 2, 2022 https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Flesh-Teonanac%C3%A1tl-History-Mushroom/dp/0982556225/ & https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/03/27/gods-flesh-teonanacatl-the-true-history-of-the-sacred-mushroom-irvin-2022/

Thomas Hatsis’ 2025 book Psychedelic Injustice: How Identity Politics Poisons the Psychedelic Renaissance https://www.amazon.com/dp/1634312783 & https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/17/psychedelic-injustice-how-identity-politics-poisons-the-psychedelic-renaissance-hatsis-2025/

Rules of Academic Debate Roller Derby

🛼🤜💥🤛🛼

• https://www.bing.com/search?q=rules+of+academic+debate

• https://www.bing.com/search?q=rules+of+roller+derby
• https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=roller+derby