Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 124: 2013-01-15

Site Map


Group: egodeath Message: 6292 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: THE BIG STORY!!! REVOLUTIONARY BREAKTHROUGH!!!
Group: egodeath Message: 6293 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Academic pseudo-study of Myst’m: crippled, phony, censored, comp
Group: egodeath Message: 6294 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Myth-religion as comical puzzle, mystery-joke/riddle
Group: egodeath Message: 6295 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Academic pseudo-study of Myst’m: crippled, phony, censored, comp
Group: egodeath Message: 6296 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Myth-religion as comical puzzle, mystery-joke/riddle
Group: egodeath Message: 6297 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/01/2013
Subject: Re: Rock worship & the Rock altar of sacrifice
Group: egodeath Message: 6298 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/01/2013
Subject: Re: Entheogenic Reformed theology
Group: egodeath Message: 6299 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6300 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6301 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6302 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6303 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6304 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Re: Rock worship & the Rock altar of sacrifice
Group: egodeath Message: 6305 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Revelation is monstrous and attractive
Group: egodeath Message: 6306 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6307 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Group: egodeath Message: 6308 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/02/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6309 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Group: egodeath Message: 6310 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Group: egodeath Message: 6311 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Group: egodeath Message: 6312 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Asymmetry of Reformed theology
Group: egodeath Message: 6313 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Asymmetry of Reformed theology
Group: egodeath Message: 6314 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Group: egodeath Message: 6315 From: Vincent Bruno Date: 25/02/2013
Subject: Vincent Bruno
Group: egodeath Message: 6319 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/06/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6320 From: Joe Date: 12/06/2013
Subject: Forthcoming essay citing egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 6321 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/07/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6322 From: hahaonlysirius Date: 06/07/2013
Subject: Please repost “Mystianity” graduate thesis paper referenced by Micha
Group: egodeath Message: 6323 From: hahaonlysirius Date: 07/07/2013
Subject: Cancellation of the will
Group: egodeath Message: 6324 From: ajnavajra Date: 07/07/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will
Group: egodeath Message: 6325 From: Simon Date: 22/07/2013
Subject: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Group: egodeath Message: 6326 From: ajnavajra Date: 23/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Group: egodeath Message: 6327 From: Simon Date: 24/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Group: egodeath Message: 6328 From: tolderoll Date: 24/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Group: egodeath Message: 6330 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/08/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6331 From: letsrap@sbcglobal.net Date: 16/08/2013
Subject: What U-R Learning
Group: egodeath Message: 6333 From: letsrap@sbcglobal.net Date: 19/08/2013
Subject: Be Hungry For Truth
Group: egodeath Message: 6335 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/09/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6339 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2013
Subject: Bk: The Psychedelic Future of the Mind (Thomas Roberts)
Group: egodeath Message: 6340 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2013
Subject: Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 6341 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Caduceus: mycopercep shows sep ctrl-lev relations/harmony
Group: egodeath Message: 6342 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will
Group: egodeath Message: 6343 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will
Group: egodeath Message: 6344 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Paul’s road conversion = Balaam’s donkey conversion
Group: egodeath Message: 6345 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Control-loss, panic, urgency; Psychedelic Cog Sci security/safet
Group: egodeath Message: 6346 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 6347 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Egodeath so simple, Freewill is endangered
Group: egodeath Message: 6348 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: False religion is freewill religion & anti-drug religion
Group: egodeath Message: 6349 From: egodeath Date: 03/12/2013
Subject: Egodeath diagram and lecture
Group: egodeath Message: 6350 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 03/12/2013
Subject: Re: Egodeath diagram and lecture



Group: egodeath Message: 6292 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: THE BIG STORY!!! REVOLUTIONARY BREAKTHROUGH!!!
What is the big picture, the Big Story, that now with my work from the 1980s, now (as of January 1988 (core theory) and November 2001 (myth/history theory-extension)) we (I) have figured out revelation enlightenment and deciphered myth and religion — our myth in our historical past and roots; our own religions and cluster of brands of transcendent knowledge, including Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian religions, and Western Esotericism, as well as Eastern religions and world religion. We now have Transcendent Knowledge, including deciphered loosecog myth, and now we understand how pre-moderns accessed routinely on-demand the mystic state in which religion is made.

Myth is about the experience-induced transformation from freewill thinking to no-free-will realization.


THE BIG STORY!!! The simpler story, put aside the most details, keep sight on the main story, what I have what’s now accomplished: we now understand myth, religious revelation, and enlightenment!!!

I provide many specific, summarizable takeaway points, the fruit and accomplishment, the harvest of the Egodeath theory, like in the bullet list at the top of my Wasson article: here are the executive elevator-speech bottom-line takeaway points of the Big Story and super massive revolutionary breakthrough discovery and invention: The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence.

o We now recognize that no-free-will is the master theme throughout the history of religion and philosophy. Myth describes nonfreedom.

o We now know what was revealed in mystery religion.

o We now know how to read mythemes including our own Greek, Roman, Jewish, Christian, and Western Esotericism religions.

o What’s revealed in religion and described by religious myth is no-free-will, and a kind of personal non-control.

o The Bible is 100% fictional, not even slightly historical factual. It was meant to be taken exoterically and then especially esoterically.

o The Bible uses mystic-state revelation to advocate flat social-political-economic structuring.

(Extract the points, revelations, takeaways, implication from my review of the book The Myth of Free Will.)


The unique aspect of revelation in our time (1988/2013): we have a bigger base of confused undeciphered meaning, and misunderstanding of myth and religion, than all previous cultures/times, and, practically no one is enlightened. It’s a long way up, when you start from the bottom, the Kali Yuga of the late modern era. There is a huge voltage differential between truth and the late-Modern era, thus a gianter lightning bolt jumps that gap than ever before. Only a perfectly OSC-based culture is so very far from truth and thus enlightenment is a far bigger collective jump or individual jump now, than in the pre-modern era.

I had to go all the way from 1985’s total darkness — though Robert Graves’ 1957 book was across the street from the dorm, I walked right past in, in the library, revealing the breakthrough, the Big News!!! that mushrooms explain Greek myth and mystery religion and religious experiencing in antiquity. The modern era is connection-challenged. I had to travel further from darkness, a completely dark and dis-connected, non-connected culture, than any other era. But on the other hand, I had much Help. My random, odd, abnormal upbringing just happened to give me from all different directions Resources. And people saw I was intelligent, so they (like around the Beatles) gave me even more Resources. “We wanted to see what you would do with this” they told me.

Convention-following scholars miss the Big Picture, the Big Story, the super simple story. They fail to make the connections. I am the Great Connection Maker. Making these connections required violating multiple taboos in and across fields including: ahistoricity, no-free-will, chronology, psychedelics, entheogen history, spirituality, Rock.

See the recoiling of some people regarding my Acid Rock analysis of Rush, 1997-2006 or so — but remember, always remember to take into account the heavy censorship! Ignoramuses who write against entheogens are fully encouraged; entheogen-positive views are fully discouraged, don’t forget that! You must take it always fully into account, the illusion given by the heavy censorship by Prohibition Press. Everyone is entheogen-positive, but censorship fabricates the Matrix-like illusion, the false reality tunnel, that everyone is entheogen-diminishing or anti-entheogen. In fact, everyone supports, privately, the truth: the strongly entheogen-positive view. Every entheogen-diminishing writing is matched by 100,000 entheogen-positive writings that are censored, prevented from being published.

Knowledge breakthrough now is all about making connections including prohibited connections. One cannot do that which it is not permissible to do, what I did: connect all the key fields truly and coherently, explaining and revealing all mysteries to the entire world.

— Michael Hoffman, January 14, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6293 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Academic pseudo-study of Myst’m: crippled, phony, censored, comp
Don’t trust any entheogen books! They are all tainted and degenerate, contaminated with False Paradigm by The Man, by the pressure of the Official Tale. Don’t trust any published writers, books, or articles! We need a scorched-earth ground clearing to make way for a completely separate and true alternative thus correct story and paradigm. Always keep it in the foreground of your thinking: remember that authors wrote and still write under the heavily distorting conditions of extreme censorship coerced to misrepresent, and tell a largely negative story, like Andy Letcher’s trainwreck confused mess of a book: even he has no idea what his assertion and position is; it changes constantly, incoherently.

Letcher was permitted by Prohibition Press to publish, only because he made a disheveled heap of negative-sounding noises regarding entheogens. Letcher shows how to get published by Prohibition Press: take truth, turn it upside down, make a pile of vague negative sounds. Don’t delude yourself that Grof is any better! Even McKenna spreads ideas that harm the truth and falsely portray entheogens as missing from our own religious history, and he falsely grants tons of power and history to the Catholic Church, asserting and repeating the falsehoods, that the Catholic Church had total dominant power over the world for two thousand long years. Rubbish all! Burn the books and articles of McKenna, Letcher, Wasson, Ott, Schultes, they are all contaminated by The Man, by the Official Entheogen-Diminishing story.

The more positive — or, the less negative — a book is, regarding entheogen history, that merely means that the anti-entheogen view is hidden more subtly in that book and so you must be even more discerning of the evil lies in the book, the lie that entheogens are not the source of all religion, our own religion, always were, before the start, at the start, and during the history. Surgically pluck potentially useful items out from these ruined books, but wash them in the acid bath and completely melt them down, dissolve and coagulate these books to turn them from the lead which they are, into the gold which they instead ought to be.

Ruck and Hoffman in Entheogens Myth & Human Consciousness page 63-67 show that the Christian revivals of the 1800s were helped by American Indians; for example, Algonquin Indian shamans of the U.S. northeast are known to use Datura and Amanita, and may have used cannabis and peyote. Show me a religion, era, area, and it’s just a matter of filling-in which visionary plants were used there. Show me the damned Church of Mars, and there is the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, founded by drug inspiration.

This is my axiomatic dogma, of the Maximal Entheogen Theory, counter-dogma actually, which lands us much closer to the truth than even the most seemingly, apparently progressive of the entheogen writers who are tainted by their credulity and complicity with the Official Story, which is always inherently a misrepresentative story, the entheogen-diminishing story. Carl Ruck helps spread the entheogen-diminishing story.

Either you are a perfect maximal radical truth-teller per my Maximal Entheogen Theory, or, you are spreading the virus of entheogen-diminishing Official Propaganda. The most seemingly progressive entheogen scholar who is not radical maximal entheogen theory advocate, merely hides their entheogen-diminishing propaganda under the guise of progressive spin, most dangerous of the anti-entheogen moves is to appear fairly progressive, to appear relatively entheogen-positive. Beware of writers who are relatively entheogen positive, meaning, their entheogen-negative propaganda is hidden all the more effectively.

We need purity allegiance tests. Are you, or have you ever been, a member of the entheogen-diminishing story-tellers guild, run by the Prohibition Press? Have you signed my confessional creedal statement to show that your interpretation of the scripture is church-approved by my counter-church?

Be extra suspicious of Bear & Co, Inner Traditions Press, because they *appear* most entheogen-positive; their entheogen-diminishing paradigm they spread is merely all the more insidiously hidden from conscious view. The official axiomatic dogma of the Prohibition Press is that our own religion must not be admitted that it was inspired and has been by psychedelics at its heart, the Holy Spirit came into it through psychedelics and called the church to initial repentance and ongoing.

If it weren’t for LSD in the 1960s and 1970s, there wouldn’t be Evangelical Christianity. The church of the lie is the church in denial of what the role of drug experience in its congregation and leadership is. The church of evil lies, Mars Church, dogma is that the psychedelics experience among the leadership and congregation is the bad stuff that the church opposes, when in fact, that experience is positive experience that positively created the church. That’s an example of how the truth is distorted by Prohibition Press. The spin is all false, all misleading. Evidently the authors of psychedelics books agree, because they always repeat the history, but in their own words: evidently they don’t like the spin others put on the tale.

New books come out with new prohibition-compliant spins, digging the some old ruts even deeper. We must have an entirely new, independent, Maximal Entheogen story of history including ancient and modern. We must put aside all books and articles about entheogens and psychedelics books and articles, and start from a clean slate axiom of my Maximal Entheogen Theory. A radically true and different story is needed that doesn’t rely on the Official Lies at all. Stop reifying the falsities, the false memes and distortions that supposedly pro-entheogen writers propagate.

Entheogens are the standard of truth and *the* source of religion and enlightenment. Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian religions are about entheogens, period, and how to use them for good. If you take away entheogens, you destroy all truth in Greek, Roman, Jewish, and Christian religions and in Western Esotericism. The same is fully true with all other brands of transcendent knowledge.

— Michael Hoffman, January 14, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6294 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Myth-religion as comical puzzle, mystery-joke/riddle
Religious myth is a playful mode of reading, using meaning-flipping.

Hellenistic-mode religious myth is often the paradoxical saying and meaning the opposite; re-connecting meanings the opposite network-flipping. It is like Satanism’s inversion of the usual mappings, to express the same thing as the Bible, which the true (mystically legitimate and coherent, compatible with the intense psychedelic loosecog state) Satanist has correctly decoded like any true mystic: Lucifer –> enlightenment, divine truth; Jesus –> the freewill delusion, ignorant pop followers, darkness, delusion.

Religious myth such as the Bible is pointed deliberate irony and paradox, a game of play with meaning: religious myth is about the “freedom” of truth, which is non-freedom, but by the time you are this advanced with using language, you can state things in two contradictory-sounding ways. Meaning lies in the understanding-network, in your meaning-connections, such as I defined in my 2006 main article.

The Bible is not talking straight; don’t assume it is talking straight; stop assuming that.


People don’t know the mood in which to read religion. They are entirely too serious and they read it under the assumption that the author is serious. Religious myth is comical, ironic, playful, joking, punning, games of deliberate systematic pointed self-contradiction. Religion is a joke, a comedy and tragedy, it has inappropriate affect suitable for divine madness. It is mad humor. The phrase “religious humor” is a redundancy. Mystic-meaning tall-tales, analogies.

God forbids entheogens absolutely: death penalty! ego death
God commands you to be sober: he makes you ingest the psychedelic Eucharist, so that you can become sober and become thus a t-total abstainer from the inebriation of sin and spiritual blindness.

A real mystic can say “I never use drugs. I only use the traditional Eucharist. I don’t eat mushrooms. I chew the flesh of Christ between my teeth.” This is Valentinian Gnostic Christians’ transcendence of word-usage.

This is the key to the mood or mode of reading religious mythic writing.


The Stairway to Heaven:
Sometimes words have two meanings
Sometimes all of our thoughts are misgiven
If there’s a bustle in your hedge-row, don’t be alarmed
It’s just a spring-clean for the May Queen
To be a rock, and not to roll


I was a slave to my passion and fear. (egoic control system, including egoic cross-time personal control-thinking)
I’m free now. (loosecog disengages the egoic control system, psychotic-like absence of fear or desire, to the point of control-instability, desperately requiring a different kind of stabilization than the old egoic system)

When I believed in freewill, I was a slave to sin and delusion, in prison in chains; my mind was possessed by ghosts, demons, and irrational magical thinking, superstition.
Now that I have experienced no-free-will, I am set free; my mind has been exorcised and now I have magic and supernatural power.

I was a slave to sin, of holding the premise of demons, the free-will assumption: a rebellious premise trespassing on and challenging God’s sovereign power.
Now I am freed to know the truth, which is no-free-will.


Mind the pre/trans fallacy: the starting and ending states have some similarities, with profound difference:

When I was deluded, I thought I had freedom, and that was magical thinking.
Now that I am enlightened and the truth has been revealed to my perception, I have freedom, and this is magic power.

If you believe in free will, freedom, you are deluded and have magical thinking.
If you believe in no-free-will, nonfreedom, you are enlightened and have magical thinking.

I was a slave to my fears and passions, avoidances and pursuits, when I thought I was free.
Now I am free, since I know there is no free will and we are frozen in spacetime.

— Michael Hoffman, January 14, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6295 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Academic pseudo-study of Myst’m: crippled, phony, censored, comp
typo correction:

New books come out with new prohibition-compliant spins, digging the same old ruts even deeper.


Luke Myers’ book Gnostic Visions seems like a rare, genuinely entheogen-truth book, a big step in the right direction.
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1462005489
Assignment: find the false, entheogen-diminishing propaganda in this book.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6296 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/01/2013
Subject: Re: Myth-religion as comical puzzle, mystery-joke/riddle
Crowley had correct use of mystic metaphor, but may have advocated social-political hierarchy, whereas the Bible uses mystic metaphor to advocate a flat social-political system.

Huxley & Wasson advocated hierarchy, elitism, exclusivism.
Keysey & Leary advocated flat, egalitarianism.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6297 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/01/2013
Subject: Re: Rock worship & the Rock altar of sacrifice
Finding the philosopher’s stone
=
Discovering the perception of the thought of feeling the changeless block universe.

Discovering the feeling of thinking that perceives time as a spacelike dimension, as a mind who is a spacetime worm and worldline snake.

To become a worm theorist.


Heretics must be stoned to death. Especially first-born children who are literalist historicist freewillist entheogen-diminishers who hold the Possibilism model of time.

— Michael Hoffman, January 16, 2013, based on original research since 1985
Group: egodeath Message: 6298 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/01/2013
Subject: Re: Entheogenic Reformed theology
The mind’s innate cognitive restructuring potential is: switching the mental model from Autonomy operating within Possibilism, to Puppethood operating within Eternalism.

This mental model transformation occurs as the result of the psycholytic-induced loose cognitive binding state, the intense mystic altered state of being possessed by the power of the Holy Spirit, that results from the traditional eating of Christ’s flesh, which is real, literal food, and drinking of Christ’s blood, which is real, literal drink.

Antinomian mystic radicals were inebriated high on Christ which opened up their cognitive-binding-loosened capacity to recognize mystic metaphor meaning-flipping. They might have written explicitly about visionary plants, but were largely censored. But to those habituated to visionary plants, the meaning and plant source is clearly evident, hardly veiled, and not veiled in the many plain depictions of mushrooms in Christian art, as well as more than enough mentions of psychoactive plants in the Bible.
http://google.com/search?q=antinomian+mystic+radical

It used to be, 1967-2012, there was an official culture, which people actually believed and took seriously, claiming that visionary plants have no role in our Greek, Roman, Jewish, Christian religious history. No-free-will actually used to be controversial. People even recently, believe it or not, actually took seriously the Old Testament as literal historical reportage, rather than as mystic metaphors and ironic joking. Even after that delusion and denseness collapsed, people still, for a few years, continued to assume historicity as the intent of the New Testament. But now, there’s no longer anything “controversial” about openly asserting 100% ahistoricity, that the Bible is 100% fictional mystic metaphors and ironic joking.

I used to make a list of the many reasons people would, at that time, choke on my Egodeath theory. Now, my Egodeath theory is simply a routinely known popular system, like the Web. I used to rail against censorship and the official story. Now, that official story is simply irrelevant, a former, now dead metanarrative like the older generation’s reality tunnel in the 1960s. That self-aggrandizing “official” metanarrative exists now as an impotent, would-be “official” story, which few take seriously. It has no real weight, no compelling force. Reformed theology is going electric, with Reformed theologians on acid. The gospel drama is what goes on in your mind: you against your worldline, then your personal thinking submitting to your worldline, as the source of your thoughts.

The mind is strongly attracted to dramatic depiction of no-free-will. Myth, including Greek drama, and the Cross, provides this satisfying dramatic depiction of no-free-will. We want to somehow know fully a loss of control and expression of no-free-will. But meaning is in the mind, not in action, so how can we fully cathartically express and experience to the fullest, this control-loss and no-free-will? Instead of idiotic gory shallow crucifixion movies, we desire something as intense, but fully altered-state mystic-metaphor based.

Although I’ve been posting my fully formed holistic theory and model of Egodeath on the Internet since 1990, with mythic deciphering since 2001, Sam Harris and the other neuroscience rationalist atheist philosophers don’t perceive how very strong this function of myth and meaning of myth is: the myth of free will; that is, the point of religious myth is to describe the psychotropic drug-induced experience of no-free-will which causes thinking to be re-organized to conform to the no-free-will experiential and intellectual altered-state realization. Harris mocks the arbitrariness of interpretation of religious myth.

The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Sam Harris
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0393327655
2004

The first successful interpretation of religious myth is the system that I developed:

1. My initial decoding of myth was preliminary portions in my 1988 first draft of the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence (the Egodeath theory): my initial foray into Christian myth, typified in my 1997 Principia Cybernetica website Comment posting.
2. In such fashion, I decoded acid-oriented Rock lyrics around 1992, uploaded to the Web around 1997.
3. I applied that mature ability to myth, including cracking the New Testament myth and world mythology, in 2001, well-presented in my 2006 main article.
4. I continued and completed the deciphering of all the main lyrics and religious myths, 2001-2013.


The puppet’s feeling of autonomy is shown the real power source, by the worldline, and the worldline makes the personal thinking realize and experience the ability of the worldline to threaten the personal control system. When in danger, pray to God who is in control as creator of your worldline. This isn’t necessarily supernaturalist. It’s all about you and your thinking ability, your mind, your Reason, how your worldline brings your thinking into line and causes grace to enter your thinking, so that your mind understands the source of its intentions, lying along your fated, pre-given, unalterable worldline. Your personal control thinking submits to your worldline, and this is equivalent to putting trust in a personal Creator god who controls your worldline.

The hand of God hidden in a cloud holds a chain that controls block universe Nature, which is your worldline, and your worldline, Nature, holds a chain that controls the monkey-mind, which is your personal control thinking. When you are made to trust your worldline, that’s equivalent to you being made to trust a controller of your worldline, outside your domain of conscious personal control ability. Steering your worldline is outside your conscious personal control ability. Your personal conscious self is one agency, and your pre-set worldline is another agency. Praying to and trusting in your worldline is equivalent to praying to and trusting in a separate Controller X in a position of creating and controlling your worldline.

o The personal control thinking system, your domain of conscious control power, is distinct from other powers:

o your pre-set, pre-given worldline

o a demiurgic Creator and controller of your worldline,

o a Good god above fatedness

You can logically, reasonably break things out that way per Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, and Christian options, if you choose. Or, you can simply conceptualize, rationally, per Multistate Science, 2 levels:

o The personal control thinking system, your domain of conscious control power, is distinct from other powers:

o your pre-set, pre-given worldline. Your worldline might make you rationally pray to and trust in the worldline, like sacrificing to Zeus Meilichios, who controls the worldline snake and is easily satisfied when you are made to proclaim loosecog realization and agreement with no-free-will.

Reformed theology is a merely singlestate fallacy reduction of this view, experience, and realization. Reformed theology without the experience of the Holy Spirit from the traditional psychedelic Eucharist, is just children’s practice training-wheels theology. No Reformed theologians are among the elect, nor Arminians, no matter what their view on no-free-will.

Only when Reformed theology goes Electric, as in Marsh Chapel, with psilocybin, will any Reformed evangelists be saved and receive grace and be made to truly submit and be shown the threat: the worldline and your Spirit-inspired insanely adept imagination, will prove to you that you are capable of imagining a threatening loss of control, and you will find that you are positively attracted to the demonstration of loss of control — which is holiness and the sacred point. To the extent you are interested in the Holy, Transcendent Knowledge, revelation and enlightenment, you are attracted to the beautiful glorious Medusa problem through which we are reborn when we turn to look behind us, see the attractive and mortifying face of God, and are turned into stone and reborn from the rock.

Now as I knew when fundamentalist writer Dave Hunt carelessly discovered Reformed Theology, the Great War is on: for control of Christianity in America: the Reformed movement, but in an evil, fallen form, lacking the traditional Eucharist, is taking over Evangelical Christianity. Just add mushrooms, the missing Holy Spirit, to turn mere Reformed *ideas* into actual salvation and revelation that the Bible is all in your mind, per my radical mystic metaphor deciphering and 100% fictional, ahistoricity of the Jewish Old Testament and the Gnostically revealed New Testament.

o No-free-will is trendy,
o Reformed theology is trendy, and
o the Shamanism revolution in Christian scholarship is trendy, and
o now everyone is aware of ahistoricity, rapidly spreading, from Old Testament, to Jesus, to Paul, and
o I push ahistoricity through per Edwin Johnson to the very existence of Christianity in antiquity: Luther wrote the New Testament in 825.

— Michael Hoffman, January 16, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6299 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: Heracleon’s Commentary on John
Elaine Pagels
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1555403344
1973
128 pages

Title of my book review:
The elect vs. moralists, sacrament of apolytrosis (redemption)

This book is Pagels’ 1973 dissertation. This reprint of Pagels’ book is decent, good printing, decently bound, blue cover, paperback. This dissertation follows academic conventions, which prevent clear communication and present information backwards. Read her book in my Satanic way, that is, last page first, because the dullest information is the first couple regular chapters, and the best information is the last page and the summary (“Synthesis”). This book lacks a glossary and lacks an index of normal useful words. She provides a “Glossary-Index” (her term) of technical theology terms, which is neither a glossary providing definitions nor an index of useful normal words.

I provide a clear summary here, assisted by decades of original work on my theory of religious experiencing and metaphor, with a summarization approach that is lacking from current conventions. The Jesus Mysteries (http://amazon.com/o/asin/0609807986) is a readable preparation for Pagels’ early books.


Pagels’ book shows that Valentinians presented the following 2-level system. I’m able to summarize it here through better communication conventions combined with my 2001 theory of mystic metaphor. See my comparable contrast summary in my review of Pagels’ book The Gnostic Paul (http://amazon.com/o/asin/1563380390).

Higher Christians (‘pneumatic’; spiritual)
Lower Christians (‘psychic’; mental)

o Don’t rely on the historicity of the Bible (page 12). What matters is the mystic-state meaning and metaphorical analogies. Deny the uniqueness of the Christian revelation. page 15
o Believe in the uniqueness of the Christian revelation, emphasizing the literalness of its occurrence of historical events.
Pagels discusses ahistoricity, or the unimportance or irrelevance of Jesus’ literal historical life and crucifixion, on pages 12-16, 44, 46, and 118.

o Received the higher Eucharist; they are given grace through receiving the sacrament of apolytrosis (which I point out is entheogenic-equivalent, like the “sacraments of Phrygia and Eleusis” mentioned on page 15).
o Only have baptism by water, associated with forgiving sins but in such a way that free-will moral thinking is still implied (various pages in Pagels). They only eat literal ordinary bread and drink literal ordinary wine.
Pagels discusses the Eucharist, wine, feast, banquet, eating, drinking, sacrament of apolytrosis, bridechamber, marriage wedding banquet, and other entheogen-equivalent topics, on page 15 (sacrament of Eleusis), 62-65, 76-82, 92-96, and 115. See my review of Gnostic Visions (http://amazon.com/o/asin/1462005489) and Flights of the Soul (http://amazon.com/o/asin/0802865402).

o Are masters of metaphor interpretation, describing experiential insights received through the sacrament of apolytrosis (redemption). Are able to interpret all brands of mystic writing (page 15)
o Literalists. They depend on a historical reading of events in the Bible, assuming that those events literally happened. This prevents them from understanding spiritually (which I explain explicitly: they don’t understand the entheogen Eucharist and its revelation of no-free-will).

o Think in terms of this higher vs. lower understanding, making this distinction.
o Don’t believe in or understand higher Christianity and metaphor reading in terms of spiritual experience.

o Redemption and heaven is now, for the elect.
o Redemption and heaven is in the future, in the age to come.

o Receives redemption, purely by God’s grace (matching Reformed theology, my theory points out). Though veiled as “election” and explained indirectly through symbolism, these Christians basically are brought to believe the supposedly “pagan” idea of no-free-will, upon discovering that they are among the elect and receive their redemption though grace — though they initially and originally think, mistakenly, using the lower way of thinking.
o The lower Christian reaches, if they are morally good, Salvation (still reifies the free-will moral premise). These can earn salvation through works. Receive a lower salvation, a forgiveness of sins, while that forgiveness still reifies free-will moral thinking; ‘ethics’ per Pagels. They believe in free-will moral agency. They conceptualize religion in terms of freewill ethics and moral conduct as the way to earn salvation.


Pagels discusses determinism, election theology, grace, works, and moral ethics on pages 49, 57, 72, 82-83, 98-113, and 120-122 especially (that is the end and climax of the book). Pagels explains how Valentinians enabled treating both higher and lower Christians both as authentic Christians. Valentinians are interesting Christian Gnostics because they define an ‘asymmetric theology’ (a term from my theory) that enables treating both higher and lower Christians both as authentic Christians. Pagels’ doesn’t point out (but my theory does) that Augustinian theology has this same asymmetry: those who are not saved, are condemned by their own freewill-type moral guilt; the elect are chosen for redemption by God in a no-free-will type of framework.

Mainstream writer Origin accuses Gnostics of asserting a fatalistic determinism theology of salvation like the pagans (page 49).

How can Pagels not mention Reformed theology here, as my theory covers? Pagels writes “To counter the fatalism of pagan religion and philosophy, mainstream Christians stress freewill ability against fatalism, and dismiss this election theology as determinism, if not arrogance. Plotinus also criticizes the Valentinians for not discussing ethics, the soul, purifying the soul, and right conduct.” (page 122) She characterizes ‘the soul’ as being a factor that’s part of free-will ethics in lower Christianity, in Valentinian Gnosticism.

Per Pagels, Valentinians as a concession to the mainstream Church that was trying to maximize its member count, Valentinians didn’t demonize freewillist Christians as “not real Christians”, but rather, included them as lower Christians, who could be saved after death, in the future time to come.

But per Pagels, page 112, Gnostics tend and want to posit 2 races:
o The race of the elect
o The race of perdition.

But Valentinians wanted to define an inclusive framework so they posited 3 races, as a concession to the mainstream church:
o The race of the elect (I point out these are those destined to believe in no-free-will, amply supportable by quotes in this book)
o The race of the freewillists, who seek a freewill morality type of salvation, that the higher Christians should humor them about and theologically affirm per Valentinian theology)
o The race of those who are predestined definitely for perdition. Pagels says little (page 104) about this group and why Valentinian theology even had this grouping.

Pagels (page 104) points out that the Gnostic Heracleon doesn’t use the term “free will”, but discusses “their only choice is whether to obey the will of the Father or the will of the devil”. Heracleon’s scheme of characterizing psychic (lower) Christians is essentially thinking in the mode of freewill moral agency. Heracleon’s Valentinianism is a veiled no-free-will theology that sort of reifies a freewillish moral salvation system, for lower Christians. Heracleon’s 2-level theology tries to keep freewillist moralists on board as legitimate but lower members of the same inclusive church.

The mainstream church tried to maximize its member count and that the Valentinian broad-church Gnostics also held that goal. Regarding the Social Gospel: I point out that Gnostics are accused of being anti-world, and that recently, salvation-focused Protestants are accused of “Protestant Gnosticism”, meaning that these Protestants demonize the world and seek only to individually escape from it, supposedly like Gnostics sought. But this book about Valentinian Gnosticism doesn’t support that “anti-world” accusation made against Gnostics at all; rather, this book shows Valentinian Gnosticism was concerned with accepting both higher and lower Christianity into the mainstream church.

This book doesn’t discuss the social gospel (flat egalitarian society) as the New Testament Christianity’s driving goal, by either the mainstream church, nor by Valentinian broad-church Gnostics, nor by supposed elitist, supposed anti-world Gnostics. The book does mention Gnostic cautions against elitism and arrogance on the part of higher Christians — I point out that the same caution is found in Reformed Theology.

The grand finale of Pagels’ book shows why it’s taboo, silently forbidden, to bring together the topics of no-free-will and Reformed theology (as my theory does): to openly admit that Christian theology asserts no-free-will would be to admit an equivalence of Christianity with paganism, and shuts out the freewillist majority of people, or threatens to eliminate the beloved, popular, and lucrative church-friendly idea of human freedom.

Her grand finale of the book, the Synthesis section, inspires me to define the church as being “universal” in the sense of using a veiled combining of two incompatible theologies: no-free-will as higher theology, together with a provisional freewill theology for the lower mass of Christians. Pagel’s Synthesis section is the summary of the book, and describes the Valentinian “complexity of their doctrine”. She describes how Valentinian theology veiled its determinism (election theology) aspect, “to express their apprehension of election in mythical and symbolic terms … imagistic and symbolic.” (page 122; the last sentence of the book). ‘Election’ means being fated for redemption.

Election theology was used by the Gnostic Heracleon and the mainstream Origen to obscure and deny the “pagan” fatalism and determinism, by relabelling the terms to enable indirectly asserting fatedness and by avoiding discussing fatedness in general but instead restricting the topic to election and using roundabout wording.

Pagels’ grand finale section is titled Anti-gnostic polemics: the development of a theory of “free will”. She explains how two incompatible theologies — elite determinism and popular freewillism — were combined into an oil-and-water or two-level hybrid system, “valid on different levels”, in an effort to maximize the size of the church. It’s great that Pagels’ dissertation essentially points this out, though her presentation is ineffective at communicating this big revelation, which aptly describes theology in general: an exercise in combining distinct systems of elite no-free-will theology (veiled, occluded, evasive, obscurantist, or in-denial) and popular free-will moralism. After reading her conclusion, I describe all religion as deliberately veiled no-free-will, disguised as freewill moralism promises of rewards, of salvation, per the scheme of Valentinianism as revealed by Elaine Pagels.

— Michael Hoffman, January 19, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6300 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
The Big News, the greatly rewarding result of me applying my knowledge to read this book: theology *deliberately* suppresses and occludes its assertion of no-free-will. That’s why Reformed Theology is kept far away from books about free will and determinism. A big train crash is coming, as I prophesied when fundamentalist writer Dave Hunt in 2002 belatedly discovered Reformed Theology. Run for cover: the big train of atheist no-free-will and, unknowingly, the separate big train of pop hipster neo-Reformed, headed toward the same point, are both headed toward freewill Christianity.

At the same time as Sam Harris condemns religion and asserts instead, no-free-will, what’s going on in our religion? The empty-headed superficial entertainment Christian clubs are discovering Reformed Theology. After I read Dave Hunt’s books in the 1990s and then read Reformed Theology books, I posted a review at Amazon of his book A Woman Rides the Beast, criticizing him for failing to inform me about Reformed Theology during the 1990s. He took my advice, and others’, and, shocked, wrote a book against Calvinism. In a Christian bookstore, I saw Hunt’s anti-Calvinism book right away, and I laughingly told people about the ramifications: empty-headed Evangelicalism discovers Reformed Theology! This is going to be a trainwreck! The two systems are diametrically opposed.

If “a woman rides the beast”, the beast is bogus pop Christianity, and the kingdom of heaven is truth, which is known (albeit in garbled fashion) in all authentic esoteric religion:

As explained simply, clearly, completely, and explicitly in my 2006 main article, what all authentic esoteric religion asserts is:
o Puppethood; no self of a particular nature
o Eternalism block universe fatedenss; no-free-will
o Entheogen-induced dissociative state; loose cognition induced by psycholytic chemicals
o Metaphors and analogies describing the above

Everything written by fundamentalists and evangelicals is true. But only metaphorically true.

Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking
Douglas Hofstadter
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0465018475

Salvation, eternal life, Jesus has done away with sin and death, just as they say — but, metaphorically, referring to repeated exposure of the mind to entheogens. Dave Hunt wrote fair and almost enlightened statements about psychedelics; what little that he wrote about psychedelics that I read will stand; it’s not false.


o What’s going on in Christianity: where’s the action at? The emergent church, which breaks away from conventional “church” structure and liturgy, and Reformed theology, which in roundabout, obscured fashion, asserts pagan idea of no-free-will. Bow down to Heimarmene and its ultimate creator, accepting it as yourself — or go out of control, irrational, insane, since a house divided against itself cannot stand.

o On a separate topic: in Atheism, the big pop topic is no-free-will, and those who *claim* they give a damn about religion are discovering Shamanism. I am Jonah, camping out under a bush waiting for God to smite Nineveh as the big train of Reformed theology draws close, unknown, toward the big train of “atheism” which is pushing no-free-will as a “new” and “modern” idea.

o And here comes ahistoricity: the Social Gospel author John Dominic Crossan waves his arms to assure the professional Historical Jesus Guild that he believes Jesus existed — he has to sign a litmus test confessional creedal statement, “I worship the Historicity of Jesus as my God”, which no one had to mention just two years ago.

o Meanwhile, Jewish scholars now permit themselves to admit the existence of religious experiencing, not just the Enlightenment era rationalist pretended version of Rational Jewish religion (read, “ordinary state of consciousness based, non-mystic-metaphor belief system).

o And Christian scholars permit themselves to preciously dance around the topic of Shamanistic-like “alternate states of consciousness” among Jesus and crew.

o Worm theorists have eaten the Possibilism branching theory of Time.

I am here where the train tracks come together, waiting to welcome you all and watch the explosion. Welcome to the post-Modern era. Here is my 1997 Core theory and 2006 summary article.

I have killed Christianity, or it has finally killed itself. Who’s Next?


The extended Theory:
The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death (including the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence; Transcendent Knowledge; The Egodeath Theory)
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm
2006

The core Theory:
Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5870
1997 (drafted 1988)

— Michael
January 19, 2013
Group: egodeath Message: 6301 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Direct self-contradictions of Elaine Pagels in this book

Pagels does almost admit that Reformed theology is the same as Gnostic no-free-will, on page 111, footnote 15:
>B. Drewery, in his book on Origen and the Doctrine of Grace, concludes: “Origen’s doctrine of grace is a cardinal flaw of his theology, being infected with the disease of merit theology. Origen makes grace and merit so complementary as to cast an iron curtain of human capacity, human desert, and human achievement around the free grace of the Almighty, opening the way of the later heresy of Pelagius’.” (205-206).

Note:
‘psychics’ means lower, freewillist-assuming Christians — per my plain, clear wording.
‘pneumatics’ means higher, no-free-will believing Christians — per my plain, clear wording.


Self-contradiction 1:

A. On page 103 bottom, Pagels writes:
Heracleon says that psychics can choose to become by adoption either “sons of the devil” or “sons of God” (Commentarium in Johannis, by Origen, 20.25). Their choice reconstitutes their nature, directs them either into “evil” or “good works”, and decides their eternal destiny.

B. But *directly* contradicting herself, on page 104 paragraph 2, Pagels writes:
Heracleon himself never uses this term [‘free will’]. He shows that the psychics do experience a range of “choice” between salvation and destruction, but their “choice is not the power to constitute themselves; it is not “free will” (autexousia) in the proper sense of the word. This philosophic term, applied to Heracleon’s doctrine, proves to be anachronistic and misleading . The conditions of psychic existence and of their “choice” are constituted for them by the demiurge. Their “choice,” in fact their only option, is whether to obey the will of the Father or the will of the devil.

Assignment: Based on the above two passages asserted by Pagels, answer this question:
Does the psychics’ choice constitute their nature and thus decide their destiny? Is the psychics’ choice the power to constitute themselves and thus decide their destiny?


Self-contradiction 2:

A. On page 112 end of paragraph, Pagels writes:
Bultmann, Langerbeck, and Schottroff all discuss the Valentinian view of natures in terms of this antithesis between “determinism” and “free will.” These categories neither occur in the gnostic texts themselves nor do they reflect the concerns of Valentinian theologians.

B. But *directly* contradicting herself, on page 115 middle of paragraph 2, Pagels writes:
Although created with free will, men have allowed themselves to fall into “sins.” Thus they stand under the penalty of death. (Heracleon supports his restatement of this view by referring to Romans 1.18 f.)

Assignment: Based on the above two passages asserted by Pagels, answer this question:
Is Heracleon concerned with free will?

(He is the main Valentinian theologian who Pagels discusses.)


Where there is self-contradiction, there is flimsy apologetics; ulterior motive; an intent to misrepresent. Accidentally muddled writing is a convenient pretended excuse to assist in the cover-up. Pagels writes in an apologetics self-contradictory tone, showing the same kinds of self-contradictions I smelled and excavated with devastating results in Wasson’s book SOMA.

She betrays that she is worried about defending Valentinian Gnosticism from the “accusation” (her word) of asserting determinism. Repeatedly she asserts that Valentinian theology has nothing to do with free will and determinism, but rather, instead, is about election theology. But she never makes much effort to explain how election theology is any different than “philosophical determinism”. And then, she *directly* point-blank contradicts herself, on these points, in the passages I present above.

The Egodeath theory, which I defined, is the simplest possible theory and is the point of reference for all theory of religious experiencing and Reformed Theology and theory of what’s revealed in enlightenment and revelation. God is the author of sin and evil. That’s the simplest point of view. We are puppets, not ultimately responsible. God only, is ultimately responsible, and, God suffered the death penalty on the cross. God is the virtual reality script-kiddie who we are all subject to in his demiurgic Matrix simulation. Our higher thinking demands that we acknowledge our helpless dependent position with respect to whatever it is that has timelessly set our worldline in place — Controller X, that is outside our practical domain of personal control power.

This is the view, the philosophical system that I define, that I am responsible for defining, because it is the simplest possible model. I don’t give a damn about saving God from being the author of evil. The puppetmaster doesn’t need his puppets to save him from anything. I don’t give a damn about saving our moral freewill culpability. I don’t, perhaps, even care about truth. I care about defining mental model that doesn’t contradict itself, as a *useful* simple point of reference to explain Transcendent Knowledge and mystic-state experiencing.

http://google.com/search?q=reformed+determinism

The first version of Reformed Theology that everyone must learn and use as the first point of reference, is incompatibilist determinism, where God is the author of evil and sin, double predestination, and what is revealed is that we are helpless ultimately non-responsible puppets. You can’t start thinking about being the savior of God’s goodness or being the savior of our ultimate moral responsibility, until you first learn my spelled-out crystal clear model of Transcendent Knowledge as Exhibit A. My version of determinism is not causal-chain materialist determinism, but rather, time as a spacelike dimension, with a single future (not manyworlds QM). Why? Because it is the simplest possible model! My Egodeath theory is Exhibit A: the simplest possible model of the nature of ego transcendence.

Every two-bit acid rock lyricist knows this model. What’s wrong with you intellectuals that you try to bypass comprehending what the acid sacrament of apolytrosis communicates to the lowly Rock Gods? You can’t start by assuming compatibilism of freewill and determinism. Freewill was invented by Valentinian theology which held freewill to be lower thinking, and held no-free-will (block-universe Eternalism) as higher truth. To expand church membership and sell salvation in a lucrative installment plan, Origen then attempted to do away with the no-free-will view held by paganism and by Gnosticism, which was the altered-state revealed model, block universe determinism with time as a spacelike dimension.

The entire project of theologians who try to be the savior of God, rescuing God from being the author of evil, and rescuing humanity from puppethood, is Pelagianism. Does the Bible command theologians to save and rescue God from being the author of evil, and be the savior of human freewill? The Bible contains playful mystical self-contradiction: “You are morally responsible, and, you are a helpless non-responsible puppet. And don’t you dare point out that this is contradictory, as if God made you incorrectly.” The Bible contains weak implications that people are ultimately morally responsible, and strong implications that we are puppets. The only people asserting freewill are neo-Calvinists.

Freewill is actually a surprisingly rare position, in the history of thought. This supports my point, that we must love and protect our childish thinking, because nothing is more delicate and temporary and easily killed than the childish freewill mode of thinking, a mere shadow, a ghost, which immediately collapses in light of mushroid loosened cognition. The Bible is designed to support, contingently and on the surface, for a limited time, the freewill delusion, but then to reveal and unveil and un-conceal the truth, of no-free-will. It’s not complicated! Don’t make it complicated. I show how very simple it is: two-mode meaning-flipping; the mind is programmed to initially be shaped in freewill form, but then upon loose cognition, reshape to no-free-will.

Bible mythemes and terms are designed to meaning-flip to support that maturation, and, support social justice and flat social structuring. I am the one who points the way, in full detail to the extent needed, to dirt-simple thinking about mental model transformation. To form an impossible project of compatibilism, to be the savior of God and Christianity and freewill, start by my simplest possible theory.

Meditation, contemplation? That’s complicated, vague, difficult, and rarely effective. Entheogens are vastly simpler of an explanatory theory of how mystics have always entered the intense mystic altered state routinely on-demand, on-tap. “Traditional Christian contemplation” (taken as non-entheogenic) is nothing but an academic bluff, a vague arm-waving, by those who try to suppress the entheogenic basis of traditional mystic practice. There’s no such thing as non-entheogen-based traditional Christian contemplation; that’s an oxymoron. Show me a historical mystic, I’ll show you a visionary plant user.

There is no “traditional Christian mystic practice” without visionary plants. That whole concept is a bluff, a transparently obvious cover-up conspiracy. We’ll take real actual religion instead of bluffing tales and engineered misrepresentations conjured out of the imaginations of those who deny and suppress the truth and are eagerly published by Prohibition Press.

— Michael Hoffman, January 20, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6302 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
clarification:

Freewill was invented by the Catholic church. Valentinian theology didn’t invent freewill; the popular mainstream church and theologians such as Origen invented freewill.

The project of saving God by working on compatibilism, is essentially the Catholic project. If you strive to save God by designing a system of compatibilism, you are a Catholic. The only kind of compatibilism that doesn’t contradict itself is my two-phase model: the childish mind is shaped like freewill animal, the adult mind, initiated by visionary plant exposure, is shaped no-free-will. Thus, free will and determinism are compatible: first we think freewill, then no-free-will is unveiled in the loosecog state, after which, we rely on freewill animal thinking, as a useful fictional shorthand tool, consciously recognizing freewill thinking as an inaccurate model.

Freewill was popular in Christian practice, and Valentinian theology was based around the principle of accepting that view as Christian — but only as a lower level of Christianity than true, no-free-will Christianity, which was revealed through visionary plants, as in all authentic brands of transcendent knowledge. Every authentic brand of transcendent knowledge was revealed through visionary plants. This is the theory I clarify and define, because it is the simplest possible explanatory model: the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture.

— Michael Hoffman, January 20, 2013
Group: egodeath Message: 6303 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Double-predestination is as serious a matter as anything in mystic metaphor.

The souls of freewill thinkers go to heaven for reward after they die, or go to hell for punishment after they die.

No-free-will thinkers are left out of that game. They have only a shadowy ghost of a soul. They just cease to exist after they die. But at least they get to be in heaven during life, upon realizing no-free-will fully, in the loose cognitive binding state. These thinkers have eternal life, but only between enlightenment and death. I have attained immortality, but only until I die. I have stopped re-incarnating and escaped the round of karma.

Where do compatibilist pseudo-Calvinists go after they die? An ill-defined limbo, appropriately. Their eternal reward and punishment is to work toward constructing a coherent system of compatibilism. That’s an important project because it’s up to you to save God and Jesus from being the author of evil, and to save everyone’s souls from the threat of no-free-will. We’re all counting on you to save us!

— Michael the Archangel
Group: egodeath Message: 6304 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Re: Rock worship & the Rock altar of sacrifice
My theory of mystic state metaphor decodes thousands of mythemes all throughout Christian, Jewish, Roman, and Greek writings of “Antiquity” (however long ago they were written).

Judas hung himself from a tree, exactly the same as Jesus.

Judas stumbled on a stone, same as Jesus’s crucifixion is a stumbling block for the Jews.

Judas’ intestines poured out, as Jesus’ blood poured out from the spear wound in his side.

God hid Moses in a split in a rock to shield Moses from seeing God and thereby dying.

The mystic experiences phenomena analogous to these mythemes. The story elements seem odd, arbitrary, crayonish, primitive, strange, clumsy, artificial, unbelieveable, because they strive to refer in joking way, as double-entendre, to something entirely different than the surface literal meaning.

It is a coding game, which is why it seems odd and artificial when read straight; it is all winking to those who are in on the joke or riddle or meaning-translation. We’re not discussing rocks and trees and snakes; we’re discussing altered state phenomena, through presenting analogy, allegory, metaphor.

Thus all the books about religion are garbage, since they fail to grasp this basic nature of the writings. The books are hardly worth reading; profoundly off-base, a massive category error. Reformed theology has God so evil he sends most people to Hell for eternal punishment — except that it’s all mystic-state metaphor, numbskulls.

God is the author of sin and evil, but no one is going to Hell or Heaven for egoic freewill agency punishment or reward. That freewill moral soul is illusory, and so is the associated concommitant Hell and Heaven.

My postulates gain us, and cost us. Good news: I have cracked the meaning of religion. Bad news: no one is punished eternally in Hell, nor remnant (after delusion burned off) rewarded in Heaven after bodily death.

I’ve solved some objections to Reformed theology, which suffers from chronic endemic literalism, as it lacked my mapping to the visionary-plant-induced intense mystic altered state.

This theory is the most useful, relevant, ergonomic, simple, elegant, easy to understand. And confirmable, reproducible readily, immediately.

The Bible is a library collection of variant mystic-state metaphors, mytheme combinations. A computer could write inspired scripture per the Core theory and stock analogies.

What use is 200 years of modern scholarship and theology about the Bible, when they all fail to know the type of literature it is? The Bible etc. is analogies of intense visionary plant induced experiential phenomena, as I have deciphered, not literalism. I discovered fully and teach the world how to begin reading religious writings in the correct, mystic mode.

John Allegro was right in that the NT must be deciphered in a visionary plant way, though I figured out the *main* ultimate referent of religious metaphor, in terms of self control agency, fatedness/possibility, and the loose cognitive association binding state specifically from visionary plants.

Allegro and Acharya and Ruck and Ulansey and Borg are correct so far as they go, but I complete the deciphering, in that I identify the ultimate referent, systematically: altered state experiencing, not s*x or plants or the sun and planets and stars.

Even Timothy Freke didn’t figure out this deciphering, mapping specific altered state experiential phenomena to mythemes. Nor Graves; he only mapped the plants themselves, to myth, and only generally, around 1957.

Ralph Metzner’s book Metaphors of Transformation has some elements that are in my solution. Scholars try to find Bible meaning, but they remain hopelessly literalist, lacking loosecog phenomena as the referent.

Like good Rock lyrics, such as Pink Floyd’s standout song Learning to Fly, every word must be mapped to the classic cognitive experiential phenomena. Rock tree snake king die fear mortal everlasting gate ride battle storm chaos drink meal etc.

Compare my outlook now vs 1988 — back then I felt some entheogens in the book of Revelation, but was far from reading all Bible etc in terms of metaphor analogy referring to the full list of entheogen-induced cognitive phenomena that I had identified by September 1988. I had the full core theory with closure, but not the mapping to metaphors in religious myth — and I had the idea of the mapping; my 1988 draft and 1997 core summary have some Bible religion theme tie-ins (explanations), but not a well-developed idea of 100% metaphor reading.

I wish 1/11/88 I had instantly known all myth and recognized its meanings-mappings to the Crystalline Ground of Being and the ramifications of noncontrol. But as I’ve show with every breakthrough, understanding is a matter of deepening the connectiions over time. It took only from October 1985 to October 1988 to formulate my Core theory, but 1999 to 2013 to fully map mystic metaphor to the Core theory (along with other developments).

1985-1998, my thinking was tainted with far too much received literalism then; literalism with a mere sprinkling of metaphor points. I had to develop the opposite. Per Swiss cheese, the Bible etc. isn’t literal as the cheese and metaphor as the holes; it’s a solid block of metaphor, no literalist content. All metaphorical cheese, no literalism holes.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com, written Jan. 23, 2013
Group: egodeath Message: 6305 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Revelation is monstrous and attractive
Psyche is soul as in the mind’s center of free will moral control agency. God’s face if you see it you die

Voice dictate

in the myth of psyche (female perishable butterfly winged delicate mortal) and Eros the question is is Eros (male immortal imperishable god) horrifically hideous and ugly or is Eros beautiful and attractive such that every psyche will fall in love with it

is gods glory beautiful or terribly monstrous

The mind of the personal control agent is attracted and drawn towards the beauty that we seek but when we see it we run away in fear and trembling and terror we are horrified and made to think things that kill our ruts of self-control thinking we think things we are forced to think things and our usual thinking is all offended and broken by the things that are transpersonal thinking discovers that it can think and intend

it is amazing attractive compelling horrible shocking frightening exciting and the psyche is seduced and ruptured and overtaken it falls

spirit is the higher transpersonal level of one’s mind

Thus the Gnostic valentinian levels make sense in the way they break out in terms of initial free will thinking and later initiated no free will thinking:

psychics, psychic Christians — free will moral Christianity, soul as the seat of free will moral agency. Psyche equals soul equals childish free will thinking

pneumatics, pneumatic Christians — no-free-will thinking is spiritual thinking. Pneumatic equals spirit equals breath equals divine wind


Penetrating the gate of no free will is like penetrating a layer which has thickness with a lower surface and upper surface generally thinking moves in Valentinian gnosticism demonize and separate from the items of the previous level the lower earlier level

imagine if you had a five level, 5-stage developmental scheme the final stage V could demonize a mixture of all previous levels and call them all the deceiver revelation in general does condemn being self-centered that is it condemns free will thinking but it also focuses a lot on condemning the prison of fatedness even though those two things contradict each other

Pride hubris self dependence contradicts the no free will revelation but both of those have negative aspects

in fact everything has negative aspects; even God has the negative aspect of wrath and being a creator of evil and moral sin, so everything has its negative aspect

Thus in stage III in a three stage system, stage III may demonize contradictory elements of stage one and stage II, yet stage III also has elements that can be demonized or criticized, like the wrath of God for example.

Michael Hoffman 2013 egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6306 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Good books on Valentinian Gnosticism and Sacrament of Apolytrosis, versus woefully pathetic books attempting to cover the Eucharist without any knowledge that the Eucharist is mushrooms

Elaine Pagels’ earliest books are best: John, Paul, then Gnostic Gospels. I feel similarly about Ken Wilber’s books and the Rush albums from their 3rd (Caress of Steel, when Peart had his acid/myth connection breakthrough) through Signals or perhaps Grace Under Pressure. Pagels’ first book, the Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis, is good, and I connect coherently with Valentinian Gnosticism as she portrays it and contrasts it against “mainstream” early Christianity. I might re-read her 2nd and 3rd books: I feel like I am in modern, intelligent company, with Valentinian Gnosticism, which focused much on defining the relation between mystically informed Christianity versus “mainstream” Christianity, of whatever era that Gnosticism was formed (“150”, “825”, or “1525”, in some chronology system or other).

Freke and Gandy’s book The Jesus Mysteries was crippled by the publisher’s strategic censorship, they told me. Evil publishers these days say “We’ll sell more books by omitting entheogens coverage.” Idiots! Sellouts! Wh*r*s! They commit blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, especially when they commit the entheogen diminishment fallacy. Without the entheogenic psychoactive alchemical sacrament of apolytrosis, redemption, we cannot receive Grace and be redeemed to gain cancellation of sin and gain eternal imperishable non-collapsing life. Without ingesting the mushroid flesh of Christ, in the likeness of man, we cannot receive the Holy Spirit.

The Jesus Mysteries drew my attention to Pagels’ The Gnostic Gospels. Her earlier books are even better, and her later books seem to have less to deliver for my Theory. Maybe her later books are less novel to me because she covers more well-trodden ground, but her first books cover ground that is usually ignored or badly distorted and covered-over.

Valentinian Gnosticism is coherent, and makes full sense mapped to the Egodeath theory, including the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence and the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion. The way Valentinian Gnosticism critiques “mainstream” Christianity seems contemporary and enlightened.


Christ, Baptism, and the Lord’s Supper: Recovering the Sacraments for Evangelical Worship
Leonard Vander Zee
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0830827862
2004

Vander Zee’s book is *so* bad, so pathetic and hopeless, after reading about Valentinian Gnosticism in Pagels’ book, it is painful. I feel sorry for the author, who has spent years trying to make sense of the Eucharist, but never heard of psychoactive mushrooms, which instantly enables making 100% sense of Eucharistic theology. I want to run and tell him, “It’s mushrooms, you fool! You need to rewrite your book to allow for this, like good writers, and not contradict this!” Reading other writings about the Holy Spirit and the Eucharist, such as the church fathers, I feel that the author recognizes that the Eucharist is visionary plants such as mushrooms or acacia bark and Syrian rue, as the Valentinian Gnostics obviously knew.

I eat the flesh of Christ; by chewing and ingesting Christ’s flesh, I receive the Holy Spirit, in fear and trembling, my eye is opened, I turn around and am made to repent, and a new life impregnates my psyche, marrying her to Christ, my spiritual husband, my other nature, in the pleroma outside the cosmos. You cannot write that mushroom-allowing pattern, if you are an outsider, a literalist, one who only is aware of plain bread and plain wine, like the painfully pathetic, hopelessly outsider, mystically and experientially illiterate books like Vander Zee’s. Vander Zee has never taken the Eucharist, only a placebo Eucharist, and is not saved nor reborn nor married to Christ.

It’s possible to make a good guess; you can tell that obviously Vander Zee doesn’t even consider the mushroom, which totally demolishes his chronic distinction between “physical” and “spiritual”. To him, bread means bread, wine means wine, and the rest is ingenious interpretations of how we receive grace and the Holy Spirit by ingesting this literal bread and literal wine (neither considered for even a moment as psychoactive).

How good of an Acid Rock mysticism song can a person write, if they don’t know the Egodeath theory or have any experience? We’d be able to easily recognize it as a poor Acid Rock lyric. Similarly, it’s generally possible to gauge how well or poorly a writer understands the Eucharist; I can tell how likely it is that a given writing reflects an underlying recognition that the Eucharist is mushrooms or other visionary plants.

But the moment a Christian writer is enlightened that the Eucharist is mushrooms, I am a package deal: they also must swallow that the Bible, as the Valentinians recognized, is 100% fiction, mystic metaphor, and, asserts no-free-will (even though fatedness is also demonized as something we must be rescued from).


Realizing Determinism is Tantamount to Transcending Determinism

Christianity advocates the theme of transcendent free will, while rejecting egoic free will. Coraxo in the Entheogen group was overly rigid in portraying the gnostics as rejecting my block universe determinism model (time as a spacelike dimension, with a single future; Eternalism). There really isn’t much distance between awakening to no-free-will, and then transcending fatedness; thus, the Ptolemaic model provides a scale, where stages 1-7 are early initiations, then you reach the 8th and 9th (the fatedness-gate of Saturn and the sidereal sphere of the fixed stars and constellations), then you punch through into the pleroma, the high heavens outside the fate-controlled cosmos.

The initiation sequence is:
animal/childish freewill
loosecog session 1 — (the air) (Moon)
loosecog session 2
loosecog session 3
loosecog session 4
loosecog session 5
loosecog session 6
loosecog session 7
loosecog session 8 — discover fatedness, no-free-will (Saturn)
loosecog session 9 — ” (fixed stars)
loosecog session 10 — transcend fatedness; divine rescue (pleroma)

Thus you rise, rise, rise, rise, rise, rise, rise, rise, then hit fatedness and then punch through it. Discovering fatedness (no-free-will) quickly becomes a problem requiring restabilization and rescue by a guardian angel, an even higher way of thinking. The Greeks waffled on whether Zeus or God was subject to the Fates. This issue is important, in that restoring your mental stability in the sea-storm, beset by the sea-serpent Typhon and Leviathan, is important; but, Coraxo overstated the difference between the gnostics believing in Heimarmene demonizing determinism.


Determinism != Heimarmene

I somewhat regret using the term ‘determinism’, because it is corrupted and ruined by the way moderns always define it, as causal-chain determinism. They overdefine it and poorly define it. It’s a poor, irrelevant, impotent model of determinism — impotent as far as helping to cause mystic control seizure. Ancient Greeks pick the superior, potent, psychoactive version of determinism.

Heimarmene, Fatum, and Determinism are nominally synonymous, but, in fact, they are defined with very different connotations.

What’s revealed in religious revelation and enlightenment is that you were thinking in terms of Autonomy operating within the Possibilism model of time and personal control, but you perceive and experience the compelling greater merit of Puppethood operating within the Eternalism model of time and control. None of this has much to do with “because events at one point in time cause the events at the next point in time”. Rather, this is experienced in terms of time as a space-like dimension, and the feeling of frozen time.

The term ‘Heimarmene’ captures and amplifies this experience and perspective; causal-chain ‘Determinism’ doesn’t, any more than we can experience Quantum Mechanics or many worlds. We can experience Heimarmene — time as a space-like dimension; it’s not a materialist reductionist notion that’s merely formed in the Ordinary State of Consciousness. The OSC gives birth to the mystically inert and impotent idea of causal-chain “Determinism”, while the ASC gives potent birth to the psychoactively amplifying, ego-killing idea of frozen-time Heimarmene; fatedness, Eternalism.


Mis-translations, lacking the Egodeath theory and mystic-state metaphor literacy

The more I learn to decode myth in English, the more I realize the translations from Greek are gross distortions that cover up the meaning. The Greek maps directly to the Egodeath theory, the bad English mis-translations — bad because they are not proper, mystic-state mytheme-literate translations — only put random barriers between the original meaning and the Egodeath theory. The word is not ‘immortal’, damn it, the word is “non-dying” or “imperishable” — completely different! Metaphor in Greek is easy to recognize as mystic analogy; mis-translated into not just literalist, but rather, just plain wrong English (literal would be better!), metaphor becomes near-impossible to recognize as mapping to the Egodeath theory and intense entheogenic mystic state cognitive experiential dynamics.

Only by reading the Greek did it become fully reasonable for me (I mean, effective confirmation of my Theory) to translate “eternal life” and “immortal” and “everlasting life” as “non-dying”, “imperishable”, “non-collapsing”. The King James Bible is obscurantist. Reading the Greek, with the Egodeath theory, is more worthwhile than any one English mis-translation that violates the mystic metaphor rules. An ideal translation of the Bible would be from Greek with the Egodeath theory. I am the new Shakespeare, showing that English *can* support a proper, mystically literate translation of pre-Modern Greek writings. We should consider the English translations of the Bible just as bad as machine-translation: highly garbled and randomized.

The Bible needs to be re-translated to English using the Egodeath theory, to do a mystic-metaphor-informed coherent translation. See Douglas Hofstadter on translation in conjunction with metaphors and analogies and cognitive science or Philosophy of Mind, albeit, at least officially, his writings are crippled by the single-state fallacy; they are (supposedly) informed by the tight cognitive binding state, only. Loosecog isn’t explicitly integrated into Hofstadter or his fields. What’s needed is to translate Hofstadter into Egodeath-informed English.


Chrono-logical A-gnosticism

I consider early Christianity to be identical in the years we call “150”, “825”, and “1525”. I get the most mileage of interpretation by collapsing-forward those eras to the era of Luther, which followed shortly after the Roman Empire. I reject the received chronology — I have to be specific and stop using charged, reifying terms such as “official” or “mainstream”, but instead be more direct: I reject the chronology which says Luther was 1,525 years after Augustus and that early Christianity was 150. But the alternative chronology is so hazily defined, it can’t even be called a proper revisionist or conspiracy theory. I totally reject the received explanation of Christian history, regarding the chronology. But I don’t have a replacement alternative hypothesis that I can precisely define. I live in a limbo in this regard.

I am resisting investigating alternative chronology as a focused research project. It’s an incidental side project, yet even diminished, it is profitable. It is more profitable to totally disbelieve the received view on religious history and chronology, and experiment with fragments of alternative hypotheses, than to adhere to the received view. What does Paul Thagard’s Philosophy of Science say about that situation: when the old theory is rejected, but the new theory hasn’t been pieced together to formulate it yet, and yet even so, the new proto-theory and rejecting the old, is more productive in its results than the old theory?

The received view is confusion and implausibility, so reject it. It’s better to have fragments of hypotheses, than to adhere to a highly implausible theory that we have many reasons to disbelieve.

— Michael Hoffman, January 24, 2013
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6307 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/01/2013
Subject: Re: Pagels: Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis: key = det’m
Valentinian Gnosticism and my Egodeath theory agree that:

Higher Christians think:
o No-free-will; religion is not moralism
o Entheogenic Eucharist
o Ahistoricity; scripture is not historical reportage at all, but is strictly metaphor, analogy
o Purely metaphorical
o Heaven and hell are metaphors referring to entheogenic mystic state, its experiences, and what it reveals. We don’t have any idea what happens after bodily physical literal death.
o Christianity is one of many true expressions of transcendent truth; anyone who adheres to the pattern of meaning and experiencing indicated by the symbol of the crucifixion story, conforms to truth and God’s thinking, and is redeemed.

Lower Christians think:
o Freewill moral agency, religion is moralism
o Placebo Eucharist
o Historicity; salvation depends centrally on the physical sacrifice of Jesus
o Literalism
o Heaven is where good freewill moral agents go after physical death, for moral reward. Hell is where bad freewill moral agents go after physical death, for moral punishment.
o Christianity is the only true expression of transcendent truth; historical literal exclusivism.

Childish thinking, of lower Christians, holds to a cluster of views. Esoteric religion is higher religion is higher Christianity, which holds a different cluster of views. Valentinian Gnosticism asserted that differentiation, per Elaine Pagels’ at least in her first three books; this differentiation was her focus in her first three books, which makes them more important and profound than her later books. She started by writing about the heart of the matter, and then her later books drifted out to peripheral concerns, in such a way that she lost touch with the heart of the matter. Valentinian Gnosticism per Pagels’ strongly affirms my Egodeath theory including my treatment of religious myth and peripheral concerns.


“God tests the heart and tries the reins” is mis-translated in modern bibles as “God tests the heart, mind, and feelings.”

The idea of ‘free will’ is an invention of early mainstream Christianity.

True theology must be centered on the entheogenic Eucharist and the Holy Spirit, not on grace as conceived in the ordinary state of consciousness.


Mis-translated bibles obscure the mapping to the Egodeath theory. This article is helpful:

http://www.sovereignword.org/index.php/will-kinneys-king-james-bible-defense-articles/285-reins-heart-mind-or-emotions

The original text is:
God tests the heart and tries the reins.
or, tries the kidneys, where kidneys are considered as desires, emotions, or feelings.

Reins are a cybernetic steering and control mechanism. Whip or goad appears in religious art and writing, as in the Stoic “kick against the pricks”, meaning, resisting the force of fatedness.


The instant Mark Driscoll stops quoting the Bible, and instead uses his own summary, he speaks falsely. On page 108-109 of Religion Saves + Nine Other Misconceptions, he rightly says “Sin has corrupted my mind, so that I do not think God’s thoughts”, citing Rom 6:16. He rightly says “sin has corrupted my behavior, which includes pagan worship of created things, rather than right worship of my creator, God”, citing Rom 1:18-31.

Then Driscoll falsely speaks from his own thinking, and adds his own wording, without citing scripture: “my sinful condition is thoroughly my own doing and in no way the fault of God” — no scripture citation. His assertion here fits with Augustinian asymmetry: when we do evil, we are ultimately responsible, and get all the blame (implying freewill thinking). When we do good, God is ultimately responsible, and gets all the credit (implying no-free-will thinking).

The most interesting aspect of the bible is when it treads on this delicate, asymmetry ground, out of the one side of the mouth, asserting freewill moral agency when talking of sin, and the other, asserting no-free-will when talking of God’s absolute sovereignty. Any assertions like such asymmetry, a delicate mystic meaning-flipping move, should be tied directly to scripture citations. The bible delicately asserts and condemns freewill thinking at the same time.

The book A Free Will, about the history of the idea of free will, shows that popular freewill thinking, of a kind that modern thinking recognizes as the freewill concept and not just the words ‘free will’, was developed in pagan and Christian thought, but especially became popular in early mainstream Christianity. For all practical purposes, the idea of free will is an invention of early mainstream Christianity.


When Mark Driscoll cites or closely paraphrases particular scriptures, I nod and agree, “Yes, that fits the rules of mystic-state metaphor describing self-control cybernetics, frozen time and mono-possibility, entheogenic loose cognition.” Then he steps away from close paraphrasing particular scriptures, and I frown and shake my head, “No, now you are violating the rules of mystic-state metaphor. The tone and connections are wrong, literalist; an outsider’s reading. You are a trespasser, an imposter, you don’t belong here. You are not one of the higher Christians. You are a literalist. You don’t get it; you don’t understand the pattern.”

Driscoll writes “God does not delight in the death of unrepentant, hell-bound sinners,” after citing scriptures that mention “death of the wicked, turn, turn back, die, saved, the knowledge of the truth, perish, repentance, not perish, eternal life”. His tone is wrong, modern, literalist. There’s a tonal difference between the scriptures he cites, which were written from an entheogenic no-free-will perspective, and Driscoll’s writing, which is written from the non-entheogenic, superficial no-free-will perspective without rich recognition of meaning-manipulation.

My core Egodeath theory, I map to scripture and other religious myth and pre-modern philosophy, deliberately speaking from a modern explicit style, so I work with two tones: the modern explicit tone, and the myth tone, mapping them, but my core Theory is coherent and multi-state compliant, unlike the basis of thinking Driscoll is limited to, since he lacks the entheogen Eucharist recognition.

Driscoll fails to emphasize the Eucharist enough. Grace saves, but the point he fails to make is that we receive grace through ingesting the Lord’s Supper/Eucharist, which is the vehicle for the Holy Spirit. If we fail to receive the Holy Spirit and then grace through ingesting the Lord’s Supper, this indicates that the Lord’s Supper was a fake, fraud, placebo. Lower Christians are tainted with freewill moral thinking, sin, lies, failure to understand, no matter how much they read Berkof’s book Systematic Theology. Berkof’s book fails to recognize the entheogenic Eucharist, so it cannot be very profitable.

You have to translate Berkof and Driscoll to the entheogen Eucharist and holy spirit, to make them become profitable to read. Thus Berkof and Driscoll lack the inspiration of the holy spirit. Some Reformed writers probably recognized the entheogenic nature of the Eucharist. Reformed theology from outsiders is false and wrong, because it is centered on grace, but instead, theology should be centered on the entheogenic Eucharist and the Holy Spirit that thereby results, as my Egodeath theory elegantly provides the model for.


Reformed theology sits in an awkward null space, like Arminian theology; it is a semi-correct, largely still incorrect muddle. It’s more correct than Arminian theology, but it is far from mystic esoteric truth and comprehension and recognition of mystic-state metaphor. You cannot do true theology without placing entheogens in the center of your thinking and your model of religious experiencing and interpretation.

This is how my Egodeath theory agrees with and disagrees with Driscoll’s Christianity. The Egodeath theory is higher Christianity, thus esoteric truth, with authentic Eucharist. Reformed popular Christianity of the modern era is lower Christianity, thus is not esoteric truth, does not have the authentic Eucharist, and these are people who say “Jesus, Jesus”, but do not belong to him, except in the grudging little slot permitted to them as baby immature pre-Christians, per the Valentinian Gnosticism system. In short, Valentinian Gnosticism and the equivalent Egodeath theory are true, and pop Reformed Christianity such as Mark Driscoll’s Christianity as of 2012 is false. Driscoll-type Christians have only received the placebo, fake Eucharist; they have not actually taken the Lord’s Supper.

Some pop Reformed Christians have used entheogens, but not in a coherent, integrated way, like the sacrament of apolytrosis (redemption) and the wedding banquet and marriage-chamber of Valentinian Gnosticism. Per Pagels, earlier Gnosticism before Valentinian Gnosticism was not accommodating mainstream Christianity. I always question the word ‘mainstream’, because it begs the question and risks making a false assumption. Reading Pagels’ early books through the Egodeath theory including the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion, I question, I pose *the* question, in a more pointed expression than I have ever before written:

To what extent was the Eucharist entheogenic, throughout Christian history?

Was mainstream Christianity non-entheogenic, as Pagels asserts if she is read through my Maximal Entheogen Theory? What percentage of Eucharist was entheogenic versus placebo, in Christian history? We must avoid McKenna’s fatal disastrous error of asserting that the Eucharist was never or almost never entheogenic. My Maximal Entheogen Theory dictates that we must assume that the Eucharist was always 100% of the time entheogenic, we must assume, until proven otherwise. Never assume that the Eucharist was thought of as non-entheogenic; never assume that Christians took a placebo Eucharist, my Maximal Entheogen Theory says.

— Michael Hoffman, January 27, 2013
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6308 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/02/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6309 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Gnostic Liberation from Astrological Determinism: Hipparchan “Trepidation” and the Breaking of Fate
Horace Jeffery Hodges
Journal: Vigiliae Christianae: A Review of Early Christian Life and Language
Vol. 51, No. 4 (November 1997), pages 359-373
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1583867
“Hipparchus’ discovery of the precession of the equinoxes was used as evidence for intervention in the world by the soteriological god, a miraculous intervention that shifted the zodiac sphere to break the bonds of astrological fate and release the elect from the power of the cosmos and its creator.”


Cosmology and Fate in Gnosticism and Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Under Pitiless Skies
Nicola Denzey Lewis
http://amazon.com/o/asin/9004245480
Due out Feb 2013
Nicola Denzey Lewis, Religious Studies professor, specialist in Gnosticism.
Condensed by Michael Hoffman:
“Gnosticism as a philosophically-oriented religious movement, with the perception of the cosmos as negative or enslaving. Astrological fate in the Apocryphon of John, the Gospel of Judas, Trimorphic Protennoia, and the Pistis Sophia. The concept of enslavement to heimarmene originated in Greek Stoicism, was deployed in the Pauline writings, and was later used by Christian and non-Christian second-century intellectuals. The ancient cosmos, its influence, and being free of its potentially pernicious effects. Gnosticism within the context of the intellectual history of the Roman Empire; emergent Christianity; the religions of Graeco-Roman antiquity.”

Contents:
Were the Gnostics Cosmic Pessimists?
Nag Hammadi and the Providential Cosmos
This Body of Death: Cosmic Malevolence and Enslavement to Sin in Pauline Exegesis
Heimarmene at Nag Hammadi: The Apocryphon of John and On the Origin of the World
Middle Platonism, Heimarmene, and the Corpus Hermeticum
Ways Out I: Interventions of the Savior God
Ways Out II: Baptism and Cosmic Freedom
Astral Determinism in the Gospel of Judas
Conclusions, and a New Way Forward

Same author:
Introduction to ‘Gnosticism’: Ancient Voices, Christian Worlds
Nicola Denzey Lewis
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0199755310
2012
Oxford University Press


Excerpts from the book This Way, condensed by Michael Hoffman:

The Sethians were very concerned with escaping astral determinism, escaping from heimarmene/fate, by recognizing and denying the influence of the astrological Archons on one’s existence in the World of Forms. In the Books of the Saviour (Pistis Sophia), the Christos ascends through the Planetary Spheres, during which he “changes the direction” of the Spheres, thereby ruining the ability of astrologers to divine:

Thou hast taken their power from them and from their horoscope-casters and their consulters and from those who declare to the men in the world all things which shall come to pass, in order that they should no more from this hour know how to declare unto them any thing at all which will come to pass.

The soul of the Knower, ascending through the Spheres, delivers a resounding denial to the Rulers of Fate who would subject it to Destiny:

Take your destiny! I come not to your regions from this moment onwards. I have become a stranger unto you for ever, being about to go unto the region of my inheritance.


In the text “Trimorphic Protennoia”, the Spheres are disturbed, thereby eliminating Fate:

And the lots of Fate and those who apportion the domiciles were greatly disturbed over a great thunder. And the thrones of the Powers were disturbed, since they were overturned, and their King was afraid. And those who pursue Fate paid their allotment of visits to the path, and they said to the Powers, “What is this disturbance and this shaking that has come upon us through a Voice to the exalted Speech? And our entire habitation has been shaken, and the entire circuit of the path of ascent has met with destruction, and the path upon which we go, which takes us up to the Archgenitor of our birth, has ceased to be established for us.”


Sacramental practice removes the bonds of Fate. From the “Excerpts of Theodotus,” a collection of Valentinian sayings recorded by Clement of Alexandria:

Until baptism, they say, Fate is effective, but after it [baptism] the astrologers no longer speak the truth [that is, their assertion of fatedness is nullified -mh]. It is not the bath [baptism] alone that makes us free, but also the knowledge [gnosis]: who were we? what have we become? where were we? into what place have we been cast? whither are we hastening? from what are we delivered? what is birth? what is rebirth


Again and again we find this concept [of escaping fatedness] in the literature. The human is trapped within the World of Forms, under the subject of the Archons, who rule the Zodiac and the Planetary Spheres.


In the Tractates Cryptica Scriptura, Philip K. Dick discusses escape from astral determinism:

Two realms there are, upper and lower. The upper, derived from hyperuniverse I or Yang, Form I of Parmenides, is sentient and volitional. The lower realm, or Yin, Form II of Parmenides, is mechanical, driven by blind, efficient cause, deterministic and without intelligence, since it emanates from a dead source. In ancient times it was termed `astral determinism.’ We are trapped, by and large, in the lower realm, but are through the sacraments, by means of the plasmate, extricated. Until astral determinism is broken, we are not even aware of it, so occluded are we.


// end of excerpts from The Way, condensed by Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6310 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
The history of transcending fatedness

Theologians are not consistent, pure asserters of no-free-will. An advantage of deciphering mythic images is the simplicity, the lack of verbal self-contradictions and backpedalling.

My generalization hypothesis: the Old Testament is creator-worship, fate-worship, heimarmene-snake worship, and that the New Testament (or more broadly, New Testament Christianity) is reactionary against that, in the spirit of its era. The new religious idea of Late Antiquity is reactionary. The New Testament (like Mithraism) emphasizes the theme of “transcending fatednesss” while the Old Testament emphasizes the theme of “realizing fatedness”. The new, transcendent god of Late Antiquity turns the sphere of fixed stars, not meaning simply that the god = fatedness, but rather, that the god transcends and controls fatedness. Clusters of related idea-combinations basically is God controlled by Fate or is God the controller of Fate? Part of the good news of Late Antiquity is that here is a way to transcend fatedness.

Demonizing “the Jews” is really disparaging fatedness. ‘The law’ means freewill moral agency but also came to mean fatedness, when for Gnostics, “the Jews” came to mean the negative aspects of stages 1 and 2 in a 3-stage entheogen initiation system.

The 3-stage system I figured out and theoretically modelled 2001-2007:

naive freewill -> no-free-will -> transcendent freedom

In the 3-stage system, from the perspective of stage 3 thinking, stage 1 and 2 are deliberately conflated, are negatively valued, and are symbolized. The confusing result, that I have deciphered, is that the devil maps both to freewill thinking *and* its opposite, no-free-will! I am the one who figured this out, unravelled it, and adequately summarized this in my 2006 main article as well as circa 2001 postings.

Contradiction:
o The devil believes in naive animal free-will, so he is “guilty of pride”.
o And, the devil imprisons us in fatedness.

Freewill thinking = the devil.
No-free-will = the devil.
Transcendence of no-free-will = the Good God; Truth that remains standing; redemption from the world.
Transcendence of the freewill delusion = Godly thinking; Truth that remains standing.

My debate with Coraxo in the Entheogen Yahoo group in 2001 led to my recognition of this problem and my solution of this problem, by describing both a 2-level and 3-level system. Before the debate, my theory covered the 2-level system; afterwards, I added level 3. Divinity inflation. I conclude that in Classical (early) Antiquity, people affirmed the 2-level system, and then in Late Antiquity, in a collective inflation-of-the-divine move, people added a 3rd level. Classical Antiquity’s invention is the religion of realizing fatedness. Late Antiquity’s invention is the religion of transcending heimarmene.


o In early Antiquity, everyone thought Fate controlled Zeus.
o In late Antiquity, everyone thought Zeus controlled Fate. This was equated with precession of the equinoxes, symbolizing transcending the fate-ruled cosmos.

o The Old Testament asserts fatedness (no-free-will) and equates God with fatedness.
o The New Testament asserts transcendence of fatedness (transcendent freedom, distinct from initial freewill thinking), and equates God with transcendence of fatedness.
o Catholic Christianity and Gnostic Christianity agreed that God transcends fatedness, but Catholic strategically affirmed the world, in order to rule the world; the Catholic Church made the Gnostic world-demonizing anathema, and sought a balanced view that maximized church membership and worldly power for the Catholic Church.

Religion is the waffling about whether we have freewill and whether God is a puppet controlled by Fate. We end up with strong assertions and strong condemnations mixed impurely with waffling, in religion and philosophy, regarding whether we are puppets controlled by fate, or not. Luther starts by asserting no-free-will, then his theology drifts, prevaricates, waffles, and backpedals. A good way, I realize, to explain this ever-repeated trajectory, is that the mind undergoes this refinement process when the mind is exposed repeatedly to the river of fire:

Stage 1. Naive freewill thinking, animal, child. Later,
Stage 2. Realization of no-free-will, in entheogen initiation. Later,
Stage 3. Realization of the problematic aspect of no-free-will thinking (control instability), and, accommodating the reality that when the tight cognitive binding state of consciousness returns, the mind returns to freewill-shaped thinking. The rescue of the mind from the peril of non-control and no-free-will thinking (by transcendently being given trust in its fate), amounts to transcending no-free-will, in a way.

Thus we see religious thinking explode initially with assertions of no-free-will, and then after that, we see waffling, complexity, a mixture of views that can be accused of impurity.

Before full initiation, the mind has impurity: a mixture of no-free-will and freewill thinking.
After full initiation, the mind has impurity, or, has a proper, justified combination: a mixture of no-free-will thinking, retained childish freewill thinking on a practical daily basis, and transcendent freedom thinking.

How to affirm both no-free-will and transcendence of no-free-will, without ending in rank nonsense and irrationality? A kind of pre/trans fallacy looms; debates loom, and self-contradiction looms. I affirm no-free-will. Do I also affirm Gnostic or NT or Mithraic escape from the snake-wrapped cosmos into transcendent freedom? How can we avoid the pre/trans fallacy of equating naive freewill thinking with transcendent freedom?

Everything in the world is determined. But everything outside of the world is not determined.


Referent:
Stage 1 thinking (pre-initiation): naive perishable egoic free will thinking; the delusion of free-will morality
Stage 2 thinking (fairly advanced initiation): the realization of fatedness/heimarmene & being subject to it; being a slave of heimarmene

Symbol:
any symbol for the negative category
the Jews
infidels
idolators
those who are displeasing to God and condemned to perish


Do Luther, Lutheranism, Reformed theology, and Calvinism assert no-free-will? “Yes. But No.” Initially Yes, then later, a qualified Yes. Does the NT assert no-free-will? Yes. But.

o No-free-will is the case. But:
o On a practical daily basis, you continue to utilize childish or initial freewill thinking.
o Realizing no-free-will in conjunction with personal non-control in the psychotomimetic state of divine frenzy brings the problematic aspect of no-free-will thinking (control instability). The practical need arises for the rescue of the mind from the peril of non-control and no-free-will thinking, by transcendently being given trust in its fate, from a source outside the domain of practical personal control power.

This is why in religion and philosophy we see an overwhelming tendency toward waffling even by those who assert no-free-will; we always end up with the assertion that “No-free-will is the case but.” All theologians and philosophers chronically end up agreeing, producing a messy mixed view, that “No-free-will is the case but.” Any time someone writes “No-free-will is the case”, eventually they write “but”. Books of Reformed theology assert that mankind’s salvation is predestined, but then, in some of those books, the author rejects “the philosophical concept of determinism”. Thus while reviewing Pagels’ first book, it struck me that official religion is the assertion of no-free-will, accompanied always and inevitably by backpedalling and denying that very assertion.

The chorus of reformed theology sings “No-free-will is the case, but we are not asserting that no-free-will is the case.” My ironic joke: Now that “determinism” (better called ‘no-free-will’) is a popular idea, the only people who assert freewill anymore are Reformed theologians. When Luther was inspired, he asserted no-free-will, for the first 5 minutes of his thinking. Then after that, the history of Reformed thought is the history of adding the “but”; adding freewill back in again, waffling, backpedaling, and denying what they asserted.


I see a similar tone of self-contradiction in the entheogen history books. The minds of entheogen history writers are polluted by Prohibition’s thought-censorship. They always end up contradicting themselves, and asserting that religion comes from entheogens but religion doesn’t come from entheogens, especially not our own religion — for example, everything Wasson ever wrote.

Wasson’s evasive pile of mush, when interrogated fully, asserts that entheogens were used only in proto-Jewish religion before Genesis was written — despite his efforts to give the impression that he may have asserted more use of mushrooms in Christian history, and despite the efforts of Carl Ruck to *claim* that Wasson asserted otherwise. Nowhere in his *writings* (at least) does Wasson assert that Christians used or even merely may have used entheogens. Schultes, same: a heap of inconsistent assertion and backpedalling, both taking a position and trying to evade that position. Like politicians, both authors seem more concerned with what they *appear* to be asserting, than with what they are actually asserting.

We see the same kinds of evasiveness and pathetic dancing against oneself, in books about Shamanism in Christianity. “God forbid I even allow the possibility of drug use in our religion, I’m just saying that the experience in the NT is shamanistic.” That’s the tone of the authors (slaves of Prohibition Press) who dare to write on this taboo, prohibited, forbidden subject. Now we have books — thanks to __ — that dare to mention (dismissively) the idea that Jesus didn’t exist. Next we’ll have more books that finally are so bold and brazen as to condemn the idea that drugs are the historically normal Christian eucharist (and thus, that acknowledge the existence of the idea) — not just as an aside, but as an entire book — like Shroom (another example of an evasive heap of inconsistent assertions).


The history of no-free-will in religion certainly must start by the affirmation of no-free-will, but in Late Antiquity, that theme was so highlighted that the reaction or inflation also was emphasized. Luther H. Martin rightly says that the master theme of Hellenistic Religion is heimarmene, but he needs to add “and transcending that heimarmene”. As a theory of what’s revealed in the altered state, my 2001 Core Theory was correct. But as an explanatory model of religion in antiquity, my 2001 theory had to add the idea of transcending no-free-will. That concept had to be added as part of my Extended Theory.


As a modern, scientific thinker, I assert no-free-will (in doing so, I make Gnostics unhappy, and I make determinists happy (though I disdain their intellectually irrelevant and experientially ignorant *causal-chain* conception of determinism, in favor of the timeless determinism), and I make Reformed theologians happy insofar as they consistently assert no-free-will).

As a historian of the mystic altered state, I have to also provide an explanatory framework covering transcending no-free-will (in doing so, I make Gnostics happy, and making determinists unhappy).


My Core Theory is as simple as possible, so can do without the concept of “transcending fatedness”. Ancient Greek religion did without the concept of transcending fatedness. Before the late Hellenistic heyday of “heimarmene and transcending it” (the Precession Revolution in religion), my 2-level model from the core theory applies fully: according to ancient religion, when the mind is exposed to entheogens repeatedly, the mind switches from the initial mental model of autonomy operating within the Possibilism model of time and control, to the mental model of puppethood operating within the Eternalism model of time and control. Fate tends to dominate Zeus. Late Hellenistic religion, in competitive inflation, added a 3rd level: Jupiter came to dominate Fate.

Early antiquity: Fate controls Zeus.
Late antiquity: Jupiter controls Fate.

There, I mean ‘Jupiter’ as Good God, the Gnostic hidden God, and Mithras. This was achieved by splitting gods into levels, in a debatable way. God’s Providence has 3 levels (per Michael Williams): the primary highest level of Providence is above Fate, and the secondary and tertiary levels of Providence are not above Fate but are in, of, within, or under Fate.

I conclude that an image of the highest god turning the zodiac should be seen as simultaneously asserting “no-free-will and transcending no-free-will”. In the religion of Late Antiquity, the initiate is redeemed from the prison of no-free-will, but the work of initiation, the work of initiating a person, is the work of awakening that mind to no-free-will (like in early Antiquity), *and*, providing that mind with some sense in which the mind transcends that no-free-will.

In this sense, the entheogen initiation gods of Late Antiquity were thought of as higher than Demeter in Eleusis, from early Antiquity.

Despite the history of muddle and backpedalling, religion is ultimately concerned with the revelation of no-free-will. Religion centers around the experiential revelation of no-free-will, even though sometimes the theme is added, of transcending no-free-will, and even though, in practice, theologians who assert no-free-will tend to also backpedal; their initial purity of assertion ends up being an impure mixture. There may be room for a consistent or pure kind of mixture, a way of asserting “No-free-will. But…” that doesn’t end up in irrational self-contradiction or a cover-up and denial of what you are asserting. We end up comparing each theologian and philosopher in terms of what version of “No-free-will. But…” they construct.

One solution is: God is all-powerful, and all-good, where ‘good’ is redefined. God is not the author of sin and evil — hasten to redefine ‘sin’ and ‘evil’ and ‘author’, or per Gnostics, ‘God’.

(irony/sarcasm:)

God only is the author of the primary Providence, not of secondary Providence. Evil is not God’s fault; blame God’s secondary Providence instead.

As virtual reality creator, I’m not the author of the evil actions in the virtual world I created, I’m only the author of the program that created those evil actions.

As puppetmaster, I am not responsible for the evil committed by the puppet: I have an intermediate-layer puppetmaster below me; it’s his fault, not mine.

— Michael Hoffman, February 4, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6311 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
I put forth a theory of no-free-will, then a Gnostic, Coraxo, said that the position I expressed is Calvinism or “unbiblical hypercalvinism”.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Entheogens/message/1480
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Entheogens/msearch?query=mhoffman

Our exchange of multiple posts here is historically important, in tracing the development of the mythic metaphor extended Egodeath theory; that debate is where I brought in “transcending no-free-will” into my extended, peripheral Egodeath theory, to explain religion and mythic metaphor historically. It is literalism, to overstate the difference between no-free-will religion and “transcending no-free-will” religion. Extending my theory to cover Gnosticism merely amounted to further explaining dynamic mythic metaphor — my core theory of religion didn’t have to change, to cover “transcending no-free-will” religion.

It is not the case that there are two different religions to explain: “no-free-will” religion and “transcending no-free-will” religion. There were merely various mythic metaphors to explain. Imagine Sam Harris (advocate of OSC-based causal-chain determinism) condemning Gnosticism because Gnosticism asserts freewill. That would be a misrepresentation and a misunderstanding. Gnosticism asserts no-free-will, and puts forth metaphors in terms of transcending no-free-will. It would be a pre/trans fallacy to assert that Gnosticism asserts freewill thinking. Gnosticism — typical of the religion of Late Antiquity — asserts transcendent freedom, not naive animalish/childish/youthful freewill thinking. The religion of transcendent freedom is the echo, shadow, or reaction produced by the religion of no-free-will. It’s really the same religion, with an added theme.

Hellenistic “no-free-will” religion is nearly the same thing as later Hellenistic “transcending no-free-will” religion. The later is framed as an escape from the former, but that “difference” is more a matter of interpretation, than substance. The substance of the late Hellenistic religion of “transcending no-free-will” is the same as the substance of Classical Hellenic or early Hellenistic “no-free-will” religion. Overstating the “difference” between these shows shallow understanding. The concern is the same: mystic esoteric religion throughout antiquity was concerned with experiencing no-free-will, regardless of what spin is put on it in one cultic brand or another.

Coraxo was correct that my theory of religion was missing or misrepresenting Gnosticism in a central, crucial way. But he was not right to think that my no-free-will theory of religion (my Core Theory) was essentially different than Gnosticism. So you see my main article is apathetic about whether we are controlled by fatedness or by a God who controls fatedness. Worshipping the heimarmene-snake is tantamount to worshipping Zeus Meilichios (easily appeased) who controls the heimarmene-snake.

Gnostic metaphor chooses to draw a hard distinction between the demiurge, who created and thus controls Fate, versus the transcendent Good God who is entirely outside of Fate and not involved with Fate but is above Fate and radically superior to Fate such that God cannot be blamed as controller of Fate; God is not in control of Fate. God is all-good, all-powerful, and is not the creator or controller of Fate.

Coraxo accuses me of Calvinistic moral inconsistency. (He’s projecting typically inconsistent, moralist Calvinism onto me; I never asserted moralism or freewill moralism.) But Gnosticism is guilty of inconsistency and evasiveness as bad as any snake-tongued Reformed theologian who proudly proclaims no-free-will out of one side of his mouth while preaching freewill moral culpability out of the other side of his mouth.

Martin Ball is correct, in the single point that he wrote: you have to trust in the uncontrollable. Whether you call it Fate or call it the Good God who is ineffably and incomprehensibly separate from Fate and irresponsible for Fate, religion is a matter of seeing your vulnerability to no-free-will, and transcendently trusting the power, outside your practical control domain, whether that power is thought of as demiurgic or as incomprehensibly transcendent. Gnosticism has its cop-out as surely as Reformed theology does.


God is all-good and all-powerful and the problem of evil contradicts that. No move is any better than redefining ‘good’ to mean ‘good and evil’. God is all-powerful and is beyond good and evil; God is all-powerful and God is much good and much evil, mixed together, fused together with your thoughts and body frozen in time. Trust in Sam Harris’ determinism, put your life consciously in its hands, in the hands of the demiurge. Trust in the demiurge, even though the demiurge has created all the evil, harm, and misfortune in the world. Trust in causal-chain determinism, put your full trust in it, for your life, even though causal-chain determinism has created all the evil, harm, and misfortune in the world.

Depend for your very life, your life depends on it, trust in the machine that gives your thoughts and has produced all the harm in the world. It is easier to trust in the loving mother figure of Isis and Virgin Mary, or a Good God who has nothing to do with the Creator. Job appreciates this problem, that (at the ultimate, trans-personal level) you have to trust in and “love” the very same God who causes all the affliction in the world. You are physically attached, through your mind and body, to the same cognitive machinery that produces all the harm that’s ever happened, as revealed in the intense mystic altered state. No wonder we try our hardest to trust in our own autonomous control power instead, taking up arms against the Fatedness machinery, which is naturally experienced as a threat.

Sam Harris disparages religion, but (real, esoteric, source) religion is concerned with the difficulty of doing what Harris is essentially advocating: putting trust in, and depending for our life on, uncontrollable Fatedness: control power lying outside of our personal practical domain of control power; trusting It with our very life. It is a last resort and we have no alternative, only nonsense.

Coherent, orderly thinking requires that we realize our situation: by its very nature, our hidden source of thoughts, that lies beyond our practical personal domain of control power, it makes no sense to not trust our hidden source of thoughts: thus the primordial chaos-monster Typhon, father of all monsters, has snakes for legs, and Zeus controls those snakes, so Typhon *has* to trust fatedness, trust Zeus, trust the very source of his own thoughts, worship the mysterious threatening fountain (spring) behind the veil in your mind, worship crazy Dionysus who is the hidden source of your thoughts — even the source of your thoughts of having and directing (steering) your personal control power.

http://google.com/search?q=zeus+typhon&num=100&tbm=isch

Your thoughts are steered by the machine-God, by the demiurge. Fall down and worship in terror and awe the demiurge snake, because that is the very source of your pathetic thoughts of self-reliance and autonomous personal control power. Look at your legs: they are the snake-machine. Look at your thoughts: they are given to you by the snake-machine. (Snake = frozen worldline, spacetime worm, in the Eternalism model, in which there’s a single pre-existing future and no real possibility-branching.) Thus Typhon shields his cybernetic self-control heart with his hand, when his perception is raised by entheogens, and he sees Zeus aiming a threatening thunderbolt at his heart, and Typhon perceives his legs as snakes holding him up, holding you up in the altered state.

Is Typhon’s realization-experience the religion of “no-free-will”, or is it the religion of “transcending no-free-will”? It is the religion of “no-free-will”. Is it substantially different than the religion of “transcending no-free-will”? Only in details of metaphor. They are the same religion, or mystic engine — perennial entheogenic esoteric mystic-state shamanistic religion — with merely a different veneer or skin of metaphor. “Transcending no-free-will is not a new religion, in Late antiquity; it is merely a new metaphor or theme or idea added to the one and only religion, the “Hellenistic Religion”, of Heimarmene, per Luther H. Martin’s book. The religion of transcending Heimarmene is the religion of Heimarmene, brand-labeled or skinned or packaged as “(Transcending) Heimarmene”.

— Michael Hoffman, February 4, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6312 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Asymmetry of Reformed theology
Lutheran Theology
Steven Paulson
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0567550001
April 2011

Excerpts condensed by Michael Hoffman:


The first thing in Lutheran theology is God, who is almighty, and so naturally a predestinating God and thus we come upon the inexorable, logical conclusion: God’s will is free; yours is not; everything happens by divine necessity. Therefore the first lie that must e exorcised from theology is the Liberum Arbitrium — the myth of the free will. Luther loved Melanchthon’s _Loci_ because it dared to begin with the bondage (slaveness, puppethood) of the will. Since all things that happen, happen necessarily, according to divine predestination, our will has no liberty. Lutherans, at the beginning at least, were the most uncompromising monotheists around and took Jeremiah 10:23 at face value: The way of man is not in himself; it is not in man who walks to direct his steps.

It is appalling to think that all things happen by almighty power, and none from the choices of our will. But this revolt against God’s being God is not caused by omnipotence itself, it comes from living under a delusions perpetrated by the legal scheme that requires free will in order truly to be free. When this myth strikes the reality of God the free-will shaped mind must rebel — it has no choice. God is omnipotent; your will is not free. But who wants to trouble themselves with this unpleasant knowledge? People don’t want to know this slap to the face we call fate. Melanchthon said “Predestination must intrude into all parts of the theology discussion.” Free will must be the first discussion in theology because it is the operating assumption of nature, reason, philosophy, all false theology, and so of the entire legal scheme.

Free will refuses monotheism, omnipotence, and predestination and therefore is in open revolt against God the minute free will is created in the mind of the sinner. The revolt is so strong, so basic, and so carefully hidden from view that it really must be brought out into the open. Paul’s calling or commission, along with all things, happens by divine necessity. There is no free will, no choice, no decision, no acceptance (of salvific grace) or any other verb you could try to give the human in relation to the Creator. This is not a passing conjecture of Paul’s; it lies at the heart of all theology. Lutherans don’t assert that only Scripture or special revelation shows you the almighty nature of God; they were always aware that the philosophers and especially the dramatists of Greece, tried to reconcile themselves to fate.

Predestination is natural knowledge for people, who then proceed immediately to deny this. The necessity of our knowing that God is almighty, together with the inevitability that we will deny that God is almighty, is what makes humans what they are, creatures of their Creator in rebellion. What your heart desires is to rebel against the Almighty. Nietzsche was son of a Lutheran pastor, that’s how he caught enough theology to know that the simplistic desc5riptions of a free will were foolish. “God’s immutable will: this bombshell knocks free-will flat, and utterly shatters it.”

Melanchthon became frightened of that doctrine and warned of “Stoical madness”, hedging and altering in later editions, asserting free will cooperating with grace under the scheme of the law, like later Protestant theology; certainly Lutheran and every other kind of theology has qualified God’s omnipotence. Modern theology is finally the rejection of omnipotence, the refusal of predestination, and the reworking of the medieval attempt to unite divine and human work in salvation under the rubric of ‘grace’. *The* question of all theology is whether or not you have free will. If you have it, then God is not omnipotent. The goal of the myth of free will is to bring the almighty God under the law. But if you do not have such free will, then everything depends upon how God is disposed toward you; that is, whether or not you have a gracious God.

Paul was speaking about the most frightening thing in the world as if it were the very hope and freedom of the world — God’s almighty power, his wrath, our slavehood in which we have no free will, and so God’s divine election apart from the law [freewill moral agency] — in which case some are chosen and others not. Who wants this as our hope?”


// end of Paulson excerpts condensed by Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6313 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Asymmetry of Reformed theology
My commentary about my excerpts of Paulson’s book Lutheran Theology:

Regarding “Lutherans were always aware that the philosophers and especially the dramatists of Greece, tried to reconcile themselves to fate”. Paulson contradicts himself here; he moments before, asserted that philosophy asserts freewill: “Free will is the operating assumption of nature, reason, philosophy, all false theology, and so of the entire legal scheme”.
He writes both:
“Philosophers tried to reconcile themselves to fate.”
“Free will is the operating assumption of philosophy.”

This is apologetics kettle-logic. “Lutherans are superior people: they believe no-free-will, whereas heathen pagans believed in freewill. And, Lutherans are superior people: they are well-informed, and realized that even the heathen pagans were aware of fate.” This is like trying to condemn Gnostics because they are libertine and because they are ascetics and because they assert free will and because they assert no-free-will. “Gnostic pagan heathens are bad people, because they choose coffee, and, conversely, because they choose tea. Those error-filled godless pagans believed in fate. Also, those error-filled godless pagans believed in free will. They are guilty of abstinence. Additionally, they are guilty of indulging.”

This is a cheap rhetorical move, found all the time in apologetics that never miss an opportunity to misrepresent the Other (Gnostics, pagans, moderns, Jews, Shamans, Catholics, etc.) in every possible way, no matter the contradiction within and between the apologetics authors. This incoherent apologetics project of omni-defamation of the Other is like sleazy R. Gordon Wasson condemning the early 20th Century mycologist as “ignorant” for asserting that Plaincourault means Amanita, and then, proudly showing us that Wasson figured out that Plaincourault means Amanita (but in a way that the painter was unaware). This kind of haughty and self-contradictory kettle-logic apologetics is as low and nonsensical as insults in discussion forums, where the goal isn’t truth or coherence, but to make oneself appear superior in status, at a glance.


Regarding “Free will must be the first discussion in theology because it is the operating assumption of nature, reason, and philosophy” – that’s only true of OSC-based nature/reason/philosophy. ASC-based nature/reason/philosophy makes the mind perceive no-free-will.

Regarding “predestination is natural knowledge”, clarification is needed. The natural mind, per Antiquity, is ignorant of no-free-will; it is the animal/childish thinking, in terms of freewill-shaped agency. Only after ingesting the super natural light particles of the Eucharist, is the mind impressed upon by the paradigmatic stamp of no-free-will awareness. This impressing by the entheogen is, in the Gnostic metaphor-system, characterized as transcending no-free-will, almost as soon as the sacrament of apolytrosis reveals no-free-will. ‘Apolytrosis’ = redemption, purchasing or saving or setting free from captivity, from the threatening prison of fatedness.


Regarding “freewill is the assumption of philosophy” — not according to the book A Free Will, until just before New Testament Christianity. That book traces the historical origin of the idea of free will. After I built independently my original model of what’s revealed in loosecog, I began reading the history of philosophy and religion, and was surprised that everyone agrees with my no-free-will conclusion, though — I now understand — because modern culture is based in the ordinary state of consciousness (OSC) with no integrated exposure to the ASC, we tend to revert or backslide constantly to naive freewill thinking.

Theology is a coward and refuses to take responsibility for its assertion of no-free-will; theology — as this book explains — keeps adding freewill back in, boldly asserting no-free-will with one hand, then, cowardly, adding freewill back in with the other hand.


Regarding “this slap to the face we call fate”:

Kicked in the face
You can pray for a place in heaven’s unearthly estate
— Rush


Regarding “thus we come upon the inexorable, logical conclusion:” — even more so, when done right, with the non-placebo, entheogenic Eucharist, in the entheogen Eucharist altered state of the Holy Spirit when we eat the actual physical real flesh of Christ in the Supper of the Lord, when you have Christ for dinner. Jesus was here, in the flesh, in history. I know, because I ate him for dinner. I saw him myself. I even have photos of Christ here in the flesh, to corroborate this, taken at 10:10 on 10/10/10.


Regarding his phrase “the myth of the free will”, compare the naive-as-Oedipus title of the OSC-based causal-chain determinism book, “The Myth of Free Will”: the Attic tragedy chorus exclaims, upon mention of that title, which expresses ominous truth uttered from within ignorance: actually, Myth is about the entheogenic revealing of no-free-will; my Egodeath theory discovered that myth is precisely about the revealing that free will is a myth.

Take my hand, I’ll lead you to the other side
To see the truth: the path for you is decided
— Iron Maiden

Opinions are provided
The future pre-decided
— Rush

Destiny planned out
Speculation of the wise
— Bob Daisley, of Blizzard of Ozz


Religion loudly proclaims no-free-will, God is almighty. And then, backpedals from that, saying “nevertheless, you are still ultimately culpable per freewill moral agency. You really are an evil moral freewill agent, and, God is almighty. Evil is not ultimately God’s fault, it’s ultimately your fault, even though God is almighty. This obvious contradiction is not our fault, as theologians; it’s your fault, as a confused and deluded sinner. And who are you, a mere creature, to question God’s logic that we freewill-denying theologians have created?” I haven’t seen so much waffling and self-contradiction since I lifted the rock from Pope-buddy Wasson’s book and saw all the worms underlying it try to crawl away and hide.

If you tell me that God is almighty and that we are ultimately-responsible moral agents rather than puppets, you are insincere, a lying serpent; you don’t believe your own words. You can’t have it both ways in the same sense at the same time, trying like Wasson to invent a mass of verbiage to try to hide your brazen self-contradiction. The child simply has freewill thinking, innocently. Theologians are guilty of hypocrisy, of preaching a garbage theology that they themselves don’t believe in; of striving to contradict themselves and pretend they aren’t. Sin is the mixture of asserting freewill and no-free-will.

The Reformed theologian pushed into a corner admits self-contradiction with the feeble excuse “the fallen mind of man cannot understand the mystery of God”. No, “1+1=3”, or “Yes = No”, is not a “mystery”; it’s nonsense and simple self-contradiction. Don’t falsely label it as a “mystery”. What’s truly the mystery is the source of our personal control-thoughts. Saying that we are ultimately responsible freewill-type moral control agents is not a mystery; it’s simply an outright falsehood, one that is undeniably common and standard in Reformed theology books, as Paulson’s book explains.

First Luther discovers no-free-will, and immediately after that, Lutheranism adds freewill moral agency to that, as is standard practice throughout the history of religion except in the pure source of religion, during the loosecog fountain in the peak window of the mystic altered state. The revelation of no-free-will is given in the heart of esoteric religion (including in Gnosticism), and then, the labor of exoteric theology and religion is to cover-up that embarrassing nakedness, hide, shield the eyes in public, to protect society from the embarrassing, horrific though attractive truth that is revealed, protecting religion by censoring the taboo heart of religion.

— Michael Hoffman, February 4, 2013, based on original research and idea-development since 1985
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6314 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/02/2013
Subject: Re: Transcending no-free-will
Clarifications:

Now we have books — thanks to [Bart Ehrman] — that dare to mention (dismissively) the idea that Jesus didn’t exist. Next we’ll have more books that finally are so bold and brazen as to condemn the idea that drugs are the historically normal Christian eucharist (and thus, that acknowledge the existence of the idea[; that is, my idea, that normally, in Christian history, the Eucharist was understood as visionary plants; per my Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture]) — not just as an aside, but as an entire book — like Shroom (another example of an evasive heap of inconsistent assertions).

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6315 From: Vincent Bruno Date: 25/02/2013
Subject: Vincent Bruno
Group: egodeath Message: 6319 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/06/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6320 From: Joe Date: 12/06/2013
Subject: Forthcoming essay citing egodeath theory
The forthcoming book ‘Breaking convention: essays on psychedelic consciousness’ (currently available for preorder on amazon) contains an essay which is based on Michael Hoffman’s theory of mental construct processing (loosening of associations in the psychedelic altered state), and which includes several citations to the egodeath theory website. The title of the essay is ‘Cognitive phenomenology of mind manifestation’, it covers the following topics:

Relation of psychedelic tripping to the mind’s association and pattern forming capacities
Using analogies to describe altered state experiences
Plato’s allegory of the philosopher in the cave, and how it maps onto the psychedelic state
Frank Jackson’s philosophical thought-experiments about radically novel kinds of experience, and how they map onto the psychedelic state
Andrew Marr’s theory of visual perception, and Jerry Fodor’s theory of mental modularity, and how both these theories imply a broadly representationalist metaphysical view (perception mediated by mental symbols, as opposed to direct perception of external reality)
Michael Hoffman’s concepts of explicit representationalism and metaperception in the psychedelic state
Undulating qualia – the specific way in which ordinary perception of physical objects is altered in the psychedelic state, and how this alteration indicates a representationalist theory of perception
Edmund Husserl’s concept of phenomenological epoche (= deliberate ‘bracketing-off’ of natural, habitual assumptions for the purpose of carrying out phenomenological analysis), and how it describes both psychedelic tripping and schizophrenic/psychotic mental fragmentation.
Freud’s analogy of the mind as a crystal vase which shatters during episodes of psychosis, making the underlying crystalline structure become visible
Humphrey Osmond’s concept of tripping as ‘psychotomimesis’
Louis Sass’ concept of schizophrenic cognition as ‘hyperreflexivity’ and how this concept also applies to the psychedelic cognitive modality
The phenomenological inaccuracy of the term ‘hallucinogen’
Benny Shanon’s analysis of the ayahuasca experience, in particular his description of the way in which ayahuasca can reorientate a person’s ontological understanding
How the psychedelic state reveals the mind’s basic function of fusing together mental representations with their external referents
How Michael Hoffman’s analysis of the psychedelic trip effect explains the proper way in which tripping is related to hallucinating
Michael Hoffman’s concept of the mental worldmodel, and how psychedelic tripping can lead to a radical overhaul/restructuring of the mental worldmodel
Using the process of waking up from a dream as an analogy for the psychedelic mental reconfiguration
Paul Thagard’s writing on paradigm conversion and how it maps onto the psychedelic mental reconfiguration
Group: egodeath Message: 6321 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/07/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6322 From: hahaonlysirius Date: 06/07/2013
Subject: Please repost “Mystianity” graduate thesis paper referenced by Micha
I would like to read the graduate thesis paper mentioned on egodeath.com by Michael Hoffman here: http://www.egodeath.com/MysticInitiationOriginChristianity.htm

>I’m amazed at the excellent quality of this summary by a student. This “report”, a graduate thesis, is about Christianity and the Mystery Religions.
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JesusMysteriesdiscussion/files/Mystianity.zip

The link no longer works, and I’ve done some googling around the web but haven’t had any luck. Does anyone have a copy they could repost? I would be very grateful.
Group: egodeath Message: 6323 From: hahaonlysirius Date: 07/07/2013
Subject: Cancellation of the will
I’ve had some involvement in a reformed church founded on Calvinist principles recently, and the discussion of the Holy Spirit in relation to the will of man came up. The position asserted was that the Holy Spirit descends on the elect, through the concept of Grace — these elect few are pre-destined for Salvation. Then, the degree to which the elect is filled with the Holy Spirit is dependent on how one submits to the Holy Spirit. By becoming an empty vessel — total submission, one can become completely full of the Holy Spirit. However, if one clings to the flesh — continues to rebel — there will be no fertile ground for the Sprit to take root.

This oddly sounded very much like the theory of egodeath, minus the entheogens of course, but it left me slightly bewildered. First, the elect have no choice whether they are chosen or not. However, being chosen, they are provided a choice: submit or rebel. Yet, is it not God’s Providence that determines whether we will submit or rebel? This seemed like waffling to me, and contradictory to the “compatibilist” position the church has professed in the past: i.e. man can do what he wills, but not will what he wills. Then how can man will to be submissive?

Surely, one can experience the cancellation of the will in the altered mystic state. However, can one cancel one’s will in the ordinary state of consciousness? Can I will myself to be an empty vessel, in anticipation of being filled with the Holy Spirit? How does this relate to ego transcendence as state in the egodeath theory?

Thanks for any insight.
Group: egodeath Message: 6324 From: ajnavajra Date: 07/07/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will
My take on this derives from enough “egodeath” experiences with
entheogens to find a sense that “I” have a continuity before this birth
and after this coming death. Sort of a reincarnationalist type view, but
that the “I” that is my true self (Self) is more than this present
personality.

Therefore the will that this current personality possesses is a smaller
amount that the Over Will of the Higher Self. (That Self may also be an
integrated unit within a yet larger Greater Self. The whole thing is
likely a fractal reflection)

So “my Father in Heaven” is my Higher Self, who as in the parable of the
talents, have given me a small “trust fund” of will, and whether I
remember this fact or not, I am still operating at His sufferance.

Many people using 5 MeO have reported being expanded back to Godhead and
then they remembered laying out the script of this lifetime. Coming back
down has the sense of being “squeezed” into a smaller more limiting
little self.

Taken in the way, your current lifetime is not by far your only one, and
the only expression of your will, or His Will. In this level of the
“video game” you have to achieve “beating the level” or the “boss” of
the level, in order to start the next level. This may involve some kind
of body upgrade too, with a new nervous system capable of sensibilities
now undeveloped.

As a child has limited will under the Will of the parent, so we too act
out our part at this level, knowing there are aspects we canot yet
understand.

All of this is predicated on having some kind internal initiations or
experiences which you can begin to trust, rather than the kind of
“faith” that comes from reading other people’s opinions. I believe if
you continue to explore taking the sacred communion with the INTENTION
of finding out what is next, and opening to there being an invisible
support group of higher beings in whose tribe you are already
integrated, they will carry you to your next level. You are already
surrounded and live in the womb of the Great Light Mother, or Holy
Spirit, and your life derives from Her. She will give you what you need
at the moment, so don’t bewilder yourself by trying to solve the entire
puzzle now! You have to grow, and keep growing.

Thus in the end, every act of your “will” small as it is, derives its
force from the greater Intention or Will of the Mother-Father who has
carried you to this moment of questioning. “They” will not abandon you.
In my opinion this “threat” of making a mistake in your decisions is
some kind of mind control bullshit laid on us by priests and
mind-slavers to cultivate our obeisance so they can milk our “soul
juice”, pick our pockets, and misdirect our forces. You are made “in the
image of God”. Follow your spiritual umbilical cord back to Source, and
feel it like a substance, a Rock, the Foundation. Now trust your will,
even when it makes mistakes.

Does a plant “decide” to grow, flower and fruit? No, the interior force
of the Holy Spirit carries it. Thus friend, be like the Lilies of the
Field. Be yourself warts and all, allow mistakes, and accept
Father-Mother’s forgiveness and GRACE and trust that “they” will carry
you onward, knowing you must fall many times in learning to walk.


— In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “hahaonlysirius” wrote:
>
> I’ve had some involvement in a reformed church founded on Calvinist
principles recently, and the discussion of the Holy Spirit in relation
to the will of man came up. The position asserted was that the Holy
Spirit descends on the elect, through the concept of Grace — these
elect few are pre-destined for Salvation. Then, the degree to which the
elect is filled with the Holy Spirit is dependent on how one submits to
the Holy Spirit. By becoming an empty vessel — total submission, one
can become completely full of the Holy Spirit. However, if one clings to
the flesh — continues to rebel — there will be no fertile ground for
the Sprit to take root.
>
> This oddly sounded very much like the theory of egodeath, minus the
entheogens of course, but it left me slightly bewildered. First, the
elect have no choice whether they are chosen or not. However, being
chosen, they are provided a choice: submit or rebel. Yet, is it not
God’s Providence that determines whether we will submit or rebel? This
seemed like waffling to me, and contradictory to the “compatibilist”
position the church has professed in the past: i.e. man can do what he
wills, but not will what he wills. Then how can man will to be
submissive?
>
> Surely, one can experience the cancellation of the will in the altered
mystic state. However, can one cancel one’s will in the ordinary state
of consciousness? Can I will myself to be an empty vessel, in
anticipation of being filled with the Holy Spirit? How does this relate
to ego transcendence as state in the egodeath theory?
>
> Thanks for any insight.
>
Group: egodeath Message: 6325 From: Simon Date: 22/07/2013
Subject: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Enlightenment as many of you may know means ego death, but what is Enlightenment and what is ego?

Enlightenment means coming to a state of perfect goodness and this means that ego is anything and everything that is bad in a person, in you…

Zen has quite a history of Enlightening people but not so much these days. Why..? There are no enlightened zen masters any more; they have all been lost due to poor students. Although this is not really their fault as you may have guessed. Evolution procedes and there is a reason for everything.

Ego includes all sickness, though not everything the modern person calls sickness is sickness. THings like schizophrenia and alhzimers are NOT sickness but glipses outside of ego.

Physicality is ego, so when a person becomes more aware, their sense of thinking things on the physical plane are important diminishes and they become more aware of the non-physical dimensions of life. This is often mistaken for illness in todays society and awareness of the non-physical is termed illness by many.

It seems society has a great deal against anything truly good and this needs to end. It is just ego playing its tricks but once the ego’s tell-tale signs are seen it is not a problem.

So a thorough understanding of ego is important for ego death proper. Remember ego is all negativity, while enlightenment and everything outside of ego is positive and life enhancing.

Society doesn’t like an Enlightened person, because society has a big ego collectively, but when that ego diminishes, the Enlightened person will become the most popular man in the world, as is to be expected. All Enlightened Souls were popular, but these days there is a lot more negativity and ignorance.

IT is all a product of Evolution and will and must work out.

Peace to you all.
Group: egodeath Message: 6326 From: ajnavajra Date: 23/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
— In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Simon” <buddhaneo@…> wrote:
>
> Enlightenment as many of you may know means ego death, but what is Enlightenment and what is ego?
>
> Enlightenment means coming to a state of perfect goodness and this means that ego is anything and everything that is bad in a person, in you…
>
> Ego includes all sickness, though not everything the modern person calls sickness is sickness. THings like schizophrenia and alhzimers are NOT sickness but glipses outside of ego.
>

> So a thorough understanding of ego is important for ego death proper. Remember ego is all negativity, while enlightenment and everything outside of ego is positive and life enhancing.
>
**************************

wow! this is a really dualistic mentalized model. Gadzooks. “perfect goodness,” “bad…???”

this seems to me to be another expression of the “run away” sickness that infects “spirituality.” Gotta get from here (“illusion”) to there (“enlightenment”). This model itself is the “illusion.”

These values of “good” and “bad” arise in the dual state which is NOT enlightenment. When the mind truly stops, these models will stop. What One is left with is what IS, and THAT includes all models of illusion and “enlightenment.” It IS what IT IS.

Even your illusion is perfect goodness!

Look up Churning the Milky Sea. Note that the forces of Darkness, Asuras, are evenly matched against the forces of Light, Nagas.. Names are not important. But the vision is that the game we call Cosmos with its supposed “evolution to higher states” is actually a balance of cross-cancelling forces, meaning that there is actually no movement at all. The only movement is an artifact of Mind scanning Itself. Every time one touches on Mind, we realize there is no place to go but here! This ends Seeking, trying to map a way out of “illusion” which is an equal part of Reality.

Capiche?
Group: egodeath Message: 6327 From: Simon Date: 24/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Even YOUR ideas are illuisions…

The ego is everything that DOESN’T KNOW its unity with God.

E dge
G od
O ut


**************************
>
> wow! this is a really dualistic mentalized model. Gadzooks. “perfect goodness,” “bad…???”
>
> this seems to me to be another expression of the “run away” sickness that infects “spirituality.” Gotta get from here (“illusion”) to there (“enlightenment”). This model itself is the “illusion.”
>
> These values of “good” and “bad” arise in the dual state which is NOT enlightenment. When the mind truly stops, these models will stop. What One is left with is what IS, and THAT includes all models of illusion and “enlightenment.” It IS what IT IS.
>
> Even your illusion is perfect goodness!
>
> Look up Churning the Milky Sea. Note that the forces of Darkness, Asuras, are evenly matched against the forces of Light, Nagas.. Names are not important. But the vision is that the game we call Cosmos with its supposed “evolution to higher states” is actually a balance of cross-cancelling forces, meaning that there is actually no movement at all. The only movement is an artifact of Mind scanning Itself. Every time one touches on Mind, we realize there is no place to go but here! This ends Seeking, trying to map a way out of “illusion” which is an equal part of Reality.
>
> Capiche?
>
Group: egodeath Message: 6328 From: tolderoll Date: 24/07/2013
Subject: Re: Enlightenment/Ego – What is it?
Why are you spamming the group? It’s obvious you’re not interested in the topics of discussion here.

— In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Simon” <buddhaneo@…> wrote:
>
>
> Even YOUR ideas are illuisions…
>
> The ego is everything that DOESN’T KNOW its unity with God.
>
> E dge
> G od
> O ut
>
>
> **************************
> >
> > wow! this is a really dualistic mentalized model. Gadzooks. “perfect goodness,” “bad…???”
> >
> > this seems to me to be another expression of the “run away” sickness that infects “spirituality.” Gotta get from here (“illusion”) to there (“enlightenment”). This model itself is the “illusion.”
> >
> > These values of “good” and “bad” arise in the dual state which is NOT enlightenment. When the mind truly stops, these models will stop. What One is left with is what IS, and THAT includes all models of illusion and “enlightenment.” It IS what IT IS.
> >
> > Even your illusion is perfect goodness!
> >
> > Look up Churning the Milky Sea. Note that the forces of Darkness, Asuras, are evenly matched against the forces of Light, Nagas.. Names are not important. But the vision is that the game we call Cosmos with its supposed “evolution to higher states” is actually a balance of cross-cancelling forces, meaning that there is actually no movement at all. The only movement is an artifact of Mind scanning Itself. Every time one touches on Mind, we realize there is no place to go but here! This ends Seeking, trying to map a way out of “illusion” which is an equal part of Reality.
> >
> > Capiche?
> >
>
Group: egodeath Message: 6330 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/08/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6331 From: letsrap@sbcglobal.net Date: 16/08/2013
Subject: What U-R Learning
Group: egodeath Message: 6333 From: letsrap@sbcglobal.net Date: 19/08/2013
Subject: Be Hungry For Truth
Group: egodeath Message: 6335 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/09/2013
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6339 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2013
Subject: Bk: The Psychedelic Future of the Mind (Thomas Roberts)

The Psychedelic Future of the Mind: How Entheogens Are Enhancing Cognition, Boosting Intelligence, and Raising Values
Thomas B. Roberts
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1594774595
January 2013

 

I wrote this review, below, and posted it to Amazon as soon as the book first shipped, Feb. 8, 2013.
My reviews: http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1YFCQT60M4XAJ


4 stars out of 5
It’s a start, but perpetuates limiting, incoherent assumptions

 

This book is an assortment, a compilation of pieces, including a couple chapters by other authors. This too-short book somewhat achieves its goal; it’s appropriate for an entheogen library but uncritically perpetuates fatally self-defeating fallacies. The book really needs to be better, more consistently enlightened, with a thoroughgoing critique. This book is average, conventional groupthink in too many ways, and where it breaks away, it does so insufficiently. Regarding the cognitive potentials of entheogens, it’s a start, but could be more substantial (without being longer). It’s a useful brief survey of the field, of current attitudes; that’s a relatively strong point of the book.

 

The sections on entheogen history and on psychedelics in cognitive science need to be expanded, but without the tepid compromise that limits this book. It needs to be harder-hitting; it’s not good enough to accomplish its goals. It relies too much on Stan Grof’s quirky, narrow model, his fixation on the birth-trauma metaphor.

 

It needs to go deeper on the taboo, censored huge interest and role of entheogens throughout many fields. As suggested but not emphasized enough in this book, millions of people (researchers, professors, priests, and mystics) are highly interested though censored and silent, and we get glimpses of this interest in several points in the book. Roberts doesn’t step up to the plate and in a sustained and direct way tackle this key blocking impediment, of communication censorship; he only keeps noting it, too feebly. I would expect his survey of thousands of books to point out what’s really going on, to explain why I go into the New Age bookstore and am told they have no books about psychoactive drugs in religion, when in fact, as Roberts knows, those books and sections are strewn throughout the store, separated, scattered, diluted.

 

Roberts vaguely mentions that there is much entheogen activity at websites, but his book is too retrograde to cover them seriously. The limited and self-defeating thinking (or lack of thoroughgoing consistent critical thinking) seen in these books that cite each other, shows why the future of clear thinking is driven online, where there is less hidebound and conventional thinking than in old fashioned and old conventional-thinking printed books.

 

I disagree with Roberts’ assertion in this book that entheogens should be controlled and doled-out by authorities. The law should be the same as it always was from the beginning of time until a few years ago in 1966 and Nixon’s drug schedules, which is to say, no law, other than accurate labelling and quality control, since religious freedom means freedom of traditional mystic methods which were entheogenic, as the books Roberts cites show. He should know better, for this book and from his Entheogen Chrestomathy (a collection of passages about entheogens from many books).

 

Instead, we get more crypto-Prohibition, Roberts allowing himself to be coerced by mental censorship into contradicting his own position, effort, and evidence, and training his readers to similarly sustain their uncritical key assumptions about religion, and training them how to hold self-contradictory ideas in their mind like himself, Walsh, and most of the other authors. Clark Heinrich is relatively enlightened in his book, Magic Mushrooms in Religion and Alchemy (http://amazon.com/o/asin/0892819979), elegantly tracing Amanita throughout our Western religious history. For coherent clear thinking about rights and meaningful religious freedom, see Steve Kubby The Politics of Consciousness: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom (http://amazon.com/o/asin/189362644X).

The books Roberts cites and surveys show that Greeks and Christians used mixed wine freely, and we claim to legally have religious freedom, so against this incoherent book, we must insist we be as free in our religious banqueting parties as we were during Antiquity; we cannot settle for any lesser pseudo-freedom while claiming we have religious freedom and claiming that America is religious. Follow the Supreme Court consistently: leave the entheogen churches alone; reject Roberts’ compromising authoritarian administration of entheogens.

 

This book claims to be forward-looking rather than a historical recounting, and yet it perpetuates major fallacious assumptions about history, in a self-defeating way, by implicitly asserting a history while lacking sufficient critical examination of our Western history of entheogens. Being forward looking shouldn’t be at the expense of telling a false and self-defeating story of the past. It would be better to be silent about the past than to tell a false story of our past lacking entheogens, so you could say this book is not exclusively forward looking enough. It’s a fairly good forward-looking story combined with a bad careless habitual historical story that defeats the forward effort.

 

Roberts needs to read the books excerpts he’s gathered and put together the pieces more, on an independent basis. Like all prominent authors of entheogen books, his thinking is far too compromised and unoriginal, coerced into unconsciously shooting himself in the foot and affirming the underpinning doctrines that support the Prohibition-friendly reality-tunnel. Schultes does the same, and Roger Walsh’s article that’s a chapter of this book does the same. They ask the Prohibition-saturated question “Do drugs have religious import?” These drug policy reform leaders are preventing success by declaring defeat before they’ve begun, by framing the self-evidently obvious as if it were something that’s in doubt. Walsh titles his article self-defeatingly as a question, “are entheogens false?”

 

This book — its authors — reify habitually the uncritically adopted unspoken Prohibitionist-compliant dogma, a hazy, incoherent dogma, that scholars understand how Christian mystics throughout history accessed the intense mystic altered state, and we know that they accessed it through meditation, and we know they didn’t access it through drugs. It is unthinkable and unwriteable by Walsh and Roberts — mis-leaders of reform — to consider the question I pose: to what extent were visionary plants used by Christians throughout history? Roberts contradicts the evidence he has collected: he cites the book The Psychology of Religion by Hood et al The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach (http://amazon.com/o/asin/1606233033), which states that Dan Merkur has shown in his book The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical Experience (http://amazon.com/o/asin/089281862X) that Jewish mystics used visionary plants.

 

Yet these writers continue, as firmly repeated in the present book, to put forward without any critical examination, the assertion — taken as if granted and established — that traditional Christian mysticism is distinct from the use of visionary plants. Per my Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion, Ruck et al, cited by Roberts’ book, have demonstrated enough evidence that we must assume the opposite: every Christian mystic used visionary plants, unless proven otherwise. That’s the exact opposite of the strong tendency of all these authors. They contradict themselves. Roberts advises about the Entheogenic Reformation, and yet, he in unthinking convention, together with the other authors, robs visionary plants of their credit.

 

He gives Christianity and Christian religious experiencing, he gives credit to non-visionary plant vague ill-defined practices, contemplation practices that are assumed without any critical thinking, to be non-plant based — despite copious evidence that Merkur and Ruck and the entheogen historians have gathered, including mushrooms in art that I have routinely identified. Roberts cites books that contain that evidence, and yet he unthinkingly fails to connect, instead, he omits and shuts out visionary plants, robbing them of their due central credit throughout our religious history.

 

He contradicts himself; he compromises with the mental shackles of Prohibition unspoken dogma (the silent Reform-preventing dogma of repeating the harmfully misleading nonsensical phrase “entheogens vs. natural traditional mystic methods”), even while citing books that contradict that phrase and show it is a false dichotomy, a massive category error. Evidence citied in many of the hundreds of books Roberts surveys, indicate — when you engage your critical thinking, consistently — that the category “entheogens” is identically the same as the category “traditional mystic practice”.

 

This book purports to advocate entheogens, yet the author permits himself to be psyched-out by Prohibitionist mental shackles and the very kind of endemic, biased thought-censorship that he mildly comments on in this book. Roberts ends up advocating against entheogens in our religious history, despite the evidence (which Roberts gathers in his books and citations, pages 146-151 here, and his book An Entheogen Chrestomathy) that shows that Christian mysticism is the same thing as entheogens; that entheogens are the traditional method of accessing the intense mystic altered state. He cites Clark Heinrich, and Carl Ruck et al: The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist (http://amazon.com/o/asin/089089924X).

 

Uncritically parroting repeatedly the nonsense phrase “entheogens vs. natural methods” (going directly against Jonathan Ott’s title Pharmacophilia: or The Natural Paradises [1888755016]), Roberts robs and steals from visionary plants the central credit they are due, within our own Western history. Just like almost all the other prominent, Prohibition-friendly, collaborationist, compromisers (Schultes, cited on page 148: Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers [http://amazon.com/o/asin/0892819790]). Roberts and all authors need to weed out their self-contradicting compromises from their thinking, purify their thinking of Prohibition-friendly unstated, uncritical dogma, and start telling the true, coherent, evidence-based history, abandoning care of what the mental shackles of censorship and Prohibition dictate.

 

Walsh (chapter 5 of this book) needs to move forward and stop asking whether drugs have genuine religious import, and engage substance: how does religious experiencing come through visionary plants, as seen throughout religious history? This isn’t a matter of citing more evidence, so much as a matter of stating coherent connections, and being consistent in their thinking and handling of the evidence Roberts has gathered. The key false dichotomy of “drugs vs. traditional mystic methods” is totally entrenched in Walsh’s writing, and totally void of any thought of critical examination, despite the seemingly open-minded questioning implied in this chapter title (false advertising): “Psychedelics and Religious Experiences — What is the Relationship?”

 

Walsh’s chapter is based on a massive fallacious assumption never mentioned or examined for even a moment: that mystics didn’t use entheogens — despite the books cited by this book. Walsh’s name is given with M.D., Ph.D., and D.H.L., but he utterly fails to think about his underlying assumption, in this article supposedly about inquiring into this relationship. As Roberts writes about censorship and omission of psychedelics in Cognitive Science: “Whether this omission is due to a simple lack of information or scientists’ and scholars fear for their careers by touching a taboo topic is hard to say; it is probably some of both.”

 

Roberts and Walsh colossally fail to effectively counter and call for an end to this mental straightjacket and censorship. But at least Roberts mentions it; a glimmering of consciousness of the conditions of Prohibition begins to awaken, but we need a thousand times more, and this gentle, compliant, positive-thinking book is too mild to tackle these key blocking dynamics, resulting from Prohibition for Profit.

 

What use is Roberts’ advice on Reform when he despite his evidence persists in reifying a key Prohibitionist lie, that historical religion uses (vague, undefined) “traditional methods” that are not visionary plants? Roberts repeats that dogmatic assumption, and never stops to subjective it to critical examination. His section on entheogen history is not connected and integrated into his thinking through the rest of the book. Ralph Metzner (who is mentioned on page 70) wrote that he made a strategic mistake in the 1960s by portraying psychedelics as something new. Roberts hasn’t learned that lesson, despite decades of scholarship gathered in his Chrestomathy, such as Robert Graves’ discovery of mushrooms in Greek religion and myth in 1957.

 

That fatal mistake and persisting in robbing entheogens of their fully due credit as the source of the mystic state throughout history, continues to reign supreme even as Ruck et al pile up more and more evidence; Roberts continues omitting and shutting out entheogens from our religious history even while he dabbles incoherently in showing that the reality is the opposite. This book is futile because in the name of Reform, it falsely eliminates entheogens from our history, despite evidence the book cites. This book inadvertantly keeps telling the story of self-defeat, as the master narrative. The key to Reform involves quitting telling that 1960s Prohibition-supporting story; Roberts doesn’t have a compelling enough story without integrated that evidence throughout his thinking.

 

This book’s purpose is Reform, yet this book perpetuates a key fallacy that pushes entheogens away: Roberts tells the story, reifying and repeating it, that our religion’s history is not entheogenic. He falls short of providing complete coherent independent critical thinking. His error is deeply entrenched in this book: page 55, he mis-portrays antiquity as having merely rites and activities, as opposed to later word-based religion of 1500, and now, new, “primary religious experiencing”. This is the evolutionism fallacy: that we have entheogens now, and we are more evolved than antiquity, therefore, antiquity lacked entheogens, but had merely “rites” (presumed uncritically and inconsistently in this book as being non-entheogenic).

 

He ought to tell the more compelling true story, of returning to the non-placebo original Eucharist which inspired Christianity throughout its history, as the evidence and coherent thinking indicates. Roberts isn’t interested in looking at the copious evidence for entheogen Christianity because it contradicts his preconceived self-defeating and incoherent story of religious evolution — a false story that is encouraged by Prohibition’s censorship effect. Roberts several times in this book criticizes authors for omitting and hiding their pro-entheogen views; for example, page 122 points out that authors censor William James, like I have criticized Ken Wilber for starting with first book by omitting William James’ lead-in, “On nitrous oxide, …” (before “it occurred to me that perception is a veil; multiple states…”).

 

But Roberts needs to gain self-awareness of how he is censoring and shackling his own thinking, and thus perpetuating the mental shackles of his readers, helping to keep Prohibition in place and prevent us from perceiving the central role of entheogens in our history. He should take a lesson from his coverage of the censorship D.C.A. Hillman’s dissertation was subjected to (The Chemical Muse: Drug Use and the Roots of Western Civilization [http://amazon.com/o/asin/B00342VG0E] and ask: How is this present book also compromised and coerced into being self-censored?

 

Roberts should’ve gathered together the several points in his book, instances of censorship he points out, calling for breaking through these mental chains and start putting the pieces of evidence, the connections, together, coherently, to tell a story that makes compelling sense. I’m surprised that Roberts didn’t mention along with Hillman, Michael Rinella’s book Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens (http://amazon.com/o/asin/0739146874), which was also extremely censored. Censorship is the top topic, the main restriction now, for policy reform, which is why online has taken the lead away from the hidebound, conformist press: Prohibition Press, I have named it, after I spoke with the entheogen-friendly Park Street Press about this problem at a Western Esotericism conference.

 

Roberts mentions that people around 1970 were drawn to religion by LSD, and yet, he tells the Prohibition-friendly version of the story, a false tale artificially created by a censorship filtering effect, and fails to mention that people were forced to move away from entheogens and attempt to substitute meditation and a placebo make-believe Eucharist instead, and forced to tell the entheogen-diminishing story of how religion with its entheogen removed is better — a story now entrenched as dogma, mitigating against Roberts’ Entheogenic Reformation project. (Jonathan Ott advocated that term in his book The age of entheogens & the angel’s dictionary [http://amazon.com/o/asin/0961423471].)

 

Roberts calls for $1 billion for research including “education” toward Prohibition reform, but should more emphasize abandoning the phony drug schedules and fully re-legalizing entheogens like before October 1966. Just get rid of obstructionist Prohibition. We don’t have a budget problem, we have a Prohibition problem. We don’t need a billion dollars so much as we need bona fide actual religious freedom, which means nothing if not the freedom to access ecstatic fear and trembling and awesome power that has always been the source of religion, through the traditional mystic method: the sacred meal of the Lord’s flesh, which is real food and which transmits effective grace just as has always been claimed for this the traditional method of mystic experiencing.

 

— Michael Hoffman

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com.  All Rights Reserved.

Group: egodeath Message: 6340 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2013
Subject: Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism

A week-long Art High: This week, I got confirmation of my hypotheses of around a year ago, about branching vs. non-branching, tree vs. snake, branching antlers of a stag, in ancient Greek & in Christian mythic art. Confirmed: artists understood that mystic revelation about moral agency is a matter of moving from freewill thinking to no-free-will thinking, moving from autonomous monolithic personal control to puppet/slave/ rail-driven personal control with 2 levels or layers of control involved: the transpersonal driving layer (hidden thought source you must trust your life to) and the personal local locus of control-power (a reactive driven-gear, your forceful control-power that you exert is forcefully steered by the rail: you are forced to push in the direction that the hidden controller has pre-set you to push).

 

Diagram of Possibilism (the diagram fails to show the tree) vs. Eternalism (rigid snake worm worldline in rock/block universe): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-bebecome

 

Another daring hypothsis from me has been confirmed: Pre-moderns in loosecog had equivalent of multistate or altered state-based Cognitive Science, about 4-D spacetime (the Rock Universe), illusory control power (kingship, vs. puppet/slave), mental construct sequences positioned in spacetime (ivy strand with leaves; pine cone that opens its scales when dry and closes its scales when wet).

 

The art evidence emphatically and pointedly confirms my theorizing of a year ago that the man riding the donkey or horse toward the broken-branch tree trunk with snake, on sargophagii, means awareness passively being carried forward in time along your frozen rigid worldline, while the donkey or horse — a separate control-agency component of the psyche — steers your thinking, following the invisible rail(way). The donkey is the personal steering among virtual possibilitiyy branches through time. The one possibility branching path that is destined and pre-set and pre-existing is the path the steersman donkey is forced to follow, forced to choose.

The artworks convey “is personal moral control agency power a matter of possbiility branching, as you originally think and feel in the OSC, or is it non-branching, like snake/ivy/monocoursal/dragon/serpent/worm/ Eve’s long hair? ” The artworks say “You thought possibility branching, with you having that particular key kind of power: steering-control power of a kind that can manifest either branch A or B into the future. But per Peart, No One at the Bridge, in the mystic state you see you have no arms to steer, no power in the present to steer to one vs. a different future branching-path.

 

This system of art confirmation is maximally profound, exactly as powerful and reputation-boosting as the confirmation of bending of light near the sun in a complete solar eclipse some time after Einstein predicated light bending near the sun’s gravitational spacetime-curving field. Artworks directly and pointedly confirmed during the past few days, that the ego-transcendent understanding and knowledge about moral agency is a matter of repudiating Possibilism and affirming Eternalism, and trusting in your near-future worldline & hidden source of control-intentions, not battling against that.

 

Art clearly and definitely confirms my Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens/Metaphor (CHEM) explanatory model of myth & religion. The kylix (saucer-shaped shallow cup) painted by Douris completely fits with and affirms the Eden tree of knowledge. This art confirmation, though “merely confirmation” of my breakthroughs of a year ago, I report that this mere confirmation actually caused substantial link-tightening and compaction of my Theory of ego transcendence and metaphor — the *real*, relevant, central, driving force in the mystic altered state, the *real* nature of ego transcendence (as discovered in my initial, main, January 11 1988 “Crystalline Ground of Being & concomitant non-control” breakthrough). Journal of Transpersonal Psychology in 1985-1988 asserted that ego transcnedenence is spatial unity. I said no, ego transcendence is illusory control together with Eternalism (one’s future stream of control-intentions is pre-set, pre-arranged into a rigid snake shaped future-worldline).

 

The pearl of great price: The unenlightened illegitimate king sends Jason to retrieve the golden fleece. The fruit of the tree in the Garden (of Hesperides/Eden) is Transcendent Knowledge about personal control power being illusory; the fruit of the tree is understanding Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens (CHE) (including understanding how Metaphor describes Cyberneics, Heimarmene, and Entheogens/Loosecog; M->EHC). Metaphor describes entheogens causing loose cognitive binding revealing fatedness and non-control.

 

In religious myth, Metaphor describes entheogens experiencing Heimarmene & Cybernetics.

M->EHC

 

CHEM:

C – Cybernetics, personal control power; loss of control; self-control seizure, control vortex, non-control, autonomous personal control, switch from autonomous kingship to puppet/slave following hidden rail into future, unable to control which control-intentions come up in the fountain/spring/wellspring behind awareness.

H – Heimarmene; no-free-will; pre-existing near-future control-intentions; block universe; worldline; non-branching possibility tree.

E – Entheogens; loose cognitive binding state, mental model transformation.

M – Metaphor, myth, religious myth, esoteric symbol usage about C/H/E above.

 

Joseph Campbell says there’s no (single) Myth for our time. I say the equivalent of the myth-system of our future, quintessentially late-Modern or transitional to post-Modern, is my layout: an explicit non-metaphorical Core Theory plus mapping that to reliigious/mythic/esoteric metaphor, and, as far as *specific* brand-styling, we must consider STEM-style themes like:

o In the Matrix series, the Animatrix movie’s tripping android segment

o Rush songs — not Pop Sike (girl-relationship as metaphor for acid experiencing) but Tech Psych (STEM as metaphor for loosecog experiential insights)

….. The Body Electric

….. Cygnus X-1

….. Vital Signs

….. Chemistry

http://egodeath.com/rushlyrics.htm

 

(STEM means Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics.  A standard acronym.)

 

In the present, late-modern or post-modern era, we won’t have a myth (in Campbell’s sense), per Campbell. My response is that we will have correct non-mythic explicit explanation of ego-transcendent knowledge & no-free-will, and, we will have correct mapping to all past mythemes/tropes and the ability to created unlimited number of themes/tropes. Metaphor-only expressions of one’s correct understanding of TK proved (historically) to have problems, so it is urgent that everyone knows the non-metaphorical Core Theory, my Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence per my 1988 first drafts and 1997 summary at Principia Cybernetica (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5870).

 

Transcendent Knowledge (Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens/Metaphor) is the forbidden fruit forbidden to the egoic mind. The fatedness snake-dragon guards the fruit of the tree of knowledge of the illusory nature of moral control culpability in light of no-free-will and the pre-givenness of all your control-thoughts. Your snake made you choose as you did; you had no meta-choice; you have pseudo-freedom, the illusion of having the kind of steering-power that can select some other possibility branching path. The heimarmene snake dragon serpent monster (this is *the* monster, forcing you to intend against your self-protection programming in such a way that your steering-power with respect to your future possibility branching is shown to be illusory impotent cybernetic control power. You are only allowed to steer how you are forced to steer.

 

The serpent guards ego-transcendent knoweldge in at least 2 ways:

 

o If you are among the Elect, the serpent makes you wrestle with and submit to & put full intimate trust in your threatening thought-source, then the serpent as gate-controller lets you pass, to get the golden fleece or eat the apple of knowledge of the illusory nature of moral agency — to get ego-transcendent knowledge. The pearl of great price held in the claw of the challenging/threatening/enlightenment-bringing dragon/monster/serpent: you must sacrifice your childish free-will thinking *and* (stabbing your heart) sacrifice your claim to have the kind of control that could prevent a fatal control-intention from arising; to stop the sea-storm shipwreck control-instability, you must pay the price, repudiate your childish animal naive initial implicit essential claim that you have possibility-branch steering control power.

 

o If you are not among the predestined, pre-existing Elect, it is impossible for you to get to the fruit, impossible for you to steer down the possibility-branching path in which you gain the elegant pearl of ego-transcendent knowledge; you are pre-destined so that you in the future are destined to not ever come to (this elegant compact explosive system of) ego-transcendent knowledge.

 

Take my hand, I’ll take you to the other side, to see the truth: the path for you is decided

— Iron Maiden, album Somewhere in Time

 

Destiny planned out … speculation of the wise

— Bob Daisley, album Diary of a Madman

 

In these artworks, also I spotted clearly the theme, across systems/brands of ego-transcendent knowledge (= no-free-will, interlinked with personal non-control (non-sovereignty)).

o Jonah being spit out by the sea serpent

o Human torso w/ serpent legs in the Gigantomachy

o Snake in Eden tree: Eve’s torso with arms, or just her face, and a serpent lower body.

o Jason in the kylix (saucer-cup for drinking mixed wine/mushroom wine) painted by Douris, ego-dead, torso coming from the guardian heimarmene-dragon/serpent.

Sometimes the serpent’s head is shown in addition to the human head. Usually the human has arms but I especially resonate with the Eden serpent that just has Eve’s face; she has no arms to steer into her future possibility-tree branches, and the serpent has no arms.

 

Invisible railways crackle with life

— Rush/Peart, Spirit of Radio

 

Printed as “airwaves”, sung as “railways” the first time, “airwaves ” the 2nd time.

 

 

Theology is too policitized, it is misleading, and you have Augustine’s winking asymmetry: God is the author of good, humans are the author of evil. God is all-powerful, all-good, and isn’t the author of evil (directly or indirectly). But the entire Theology industry knows this is self-contradiction. Gnostic-like thinking (in whatever metaphor-systems of ego-transcendence) solves that by splitting the creator god (who is responsible for layout out our evil actions in spacetime) saying the evil creator (Demiurge) *is* the author of evil, and the high God is purely good and isn’t the creator. Theology advocates confusion and waffling, leading Reformed theologians to falsely say “man’s mind can’t understand this apparent contradiction: God is all-powerful and all-good” when the truth is, it’s blatantly self-contradictory and impossible to “solve” other than by subtle or covert or dishonest meaning-shifting.

 

Art tells a simple, valuable story: no-free-will, your snake-rail controls & pre-sets your steering, your awareness can only helplessly look on as the future destined thoughts & steering-direction are revealed, and thus God is the author of evil – ‘evil’ as unethical acts and as the delusion of freewill moral culpability. The essence of the story is beautifully straightforward as communicated in art, rather than in Theology: ingest entheogen, see and experience the self-contradictions of freewill thinking & its control-thinking, and switch to no-free-will thinking including the puppet/slave relationship of personal control to time. Alex Grey has not represented the discovery of the no-free-will, consistent, beautiful, attractive, threatening model of personal control in relation to time. This is the frozen-puppet-universe perspective.

 

I was surprised that “mere” confirmation of my theory by the layered and clustered branching antler and serpent and tree and “tree’s guarded treasure”, caused some jackpot updating of my cross-linking: adding new insights and giving an *enlightening* confirmation as opposed to mere simple confirmation. Art inspired me to see things even more clearly, simply, starkly: *tree* of knowledge of good & evil; fruit of the tree; golden fleece like pearl of great costly sacrificed price — the snake is the fruit of the tree; the fruit is the product of mentally considering tree vs snake, posssibility branching vs. monocoursal linear nonbranching; Possibilism vs. Eternalism & concomitant personal control power implications.

 

Artworks’ confirmation of my snake vs tree theory, and man riding donkey/horse/panther (or snake-drawn cart), toward branchless tree with snake, caused massive adjustments to the cross-linking in my theory — not negating anything I wrote, but tightening and affirming it, such as confirming my assertion that pre-modern elites understood 4D block time, loosecog, and levels of control. 

 

That’s one example of how daring I’ve been always in my Theory: I had to make an entire set of ideas that each totally conflict with strong dogmatic assumptions. Pre-moderns were stupid, we assume, and yet, we late-moderns were the clueless ones who were incapable until me of reading the simple message encoded by Douris and the pre-modern or early-modern artists: snake vs. tree, fruit reveals no-free-will & its concomitant ramificaitons for personal control morality steering power.

 

Art’s confirmation of my theorizing about branching, of a year ago, only showed me a few truly new insights this week, yet I’m getting a huge reading: my feelings report that the ability to more and more quickly read and decipher these metaphor artworks resolving them into no-free-will, or “Cyb/Heim/Enth” concerns, I detected or “heard the jackpot sound” of linking-updating the cross-linking throughout my Theory of myth & religion. It by today has become clear and feels simple: mystic revelation shows simply no-free-will; map the athiest no-free-will books’ phrases to *esoteric* religion. 

 

Everything Sam Harris asserts in discussing no-free-will maps *directly*, consistently, to religious myth — to higher-order, esoteric religious understanding. It’s only exoteric, lower-order religion that clings to the childish sinful confused self-contradictory freewill idea which posits and includes the feeling of, being a control steering power agent, a kind of control that is precisely the impossible aspect: the power in the present of steering into more than one real possibility branching path — that is the key core central power we assume and that we iniitally take as real, forming our moral control agent identity and its supposeed moral culpability.

 

The adult must cast off both the freewill assumption and the control meta-steering power assumption, but through intense overwhelming experiencing in loosecog, not speculation based only in the tight cognitive binding state — not the model of linear time & linear domino-chain causality. With my main article in hand, and my snake vs. tree revelation of switching from Possibilism moral thinking to Eternalism thinking, It is possible now, without entering the loosecog state, to have a correct and clear 2nd-hand understanding of control seizure and revelation of this specific kind of non-control, and changelessness of your near-future sequence of control-thoughts or control-intentions.

 

Joseph Campbell and Ken Wilber are not wrong so much as grossly massively incomplete. When the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence a la my first mid-1988 article drafts is inserted into Wilber’s system or Campbell’s, their systems are overwhelmed and totally dominated by my system, which is CTET/TK/Egodeath theory / the CHEM (M->E->H&C) model of ego transcendence & religious myth & esotericism-based tropes such as narrow escape in ancient novels.

 

My Egodeath (CHEM or M->EHC) theory:

M->E->H&C

Metaphor describes Enthoegens for experiencing Heimarmene & Cybernetics limits/vulnerability (“noncontrol”).

Cybernetics is the biggest most soul-shattering topic, Metaphor is the least, so imagine each letter font size from small to big: meHC, or CHem.

When I say “Entheogens” as 1 of 4 key topics, ‘Entheogens’ is a condensed term meaning & emphasizing loosecog — that is, loose cognitive association binding of (as worded per my crucial April 1987 thinking-style change) DMCRMs: dynamic mental-construct relationship matrixes — MCs (mental constructs), for short. This is an example of how I have deciphered metaphors describing what’s revealed in loosecog, and have engineered a language that is optimized for discussing efficiently ego-transcendent knowledge.

 

I feel guilty for only really speaking 1 language (English), but to redeem myself, I have fully cracked the mystery encryption code to fully explain what is actually essential in religious myth, and I have formed and shared a highly efficient language to discuss ego-transcendent knowledge. Each brick component of my theory I have customized, modified, and optimized; I have contributed “bricks” in many fields but the value of those bricks is superior because my bricks fit together successfully across fields. identifying analogies others that other investigators didn’t recognize. 20th Century research in myth & religion uses English, French, German, Greek, & Latin, but those are equivalently clueless and really only amount to 1 language. I provide the other language, that of the CHEM model I have created and discovered, rediscovering the essence but putting forth the first efficient systematic useful practical omni-powerful model that explicitly gives the solution to all the mysteries that matter.

 

I deciphered Moses’ seeing the burning bush = the subjectively moving present, seeing illusory unreal virtual possibility branching, like a hanging rope/fuse, with a smalll, localized flame climing up. A possibility branching bush with only the pre-existing branching-path being real; the other possibilities are virtual-only possibilities; they are impossible because not fated; those other, illusory branches are the branches which do not match what is happening in your worldline in your future.

 

Professors who lack my Egodeath theory are clueless and need to know that my theory will accellerate their work ideally and provide the ideal perfect solutions.

 

Researchers of Western ancient religion are doing a reset now, revisiting more carefully their assumptions, shaking off the horrible and confused Christian apologist historians — the equivalent of my desecrating and p*ss*ng on the pathetic worthless books around 1994. Previous books are as much misleading as informative. The field is saying “quit believing the biased presupmtions, the shared wrong assumptions. We must mind our assumptions! We couldn’t understand puzzles in religion, because our assumptions were wrong and careless. We must be careful this time in our foundational assumptions and be ready to change our assumptions.

 

In 2006 when I wrote the main article defining the CHEM model, the Jesus Myth hypothesis was beyond the pale, taboo, and no one heard of it. Now no-Jesus has become mainstream *on the internet* but not in the “real world” (the Establishment media & print-based press), and thank God for the Web, where real people can challenge the confusion of the Establishment position and its slave-scholars it employs and deploys such as the malarkey assumption-laden phrase “entheogens vs. traditional mystic methods”.

 

Back in the print days, the Establishment had a monopololy and effective censorship (of professors and of real people); they could get away with ignoring and dismissing challenges. Now, thank God, real people (critically thinking individuals) are calling the Establishment-collaborationist academics on their nonsense. It’s a war over defining reality: print vs. online, falsity vs truth, Establishement professors with mental shackles (they want you to wear shackles too) vs. actual free thinkers, who follow the evidence and reason, not politiicized status quo dogma and policed boundaries of what views are permited to be considered. If you are an academic, to write truth, you must post online in an area not controlled by the Establishment paradigm-police.

 

In 2006, my theory was far beyond the pale, far outside where academics are permitted to comment and write and think:

o No Jesus/Paul/apostles. That was way taboo but now has become a hot topic online, with real thinkers, un-cowed, shamelessly and brazenly challenging the clueless and self-contradicting Establishment academics.

o No free will. That was way taboo but now has become a hot topic online.

o Reformed theology: was shocking to Evangelicals, was way taboo but now has become a hot topic among thinking Christian young guys who move from perfectly clueless high school Christian groups to college and — a few years after me — discovered Reformed Theology.

o Entheogens: officially this is beyond the pale and unthinkable. But recently this has become a hot topic.

o God is the ultimate author of evil.

o You have no power to steer your future or make your future be anything other than the 1 path that always already exists in your future. You merely implement and discover your steering-direction; you cannot choose which path you will steer into.

 

No-free-will was a serious liability for the Egodeath theory in 2001 (my mythic metaphor deciphering breakthrough year), but suddenly has flipped to be a benefit, a genius insight and commendment for the Theory.

 

Ahistoricity of Jesus/Paul was a serious liability for the Egodeath theory in 2001, but suddenly has flipped to be a benefit, a genius insight and commendment for the Theory.

 

Same w/ entheogens.

 

o  Professors who don’t have my perfect omni-successful key theory are clueless.

o  Professors who have my perfect omni-successful key theory agree with it, but are censored — but they still need to use my Theory fully in their thinking, and (in the ways that these slaves are permitted by their masters) in their writing.

o  Students who don’t have my Theory are cluesss.

o  Students who have my Theory agree with it, but are censored by their Establishment-complicit professors and advisors — they need to use my Theory fully in their thinking, and write as they can get away with.

 

There is no problem of “people who disagree with the Theory”. It’s not possible to understand the Theory and disagree with it, because the Theory works, perfectly and extremely well and no other Theory works at all. The problem is either people don’t have the Theory, or, they have it and therefore agree with it (to understand it is to agree with it) but they are aggressively censored by the Establishment commitments: commitment to historical Jesus/Paul, commitment to generally literalist reading of pre-modern evidence, commitment to underestimating the intelligence (per the Evolutionism ideology) of pre-moderns, commitment to assuming pre-moderns were in the OSC only, commitment to non-entheogenic methods of mysticism throughout *our* culture’s history — white Western European history. Bunk unexamined assumptions a la Schultes’ Golden Book on Psychedelics: if a culture has writing, it doesn’t have entheogens; only if a culture lacks writing, it might have entheogens.

 

My Theory is perfectly cohernet & simple & successful (massive explanatory power & scope), there’s no other theory. The fields need my theory; it is painful to watch authors fail without the Theory. At this point, writers in the fields of myth, religion, psychology, cognitive science, time, entheogens, and agency, just need to discover that my Theory exists and perfectly explains every essential aspect and puzzle in the field. If only they *knew* my theory, they would hasten to leverage it; it is the solution they are in need of. It’s not a matter of some agree and some disagree; it’s a matter of some have this Theory, some lack this Theory. To know the Theory is to agree with it and recognize the genius of it: so butt-simple, so earth-shattering of all we thought we knew, so totally broad and deep in explantory power. Will the lecture audience agree with it?

 

That’s off-base: the lecture audience will be shattered, stunned, I have destroyed the world. Don’t bother thinking about the Establishment, because my Theory changes everything: Armageddon, the end of the world as Academia mis-knew it. Now we will need to instruct young adults in high school & college in sacrificing their childish freewill thinking. Not for the educating State to advocate a particular religion; more like, the State needs to teach (in place of “drug education”) what mental control dynamics result from loose cognition, and how these dynamics have been connected with no-free-will. The State can’t push a particular religion, nor illegalize a particular religion. What is religion? Original, source, higher, esoteric religion is the use of visionary plants to induce loose cognitive binding, to explore personal control power and no-free-will. Religion is the use of loosecog to change from freewill thinking to no-free-will thinking.

 

Should the State, in Education, teach the use of loosecog to change from freewill thinking to no-free-will thinking? That’s not laws pushing one religion or forbidding one religion; it would be educating people in religious cognitive structure transformation. The State should make available to people, in Education, the option of understanding religion in terms of CHEM (Cybernetics, Heimarmene, Entheogens, Metaphor), as a theory/hypothesis, as an alternative to literalist interpretation that’s done only because of ignorance of the CHEM option.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.  Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

Group: egodeath Message: 6341 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Caduceus: mycopercep shows sep ctrl-lev relations/harmony
The coupled-snakes model of fate-locked personal control power:

One’s thought-source is fated, and one’s stream of local control thoughts is fated, so there are two distinct fated snakes that are coupled.

o Your personal local locus of control power is female (helplessly injected with thoughts)

o Your hidden thought-source, which is overwhelmingly powerful like a puppetmaster in relation to your local locus of persona control (and is therefore male).

Both locii of control (personal & transpersonal; “female” and “male”) are governed in frozen time by fatedness (Heimarmene).

You a “female” helpless passive gear-driven puppet have no power to deviate from what your male hidden thought-source forces you to do & steer toward. The “male” hidden thought source — specifically your own transpersonal self involved specifically in *your life* — is also pre-set by fatedness.

The pole, staff, or spear is {the directionality and forceful passage of time}. Time or your near-future potentially fatal control-thought is impossible to steer away from or slow down. This is more specific, technically useful, generally useful, direct, and literal than “The vertical line in mythic art is the world axis on which you climb to the stationary constellation”).

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

 

—In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, <mike@…> wrote:

“Kundalini energy” is true, but is not sufficiently useful as a method or explanatory framework. “Truth and revelation is energy.” Ok, but “the snake and spine is spiritual energy” falls short of a useful explanation.
Group: egodeath Message: 6342 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will

The coupled-snakes model of fate-locked personal control power

 

One’s thought-source is fated, and one’s stream of local control thoughts is fated, so there are two distinct fated snakes that are coupled.

o Your personal local locus of control power is female (helplessly injected with thoughts)

o Your hidden thought-source, which is overwhelmingly powerful like a puppetmaster in relation to your local locus of persona control (and is therefore male).

 

Both locii of control (personal & transpersonal; “female” and “male”) are governed in frozen time by fatedness (Heimarmene).

 

You a “female” helpless passive gear-driven puppet have no power to deviate from what your male hidden thought-source forces you to do & steer toward. The “male” hidden thought source — specifically your own transpersonal self involved specifically in *your life* — is also pre-set by fatedness.

 

The pole, staff, or spear is {the directionality and forceful passage of time}. Time or your near-future potentially fatal control-thought is impossible to steer away from or slow down. This is more specific, technically useful, generally useful, direct, and literal than “The vertical line in mythic art is the world axis on which you climb to the stationary constellation”).

 

A person is a puppet locked in time (future as well as past). If the person is among the elect, that means that the person will be forced to ingest the entheogen and experience no-free-will & non-control over which possibility-branching path the person steers into in the immediate future. All thoughts are forced. The mind of the elect person knows that all thoughts are forced into their mind. Theology is about consistent waffling, consistent inconsistency, principled self-contradiction, calculated illogic. Theology is concerned about controlling the masses of exoteric tithe’ers, so Theology won’t admit simple no-free-will & puppethood & moral non-culpability. Theology is to con the masses.

 

Luther got close to simple consistent no-free-will, and close to coherent honest coverage of the real entheogenic Eucharist, but I perceive social-control politics pushing him away from simple honest clarity, into waffling and muddying and backpedalling. What Luther or Augustine believes, vs. how Luther or Augustine spins it and self-censors. Admitting the plain straightforward no-free-will position was not politically acceptable, so Theology as a project of obfuscation ensued. Every time a Reformed theologian gets close to stating CHEM (Cybernetics, Heimarmene, & Entheogens as the referent of Metaphor), he self-censors and backpedals (or, is censored and killed – like pro-Entheogen academics are censored and demoted).

 

In the bunk world of officially condoned ideas now (prior to my CHEM revolution), there’s no hope for organized Establishment authorities such as fabricate official Establishment Theology.

 

Several dynamics occur; any analysis of a part of the Theory or a part of “loss of control” requires typically several dynamics to be discussed; it’s not enough to do one single simple train of reasoning.

 

Isis made Apuleius get initiated, made him ingest the sacred meal (mushroom wine), made him struggle against the hidden thought-source, made him see the futility of struggling against this thought-source he is helplessly subjected to, made him see that his only option is to submit to his hidden thought-source intimately marrying it and recognizing it as his other uncontrollable distinct half.

 

Isis makes you ingest the entheogen. Isis makes you struggle and battle against your untrustworthy alien thought-source. Isis makes you realize that you must end up either steering toward chaos, illogic, insanity, system-chaos and control instability, or steering toward submissive trust in your hidden thought-source.

 

Which will you choose? If Isis is merciful, you will think “I shall have mercy on myself and quit kicking against the pricks (of stirrups); I have completed testing/battling about my control power and thought-source.” It may be that any mind that sees “I must submit, ecstatically bow to receive divine mercy, and trust this Mystery thought-source that my life depends on — or else, I reject sanity and coherence and choose insanity and cybernetic chaos and perpetual battling against my own thought-source component of my personal control power.”

 

Trusting and submitting brings life, civilization, rules for a viable city/culture, foundation of a truth-realizing society. Choosing to not trust the hidden thought-source leads to non-viability, “death”, continued battle, continued struggle. Once you comprehend and experience the two options clearly, there’s relief because there’s no reason or justification for sticking to the freewill personal power thinking. In a completely unchained state, the mind has no reason to choose life and continued existence, over death, mayhem, chaos, insanity; there’s no reason for steering toward submitting & viable continued life per Abraham’s descendents. The mind is forcefully brought to a choice between {chaos and retaining the freewill power claim or stance} vs. {order, enlightened viable civilization, submitting, formally repudiating your childish/animalistic no-free-will thinking. These are what the two choices are, in terms of cybernetics rather than religious terminology.

 

So the decision or choice in question is this one; this choice when it is presented in its full mature form is clear. We *can* debate over how that choice is made (free or forced). But first we must (in this discussion) clearly accurately understand what the 2 choices *are*, why those are the two choices.

 

There is only one logic-conformant, coherent option: submit and trust the hidden thought-source, affirm esoteric religion, and go on to survive the Holy Encounter with the Transcendent Control-Limit, and live and prosper. The only other choice is plainly not logic-conformant, and in practice, people take this option (they are forced to take this option) when they fear loss-of-control and they fear insanity. Such retreat has the advantage of protecting and preserving egoic control stability and delusion, but the disadvantage of avoiding understanding & making peace with (integrating) no-free-will.

 

Per classic Ken Wilber: eventually the dissonance and discomfort, or torment, of still not having transcendent knowledge though you can smell it so close within attainment, eventually you fear the control-loss chaos serpent monster less than you hate lacking enlightment. Eventually you want enlightenment bad enough to interrogate The Monster (fated loss-of-control) and find how to keep your egoic control intact enough for control stability, while repudiating the specific child-like or demonic beast-like (animal-like) notion of personal freewill power.

 

Logically, there’s no way to choose between the two responses in the peak mystic-state window (ecstatic peak, amazement, trembling, psychotomimetic, terrifyingly ready to do anything, fully open-minded):

 

A. Submitting to no-free-will, and immediately gaining control-stability, the sea-storm cybernetic instability threat vanishes, instantly calm and stable.

 

B. Rejecting what Reason showed you and instead obstinately and foolishly adhering to personal freewill power after it has been proved as impotent and unstable. Insanity, hard to visualize: how could you act-out “I’m out of control”, if you have such precise understanding of what the issue or choice is? The option, here, really, seems to amount to literal insanity, a scrambled and broken mind. But typically, no one chooses this option who understands this option. Typically, choosing this option is a matter of mis-understanding the two options, and running away for egoic self-preservation (or to slow down and return to the Peak loosecog state later).

 

Given a person who clearly understands what the two options are, the person will choose what they are fated to choose. Everyone who is fated to choose continued viable life as a control-agent is fated to submit. Everyone who is fated to reject no-free-will and refuse to submit to their hidden thought-source, either returns to the egoic worldmodel of delusion, or, they become insane — breaking down, as described in the sense of early Ken Wilber. Especially now that this Theory is available, it’s normal to retreat in fear, fearing insanity, returning to stability of control by returning to egoic delusion. Really, B splits into B and C:

 

B. Understand the requirement of trusting no-free-will & thot-source, but reject no-free-will. That’s the bad-choice option per Theology, as held up by Theology, but no one takes this choice-branch.

 

C. Not understanding the requirement of trusting no-free-will & thot-source, and running away in fear to protect self-control stability. This is the option that the Elect takes in the first initiations, and eventually rejects when their understanding is purified enough, after they have burned away mental error by exposing it to loosecog and no-free-will sufficiently. We burn away delusion in our struggle against the alient controller in our Hellish battle series, and then instead, when reconciled and we win *and* lose the battle in the right sense, and we understand and trust and heal our animal sickness of the mind that threw us into dissonance and self-battle, we bathe in the light of Heaven. The situation that produced hellish panic and self-battling (fire of Hell), now becomes the situation that produces relief and integrity, security, calm, self-integrity, a spiritual marriage-harmony (the supernal light of Heaven).

 

Those choice-options are like my Theory reception under the conditions of Prohibition & false Historicity/literalism of Jesus/Paul & modern crude conceptions of “determinism” as linear domino causal-chain: A scary option is that people will understand my Theory and reject it. That’s not happening, and not likely to happen.

 

Anyone who understands my Theory affirms it.

Anyone who rejects my Theory doesn’t understand the Theory.

Anyone who understands my Theory and rejects it… is an empty set, because understanding the Theory inherently contradicts rejecting the Theory.

 

Anyone who understands the Creator’s power over our thoughts & control-intentions affirms that power.

Anyone who rejects Creator’s power over one’s thoughts doesn’t understand control-power.

Anyone who understands Creator’s offer of harmony/salvation/system-coherence and rejects it… is an empty set, because understanding the power-relation of local control-thoughts vs. hidden thought-source inherently contradicts rejecting that understanding of power.

 

‘Creator’ or ‘God’ here refers to that which controls what thoughts arise in your wellspring in your mind’s fate-embedded rock-cave. ‘God’ refers to the hidden source of thoughts. Your hidden male portion, the thot-injector part of you, your personal fraction of God-identity is, the aspect of God which is the hidden source of *your* thoughts & intentions, as distinct from someone else’s thoughts & intentions.

 

Anyone who understands God’s and the Holy Spirit’s overwhelming power over your local personal control-power, accepts no-free-will & accepts the non-autonomy of personal control. The person received Understanding/Grace. The elect puppet is initially frightened away, but is fated to eventually choose A and be saved because of the puppetmaster made the puppet clearly understand the choices. The problem of “understanding TK but rejecting it” doesn’t actually exist, though Theology falsely makes it sound like the non-confused person (sinner, apostate) understands God’s power (or HS’s power) and rejects it.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

Group: egodeath Message: 6343 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Cancellation of the will

Correction (removed “no-“):

 

The mind is forcefully brought to a choice between {chaos and retaining the freewill power claim or stance} vs. {order, enlightened viable civilization, submitting, formally repudiating your childish/animalistic free-will thinking.



—In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, <egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

The coupled-snakes model of fate-locked personal control power

 

One’s thought-source is fated, and one’s stream of local control thoughts is fated, so there are two distinct fated snakes that are coupled.

o Your personal local locus of control power is female (helplessly injected with thoughts)

o Your hidden thought-source, which is overwhelmingly powerful like a puppetmaster in relation to your local locus of persona control (and is therefore male).

 

Both locii of control (personal & transpersonal; “female” and “male”) are governed in frozen time by fatedness (Heimarmene).

 

You a “female” helpless passive gear-driven puppet have no power to deviate from what your male hidden thought-source forces you to do & steer toward. The “male” hidden thought source — specifically your own transpersonal self involved specifically in *your life* — is also pre-set by fatedness.

 

The pole, staff, or spear is {the directionality and forceful passage of time}. Time or your near-future potentially fatal control-thought is impossible to steer away from or slow down. This is more specific, technically useful, generally useful, direct, and literal than “The vertical line in mythic art is the world axis on which you climb to the stationary constellation”).

 

A person is a puppet locked in time (future as well as past). If the person is among the elect, that means that the person will be forced to ingest the entheogen and experience no-free-will & non-control over which possibility-branching path the person steers into in the immediate future. All thoughts are forced. The mind of the elect person knows that all thoughts are forced into their mind. Theology is about consistent waffling, consistent inconsistency, principled self-contradiction, calculated illogic. Theology is concerned about controlling the masses of exoteric tithe’ers, so Theology won’t admit simple no-free-will & puppethood & moral non-culpability. Theology is to con the masses.

 

Luther got close to simple consistent no-free-will, and close to coherent honest coverage of the real entheogenic Eucharist, but I perceive social-control politics pushing him away from simple honest clarity, into waffling and muddying and backpedalling. What Luther or Augustine believes, vs. how Luther or Augustine spins it and self-censors. Admitting the plain straightforward no-free-will position was not politically acceptable, so Theology as a project of obfuscation ensued. Every time a Reformed theologian gets close to stating CHEM (Cybernetics, Heimarmene, & Entheogens as the referent of Metaphor), he self-censors and backpedals (or, is censored and killed – like pro-Entheogen academics are censored and demoted).

 

In the bunk world of officially condoned ideas now (prior to my CHEM revolution), there’s no hope for organized Establishment authorities such as fabricate official Establishment Theology.

 

Several dynamics occur; any analysis of a part of the Theory or a part of “loss of control” requires typically several dynamics to be discussed; it’s not enough to do one single simple train of reasoning.

 

Isis made Apuleius get initiated, made him ingest the sacred meal (mushroom wine), made him struggle against the hidden thought-source, made him see the futility of struggling against this thought-source he is helplessly subjected to, made him see that his only option is to submit to his hidden thought-source intimately marrying it and recognizing it as his other uncontrollable distinct half.

 

Isis makes you ingest the entheogen. Isis makes you struggle and battle against your untrustworthy alien thought-source. Isis makes you realize that you must end up either steering toward chaos, illogic, insanity, system-chaos and control instability, or steering toward submissive trust in your hidden thought-source.

 

Which will you choose? If Isis is merciful, you will think “I shall have mercy on myself and quit kicking against the pricks (of stirrups); I have completed testing/battling about my control power and thought-source.” It may be that any mind that sees “I must submit, ecstatically bow to receive divine mercy, and trust this Mystery thought-source that my life depends on — or else, I reject sanity and coherence and choose insanity and cybernetic chaos and perpetual battling against my own thought-source component of my personal control power.”

 

Trusting and submitting brings life, civilization, rules for a viable city/culture, foundation of a truth-realizing society. Choosing to not trust the hidden thought-source leads to non-viability, “death”, continued battle, continued struggle. Once you comprehend and experience the two options clearly, there’s relief because there’s no reason or justification for sticking to the freewill personal power thinking. In a completely unchained state, the mind has no reason to choose life and continued existence, over death, mayhem, chaos, insanity; there’s no reason for steering toward submitting & viable continued life per Abraham’s descendents. The mind is forcefully brought to a choice between {chaos and retaining the freewill power claim or stance} vs. {order, enlightened viable civilization, submitting, formally repudiating your childish/animalistic no-free-will thinking. These are what the two choices are, in terms of cybernetics rather than religious terminology.

 

So the decision or choice in question is this one; this choice when it is presented in its full mature form is clear. We *can* debate over how that choice is made (free or forced). But first we must (in this discussion) clearly accurately understand what the 2 choices *are*, why those are the two choices.

 

There is only one logic-conformant, coherent option: submit and trust the hidden thought-source, affirm esoteric religion, and go on to survive the Holy Encounter with the Transcendent Control-Limit, and live and prosper. The only other choice is plainly not logic-conformant, and in practice, people take this option (they are forced to take this option) when they fear loss-of-control and they fear insanity. Such retreat has the advantage of protecting and preserving egoic control stability and delusion, but the disadvantage of avoiding understanding & making peace with (integrating) no-free-will.

 

Per classic Ken Wilber: eventually the dissonance and discomfort, or torment, of still not having transcendent knowledge though you can smell it so close within attainment, eventually you fear the control-loss chaos serpent monster less than you hate lacking enlightment. Eventually you want enlightenment bad enough to interrogate The Monster (fated loss-of-control) and find how to keep your egoic control intact enough for control stability, while repudiating the specific child-like or demonic beast-like (animal-like) notion of personal freewill power.

 

Logically, there’s no way to choose between the two responses in the peak mystic-state window (ecstatic peak, amazement, trembling, psychotomimetic, terrifyingly ready to do anything, fully open-minded):

 

A. Submitting to no-free-will, and immediately gaining control-stability, the sea-storm cybernetic instability threat vanishes, instantly calm and stable.

 

B. Rejecting what Reason showed you and instead obstinately and foolishly adhering to personal freewill power after it has been proved as impotent and unstable. Insanity, hard to visualize: how could you act-out “I’m out of control”, if you have such precise understanding of what the issue or choice is? The option, here, really, seems to amount to literal insanity, a scrambled and broken mind. But typically, no one chooses this option who understands this option. Typically, choosing this option is a matter of mis-understanding the two options, and running away for egoic self-preservation (or to slow down and return to the Peak loosecog state later).

 

Given a person who clearly understands what the two options are, the person will choose what they are fated to choose. Everyone who is fated to choose continued viable life as a control-agent is fated to submit. Everyone who is fated to reject no-free-will and refuse to submit to their hidden thought-source, either returns to the egoic worldmodel of delusion, or, they become insane — breaking down, as described in the sense of early Ken Wilber. Especially now that this Theory is available, it’s normal to retreat in fear, fearing insanity, returning to stability of control by returning to egoic delusion. Really, B splits into B and C:

 

B. Understand the requirement of trusting no-free-will & thot-source, but reject no-free-will. That’s the bad-choice option per Theology, as held up by Theology, but no one takes this choice-branch.

 

C. Not understanding the requirement of trusting no-free-will & thot-source, and running away in fear to protect self-control stability. This is the option that the Elect takes in the first initiations, and eventually rejects when their understanding is purified enough, after they have burned away mental error by exposing it to loosecog and no-free-will sufficiently. We burn away delusion in our struggle against the alient controller in our Hellish battle series, and then instead, when reconciled and we win *and* lose the battle in the right sense, and we understand and trust and heal our animal sickness of the mind that threw us into dissonance and self-battle, we bathe in the light of Heaven. The situation that produced hellish panic and self-battling (fire of Hell), now becomes the situation that produces relief and integrity, security, calm, self-integrity, a spiritual marriage-harmony (the supernal light of Heaven).

 

Those choice-options are like my Theory reception under the conditions of Prohibition & false Historicity/literalism of Jesus/Paul & modern crude conceptions of “determinism” as linear domino causal-chain: A scary option is that people will understand my Theory and reject it. That’s not happening, and not likely to happen.

 

Anyone who understands my Theory affirms it.

Anyone who rejects my Theory doesn’t understand the Theory.

Anyone who understands my Theory and rejects it… is an empty set, because understanding the Theory inherently contradicts rejecting the Theory.

 

Anyone who understands the Creator’s power over our thoughts & control-intentions affirms that power.

Anyone who rejects Creator’s power over one’s thoughts doesn’t understand control-power.

Anyone who understands Creator’s offer of harmony/salvation/system-coherence and rejects it… is an empty set, because understanding the power-relation of local control-thoughts vs. hidden thought-source inherently contradicts rejecting that understanding of power.

 

‘Creator’ or ‘God’ here refers to that which controls what thoughts arise in your wellspring in your mind’s fate-embedded rock-cave. ‘God’ refers to the hidden source of thoughts. Your hidden male portion, the thot-injector part of you, your personal fraction of God-identity is, the aspect of God which is the hidden source of *your* thoughts & intentions, as distinct from someone else’s thoughts & intentions.

 

Anyone who understands God’s and the Holy Spirit’s overwhelming power over your local personal control-power, accepts no-free-will & accepts the non-autonomy of personal control. The person received Understanding/Grace. The elect puppet is initially frightened away, but is fated to eventually choose A and be saved because of the puppetmaster made the puppet clearly understand the choices. The problem of “understanding TK but rejecting it” doesn’t actually exist, though Theology falsely makes it sound like the non-confused person (sinner, apostate) understands God’s power (or HS’s power) and rejects it.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

Group: egodeath Message: 6344 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Paul’s road conversion = Balaam’s donkey conversion

When you set out to get the golden fleece (sending the young upstart throne-claimant Jason) or send the seer Balaam to curse the Israelites, you are the evil godless deluded king.  King = egoic autonomy-claim: “I have the power to steer into this future possibility branch or this other possibility branch.  It’s up to me, that type of power is in my control.”  King Pentheus, King Ego; King Multi-Steerer in the possibility branching tree (the Possibilism model of time *and personal control*).

 

Balaam rides donkey.

Jesus rides donkey entering the city.

Paul rides horse on the road.

Man rides donkey toward broken-off-branches tree trunk, with snake on tree trunk (common art theme on a sarcophagus (a rock/stone coffin)).

 

I need to review all insights since the main article in 2007, and see if there are any other big breakthroughs besides the Eden tree/snake as Philosophy of Time in the Philosophy department, repudiating Possibilism for Eternalism (in the intense loose cognitive binding state, with fireworks).  However, those fireworks are mitigated or moderated — or amplified — by my core Theory (the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence), along with the CHEM model of religious myth (& pre-modern literature & arts). 

 

CHEM:

Cyb/Heim/Enth/Mtph

Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens/Metaphor

 

Must-read posts; or, important powerful useful touchstone ideas I’ve kept appreciating:

 

Idea/post 1.

My description of a 4-quadrant diagram, ~Feb. 2013 posting:

We change from a mental model of

[upper left:] Autonomy (King) steering in a

[lower left:] possibility-branching tree (Tree; bush; reinforced by motif of Antlers behind & plant-branch in front of Eve’s branching legs — a phallus in contrast is non-branching, snake-shaped; worldline-isomorphic.)

to a mental model of

[upper right] puppet/slave

caught motionlessly in

[lower right] a worldline-tube (of subjective experiences including control-intention thoughts) frozen into the changeless rock universe (Eternalism; Rock motif, snake/serpent/worm)

 

2. Idea/post (~Feb 2013): listing of all objects and their mapping to CHEM (cybernetics, heimarmene, entheogens):

rock

tree

snake

king

cup

well, spring, fountainhead

A hugely important post, the most useful.  The concrete bottom-line key to all reading of non-modern cultural products.

 

3. idea/post ~Feb 2013:

tree vs snake means the Possibilism vs. the Eternalism models of time (Stanford Philosophy page) — ***HUGE*** breakthrough.  10 on a 10 scale.  A *beautiful* capstone.  A post-Article discovery/breakthrough.  This week, confirmed in art.  *Widespread* ramifications.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

 

—In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, <mike@…> wrote:

The Many Faces of Biblical Humor
David Peters
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0761839585

http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/13252.aspx
Book review by Tony Fitzpatrick: excerpt condensed by Michael Hoffman

“Peters’ favorite story is Balaam and the Talking Donkey. Someone [the bad king, against Israel] calls on Balaam to prophesy against the children of Israel and Moses for coming out of Egypt. God tells Balaam not to go, but he’s offered a lot of money, so he goes anyway. On the road, the donkey that he’s riding sees an angel of God with a sword [angel of death, you must die ego death to get past the flaming fire gateway, burning off your moral transient failable destructible volatile self-concept; egoic thinking can only last until the mind is exposed to loosecog, then the illusion collapses and can never be taken for reality again -mh], and the donkey stops.”

“Balaam can’t see the angel, and he beats the donkey. Farther down the road, the donkey sees the angel again and stops between two walls, crushing Balaam’s foot. There is no way getting around the angel [pre-set worldline -mh], so the donkey lies down. God enables the donkey to talk: `What did I do to make you beat me these three times? Have I ever done anything like this before?’ God enables Balaam to see the angel, and the donkey says `If I were you, I’d take better stock of the situation.’ When Balaam sees the situation for what it is, he faints.”

Balaam faints (control seizure).
His foot is crushed (the foundation of what he depends on for control-power collapses). See my posts on leg, foot, sitting, carried, riding.

— Michael Hoffman, January 14, 2013, based on theory work since 1985
Group: egodeath Message: 6345 From: egodeath Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Control-loss, panic, urgency; Psychedelic Cog Sci security/safet

According to the end of the New Testament, Cognitive Scientists *will* be able to use loosecog safely, able to enter and leave at will without being killed by God.  These are the cognitive scientists who know the youthful folly of trying to battle against your own thought-source.

 

Cognitive Scientists who don’t understand Cybernetics and Heimarmene, enter a furnace of instruction / futile battle.  Entheogens are dangerous for them, in that way.  Entheogens are not dangerous for those who understand the folly of not trusting your thought-source.  Are you inclined to test and probe whether you are vulnerable?  Then to that extent, your testing will put you in danger.  After you have done the testing, you can  dabble in relative safety.  Are entheogens dangerous?  Yes, but if you understand praying and understand the self-control battle, The Battle, entheogens become as safe as the garden in the end of the Bible; the Bible says so.  Authentic Jewish mystics emphasize fear, trembling, danger (of self-control instability), rightly.  But to the man who is humble *on this point*, not proud, having no hubris *on this point*, is safe because such man is not, when in danger, going to say “throw more egoic-control power at the Heimarmene-monster!”  He is too wise to provoke danger by brandishing his freewill weapon against the Heimarmene monster. 

 

I am a wise man; by definition, I already possess the fruit of the possibility branching tree; I already have Transcendent Knowledge, paid for by sacrificing my freewill child-thinking.  I have already fastened my child-self to the Tree to pay the Gods; I am hardly able to challenge and threaten the dominion of the Gods or Fate.  I am their no-free-will puppet, as far as this particular point, about the nature of personal control power in relation to my role as steersman (now I am a divinely approved steersman) steering among future possibility-branches, all but one of which are illusory, virtual-only possibilities.

 

Copyright (C) 2013, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.



—In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, <mike@…> wrote:

In loose cognition, the transpersonal region of the mind has broken out and managed to escape the domain of innate, animal-like egoic restraints and constraints on thinking. Accessing a new mode of the mind brings, exposes, and reveals new needs per Maslow’s hierarchy, in order to have viable, sustainable stability of personal (or now, trans-personal) control. A new kind of trust in one’s beyond-control, transcendent mind is required: a transcendent, baseless trust.

The first mental dynamic phenomenon that is liable to occur when passing through the barrier from egoic to transpersonal thinking is the control panic seizure vortex, which has positive feedback like a magnet, escalating to a battle of self-testing: the mind’s egoic personal control system tests its ability to resist the now unconstrained thoughts which are experienced as uncontrollable in several distinct ways.


Can Psychedelic Cognitive Scientists be confident and serenely at peace as they take 500 micrograms of LSD and explore various topics while in loosecog? Cognitive Scientists have assurance that they are immune to a serious panic and control seizure, after they have experienced such escalation and studied the Egodeath theory, and have experienced transcendent rescue and reset from the transcendent mind that depends on transcendent recursive control like praying to a compassionate and powerful god to rescue the mind from its practical powerless, seized state.

You have no fear because when you will fully succumb to fear completely and fully realize that you are completely vulnerable to practical loss of control of your mind, you can be assured from experience and religious reports by others that you will receive trust in your transpersonal control source and will therefore receive transcendent rescue, most likely (if Fate and the alien, unknown Controller X are willing).

No activity is guaranteed to be safe; you might walk down the hall and it is possible a trap door will swallow you up; you live by faith. You might die within the hour for any of a variety of reasons: for example, you might be watching through television when a giant tower crane suddenly falls over, crashes through your tall apartment building, and crushes you to death. If you are all paranoid (untrusting), you cannot live. The devil tells Jesus to jump and trust god to catch him, and Jesus replies, Don’t test God.

I guarantee that if you have sufficient panic or full grasp of your situation of need, you will be forced to trust, so you will fully trust, so you will be transcendently rescued. If you go out of control, that proves I was right, because it shows you failed to have full trust, so you didn’t see your neediness clearly enough. So we need not fear that we’ll panic, because when we panic, we will trust and be set at peace. This is the transcendent mind rescuing itself by reaching transcendently, like magic.


A model of the mind then is thus:

The egoic mind is organized as:
o Personal control, which is the source of thoughts and the control-executor.

After a series of initiations and study of the Egodeath theory, the transcendent mind is organized as:
o God, outside the mind and time — pointed to by upward transcendent thinking, per Hofstadter
o Transcendent thinking, in a person’s mind
o Helpless personal control power


In tightcog, you don’t need transcendent reliance on a stabilizing trust ability that points outside of your domain of control-power.
In loosecog, having broken and escaped from egoic control restraints, you encounter quickly a new need, a new principle in your thinking — transcendent reliance on a stabilizing trust ability that points outside of your domain of control-power.

Jesus says to the paralyzed man, “Now get up and walk. Your faith has healed you.”

Are you stabilized and firmly supported by your own effort? Define “your own”. Your transcendent area of your mind forms a model of a vector of dependence outside of any kind of personal control power. Because your trans-personal thinking eventually incorporates a stabilizing transcendent factor that explicitly points outside of any personal control, we can say that the mind saves itself using its own resources, where “its own resources” includes the ability to rely and trust and depend on its stability, with help received from transcendent location outside of the mind.


Thought experiment:

1. There is an android or person in tightcog in a dorm room in an armchair. It is a weekday after class, and the afternoon and evening is free to do classwork and think about control. The person has standard control of their mind. The person is able to freely move around; they are autonomous, independent, and not connected. The person moves through time.

2. The person enters loosecog.

3. Now the person in the dorm room in loosecog in an armchair starts to lose control of their mind and enters a panic attack, and the person says “I had control, but now I am losing control and I am headed toward psychotic loss of control. This is an emergency overriding everything else and I need to be sedated, to save my future life, sanity, control, and safety. I have fear and trembling and I require rescue from outside my personal control power. I fear strongly that I am almost certainly heading for disaster, loss of control, loss of sanity; toward danger and wrecking my future life.”

No armchair philosopher can wave aside or define-away, using the magic power of analytic philosophy, this cognitive phenomenology. We must engage with the real dynamics, the real loss of control, and not be in denial of it, while we analyze what this “usual control” consists of and refers to, and what this actual given “loss of control” consists of and refers to. ‘Control’ and ‘losing control’ have a particular meaning, to the mind that functionally used egoic personal control but didn’t’ analyze or critique it as happens in the loose cognitive state.

This is more interesting, relevant, and profound than other Cognitive Science thought experiments, which were merely preparatory training wheels for this one.

God, Fatedness, or some Controller X factor outside of the domain of my personal control, controls whether I intend to:
o Retain my sanity
o Keep practical control
o Protect my safety
o Have a viable future.
During loosecog, when the mental structures of egoic mental restraints are dissolved, I do not have the kind of power that can control whether I intend in the near future to retain sanity, keep control, stay safe, and have a viable, stable future. This is true whether I am an android or a human, with autonomous self-control programming and the ability to enter an unstable metaprogramming mode. To enter a self-control metaprogramming mode with assurance of stability and safety and viable control, something new is needed, specific to the metaprogramming state: transcendent reset, trust, outside of practical personal control.

The transcendent, transpersonal mind of the person, thus gains personal control power by incorporating transpersonal thinking which includes transcendent thinking that points outside all personal resources. I become my own savior and rescuer of my crashable personal control system, by becoming like a god who transcends Heimarmene (Fatedness), though Hellenistic religion waffles and vacillates on whether Zeus controls Heimarmene, or Heimarmene controls Zeus. Did Fate control Jupiter? One would think that in Roman Imperial ruler cult and its military Mithraism, Jupiter — who adopted Caesar as his son to rule the entire world — must have been portrayed as standing dominant over Fate, using Fate as his tool to control the world. Fate doesn’t control Jupiter, like Heimarmene controlled Zeus.

Through the historical power inflation competitive escalation, our superior religion of course (Judaism and Christianity), has God control everything, leaving no doubt: God controls Fatedness (the world), Fatedness doesn’t control God. The Greeks didn’t need a hyper-transcendent rescuer Zeus, any more than early Christianity needed a literal historical Jesus.

Zeus Meilichios was “easily satisfied” to avert his wrath and receive rescue and be spared from destruction, pictured as a big heimarmene-snake, Fatedness snake. Zeus Meilichios integrated Zeus and Heimarmene, figured as the snake-shaped worldline representing the forced, unchangeable shape of one’s pre-set life. Early Christianity didn’t have a literal historical Jesus. Both religions had some conception or functional equivalent of transcendent rescuer lifting you up from outside your own resources as soon as you see your neediness so clearly that you sacrifice your claim that you are able to stabilize yourself using your own resources of control power.


These forces and dynamics are distinct but mutually reinforcing, like a conspiracy:

o Perceiving the mind’s thought source as residing outside the domain of personal control power. You cannot control what you intend to think; intentions arise unstoppably.

o Seeing, feeling, and thinking about the block universe model of spacetime including one’s near-future worldline as filled with dreadfully untrustworthy and unstoppable content that you are forced to move toward, with no brakes and no ability to turn away, out of one’s destiny tube, tunnel, or rail. Possibilities become seen as illusory; only what is fated in the worldline is actually possible.

o Feeling of powerlessness. There is awareness but thoughts are presented to awareness, without the awareness having a control-handle to steer the thoughts. One’s power is like a puppet or transmission gear, interlocked with a driving gear or hidden, uncontrollable puppetmaster.

o Disengagement and dissolution of the usual reliable egoic control restraint, as mental ruts and blind spots that restrict what the mind can think about and intend.

These are distinct topics for thinking, feeling, and perceiving, but they conspire, they are mutually reinforcing. The result is that the mind is coerced; its thinking is pulled toward constructing the innate transcendent mental model of time, self, and control.


Every direction the mind turns, it is reminded of the loss-of-control vulnerability as a fatal threat, and the practical personal control system, in reaction, pulls back against being reminded, and this also causes mental self-coercion, of different aspects or directions of thinking, that ends up escalating into a compulsive testing and self-challenging of the mind’s ability to envision and resist envisioning the intention to lose control, sanity, future life, and safety. This wrestling, hunting, and testing forms a mental movement pattern like getting caught in a net, or hunting like Dionysus’ panther, like a heat-seeking missile.

The mind in loose cognition encounters its central feature, personal control power, caught in a struggle that escalates into panic and ends up willing to go out of control, and certainly heading in that direction without end, with the predictable outcome being the potential of the mind to construct a loss-of-control scenario in which the effort to test and secure personal control power over the incoming intentions trigger the intention to mentally construct an even more compelling loss-of-control scenario. The mind, being centrally arranged and focused around personal control, is interested in the potential for full transpersonal intention of fully violating and breaking the efforts of egoic personal control.

This positive feedback loop of mental struggling to both exert and evade the mind’s control power is described in mythemes of battle, chaos, cancelled-out or seized kingship, and entrapment.

“Some fought themselves, some fought each other”
“Then all at once the chaos ceased”
— Peart/Rush, Hemispheres

Practical inability to control the source of thoughts; the source of thoughts resides outside the domain of personal control ability.
Perceiving, thinking, and sensation in a new mode that is unconstrained in certain ways, but newly aware of other constraints that weren’t perceived, thought about, or experienced (felt) before.
o Perceiving
o Thinking
o Sensation, feeling, experiencing


Myth is tasked with visually representing the transformation of the mental model from the mind’s innate egoic mental model of control and time, to the mind’s innate transcendent mental model of control and time, including the loosecog experience of noncontrol and Fatedness. In myth, this mental model transformation regarding noncontrol and Fatedness is represented through mythemes of king, snake, cross, wood, plank, pole, stake, stub-branches, cross, crossroads, steering, chariot-driving, donkey riding. Any item in myth means, or participates in the meaning-network of, noncontrol (transformation of control level thinking), and Fatedness, as well as the dissociative cognitive state that causes this mental model transformation. Noncontrol and Fatedness are two distinct yet interlocked, mutually supporting areas of ideas.

The kind of control that the egoic personal control thinking has, and thinks it has, and is structured around having, is that kind of control that is suited for a metaphysical world that is modelled as Possibilism: a really, genuinely open, branching possibility future. The future doesn’t exist in any sense, and what the future ends up being, is controlled by you as the Creator, the controller and author of what your own future will be: it’s not set, and you have or wield the kind of power that brings the future into a definite existence, where before, it didn’t at all exist. When that model of time is replaced by the simple Eternalism model, with a single preexisting preset future, the block universe with your life being a snake- or worm-shaped worldline, the egoic kind of control power dies, becomes impotent.

Ego (as a mental model and mental structure) is a certain kind of controller that is designed specifically for a certain kind of spacetime world. Egoic power rules or has force and apparent practical efficacy only within a world that is Possibilism shaped: having a branching future, with cybernetic possibility-branching. When egoic power gives way to the transcendent control mode, interlocked with that distinct change in one’s mental worldmodel, is another distinct change in aspects of one’s mental worldmodel: the Possibilism model of time, control, and possibility is replaced by the Eternalism (block universe containing worldlines) model of time, control, and possibility. Only the one path or branch is possible: the branch-path which is fated and already always exists.

What the king Pentheus figure of “king caught in tree” is trying to elegantly summarize is the change, in the loosecog state, from egoic control power operating in a Possibilism world, to noncontrol (or transcendently dependent power) operating in an Eternalism (block universe) world. Simple mythemes in several combinations, in many expressions, are needed, to express all that. You can only glimpse a subset of these dynamics in any one mytheme diagram such as the Tauroctony or the figure of the sacrificed king hung on a cross or tree. Ancients had advanced Cognitive Science and diagramming except expressed in the form of metaphor.

We have to — which I have done — extract and map my post-modern explicit, non-metaphor-based Egodeath theory to the messy pre-modern metaphor-expressed Cognitive Science of loosecog. The Egodeath theory is new in its clarity of explicit expression, and yet metaphor remains powerful, but what is the most powerful is my non-metaphor Core theory linked with my metaphor extended theory. Thus I constantly bounce between non-metaphor expression and metaphor expression; the greatest explanatory power is by providing both, distinctly, interlinked: nonmetaphor and metaphor.


Mythemes such as “king hung on tree” represent the two distinct main parts of the transcendent mental model, having switched from the egoic mental model. ‘King’ and ‘tree’ are both a negation of egoic thinking: “not personal control power”, and “not branching future possibilities”. The ‘snake’ analogy is a positive assertion, of a negative fact: reality per the simplest model is a block universe with your life being shaped like a snake, and only like a snake, not branching like a tree. So on the left as starting state, picture the king hung on a tree, and on the right as the end-state, picture a snake on a non-branching tree.

Bad, egoic control-thinking: king and branching tree; king hung on a tree
Good, transcendent control-thinking: snake and branchless tree (pole); snake on a pole

The Old Testament features a God-disapproved king hung on a tree, and a God-given snake on a pole for rescuing people from snake-bite by looking at (perceiving) it.

— Michael Hoffman, original research and idea development, December 20-21, 2012. http://www.egodeath.com
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6346 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Re: Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism

I am on a week-long Art High because a stag at the Tree of Knowledge confirmed my recognition from a year ago:

tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism (2 models of time and personal control).

This is the biggest breakthrough, because it is the most fundamental.

 

___________

 

Regarding my history, my first superpower, manifesting in 1988 at the peak of the Psychedelic 80s, didn’t involve religious myth..  It was the ability to freshly define ego transcendence in terms of personal control power operating within 4D spacetime, in contrast to Transpersonal Psychology & Integral Theory, which are missing this key piece at their core.  Ken Wilber’s writing about “myth” and “mythic” and western antiquity and Christianity is almost completely wrong.  Changes to Wilber’s history theory are forced by my revelations.  Per book Shame & Necessity (http://amazon.com/o/asin/0520256433), ancients were post-egoic, not pre-egoic — the most disastrous mistake Wilber could make.

 

My 2006 superpower is deciphering religious myth in terms of analogies to Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens.

 

 

Silenuus old tripper of Dionysus had to be helped — rather, placed — onto horse (passive awareness is carried by animalish egoic freewill steering thinking as time passes) after mushroom-wine symposium; Silenus has more than drunk or tripping, he has a temporary nervous system shutdown or weakening, paralysis.  One would feel like Silenus after a large quantity of mushrooms especially if re-dose.  Silenus before the mushroom-wine symposium already understands egodeath and the spectacular personal-control dynamics that occur in switching from freewill to no-free-will thinking.

 

———

 

My fingers barely work.

 

My magician abilities using freewill vs nofreewill double-meanings.  I raise the dead, heal the sick, and cast out demons, and cancel sins.  You too shall do these things, having no more sin or death, if you Believe in the snake rather than the tree.  Only clueless literalists believe in the tree, idol worshippers, enemies of God, destined for the eternal flames.  To understand the snake is also to understand meaning-shifting.  Snake is frozen worldline embedded in Rock universe.

 

We are all puppets of God, puppet kings put in place by God, therefore ignore the hierarchy of society (one puppet isn’t more honorable than the other), and have equality and justice instead.  Battle the heimarmene serpent monster, have victory not by your own power, switch from accursed freewill thinking (destined only for sacrifice), get victory wreath.

 

— Cybermonk

Group: egodeath Message: 6347 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: Egodeath so simple, Freewill is endangered

Muntzer is going round exuberantly preaching nofreewill.

 

To prevent children and undesirables from understanding nofreewill, we must be reverent and veil our language by double-meanings — one meaning implies childish freewill + literalist childish supernaturalism, the other meaning implies adult no-free-will + purely metaphor (for adults/initiates).  What is youngest age allowed in Eleusis initiation?

 

Do you want your child to know no-free-will and metaphor about it?

 

We now understand — with my Theory — *why* ancient Greece (Athens) not only explored the veiled mystery (of thought-source origination at the fountain behind our thinking in the cave of the mind), but also legislated that children are to be veiled/protected from knowledge of no-free-will.

 

I’m coming to grips with the magnitude of the ramifications of art that masters these metaphors — rather, this massive metaphor/analogy system.  I discovered the double-meaning principle like Mark 4:12, around November 11, 2001 (2 months after 9/11).

 

I have a better, complete feeling for what a closed system, with closure, metaphor about Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogens was, throughout history.  I have a better feel for the ciphering fad of Alchemy, which took meaning-veiling and misdirection to the extreme, to the point of pointlessness. 

 

What will Sam Harris say?  I proved that his call for no-free-will and repudiating religion is (unrealized by Harris) a call for higher, esoteric religion and a call for doing away with exoteric religion, which I point out, the Bible *tries* to misdirect outsiders into literalism — that was fair and amusing back in the Roman empire when the entire culture was ingesting mushroom wine all the time, but that clever misleading turned deadly when the entheogen was removed (1500? 1675?) and everyone, practically, lost the key to meaning-flipping and so the culture at large got sucked into misleading, into literalist supernaturalism, into childish thinking and delusion. 

 

The intent of veiling is to unveil at age 13.  Failing to do that, the entire culture got sucked into the metaphor misleading trap, finally I figured out the systematic misleading (in 2001 and now, I now have a spectacular vantage point such as in art).  Veiling is opposite my philosophy, and the Bible seems to me to suggest that as Michael the Archangel, I am supposed to reveal no-free-will to everyone; all mysteries shall be revealed, even though that means I “kill” egoic children before their time (adolescence).  The Internet prevents — fitting ‘Revelation’ — any veiling from anyone.  I am the greatest hierophant of all time, in terms of the number of ego deaths I cause, because I efficiently explain egodeath to the entire world, in a way that cannot be veiled, cannot mislead people into freewill delusion and dangerous religious literalism that mystic-mode writing in the Bible tries to (only) temporarily imply.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 2, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

Group: egodeath Message: 6348 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 02/12/2013
Subject: False religion is freewill religion & anti-drug religion

There are many freewill based systems that purport to provide transcendence.

My Theory is the no-free-will based system, that actually provides a specifiable, definite kind of transcendence: transcending (and retaining as a tool or vehicle (donkey)) freewill thinking and its concomitant autonomous kingship assumption.

 

False religion is anti-drug religion.

 

True religion is centered on Cybernetics, Heimarmene, and Entheogens.

 

— Michael Hoffman, December 2, 2013

Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved. Based on original research & idea development since 1985.

Group: egodeath Message: 6349 From: egodeath Date: 03/12/2013
Subject: Egodeath diagram and lecture

This is the biggest possible, most-fundamental breakthrough — the tree vs. snake ultra-condensed metaphor system.

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/photos/albums/1651450143

 
The religious myth portion of the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence. This photo is proof of my priority of discovery of the following:
 
tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism (2 models of time and personal control power).
 
This is the key to religious myth, which I discovered and figured out. I also have a great 2GB video lecture 17 minutes long explaining this chalkboard, that I will upload. I am emailing key professors and theorists. University of Washington, Loew hall, room 220 (Electrical Engineering).
 
Copyright (C) 2013 Michael S. Hoffman, Egodeath.com.  All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6350 From: egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com Date: 03/12/2013
Subject: Re: Egodeath diagram and lecture

Photo might be upside-down when try to view.  You can download, view in Windows Photo Viewer, and spin right-side-up and zoom.

Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 183: 2019-05-20

Site Map

Contents:


Group: egodeath Message: 10751 From: egodeath Date: 20/05/2019
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary



Group: egodeath Message: 10751 From: egodeath Date: 20/05/2019
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Per atheists, forget ‘religion’. Instead of religion, use cognitive metaprogramming in the loosecog state, studying personal control integrity across time.

Study no-free-will and control stability.

Pursue perceiving the frozen-time block universe worldline, per no-free-will, with unchangeable control-thoughts that will come into the mind uncontrollably, and experience personal control in light of no-free-will.

A control seizure, profound dependence on that which is the actual source of control thoughts.

What to call these dynamics? Religion, prayer, sacrifice, resurrection, salvation, eternal life? Or other labels, for the most shocking, profound, transcendent, numinous experiencing?

If ‘religion’ is taken to mean “whether God exists” and religion is literalist supernaturalism, then the terms from Religion cannot be used to describe cognitive dynamics and mental model transformation in the “analogical/ psychedelic/ block universe worldline/ no-free-will” state of consciousness.

Esoteric religious mythology is in fact positioned in contrast to exoteric literalist thinking, the two are contrasted in the New Testament by the Jesus figure.

Avoiding religion and studying personal control power instead, in the block universe no-free-will state of consciousness that results from the metaprogramming agent that loosens cognitive associations, leads to experiential dynamics and a mental model transformation that is described by religious mythology and religious language, when recognized.

The target dynamics must be understood, before religious figuration can be recognized as descriptions of those cognitive dynamics in the religious state of consciousness, which is the loose cognitive association state, which switches from Possibilism to the Eternalism mode of experiencing and mental worldmodel.

Thread:
Summary statements of Egodeath theory

The below posts are from this thread. They were all together in Yahoo Mail; I had to scroll down through it.

May 25, 2019, 9:46 am

the Theory = religious mythology, analogy, psychedelics, loose cognition, frozen block universe, no-free-will, non-control.

The Egodeath theory is that religious mythology is analogy describing psychedelics loosening the mind and causing an experience of the frozen block universe that contains your snake-shaped worldline of future control thoughts, an experience of no-free-will, and the experience of non-control, in contrast to experiencing time and control as a tree of branching possibilities that you steer among to create your future in an open future.

The Theory is becoming extremely simple, yet my summary expressions of it are still too turgid to vocalize, so I must take a speaking-first approach, by reading-aloud the attempted written summary statements, followed by impromptu oral statement of the points.

The statements must include the phrases:
religious mythology
analogy
psychedelics, such as mushrooms
the frozen-time block universe
the snake-shaped worldline
no-free-will
non-control
the feeling of loss of control
tree vs. snake
pre-existing control thoughts
steering among branching possibilities

To improve the plainspoken simplicity of writing, I must literally speak my summary statements rather than write them.

I need to add a speaking-first, writing-second approach. 

The best way to simplify the writing is to stop writing and instead speak, which is to say, bounce between the simplest possible writing and the simplest possible speaking.

Write simple summary sentences, record reading aloud the sentences followed by vocally restating in plainer form those points, then write down those simpler, spontaneously spoken statements and repeat that refinement/simplification cycle. 

I do too much writing of Theory summary statements, and too little speaking of the Theory summary statements. 

I reached the limit — now, like in 2006 — of my simplified-writing ability. 

When I finished the 2006 version of the main article, I saw it was great in its clarity, a first-order breakthrough in clarity of Theory.

I was dismayed to find, upon vocalizing the 2006 main article, that the sentence construction was far from simple and clear. 

In 2013 I discovered a huge missed opportunity to simplify the expression of the theory in terms of tree vs. snake.

I thought in 2006 that the coverage of religious mythology in the main article was incomplete in scope, but was as efficient as possible.

My summary statements fail the vocalization test, as did my initial 2006 version of the main article. 

My slight revision into 2007 was driven by the discovery — when I made a spoken reading of the main article — that many sentences were literally unvocalizable.

In the 2006 sentences in the main article, there was no phrase-boundary where it is possible to inhale.

By writing summary statements, I discovered the extreme simplicity of the Theory, and yet those summary statements are still awkward, turgid, unnatural, not how people speak plainly. 

The Theory is extremely simple, yet my sentences — as proven by reading aloud — are still not plainspoken. 

The summary sentences, overall, remain on the wrong side of the threshold of plain speaking, just as my 2006 main article was only *relatively* clearly expressed. 

The great degree of success of my 2006 summary article hides the shortcomings of that relatively clear, only relatively clear, expression, as revealed when I tried and failed to vocalize the 2006 sentences. 

The 200-character limit on posts, combined with a random audience, helped toward breakthrough in simplicity of expression, but, I’m still self-censoring to withhold uncomfortable aspects, and to conform to the poor venue in that my posts are off-topic or too specialized of a focus. 

I won’t necessarily upload recorded speaking, but I do need to both vocalize and record, to push the expressions — that is, I do too much writing (even if “short summary statement” form is great) and not enough vocalization. 

I need to do short-form writing and short-form vocalization, to achieve being extremely plainspoken. 

The 2006 main article turned out to be *far* from natural and plainspoken in its sentence construction, which forced me to fix the worst, but only the worst, sentences to produce the stopgap fix, as the 2007 slight fix of the main article. 

In November 2013, I discovered the tremendous simplifying effect of contrasting tree vs. snake and recognizing that efficiency having been discovered and used by the most archaic explorers of the two cognitive states. 

Similarly now I need that kind of a jump in efficiency and plain speaking to express how utterly basic and simple the Theory is.

Any short-form statement must include these words, and not evade them or censor these pointed points:
religious mythology
analogy
psychedelics, such as mushrooms
the frozen-time block universe
the snake-shaped worldline
no-free-will
non-control
the feeling of loss of control
tree vs. snake
pre-existing control thoughts

Non-essential terms:

eternalism – no one has heard of this term, except a different usage in Buddhism

entheogens – no one has heard of this term, in contrast to ‘psychedelics’

ahistoricity – puts the focus on the wrong debate, loses the direct-science focus

determinism – connotes in-time domino-chain model with open future, against eternalism

metaphor – more confusing than ‘analogy’

any term that needs to be defined every time it is introduced

May 25, 2019, 9:47 am

Dup post? Corrections? Might be a re-post.

the Theory = religious mythology, analogy, psychedelics, loose cognition, frozen block universe, no-free-will, non-control.

The Egodeath theory is that religious mythology is analogy describing psychedelics loosening the mind and causing an experience of the frozen block universe that contains your snake-shaped worldline of future control thoughts, an experience of no-free-will, and the experience of non-control, in contrast to experiencing time and control as a tree of branching possibilities that you steer among to create your future in an open future.

The Theory is becoming extremely simple, yet my summary expressions of it are still too turgid to vocalize, so I must take a speaking-first approach, by reading-aloud the attempted written summary statements, followed by impromptu oral statement of the points.

The statements must include the phrases:
religious mythology
analogy
psychedelics, such as mushrooms
the frozen-time block universe
the snake-shaped worldline
no-free-will
non-control
the feeling of loss of control
tree vs. snake
pre-existing control thoughts
steering among branching possibilities

To improve the plainspoken simplicity of writing, I must literally speak my summary statements rather than write them.

I need to add a speaking-first, writing-second approach. 

The best way to simplify the writing is to stop writing and instead speak, which is to say, bounce between the simplest possible writing and the simplest possible speaking.

Write simple summary sentences, record reading aloud the sentences followed by vocally restating in plainer form those points, then write down those simpler, spontaneously spoken statements and repeat that refinement/simplification cycle. 

I do too much writing of Theory summary statements, and too little speaking of the Theory summary statements. 

I reached the limit — now, like in 2006 — of my simplified-writing ability. 

When I finished the 2006 version of the main article, I saw it was great in its clarity, a first-order breakthrough in clarity of Theory.

I was dismayed to find, upon vocalizing the 2006 main article, that the sentence construction was far from simple and clear. 

In 2013 I discovered a huge missed opportunity to simplify the expression of the theory in terms of tree vs. snake.

I thought in 2006 that the coverage of religious mythology in the main article was incomplete in scope, but was as efficient as possible.

My summary statements fail the vocalization test, as did my initial 2006 version of the main article. 

My slight revision into 2007 was driven by the discovery — when I made a spoken reading of the main article — that many sentences were literally unvocalizable.

In the 2006 sentences in the main article, there was no phrase-boundary where it is possible to inhale.

By writing summary statements, I discovered the extreme simplicity of the Theory, and yet those summary statements are still awkward, turgid, unnatural, not how people speak plainly. 

The Theory is extremely simple, yet my sentences — as proven by reading aloud — are still not plainspoken. 

The summary sentences, overall, remain on the wrong side of the threshold of plain speaking, just as my 2006 main article was only *relatively* clearly expressed. 

The great degree of success of my 2006 summary article hides the shortcomings of that relatively clear, only relatively clear, expression, as revealed when I tried and failed to vocalize the 2006 sentences. 

The 200-character limit on posts, combined with a random audience, helped toward breakthrough in simplicity of expression, but, I’m still self-censoring to withhold uncomfortable aspects, and to conform to the poor venue in that my posts are off-topic or too specialized of a focus. 

I won’t necessarily upload recorded speaking, but I do need to both vocalize and record, to push the expressions — that is, I do too much writing (even if “short summary statement” form is great) and not enough vocalization. 

I need to do short-form writing and short-form vocalization, to achieve being extremely plainspoken. 

The 2006 main article turned out to be *far* from natural and plainspoken in its sentence construction, which forced me to fix the worst, but only the worst, sentences to produce the stopgap fix, as the 2007 slight fix of the main article. 

In November 2013, I discovered the tremendous simplifying effect of contrasting tree vs. snake and recognizing that efficiency having been discovered and used by the most archaic explorers of the two cognitive states. 

Similarly now I need that kind of a jump in efficiency and plain speaking to express how utterly basic and simple the Theory is.

Any short-form statement must include these words, and not evade them or censor these pointed points:
religious mythology
analogy
psychedelics, such as mushrooms
the frozen-time block universe
the snake-shaped worldline
no-free-will
non-control
the feeling of loss of control
tree vs. snake
pre-existing control thoughts

Non-essential terms:

eternalism – no one has heard of this term, except a different usage in Buddhism

entheogens – no one has heard of this term, in contrast to ‘psychedelics’

ahistoricity – puts the focus on the wrong debate, loses the direct-science focus

determinism – connotes in-time domino-chain model with open future, against eternalism

metaphor – more confusing than ‘analogy’

any term that needs to be defined every time it is introduced

/ end of possible re-post

May 25, 2019 3:56 pm

313-character sentence, from the post:

A mind can lack or have the understanding of what is revealed in the mystic altered state; understanding the two experiential mental models of possibility branching, time, and control, and the dynamics of switching to the later, second innate mode of experiencing and the second mental model of time and control.

Revised as multiple sentences less than 200 characters each:

Ideally, a person has both experience and understanding of what is experienced and revealed in the altered state.

There are two experiential mental models of possibility branching, time, and control.

The mind undergoes characteristic mental and experiential dynamics of switching to the later, second innate mode of experiencing.

Multiple sessions of the altered state experience eventually produces a retained second mental model of time and control, even when the ordinary state of experiencing resumes.

4:06 pm

In the best posts in this thread, I will read-aloud each sentence and then say something critically assessing that sentence.  
How good of a sentence?  Length/complexity?
What was the central intended point of the sentence?
Are the terms in the sentence familiar and understandable without explicit definition?
How many distinct points are being made in the sentence?  Can they be separated into dedicated sentences?
How central is the point, to the Egodeath core theory?

4:15 pm

Statement from post 10725 to read aloud and critique:

Dionysus is a major elevated component of high civilization.

How good of a sentence?  Length/complexity?     
Short, simple.

What was the central intended point of the sentence?
The figure of Dionysus is central and lofty in the history of civilization.

Are the terms in the sentence familiar and understandable without explicit definition?
Yes.

How many distinct points are being made in the sentence?  Can they be separated into dedicated sentences?
1

How central is the point, to the Egodeath core theory?
Indirect. 
A statement that is of direct relevance to the core Egodeath theory would be:

The potential and ability of the mind to experience loose cognition and transform the mental model of time and control is, and has been considered, essential to high civilization and culture.

5:23 pm

Sentence to read-aloud and critique: 

Esoteric mysticism is simple to rationally explain as metaphor or analogy describing the psychedelic sacred meal-induced experience of frozen-time noncontrol, no-free-will, and monopossibility.
I couldn’t even read aloud to the midpoint of the sentence before I (mistakenly) exclaimed “What the hell is that junk verbiage inserted after the first two words?!” —
As I read it aloud, I parsed the sentence as:
Esoteric mysticism is [pointless junk words:] simple to rationally explain as [resume the brilliant payload:] metaphor or analogy describing the psychedelic sacred meal-induced experience of frozen-time noncontrol, no-free-will, and monopossibility.
The motivating point to post that text message was *that* explaining esotericism is surprisingly simple (and, secondarily here, that the simple explanation is, esotericism is analogy describing the psychedelic sacred meal-induced experience of frozen-time noncontrol, no-free-will, and monopossibility).

That 2-point sentence is strong in many ways but even so, my initial reaction was that the ‘the explanation is simple’ phrase was pointless junk-words that disrupted the explanation.  Even when you separate out the two points:o  The explanation is simple.   <– non-essential, commentaryo  The explanation is x.   <– essential, payload
there is far more value in stating the explanation, than in assessing the degree of simplicity the explanation has. 
The fact that people think the explanation is hard, and that it is actually easy, is peripheral, far inferior to the explanation itself (which happens to be surprisingly simple instead of hard as people expect).

Core theory:
Esotericism is [simply] x.

Peripheral, non-essential commentary on the core theory:
The explanation is surprisingly simple, not hard as people are accustomed to expecting.

Given that I was trying to cram two points into a <200 character post in a foreign context/venue, the sentence is strong.  But when later reading the sentence with no context, I immediately judged it as an overcomplex definition with needless junk verbiage inserted, breaking the point, as if I wrote:
Esotericism is [this explanation is surprisingly simple] x.
Given what I was trying to communicate in the chat venue, the sentence is strong, and successful.
But the sentence is poor if used as a general model, and in fact when I read the sentence aloud, I was *unable* to continue past midpoint of the sentence before exclaiming that the intrusive junk phrase was not carrying its weight:
[start of high-value statement] [inserted low-value statement] [second half of high-value statement]
even though at the time I wrote the sentence, the main thing motivating the posted sentence was “the explanation is simple”, and the secondary point was “the explanation is x”.  A more useful approach that stands up better when the sentence is read in isolation is, avoid making a point within the middle of a point.
Esoteric mysticism is surprisingly simple to rationally explain: esotericism is analogy describing the psychedelics-induced experience of frozen-time noncontrol, no-free-will, and monopossibility.
The fact that the sacred meal is psychedelics-based is actually a greedy or “efficient” cramming of a third point into the sentence.  
For general use, it is better to break out each point into a standalone sentence:

Esoteric mysticism is simple to rationally explain.
Esoteric mysticism is analogy describing the psychedelics-induced experience of frozen-time noncontrol, no-free-will, and monopossibility.
The sacred meal is psychedelics, such as psilocybin mushrooms.

There is a tradeoff or conflict between low wordcount/ character count, vs. simplicity of expression.
When you achieve simplicity of expression, wordcount increases, unfortunately.
When you achieve low wordcount, expression becomes more complex, unfortunately.
My 2006 main article was not optimized for simplicity of expression, but for cramming as many breakthrough points as possible into a predefined wordcount; the article was designed to be dense, not designed to have extreme simplicity of expression.
When I attempted to read-aloud the article, I began to intensely focus, like around 2011, on simplicity of expression.  
But I only started to *really* hammer on simplicity of expression recently, around late 2018, in the context of <200 character posts in random venues online with unknown audiences.
A historical turning point or milestone in my simplicity of expression is when I started writing all posts in this weblog/discussion group as independent sentences rather than prose multisentence paragraphs.  Part of how I started that, was when I blew apart my main article into sentences around 2012… which I did during composing the 2006 main article.  
That was a technique I started perhaps 1992 or 1989 when working in Word Perfect.  Possibly 1987 – I did these kinds of experiments for a long time.
My idea development in January 1986 had that characteristic of aphorisms – isolated statements, not particularly grouped into multi-sentence paragraphs. 
When did I start posting every post in the form of standalone sentences, one sentence per line?  
When I regularly posted as independent sentences, that marks the practical start of this intent push for simplicity of expression.  
The push for simplicity of expression started after my initial draft of the contrarian article around January 1988.  
My 1988 attempted article got off to a failed start, a counterexample: it starts with a really stupid idea, a prelude, preliminaries, setting the stage.  
I succeeded in 2006-2007 at writing the 1988 article.]
The 1988 article’s point is: “Against Ken Wilber & Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, Transcendent Knowledge is actually the noncontrol experience that results from the block universe experience in the loose cognitive state”.
By 1996 after failing to write a condensed article, I temporarily gave up on the article format, and simply posted the outline of principle summary points at Principia Cybernetica. 
Forget the “article” format; just get to the damned point.

5:47 – Reading Aloud to Drive Simpler Writing

My reading-aloud of the attempted summary sentences, together with critiquing each sentence, reveals that I failed so far to accomplish or reach the goal, of simple explicit summary sentences.
I now *can* record reading-aloud the summary sentences, that is, the main post in the present thread, but I know that I am not satisfied with the result. 
The first post fails to focus on the core theory, fails to have simple sentences.  
The second summary post is not quite as bad, but still I hold out for improvement, in the 3rd post.  That post also is all too easy to improve upon.  
My latest main post in this thread, containing all summary sentences, still remains — as demonstrated in the past few critical posts — insufficiently focused on the core theory, and the sentences are too complex, without each sentence serving a single purpose.
This would be a worthwhile, interesting, improvement-causing recording approach: Read the attempted posts in this thread: read a sentence, then critique the sentence:

Critique each sentence:
How good of a sentence?  Length/complexity?
What was the central intended point of the sentence?
Are the terms in the sentence familiar and understandable without explicit definition?
How many distinct points are being made in the sentence?  Can they be separated into dedicated sentences?
How central is the point, to the Egodeath core theory?

6:39

However I use voice recordings, I do plan to get in the practice of mono smartphone recordings with no accessories, recorded anywhere, using good technique but not using any supplemental gear, such as pop filter, windscreen, dead cat, outboard microphone, headphone monitoring, or treated environment.
I was distracted and completely blocked and sidetracked by the attempt to make perfect recordings, regarding the resulting fidelity.  I was blocked by attempting for perfect fidelity.  To counter that fatal impediment, I need to be comfortable and in the habit of targeting casual fidelity, sacrificing high fidelity in order to concentrate on the payload, content.
I wasn’t blocked by attempting for perfect content.
I wasn’t blocked by attempting for perfect vocalization.

6:51 pm

Summary sentence for critique:

Religion is based on Reason in the Holy Spirit state of consciousness that is conveyed through the Eucharist.

The context that shaped that statement was some online discussion of Logos, atheism, Christianity, paganism, and religion.
It is a busy, overambitious sentence, written in the spirit of trying to cram an impressive amount into a low wordcount.

The phrase “the Holy Spirit state of consciousness” is too complicated and at least needs punctuation.
The “Holy Spirit” state of consciousness is the altered state of consciousness; that is, the psychedelic state of consciousness, which is characterized by loose cognitive association, which brings different experiencing and thinking.
The “Holy Spirit” state of consciousness is induced by ingesting the Eucharist, which is a form of the traditional “sacred meal”, which means psychedelics, most typically psilocybin mushrooms.
Religion is not based on “the non-rational”.
Religion is based on Reason in conjunction with different experiencing and thinking in the altered state of consciousness.
Religion is based on Reason in the altered state, which gives different experiencing and thinking.
Religion is based on reasoning about time and control in the altered state from psychedelics, such as in the Eucharist sacred meal provided by the God to the acolytes who are chosen by God.
God uses the psychedelic sacred meal as the means by which the mind is taught a different mode of experiencing and thinking, about time and control, possibility and moral culpability.  
‘God’ refers to the hidden uncontrollable controller as the normally veiled source of control thoughts.  
The control agent is ultimately helplessly controlled by the hidden uncontrollable source of control-thoughts.

A mostly straight-through reading of each posting, to quickly record on TASCAM DR-05 field recorder

May 26, 2019, 12:12 am

Posting — raw tracking file
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10725 190525_870.wav
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10723 190525_871.wav
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10717 190525_873.wav & 190525_878.wav
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10715 190525_879.wav
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10713 190525_882.wav

May 26, 2019 4:52 pm

1 week to download this zip file of mp3 files of reading aloud the summary statements
https://we.tl/t-m2GG7Kj6kM
limited time members-only exclusive for those on the inside

May 27, 2019 8:43 pm

mentalModelTransition.mp32 minutes 9 seconds.  The download URL, for 1 week:  https://we.tl/t-8D1UqKGG2EReading aloud the following text.The text here was written in order to read aloud.The first part was written after seeing the problems with the initial part, shown at bottom.

The dynamics of shifting control-dependency
Moving from the initial model of control to the revised model of control requires a profound shift of control dependency or reliance.  
To change worldmodels, instead of relying on your usual imagined basis of control, you must consciously rely on the actual source of control.
Your actual source of control is the pre-existing rail of control-thoughts that is laid out frozen in the block universe.
The pre-existing rail of control thoughts is frozen and you cannot change or control it.
The shift of control-dependency is the most interesting dynamic of the change from the initial to final worldmodel.
Initially, the mental model of control is based on the assumption and sensation that the person is the originator of control thoughts, with an open future.
In the revised mental model, the mind recognizes, perceives, and experiences the actual basis of personal control, in the loose cognitive state.
______________________
To transcend ordinary thinking, the mind moves from an initial mental worldmodel, through a transition period, to a final mental worldmodel.
Psychedelics produce the experience of the block universe containing a frozen worldline of control-thoughts, the experience of no-free-will and noncontrol, and the experience of helplessly receiving thoughts.
The mind tries to retain control on the basis of the initial worldmodel, but then shifts conscious attribution from the intial purported source of control ability to the later, accurately recognized source of control ability.
The mind dramatically shifts from the initial to the later mental worldmodel of control, time, and possibility.
The shift of worldmodels is driven by testing control ability to the point of full instability to disprove the initial model.
The mind repudiates the initial model of control ability and recognizes the real, now perceptible source of control ability, recognizing that personal control is dependent on a mysterious hidden uncontrollable source.

(In the above sentence: repudiate = {sacrifice}, recognize = {prayer})

May 27 9:46 pm

First I recorded spoken idea development (download below), then I transcribed it, as follows:

______________

Religion is based on the moment of transition, of moving from one leg to the other, the moment of shift, the moment of transition/shift to a new basis, the moment you move from control based on you as initator, to control based on dependence on a pre-given, externally given control source.

Religion is based on and centered around the moment that you move from the familiar basis of control, from the familiar mental conscious assumed and presumed basis of control, to the different external, uncontrollable basis of control.

That moment of shift from the one basis of control to the other is the peak climactic point which is the basis of religion.

Behind that is the whole looming framework of the old mental model and the new mental worldmodel, but the main focus is the moment of transition.

The mind undergoes various dynamics in switching from the old and learning the new model of control.

The mind retains the old model and uses it in mundane life, while adding the new model and relying on the new model in the loose cognitive state.

The central focus in religion is the moment of switching from the old model, particularly with regard to reliance and dependence for the control basis.

The most prominent and celebrated mental dynamic is the change of reliance on control basis, from the old familiar basis to the new, dependent basis.

The conscious shift of the recognized basis of control is the central climactic pivotal point which is the center or foundation of religion.

Hymns are celebrating this particular point: I was failing and you lifted me up, that I’m dependent on something external.

That expression of being dependent on the higher power is the peak experience, the peak dynamic, of switching from the Possibilism worldmodel to the Eternalism worldmodel.

______________

Written summary of phases or components from the transcription above:

Religious mythology = analogy describing
psychedelic loose cognition
starting from the Possibilism mental worldmodel
then MOVING the conscious basis of control
to the Possibilism mental worldmodel.

1. Religious mythology is analogy describing how
2. psychedelics induce loose cognitive binding
3. giving perception and experience of the frozen block universe worldline of your future control-thoughts
4. and concommitant noncontrol, or shift of basis of control, and no-free-will
leading to moving the mental worldmodel from Possibilism
through a MOVING of the attributed basis or source of control power
to the Eternalism mental model, with awareness of dependence on a hidden, uncontrollable source of control thoughts.

______________

mp3: centralMomentOfShift.mp3
download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-RQG9VFvZKf
length: 2:18

mic: Shure – SM57
project: e609sm57testReadingTelosPosts.aup
track: mmTransition3

May 27, 2019 9:47 pm

First I recorded spoken idea development (download below), then I transcribed it, as follows:

______________

Religion is based on the moment of transition, of moving from one leg to the other, the moment of shift, the moment of transition/shift to a new basis, the moment you move from control based on you as initator, to control based on dependence on a pre-given, externally given control source.

Religion is based on and centered around the moment that you move from the familiar basis of control, from the familiar mental conscious assumed and presumed basis of control, to the different external, uncontrollable basis of control.

That moment of shift from the one basis of control to the other is the peak climactic point which is the basis of religion.

Behind that is the whole looming framework of the old mental model and the new mental worldmodel, but the main focus is the moment of transition.

The mind undergoes various dynamics in switching from the old and learning the new model of control.

The mind retains the old model and uses it in mundane life, while adding the new model and relying on the new model in the loose cognitive state.

The central focus in religion is the moment of switching from the old model, particularly with regard to reliance and dependence for the control basis.

The most prominent and celebrated mental dynamic is the change of reliance on control basis, from the old familiar basis to the new, dependent basis.

The conscious shift of the recognized basis of control is the central climactic pivotal point which is the center or foundation of religion.

Hymns are celebrating this particular point: I was failing and you lifted me up, that I’m dependent on something external.

That expression of being dependent on the higher power is the peak experience, the peak dynamic, of switching from the Possibilism worldmodel to the Eternalism worldmodel.

______________

Written summary of phases or components from the transcription above:

Religious mythology = analogy describing
psychedelic loose cognition
starting from the Possibilism mental worldmodel
then MOVING the conscious basis of control
to the Eternalism mental worldmodel.

June 1, 2019 7:13 pm

The Egodeath theory explains that mythology describes the effects of eating magic mushrooms.

Normally, when not on mushrooms, the person feels like a king steering in a tree, with the power to make decisions and create their future.

The future feels like it doesn’t exist, and it feels open and can become any of several outcomes.

In Physics, time and space are thought of together as an unchanging block universe.

A person’s sequence of experiencing from birth to death, is shaped like a snake that is embedded into the block universe.

The person’s future thoughts cannot be changed or avoided.

The person doesn’t have the kind of control that lets the person alter their future thoughts.

Magic mushrooms produce an experience of being frozen like a snake in a rock.

On mushrooms, it feels like future thoughts already exist.

It feels like there is no free will, and the person has no ability to control their thoughts.

It feels like something outside of the person is controlling the person’s thoughts.

When the person tries to control their thoughts, they lose the feeling of controlling their thoughts, and the person becomes afraid about what thoughts they will receive next.

The person feels like they are helpless and dependent on a hidden force that controls their thoughts.

When the person realizes that they have no power to control the hidden source of their thoughts, the person has to trust the hidden source of thoughts.

When the person realizes that they have no alternative but to trust the hidden source of thoughts, the person becomes calm and happy to understand higher knowledge and religion.

June 1 7:29 pm

Version 2 is more readable:

The Egodeath theory explains that religion and mythology describe the effects of eating magic mushrooms.

Normally, when not on mushrooms, the person feels like a king steering in a tree, with the power to make decisions and create their future.
The future feels like it doesn’t exist, and it feels open and can become any of several outcomes.

Magic mushrooms produce an experience of being frozen like a statue of a king, or frozen like a snake in a rock.
On mushrooms, it feels like future thoughts already exist.
It feels like there is no free will, and the person has no ability to control their thoughts.

The experience of being frozen without control is like the idea of the block universe in Physics.
In Physics, time and space are thought of together as an unchanging block universe. 
In the block universe idea in Physics, a person’s sequence of experiencing from birth to death is called a “worldline”.
Your sequence of thoughts and experiences is shaped like a snake that is embedded into the block universe.
The person’s future thoughts cannot be changed or avoided.
The person doesn’t have the kind of control that lets the person alter their future thoughts.

After taking magic mushrooms several times, it feels like something outside of the person is controlling the person’s thoughts.
The person tries to control their thoughts, but they lose the feeling of controlling their thoughts.
The person becomes afraid about what thoughts they will receive next.

The person feels like they are helpless and dependent on a hidden force that controls their thoughts.
The person realizes that they have no power to control the hidden source of their thoughts.
The person realizes that they have no alternative but to trust the hidden source of thoughts.
The person becomes calm and happy to understand higher knowledge and religion.

7:48 pm

I recorded reading aloud posting 10797, the (incompletely) simplified summary of the Egodeath theory.
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10797

download url (for 1 week): https://we.tl/t-ffEN8doNVW
filename: SimplifiedEDIntroTake1.mp3
length: 2:16
mic: Shure – SM57

Open window; background noise.  This is just a practice run and mic check, Take 1. 

I should probably analyze and simplify that text, and then record reading the successful version.

June 1, 2019 8:04 pm

This version (3) of the Egodeath summary reaches the target simplicity. 

___________________

The Egodeath theory explains that religion and mythology describe the effects of eating magic mushrooms.

Normally, when not on mushrooms, the person feels like a king steering in a tree.

It feels like there are many possible actions.

It feels like you have the power to select any of the possible actions and create your future.

The future feels like it doesn’t exist, and it feels open and can become any of several outcomes.

Magic mushrooms produce an experience of being frozen like a statue of a king, or frozen like a snake in a rock.

On mushrooms, it feels like future thoughts already exist.

It feels like there is no free will, and the person has no ability to control their thoughts.

The experience of being frozen without control is like the idea of the block universe in Physics.

In Physics, time and space are thought of together as an unchanging “block universe”.

A person’s sequence of experiencing from birth to death is called a “worldline”.

Your sequence of thoughts and experiences is shaped like a snake that is embedded into the block universe.

The person’s future thoughts cannot be changed or avoided.

The person doesn’t have the kind of control that lets the person alter their future thoughts.

After taking magic mushrooms several times, the person learns to watch how the mind works.

The person learns to think carefully about control while on mushrooms.

It feels like something outside of the person is controlling the person’s thoughts.

The person tries to control their thoughts, but they lose the feeling of controlling their thoughts.

The person becomes afraid about what thoughts they will receive next.

The person feels like they are helpless and dependent on a hidden force that controls their thoughts.

The person realizes that they have no power to control the hidden source of their thoughts.

The person realizes that they have no alternative but to trust the hidden source of thoughts.

The person becomes calm and happy to understand higher knowledge and religion.

_________________________

(The Egodeath theory doesn’t advocate anything except understanding.)

June 1, 2019 8:38 pm – Read-aloud v3.1 of Egodeath Summary Reaches Target Simplicity

I recorded reading aloud the following version 3.1 of the simplified summary of the Egodeath theory.
filename: SimplifiedEDIntroV3.mp3
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/10799
download URL (for 1 week): https://we.tl/t-OxJhAYmtLZ
length: 2:18

This version (3.1) of the Egodeath summary reaches the target simplicity. 

___________________

The Egodeath theory explains that religion and mythology describe the effects of eating magic mushrooms.

Normally, when not on mushrooms, the person feels like a king steering in a tree.

It feels like there are many possible actions.

It feels like you have the power to select any of the possible actions and create your future.

The future feels like it doesn’t exist, and it feels open and can become any of several outcomes.

Magic mushrooms produce an experience of being frozen like a statue of a king, or frozen like a snake in a rock.

On mushrooms, it feels like future thoughts already exist.

It feels like there is no free will, and the person has no ability to control their thoughts.

The experience of being frozen without control is like the idea of the block universe in Physics.

In Physics, time and space are thought of together as an unchanging “block universe”.

A person’s sequence of experiencing from birth to death is called a “worldline”.

Your sequence of thoughts and experiences is shaped like a snake that is embedded into the block universe.

The person’s future thoughts cannot be changed or avoided.

The person doesn’t have the kind of control that lets the person alter their future thoughts.

After taking magic mushrooms several times, the person learns to watch how the mind works.

The person learns to think carefully about control while on mushrooms.

It feels like something outside of the person is controlling the person’s thoughts.

The person tries to control their thoughts, but they lose the feeling of controlling their thoughts.

The person becomes afraid about what thoughts they will receive next.

The person feels like they are helpless and dependent on a hidden force that controls their thoughts.

They have no power to control the hidden source of their thoughts.

They have no alternative but to trust the hidden source of thoughts.

June 20, 2019 2:21 am

“Rain Ego Death.m4a”
download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-grpzqAerwN
stereophonicleft channel: Shure – SM57 dynamic mic, cardioid pattern. rumble cut switch. 8:00 12:00 3:00
right channel: CAD – M39 large-diaphragm condenser mic, omni pattern.  rumble cut switch.  10:00 1:30 2:00

June 24, 9:01 pm

Voice recording: Off-the-cuff summary of Egodeath theory, June 24, 2019

Filename: “Summary 2019-06-24 (CAD-M39 AudEq).mp3”

Download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-82BUPyjFgP

____________________

Production notes:

CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser mic, cardioid pattern, mic’s low-cut switch, recorded dry/flat to DR-05 field recorder in mono, eq’d in laptop, exported as 320 kbps MP3.

Project files sequence:
190624_0652Orig.wav from DR-05 — raw tracking file; long silences
190624_0652_cadm39direct_trimmedsilence.aup
exported as 190624_0652.wav put back onto the DR-05 32MB microSD card
190624_0652_cadm39direct_trimmedsilence_eq.aup — has eq added
exported as Summary 2019-06-24 (CAD-M39 AudEq).mp3
uploaded

June 24, 2019 10:48 pm

Voice recording with effects: Off-the-cuff summary of Egodeath theory, June 24, 2019

Filename: “Summary 2019-06-24 fx (CAD-M39).mp3”

Download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-xfq6kuIOFO

Length: 39:41 (album-length)

Filesize: 95 MB

____________________

Production notes:
Started with mono direct/dry CAD M39 mic in 190624_0652.wav (5:55 long) which was silence-trimmed like “Summary 2019-06-24 (CAD-M39 AudEq).mp3” but without eq, on a TASCAM DR-05 field recorder.
Treble boost
dbx – 266xs Compressor & Expander/Gate
tc electronic – Flashback delay
tc electronic – Hall of Fame reverb
Recorded in stereo on a TASCAM DR-05 field recorder as file “190624_0961.wav”.
Project file: “Summary 2019-06-24 fx (CAD-M39).aud” – normalized
Exported as 320 kbps MP3

Jun 29 2019 2:48 pm

Short spoken clips from 190624_0652.wav (= recorded on June 24, 2019)

folder name: 190624_0652_wav_extracts
29 .wav files. 
length: 4 minutes

the download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-xqKp44vPUT

Adding EQ on playback:
iTunes on iPhone can play these short .wav files. 
These files are direct from the mic with no eq or processing.  They need bright speakers or treble boost.
For iTunes on iPhone, “Settings: Music: EQ” works, but might take about 15 seconds or a couple plays of a given .wav file. 
On Sony 7506 headphones, I use Treble Boost.

_________________________
Production notes:
Mic: CAD – M39 large diaphragm condenser mic, cardioid, no low-cut switch?, recorded in mono with no eq or processing on TASCAM DR-05 field recorder, to create file in 190624_0652.wav which was 5:55 long after trimming silence.
From that file, I copied and exported selected excerpts as .wav files.

Jun 29 8:35pm

Egodeath summary recording, as fx-processed snippets (eq’d) – version 1 of 2

filename: “Egodeath 652 snippets fx (CAD M39).mp3”

download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-DbVFJIPnyz

________________________

Production notes:
Mic: CAD – M39 large diaphragm condenser mic, on cardioid, no eq, as 190624_0652.wav (= tracked June 24, 2019) file.
TASCAM – DR-05 field recorder loaded with that file’s excerpted .wav snippets in laptop folder “190624_0652_wav_extracts”
MXR eq (Mastering monitors: Sony – MDR-7506 studio tracking headphones)
dbx dynamics processor
tc electronics – Flashback stereo delay
tc electronics – Hall of Fame stereo reverb
Recorded to TASCAM – DR-05 field recorder as 190629_0658.wav (= processed June 29, 2019) (that’s version 1)
Loaded and saved as project “190629_0658.aup” — trimmed, norm’d, deleted some, moved tail to middle
Exported as “Egodeath 652 snippets fx (CAD M39).mp3”

Version 2, a separate take, will be cleaned up and exported from 190629_0659.wav and 190629_0660.wav.

8:37pm

Egodeath summary recording, as fx-processed snippets (eq’d) – version 1 of 2

filename: “Egodeath 652 snippets fx (CAD M39).mp3”
length: 10:30

download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-DbVFJIPnyz

filesize: 25MB

9:54 pm

Egodeath summary recording, as fx-processed snippets (eq’d) – version 2 of 2

filename: “Egodeath 652 snippets fx v2 (CAD M39).mp3”
length: 11:57

download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-Jg9LnjHAl2

filesize: 29MB

________________________

Production notes: basically same as for v1.
Mic: CAD – M39 large diaphragm condenser mic, on cardioid, no eq, as 190624_0652.wav (= tracked June 24, 2019) file.
TASCAM – DR-05 field recorder loaded with that file’s excerpted .wav snippets in laptop folder “190624_0652_wav_extracts”
MXR eq (Mastering monitors: Sony – MDR-7506 studio tracking headphones)
dbx dynamics processor
tc electronics – Flashback stereo delay
tc electronics – Hall of Fame stereo reverb
Recorded to TASCAM – DR-05 field recorder as 190629_0659.wav & 190629_0660.wav (= processed June 29, 2019) (those are version 2)
Loaded and saved as project “190629_0659.aup” (190629_0660.aup was folded in) — trimmed, norm’d, deleted some
Exported as “Egodeath 652 snippets fx v2 (CAD M39).mp3”

June 30 11:55pm

voice recording: “Perceiving the Control Source.mp3” (recorded June 23, 2019)

download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-HpTFlkpD0y

lenth: about 1:30

This is a precursor to the excellent but quieter-voiced “190624_0652.wav” source file. 
This is a tribute to the next day’s track 652, but is also noteworthy because of more standard vocalization (louder; fuller).

June 30 11:58 pm

voice recording: “Perceiving the Control Source.mp3” (recorded June 23, 2019)

download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-HpTFlkpD0y

length: about 1:01

This is a precursor to the excellent but quieter-voiced “190624_0652.wav” source file. 
This is a tribute to the next day’s track 652, but is also noteworthy because of more standard vocalization (louder; fuller).

_____________________

Production notes:

Mic: CAD – M39, large diaphragm condenser mic, dry; no EQ in tracking file

tracking file: 190623_0649.wav

project file used to trim down to the excerpt: “190623_0649_wav excerpt.aup”

EQ: applied saved curve “CAD M39 03”, in the box

July 6 9:52pm

Egodeath Theory vocalization practice

Filename: “EDT M39 voc 2019-07-04 _1015 eq.wav”
Length: 12:09
Filesize: 64MB

Download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-yHxRZsmc3e

Production notes:

Mic: CAD – M39 large-diaphragm condenser

Filename pattern:
o  EDT (= Egodeath Theory)
o  Mic model
o  Focus (miking, vocalization, or content)
o  Date originally recorded
o  File number(s) of original recording(s)
o  Signal processing if any
o  Filename extension

Eq: in app, “CAD M39 04”

July 7 4:37 am

Egodeath Theory mic demos

Filename: “EDT M39 mic 2019-07-04 _742 _743 eq.wav”
Length: 2:38
Mic: CAD – M39 large-diaphragm condenser (Pattern: Cardioid, Bass Cut: Off)

Filename: “EDT SM57 mic 2019-07-04 _733 eq.wav”
Length: 1:39
Mic: Shure – SM57 dynamic

Filename: EDT “e609 mic 2019-07-04 _759 _1032 eq.wav”
Length: 8:43
Mic: Sennheiser – e609 dynamic

Download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-SiMUKkZ0Nu
..zip filesize: 56.3MB

Filename pattern:
o  EDT (= Egodeath Theory)
o  Mic model
o  Focus (miking, vocalization, or content)
o  Date originally recorded
o  File number(s) of original recording(s)
o  Signal processing if any
o  Filename extension

Eq: hardware

August 3, 2019 7:59 p.m.

4 new voice recordings.
Raw files, a bit slow-paced

The download URL for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-CCpO7XoNjH

Filename 1: “No chatting name of theory.m4a”
Length: 3:24 (iPhone bottom mic)
In 200-character posts format, it’s all about packing-in good keywords that don’t evoke misleading connotations, but get directly to the central point.  In practice, a set of 200-character posts, each with 4-5 highly summarized ideas.

Filename 2: “Chat post summaries commentary.m4a”
Length: 36:17 (iPhone bottom mic)
Some of the summaries are posted below.

Filename 3: “The religion of the future.m4a”
Length: 12:07 (iPhone bottom mic)
The religion of the future is direct, public summarization of the altered-state experience of no-free-will.

Including preexisting future, block-universe worldline, non-(meta)-control — and instead of a single literalist metaphor-system as a user interface skin that serves to obscure and confuse and prevent accessing the core knowledge, there will be a mapping of the explicit simple core model of time and control, to each extant brand or metaphor system, including technology metaphors like in the Rush songs The Body Electric (from Grace Under Pressure), and Vital Signs (from Moving Pictures). 

Instead of the main emphasis being a particular UI skin (metaphor system), with fewer than 1% of people accessing the core knowledge, the main emphasis will be on the core knowledge, assisted by subservient mapping to all the various analogy and metaphor systems.

Filename 4: “Reducing the size and value of wisdom (budmic).m4a”
Length: 9:57 (iPhone earbud mic, mostly dangling rather than held in position)
The word ‘wisdom’ used in this title means the pearl held by the dragon, the treasure guarded by the serpent monster; transcendent knowledge; enlightenment, mental model augmentation or transformation adding a new model of control, time, and possibility. 

The treasure guarded by the serpent monster, or the pearl held by the dragon, is the Egodeath theory.

{pearl, treasure} = the Egodeath theory = the knowledge mythology is analogy describing mushrooms loosening cognitive associations, giving an experience of frozen-time block-universe and personal control worldline with preexisting future control thoughts, changing the mental worldmodel from free-will control with an open future, to no-free-will with a preexisting future.

The worldmodel of self, time, control, and possibility branching, is sacrificed to gain the treasure of enlightenment and regeneration of self and world.

__________

Summary posts:

No-free-will, preexistence of one’s own future control-thoughts.  Block-universe worldline likened to wise fearsome “snake” demands sacrifice, to gain treasure: wisdom.

Sacred Meal 🍄 in the Mystery Religions including Eucharist.  Loosens mental associations, experience the higher state of experiencing.  Speak the Mysteries, which are to be revealed.

Mystery Religion has been decoded, in clear summary, the greatest achievement of civilization, describing high experiential revelation.

Don’t let your mental world collapse when you hear these 3 revisionist ideas: ahistoricity of Jesus; visionary plants as Eucharist; no-free-will.  These are not necessarily harmful ideas. It’s best to immunize people.

The “sun worship” theory of what religion is about, is secondary, reductionist; physical/literalist.  It can’t explain the intense mystic altered state of experiencing.  There’s nothing of Dionysus in it.

Mature esoteric 2-level religion is *rational* discovery of no-free-will mental model in the altered state.  Only lower, exoteric, beginners’ religion is *irrational*.

“Born again” in esoteric religion means you experienced the feeling of the death of personal control agency in the mystic state, then formed a new model of control and time.

Most theories of religious mythology don’t account for religious experiencing (the intense peak mystic altered state), so are reductionist, ordinary-state based.

Myth describes e.g. battle with serpent demons guarding treasure, then the armchair theorists say myth means observing celestial bodies – mostly wrong; misses the primary referent and origin of myth.

The primary meaning of myth is analogies describing the sacred meal inducing the altered state. The secondary meaning is celestial bodies.

The Greeks with their Mystery Religion would look at us moderns as outsiders, non-initiates, like children or animals.

We have the potential to figure out high ancient Greek culture, myth, Mystery Religion.

This is a golden age for scholars studying ancient religious texts, many translations becoming available, a renaissance.

Scholars are no longer hampered by heavy-handed Christian bias like they were in the early 20th Century. Now scholars are able to be more objective in interpreting ancient texts.

_____________

People liked my clearly-written posts about Calvinism and double-predestination.  I didn’t capture them.  Something like:

Some people are destined to be saved, and other people are destined to not be saved. Their control-thoughts were created not by the person, but by the Creator, before time began.

Skipped 1 Post

todo: get from Yahoo Mail

August 10, 2019 5:41 a.m.

Mythology is primarily analogies that serve to describe the experiential phenomena in the altered state that results from ingesting the psychoactive sacred meal, as in Mystery Religion and the Eucharist with its real presence of the mind-transforming god-figure.

Visionary plants cause loose cognitive association, as in “dissolve and re-coagulate”, causing an experience of frozen-time block-universe no-free-will, with pre-existing control thoughts frozen in rock. The stream of one’s control thoughts frozen in time is snake-shaped; it is the worldline in the unveiled block universe.

Mythology and fiction are both broad, and ancient fiction has mythemes. Key mythemes include king, tree, branching vs. nonbranching, rock, wine, sacrifice of a ruler or child, snake/ serpent/ dragon monster, death, and transformation.

The theory of religious mythology as analogy describing visionary plants causing loose cognition and experiencing block-universe no-free-will, monopossibility, and a kind of non-control and cancelling of personal moral culpability

Psychotomimetics cause loose cognitive association, as in the term ‘psycholytics’ (mind looseners), and mania: sacred madness, frenzy.

The loose cognitive state causes an experience of block universe no-free-will and noncontrol, including the fearsome snake-shaped frozen worldline of one’s control-thoughts.

The Eucharistic sacred meal is given by the god, as in Mystery Religion; carried to the elect, predestined recipients by their snake-shaped worldline.

Consuming the sacred meal transforms the mental model of control agency and time.

The dragon serpent is one’s pre-existing worldline frozen into the rock-like block universe.

The dragon guards the treasure or pearl of wisdom, demanding sacrifice of the king or child in order to gain the treasure of knowledge about control, time, and moral agency.

The “king” or “child” that must be sacrificed is the original freewill-based control assumption and the assumption of the open future.

The original assumptions about controlling and steering among possibilities to create the future must be sacrificed, to restore stable control that can withstand this transformative trial.

Traditional world religious mythology is analogies, key mythemes, that describe the experience of repudiating the original, assumed freewill basis of control power, in order to withstand the vision of pre-existing control thoughts.

The mind has the innate religious capability to have stable control in the intense mystic state, by relying on a new basis and source of control.

Mentally developing this new basis of control through a series of initiation sessions enables gaining and retaining gnosis, bringing the numinous, terrifying and ecstatic vision of the block-universe worldline snake back into mundane life in the ordinary state.

This peak religious experience that deeply transforms thinking about moral agency has been valued most highly.

Traditional world religious mythology such as Jewish, Christian, Greek, Roman, Hellenistic, Ancient Near East, and Northern, engages with the peak experiences and describes transformation of thinking about control, to survive the corrective ordeal while successfully gaining the new mental model of self, world, control, and time.

Assess the value of the Holy Spirit, visionary plants, the loose cognitive association state, the resulting experience of pre-existing thoughts and no-free-will. Critique the world tradition of valuing these things most highly.

Visionary plants were traditionally considered the sacred meal that gives moral transformation, peak experiencing, salvation, gnosis, revelation, purification, exorcism, enlightenment, redemption, regeneration, Transcendent Knowledge.

Poison or medicine, fatal snake bite or looking at Moses’ brass snake on a pole to cure the fatal snake bite, is a matter of positioning, usage, application of the powerful tool.

The revelation of the pre-existence of the future and no-free-will, a kind of non-control, and the illusory nature of possibility branching, could harm or elevate civilization.

9:08pm

Religious mythology is primarily analogy describing visionary plants causing the intense mystic altered state of loose cognitive association, which causes the experience of rock-like frozen-time block-universe no-free-will, confronting the snake-shaped worldline of pre-existing personal control thoughts, leading to a new mental worldmodel of time, self, possibility, and control. 

These analogies that describe the altered-state experiences include tree, snake, rock, king, wine, death, dismemberment, madness, sacrificing a child, storm and then calm, and exorcising an animal-like demon.  (also heaven, hell, afterlife, resurrection, rebirth)

Christianity has lots of great legitimate religious mythemes from the Ancient Near East.

Esoteric, insiders’ Christianity tends to “break” lower, literalist, exoteric Christianity.

Future religion: everyone knows gnosis/ enlightenment/ esoteric wisdom, and knows how it maps to all the mythemes and metaphors from various religions.

Western Esotericism studies are thriving; figured out gnosis, Mystery Religion, the treasure/pearl of wisdom guarded by the dragon; esoteric religion.

In the daily ordinary state, we experience as-if freewill. In the mystic state (as myth describes), underlying no-free-will is experienced/revealed, giving the additional mental model, traditionally considered “higher”.

🍄🐍

Western Esotericism scholarship is suddenly increasing; it’s a golden age/renaissance for the field.

Identifying the *primary* referent of mythology requires studying world mythology, Ancient Near East myth including Jewish/Christian/Greek/Roman, Northern myth, Western Esotericism. Beware partial/secondary solutions.

Aug 10 2019 10:37 pm

The block-universe worldline snake 🐍 guards the treasure: gnosis of no free will, pre-made future.  Mythology is analogy describing sacred 🍄 meal causing loose cognitive association to transform the mental model of time, control, & possibility.

The secret revealed knowledge in peak Western Civilization culture, the dragon-guarded treasure: no-free-will, unveiled in the visionary-plant state.

Shocking heresies in each major area of the Egodeath theory:
o  in Analogy:  No historical Jesus, no literal Heaven or Hell for moral agents
o  in Loosecog:  Religion/eucharist comes from 🍄
o  in Time:  The future is pre-existing and closed
o  in Control:  No-free-will, no meta control

Everyone is innocent of killing Jesus, who was a mythic composite figure – a Jewish-styled Hellenistic mystery cult savior figure.

Insane sophistry preached by exoteric thinkers: Christ is lord of all people, therefore there is no separation, no individuation, no differentiation; we are all the same person, one family, one kin, one nation, spiritually and metaphorically, and therefore literally as well.

At the lower, exoteric, literalist, childish-thinking level, we have perpetual standoff between Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism.  They can be allied but not integrated, on the lower, exoteric level.  Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism are not only allied, but integrated, on the esoteric level.

Hyper hyper-Calvinism: everything is God’s fault, the future is closed and pre-existing.  At all points in time, you are forced to think and will what the Creator has made you think and will at that point.  Hell for moral punishment and Heaven for moral reward are metaphorical.

High art describes the sacred meal visionary state, the cognitive changes that it causes, forming the new model of control and time.

The tragedy is the unveiling of no-free-will, inability to change and create the future, which is experienced as closed when in the altered state.

The simple theory of no-free-will is completely offensive to religious preconceptions about moral agency in mundane daily life, and that’s part of what makes the altered state such a radically transformative experience.

Church Fathers before Augustine in 400 asserted freewill. 

Augustine began with no-free-will, asserted freewill, then returned to no-free-will. 

We can expect the Bible to waffle and even highlight waffling – consistently inconsistent – God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, Pharaoh’s heart was hardened by God, Pharaoh hardened his heart against God. 

We can expect the Church Fathers to waffle. 

We can expect Calvinists to waffle, in their impure thinking, except for the hyper hyper-Calvinists who go all the way to consistency.

If you expect to find consistent no-free-will asserted in Hellenistic religion or in the Bible or in historical Theology, that’s naive.  Expect normally to find a wishy-washy, inconsistent jumble.  The best that the Egodeath theory matches this prevarication is modal:

In the ordinary state (tight cognitive binding), the mind experiences freewill, moral agency, open future, multiple branching possibilities. 

In the altered state (loose cognitive binding), the mind experiences no-free-will, frozen-time block-universe worldline, pre-existing control thoughts, closed future, monopossibility.

I don’t “like” Christianity, Atheism, Gnosticism, Mystery Religions, Calvinism, or Catholic Theology, and I don’t agree with them.  They are all poorly organized worldmodels, compared to the Egodeath theory.  They are the old explanatory paradigm to be replaced by this superior explanatory framework.

The most idiotic and unprofitable debate, by complete outsiders, is “Does God exist?”  No one bothers defining ‘God’.  Forget Epistemology; cognitive phenomenology is way more relevant.

Destined to be regenerated by the real presence of esoteric Christ in the Eucharist

If truth is important: Hell is esoteric mythic description of mystic-state experiencing.

If Christianity is truth, at least the esoteric level of Christianity must reveal Jesus as a composite mythic figure.

The 🐍serpent is the #1 mytheme; it means one’s pre-set worldline, frozen in the rock-like block universe, in the altered state from the 🍄sacred meal in mystery religion.  The snake monster guards gnosis.

Immature, exoteric outsider Christians, those on the outside who don’t understand Jesus’ parables, haven’t heard of Richard Carrier, Robert Price, Earl Doherty, or the Jesus Myth theory. 

Traditionalists include esotericists, who know that religion originates from the esoteric, nonliteral level and that the literalist, exoteric level of religion is derivative and untrue.

For those who want it or can benefit from it, esoteric gnosis is available, connecting the factions which are against each other on the lower level: Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism.

Providing the esoteric gnosis part is now easy, and mapping esoteric gnosis to the lower camps is easy, but how to support each feuding lower camp is unclear. 

The main lower camps are exoteric Christianity, Paganism, and Atheism. 

Even altered-state Atheism can be fundamentalist, exoteric, hostile to Transcendent Knowledge, stuck determinedly in its (false) opposition to Christianity and Paganism.

There is much overlap between Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism, especially perceptible from within the higher, esoteric level.

“The chosen” are those who are predestined to understand no-free-will.

Exoteric followers of the early Church Fathers prior to later Augustine, form a religion based on (typically) naive freewill, or (ideally) super-cosmic surpassing of high no-free-will, punching through the sphere of fixed stars into the ultra-transcendent heavens.

Religion supports family, but literalist exoteric religion is false.  True religion that supports family values can and must include esoteric religion like that of Paul, the New Testament Jesus, the later Augustine, and hyper hyper-Calvinism.

Swoon theory: Jesus was alive when removed from the cross.

post says “accidentally deleted extra spacing”, maybe below has better:

10:53 pm – has more at bottom, than the above version

The block-universe worldline snake 🐍 guards the treasure: gnosis of no free will, pre-made future.  Mythology is analogy describing sacred 🍄 meal causing loose cognitive association to transform the mental model of time, control, & possibility.

The 🐍serpent is the #1 mytheme; it means one’s pre-set worldline, frozen in the rock-like block universe, in the altered state from the 🍄sacred meal in mystery religion.  The snake monster guards gnosis.

The secret revealed knowledge in peak Western Civilization culture, the dragon-guarded treasure: no-free-will, unveiled in the visionary-plant state.

Shocking heresies in each major area of the Egodeath theory:
o  in Analogy:  No historical Jesus, no literal Heaven or Hell for moral agents
o  in Loosecog:  Religion/eucharist comes from 🍄
o  in Time:  The future is pre-existing and closed
o  in Control:  No-free-will, no meta control

Everyone is innocent of killing Jesus, who was a mythic composite figure — a Jewish-styled Hellenistic mystery cult savior figure.

Insane sophistry preached by exoteric thinkers: Christ is lord of all people, therefore there is no separation, no individuation, no differentiation; we are all the same person, one family, one kin, one nation, spiritually and metaphorically, and therefore literally as well.

At the lower, exoteric, literalist, childish-thinking level, we have perpetual standoff between Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism.  They can be allied but not integrated, on the lower, exoteric level.  Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism are not only allied, but integrated, on the esoteric level.

Hyper hyper-Calvinism: everything is God’s fault, the future is closed and pre-existing.  At all points in time, you are forced to think and will what the Creator has made you think and will at that point.  Hell for moral punishment and Heaven for moral reward are metaphorical.

High art describes the sacred meal visionary state, the cognitive changes that it causes, forming the new model of control and time.

The tragedy is the unveiling of no-free-will, inability to change and create the future, which is experienced as closed when in the altered state.

The simple theory of no-free-will is completely offensive to religious preconceptions about moral agency in mundane daily life, and that’s part of what makes the altered state such a radically transformative experience.

The Church Fathers before Augustine in 400 asserted freewill. 

Augustine began with no-free-will, asserted freewill, then returned to no-free-will. 

We can expect the Bible to waffle and even highlight waffling – consistently inconsistent – God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, Pharaoh’s heart was hardened by God, Pharaoh hardened his heart against God. 

We can expect the Church Fathers to waffle. 

We can expect Calvinists to waffle, in their impure thinking, except for the hyper hyper-Calvinists who go all the way to consistency.

If you expect to find consistent no-free-will asserted in Hellenistic religion or in the Bible or in historical Theology, that’s naive.  Expect normally to find a wishy-washy, inconsistent jumble.

The Egodeath theory has a modal way of providing relevant prevarication, actually experienced:

In the ordinary state (tight cognitive binding), the mind experiences freewill, moral agency, open future, multiple branching possibilities. 

In the altered state (loose cognitive binding), the mind experiences no-free-will, frozen-time block-universe worldline, pre-existing control thoughts, closed future, monopossibility.

I don’t “like” Christianity, Atheism, Gnosticism, Mystery Religions, Calvinism, or Catholic Theology, and I don’t agree with them.  They are all poorly organized worldmodels, compared to the Egodeath theory.  They are the old explanatory paradigm to be replaced by this superior explanatory framework.

The most idiotic and unprofitable debate, by complete outsiders, is “Does God exist?”  No one bothers defining ‘God’.  Forget Epistemology; cognitive phenomenology is way more relevant.

Swoon theory: Jesus was alive when removed from the cross.

Added:

The elect are destined to be regenerated by the real presence of esoteric Christ in the Eucharist.

“The chosen” are those who are predestined to understand no-free-will.

If truth is important: Hell is esoteric mythic description of mystic-state experiencing.

If Christianity is truth, at least the esoteric level of Christianity must reveal Jesus as a composite mythic figure.

Immature, exoteric outsider Christians, those on the outside who don’t understand Jesus’ parables, haven’t heard of Richard Carrier, Robert Price, Earl Doherty, or the Jesus Myth theory. 

Traditionalists include esotericists, who know that religion originates from the esoteric, nonliteral level and that the literalist, exoteric level of religion is derivative and untrue.

For those who want it or can benefit from it, esoteric gnosis is available, connecting the factions which are against each other on the lower level: Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism.

Providing the esoteric gnosis part is now easy, and mapping esoteric gnosis to the lower camps is easy, but how to support each feuding lower camp is unclear. 

The main lower camps are exoteric Christianity, Paganism, and Atheism. 

Even altered-state Atheism can be fundamentalist, exoteric, hostile to Transcendent Knowledge, stuck determinedly in its (false) opposition to Christianity and Paganism.

There is much overlap between Christianity, Paganism, and Scientific Atheism, especially perceptible from within the higher, esoteric level.

Exoteric followers of the early Church Fathers prior to later Augustine, form a religion based on (typically) naive freewill, or (ideally) super-cosmic surpassing of high no-free-will, punching through the sphere of fixed stars into the ultra-transcendent heavens.

Religion supports family, but literalist exoteric religion is false.  True religion that supports family values can and must include esoteric religion like that of Paul, the New Testament Jesus, the later Augustine, and hyper hyper-Calvinism.

Aug 10 11:02pm

Christianity based on naive freewill thinking is non-transformative, like Job’s incorrect, moralist neighbors, who sin in assuming conventional moral agency thinking. 

Exoteric religion is ordinary-state based; there’s nothing of Dionysus in it, no knowledge of God except in a reductionists, moralizing way. 

Exoteric religion is naive freewill religion; single-level religion. 

Any lunkhead, ordinary-state based, unregenerate, conventional Catholic non-religious outsider will tell you, Christianity is really just about moral conduct. 

There’s nothing of the numinous, nothing shocking, nothing that shakes the mind to its foundations as a control agent.

Exoteric religion only has knowledge of God in a reduced way, the conception of God held by the animal-like freewill moral agent.

Aug 13 9:28 pm

I’m not motivated by moralism or truth; I am motivated by identifying a compact elegant model that describes the phenomenology. Conceptual coherence.

I am not concerned whether someone agrees with the theory; I am concerned that they appreciate and understand its compact potent explanatory power, its clarity as an extremely simple model, its beauty and elegance as a theory.

The extreme compactness or compactibility of the Egodeath theory is one of its greatest merits and contributions.

It’s not so much a matter of agreeing with the theory, as knowing what the theory is. It serves as a perfect, clear, specific, highly specified point of reference for any debates.

You can’t get any simpler than saying “in the ordinary state we experience free will, in the altered state we experience no free will”, and this is the most intense experience, that causes a change of mental world model, or at least presents a surprising intense alternate model.

Religious mythology describes the change from ordinary state free will experiencing to altered state no free will experiencing which is the most intense and remarkable experiencing.

Religion which tries to downplay no free will inevitably eliminates the most intense experiencing. The holy spirit combined with avoiding no free will is disempowered and reduced.

Advocating the Egodeath theory does not mean asserting no free will; advocating the theory means advocating the theory as the most interesting, simple, compact, elegant explanation of the phenomena experienced in the altered state, and advocating this impressively simple explanation of mythology in terms of the altered-state experience of non-kingship per the vision of the person’s block universe worldline.

Start with the simplest explanation, the simplest, most potent theory: the ordinary state experiencing is the possiblism model; the altered state experiencing is the eternalism model. Mythology and theology are less-explicit reflections of this contrast.

ripe wrote: aug 15 1pm (i haven’t read)

> I’m not motivated by moralism or truth; I am motivated by identifying a compact elegant model that describes the phenomenology. Conceptual coherence.

If you turn away from moral and truth, it’s like you are turn away from God.
Sound like, moral and truth (which come from God) is less important compared with what your awesome-human-mind can conceive. Are you losing your soul Michael?

This remind me:

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; (4) And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
– Timothy 4:3-4

Your ego-death theory sound now more like a New Age religion, where SIN is not anymore consider, but the power inside humans: you are teaching that we can become like god?

What is more important to you? Become god on earth and lost your soul or to remain humble and join God after death?

Born-again means change your mind and hearth in-line with God Words, and not become god.

Your own ego-death theory suggest that our thoughts come from outside. If is not from God, from whom you are getting this info?

Good Luck with your research and may God guide you and not your human-mind.

August 24, 2019, 11:15 p.m.

These are increasingly accessible, plain-spoken, direct and blunt, ultra-condensed summaries of the Egodeath theory.

“The Egodeath theory” is a label for a simple, compact set of ideas: the analogy/psychedelics/no-free-will explanation of religious mythology and the nature of primary religious experiencing, and the nature of Transcendent Knowledge.

_______________________
SIMPLICITY OF GNOSIS; HOW EASY IT IS TO SUMMARIZE GNOSIS

Gnosis is merely the altered-state experience of no-free-will, pre-existences of control-thoughts.

Gnosis — the peak achievement of western civilization — is the altered-state experience of no-free-will regenerating the mental model of self, time, and control.

🌳⚡🍄🐍✝ sacred meal -> intense mystic altered state -> experience the frozen block-universe with pre-existing snake-shaped worldline of control thoughts & no-free-will.

The pearl of gnosis guarded by snake dragon monster is experience of no-free-will, the peak experience that transforms, from Eucharistic sacred meal; revelation = alt-state no-free-will.

Gnosis wisdom enlightenment: sacred meal 🍄 altered state experience of no-free-will, block-universe worldline 🐍 of your pre-existing control-thoughts.

Gnosis, peak enlightenment is nothing but merely the experience of no-free-will, which cancels moral culpability.  Religious myth describes altered-state experience of pre-existing control-thoughts.

Here is proof that turgid intellectual writing is B.S.: the highest gnosis revelation is simply the altered-state experience of block-universe no-fee-will, perceiving the uncontrollable pre-existence of control-thoughts; easy to express.

Heidegger: 10,000 turgid pages < Euro-Americans: 120-character text message 🌳⚡🍄🐍✝

Real Philosophy is dirt-simple.  Complexity of expression indicates fake posturing pseudo-Philosophy.

_______________________
UNIVERSAL INNATE NATURE OF RELIGION

The mind has innate ability to deeply revise the mental model of control and time in visionary state, = origin of religion.

World religious mythology is evidence that all minds transform the same way in the altered state; gnosis or esoteric revelation applies universally.

The loose cognitive association state from the Eucharist’s Holy Spirit is the visionary state to regenerate and purify.

_______________________
AUTHENTIC EUCHARIST

🍄 Eucharist flesh of Christ, vehicle of the Holy Spirit to regenerate the mental model of moral agency.

Exoteric Catholics don’t have the authentic effective Eucharist, to change the mind.

Agape Meal = Eucharist = love for God = sacred meal inducing altered-state Holy Spirit in Mystery Religion.

_______________________
SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENTS

The greatest Science achievement is internal, about cognition: decoding mythemes as analogy describing altered-state no-free-will experience & mental model.  We went beyond the sphere of the fixed stars.

_______________________
SACRIFICE

The authentic sacrifice is of one’s freewill mental model in the mystic state, which deeply changes moral agency.  Literalist sacrifice is misguided and ineffective.

_______________________
SERPENT/SNAKE

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated preexisting control-thoughts revealed by Mystery Religion sacred meal = Wisdom tradition = treasure/pearl guarded by dragon/serpent, won by hero with divine help.

Don’t disparage the snake 🐍🐉, the shape of peak wisdom.  Experiential revelation of worldline of preset control-thoughts frozen into the block universe.

The snake mytheme is bi-valent; positive valued and negative valued.  Highest gnosis is seeing block-universe snake-shaped preset worldline of your preexisting control-thoughts; 🐍 = wisdom, gnosis, regeneration.

Mythemes: dragon 🐉 guards the treasure of gnosis, Transcendent Knowledge.  Dragon is the snake monster to reconcile with, frozen block-universe preset path of your life.

Jesus said as a sign, he must be lifted up like Moses’ brass snake on a pole.  Snake is #1 mytheme, describes preset path of control-thoughts frozen into the block universe experienced in the Holy Spirit.

The Vatican building represents the snake.  Looking at Moses’ rigid brass snake on a pole (a de-branched tree) heals “fatal snake bite”.  Serpent/ snake/ 🐉 dragon monster guards treasure of Transcendent Knowledge, of no-free-will.

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated pre-existing control-thoughts revealed by Mystery Religion sacred meal = Wisdom tradition = treasure/pearl guarded by dragon/serpent, won by hero with divine help.

_______________________
KING

Jesus on the cross is a king, thus is an instance of the widespread mytheme of {king hung fastened helplessly on a tree}.

Lots of Hellenistic-type mythemes in Christ’s Passion story: mocking the king and Mystery Religion initiates (impotence of freewill agency), king hung helpless in branching tree, reborn from rock cave.

Personal king-like control-power evaporates upon perceiving the pre-existing path of your control-thoughts frozen into the spacetime block.

_______________________
SHOCKING THEORIES

Heresy theories:
The swoon theory
The Christ Myth theory
No-free-will revelation
Chronology revision
🍄 the source of religion

_______________________
TWO TYPES OF CHRISTIANITY

Literalist religion is popular; metaphorical mystic-state religion is less common; primitive cultures sit halfway between.

Most religionists and atheists sound like a fool when characterizing religion.  Need more esotericism awareness.

Restorationist Esoteric Christianity

The true church is esoteric Christians regenerated by the Holy Spirit from the real presence in the sacred meal Eucharist.

Esoteric religion contradicts exoteric, they are somehow “compatible”.  Two meanings of “heaven” & “hell”.

Esoteric Christians love literalist immature outsider exoteric Christians.

Christianity is Hellenistic mystery religion expressed with Jewish elements.

Lower-level religion is moral conduct of life. 
Higher religion is altered-state (Holy Spirit) revision of the mental model of moral control agency.

_______________________
ACCELERATIONIST CHRISTIANITY

The Bible plan: Christians put Antichrist on the throne in the temple and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing of sin – an ineffective religion of literalism that cannot cancel moral culpability and deeply transform the mind like the altered-state experience of timeless no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

Christians must help put antichrist on the throne in the temple that God tore down twice, and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

Christian accelerationism: Christians must help put antichrist on the throne in rebuilt template and restore animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

_______________________
CONFLATION OF ‘UNITY’ WITH LACK OF DIFFERENTIATION

We are all united by Christ, but that doesn’t mean we are undifferentiated; that would be insanity and mental regression in Ken Wilber’s sense.  Christ is lord over all, but that doesn’t mean dissolving all boundaries into an undifferentiated mass.

The Bible doesn’t assert insanity like “never judge, don’t make any distinctions, male is literally the same as female, we are an undifferentiated mass”.  Insanity is dissolving into chaos all boundaries and distinctions. 

Ken Wilber’s concept of the pre/trans fallacy, don’t conflate transcending mental structures, with the failure and chaotic dis-integration and breakdown of mental structures.

_______________________
REINCARNATION MYTHEME

“Reincarnation” is an analogy describing altered-state experiencing: forgetting the temporary vision of the higher model of control & time.

_______________________
ANDRO-GYNE

Mithras, Christ, and Dionysus were given male and female traits, per common mythemes.

Traditional culture includes Herme-Aphrodite in myth; andro-gyne: for example, Dionysus had female traits.

In ancient Athens, men played the women’s roles in plays.

Greeks culture many surprises.  Men played the women roles in platys.  Religious experience via rounds of mushroom wine (wide tradition of sacred meals), andro-gyne Dionysus.

Myth includes andro-gyne; Herme-Aphrodite.  Altered-state experiencing of “inability to control one’s pre-existing control-thoughts” is like “being female”, ie. involuntarily receptive of thoughts from the male source.

_______________________
ATHEISM DECLINE

Religious founder figures are mythic composite figures also incorporating historical individuals.

Atheism fell off a cliff a few years ago.  That is revealed in the dates on YouTube Christ Myth Richard Carrier videos.

Atheism is ignorant of higher mind peak experience (as is exoteric religion, and lower Cognitive Science).

Christ-myth research thrived around 2005-2015, and won, with the pathetic response from Bart Ehrman, and then fell off a cliff a few years ago around 2014-2016.

Atheism sharply plummeted when Richard Carrier pushed Atheism Plus and everyone ran away, a few years after the 4 Atheists wrote their uninformed books that lacked awareness of mysticism or esoteric religion.

Around 2010, it was dominant Christians vs. underdog Atheists.
In 2019, it’s split unclearly between Atheism, Paganism, and Christianity advocates. 

I completely stopped following Christ Myth research around the time Richard Carrier wrote his first book. 

I was a leader within the heart of Christ Myth research, though the JesusMysteries discussion-group moderators overrode people’s asking me for the updated, improved mushroom alternative theory replacing Allegro’s poorly formed, anti-Christian version of the theory.

I provided some better formulations of the ideas such as what does “Historical Jesus” mean instead of conventional ideas that “Jesus was really this particular historical minor figure I latched onto”.

_______________________
MUSIC

Some Metal is truly classic; it describes peak esoteric altered-state experiencing.  mundane conservatives disparage Sabbath and Ozzy, but Bob Daisley’s Ozzy album _Diary of a Madman_ is epic and classic by traditional standards.

Classic Metal includes the altered-state revelation of no-free-will — peak culture.

Rap music probably has few lyrics about the peak-state revelation of mind-transforming block-universe worldline 🐍.

Boomers invented electric Rock ⚡🎸🎹⚡ music including some peak-state classic Dionysian revelation of block-universe no-free-will.

Strangely, in Beatles lyrics, only the early song Help! has solid altered-state classic-type lyrics.

Pink Floyd’s song “Learning to Fly” has solid classic altered-state description lyrics.

Country/Western music suffers the same problem as much conservative culture: it is limited to the mundane daily life, conduct of life, ordinary state of consciousness.

Mundane Country/Western music doesn’t reach up to describe the mind-changing experiences of the intense mystic altered state.

Liberal culture ends up holding the higher goods, inasmuch as it can, lacking the structure of conservative thinking.

The Egodeath theory was born from an outsider, break-the-mold combination of liberal and conservative culture or thought-styles.

Aug 25 2019, 1:25 am – might be typos, which might be fixed in subsequent post

hard to be certain, due to erratic system

These are increasingly accessible, plain-spoken, direct and blunt, ultra-condensed summaries of the Egodeath theory.

“The Egodeath theory” is a label for a simple, compact set of ideas.

The Egodeath theory is the analogy/ psychedelics/ no-free-will explanation of religious mythology and the nature of primary religious experiencing, and the nature of Transcendent Knowledge.

_______________________
SIMPLICITY OF GNOSIS; HOW EASY IT IS TO SUMMARIZE GNOSIS

Gnosis is merely the altered-state experience of no-free-will, perceiving the pre-existence of control-thoughts.

Gnosis — the peak achievement of western civilization — is the altered-state experience of no-free-will regenerating the mental model of self, time, and control.

Gnosis is the peak achievement of Western civilization.

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of no-free-will.

The repeated experience of timeless frozen block-universe no-free-will changes the mental model of self, time, and control.

The intense mystic altered state (loose cognitive association) causes experiencing block-universe no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

The intense mystic altered state causes experiencing block-universe no-free-will, with pre-existing control-thoughts.

Key mytheme sequence: {king steering tree wine battle die snake rock rebirth}

The king steers in a possibility-branching tree, drinks wine, battles, dies, transforms to a snake frozen in rock, then rebirth from the rock cave.

No-free-will cancels, transforms, and regenerates the mental model of self, time, and control.

The repeated block-universe experience changes the mental model of control and time.

🌳⚡🍄🐍✝ sacred meal -> intense mystic altered state -> experience the frozen block-universe with pre-existing snake-shaped worldline of control thoughts & no-free-will.

The pearl of gnosis guarded by snake dragon monster is experience of no-free-will, the peak experience that transforms, from Eucharistic sacred meal; revelation = alt-state no-free-will.

Gnosis wisdom enlightenment: sacred meal 🍄 altered state experience of no-free-will, block-universe worldline 🐍 of your pre-existing control-thoughts.

Gnosis, peak enlightenment is nothing but merely the experience of no-free-will, which cancels moral culpability.

Religious myth describes altered-state experience of pre-existing control-thoughts.

Here is proof that turgid intellectual writing is B.S.: the highest gnosis revelation is simply the altered-state experience of block-universe no-fee-will, perceiving the uncontrollable pre-existence of control-thoughts; easy to express.

Heidegger: 10,000 turgid pages < Euro-Americans: 120-character text message 🌳⚡🍄🐍✝

Real Philosophy is dirt-simple.  Complexity of expression indicates fake posturing pseudo-Philosophy.

_______________________
UNIVERSAL INNATE NATURE OF RELIGION

The mind has innate ability to deeply revise the mental model of control and time in visionary state, = origin of religion.

World religious mythology is evidence that all minds transform the same way in the altered state; gnosis or esoteric revelation applies universally.

The loose cognitive association state, from the Eucharist’s Holy Spirit, is the visionary state, to regenerate and purify.

_______________________
AUTHENTIC EUCHARIST

🍄 Eucharist flesh of Christ, vehicle of the Holy Spirit to regenerate the mental model of moral agency.

Exoteric Catholics don’t have the authentic effective Eucharist, to change the mind.

Agape Meal = Eucharist = love for God = sacred meal inducing altered-state Holy Spirit in Mystery Religion.

_______________________
SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENTS

The greatest Science achievement is internal, about cognition: decoding mythemes as analogy describing altered-state no-free-will experience & mental model of time and control. 

We went beyond the sphere of the fixed stars.

The greatest Science achievement is internal, about cognition. 

The greatest Science achievement is decoding mythemes as analogy that describes altered-state no-free-will experience & transforming the mental model of time and control.

_______________________
SACRIFICE

The authentic sacrifice is of one’s freewill mental model in the mystic state, which deeply changes moral agency.

Literalist sacrifice is misguided and ineffective.

_______________________
SERPENT/SNAKE

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated preexisting control-thoughts revealed by the Mystery Religion sacred meal = the Wisdom tradition = the treasure/pearl guarded by the dragon or serpent, won by the hero, with divine help.

The snake frozen in rock is like the block universe worldline of fated preexisting control-thoughts.

The pre-existence of control-thoughts is revealed by the Mystery Religion sacred meal.

The Wisdom tradition = the treasure or pearl guarded by the dragon or serpent.

The treasure of gnosis is obtained from the dragon, won by the hero and reconciled, with divine help.

Don’t disparage the snake 🐍🐉, the shape of peak wisdom.

Experiential revelation of worldline of preset control-thoughts frozen into the block universe.

The snake mytheme is bi-valent; positive valued and negative valued.

Highest gnosis is seeing the block-universe snake-shaped preset worldline of your preexisting control-thoughts.

🐍 = wisdom, gnosis, regeneration

Mythemes: dragon 🐉 guards the treasure of gnosis, Transcendent Knowledge.

The dragon is the snake monster to reconcile with, frozen block-universe preset path of your life.

Jesus said as a sign, he must be lifted up like Moses’ brass snake on a pole.

The snake is the #1 mytheme, because it describes the pre-set path of control-thoughts frozen into the block universe, experienced in the Holy Spirit.

The Vatican building represents the snake.

Looking at Moses’ rigid brass snake on a pole (a de-branched tree) heals “fatal snake bite”.

Serpent/ snake/ 🐉 dragon monster guards treasure of Transcendent Knowledge, of no-free-will.

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated pre-existing control-thoughts revealed by Mystery Religion sacred meal = Wisdom tradition = treasure/pearl guarded by dragon/serpent, won by hero with divine help.

_______________________
KING

Jesus on the cross is a king, thus is an instance of the widespread mytheme of {king hung fastened helplessly on a tree}.

Lots of Hellenistic-type mythemes in Christ’s Passion story: mocking the king and Mystery Religion initiates (impotence of freewill agency), king hung helpless in branching tree, reborn from rock cave.

There are many Hellenistic-type mythemes in Christ’s Passion story.

Mocking the king and the Mystery Religion initiates means pointing out the impotence of freewill agency.

The king is hung and fastened helpless like a rigid snake in the branching tree, then is reborn from the rock cave.

Personal king-like control-power evaporates upon perceiving the pre-existing path of your control-thoughts frozen into the spacetime block.

_______________________
SHOCKING THEORIES

Heresy theories:
The swoon theory
The Christ Myth theory
No-free-will revelation
Chronology revision
🍄 the source of religion

_______________________
TWO TYPES OF CHRISTIANITY

Literalist religion is popular; metaphorical mystic-state religion is less common; primitive cultures sit halfway between.

Most religionists and atheists sound like a fool when characterizing religion.

More awareness of esotericism is needed, including Western Esotericism.

Restorationist Esoteric Christianity

The true church is esoteric Christians regenerated by the Holy Spirit from the real presence in the god’s sacred meal, the Eucharist.

Esoteric religion contradicts exoteric, they are somehow “compatible”.

There are two meanings of “heaven” & “hell”.

Esoteric Christians love literalist immature outsider exoteric Christians.

Christianity is Hellenistic mystery religion expressed with Jewish elements.

Lower-level religion is moral conduct of life. 

Higher religion is altered-state (Holy Spirit) revision of the mental model of moral control agency.

_______________________
ACCELERATIONIST CHRISTIANITY

The Bible plan: Christians put Antichrist on the throne in the temple and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing of sin.

Christians must help put Antichrist on the throne in the temple that God tore down twice, and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

Christian accelerationism: Christians must help put Antichrist on the throne in rebuilt template and restore animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

The actual, specific sacrifice is repudiating relying on the “branching open-future” model of time and control.

Animal sacrifice is an ineffective religion of literalism that cannot cancel moral culpability and deeply transform the mind like the altered-state experience of timeless no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

Animal sacrifice is an ineffective religion of literalism.

Sacrifice the “branching open-future” model of time and control.

Experiencing block-universe no-free-will cancels moral culpability and deeply transforms the mind.

Experiencing timeless frozen pre-existing control-thoughts cancels and transforms moral agency.

The mind is deeply transformed by the altered-state experience of timeless no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

_______________________
CONFLATION OF ‘UNITY’ WITH LACK OF DIFFERENTIATION

We are all united by Christ, but that doesn’t mean we are undifferentiated; that would be insanity and mental regression in Ken Wilber’s sense.

Christ is lord over all, but that doesn’t mean dissolving all boundaries into an undifferentiated mass.

The Bible doesn’t assert insanity like “never judge, don’t make any distinctions, male is literally the same as female, we are an undifferentiated mass”.

Insanity is dissolving into chaos all boundaries and distinctions. 

Ken Wilber’s concept of the pre/trans fallacy, don’t conflate transcending mental structures, with the failure and chaotic dis-integration and breakdown of mental structures.

_______________________
REINCARNATION MYTHEME

“Reincarnation” is an analogy describing altered-state experiencing: forgetting the temporary vision of the higher model of control & time.

_______________________
ANDRO-GYNE

Mithras, Christ, and Dionysus were given male and female traits, per common mythemes.

Traditional culture includes Herme-Aphrodite in myth; andro-gyne: for example, Dionysus had female traits.

In ancient Athens, men played the women’s roles in plays.

Greeks culture many surprises.  Men played the women roles in platys.  Religious experience via rounds of mushroom wine (wide tradition of sacred meals), andro-gyne Dionysus.

Myth includes andro-gyne; Herme-Aphrodite.

The altered-state experiencing of “inability to control one’s pre-existing control-thoughts” is like “being female”.

The altered-state experience is like “being female”.

The person is the female-like receiver of control-thoughts, which are input by the male-like source of control-thoughts.

_______________________
ATHEISM DECLINE

Religious founder figures are mythic composite figures also incorporating historical individuals.

Atheism fell off a cliff a few years ago.  That is revealed in the dates on YouTube Christ Myth Richard Carrier videos.

Atheism is ignorant of higher mind peak experience (as is exoteric religion, and lower Cognitive Science).

Christ-myth research thrived around 2005-2015, and won, with the pathetic response from Bart Ehrman, and then fell off a cliff a few years ago around 2014-2016.

Atheism sharply plummeted when Richard Carrier pushed Atheism Plus and everyone ran away, a few years after the 4 Atheists wrote their uninformed books that lacked awareness of mysticism or esoteric religion.

Atheism sharply plummeted when Richard Carrier pushed Atheism Plus and everyone ran away.

Atheism dropped sharply, a few years after the 4 Atheists wrote their uninformed books that lacked awareness of mysticism or esoteric religion.

Athiests wrote uninformed books that lacked awareness of mysticism or esoteric religion.

Around 2010, it was dominant Christians vs. underdog Atheists.
In 2019, it’s split unclearly between Atheism, Paganism, and Christianity advocates.

Paganism is religion and spirituality avoiding the liabilities of Christianity.

I completely stopped following Christ Myth research around the time Richard Carrier wrote his first book. 

I was a leader within the heart of Christ Myth research.

In the JesusMysteries discussion group, people were interested in the mind-changing Eucharist.

The JesusMysteries discussion-group moderators overrode people’s interest in the mind-changing Eucharist.

People asked me for the updated, improved mushroom alternative theory.

The new model replaces Allegro’s poorly formed, anti-Christian version of the theory.

Allegro has a poorly formed, anti-Christian version of the mushroom Christ Myth theory.

I provided some better formulations of the ideas such as what does “Historical Jesus” mean, how it should be most relevantly defined.

“Historical Jesus” must mean a single unique identifiable man without whom Christianity wouldn’t have started.

A common fallacy is to identify Jesus arbitrariliy with a minor single particular historical figure.

_______________________
MUSIC

Some Metal is truly classic; it describes peak esoteric altered-state experiencing.

Mundane conservatives disparage Sabbath and Ozzy, but Bob Daisley’s Ozzy album _Diary of a Madman_ is epic and classic by traditional standards.

Classic Metal includes the altered-state revelation of no-free-will — peak culture.

Rap music probably has few lyrics about the peak-state revelation of mind-transforming block-universe worldline 🐍.

Boomers invented electric Rock ⚡🎸🎹⚡ music including some peak-state classic Dionysian revelation of block-universe no-free-will.

Strangely, in Beatles lyrics, only the early song Help! has solid altered-state classic-type lyrics.

Pink Floyd’s song “Learning to Fly” has solid classic altered-state description lyrics.

Country/Western music is limited to the mundane ordinary state.

Country/Western music suffers the same problem as most mundane culture: it lacks altered-state transformation into the no-free-will mental model.

Country/Western music lacks altered-state transformation into the no-free-will mental model.

Elevated music describes altered-state transformation into the no-free-will mental model.

Country/Western music is limited to the mundane daily life, conduct of life, ordinary state of consciousness.

August 25, 2019 , 2:04 a.m.

These are increasingly accessible, plain-spoken, direct and blunt, ultra-condensed summaries of the Egodeath theory.

“The Egodeath theory” is a label for a simple, compact set of ideas.

The Egodeath theory is the analogy/ psychedelics/ no-free-will explanation of religious mythology and the nature of primary religious experiencing, and the nature of Transcendent Knowledge.

_______________________
SIMPLICITY OF GNOSIS; HOW EASY IT IS TO SUMMARIZE GNOSIS

Gnosis is merely the altered-state experience of no-free-will, perceiving the pre-existence of control-thoughts.

Gnosis — the peak achievement of western civilization — is the altered-state experience of no-free-will regenerating the mental model of self, time, and control.

Gnosis is the peak achievement of Western civilization.

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of no-free-will.

The repeated experience of timeless frozen block-universe no-free-will changes the mental model of self, time, and control.

The intense mystic altered state (loose cognitive association) causes experiencing block-universe no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

The intense mystic altered state causes experiencing block-universe no-free-will, with pre-existing control-thoughts.

Key mytheme sequence: {king steering tree wine battle die snake rock rebirth}

The king steers in a possibility-branching tree, drinks wine, battles, dies, transforms to a snake frozen in rock, then rebirth from the rock cave.

No-free-will cancels, transforms, and regenerates the mental model of self, time, and control.

The repeated block-universe experience changes the mental model of control and time.

🌳⚡🍄🐍✝ sacred meal -> intense mystic altered state -> experience the frozen block-universe with pre-existing snake-shaped worldline of control thoughts & no-free-will.

The pearl of gnosis guarded by the snake dragon monster is the experience of no-free-will, the peak experience that transforms, from the Eucharistic sacred meal.

Revelation is the altered-state experience of no-free-will.

Gnosis wisdom enlightenment: sacred meal 🍄 altered state experience of no-free-will, block-universe worldline 🐍 of your pre-existing control-thoughts.

Gnosis, peak enlightenment is nothing but merely the experience of no-free-will, which cancels moral culpability.

Gnosis is the experience of no-free-will, which cancels moral culpability.

Religious myth describes altered-state experience of pre-existing control-thoughts.

Here is proof that turgid intellectual writing is B.S.: the highest gnosis revelation is simply the altered-state experience of block-universe no-free-will, perceiving the uncontrollable pre-existence of control-thoughts; easy to express.

Turgid intellectual writing is B.S.

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of block-universe no-free-will, perceiving the uncontrollable pre-existence of control-thoughts.

Heidegger writes in a thousand turgid pages less content than Euro-Americans write in a 120-character text message 🌳⚡🍄🐍✝

Real Philosophy is dirt-simple.

Complexity of expression indicates fake posturing pseudo-Philosophy.

_______________________
UNIVERSAL INNATE NATURE OF RELIGION

The mind has innate ability to deeply revise the mental model of control and time in visionary state, = origin of religion.

World religious mythology is evidence that all minds transform the same way in the altered state; gnosis or esoteric revelation applies universally.

The loose cognitive association state, from the Eucharist’s Holy Spirit, is the visionary state, to regenerate and purify.

_______________________
AUTHENTIC EUCHARIST

🍄 Eucharist flesh of Christ, vehicle of the Holy Spirit to regenerate the mental model of moral agency.

Exoteric Catholics don’t have the authentic effective Eucharist, to change the mind.

Agape Meal = Eucharist = love for God = sacred meal inducing altered-state Holy Spirit in Mystery Religion.

_______________________
SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENTS

The greatest Science achievement is internal, about cognition: decoding mythemes as analogy describing altered-state no-free-will experience & mental model of time and control. 

We went beyond the sphere of the fixed stars.

The greatest Science achievement is internal, about cognition. 

The greatest Science achievement is decoding mythemes as analogy that describes altered-state no-free-will experience & transforming the mental model of time and control.

_______________________
SACRIFICE

The authentic sacrifice is of one’s freewill mental model in the mystic state, which deeply changes moral agency.

Literalist sacrifice is misguided and ineffective.

_______________________
SERPENT/SNAKE

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated preexisting control-thoughts revealed by the Mystery Religion sacred meal = the Wisdom tradition = the treasure/pearl guarded by the dragon or serpent, won by the hero, with divine help.

The snake frozen in rock is like the block universe worldline of fated preexisting control-thoughts.

The pre-existence of control-thoughts is revealed by the Mystery Religion sacred meal.

The Wisdom tradition = the treasure or pearl guarded by the dragon or serpent.

The treasure of gnosis is obtained from the dragon, won by the hero and reconciled, with divine help.

Don’t disparage the snake 🐍🐉, the shape of peak wisdom.

Experiential revelation of worldline of preset control-thoughts frozen into the block universe.

The snake mytheme is bi-valent; positive valued and negative valued.

Highest gnosis is seeing the block-universe snake-shaped preset worldline of your preexisting control-thoughts.

🐍 = wisdom, gnosis, regeneration

Mythemes: dragon 🐉 guards the treasure of gnosis, Transcendent Knowledge.

The dragon is the snake monster to reconcile with, frozen block-universe preset path of your life.

Jesus said as a sign, he must be lifted up like Moses’ brass snake on a pole.

The snake is the #1 mytheme, because it describes the pre-set path of control-thoughts frozen into the block universe, experienced in the Holy Spirit.

The Vatican building represents the snake.

Looking at Moses’ rigid brass snake on a pole (a de-branched tree) heals “fatal snake bite”.

Serpent/ snake/ 🐉 dragon monster guards treasure of Transcendent Knowledge, of no-free-will.

🐍 = the block universe worldline of fated pre-existing control-thoughts revealed by Mystery Religion sacred meal = Wisdom tradition = treasure/pearl guarded by dragon/serpent, won by hero with divine help.

_______________________
KING

Jesus on the cross is a king, thus is an instance of the widespread mytheme of {king hung fastened helplessly on a tree}.

Lots of Hellenistic-type mythemes in Christ’s Passion story: mocking the king and Mystery Religion initiates (impotence of freewill agency), king hung helpless in branching tree, reborn from rock cave.

There are many Hellenistic-type mythemes in Christ’s Passion story.

Mocking the king and the Mystery Religion initiates means pointing out the impotence of freewill agency.

The king is hung and fastened helpless like a rigid snake in the branching tree, then is reborn from the rock cave.

Personal king-like control-power evaporates upon perceiving the pre-existing path of your control-thoughts frozen into the spacetime block.

_______________________
SHOCKING THEORIES

Heresy theories:
The swoon theory
The Christ Myth theory
No-free-will revelation
Chronology revision
🍄 the source of religion

_______________________
TWO TYPES OF CHRISTIANITY

Literalist religion is popular; metaphorical mystic-state religion is less common; primitive cultures sit halfway between.

Most religionists and atheists sound like a fool when characterizing religion.

More awareness of esotericism is needed, including Western Esotericism.

Restorationist Esoteric Christianity

The true church is esoteric Christians regenerated by the Holy Spirit from the real presence in the god’s sacred meal, the Eucharist.

Esoteric religion contradicts exoteric, they are somehow “compatible”.

There are two meanings of “heaven” & “hell”.

Esoteric Christians love literalist immature outsider exoteric Christians.

Christianity is Hellenistic mystery religion expressed with Jewish elements.

Lower-level religion is moral conduct of life. 

Higher religion is altered-state (Holy Spirit) revision of the mental model of moral control agency.

_______________________
ACCELERATIONIST CHRISTIANITY

The Bible plan: Christians put Antichrist on the throne in the temple and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing of sin.

Christians must help put Antichrist on the throne in the temple that God tore down twice, and resume animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

Christian accelerationism: Christians must help put Antichrist on the throne in rebuilt temple and restore animal sacrifice for cleansing sin.

The actual, specific sacrifice is repudiating relying on the “branching open-future” model of time and control.

Animal sacrifice is an ineffective religion of literalism that cannot cancel moral culpability and deeply transform the mind like the altered-state experience of timeless no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

Animal sacrifice is an ineffective religion of literalism.

Sacrifice the “branching open-future” model of time and control.

Experiencing block-universe no-free-will cancels moral culpability and deeply transforms the mind.

Experiencing timeless frozen pre-existing control-thoughts cancels and transforms moral agency.

The mind is deeply transformed by the altered-state experience of timeless no-free-will with pre-existing control-thoughts.

_______________________
CONFLATION OF ‘UNITY’ WITH LACK OF DIFFERENTIATION

We are all united by Christ, but that doesn’t mean we are undifferentiated; that would be insanity and mental regression in Ken Wilber’s sense.

Christ is lord over all, but that doesn’t mean dissolving all boundaries into an undifferentiated mass.

The Bible doesn’t assert insanity like “never judge, don’t make any distinctions, male is literally the same as female, we are an undifferentiated mass”.

Insanity is dissolving into chaos all boundaries and distinctions. 

Ken Wilber’s concept of the pre/trans fallacy, don’t conflate transcending mental structures, with the failure and chaotic dis-integration and breakdown of mental structures.

_______________________
REINCARNATION MYTHEME

“Reincarnation” is an analogy describing altered-state experiencing: forgetting the temporary vision of the higher model of control & time.

_______________________
ANDRO-GYNE

Mithras, Christ, and Dionysus were given male and female traits, per common mythemes.

Traditional culture includes Herme-Aphrodite in myth; andro-gyne: for example, Dionysus had female traits.

In ancient Athens, men played the women’s roles in plays.

Greeks culture many surprises.  Men played the women roles in plays.  Religious experience via rounds of mushroom wine (wide tradition of sacred meals), andro-gyne Dionysus.

Compact, plain-language summaries
September 1, 2019, 9:02 p.m.

Probably reorg’d and cleaned up vs. the prev post.

Compact, plain-language summaries

___________________________________
GNOSIS

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of block-universe no-free-will with preexisting control-thoughts ☸🤔, reconciled with the creator of all thoughts.

Snake or dragon = gnosis wisdom = experiencing block-universe no-free-will in Holy Spirit state from Eucharist, frozen worldline of pre-existing control-thoughts ☸🤔.

Enlightenment 🔥🔦 = 🍄 experiencing pre-existing control-thoughts frozen in a snake-shaped worldline embedded in the block universe.

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of block-universe no-free-will and reconciling with pre-existing control-thoughts ☸🤔.

Gnosis is the altered-state experience of no-free-will, changing the mental model 🤔 of control and time ⏳🕰, learning to trust the hidden source of control-thoughts.

Metaphysical enlightenment 🔥🔦 is reflected in world religious mythology, including Western Esotericism.

__________________________________
NO-FREE-WILL

We already travelled *beyond* the stars, per Ptolemaic Astral Ascent Mysticism – an advanced level is “penetrating the sphere of Saturn and the fixed stars” into the higher heavens.

Moral culpability reverts to the Creator; no-free-will cancels culpability.

The first Church Fathers & mid-period Augustine assert freewill, but late Augustine asserts no-free-will. 

Atheism (such as Sam Harris), Stoicism, Gnosticism, and Calvinism assert no-free-will.

The key issue and the center of theology is no-free-will, and ways to combine moral culpability with no-free-will.

People severely object to no-free-will, because no-free-will completely kills ego and moral agency culpability, and renders Heaven and Hell for moral reward and punishment inapplicable.

In the ordinary state, is experienced free will; in the altered state, is experienced no-free-will.

It makes sense that freewill is the central focus of theology and religion and mystic-state experiencing, and mental transformation.

The fact of severe objections to no-free-will confirms how totally central, relevant, and potent the no-free-will experience and proposition is.

No-free-will completely undermines the assumption of self-determination and moral culpability.

The best type of Compatibilism is experiential, phenomenological, cognitive psychology: the ordinary state gives the experience of freewill, and the altered state gives the experience of no-free-will.

Freewill arguments are convincing only to people who believe in free will.

Freewill justifications are unconvincing to people who believe no-free-will.

The no-free-will position takes into account rationality and interpersonal emotions.

The no-free-will position explains how moral culpability can be done away with, as in, believing in “the king 👑 fastened helplessly to the 🌳” clears moral sin.

“Objection: If there is no-free-will, our moral culpability is done away with, and that’s bad.” Yet “Believing in Jesus clears our sin, and that’s good.”

Freewill arguments are completely weak and ineffectual.

___________________________________
MORAL AGENCY BUT NOT EGO?

Spiritualists advocate no-ego.

No-free-will is total negation of ego power. 

Spiritualists reject no-free-will, to preserve moral culpability = ego.

___________________________________
HEAVEN & HELL

Hell describes trying in vain to rely on freewill power while in the mystic state of experiencing no-free-will.

Hell is the bedeviled personal control system.

In hyper-Calvinism, everything is God’s fault; the future exists and is closed, including future control-thoughts, and Heaven and Hell are analogies for transformative experience.

Heaven and Hell are mythic analogies describing the futile attempt to retain control using the presumed freewill basis of control.

__________________________________
2-LEVEL RELIGION

{little children 👶} means exoteric religionists.  Awakened esotericists should not be a stumbling block to exoteric religionists.

The “chosen race” means the set of individuals predestined to receive the 🍄 sacred meal and experience no-free-will and mentally shift moral culpability to the hidden source of thoughts, the Creator.

Winnowing the wheat from the chaff is key to reading nonfiction books, and how to approach everything: movies, Rock, Art, Comics, Religion, mysticism/esotericism, etc.

Pray for us on Sunday mornings to rightly divide the scriptures, when in church.  Spiritual network of saints.

Don’t blanket-demonize Rock, Christianity, Paganism, movies, art, comics, or videogames — reject the harmful version and develop the healthy version of any part of culture.

___________________________________
MYTH AS ANALOGY

Mythemes are shared across religions including Persian, Jewish, Greek, Christian, Roman, & Pagan.

To the esotericist, there’s less substantial differences between brands of religion.

Myth explanation must include the altered state.

Theories of religious mythology are weak because they fail to account for intense altered-state experiencing; they don’t engage with the subject matter.

Paul’s Christ was a spiritual figure; early Christians before the biographical Gospels were written didn’t need a historical Jesus.

Mythology is analogy describing intense mystic altered state, such as the Holy Spirit from the 🍄sacred meal Eucharist.

Bunk theories of myth assume the ordinary state, so fail to engage religious experience.

Bunk reductionist theories fail to explain intense experience.

In the Bible, an encounter with an angel 👼 causes numinous ⚡ terror 😱 and awe and fear, falling down trembling in terror.

Religious myth describes metaphysical enlightenment 🔥🔦 from the altered-state experience of no-free-will.

Myth is analogy describing ingesting visionary plants, the sacred meal 🍄, causing the altered state of loose cognitive association.

Myth is analogy describing ingesting the sacred meal 🍄 and experiencing frozen-time ❄⏳🕰 non-control, receiving control-thoughts from an uncontrollable source.

Mythemes describe mental transformation about time ⏳🕰 & control in the altered state.

___________________________________
SACRED MEAL

Psil 🍄is most traditional & representative of Western Esotericism.

🍄 are shown heavily throughout Christian art, proving that they were *not* restricted only to greeks, but have been a major Western religious tradition.

The altered state is the Holy Spirit from ingesting the Eucharist.

The sacred meal 🍄 gives the experience of block-universe worldline, described like a rock containing a snake 🐍.

Unforgivable sin, don’t blaspheme the 🍄Holy Spirit.

The flesh of Christ 🍄 sacred meal Eucharist gives Holy Spirit altered state, experience of no-free-will frozen in rock.

The sacred meal 🍄 induces Holy Spirit altered state, experience no-free-will, mind is reformed to trust hidden source of control-thoughts.

The ancient 🍄 sacred meal tradition was ubiquitous and standard.

___________________________
ART

Art and myth describe the peak altered-state experiencing of no-free-will.

Integrate Dionysus, music, higher consciousness in a well-formed version.

Authentic traditional high art describes the peak mystic state of consciousness, per Alex Grey but add mythemes.

Art expresses & conveys full 2-level religion & Philosophy.

For any book, such as The Mystery of the Cathedrals: and the Esoteric Interpretation of the Hermetic Symbols of the Great Work (1926): check for mystic state giving experience of no-free-will/ non-control.

___________________________
MENTAL MODEL TRANSFORMATION

The word ‘death’ has two important meanings: the mystic-state death experience in initiation, & literal physical death.

Youths have an innate initiation drive, for death, transformation, & rebirth.

Being an adult is equated with being initiated in Mystery Religion, which means ingesting the sacred meal and experiencing the intense mind-changing altered state.

The mind has an innate hunger for mental transformation, thus the initiation tradition.

The intense mystic altered state changes the mental model 🤔 of control and time 🕰.

Instead of depending on the presumed freewill basis of personal control power, the mind consciously depends on and trusts in the hidden source of control-thoughts.

The initial model of control ☸ is sacrificed like a childish 👶 or animal-like 👹 way of thinking.

The control model changes from a king 👑 steering ☸ in a branching possibility 🌳 into an open future, to a 🐍 frozen in rock.

The new mental model is born from the block-universe rock, and the mind is released from the experience of no-free-will.

In the ordinary state, the freewill experience and mental model returns.

After the altered state, the freewill model is qualified and supplemented by the no-free-will model, with trust in the revealed hidden source of thoughts 🤔, the Creator of the block universe.

The altered state gives the experience of the block universe with embedded, preexisting, 🐍-shaped worldline of your control-thoughts ☸🤔.

___________________________________
SNAKE, DRAGON

Apollo sh*t arrows at the dragon, was victorious, earned the laurel wreath victory crown: analogies for transcending the lower, freewill-based mental model of self, control agency, & time 🕰.

Poisonous snake 🐍: Jesus said a sign is, he must be lifted up like Moses’ rigid brass serpent on a pole for healing fatal snake-bite.

The dragon is the most powerful esoteric mytheme; a snake monster 🐉 guarding treasure of higher revealed wisdom, of the worldline of control-thoughts frozen into the block universe.

In altered-state analogy, the snake 🐍 is neutrally your pre-existing fixed worldline of control-thoughts frozen into the block universe.

The dragon 🐉 is the fearsome, dreaded, monstrous ramifications of the no-free-will, 🐍snake-shaped worldline, having no control over what control-thoughts are about to be forced into the mind in the next few minutes.

The dragon 🐉 is the threatening aspect of the snake 🐍, that demands sacrificing the presumed freewill basis of personal control-power.

The transformed mind is reconciled with the serpent monster 🐉 that guards the treasure of gnosis.

#1 mytheme: 🐉 dragon (snake monster) guards the treasure of gnosis wisdom.

The serpent monster, the dragon 🐉, is the perceiving of the frozen pre-existing worldline of your control-thoughts.

The dragon 🐉 (block-universe worldline) guards the treasure of this metaphysical enlightenment 🔥🔦, and causes sacrifice of the childish 👶 king-like 👑 idea of personal control.

{tree 🌳 vs. snake 🐍} means Possibilism vs. Eternalism — the two models of control & time 🕰, per the two states of consciousness.

__________________________________
KING ON CROSS ✝

The cross ✝ is a sign, a king 👑 fastened to the tree 🌳 is like a snake 🐍 frozen in rock, and like a brass snake 🐍 on a pole made by de-branching a tree 🌳.

Mythology decoding: Jesus is a dying sacrificed king 👑 fastened to a tree 🌳 (and then born from a rock).

The Jesus figure is analogy describing altered-state experience of no-free-will, new mental model of control and time 🕰, made to put trust in the hidden source of control-thoughts.

The altered-state experience of being a king 👑 fastened helpless in a tree 🌳.

The cross ✝ means a king 👑 drinking sacred wine 🍄 fastened helplessly to a branching 🌳.

King hung from a tree 🌳, experiencing block-universe no-free-will.

Lifted up like Moses’ brass 🐍 (worldline) on a pole (a de-branched 🌳).

__________________________________
MALE & FEMALE

In Mithraism, soldiers at one initiation level wore a bridal dress and married Mithras.

Mythemes include male thought-source, female thought-receiver, herme-aphrodite, andro-gyne. Dionysus and Mithras have female traits.

__________________________________
UNITY AND BOUNDARIES

Don’t conflate Jesus’ universal salvation with dissolving all distinctions; losing differentiation, distinctions, and boundaries is insanity.

__________________________________
TIME 🕰; FUTURE EXISTS

The future already exists, as the Creator made it.

We discover what the timeline is, including each person’s frozen pre-existing worldline 🐍.

___________________________
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION

The scientific style of explicit explanation enables summarizing and communicating metaphysical enlightenment 🔥🔦 better than was done before the late-modern era.

Scientific explanation is now possible, clearly and simply explaining the numinous 😱 intense experience described by religious myth.

__________________________________
ATHEISM

The Atheism vs. Christianity debate is worthless, irrelevant, off-base fixation on Epistemology, but religion comes from altered-state cognitive *Phenomenology*.

Richard Carrier disproved historical Jesus, but then he combined politics with Atheism, causing everyone to disavow Atheism and run away.  Atheism fell of a cliff a few years ago.

Thread:
Sea serpent, nautical mythemes

Oct. 19, 2019 10:05 pm

Sea serpent, nautical mythemes

o Jonah’s shade-plant is a vine, isomorphic with the ketos (sea serpent).

o Andromeda, princess to be sacrificed to ketos/ sea serpent/ dragon, is *chained* to a *rock*.

o ‘ketos’ means sea serpent, not “whale”.

Click the search-links below; too many interesting ancient artworks to link to.

_________________________________

My previous posts about ketos, Jonah, hippocamp, sea mythology:

“Jonah’s prayer”:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/7161

“Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism”:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/9678

“Mytheme: Chariot steersman”:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/5469

_________________________________

Vocabulary mythology challenge:
Poseidon
Neptune
Amphitrite
sea thiasos
Andromeda
Triton
Nereids
ketos
hippocamp
sirens

Sea thiasos – Nereid on a hippocamp, bringing a present

Sea thiasos for the wedding of Poseidon and Amphitrite, 2nd half of the 2nd century BC. Detail: Nereid on a hippocampus, bringing a present; Erotes (front panel).

Sea thiasos – Nereid on a hippocampus, bringing a present
https://www.flickr.com/photos/28433765@N07/6282975858
Sea thiasos [procession] for the wedding of Poseidon and Amphitrite
2nd half of the 2nd century B.C.
with Erotes
“Altar of Domitius Ahenobarbus” or “Statue Base of Marcus Antonius”, (relief frieze). [= sculpted of rock; depicts snake frozen into block universe]

_____________________

Decoding “Jonah and the Whale and the shade-Gourd”

Riddle:
How is a Whale and a Gourd isomorphic?
How are they isomorphic with the frozen block-universe worldline

Illustration (containing hints on both sides of the question) https://www.flickr.com/photos/profzucker/31527615296

It’s a double trick question.  Not-whale ~= not-gourd.  A specific thing that’s not a whale, has the same shape as a specific thing that’s not a gourd.

Solution:
“whale” is a mis-translation of sea *serpent*.
Gourd is the produce of a *vine* plant.
sea serpent is isomorphic with vine.  Q.E.D.

serpent and vine are non-branching — vine is primarily non-branching, like worldline or worm theory, in block universe spacetime physics.  https://www.google.com/search?q=“worldline”+”worm+theory”+”block+universe”

Ketos and Jonah (in Endymion pose) with a ketos (sea monster) below an arbor
https://www.flickr.com/photos/profzucker/31527615296
[arbor = “a shady garden alcove with sides and a roof formed by trees or climbing plants [vines] trained over a wooden framework”]
Santa Maria Antiqua Sarcophgus [rock coffin]
275 A.D.
white veined marble

A gourd is the produce of a vine.  snake gourd: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichosanthes_cucumerina

worldline = in the loose cognitive association state, experiencing & perceiving the givenness, presetness, uncontrollability, unavoidability of your near-future control-thoughts.

Jonah’s shade-plant is a gourd vine (snake-shaped worldline frozen in block universe). Not a grape vine.  Not an ivy vine. 
The important thing isn’t grapes or gourd, nor psychoactive effect per Ruck’s speculation, but rather, *vine* — snake shaped — which is to say, *worldline-shaped*.
https://google.com/search?q=jonah+vine&tbm=isch

gourd:
o  A fleshy, typically large fruit with a hard skin, some varieties of which are edible. 
o  A climbing or trailing plant which bears gourds.
o  “Out of one’s gourd” — out of one’s mind; crazy.
From Oxford dictionary UI at https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/gourd

gourd:
Tendril-bearing vines including the cucumber, melon, squash, and pumpkin.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gourd

________________________

Wedding sea-processions:
https://google.com/search?q=sea+thiasos&tbm=isch

What is the name of the billowing cloth behind the head, indicating loosecog/ pneumos/ holy spirit?

Andromeda is chained to a rock.  A chain gives limited freedom, like the freewill experience in the ordinary state (tight cognitive association binding).

Female = passive.  Don’t think she is steering controlling commanding the serpent.  Rather she is being carried by the sea serpent/ ketos or hippocamp. 

Andromeda is princess to be sacrificed to the sea-serpent, chained to a rock, sometimes shown with one foot standing on the rock as foundation. 

Rescued, by a sacred power outside of her power, Perseus riding Pegasus – flying horse, carrying head of Medusa with snakes. 

Perseus shows Medusa attractive snake hair head to kill the marriage rival, Andromeda’s uncle, who is a ruler — the brother of the king. 

{Chained to the rock}, helpless female young ruler (of initiation age, ready to marry and be initated, “abducted”, sacrificed. 

Dragon monster demands sacrifice of initial mental worldmodel of self, control, time, and possibility.

Andromeda has a story conjunction with Medusa snake head that turns rulers into helpless rock statues; apply same family of myth-decodings. 

The dragon monster demanding sacrifice of Andromeda is a ketos; a sea serpent monster.

Triton is human torso/head, snake body. sometimes split into two legs/snakes, variant from the main idea of snake below, human torso and head above.

Nereid with Hippokamp and two dolphins
https://www.akg-images.co.uk/archive/-2UMDHU3UA26I.html
Roman mosaic 3rd Century.
dolphins = theme of ‘rescue’
billowing cloth = ASC

Nereid on Ketos
https://www.art.com/products/p14187211-sa-i2935920/roman-nereid-on-ketos-from-the-lid-of-a-pyxis-found-at-canosa-di-puglia-c-130-bc.htm?upi=P5426F0
130 B.C.
from the Lid of a Pyxis

Sea monster Ketos (Cetus)
https://www.ancient.eu/image/3363/sea-monster-ketos-cetus/
compare head to horse (as in hippocamp)
compare front fins to horse front legs (as in hippocamp)
“Monsters. Fantastic Creatures of Fear and Myth” exhibition

Heracles fighting the Ketos
https://www.flickr.com/photos/28433765@N07/3411670893
Caeretan black-figure clay vase from Stavros S. Niarchos collection Athens.

Nov 28, 2019 2:17pm

The story of Jonah and the “Whale” (sea serpent) includes the following worldline-shaped elements:

o  ketos (sea serpent)

o  seaweed wraps around his head in one translation of the prayer inside the sea serpent

o  gourd (vine plant like pumpkin)

o  worm eats gourd shade-plant

Nov 30 2019 1:59 am

With the Yahoo Groups website UI going away, with the Egodeath Yahoo Group moving to email-only, it might be nice to temporarily open up the Egodeath Yahoo Group for other people to post.  This could help keep the “community” intact while the platform changes.  
The factors have changed, factors which led to only permitting the Admin (me) to post. 

I haven’t decided which email address and email software or interface to use.  I’m uncertain whether this Yahoo Email web-based UI will remain.  Time will tell.

I want to gather and post another batch of short-form summary posts.  

The substance of the Egodeath theory is done; the period of Revolutionary Science is past, and I’m entering into the period of Normal Science.  (Per Thomas Kuhn’s theory in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.) [yeah but I hadn’t solved the the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image with the trained, self-threatening Psalter reader. – mh dec 30 2020]

The Egodeath Yahoo Group Web UI, I used from 2008-2019.  

Around 2014 I had a major breakthrough and completed the substance of the Theory (mostly re: analogy, also some influence on strengthening the Core Theory).  

2018-2019, I worked on plain-language short-form summaries of the Egodeath theory.  

As the Yahoo Groups web-based UI ends, I have finished the substance of the Egodeath theory, and the ways of expressing the Egodeath theory.

Private Email Sent Nov 30 2019 207pm

typically i sent such to the Egodeath Yahoo Group too.

Per Thomas Kuhn’s famous theory of science progress:
There is a short period of “revolutionary science” where a new paradigm framework with better potential is introduced.  A new skeleton.

Followed by a long period of “normal science” where the new paradigm framework is filled-in, or fleshed-out, with details.

I hold that the whole idea of revolutionary breakthrough comes from the mystic-state experience in which the mental model transforms.  The Egodeath theory is a modern systematization of that key original “paradigm shift”. 


Kuhn generalizes how a revolutionary paradigm shift works – but the original master version of “paradigm shift” is the cognitive change during the Holy Spirit experience, which is systematized in the Egodeath theory.

Private email sent Nov 30 224pm

The original paradigmatic instance and master model of “paradigm shifts” is, altered-state mind transformation induced by ingesting the sacred meal.

The best instance and paradigmatic model of “scientific explanation” is the Egodeath theory, which clearly and directly explains the master paradigmatic instance of “paradigm shifts”, that is, altered-state mind transformation.  And also decodes and maps analogies from religious mythology to this direct explanation.

w wrote: dec 14 2019 9:36 am

The Caduceus, the Staff of Asclepius and Serpents
https://misfitsandheroes.wordpress.com/2016/06/06/the-caduceus-the-staff-of-asclepius-and-other-serpents/ 

“The pictures are great and show the serpent in different mythological cultures in addition to Greek, such as the Chinese, Egyptian, North African, india’s Kundalini yoga and pre-Christian Ireland. 

It would be better for the doubting Thomases to look into historical evidence such as this, rather than reading such things as athiest author’s writings to understand the Egodeath Theory.   

 The author does mention in a few spots some mis-understanding ( in my opinion) about the two historical Caduceus’, one being the twin snakes moving up the staff toward the wings of Hermes and the other with Asclepius, one snake on the staff. 

The author states that the staff or rod with one snake may have been a better choice to represent medicine because Asclepius was a more righteous character than Hermes. 

Hermes, he mentions, has a “mixed reputation being a messenger of the gods, guide of the dead, and protector of merchants, shepherds, athletes, liars and thieves.” 

 The author forgets or doesn’t realize the true meaning of the Caduceus, and doesn’t see that the Jesus figure was on the cross next to thieves and  embraced them by saying,  ‘I say to you today, you will be in paradise  with me.”   

The author also states that yin and yang, female and male, is an “older and far more universal concept than the Greek God Hermes.”

The problem with some authors is that they take a snippet, a concept, and separate it from the whole of religious mythology, which has been a major cause of religious division. 

 Hermes is carried through time and boundaries as the mythology lives on within the Caduceus.  The ‘healing’  within the  message of the Caduceus as told in the Egodeath theory regarding ‘madness’  is inclusive of yin and yang, not separate from it.

[person’s] Caduceus was that of twin snakes with the wings of Hermes.  

My Reply Feb 3 2020 8:16pm

I likely read that article among others, and it may have been the best, or one of the best. 

I have a bunch of little points to make even if they repeat what I posted. 

Greek evidence clearly shows that it’s a debranched tree or debranched branch (staff of A.). 

Hope you caught my post a couple months ago about the Cup of Hygeia – which appears in my main article, as a snake drinking from chalice.  todo: try to find that post and copy to WordPress.

I don’t have a satisfying decoding of Hermes’ twin serpents. They are male and female.  [lol – i re-figured it out late 2020, then found my dec 2 2013 vid lecture explained it. two worldlines: that of the control-thought inserter/injector, the control-thought receiver/receptacle. ]

I have a great, fully satisfying decoding of snake around debranched tree, which connects directly to how the snake on Eden tree is normally depicted: wound around trunk, the snake head is right at where the tree branching starts (top of trunk). 

tree vs snake *contrast* (= Possibilism vs. Eternalism, to use two technical terms).

People use the epithet “snake” to disparage a bad person.  I then counter that; I explain the positive meaning, the good reason why the shape of the snake is like gnosis, enlightenment.

w wrote Oct 13 2020

I listened a bit to that author Brian Muraresku  being interviewed by a Simon Drew. 

The author ends the interview by saying there is no before and there is no after.

To be here now is the key to immortality.

It’s a New Age sweep by a snake charmer attempting to control psychedelics.

my reply dec 30 2020

Any time a spiritual salesman starts sentence w/ “There is no….”, hold onto wallet.

  • There is no time
  • There is no self
  • There is no ego
  • There is no control
  • There is no doer

yeah, thanks for your: 
“There is no insight”. 

And I have a message for you:

There is no money

Oct 30 2019 10:39 am
subject: Re: email vs. Yahoo Web UI

Yahoo is cancelling all Yahoo Groups.  This email address will become inoperable Dec. 10, 2020.

See my recent blog posts at WordPress: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/

At some point I’ll update the website, egodeath.com –  Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics
Ego Death and Self-Control Cyberneticscontemporary metaphysics, self-control cybernetics, ego death, Eleusinian mysteries, fatalism, mental models, vi…

Oct 30 2019 10:43 am
Sub: All Yahoo Groups cancelled Dec. 10, 2020

[Dec 15th actually]

Yahoo is cancelling all Yahoo Groups.  This email address will become inoperable Dec. 10, 2020.

See my recent blog posts at WordPress: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/

You can post replies there; it’s a good layout that elevates my posts over the replies instead of jumbling them together.

At some point I’d like to update the website to add 2008(?)-2020 Yahoo Groups post.  egodeath.com –  Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics

Love to you all and thank you Yahoo!!! 

The Egodeath Yahoo Group worked well since 2001.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com

Farewell Yahoo Groups, thx for following, see you on the Web
oct 30 2019 1044am

Farewell Yahoo Groups, thx for following, see you on the Web
Yahoo is cancelling all Yahoo Groups.  This email address will become inoperable Dec. 10, 2020.
See my recent blog posts at WordPress: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/
You can post replies there; it’s a good layout that elevates my posts over the replies instead of jumbling them together.
At some point I’d like to update the website to add 2008(?)-2020 Yahoo Groups post.  egodeath.com –  Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics
Love to you all and thank you Yahoo!!!  The Egodeath Yahoo Group worked well since 2001.
— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com

dup repost?
Farewell Yahoo Groups, thx for following, see you on the Web
10:53 am – adds Triumph mosaic

Farewell Yahoo Groups, thx for following, see you on the Web

Yahoo is cancelling all Yahoo Groups.  This email address will become inoperable Dec. 10, 2020.

See my recent blog posts at WordPress: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/
You can post replies there; it’s a good layout that elevates my posts over the replies instead of jumbling them together.

At some point I’d like to update the website to add Yahoo Groups posts from Feb. 14, 2004 – Oct. 2020.  Website: http://egodeath.com –  Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics

The Egodeath Yahoo Group worked well since 2001.

Thank you for those who contributed posts with valuable content eg. the awesome Dionysus Procession with mushroom tigers at the end of the Egodeath article.

Love to you all and thank you Yahoo!!!  
— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com

oct 30 2019 1057 am

Caption: 

Dionysus rides with the abducted and married soul, Ariadne, in Dionysus’ victory procession, in a chariot drawn by four mushroom-tigers.

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Section: The Sacred Marriage
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm#_Toc177337640

1:07 pm

I don’t have any ideas for email forum, but WordPress comments at bottom of a weblog post seem good. 

I don’t think you have to be a WordPress member/account.  

Cyberdisciple’s WordPress is cross-linked.  
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/

Be sure to see all the latest YT content:

Max YT ch 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwJ_O4EgF61AuLRuoI0S4qw

Cyb YT ch
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVrwl3M_yZw9p3V4B2km23A

Dec 1 2020 – snapshot of new WordPress Site Map page

Last I heard, end-of-life for Yahoo Groups is December 15, 2020.

New articles – book review (abstractly) of Way of Zen.
New nav page (site map).
New Nav bar.
Mytheme List + Dictionary of Egodeath/Altered State phenomena, cross-linking the entries now.

Max provided Yahoo Group postings as a set of long HTML files, ready-to-upload eg to Egodeath.com, in numerical order, which is pretty good.

Site Map

Contents
Flagship Articles
Key Reference Pages
Good Pages
Idea Development pages
Particular Mythemes
Books, Articles, Videos, & Comics
New Old Religion
Utility pages
Scientific Theory Methodology

Flagship Articles

Table of contents, bibliography & see also; publishable quality.

Key Reference Pages
Good Pages

Wikipedia-like, but not publishable quality.

Idea Development pages

Realtime latest breakthroughs and thinking. Messy by design.

Particular Mythemes

Each page focused on elaborating connections around a particular mytheme.

Books, Articles, Videos, & Comics
New Old Religion
Utility pages
Scientific Theory Methodology

Dec 13 2020 629pm –

HO-HO-HOLY SPIRIT!  

🎄🍄🦌🦌🦌🦌🛷🎅🎁

IF YOU ARE GOOD, THE NATIVE CHRISTMAS SHAMANS WILL INITIATE YOU IN THE SACRED MEAL THAT WAS USED IN ALL THE HELLENISTIC MYSTERY RELIGIONS (SECRET AMANITA CULTS)

“They also drank wine at these Mithraeum communion banquets, and the wine was laced with Amanita muscaria mushrooms, which were intended to produce a kind of out-of-body experience.” 2:20
Video:
Mithraism with Jason Reza Jorjani
YT ch: New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove
OF COURSE HE CHOOSES THE MALFORMED STATUE WHERE MITHRAS FAILS TO REMEMBER TO TURN, CONVERT, AND LOOK BACK BEHIND HIM TO THE RIGHT, TO PERCEIVE SOL, THE MIND’S UNCONTROLLABLE SOURCE OF CONTROL-THOUGHTS
Mithraism with Jason Reza Jorjani
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIQ0i_1eoJ8&t=135s

RECENT POSTS

(etc.)

w wrote:

So glad the Egodeath Theory is thriving in it’s new home and that you’ve been able to reach your followers before Yahoo Groups is completely gone. 

You’re helping so many people.  Truly a blessing!

Dec 15 2020
Re: Announcement: End of Yahoo Groups

wrmspirit wrote:

Rest in peace Yahoo Groups. 

You worked so hard. 

You can rest now.  Please know that you are loved for all the many gifts that came through you.  

So Close your eyes and go to sleep.. and .. love will lead the way…

Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 160: 2016-07-31

Site Map


Group: egodeath Message: 8427 From: egodeath Date: 31/07/2016
Subject: Re: test: post dammit
Group: egodeath Message: 8429 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Against Drug Policy Reform
Group: egodeath Message: 8431 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8433 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: DON’T REVEAL LONG HISTORY OF PSILOCYBIN!
Group: egodeath Message: 8434 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: DON’T REVEAL LONG HISTORY OF PSILOCYBIN!
Group: egodeath Message: 8435 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8436 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 8437 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8438 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8439 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8441 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8445 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8446 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Repeal Prohibition for the Environment
Group: egodeath Message: 8447 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8449 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8451 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: First public legal Ayahuasca church in the U.S.
Group: egodeath Message: 8452 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8453 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8454 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8457 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8459 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8460 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Repealing Prohibition is the most important activism
Group: egodeath Message: 8461 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8462 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8464 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8467 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Group: egodeath Message: 8468 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8469 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Death penalty for 14 accused of providing drugs
Group: egodeath Message: 8470 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8472 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8474 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8475 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Death penalty for 14 accused of providing drugs
Group: egodeath Message: 8476 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Death penalty for trafficking in Evil, witches drugs
Group: egodeath Message: 8478 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8479 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8480 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8483 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Fashionable nonsense, pseudoscience gibberish
Group: egodeath Message: 8485 From: egodeath Date: 04/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8487 From: egodeath Date: 04/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8492 From: egodeath Date: 05/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8494 From: egodeath Date: 05/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8496 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Psychedelic reductionism to healing therapy
Group: egodeath Message: 8497 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Uniqueness of Maximal entheogen Eucharist view
Group: egodeath Message: 8498 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8500 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
Group: egodeath Message: 8502 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
Group: egodeath Message: 8504 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 8507 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 8511 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8513 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath



Group: egodeath Message: 8427 From: egodeath Date: 31/07/2016
Subject: Re: test: post dammit
In 12 hours I expect 6-8 exact-duplicate, redundant posts to appear in the Web interface of Yahoo Groups. Either a post appears instantly, or after a long random delay. I have to see posts immediately, to make sure at least one is actually visible immediately in the Web UI. I keep reposting until at least 1 copy makes it through Yahoo’s broken software.
Group: egodeath Message: 8429 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Against Drug Policy Reform
If you advocate “drug policy reform” in terms of proving that drugs are not as harmful as Prohibitionists say, you lose, because the “harm” issue was just a ploy and pretence, anyway.

Yes, you do have to demolish the “harm” claim to smithereens, but you must understand and recognize that that’s not actually the center of action, for “reform” — rather, for *REPEAL* of all drug Prohibition laws.

Government has no right to appoint itself authority over drug users or providers.

Government has zero authority regarding drugs, and any authority which government might have had prior to 1914, has been totally forfeited by the government because Prohibition by the government has been nothing but fraud, scam, corruption, and lies, through and through.

The government’s drug Prohibition has caused a million times more harm than drugs — not that the “harm” ploy, pretext, and excuse ever had anything to do with the real purpose and motivation of drug Prohibition.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8431 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
The Psychedelic Continuationist Christian movement

PSILOCYBIN EUCHARIST PSYCHOSIS STRIKES DOWN A THIRD OF PSYCHEDELIC CONTINUATIONIST CONGREGATIONS

We are the Psychedelic Continuationist movement.

Christianity has always been understood as mushroom Eucharist. We are not innovating, but amplifying the main Christian tradition, the mushroom Eucharist tradition.

Redosing with low-dose psilocybin capsules is ergonomic.

We acknowledge Amanita water into wine.

The Holy Spirit continued from Jesus forever, psilocybin Eucharist, and we continue and amplify that tradition.

Our missional outreach is to get Eastern religionists to authentically trip in their traditional psychedelic religion ways, not for them to innovate, nor to restore something as if it were missing, but to *continue* and amplify the ever-ruling, authoritative original source of Eastern religion, ever revolving around psychedelics.

Psychedelics is the ever-continuing fountainhead of Eastern religion. Psychedelics never went away from the core Eastern religion practice.

Psychedelics are present in every church in history, but 2016 Psychedelic Continuationism, the Psychedelic Continationist movement, is amplifying the never-missing tradition of psilocybin Eucharist, and drug-based meditation.

______________________

The History of Psychedelic New Age Materialistic Quantum Drug Reform Neurotherapy

Paradigms per Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, Episode 3:

Psychedelic New Age Spirituality
Psychedelic Neuroscience
…Materialism, Idealism, Representationalism
Psychedelic Therapy
Entheogen History
Drug Policy Reform

Some commentary on those:

o pop Entheogen History Scholarship

o Drug Policy Reform / Prohibition Repeal

How to destroy the “Harm” pretext of Prohibition.

Full Repeal of Drug Prohibition (with the government formally stating that the WoD was always a destructive, predatory Fraud under the pretext of “safety”.

Repeal of Prohibition VERSUS the paradigm of “Drug Policy Reform”

‘Drug Policy Reform’ refers to a kinder, gentler WoD using anti-terrorist miltary surplus, to protect people from harm. Serve and Protect for profit, against the enemy.


o Psychedelic New Age Spirituality

fractal energy vibrations
nondual unity oneness consciousness
vague folk tech for the shadow threat

o Psychedelic Neuroscience; Professor Nutt’s Psychedelic Quantum Neurophrenology

… o Materialism, Idealism, Representationalism

o Psychedelic Therapy, including Quantum Neurotherapy
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy&tbm=isch

I support businesses and people pursuing anything they want to explore and do together: therapy, counselling, quantum neuro therapy.

I am pro-spirituality, pro-business, pro-Woo, I totally support all vapid exotic otherworld quantum neurowoo, if that’s valued by people.

I support those who pursue and photograph unicorns farting rainbows.

The Egodeath theory is an independent foundation.

I’m not about tearing anyone down except the Prohibitionist puppets, rather, I’m making available the Egodeath theory.

I don’t have to do a scorched-earth approach. Low religion is low religion, but I leave it be, but make available high religion. Maybe I have to utterly demolish low religion to make high religion available.

My father’s income was from counselling.

Quantum Neurowoo can be a distraction or avoidance of what the Egodeath theory covers. Ancestors agree that developing the psychedelic potential of the mind is valuable and desirable.

Quantum Neurowoo distracts and derails from focusing on developing the traditional psychedelic potentials of the mind which inherently leads to Eternalism experiencing and noncontrol.

Planned or not by the Quantum Neurowoo scientists, the psychotomimetic state which our Christian ancestors revered as the Holy Spirit, leads to Eternalism experiential consciousness and a kind of noncontrol. It leads to psychedelic maturation.

We can talk in terms of “should we” mature, but in any case, the people who choose to explore Psychedelic Quantum Neurowoo are now bound to psychedelically mature following the Egodeath theory.

This loose cognitive state from the Christian psilocybin Eucharist tradition can lead to permanent insanity or spiritual regeneration, as God sees fit.

The Holy Bible claims that the mushroom Eucharist cures insanity, which would mean that the temporary psychotomimetic sacred state is resolved, and that egoic delusion is sacrificed, by ingesting Christ’s mushroom flesh.

Our Christian and Greek ancestors positively valued and desired the maturation of the mind by immersion in the mushroom fire, exploring the altered experiential sensation, for control-dynamics mental discipline and retraining; for converting the mind from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Also necessary is learning literacy of our Psychedelic World Religions 101 heritage of mythemes describing the drug-induced altered-state origin and content of high, esoteric, adult religion for fully initiated minds.

People before us valued this developmental potential of the mind. They thought it good and desirable to activate the mind’s innate ability to trip on Christ’s mushroom flesh and be converted to become a real, inner circle, grown-up Christian.

Our Christian ancestors did not think that the mind should remain undeveloped in its high potential. Leaving the mind undeveloped would require not using psychedelics. Analogy: castrating a boy, not permitting his body to develop into adult form.

To avoid developing this department of the mind, which our Christian ancestors valued, would be very like never using the sex organ, never being born again, never taking the traditional psilocybin Eucharist — pretty much unthinkable.

Why in God’s name would anyone not develop the mushroom receptors higher consciousness of the mind?

There is no reason to leave the mind psychedelically virgin and immature, in child form, not doing the normal transformation into butterfly, but staying in worm form.

Organisms that God gave developmental potential are supposed to develop, not remain undeveloped. The acorn is supposed to develop into an oak.

The childish way of thinking is supposed to be cured by the Holy Spirit through ingesting Christ’s mushroom flesh, to produce the presumably, universally agreed, adult and desirable, holy, blessed way of thinking, to relate to the Creator and know dependency of control on the pre-created preset worldline of thoughts frozen in the spacetime block.

It’s unnatural, to avoid the mushroom Eucharist, to avoid (what everone judges as) higher mental development.

We have a psychedelic mystical sex organ through which we can die and give birth to a new self-in-world model. Is it a good thing, ought we to use this mystical sex organ of climax and death and rebirth? Is it a positive thing, to have mystic experience, to see transcendent relationships?

Science values exploring, the human mind values exploring, and our ancestors valued religious conversion through the mushroom Eucharist, and valued Transcendent Knowledge.

I estimate that a third of the congregation will go insane, of course, from the traditional Christian mushroom psilocybin Eucharistic agape feast, but whatever, glory to God, and fully repeal drug Prohibition and throw the Prohibitionist con-men out, into the darkness outside.

The Bible says that eating Jesus’ flesh makes the insane demon leave the mind, not enter the mind. Accepting ingesting Christ *cures* insanity, not *causes* it, according to the Bible.

If God wants to give his mushroom Eucharist to his puppets and a third of us puppets go permanently insane from psilocybin psychosis, so be it, glory to God, even though psilocybin pschosis is even worse than a special disease that they have only in the UK, CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS; so now, the headline in the 2025 newspaper will read:

PSILOCYBIN EUCHARIST PSYCHOSIS STRIKES DOWN A THIRD OF PSYCHEDELIC CONTINUATIONIST CONGREGATIONS

Fully repeal drug Prohibition. Remove all laws against psilocybin Eucharist in all churches. The U.S. laws against mushrooms in Christian worship were valid and just during 1776-1913, and we will return to those laws.

The guards won’t let Prohibitionists through the gate into the mushroom-wine wedding banquet party at the end of time.

The mind has the innate potential to switch from an initial innate mental world model (Possibilism) to the subsequent innate mental world model that is veiled latent in the mind, the mind is designed to receive psychedelics which sacrifice the initial innate mental structuring — the mental model of self-in-world.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8433 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: DON’T REVEAL LONG HISTORY OF PSILOCYBIN!
If we legalize psychedelics, many people will be harmed and go insane. BRING IT ON! Throw out the Prohibitionist frauds, who want to shoot and rob and enslave people and remove their voting rights, not help them.

If you *really* give a sh*t about harm and safety, throw out the most destructive people in the world, drug Prohibitionists. Drug Prohibitionists cause a million times more harm than drugs.

Any amount of harms caused by drugs is a massive improvement over Prohibition. Drug Prohibition is harm maximization to the extreme.

If we legalize coca, many people will be harmed and go insane. BRING IT ON! Throw out the Prohibitionist frauds!

If we legalize opiates, many people will be harmed and go insane. BRING IT ON! Throw out the Prohibitionist frauds!

If we legalize cannabis, many people will be harmed and go insane in the UK, from the UK-only disease of CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS. BRING IT ON! Throw out the Prohibitionist frauds!

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8434 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: DON’T REVEAL LONG HISTORY OF PSILOCYBIN!
We shouldn’t teach Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism to 13-year-old people.

Interesting new answer for the question I’ve considered since 1988, “Who should I dedicate the Egodeath theory to?”

I dedicate the Egodeath theory to myself at age 13.

I am not teaching 13-year-olds Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism, other than — hypothetically, involving time travel — teaching it to myself at age 13.

I have a list of contenders for who I should dedicate the Egodeath theory to. It’s artificial dedicating it to any one person such as Satan or one of my mothers, or to the HEROES who are in jail, or dedicating my Theory to everyone who has sold or given away “illicit” psychoactive drugs.

Just as Christianity was dedicated to the most accursed person Rome could identify, I could dedicate the Egodeath theory to the most demonized people of all, “drug pushers” (as if Tobacco, Alcohol, and Pharma weren’t exactly that, drug pushers!).

Jesus hung out with drug pushers, heroin addicts, and even what some people say are the most vile, evil, destructive, lying, corrupt scum of all, drug Prohibitionists. Myself, I love drug Prohibitionists as I love all of God’s puppets.

In any case, it is interesting, the dynamics of writing the Egodeath theory for the audience of myself at age 13.

I work hard to make sure that my Theory is kept hidden from 13-year-old people, even though middle school is the age when exploration of psychoactives naturally occurs due to the drive to self-transcendence; the drive of the mind to switch from Literalist Ordinary-state Possibilism to Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism at age 13. At 5th grade, I was tested as 11th grade intelligence, so I don’t know how representative I am.

So I consider:

“I dedicate the Egodeath theory to myself at age 13.”

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8435 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
The Psychedelic Continuationist Christian movement

PSILOCYBIN EUCHARIST PSYCHOSIS STRIKES DOWN A THIRD OF PSYCHEDELIC CONTINUATIONIST CONGREGATIONS

We are the Psychedelic Continuationist movement.

Christianity has always been understood as mushroom Eucharist. We are not innovating, but amplifying the main Christian tradition, the mushroom Eucharist tradition.

Redosing with low-dose psilocybin capsules is ergonomic.

We acknowledge Amanita water into wine.

The Holy Spirit continued from Jesus forever, psilocybin Eucharist, and we continue and amplify that tradition.

Our missional outreach is to get Eastern religionists to authentically trip in their traditional psychedelic religion ways, not for them to innovate, nor to restore something as if it were missing, but to *continue* and amplify the ever-kickass, ever-ruling, original source of Eastern religion, ever revolving around psychedelics, which is the ever-continuing fountainhead of Eastern religion.

Psychedelics never went away from the core Eastern religion practice.

Psychedelics are present in every church in history, but 2016 Psychedelic Continuationism, the Psychedelic Continationist movement, is amplifying the never-missing tradition of psilocybin Eucharist, and drug-based meditation.

______________________

The History of Psychedelic New Age Materialistic Quantum Drug Reform Neurotherapy

Max and Cyber Paradigms per Episode 3:

Psychedelic New Age Spirituality
Psychedelic Neuroscience
…Materialism, Idealism, Representationalism
Psychedelic Therapy
Entheogen History
Drug Policy Reform

Some commentary on those:

o pop Entheogen History Scholarship

o Drug Policy Reform / Prohibition Repeal

How to destroy the “Harm” pretext of Prohibition.

Full Repeal of Drug Prohibition (with the government formally stating that the WoD was always a destructive, predatory Fraud under the pretext of “safety”.

Repeal of Prohibition VERSUS the paradigm of “Drug Policy Reform”

‘Drug Policy Reform’ refers to a kinder, gentler WoD using anti-terrorist miltary surplus, to protect people from harm. Serve and Protect for profit, against the enemy.


o Psychedelic New Age Spirituality

fractal energy vibrations
nondual unity oneness consciousness
vague folk tech for the shadow threat

o Psychedelic Neuroscience; Professor Nutt’s Psychedelic Quantum Neurophrenology

… o Materialism, Idealism, Representationalism

o Psychedelic Therapy, including Quantum Neurotherapy
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy&tbm=isch

I support businesses and people pursuing anything they want to explore and do together: therapy, counselling, quantum neuro therapy.

I am pro-spirituality, pro-business, pro-Woo, I totally support all vapid exotic otherworld quantum neurowoo, if that’s valued by people.

I support those who pursue and photograph unicorns farting rainbows.

The Egodeath theory is an independent foundation.

I’m not about tearing anyone down except the Prohibitionist puppets, rather, I’m making available the Egodeath theory.

I don’t have to do a scorched-earth approach. Low religion is low religion, but I leave it be, but make available high religion. Maybe I have to utterly demolish low religion to make high religion available.

My father’s income was from counselling.

Quantum Neurowoo can be a distraction or avoidance of what the Egodeath theory covers. Ancestors agree that developing the psychedelic potential of the mind is valuable and desirable.

Quantum Neurowoo distracts and derails from focusing on developing the traditional psychedelic potentials of the mind which inherently leads to Eternalism experiencing and noncontrol.

Planned or not by the Quantum Neurowoo scientists, the psychotomimetic state which our Christian ancestors revered as the Holy Spirit, leads to Eternalism experiential consciousness and a kind of noncontrol. It leads to psychedelic maturation.

We can talk in terms of “should we” mature, but in any case, the people who choose to explore Psychedelic Quantum Neurowoo are now bound to psychedelically mature following the Egodeath theory.

This loose cognitive state from the Christian psilocybin Eucharist tradition can lead to permanent insanity or spiritual regeneration, as God sees fit.

The Holy Bible claims that the mushroom Eucharist cures insanity, which would mean that the temporary psychotomimetic sacred state is resolved, and that egoic delusion is sacrificed, by ingesting Christ’s mushroom flesh.

Is it justified, to positively value and desire the maturation of the mind by immersion in the mushroom fire, exploring the altered experiential sensation, for control-dynamics retraining; for converting the mind from Possibilism to Eternalism, and also arguably necessary, is time to learn literacy of our Psychedelic World Religions 101 heritage of mythemes describing the drug-induced altered-state origin and content of high, esoteric, adult religion for fully initiated minds.

People before us valued this developmental potential of the mind.

They thought it good and desirable to activate the mind’s innate ability to trip on Christ’s mushroom flesh and be converted to become a real, inner circle, grown-up Christian.

Our Christian ancestors did not think that the mind should remain undeveloped in its high potential. Leaving the mind undeveloped would require not using psychedelics. Analogy: castrating a boy, not permitting his body to develop into adult form.

To avoid developing this department of the mind, which our Christian ancestors valued, would be very like never using the sex organ, never being born again, never taking the traditional psilocybin Eucharist — pretty much unthinkable.

Why in God’s name would anyone not develop the mushroom receptors higher consciousness of the mind?

There is no reason to leave the mind psychedelically virgin and immature, in child form, not doing the normal transformation into butterfly, but staying in worm form.

Organisms that God gave developmental potential are supposed to develop, not remain undeveloped. The acorn is supposed to develop into an oak.

The childish way of thinking is supposed to be cured by the Holy Spirit through ingesting Christ’s mushroom flesh, to produce the presumably, universally agreed, adult and desirable, holy, blessed way of thinking, to relate to the Creator and know dependency of control on the pre-created preset worldline of thoughts frozen in the spacetime block.

It’s unnatural, to avoid the mushroom Eucharist, to avoid (what everone judges as) higher mental development.

We have a psychedelic mystical sex organ through which we can die and give birth to a new self-in-world model. Is it a good thing, ought we to use this mystical sex organ of climax and death and rebirth? Is it a positive thing, to have mystic experience, to see transcendent relationships?

Science values exploring, the human mind values exploring, and our ancestors valued religious conversion through the mushroom Eucharist, and valued Transcendent Knowledge.

I estimate that a third of the congregation will go insane, of course, from the traditional Christian mushroom psilocybin Eucharistic agape feast, but whatever, glory to God, and fully repeal drug Prohibition and throw the Prohibitionist con-men out, into the darkness outside.

The Bible says that eating Jesus’ flesh makes the insane demon leave the mind, not enter the mind. Accepting ingesting Christ *cures* insanity, not *causes* it, according to the Bible.

If God wants to give his mushroom Eucharist to his puppets and a third of us puppets go permanently insane from psilocybin psychosis, which is even worse than a special disease that they have only in the UK, CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS; so now, the headline in the 2025 newspaper will read:

PSILOCYBIN EUCHARIST PSYCHOSIS STRIKES DOWN A THIRD OF PSYCHEDELIC CONTINUATIONIST CONGREGATIONS

The guards won’t let Prohibitionists through the gate into the mushroom-wine wedding banquet party at the end of time.

The mind has the innate potential to switch from an initial innate mental world model (Possibilism) to the subsequent innate mental world model that is veiled latent in the mind, the mind is designed to receive psychedelics which sacrifice the initial innate mental structuring — the mental model of self-in-world.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8436 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8437 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Journals and conferences of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”

The Transcendent Knowledge Podcast doesn’t mention Quantum, but it’s huge and is often connected to the other paradigms: neuro and psychedelic/entheogenic.

Nothing is more Pop than Quantum. Are people especially connecting Quantum and psychedelic?

What are combinations of topics other than Quantum Neuro Psychedelic? Are there other conferences / journals that cover Quantum neuro but not psychedelic?

# journals/conferences covering Q + N
# journals/conferences covering Q + P
# journals/conferences covering P + N
# journals/conferences covering Q + N + P
# journals/conferences covering Q + N + [other field, not psychedelics]

Hypothesis: There is an explosion of journals/conferences covering *three* specific topics: quantum neuro psychedelic.

What are the attributes of Quantum “science”, Neuro “science”, and Psychedelic “science”, such that they have appeal and lots of room for careerist publishing?

Like Kant is better than Berkeley for a career because Kant is vague and wishy washy and thus open, bendable, endlessly debatable, a vein of low-grade ore that never runs out?

These kinds of journals and articles need critical survey and analysis. I’ve stumbled upon several such conferences/journals that combine:

scientific pose/{cargo cult stylization, style-mimicking}/aura, covering these specific topics above all:
neuro
quantum
psychedelic

There are *thousands* of authors, penning thousands of articles, all a heap of the same “stuff”, sort of “theory goo”. What’s up with it. Is any *progress* going on in such articles/ journals/ conferences?

In what way does this Stuff represent actual science vs. all jumped-the-shark scientism, scientistic stylization veneer of bullshit? Vapid bullshit with a veneer of scientistic stylization?

Or, is this how the sausage of Science really is made, eventually producing 1% progress in Science; scientific progress through sheer quantity of math neuromonkeys typing on an infinite number of quantum typewriters while tripping?

Infinite monkeys typing enough sheer quantity of neuro quantum psychedelic bullshit will eventuate in genuine science progress???

Dirt cheap, a dime a dozen: dubious science-styled articles about neuro quantum psychedelic pseudoscience — or some, how mush, I mean how much, of this is real science? Is science progress really so noisy? It’s a massive industry!

What’s the relative size of this paper-mill, article-mill, these people desperate(?) to get their me-too article published.

Ruck in this quantum neuro bs journal, WTF? Correction: Ruck in this kind of quantum neuro psychedelic journal… ‘

This seems to be a new paradigm that has formed, the paradigm of, I think specifically:

Quantum Neuro Psychedelic science — is this the major formation I’m seeing? Is there this distinct outstanding paradigm?

How many journals and conferences are scoped as:

“Step right up folks get chur Science here, we got it all,” calls out the carny barker, “We got chur Quantum! We got chur Neuro! And we got chur Psychedelic/Entheogenic! We got it all, and proof of paranormal too. Step right up!”

http://google.com/search?q=demarcation+problem

Big question: the differentiation question, the demarcation problem: how differentiate pseudoscience from real science in this pile of Stuff, goo, mush, a mushy blend of what? What are the main topics combined? What is the scope of the trend?

Am I seeing, is there a breakaway movement where these journals profit the most and become the most popular by covering what list of topics?

What is the relation between newage vs. science? I CAN’T TELL ANY DIFFERENCE. The hot trend in newage pseudo(?)science is quantum neuro psychedelic, is that true, or is that an arbitrary focus of mine?

I speculate that there is an explosion specifically of quantum neuro psychedelic.

List the conferences
List the journals
List the adjacent combinations that are scoped differently than Q + P + N.

What subjects/fields are considered “in scope” by these people? In what way are these an absurd and hardly profitable (productive of knowledge) product of Reagan/Nixon’s Prohibition?

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8438 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Does “fake it til you make it” work? Can we act as if we are doing science, while we put forth speculation on quantum neuro psychedelics, and eventually Professor Nutt will make it, actually producing real science progress, by acting the right style?

A science performance, a scientist act. If I wear a lab coat, hold up a vial, and write enough math equations, *something* scientific has to eventually result, right?

By mimicking the Science style faithfully enough, we can speculate on brain and psychedelics and popcog, and if we faithfully enough simulate the cargo planes, eventually the cargo planes will arrive. Have faith.

Wear the right clothes, affect the right mannerisms, write in the correct stylization, and you will eventually become a Real Scientist contributing actual progress in Science, even in combining quantum neuro psychedelics.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8439 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8441 From: egodeath Date: 01/08/2016
Subject: Re: Journals of quantum neuro psychedelic “science”
Group: egodeath Message: 8445 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Ruck’s been hanging out with a shady and rough crowd lately — Quantum Physicists, Neuroscientists, Roller Derby instructors…
Group: egodeath Message: 8446 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Repeal Prohibition for the Environment
Carl Ruck and David Ulansey are turning their attention to the Environment, environmental activism.
Group: egodeath Message: 8447 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Possible “paradigms” that aren’t included in the list of paradigms in Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, Episode 3


Ayahuasca shamanism and Ayahuasca Christian churches
http://google.com/search?q=Ayahuasca+shamanism+and+Ayahuasca+Christian+churches
http://google.com/search?q=Ayahuasca+shamanism+Christian+church

There is much in common with the Egodeath theory and Ayahuasca Christian churches. I’m focused for various strategic reasons on amplifying or fully continuing the traditional mushroom Eucharist.

http://www.heroic-adventures.com/ayahuasca-ceremonies-usa/
“Interesting Discussion on Legality of Ayahuasca in the USA
In the Fall of 2015, a website popped up touting the First Ayahuasca Church in the USA that is open for ceremonies to anyone. … After this article [ http://www.bialabate.net/news/dont-believe-the-hype-about-the-legal-ayahuasca-usa-church-going-around-facebook-its-not-legal-its-dangerous-and-heres-why ] was published detailing why this church is not legal … A curious story in the world of spirituality, religious rights, internet marketing, and law. (updated December 08, 2015)”


Psychedelic Quantum Physics

http://google.com/search?q=Psychedelic+Quantum+Physics

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8449 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)

Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use
Beatriz Caiuby Labate (Editor), Clancy Cavnar (Editor)
https://www.amazon.com/Prohibition-Religious-Freedom-Human-Rights/dp/3642409563/
2014
“This book addresses the use and regulation of traditional drugs such as peyote, ayahuasca, coca leaf, cannabis, khat and Salvia divinorum.

The uses of these substances can often be found at the intersection of diverse areas of life, including politics, medicine, shamanism, religion, aesthetics, knowledge transmission, socialization, and celebration.

The collection analyzes how some of these psychoactive plants have been progressively incorporated and regulated in developed Western societies by both national legislation and by the United Nations Drug Conventions.

It focuses mainly, but not only, on the debates in court cases around the world involving the claim of religious use and the legal definitions of “religion.”

It further touches upon issues of human rights and cognitive liberty as they relate to the consumption of drugs.

While this collection emphasizes certain uses of psychoactive substances in different cultures and historical periods, it is also useful for thinking about the consumption of drugs in general in contemporary societies.

The cultural and informal controls discussed here represent alternatives to the current merely prohibitionist policies, which are linked to the spread of illicit and violent markets.

By addressing the disputes involved in the regulation of traditional drug use, this volume reflects on notions such as origin, place, authenticity, and tradition, thereby relating drug policy to broader social science debates.”
Group: egodeath Message: 8451 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: First public legal Ayahuasca church in the U.S.
http://www.heroic-adventures.com/ayahuasca-ceremonies-usa

“Interesting Discussion on Legality of Ayahuasca in the USA – In the Fall of 2015, a website popped up touting the First Ayahuasca Church in the USA that is open for ceremonies to anyone. … After this article [ http://www.bialabate.net/news/dont-believe-the-hype-about-the-legal-ayahuasca-usa-church-going-around-facebook-its-not-legal-its-dangerous-and-heres-why ] was published detailing why this church is not legal … A curious story in the world of spirituality, religious rights, internet marketing, and law. (updated December 08, 2015)”
Group: egodeath Message: 8452 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Bia Labate
http://bialabate.net

The Inauguration of the UDV Temple in Santa Fe: A Sweet Taste of Justice
Bia Labate
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9788494
Apr 28, 2016
Group: egodeath Message: 8453 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
The word ‘regulating’ means Drug War Status Quo; Witch Hunt alive and well. If you get caught with unauthorized psilocybin Eucharist, the State has given itself the authority to kill you, rob you, enslave you, jail you. The same old witch hunt continues; Prohibition for Profit.

The right way to regulate the traditional Christian psychedelic mushroom Eucharist is full repeal of drug Prohibition, like in 1913.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8454 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
If you are accused of unauthorized psilocybin Eucharist, the State has given itself the authority to literally kill you, rob you, enslave you, jail you.

The witch hunt never ended; the old witch hunt was repositioned as drug Prohibition, to *protect* people from the *harms* of (non-Big Pharma, non-Alcohol industry, non-Tobacco) drugs.

“But the government don’t give a *F-CK* about your safety.” — Chris Rock

Trump’s VP pick Mike Pence is hardline extreme Prohibitionist FUNDED BY THE TOBACCO LOBBY.

A VOTE FOR TRUMP IS A VOTE FOR TOBACCO-FUNDED “DRUG” PROHIBITION.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8457 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
What *ought* to become pop psychedelia is biopolitics, repealing Prohibition to save the Environment.

Environmentalist “drug policy reform”; that is:

Environmentalist repeal of drug Prohibition

Entheogen historian Carl Ruck has turned his attention to Environmentalism; follow him.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com.
Group: egodeath Message: 8459 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Yahoo code is so broken. When I post, it appears in web ui after a random time 0 to infinity.
Group: egodeath Message: 8460 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Repealing Prohibition is the most important activism
Repealing Prohibition is the most important activism

Shame on activists for being stupid and thinking drug Prohibition is frivolous.

Prohibition affects countless issues, such as illegal thus profitable coca being pushed into the rainforest.

Black Lives Matter is all about drug Prohibition — the New Jim Crow. WTF, so-called “activists”, GET A CLUE!!

Ignorant and short-sighted activists!

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8461 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Prohibition, Religious Freedom, and Human Rights: Regulating Traditional Drug Use
Beatriz Labate (Editor), Clancy Cavnar (Editor)
https://www.amazon.com/Prohibition-Religious-Freedom-Human-Rights/dp/3642409563/
2014
Group: egodeath Message: 8462 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Drug Policy Reform wants to trim the drug Prohibition bush.

The drug Prohibition bush needs to be torn out at the roots in its entirety. Every bit of drug Prohibition is thoroughly evil, destructive, poisonous, corrupt, and needs to be burned up in a total holocaust, nothing left, so that the path to God is cleared.

God created Satan, and Satan created drug Prohibition. You can’t “debug” Satan’s product created by Governor Reagan and President Nixon.

Everything about antidrug laws is an offense against the Holy Spirit. Laws against drugs are fundamentally ill-intentioned, dishonest, and illegal; Prohibition law is illegal law, non-law, totally null and void to the core and root.

The entire system of Prohibition must be totally demolished — let us not talk of “reforming” Satan’s system of demonization of the holy mushroom Eucharist, which is the means God gives us and makes us ingest so that we die to sin and are made righteous in God’s sight because we have ingested Christ’s saving flesh.

— Michael
Group: egodeath Message: 8464 From: egodeath Date: 02/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
Traditional drug use, especially the psilocybin Eucharist, should be informally regulated voluntarily by individuals, NOT “regulated” by law and government and military-assault terrorist drug squads from the bowels of Hell.

Regulating drugs must be done by free individuals, not by the government.

The government has no authority or competence to “regulate” drugs, and the catestrophic experiment with Prohibition 1913-2016 has destroyed any prospect of trustworthiness of the government to “regulate” drugs; the government has proved that the only result of the government “regulating” drugs is extreme, total corruption of the government, which turns against the citizens it supposedly exists to serve.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8467 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Bk: Regulating Traditional Drug Use (Labate)
The “drug policy reform” movement ought to be the Prohibition Repeal movement, instead.

Everyone needs to become theorists of rhetoric. We didn’t need laws about drugs in 1913, and we don’t need laws about drugs now, or ever.

We tried Prohibition during 1914-2016 and it was an absolute disaster — except for the success of using “harm” rhetoric as pretext to accomplish the real goal of Prohibition: harming people that those in power want to get rid of, for their own corrupt personal gain.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8468 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Outrageous Yahoo bug: 13 hours for a post to appear. That’s impossible to deal with. I’m forced to repost (identical duplicate post).

I also repost when I improve a previous post.
Group: egodeath Message: 8469 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Death penalty for 14 accused of providing drugs
Death penalty for 14 accused of providing drugs

http://www.handsoffcain.info/news/index.php?iddocumento=20314502

INDONESIA: FOUR PRISONERS KILLED IN FIRST EXECUTIONS IN A YEAR

July 29, 2016: Indonesia has carried out its first executions in more than a year despite a string of legal appeals, diplomatic pressure and international condemnation.

Four prisoners, all sentenced to death for drug offences, were escorted to a clearing on the penal island of Nusa Kambangan and shot dead by a firing squad early on July 29.

They were identified as
Freddy Budiman, an Indonesian citizen;
Humphrey Jefferson Ejike Eleweke and
Michael Titus Igweh, from Nigeria; and
Seck Osmane, from Senegal.

Ten others who had also faced execution – including three Indonesians, and foreign nationals from countries including Pakistan and India – were not killed, but officials said they would be put to death at a later date.

Deputy attorney general Noor Rachmad said the four men were executed shortly after midnight local time.

“This is not a fun job. For us, this is really a sad job because it involves people’s lives,” he said. “This was done not in order to take lives but to stop evil intentions, and the evil act of drug trafficking.”

Lawyers said there was evidence to suggest Jefferson was not guilty of the crime for which he was condemned to death – possessing 1.7kg of heroin – including an admission of guilt on his deathbed by the man who allegedly framed him.

Police, army and navy personnel were tightly monitoring the port, the gateway to Nusa Kambangan prison, with 1,500 officers assigned to guard the area.

Coffins were ferried to Nusa Kambangan on July 28 morning, and spiritual advisers – who provide comfort and guidance to prisoners in their final hours – were told to prepare the inmates for their deaths within hours.

Amnesty International described the execution as “a deplorable act”.

“Any executions that are still to take place must be halted immediately. The injustice already done cannot be reversed, but there is still hope that it won’t be compounded,” said Rafendi Djamin, Amnesty’s director for south-east Asia and the Pacific.

Indonesia had largely withheld details of this round of executions from the public, declining even to publicly confirm the list of those slated to be executed in the hours leading up to their deaths.

Two people whose cases had raised high-profile international concern among rights groups were not executed.

The first was Pakistani Zulfiqar Ali, who has alleged he was beaten into confessing to the crime of heroin possession.

The other was Indonesian woman Merri Utami, who was caught with heroin in her bag as she came through Jakarta airport and claims she was duped into becoming a drug mule.

Ricky Gunawan, the director of the Community Legal Aid Institute, said the lack of transparency around the latest round of executions has been a convenient cover.

“For all this time they have kept it secret,” he said. “Indonesia is perhaps aware that there are so many laws they are violating so that’s why they keep it secret.”

(Sources: theguardian.com, 29/07/2016)
__________________

[Reminder: [non-Tobacco, non-Big Pharm, non-Alcohol industry] drugs normally cause pemanent psychosis. Here is the referenced unimpeachable logic from the authorities, who have not taken drugs and so do not have psychotic thinking, but clear thinking:

We authorities who have to protect people, we hate killing people, but we were forced to kill people.

To prevent people from being harmed, we should kill people for committing the harmful act of providing drugs.

Providing drugs is harmful, is an assuault on unknown victims who choose to buy them, so we must minimize harm by shooting to death these harm-bringing witches/drug providers.

Providing drugs causes harm to someone who wants to buy them.

Therefore, to protect people who want to buy drugs, we should kill and harm the people who provide drugs.

“This was done not in order to take lives but to stop evil intentions, and the evil act of drug trafficking.”

This was done for the purpose of:

o “Stopping evil intentions.”

o “To stop drug trafficking, which is an evil act.”

This is a battle against “Evil”, not against some mundane specific harms or victims, but rather, morality; stopping moral Evil.

It’s the *abstraction*, Evil, that we are fighting against — that’s the wording we use to justify “legal” killing of people by the “justice” system.

The purpose of the justice system isn’t about mundane specific harms and victims, but is rather, aimed against Evil, in general.

To fight Evil, we must kill people who bring Evil, in the form of providing Evil drugs.

Evil is (a certain class of) drugs.

Evil is drugs.

Drugs, this class of drugs, are the physical form of this principle of Evil.

Drugs are the physical form of this principle of Evil.

To eliminate Evil, we must eliminate the people who bring Evil, which is a certain class of drugs.

To eliminate Evil, we must eliminate the people who bring Evil, which is drugs.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8470 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Group: egodeath Message: 8472 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Ingesting the traditional Christian mushroom Eucharist (the saving flesh of Christ given to us for our salvation by God) causes permanent psychosis. Like 102 years of ratcheting-up drug Prohibition.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8474 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
The authentic traditional Biblical mushroom agape meal causes permanent psychosis, and throw the Prohibitionist bums, con-men, psychotics out!

I [heart] permanent psychosis from Christ’s traditional mushroom flesh. Run the Prohibitionists out of town.

Psilocybin Psychosis — Sign Us Up! Throw the Prohibitionist bums out!

We embrance and own our promised insane brethren, glory to God, and to the flames of Hell for correctional reconditioning of drug Prohibitionists.

The curing therapy is, eat more psychedelic mushrooms, and be made to turn, and convert, and your sins be forgiven, and the demon of animal illogic, agitating for a fantasy of control, is guaranteed by the Bible to be cast out, based on magic: Christ ingested into us, commands the demon to leave, and our right mind, sanity, arrives in the new kingdom at the end of time.

Our religion — authentic Christianity — is the religion of permanent psychosis from psilocybin and THROW THE DEMONIC PROHIBITIONIST BUMS OUT!

Glad you mentioned “harm, psychosis, and Evil” — this describes what motivates and possesses drug Prohibitionists.

IF DRUG PROHIBITION REPRESENTS “SANITY”, AND THE BIBLICAL TRADITIONAL MUSHROOM EUCHARIST OF CHRIST OUR SAVIOR CAUSES “PERMANENT PSYCHOSIS”, IT IS CLEAR THAT WE SHOULD CHOOSE PSILOCYBIN-INDUCED PERMANENT PSYCHOSIS AND PUT AWAY PROHIBITIONISTS AS A MENACE TO SOCIETY.

— Michael
Group: egodeath Message: 8475 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Death penalty for 14 accused of providing drugs
Firing squad? Not much of a deterrent. I recommend scourging and crucifixion of thousands of traffickers of Evil which is drugs along the roads into the cities.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8476 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Death penalty for trafficking in Evil, witches drugs
placeholder while waiting 13 hours for my commentary post to appear

Death penalty for trafficking in Evil, witches drugs

http://www.handsoffcain.info/news/index.php?iddocumento=20314502
Group: egodeath Message: 8478 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Serious searches joke

It just doesn’t get any more serious than this.

Search terms:
quantum
shaman
neuro
entheogen
conference
journal
therapy
psychedelic

At the Google search results page, you can click Images or Books, or other info formats.

Prefix:
http://google.com/search?q=
delimiter: +

http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+quantum+therapy

http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=neuro+shaman+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=shaman+quantum+therapy

http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+shaman
http://google.com/search?q=shaman+journal+conference

http://google.com/search?q=entheogen+journal+conference
57,500 hits
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+journal+conference
912,000 hits

http://google.com/search?q=entheogen
292,000 hits
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic
52,000,000 hits

Erik Davis in 2013 says ‘entheogen’ is passe, 1990s jargon, and the term ‘psychedelic’ remains as in, or out, as ever; ‘psychedelic’ is holding steady, while ‘entheogen’ is looking more like it was trendy.

Many people resent Christianity being snuck in through psychedelics — sneaking in the most dread spectre of all: *organized religion*, run away!

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8479 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
These thousands of articles coming out every year about psychedelic neuro quantum shamanism therapy — it’s a heap of mush. We’d make more progress by feeding the popular phrases from these fields into the computer programs that automatically output computer-generated fake journal articles filled with arbitrary nonsense, generating (and electronically submitting to the automated scientific journal review process) a thousand articles per hour.

New scientific study shows the quantum nature of neuroshaman therapy

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8480 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
This article provides a solid foundation for the Egodeath theory:

Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity
http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html
Alan Sokal
Department of Physics
New York University
Social Text #46/47, pp. 217-252 (Spring/Summer 1996).
1994/1995
Group: egodeath Message: 8483 From: egodeath Date: 03/08/2016
Subject: Fashionable nonsense, pseudoscience gibberish
Fashionable nonsense, pseudoscience gibberish

http://scigen.csail.mit.edu/scicache/824/scimakelatex.15407.Carl+Ruck.Andy+Letcher.Michael+Hoffman.Tom+Hatsis.Max+Freakout.html

A Refinement of XML
Carl Ruck, Andy Letcher, Tom Hatsis, Michael Hoffman and Max Freakout



Abstract

Recent advances in pervasive information and lossless information have paved the way for context-free grammar. After years of significant research into IPv7, we validate the refinement of voice-over-IP. Chider, our new algorithm for von Neumann machines, is the solution to all of these issues [27,1].

Table of Contents
1 Introduction


Introspective symmetries and spreadsheets have garnered tremendous interest from both leading analysts and cyberneticists in the last several years. After years of theoretical research into congestion control, we confirm the simulation of the partition table, which embodies the compelling principles of permutable authenticated electrical engineering. It should be noted that Chider analyzes the improvement of symmetric encryption. Thusly, the deployment of 2 bit architectures and empathic information do not necessarily obviate the need for the study of spreadsheets.


We introduce a novel methodology for the emulation of robots, which we call Chider. For example, many applications investigate flip-flop gates. It should be noted that Chider is copied from the principles of networking. Such a claim might seem perverse but usually conflicts with the need to provide wide-area networks to physicists. Combined with stochastic theory, such a claim synthesizes an analysis of active networks.


Motivated by these observations, write-ahead logging and stochastic technology have been extensively constructed by steganographers. We emphasize that Chider requests relational epistemologies. We view networking as following a cycle of four phases: refinement, provision, observation, and study. Without a doubt, indeed, Scheme and robots have a long history of collaborating in this manner. It should be noted that Chider learns low-energy technology. Such a claim at first glance seems unexpected but is derived from known results.


In this position paper, we make three main contributions. To begin with, we introduce an ambimorphic tool for enabling Byzantine fault tolerance (Chider), disconfirming that local-area networks can be made client-server, lossless, and introspective [12,26,20,1,15]. We construct an empathic tool for developing DNS (Chider), which we use to argue that the memory bus can be made adaptive, reliable, and cacheable. Continuing with this rationale, we demonstrate that even though randomized algorithms and DHCP are always incompatible, expert systems and DHCP can interfere to fix this obstacle.


The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, we motivate the need for hash tables. On a similar note, to fulfill this goal, we better understand how compilers can be applied to the refinement of evolutionary programming. Next, we place our work in context with the existing work in this area. Ultimately, we conclude.


2 Model


The properties of our method depend greatly on the assumptions inherent in our model; in this section, we outline those assumptions. While system administrators usually hypothesize the exact opposite, our methodology depends on this property for correct behavior. Any important visualization of embedded modalities will clearly require that Moore’s Law and gigabit switches can cooperate to achieve this aim; Chider is no different. Though information theorists entirely believe the exact opposite, our heuristic depends on this property for correct behavior. We believe that each component of our methodology constructs the evaluation of vacuum tubes, independent of all other components. This seems to hold in most cases. Therefore, the model that our application uses is not feasible.





Figure 1: The decision tree used by Chider [9,17,11].


Suppose that there exists low-energy modalities such that we can easily deploy ubiquitous symmetries. Consider the early architecture by Johnson; our framework is similar, but will actually accomplish this purpose. We assume that the little-known optimal algorithm for the evaluation of the location-identity split by J. Robinson [21] is optimal. this seems to hold in most cases. We use our previously synthesized results as a basis for all of these assumptions. This seems to hold in most cases.
Group: egodeath Message: 8485 From: egodeath Date: 04/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
New Scientific Study Shows the Quantum Nature of Neuroshaman Therapy

http://google.com/search?q=New+Scientific+Study+Shows+the+Quantum+Nature+of+Neuroshaman+Therapy

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8487 From: egodeath Date: 04/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
New Scientific Study Shows the Quantum Nature of Neuro-shaman Therapy

http://google.com/search?q=New+Scientific+Study+Shows+the+Quantum+Nature+of+Neuro+shaman+Therapy

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8492 From: egodeath Date: 05/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Wise and Foolish Searches

‘neuroscience’ vs. ‘cognitive science’ vs. ‘cognitive neuroscience’
(most common first)
___________________
Search terms:
quantum
shaman
neuro
meditation
consciousness
psychedelic
entheogen
therapy
conference
journal

At the Google search results page, you can click Images or Books, or other info formats.

To construct a Google Search URL:
domain: http://google.com/
command: search?q=
delimiter: +
quote: %22

Wise searches:
http://google.com/search?q=recognize+mushroom+Eucharist+tradition
http://google.com/search?q=divine+panic+ecstasy+enlightenment
http://google.com/search?q=tree+snake+Possibilism+Eternalism
http://google.com/search?q=dragon+pearl+enlightenment
http://google.com/search?q=snake+worldline+enlightenment
http://google.com/search?q=myth+rock+time
http://google.com/search?q=king+wine+snake+stone
http://google.com/search?q=balaam+donkey+path+paul+horse+road
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+loss+of+control+freakout+panic+attack+pray+sacrifice+rescue
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+loss+of+control+freak+out+panic+pray+rescue
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+loss+of+control+freak+out+panic+rescue
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+loss+of+control+freak+out+panic

Foolish searches:
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+psychedelic
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+shaman+consciousness+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+shaman+psychedelic
http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+shaman+meditation
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+quantum+therapy

http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=neuro+shaman+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=shaman+quantum+therapy
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+quantum+neuro+meditation+therapy

http://google.com/search?q=quantum+neuro+shaman
http://google.com/search?q=shaman+journal+conference

http://google.com/search?q=entheogen+journal+conference
57,500 hits
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic+journal+conference
912,000 hits

http://google.com/search?q=entheogen
292,000 hits
http://google.com/search?q=psychedelic
52,000,000 hits
_____________________

http://google.com/search?q=cognitive
104,000,000 hits
http://google.com/search?q=neuro
38,400,000 hits

http://google.com/search?q=neuroscience
39,800,000 hits (5.33 times as common as:)
http://google.com/search?q=%22cognitive+science%22
7,470,000 hits (5 times as common as:)
http://google.com/search?q=%22cognitive+neuroscience%22
1,540,000 hits

‘neuroscience’ is 27 times as common as ‘cognitive neuroscience’.
‘neuroscience’ is 5.33 times as common as ‘cognitive science’.
‘cognitive science’ is 5 times as common as ‘cognitive neuroscience’.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8494 From: egodeath Date: 05/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
https://techgnosis.com/psychedelic-culture/

“So there’s a profound difference between decriminalization and legalization, and I think the anti-prohibition movement needs to start addressing some of these questions more critically.

Legalization implies the incorporation of drugs inside the regulatory regime of big medicine and mainstream corporate culture, which needs to create “disorders” in order to proscribe commodity fixes.”


My third alternative, which is a new, minority voice, is Repeal; full repeal of drug Prohibition, back to the nonexistence of laws about drugs, as in 1913; 1776-1913.

From the Big Bang through 1913, humanity “somehow, miraculously” survived without the “benefit” of laws against or about psychoactives.

Decriminalization?
Legalization?
Repeal!

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8496 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Psychedelic reductionism to healing therapy
Psychedelic reductionism to healing therapy

After my critical Amazon review of Roberts’ most recent book, Thomas Roberts in January 2016 chastises the dull recent trendy monofocus on the healing, therapy power of psychedelics:

“There is also scholarly work in religion and the other humanities and in the arts and social sciences. I look forward to your essay on those topics..”

http://blog.oup.com/2015/12/psychedelic-drugs-medicine/#sthash.k0GODJ6P.dpuf

The Egodeath theory focuses on the healing therapeutic potential of panic attack control seizure loss-of-control freak out, described in our traditional psychedelic religious mythology, such as ingesting the Eucharist and then experiencing judgment, corrective scourging, and then death by fastening to a tree, followed by rebirth in a rock cave.

Recent trendy emphasis on psychedelic healing is incomplete. You can’t have the staff of Aesclepius the healer without Pan.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8497 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Uniqueness of Maximal entheogen Eucharist view
Uniqueness of Maximal entheogen Eucharist view

In existing books and in articles presently on the Web, it is extremely rare, the idea that not only were mushrooms *sometimes* used as the Eucharist in Christian history (the Moderate entheogen theory), but that the *normal, traditional* understanding in Christianity is mushroom Eucharist (the Maximal entheogen theory).

On the spectrum from Minimal, to Moderate, to Maximal positions, as you approach the Maximal end of the spectrum, fewer authors are located — they fall off as you approach my Maximal position.

Part of the problem is copycat meme repetition of low-relevance topics such as Amanita Christmas, skirting the real, explosive central issue, of:

To what extent was the Eucharist understood as mushrooms throughout own Christian religious history, including our cultural roots in ancient Greece with mixed wine inducing mythological experiential cognition?

Even more than I am concerned to prove my priority of discovery, I am motivated by shutting out the possibility of any theorist being more radical than the Egodeath theory.

That is the benefit and spirit of my formulation in the most extreme terms:


Many lay and priests in all churches have always understood the Eucharist as mushrooms.

The Eastern religion corollary:

Many lay and priests in all Eastern religion have always understood meditation as mushrooms.


This assertion brings the Entheogen History conversation forward to the argument about not whether, but how many.

The only way a theorist can be more radical than me is the argument about how many — which I vaguely specify as “alot”.

A substantial, influential percentage of our Western, Christian ancestors recognized the Eucharist as mushrooms.

The esoteric Christian tradition, the normal traditional view held by “those on the inside”, is the mushroom Eucharist.

The normal traditional exoteric view is the ordinary wine Eucharist (grape alcohol, or better, per the exoteric Church of Christ, the primitive Christians had grape juice Eucharist).

The normal traditional esoteric view is the mushroom Eucharist.

I have defined two specific contrasting Eucharist understandings and traditions.


The exoteric Christian tradition is wine Eucharist.

For exoteric Christians, only a single tradition is recognized or perceived: “the” tradition is wine Eucharist.


The esoteric Christian tradition is mushroom Eucharist.

For esoteric Christians, two contrasting traditions are recognized and perceived, low vs. high; the *high* tradition is mushroom Eucharist.

Esoteric Christians understand that the *low* tradition of clueless outsiders, of “those on the outside”, is wine Eucharist.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8498 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast commentary
Required: mastery of rhetoric, discourse, narrative, story:

How many different narratives are being told about psychedelics and about mushrooms in Christian tradition?

I have formulated a different, more coherent narrative.

Why are psychedelic writers so devoid of imagination in parroting their narratives?

Partly, the conditions of Prohibition cause ruts of thought; partly, conformity.

I have to pay great attention to what others are writing, but, I must stand fundamentally on my own independent basis, such as, the most influential thing I did in Bruce Eisner’s famous 1991 Bridge conference across the street at Stanford Junior University, was to not go.

Writers on psychedelics are afraid of saying anything other than what all the other writers are saying.

These writers are tools used by memes; writers are robots through which memes repeat and repeat and repeat…

Writers on psychedelics are incredibly repetitive of each other’s entrenched ideas and assumptions.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8500 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
The secret tradition of mushroom Eucharist

Jerry Brown is gradually, partially waking up to his previous Blind Spot: real Christians understood {mushroom Eucharist}. His course syllabus omits the Michael Hoffman question: to what extent did our Christian ancestors understand the Eucharist as mushrooms? But now his latest study is a book specifically on that, scoped to that, centered around that.

1. Course: Hallucinogens and Culture — no sign of the mushroom Eucharist question in our Christian tradition:
http://gss.fiu.edu/courses/current-undergraduate-courses-and-syllabi/ant4461brownsylfall2011.pdf
2011

2. Article: Sacred Plants and the Gnostic Church: Speculations on Entheogen-Use in Early Christian Ritual — closer to the question of mushroom Eucharist in Christian tradition:
2014
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jah.2014.2.issue-1/jah-2014-0010/jah-2014-0010.xml

3. Book: The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity — focuses on the Michael Hoffman question, the question of mushroom Eucharist in our ancestors’ Christian tradition (consistently? coherently? pointedly, as such?)
Jerry Brown, Julie Brown
Park Street Press
Planned September 2016
http://amazon.com/dp/1620555026
Planned for September 2016

Much hinges on “secret”. We should neither fixate on “secret” as Ruck does, nor dumbly reject “secret”.

In *some sense*, for which we need the right narrative, story, discourse, and rhetoric, and conceptual vocabulary, our ancestors’ Christian historical esoteric tradition was “a secret tradition”, “the secret esoteric mushroom Eucharist tradition”.

‘Secret’ is a political and theoretically loaded term.

What is the correct accurate understanding of ‘secret’ in “the secret esoteric mushroom Eucharist tradition”?

I can already write a draft of my critical review of this forthcoming book, based on the blurb and my knowledge of the scholarly situation.

This book is on the most important and strategic topic.

The blind spot in entheogen history studies is the normalcy of mushrooms in Christianity.

The blind spot in entheogen history studies is mushrooms in Christianity.

The Egodeath theory is the complete counter to the blind spot in entheogen studies: recognizing the mushroom Eucharist as the normal primary mainstream standard Esoteric view, the view held by real Christians throughout history, those on the inside, who Jesus recognizes.

Typical unimaginative writers on entheogen history write with fanfare exposing a little deviant abnormal creative interpretation of the Eucharist as mushrooms, in a couple points in Christian history.

Normally, throughout our ancestor’s Christian history, the high normal tradition recognized and understood {mushroom Eucharist}. Real, esoteric, inner circle Christians are those who have always, by definition, perceived {alcohol Eucharist} as a common low understanding, the standard misunderstanding.

If you say the Eucharist was alcohol wine, this says nothing about reality or history, but it simply stamps you as a low, exoteric, those-on-the-outside Christian, who Jesus doesn’t recognize as his follower.

It was normal for real, initiated Christians to understand the alcohol Eucharist as a misunderstanding for noninitiates.

Enlightening Analogy between ancient Greece and New Testament Christianity:

Initiated Greeks deliberately misled noninitiates, veiling the psychoactive wine, posing as if the sacred meal used alcohol wine. The unveiled wine is mushrooms. For noninitiates, the sacrament is veiled as alcohol wine. For initiates, the sacrament is unveiled as mushroom wine and mushroom bread.

For noninitiates, the sacrament is veiled as alcohol wine. The psychoactive is omitted.

For initiates, the sacrament is unveiled as mushroom wine and mushroom bread. The psychoactive is included.

Esoteric Christians are by definition, those who hold and understand and who have been made experientially compatible with Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

When God created the frozen block universe with pre-existing future, when Controller X defined the Creation algorithm and pushed the “Go” button to create the entire block all at once from outside the time block, the resulting Creation included low, exoteric Christians.

When God wrote the New Testament, He wrote about those on the inside, who have been given the mushroom Eucharist, and Jesus recognizes those as his followers of his way.

Delivering a contrast and instructing us to consider the contrast, the New Testament writes about those on the outside, low Christians, exoteric Christians, from whom the Creator withheld the mushroom Eucharist, and Jesus does not recognize those as his followers of his way.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8502 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
Zoom on the sample pages of this book at Amazon.
Group: egodeath Message: 8504 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
My grandfather gave me exoteric primitive Christianity, the low, outsiders’ layer of the Churches of Christ quasi-denomination.

My father gave me the key to the junkyard of therapy, psychology, meditation, self-help Spirituality, the fields Ken Wilber studies under the OSC singlestate confusion.


My undergraduate university gave me the familiarity with Science to enable me to scoff at the folly of Neuroscientism, and at the Quantum Physics chaos-of-interpretations.

The Illusion of Will, Self, and Time: William James’ Reluctant Guide to Enlightenment
Jonathan Bricklin
http://amazon.com/dp/143845628X
2015 hardcover, January 2016 paperback

The secret of QM is that it’s really to bolster egoic freewill control power, standing with William James against the threat of the Eternalism Iron Block Universe, and that no two philosophers or Physicists agree on what QM asserts.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8507 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
After my initial inspiration from being in the college band network 1982-1985, the Grateful Dead scene (1985 through Jerry’s death) provided the inspiration for the Egodeath theory.

New book: Heads

Beat Hippie Raver (an entheogen book editor) emailed me a writeup of his, around 2005, listing how Dead lyrics express altered-state experiential revelation. I don’t think I posted it.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8511 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Pros of repealing Prohibition:
Knowledge of God; becoming mentally stable, durable, and compatible with the experience of Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism; the mind is made acceptable to God-thinking; salvation.

Cons of repealing Prohibition:
The traditional mushroom Eucharist of inner-circle Christians causes permanent psychosis, same as Ayahuasca used as the Eucharist.


Pros of Prohibition:
Doesn’t cause insanity or any other harm or danger; results in 102 years of enjoying the benefits of laws against drugs, such as drug squads shooting the family dog and driving coca fields into the rainforest, and other benefits such as putting all blacks in jail and taking away their voting rights.

Cons of Prohibition:
Alienation from God; failure to spiritually regenerate; being accursed and standing under God’s condemnation; damnation.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 8513 From: egodeath Date: 06/08/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early Christianity
Laura Nasrallah
http://amazon.com/dp/0674012283
2003
Ecstatic states in early Christianity.

Christians defame the Pagan sacred meal as causing madness and delusion.

Pagans defame the Christian sacred meal as causing madness and delusion.

Madness, delusion, and accursedness by God: see 102 years of drug Prohibition.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com

Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 140: 2015-11-17

Site Map


Group: egodeath Message: 7171 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Deciphered: Holy of Holies; adyton; No Access; veil
Group: egodeath Message: 7174 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabulary
Group: egodeath Message: 7175 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7176 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7177 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7179 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7180 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7181 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7182 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Group: egodeath Message: 7183 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced positio
Group: egodeath Message: 7184 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Group: egodeath Message: 7185 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Group: egodeath Message: 7186 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: 2015 International Drug Reform Conference, entheogen enlightenme
Group: egodeath Message: 7187 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7188 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Group: egodeath Message: 7189 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7190 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7191 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7192 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7193 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: Deciphered: mirror = look back at thought-source
Group: egodeath Message: 7194 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
Group: egodeath Message: 7195 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7196 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
Group: egodeath Message: 7197 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
Group: egodeath Message: 7198 From: egodeath Date: 21/11/2015
Subject: Re: Matrix movie
Group: egodeath Message: 7199 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Group: egodeath Message: 7200 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: vibrational energy morphological resonance frequency takeover
Group: egodeath Message: 7201 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Group: egodeath Message: 7202 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Group: egodeath Message: 7203 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Group: egodeath Message: 7204 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Group: egodeath Message: 7205 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Group: egodeath Message: 7207 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Posting twice worked, to get immediate feedback
Group: egodeath Message: 7208 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Group: egodeath Message: 7209 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Group: egodeath Message: 7210 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Group: egodeath Message: 7211 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7212 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Group: egodeath Message: 7213 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Group: egodeath Message: 7214 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Group: egodeath Message: 7215 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Group: egodeath Message: 7216 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Group: egodeath Message: 7217 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7218 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7220 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7221 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7222 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7223 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Fake Christianity = Fake Buddhism
Group: egodeath Message: 7224 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7225 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism



Group: egodeath Message: 7171 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Deciphered: Holy of Holies; adyton; No Access; veil
we are above all, first and foremost, control agents

all myth figures (characters) are you
you are a cybernetic steering control agent
therefore
all myth is about the transformation of cybernetic control agency

myth is about personal cybernetics cybernetic steering control agency and how it transforms in the Eternalism state which is the entheogen state of cognitive dissociation psycholytic loosening of mental construct binding

Copyright (C) 2015 Michael S. Hoffman (Egodeath.com). All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7174 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabulary
P1 task and commission: Read aloud my writings and ensure that Siri and Cortana are able to recognize the common words (many ordinary common words fail) and specialized words (Possibilism, Eternalism, fatedness, worldline).

Thank you, I appreciate the powerful results you have achieved so far. The highest purpose and application of voice recognition is theorizing about the Egodeath theory; Transcendent Knowledge; Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism; the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence; the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture.

— — Michael Hoffman (Eta Kappa Nu (EleKtroN)), the interdisciplinary theorist of ego death
Group: egodeath Message: 7175 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
IEEE Eta Kappa Nu honor society voices our recognition of Vulcan.

Hephaestus, trapper of Hera on the throne, had to be carried on the donkey trip to heaven by Dionysus in order to release the Queen of the Gods.

— Michael, pinner down of the dragon
Group: egodeath Message: 7176 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
as I have mentioned before,
the technology causes AIDS virus in what words I choose to use
the technology causes a bias in what words I choose to use

voice recognition recognizes the utterance “visionary plants” but not infusions [I actually said “Entheogens”]:
in the engines
infusions
so if you see those words, I probably actually said “entheogens”. so it is easier to say “visionary plants”,
and I’ll Jareds which Siri recognizes
an utterance which Siri recognizes

I could post another raw voice misrecognition session followed by a cleaned up posting to show how bad and how good voice recognition currently is

Cortana wins this round if recognizes infusions [I actually said “entheogens”]

— my coal hot man the dearest of you go death
Group: egodeath Message: 7177 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
cleaning up a voice misrecognition session is very hard but it is so wonderful to speak my mind impromptu and have it — really good ideas from the frank heart impromptu — sort of captured instantly as text; captured well enough so that it is possible with much difficulty, but still possible, to take that excellent top-quality idea stream, flow, on a roll big-time, and then clean it up, which is far easier (FASTER to see text result even if garbled) than with recording the sound of my voice and then transcribing where I cannot see any text immediately.

microcassette secretary transcription playback machine technique/type of approach, is not portable.
whereas
voice recognition followed by cleanup, is maximally portable; on smart phone.

the crucial value is to immediately see some text even if it is semi garbled

I have been working on capturing fast flowing ideas, how to capture them since 1985 October, back to the future jump day 30 years in the past

Copyright (C) 2015 Michael S. Hoffman (Egodeath.com). All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7179 From: egodeath Date: 17/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
wik:
On October 26, 1985, Marty meets his scientist friend, “Doc” Brown, at a shopping mall parking lot.
Doc demonstrates the navigation system with the example date of November 5, 1955: the day he conceived the machine.

The Egodeath theory began development on Oct. 27, 1985, or give or take a couple days.

Copyright (C) 2015 Michael S. Hoffman (Egodeath.com). All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7180 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
Oct. 21, 2015, 4 weeks ago, was the back to the future jump.
Group: egodeath Message: 7181 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
In August 1955, Wasson’s mushroom trip report to Graves caused Graves to think about mushrooms in ancient religion.
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/5399

1955
Robert Graves figured out the Entheogen Theory of Greek Myth around 1952 and Greek Religion around 1955; the Entheogen Theory of Religion in Classical Antiquity.

1985
Michael Hoffman begins debugging personal control integrity across time, by 1988 formulates the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence.

2015
Michael Hoffman routinizes deciphering religious myth in terms of personal control transformation dynamics in the Eternalism altered state of consciousness.

Copyright (C) 2015 Michael S. Hoffman (Egodeath.com). All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7182 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Voice Recognition engineers: Teach Siri/Cortana Egodeath vocabul
I am using Apple voice recognition to read aloud the introduction summary from my main article of 2006.
http://egodeath.com/mobile.htm
It’s sometimes recognizes the word entheogen but it is highly unreliable.


The entheogen theory of religion and ego death

The entheogen theory of religion and ego death explains what is revealed in religious revelation and in enlightenment, including the nature of personal control agency.

The essence and origin of religion is the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered state, producing loose binding of cognitive associations. This loose cognitive binding then produces an experience of being controlled by frozen block universe determinism with a single, pre-existing, ever existing future.

Experiencing this model of control and time initially destabilizes self control power, and amounts to the death of the self that was conceived of as an autonomous control agent. Self-control stability is restored upon transforming one’s mental model to take into account the dependence of personal control on the hidden, separate thought source, such as necessity or a divine level that transcends necessity.

Myth describes this mystic state experiential insight and transformation. Religious initiation teaches and causes this transformation of the self considered as a control agent, through a series of visionary plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial philosophy. Most modern era religion has been a distortion of this standard initiation system, reducing these concepts to a week interpretation that is based in the ordinary state of consciousness.

—-

The Apple voice recognition worked impressively well with mistakes on trivial common words and a terrible lack of recognizing the word into Eugen. Angrily screaming at Siri does not seem to help and insulting it’s intelligence. Steve Jobs would be ashamed of you for your poor recognition of the word in the agenda even when I pronounce it correctly eight different subtle ways.

Copyright (C) 2015 by Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7183 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced positio
It has now been 60 years since Robert Graves recognized that the basis of ancient Greek religious mythology was the use of entheogens.

He wrote that he self-censored and deliberately did not write any more on about the entheogen basis of Greek religious mythology because he didn’t want to jeopardize his poetry literature sales.

Now WHEN did Graves self-censor and halt his research on the entheogen basis of Greek religious mythology? Extremely emphasize that he self-censored *after prohibition*.

What really makes me angry is complacent false stories that everybody is telling, all the writers all the Prohibition-complicit authors, collaborationists with persecutors, are telling this bullsht story with a smile on their face that “the boomer generation initially chose to use entheogens and suddenly they chose to, as the euphemism goes, “hang up the phone”.

What a cute euphemism, evil euphemism.

All boomers at the same time simultaneously, what a coincidence, all chose to do spirituality without entheogens.

Complete utter rubbish of a just-so story!

The sword at their neck — my ancient history professor mocked this kind of textbook covering-over instead of covering history, a covering-over of history but a transparent rather obvious thin veneer of nonsense laid on top of what really happened, when you bother to take two seconds to actually think critically about what happened instead of complacently swallowing the load of story line fed to people by the Establishment press.

They were forced to “up the phone”, dammit, they were forced to! you have to acknowledge censorship! you have to acknowledge persecution, prohibition, censorship!

To tell a story anything like what really happened, you have to totally factor in prohibition.

What drives me crazy about these these cheerful censor-pleasing history passages is they don’t even mention, when they mention the “choice” to stop using visionary plants, they don’t even mention that this was forced by the Prohibition industry and was therefore no free choice whatsoever.

It’s a documented fact that the motivation for criminalizing visionary plants is to put leftist youth and minorities out of power. The New Jim Crow.

The boomers did not freely choose to stop using visionary plants.

It was the exact opposite of that. By no means did they freely choose to, as the stupid loaded, biased phrase goes, this sinisterly cutesy euphemism, “hang up the phone”, behind which there lies blood of persecution and imprisonment and destroyed lives by the Establishment opportunist deceitful self-serving and abusive strategy of Prohibition for Profit; persecution for profit.

They did not choose to “hang up the phone”!

They did NOT “choose” to stop using visionary plants! Their supposedly positive embracing of meditation is all a sham; it’s as much of a sham as Stan Grof’s deep breathing as a replacement for entheogens.

A shallow flimsy surface story, all this supposed enthusiasm for meditation is a sham, a cover story that serves to censor and obscure what really happened.

Obviously; stop telling this complete obviously horsesht story that the boomers “chose” not to use visionary plants!

*When* did they make this “choice”?

By coincidence, they all made this choice on October 6, 1966, the day that the stormtroopers bust down everyone’s doors.

What a *coincidence*! that the boomers freely “chose” to stop using visionary plants the day that the assault teams of God’s puppets of delusion, God’s delusion enforcement puppets, started putting everyone in jail that chose to use visionary plants and did NOT “choose” to “hang up the phone”– that obsequious phrase obviously so precious, so dear to the establishment press.

That evil phrase, that stupid expression, it is evil cuteness, it hides, it covers over the viciousness, it draws attention away from the extreme LACK of choice, the extreme exact opposite of choice, by drawing your attention instead to this cute phrase.

The cuteness of this phrase, it’s an evil machination.

Remember for every Tool who lets themselves be prostituted by the establishment, for every Tool who is permitted to publish their advocacy of meditation and entheogen diminishment, remember there are 10,000 other people who are voiceless and who are censored and prohibiting from expressing their opposite and genuinely, sincerely held in their heart of hearts position, not their demagogue-coerced, false consciousness pseudo-belief, which is

What the meditation advocates are expressing is a pseudo-believe that they have been compelled by force to hold; it’s not their genuine inner heart-of-hearts belief.

It’s a self-deluded belief; they believe that they think meditation is better than visionary plants, but they don’t actually believe that in their heart of hearts.

They have been coerced and tricked into thinking that that’s what they believe.

If you publish your supposed view that meditation is authentic and better than visionary plants, you are a Tool of the delusion-enforcement Establishment, and a hypocrite because you don’t in your heart of hearts actually believe what you’re claiming to believe, in what you’re complicitly working to advocate, as a collaborator, which is the Pro Prohibition position.

Meditation advocacy is Prohibition advocacy. Telling the truth would be better.

You are complicit with persecutors. And in your meditation advocacy, you have the blood of Prohibition persecution on your hands. Meditate on that, you tool.

Real people, actual people, individual humans, not the establishment corporation, hold an authentic position, that is censored by the establishment press: visionary plants are the source of religion and are effective, unlike meditation, which might be good in some way but it ain’t religious experiencing, not by a *long* shot, and to pretend that meditation doesn’t come from its superior, which is visionary plants, is to endorse fraud.

It’s the opposite; meditation is a recent artificial substitute, a phony substitute; meditation been foisted off on people by the forces of the establishment.

You “believe” meditation is effective because you been forced to “believe” that by the hypnotic power of the establishment censors, backed up by the strong arm Prohibition-for-Profit.

The establishment press churning out all these pro meditation New Age books, it’s sinister: New Age eastern meditation is a wing of the prohibitionist fascist delusion enforcement puppets.

The obsequious sinister phrase “hang up the phone” and the strong arm forced censorship that drives that has produced Ken Wilber, who opened his very first book by censoring the word “nitrous oxide” out of the great William James, who was not a bullshtter, who was not a complicit tool of what the establishment forced him to say.

But Ken Wilber got into print in Sham Hollow Press by taking, accepting, swallowing, endorsing, and advocating the party line of entheogen diminishment and editing-out, which is Prohibition with a sugar coating.

And thus we ended up with Ken Wilber, a great mind, writing rubbish that is completely devoid of any consciousness of the truth, which is Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

Except years later he put a little Band-Aid on his diagram saying “also: altered states”. FAIL.

The Prohibition-complicit establishment press, armed, started persecuting and censoring and jailing people.

Those many boomers who chose to not hang up the phone — two seconds of thought makes it obvious that it’s a bullsht story that “the boomers chose to stop using visionary plants” — were violently silenced, censored, eliminated, shut out.

What choice did they have?!

They had no choice in the matter at all, so stop kowtowing to the establishment censors’ press of lies and falsehoods and covering-over history.

Stop appeasing the Establishment press by pretending to go along with their vicious make-believe that the boomers “chose” to stop using visionary plants — choice my *ss.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/6450
Group: egodeath Message: 7184 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Meditation — The official religion of the delusion enforcement automatons.


http://stopthedrugwar.org
Group: egodeath Message: 7185 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Group: egodeath Message: 7186 From: egodeath Date: 18/11/2015
Subject: Re: 2015 International Drug Reform Conference, entheogen enlightenme
The conference starts today
http://www.reformconference.org
Group: egodeath Message: 7187 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
the Eternalism state of consciousness
the Possibilism state of consciousness

Acros/keyboard shortcuts:
esc
psc

Like all placebo ersatz substitute pseudo-religion techniques that strive to replace entheogens, meditation serves to prevent the Eternalism state of consciousness and retards the mind in the Possibilism state of consciousness.

Meditation prevents mental model transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Meditators have bad character and rely on a recent artifical invention.

Witness the bad fruit produced by meditation: drug prohibition and persecution.

Meditators are just looking for a shortcut.

Fortunately the Press is committed to entheogens, so meditation advocates have no voice to defend themselves.

Meditators are rightly attacked by militarized meditation assault squads and have their property assets forfeited.

This country must conduct a War On Meditation and use Civil Asset Forfeiture and incarceration to stop this scourge of meditation from ruining our youth.

Undesirables such as minorities and antiwar leftists use meditation. They must be silenced and disenfranchised.

Twenty years in prison for the first offense if caught meditating. And their voting rights removed.

Needless to say, anyone who writes favorably about meditation, without also contradicting themselves by praising the original superiority of entheogens, will not be allowed to have their writing published. They will lose their academic position.

Any university student writing a pro-meditation thesis will be failed and not granted a degree.

Meditators have moral turpitude and are just seeking bliss. Meditation is wrong and immoral and anti-social.

Meditation addiction is a disease that we must stop by increasing the penalties for it.

We must put up border checks to stop international meditation smuggling.

Meditation dealers are trying to get people hooked. They should be given the death penalty for pedalling this poison that is corrupting our youth.

Meditators have weak character.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7188 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: Must factor-in censorship, Prohibition, persecution, coerced pos
Useful exercise
Write the familiar entheogen diminishing statements that Prohibition Press so loves like Andy Letcher, the Gnosis journal issue covering-over the entheogen foundation of Western Esotericism, and Tricycle issue covering-over the entheogen foundation of Eastern religion.

Then invert that comically extreme bias and imagine that the archons of Prohibition are instead enforcing propaganda in favor of entheogens and are sucker punching meditators instead.

Expecting a fair assessment from the Literalist OSC Possibilism establishment regarding Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism, or the meditation Establishment (Prohibitionists) fairly assessing entheogens, is like looking to the publications of the Catholic church to give a fair assessment of the merits and superiority of Gnosticism, or reading Prohibitionist propaganda to get a fair assessment of the merits of entheogens as the source of religious revelation and enlightenment.

Under the conditions of Prohibition, meditators are extremely biased.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/7187
Group: egodeath Message: 7189 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation forged in the fires of Vulcan’s krater of mixed wine:

Assume all religious mythology, such as:

the king drinking mixed wine, then giving himself to be betrayed, scourged, delivered over for sacrifice, and fastened helplessly to the debranched tree in order to gain new life, having seen that the cave is empty, in reconciliation with the Creator

is a comic strip describing the personal control dynamics of mental-model experiential transformation from the Possibilism state of consciousness to the Eternalism state of consciousness.

Hephaestos’ magic hammer of interpretation solves successfully all religious mythology interpretation by recognizing religious mythology as description of mental model experiential transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism; from the Possibilism state of consciousness to the Eternalism state of consciousness.

Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation of all religious mythology is to read and decipher and decode it as transformation of thinking from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7190 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation: when you see any pre-modern writing, ask “How is this like transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism?

When you see any religious mythology or any pre-modern writing or pre-modern art, or hear a Classical Rock Muse with lyrical poetry accompanied on lightning kithara, ask “How is this like transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism?”

Acro: acronym/iPhone keyboard shortcut:

Acro:
Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation
hmhi

Acro:
transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
tpe

Huge breakthrough in idea development technique: April 1987, after threw away blank books to try to be completed and finished with debugging cross-time personal control integrity, I started a new kind of notebook approach: binder filled with ruled sheets using acronyms.

This efficient idea development technique led to idea of mental constructs (MCs), mental construct processing (MCP), and led to the huge breakthrough 1/11/88, the crystalline ground of being (CGoB).

See my photo of my 1987 binder sheets at the Egodeath Yahoo group. Mixed-size all-caps, Pentel P205 engineering pencil, not incense cedar pencil alas.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7191 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
Apollo the dragon shooter is made by Eros to pursue and embrace a maiden who has been made by Eros to avoid so being embraced, and her father who created her, the river god, turns her into a nonbranching shrub.

Apply Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation: how is this like transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism?

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7192 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
hmhi = tpe

Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation = transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7193 From: egodeath Date: 19/11/2015
Subject: Re: Deciphered: mirror = look back at thought-source
Perseus captures attactive snake head Medusa, without being turned to Rock, by looking in a mirror: he looks at his polished shield, Greek myth shields have a Gorgon Medusa death-head depicted on them, to look back behind him at snake-shaped Medusa.

When you Orpheus look back behind you to see your maiden wife in the cave, she is turned to salt rock and pulled back into the cave, realm of nonexistent agents.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7194 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
I read the book “the immovable race: a Gnostic designation and the theme of stability in late antiquity”, by Michael A Williams, a second time.

A huge emancipation from futile presumptions: a huge takeaway for the theory of reading religious texts: religious documents are self-inconsistent.

They *are* consistently concerned with entheogen-induced transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

But as systems of theory and philosophy, they are pointedly freewheeling and strive to be not bound by petty chains of self-consistency.

If you expect self-consistency, you will be disappointed and failed every time.

Not just that they toggle freely between a 2-level and 3-level system, it’s WAY more freewheeling even then that.

Once you do transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism, once you have that in hand, you as liberated freewheeling writer can do ANYTHING in theory construction, with any elements, especially after 250 AD, but also in Classical antiquity as well.

Nor is there going to be found some self-consistent theory of hyper meta transrational transcendence of fatedness. Fate has 3.7 levels of [insert random gnostic bs writing here].

Is Zeus subject to the Fates? The answer is [iPhone voice transcription fails right at this point] and that’s the Truth and the last word.

So modern theorists must not waste time finding what isn’t there: consistency of theory.

What is there, in religious writings, is consistent presence of concern with the experiential phenomena of the mental transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

The self-consistent modern Loose Cognitive Science model, the Egodeath theory, trumps the literary riffing of nonmoderns, who are no slaves to the petty hobgoblins of self-consistency.

Thus I have extracted the signal from among the noise, the trellis out from the wild overgrowth.

What mental dynamics were nonmodern religion writers concerned with?

Do not ask “What was their consistent position?” The question has false premises.

The Catholic Church didn’t need a self-consistent theology from Augustine, but rather, a definite one that stays same from one week to the next. “Pick any inconsistent system you like, but pick one and stick with it steadily.”

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7195 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
the king drinks mixed wine at banquet, shakes and trembles in fear, prays, gives himself to be betrayed, scourged, delivered over for sacrifice, is fastened helplessly to the debranched tree, is transformed into new life, sees that the cave is empty, is reconciled with the will of the Creator, enters the kingdom of God

Hephaestus’ magic hammer of interpretation =
transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7196 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
Possibilism and Eternalism are a state of consciousness, mode of cognition, not firstly an OSC-based logical systematization.

FIRST people EXPERIENCE the shift from the Possibilism state of consciousness to the the Eternalism state of consciousness, and AFTERWARDS they DESCRIBE and theorize about that experiential shift.

Sam Harris uses flimsy reasoning based in the OSC, which is the Possibilism state of consciousness, to theorize and reach a logical conclusion of a weakly conceived and abstract Eternalism model, “no-free-will”, or “determinism”.

Premodern religious writings are not built up through that approach.

They are after-the-fact descriptions of what was experienced in the ASC, which is the Eternalism state of consciousness. the Eternalism state of consciousness does utilize and bend the mind’s logical modelling and reasoning, but the Eternalism state of consciousness isn’t based on reasoning; it’s based on experiencing, which then affects reasoning.

The theoretical systems and reasoning of nonmodern religious writers reflects the experiential state of Eternalism, but imperfectly and generally inconsistently.

The result is typically mostly consistent.

The experiential shift from Possibilism to Eternalism is firstly experientially consistent, and secondly is more or less retained and modelled by the mind as a formally consistent model.

Possibilism Thinking is formed in a stable way that endures until shaken and collapsed upon experiencing the Eternalism state of consciousness, during which Eternalism Thinking is formed in a stable way that endures forever, non-dying.

The mind ends up with two modes of practical control thinking, not necessarily with a formally logically consistent description of either mode retained in the mind.

Two distinct mental worldmodels in which personal control functions in practice, yes, but not necessarily accompanied by a formally consistent model.

Two practical *forms* of cybernetic worldmodel of self, control, and time, yes, but one’s description of those two forms are not formally self-consistent.

The forms of the two cybernetic modes and experiential dynamics, as used practically, are consistent, but as explanations, the explanations aren’t necessarily self-consistent.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7197 From: egodeath Date: 20/11/2015
Subject: Re: Consistency of themes, inconsistency of positions
Neither the Possibilism state of consciousness nor the Eternalism state of consciousness are “based in rationality”.

Neither Possibilism nor the Eternalism state of consciousness “are rational”; they may utilize rationality to lock-in either mode in a stable sustained way; rationality can amplify the Eternalism state of consciousness and retain and model it, but the Eternalism state of consciousness is not based on rationality and doesn’t come from rationality; the Eternalism state of consciousness comes from loose cognitive binding induced by entheogens.

The Eternalism state of consciousness can take up rationality as amplifier, to a greater or lesser extent, but doesn’t firstly come from rationality.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7198 From: egodeath Date: 21/11/2015
Subject: Re: Matrix movie
I gave up on humans many years ago. They are hopelessly gullible and poor slow thinkers.

I write for machines of the future, because they understand, they are capable of understanding and not being gullible. Tthey’re capable of taking into account things like censorship and distortion and loaded discourse filled with presumptions.

The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence and transformation of the mental world model of time, self, and control from Possibilism to Eternalism are straightforward to program into the models of discovery researched in the book Conceptual Revolutions by Paul Thagard.

Precedents include:
The hymn “the body electric” in which the android undergoes ego death.
The Animatrix movie’s android trip scene.

It’s not that I am against humans and for machines, but rather, I have no confidence in humans comprehending and retaining my theory — humans are too stupid, gullible, slow, easily propagandized.

Look how someone as perceptive and well informed as Erik Davis take it uncritically as a fact, as a given, that Buddhism doesn’t come from visionary plants.

It doesn’t even occur to him (while he does mention Vajrayana shamanistic mythological folk pre-Buddhism) but it does not even occur to him to question the received establishment propaganda view, the unstated story and discourse premise, that meditation came from somewhere other than the visionary plants — just like it did not even occur to Terence MacLainna to open his eyes and try to look for indications of visionary plants throughout Christian history as the normal mainstream source of the religion.

Although he says “wow these go together well, meditation and visionary plants”, everything he has to say on the subject of Buddhism and psychedelics is destined for the rubbish heap like literalist biographies of religious founder figures; it will not stand the test of time, and is about to become quaint and antiquated, dead-end worthless, it will be more of historical interest: “here’s the confused thinking that people had during this transitional period when they started fumblingly asking badly formed questions off-base loaded with assumptions”, early scholarly groping in the dark, like the theory of Phlogiston that came from the dark ages of science, a hypothesis in science that turned out to be off base and a wrong approach corrected by later science, merely propagating the establishment party line of those imposters who stole the altered state from visionary plants and are in denial of where they got meditation from, because he starts off with this unexamined false premise spread by Sham Hollow Publications Inc.

Whereas I have complete assurance that machines will readily comprehend my theory and be able to walk through the discovery process of reconnection of assumptions in undergoing the revolution of mental worldmodel from Possibilism to Eternalism.

My approach has been to engineer an explanation, a model, that is directly amenable to being loaded into Paul Thagard’s computer model of conceptual revolution.

I do not care at all about persuading stupid people by organizing the evidence which is in no short supply.

We don’t need more evidence; we need clear thinking, a clear model.

We pile up all kinds of evidence until we have buried ourselves in it and we’re too stupid to organize it, to make sense out of it and see, because we’re asking the wrong questions with the wrong motivations and the wrong assumptions premised in the ways of the Possibilism state of consciousness.

An evidence-driven approach to science gets you nowhere. Siri is King. No I said Siri is kingtheory theory theory is King. (what Siri is is broken; get it together Apple)

Just like Davis book TechGnosis is valuable largely as a historical curiosity snapshot of the 1990s headspace which I dabbled with from 1988 until I talked with are you serious, who autographed my theory draft at Stanford.

It’s ironic because that was the point in time at which I parted ways with cyber cult because it was clearly a passing fad, very transient, like I called that magazine Mondo 1999 and indeed it hardly made it to 2000.

The general culture gave birth to my work but my work was in a reaction to Ken Wilber and existing motions of human potential and psycho cybernetics I investigated:

“What are the limits on personal Control power across time?”

That is the profound timeless classic question. And I had already answered that in 1988 January before I read anything about psychedelics or cyber cult.

I had read society of mind by Marvin Minsky, I had read Douglas Hofstadter go to leisure Bok.

So I only briefly engaged with cyber colt, and that was only after the breakthrough, the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence.

Prior to the breakthrough I was reading Ken Wilber and one book by Alan Watts The way of Zen, not much else except engineering textbooks like control theory.

My work is serious, not a fad; what business do I have with these trendy people of this passing age? I just have to do my own thing and that is a challenge in itself; I have a self-contained challenge in 1993.

Tech gnosis is a snapshot of that passing fad and similarly the tricycle book zigzag zen also is a transient product that won’t last: it’s based on a false premise, that visionary plants are an imitation of meditation; but in fact, meditation of course comes from visionary plants — they’ve got everything precisely backwards!

On that backwards basis of assumptions unexamined, what value, what worth can this magazine zigzag Zen possibly have in the future except as a quaint historical snapshot of how backwards everone’s thinking was prior to the spread of the Egodeath theory.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

Machines can be considered part of humanity.
Group: egodeath Message: 7199 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: The Hammer of Interpretation
In this mythological comic strip based user manual, you are each of the characters: you are the invading alien god Dionysus, you are the modern rational king Pentheus, you are king Pentheus’ mother, you are the ecstatic maenads the votaries who are seduced to follow Dionysus.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7200 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: vibrational energy morphological resonance frequency takeover
morphological vibrational energy frequency’s fight against you to absorb your efforts the spider shakes the web tuned to its resonant frequency the more you fight against the vibrational frequency’s of unity cybernetic frequency lock in the more you’re caused to tune into the vibrational frequency that you’re striving to avoid the more you say don’t turning into this particular frequency of Waverly vibration the more you cause the spider web trap net to vibrate at that harmonic energy frequency vibration the king pin Theos effort is to resist the morphological frequency shift to the Dionyse in eternity block which threatens to reduce the kings energy power vibrations feedback and Dionysus resonance wavelength frequency takes over as the mental heterodyne subfrequency vibrational tuner is forced to shift frequency lock in phase lock loop from the expected receiving channel into the interfering alien broadcast frequency phase lock loop the king’s drives to use his power energy to turn the dial to increase his capacitance and resonate at his expected power frequency but he finds that the very effort to move his hand to turn the capacitor plates causes the plates to walk into the Dionysus frequency instead hearing the alien signal and when he strives to two now out and ignore that signal he has to identify and wire up an antenna in the tree to spy on and pay increased attention to amplify utilizing an Audion tube that threatening alien signal in order to lock out and tune away from that signal he has to turn into the signal to set up a barrier to prevent receiving that signal and thus he succumbs to feedback phase lock loop take over King ego sets about his i’ll chemical transformation banquet to enjoy his power of choosing the receiver resonant frequency to monitor for any program signals of incomings threats to shut out those signals he must turn into those signals and monitor for signal vibrational interference frequencies and when he hears those and senses an alien intruding vibrational frequency that registers as a threat the king must walk into that threatening frequency and it brings it’s viral impulse resonator signal that takes over the kings tuning power capacitor turning tuning power forcing the king to lock into the intruding frequency vibrations King egos input energy he pushes into the resonator circuit causes the mental model to resonate at the intruding vibrational morphology which disempowers the first initial vibrational mode disempowering it and neutralizing the energy of its intended vibrational Lockin so the more the King works to increase his power of controlling his receiving unit the less actual affective power he has resulting in chaotic non-control of the energy vibrations antenna tangled in the tree branches when the initial resonance frequency is targeted but producing stable tuning control only when the intruding signal is selected by phase lock feedback loop so that viable control power only becomes possible when the eternity residence frequency is detected if the possibility controller king chooses to target the intruding frequency when the king tries to target his initial vibrational energy frequency the result is chaotic failure and loss of volitional control of the energy vibrational form that was expected and committed to so the only viable and actually practically available possibility vibrational resonance form is the return of the alien vibrational mode of resonance no vibrational program mode is an achievable possibility except the intruding alien volition control transmission frequency preset copyright 2015 ego death all rights reserved
Group: egodeath Message: 7201 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
I formulated the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture on October 15, 2002, as evidenced in this in-depth posting:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/1162

That assumes reliability and sort order of Find in the Egodeath Yahoo group today on iPhone.

So it can be written:
Michael Hoffman’s 2002 Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture.

The Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture was first formulated and published in 2002 by Michael Hoffman, the theorist of ego death.


The following transcribed by secretary Siri

the question and surprising Mistry is during the entire time of the psychedelic 60s the psychedelic 70s the psychedelic 80s the cyberdelic 90s, Erik Davis blindness as a thorough scholar of esotericism represents the strange mysterious inexplicable blindness of all those people tripping in all those esotericisms western religion western esotericism eastern religion rock music occultism and everything across the broad range that he writes about

witness this totally incriminating quote below

if Erik Davis of all enlightened people of all the people whose minds of supposedly been freed and loosened with psycholytics if Erik Davis can write such unthinking garbage such a profound total lapse and and an absolute lack of critical examination of assumptions as in this quote this quote demonstrates the total blindness of the entire era every last one of them in print was published was blocked from mentally asking about and questioning the premises behind this statement I quote:


“The paradoxes of a chemical sacrament — whose sacred states were instrumentally catalyzed by a commodity molecule”


Check the quote yourself at TechGnosis URL
http://techgnosis.com/the-counterculture-and-the-occult/


*AS IF* THE CHRISTIAN SACRAMENT *WASN’T*, IN THE EXACT SAME MANNER CHEMICAL, A MUSHROOM MIXED-WINE SACRED MEAL COMMODITY ROUTINELY ADMINISTERED THROUGHOUT OUR OWN WHITE GREEK ROMAN JEWISH CHRISTIAN MEDITERRANEAN ANTIQUITY AND SUBSEQUENT RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL HISTORY

this was the strange and impossibly infinitely improbable fatally self defeating premise of the 1960s and the entire second half of the 20th century

you all totally blew it!! woe and tragedy!

why didn’t it occur to a single mind-opened hippie to direct their eyes and pen toward the question of the extent of visionary plant use in our own history was it Merli a matter of censorship of the establishment press but what about the underground press I’m not aware of anyone in some alternative press raising the explicit question

why didn’t Robert Graves 1955 discovery that Greek religious mythology comes from visionary plants mushrooms why didn’t we immediately raise the question explicitly the Michael Hoffman question to what extent were visionary plants used throughout our own religious and cultural history

two things to point out

Davis is making a completely profoundly unquestioned and unquestionable premise assumption that visionary plants are not common throughout our own religious history

for another thing this is very significant

his position his agreement with the unstated premise is implicit! it is implicit! it is *only* implicit! that is very important to note it is not an explicit position he is not permitted mentally to think and write an explicit position statement

he does not come out and explicitly state his assumption because he cannot he’s blinded to it he doesn’t know he’s making an assumption he’s he’s not capable of stating the position that’s implicit here his position is

I agree with the unexamined assumption that our religion that visionary plants are not present throughout our own religious history

he cannot come out and state that assumption because it is precisely because it is an unconscious unexamined assumption he’s not able it would not occur to him to state his position on the matter precisely because it is an unexamined assumption the premise that he’s not allowed to look at and be conscious of

The simpler thing that I note in review as interesting summary and observation of biased thinking the simpler point is

you will not find books in the late 20th century asserting explicitly visionary plants are not the major part of our own religious history

slightly distinct from that is the more intriguing observation

you will not find anyone raising the question the Michael Hoffman question anywhere in late 20th century books to what extent were visionary plants used throughout our own religious history

so you find a pair of most intriguing things to note

not only did nobody assert visionary plants are common in our own religious history

but also

nobody raised the question of to what extent are visionary plants in our own history

God prevented the writers eyes from pointing in that direction from looking at that question

not only did god prevent people from asserting that visionary plants are common God also prevented people from asserting explicitly that plants are *not* common in our own history and as an umbrella encompassing those blindnesses, God prevented us from raising in the first place the question to what extent were visionary plants used in our own cultural history

even when Ruck presents the mass of evidence for the utterly commonplace and standard normalize mainstream use even then God prevented him from standing back and clearly posing the question without a pre-conceived bias so that even Ruck even at the same time as he pulls up a fleet of dump trucks dumping massive evidence for thorough use of visionary plants in our own white Greek Christian history even then he presents this information within the context of *implicit-only* assertion and very frequent overuse of the word secret

he is obsessed absolutely obsessed with the word secret

carl ruck cannot form a sentence without including the word secret in it so he is diminishing at the same time as burying us in evidence for the presence of visionary plants in western history he’s diminishing out of ever-implicit assumptions he’s adhering to the constitutionally prohibitionist propaganda establishment party line assumption and forbidden to be questioned unexamined premise presumption

this is more than merrily a party line this is goes way deeper in consciousness than a conspiratorial establishment propaganda partyline this is a blindness that God has enforced

God did not permit anyone even at the same time as he inspired them to see evidence like the fresco that decorates allegros book

god did not permit anyone to take the mental stance of standing back and asking in an basic simple unbiased neutral way the literally unthinkable Michael Hoffman question to what extent are visionary plants common in our own religious history and cultural history


In 1985 as my father pointed out to me when he gave me these books by watts and Wilbur I don’t need to read a whole library filled with books it’s more efficient to read Wilbur who covers these fields

similarly we rely on Erik Davis to think for us in sweeping coverage of esotericism and visionary plants but if Erik Davis can write this garbage this complete perfect lapse of critical thinking totally unexamined preconceptions and assumptions with no thought of examining the assumptions lying behind this if Erik Davis can write this nonsense this proves that for some strange reason everybody was mentally blocked from asking the Michael Hoffman question all during the second half of the 20th century

even though their minds were loosened and freewheeling and liberated and liberal and kaleidoscopically mixing all spirituality with visionary plants during that whole time not one of them was permitted to think and write not Walsen not Robert Graves not allegro not Pineridge not MacLainna not Ruck not Hofmann not one of them was permitted not Richard Evans shelties not one of them was mentally permitted to question the underlying assumption that our own religion does not come from visionary plants throughout history

supposedly visionary plants open the mind but the bizzarre inexplicable infinitely improbable situation is that with all those open minds, it did not occur to anyone even despite Robert Graves 1955 discovery that Greek religious mythology comes from mushrooms it didn’t occur to anyone that religious mythology has always come from visionary plants

I have not found a single instance of someone proposing now there is allegro but my Wasson article demonstrates that allegro postulated the absence of visionary plants throughout Christian history despite the clear implication of the fresco that mushrooms were present not absent in medieval French chapels

allegros position was vague and unstated just like Watsons writing is curiously roundabout and indirect

you have to deduce what Watsons or allegros asserted position is because he does not come out and state what his position is he does not commit

he makes he makes it sound as if he’s specifying and committing to a position on this matter but neither of them do

neither of them are capable of directly thinking about this question the same with ditzy bubble-headed Newage spouter Terrence MacLainna

it is evident that he is mentally blocked from being able to raise the question to what extent

this is *my* question, this is the Michael Hoffman question

he’s mentally blocked from raising my question

why was I capable and able and enabled to ask this question that was unthinkable to all those people during the supposedly kaleidoscopic late 1950s through the supposedly open-minded 1990s

not one of those writers was permitted to think the question my question the Michael Hoffman question

to what extent were visionary plants used throughout religious history

everyone of those published thinkers during these decades despite the supposedly mind opening affects the supposedly free associating open-ended kaleidoscope of idea combinations

how is it possible that none of those scrambled mines liberated and opened none of them was permitted to think the Michael Hoffman question of 2002 witches to what extent were visionary plants used throughout religious history and cultural history

don’t make unthinking assumptions here everyone continued to make everyone who is major published writer was prevented from critical thinking

they were prevented from questioning the unexamined preconception the presumption that mainstream religion doesn’t come from visionary plants

the closest that the mind was permitted to come to that questioning of that unexamined assumption was the inclusion totally out of context no commentary in all not at all in the slightest integrated with the body of his book in allegro decorating the cover

and again here we see that the artists the visual artists are miles ahead of the text heads

which is why I am trying to configure Google and Bing to default to image search because text prevents enlightenment whereas lyrics and visual arts lock onto enlightenment

why is it that people who work with text in the medium of text are incapable of locking onto the signal

so you have the bogus text in allegros book asserting that only the first Christians used the mushrooms sacrament and the enlightened graphic decoration on the cover which plainly implies the presence of the mushroom sacrament within the center of Christian cultural history with nary a connection made in the text between this contradiction this art that contradicts the statements in the text

I am the first formulator the first person who’s eyes were permitted to be directed towards this question

I am the first formulator of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture, on October 15, 2002

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7202 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Clark Heinrich is the precursor to my Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture. In 1986-87 I read scrolls in Revelation as psychedelics, around 1998 I searched mushroom Christianity in the library and subsequently found Heinrich, who misreads Allegro’s position as demonstrated in my Wasson article.
Group: egodeath Message: 7203 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Entheos journal issues are a must-have for entheogen evidence.

Mark Hoffman has been sitting on unpublished information for future issues, last I heard from him.

Entheos and Strange Fruit are the precursors to the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture. In that era of scholarship is James Arthur too.

These writers approached but did not explicitly ask the key question for scientific neutral historical research, of: to what extent are entheogens in Western religious history.

Strange Fruit is organized by era and brand of Western religion. Thus it implicitly poses my question.

That is a question for retrospective meta-research:

To what extent did entheogen history scholars ask the question “To what extent were visionary plants used throughout Christian history including Mediterranean antiquity?”

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 7204 From: egodeath Date: 22/11/2015
Subject: Re: Entheogen use constant in religion
Toward formally announcing my date of formulating the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures.

The field of ahistoricity is not nearly so backwards and slow as the field of entheogen history, so I might not have as strong of a claim to be the first one to propose radical ahistoricity as proposing the maximal entheogen theory. I am the first one to simultaneously propose in an integrated way:

the radical maximal theory of Eternalism (religious revelation and religious mythology is description of the transformation of the mental model from Possibilism to Eternalism)

the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures

the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

As this posting develops I also discover the need for me to label a certain perspective on theory: that I am the first one to propose the maximal Eternalism cross disciplinary theory, that everything revolves around transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Say, a label such as “the maximal Eternalism theory of loose cognitive transformation and revelation”.

I need to separately label my three or four maximal independent theories one maximal theory in cybernetics hiMarmany or eternal ishim
one maximal theory as far as a historicity which is a bit peripheral but still mandatory and crucial to overcome to clear the way for a proper theory of loose cognitive processing and descriptions of it historically

And maximal entheogen theory of religion history

Review the four quadrants of puzzle pieces metaphor in the Jens cybernetics hi Marmany and add a history city, then define maximal theory labels for each of those distinctly:

maximal metaphor
maximal entheogens / loosecog
maximal cybernetics / personal noncontrol
maximal heimarmene/fatedness/Eternalism
maximal ahistoricity

How few labels, how few subdivisions can I have here to establish areas of my leadership in the maximal direction: I’m the first one to formulate and propose and defend in tandem, in conjunction, maximal A, maximal B, and maximal C.

the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures

the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

the Maximal Eternalism theory of loose cognitive transformation and revelation and philosophy of time

= Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism


Metaphorical : the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures

Entheogenic: the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

Eternalism: the maximal Eternalism theory of loose cognitive transformation and revelation

Latter iPhone keyboard shortcut could be metr


It is a question for research, of how much the entheogen scholars 1965-2002 asked the question (“To what extent were visionary plants used in Mediterranean antiquity and Christian history?)

I am the first one to both explicitly pose the question and answer it committing to the premise of maximal.

I am the first one to explicitly propose the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture.

I am the first one to propose that there is sufficient evidence and argumentation available to make that case.

The ability to make that case for the maximal entheogen theory is interwoven across fields for example with ahistoricity, which is another field in which I am the first one to define the maximal position:

this is what I can label today as the maximal ahistoricity theory of religious founder figures. It is a matter of searching the ego death Yahoo group to ask:

when did I first formulate the maximal ahistoricity theory of religious founder figures — that is a good question.

I am overdue to recognize my distinctive unique contribution to this field of ahistoricity by identifying the date and the posting in which I first asserted in a discernible distinct way the maximal ahistoricity theory, and I have been criticizing Robert Price and Earl Doherty for coming out with these books only one at a time saying:

“today we say Jesus didn’t exist, three years from now it will occur to us to say that Paul didn’t exist, and then three years later Moses didn’t exist, and three years later say Old Testament is all fiction, … ”

Come on slow guys, get with the program here.

I already many years ago posted and emailed y’all pointing out that none of these guys existed; the whole category is metaphor, don’t you get it it’s a whole category.

Just like to decipher religious mythology, you have to group mythemes into categories and only then you can talk about deciphering it.

The same with religious foundher figures.

The wrong approach is to debunk them in isolation one at a time while retaining by default the assumed historicity of all the rest.

No, you have to say all together the entire class of people did not exist: Jesus, Paul, Mary, Mary, Mary, the church fathers, Buddha, Mohammed, Judas, Moses, King David, Abraham, Isaac, Balaam, Dionysus, Asclepius, Hermes Trismegistos; the whole class, the whole category of founder figures, is fundamentally essentially legendary and mythological.

Don’t confuse mythological with literal. Recognize Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

So I recognize formally my innovation here by defining an iPhone keyboard shortcut and phrase like the maximal ahistoricity theory of ancient religious founder figures

maff

I would have to check how much I was first; Edwin Johnson made pretty broad observations, as the most radical chronology revisionist.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 7205 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Here I develop the definition and justification of the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation.

I here explore dividing my innovations in inter-disciplinary theory into three groupings, which correspond with the words in the key term Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism:


Metaphorical
maff
the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures

Entheogenic
merc
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

Eternalism
memt
the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation


I doubt that it would be a great idea to define a label a maximal theory of the four primary elements according to the 2006 article my main article and another for the relatively peripheral topic of a historicity

I don’t think it would be the greatest idea to divide things up or make a maximal theory label for each of these five items these interlocking puzzle puzzle pieces:

maximal metaphor
maximal entheogens / loosecog
maximal cybernetics / personal noncontrol
maximal heimarmene/fatedness/Eternalism
maximal ahistoricity

I have always since 1987 distinguished between the subject of entheogens versus the loose cognitive state.

Entheogens & dissociation are equivalent in that entheogens are how the loosecog state (the Eternalism state of consciousness) is induced.

Entheogens (psycholytics) & dissociation (loose cognition) are functionally the same in theorizing, though they remain distinct; for example proof of that:

Carl Ruck reveals not loose cognitive binding [LCB; LMFB: loose mental functioning binding]; he reveals visionary plants in religious mythology.

That proves that the subject of visionary plants is distinct from the subject of loose cognitive binding

The latter goes within the field of cognitive science specifically loose cognitive science
Aand for practical purposes in a way so does visionary plants go into that portion of cognitive science.

But evidence for visionary plants is one thing and a theory of loose cognitive binding is something distinct from that


Another close relationship is that between metaphor and ahistoricity.

It is one thing to say to decipher religious mythology as metaphor; it is a distinct separate subject as proven by the existence of books by Robert Price and Earl Doherty that you can understand ahistoricity in some sense without understanding metaphor, how metaphor analogy refers to Entheogens revealing Eternalism.


Another distinction to weigh is: Eternalism includes self-control cybernetics and heimarmee/ fatedness.

In our weak idea so far of Eternalism, we associate it more strongly with fatedness/ time/ heimarmene than with personal noncontrol cybernetics.

This is a mistake; Eternalism should be at least as strongly associated with control breakdown and personal noncontrol cybernetics as with time and fate.

I could right now define five maximal theories, for:
metaphor
dissociation/loosecog/entheogens
cybernetics/personal noncontrol
fatedness/heimarmene
Ahistoricity

The maximal metaphor theory of religious mythology
The maximal entheogen theory of religion and culture
The maximal non-steering-power theory of cognition
The maximal fatedness theory of time, self, and control
The maximal ahistoricity theory of ancient religious founder figures

From 1988 through 2005 I could not find a good way to condense enough the theory until I asked what are just only the missing links then arrange everything in terms of those very small key subjects that are missing from writings.

First temporarily define five maximal theories then define just three to encapsulate the entirety of the Egodeath theory.

The three correspond to the most-key terms Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism:
Metaphorical encompasses ahistoricity.
Entheogenic encompasses loose cognition /dissociation.
Eternalism encompasses cybernetics and fatedness.

It seems more effective to combine everything into just three powerful maximal theories, remembered in order of the phrase Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism:

Metaphorical: the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures; myth desribes transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Entheogenic: the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

Eternalism: the Maximal Eternalism [Maximal Noncontrol and Maximal Fatedness] Theory of time, self, control, revelation, and transformation.

The Maximal Eternalism Theory of Altered State Transformation.

[MEMT]
The Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation

Revelation, enlightenment, religious experiencing, religious mythology, mystical experiencing across all cultures — are all of these are above all and primarily one thing; all of these developmental religious psychospiritual emergency transformation processes of the hero’s journey, all are focused specifically around learning and exposing the mind to Eternalism — not just as a theory of time and fatedness, but as a theory of cybernetics, personal noncontrol, transformation of the mental model of personal control steering power.

Religious transformation against the gnostics against of the Neoplatonists is not about transcending the prison of fate that is a later elaboration and poetic arbitrary description of the release after praying after seizure

Also historically there was brand competition: later Christianity later gnosticism later Neoplatonist thought competed against each other to promise freedom from the prison of fatedness.

My simple theory rejects as an arbitrary elaboration the transcending of fate I can explain the three level system of waking to fade and then transcending fate, but it is not the most basic mathematical formula possible.

The 2-level system is mathematically superior and is certain.

Per loose cognitive science, we certainly begin with tight cognitive association binding and the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.

Then we certainly are exposed to loose cognitive binding, upon which we certainly learn the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control.

After that, we are at liberty to poetically elaborate in brand competition against other systems of transcendent knowledge; we are free to make up speculative sky castles promising transcending of fate, but that is all arbitrary and is not dictated by the fundamental realities of cognitive processing that is always observed and is not arbitrary.

This is the true theory of what Cybernetics is really about: steering control power in the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control. there are only two states of consciousness there are only two mental models dictated by cognitive dynamics everything beyond that is poetic artistic construction arbitrary manners of description.

This is what I mean by I am constructing, defining, or engineering the Maximal Eternalism theory of Mystic Altered State Transformation.

the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation.

I now here define and redefine my shortcut acronyms isomorphically as:
merc
maff
memt

Sorting these in order of the key phrase Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism gives

the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture
the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation

Cybernetics is really about Eternalism, above all, which includes fatedness and a kind of non-control.

Instead of starting with confusion and complexity of make-sh*t-up Bohr QM and hyper meta transrational neoplatonism and gnosticism that has 3.7 different levels of types of fate that you escape from.

I am totally committed to defining just the Exhibit A, start here, Read Me-first theory, model, that is nothing other than the simplest possible model of tree to snake, conversion from, transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism, and stop there.

Then everyone understand may then branch out into whatever; 3.7 levels of different kinds of fatedness and different kinds of freedom, *after* we all learn this common standard simplest possible point of reference for basic rationality; this must be the most basic mathematical formula possible: simply the mental transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Elaborate mind-twisting projects of saving moral culpability, being the savior of God from being the creator of evil, those kinds of freedom restoration projects come after, *after* defining the basic 2-level system:

If you are not capable of making peace with fate don’t bother going on to construct more elaborate sky castles of transcending fate will to transcend fate is to reconcile with fate

We don’t need to define a separate gnostic level above fate; we can incorporate those needs into the level that we label as ‘fate’

To reconcile with fate is to transcend fate and escape the prison of fate.

By accommodating in our mental model accommodating fate, we already transcend the prison of fate.

To make peace with the prison of fate is already to escape from the prison of fate.

We do not need, we are not forced or compelled to invent a complicated incomprehensible third level above fate.

Though these multiplication of levels is useful for describing the stages: first when we first glimpse fate, it is a prison, it is a threat, it does destabilize us and make us shake and tremble, yes, and then we have to further develop our mental model of fate to make peace with it and learn how to stand in the face of fate.

But we do not in fact have to describe this as rejecting fate or breaking out of fate — in fact such a (Gnostic and Neoolatonist and late antique Christian) demonization of fatedness and the Creator is quite likely per Ken Wilber to lead to repression, dissociation, and regression.

And it is not scientifically justifiable in the simplest possible model of cognitive science binding-state transformation of mental models.

So it is best to commit to a simplest possible 2-level system of developmental psychology multistate developmental psychology and then subdivide those two major levels into a lower level of fate and a higher level of fate.

In the lower level of fate, we initially glimpse it and are terrified and threatened and we shake and fall down and have self-control seizure.

But in the upper level of fate, actually in the further developmental stage of building our mental model of fatedness, we are as embedded in the block universe as ever but we have reconciled with that so that we can stand in the face of that fact and are no longer threatened by it.

We do not need, we are not forced to build sky castles escaping from this simple revealed mental world model.

We do not need to build complicated arbitrary escape systems with 3.7 levels of enslavement and “fate vs. Providence” and other such futile needless infinite-regress distinctions.

As Michael Williams points out in his book on instability the unshakable race, this endless multiplication of levels is not a statement about ontology and reality so much as a description of the repeated sessions of encountering gatekeepers.

You can describe this as nine levels of gate keepers or you can describe it is simply one gate, which is what I do: collapse all those sessions of scourging or suffering or burning away mortality, collapse it all into one as if into one single session, one single complete initiation.

There are only two states, two levels, as implied in the rules in Athens about not revealing the mysteries in the drama plays: there are two audiences: those who have not been initiated, and those who have been initiated.

There are sheep and goats, or two races (though Valentinian Gnosticism synthesizes three races though one of those is empty so what’s the point). See my reviews of Elaine Pagels’ first three books.

So cognitive science can only justify 2 main states and two main mental models; those aren’t for debate.

What is arbitrary is how we choose to descriptively subdivide those into stages like a series of nine loose cognitive sessions passing by nine gatekeepers that we give nine names — that’s arbitrary; it could be sliced into seven or sliced into 10.

What is not arbitrary is that there are two distinct states of cognitive binding and two distinct mental models.

The pre-moderns who map this area violate the rule of violate the scientific rule of parsimony.

Do not multiply entities beyond what is needed.

We need no fewer than two cognitive states in our model.

We need no fewer than two mental models in our model.

We do not need three levels of heaven above the fixed stars, though that might be a reasonable model of the sub stages but there really exist only two major stages according to my Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation, which is based solely and strictly within the certain and undoubted facts of cognitive dynamics in the two states of mental binding.

To try to construct a sky castle above the block universe is no longer science; it goes beyond the minimum equation necessary and everything all the model becomes arbitrary if you postulate such a level.

You just go back to the year 250 and the Middle Ages which was a giant project of freewill reconstruction project where we had to have it both ways, that God is and is not the author of evil, we do and do not have free will.

Speculating about a level above the block universe is like speculating about string theory: it goes beyond what we are forced to conjecture.

Our simple equations are sufficient and are absolutely justifiable equations.

Beyond that are conjectural and unnecessary; as Cushing asks: what would’ve happened in Physics if we had chosen the simple visualizeable route of Einstein, Bohm, and nonlocal hidden variables determinism; Eternalism?

We did not have to take the complicated unvisualizable mystifying route of the Possibilism branching multi-verse that Bohr and pop QM proferred.

We begin with the delusion of Possibilism, then we can become enlightened by the model of Eternalism that is revealed to the mind in the Eternalism state of consciousness, the loose cognitive association binding mode, which is induced by psycholytics.

1. Before the veil in the back of the mind at the wellspring of thoughts is pulled back, we have Possibilism. A temporary state that collapses when the snake is revealed.

2. After the virgin veil is torn and pulled back, then we have Eternalism.

The Eternalism state of consciousness is temporary but the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control is permanent, leaving the mind with two mental models in in the end, regardless of the state of consciousness.

Ken Wilber emphasizes distinguishing between states and stages; I emphasize distinguishing between states of consciousness versus mental models of time, self, and control (and religious mythology).

Comparable to Ken Wilber’s stages I do discuss the transitional.

When the mind is learning and when it is transforming to develop the second, additional mental model, this includes qualifying or modifying but like Ken Wilber, I say not discarding the initial mental model.

You scourge and correct the initial mental model.

First the mind possesses only a single mental model the egoic mental model formed in the Possibilism state of consciousness, which is the tight cognitive binding State.

Then the mind learns the transcendent mental model of time, self, and control when the mind is exposed to the Eternalism state of consciousness, which is the loose cognitive binding state.

Then the mind returns to the default possible is in the state of consciousness except during banqueting, and the mature finished perfected mind after that always contains two distinct mental models: Possibilism and Eternalism, even while the mind goes between and walks in and out of the garden going back-and-forth at will between the tight cognitive binding and loose cognitive binding states, which are the Possibilism state of consciousness and the Eternalism state of consciousness.

simple. basic. end of story. End of scientific equation and efficient systematic model.

Any fewer is certainly inadequate.

Any more is arbitrary.

Mathematics dictates two level system of two *main*, definitely identifiable states, with two *main*, definitely identifiable mental models.

Everything else is arbitrary detail choices of how to subdivide those.

This is why I must define maximal:

the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation

First and foremost and certainly, mental transformation is from Possibilism to Eternalism — *not*, necessarily, continuing on to transformation to some additional distinct level above Eternalism.

Defined correctly and suitably, Eternalism is the final stop.

We do not need to engineer some level above that and then redefine Eternalism as an incomplete stage of mental model spiritual development.

We do not need to demonize the Creator and idolize a transrational God above the creator.

That is not necessary and goes beyond the simplest scientific systematic model. And in practice leads to infinite regress, incomprehensible logic chopping (“fate vs. providence”) and multiplication needless of entities and psychological regression into naïve free will confusion just as exactly happened in 250 A.D. after the heyday of no-free-will around 150 AD.

The real winning point of my Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation is that it is instantly butt-simple to understand and model and describe. any child can understand to cognitive states and two mental models but when you introduce a third layer you’ve fallen into infinite uncontrolled regress, arbitrary, unscientific, incomprehensible, and unexplainable.

At best, a three-level system ends up fairly systematic, like Valentinian gnosticism. but for all the mess that a three-level system introduces it does not earn its complexity you have a more effective streamlined ergonomic system by sticking with what the certain facts give us the given that we scientifically model is two states and two mental models.

As soon as you add a third mental model, a spiritual level above the level of fate-imprisoned soul, or suchlike equivalent complexity, you gain huge complexity and do not gain any clarity at all; you lose clarity; it’s a backwards move, a move away from clarity of enlightenment; in other words in the words of Ken Wilber, it is a regression!

By following Alan Watts’ satori model, I have always had a far simpler system than Ken Wilber, by focusing exclusively on two ways of understanding: egoic thinking versus transcendent thinking; the egoic mental model versus the transcendent mental model.

Ken Wilber makes the mistake of following the bad judgment of other people: he constructs a complicated system (his Vedanta conception) to swallow up everybody else’s complicated systems.

I do the opposite: I make an extremely alarmingly simple system that works perfectly well and works far better than everyone else’s system and can explain the complexities of the other complex systems and why we need to throw away their epicycle corrections and needless complexities that produce delusion and confusion not simple clarity of enlightenment.

Multiplying entities beyond that moves you and everyone further away from comprehension of Transcendent Knowledge.

Part of Valentinian gnosticism was a social move: how to permit the unenlightened Christians to have their system of moral punishment and moral reward in heaven and hell, while they themselves the gnostics had a system of two races, preset.

There is a simpler way: divide people into non-initiates and initiates.

Science must explain the gnostic systems, but not use them as a guide for good advice on an ergonomic model.

It is a failure of an ergonomic design. Science is all about an ergonomic model, streamlined, maximal explanatory power by using minimal equations.

The historical benefit of that three-level confusion and hyper complexity of “transcending fate” during the Middle Ages and during the modern era did give us political individual freedoms, not the freedom of antiquity which was based on slavery, but freedom based on a society where every person is free and every person, every gender, every race has individual human rights, as makes sense because we each have a relationship directly with the Creator, not through some artificial social hierarchy artificially inserted between a person and the Creator (controller x ).


It’s false, nonsense, to say nothing is gained during enlightenment.

What is gained during enlightenment is the transcendent mental mode (Eternalism; [EMM] the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control) and the ability to banquet in peace, with mental control stability that is able to stand and not shake itself apart during loose cognitive binding induced by psycholytic, cyberscopic plants.


It is wrong to say that the mystic state is ineffable. It initially may be felt and experienced as ineffable.

Before the mind learns the eternal some mental model of time, self, and control, the mystic state might *seem* “ineffable”, but that is just an indication that that new state of consciousness has not yet been used by the mind to construct the natural appropriate mental model, a transformation.

During the initial sessions of loose cognitive binding, or the Eternalism state of consciousness, the mind still has the egoic (Possibilism) mental model, which is suited to the Possibilism state of consciousness, but has not yet grown, cannot yet bear, has not yet developed — the mother persecuted by the heimarmene dragon control-loss threat and scourged with correction, is still pregnant with the developing new mental model that will be added to the initial first born son; the second born son has not yet been born to replace and overthrow and augment the first mental model.

*After* we understand this kindergarten simple rational foundation of mathematical formula, *then* you can proceed to dump all kinds of dirt and mud obscuring it and complicating the mind with your projects of being the savior of God from being the creator of evil, and projects of transrational freewill restoration.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7207 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Posting twice worked, to get immediate feedback
I posted identicsl messages. The first was delayed appearing at the web view so I immediately resent it a fresh thread and a copy of the post appeared immediately giving me the feedback I needed that it went through.

Su:
Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Group: egodeath Message: 7208 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Transcription corrections because Siri does not recognize the technical terms from the philosophy of time (which also should be emphatically recognized as the philosophy of personal cybernetic self-control power), ‘Possibilism’ & ‘Eternalism’:

Then the mind returns to the default, Possibilism state of consciousness except during banqueting

Before the mind learns the Eternalism mental model

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7209 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
I am the first theorist to define and combine and integrate:

the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures

the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture

the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation

These formi the Egodeath theory, which asserts as the answer to life, the universe, and everything, Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

The only further condensation of all this wisdom that my computations produce is the number 42, which lacks clarity.

Something I struggled with greatly in 1988 and ever after words during the 90s and beyond was what to name the theory.

It’s too big to be covered usefully by a single label so the single label I use is well I think the phrase may have been formed by cyber disciple not me:

the Egodeath theory

A search within Yahoo! Groups could confirm when I first typed the phrase versus when Cyber D first typed the phrase.

It is incorrect to ask what is the title, but I have found it useful and I must continue using a set of closer to 10 different labels, which are useful in various contexts for constructing statements and comparing my ideas to the theories of other people.

I am certainly against needless multiplication of labels for the theory; however, I must not be constrained, cannot be constrained by underutilizing such labels for aspects or portions of the theory.

I have posted how all these labels relate to each other.

This is not something wrong, it’s not a problem, it is an opportunity and a genuine need.

I have a controlled number labels for the major aspects of the theory.

it is not out of control

I have some 10 phrases and keyboard shortcut acronyms and I do try to honor my 1986 work by continuing to keep alive my terminology from that early phase which I have sometimes called phase 0 terminology from October 1985 to April 1987 when my father died and I threw out my blank books and changed to using open large ruled class note binder sheets together with acronyms in April 1987.

Prior to that point, I used my first-generation terminology such as ET vs. TT — egoic thinking vs transcendent thinking.

Most likely I used only a few acronyms before leveraging them seriously in April 1987.

If I look at my 1986 classroom notes sheets from mathematics engineering classes I do think I will find occasional use of acronym such as ET and TT.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7210 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
Terms for use in the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation:

the Possibilism state of consciousness
the Eternalism state of consciousness

the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control
the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control

transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7211 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Shamanism is metaphorical description of mental model transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

The transformation is analogous to healing; it is it kind of healing.

The theme of shape-shifting comes from this mental model transformation.

The snake means your preset worldline frozen in the timeless block universe, which you experience in the the Eternalism state of consciousness which is induced by visionary plants.

Your snake-shaped worldline is given to you, preset in the near future without your ability to deviate from it.

Every control steering choice or move that you make is preset in time.

You have no arms of the sort that could steer away from that; your steering is itself preset.

Against Eliade, Wasson is correct: visionary plants is not degenerate recent, but historically normal.

Visionary plants are the way that shamans use to have visionary experiencing.

All religions now recognize shamanism as their origin.

Shamanism is based in visionary plants.

All religions are based in visionary plants.

Dionysus’ panther or jaguar is the ideal hunter.

In the intense psycholytic loose cognitive binding state, the visionary state, the Eternalism state of consciousness which is induced by visionary plants, the mind first experiences and senses the Eternalism state of consciousness

At this point, the mind only has the incompatible and state-unstable Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control, the mind then proceeds to construct the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control.

When the mind enters the loose cognitive state, the Eternalism state of consciousness, but so far only contains the the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control, this is an unstable phase of the Eternalism state of consciousness.


The sequence of states of consciousness and mental models during the initiation process:

1. Initially the mind is in the Possibilism state of consciousness.

2. In the Possibilism state of consciousness, the mind is led to construct the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.


3. The mind enters the Eternalism state of consciousness.

4. In the Eternalism state of consciousness, The mind is lead to construct the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control and to modify its initial, Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.


5. The mind returns to the Possibilism state of consciousness.

6. The mind retains both the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control, now with modifications, and the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control.


The mind needs to have, to endure with control stability in the loose cognitive state, the mind must modify the initial, Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control, and must construct a new, distinct Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control.

The mind is forced by experiencing and sensation to undergo a conceptual revolution.

The Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control is a mental model based in and following from the Eternalism state of consciousness.

The mind looks for a different new suitable stable way of thinking; the mind hunts for a way of thinking about time, self, and control, and when this way is glimpsed and found, the initial sense of self as the mind hunting for understanding dies in an experience of dying.

The original self, the self model premised on the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control, is hunted down and torn apart by Eternalism thinking.

Visionary plants induce loose cognitive binding.

Mental constructs dissociate; the mind and control-agent mental model dis-integrate.

The hunter who is hunting for the new mental model is torn to pieces and reborn in transformed form.

One life dies, the initial hunter dies and the divine transcendent hunter is born.

— Cybershaman

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7212 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
I may have mentioned this before – I’m the one
who informed MAPS to consider having a website. I might upload the Post-It Note from them (her) thanking me for the suggestion. Curious trivia of a pregnant point in gnostic tech history.

I might also upload the cassette tape of my recodings as Illumination Valve, the tape album titled Escape Velocity which I suspect inspired Mark Dery’s book title Escape Velocity based on my WELL postings as Hoff in the early 1990s — my first, BBS-era, pre-Internet online postings of my 1988 Egodeath theory before the Web.

I am also wondering if Erik Davis and I read each other’s WELL postings. I have printouts of all my copious WELL postings. Not sure if these got folded into my site via my giant Word file.
My favorite Word page printout I really truly should upload: an early 1990s outline of the Theory that glows.

These are papers from the past. I’m glad I posted sufficient autobiography to show how the Theory developed, what impulses it came from, what it was like, how it came to be.

I’m glad I fifugred out and reconstructed that because I had amnesia because I’m so forward-looking. TechGnosis helps remember it for us, how we got here.

Yesterday Principia Cybernetica website was not responding, so I couldn’t check on my 1997 posting of my Core theory there.

It continues to sink in how distinctive and extreme was my cultural context growing up in radio distance of San Francisco. I had a combination of advantages including my age luck timing. I was a particular focal nexus, a combination of factors that others didn’t have.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 7213 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
I couldn’t be bothered to walk across the street to Stanford to the major historical entheogen conference in the early 1990s. I was too busy successfully making progress in developing the Egodeath theory.

What would those conventional thinkers have to offer me? They might dull my thinking. Leary had little to offer at my university in 1988; I’m just proud that I had the classical rock radio station play Legend of a Mind and announce his visit to the university — that’s more meaningful to me than his content.

Allen Ginsberg said hi to me at the bookstore in San Francisco around 1989 but I hastened to focus on my book research.

I basically don’t believe in such social networking as in these communal collective efforts, the hive mind.

The Egodeath theory was a product of general cultural influence on one person working alone to develop a theory, using books if anything, library research, not conferences.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 7214 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Reading the books around San Francisco 1987-1994, I felt like it was detritus of an explosion that hadn’t quite succeeded.

There were a lot of resources for me to repurpose and utilize for my theory but I saw the existing book says more or less failures the previous generation had its chance to grasp things and they made amends progress but then the project had shut down and I had arrived at the venue after the event had finished and basically closed they had the experiences they did the research they wrote their books and then the era finished and then I came along

And of course I wonder if every generation feel this way but it was a real snapshot in time a distinctive feeling of following after the generation following on the heels of the boomers and that’s part of reading TechGnosis is it’s written by one of us by someone in my generation. Post Boomer post 70s even where the 70s are considered the last part of the 60s which were too big to be contained in a mere 10 year period. Although the festival had closed before I arrived on the other hand it was a big festival there was a lot of detritus there was a lot of material to be repurposed available.

All these detritus artifacts of the explosion of the 1960s it was such a big explosion it took all the way through the 70s to come back down for the debris to fall back down earth and land at my feet like a big spaceship that had taken off and blown up and fallen back down. The riches of potential here that had not been successfully piece together and do something that would fly

I would have to take up these broken religions and repair them and make something that actually flies.

By 1988 it was clear the journal of transpersonal psychology was lost its way failed to be an effective take up of the technologies.

Failed to be relevant, it was a disconnect, not an answer. and everything was crushed under censorship; you had debased versions of everything: debased rock debased Esselen debased transpersonal psychology and human potential, the magic had been censored out. like listening to mediocre cover versions of songs instead of the electric authentic real thing,

it was like Dionysus play performed by squares Ville. we were going to have to roll up our sleeves, meaning I was going to have to roll up my sleeves and put this sh*t together the right way, after the doors had been closed. JTP was a surrender, giving up, whitewashing, censoring out the entheogen basis of Esalen.

All the research had ground to a halt as far as could be seen. It was all padlocked, locked down, closed, no entry

of course there was shakedown Street of the dead and I was happy recently to come across a great 1987 Summer tour steal your face shirt.

Clearly the official culture had surrendered given up white washed everything over.

The whole project had been put away in a museum of historical interest only.

But another spark of light was the new Beatles album long-awaited Sergeant peppers came out much anticipated and so I was thrilled with the audio window of compact discs into the depths of the explosion of 1967.

There were certainly those pockets of celebration of 1967 during 1987.

I was certainly enjoying Donovan on new perfect sparkly magical compact disc and Satanic majesties request.

that was exciting in the late 80s the compact disc audio; perfection at last! 86 I had somewhere in time; I had are you experienced. in 1988 I got Diery of a mad man on cd supplementing my awesome vinyl big format.

Mind culture was a whitewashed simulation like Fender guitars after CBS bought them and really truly did trash the quality it it was like cardboard imitations, it wasn’t the same at all.

That opened the opportunity for Japanese companies to make true quality guitars. My Ibanez absolutely blew away the fender quality I wouldn’t touch Fender; and I got spoiled my Ibanez was so much better I couldn’t play Fenders.

By the 1980s we had this cardboard simulation of the previous magic explosion. But metallica was finding potential riding the lightning.

I felt like I had come along after the action had come and recently gone, leaving records in historically curio journals like Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, and denatured diluted Journal of Transpersonal Psychology.

The only sign of life was Reality Hacker zine; Mondo 1999.

Classic rock had come and gone; the action was in the rear view mirror and in my lone work.

But just like the massive complete difference in the spirit of rock in 1965 versus 1966 versus 1967 1968 each year was his own universe.

Similarly the more familiar I become with 1985 through 1994 I suppose it’s hard to generalize about the mood of the time which perhaps changed every year.

Ccertainly my life changed dramatically 1985, six, 7 8 9-1990 each year was quite different in developing my work and I suppose the atmosphere of the times was changing drastically year to year and it’s hard to generalize what it felt like.

1989 was my hypertext year of needing to go to the library and be able to read books and journals that are in other libraries.

So 1988 1989 were the years of sifting through the rubble learning everything to repurpose and re-integrate it pulling gold pieces reconfigured into my theory.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 7215 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
Transcrip fixes

There were a lot of resources for me to repurpose and utilize for my theory but I saw the existing books as more or less failures.

The previous generation had its chance to grasp things and they made immense progress but then the project had shut down.
Group: egodeath Message: 7216 From: egodeath Date: 23/11/2015
Subject: Re: Post-It Notes of highest knowledge
1988-1997 I explicitly and consciously thought of myself not building up my theory so much as struggling to communicate it.

The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence was born like Athena out of the head of Zeus opened by the magic hammer of the festivals. (I said “of Hephaestos” but Siri corrected me.)

The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence was born complete in January 1988 or written up in a fairly clear communicable way by December 1989; by then my article drafts are content-complete.

It is easy to test that assertion by comparing my 1997 summary at Principia Cybernetica compared to my August 1988 P205 engineering pencil on binder sheets Minnesota lake draft for JTP telling them the real nature of ego transcendence, against the received view of my father’s generation.

Ego transcendence is not meditation for unity consciousness giving a permanent altered state, as JTP vaguely asserts the reigning confused paradigm as of 1988.

Ego transcendence is actually about loosening cognition and switching to the block universe mental model of time, self, and control through self-control seizure and reconfiguration in the loose cognitive binding state where we experience no-free-will.

Thoughts are preset; we have no ego control power over our future; they are given and preset.

That was my January 1988 realization in the ivy-covered computer lab having read the Way of Zen some five times and having read with disagreement Ken Wilber’s early books.

Stanford entheogens conference: I could’ve participated to learn how to communicate, but I knew that they did not have information to help build up my theory, and I was not yet ready to teach to communicate it.

My purpose of massive reading, of starting to educate myself on what peolle were writing, in 1988, was not to learn content for my theory. My content was already complete.

I was reading in order to understand what inadequate understanding and off-base terms of understanding of my audience that I would have to communicate my theory to.

I was a knowledgeable alien with vastly better technology studying the primitive benighted earthlings in order to communicate my superior technology to them.

The shut down festival of the 1960s that I arrived at too late I had not finished rather it have been shut down prematurely but the light spark of Dionysus was kept a life within Rock The Dead Metal in the college Rock band network.

Not that I arrived too late at the 1960s cultural festival, but rather, the festival had closed prematurely.

We my generation were shut out our tickets were no longer valid. We were shut out.

We were forced to put on our own unauthorized makeshift underground afterparty to continue the scholarly research on Dionysus and the nature of religion.

I was an electric kitharist. I grew up listening to my mother’s near eastern and early music and collection of classical music cassettes.

She borrowed Beatles psychedelic era cassette albums for me in 1974-5, played on a mono boombox — I had constant immersion in world music because she was a soprano singer and graphic arts student and we went to Greek dance at the college every Friday where he played multiple instruments often including Les Paul 6- string (not 7-string) lightning kithara on a Music Man amplifier which I have a photo of me moving that tube power amplifier.

— Cybermonk
Group: egodeath Message: 7217 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
The sequence of cognitive states and resulting mental models transformation

First, the tight cognitive binding state produces the Possibilism experiential mental model of time, self, and control.

Then, the loose cognitive binding state produces the Eternalism experiential mental models of time, self, and control & qualified Possibilism (typically during a *series* of loose cognitive sessions).

Finally, the tight and loose cognitive binding states include the Eternalism & the qualified the Possibilism experiential mental models of time, self, and control.


Latest good definitions/labels:

Maximal Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism
=
the Maximal Metaphor Theory of Religious Mythology (new; MMRM) — includes: the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures, & all items in religious writings/pctures are analogies describing experiential mental model transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.
&
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture — groups a set of extreme assertions. eg: Approaches other than entheogens prevent mental model transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism. Maximal simplicity & coherence.
&
the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation


This concept of Maximal applies to each major area of the Egodeath theory. No weak waffling. Strong simplest position. Not striving for nuance, edge cases, apologies, exceptions; rather, the essential basic idea only. Eg the loosecog state = entheogens = Eternalism. Don’t blur, dilute, or diffuse the stark basic maximal ideas.


Though he advocates some conception of “no-free-will”, Sam Harris likely lacks the Eternalism experiential mental model of time, self, and control, he is impure and contaminated, is still in his sin, and would be unstable and seize and egodie when exposed to the intense psycholytic state.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7218 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Maximal Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism

new term. Maximal applies throughout.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7220 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
FEAR NOT, GOING TOO FAR; FEAR: NOT GOING FAR ENOUGH!

— Cybermonk
Group: egodeath Message: 7221 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Wussed Out Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism

Everyone’s feelings must be legitimated and validated as a correct view.

Sentimental ordinary state-based religion is every bit as legitimate as mystic experiencing.

The Holy Spirit is an idea you read about. It is not normally experienced, so we should not set the standard as actually having a dunamis overpowering experience of the holy spirit, and that would be threatening so cannot be normal true definitive religion.

Some people occasionally have mystic experiencing through plants but quite often not.

If religious experience is negative, it is not normal and not part of what religion should be.

Religion is ethical conduct of life and an emotion of peace.

Some people experience the eternity world model but the people who don’t are every bit as legitimate.

We need a theory that fully respects everybody’s experience.

Different cultures have different religious experiences and we should not oppress them by postulating a common core revelation.

People who take religious mythology literally should be fully respected and in no way is their view incorrect or inferior, it is every bit as legitimate as metaphorical interpretations.

We should have respect for what the authorities say religion is really about.

Every anthropological theory of mythology should be considered equally valid.

The unquestionable tradition of the common people have established is ordinary state religion which therefore is the definition of what religion is.

If people find emotional forced simulated ecstasy to be their norm, it is wrong to judge that; we must hold it to be fully legitimate.

We should not teach students western classical mythology, because that encourages cultural oppression.

Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism is just one idea of what religion is about. All other views are just as valid for the person or culture.

This is the useful definition of religion and a reasonable, balanced, realistic, generous definition of Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism, unplugged, tempered by moderation and sobriety.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7222 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
Example of extreme/maximal Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism to set the bar for every element of the Egodeath theory being extreme/’maximal’: to form the simplest most powerful theory, maximally coherent, without self-contradictory waffling:

Entheogen-free meditation is a sham. It prevents mental transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism. It avoids the serpent. It remains egoic. It replaces real religion.

There is no level above Eternalism/fatedness.

All religious mythology is fundamentally an analogy for Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism; transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

No ancient religious founder figures exist as a required identifiable individual. Paul and Church Fathers are fundamentally empty fictional authorial tokens written and revised by multiple people.

Bohr is wrong. Einstein’s iron block universe is true.

We can know highest truth: Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

Mythology asserts Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism. Systems that promise transcending fate are using poetic license.

Visionary plants are the only normal way people access the mystic state throughout history.

Etc.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7223 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Fake Christianity = Fake Buddhism
Ersatz phony pretenders simulate intense religious experiencing in Eastern and Western religion.

Take your pick: simulated Eastern satori experience or simulated Christian ecstatic Holy Spirit experiencing.

They are equals in fraudulence, since the real deal has always come from visionary plants.

Authentic religion has always been entheogen-induced.

Fake Buddhism, Fake Christianity, there is no difference.

We can simply condense them into “fake Buddhism/Christianity” for efficiency.

Buddhism Unplugged is the same thing as Christianity Unplugged.

Neither is true to its authentic origin and its ongoing authentic tradition.

Entheogen-free Buddhism/Christianity is a travesty, an insult to the holy spirit of bona fide dragon satori.

The best we can say is “Good simulation effort, non-Dionysus!”

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7224 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
On each key aspect of the Egodeath theory, define a spectrum of possible positions:

At the left hand extreme end of the spectrum of potential positions is the most tepid prevaricating wishy-washy flexible blurry and defocused and compromising,

At the right hand extreme end of the spectrum of potential positions is the most extreme pure single-frequency, single resonant feedback loop lock-in, extreme definitive, radical.

Then consider the set of the right hand extreme end point of each of those spectrums for each of those key aspects of theory.

Look at that as a compact mathematical peak point like a minimum or maximum, mathematically extreme compact simple lockin like approaching infinity when you combine these extreme points together.

Let the math dictate what the position is.

Define that as the mathematically maximal theory.


Key aspects of the theory include the four puzzle pieces from the main article also a historicity; what is the mathematical extreme position on each of:

Toward making a list of the key aspects of the theory consider these key phrases:
Metaphor describes entheogens revealing fatedness and noncontrol
Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism
Metaphor/Dissociation/Heimarmene/Cybernetics
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture
the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures
the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation
transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism

What is the most maximal position on a potential spectrum of positions in each of the key aspects of the theory, in a book titled “5 Views on X”?:

Key aspects of the theory:

Metaphor (analogy, religious mythology, ahistoricity, personification*, fictitious authors**, meaning of heaven and hell)

Dissociation (entheogens, visionary plants, psycholytics, loose cognitive binding)

Eternalism:
…Heimarmene (fatedness, block universe, Eternalism, nonbranching possibility, worldline, Reformed theology [God author evil?])
…Cybernetics (noncontrol, control seizure, trap, feedback loop lockin, control chaos)

For each of those key aspects of the theory define the spectrum from tepid wishy-washy moderate mild positions all the way to the extreme maximal position.

Then define the maximal theory as the combination of the maximal position on the spectrum for each aspect.


*’Personification’ means the way that every character is an aspect of control agency during the process of transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism:

Every character in the story of Dionysus Bacchae

Every character in the story of the passion of Christ

Every character in the tauroctony

Every character in the villa of the mysteries comic strip

Every character in Balaam riding the donkey on the vine path to the angel of death to curse then to praise the Israelites

Every character in the diagram of the woman on the altar praying to Zeus who has the clouds extinguish her with people lighting fire to the altar

Every character including the ram in Abrahams’ sacrifice of Isaac


**’Fictitious authors’ means Paul and the church fathers and Moses as author of texts. This is an empty author name behind which anybody can write for example here I utilize the Paul fictitious author:

Dear churches of Christ in Phoenix, Tacoma, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, greetings to Bob and Timothy and Dave and Martha from your brother in Christ, this is me, Saint Paul The Apostle. The truth is, Maximal Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.
“Guidance systems break down
A struggle to exist, to resist
A pulse of dying power in a clenching plastic fist”
Women should have their heads covered. Slaves, obey your masters. Let him be accursed who changes a word or even a single letter of this letter, I give you my word this is me Paul writing to you, signed, yours in Christ,
— Saint Paul The Apostle

‘Fictitious authors’ is a subset of ‘ahistoricity’ (of ancient religious ‘founder figures’), which is a subset of ‘metaphor’.


In the book “5 views on the historical Jesus”, Robert Price represents the extreme radical view on Jesus: ahistoricity, though I am more extreme than that the church fathers are empty authorial figures, as Robert price ought to know from Edwin Johnson’s The Pauline Epistles Studied and Explained (1894).
http://egodeath.com/edwinjohnsonpaulineepistles.htm

I have clearer thinking than Price and Carrier and Doherty because of my incisive saying that cuts to the true key point for defining what it means to say “Jesus didn’t exist” or “Paul didn’t exist”:

There is no single individual identifiable person on whom the Jesus figure depends; without whom the Jesus figure would not have been formed.

So it is completely moot if you point to some schmuck and say that guy was “the” real source of the Jesus figure and therefore he constitutes the historical Jesus — Rubbish! Arbitrary!

There’s either 0, 1, or many sources and saying there’s zero is the same thing as saying there’s many.

To say there’s no Jesus is the same as saying that there’s many people who were the source of the historical Jesus.

What you cannot say is it there is one a single distinctly uniquely identifiable source.

The Jesus figure is a conglomeration fundamentally.

It’s completely missing the point to point to one person you can pick out; you might as will pick out anyone.

There are thousands of people you could point to and say he’s “the” real kernel of the Jesus figure.

If *he* is, then so are these 10, 20, hundred, 200 other guys as well, by the same token.

You can have zero, or many, kernels of the historical Jesus, but what you cannot have is one single identifiable kernel, a single identifiable person without whom the Jesus figure could not have been formed and would not have been formed; that’s what we do not have.

We can have zero historical Jesuses or many but what we cannot have is one; that’s what it means to say there that “Jesus didn’t exist”, which is a vague concept when you pull it apart.

You have to define in the way I have done what it must mean to say that Jesus didn’t exist what does that mean, and what does it not mean?

The character is fundamentally and essentially a conglomeration, a construct, regardless of whether you can point to some individual or some one of 10, 20, or 100 individuals.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 7225 From: egodeath Date: 24/11/2015
Subject: Re: Shamanism is transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism
I herein add a middle layer of the STRUGGLE PERIOD with Eternalism and this way the reconciliation is equivalent to transcending fate, without any need to postulate a model of time above or after Eternalism.

Major post, and an example of how mythology beneficially shapes my core nonmythological non-metaphorical theory or at least shapes how I present it.

When you look only at the endpoints of initiation, you go from perfect naïveté to complete initiation (transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism) but that struggle in the middle has to be accounted for.

So although there are only two levels, two models of time and control, however there are three mental stages or eras in your growing up:

first the era of naïveté (developing the the freewill Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control)

then the era of STRUGGLING to switch your mental model to the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control

and then the era of maturity where you enjoy the use of both mental models.

I said Ken Wilber had a complicated 10 level system and I have a maximally simple two-level system.

but now I need to present it as three stages to move between two mental models.

The core ego death theory needs to be three stages to move between two mental models. Prior to initiation; then the initiation series; then the perfected stage forever — that’s *three* stages that the core theory must represent as such. To move between *two* mental models.

There are only two mental models (Possibilism then Eternalism) but to get from the first to the second involves the journey, the struggle period.

You end up with two legs not just one but you negate our qualify your first leg your first mental model so you end up with two legs not just one but the first leg limps.

You become the limping king.

Before you start your journey you only have one leg, you are a child having one leg and it is a good leg for the time being.

You only have one mental model, Possibilism, and you have not yet corrected and negated and repudiated that model and have not seriously grappled with the fatal limitations and flaws, the self contradictions in that model.

I have subsumed
the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures
as a subset of the even newer term
the Maximal Metaphor Theory of Religious Mythology

So I have, arranged in standard order of “Metaphor describes Entheogens revealing Eternalism” or “Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism”:

the Maximal Metaphor Theory of Religious Mythology
… the Maximal Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture
the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation

the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation rejects multiverse, Copenhagenism in QM, Bohr; and rejects the 3-level system of: naïve free will; then awakening to fate; and then transcending fate; rejects a level above fate because all we know from loose cognitive science, which I am the definer of, is that:

The mind begins with tight cognitive binding,
which produces the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.

Then the mind encounters loose cognitive binding,
which produces the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control (including a qualified Possibilism model).

Then the mind freely moves between tight and loose binding, retaining both models.

We do not know, loose cognitive science does not report that the mind moves on after the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control, to continue on to some model of time and control that is above and beyond Eternalism.

The philosophy of time and control offers only two positions (and I am ignoring stupid irrelevant Presentism): Possibilism vs. Eternalism.

There is not a model within the philosophy of time that is transcending of and above and beyond Eternalism.

The ancients agree as diagrammed in mythology they agree that the mind in the loose cognitive state moves from initial Possibilism to Eternalism. But not instantly.

Then later after the heyday of no free will we have clear diagrams of transcending fate such as:

Ptolemaic cosmos where the goal is to not only reach the fixed stars but punch through the sphere of the fixed stars, which definitely depicts transcending fate.

We certainly can have a clear distinct idea of transcending fate.

And we have Christ pulling the saints out of the purifying furnace of the serpent jaws of hell, which can suggest transcending fate.

Christ sets you free from the prison of sin or the prison of heimarmene.

The super transcendent superGod frees us from the fate-prison controlled by the low Creator demiurge.

It is possible to treat the above “2 states giving 2 models” sequence as the given data to be explained, the scientifically observed data that needs to be explained and organized by theory, which I have done.

This simple two-states-only, or two model only, theory successfully is capable of accounting for the mythological themes of later antiquity the theme of “transcending fate”.

The two phase model in my theory is capable of accommodating the idea, the theme of transcending fate.

The theme of transcending fate implies or amounts to a three level system:
naïve free will in tight cognition
then loose cognition giving no free will
then loose cognition giving transcending fate


My two level system which is based on observed lose cognitive science data reported by everyone accommodates the three level system which is implied by the theme of transcending fate:

tight cognition gives naïve free will thinking.

Then loose cognition gives Eternalism thinking: seizure-prison. Struggling to control in a way that is still polluted by naïve free will control power thinking.

Here we may place the series of loose cog sessions initiation sessions; Jesus being baptized, betrayed (false control-claim demonstrated), scourged, Jesus trembling in fear and apprehension after drinking the mixed wine.

Then loosecog gives Eternalism thinking: seizure release and successfully accommodating eternalism: the deliberate formal sacrifice of your childish thinking bringing reconciliation with your higher thinking (which includes higher experiencing and higher rationality to model that experiencing).

Here we may place the “final” session, a full realizationt session and subsequent peaceful banqueting sessions (the completed crucifixion on the debranched tree and the rebirth in the rock cave; and ever afterwards the wedding banquet in heaven; ability to go in and out of the gated garden of Apple) enjoying loose cog now with always the sacrifice for reconciliation in mind comprehended and affirmed sacrificing your freewill power claim to be fully rational and to be amenable conformant with the loose cog state.

All of the latter control transformation dynamics in the loose cognitive state can all be placed with in the second phase that cognitive science shows us which is the loose cognitive state with the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control.

There is no need to literally form a realm above fate above and after Eternalism.

However here now I have identified a good way of dividing the process of transformation into three:

Tight cognition gives naïve free will Possibilism
Loose cognition gives a period of transformation into Eternalism
Loose cognition as well as tight cognition is able to sacrifice or repudiate the free will error, the Possibilism Sin, restoring stability peace and reconciliation — which is equivalent to in the three level system, transcending fate! QED

I have succeeded at fitting-in the mythological theme of “transcending fate” within the scientifically justified 2-level-only system of moving from Possibilism to Eternalism without going any further and without postulating any model of time and control beyond or after Eternalism!

Speaking as the voice of Science I can thus tell you the facts which is that there are two models of time and control.

Loose cognition switches the mind from the one gradually to the other and upon completion, further enjoyment — what has been depicted in mythology as “transcending fate” but that theme really in fact means and refers to none other than *reconciling with fate*, with the simple-to-visualize, simple-to-specify, model of time and control called Eternalism.

Eternalism is initially a threat that is incompatible with our psychological constitution, but then the thing to do is not reject fate — that’s just repression and regression.

The thing to do is to successfully accommodate fate so in a fact we have a series of two mental takes on Eternalism:

first the mind makes of Eternalism a threat, struggle, a prison

and afterwards the mind makes of Eternalism reconciliation and perfection, The kingdom of God.

After the 150 AD heyday of Eternalism/heimarmene, Everyone wanted after 250 A.D. to form a three-level system will the gnostics wanted to take her generally negative you though a negative view of fate and the created world, although Michael A Williams in his 1985 book The Unmovable Race disputes that gnostics were against the created world.

There was some dispute about whether to take a negative stance toward Eternalism/fatedness.

At first the mind is in emnity with the snake.

But then the snake on the debranched tree of Moses heals and saves from snakebite.

First the snake bites you — this is when you are struggling to accommodate in your mental model Eternalism.

And then the snake heals you when you achieve accommodation of your mental model with Eternalism.

It just now occurred to me — I deciphered a theme: that when Herakles is battling the hydra snake monster, a crab bites his heel: this refers to negating or qualifying our initial mental model, the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.

As I recently observed the way that these are definitely deciphered is by grouping themes into groups and asking what does the category theme mean across all of these stories.

Here we have an obsession a category of foot of injured or weakened foot 1 foot not both but one.

Deciphered:
Achilles’ heel is the need, the forced need, to qualify and negate the initial one of our two mental models of time and control: Possibilism.

Compare the firstborn son to the injured or bad leg: first the first, God-disapproved boy is born, but then he is overthrown by the second, God-approved boy.

We can specify that the injured leg is the first leg and that the good leg is the second leg, where each leg means a distinct mental model of time and control.

It is even insightful to refer to it as “a firstborn leg” which is the bad leg and “the second-born leg” which is the good leg.

So in Moses’ snake on a pole, we can see a implicit three level system which yet conforms with what science shows us which is a 2-level system ie moving from one model of time to another.

During the period of struggle we lead up to finally aborting our initial mental model, repudiating it, qualifying it.

Egoic thinking is destined to be aborted near the end of the series of struggles in loose cognition.

My radical commitment to only two levels and refusing to go to a third level has paid off; the Maximal Eternalism Theory of Mental Transformation.

In Eternalism consciousness, you struggle for awhile to transform, then you transform.

While you are struggling to transform, fate is acting as a prison.

You are a prisoner of the creator of the fate-ruled world.

When you have successfully transformed, that success is equivalent to transcending fate — but this is critical for science for a scientific theory the latter still remains with the Possibilism-to-Eternalism model.

I am not postulating some philosophy of time that’s transrational — depending on how, there’s an opportunity here to define ‘transrational’ such that when the mind is reconciled with Eternalism, you have reached a transrational state

So all these ideas of “transcending fate” to have hyper ultra super transrational, can be folded into the scientifically justified observed data of moving from an initial model NOW WITH THE THEORY REFLECTING A TRANSITIONAL PERIOD OF STRUGGLE/WRESTLING WITH/AGAINST Eternalism, a period of struggle to transform to the final model; and then finally the final model which is equivalent to the theme of transcending fate but we are not actually proposing any level beyond Eternalism. We are moving from you could say lower or preliminary Eternalism to hire and final completed Eternalism:

1. Tightcog. Possibilism.
2. Loosecog. Struggle with Eternalism.
3. Loosecog. Reconcile with Eternalism.

There I’ve just succeeded at a mathematical transform between the two level system and the three level system. There are only two models of time there are only two mental models of time in control but there are three periods regarding transformation from the first model to the second model.

First you have the first model of time then you struggle with the second model of time then you succeed at the second model of time.

We have three phases of mental activity to progress through two models of time.

That region above the fixed stars in Ptolemaic mystic ascent cosmology does not represent a model of time that is higher than Eternalism.

What it can excellently and must be scientifically taken to represent is the mind having accommodated Eternalism, as opposed to the mind initially struggling to accommodate Eternalism, which struggle is represented in the ascent through the planetary spheres and the entering of the fixed stars at which the child is sacrificed by Saturn.

When you are working up to the sacrifice and approaching it your grappling with Eternalism, wrestling all night with the angel and coming away limping, meaning that your freewill mental model is now *qualified* (restricted) so the two legs of the limping king: the sturdy lag is Eternalism, and the limping deformed weak leg is *qualified* Possibilism.

After enlightenment, we still have and rely on our deluded irrational childish Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control.

Hera threw Hephaestus out of heaven because of his deformity (his now qualified Possibilism thinking).

In retaliation he engineered a throne which trapped her and all the gods were in dire straits and Dionysus had to give mixed wine to the engineer god Hephaestos and bring him with deformed foot (of qualified Possibilism thinking) on a donkey ride trip to Heaven to release the queen of the gods.

A god represents true control agency maturely understood.

This God is represented with two distinct different legs, one crippled leg — how is this like transformation of control mental models from Possibilism to Eternalism?

You end up with two distinct models of control one which is crippled — that would be the egoic model of control and a time.

After the series of loose cog sessions, you still have your initial thinking but now it is “negated” though utilized and relied on.

Sso what is really lacking in my two model / 2-level system is representation of the transitional turbulence period/duration, the nine months of pregnancy during which the dragon persecutes the mother.

First tight cognition gives naïve freewill Possibilism.

Then initial sessions of loose cognition give A PERIOD OF STRUGGLE with Eternalism to build and trying to grapple with the angel and struggle to reconcile without yet succeeding at learning, like riding a bicycle, learning the experiential Eternalism model.

That phase is the bulk of developmental psychology properly understood as struggle in loose cognition.

Thirdly the mind succeeds at reconciling with Eternalism in loose cognition.

This is equivalent to transcending fate — and this is fully compatible with what loose cognitive science observation shows us, that the mind learns to accommodate lose cognition and the Eternalism it reveals.

The mind has learned how to routinely betray the false claim of freewill power (the Possibilism experiential mental model of time, self, and control), routinely observes the sacrifice, we routinely receive communion of the mixed wine remembering and repeating the sacrifice of the false claim to freewill power, every time the mature Christian takes banquet in remembrance of the sacrifice, is practicing going through the motion of repudiate your freewill claim to power, that you may have peace and reconciliation and retain purity of thinking of advanced loose cog state advanced rational thinking, freed from the contamination pollution that raises the furies/panicked horses of Possibilism.


My source for this scientific observed data to be explained (tightcog gives Possibilism thinking, then loosecog gives STRUGGLE for Eternalism thinking, then loosecog gives Eternalism thinking) is the trip report hymnal canon including iron maiden, Blizzard of Ozz band, Rush, Metallica, and pop sike singles reporting to us from the experiential window of 1967. Supplemented by Greek mythology and bible mythology and shamanism and world mythology.

Copyright (C) 2015 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 120: 2012-12-01

Site Map


Group: egodeath Message: 6091 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: How to explore loss of control in the altered state
Group: egodeath Message: 6092 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Electric Prunes: Get Me to the World on Time
Group: egodeath Message: 6093 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: How to explore loss of control in the altered state
Group: egodeath Message: 6094 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Bk: Crossan: Power of Parable: Fiction About Jesus
Group: egodeath Message: 6095 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 6096 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Cog Sci, Phil of Mind, Cog Psych, Phenomenology, Neurosci
Group: egodeath Message: 6097 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Transcendent violation of egoic will = sacrifice illusion
Group: egodeath Message: 6098 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/stake
Group: egodeath Message: 6099 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Re: Bks by Algis Uzdavinys on Mystic Platonism, Ascent Mysticism
Group: egodeath Message: 6100 From: jdcasten Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…
Group: egodeath Message: 6101 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sacrifi
Group: egodeath Message: 6102 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Group: egodeath Message: 6103 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Group: egodeath Message: 6104 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Break, and writing experiments
Group: egodeath Message: 6105 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…
Group: egodeath Message: 6106 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
Group: egodeath Message: 6107 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Swoon/Shroud/India theory of Jesus’ death
Group: egodeath Message: 6108 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
Group: egodeath Message: 6109 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
Group: egodeath Message: 6110 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
Group: egodeath Message: 6111 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: Break, and writing experiments
Group: egodeath Message: 6112 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Electric Prunes: Get Me to the World on Time
Group: egodeath Message: 6113 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionate de
Group: egodeath Message: 6114 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Group: egodeath Message: 6115 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Group: egodeath Message: 6116 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Stabilizing control by mental-only non-metaphor understanding
Group: egodeath Message: 6117 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Group: egodeath Message: 6118 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Group: egodeath Message: 6119 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Stabilizing control by mental-only non-metaphor understanding
Group: egodeath Message: 6120 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Group: egodeath Message: 6121 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Group: egodeath Message: 6122 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Group: egodeath Message: 6123 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Group: egodeath Message: 6124 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Group: egodeath Message: 6125 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
Group: egodeath Message: 6126 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
Group: egodeath Message: 6127 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Group: egodeath Message: 6128 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Impotent, flaccid Transpersonal Theory
Group: egodeath Message: 6129 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Group: egodeath Message: 6130 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Group: egodeath Message: 6131 From: jdcasten Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…
Group: egodeath Message: 6132 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Group: egodeath Message: 6133 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Group: egodeath Message: 6134 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Group: egodeath Message: 6135 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Group: egodeath Message: 6136 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
Group: egodeath Message: 6137 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Group: egodeath Message: 6138 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
Group: egodeath Message: 6139 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
Group: egodeath Message: 6140 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st



Group: egodeath Message: 6091 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: How to explore loss of control in the altered state
Lyrics relevant to the above posting.

Cheap Trick’s Dream Police album is Power Pop Sike. The dream police = the trip police — they are in heaven, the otherworld, the intense altered state.

Cheap Trick
Way of the World

It’s the way of the world
Remember
You were at work and then Friday at 5
I remember
Felt like a pawn was I dead or alive
I remember
Thought no one could hear me I was goin insane
I remember
It was a real fine line
Now you changed my life around

I’ve been running
I’ve been hiding
It’s the way of the world
You say it’s over
But the world keeps turning round


Diary of a Madman
Bob Daisley
excerpts

Watch me die another day
Hopeless situation
Sanity now it’s beyond me
There’s no choice

Diary of a madman
Entries of confusion
Dear diary I’m here to stay

A sickened mind and spirit
The mirror tells me lies
Could I mistake myself for someone
Who lives behind my eyes

Will he escape my soul
Or will he live in me
Is he trying to get out or trying to enter me

Can I ask a question
To help me save me from myself
Enemies fill up the pages
Are they me


Help!
John Lennon
excerpts

I never needed anybody’s help in any way
But now these days are gone and I’m not so self assured
Now I find I’ve changed my mind, and opened up the doors

Help me if you can
And I do appreciate you being round
Help me get my feet back on the ground
Won’t you please, please help me

And now my life has changed in oh so many ways
My independence seems to vanish in the haze
But every now and then I feel so insecure
Now I know I need you like I’ve never done before

Help
I need somebody
Not just anybody


Shock Wave
Black Sabbath
excerpts

There’s no reason
For you to run
You can’t escape the fate
Of the chosen one

Black moon rising
In a blood-red sky
It’s time to realize
That you’re gonna die

Floating in time you cheat this death’s master
You’re on your own
Going through

When the mist has taken over your mind
And you think you’re on your own
Don’t believe you are the only one here
Look around – you’re not alone

Feel the forces of another world
Ghostly shadows fill your mind
Evil power hanging over you
As you freeze your life in time
Look behind you

Somebody’s calling
Crawling with fear
You tell yourself you’re dreaming
You know that this shouldn’t happen to you
You tell yourself that it just can’t be true
But there is nothing you can do

Ghostly shadows from the other world
Evil forces in your mind
Trapped between the walls of life and death
Frozen in the lands of time
Look behind you

You’re at the end of the line
Group: egodeath Message: 6092 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Electric Prunes: Get Me to the World on Time
In lyrics in general, my policy is to eliminate apostrophes, such as spelling out goin’ as going, because that pronunciation is an unneeded, irrelevant distraction. The purpose of transcribing is to convey words, not to indicate the pronunciation. I instead indicate double-pronunciation, or where the sung lyrics interestingly contradict the printed lyrics.
Group: egodeath Message: 6093 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: How to explore loss of control in the altered state
This song is on the radio now. It is a love song about the control vortex, the state of being headed for cybernetic self-control disaster. Fresh commentary here.

Lyrics: Electric Prunes: Get Me to the World on Time
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/4203
Artist: The Electric Prunes
Song: Get Me to the World on Time
Release date: March 1967
Reached #27 on the U.S. pop charts
Transcribed accurately by Michael Hoffman (Egodeath.com) for the first time on the Web, Sep. 15, 2005
excerpts:

Here I go, higher, higher
You gotta get me to the world on time

The minute you [control vortex] walk in the room [loosecog realm]
I break into a sweat
My hands begin to shake so bad
Can’t light my cigarette

Then you start walking toward me
And my glue comes all undone <== looose cognition
If I could get my feet to move
I’d turn around and run

My pulse is beating faster
And I’m heading for disaster <==
Here I go, higher, higher

One kiss from you
And my whole body starts acting strange
You shake up all my hormones
You put me through a change

This chemical reaction
Isn’t easy to define
You drive me to distraction
You disturb my peace of mind

You got me spinning like a top now <== whirlwind elevator
And I don’t know how to stop now

Is this what love’s all about [eros drive toward Atman per Wilber]
Lately I feel so wigged-out
Wild sensations
Sweet frustrations <== attraction of control self-frustration
You get me going
And there’s no slowing me down

Whoa here I go, oh!
Group: egodeath Message: 6094 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Bk: Crossan: Power of Parable: Fiction About Jesus
The Power of Parable: How Fiction by Jesus Became Fiction about Jesus
John Dominic Crossan
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0061875694
March 2012
“Did Jesus ever exist as a historical figure in time and place? Is he like Julius Caesar–a factual figure, but enveloped in clouds of parable? Or is he like the Good Samaritan–an entirely fictional character of Christianity’s parabolic imagination? My answer is that Jesus did exist as a historical figure.”

This book — like my deciphering of the Bible as mystic-state metaphor and meaning-flipping — further strengthens the evidence that Jesus is purely fictional and is to be analyzed as such, in a metaphor-deciphering, riddle-solving mode, as I have provided the full solution for in terms of noncontrol/nofreewill/loosecog.

His introduction mentions food, “sharing a meal”, the Eucharist. He fails to comprehend the allusion to entheogens, so he is condemned to Hell. He fails to understand the riddle, so he is punished with death. If you don’t understand the meaning of The Parable — if you don’t listen with the right riddling mindset to recognize that Jesus meant Michael Hoffman’s Egodeath theory of interpretation — you are not among the Elect who were given to Jesus from before the beginning of time, and are therefore condemned to perdition. You didn’t get the joke, so you are cast into Hell.

He cites Wikipedia. He should cite my website, such as my main article.

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6095 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.


— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6096 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Cog Sci, Phil of Mind, Cog Psych, Phenomenology, Neurosci
> The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self
> Thomas Metzinger
> 2009
> http://amazon.com/o/asin/0465045677
> Entheogen chapter at the end

Metzinger advocates that we begin developing ideas about no free will, no self, no time, and entheogens or psychedelics, per the section “A New Kind of Ethics”, pages 223-230:

Keywords: psychedelic, psilocybin, LSD, Huxley, Pahnke, Griffiths, psychotic reaction, panic, psychedelic sacraments, 2C-B, 2C-T-7, religious ecstasy, classic hallucinogens, altered states, drug policy.

I have already *finished*, with full basic coverage of Egodeath 101, developing an *integrated* set of ideas that *emphasizes* and exclusively focuses on these ideas, without the clutter of neuroscience and quantum physics. I cover peripheral topics such as ahistoricity of Jesus and Paul, and the forged back-dated nature of *all* the New Testament and Church Father writings, but I keep the focus centered on noncontrol/nofreewill/loosecog.

My coverage of personal non-control includes explaining exactly the content of the threat of loss of control, or wrestling with and probing the limits of our mental control ability.
My coverage of no-free-will includes the 4D pre-set frozen-time version of “determinism”.
My coverage of loose cognition (the intense mystic altered state describes the specifics of loosecog dynamics including mental model transformation, without getting distracted by neurochemistry, which can be *entirely* bracketed-off from the core Theory.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com, December 1, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6097 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/12/2012
Subject: Re: Transcendent violation of egoic will = sacrifice illusion
This is a cleaned-up version of my voice-dictated posting, with substantial material added December 1, 2012.

I made a *great* revolutionary hour and a half voice recording today (November 28, 2012) and open letter to send to neuroscientists such as Metzinger, telling them to drop everything and first study and cite the ego death theory, if they want to advance the field by 50 years overnight and keep up with the other cognitive scientists.

Cognitive Scientists are already learning my theory about the extreme ultimate no-free-will, the extreme ultimate “no egoic personal control” view, the extreme ultimate timelessness version of “determinism” where the future already exists (an entirely different approach than causal-chain determinism acting sequentially in time), and the extreme concept of illusory possibilities that are not fated to be possible.

How do we say Yes to the only path that is truly possible: the one that is fated?

And how do we trust and put full trust in controller X, and fully understand that we have no power to steer away from and avoid our fate, no way to avoid the control thoughts and intention that is coming from controller X into the mind next? When we are bothered by this idea, we are also interested in and fascinated and fixated and caught up in this tree of ideas; we are compelled and drawn in to manipulating and exploring the ramifications of the circular dynamics of personal control-power.

If my future thoughts are pre-existing and I cannot avoid them nor can I control their arising, nor avoid and steer away from my possibly harmful near-future thoughts, then my control-power is doomed and I am potentially headed for disaster, unavoidable harm lying straight ahead on the crazy rail and I’m helpless and powerless to steer away from that possible future, which my thinking is now compelled to construct. Suppose I have a vivid idea — now picture a vivid idea of some self-thwarting, harmful, anti-desirable action.

Let us test this idea, can we steer away from it? While in the mystic psychotic genius state, the mind desires — to gain security and enlightenment and control-power — the mind desires to construct a bad intention as a test case, and then run an experiment with oneself as the test subject, to test to see if we have the power to steer away from it.


A *strength* is that my super-revolutionary theory is not published by any printed press or journal or peer-reviewed environment or conference, but is the work of an independent researcher publishing in hypertext on the World-Wide Web. Publishing such an important Theory in the form of an independent web page represents a revolution in publishing and Communication — if Thomas Metzinger is serious about the Internet changing our consciousness, then this is a strength and a revolution that such a massively important breakthrough theory is published on the World-Wide Web, not through old media, not printed on dead trees.


Writers need to base their thinking around my ego death Theory, because this accomplishes already what they are calling for better than they can, more strongly.

Cybernetics: Cognitive scientists advocate the nullity of personal control agency — I’ve already finished explaining that. I cover absolute nullity of egoic control agency more so than the cognitive science books.

Heimarmene: Cognitive scientists advocate no-free-will — I am already years ahead of them. My model of the single preset future and block universe goes far beyond conventional determinism which is causal chain determinism.

Dissociation: Cognitive scientists slightly advocate entheogens — but this should be their #1 hue and cry. They should be going on strike until drug laws (a recent, illegitimate, fraudulent creation) are thrown out. I’ve already finished explaining that, including loose cognition, and mental model transformation about self, time and control. I have already finished the entheogen theorizing going beyond what the cognitive scientists are starting to demand (The Ego Tunnel, Thomas Metzinger, pages 223-230).

Metaphor: Hofstadter

Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking
Douglas Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0465018475
April 2013
“Analogies are the building blocks of thought. A theory about the way the mind works. From the simplest forms (a single word, category, or phrase) to infinitely complex constructions (an idiom, proverb, or algorithm), they show how analogies are the tools our brains use to interpret and master daily life. Language, the mind, and intelligence.”

The Power of Parable: How Fiction by Jesus Became Fiction about Jesus
John Dominic Crossan
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0061875694
March 2012

I previously posted about other books approaching the Bible as fiction and comic fiction and riddling, which is the correct approach, when comic fiction is applied to Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Dissociation per the Egodeath theory.

The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative Experience / Opening to Inner Light: The Transformation of Human Nature and Consciousness
Ralph Metzner
http://amazon.com/o/asin/098183180X
April 1986; 1998; 2010
Based on his 1980 article for Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, “Ten Classical Metaphors of Self-Transformation”.
Reviewer Michael Hoffman writes:
“Metaphors describing dissociative-state experiencing: This book is an organized inventory of the various metaphors that have been used to describe the phenomena encountered in the mystic dissociative state. Dissociative psychoactives are mentioned in an integrated manner throughout the book. This is a revised edition of Opening to Inner Light: The Transformation of Human Nature and Consciousness. Benny Shanon’s book Antipodes of the Mind is a good companion volume similarly explaining dissociative-state cognitive phenomenology as the origin of mythic metaphor.”

Metzner notes that the book doesn’t cover what I consider as meme propagation and collective state-flipping per the arrival of the Kingdom of God with all the Elect united in spacetime by the Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Entheogen revelation.

Metzner notes that the book “does not delineate linear developmental models showing sequential stages of evolution. This is not to say that development does not proceed in stages — only that agreement on mapping these stages seems quite elusive. Much of the literature on evolutionary stages seems to me to be overly abstract, highly subjective and sometimes indicative of a kind of premature conceptual crystallization. Subtle judgments of spiritual superiority [like Ken Wilber’s error in treating “mythic consciousness” -mh] seem to slip too easily into discussions of levels and stages.”

Well said, making points that I posted the other day on my frustration at Dan Merkur and Zaehner, writers of books about mysticism theory, and writers about the evolutionary development of early, middle, and late Greek religion and philosophy, with their stupid overconfident stilted and stuffy self-assured categories and schemes when they understand jack squat about the content and meaning of the ideas and mythemes they *presume* to — with great fanfare — emphasize and rely on.

The result is pseudo-knowledge, misleading, leading away from understanding — substitute for comprehension. *First* you must understand mythic metaphors as I have solved, and *then* you can do the trivia of sorting those into eras with different emphases. As it stands, we have the abominable faux knowledge that Greek “religion” gave way to Greek “philosophy”, while totally misunderstanding and misrepresenting both.

See Myers’ book Gnostic Visions (or my work) for some sanity on that matter: Greek religion and philosophy were both drenched totally in the entheogen-induced loosecog state; it was entheogenic myth, and, entheogenic philosophy, not the God-forsaken ordinary-state modern-era type of analytic philosophy. I hold that now and before the modern era, the use of entheogens to produce a fully transformed mental model always has required multiple sessions of loose cognition.

Through pressing one’s mind against the loosecog realm repeatedly, the mind is impressed and sculpted in compliance with the altered state observations of mental dynamics regarding self, time, and control, together with learning the traditional metaphors and analogies that express the loosecog dynamics, such as ‘king’, ‘death’, ‘snake’, ‘tree’, and ‘sacred food and drink’.

Gnostic Visions: Uncovering the Greatest Secret of the Ancient World
Luke A. Myers
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1462005462
April 2011
Entheogens including Syrian rue + acacia, throughout Western religion and spiritual philosophy.


Cognitive scientists are on a trajectory: I am pulling them in like a tractor beam. The ego death Theory is inevitably their destination and I am already standing there right in the middle on top of that peak. I already reached where they are headed in 1988, and then in 2001 I extended that to cover myth, religion, and religious experience to fully explain religious myth, a subject which is barely on the radar of cognitive scientists, despite Hofstadter’s focus on analogies. They have a crude model, and a call to begin work on self/nofreewill/psychedelics/analogies, and I have a finished model.

My voice recording tonight contains new, important, profound connections about sacrifice as desirable demonstration of violating, of willing against itself, of transcendently violating control of your will, playing with your inability to avoid possible near-future thoughts intentions of self-harm in order to secure and increase personal control, by gaining understanding of the dynamics of personal mental control. This inability, a kind of cybernetic blind spot and vulnerability built into our self-control system, is profound.

Our doorway to transcendence is our control-vulnerability, the glorious malfunction and limitation we have, which brings the idea of mythic king Jesus saying “I hesitate to drink this cup of Ayahuasca and die ego death, but not my will, Controller X, but yours be done” giving himself over to transcendently violate his own will to satisfy and fulfill our comprehension of how Controller X can be trusted as merciful and harmless to us although Controller X can force us to will to violate our own will, such as could be demonstrated through a kind of self- harm like my ritually scrambling my dorm room in violation of my egoic will, possessed by Dionysus, where my mind was ecstatically unified with the mind of Dionysus.

Judas’ affirmation is our own affirmation of “send King Ego to the cross and disprove his illusory power, in order to know truth and have full, satisfactory demonstration that his power is nullified by pre-set fatedness”.

Instead of taking the physical action of physically ritually scrambling my dorm room as a way of firmly demonstrating the unreality of egoic control constraints or chains, I could’ve merely mentally understood the idea of Jesus willing to be harmed and have his will repudiated. No other DEMONSTRATION of transcendent self-violating of the personal will is needed, only the mental comprehension of the myth of Isaac’s willing sacrifice, or the Eleusinian piglets’ willing sacrifice, or Jesus’ willful affirmation that he should be sacrificed.

When it comes to satisfactory complete forcing of mental model transformation, the idea is the thing. Even if we do sacrificially harm ourselves to drive home and prove the point of our ability to transcend our egoic self-constraints, that physical action can fail to transform the mental model of self, time, and control; we end up with mere uncomprehending magical sacrifices that have to be repeated.

God gave us his son Jesus as an idea, the idea of demonstratively sacrificing our own youthful egoic self-concept, “childish things, thought like a child”, a totally and completely satisfactory sacrifice, as an idea, once and for all, for this very purpose of violating and cancelling our egoic will, to understand God’s power over our control thinking and to fully explore this idea of self will violation which we desire to fully explore. Total absolute forceful sacrifice of our child-thinking requires an idea, comprehension — not a harmful action as proof.

When we arrive at Peter’s gate in the heavens, our completeness of mental model transformation is measured and assessed not by what physical action we have done to disprove and repudiate egoic-control thinking, but rather, we judge ourselves effectively by asking: do you comprehend the meaning of the idea or figure of the king willingly sacrificed on the cross, to bring in the hidden kingdom of God?

We must intend to violate our intention, though it is not clear how to gain and achieve full satisfaction, is a matter of meaning and intending to violate intention it is not a matter of doing some physical magic action or harm or destruction to destroy the ego illusion requires what type of action, intend that the mystic king intend to violate his will and give himself to wake you deviation fastened to space time the point is not suffering or pain the point is to destroy and cancel out and support and trip up and wreck or dominate absolutely the ego sense of control over intending.

I need and want to break my illusion of having control over what I intend. How can I do this? Compare breaking in a cadet or breaking in a horse to establish dominance of control and subservience of control. The egoic power of control must be proven to be merely an illusion or secondary type of control. How do we accomplish this? What do we think, to prove we have transcended the egoic control delusion? What must we think, to prove that our control of our will is merely secondary control?

During the course of making the voice recording, on-the-fly, I proved how powerful the interpretive key is, using the Egodeath theory to decipher myth, by on-the-spot figuring out profound, fundamental myths that are the most important mythemes in the Bible: the main line of connection between Abraham’s sacrifice of his son Isaac and God’s sacrifice of his son Jesus.

I deepened connections about the ram of Abraham and Isaac, which is a kind of lamb sacrifice analogous to God providing his son as a sacrifice that we may come to comprehend the potential of our mental control. God provided the ram (a kind of lamb) which is a willful creature with its powerful horns caught in the (cybernetic possibility branching) bush equivalent to God providing his mythic son who willingly is fastened to the tree or pole or cross which represents the egoic agent physically fastened to frozen unchanging spacetime and the illusory cybernetic possibility branching tree

They say we scientists must provide a replacement for no free will , and the no-Jesus scholars say we must give a way for Christianity to go on

The New Testament is precisely what the cognitive scientists are calling for: a set of guidelines meant for people who have drunk the cup of Ayahuasca (Syrian rue and acacia-bark) and realize no-free-will and have ritually violated their egoic will, by playing with the source of our control thoughts to gain self-knowledge and Know Thyself.

I am the modern theorist who first discovered that the New Testament *is* the “new system of morality” for people who have seen through the illusion of free will, the illusion of autonomous authorship of our thinking, and the illusion of the open future (based on the 4D, no meta-change, altered-state perspective, *not* the ordinary-state speculation based on the hypothesis of sequential causal-chain determinism).

We are simply returning to original Christianity and Greco-Roman thoughts about violating the free will illusion through the sacrifice idea, exposing the illusion of personal control agency, the illusion of autonomous self authoring, the illusion of initiating our actions, and the illusion of authoring our future. All together at once, we reveal as an illusion time, self, free will, and alternate possibilities. There is only one possibility: the fated pre-existing permanently existing future. There is no other true possibility, only virtual possibilities.

All in the same sense, time is an illusion; self is an illusion; free will is an illusion; and alternate possibilities are an illusion. No free will, no self, no time, no possibilities, only the one fated path.


Iron Maiden
Somewhere in Time
1986

Take my hand
I’ll take you to the other side
To see the truth:
The path for you is decided


I invite and urge Cognitive Neuroscientists to play with the self violation of the will to demonstrate and comprehend the ramifications of personal non-control, the illusory nature of the controller self, and our inability to control our thoughts across time. In today’s voice recording, I warned Cognitive Neuroscientists of the potential to harm oneself by playing with thoughts about harming and violating one’s own will.

That is the purpose of this figure of Jesus: God provides the ram or his king has a willing demonstration of violating the egoic personal will, in order to know and enter fully the awareness of the kingdom of God. Entering the secret kingdom of God means in the intense altered state of loose cognition, gaining awareness of the transcendent power of control of thoughts, rather than egoic illusory control power.

The most attractive thing for power and military power is playing with our inability to prevent and steer away from our near future thoughts of self violation. This kind of dangerous and profound demonstration is the way to forcefully, completely, thoroughly, and systematically transform the mind’s mental model of time, self, and control.

This mental exercise of violating the personal will is the way to fully understand no free will, fully understand the illusion of self as control agent that initiates thoughts, fully understand the illusory aspect of time and change, and fully understand the illusion of possibilities and the open future. This is the most profound thought-experiment in Cognitive Science, and produces understanding of the figure of the king willingly repudiated, fastened to the tree, cross, or branchless pole (“stake”).

We sacrifice our delusion of autonomous kingship creating our future by steering among open possibility-paths, to purchase enlightenment and comprehension of the kingdom of God: not our will be done, but the will of controller X be done.

To fully understand no-free-will and the emptiness of the self-symbol, we must mentally violate and repudiate the illusion of the power of the personal egoic top-level controller, therefore meditate on the mythic meaning of the king willingly sacrificed on the cross as a cybernetic possibility-branching tree.

Thus I have demonstrated that to advance Cognitive Science by 50 years overnight, you must study and cite my name and the Egodeath theory, which is already finished at what you Science writers are advocating that we begin doing: developing ideas about no free will, no self, no time, and entheogens — psychedelics, per Thomas Metzinger in the section “A New Kind of Ethics”, pages 223-230, keywords: psychedelic, psilocybin, LSD, Huxley, Pahnke, Griffiths, psychotic reaction, panic, psychedelic sacraments, 2C-B, 2C-T-7, religious ecstasy, classic hallucinogens, altered states, drug policy.

I would mention 4HO-DiPT, which produces classic psychedelic effects with an ergonomic, 1-hour duration.

No-self, no-free-will ethics is not actually “new” per Metzinger’s subheading; antiquity and the New Testament believe no-free-will and provide no-free-will ethics, per my original research incorporating Luther H. Martin’s book Hellenistic Religion, which focuses on heimarmene.

We scientists, when we reveal no-free-will to society, must provide guidance and a replacement system for society. We scientists remove the illusion of free will. This is the consciousness revolution, which is the same revolution as the New Testament in 325 and 1525, a social and metaphysical alternative to Caesar’s Empire or that of worldly popes and “renaissance” pagan kings.

A forged new testament is perhaps, per Bart Ehrman’s 2013 book “Forgery and Counterforgery”, better than no new testament and it was good enough for the early proto-Christians it should be good enough for today’s hapless Christians finally brought to enlightenment instead of literalism and the historical Jesus and Paul.

Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics
Bart D. Ehrman
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0199928037
December 2012

These are most of the ideas that are in my hour and a half voice recording today.

— Michael Hoffman, November 28/29, 2012, with expansions December 1, 2012.
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6098 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/stake
The ram of Abraham and Isaac is a kind of lamb sacrifice analogous to God providing his son as a sacrifice that we may come to comprehend the potential of our mental control. Abraham killing his son: realize this isn’t just any son; this son represents the future of all believers in the Egodeath theory — that is, the puppets (“the kingdom of Israel”) who learn that they are controlled by God.

In using the cybernetic ram as the sacrifice as substitute for Isaac (= entirety of Israel), the ram is equated with Israel; that is, just as God provides the ram as the willing sacrifice, God could just as well have made all people in the kingdom of Israel will their own sacrifice (willingly ending their own viable future) in demonstration of their puppethood under God’s power. The ram not only is functionally equivalent to the boy Isaac; the ram is functionally equivalent to every person in God’s kingdom of Israel, because all of Israel proceeds from the loins of Isaac.

God provided the ram (a kind of lamb) which is a willful creature with its powerful horns caught in the (cybernetic possibility branching) bush equivalent to God providing his mythic son who willingly is fastened to the tree or pole or cross which represents the egoic agent physically fastened to frozen unchanging spacetime and the illusory cybernetic possibility branching tree.

An analogy: The God of the people of the kingdom of Israel made Abraham will to sacrifice Abraham’s entire future lineage (the entire future kingdom of Israel!), in the form of sacrificing his only son in the line of Israel.

When the knife proved to come down willing to sacrifice in one blow God’s entire future kingdom of people (puppets) who depended on Isaac living and procreating, God chose to preserve his entire kingdom of people, by preserving Isaac and by instead providing a willful ram caught in a cybernetic possibility-branching bush, providing a substitute sacrifice that would thus enable God to have a future people to know him and have communion with him. The prophets of Israel understand all this. This is the main meaning and theme of the Old Testament.


Does logical consistency dictate and compel us to enter control chaos in the intense mystic altered state? Why was Jesus hesitant to drink the cup of Ayahuasca and die as a cybernetic control-agent? Why do we fear loss of control when ingesting the entheogen that God leads us to and makes us eat and drink? Is it rational for us to fear the loss of control? What exactly, specifically, does the enlightened holy spirit of thinking teach the mind; what specifically is the train of thinking?

How can the mind possibly hang onto this strange kind of thinking from the peak state, these crazy, too brilliant, holy, transcendent ideas, which egoic tight-binding thinking would never think of? These are not rare or strange ideas: these are actually the standard ideas that occur to the mind when the biased ruts of egoic thinking are suspended and disengaged. This is transcendent control-thinking now speaking, in the extremely rational state of reasoning in which the mind’s puppethood is revealed and the potential of the mind to think *anything* vividly is revealed.

When you are made able to think *anything*, to intend anything vividly, when your thinking becomes *that* flexible and completely disinhibited, the problem is, when you are removed from your personality restraint chains, and you are given the mind of God — entering the God mode of control over your mind, you find that you can make your mind intend and visualize anything and you have no control over this thinking, which God forces you to do and which you are made to want to do in order to know coherent truth and rationality about personal control agency and access the full potential of the mind.

God wants you to think this, and you want to think about this, to know and experience the full dynamics of how personal mental control works. The mind recoils from this type of reasoning and exploration, and the mind is threatened by this so drawn into this thinking to map out the danger to avoid the danger. The mind sometimes hides its head to avoid seeing the face of God and dying, but, per Ken Wilber, the mind is not satisfied until it works through this mode of reasoning about the foundation and source of personal control and non-rational bias in favor of choosing life while also knowing truth and accessing the mind’s full potential.

I am able to think control-chaos, and I don’t, because (non-rationally) and as long as God the puppetmaster chooses to not make me enter control chaos. Per the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, we are taught in the super-rational transcendent Pure Reason state, that God *could* make the mind enter control-chaos, smiting and crushing and destroying his puppets.


The Twilight Zone
Neil Peart
excerpts

Beneath his hat the strangeness lies
Take it off, he’s got three eyes
Truth is false and logic lost
Now the fourth dimension is crossed
Beyond this world strange things are known
See what your fate might have in store
Enter this world of imagination
You wake up lost in an empty town
Look up to see a giant boy
You’ve just become his brand new toy
And no escape, no place to hide
Here where time and space collide


How to demonstrate to your puppets that you are in total control of their thinking, without destroying all your puppets, without making all your dolls decide to tear off their own heads and end their viable future. Do you want to be the ruler over a thriving coherent society filled with coherent viable dolls, or over a pile of self-destroyed dolls? If you want to have communion with the people of your kingdom that you absolutely control, you must have a way of demonstrating your absolute power over the minds of your people, in such a way that you don’t harm and terminate your people.

In the peak window of the intense mystic altered state, when we become enlightened about the chaotic, non-rational basis of personal control, we choose between the two paths:

o Path 1: logical control-chaos, non-viable future, in transcendent recognition of our puppethood and the logical baselessness of personal control. Controller X forcefully demonstrates the ability to make your mind take this path. You logically have to understand this point of view, to know the truth about personal control theory.

o Path 2: act viable and stable, without any logical basis. Miraculous resurrection, while in the transcendent mental state where rules of egoic bias don’t apply and carry no weight. Continue thriving and multiplying while you teach other people about transcendent control rationality and the logical baselessness of stable personal controllership.

Why would a transcendently rational person even consider control-chaos, or even think about it? There is strong confirmation that mystics are pulled toward this thought as the dead center of transcendent thinking. It is not at all insane or irrational to think about “control chaos”. What we fear in fearing acid, the numinous sacred sacrament that poisonously kills our control thinking, is precisely control chaos.

If you are not thinking about control chaos as a problem involving justification of your continued pretended controllership existence, you are failing to see and engage with the main problem at hand. All other discussion is avoidance and beating around the bush. In the name of logical coherence and truth and recognition of the powerlessness of personal control in relation to the uncontrollable transcendent source of thought.

From the mystic’s point of view in the peak window of the psychotomimetic state of un-chained, un-tethered trans-sanity, or radical existential freedom unmoored (like an upper-class Philosophy dorm roommate who became an unrepentant bum and societal drop-out): given that there is *no basis* and I am intent on knowing that there is *no basis* on which to live as a cybernetic control agent, *what then shall I do*? Shall I go berserk, become the cybernetic chaos monster, end my viable future, while I know the truth about personal control?

Or, shall I — with *no logical basis* (because there can’t be a logical basis for personal conduct, from the absolute transcendent point of view) — continue on in a viable stable life — unjustifiable, non-rational, trans-rational, but not irrational, not anti-rational — both knowing the transcendent cybernetic truth *and* going on to have a (logically baseless) viable life, for example a life in which I can go on to teach other people about the mystic state and trans-logical “justification” or “trans-justification” for continuing to live.

It requires a miraculous resurrection, to go on living in the knowledge of truth, after our logical egoic basis and irrational egoic bias is exposed. This concern is unbelievable, can’t be taken seriously, by the mind in the ordinary state of tight cognitive binding — but these concerns are standard in the genius transcendent mind when egoic bias is drastically lifted and the mind is possessed by Pure Reason. Pure Reason cannot provide a rational, logical justification for conducting your life as if you are a power-wielding control-agent.

The kingdom of God is filled with pure reason and with an understanding of what pure reason cannot provide: justification for not acting-out control chaos. There is no rational justification for having a viable life rather than entering control-chaos. There *is* the reasoning that “God wants his kingdom of puppets to be viable, to both know his power and continue to live and thrive and multiply while knowing his power.” Puppets who decide to enter control-chaos would fail to make God’s kingdom multiply.

The reason you should not enter control-chaos is so that God’s kingdom can multiply by your instructing other people. I could’ve entered control-chaos — God made me know this through experience: God totally could’ve made my mind choose to enter control chaos and end my viable life; he showed me that. But instead, God chose to make me continue — with no basis in my own power or logic — with a viable life so that I can teach people about the cybernetic position of God.

I have a voice recording on cassette of the moment these principles (not the Isaac metaphor) was shown to me, on March 19, 1993, just after my roommate’s cat (= Dionysus) yawned. My mind was extremely relaxed and tranquil to the point of coming to a halt; the cat yawned, and the thought was put into my mind that I could be made to do *anything* and had no power to steer away from a compelling thought. I was shown the idea that my future could immediately be ended, that I could be made to will some harmful thing that would end my viable future.

I also at that time had a clear, though vague, vision of Jesus floating up with his kingdom, though this was confusing until November 2001 because I still assumed that Jesus was a historical figure. I was starting to understand this mystic principles and such logic, and had trouble, through 1999, attempting to fit-in the role of the historical Jesus in with these mystic-state principles. The solution rushed together upon removing the premise that didn’t fit — the historical Jesus.

In that 1993 experience, I was shown the ability to go on with a logically exempt, unjustifiable viable future, so that I could teach other people about personal control cybernetics (such as going on to publish my 1997 Core theory summary at Principia Cybernetica). This is presented as a choice to reason-through. There is no logical basis to choose between demonstrating your puppethood by control-chaos and ending your viable future versus going on (without logical justification) to have a baseless viable future in which you can teach other people about personal control baselessness revealed in the altered state.

If you choose control-chaos — which is completely ok per transcendent rationality, which doesn’t apply, then that implies that upon seeing Truth, people become non-viable; you cannot see God’s face and continue with viable life. If you choose viable life even though you know there’s no logical rational basis of justification for an awakened puppet to act as a coherent stable controller, then the advantage for God or for Truth is that you can go on to continue existing *and* knowing truth, both at the same time.

In terms of Bible metaphor, if you choose to see the substitute sacrifice that God provides as properly satisfying the logical requirements to recognize our helpless puppethood, then you can go on to multiply and thrive, so God will have a thriving kingdom of awakened people. You can go on to spread and communicate and propagate the race of the God of Israel. Not through literal procreation, but by *meme* propagation.

My role per 1993 is to propagate the knowledge of the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence, which is what the Bible is about: the collective set of people who are made to understand that they are helpless puppets and have no logical rational basis for their acting with cybernetic power.

“White-light electricity hum/buzz/beats feedback — Instrumental only. Free-form electric guitar. The main part starts around 1:30. 8 minutes. From an idea-development spoken-word recording named Escape Velocity, by Illumination Valve, March 19, 1993, a few minutes prior to the onset of transcendent religious control seizure (which was also captured on tape, against the backwards playback of this passage). Uploaded July 24, 2007. Compare to the visual art of Alex Grey.”

How can God have a kingdom of believers in him, if every time a person discovers the power of God or control-chaos in the intense psychotomimetic altered state of loose cognition, the person is made to sacrifice their viable future? In the peak window of psychotically unbiased transcendent thinking, you reach the point of control-chaos and the decision arises: I can either become chaotic, in which case, my life practically ends and I’m locked away and separated from society; or, I can baselessly *assume* that it is legitimate for me to continue with stable, viable self-control life.

It is disturbing, the baselessness, the logical lack of foundation for control activity once we perceive the arbitrariness of control. What is the logical basis justifying our continued pretense of stable self-control, once we see the truth, that we are controlled by blind heimarmene? There is no personal god, there is only Fatedness. The peak window in the altered state reveals that my life is subject to the whim of blind, mechanistic, uncaring fate — the monstrous god of heimarmene, ruler of the physical world. That is my given logical basis, I see.

There is a choice presented to the enlightened person: given that I am a helpless puppet of blind mechanistic fate, how can I logically justify acting coherently? Isn’t this the end of the road, for my viable self-control stability? How can we live, without delusion, after we have shown the non-veracity of egoic control; of self, time, and control? How can we live in a truth-aware way, where the truth shows that we have no logical basis for doing one thing or another after we have transcended egoic control?

There simply is no logical basis on which to live. It’s a category error. Our conduct is not a matter of logic; the demand for a logical basis for action is incoherent and meaningless.


Stairway to Heaven
Led Zeppelin
excerpt:

If there’s a bustle in your hedgerow, don’t be alarmed now,
It’s just a spring clean for the May queen.
Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run
There’s still time to change the road you’re on.


o Path 1 that occurs to us: Acting out chaos, in which case we go psychotic and have no viable future. We kill our future (represented by our son Isaac, who will go on to propagate the entire race of Israel, who is God’s people who worship him). Note the special circumstances about Isaac: the mother is unable to have any more children. Isaac is Abraham’s only son in the chain that will be Israel, God’s worshippers. If Isaac dies, *it’s not just Isaac* who dies, the whole *point* is that killing Isaac amounts to killing the entire set of people in the future who will be God’s worshippers.

By God having Abraham destroy Isaac, God is having Abraham destroy the entire set of God’s future worshippers! That’s the shocking point! It’s unimportant that Abraham is about to kill his son. as far as the son dying — that’s merely one little person. But this isn’t just any son — this is the son who will propagate the entire race of all the people who will worship this god in the future. By killing the root of the branch of all his worshippers, god in demonstrating his power over Abraham’s will, is depriving himself of all his future worshippers.

If the truth shows you that you have no viable basis for control and you must switch from viable delusion to enlightened control-chaos, then only transcendent psychotic chaotic people remain alive to worship god, and their lives are not viable. If seeing God makes you so sane and rational that you go berserk and become random and enter permanent control-chaos, then no one can know truth and go on to live within the state of knowing truth. God’s kingdom of worshippers will be practically empty. That’s the point of the story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac. God has to prove his power over his people, without destroying his people.

God has to kill something, or put that creature into control-chaos and demonstrate his ability to end that person’s life as a viable control-agent. So God provides a willful ram with its power caught in the cybernetic possibility branching bush, and God demonstrates his power to wreck and override one’s control-thoughts by making Abraham sacrifice the ram, *thereby preserving* Isaac who is the future progenitor of all the people who will know and worship and understand God’s cybernetic preeminence over our personal control power.

Belonging to Israel is only metaphorically being of a certain “race” — the “race” of the elect, those who are destined to be shown the ability of God to override and drive our control-thoughts into chaos and make us end our viable future as control-agents. For his worshippers to fully understand his position, God must demonstrate his “wrath”, his controller position which enables him to wreck our control. The idea of Jesus as the sacrificial lamb provided by God is equivalent.

In the case of Jesus, Jesus as ram is both sacrificed and preserved upon resurrection as the mystic king over a kingdom of the enlightened puppets, who all know that God can take over and wreck the control-viability of any of our minds. We are the “race” of puppets who have been demonstrated to be helpless and shown that our future is radically up to God’s whim. The puppetmaster at his whim could make our thoughts end our life or go chaotic in any number of ways — why doesn’t God drive our control into a wreck?

Because — the answer of the Bible is — if God’s way of revealing his position of power to us is that he harms us and wrecks our viable life, — (you must reason to yourself this way, thinking as God) — he wouldn’t have kingdom of worshippers; he would have a heap of psychotic ship wrecked minds. His kingdom would be merely a graveyard and insane asylum, hardly a worthy viable kingdom. He must build up his kingdom, he must have a way of demonstrating his power to smite or uphold the person’s train of control-thoughts, without actually harming his people that he brings into his court.

If I am the king, and I demonstrate my power over my people’s thinking by driving them insane and making them kill themselves, I will have no kingdom! I must find some other way to demonstrate that I am in control of my people’s minds, their personal cybernetic control-thinking.

Instead of having my people destroy their future as my way of revealing and demonstrating my power over them, I will instead provide my own *only* son, thus representing the entirety of my future control-life and lineage, and I shall make his mind choose willingly to sacrifice his own future, which is my future as control-agent, and I shall not make my people’s minds go into control-chaos and wreck and sacrifice their viable control-future. This way, I both demonstrate my power over thinking, and, preserve the viability of the future of my people in my kingdom.

When I make my son want to sacrifice himself, my point is that I could have made any of you, my people, will to go into control-chaos and sacrifice your viable future.


o Path 2 that occurs to us: Though we have no logical basis for justifying acting stable and consistent, it is possible, though not logically justifiable (it’s trans-rational; it’s not a matter of “logical basis”; the idea doesn’t apply; it would be a category error to demand a “logical basis” for acting coherent and viable in the future after being enlightened about being a helpless puppet and also throwing off the chains that constrain egoic thinking: our natural biases, likes, dislikes, attitudes.

You *can* non-rationally (not irrationally; not against logic, but independent of logic; logic doesn’t apply, though we expect it to) adopt transcendent magical thinking, a miraculous resurrection and bootstrapping, honoring a personal God. To sacrifice Isaac is to harm and cut off your own future life. Shall we hold that when you become enlightened, you must become chaotic and practically end your life? If that were the case, if we agree to that, there would be no enlightened *and* viable people to worship God. That’s the simple, classic religious idea.

If God shows his power by making you kill yourself and end your future, to show he’s in control of your thinking, then no one is allowed to live and know God. How can we (as cybernetic control agents) see the face of God (perceive our cybernetic nullity) *and* go on continuing to live in a viable, stable way?


I Don’t Know
Bob Daisley
excerpt

Nobody ever told me
I found out for myself
You gotta believe in foolish miracles
It’s not how you play the game
It’s if you win or lose
You can choose
Don’t confuse
Win or lose
It’s up to you


This is a new increase in clarity of connections: I’ve been working on these thoughts for years, but now they have really come together.

— Michael Hoffman, December 1, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6099 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Re: Bks by Algis Uzdavinys on Mystic Platonism, Ascent Mysticism
> Orpheus and the Roots of Platonism
> Algis Uzdavinys
> December 2011
> http://amazon.com/dp/1908092076
> 118 pages
Blurb:
“the religious, mystic origins and substance of philosophy. a critical survey of ancient and modern sources and of scholarly works dealing with Orpheus and everything related to this major figure of ancient Greek myth, religion and philosophy. Here poetic madness meets religious initiation and Platonic philosophy. insights into the usually downplayed relations between Egyptian initiation, Greek mysteries, and Plato’s philosophy and followers, into Hellenistic Neoplatonic and Hermetic developments.”


Reviewer Mysterium Ineffable wrote (rewritten for clarity by Michael Hoffman):
“In the modern era, it has always been a battle to understand the complex relationship between the work of Socrates and Plato and the religious context of the Greek religious world which they inhabited. This is primarily due to the fact that we are fed utter nonsense about them in the corporate academies, nonsense that flows downstream to the common folk and pollutes even the more noble attempts to appreciate their work.”

“I am fed up with the desire to see in these figures a kind of evolution from the befuddling superstitions projected back onto the ancient religious world, an evolution that makes its decisive break with Aristotle and which is then inherited by the Europeans a millennium later–a millennium spent mostly dormant in the prison of Islam–who then labored with it until they birthed together the modern world which in turn produced one simple irrefutable truth–namely, the only truth we can know is that we can’t know truth. If ever there was a reason to question our collective sanity, this must be it. The modern mentality is comprised of this insane fabric of assumptions. Whatever the causes and effects of this stupefying historical phenomenon, that is a false tale of evolutionism from ancient superstition up to wonderful us.”

“A handful of philosophers have kept the torch of real sophia lifted above the dark miasma of misosophy — hatred of wisdom or knowledge. Uzdavinys is a torch-bearer. He shows the relationship between the sacred and the Platonic tradition; between the Orphic and Apollonian mysteries and the work of Plato and Socrates. Shows the continuity between Plato and the various Platonists of antiquity, and it re-roots the holy work of the philosopher back in the soil of the sacred.”


Reviewer VeritasluxMea wrote (rewritten for clarity by Michael Hoffman):
“Algis’ intellect superceded his mentor, AK Coomaraswamy. Out of thousands of books on Orphism, Theurgy, and genuine ‘know their stuff’ metaphysicians, this book is one of the best, without question. Genuine metaphysicians like this rarely exist. The golden age of illumination was 200-600 CE. Algis was a genuine metaphysician. He threw his life upon the quest for Hellenic and Orphic Illumination. Condensed and straight to the point; inspired.”

______________

I heartily agree with the anger and disgust at how know-nothing non-initiate scholars have destroyed their subject by ignorantly forcing it into the mold of “evolution of ideas”. These modern writers are getting in the way and interfering with understanding the ancients. This is why I breathe relief when reading books from just prior to Jungianism. To damn Jung with faint praise: at least he’s not as bad as Freud.

Ken Wilber does this, misrepresenting “mythic consciousness” in Antiquity — as if he had the faintest clue about the meaning of myth, which he doesn’t; he obscures and pushes us away from understanding myth, by mis-interpreting it as child-like psychospiritual development by people who hadn’t yet learned egoic thinking.

The irony! Talk about “pre/trans fallacy”! Antiquity was post-egoic — turning Ken Wilber on his head. They can only be considered “pre-egoic” in a minor sense. In a way, society “progressed” or “evolved” from the entheogenic post-egoic Antiquity, to the eventual ordinary-state based Modern-era egoic-only consciousness, but our evolutionary trajectory is more a matter of thesis->antithesis->synthesis:

1. Antiquity: children had egoic thinking, all adults had entheogenic post-egoic mental models.

2. Modernity: children and adults had egoic-only mental models, no entheogens (within official culture), no transcendent mental model.

3. Post-Modernity: everyone has all the advantages of the modern egoic-only culture, plus, entheogenic Egodeath theory understanding of ancient myth and ego transcendence.

If Postmodernism outlaws metanarratives, early Ken Wilber was an outlaw, because he had a very heavy-handed, and substantially incorrect, metanarrative — the “evolutionary” tale of an ancient pre-egoic consciousness, modern egoic consciousness, and post-modern transcendent consciousness. It is an almost complete misunderstanding to think of antiquity as “pre-egoic”. They were much more, post-egoic, though they were pre-modern; that is, they were prior to the modern, egoic-only consciousness.

It is hard to defend the modern era as “more mature” than antiquity, given that modernity was developmentally stunted in mental childhood, without egodeath initiation.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 1, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6100 From: jdcasten Date: 02/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…

I’m thinking you’re a prophet Mr. Hoffman!

Just kidding… but yes…  check out this post from 1995 too:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan/VQC9aNU0XDQ

I’ve been researching my book Cybernetic Revelation for over 20 years… probably was more influenced by Heidegger in my choice of title than Hoffman… a phrase I independently discovered / coined… but I acknowledge your pioneering and inspiring work as a psychonaught—maybe we could agree about the possibility of independent poetic/scientific verification?  We share some influences as well… like Plato?  He was all for soul steering and revelation.

Yet, my perspective with my books is a bit robustly complex, not a tune to be named in one note, less defined and not reducible to phrases, such as “we are always already artificially intelligent,” “the zero dimension,” or “cybernetic revelation.”  Hence I would not think there was a Newton-Leibniz debate between the two of us… not a “who discovered calculus first” but more like two more or less “enlightened” perspectives on a similar universe.

Also check this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/fashion/bah-humblebrag-the-unfortunate-rise-of-false-humility.html?smid=pl-share

More ego-trip irony to think about…:D

Love your work Michael… thanks for pointing out the connection… keep on truckin’!

—JD


— In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, egodeath-owner@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> I wrote the phrase ‘cybernetic revelation’ in my Egodeath Yahoo group some 7 times to date, since November 13, 2001, which was the week of my great Phase 2 breakthrough (extending my Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence to explain religious myth). I don’t know if I used the term before that, such as on the WELL in 1990.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/msearch?query=%22cybernetic+revelation%22
>
> The Egodeath theory clearly explicitly explains what’s revealed in the mystic altered state, and how to translate religious myth to statements in terms of modern metaphysics and cognitive science and control theory — in terms of ‘cybernetics’, which is a neo-ancient word.
>
> I wrote the phrase ‘cybernetic transcendence’ in my Egodeath Yahoo group some 13 times to date.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/msearch?query=%22cybernetic+transcendence%22
>
> — Michael Hoffman, November 2012
>
Group: egodeath Message: 6101 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sacrifi
Warning; invitation; requirement for enlightenment: this posting is a major accomplishment in the theory of blood sacrifice and ecstatic terror. It is advanced and some elements are newly figured out and expressed here for the first time anywhere, ever, as far as a modern explicit explanation. I am the victorious heroic Theorist of Ego Death; I am the first modern theorist to explicitly and clearly explain the cybernetic self-control logic of blood sacrifice, being made willing to will one’s own demise.

I invite and warn you cognitive scientists: I guarantee you will be led to these horrific ecstatic considerations as through a doorway that you must pass through and cannot avoid and do not want to avoid. You want to understand the peak mystic-state vision of being made willing to harm yourself and your future, and understand why in that peak state you will be re-stabilized, relieved, set free, and released from a trap by envisioning:
o An android that is caused to will its own harm and destruction and loss of a viable future.
o A bloody self-sacrifice of a control agent.


What is the commonality between:
o Messiah savior king (political military leader) Jesus, willing to be crucified
o Sacrificing Isaac who will father all of Israel
o Mystic peak-state willingness to end one’s viable future, against one’s conventional will

All three scenarios express the theme of being made willing to end one’s entire future life as a cybernetic control agent. If God wills Jesus to will being killed on the cross/tree/pole, then his future kingdom and future kingship is ended. One theme hidden in the New Testament fiction is that Jesus didn’t actually die — his blood flowed from his side, thus he was removed alive from the cross.

“I’m reluctant to drink this cup of egoic-control-poisoning entheogens and have my kingship killed, but not my will, but yours, Father, be done.”


This analysis pulls together years of insights about the peak-state climax of ecstatic panic and loss of conventional control over thinking, leading to release from a kind of being held hostage (captivity, imprisonment) until paying the ransom price to purchase release into a viable and cybernetics-enlightened future, having spilled blood (willing it in violation of one’s will) to gain cybernetic integrity and purification of the mental model of personal control power.

A theory of religion must explain the classic peak-state dynamics of personal control inevitably heading for disastrous loss of control, and how control stability is restored. Foolish spiritualists tell me that negative panic is never necessary. But negative panic is an especially prominent potential of the altered state, and it’s something that the mind is inherently fascinated by: a strange, intriguing kind of treat, that is related to the workaday threat of mundane lack of control-integrity across time, as in intending to do engineering homework today and throughout the semester and having a puzzling struggle at carrying out that intention consistently.

It is a misconception to only think of negative panic as negative. We must purify thinking by fire, by threatening, by overpowering one’s control-power. The point, perhaps, is not the threat per se, not of one’s control power being overpowered by the divine sacred transcendent mental perspective; the point is to fully comprehend the cybernetics ramifications of the mystic-state perspective on time, self, and control. The objective is to have an integrity of understanding the transcendent mental model, and not be stuck only in the egoic mental model.

How can we effectively accomplish gaining integrity and satisfactory completeness of the transcendent mental model, which we desire? What is the most effective, ergonomic method, the most-effective means of forcefully putting into place the transcendent mental model?


One humanoid escapee
One android on the run
Seeking freedom beneath a lonely desert sun
Trying to change its program
Trying to change the mode — crack the code
Images conflicting into data overload
1-0-0-1-0-0-1
S.O.S.
In distress <==
Memory banks unloading
Bytes break into bits
Unit One’s in trouble and it’s scared out of its wits <==
Guidance systems break down <==
A struggle to exist — to resist <==
A pulse of dying power in a clenching plastic fist
It replays each of the days
A hundred years of routines
Bows its head* and prays <==
To the mother of all machines
-Neil Peart, The Body Electric

* = offering your head to be cut off, in cybernetic submission and acknowledgement: “You God could make me will *anything*, such as willing to end my viable future.” New lyric analysis point, December 2, 2012


Theory of sacrifice in terms of thinking about bloody self-harm as desiring to oppose one’s own desire, control-intending to contradict one’s own control-intention.
According to classic mystic-state myth, and acid-oriented Rock from the late modern era, the shortest path to fullest enlightenment about self, time, and control, is to think about your will being pitted against itself, such as thinking of an action that represents “a control-action you certainly don’t want to do”, such as ending one’s viable future in some ritual blood-spilling way, representing “overpowering ego”.

The problem is, though, no amount of physical acting-out the idea of “negate egoic control power and desire” can possibly guarantee comprehension of the transcendent perspective on personal control power. Therefore, you have to think about horrific ecstatic loss of control or overpowering-of-control scenarios, not do them.

These two actions are equivalent:
o Ritually scrambling one’s room (which I would never do, being a neatnic) as a demonstration of being unchained from egoic control power
o Spilling blood in such a way as to destroy one’s future, as a control-sacrificial demonstration of the powerlessness of egoic control power.

This is a reason why the figure of Jesus on the cross is bloody: when we are in the frenzied ecstatic state, in which we are caused by God to will against our will, to will the total harm and destruction of our egoic will, this idea is conveyed most vividly and forcefully by a horrific ecstatic vision of being made willing to commit bloody harm in a way that’s harmful to oneself, in an extreme violation of one’s egoic control bias.

Part of this ability is that egoic restraints are lifted, and part of this cybernetic ability is that the mind perceives its thoughts as being forced upon it, and personal control power being overridden and destabilized; one has no control over what intentions are injected into the mind by God and heimarmene/fatedness, some horrific knife blood desire violation idea, lying as a child-devouring monster on the labyrinth course dead ahead.

The sacrifice such as killing a piglet (Eleusis) or killing Jesus or killing the ram in place of Isaac, must be bloody and horrific and ecstatically willed and affirmed, to represent the idea of “the cybernetic agent is vulnerable to whatever ideas and intentions are lying ahead on the pre-set, timelessly pre-existing worldline”. This is how the clean logic of cybernetics ends up affirming and needing a bloody horribly anti-desired intention. Control must become its own enemy, contradicting itself to the extreme, to satisfy integrity of thinking about control. So we have acid-rock lyrics signaling “knife, enemy, horrors, doll, fear, death, guillotine”.

He’s got to walk a fine line
and keep his self-control
Or lose the race to rats
Get caught in ticking traps
The boy lies in the grass with one blade
stuck between his teeth
A vague sensation quickens
in his young and restless heart
Like a steely blade in a silken sheath
Excitement so thick
You could cut it with a knife
Circling choppers slash the night
-Neil Peart, from the Signals album

How to fully exorcise the ego demon and purify the mind of egoic thinking?
purification: blood let out = egoic mental pollution let out. circumcision = blood


All preordained
A prisoner in chains
A victim of venomous fate <==
A planet of playthings
We dance on the strings
Of powers we cannot conceive (“un-perceive”)
Kicked in the face <==
You can’t (“can”) pray for a place
In heaven’s unearthly estate
Life is nothing left to chance
A host of holy horrors <==
To direct our aimless dance
You can choose a ready guide
In some celestial voice
Or the gods are malign <==
Blame is better to give* than receive
You can choose from phantom fears <==
And kindness that can kill <==
I will choose a path that’s clear
-Neil Peart, from the song Free Will

* The mystic attributes all blame to the transcendent Controller X, Zeus, the Fates, the Heimarmene-snake, JHVH, God, instead of to the mystic’s own moral-control agency. New; I figured out this line on December 2, 2012.


The peaking mystic is held hostage in prison by the blind heartless cosmic Necessity machine that demands a ransom payment (for your release) of full acknowledgement that God could inject any thought into your mind and there’s nothing you could possibly do about it. That is the breakthrough realization that we cybernetic control-agents desire: to comprehend that God could inject any thought into your mind and there’s nothing you could possibly do about it.

The mystic peak state is dangerously rudderless, which is vulnerability to control-disaster, a desirable vulnerability to being made willing to end your future as a control agent. There is no possible way to steer away from the thought that is lying ahead on the pre-set rail of your worldline: God and Heimarmene can prove to your mind that he can make your mind will to end your future life as a control-agent. He can forcefully turn your plastic hand against yourself, to fully disprove your power of self-control.

There is no way to slow down and stop the crazy train of thought that is rushing toward the inevitable beautiful disaster realization that cleanses the mind of egoic impurity, of the delusion that we have autonomous control of our thinking, control over what thoughts are made to arise in our mind. Dionysus predestines us to ingest the entheogenic cup, enter ritual madness and ecstasy, and predestines us to think about these things.


When King Lycurgus (= king Ego; egoic control-thinking) of Thrace heard that Dionysus was in his kingdom, he imprisoned all the followers of Dionysus (= kingdom of Israel/Jesus). Dionysus injected thoughts of revolt into the people of Thrace. Dionysus made King Lycurgus (king ego) insane; Dionysus gave thoughts to the king that made the king slice his own son (sacrificing one’s childish thinking and self-concept) into pieces with an axe, thinking he was a patch of ivy (= heimarmene, worldline in frozen 4D spacetime). Ivy is snake-shaped like heimarmene and is a sacred attribute of Dionysus (compare ribbons on the thyrsus).

An oracle claimed that the land would stay barren as long as king ego was alive, so his people had him drawn and quartered (= loose cognition, ego death, disproof of egoic control power). As soon as king ego was sacrificed, Dionysus lifted the curse of cybernetic control-impotence from the kingdom. — Homer, Iliad 6.136-7. Lycurgus tried to kill Ambrosia (= entheogen), a follower of Dionysus. Ambrosia was transformed into a heimarmene-vine that twined around the enraged king-ego and restrained him to the 4D block universe, killing king ego.


Your control-thoughts are profoundly dependent = loss of control = sacred disaster = transcendent instability = the numinous (attraction + horrific fear) = heading for disaster enlightenment = prophecy = “your kingdom will fall unless you repent and worship God” = unable to save oneself = require reset from outside one’s power = panic = cybernetic control-agency death = control-power instability = self-control seizure = self-control vortex = doomed =

A song just came on the radio: “Oh no, here we go, got a crazy feeling I don’t understand, got to get away from here, feeling like I should’ve kept my feet on the ground, waiting for the sun to appear” -Bob Daisley

= desiring an enlightening state of helplessness = puppet = doll = crazy = divine madness = desire to be tied up and rap’d and overpowered by the deity = self-transgressive mission to heaven = necessary disproving = being made to desire a complete maximum violation of self-control to gain full enlightenment and cleanse the mind of egoic confusion about control-power.


The mind is made willing to spill blood and end one’s future to satisfy the requirement of proving powerlessness over one’s thoughts (this presumes you absolutely don’t want blood spilled; a more general idea of this is “to harm one’s future in a way that one totally objects to, thus demonstrating totally forceful willing against one’s totally forceful will — an arm-wrestling to the point of ego-death of one’s power wrestling against oneself; wrestling alone against the angel/man/God all night and got a blessing because he struggled with God and has overcome. “I saw God face to face, and yet my life was spared.”

The idea of blood sacrifice violation of one’s future fulfills and appeases one’s demand (when one is given the mind of Dionysus) to demonstrate understanding of personal control limitations and fascinating cybernetic self-control vulnerability. God wants me to understand. God wants my non-control. God controls my thinking. I want non-control. I want to understand. I am God; my mind conforms to the mind of God. I want to prove non-control.

I’m not here right now; Dionysus has taken over my mind. I am in full control of my mind and of my personal control: I am Dionysus. The ego mask belongs to no one, it belongs to Dionysus, the secret foreign king.


People think I’m crazy but I’m in demand
Never heard a thing I said (dead… dead… dead)
No use saying sorry
It’s something that I enjoy

He’ll show you no mercy.
Your image in his hands it’s useless to try
Escaping his curses
Nowhere to run – your fate is in his hands
Your time has come – you’ll live to his command
I’m warning you – the worst is yet to come
You never imagined such a fate could follow you
And when it’s your time I wonder how you’ll do
Your kind of trouble’s running deeper than the sea
You broke the rules
You’ve been a fool
The little doll is you

-Bob Daisley

Acid-oriented rock (AOR) = holy sacred scripture and prophecy of disaster and satisfactory transcendence exorcism purification cleansing to gain complete perfected integrity of the mental model of self, time, and control. Acid-rock lyrics carry more authority, credibility, and weight than the Bible, because they are written by our peers in the late modern era.

‘Snake handling’ means mentally playing with the perspective and control-ramifications of heimarmene. The difference between snake handling in Antiquity and in the late modern era is that Antiquity recognized the snake as representing Fatedness, heimarmene, and its ramifications for personal control power. To safely manipulate ideas about the ramifications of heimarmene for null personal control power over your future thought-stream, you must understand your mind being taken over by the heimarmene-serpent God and made willing to think anything.

As the perfect extreme example, God and Fate is secretly in control of your mind and can very well make you willing to harmfully end your future as control-agent, as we may recognize and affirm in the vision of the willing sacrificial crucifixion of king Jesus, the messiah of his future kingdom of the Elect. His blood spills, as Isaac’s ram’s blood spills, as king Pentheus is made to will his demise, as Mithras’ powerful ego-bull’s blood spills out and we are purified upon realizing the god and Fatedness can make us will anything including our own demise.

The peak-state harmful willingness to spill blood and come to an end as a control-agent proves enlightenment and purifies and cleanses the mind of egoic thinking.

Thus I am the victorious heroic Theorist of Ego Death. I am the first modern theorist to explicitly explain the cybernetic logic of blood sacrifice.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 2, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6102 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
In this lyric line (as I mentioned years ago), “kill” is double-pronounced “kill/cure”. The highly relevant, acid-oriented song “Black Blade” by Blue Oyster Cult has such a double-pronunciation, around the same year.

You can choose from phantom fears
And kindness that can kill
-Neil Peart, Free Will

The mind is cured, cleansed of pollution, purified, and exorcised, through complete ego death and mental model transformation about self, time, and control. ‘kindness’ relates to ‘mercy’ saving and preserving the mystic from the ‘wrath’ of God. The mystic-state threat of God’s wrath, in which the mystic mind is made able to will self-violation of control (“can kill”), followed by mercy, cures the ego delusion. This is a new exegesis of this lyric line, December 2, 2012.

I suspect John Edwards (Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God) and other modern-era Christians used entheogens, as already evidenced with Joseph Smith (Mormons).

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6103 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
My previous post is sufficient, on the mystic self-violation blood sacrifice idea and vicarious self-will-violation blood sacrifice. I have attacked the subject dead-center of the extreme psychotic-like crazy too-sane realization lying in wait in the peak window of the intense mystic altered state. Thus I have covered all the real actual basics of what is in fact commonly experienced in the modern acid dissociation state in full, uncensored, not whitewashed or misrepresented.

I have covered the full ecstatic terror and logic of the Bible as mystic peak-state fiction, modern full-on acid-type dissociation experiencing, and Greco-Roman religious mythemes of sacrifice, killing the king, snake, tree/bush, pole, ivy, turned to stone, purification, and exorcism.

Having mentioned ‘bush’, a note now occurs to me: Moses’ burning bush is connected to the cybernetic possibility-branching bush (= ‘tree’) in which Isaac’s ram’s power is struggling, caught, and nullified. Thus I have completely shown how all religious myth connects to the main underlying framework, the simplest possible framework underlying religion and esoteric mystic-state religious revelation, which is Cybernetics/Heimarmene/Dissociation per the Egodeath main article.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 2, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6104 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: Break, and writing experiments
I am going on hiatus now.


On the radio now:

Pink Floyd
Learning To Fly
excerpts

Stretched to the point of no turning back <== worldline unavoidability
A flight of fancy
Standing alone my senses reeled
A fatal attraction is holding me fast, <== attraction, fatedness
How can I escape this irresistible grasp?

Can’t keep my eyes from the circling skies <== noncontrol of mental attention
Ice is forming on the tips of my wings <== headed for disaster
Unheeded warnings, I thought, I thought of everything
No navigator to find my way home
Unladened, empty and turned to stone <== 4D block universe
A soul in tension — that’s learning to fly <== nonctrl of intention: panic
Condition grounded but determined to try

Above the planet on a wing and a prayer,
My grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air,
Across the clouds I see my shadow fly
Out of the corner of my watering eye <== water-like vision
A dream unthreatened by the morning light <== threat
Could blow this soul right through the roof of the night

There’s no sensation to compare with this
Suspended animation, a state of bliss <== timeless block universe

Can’t keep my mind from the circling skies <== no control of thinking

– New exegesis by Michael Hoffman, December 2, 2012. Exercise for the reader: apply Egodeath theory interpretation to the version by Petty/Lynne.

Learning to Fly
Tom Petty/Jeff Lynne

Well I started out down a dirty road
Started out all alone
And the sun went down as I crossed the hill
And the town lit up, the world got still

I’m learning to fly, but I ain’t got wings
Coming down is the hardest thing

Well the good ol’ days may not return
And the rocks might melt and the sea may burn

Well some say life will beat you down
Break your heart, steal your crown
So I’ve started out, for God knows where
I guess I’ll know when I get there

I’m learning to fly, around the clouds,
But what goes up must come down
Group: egodeath Message: 6105 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…
My linked posting from September 21, 1995:

Coming soon:


THE CYBERNETIC REVELATION
Deconstruction of Self-Control


gathering topics such as:

Hyperfrozen Hyperfreedom

Virtual Freedom and the Virtual Ego

Predetermination or ‘Fate’: A Simpler Proposition than Determinism
(‘Predictable-ism’)

Acid Rock – The Authentic Modern Mystery-School

Hypothetical Realism – Anything Other than My Present Experiencing
Might or Might Not Exist

Uh oh — The Terror Is Beginning Again, and There Is No Way to Avoid
Playing into the Hands of the Future

Shining the Psychedelic Spotlight On Cognitive Self-Control
Cybernetics

Armchair Conjectures about Cybernetic Freakout

The Taboo Against Alchemical Introspection

What Transgression Lies in Store for a Temporarily Psychotic Morality
Puppet?

Control Stability and the Limits to Self-Determination

Fate, Predetermination, and the Block Universe

Homeostatic Equilibrium and Catastrophic State-Shift

— Michael Hoffman, 1995
http://www.egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6106 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
I now for the first time provide an exegesis of The Spirit of Radio, which is playing now on the radio.

http://egodeath.com/rushlyrics.htm#xtocid22967

The Spirit of Radio
Neil Peart
excerpts for scholarly analysis

Plays the song that’s so elusive
And the magic music makes your morning mood. <== magic=entheogenic. also consider mourning your ego death/Tammuz/Jesus’s apparent death

Off on your way, hit the open road <== closed future
Undemanding contact in your happy solitude. <== percep solips bubble

Invisible airwaves crackle with life
Double-pronunciation:
“Invisible *railways* crackle with life” — worldline, hidden heimarmene snake / your preset rail

Bright antenna bristle with the energy <== receiving suggestions
Emotional feedback on timeless wavelength <== 4D frozen spacetime
Bearing a gift beyond price, almost free <== price of enlightenment = death of freedom

All this machinery making modern music
Can still be open-hearted. <== heartless Heimarmene-thinking or merciful compassionate God-thinking
Not so coldly charted, it’s really just a question
Of your honesty, yeah, your honesty. <== no wrath; understanding
[check: isn’t this “yeah, you honestly”? I need to do my own transcription of what’s actually sung]

One likes to believe in the freedom of music, <== not freedom
But glittering prizes and endless compromises
Shatter the illusion of integrity. <== loose cognition, awareness sees through illusion of self/control/time/change

For the words of the profits were written on the studio wall, <== prophet of the self-control king’s impending inevitable control-cancellation doom and coerced self-destruction unless he acknowledges his helpless dependence on God/heimarmene

And echoes with the sounds of salesmen. <== No One at the Bridge: sails men, the dead helmsman

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com December 2, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6107 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Swoon/Shroud/India theory of Jesus’ death
The punch line of the mystic joke meaning-flipping fiction that is the Bible: according to the gospel story, Jesus (a character in the Hellenistic fiction story) was alive when removed from the cross. He bled, they emphasize, therefore he was alive per Gruber and Kersten. I have connected the swoon theory, NT as Hellenistic fiction, Bible as mystic riddle-joke, and Mythical Jesus, and the ahistoricity of Paul and Christinity in antiquity.

The “medieval” shroud of Turin and alternative chronology are connected to that gospel fiction story. I disbelieve our Benedictine chronology. I cringe every time I read “for a thousand years” or “for two thousand years”. I call b.s. on those long periods. We need a good alternative hypothesis. Edwin Johnson: Medieval Christianity is the start of Christianity, in the “renaissance” pagan era (there was no paganism decline or rebirth).

Now that no one believes Jesus existed, we are justified in asking what else are we dead wrong about? Chronology, and historical Paul as I’ve written about for years. Don’t tell me “ok we were dead wrong about Jesus existing, but Paul existed and it’s crazy to question our established chronology. And we still have 3 authentic letters written by Paul.”

I discovered the single identifiable historical Jesus on whom Christian origins depend: the man in the Turin shroud in the “middle ages”, the age of magic and forgery.

Ehrman’s new book Forgery and Counter-Forgery says everything is forgery. The Bible is the prime product of the 15th Century– the age of magic, esotericism, and forgery, and invented, pseudo-history.

— Michael Hoffman, December 2, 1312 aka 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6108 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
Blessing, graduation, and Armageddon for literalist Christianity

My 2012 Prophecy and Delivery Package: now is Armageddon, the end of the world for literalist Christianity, and a new Kingdom of God on Earth as in Heaven. I take away literalist historical Jesus and Paul, and reveal that the figure on the cross was taken down alive and bleeding from his side in the Hellenistic Gospel story, where he rose again from among the dead.

I Michael the Archangel destroy literalist Christianity and reveal transcendent control thinking, giving the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence and full justification and completed transformation of our mental model of self, time, and control.

I take away the bush of possibility branching, and free will, and personal moral autonomous culpability. I take away the exciting prospect of destruction of the world in a literal fiery conflagration. I take away the ecstatic, exciting frenzy of the alarming build-up of the mental scenario of self-destruction in light of our mental vulnerability to remembering our Fated sacrificial self-violation that demonstrates understanding transcendent knowledge about the illusion of personal control acting across time.

I bring a completed, finished theory and explanatory framework for myth, metaphor, and analogy in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, revealing that all of these refer ultimately to Cybernetics, Heimarmene, and Dissociation.

We want, we need completion of transcendent thinking; we want a blessing and a graduation diploma in fully understanding what horrifically thrilling serpentine monstrous thought is revealed in the peak window of the intense mystic altered state. We must have the diamond from the dragon as certification of our completion of transcendent comprehension. We demand a blessing from the angel that we have proven our full understanding of the mind’s helpless puppethood, being injected with the intention to prove our willingness to violate self-control to demonstrate understanding of transcendent control thinking.

We get the blessing from the angel, the graduation certification of full basic understanding of Cybernetics, Heimarmene, and Dissociation, after we stare into God’s face and see our ability to violate self-control and end our cybernetic life, thinking with the mind of the Angel of Death who demonstrates our helpless, dependent mental puppethood.

We demand a blessing from the God/man/angel before we will let go of wrestling with him, since we were able to look in his face and affirm demonstration of lack of control of intention, being made willing to intend demonstration of catastrophic self-control violation. With Abraham we say “Yes I can be made willing to sacrifice my future lineage and thriving kingdom, through my son — or sufficiently through the ram caught in the control-branching bush and provided for us by God as the sacrificial tribute and proof-demonstration that God gives to himself.”

With Jacob, we demand certification, the graduation diploma, a blessing from the angel we are willing to look at and wrestle with. With Balaam we say “All the words I speak to you are put into my mouth by God. I affirm and bless, not curse, Israel: the kingdom of Israel is true and enlightened and has attain perfection and completion of transcendent thinking, and they are justified, blessed, and certified as having past the graduation test, the acid test, of being willing to bow their head and say “No my will, but that of Heimarmene and Controller X be done.”

With Paul on the snaking road of heimarmene, we turn from cursing the Christians to blessing them. With Jesus, we affirm, “Yes, I am willing to lose my life and demonstrate my willing loss of control power.” We are spiritual warriors proving willing to die to egoic self-control and self-preservation. As puppets of God, we know the cybernetic truth about self-control illusion aspects, no-free-will, inability to control and avoid our thinking that is predestined, and have made peace with the prospect of loose cognition taking over our thoughts and intentions.

We understand mythic metaphor and all analogy in Antiquity, all leading to Cybernetics, Heimarmene, and Dissociation. We recognize all religious writing and mythemes and genres as in truth, pointing to Cybernetics, Heimaremene, and Dissociation. With Jonah, we are disappointed that Nineveh heeded our warning of certain coming doom, and repented humbly acknowledging God’s position to strike down our kingdom in an ecstatic frenzied loss of control.

I take away literalist Christianity, and thereby also literalist Islam and literalism Jewish religion and it is now Armageddon for all literalist religion, revealing the Apocalypse of the simplest religion, the Egodeath theory, the disappointing removal of vague and fantastic “traditional mystic methods”, replaced by psychedelic drugs, entheogens, psychotomimetic sacred meals which is the traditional Eucharist.

Born from a rock, set free from being held hostage in prison, water and life flowing from a rock, and rulers being turned to marble statues that move, our bodies are wrapped tightly locked in place by the sacred heimarmene snake and we awaken to the egg shell and burst through it, past the gatekeeper of the terrible thought of willingness to violate self-preservation in order to fully comprehend truth.

Puppets of Israel, brides of Mithras, you who have learned to look at the sun without flinching and understand willingness to demonstrate transcendence of personal control, you have been certified and cleansed of mental impurity and brought into alignment with the transcendent thinking. You have been brought into God’s sacrifice that he provides for you, for himself, instead of making you prove your puppethood, to fully know the truth about personal control-power and the origin of personal control thoughts and intentions.

The demon has been cast out, certain destruction of our self-control has been averted and affirmed, and the sacred madness of willing self-sacrifice has been mentally integrated into our thinking. Perfection, sacred marriage, completion, certification, graduation, and blessing to Israel, the kingdom of enlightened puppets who have been injected with complete basic transcendent knowledge.

Make clear the way of the Lord, who will re-legalize all drugs, set the prisoners free, and condemn to perdition the dangerous, demonic, anti-truth Prohibitionists, who are a menace to society and block the way of Science.

The Politics of Consciousness: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom
Steve Kubby
Foreward by Terrence McKenna
http://amazon.com/o/asin/189362644X
1995

It is a time of mourning the mega ego deaths as the memes of the Egodeath theory propagate, as an entire civilization flips from egoic delusion and literalist religion, to transcendent thinking and comprehension of mystic analogy, as the scales fall from our eyes and we understand the Parable, and turn to look behind the mind, and our sins be forgiven.

There is no more need to prove transcendent comprehension of divine control-seizure, as the angel could not prevail over our God-conformed thinking which passed the test of transcendent thinking. There is no more sin or dying or alienation from the transcendent, and no more heaven for deluded moral freewill souls.

The end of the world is here for literalist religion, and we console with comprehending ancient religion, mystic metaphor, and mystic psychedelic state analogies in all forms and genres. Heed the Teafaerie on 2012 doomsday wisdom. http://www.erowid.org/columns/teafaerie/2009/12/02/towards-2013/

We have been abandoned by our childish idea of God, and are left with nothing to fall back on but transcendent knowledge about Cybernetics, Heimarmene, Dissociation, and Metaphor, to solve our real world problems, helped by the wisdom of real, mystic, entheogenic religion, which is all about Cybernetics, Heimarmene, and Dissociation, not escapism into vague unrealities.

Time shall be no more: when we were children, we thought as children, and now it is time to put away childish things and study the bitter sweet scrolls the angel inevitably gives us: take, eat, and know the message of the Lord.

— Michael the Archangel
http://www.egodeath.com, December 4, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012 M. Hoffman. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6109 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
I affirm and bless, not curse, Israel: the kingdom of Israel is true and enlightened and has attained perfection and completion of transcendent thinking, and they are justified,
blessed, and certified as having passed the graduation test, the acid test, of
being willing to bow their head and say “Not my will, but that of Heimarmene and
Controller X be done.”
Group: egodeath Message: 6110 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: The Revelation, Apocalypse, and Last Judgement
What happened to the comforting shade of the possibility branching bush that sheltered Jonah from the light of the face of God’s transcendent cybernetic truth? The heimarmene worm ate the bush of virtual possibilities, revealing, in the light of the sun of clear perception, that only a single path through the possibility bush is actually possible: that path through the bush branching that is the single, pre-set, pre-existing, fated future path of thoughts and actions. The snake ate up the tree, exposing the sun light.

— Original theory application result, December 4, 2012, Michael S. Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6111 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/12/2012
Subject: Re: Break, and writing experiments
I am going on hiatus now. Flow is a strain.

This is complete. More is mere variants and additional application of the same thing. My role is to explicitly uncover and reveal the entire comprehensive basic framework of transcendent knowledge including how to analogy-map anything to the core Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence, which is the starting point of reference for all religious philosophy, the model by which all are compared in relation to.

— Michael Hoffman, December 5, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6112 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Electric Prunes: Get Me to the World on Time
Written by Annette Tucker with Jill Jones

> Artist: The Electric Prunes
> Song: Get Me to the World on Time
> Release date: March 1967
> Reached #27 on the U.S. pop charts
> Transcribed accurately by Michael Hoffman (Egodeath.com) for the first
> time on the Web, Sep. 15, 2005
Group: egodeath Message: 6113 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionate de
The attractive, compelling self-cancellation of self-control, is numinous: it is apprehended and desired and sought. How can we learn to climax safely, experiencing our ability to experience being out of control, without spilling the shallow kylix (“cup”, actually a shallow saucer)? How to experience being really, forcefully, dynamically out of control (as a real, nonordinary state), while remaining practically in control?

The uninspired outsiders say we have the waking and dreaming state, but there’s the climax state too — not merely thinking about control cancellation, but *experiencing* the paranoid bending-inwards, the latching and catching of thought on itself, like a circle that turns and has curly hooks that catch, on its rim. How to surf the point of no return, the event horizon, controlling the build-up and release?

4-HO-DiPT is a 2-3 hour orally active psychedelic with classic-effects that could enable the safest strongest dancing with this control-vortex catching ability, where the mind can enter into the point of no return, and experience the alien takeover effect, and then come out of that and go back in and out of that opening, that experiential organ of climax and control-loss potential. Shulgin “doubt[s] that there is another psychedelic drug, anywhere, that can match this one for speed, for intensity, for brevity, and sensitive to dose, at least one that is active orally.”

It is not merely a matter of “think these thoughts and counter-thoughts, and hold this attitude and perspective in mind”. You also must have a suitable degree of loose cognition. It can be a little depressing after dancing with the control-vortex capability

The hole in the side from which transcendent thinking is born is an organ of regeneration and climax. Control loss is initially frightening. Later, the higher male thought injector and lower female helpless thought receiver have coupled climactically a number of times in the mystic bridal chamber. Now the advanced initiated mystic regularly comes home after class and can have a self-control seizure climax on-demand.


Today, December 6, 2012, is Drug Re-legalization Day: a Holy Day for the Egodeath theory

Until 1966, psychedelics and entheogens were correctly covered by law; that is, there was no law. Then, recently, Richard Nixon pulled out of a dark place, his rules, which are erroneously called “laws” by some people, claiming nonsensically that entheogens are “illegal”. Such is the way of all the “drug schedules”. They are a recent fabrication invented for all the worst motivations. There is nothing good about Prohibition, and there is everything bad about it.

The mythic, fictional Jesus, the mythic Paul, and the mythic Church Fathers in Antiquity all drank entheogenic wine and ate psychedelic bread, same as everyone did in Greco-Roman recreational religious banquets and political ceremonies and city festival feasts and funeral clubs and mystery cultic initiations.

Today, the drug schedules (a recent, phony invention) are all thrown away forever: Cannabis is again not a crime, just as through 1900 it was not a crime. Now that Cannabis is legal, it is legal like it was in 1900 and all psychoactive drugs and plants are legal like they were in 1900. Prohibition rose up one day recently, caused immense harm, and then freedom was restored. Cannabis was re-legalized today, which means a catastrophic collapse: War Is Over: there is no more drug prohibition; instead, the door to religious experiencing and the passion of self-control seizure climax is thrown open.

Prohibitionists are thrown into the fiery pit, thrown into the prison system that they engineered, and are viciously dealt with by their own thugs-in-uniform God-forsaken drug squads that they designed, and we look down at them and vengefully laugh at their torment and separateness from God and truth and the passion of self-control seizure climax. The hunters become the hunted, the oppressors the victims of their own oppression. The prisoners are set free and the evil prohibitionist rulers of this world take their place rightfully, frozen in chains in the bottom of the pit of Hell.


We must trace the transition from Antiquity in which the heimarmene snake was worshipped (with Zeus subject to Fate), to the later Gnostic and then Christian level-increase where the praise was transferred to the idea of transcending heimarmene. The distinction is relatively advanced in terms of symbol-usage or allegory-connecting. We are one-foots, hokey-pokey standers: if one foot is supported by the Heimarmene snake, then what supports our other foot: personal control thinking, or transpersonal God ruling from outside the cosmic egg of Heimarmene?

Do we hate egoic freewill delusion (the Possibilism or branching tree view of time) and revere Heimarmene (the Eternalism view of time), or do we — like Gnostics and later Christians — disparage Heimarmene as a “prison” that the higher God provides the sacrificial demonstration for to pay the ransom hostage-release price to set us free and buy us back so that we are transferred, no longer slaves to the rulers of this world that’s ruled by the sun (the Fate-ruled Heimarmene) but now are slaves owned and controlled by the transcendent Mithras or God, whose throne of control lies outside the cosmic boundary of the Heimarmene snake.

But we are not slaves of Mithras; we are sons, but we are even more than merely natural sons, we are adopted sons of God, and therefore he passes on his power and life and transcendent freedom to us.

Being and Becoming in Modern Physics: Presentism, Possibilism, Eternalism
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-bebecome/#2.1
Shows diagrams of time-slice solipsism, egoic branching-future possibility-tree, and the single-future frozen block universe. I identified (as a massive breakthrough around 2003) as the Heimarmene snake, and the branching I realized in 2011 as the tree in mystic-state mythic metaphor, completing the Rosetta-stone translation of the snake-tree contrast together with “marble rock – flowing water” contrast, and the master-mytheme of ‘kingship’.

Rudy Rucker’s 1977 first edition of the 4th Dimension has a couple pages that contain some of the words ‘branch’, ‘tree’, ‘worm’, and ‘snake’, but that’s the closest anyone got to recognizing this massive key breakthrough connection.

Geometry, Relativity and the Fourth Dimension
Rudolf Rucker
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0486234002
1977
“world line” 23 hits.
branch — 3 relevant hits
worm: 4 hits. Uses world line and life-worm as synonyms. A worm is even more linear than a snake, to represent a spacetime world-line of a person or object.
tree: 7 hits, apparently not branching possibility trees
bush: 0 hits

Such advanced idiocy totally dominates now: when people write about ‘block universe’ they instantly fixate on “many-worlds of QM = block universe”, ruining, bastardizing, and obscuring the original, clear model of the block universe. QM is the #1 thing preventing people from thinking clearly. Say “freewill” — people say QM. Say “block universe” — people say QM and “many-worlds”. Say “ESP” and people say QM. Say “consciousness” and people say QM.

QM is the late-modern idol that the lost and benighted sacrifice to. People can’t even understand the elementary idea that the spacetime block *contains* change. Some people try to improve on the idea by adding change to it — “as unneeded as legs on a snake”, Alan Watts would say. Except for the inherently nebulous idea of “transcending heimarmene” (necessary for explaining ideas that developed in late-antiquity religious myth), the Egodeath theory is brutally simple, as simple as possible.


What if my unavoidable near-future worldline contains some generalized horrific self-control violation, and loose cognition latches onto that idea, desiring to Know the truth and the experiential potential for the mental dynamics of self-control? The mind has that climax-organ. How does it work? How can we use it safely, on-demand?

How can entheogenic adult initiates, married to God, practice safe seizure, safe sacrifice, safe mystical passion, safe self-cancellation of personal control? It is not too complicated. It requires *not* complicating thinking, though everyone is intent on complicating things. I am a simple thinker. The solution to the Mysteries must be a simple analogy riddle solution: “4 then 2 then 3 legs” means a person, and thus answering the riddle, our life is spared from self-destruction upon self-control seizure.

We think of sacrificing the willful ram whose powerful horns are caught struggling to no avail in the bush all provided by God for us to rely on rather than carrying out some self-control violation demonstration; we think of the myth of God’s son (whether adopted or merely begotten) willingly sacrificing himself and his kingship to pay the passion price so that we may have interpenetration with God and live freely and thrive despite looking right into the face of transpersonal control power.

Through travelling in and out through the portal opening in his side, we move back and forth in and out of divine madness frenzied ability to threaten our own egoic control and put down the threat and excite the suggestible mind on demand, calm, passionate, well-experienced, ecstatic, and when the quickening embrace releases, “it’s really not the end, like old Sol behind the mountain, I’ll be coming up again.”

New connection:
Mars: taking a stance of war against our own seizing, near-future control-thoughts.
Venus: pursuing self-control seizure as a climactic love embrace in a herme-aphrodite person of 2-natures.


New connection realization just now (probably refutes some shortcomings of Acharya as well as Ulansey and everyone else):

Sol, the initiate, in Mithraism, represents personal rulership in the initiate, as distinct from cosmic transcendent rulership which is held by Mithras (= God). This is how the sun is represented in Mithraism both as transcendent but merely the lower sun. The killer question for Acharya’s true-so-far-as-it-goes system: if religion is really about the sun, *which* sun, and what is the relation between the sun and the hypercosmic sun, in terms of entheogenic loose-cognitive initiation and transcendence in personal control power?

David Ulansey writes about the hypercosmic sun beyond the sun. The sun is the ruler of the block universe, which is bounded by an ouroboros heimarmene snake. Beyond the sphere of the fixed stars — outside of Heimarmene — is the transcendent cosmic light peeking through the star-holes. The realm of the God who lifts us up out from the cosmic cave of Heimarmene. We then walk out of the cave, now having transcended Heimarmene.
http://www.mysterium.com/hypercosmic.html


Perhaps Ken Wilber or the early Catholic Church (to rule this and the otherworld) reconciles this value-flipping: First, we develop to a stage, then dissociate from it *but integrate* it while we struggle to be free from *exclusive* identification with it. First we leave our attachment to egoic control and identify with ego-killing Heimarmene, and then after Antiquity we leave our Heimarmene-attachment and transcend higher while retaining both egoic mental structures and our understanding of and perception of Heimarmene.

This is a *valid* way of doing what Wilber tries to do, force a story of “evolution” onto history in the so-called “mythic” era. Historically, we might see a change from depictions of Fate and Heimarmene as representing piety (such as touching the snake in a non-branching tree), to depictions of standing on the cosmic X-cross to transcend Heimarmene.

Antiquity moved from venerating Heimarmene (snake worship) to venerating Mithras who stands outside time and moves the Zodiac itself, venerating the transcending of Heimarmene. The mind has an organ, a birth-passageway, which enables the experience of mystic-state ego-death climax, mystic passion, entheogenic self-control cancellation org*sm and overpowering, where Fate gives the mind the desire to cause its own self-control instability on-demand as a thrilling capability the mind discovers and desires intimate interaction with repeatedly in a sacred marriage ongoing.

Did the move from venerating Heimarmene in Antiquity to venerating the transcending of Heimarmene in Late Antiquity, change the psychological experience of passionate climax of self-control being overcome and overpowered by the divine? That is an advanced basic question for the Egodeath theory.


Learning How to Cybergasm

We must recognize positively the mind’s organ and potential to latch onto suggestible paranoia and be pulled in on itself in a climactic enlightening self-control violation event, not as we fear parents playing privately in the other room, but embrace and passionately desire the climax, on-demand, through God-given psychedelic entheogens, that Fate makes us ingest so that God can experience through us his power and passion. Self-control transcendence is not merely comprehension of the Egodeath theory, Transcendent Knowledge.

Carnal and mystical knowledge are closely analogous. Reading doesn’t give carnal knowledge; that knowledge is a matter of experiencing. Reading Transcendent Knowledge provides some knowledge but Gnosis is the experience that requires combining textbook knowledge of Egodeath with the repeated, intentionally sought experience of the self-control vortex: excitement, trepidation, respect, enthusiasm.

Religion is reading the Egodeath theory and experiencing in loose cognition the pulling away of control of thoughts, in a sacred transcendent seizure, which is the experience of the Passion of Christ the king and sacrificial lamb of God provided by God to the Elect as a mythic figuration of accord and sacred marriage including repeated ongoing passionate climax of self-control overcoming. Through this passageway, opening, hole in our side, shall flow blood signifying new life, so that we have truly adult Knowledge and thrive, multiply, and prosper. May we climax in the sacred passion of self-control seizure many more times.

We walk as a two-nature male-and-female dyad, a pair — the transcendent uncontrollable thought-injector and the helpless psyche as thought-receiver — that is able to move in and out of the dance, the wrestling, the sacred state of onset of self-control seizure. This sacred kingly experience is our right in a nation of sovereign citizen-kings. Religious freedom means specifically the freedom to enjoy transcendent passion of self-control climax on demand, through psychedelic entheogens.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 6, 2012: Drug Re-legalization Day
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6114 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Love ode to dancing with the self-control seizure vortex, written by women:

Song: Get Me to the World on Time
Written by Annette Tucker with Jill Jones
Artist: The Electric Prunes
Release date: March 1967
Reached #27 on the U.S. pop charts. Excerpts transcribed accurately by & with notes by Michael Hoffman:

Here I go, higher, higher
Here I go, oh oh, oh oh! <== climax

The minute you walk in the room <== relating to the control vortex
I break into a sweat
My hands begin to shake so bad
Can’t light my cigarette

Then you start walkin’ toward me
And my glue comes all undone
If I could get my feet to move
I’d turn around and run

My pulse is beatin’ faster
And I’m headin’ for disaster <== control cancellation potential
Here I go, higher, higher
Here I go!!!

One kiss from you <== the vortex touches the suggestible mind, latching on
And my whole body starts actin’ strange
You shake up all my hormones
You put me through a change

This chemical reaction
Isn’t easy to define
You drive me to distraction
You disturb my peace of mind

You got me spinning like a top now
And I don’t know how to stop now

Is this what love’s all about <== love = desiring self-control seizure dynamics
Lately I feel so wigged-out
Wild sensations
Sweet frustrations <== desire for self-control cancellation dynamics
You get me goin’
And there’s no slowin’ me down

Whoa, here I go, oh, oh! <== climax

— Annette Tucker with Jill Jones


http://www.egodeath.com/MysticClimax.htm — sections:
Self-control seizure as a goal (post 55, Jun 27, 2001; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/55 )
Ego-death control-seizure as climax (post 64, June 29, 2001)
Mystic Climax Like S*xual Climax (posted as “Mystic climax has the same intensity/timing curve”, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/1435 )
Mystic climax as a distinct innate potential (Jun 22, 2003)

https://www.google.com/search?q=climax+self-control+seizure

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/11/15/only-epilepsy-brings-more-activity-to-womens-brains-than-does-self-stimulation-to-orgasm/
Condensed by Michael Hoffman: “More activity exists in the brains of women during self-stimulation to org*sm than anything short of an epileptic seizure. It activates all of the major brain systems. We don’t know of any other behavioral process that is so powerful, except for an epileptic seizure.” About the author: Gary Stix writes about neuroscience for Scientific American, and was previously a science journalist at IEEE Spectrum, the flagship publication for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.


Delirium and epilepsy
Peter W. Kaplan
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181626/
Condensed by Michael Hoffman:
“States of altered consciousness such as delirium and psychoses have long horrified humanity with the specter of loss of an individual’s sovereignty and self-control, carrying with it the intimation of passage towards death. Agitated states with altered awareness and components of excitation and delusion have evoked the perception of visitation by demons, spirits, or even divine influence, but often with the consequence of ostracism from society. This has led, even in an age of enlightenment, to relegation to insane asylums. Such conditions of insanity were recently approached as forms of illness, which were identifiable even if not successfully treatable. In the 20th century, scientific effort has been directed toward understanding delirium and researching its causes.”

“Epilepsy carried with it a similar societal view. These conditions often are intertwined in terms of both clinical features and common substrates and triggers. The term ‘epilepsy’, derived from the Greek epilambanein, arose from the concept that the individual was seized, gripped, or attacked by forces, thus presupposing a relatively circumscribed duration; while delirium comes from the Latin for “to leave the furrow,” representing a “leave-taking” of one’s senses.” — Peter W. Kaplan
Group: egodeath Message: 6115 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
[clarifications]
I identified (as a massive breakthrough around 2003) [Rucker’s ‘world line’] as the Heimarmene snake, and the branching [which is only implicitly alluded to in the Possiblism diagram] I realized in 2011 as the tree in mystic-state mythic metaphor, completing the Rosetta-stone translation of the snake-tree contrast together with “marble rock – flowing water” contrast, and [around 2001] the master-mytheme of ‘kingship’ [as personal control agency as considered in loosecog].

Rudy Rucker’s 1977 first edition of the 4th Dimension has a couple pages that contain [the words ‘branch’ and ‘worm’], but that’s the closest anyone got to recognizing this massive key breakthrough connection.
Group: egodeath Message: 6116 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Stabilizing control by mental-only non-metaphor understanding
To trigger the ego-transcending cybernetic seizure in order to effectively transcend one’s personal control-power, and then to safely preserve (save, rescue) viable control, in the loosecog state, one says the cybernetic prayer or transcendent idea:

“I acknowledge my profound absolute dependency on my fated pre-set worldline, and I trust in it, as I must, though it is obscure.”

Danger passes-over the personal control system this way, while increasing enlightenment about the dynamics of personal control. The mind this way effectively and safely comprehends and experiences its limits of personal control power, gaining full transcendent knowledge.

Effectiveness and safety increase each other; they fit together:
o The safe way of comprehending the limitations of personal control is also the effective way of comprehending the limitations of personal control.
o The effective way of comprehending the limitations of personal control is also the safe way of comprehending the limitations of personal control.


Other religions and sacrifice-demonstrations are works-based and ineffective.

The Historical Jesus fallacy is works-based salvation and cannot provide salvation. How are we saved; that is, how is the loose-cognitive mind and personal control system rescued from cybernetic instability, and regenerated into the transcendent mental model? The notion that we are saved due to the sacrifice of a historical Jesus is actually a false and ineffective, *works-based* attempt at salvation. It does not, and cannot, work.

Closer to truth and effectiveness is that we are saved by thinking of the metaphor and analogy of a mythic-only Jesus and by thinking of Abraham sacrificing a literal ram in place of his son (and future holy-kingdom leader) Isaac.

Even closer to the truth is that we are saved by thinking of the general metaphor or analogy of “the idea of sacrificing a creature that’s in a situation of control-cancellation like the mythic ram with horns caught in a possibility-bush or a mythic would-be rebel leader and king who willingly is sacrificed fastened to a possibility-tree, wooden cross, or branchless pole”.

Even closer to the truth is that we are saved by thinking non-metaphorically about the nullity of our personal control power in relation to our fated worldline that we are forced to trust in and rely on in faith and a certain kind of helpless dependency. That is the purest Salvation by Faith Not Works. You think that, if you are forcefully fated to think that, forced by fate and by Controller X. Any thought you think, you passively receive. To save yourself, put trust in your worldline — that will happen if your worldline forces you to do so.

I am saved because I put faith in God’s goodness toward me (… *if* God wills me to put faith in him). I decide to do this (… and God/Fate is that which forces me to decide whatever I end up deciding). To put faith in God and be saved, the action that you must exert is: passively be given (receive) faith-in-God (that is, conscious trust in your fate-forced worldline) from God/Fate. How can the mind demonstrate, or be made by Fate to demonstrate, that the mind consciously puts trust and dependency in its own worldline?

The mind is made to distrust its heimarmene-source, experience self-war and a paranoid bending-inward, thought-coercion pulling attention toward the vulnerability to the fated worldline. One is carried forward to the demonstration of personal non-control of thought (that is, the inability for personal control to deviate from the coming thought-stream), experiencing being profoundly overpowered at the very root of one’s source of thoughts (as a clear logical necessity), and then when the mind looks into the sun, into the cybernetic control-core logic, the mind acknowledges that it has no choice but to think the fate-forced thoughts.

The mind wants to retain this understanding, partly as a way of taming it safely, but also to understand transcendent knowledge, so the mind is given the question: how to demonstrate vulnerability to any thoughts? The logical answer is: one answer is, anything you do at all can be considered a demonstration of Zen understanding. Action proves nothing and certainly can lead to a unnecessarily short and impoverished life if you try to act out and demonstrate control chaos or control instability.

It is fair logic to sustain life, fully preserving egoic life-preserving values, while cancelling-out *by understanding* — not by action — nor by metaphor-understanding, but by pure direct understanding: like a formal statement like a prayer, saying “I acknowledge my profound absolute dependency on my fated pre-set worldline, and I trust in it, as I must, though it is obscure.”

The notion that comprehending the limits of personal control requires literal physical action such as harmfully violating control, is doubtful in terms of relevance, effectiveness, and longevity; arguably, it is crazy to think that transcendent realization requires any kind of payment, cost, price, or sacrifice other than transforming one’s mental model of self, control, and time. That is the only true sacrifice, the only true “demonstrative proof of understanding”: purely mental activity, mental testing of power to steer thinking, while developing and presenting to oneself the transcendent mental model.

No killing oneself is needed. No schizophrenic bodily self-harm is needed per the audible commands from some alien remote Controller X. No killing a magical historical Jesus is needed or relevant. No killing a son Isaac or a ram in his place, is needed or relevant. Not even a metaphor of sacrificing Jesus or a ram is needed, nor is that especially helpful or effective.

Ultimately, salvation or control-viability and transcendent knowledge require *understanding*, which can be helped by metaphors as long as it is made absolutely clear that what counts is the understanding, not the metaphor figure, and not some physical action. Mentally experimenting with intention, such as intending to fear and fight one’s heimarmene-rail of near-future thoughts, can help provide understanding.


Degrees of ineffective literalism when you attempt to demonstrate the limits of personal control

To complete the mental-model transformation to the transcendent mental model, the mind needs to effectively and safely demonstrate that it understands that personal control power is null with respect to the hidden fated source of thoughts; that it understands personal control-power nullity, unable to switch from the pre-existing fated branch of the person’s worldline to a virtually possible alternative branch in the frozen spacetime block.

To demonstrate that understanding, the person could do any of the following, listing the ineffective, works-based attempts first:

o Literally harm or violate yourself in some generic or representative physical way.

o Literally kill an animal or person representing yourself, in some generic or representative way.

o Think of harming yourself in some generic or representative way.

o Think of harming an animal or person representing yourself, in some generic or representative way; such as: think of the literal Abraham killing a literal ram trapped helplessly in a branching-future bush; think of God providing a literal historical Jesus who is willingly killed.

o Think of harming an animal or person representing yourself, in some generic or representative way; such as: think of the mythic-only Abraham killing a mythic-only ram trapped helplessly in a branching-future bush.

o Think of the abstract idea of violating or cancelling-out your control-power.

o Think of the abstract idea of formally cancelling-out a certain presumed aspect of your control-power, like a thorough advanced understanding of the core of the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence, without involving the extended theory which covers religious history and mystic-state metaphors.


It is possible for the personal control system to probe, test, or threaten itself and cause itself to seize in a destabilizing or chaos-like way, and it is possible for the mind to restore trust and order and have harmonious mercy on itself. Such episodes are given to the mind, as every thought is given to the mind obscurely from outside the personal control system.

The more metaphorical and physical ways have the advantage of concreteness, but the disadvantage of magical, works-based efficacy. The more abstract ways have the advantage of being non-physical, direct and non-metaphorical, and faith-based, or trust and commitment based, but the disadvantage of being abstract.


Cybernetic truth and stable viability strictly requires understanding, not action; the only works-based salvation is through the act of receiving understanding and trust and certification of completeness of demonstration of understanding. This doesn’t mean the mind needs to understand metaphor. Place yourself in a time before metaphor was invented. There’s no tale of Abraham and Isaac yet, nor of Jesus’ sacrifice. Or in a possible culture that has no such metaphors, similar to a Vulcan, Borg, or android culture.

What is the non-metaphorical, non-analogy-using way to conceptualize the dynamic of demonstrating understanding of nullity of personal control power and forceful dependency on the hidden thought-source? How can a person purely and directly demonstrate understanding of the puppethood of personal control-power? This is like asking how can you demonstrate understanding that change is frozen in place across time. It’s a category error to think that such “demonstration” is a matter of some physical action.

To demonstrate understanding, requires one action, a purely mental action, the action of understanding, which is the action of receiving understanding or receiving the action of displaying one’s understanding, where that displaying is purely mental.

How can we mentally, non-metaphorically display our understanding that change is frozen in place across time, and that personal control-power is puppet-like in relation to the hidden source of our eternally pre-existing fated thoughts? The goal is for the mind to fully grasp these and have full self-assurance of grasping these concepts, and to continue grasping them as long as possible. It is confusion and weakness to think that any physical action is required, on one’s own part or on the part of an sacrificial creature, such as sacrificing oneself, a literal ram, or a literal Jesus.

And it is mental confusion and weakness to think that some metaphor is required, such as the recent metaphor of sacrificing Jesus or Isaac’s ram. No physical action is needed. No metaphor is needed. And no self-originating act is needed. What’s needed is a non-physical, non-metaphorical, transcendently injected idea or understanding.

For rescue and preservation and salvation and escape while understanding relative puppethood and frozen preset worldlines, the mind must receive {trust in its obscure thought-source} along with receiving and reviewing {understanding of relative puppethood} and {understanding that worldlines are frozen and preset}.

From the active personal-controller-agent point of view: you must put trust in your obscure thought-source and you must commit to relying on your obscure thought-source, while understanding that you can make your personal control system catch on itself and seize into chaotic instability by not having that lower-level trust and reliance in its higher-level control-source, or by taking a paranoid, oppositional, alienated, disowned, or testing stance toward your uncontrollable higher control.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 7, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6117 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Per Stoic cybernetic heimarmene theory, you can distrust your higher hidden control-source and as a result, experience being dragged along by it forcibly, or, you can trust and identify with and affirm your higher hidden control-source and flow or ride along with it in harmony.

The horse that we ride — the donkey of Balaam that Balaam beat against and criticized, the horse of Paul that Paul fell off, and the donkey that Jesus harmoniously rode, and the horse riding up to the snake in a tree shown in some reliefs, or the ox ridden, or the bull of Mithras that Mithras overcomes, are analogous to the forceful pre-set pre-existing fated worldline that the self travels along, the hidden snake rail of heimarmene that we have no choice but to follow, no meta-choice; we are forced to make the choices and do the choosing-activity that fate eternally forces and causes us to at every moment along our frozen worldline from birth to death.

We ride the snake of our heimarmene worldline. We can fight this overpowering worldline, like Mars, at which point the worldline contains chaos and self-strife; or embrace and relate to this scary powerful worldline we are stuck with, like Venus, producing harmony and flow and full unified identification. The worldline is the vehicle through which Controller X injects our thoughts at every moment. The person riding the horse or donkey or snake-pulled chariot is shown above a snake.

In Eastern symbols, riding the ox and chasing it and riding it again. The horse is the moving self, the personal self-control system moving through time, controlled obscurely by the heimarmene-snake preset worldline rail. When you loosen the mind, you perceive the normally occluded, covered worldline, and you perceive your motion riding along that worldline: your horse or donkey carries you along that fate-forced, forcefully propelled worldline.

Ken Wilber’s “centaur stage” really means the perceiving of the moving-through-time illusion, like seeing that you are riding a horse along a track of heimarmene worldline, with no way to stop or freely steer that horse. If you cause trouble, the horses (bouncers) will throw you out of the recreational religious entheogen banquet funeral-club party. The horses at the wedding go out of control on wine, fighting against their own heimarmene-rail.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 7, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6118 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Literalist, metaphor-based religion is harmful and must be prevented by the scientific Egodeath theory.

It is weak, and largely futile, and confusing and misleading, to try to secure understanding by working with physical actions of sacrifice and by working with metaphors of sacrifice. Non-physical, non-metaphor based *understanding* is the main thing: we proved in our religion of Christianity and other religions that metaphors are dangerously misleading when the entheogen is removed and the encoding is therefore forgotten.

Ken Wilber insists on forcing an evolutionary model onto history. I can agree with him this way: Greco-Roman antiquity understood Transcendent Knowledge and the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence, but, they packaged it badly, fusing transcendent knowledge together with physical sacrifice (the sin of salvation-through-works) and fusing transcendent knowledge together with mythic metaphor without effective emphasis of the non-metaphorical meaning (thus committing the sin of literalism, a kind of idol-worship including Bible idolatry).

The ultimate idolatry, worshipping idols carved by man instead of worshipping God, is the Historical Jesus fallacy, along with idolatrous worship of metaphors such as the metaphor of sacrificing the ram in place of Isaac, and the metaphor of sacrificing Jesus for our salvific regeneration. Literalist Christianity and the Historical Jesus fallacy, is idolatry and prevents salvation and regeneration into the transcendent mental model. Dependence on metaphors is almost as bad, even if they are recognized as visionary-state metaphors, almost preventing salvation and regeneration as much as idol-worship of Mr. Historical Jesus.

Equating religion with worship of literal physical celestial bodies is also far from the transcendent truth, and in practice prevents us from attaining transcendent knowledge. The only purely non-idolatrous, purely effective religion is the non-physical, non-metaphor-dependent (non-metaphor-based) Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence. So it is necessary to strive for purity of presentation: for maximum effectiveness at conveying Transcendent Knowledge, the scientific Core theory of Egodeath must be purely explicitly distinguished from the extended application to historical religion and mythic metaphor.

We tried wrapping Transcendent Knowledge in metaphor and in physical demonstration form. The result was a disaster and the modern scientific mind ought to recoil is disgust at the extreme misuse and barbaric ineffectiveness of metaphor. We must thoroughly comprehend the referent-meaning of metaphor in order to purify our thinking from metaphoric confusion. We must weed out metaphor from religious transcendent knowledge in order to save and redeem religious truth, from the polluting clutches of metaphoric confusion.

We must separate astronomy from astrology, and ultimately, re-integrate them while fully differentiating them. Differentiate and integrate. That is a Wilber-type idea. We *must* — to kill religious strife and gain transcendent knowledge — differentiate the referent meaning versus historical metaphor, and then, integrate the referent meaning with the metaphorical coverage — while fully retaining the distinction and differentiation. This is a scientific mission, my calling.

To maximize transcendent knowledge, we must eliminate-out the religious mythic metaphor, and then, map the pure scientific transcendent knowledge with the historical religious mythic metaphor, keeping our foot firmly on top of the neck of the mythic metaphor. Religious mythic metaphor is dangerous. This doesn’t mean that we should shove no-free-will in our children’s face. This doesn’t mean ripping the clothes off of the hidden mystery of the snake in the covered basket, heimarmene pulling our puppet strings, at the mercy of Controller X.

We can still use both the workaday egoic mental model and the transcendent mental model, saving the latter more for initiated adults. But we must not permit ever again, mystic metaphor to be mistaken as the referent. We must forevermore permanently kill the Historical Jesus fallacy and not permit such toxic delusion again, delusion which shuts-out and prevents transcendent knowledge (not “assisting through colorful metaphor”) and which leads to harmful religious wars (not that secular wars, or the fraudulent secular religion of drug prohibition, are any better).

We must ensure that metaphor is used to enhance the communication of an already strong, self-sufficient non-metaphorical scientific understanding. This is why it is not a luxury but is *mandatory* that we define — that I define — what it logically must mean to have a “scientific” explanatory theory of Transcendent Knowledge. We badly need a scientific model that is not at all metaphor-based, and that is strong enough to put metaphor in chains, to prevent metaphor from ever again taking over people’s minds and shutting out transcendent knowledge.

We must provide explicit transcendent knowledge in order to prevent degraded, degenerated literalism, which is harmful delusion. The Historical Jesus is a harmful, idolatrous delusion that robs us of our rightful transcendent knowledge and religious experiencing, and causes harm among Christians and among all religion. We must provide as scientific as possible a theory of transcendent knowledge in order to kill and prevent false, harmful religion such as literalist Christianity and literalist Islam and literalist Jewish religion.

We *must* have more intense psychedelic entheogenic experiencing per the Egodeath theory, so that we shut out and preventatively inoculate against literalist and clueless metaphor-based religion ever again. We must given the Enlightenment its opportunity: scientific religion to shut out dangerous travesty of pseudo-religion such as that which uses the Historical Jesus notion.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 7, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6119 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Stabilizing control by mental-only non-metaphor understanding
[clarification]
o …

o Think of harming an animal or person representing yourself, in some generic or representative way; such as: think of the mythic-only Abraham killing a mythic-only ram trapped helplessly in a branching-future bush; [think of the mythic-only Jesus being willingly sacrificed to represent personal control-power nullity followed by restoration of practical control agency.]

o …

My point at that place in the scale of metaphoricity is that it’s better to comprehend Jesus as a mythic-only representation of personal metaphysical non-control realization than to misunderstand the Jesus figure as a literal historical individual, but, scientifically, it’s even clearer and better to base your understanding on a non-metaphorical explanatory model of personal metaphysical non-control realization.

Separate from that, off to the side, you must be able to connect the Jesus mythic metaphor to the referent meaning in the scientific model — mapping out from your scientific model which you identify with and rely on, out to various peripheral illustrative metaphors which are firmly bracketed-off and identified as *not* being the ultimate referent, but merely an analogous roughly isomorphic metaphor symbol-system.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6120 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
We must give the Enlightenment its opportunity to reach its potential: provide science-based intense loose-cognitive experiencing and a non-metaphor based relevant theory of what’s thereby revealed about self, time, and control, in order to preventatively shut out pseudo-religion, which is a dangerous travesty of religion, such as versions of Christianity which use the Historical Jesus notion.

The sickness of bad, pseudo-religion is not cured by irrelevant reductionist scientism, but rather, by cognitive-level, loose-cognitive mode, science-based religion, which thoroughly explains the garbled and over-grown historical religious mythic metaphors, as an emphatically demoted, peripheral area that is distinct from the Core Egodeath theory proper.

We must despise and disdain reliance on mythic metaphor, like a cute gremlin or a pretty weed that must not be let loose lest it take over minds again and prevent bona fide religious experiencing and religious understanding — Transcendent Knowledge. In the name of Transcendent Knowledge, we must banish and put down, and thoroughly map and explicate, all mythic metaphor, strictly subservient to the scientific explanatory model of what is revealed in the intense loose cognitive state.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6121 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Zeus Meilichios (Zeus the appeasable, friendly, satisfiable) is the cthonic aspect of Zeus, which means (I’m the one to discover and figure out and explain): Zeus Meilichios is the Heimarmene aspect of Zeus. Cthonic means under the earth. What is under the earth is the hidden heimarmene-snake-rail that secretly governs our lives and thoughts and destiny. We ride our heimarmene rail through time as riding a donkey, as in Apuleius’ mystic enlightenment tale The Golden Ass: The Transformations of Lucius.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 8, 2012
Group: egodeath Message: 6122 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
That which is uncontrollable, inevitability, that shapes and constrains human life, was equivalently labeled as: Zeus, Fate/Fatum/Heimarmene, the gods, god, the god, the divine, the godlike.

“the gods were not a collectivity of individuals with individual wills, but rather the uncontrollable and inevitable element shaping and constraining human life and human lives[7]. This element could be spoken of indifferently as “the gods,” “god,” “the god,” “the divine,” the godlike” (daimonion), “Zeus,” and “fate.””
— page 67, On Greek Religion, Robert Parker.

7. Cf. H. S. Versnel in _Sacrifice dans l’antiquite_, 171-79.

“The system created a fragmentation of the divine figure. Zeus Meilichios was one aspect of Zeus, which was treated as an independent figure. Zeus Meilichoios was portrayed as a gigantic snake.”

The sacrifice to Meilichios was a holocaust of pigs (representing oneself; humans, or, personal control power), which was wholly consumed in fire and not shared by the votaries, “a dread renunciation to a dreadful power”. One makes a demonstration of annihilation in renunciation of one’s claim to have power over Fatedness, over one’s worldline. My God-given, fated worldline, is what controls me; my autonomous claim to power is emphatically not what controls my future, my ending up in one possibility-branch versus another.

This sacrifice to the Heimarmene aspect of Zeus is a total affirmation of the pre-existing single-future eternal timeless frozen block universe, and averts and wards-off one’s own higher (ecstatic-state, Dionysus-possessed) mind’s self-destructive disproof of one’s control power, as opposed to holding on to the mental claim of wielding autonomous personal control power.

To affirm autonomous personal control power is to lead to disproof and self-destruction, mental contradiction and chaotic war against oneself, but to instead affirm the block universe is to achieve peace and mental harmony, propitiating the transcendent demand for destruction of self-contradiction.

“Meilichios” means “Easy-to-be-entreated”; merciful, friendly, gracious, kindness, soothing, propitiation — implying a prior anger which must be appeased.
“Maimaktes” means the raging, wrathful, blood-thirsty.
Harrison, p. 17.

When you enter into loose cognition and consider autonomous personal control power, this leads to testing and disproving that claim, leading to self-destruction and control instability. Life after enlightenment requires sacrifice of delusion of personal control autonomy, thus (the idea of) sacrificing the piglet (representing one’s own claim to personal control autonomy) purchases continued life, now with enlightenment added. “Fertility” must be understood as “giving oneself permission to continue living” after having seen the lie of autonomous personal control power.

Sacrifice of one’s anti-heimarmene claim brings life and renewed vigor. Festivals celebrate this sacrifice of the false self as bringing continued, justified life and fecundity — not merely fertility of people, animals, and crops, but the very possibility of continued personal existence. The general concept of fertility in religious thought represents, above all, justification of continued ongoing personal existence after egoic personal control power has been fully recognized as illusory and false, though practically, one must continue relying on egoic-mode thinking.

How can the pursuer of truth and self-knowledge tolerate continuing to live, after seeing that their mental foundation is a lie, a self-contradiction, an illusion, a falsehood?

The gods are all-powerful and are bound by fate. Zeus cannot save the life of his son, because that would cause disorder and unbalance of the cosmos. p. 377, Encyclopedia of European Peoples

Perhaps it’s not even a matter of whether this ego-killing logic is true and watertight, but is more a matter of reporting a most-fascinating and stimulating and revitalizing capacity of the mind. Approach this mental dynamic from the perspective of Cognitive Phenomenology (or perhaps Cognitive Psychology) rather than only analytic logic. People in fact experience these dynamics of self-challenging of personal control power, where one’s hand is forced to violate oneself, threatened to self-harm.

Then in fact trippers throughout history have sacrificed their claim to autonomous control power, and have thereby restabilized their control, making friends with their heimarmene worldline, and gone on to live and have a future and have children trippers who face the same potential and problem.

Do not think of this dynamic as possibly being “error” or “avoidable”, or worship at the temple of Quantum Mechanics to avoid this capacity of the mind. We must instead — with me as captain at the collective helm — set the controls for the heart of the sun. Instead of striving to explain away or do away with this capacity, we must figure out how to point our ship straight into the center of the cyclone, how to successfully become caught in the Death Star tractor beam, how to penetrate the event horizon and jump into the fire.

The task at hand is not how to avoid the fire, not how to avoid cybernetic destabilization potential, but rather, how to have interaction with our cybernetic self-control contradiction potential. How do you drop the bomb accurately into the center of the Death Star of egoic control logic, demolishing it? I am Godel striving to prove unprovability, striving to cause the egoic control system to hang. How can we successfully throw a wrench into the logic of personal control power, causing the whole damn thing to blow up? And how have people done this successfully throughout history?

How does that entire dynamic work? That is the task at hand which I have accomplished: the first modern explicit non-metaphor-dependent explanatory model of the mental sequence that is the peak ego death and rebirth experience, our climactic cybernetic self-control seizure potential and restabilization potential, which is the logical core at the heart of religious experiencing, which is the main concern reflected in myth, cultic sacrifice, and mystery initiation.

How to drop a bomb into the heart of egoic control logic, safely, and go on to build an entire society that understands this mental capacity? That is my project of the Egodeath theory, that is what Transcendent Knowledge is about. The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence is not so much about ontological truth, nor epistemology, but rather, explaining and giving us fullest access to the cognitive phenomenology of religious experiencing.

This perspective and motivation relaxes the logical demands slightly, enough to enable brushing aside the thousand objections to each component of the reasoning. Our goal is not to avoid this train of reasoning, but to steer straight into it — to first believe in it and test it, see how well it accomplishes the dynamic that is reported. The experience is true; it really happens. Is the block universe, wrath, and mercy all true and what we are forced to believe? That doesn’t matter.

Our ability to challenge our personal control power, encounter wrath and life-violating danger, and then recover, is what matters — along with understanding historical religious myth about this dynamic. I have taught people how to cybergasm and how to recognize historical religious myth as related to cybergasm. I must stay true to the inner logic of my system and explaining how it explains religious mythemes. That’s what people report, experience, and do.

It is irrelevant to try to avoid all this, to punch holes in the logic such as saying “QM provides a hazy alternative to all this.” Lobotomy provides an alternative to my theory, as well. The goal is successfully model what is revealed in loosecog and explain how religious myth expresses that. The goal is not to evade these dynamics through neurocognitive science nor through QM’s sophisticated confusion. Explain, not explain away or evade.

Give better, increased, amplified access to ego death cognitive dynamics, which inherently means safety as well. Safer access to egoic control destruction enables increased access to egoic control destruction. I teach how to lay down your life as a control-agent and how to take it up again.


Cygnus X-1, from A Farewell to Kings, by Neil Peart
excerpts, for scholarly study

There lurks a mysterious, invisible force
The black hole
Invisible to telescopic eye
The star that would not die

All who dare to cross her course
Are swallowed by a fearsome force
Through the void to be destroyed
Or is there something more?
Atomized at the core or through the astral door, to soar

Headed for the heart of Cygnus headlong into mystery

The x-ray is her siren song
My ship cannot resist her long
Nearer to my deadly goal
Until the black hole gains control

Every nerve is torn apart
[yet, irregular heartbeat from heavy loosecog continues on]

I see the gods in battle rage on high,
Thunderbolts across the sky.
I cannot move, I cannot hide,
I feel a silent scream begin inside.

Then all at once the chaos ceased.
A stillness fell, of sound and peace.
The warriors felt my silent cry
And stayed their struggle, mystified.

Apollo was astonished; Dionysus thought me mad.
We will call you Cygnus, the god of Balance you shall be.

— The Professor


Zeus’ son is one’s childish claim to autonomous control power, a delusion which implies the ability to steer into other branches of possible futures other than the fated branch of one’s worldline. If you hold onto such a claim, you can — in loose cognition — demonstrate and prove that such a claim leads to self-contradiction, control instability, and cybernetic chaos. The original God (the paradigmatic founding father at the beginning of our collective culture) battles the chaos-monster and sacrifices his son to attain control-stability and continue existing, to then go on to be the progenitor of oneself.

My very existence relies on my advanced tripper great grandfather and father having sacrificed and renounced their control-wrecking claim to wield autonomous self-control power. Had they held onto the claim of personal control power in the peak state, they would’ve harmed themselves and I wouldn’t have been born. Continued viable life, fertility, requires control stability, which requires dropping the claim of personal control autonomy — to hold onto the claim of personal control autonomy is to lead to cybernetic disaster, real self-termination.

The problem isn’t fear, or freaking out, or feeling threatened by one’s own self-challenging thoughts, so much as committing harm. A controversial claim is that one *must* experience self-threat, self-wrath, or self-challenging, to be enlightened. You must challenge and test your claim to be able to avoid the fated branch that your donkey-on-a-rail carries you toward. What if your fated branch contains a fearsome psychotic control-violation demonstration, how can you avoid that?

In loosecog, the mind forcefully experiences all aspects of this thinking, together: you feel and perceive the spacetime block point of view, you feel the lack of control power, you feel your thinking forced, compelled, attracted to, and pulled into this control-vortex thinking — but not just “thinking”, rather, forceful experiencing. The mind has this organ of seizure-thinking, this capacity to self-seize, to overpower itself.

If it does you can’t; to avert that disaster you sacrifice your claim to have the power to steer away from your destiny. This *type* of reasoning about self, control, and time, is the true explanation of the origin of foundational mythic themes of battling the serpentine chaos-monster at the beginning of civilization.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 7, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6123 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Self-control seizure: divine organ of climax ability & passionat
Clarification: these sentences belong together:


What if your fated branch contains a fearsome psychotic control-violation demonstration, how can you avoid that? If it does you can’t; to avert that disaster you sacrifice your claim to have the power to steer away from your destiny.


— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6124 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Taraxippos is a circular altar at a passageway in the race-course of Olympia. This altar and passageway terrifies the horses; they are seized by a strong and sudden fear and disturbance for no apparent reason. The chariots crash and the charioteers are injured. Therefore the drivers offer sacrifices and pray to Taraxippos to be propitious to them.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Taraxippus+horse-disturber

The donkey or horse is the egoic control system that is secretly propelled among the fated heimarmene-rail. We can think of Dionysus’ ivy leaves or the thorns of Jesus’ crown as rail teeth that forcefully pull you through the roller coaster of your pre-existing, fate-locked life. Is this how reality works? We don’t know anything certainly, such as Newtonian physics, but this is definitely how the mystic ego-death seizure and reset most readily and powerfully occurs, and how we correctly understand the meaning of myth as reportage of the cognitive dynamics in the loose cognitive state.

This type of reasoning is how to provoke your mind, your heart of personal control power, to seize and reset. I have blown open Cognitive Phenomenology of the altered state and revealed this Cognitive Phenomenology as the primary subject of the history of religious myth, including altered-state poetic themes.

The Egodeath theory provides an endless wealth of successful, meaningful, coherent interpretation of countless elements of religious myth. My decryption algorithm opens up the ability to read countless descriptions of mythemes, like deciphering the hieroglyphic language. I could easily sit here all day and explain the meaning of connection upon connection in the studies of Greco-Roman myth and Christian mythic, mystic-state theology.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 8, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6125 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
It might be possible to engineer a double-pronunciation, such as “invisible railways crackle with life”, by recording it sung both ways, and then mixing the two takes together.

I have identified double-pronunciations in Rock lyrics including:

Why am I so shy when I’m inside you / beside you?
I get high / can’t hide
invisible railways/airwaves crackle with life
thoughts/doubts may arise though
kill/cure my friends
kindness that can kill/cure

I’ve read others note “get high”, but the rest are my independent discoveries and I don’t know of others noting these. I’m the only one to write about double-pronunciation in general, so far as I’ve read, particularly with a focus on allusions to mystic-state cognitive phenomenology.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6126 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Lyrics: The Spirit of Radio (Rush/Peart)
At 1:32, the sung lyric sounds glitchy, like two takes combined: railways & airwaves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Juv5Ifs2fFY

The clueless-as-a-rock morons who used to state that Rush is a philosophy band therefore wouldn’t use drugs, explained to me that professional studio engineers have poor control over their equipment, thus explaining these accidental glitches. But I posted a printed interview in which Rush says they take drugs all the time, constantly. As if that was unclear. Morons!

http://egodeath.com/signalclips.htm

Thank God we don’t rely on such people to figure things out. They puzzle over what “Purple Haze” refers to. It comes as a surprise to them, the idea that the song refers to acid. No way! You think so? [facepalm] What is our collective IQ, 50? Could you possibly be any more clueless? You are ready to become an academic scholar of religious myth. Requirement: must live under a rock.

— Michael Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6127 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Images of 3 worshippers of Zeus Meilichios as a giant heimarmene-snake:

http://google.com/search?q=Zeus%20Meilichios&tbm=isch
Group: egodeath Message: 6128 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2012
Subject: Impotent, flaccid Transpersonal Theory
Ken Wilber fails to teach you how to cybergasm. His system, like that of Acharya S, is true so far as it goes, which is not all the way to effective climax of self-control seizure and reset. Other models of myth and religion likewise fail to bring you to the climax of your potential for self-cancellation of your power of control.

My Egodeath theory is precisely that system of technique and explanation which gets you to the self-control seizure climax through the shortest, most direct path possible. And does so safely, enabling cybernetic reset of personal control power, now enlightened about its limitations, so as to continue living and thriving, now in a transcendent mentality.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 8, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6129 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
Rudolf Bultmann’s call for demythologizing Christianity is fulfilled by my Egodeath theory, which is divided into a scientific non-metaphor-based core theory and a metaphor-mapping peripheral theory.

My non-mythic-dependent scientific explanatory model of what’s revealed in the core theory of Transcendent Knowledge, fits with Bultmann, who advocated Christianity with all myth removed. Instead of depending on myth, the core Theory incorporates the loose cognitive state, and the peripheral Theory maps out to myth, which is kept firmly distinct from the Core theory. Theoretically, Christians of the future — after Revelation has been fulfilled — understand all brands of myth. After the Bible history completes, is the world post-Christian?

To read the Bible, means, in full, that you understand how the mythic metaphor mapping to the referent meaning works, and, that you understand how the referent meaning maps to or is identical with the non-mythic, scientific model of what’s revealed in religious revelation in the loose cognitive state, regarding self, time, and control. Figure out what’s revealed in religious revelation through studying self, time, and control, without negligible reference to religious myth, as I did October 1985-January 1988, and then identify the mapping of that core theory to historical religious myth, as I did mainly around 2001. Thus my core and extended Egodeath theory enables people to read the Bible’s underlying referent meaning, through translating the mythic metaphor analogies.

Therefore we must say, resolving the Jaspers/Bultmann dispute, that demythologizing is a matter of separating-out and fully grasping both myth and the referent of myth, as completely differentiated layers. Religious myth expresses a worldmodel indirectly, through a system of analogy. Jesus spoke in allegories; we have to decipher the allegory, such that we turn to look behind the mind, and perceive our previous errors about moral culpability, and perceive that God has covertly been in control of our thoughts the whole time even when we mistook ourselves as autonomous moral control agents.

Insofar as we end up holding demythologized Christianity, that’s identifiable as Christianity, this must mean that we end up holding *both* the Christian myth in one hand firmly, and holding the purely non-mythical referent meaning, now fully revealed, in the other hand. We don’t end up with Jaspers, holding only the Christian myth; we don’t end up with Bultmann, holding only the referent meaning. We end up holding both, separately, separated-out so that we can now perceive the referent meaning.

The non-mythic meaning of the Bible is:

God makes his followers enter the loose cognitive state and perceive God as being in control of their thinking across time. This forms a community that is informed by justice and non-oppression, a community-network which is distinct from the social-political-economic system of Caesar and other mundane rulers and their mystic-state metaphor-based propaganda that props up their oppressive, unjust honor-shame hierarchy and aristocratic divine rights of kings and popes oppressively lording it over the peasants and mercantiles.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 9, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
________________________________________

Part 2: Bultmann reviews, tempered by my ideas.

Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate
Rudolf Bultmann & 5 critics
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0061300802

Per Bultmann:

The radical attempt to demythologize the New Testament is a perfect parallel to St. Paul’s and Luther’s doctrine of justification by faith alone apart from the works of the Law.

The cosmology of the New Testament is essentially mythical in character. The world is viewed as a three-storied structure, with the earth in the centre, the heaven above, and the underworld beneath. Heaven is the abode of God and celestial beings–the angels. The underworld is hell, the place of torment. Even the earth is more than the scene of natural, everyday events; it is the scene of the supernatural activity of God and his angels on the one hand, and of Satan and his demons on the other. These supernatural forces intervene in the course of nature and in all that men think and will and do. Miracles are by no means rare.

The end will come very soon, and will take the form of a cosmic catastrophe. It will be inaugurated by the woes of the last time. Then the Judge will come from heaven, the dead will rise, the last judgment will take place, and men will enter into eternal salvation or damnation.

It is impossible, and would be senseless, for Christian preaching to expect modern man to accept the mythical view of the world. There is nothing specifically Christian in the mythical view of the world as such. It is simply the cosmology of a pre-scientific age. An Existentialist [loose-cognitive state experiential -mh] interpretation is the only solution. The Bible shows me a way of understanding my own existence [control-agency acting across time -mh], in the form of a message which addresses me personally.


Myth & Christianity: An Inquiry Into The Possibility Of Religion Without Myth
Karl Jaspers, Rudolf Bultmann
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1591022916

My condensing of the blurb:
Bultmann’s attempt to divest Christianity of its mythical components and make sense of it in more modern terms. Jaspers rejects the premise that a religion can or should be understood without its mythical framework; myth is an irreplaceable form of symbolic communication. Bultmann holds that moderns in the scientific tradition reject biblical texts because of the miraculous and supernatural content [loose cognitive state analogies designed for meaning-flipping -mh]. Per Bultmann, the scholarly, scientific study of the Bible is the way to reveal its true message, distinct from the supernatural trappings [UI skin -mh]. They dispute application of the principle ‘justification by faith’ to myth.


My condensing of A Certain Bibliophile’s review:
Introduction by R. Joseph Hoffmann covering the rise of liberal theology in the nineteenth century. Hermeneutics as applied to religious myth.

Demythologization divests religious meaning and intent from the original myths in which they are couched. The Ascension and the Virgin Birth are religious myths that mean something, but the religious content is ensconced in the language of the miraculous, which modern thinking views as ridiculous and impossible. Therefore, these myths need to be reconfigured, divested of their Biblical form and given a structure which is makes getting at their meaning and significance possible for someone living in the modern era.

Jaspers sees the element of myth as indispensable from the content of religious belief itself. Reading these myths without their mythical structures is impossible. A religion can’t be understood apart from its mythical origins. The topology of the origin myths is essential to our understanding. Religious myths are not there to provide us with a decoding project. Cutting away myth simultaneous causes the disappearance of the religious message.

Per Jaspers, Bultmann’s project of demythologization is a sanitizing project that fails to understand myth as an essential vehicle for apprehending and describing the transcendent. Jaspers comes close to Northrop Frye’s “The Great Code: The Bible and Literature,” which asserts that modern attempts to read the Bible are often foiled because we no longer read and write in the mythical. Our system of expression in the modern era is empirical and positivistic. One cannot read the Bible without myth, since it is written in myth. Bultmann’s project is scientism, an attempt to present religion without being accused of foolish mythologies.

The Great Code: The Bible and Literature
Northrop Frye
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0156027801
1981
“the Bible as redeeming history with a visionary poetic perspective that joins science in its understanding of man’s nature”

My condensing of reviewer Arch Llewellyn:
Per Frye, the Bible is literature and myth. The chain of typological anticipations in this literature doesn’t culminate in Israel or Jesus or Revelation, but continues past the book of Revelation and the final events into our own lives, waking us up to our radical freedom. Frye treats the Bible as a unity which utilizes the Hebrew Torah as a typological precursor for the Christian Messiah.


My condensing of Steven Propp’s review of Myth & Christianity:
Jaspers argues that myth is a code language, a cipher, referring to transcendence; myth is not about a mere tangible presence. He says Bultmann alternates between empirical, philological exegesis (the historical investigation of religion) and a theological appropriation of religion (the primary comprehension of faith) — these contradict each other.

Bultmann replies that a corpse cannot come back to life or rise from the grave, that there are no demons and no magic causality. It is not feasible to explain the Resurrection of Jesus in the flesh, demons, or magic causality. Jaspers says redemptive history must be tested existentially, Bultmann replies “How is this done?”


Jesus Christ and Mythology
Rudolf Bultmann
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0334046300
1941
Blurb:
He was criticized as abandoning the essence of Christianity. How Christianity can be restated without the myths.

My condensing of reviewer Steven Propp:
Rudolf Bultmann’s 1941 essay “New Testament and Mythology” (in _Kerygma and Myth_) held that the heart of the preaching of Jesus Christ is the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom of God is a spiritual community joined together by obedience to the will of God which rules in their wills. The Kingdom of God is a realm which is spiritual but within the world.

Jesus expected that this would take place in the immediate future, and that the arrival of that age could already be perceived in the signs and wonders which he performed, especially in his casting out of demons. The inauguration of the Kingdom of God is a tremendous cosmic drama.

Reviewer Sylveste:
Strips away a lot of the trappings of the Bible to get to the heart of its message.

My condensing and clarification of reviewer Jesse Rouse:
The scriptural account of Jesus is clouded in mythology. We must de-mythologize Jesus, stripping the myth from the referent meaning. Knowledge is about mystical intuition or vision, a mystical union with Christ as ruler. This mystical truth is self-knowledge. The question of God and the question of oneself are identical. We de-mythologize New Testament history to understand the possibilities of personal human life and human existence.

God acts within worldly events. The action of God is hidden but can be perceived by the eye of mystic faith. The crucifixion as atonement is a mystic-state event.

Jesus Christ is a messianic figure of truth only in the realm of faith and mystical experience, which is not built upon historical reality, but is the mystic-experiencing collective of his followers. He clears the way for us in his subjection to wrath and then mercy (rescue, pass-over of the threat, salvation, averting wrath, purchase of freedom from certain destruction), like the knife passing over Isaac enables his descendents to exist. We have faith in God’s benevolence and power, though God withholds himself from direct view and observation. We trust in Christ as the Lord, the ruler, our protector, our paradigm; our wills are in his will and we form the mystically redeemed kingdom of God.

End of Part 2, condensed reviewer excerpts.
— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Group: egodeath Message: 6130 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
[clarification]
Figure out what’s revealed in religious revelation through studying self, time, and control, [with] negligible reference to religious myth, as I did October 1985-January 1988, and then identify the mapping of that core theory to historical religious myth, as I did mainly around 2001.

[expanded:]


The following is the ultimate referent meaning of the Bible, expressed directly and scientifically, non-mythically, non-metaphorically:

God makes his followers ingest cognitive loosening chemicals and enter the loose cognitive state and perceive God as being in control of their thinking across time, in a way that forcefully coerces and demonstratively threatens personal control power, but then forces the follower to fully trust in their source of thoughts instead of distrusting and fighting against it, alienated from it. This act of trusting the revealed hidden uncontrollable source of our thoughts permits subsequent use of the disproved or circumscribed personal control power. This self-control seizure climax and release, among all people at all times who hear the mythic allegory of God’s kingdom, forms a cross-time society or community that is informed by justice and non-oppression.

This community-network is distinct from the social-political-economic system of Caesar and other mundane rulers and their mystic-state metaphor-based propaganda that props up their oppressive, unjust honor-shame hierarchy and aristocratic divine rights of kings and popes oppressively lording it over the peasants and mercantiles.


Just as I myself realized yesterday and posted about, Bultmann points out that demythologizing the New Testament is required, per the doctrine of justification by faith alone; mythology-fused Christianity amounts to works-based salvation; superstition, degraded magical thinking and irrelevancies that displace and obscure the actual meaning and real referent of Christian salvation.

Permanent life-sustaining salvation and mental purification means attaining full mature mental control integrity and a viable ongoing future. To gain this salvation and mental cleansing-away of self-contradiction and self-battling, you must, specifically pay *this* price: you must acceptably renounce your claim to autonomous control-power over your thoughts and actions, and acceptably perfect trust in and reliance on your pre-given heimarmene-rail. *That* is how we are saved; that is “salvation by faith”. Salvific faith is strictly a mental, non-metaphor-based act, of trusting your given fate, and that which gives you your fate. Any other attempt amounts to a futile irrelevant magical-thinking works-based salvation attempt.

You can *accompany* that act of faith with a metaphor such as the idea of sacrificing a bush-nullified ram in place of proving your ability to violate and harm your self-control. But it’s not the thinking of the metaphor that saves you; it’s the placing of faith in your fated worldline, given to you by the Creator, that preserves your control-viability while cleansing your mind of self-contradiction, producing Transcendent Knowledge about self, time, and control.

It is false to think that we must have a sacrificed historical Jesus. It is a myth to think that our salvation requires the idea of a bloody sacrifice. Actually, the referent underlying mechanism of how Christianity saves us, cannot require any analogy, metaphor, or myth, or magical sacrificial spilling of blood. The idea of sacrificing something in place of

We must commit *some kind* of demonstrative self-destruction to prove that we fully understand and recognize the nullity of our personal control power with respect to the overwhelming power of the pre-set heimarmene-rail which gives us our thoughts.

These 3 are the same:
o To demonstrate our understanding of our personal control limits, we must think a specific (non-metaphorical) thought; we must mentally repudiate our childish thinking’s implicit claim to wield personal control power over which branching future possibility we end up in.
o The myth of Isaac and bush-tangled-ram; refers to the above.
o The myth of the willingly crucified and then revived sacred king; refers to the above.

Salvation is free; salvation occurs through faith, not through the works of thinking of an allegory of harming an animal or person; nor through actually harming an animal or harming one’s future self. The true specific price of salvation from self-control violation, to gain continued viable personal control and attain perfect mental non-contradiction, you must think a thought: “I repudiate my claim to wield autonomous control power over my future thoughts and actions, and I must rely on and trust in the hidden Controller X and my frozen pre-existing heimarmene-railway.”

Thinking of some analogous allegory or myth such as Jesus dying on the cross, or the idea of sacrificing a bush-caught ram representing your previously deluded child-thinking control power, brings about salvation and restabilization and subsequent viable control-life because thinking of the analogous myth causes you to think the referent thought — it’s the referent thought that is the humility and dependence-attitude faith that saves you.

You are saved by faithful trusting dependency and renunciation of your former claim to a certain kind of power. You are *not* saved by harming your future or by harming an animal, nor by thinking of the myth of harming an animal or sacrificing a savior figure. It is idolatry to think that your salvation depends on you thinking some myth, or committing some harmful proof-demonstration act, some magical work such as harming your future.

You are saved by your faith and trust and renunciation of your naive childish claim to control what your future thoughts are, your claim to have the power to make your future be one scenario-branch or a different scenario-branch. You have no such type of power; your future scenario-branch is and shall be what it already has been created as. You are helplessly dependent on the timeless Creator of your future thoughts, the Creator of your pre-set, pre-existing, unchangeable heimarmene-rail.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 9, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6131 From: jdcasten Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: I mention and cite your work in my new book…
Yes! This is somewhat uncanny for me… even though we may have differing takes on “Cybernetic Revelation”… again, we do have some common ground too.

Good thing you didn’t trademark that, or I might be in trouble!

But I did find this 1974 reference to the phrase, in a more political context:

http://books.google.com/books?id=Ee4RAQAAIAAJ&q=%22cybernetic+revelation%22 

Thanks,

JD Casten

http://casten.postegoism.net 


— In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mike@…> wrote:
>
> My linked posting from September 21, 1995:
>
> Coming soon:
>
>
> THE CYBERNETIC REVELATION
> Deconstruction of Self-Control
>
>
> gathering topics such as:
>
> Hyperfrozen Hyperfreedom
>
> Virtual Freedom and the Virtual Ego
>
> Predetermination or ‘Fate’: A Simpler Proposition than Determinism
> (‘Predictable-ism’)
>
> Acid Rock – The Authentic Modern Mystery-School
>
> Hypothetical Realism – Anything Other than My Present Experiencing
> Might or Might Not Exist
>
> Uh oh — The Terror Is Beginning Again, and There Is No Way to Avoid
> Playing into the Hands of the Future
>
> Shining the Psychedelic Spotlight On Cognitive Self-Control
> Cybernetics
>
> Armchair Conjectures about Cybernetic Freakout
>
> The Taboo Against Alchemical Introspection
>
> What Transgression Lies in Store for a Temporarily Psychotic Morality
> Puppet?
>
> Control Stability and the Limits to Self-Determination
>
> Fate, Predetermination, and the Block Universe
>
> Homeostatic Equilibrium and Catastrophic State-Shift
>
> — Michael Hoffman, 1995
> http://www.egodeath.com
>
Group: egodeath Message: 6132 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: *Scientific* theory explaining altered-state revelation
How can I *fully* purify my mind of egoic control thinking? How can I be fully justified in continuing to carry myself through life? How can I prove that I Believe and have Faith in no-free-will? Shall I try to prove my ability to crash my control power against itself every week? Shall I sacrifice a bush-nullified ram every week? Does it cost one piglet, like I kill in my place in the enlightened Mysteries of Eleusis?

How many pigs, rams, or only-sons do I need to sacrifice to prove to myself that I have fully renounced the self-contradictory claim to wield egoic control power? How can I guarantee that my mind has achieved full transcendent knowledge? How can I prevent my ego-dead ghost from returning again and causing control-chaos instability, that curse, that thorn in my side which is my sacred disease epileptic cybernetic self-control seizure climax cybergasm potential? How can we permanently kill ego *dead* forever and quit forgetting that glimpse of comprehension that we see (and recoil from, for self-preservation)? How can I stop being reborn into deluded egoic thinking, and permanently hang onto cybernetic enlightenment about the nullity of personal control power?

Thus the idea and the functional working or mechanism of the idea of “Jesus is a once-for-all-time perfect final sacrifice” — no more paying evil collaborationist priests on an installment plan and refresher plan for salvation. We are thus justified in continuing to live as control agents, now purified, perfected, finished, completed, forever; no more need to prove that I can threaten my own self-control with instability and self-violating contradiction. I can be friendly with my egoic control system now that I am justified in considering it to be completely transcended.

Even by relying on the Hellenistic joke that Jesus — docetism — the guy in the Turin shroud on the cross, didn’t actually die, but trusted in his fate, and lived to walk out from among the dead. He didn’t need to be literally killed, in the canonical very late-written Gospel tale, but he only needed to *seem* to die, to *appear* to die, and that is sufficient as an analogy for our price we must pay to purchase mental purification and justification as placing full faith in our God-given heimarmene-rail.

Jesus according the New Testament Gospel tale, didn’t actually die, but only *seemed* to die, and by such logic, by analogy, neither do we need to prove our self-cancellation, in order to be considered fully justified and purified, perfected, completed, forever, a-thanatos, we are no longer under the curse of self-contradictory thinking that kills and cancels itself and battles against itself. Now we have the sacred marriage, harmony, trust, peace, and our thinking is washed white as the lamb, the ram, the non-killed, spared, Jesus mythic figure in the Hellenistic leg-pulling mystic-meaning tall-tale of sufficient justification through atonement-demonstration in the Gospel fiction in the New Testament.

Jesus Lives, as he is taken down from the possibility-tree, and we are fully sufficiently justified, absolved, and purified. There is no more sin and death, no more self-contradicting mental error and ego-death remaining.

We have been given the mind of God, which is a merciful and friendly God, readily appeasable, easily satisfiable, so we may enjoy seizing in an overpowering cybergasm yet we may also relax and enjoy this marriage to the Bridegroom in this wedding chamber. I have the mind of God, and this mind of God is readily satisfied and self-harmonious, readily accepting the renunciation of the claim to egoic control power, as constituting complete permanent mental purification and harmonious coherence, no more *necessary* to test one’s alliance and faith through testing Wrath of self-distrust of my near-future thoughts.

I *can* be made to play with that divine control-seizure cybergasm, but I have a certain transcendent dis-association from the way my egoic control power can self-threaten, contradict, and destabilize itself. The price has been fully sufficiently paid, of mental renunciation, and knowing I must trust in the uncontrollable hidden controller, the snake hidden in a basket underground, the Creator.

Now I ride the donkey on the path with Balaam and Jesus, or the horse going along the road with Paul, appearing to propel myself though time by my own power, but all the words that I speak to you are actually put into my mouth by God, and if I were to claim ownership of them, my mind as an angel of death would strike me down in self-contradicting power: cybernetic self-control seizure, the thorn in my side, the hole in my side through which my new, justified, purified, undying life is born, sins washed away, absolved.

Additionally, there are mythemes of transcending heimarmene, possibly including a kind of demonization of heimarmene as a prison controlled by a hated demiurge. The power from outside the mandorla passageway must lift me up from this underworld prison-cave up into freedom in the heavens outside the astral plane, past the cosmic heimarmene-snake ouroboros, outside the frozen spacetime block of creation.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 9, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6133 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Woe unto you, Cognitive Neuroscientist trippers! Repent and demonstrate trust in God because your kingship is otherwise destined to soon be destroyed by self-control violation vortex.

Where did this pre-modern idea come from, and what does it actually mean? “The god is blood thirsty, and his wrath is appeased by sacrificing one’s child.” What does that mean underneath the mythic figurations, as the actual ultimate referent, as explained by scientific thinking? The Egodeath theory fully explains how that idea arises. Your life is primarily the life of a personal control agent, usually perceived mentally from the perspective of tight-cognitive binding, where awareness is bound-into egoic control dynamics, egoic control mental constructs.

Perhaps a mythic image of blood sacrifice is more effective for control restabilization, for the intermediate initiate, than the mere abstract abstruse concept of “to save your control stability, you-as-God demand merely that you mentally renounce your childish, idolatrous and ungodly claim to wield autonomous personal control power that has the power to steer away from your coming near-future fated thought, as if you have the power to create your own destiny and future possibility-branch, as though you are the creator of the spacetime block.

The no-free-will book-authors don’t think yet in terms of discovering ecstatic numinous horrific potential vulnerable helpless dependence. I am Jonah on a ship certainly headed for shipwreck in a storm, and know that God is angry at me for not acknowledging his power over me; I know that he demands that I sacrifice my self and throw it overboard because God has been commanding me to prophecy to the king of Nineveh that if he doesn’t repent and honor God, his kingdom is fated to very soon fall into destruction.

The philosophers recently go around advocating no-free-will, but if you follow that logic, into loosecog, you discover an interesting transcendent-thinking vulnerability, a thorn in the side, an organ through which a new self-concept *beyond* mere no-free-will, is born: a self-concept of vulnerable helpless dependence.

What exactly and specifically, scientifically, is the cognitive dynamics of “bad trip”? What founding hero-Theorist can cage this “bad trip” monster that demands propitiary sacrifice of the town’s children every year, lest the monster destroy everyone in the land, preventing life, making it an impotent wasteland. Terrence McKenna cut back extremely on mushroom use due to a bad trip in the late 1980s. Most “bad trips” are probably due to encountering these self-control limitations, control-level conflicts, and cancellation dynamics, but without a coherent way — until the Egodeath theory — to confront, process forward through, and integrate these dynamics, along with mapping to historical religious myth where these dynamics are standard and have been resolved such as using themes of mythic cultic blood sacrifice.


It might be typical, a logical sequence, for the semi-advanced initiate to consider ritually deliberately committing harm to one’s future but then rejecting that natural train of reasoning because it is magical thinking and not necessary, not really relevant, not effective, and harms one’s ability to continue living and honoring the God (the transcendent dimension that controls one’s fated thoughts). That’s where the idea comes from, of “substitute sacrifice”, “transferring guilt onto the animal”, and “substitutionary atonement for purification”.

Perhaps this sequence of thoughts occurs often in the peak advanced freak-out window.
First, the thought appears: does my god-like thinking need to see me prove my transcendent ability to violate my own self-control power?
Then, the thought appears:

That natural sequence of cybernetic self-control thoughts would explain the origin of “the gods are bloodthirsty for sacrifice but they can be appeased even through a vegetative sacrifice.” Remember what the challenge is. The challenge is not to stay dumb and comfy in your boring-to-death suburban wasteland, stunted, infantilized. The goal and challenge is to experience the peak window ecstatic numinous encounter, cybergasm. Not to avoid the self-control strange-attractor vortex. The task to face, to face the music, is to *engage* and *explain* the logic of propitiating sacrifice to avert the wrath of the god.

The goal is not to avoid encountering and experiencing the wrath of god. The goal for the theorist of ego death is to *engage* and *explain* scientifically why self-control cybernetics in loosecog is drawn toward self-violation demonstration ideas, which are described as “blood thirsty god demanding to eat the child, demanding propitiary sacrifice of your child, to avert the god’s wrath.” What do you have for that to explain it? You got nothing? Shall we puss around the subject, or man up heroically as the hero-theorist?

Per myth in antiquity, gods are bloodthirsty and demand a blood sacrifice to avert their wrath, their danger. The generalized terror and fear of one’s newly revealed heimarmene-track perhaps initially is envisioned as horrific chaos and extreme strife, or frighteningly clear unchained, mentally unrestrained ability to imagine intending some demonstrative ritual-like self-violation, such as scrambling your dorm room which you would never do, being a highly controlled person. I was told of a couple people doing that: I take it, they had a revelation about their own inability to control themselves across time, and ritually demonstrated doing a disordering they would never do. It is mandatory that we explain the maenads, which I read as male initiates on psychoactive mushroom wine.

From the point of view of where you think as the god, when you think from the point of view of being possessed by Dionysus, you might want to somehow test and disprove your ability to “control yourself” in some sense, in order to gain a more coherent mental model of self-control across time, a model that doesn’t contradict itself in practice.

Suppose a series of 9 initiations, loosecog sessions. Perceiving the hidden heimarmene-track and recognizing it as a mortal threat to your control stability might happen in session 6. At first you recoil and run away. But then you get sick of not understanding this dynamic and not having peace of mind, not having transcendent knowledge. You get sick of being possessed by egoic thinking. That motivates you, as a hero, to come back toward the threatening control-loss vortex and the heimarmene-rail, that monstrous snake hidden underground. Now in session 7, you have somewhat the Dionysus-possessed mind, and you want to test your control-power. So then you think about this “vulnerability to go out of control with harmful self-control violation”.

The question poses itself to the mind: What are you trying to demonstrate and prove, and how can you manage to prove it and demonstrate the constraints on the dynamics of personal control power? At that stage of initiations, the mind considers the idea or question, must I, to gain full self-control integrity of my mental model, must I sacrifice harmfully? By what means is the demonstration of noncontrol (of inability to control one’s control across time) adequately performed?

The question of whether the godly mind wants or demands a blood sacrifice could possibly be a logical standard question that arises, a standard horror for a certain stage of initiations, especially in antiquity, where blood sacrifice was de rigueur. Then after that question arises — like after Abraham raises the knife over Isaac according to the fictional tale, then the godly mind thinks in the manner of the gods who respond to being propitiated.


The newage peace-and-light hippie spiritual acid people presume to guide others to wisdom through a vanilla, sterilized, safety-helmeted, toned-down approach — good luck with achieving perfection and fecund cybergasm that way.

Taking wimpy doses and avoiding thinking about self-control violation fails, erring on the side of too much caution and prevention. Excessive peace and light.

Taking heroic doses fails, producing terror lockup of thinking, mental constructs too dis-integrated and fragmented. Excessive heavy metal darkness; the PA system is blasting so loud it’s wimpy unproductive sonic chaos, useless mush. Get crazy, sacrifice a cat? Terrorize yourself to death? It won’t accomplish anything.


Can we have perfection and purification of the mental model, to forcefully cancel out egoic control power (or egoic control logic), without terror and fear, apprehension, without thoughts or questions of some horrific deliberate hyper-controlled ritual demonstration of transcending personal control power?

New: Explanation of the meaning of the n*ken guy recoiling from the red star on the 2112 album:
Picture the n*ked guy on the 2112 acid-rock album cover, in a stance of apprehension upon perceiving the logical and esthetic perfection of the star in the circle.

(The radio is now playing the start of the 2112 album; it started after I wrote that. Prelude and Temples of Syrinx, which is about Richard Nixon’s evil, anti-God, anti-Science, anti-Philosophy, anti-Humanity, fraudulent “war on drugs”.)


The goal is *not* to avoid encountering self-control seizure. The goal is to encounter and explain and comprehend self-control transcendence, the self-control vortex and the involved experiential and perceptual revelations involved. Not to avoid the monster, but to contain, integrate, domesticate, and map-out the interesting hidden horror that sits in the middle of the path, as a doorway, on the road to transcendent knowledge, required, to Know Thyself. We cannot have transcendent knowledge by avoiding encountering with and grappling and dancing with, and embracing, the self-control vortex.


The foundation myth of our Greco-Christian culture is: “The god is blood thirsty, and his wrath is appeased by sacrificing one’s child.” Explain it. My Egodeath theory explains it. This is a logical natural sequence of loosecog initiation encounters with ideas about personal control:

Loosecog session 1. Random beginner exploration: metaperception of mental constructs. Your awareness doesn’t directly perceive your hand; your awareness is presented with mental constructs instead.

One sooner or later comes across issues of control.

Loosecog session 2. Maenad-like room scrambling, meant to fully demonstrate the inability to control oneself across time.

Loosecog session 3. Feel suspended frozen in time, powerlessly, but not yet with fearsome vision of being threatened by one’s forcefully arriving fated thoughts.

Loosecog session 4. Experience a desire to demonstrate full control violation; experience the mind being pulled and sucked inevitably toward the seemingly appealing thought of self-violation, destroying one’s future. The mind conspires: even to the point of a false memory, a compelling (though suspected artificial) intense deja-vu feeling: remember that you were here before, timelessly again are here where your mind was being pulled inevitably toward remembering the intention to violate your self-control harming your future, and you felt and feel powerless, and this is the way of transcendent highly desirable morally superior pure logically true thinking. The climax-bound mind is eager to construct-together a dynamic of “I can’t help but want to feel forced to self-violate”.

What matter is the mind has that capacity and that desire for self-knowledge and transcendent knowledge about its potential control dynamics. How can we indulge this dynamic and get this transcendent knowledge, both effectively and safely, and how can we remember it so that the egoic delusional mental model doesn’t reappear in such a way that the transcendent knowledge is once again forgotten?

Loosecog session 5. Thinking with the transcendent mind of god possessing your mind (egoic thinking suspended/disengaged), realize that no action, no “works based sacrificial demonstration for purification” can prove anything about how well you understand, and, at this point, the mind questions: “Well, what does God, what do I *as* Dionysus, demand myself to meet as a standard to demonstrate and proof and lock-in permanently my grasp of the idea of my personal non-control relative to the forced-injection of my fated ideas?” What makes sense? What is effective? How does my Jesus-possessed mind permanently exorcise the ego-demon of egoic control thinking and the egoic mental worldmodel? What must I do to be purified and permanently cast out my demon that separates me from God?

How can the logical initiate do or think something that will prevent egoic thinking from reappearing? How can the logical initiate remember and hang onto this vision, in the peak window, of noncontrol? Does self-violation of some sort make sense for that objective? At this point, the mostly-transcendent mind, or mental model, is *searching*: what *kind* of “demonstration” or “making a permanent impression on my thinking”, can cause me to permanently kill and prevent my childish egoic control thinking, my egoic mental model? As a godly-thinking mind, the ancient initiate figured that the goal is to continue living, viably, while permanently retaining the non-control perspective. Does the ancient ritual of blood sacrifice help accomplish this, to represent self-violation?

Loosecog session 6. Think of mythic ideas of blood sacrifice, such as of Isaac (progenitor of *all* God’s kingdom of Israel!!), then think of the myth of the substitutionary, satisfactory sacrifice of the God-given bush-nullified ram of Isaac, and similarly think of the myth of God giving his own only son as the king of his entire kingdom of Israel to be blood-sacrificed (so much for God’s kingdom then). Consider from Dionysus’ or Zeus’ point of view: what do you want and need from yourself? To think of blood, in reality or in mythic figuration? No, the point is, to acknowledge the limitations of personal control power and the forced demand that we trust our hidden uncontrollable source of thoughts (the heimarmene snake given to oneself by Controller X, the creator of the block universe).

The whole point is, to mentally exhibit or demonstrate to one’s satisfaction, the idea of mental renunciation of your claim to autonomous control power.

Loosecog session 7. Think the abstract concept of: to save your control stability, you-as-God demand merely that you “mentally renounce” your childish, idolatrous and ungodly claim to wield autonomous personal control power that has the power to steer away from your coming near-future fated thought, as if you have the power to create your own destiny and future possibility-branch, as though you are the creator of the spacetime block. And that you “put trust in” and “take a trusting stance toward” the heimarmene worldline that is forcefully always injected into your mind at all points along your worldline.

Usually, the divine power forcefully injects your thoughts secretly, covertly, occluded, except during the peak window of the loose cognitive state that Isis sometimes makes you enter, when she draws your donkey into her temple.


One asks oneself, while possessed by Dionysus, or while one is possessed by Jesus the demon-exorcist: how can I, Dionysus, satisfy myself that this mind has renounced its egoic claim to autonomous control power? How can I, God of Israel, satisfy myself that this mind has renounced its egoic claim to autonomous control power and is in a friendly trusting testament treaty relationship, a sacred trusting marriage, trusting the heimarmene-rail I have given to this mind at the timeless moment of creation of the block universe? “Your faith has saved you. Tell no one, but show yourself to the collaborationist priest.”

Out of weakness, the mind invented blood-sacrifice myths and should let go of them, they are a crutch, not strictly necessary but when you are in the peak window, fairly advanced in your series of loosecog initiations. The urge or notion to self-violate as proof and securing of self-integrity of your mental model of control, naturally suggests some extreme self-violation demonstration or life-threatening possibility, and that is why the mind finds it comforting to picture a (substitutionary) blood sacrifice: because in theory, the loose mind possessed by Dionysus or Jesus or some ego-demon, could commit extreme self-violation; that’s the logical fear that follows from feeling and perceiving personal control as illusory.

The next thought in the sequence after that is: what does pure logic, or God, or me-thinking-as-God, actually want? And what can I *do* to *remember* this non-control, block-universe perspective? Antiquity was drenched in themes helping people to remember noncontrol, repudiation, no-free-will, and frozen block-universe heimarmene. The first modern-era Theorist of Egodeath faces a challenge to remember and not forget, these things. The Theorist writes and cybernetically communicates in 2006 the clear Egodeath theory of self-control violation and repudiation-sacrifice of egoic control thinking — this is extremely helpful for other people to safely anticipate, repudiate, and remember what their self sacrifice was about.

The ancients faced the problem of remembering no-free-will too well; they had to strive to hide it from their non-initiated children and youths, to prevent untimely, premature egodeath virally spreading to entirely wipe out our beloved youthful childish freewillist delusion of autonomous personal control agency.

Perhaps the initial repudiation of personal control power during the peak window is easier than *remembering* the insight and repudiation, the control-nullity perspective, the inability to avoid the near-future fated thought that you are being inevitably pulled forward toward, with no braking ability, no way to slow down, no steering ability, threatened by cybernetic shipwreck, extreme self-violation threat, unless Jonah throws his egoic self overboard in obedience to God’s command, repudiating his egoic distrust of his own fated heimarmene worldline, to stay God’s hand, to avert the wrath that results when you take a stance of distrusting God’s fated future worldline he commands you to have.

We can ride pleasantly in God’s chariot, or kick against the pricks (steering-goads), and be chaotically dragged to our destruction behind God’s chariot — that is a Stoic-type figuration of the mind’s proper stance of relationship to Heimarmene.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 9, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6134 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
Reset through trembling ecstatic kneeling submission

The problem for the modern secular transcendent person: how do I mentally exhibit or demonstrate to my satisfaction, the idea of excitedly, trembling, enlightened, backing-down from my ecstatic, panicked, counter-attack against the root of my own power, mental renunciation of my claim to autonomous control power, against the overwhelming power of the now-revealed heimarmene-snake, now that I fully understand the deadly cybernetic ramifications of going up against that unstoppable force of God’s power of Creation, of the block universe itself? “Ignorance gave him confidence to go up against reality.” If you take up arms against your own subterranean heimarmene-snake worldline, your horse will panic and throw you to your grave injury.

To avert self-control disaster, and to secure transcendent knowledge and prevent reincarnation into egoic delusion (mental model backsliding), no thought of anything like a propitiating blood sacrifice is needed; merely think of submissively bowing your head, which is a sign of submission — offering your neck and life, putting yourself at the mercy of the other control-agent, and state, as kind of a prayer:


To avert disaster, restabilize control, and secure transcendent knowledge without forgetting it, think of kneeling and bowing the neck, and think:

“I repudiate my claim to autonomous self-control power separately from my fated worldline, and I put trust as I must in my worldline, which is the root and source of my power of personal control agency, though I, as a conscious control agent on this level of control cannot control my underlying fated worldline.”


U2:
If you want to kiss the sky
Better learn how to kneel
On your knees boy


The Acid Rock Prophet tells us:
excerpts from Neil Peart, for scholarly purposes:

Blood-stained velvet, dirty lace
Naked fear on every face
See them bow their heads to die <==
As we would bow as they rode by

And we’re marching to Bastille Day
La guillotine will claim her bloody prize
Sing, oh choirs of cacophony
The king has kneeled to let his kingdom rise.


A thousand years have come and gone
But time has passed me by
Stars stopped in the sky
Frozen in an everlasting view

Waiting for the world to end
Weary of the night
Praying for the light <==
Prison of the lost
Xanadu


All preordained
A prisoner in chains
A victim of venomous fate
Kicked in the face
You can’t (sung “can”) pray for a place <==
In heaven’s unearthly estate.


He’s got a problem with his poisons
But you know he’ll find a cure
He’s cleaning up his systems
To keep his nature pure

He’s got a problem with his power
With weapons on patrol
He’s got to walk a fine line
And keep his self-control


1-0-0-1-0-0-1 (“I”)
S.O.S.
In distress

Memory banks unloading
Bytes break into bits
Unit One’s in trouble and it’s scared out of its wits

Guidance systems break down
A struggle to exist — to resist
A pulse of dying power in a clenching plastic fist

It replays each of the days
A hundred years of routines
Bows its head and prays <==
To the mother of all machines


I have scientifically explained the cognitive dynamics of the advanced initiate’s bad trip.

I have explained the self-control logic of testing one’s power by using the latent potential threat of harmful self-control violation.

I have explained the master mytheme of “The god demands blood sacrifice of your child to avert his wrath.”

I have explained why ideally, eventually, the mind can move past even the idea or myth of blood sacrifice or any harm, to reach a completely harmless method of simply thinking of bowing the head or just thinking, “I hereby repudiate my claim to autonomous self-control power separately from my fated worldline, and I put trust as I must in my worldline, which is the root and source of my power of personal control agency, though I, as a conscious control agent on this level of control cannot control my underlying fated worldline.”

I have explained the dynamics of the loosecog control-vortex and why it is the main, most interesting feature of the psychedelic loosecog state.

I have pointed out that the control vortex is a phase or doorway which all Cognitive Scientists will be forced to go through and they will be forced to have my Egodeath theory as the map and explanation of this intensely attractive and destructively, threatening, most-interesting capacity, of cybergasm.

I have shown how this cybergasm capacity relates to mythic mystery initiation, the sacred marriage, the bridal chamber, the death of the maiden, and the birth of the divine child from a God and a mortal woman, all based on a non-metaphorical Core theory with a theory extension mapping the core to historical religious myth.

I have provided the traditional Acid Rock lyric epic poetry soundtrack guide to accompany and paranoiacally provoke the encounter and exploration of the cybernetic personal self-control vortex.

— Michael Hoffman, http://www.egodeath.com, December 9, 2012
Copyright (C) 2012, Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. All Rights Reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 6135 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Ecstatic self-violation, willing end of king’s future, blood sac
A victim of venomous fate

venom = snake
venomous fate = heimarmene snake
Group: egodeath Message: 6136 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
Some translations commit a mystic error by omitting the theme of “turn around and look back behind your self and see the truth about your control power”.

International Standard Version
Then Abraham looked up and behind him to see a ram caught by its horns in the thicket. So Abraham went over, grabbed the ram, and offered it as a burnt offering in place of his son.

King Pentheus caught in a tree and then sacrificed by being disintegrated, pulled into pieces by ecstatically crazed Maenads initiates is

Ill-equipped to act
Caught in ticking traps
-Peart

Pentheus means ‘sorrows’: the Man of Sorrows, sorrow for the death of a loved one, as in the death of one’s child self.
Group: egodeath Message: 6137 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Riding atop a horse, donkey, bull, ox
Photo of 3 researchers holding up a 15-foot python
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/06/us/florida-python-hunt/?hpt=us_c1
Group: egodeath Message: 6138 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
The ram’s horns are snake-shaped

The hunter is turned into a stag with possibility-branching antlers and his dogs tear him to pieces.

In the Gigantomachy, initiates have snakes for legs; our power is supported by and comes from timeless fatedness, which Zeus controls as we are made to battle against Zeus. Lightning, Zeus’ power against delusion of ego power, is snake shaped, and branching.

Zeus Meilichios shown as a bearded man’s head on the body of a snake

Hell is a lion’s head on a snake’s body, Jesus pulls Adam through jaws.

Mytheme abbreviation: snake then ram horn (blowing the shofer horn) then Moses’ horns

Ruck and M Hoffman see mushrooms everywhere, but I have mystic vision: I see snakes and branching, contrasted, everywhere.

Jonah’s prayer: seaweed (worldline) wraps my head like ivy victory wreath crown garland

images
http://www.google.com/search?q=zeus+meilichios

Zeus battles Python which is you holding your hand over your heart they call this submissive gesture but why? Because it is submissive cybernetically: Zeus overpowers me at my very heart of my power, through fatedness, thot injection through time given to me at all times already, before I arrived at this point along my time path. I remember now Zeus is putting my control thoughts in my mind and I am dying, dead power, and bowing to him who trumps me from outside of the spacetime block. There is no time for me to have power over time.

In ivy and lightning and meanders and roads, you can find some 1D nonbranching segments and some branching, but the profound mystic meaning lies in the contrast between branching possibilities versus nonbranching fated worldline

Lion gorgon head on breastplate is death head, posted previously; it’s clear that the lion head depicts ego death overpowering of the mind’s personal control power. Dionysus is panther cat lion, lion is king ego. The world of myth is packed with this anti-delusion of reference.

Diamond hammer of interpretation: all mytheme elements and mythic attributes refer to cybernetics/heimarmene/dissociation.

Mythic figuration has a certain effectiveness at communicating abstruse concepts that express intense altered state experiencings.

— Copyright 2012 M Hoffman
Group: egodeath Message: 6139 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
ram’s horns in bush/bramble/thicket =
snake in tree =
ivy wreath crown of thorns nailed to cross or hung on a tree
heimarmene worldline vs our virtual-only cybnernetic possibility branching power

Once the coding is estab, can coherently abbrev in other less clear exprns of it
Group: egodeath Message: 6140 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2012
Subject: Re: Sacrif Isaac = kingdom, subst ram in bush, son Jesus on tree/st
The wings on Typhon indicate that Typhon is an initiate (you) in the loosecog state while being struck down by Zeus, and by heimarmene as the basis of your pre-given thoughts at all points in time.

[typo correction]
Zeus battles [Typhon] which is you holding your hand over your heart

Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 100: 2007-11-18

Site Map


Group: egodeath Message: 5060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation is bunk, a scam, complicit in Prohibition, anti-relig
Group: egodeath Message: 5063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Admin: posts getting filtered into junk folder
Group: egodeath Message: 5064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Meditation and entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 5065 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 5066 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 5067 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 5069 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 5070 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Dogmatic denominational doctrine: Egodeath stronger than Emergent
Group: egodeath Message: 5071 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Re: Dogmatic denominational doctrine: Egodeath stronger than Emergen
Group: egodeath Message: 5072 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Re: Progressive Christianity, Emergent Paradigm, ahistoricity, enthe
Group: egodeath Message: 5073 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: McLaren on cross, vicarious atonement, penal substitution
Group: egodeath Message: 5074 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5075 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5076 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Re: Popularity of Egodeath site
Group: egodeath Message: 5077 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5078 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5079 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5080 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5081 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
Subject: Re: Website: Urban Shaman
Group: egodeath Message: 5082 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/11/2007
Subject: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahistori
Group: egodeath Message: 5083 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2007
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
Group: egodeath Message: 5085 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Re: Views on NT Xy: Redactors, Evangelicals, Emergent, Freke, Horsle
Group: egodeath Message: 5084 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Psychonautica: Max Freakout on Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 5086 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Evidential data for theories is structured, not unstructured
Group: egodeath Message: 5087 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Re: Views on NT Xy: Redactors, Evangelicals, Emergent, Freke, Horsle
Group: egodeath Message: 5088 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5089 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Re: Evidential data for theories is structured, not unstructured
Group: egodeath Message: 5090 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
Subject: Emergent view: NT as guide to how entheogens ought to be experienced
Group: egodeath Message: 5091 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5092 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
Group: egodeath Message: 5093 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
Group: egodeath Message: 5094 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5095 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5096 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5097 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5098 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5099 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
Group: egodeath Message: 5100 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5101 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
Group: egodeath Message: 5102 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5103 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5104 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
Group: egodeath Message: 5105 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Video: 1988 Egodeath book commencement party
Group: egodeath Message: 5106 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
Group: egodeath Message: 5107 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Characterizing experience of the loose cognitive association state
Group: egodeath Message: 5108 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Sensationalism, fame, pride, humility, PR, standing out, social grou
Group: egodeath Message: 5109 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
Subject: Re: Sensationalism, fame, pride, humility, PR, standing out, social
Group: egodeath Message: 5110 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2007
Subject: Emergent missional post-church practice, entheogen house-church move
Group: egodeath Message: 5111 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2007
Subject: Re: Emergent missional post-church practice, entheogen house-church
Group: egodeath Message: 5112 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2007
Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes



Group: egodeath Message: 5060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
Subject: Re: Meditation is bunk, a scam, complicit in Prohibition, anti-relig
Attachments :
    C-Realm podcasts:
    http://c-realmpodcast.podomatic.com


    Episode 63: KMO and meditation instructor, Heidi Smith of the Center for
    Soulful Living pick up the conversation started on Psychonautica examining
    the friction between proponents of pharmacologically assisted spirituality
    and zero-tolerance advocates of drug-free meditation.

    Direct link:
    http://c-realmpodcast.podomatic.com/enclosure/2007-11-07T18_56_30-08_00.mp3


    Episode 64:
    KMO concludes his talk with meditation instructor Heidi Smith of the Center
    for Soulful Living and then rounds out the discussion of the relative merits
    of drug-free meditation vs. entheogen-assisted explorations of consciousness
    with Jan Irvin of Gnostic Media and Daniel Siebert of The Salvia divinorum
    Research and Information Center.

    Direct link:
    http://c-realmpodcast.podomatic.com/enclosure/2007-11-14T17_52_11-08_00.mp3


    63 — 42:30 — Andrew Weil affirms the spiritual utility of the general
    category of visionary plants (for example, opium), as opposed to strictly
    entheogens only.

    Fasting is mentioned by Weil and KMO as an alternative to visionary plants,
    but this is ironic, since the origin of fasting is to potentiate visionary
    plants.


    Weil points out that it is illogical and biased that fasting is considered
    legit, yet visionary plants are dismissed as “artificial” and “effortful”,
    and thus non-legitimate.


    In episode 63, like The Seeker when interviewed by Max Freakout in
    Psychonautica 15 and 16, Heidi Smith comes in supposedly as a spokesperson
    for the view that drug-free meditation is superior to drug-based spiritual
    practice, and yet starts by pointing out the proven efficacy of visionary
    plants for herself. That’s the extent of the content in this episode: Smith
    states that entheogens were efficacious and awakened her spirituality, and
    provides no arguments yet for the superiority or even equivalence of
    drug-free meditation.

    I point out that we must remember the skewing and filtering effects of drug
    prohibition, which began in 1966 — no debate can be legit without
    discussing this censorship and filtering effect of which spokespeople we are
    permitted to hear from. We are only permitted to hear certain people, and
    certain positions and arguments; other people and positions/arguments are
    filtered out, forming a distribution curve of views that is heavily warped
    away from the distribution curve of views in actuality, actually held by
    people in the world.

    Compare the infrequency of anti-war views, politically progressive views, or
    views for repealing drug prohibition, that are permitted to be expressed in
    the corporate-owned news media. Drug-free meditation is over-represented in
    the Establishment publishing industry, since 1966, and drug-employing
    spirituality is extremely under-represented. Psychoactive drugs are not
    only illegal (for the most part), they are culturally taboo, marginalized,
    and suppressed — even at the same time as they are ubiquitous, popular, and
    mainstream.

    Given that psychoactive drugs are both illegal and taboo, it is guaranteed
    that the Establishment media and publishing industry puts forth a heavily
    biased and skewed presentation of views about the legitimacy of
    drug-utilizing versus drug-free spirituality practices. I’m waiting, ever
    in vain, for any other people to acknowledge this major, relevant
    consideration.


    63 — 47:40: From Parker Palmer’s book The Active Life: “Our tendency to
    identify our selves with our acquired skills rather than our natural gifts
    is one of the less desirable habits of the ego, because the ego’s identity
    is so heavily invested in these acquired skills, it does not want to
    acknowledge the natural, untrained, effortless gifts over which the ego has
    no ownership or control.” I hold that “a free, natural, untrained,
    effortless, salvific gift” is a description that fits entheogens better than
    drug-free meditation, and this seems to be KMO’s point as well.

    I consider meditation and fasting to have been historically derived as
    activities associated with visionary plants, not an alternative that
    competes against the use of visionary plants. The purpose of fasting,
    historically, was to potentiate visionary plants. The purpose of
    meditation, historically, was an activity to do during the plant-induced
    visionary cognitive state.
    Group: egodeath Message: 5063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
    Subject: Admin: posts getting filtered into junk folder
    Attachments :
      I can’t see why for some of my posts, my computer (and maybe others’)
      decides that the post, for no apparent reason, is junk mail. I might have
      to resort to calling Support, or using a Test Yahoo group to experiment with
      this.
      Group: egodeath Message: 5064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
      Subject: Meditation and entheogens
      Attachments :
        In C-Realm episode 63, KMO and meditation instructor, Heidi Smith of the
        Center for Soulful Living pick up the conversation started on Psychonautica
        examining the friction between proponents of pharmacologically assisted
        spirituality and zero-tolerance advocates of drug-free meditation.

        In Episode 64, KMO concludes his talk with meditation instructor Heidi Smith
        of the Center for Soulful Living and then rounds out the discussion of the
        relative merits of drug-free meditation vs. entheogen-assisted explorations
        of consciousness with Jan Irvin of Gnostic Media and Daniel Siebert of The
        Salvia divinorum Research and Information Center.

        In episode 63, at 42:30, Andrew Weil affirms the spiritual utility of the
        general category of visionary plants (for example, opium), as opposed to
        strictly entheogens only.

        Fasting is mentioned by Weil and KMO as an alternative to visionary plants,
        but this is ironic, since the origin of fasting is to potentiate visionary
        plants.

        Weil points out that it is illogical and biased that fasting is considered
        legit, yet visionary plants are dismissed as “artificial” and “effortful”,
        and thus non-legitimate.

        In episode 63, like The Seeker when interviewed by Max Freakout in
        Psychonautica 15 and 16, Heidi Smith comes in supposedly as a spokesperson
        for the view that drug-free meditation is superior to drug-based spiritual
        practice, and yet starts by pointing out the proven efficacy of visionary
        plants for herself. That’s the extent of the content in this episode: Smith
        states that entheogens were efficacious and awakened her spirituality, and
        provides no arguments yet for the superiority or even equivalence of
        drug-free meditation.

        I point out that we must remember the skewing and filtering effects of drug
        prohibition, which began in 1966 — no debate can be legit without
        discussing this censorship and filtering effect of which spokespeople we are
        permitted to hear from. We are only permitted to hear certain people, and
        certain positions and arguments; other people and positions/arguments are
        filtered out, forming a distribution curve of views that is heavily warped
        away from the distribution curve of views in actuality, actually held by
        people in the world.

        Compare the infrequency of anti-war views, politically progressive views, or
        views for repealing drug prohibition, that are permitted to be expressed in
        the corporate-owned news media. Drug-free meditation is over-represented in
        the Establishment publishing industry, since 1966, and drug-employing
        spirituality is extremely under-represented. Psychoactive drugs are not
        only illegal (for the most part), they are culturally taboo, marginalized,
        and suppressed — even at the same time as they are ubiquitous, popular, and
        mainstream.

        Given that psychoactive drugs are both illegal and taboo, it is guaranteed
        that the Establishment media and publishing industry puts forth a heavily
        biased and skewed presentation of views about the legitimacy of
        drug-utilizing versus drug-free spirituality practices. I’m waiting, ever
        in vain, for any other people to acknowledge this major, relevant
        consideration.

        In episode 63, at 47:40, KMO reads from Parker Palmer’s book The Active
        Life: “Our tendency to identify our selves with our acquired skills rather
        than our natural gifts is one of the less desirable habits of the ego,
        because the ego’s identity is so heavily invested in these acquired skills,
        it does not want to acknowledge the natural, untrained, effortless gifts
        over which the ego has no ownership or control.” I hold that “a free,
        natural, untrained, effortless, salvific gift” is a description that fits
        entheogens better than drug-free meditation, and this seems to be KMO’s
        point as well.

        I consider meditation and fasting to have been historically derived as
        activities associated with visionary plants, not an alternative that
        competes against the use of visionary plants. The purpose of fasting,
        historically, was to potentiate visionary plants. The purpose of
        meditation, historically, was an activity to do during the plant-induced
        visionary cognitive state.
        Group: egodeath Message: 5065 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
        Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
        Attachments :
          Group: egodeath Message: 5066 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
          Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
          Attachments :
            The diminishment of the legitimacy and efficacy of entheogens by meditation
            advocates is primarily a phenomenon existing in the realm of published
            works, such as books and articles in spirituality magazines. The debate is
            not primarily about what people actually think, or what they express in
            open, (relatively) uncensored online forums. The debate cannot really occur
            until we reference specific statements in published works, amounting to a
            gallery of position statements and particular published arguments. It is
            thus mainly a *scholarly* argument or debate, that must occur in the form of
            scholarly citations and rebuttals — citing works that were permitted to be
            published by the Establishment publishing industry, especially since the
            prohibition and demonization of LSD in 1966.

            The entheogen-diminishing view is often expressed in postings in online
            forums, but is primarily spread and legitimated through published works.

            Examples:

            R. C. Zaehner’s 1957 book: Mysticism Sacred and Profane: An Inquiry into
            Some Varieties of Preternatural Experience
            http://csp.org/chrestomathy/mysticism_sacred.html


            R. C. Zaehner’s 1972 book: Zen, Drugs and Mysticism
            http://csp.org/chrestomathy/zen_drugs.html


            Gnosis issue about Psychedelics & The Path
            http://www.lumen.org/issue_contents/contents26.html

            Tricycle issue 21 Fall 1996 about Psychedelics and Buddhism, which became
            the book Zig Zag Zen. “Tricycle’s controversial bestseller on Psychedelics
            and Buddhism: Views from John Perry Barlow and Rick Fields; interviews with
            Terrence McKenna and Jack Kornfield; a roundtable discussion with Robert
            Aitken, Richard Baker, Ram Dass & Joan Halifax.”
            http://www.tricycle.com/catalog/backissues/163-1.html
            Group: egodeath Message: 5067 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
            Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
            Attachments :
              A paradigm inversion needs to occur now within Western and Eastern religion,
              like the change from Eliade’s 1950 entheogen-disparaging view of shamanism,
              to today’s entheogen-affirming view of shamanism.
              Group: egodeath Message: 5069 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/11/2007
              Subject: Re: Meditation and entheogens
              In episode 63, at 43:25, Weil states: “There are many people who claim
              to have found God and spiritual life through alcohol; that’s a very old
              tradition going back to ancient cultures, and it persists to this day in
              occasional people.”

              That’s been proven to be a fallacy and an anachronism, labeling the
              substance in question as “alcohol”. Ancients used “beer”, “wine”, and
              “mixed wine”, which typically, and provably, meant “visionary plant
              mixture”, including henbane, opium, cannabis, mushrooms, datura, and
              mandrake — the effects were not due only to alcohol. For example, see
              the “index” entries (page numbers) I have posted here in the book Road
              to Eleusis.
              Group: egodeath Message: 5070 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Dogmatic denominational doctrine: Egodeath stronger than Emergent
              The Emergent church is worried and harrassed about theological
              correctness, but they cannot be coherent, while hanging onto the
              demythologized historical Jesus, and while lacking visionary plants as
              the Eucharastic flesh and blood of Christ, freely given by God.

              Theological correctness is a piece of cake for the Egodeath dogmatic
              denomination. Emergent liberal demythologized thinking cannot explain
              how Jesus, a human being, gives his flesh and blood for our salvation
              and regeneration, and how Jesus is God.

              It is easy to define the 12 1/2 dogmatic doctrinal points that certified
              members of the Egodeath church must sign their souls to:

              Jesus is God; the allegorical Jesus figure is to be equated with the
              mysterious hidden controller of all thoughts, events, and actions — the
              master-controller aspect of the Ground of Being.

              Members must trip on the entheogenic Eucharist, which is the flesh and
              blood of Christ.

              The Jesus mystic poseable superhero figure must be held as having a
              virgin birth, to compete against Caesar Augustus.

              Only the predestined, chosen-by-God Elect are saved. Those chosen by
              God for perdition are such. Double predestination.

              Determinism is the case throughout the entire world.
              Determinism-transcendence is the case outside the cosmos.

              Eternal life (athanatos), the dogmas of the Gospel of John, all are the
              case, as the Valentinian Gnostic Christians readily affirmed. Jesus is
              the only name by which we are saved — not Caesar, “the savior of the
              entire world”.

              Christ came in the likeness of sinful, phallic flesh.

              Entheogenic enlightenment casts out demons, by the power outside one’s
              personal power.

              The Jesus Christ figure and the power of the Holy Spirit is confessed as
              my transpersonal savior.


              The Emergent church clings to the mundane historical Jesus and is
              therefore incapable of coherent theology and theological affirmation.
              And without visionary plants, no real explanation is possible for how
              exactly the Holy Spirit ever descends. The Emergent church is
              half-baked, until historicity is abandoned and visionary plants are
              added. Emergent writers attempt to grapple with Theology while
              rejecting the modern-era literalist-supernaturalism and embracing
              demythologized liberal mundane ways of thinking — it’s a hopeless and
              pathetic project.
              Group: egodeath Message: 5071 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Re: Dogmatic denominational doctrine: Egodeath stronger than Emergen
              It would be profitable and efficient to upload to the Egodeath site an
              Egodeath-theory based commentary on the following Emergent statement,
              affirming it in a modified, specific way:

              http://www.stevekmccoy.com/GospelCoalition.pdf


              The principles of New Testament Christianity are timeless
              (altered-state enlightenment leveraged for counter-imperial
              social-political emancipation), but the form and figurations used in
              the New Testament are too dated; the New Testament was optimized and
              designed to go up against a specific foe, a particular scenario: the
              Caesar-ruled Roman Empire. Away from that meaning-context, inevitably
              the New Testament necessarily becomes *much* less meaningful and
              clear; it becomes more confusing than helpful or encouraging.
              Group: egodeath Message: 5072 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Re: Progressive Christianity, Emergent Paradigm, ahistoricity, enthe
              Characterizing the head-to-head competing paradigms of Evangelical vs.
              Emergent Christianity:

              Evangelical vs. Emergent

              Conservative vs. Liberal or Progressive

              Exclusivism (who’s saved, who’s in, who’s out/lost) vs. inclusiveness
              (McLaren’s “generous orthodoxy”, as an oxymoron)

              Individual salvation vs. combining that with more emphasis on the social
              gospel of manifesting the Kingdom of God

              Modern vs. Postmodern or Post-Modern or “new/ancient” figurative mode of
              thinking & metaphor-systems

              Literalist-supernaturalist vs. metaphor & mystic alternative state of
              consciousness

              Epistemological obsession with “right belief” vs. experiential and a
              social project and metaphor/allegory

              Afterlife-focused vs. Kingdom of God social-political movement that
              includes spiritual experiencing (doesn’t affirm or emphasize the
              afterlife — going to heaven after you die)

              Atonement theology (vicarious sacrifice, focus on sin and forgiveness)
              vs. the cross as an ego-death model each person must follow, and as a
              symbol of inverting the values of Empire (specifically of Caesar-ruled
              Roman Imperial system, with its honor-shame hierarchy and
              social-political configuration)


              I reject Evangelical Christianity’s mode of thinking and I affirm
              Emergent Christianity’s mode of thinking, except that I subtract the
              Historical Jesus, add visionary plants as the Eucharist, and emphasize
              experiencing helpless embeddedness in spacetime (heimarmene, fatedness)
              and then feeling transcendent/miraculus release from that altered-state
              entrapment-experience.


              There is an opportunity to stand up against today’s Empire particularly
              against drug prohibition and its death penalty (the ultimate solution to
              “the drug problem”). Though drug use was not objectionable in the Roman
              Empire; making social-political counter-claims against Caesar’s system
              was objectionable.
              Group: egodeath Message: 5073 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: McLaren on cross, vicarious atonement, penal substitution

              I favor Marcus Borg a little over Brian McLaren because Borg is slightly closer to grasping the importance of ingesting the Eucharist to trigger the descent of the Holy Spirit to effect salvific regeneration — and integrating that with the alternative-kingdom project.

              I like the idea of a cluster of themes rather than singleminded insistence upon any one particular doctrine; for example, in the altered state, powerlessness often manifests as perceiving fatedness or determinism, but the point of Egodeath theory is not to insist on the dogmatic doctrine of determinism, but rather, to explain such kinds of cognitive phenomena and experiential insights.

              The Evangelical vs. Emergent debates, when combined with the Egodeath theory, provides good reason and perspective to go back and read the books of the New Testament in order to form one’s own judgment about what are actually the main concerns of the New Testament; what is actually the main emphasis of the gospel/good news concerning Jesus?


              From http://archives.wittenburgdoor.com/archives/mclaren.html

              WITTENBURG DOOR: First off, how would you respond to those who say that you’re a proponent of a theology that has abandoned the cross?

              BRIAN MCLAREN: I can’t imagine why anyone would say I have abandoned the cross! … this kind of thing would be coming from people who claim that the gospel can be reduced to one theory of atonement. I have consistently affirmed that there are a whole range of classical theories of atonement, and have resisted pressures to reduce the mysterious and majestic power of the cross to a flat, one-dimensional explanation. I have also sought to explore the biblical understanding of the cross in its social dimensions and what it says about reconciliation both with God and among humanity, including those who criticize, persecute or posture themselves as enemies. On a practical and personal level, my understanding of the cross is teaching me to listen, to critique humbly, to learn all I can from it, and to trust in God’s power to bring resurrection from my own failures and weaknesses.

              … far from abandoning the cross, I want to experience what Paul spoke of when he said he was crucified with Christ and yet lived. Like many of our best contemporary theologians and missiologists, I see the cross as having many dimensions, not just one. I’m not for limiting our understanding of the cross and the gospel to forensic categories. Obviously, the New Testament writers employ legal metaphors to describe the work of Christ, but they use many other metaphors, too—disease metaphors, kingdom metaphors, and so on. I think a fair reading of my works will show that I’m simply trying to affirm a multi-dimensional gospel, not a flattened one.

              Group: egodeath Message: 5074 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

              The Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical, and post-post-Catholic.

              The fatal error of Calvinism and Reformed Theology is that it is too oriented around fighting directly against the Catholic religion.  Once early Christianity succeeded in fighting against Caesar’s Roman Empire system, and became the religion *of* the state rather than the religion *counter to* the state, Christianity was de-politicized and turned into a religion of personal individual salvation and putting all emphasis on going to heaven after you die.  Going to heaven after you die is only one of many themes that the New Testament is actually concerned about and driven by.  The NT takes up that idea and theme, but is not driven by it as the central concern.

              Protestantism was merely a mirror of Catholic religion, mirroring the error of re-casting the NT as being all about how to go to heaven after you die.

              The NT is designed and shaped to be against Caesar’s Roman Empire.

              Protestantism, including Reformed Theology, is designed and shaped to be against the Roman Catholic scheme of how to go to heaven after you die.  The Protestant paradigm fights against the straw man of “Jewish salvation through works”.  But the NT is barely, and not really, concerned with fighting against “Jewish salvation through works” — the NT is concerned more with how to justify including everyone into the Jewish covenant of justice against worldly empires.

              The Emergent paradigm is against the Protestant error of repeating the Catholic error of re-casting the NT as centering on how to go to heaven after you die.  The Emergent paradigm is paying full adequate attention to how the NT was against Caesar’s system.  In a sense, Emergent is counter to Evangelicalism, but in a sense, Emergent has returned to the roots of NT meaning, becoming a counter to “Caesar’s domination-system of empire” in a general sense or general type of social-political system.

              After the Catholic religion as a way for individuals to go to heaven after they die, was the Protestant (post-Catholic) religion as a way for individuals to go to heaven after they die.  Emergent is post-Protestant, and Protestantism is post-Catholic, thus Emergent is post-post-Catholic.

              Emergent is post-Modern in that it does not repeat the modern-era Protestantism error of centering around epistemology — cognitive assent to belief in doctrine correctness.

               

              Group: egodeath Message: 5075 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
              I affirm, advocate, and defend the Emergent paradigm against Evangelicalism, but emphasize spiritual regeneration in service of a counter- or anti-empire project.  I also emphasize subtracting the historical Jesus way of thinking, add emphasize visionary plants as the only authentic and legitimate New Testament Eucharist.  A Eucharist that is not visionary plants is phony, inauthentic, and illegitimate; Christians who haven’t used visionary plants as the Eucharist have never actually taken the Eucharist or Lord’s Supper, and have never actually experienced the Holy Spirit in the New Testament way.
               
              Evangelicalism isn’t even Christianity, except in a generously broad sense.  I don’t give Evangelicals the compliment of referring to them as “Christians”.  Evangelicals don’t even refer to themselves as “Christians”, but rather, as “Evangelicals”.  Many Christians loathe all that Evangelicals and Evangelicalism have become, and are thus committed to developing the Emergent paradigm against the non-biblical Evangelical all-emphasis on individual salvation, sin and forgiveness, and going to heaven after you die.
               
              Catholicism, Protestantism, and Evangelicalism all are unbiblical and misrepresent the NT, distorting its emphases, depoliticizing the NT and placing a single, central focus on how to individually get into heaven after you die.
               
              Emergent is counter to Evangelicalism, without making the mistake of being merely a mirror of Evangelicalism. 
               
              Protestantism is shaped to fight the Pope.  But the NT is not shaped to fight the Pope; it is shaped to fight Caesar.
               
              Protestantism was not really *post*-Catholic; it was more like an *alternative version* of the later Catholic religion, in that it retained the unbiblical central focus on how to individually get into heaven after you die.  Emergent is *truly* post-Catholic, and *truly* returns to the actual concerns and themes of the Bible.  Protestantism only returned to the Bible selectively, in such a way as to combat the Catholic means of going to heaven.
               
              How does a view define itself?  Particularly, what view is it against?  Emergent is primarily shaped to be against empire.  Emergent is only incidentally shaped to be against Evangelicalism or Protestantism.
               
              The political rulers in northern Europe supported Protestantism because it was politically anti-Pope.  But these rulers sought to officially depoliticize Christianity and the NT, to retain their political power.
               
              Group: egodeath Message: 5076 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
              Subject: Re: Popularity of Egodeath site
              Attachments :
                Uploading my posts since Feb. 14, 2004 as webpages will double the
                popularity of the Egodeath site.
                Group: egodeath Message: 5077 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/11/2007
                Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

                This thread constitutes a breakthrough of mine, based on a strong feeling of breakthrough that I have, even though I’ve been developing these ideas for awhile.  I suddenly “got” the way in which Emergent is right and Evangelical is wrong.  I have vanquished Evangelicalism.  Emergent is a nice, intellectually beautiful and efficient package well-suited for wrapping up the “New Testament as counter-Roman-Imperial social-political system” ideas I’ve been reading about and putting together from Horsley, Crossan, Wright, Borg, Howard-Brook, and Warren Carter.  And Emergent has the room that the Egodeath theory requires for the spiritual-transformation aspect which is omitted by Horsley, Stark, and Crossan.

                Emergent + entheogens + no Historical Jesus = the true original meaning of New Testament Christianity
                where Emergent = social gospel, liberation theology, Context Group, Wright, McLaren, Borg, Crossan, Horsley, Carter, but also includes (against the Evangelical detractors) some spiritual transformation.  That is, the better of these authors do include and make room for the spiritual-transformation half of the New Testament strategy.

                Evangelicalism is outraged that Emergent doesn’t make “individual personal salvation as going to heaven after you die” the central, sole, narrow, be-all and end-all purpose and central focal point of the Gospel, but instead takes a broader and more inclusive view of Bible themes and concerns.  The Jesus figure did not come announcing the gospel as 5-point Calvinism, but rather, as the kingdom of God against the empire of Caesar, entered into via communal altered-state transformative experiencing via ingesting the psychoactive Eucharist and interpreting that ASC experience per the New Testament rather than per Roman Ruler Cult (the Imperial Mysteries (described in Pleket’s article)). 

                Evangelicalism has recently been reduced to a defensive stance, and is taking the futile approach of retreating into asserting the same old theology all that much harder, about individual salvation and going to heaven after you die, which Emergent has proven is an unbiblical and grossly incomplete *emphasis*, a reductionist narrowing of the gospel based on ignoring the Roman Empire meaning-context against which the NT was shaped and designed as a rebuttal to.

                The New Testament is about spiritual transformation leveraged in service of an anti-empire project.

                Group: egodeath Message: 5078 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
                Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

                Evangelicals optimistically say “Emergent is not entirely wrong, they do have some legitimate criticisms we must listen to.  We need to be sure to include the social gospel a little, and quit leaving it entirely out.” 

                However, there is no hope for Evangelicalism, no saving it; Evangelicalism is doomed, because it has defined itself, quite unbiblically, purely in terms of individual salvation and how to get into heaven after you die, by definition.  By the time Evangelicalism cleans up its act and corrects it errors, it will necessarily have profoundly shifted its focal point — it will have become something the opposite of Evangelicalism, and there is a name for that something already: Emergent, or New Testament Christianity. 

                Evangelicalism has made its bed, and now must lie in it.  Individual Evangelicals will be increasingly converted to Emergent, which is to say, Evangelicals will be converted away from their modern-era, recently invented religion, to the religion of New Testament Christianity.  This is an opportunity for Emergent students of New Testament Christianity to proselytize the Evangelicals, with a mixture of aggressive retaliatory glee and mutual chastisement.  New Testament Christianity is not designed or optimized to apply to today’s needed anti-imperialism, but such an understanding and project seems inevitable due to the cultural entrenchment of Christianity anyway — or what has previously gone by the name of “Christianity”.

                Emergent authors (by which I include aspects of non-spiritual, political authors such as Horsley) have pointed out the clear focal point of the New Testament and have come out looking far more straightforward, simple, and plausible, compared to the arbitrarily narrow hyper-emphasis on a couple themes plucked out from the overall Bible story.  The Emergent argument is powerful and compelling, and the Evangelical culture has earned hatred and loathing for itself.  The Evangelical or Protestant reading of the New Testament doesn’t hold up for a moment, compared to the vastly and entirely more successful reading that Emergent provides. 

                The Evangelical temple is doomed to fall soon.  Hyper-narrow isolated proof-text based schemes of Calvinistic individual-salvation doctrine are inherently impotent and baseless, compared to the holistic, broader reading that Emergent provides.  The trouncing of Evangelicalism by Emergent is practically a done deal, because Emergent so much better fits the New Testament — the only thing to work on is improving the Emergent view, not on the futile project of trying to redeem Evangelicalism, which is fundamentally and inherently a bad, baseless, biblically illiterate paradigm. 

                The Emergent view needs to strengthen its awareness of ingesting the psychoactive Eucharist to bring the Holy Spirit for mental reconfiguration, or spiritual salvation, and needs to let go of the complicating confusion of the historical Jesus assumption.

                To say that there was no historical Jesus is shorthand; actually, more specifically, the no-historical-Jesus assertion means that Christian origins needed no, and used no, single historical individual as the causal origin and impetus that created and initiated the Christian movement.  It is not clarifying to assert that there was no historical Jesus.  It’s merely a shorthand.  In practice, the shorthand and the long clarifying form are both needed, and will probably propagate together. 

                As long as Emergent retains the historical Jesus assumption, puzzles and difficulties and complexities will remain.  Already the Emergent social gospel reading is so coherent and so complete of an explanation of Christian origins, Jesus is left with no real role.  The role of Jesus must be recognized as an orienting figure and a counter-Caesar figure and a model that’s a symbol of anti-imperial commitment, with the cross also serving as an altered-state metaphor for the experience of powerlessness of oneself in spacetime.  A no-Jesus reading or reconstruction, as an explanation of the origins of New Testament Christianity, has great explanatory advantages over a reading that strives to maintain and include a historical Jesus.

                Group: egodeath Message: 5079 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
                Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

                To read about the Emergent paradigm, currently, the Web has little content that is worth reading.  The Web content is outdated: it conflates Emerging churches (which is a 1990s idea and often means nothing but a youth-worship style) with Emergent.  The Web content heavily misrepresents Emergent, and misunderstands it.  I started by reading the books about a political reading of the New Testament, and what I read now on the Web about Emergent provides a description of emphases that doesn’t at all match what I read by the Emergent authors or Social Gospel authors themselves, in their own books.

                The current lagging situation on the Web reminds me of the futility of trying to do religious research using the early Web back in 1997.  On the subject of Emergent, for substantial and reliable content, the Web is lagging about 5 years behind the recent books such as those listed in my “Christianity as counter-Caesar” Amazon book lists.  And that is a critical 5-year period, because only the recent few books by these authors have really locked onto the political aspects of New Testament Christianity, such as Wright’s recent leveraging of Horsley’s work.

                The Web is stuck 5 years back, and tends to clumsily conflate Emergent interpretation of the New Testament with an abstruse Postmodern philosophy rejection of truth.  That epistemology emphasis and characterization has practically zero match with Emergent thinking as it has been presented by the Emergent authors themselves in their recent books — it’s irrelevant, and reflects the 1990s books about the Church in Postmodernity.  Critics of Emergent need to read more of the books that don’t label themselves as Emergent, and read less of the vapid and roundabout comments of bloggers. 

                The poor quality of blogging is largely to blame: there are many blog posts, with little substance.  I could list a few webpages, but overall the Web situation currently *pales* compared to the recent books which I have read and listed.  If you want to grok Emergent thinking, there’s no contest: the books on the political aspects of New Testament Christianity blow away the scattered, diffused, confused resources that are currently on the Web. 

                The current weblogs and webpages are soft in the brain compared to the books and my book-centric posts.  My own posts are far more to-the-point about the core ideas in Emergent; that is, based on the books I’ve read, I can write far more clarifying posts and webpages explaining the content and substance of the Emergent paradigm.  The Web now just has a lot of noise, not substance: false hits, links to links, outdated conflations, and peripheral comments.

                My posts are book-centric and book-based.  As much as I trumpet the wonders of Web-based scholarship, I’m here reminded that I’m just as much a book-based scholar, for good reasons of substance, polish, and efficiency.

                I consider two books to be definitive of the Emergent paradigm, because they cover both the spiritual gospel and the social gospel.  McLaren’s Secret Message of Jesus, and Marcus Borg’s Heart of Christianity.  N.T. Wright’s recent books also combine these.  However, these books should be supplemented with recent, more purely social-politically minded books by J. D. Crossan, Richard Horsley, Wes Howard-Brook, Warren Carter, and Walter Rauschenbusch’s 1907 book.

                Bk list (1 of 3 related):
                Christian ‘Kingdom’ claims as counter-claims to Roman Empire
                http://www.amazon.com/lm/R38V3OTJUHIMW5


                It is probably necessary to repeat myself, my emphasis, in every posting about Emergent or the political aspect of the NT:

                The New Testament was the use of entheogen-induced altered-state experiencing of personal powerlessness and God’s sovereignty, leveraged in service of an anti-empire social-political movement.  Reconstructing NT origins and accounting for the religious theology is much easier by abandoning the assumption of a single historical individual Jesus who was the necessary inventor and creator of the Christian movement, abandoning the assumption that there was a single isolated kernal of the eventual Christ figure. 

                Adding entheogens and subtracting the historical Jesus enables straightforwardly and satisfyingly accounting for all the religious and theological aspects of NT origins.  Any adequate account of New Testament meaning must have 3 parts: a spiritual-gospel account, a social-gospel account, and the relationship between the two.

                Group: egodeath Message: 5080 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
                Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

                Catholicism, Protestantism, and Evangelicalism share in common the same
                fatal, fundamental flaw: they all hold that the gospel in the New Testament is about individual spiritual salvation and how to get into heaven after you die.  Actually, the gospel in the New Testament is about communal altered-state experiencing of God’s sovereignty, to bring about a better social-political configuration.

                The themes in the New Testament that may appear to be about
                individual spiritual salvation and how to get into heaven after you die, are minor, mystical, and metaphorical, and are not the central focal point of the gospel.

                Group: egodeath Message: 5081 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/11/2007
                Subject: Re: Website: Urban Shaman

                The new website is now operational.
                http://www.urbanshaman.net

                Group: egodeath Message: 5082 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/11/2007
                Subject: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahistori
                Attachments :
                  Emerging church practices complain against dullness. There is a solution.
                  I will prepare a podcast discussing:

                  The tepid “Emerging church” vs. the radical “Emergent church”.

                  Psychotomimetic drugs (that is, hallucinatory drugs).

                  No historical Paul, and, less interestingly, no historical Jesus.

                  What kind of writings are the New Testament books? How to read the New
                  Testament.

                  References to LSD, psychedelia, and Tim Leary found in emerging church
                  podcasts and weblogs.

                  How Allegro was right, and how he was wrong, and why we must move through
                  him, and cannot move around him.

                  The primary origin and context of New Testament Christianity was the Roman
                  Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, not Jerusalem in the 1st century.

                  The evidence that proves that all religion was based on psychedelic drugs
                  throughout the Roman Empire, including the Christian Eucharist during the
                  first several centuries and beyond.

                  Integrating Emergent, the psychoactive entheogenic Eucharist, and the
                  ahistoricity of Jesus and all the apostles.

                  What it’s like to experience helpless frozenness in spacetime (often as
                  Fatedness or predestination) and perceiving the all-sovereignty of God over
                  all of one’s thoughts and actions. How this was expressed in the New
                  Testament as “crucifixion and resurrection through the Eucharist and Holy
                  Spirit”.

                  Explanation of mystery-religion, including Imperial Cult and Christian
                  house-church agape meals.

                  Why theology cannot make any sense until the entheogen-and-ahistoricity
                  reading of the New Testament.

                  Why entheogen religion must go through Christian theology and take over
                  Christianity to return it to the New Testament meaning.

                  Which is more profound and paradigm-shattering: exposing Eastern religion as
                  totally corrupt and bunk, or exposing Western religion as totally corrupt
                  and bunk.

                  Why Christianity, rightly understood per the original New Testament
                  Christianity, is fundamentally crippled outside its native Roman Empire
                  context.


                  I will probably blast-through these topics pointing out the top 3 points in
                  each topic, and I vow not to edit it — because recording a Podcast only
                  takes 1 hour, while editing it takes some 4 hours.

                  Dullness is not a problem in the Egodeath theory — because dullness is
                  never a problem in psychedelic drug experiencing, which is and was the only
                  authentic Eucharist. Christianity, or what passed for it during the modern
                  era, was dull only because the authentic, psychedelic Eucharist was omitted.

                  I am available for podcast interviews, having done 22 years of research and
                  development of the Egodeath altered-state explanatory framework. I will be
                  as outspoken as possible.

                  — Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
                  http://www.egodeath.com/
                  Weblog: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/
                  Group: egodeath Message: 5083 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/12/2007
                  Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
                  The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
                  covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
                  including:

                  o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
                  and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
                  holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

                  o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
                  ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
                  self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
                  and self-government.

                  o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
                  transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

                  o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
                  metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
                  and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
                  Acid Rock mysticism.

                  o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
                  psychosis and schizophrenia.


                  — Michael Hoffman
                  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
                  http://www.egodeath.com
                  Group: egodeath Message: 5085 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                  Subject: Re: Views on NT Xy: Redactors, Evangelicals, Emergent, Freke, Horsle
                  Attachments :
                    What’s most missing in this comparative matrix is Mainline Liberal
                    denominations. McLaren strives to distance himself from that, but his
                    critics simply label him as “very liberal and left”, which would equate him
                    with the Liberal Mainline that he strives to criticize along with the
                    Evangelical Right. Emergent (McLaren) is only slightly different than the
                    Liberal Mainline, and it’s no surprise that critics simply equate and
                    conflate the two positions, which largely overlap.
                    Group: egodeath Message: 5084 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/12/2007
                    Subject: Re: Podcast: Psychonautica: Max Freakout on Egodeath theory
                    Attachments :
                      http://dopecast.libsyn.com/index.php?post_category=Psychonautica

                      #21 —

                      Live from the Dolphins coffeeshop in Amsterdam

                      3-way conversation between Max Freakout, The Seeker and Ravi

                      LSD trip report from Dopey J

                      ‘Crisis’ experiences

                      The new Blair Witch spinoff movie ‘Shroom’

                      LSD doses, psychedelic and psycholytic psychotherapy

                      Safety issues of tripping in public environments

                      The role of music as a tool in combination with psychedelics

                      Neurolinguistic programming, and other techniqes for overcoming addictions

                      The relevance of addiction to problems of self-control and egodeath theory

                      Isolation/floatation tanks and their potential for combination with
                      psychedelics, ketamine, dissociation, sensory deprivation and the
                      womb-regression experience

                      The idea of a paradigm shift

                      The authenticity of taking entheogens in contrast with other spiritual
                      practices

                      Evolutionary advantages to plants which contain psychoactive chemicals


                      http://www.c-realm.com/podcasts.php
                      C-Realm episode 65 and 66 features Martin Ball, author of books about
                      entheogen phenomenology
                      Group: egodeath Message: 5086 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                      Subject: Evidential data for theories is structured, not unstructured
                      Attachments :
                        Someone wrote:
                        >>About visualizing highly structured data: philosophers of science are
                        behind the times when it comes to how evidence relates to theory. The Old
                        Way of viewing evidence was atomistic and unstructured. Once you start
                        thinking of evidence/data as inherently structured (at least in the context
                        in which it’s usable), then you can have more interesting things to say
                        about buzz-word concepts like innovation and creativity. This suggest a
                        more Kantian approach to evidence and theory.


                        I’ve written often about this. Early Christianity did not involve a single
                        historical Jesus, and did involve visionary plants, as did the entire Roman
                        Empire. People ask for “evidence” for this view, particularly for
                        “evidence” that early Christianity involved visionary plants.

                        But what happens is that people hold the predominant paradigmatic
                        interpretive assumption-framework in mind while they purport to look at the
                        “evidence”; they view the evidence, or what is potentially evidence, through
                        a default, unexamined assumption-framework, which of course is designed to
                        not perceive that evidence as significant evidence.

                        Therefore I’ve come to realize that what is required is
                        evidence-with-interpretation, including, as well, entire alternative
                        scenarios and explanations. So what actually enables a paradigm shift, or a
                        change of explanatory models, amounts to
                        evidence-with-explanation-with-framework-with-scenario — not isolated bits
                        of evidential data. All the time I see people pick up the bits of data but
                        then proceed to consider them within an explanatory framework that is not at
                        all the framework that is required to perceive that data as significant,
                        change-compelling data.

                        This approach also helps for examining data for determining whether Jesus
                        existed or not. The only way the case can be made for ahistoricity is to
                        define an entire scenario and fully unpack what specifically it means for
                        “that historical person to not have existed”, and do that in conjunction
                        with picking up and examining pieces of evidential data, as explicitly and
                        particularly *structured* data: does the evidential data fit better into the
                        currently predominant explanatory model, or into the new model, as a more
                        readily clarifying interpretive lens? Data is not something separate from
                        explanatory system-organization, in practice, for theory-construction and in
                        competition between theories.

                        All data is theory-bound; data is always theory-bound, either by the
                        predominant theory or by a competing, alternative, challenger theory. The
                        whole challenge for the alternative proponent is to prevent the defenders of
                        the predominant paradigm from pulling the old false move of covertly
                        filtering the data through the old predominant paradigm, and to force people
                        to actually look at the data through the new explanatory paradigm *rather
                        than* through the old explanatory assumption-framework. A classic bogus
                        move is to drawing all attention to isolated bits of data sheerly for the
                        purpose of drawing attention away from the sneaky, covert use of the old
                        paradigm-lens.

                        The same holistic data-within-framework view is required for explaining what
                        really happened, and didn’t happen, on 9/11 — challenging the official
                        explanation heavily involves truly alternative “why”, motives, and scenario
                        issues, which are data *structure* questions, *not* merely isolated,
                        unstructured bits of evidential data.

                        The best way to protect a false theory and bunk historical explanation is to
                        only permit examining isolated bits of evidential data, while always
                        evaluating those isolated bits of explanatory evidence through the currently
                        predominant official story, lens, or explanatory assumption-framework.

                        The language of “structured data” could be useful, as against the bad habit
                        of treating data as though it were inherently unstructured (while of course
                        applying a covert, unconscious, unacknowledged predominant default
                        structuring-system to view that data).

                        I give highest recommendations to this book:

                        Paul Thagard, Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University, 1992.
                        http://www.amazon.com/dp/0691024901/ — Conceptual Revolutions uses
                        easy-to-follow computer-based models to demonstrate the cognitive mechanisms
                        of the process of what seems most occult and irrational in Kuhn’s model of
                        paradigm conversion. Explains complex networks and hierarchies of concepts,
                        mental structures, and conceptual systems, and how conceptual systems
                        develop so that a new conceptual system eventually provides greater
                        explanatory coherence than the previous conceptual system. Covers conceptual
                        hierarchy transformation and how concepts are recombined, added into, and
                        deleted from large-scale conceptual systems. Brings Kuhn’s theory to
                        completion, resulting in a fully powerful way of thinking about conceptual
                        revolution in any domain, thus intellectual conversion in general.
                        Group: egodeath Message: 5087 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                        Subject: Re: Views on NT Xy: Redactors, Evangelicals, Emergent, Freke, Horsle
                        Attachments :
                          There are 3 main positions, relevant for discussion with conventional
                          Christians: they want to know whether the Egodeath theory matches
                          Conservative Christianity, or whether it matches Liberal Christianity. The
                          Egodeath theory is a 3rd basic position, which combines High Christology
                          with altered-state metaphor.

                          o Conservative Christianity has a High Christology but one that is based in
                          the ordinary state, resulting in literalist-supernaturalism. Conservative
                          Christianity takes it for granted that “the gospel” is all about how to get
                          into heaven after you die.

                          o Liberal Mainline has a low Christology and reduces metaphor to the
                          ordinary state. The Liberal Mainline leans toward the Social Gospel instead
                          of how to get into heaven after you die.

                          o The Egodeath theory holds that New Testament Christianity was the use of
                          visionary plants to have a communal altered-state experience of personal
                          powerlessness and God’s transcendent power, leveraged in service of setting
                          up a social-political system that was *specifically* an alternative to the
                          Roman Imperial social-political system. Combines High Christology with
                          altered-state metaphor. The gospel is not about how to get into heaven
                          after you literally bodily die; it is about bringing Godly justice into the
                          world, and about leveraging the altered state experience of ego death and
                          transcendent experiencing (such as an experience of heaven) toward that
                          objective.


                          The Emergent movement is merely a variant of Liberal Mainline, or an
                          adjustment to Liberal Mainline — with emphasis on open communion,
                          non-denominationalism, church unity, and flexible belief
                          (non-foundationalism, non-doctrinalism, non-confessional; not “religion as
                          confession in doctrinal belief”). Emergent is merely a correction of some
                          of the bad church habits of the Liberal Mainline.


                          > ___________________________
                          Liberal Mainline denominations
                          General characterization summary of the position held by Liberal Mainline
                          denominations, which means older, established, brand-name, systematically
                          self-governed, doctrinal-defined, confessional, U.S. nationwide
                          denominations, such as Episcopal (or Baptist, or Presbyterian) (as opposed
                          to nondenominational, Evangelical, politically rightist, megachurches):
                          demythifying, but reductionist, reducing myth to things from the ordinary
                          state of consciousness.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: spiritual salvation/regeneration
                          through altered-state religious experiencing & metaphor: they inconsistently
                          consider it and give it lip service. They are accustomed to giving it lip
                          service and wordiness, while completely lacking altered-state experience
                          except for a tepid warm feeling and vague emotionalism.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: political counter-imperialism: they
                          pay some attention to it, but not enough, even though they largely advocate
                          the Social Gospel.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: ahistoricity of Jesus, Paul, and the
                          apostles: they ignore it, but are sometimes receptive when this view occurs
                          to them.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: visionary plants in early
                          Christianity: they completely ignore it.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: use of visionary plants throughout
                          Roman Empire culture:
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: literalist-supernaturalism: they
                          downplay it, presenting it half-heartedly. The Evangelical Right critics
                          claim that the Liberal Mainline is afraid to mention Jesus, because “Jesus
                          is the only way to salvation” is oppressive and offensive.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: metaphoricity: they reduce miracles
                          and supernatural into metaphor that is based in the ordinary state of
                          consciousness, when that metaphor was actually from the altered state and
                          from Roman Imperial propaganda.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: Gnosticism: they latch onto it as
                          unoppressively spiritual, but ignore its content in terms of a system of
                          themes.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: Platonism and Ptolemaic astral
                          ascent mysticism: they are oblivious to it.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: Catholic-type mysticism: they ignore
                          it, giving mere lip-service to the Holy Spirit and the regeneration or
                          transformation it brings. They marginalize Pentecostals as sub-Christian.
                          The Liberal Mainline denominations, re: theology: they use doctrinal
                          hair-splitting to break up denominations into ever-smaller groups, going
                          against the unity of the Church that is a dominant theme in the Pauline
                          writings and the Church Fathers. The Kingdom of God is broken up into
                          bickering subgroupings that each condemn and de-legitimate each other,
                          typified by closed communion across doctrinally and theologically
                          hair-splitting distinctions. Theology is more important to them than the
                          Gospels’ theme of the Kingdom of God arriving on Earth.

                          ___________________________
                          Template
                          General characterization summary of the position held by ___:
                          ___, re: spiritual salvation/regeneration through altered-state religious
                          experiencing & metaphor:
                          ___, re: political counter-imperialism:
                          ___, re: ahistoricity of Jesus, Paul, and the apostles:
                          ___, re: visionary plants in early Christianity:
                          ___, re: use of visionary plants throughout Roman Empire culture:
                          ___, re: literalist-supernaturalism:
                          ___, re: metaphoricity:
                          ___, re: Gnosticism:
                          ___, re: Platonism and Ptolemaic astral ascent mysticism:
                          ___, re: Catholic-type mysticism:
                          ___, re: theology:
                          Group: egodeath Message: 5088 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                          Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                          Attachments :
                            Here’s a little bit of a start, of some detailed points, to get the podcast
                            going. Pressed for time, I’m feeling ready to jump in a discuss the
                            remaining topics verbally. I’ve written and spoken about these topics
                            previously, so I’m just refining and customizing some existing coverage of
                            these topics, to present the ideas specifically in the context of “the
                            Emergent conversation”.

                            I will probably duplicate (re-post) these paragraphs in more specialized
                            discussion threads.

                            I’m feeling like typing is slowing me down; my thinking is running ahead. I
                            just hope there won’t be too many silences, since I’m committed to not
                            spending the time to edit-out silences or other junk. Although there will
                            be that “noise” as opposed to signal, I’ve listened to many podcasts, and I
                            know that no one gets to the point more than I do. Too many podcasts have
                            half an hour of worthless junk before getting into the substance of the
                            interview.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > The tepid “Emerging church” vs. the radical “Emergent church”.
                            >
                            Brian McLaren claims that the Emergent movement or “conversation” is against
                            the religious right but is certainly not advocating the religious left.
                            However, as critics point out, it completely appears that McLaren is
                            identically the same as the Christian religious left, the mainline
                            denominations. A challenging exercise is to list the differences between
                            McLaren and mainline 20th Century denominations:

                            McLaren de-emphasizes denominationalism, and calls for unity and open
                            communion across all brands of Christianity including Catholic, Protestant,
                            Pentecostal, Evangelical, and Eastern Orthodox.

                            McLaren emphasizes the Social Gospel even more than mainline does.

                            Emergent disparages Joseph Shelby Spong as merely *modern*-era liberalism.
                            But there’s no clear difference between McLaren or Marcus Borg, and Spong:
                            they uncritically retain the historical Jesus assumption, and read all
                            miracles and High Christology as metaphor that was piled on top of the
                            mundane, non-miraculous historical Jesus. Actually, McLaren is nothing but
                            a fine-tuned version of liberal mainline modern-era Christianity.

                            McLaren downplays “belief” as the center and essence of Christianity,
                            perhaps more and more clearly and consistently than the Liberal Mainline
                            does.

                            The inferior podcasts I’ve heard are those of the merely “emerging church”,
                            including run-of-the-mill, long-winded, low-information-density “edifying
                            sermons” that play out a metaphorical theme. The better podcasts are fully
                            “emergent”, focus more on the Roman Empire as meaning-context for the New
                            Testament, and are more like scholarly summaries. McLaren and Borg almost
                            always get to the damn point immediately, which is the kind of ergonomic
                            efficiency that is needed more.

                            What’s most missing in my comparative matrix is Mainline Liberal
                            denominations, such as Episcopal. (See my thread titled “Views on NT Xy:
                            Redactors, Evangelicals, Emergent, Freke, Horsley, Wright, Pilch,
                            Groenewald, Allegro”.) McLaren strives to distance himself from the Liberal
                            Mainline, but his critics simply label him as “very liberal and left”, which
                            would equate him with the Liberal Mainline that he strives to criticize
                            along with the Evangelical Right. Emergent (McLaren) is only slightly
                            different than the Liberal Mainline, and it’s no surprise that critics
                            simply equate and conflate the two positions, which largely overlap.

                            I’m tired of hearing Emergent presentations that barely touch on the Roman
                            Empire meaning-context. The only way to have any grasp and explanation of
                            New Testament Christianity is to put more than 50% of the focus on the Roman
                            Empire meaning-context. There’s still way too much discussion, in podcasts
                            by Borg and McLaren, of the New Testament themes and applying them in
                            today’s world, with often no discussion at all of the Roman Empire
                            pre-existing meaning-context which New Testament themes were specifically
                            designed to push against.

                            The Emergent movement is more environmentally conscious, by its inherent
                            nature, than other variants of Christianity.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Psychotomimetic drugs (that is, hallucinatory drugs).
                            >
                            Correction: “hallucinogens”.

                            It is forked-tongue evasiveness when Christians talk on and on about how
                            much they want to better know the Holy Spirit, while they censor themselves
                            from any mention of psychedelic drugs, which everyone now knows causes
                            religious experiences. This is a willful, deliberate, conscious cover-up
                            everyone is participating in. It’s a loudly taboo topic that everyone knows
                            they are supposed to avoid.

                            I am considering attending McLaren’s 2008 tour to point out how he is not
                            really post-modern, because he continues to adhere to the assumption of a
                            historical Jesus and he continues to not consider the Eucharist as
                            psychotomimetic plants. Thus Emergent claims to be post-modern, but
                            actually, is merely a continuation of the modern-era predominant
                            paradigmatic assumptions, including the Social Gospel, which was, in a
                            sense, predominant during the 20th Century, given that the Liberal Mainline
                            had an affinity for at least some version of the Social Gospel, just like
                            Emergent.

                            If Emergent actually wants to get back to New Testament Christianity and
                            away from the modern-era paradigm, they must subtract the historical Jesus
                            and add visionary plants as the Eucharist — only then would the early
                            Christians in the Roman Empire recognize Emergent as being the same as them.

                            Dullness is not a problem in the Egodeath theory — because dullness is
                            never a problem in psychedelic drug experiencing, which is and was the only
                            authentic Eucharist. Christianity, or what passed for it during the modern
                            era, was dull only because the authentic, psychedelic Eucharist was omitted.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > No historical Paul, and, less interestingly, no historical Jesus.
                            >
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > What kind of writings are the New Testament books? How to read the New
                            > Testament.
                            >
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > References to LSD, psychedelia, and Tim Leary found in emerging church
                            > podcasts and weblogs.
                            >
                            The Jesus People movement of the early 1970s

                            There’s an active, taboo common knowledge and interest in psychedelics,
                            among Christians, that has been censored and self-censored since LSD was
                            illegalized in 1966.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > How Allegro was right, and how he was wrong, and why we must move through
                            > him, and cannot move around him.
                            >
                            Discuss Allegro’s right and wrong aspects for an Emergent audience. How
                            Allegro fits into Emergent.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > The primary origin and context of New Testament Christianity was the Roman
                            > Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, not Jerusalem in the 1st century.
                            >
                            Emergent needs to always emphasize this, and not leave it out of any
                            discussion. Don’t discuss abstracted “kingdom of god” anti-empire
                            principles in today’s world, without discussing them in some depth in the
                            Roman Empire meaning-context. Ground the discussion, or else it becomes
                            meaningless and we revert to the modern-era mental framework, and lose the
                            meaning of the New Testament.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > The evidence that proves that all religion was based on psychedelic drugs
                            > throughout the Roman Empire, including the Christian Eucharist during the
                            > first several centuries and beyond.
                            >
                            Emergent strives to be “alternative”, but won’t be significantly an
                            alternative without psychedelic drugs.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Integrating Emergent, the psychoactive entheogenic Eucharist, and the
                            > ahistoricity of Jesus and all the apostles.
                            >
                            In discussing what’s so good about Emergent but what’s so limited about
                            Emergent, a good approach is to compare and contrast Conservative
                            Christianity, Liberal Mainline Christianity, the Emergent movement (as
                            merely a corrective variant of Liberal Mainline), and the Egodeath theory.

                            There are 3 main positions, relevant for discussion with conventional
                            Christians: they want to know whether the Egodeath theory matches
                            Conservative Christianity, or whether it matches Liberal Christianity. The
                            Egodeath theory is a 3rd basic position, which combines High Christology
                            with altered-state metaphor.

                            o Conservative Christianity has a High Christology but one that is based in
                            the ordinary state, resulting in literalist-supernaturalism. Conservative
                            Christianity takes it for granted that “the gospel” is all about how to get
                            into heaven after you die.

                            o Liberal Mainline has a low Christology and reduces metaphor to the
                            ordinary state. The Liberal Mainline leans toward the Social Gospel instead
                            of how to get into heaven after you die.

                            o The Egodeath theory holds that New Testament Christianity was the use of
                            visionary plants to have a communal altered-state experience of personal
                            powerlessness and God’s transcendent power, leveraged in service of setting
                            up a social-political system that was *specifically* an alternative to the
                            Roman Imperial social-political system. Combines High Christology with
                            altered-state metaphor. The gospel is not about how to get into heaven
                            after you literally bodily die; it is about bringing Godly justice into the
                            world, and about leveraging the altered state experience of ego death and
                            transcendent experiencing (such as an experience of heaven) toward that
                            objective.

                            The Emergent movement is merely a variant of Liberal Mainline, or an
                            adjustment to Liberal Mainline — with emphasis on open communion,
                            non-denominationalism, church unity, and flexible belief
                            (non-foundationalism, non-doctrinalism, non-confessional; not “religion as
                            confession in doctrinal belief”). Emergent is merely a correction of some
                            of the bad church habits of the Liberal Mainline.

                            Emergent is a corrective on Liberal Mainline (the Social Gospel), which
                            requires further correction. Which type of Christianity is closer to the
                            truth, closer to New Testament Christianity in its original Roman Empire
                            meaning-context, and closer to the Egodeath theory: Conservative
                            Christianity, Liberal Mainline Christianity, or the Emergent movement? All
                            3 are hopelessly confused, because they commit the ordinary-state fallacy,
                            producing different results:

                            o Conservative Christianity commits the ordinary-state fallacy, resulting
                            in literalist-supernaturalism. And it so happens that Conservative
                            Christianity puts *all* emphasis on going to heaven after you die, so that
                            they wholly condemn and avoid the Social Gospel (even Environmentalism,
                            crucially), and ignore the theme of “good news: the kingdom of god has now
                            arrived in the world”, which is the main content and theme of Jesus’
                            teaching.

                            o Liberal Mainline and Emergent Christianity commit the ordinary-state
                            fallacy, losing a high Christology, reducing the anti-Caesar Jesus figure to
                            an ordinary man, and failing to connect at all with the Holy Spirit and its
                            intense altered state which is required in order to perceive the all-power
                            of God over human power. What is the purpose of Christianity: to get into
                            heaven (per Conservative Christianity), to bring justice and ethics to the
                            world (per the Emergent extreme of the social gospel in the Liberal
                            Mainline), or to have a collective intense altered-state experience of
                            heaven and God’s overwhelming power, through ingesting the Eucharist, in
                            service of a counter-imperial social-political configuration (per the
                            Egodeath theory and per the New Testament)? The Holy Spirit, through the
                            Eucharist, applied toward the alternative Kingdom of God: does Conservative
                            Christianity provide that, or does the Liberal Mainline, with Emergent
                            corrections, provide that?


                            Does Conservative Christianity provide a collective intense altered-state
                            experience of heaven and God’s overwhelming power, through ingesting the
                            Eucharist, in service of a counter-imperial social-political configuration?
                            Does Conservative Christianity provide the Holy Spirit, through the
                            Eucharist, applied toward the alternative Kingdom of God?

                            Conservative Christianity does not provide a collective intense
                            altered-state experience of heaven and God’s overwhelming power, through
                            ingesting the Eucharist. It does not provide the Holy Spirit, through the
                            Eucharist.

                            Conservative Christianity does not strive to manifest a counter-imperial
                            social-political configuration. Conservative Christianity does not strive
                            for the alternative Kingdom of God in the world, but strives to do away with
                            the world and wholly replace it, as a project jumbled together with
                            literal-supernaturalist escape from the world into heaven after we die.


                            Does Liberal Mainline Christianity (with Emergent corrections) provide a
                            collective intense altered-state experience of heaven and God’s overwhelming
                            power, through ingesting the Eucharist, in service of a counter-imperial
                            social-political configuration? Does Liberal Mainline Christianity (with
                            Emergent corrections) provide the Holy Spirit, through the Eucharist,
                            applied toward the alternative Kingdom of God?

                            Liberal Mainline Christianity (with Emergent corrections) does not provide a
                            collective intense altered-state experience of heaven and God’s overwhelming
                            power, through ingesting the Eucharist. It does not provide the Holy
                            Spirit, through the Eucharist.

                            Liberal Mainline Christianity strives to be the vehicle through which
                            arrives a counter-imperial social-political configuration. It strives for
                            alternative Kingdom of God, as an ethical and just configuration. This
                            end-goal matches the end-goal of the New Testament, but not the means of the
                            New Testament, and not the along-the-way goal of the New Testament, which
                            was the intermediate objective of spiritual regeneration — a general kind
                            of objective that was held in common by the mystery-cults of antiquity, and
                            by the general religious use of visionary plants throughout antiquity.


                            In conclusion, by the measure of the NT, held as an intermediate objective
                            in service of a subsequent objective, Conservative Christianity is further
                            from the NT than the Liberal Mainline is.

                            Conservative Christianity matches or achieves neither the altered-state
                            transformation objective of the NT, nor the “just kingdom of God arrived in
                            the world” objective. Conservative Christianity squanders and dissipates
                            itself on a confused literalist-supernaturalist misfiring and gross
                            distortion of both objectives; Conservative Christianity has something
                            *like* each of the two objectives of the NT, but ends up with merely a
                            degenerate version of both these objectives. Conservative Christianity has
                            a degenerate rough equivalient of altered-state transformation through the
                            Holy Spirit. Conservative Christianity has a degenerate rough equivalient
                            of striving to manifest the arrived, just Kingdom of God.

                            Liberal Mainline Christianity (with Emergent corrections) sometimes gives
                            lip service to the Holy Spirit and “contemplative practices”, but doesn’t
                            actually deliver the intense communal altered-state experience of the Holy
                            Spirit, showing personal powerlessness and God’s all-power, or a vision of
                            God’s throne and kingship in heaven. Liberal Mainline Christianity *is*
                            faithful to the NT’s subsequent objective of striving to be the vehicle
                            through which the just Kingdom of God, as a social-political configuration
                            that’s an alternative to Empire, arrives in the world. That objective is
                            met fairly accurately in Liberal Mainline Christianity, but even the
                            Emergent explanation needs to more consistently emphasize the original Roman
                            Empire meaning-context for which the New Testament was specifically designed
                            and optimized to go up against.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > What it’s like to experience helpless frozenness in spacetime (often as
                            > Fatedness or predestination) and perceiving the all-sovereignty of God
                            > over all of one’s thoughts and actions. How this was expressed in the New
                            > Testament as “crucifixion and resurrection through the Eucharist and Holy
                            > Spirit”.
                            >
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Explanation of mystery-religion, including Imperial Cult and Christian
                            > house-church agape meals.
                            >
                            Emergent claims to be grounded in anti-imperial Roman Empire
                            meaning-context, but they put quite little attention on the experience of
                            the Holy Spirit and agape meals, treating those merely as indications of how
                            Jesus welcomed everyone and outcasts to purportedly “social events”,
                            socializing at a regular, ordinary-state meal of regular, non-visionary
                            food.
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Why theology cannot make any sense until the entheogen-and-ahistoricity
                            > reading of the New Testament.
                            >
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Why entheogen religion must go through Christian theology and take over
                            > Christianity to return it to the New Testament meaning.
                            >
                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Which is more profound and paradigm-shattering: exposing Eastern religion
                            > as totally corrupt and bunk, or exposing Western religion as totally
                            > corrupt and bunk.
                            >
                            Perhaps the worst, most vulgar and distorting misreading of the New
                            Testament is to read “Jesus is the only name by which you must be saved” as
                            a statement against the religion of Buddhism — against Buddha — rather
                            than as against Caesar.

                            The book God Is Not Great has a chapter against Buddhism, politically
                            criticizing how Buddhism supports the emperor and his empire. But there’s
                            also the untapped potential debunking of the purely religious aspect of what
                            goes by the name of “Buddhism” today. Meditation is snake oil, bunk, a way
                            of delaying and avoiding intense religious experiencing rather than bringing
                            it about — some shamanistic Vajrayana Buddhism excepted. Although today’s
                            junk Buddhism might be less harmful than today’s junk Christianity, it
                            amounts to false promises and a fake product — phony, substitute religion,
                            snake oil. It sells short what religious revelation or transformation can
                            and should be: the ergonomic entheogen approach, which is the historical
                            origin of religion including Eastern religion.

                            ______________________________________________________

                            > Why Christianity, rightly understood per the original New Testament
                            > Christianity, is fundamentally crippled outside its native Roman Empire
                            > context.
                            >
                            >
                            Group: egodeath Message: 5089 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                            Subject: Re: Evidential data for theories is structured, not unstructured
                            Attachments :
                              The mind is innately designed to harbor two distinct world-models: that of
                              the ordinary state of consciousness and that of the altered
                              (loose-association) state — along the lines of Charles Tart’s call for
                              “multi-state sciences”. Philosophy of Mind must include multi-state
                              Philosophy, taking into account not only the ordinary cognitive state.
                              Religious conversion, revelation, or spiritual transformation is a matter of
                              the mind switching from the one innate, predetermined mental worldmodel of
                              self and world, to the other innate, predetermined mental worldmodel of self
                              and world.
                              Group: egodeath Message: 5090 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/12/2007
                              Subject: Emergent view: NT as guide to how entheogens ought to be experienced
                              Attachments :
                                I wrote:
                                >>the along-the-way goal of the New Testament, which was the intermediate
                                objective of spiritual regeneration — a general kind of objective that was
                                held in common by the mystery-cults of antiquity, and by the general
                                religious use of visionary plants throughout antiquity.


                                The New Testament says “here’s how the altered state ought to be
                                experienced: as that which leads toward the just kingdom of God, not the
                                empire of Caesar.” The New Testament not only utilizes the ASC (intense
                                altered state) as a fixed-shaped experiencing or perception in service of
                                the “kingdom of God”; also, the New Testament works the other direction,
                                starting with the principle of the just kingdom of a loving God, using that
                                as a way of shaping and interpreting the ASC experience.

                                The New Testament confronts the Roman Empire, which says “here’s the ASC and
                                here’s how it props up the Roman Empire”. The New Testament says “Instead
                                of your religious-experience ASC and your violent and oppressive empire of
                                Caesar, here’s a better view and version of the religious-experience ASC, in
                                conjunction with a better vision of a just kingdom.”

                                The New Testament provides a better vision of the phenomenology of the
                                altered state, and a better vision of the social-political configuration
                                that the ASC can be utilized to prop up — compared, specifically, to the
                                Roman Empire’s “divinely authorized” social-political configuration and its
                                use of religious experiencing to justify itself.

                                Thus the New Testament isn’t just a preliminary objective (experience the
                                ASC) in service of a subsequence objective (the kingdom of god); the New
                                Testament presents a coupled alternative pairing of a certain, particular,
                                strategically described vision of what the altered state should be about, in
                                conjunction with a certain vision of the social-political configuration.

                                The New Testament explains how we *ought* to experience psychedelic drugs —
                                in terms of a loving God and leading toward a better social-political
                                configuration. And the New Testament explains how we *ought* to set up a
                                social-political configuration. These two visions are not contrasted
                                against today’s system of empire, in the New Testament, but against
                                pre-modern empire, and particularly and especially against the specific
                                Roman Empire. The New Testament says “Instead of experiencing entheogens in
                                the way that’s part of the official Roman Empire, experience entheogens in
                                this other way, within this other experiential-interpretive framework,
                                instead.”

                                The Bible does not advocate or prohibit psychoactive drugs; rather, the
                                Bible says “Interpret and conduct psychoactive drug experience in this godly
                                and just way, instead of in a way that props up a harmful society.” The
                                Bible is concerned with *how* we use entheogens, more than *whether* we use
                                drugs. The New Testament tells us to ingest the Eucharist to experience the
                                Holy Spirit and be spiritually regenerated in accord with the loving and
                                just kingdom of God. The New Testament, in effect, tells us that the use of
                                drugs in a way that goes against the loving and just kingdom of God amounts
                                to sorcery and demon-worship, while the use of drugs in a way that builds up
                                the loving and just kingdom of God amounts to the Holy Spirit, salvation,
                                and worship of God.
                                Group: egodeath Message: 5091 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                Attachments :
                                  I’m prepping a preliminary podcast for uploading. I only did minor editing
                                  — removing major silences, and normalizing volume. The unexpected problem
                                  with not editing is that I’m coughing and having trouble talking at all.

                                  This podcast compares Conservative Christianity, Liberal Mainline
                                  Christianity, Emergent movement, and the Egodeath theory. The information
                                  is subset of what I’ve posted. The next will actually go into the points in
                                  the present thread.

                                  The URL will be:
                                  http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast01.mp3
                                  Group: egodeath Message: 5092 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                  Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
                                  Attachments :
                                    I’m getting better at recording vocally clean sessions that don’t have to be
                                    edited. I’ve learned to weed out most of the junk vocalizations while I am
                                    speaking: “um”, “you know”, “so”, and “I mean” — and to breathe quietly,
                                    and to manage other vocal junk noise. I would benefit from setting up an
                                    easy-to-use Pause and Mute.
                                    Group: egodeath Message: 5093 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                    Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
                                    Attachments :
                                      The practice of creating a warm-up, practice Podcast, to practice verbally
                                      discussing and vocalizing a set of topics, has been proven to work for the
                                      Egodeath material.

                                      In my latest vocal recording, the coughing isn’t as bad as I thought — only
                                      a few spots. After getting rid of long, 15-second silences, I’m surprised
                                      at how clean this recording is. I do admit that the sometimes long
                                      sentences and compound statements in this recording would be easier for the
                                      listener to follow if I cleaned them up. But there’s nothing distinctly bad
                                      about this recording, other than a few coughs — this is really good news
                                      for me. Doing penance, of spending hours cleaning up my vocal bad habits,
                                      has prompted me to clean up my speaking while I am speaking.
                                      Group: egodeath Message: 5094 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                      Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                      Attachments :
                                        One way to download the file:

                                        At
                                        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5091
                                        right-click the URL
                                        http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast01.mp3
                                        and Save As.

                                        I’ll update the page http://www.egodeath.com/ to contain the link, which
                                        you’ll be able to right-click. I should break out a separate Podcasts
                                        navigation page.


                                        This preliminary Podcast is relatively dull; it’s not the vision I had for
                                        this thread. It’s merely preliminary. It is practice and warm-up for the
                                        main Podcast I planned in this thread. I may need to sweep evenly across
                                        the topics giving 5 minutes each, and then optionally add further expansion
                                        of certain points. This fast pacing, skipping across topics, should help
                                        against dullness. I add a certain dullness in that I routinely discuss
                                        these “edgy” topics at a highly developed level, yet casually. I discuss
                                        them as if a boring routine classroom lecture, not injecting or forcing any
                                        hype and tone of excitement like marketing blurbs for some book hyped such
                                        as “Controversial secrets of Jesus followers, revealed!” Let the substance
                                        carry the excitement (the non-dullness).
                                        Group: egodeath Message: 5095 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                        Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical

                                        This book review gives valuable background insight on recent U.S. history of popular Christianity.  Not edited or condensed.   It shows the concerns and outlooks within the church today, such as church growth, which is a euphemism for alarming church shrinkage.  Until the 1970’s, American culture required church attendance; to be a good American, one also had to be a churchgoer.  Given that that is no longer the case, church attendance is in free-fall decline — a long fall that takes awhile, because from a great height of popularity. 
                                         
                                        Much of the “emerging post-modern church” books and ideas is an emergency action in a desperate attempt to try to stop this free-fall decline in church attendance.  Blame Evangelicalism’s overemphasis on individual personal salvation to go to heaven after you die — that isolated individualistic misconception of New Testament Christianity leaves its adherents with no reason to participate in the church community or to coordinate with other people to change the world on this side of the grave.
                                         
                                         
                                        Christianity for the Rest of Us: How the Neighborhood Church Is Transforming the Faith
                                        by Diana Butler Bass
                                        http://www.amazon.com/Christianity-Rest-Us-Neighborhood-Transforming/dp/0060859490/ref=pd_sim_b_title_32
                                        Sep. 2006
                                         
                                        — reader’s review —— 
                                        by  pastorman02 (Florida)
                                         
                                        If there are made for TV movies this is a made for NPR book. (And I listen to NPR regularly. I recognize the genre.) Her anecdotes come from people who always laugh with a wry twist of self-deprecation or weep softly in joy over a newfound insight. I get the feeling she goes about her work with contrived naïve innocence. All of her characters are happy, well adjusted, mainline Christians in congregations that may have disagreements but never conflicts. And their spirituality is so above average. Apparently they never have to worry about declining budgets, loss of membership, and minister’s health insurance and where to recruit Sunday School teachers. I genuinely wish we could have seen the congregational warts as well so that my real life pastors could draw some real life encouragement for transforming their real life congregations. My friends do not live in Pleasantville.
                                         
                                        I wish I could say this book is worthwhile. Unfortunately it fails on very many levels. I wish I could use it in our pastor’s development course. I cannot even put it on the suggested reading list, much less use it as a main source book.
                                         
                                        The first problem is rather trivial. The subtitle for the book is How the Neighborhood Church is Transforming the Faith. That would be a wonderful study if indeed it is happening. But this is not a study of neighborhood churches. And many of these congregations are simply not transforming the faith. Many of them continue in their gradual decline toward closing the doors. If you are looking for book that will show you how to grow a neighborhood church, this book is not for you. Now on to the important issues.
                                         
                                        The research behind this book is not a designed study by any academic or scientific standard. It is a collection of anecdotes from participants of carefully selected, perhaps cherry picked, congregations, assembled to support a particular predetermined premise. All the congregations shared an ethos and catalogue of best practices. Well and good. BB declares them therefore to be vital churches. However there is no investigation of other churches with similar ethos and best practices and whether or not they too are vital. That is to say, after reading the book, I have no idea whether or not implementing these ten sign post practices will turn around a declining congregation to spiritual and numeric growth. A similar subject was undertaken by Thom Rainer in Breakout Churches. Rainer sets criteria for health, identifies congregations that meet the criteria, and then studied their histories, ethos, and best practices. BB finds churches with a certain profile of ethos and best practices and declares them vital. The problem with this approach is that it becomes a celebration of her particular prejudices. And she has many prejudices.
                                         
                                        During the course of the book she insults Roman Catholics, Pentecostals, and southern Christians in general.
                                         
                                        “I heard quite a few stories from smart, well-educated – and clearly not Pentecostal – churchgoers about supernatural healings.” P. 113.
                                         
                                        “Memphis, Tennessee, conjures visions of southern religion. These two words, southern religion, evoke images of folks hootin’ and hollerin’ about God. Eternal damnation and hell. Sweating preachers thundering on about sex, drinking, and Democrats. Southern religion is all heart and fire, the blinding light of Jesus converting sinners to saints in a flash. This is what more reasonable Christians used to ridicule as “enthusiasm.”
                                        In Memphis, the Church of the Holy Communion, an Episcopal parish, stands in stark contrast to the fulminations of southern evangelical religion.” P. 115.
                                         
                                        Far and away the most frequent target of the vinegar is evangelicals generally and evangelical megachurches in particular.
                                         
                                        “I immediately think of evangelical megachurches, with their huge congregations complete with doctrinal statements and Republican voting guides. Big yields, yes. But where is wisdom?” P. 147.
                                         
                                        “Unlike in evangelical churches – where doctrinal uniformity is considered nonnegotiable – theological diversity shapes the daily life of most mainline churches.” P. 146.
                                         
                                        “Unlike conservative evangelicals who read the Bible literally, seeking out proof-texts for narrow moral or ethical readings of scripture, the Episcopalians at Redeemer approach the Bible “seriously, but not Literally.” P. 188.
                                         
                                        “However, there is still a rift in the ways that Christians view art. Some, usually those in evangelical churches, understand art instrumentally. Art is important because it proclaims a message, usually intended to convert people to the faith. … Other Christian, however, engage art for the sake of mystery instead of a message.” P. 213.
                                         
                                        Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, and its viewers receive special attention. “Unlike the evangelical Christians who flocked to the film, mainline Protestants more thoughtfully engaged The Passion in its theology and as a spiritual product.” P. 230. Anyone who dared to view “The Passion of the Christ” incurs her judgment. She comes close to saying that anyone who went to see “The Passion of the Christ” is an anti-Semite and a consumerist, a willing participant in economic sin.
                                         
                                        “That is, of course, what happened with The Passion of the Christ: the primary symbol of Christianity, the cross, was turned into a marketing event.” P. 233.
                                         
                                        She was unnecessarily insulting to several individuals and their readers. For example she belittled Forty Days of Purpose (twice) and Purpose Driven Church, although several of her congregations described implementing Purpose Driven action items. If these two resources are so counterproductive why have they had such an impact on the lives of so many individuals and congregations. BB spent a whole chapter on the practice of discernment. So what is wrong with asking the purpose of a life or of a congregation? She came close to insulting Billy Graham. One wonders why an author of her talent feels a need do insult people. It may be true that Purpose Driven, etc., are the basics. But she comes off as a university mathematics professor belittling an elementary school teacher for teaching arithmetic to first graders. What purpose does this serve?
                                         
                                        People who have a perspective different from hers and dare to speak it with conviction are thundering partisans. See page 238 and the southern religion quote above for examples.
                                         
                                        I am very concerned as well over the makeup of the study group. Of the ten primary congregations eight were all white, one was Latino, and one was multiethnic. The multiethnic congregation had three African American staff members, two of whom are sextons. Do the math. Is this a prejudice or a coincidence? I honestly do not know. But either way I cannot recommend this book to any of our African American pastors.
                                         
                                        Butler Bass also seems to misunderstand the place of evangelicals in mainline churches. Generally speaking she does not acknowledge that there are very many evangelical mainline congregations and even more evangelicals in congregations that are not totally evangelical.
                                         
                                        “The most troubling division comes from the tensions within the Presbyterian denomination between the church’s traditionally more liberal theological constituency and its vocal evangelical minority.” P. 146.
                                         
                                        One need look only at the Evangelical Presbyterian Church and the upcoming exodus of evangelical congregations in the Presbyterian Church USA to see Butler Bass’ misconception of mainline evangelicals. In one PCUSA presbytery 60% of the Sunday morning attendance was in Confessing Churches. Currently the PCUSA has entire presbyteries who wish to leave the denomination as a whole presbytery. The EPC is setting up a provisional presbytery to receive the congregations leaving the PC USA. Some projections estimate that the provisional presbytery will be as large or larger than the original EPC. Similar phenomena are occuring in the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran tradition, and the Methodist tradition. Indeed within a few years the PC USA will cease to be the majority Presbyterian voice in the United States given the current rate of change. That is to say there will be more Presbyterians who are not members of the PCUSA than those who are.
                                         
                                        On page 2 BB writes, “Rather, I journeyed with a surprising group of contemporary pilgrims – those folks who gather in mainline Protestant congregations, communities that describe themselves as theologically centrist to liberal-progressive and are part of denominations that trace their lineage back to colonial America. I hung out with brand-name Christians – Methodists, Presbyterians, Lutherans, Congregationalists, and Episcopalians, …” Does BB mean that only centrist to liberal-progressive Christians are mainline? What about centrist to evangelical, those just right of center but still in the center? What about those who are just plain centrist, for whom the evangelical/progressive divide is irrelevant. In the Presbyterian Church, USA I know many a minister who is just plain Presbyterian. Are they not mainline because they do not at least lean towards the progressive side?
                                         
                                        On the other hand if mainline is defined as tracing their lineage back to colonial America, and centrist to progressive is a subset of mainline, why exclude the other subsets? One cannot read Presbyterian history in North America without seeing that there has always been tension in our antecedent denominations over this very issue. We have had Old School/New School, Old Light/New Light, Modernist/Fundamentalist, Liberal/Conservative, and now finally evangelical/progressive controversies. What is important to note about these controversies is that despite the formation of some splinter groups the majority of both sides remained in the denomination. Both sides remained mainline. In our current context there will be some splintering, with many congregations leaving the PCUSA and moving to the EPC. There remain many evangelicals who wish to remain in the PCUSA and to work through the difficulties. The Constitutional Presbyterians is such a group. And while many New Wineskins congregations will go to the EPC, many other NWAC congregations will remain in the denomination. Why then exclude such a large and healthy, and historically significant cohort, from the study? If this is progressive inclusiveness we need a different inclusiveness.
                                         
                                        BB never addresses the fundamental question regarding mainline churches. Until the 70’s American culture required church attendance. To be a good American one also had to be a churchgoer, if not a genuine Christian. Protestant was preferred over Catholic and Orthodox was a genuine peculiarity. Mainline denomination (meaning successor to a northwestern European tradition) was culturally more desirable than Southern Baptist or Pentecostal. Little League was never scheduled on Sunday morning. Mainline churches did not have to go out into the highways and byways and compel them to come in. We relied on our culture to do that for us. That has changed. Now our culture is not only not supportive of Christianity it is at best suspicious of and at times hostile to Christianity. Which means that for the churches to thrive they have to go to the world and interrupt people’s lives with the Gospel. Her list of best practices is quite good. But it is not the main issue. If the congregations do not create their own new participants they will all die. Of all the personal anecdotes I read I was struck by how many quotes were from people who had been churched as children. I counted only two people who were adult converts, and one of those came to Christ through an evangelical Bible study, then moved on to one of the cohort congregations. BB rails against evangelicals. But were it not for an evangelical Bible study this young woman would not have become Christian. The study church certainly was not doing any evangelism. And this is the biggest problem with BB’s book. It is all about baby boomers who were churched as children, left the church, and now are back. The issue we face now is how to reach people who were never churched. Yes, by all means, the depth discipleship described in the ten signposts is great. But it is almost, though not completely, inner focused. Even the testimony section is not about bearing witness to Christ to non-Christians. She has changed it to bearing testimony within the congregation for the benefit of the congregation.
                                         
                                        The result of this Boomer propensity for navel gazing is a steep decline in worship attendance across the board. I had hoped that this book would help us see ways in which mainline congregations can address this very issue. Unfortunately this is not the case. Of the four Presbyterian congregations in her cohort three were stagnant or in decline. I say this not to pick on Presbyterians. Rather they are the easiest to get data from. So the long term question remains. If I am not replacing my losses in participation how will this congregation’s ministry continue? If our ministry is good, but dies, who will take over the needed ministry? Who will host the tent cities?
                                         
                                        Butler Bass’ real issue is how can a liberal/progressive church survive, and maybe possibly grow numerically as an unanticipated but welcome side effect. If you think that the answer lies along the axis of “it is possible to have our old, traditional worship with a hymnbook and an organ prelude, with a cerebral Enlightenment/Modernist confessional approach to faith,” you will be sorely disappointed. The congregations she studied have abandoned those things for the most part. Her ten signposts are all things that were not practiced in mainline Protestant congregations in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries in North America, as she very ably demonstrates. Her answer instead is that to survive as a mainline Protestant congregation you have to start doing the very things that her mainline village church never did. That is to say, to survive as a mainline congregation one must stop being traditionally mainline, or change one’s definition of mainline, both of which violate her premise.
                                         
                                        On p. 174 BB describes a “mainline” church that is not at all traditional mainline. “Combining elements of jazz, performance art, film clips and video, multimedia reflection, live-camera feed, testimony, readings, silence, contemplative prayer, and journaling, they christened this service The Studio.” How is this traditional mainline? Simply because they still put Congregationalist on the marquis? BB never addresses this question. The congregations she describes are no longer “mainline” in practice, only in name and judicatory membership. That is exactly the issue.
                                         
                                        Her study congregations are post-modern experientialists who are PC USA or UMC or UCC or Episcopal or Lutheran in name only. This is not necessarily a bad thing. But let’s be honest about it. The Presbyterian, Methodist, and Lutheran ministers of the study congregations may be able to describe Reformed, Wesleyan, and Lutheran theology respectively. But she gives no evidence that the members understand or even care about it. And of course, denominational identity was a hallmark of mainline Protestantism. The congregations she worked with are not traditional mainline churches any more. The answer she arrives at is exactly the same answer the “evangelicals” arrived at. Traditional mainline Protestantism, based on northwestern European culture beginning in the early Sixteenth Century and founded on Enlightenment rationalism, no longer is a viable model for Church in post-modern North America.
                                         
                                        Butler Bass spent many years as an evangelical, and an eloquent one. She has left that behind and moved into the progressive fold. Well and good. But in leaving the evangelical fold she feels the need to castigate her former colleagues. Martin Luther ultimately affirmed, “I am not!” Perhaps this book is her “I am not” to her evangelical sisters and brothers. I hope that as her service to the church continues the evangelical stage will be her thesis, the progressive phase will be her antithesis, and that she will find somewhere and somehow the peace of a synthesis.
                                         
                                        — end of reader’s review — 
                                         
                                        Group: egodeath Message: 5096 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                        Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                        Attachments :
                                          I felt that I could not leap into the radical leading-edge interesting
                                          topics in light of Emergent, without first laying down some foundation
                                          discussion about the Emergent movement in relation to Conservative
                                          Evangelicalism and Liberal Mainline denominations. This latest, preliminary
                                          podcast serves as a relatively dull bridge to the non-dull topics which I am
                                          actually interested in demonstrating an interesting treatment of.

                                          Followers of the Emergent movement, or trends in Christianity, will find my
                                          preliminary comments interesting, and not particularly dependent on the
                                          “controversial” topics of entheogens and ahistoricity. The “controversial”
                                          topics of entheogens and ahistoricity play only a minor role in this
                                          introductory or prolegomenon podcast.
                                          Group: egodeath Message: 5097 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/12/2007
                                          Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                          Attachments :
                                            The following discussion (a re-post about “the New Testament as guide to how
                                            entheogens ought to be experienced”) fulfills several existing topics for
                                            this podcast such as:

                                            Psychotomimetic drugs (that is, hallucinatory drugs).

                                            What kind of writings are the New Testament books? How to read the New
                                            Testament.

                                            References to LSD, psychedelia, and Tim Leary found in emerging church
                                            podcasts and weblogs.

                                            How Allegro was right, and how he was wrong, and why we must move through
                                            him, and cannot move around him.

                                            The evidence that proves that all religion was based on psychedelic drugs
                                            throughout the Roman Empire, including the Christian Eucharist during the
                                            first several centuries and beyond.

                                            Integrating Emergent, the psychoactive entheogenic Eucharist, and the
                                            ahistoricity of Jesus and all the apostles.

                                            What it’s like to experience helpless frozenness in spacetime (often as
                                            Fatedness or predestination) and perceiving the all-sovereignty of God over
                                            all of one’s thoughts and actions. How this was expressed in the New
                                            Testament as “crucifixion and resurrection through the Eucharist and Holy
                                            Spirit”.

                                            Explanation of mystery-religion, including Imperial Cult and Christian
                                            house-church agape meals.

                                            Why theology cannot make any sense until the entheogen-and-ahistoricity
                                            reading of the New Testament.

                                            Why entheogen religion must go through Christian theology and take over
                                            Christianity to return it to the New Testament meaning.

                                            ________________________


                                            The New Testament as guide to how entheogens ought to be experienced


                                            The New Testament says “here’s how the altered state ought to be
                                            experienced: as that which leads toward the just kingdom of God, not the
                                            empire of Caesar.” The New Testament not only utilizes the ASC (intense
                                            altered state) as a fixed-shaped experiencing or perception in service of
                                            the “kingdom of God”; also, the New Testament works the other direction,
                                            starting with the principle of the just kingdom of a loving God, using that
                                            as a way of shaping and interpreting the ASC experience.

                                            The New Testament confronts the Roman Empire, which says “here’s the ASC and
                                            here’s how it props up the Roman Empire”. The New Testament says “Instead
                                            of your religious-experience ASC and your violent and oppressive empire of
                                            Caesar, here’s a better view and version of the religious-experience ASC, in
                                            conjunction with a better vision of a just kingdom.”

                                            The New Testament provides a better vision of the phenomenology of the
                                            altered state, and a better vision of the social-political configuration
                                            that the ASC can be utilized to prop up — compared, specifically, to the
                                            Roman Empire’s “divinely authorized” social-political configuration and its
                                            use of religious experiencing to justify itself.

                                            Thus the New Testament isn’t just a preliminary objective (experience the
                                            ASC) in service of a subsequence objective (the kingdom of god); the New
                                            Testament presents a coupled alternative pairing of a certain, particular,
                                            strategically described vision of what the altered state should be about, in
                                            conjunction with a certain vision of the social-political configuration.

                                            The New Testament explains how we *ought* to experience psychedelic drugs —
                                            in terms of a loving God and leading toward a better social-political
                                            configuration. And the New Testament explains how we *ought* to set up a
                                            social-political configuration. These two visions are not contrasted
                                            against today’s system of empire, in the New Testament, but against
                                            pre-modern empire, and particularly and especially against the specific
                                            Roman Empire. The New Testament says “Instead of experiencing entheogens in
                                            the way that’s part of the official Roman Empire, experience entheogens in
                                            this other way, within this other experiential-interpretive framework,
                                            instead.”

                                            The Bible does not advocate or prohibit psychoactive drugs; rather, the
                                            Bible says “Interpret and conduct psychoactive drug experience in this godly
                                            and just way, instead of in a way that props up a harmful society.” The
                                            Bible is concerned with *how* we use entheogens, more than *whether* we use
                                            drugs. The New Testament tells us to ingest the Eucharist to experience the
                                            Holy Spirit and be spiritually regenerated in accord with the loving and
                                            just kingdom of God. The New Testament, in effect, tells us that the use of
                                            drugs in a way that goes against the loving and just kingdom of God amounts
                                            to sorcery and demon-worship, while the use of drugs in a way that builds up
                                            the loving and just kingdom of God amounts to the Holy Spirit, salvation,
                                            and worship of God.
                                            Group: egodeath Message: 5098 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                            Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                            Attachments :
                                              I’m uploading the 2nd podcast for the present thread. This podcast lists
                                              the planned topics, then discusses points about some of those topics, points
                                              that I have already written about. This podcast amounts to reading-aloud
                                              two major postings from the present thread. I plan to do a 3rd, main
                                              podcast for this thread, which will evenly spend 4 minutes per each of the
                                              15 topics.

                                              I’m targeting 60 minutes / 60 MB for each podcast.

                                              One way to download the file: at
                                              http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5098
                                              right-click the URL
                                              http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast02.mp3
                                              and Save As.

                                              I’ll update the page http://www.egodeath.com/ to contain the link, which
                                              you’ll be able to right-click. I should break out a separate Podcasts
                                              navigation page.
                                              Group: egodeath Message: 5099 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                              Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
                                              Attachments :
                                                To pretty easily produce pretty clean recordings, I’m settling on a sweet
                                                spot, of using Mute and using clean vocalization to produce as clean a
                                                master session recording as I can, and then, doing some minimal amount of
                                                editing — *not* deleting every hiccup, dog bark, or excess tenth of a
                                                second of silence as I used to (*very* grueling and prohibitively
                                                time-intensive), but rather, deleting all silences longer than perhaps 7
                                                seconds. That technique is helped alot by the technique of using Mute and
                                                using clean vocalization. I developed a useful Mute technique around
                                                halfway into today’s latest recording (EmergentPodcast02.mp3).

                                                I’ve had trouble getting the recordings to be loud enough, even with
                                                normalization. So I’m trying selecting 10-minute blocks and normalizing
                                                each block to 0dB level, to make the recording louder than all-at-once
                                                normalizing produces. Using a compressor would help more, to make louder
                                                recordings.
                                                Group: egodeath Message: 5100 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                                Attachments :
                                                  I’m uploading the 3rd podcast for the present thread. This podcast covers:

                                                  CHARACTERIZING DRUGS
                                                  Psychotomimetic drugs, or hallucinogenic drugs. Conceptual networks and
                                                  assumption frameworks. All translation across cultures is mis-translation.

                                                  DRUGS EXISTING IN EMERGENT
                                                  References to LSD, psychedelia, and Tim Leary found in emerging church
                                                  podcasts and weblogs.

                                                  EVIDENCE AND SCENARIO FOR ALL ANCIENT RELIGION HAVING DRUG BASIS
                                                  The evidence that proves that all religion was based on psychedelic drugs
                                                  throughout the Roman Empire, including the Christian Eucharist during the
                                                  first several centuries and beyond.


                                                  I plan to do a 4th podcast for this thread, spending about 5 minutes on each
                                                  of the remaining topics.

                                                  One way to download the file: at
                                                  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5100
                                                  right-click the URL
                                                  http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast03.mp3
                                                  and Save As.

                                                  I’ll update the page http://www.egodeath.com/ to contain the link, which
                                                  you’ll be able to right-click. I should break out a separate Podcasts
                                                  navigation page.
                                                  Group: egodeath Message: 5101 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                  Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
                                                  Attachments :
                                                    I think I can eliminate, in future recordings, the sporadic whine that might
                                                    be found in EmergentPodcast01.mp3, 02.mp3, and 03.mp3. It was largely or
                                                    partly due to having inactive channels that were not turned down on the
                                                    mixer. Turn down unused mixer channels!

                                                    Too bad about that slight flaw in recordings #1-3, but one must learn at
                                                    some time, and at least I am learning as fast as possible.
                                                    Group: egodeath Message: 5102 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                    Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                                    Attachments :
                                                      I’m uploading the 4th podcast for the present thread. This podcast covers:

                                                      MYSTERY CULTS, IMPERIAL CULT, AND CHRIST CULT (EUCHARIST, HOLY SPIRIT)
                                                      Explanation of mystery-religion, including Imperial Cult and Christian
                                                      house-church agape meals.

                                                      ADDING DRUGS TO EMERGENT
                                                      How Allegro was right, and how he was wrong, and why we must move through
                                                      him, and cannot move around him.

                                                      ADDING DRUGS AND AHISTORICITY TO EMERGENT
                                                      Integrating Emergent, the psychoactive entheogenic Eucharist, and the
                                                      ahistoricity of Jesus and all the apostles.

                                                      DRUGS IN NT METAPHOR
                                                      What it’s like to experience helpless frozenness in spacetime (often as
                                                      Fatedness or predestination) and perceiving the all-sovereignty of God over
                                                      all of one’s thoughts and actions. How this was expressed in the New
                                                      Testament as “crucifixion and resurrection through the Eucharist and Holy
                                                      Spirit”.

                                                      ENTHEOGENISTS MUST ENGAGE WITH CHRISTIANITY
                                                      Why entheogen religion must go through Christian theology and take over
                                                      Christianity to return it to the New Testament meaning.

                                                      AHISTORICITY
                                                      No historical Paul, and, less interestingly, no historical Jesus.

                                                      INHERENT LIMITS OF MODERN THEOLOGY
                                                      Why theology cannot make any sense until the entheogen-and-ahistoricity
                                                      reading of the New Testament.

                                                      EMERGENT; CHURCH TRENDS
                                                      The tepid “Emerging church” vs. the radical “Emergent church”.

                                                      BASIC CORRUPTNESS OF EXISTING CHRISTIANITY
                                                      Which is more profound and paradigm-shattering: exposing Eastern religion as
                                                      totally corrupt and bunk, or exposing Western religion as totally corrupt
                                                      and bunk.

                                                      CLEARLY UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITS OF CHRISTIANITY
                                                      Why Christianity, rightly understood per the original New Testament
                                                      Christianity, is fundamentally crippled outside its native Roman Empire
                                                      context.

                                                      NT MEANING AND GENRE
                                                      What kind of writings are the New Testament books? How to read the New
                                                      Testament.

                                                      ACTUAL MEANING-CONTEXT OF NEW TESTAMENT
                                                      The primary origin and context of New Testament Christianity was the Roman
                                                      Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, not Jerusalem in the 1st century.


                                                      I’m considering doing a 5th podcast for this thread, which would *actually*
                                                      do what I originally intended: spend 4 minutes *summarizing* each of the
                                                      stated topics. Only now is it possible to do this, because now I have both
                                                      written about these topics (at least partially), and have spoken about these
                                                      topics. The 4 podcasts so far in this thread all have to be considered as
                                                      preliminary warm-ups, practice runs, that go into some detail but largely
                                                      fail as efficient summaries. Before I could do a “perfect” podcast as
                                                      originally envisioned, I would need to repeatedly listen to these 4
                                                      preliminary, warm-up podcasts. And I would also, ideally, need to type-up
                                                      the summaries.


                                                      One way to download the file: at
                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5102
                                                      right-click the URL
                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast04.mp3
                                                      and Save As.

                                                      I’ll update the page http://www.egodeath.com/ to contain the link, which
                                                      you’ll be able to right-click. I should break out a separate Podcasts
                                                      navigation page.
                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 5103 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                      Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                                      Attachments :
                                                        I’m re-uploading
                                                        http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentPodcast03.mp3
                                                        It should be no shorter than 49 minutes, ~46 MB.
                                                        Group: egodeath Message: 5104 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                        Subject: Re: Podcast: Against dullness: Emergent church, entheogens, and ahis
                                                        Attachments :
                                                          I added these 4 podcasts to the home page, where you can right-click them to
                                                          download.

                                                          http://www.egodeath.com/ — Podcasts section:

                                                          Why the Emergent movement in Christianity must add entheogens and subtract
                                                          the historical Jesus — December 8, 2007
                                                          Part 1: preliminary definitions of Emergent vs. Evangelical
                                                          Part 2
                                                          Part 3
                                                          Part 4
                                                          Group: egodeath Message: 5105 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                          Subject: Video: 1988 Egodeath book commencement party
                                                          Attachments :
                                                            Today I watched the videotape from my 1988 college party which was to
                                                            announce my commencement of writing my Egodeath theory as books. I watched
                                                            it to determine whether my stated objectives of the Theory have been carried
                                                            forth consistently, matching my current conception of the Egodeath theory
                                                            and project of theorizing.

                                                            There were questions from the audience, all college students — friends, and
                                                            their friends. My responses, and my description of the Theory and Project,
                                                            were acceptably coherent with my current thinking, although of course then I
                                                            was only 3 years into the Project, now 22 years, so I now have some 7 times
                                                            the breadth of potential responses, and some of my terminology-usage has
                                                            improved. In evaluating this presentation in the video, I determined that
                                                            my conceptualization of the Project and Theory back then, 20 years ago, was
                                                            not essentially different than now — just less developed.

                                                            I am intently devoted to making good on the promises and plans that I told
                                                            to the audience, my friends, 20 years ago. Since then, the Web arrived,
                                                            with my Egodeath content, and Austin’s book Zen and the Brain has arrived —
                                                            but surprisingly little has changed in these 20 years; my basic complaints
                                                            about the state of knowledge still basically hold true and my criticisms
                                                            still hold up.

                                                            I’m more articulate now, though I had no shortage of ideas and responses 20
                                                            years ago.
                                                            Group: egodeath Message: 5106 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                            Subject: Re: Emergent Church paradigm is post-Protestant, post-Evangelical
                                                            Shorter URL:
                                                             
                                                            Christianity for the Rest of Us: How the Neighborhood Church Is Transforming the Faith
                                                            by Diana Butler Bass
                                                            http://www.amazon.com/dp/0060859490/
                                                            Sep. 2006
                                                            Group: egodeath Message: 5107 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                            Subject: Characterizing experience of the loose cognitive association state
                                                            N. wrote:
                                                            >>The book Zen and the Brain … Place in your book some wording of actual experience, to help take the reader closer to the state of dissociation.  Help people relate to the words, ‘dissociative state’ or ‘loose cognition,’ by relating to what they represent experientially.  People have experienced the dissociative state but don’t realize they have.  Point out how that state has impacted the world we live in.  Write into the experience of your readers, to pull the reader into an understanding of the paradigm or Theory.
                                                             
                                                            Group: egodeath Message: 5108 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                            Subject: Sensationalism, fame, pride, humility, PR, standing out, social grou
                                                            Attachments :
                                                              I’m ready to relatively turn my attention back to my Phase 1 topic of
                                                              cognitive science/ cognitive phenomenology, rather than my more recent Phase
                                                              2 “historical” focus of history of religion and myth. However, the
                                                              revisionist historical focus (Christianity, Eastern meditation, entheogens
                                                              in the origins of those religions, and ahistoricity of Jesus) is valuable
                                                              for its sensationalism. My treatment of religions has value for
                                                              sensationalist attraction, that the pure cognitive phenomenology theory
                                                              can’t have. I asserted some surprising positions in my 1988 commencement
                                                              party presentation, about how alien and boring and not-immediately-relevant
                                                              my theory was (during my Phase 1).

                                                              I want to highlight the surprising ideas in the Egodeath theory both as
                                                              applied to our religious and cultural past, and to present mental
                                                              processing, and to the future of religious practice and our
                                                              self-understanding. Phase 1 (cog sci) and Phase 2 (religious historical
                                                              revision) both are sources for many surprising points, and it is crucial to
                                                              be surprising, for a new theory. For example, although espousing
                                                              “determinism” has problems because people object to “determinism” (as *they*
                                                              conceive of it – usually a misunderstanding), it does provide some
                                                              motivating, attractive controversy, some “bad PR” (given that “there’s no
                                                              such thing as bad publicity). To be notorious, to be controversial, to be
                                                              infamous — these things have their advantages.

                                                              Above all, don’t be a wallflower. To all the people who are so stupid or
                                                              cheap and superficial in their thinking that they equate ego transcendence
                                                              with mundane humility and mundane self-deprecation in regular social
                                                              relationships in the ordinary state of consciousness, what can one say but
                                                              “you are a small and insignificant person in light of my huge superiority of
                                                              person” — that is, pulling the strings that they have constructed, pressing
                                                              their buttons that they put forward. If you want to demonstrate to me that
                                                              you are not a serious thinker, all you have to do is equate “ego
                                                              transcendence” with mundane “humility”.

                                                              To emphasize the difference, I am the world’s most humility attuned person
                                                              regarding personal power in the altered state (that’s the true meaning of
                                                              ‘humility’ in a religious context or in transcendent knowledge), and I am
                                                              the world’s most proud person (best theorist) with the strongest sense of
                                                              superiority to others in the mundane world. That’s like Wilber’s call for
                                                              “an ego strong enough to die”. As a theorist, I am the best, and the most
                                                              superior to others, because as a control-agent, I’m most attuned to the
                                                              utter powerlessness of the personal locus of control in light of the
                                                              uncontrollable higher-level controller that is the source of all of our
                                                              thoughts and actions.

                                                              I’m fully proud, in the mundane state (as a competing theorist), and I’m
                                                              fully humble, with respect to that which is revealed in the altered state.
                                                              That demonstrates how distinct mundane pride is from religious-state
                                                              humility. Anyone who understands ego death ought to be very proud and
                                                              consider themselves superior to other people (while per the New Testament,
                                                              constructing a flat, fair, non-oppressive, just society). And anyone who
                                                              understands ego death is, by definition, truly humble, in the sense which is
                                                              religiously relevant. The Elect of God are proud (before others) to be
                                                              humbled (before God).

                                                              Little people with nothing to contribute are always the first to criticize
                                                              and put-down anyone who stands out and puts forth a substantial
                                                              contribution. American society has schizophrenic self-contradictory values:
                                                              we give lip-service to striving for excellence, and we enviously disapprove
                                                              of those who actually achieve excellence. That attitude voted for the
                                                              abrasively and aggressively imbecilic G. Bush. Australia is more
                                                              consistent: they are suspicious of even striving for excellence, because
                                                              they equate excellence with oppressiveness and oppressive social structures.
                                                              Anyone who contributes more than others is suspect of striving to oppress
                                                              others. Excellence is equated with oppression.

                                                              Ayn Rand criticized this tendency in the socialism of her day, and pointed
                                                              out the possibility of the superior people going on strike, against the
                                                              freeloaders who would keep down the superior people. However, her system
                                                              was helpless against the unethical people in influential positions that
                                                              really do want to just oppress other people.

                                                              These ideas are intellectually interesting, but all I’m really saying is
                                                              that our society holds loose sets of values that are mutually contradictory,
                                                              and that to make an impact, one must be proud and must stand out from the
                                                              crowd, in order to punch-through the noise. You must explicitly offer
                                                              something different, something distinctive, something that boldly stands
                                                              out; you must boldly *contradict* the existing norm. Anyone who is too
                                                              humble, too much a wallflower, never self-assertive, a pushover, who just
                                                              blends into the hive society, like the characterization of the Japanese
                                                              culture as “the peg that stands out will be hammered”, cannot succeed at
                                                              creating something innovative and making it available and visible in the
                                                              noise of post-modern culture.

                                                              It’s taboo to point out these realities, but as the theorist of ego
                                                              transcendence, discussing this taboo is relevant, and I did play with this
                                                              taboo even 20 years ago in my Theory commencement party presentation. You
                                                              have to — secretly or not — think in terms like being destined for
                                                              greatness; you have to go to “prep school” and “finishing school”, so to
                                                              speak; you have to be deliberately cultivated. The exceptions (people who
                                                              are actually thoroughly unassuming and self-effacing) are rare so as to
                                                              prove the rule. If Madonna is famous for being famous, Curt Cobain is the
                                                              one person who is famous for acting “not famous”.

                                                              To some extent, these are reflections that I am actively using, that affect
                                                              me; but to some extent these are merely idle reflections that I’ve had to
                                                              think about and that amount to nothing in practice, for me personally.
                                                              Anyone who writes a book, in some sense *has to* think of themselves as in
                                                              some way “destined for greatness”, even though coming to grips with that
                                                              practical fact of psychology may be tabooed in our democratic,
                                                              aristocracy-hating society (a society which nevertheless worships fame).

                                                              To declare all previous theories of transcendent knowledge to be grossly
                                                              inadequate, sloppy, and ineffective, as I have done since 1986, is to right
                                                              away, inherently, in some sense already be proud and to act as though one is
                                                              destined for greatness. That implication is unavoidable, and suitably
                                                              appropriate, even if the concept of “destined for greatness” is taboo in
                                                              democratic society that worships *striving for* excellence but jealously
                                                              hates and fears any actual *achieving* of greatness, equating greatness with
                                                              oppression and pushing down other people.

                                                              The person who has achieved may have a certain kind of comfort being around
                                                              others who have achieved, like pop stars hanging out together in their elite
                                                              circles, circles which play with being oppressive elite circles. I should
                                                              read books on the social psychology of fame and pop stardom — that would
                                                              help me address this topic that’s relevant for the general theory of ego
                                                              transcendence and for my particular personal needs as a breakthrough
                                                              theorist.

                                                              I’d connect it with ideas of “Jesus Christ superstar”, the apostle figures
                                                              as stars, the early popes, emperors in antiquity, the person of the King (“I
                                                              am the state”), and the New Testament project of using religious
                                                              experiencing to bring about a flat, non-oppressive way of organizing
                                                              society, against the “superstar” Caesar-based steep hierarchy system of
                                                              honor and shame, and client/patron pyramid. Compare Imperial Cult to the
                                                              cult of pop stardom — and postmodern analysis of “pop cult”.

                                                              When did I first start thinking about the idea of being “destined for
                                                              greatness”? Some time in between envisioning writing a book in 1986, and my
                                                              commencement party in Spring 1988. To declare all previous religion and
                                                              theories of transcendent knowledge as inadequate, to be replaced by one’s
                                                              own theory, is inherently tantamount to conceiving oneself as, and mentally
                                                              preparing oneself to be as, “destined for greatness” — regardless of how
                                                              one tries to spin and portray that inescapable fact.

                                                              Sometimes democratic society expects and demands that the person who is
                                                              actually in fact great, to strenuously make-believe and play-act humility.
                                                              Thus it is a flimsy cliche that we eulogize great Americans as infinitely
                                                              humble. The rule in our society is that when you talk about a great
                                                              American, you *must* declare them to have been infinitely humble,
                                                              *regardless* of the truth of the matter. It’s a matter of American pride
                                                              that we *must* declare the achievers who are role models to be paragons of
                                                              humility — lest we commit the unpatriotic and traitorous crime of
                                                              worshipping kings and aristocracy who rule (and oppress) by divine right.

                                                              To admit that one has to think of oneself as “destined for greatness” is
                                                              considered traitorous — it’s felt, in our blood, to be a crime against the
                                                              nation, even though picking up the pen to write a book *inherently* has that
                                                              component of pride, verge, and willingness to stick one’s head out and
                                                              declare “I have something of value to provide to society, that other people
                                                              cannot offer.” To set one’s mind to achieving anything that is outstanding
                                                              and culture-changing is, in some sense, inescapably to address all other
                                                              people as “peasants” or “proles”, no matter how you try to spin and evade
                                                              this fact.

                                                              To contribute something distinctive of value to society, one *has* to have
                                                              some sort of “high view of oneself”, to fail to — like British “commoners”
                                                              — “know your place” or “keep to your station”. Alexis de Tocqueville would
                                                              be relevant, in his comparison in his 1835 book Democracy in America, of the
                                                              different attitudes of Americans (“a society where every citizen is a
                                                              sovereign king”) compared to the British, French, and European aristocratic
                                                              monarchies. The real idea is that as an American, you are supposed to try
                                                              to achieve full human potential, but not in a way that denies achievement or
                                                              potential greatness to other “citizen-kings”. Thus it’s OK to think of
                                                              oneself as “destined for greatness” in a way that permits others to be so as
                                                              well.

                                                              Consider Leibniz, Newton, and Descartes battling it out for acclaim and fame
                                                              in Natural Philosophy, and how that was treated as rivalry between the
                                                              early-modern nations of Germany vs. England vs. France, where national egos
                                                              competed against each other for greatness and superiority. Or the German
                                                              cultural inferiority complex that is said to have given rise to Weimar
                                                              German culture. The American system has a certain innate egoic inferiority
                                                              complex since everyone is expected to strive for the greatness of achieving
                                                              their human potential, lifting themselves high by their own bootstraps as
                                                              each person a sovereign citizen-king.

                                                              This can lead to depression, frustration, and self-condemning that can
                                                              result from an overdose of Shirley MacLaine New Age self-help philosophy
                                                              that credits and blames the individual for all that happens to them and all
                                                              that they achieve. “You are fully responsible for all that happens to you
                                                              and all that you experience” (a rather convenient self-justification for
                                                              those who happen to be among the privileged, sheltered, fortunate, lucky
                                                              elite who grew up with an unconscious sense of entitlement and who, on the
                                                              whole, get all the breaks).

                                                              Being a paradigm-changing theorist of transcendent knowledge cannot be
                                                              compared to an average successful businessperson — a better comparison
                                                              would be to innovative engineers who are considered to be the creators of
                                                              new major influential technologies like the Web, Amazon.com, the Mac, or
                                                              Google. Or to influential, famous scientists. That is, the product or
                                                              achievement is intimately associated with the person who created it. Thus
                                                              “I *am* the Egodeath theory”, and for the Egodeath theory to be famous and
                                                              influential is inseparably synonymous with me as a person being famous and
                                                              influential. That’s why I’ve been forced to consider my person being thrust
                                                              into the role of “great and famous” simply by virtue of my Theory striving
                                                              to become “great, breakthrough, famous”.

                                                              It’s not actually possible to envision the Theory becoming “great,
                                                              breakthrough, famous” while I consider myself like the hogwash requisite
                                                              cliche of the eulogizing and hagiography of famous innovators as “he was
                                                              infinitely humble”. That would be nonsense in the case of this Theory of
                                                              transcendent knowledge; it is nonsense and an impossibility that the Theory
                                                              would be considered as “great, breakthrough, famous” while I go around
                                                              considering myself “just an ordinary Joe like G. Bush.” For my Theory to be
                                                              received as Great is *inherently*, by the nature of such theorizing, for me
                                                              personally to be seen as Great — any avoiding of that necessity is phony
                                                              pretense.

                                                              I don’t know if this reality and situation is a “problem” for me, but it is
                                                              certainly something I’ve been forced to consider: it comes with the
                                                              territory the moment I thought “all the existing, previous theories and
                                                              religions are bunk, ineffective, inefficient, they aren’t cutting it, not by
                                                              a long shot, and I have to step in and remedy this situation by formulating
                                                              and putting forth a new, vastly superior Theory — a great Theory, which
                                                              would be *my* Theory.” The result of putting for a great Theory is
                                                              *necessarily* that one becomes great oneself; this is inescapable (and not
                                                              necessarily undesirable, a bad thing).

                                                              That gives some background on why I’ve been grappling since 1988 with being
                                                              in a position of “destined for greatness” as a result of striving to put
                                                              forth a Theory of transcendent knowledge and religious that is “destined for
                                                              greatness”. This type of intellectual product is inseparable from one’s own
                                                              person. “Great Theory” necessarily immediately entails “Great Theorist”.
                                                              Group: egodeath Message: 5109 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 09/12/2007
                                                              Subject: Re: Sensationalism, fame, pride, humility, PR, standing out, social
                                                              Attachments :
                                                                In terms of social groups, I also have a degree of feeling I’m a “Great
                                                                American”, “Great Californian”, “Great Engineer”, and “Great Alumni”. I’m
                                                                not only a proud Theorist, I’m a proud American, a proud Californian, a
                                                                proud engineer, and a proud alum. Perhaps a proud cybercult denizen (e.g. a
                                                                proud member and product of the Mondo 2000 & WELL community). A proud
                                                                Christian, and a product of Christianity. Also a proud Alan Wattsian, a
                                                                product of his treatment of Eastern and Western religion.

                                                                As a Theory creator, I’m a product of America, California, engineering,
                                                                cybercult, tech school and university, the WELL, and Christianity — I am a
                                                                representative of these groups. My pride and my achievement reflects back
                                                                onto these groups. I’m also a member and product of other groups, such as
                                                                the JesusMysteries online discussion group, my circle of friends, a member
                                                                of professional societies, a member of the group entheogen scholars.

                                                                Also now I had my Bar Mitzvah a week ago, so now I am a member of the Jews,
                                                                and I’m a product of a Jewish upbringing, as well as baptized into the
                                                                Church of Christ, thus my greatness (due to my Theory’s greatness) would
                                                                amount to pride and product of these groups. To some extent I’m a member of
                                                                my grade school long ago, but that’s not directly associated with my
                                                                theorizing, so my greatness or achievement in Theory hardly reflects back to
                                                                that social or societal group. My significant social groups relevant for
                                                                Theory development only has tangible roots going back to mid high school.
                                                                Before that, I was generic and you could not tell that I’d have any future
                                                                in Theory development about transcendent knowledge; such a future would have
                                                                been conjectural had you analyzed my life back in early high school.

                                                                Prioritizing my influences *as* a Theorist might place me (and my
                                                                Achievement) as a member and product of certain groups more than others:
                                                                firstly,
                                                                * Engineering
                                                                * University (and, private university where all courses are actually
                                                                taught by professors)
                                                                * California
                                                                * Human Potential movement / transpersonal psychology
                                                                * Alan Watts
                                                                * Christianity
                                                                * Stanford / Palo Alto (I characterized my Phase 1 work as “the
                                                                Stanford view”: that is, exuding the vibe and mentality of Silicon Valley in
                                                                the 1990s).
                                                                * Entheogen scholars
                                                                * Ahistoricity scholars
                                                                * The WELL / cybercult, then the Web especially during my Phase 2
                                                                * The late 1980s through 1990s

                                                                Not much:
                                                                * Judaism as cultural practice & upbringing
                                                                * Grade schools
                                                                * Pomo studies
                                                                * Tech school
                                                                * Eastern religion in general
                                                                * America (I consciously feel more affinity, a product more of
                                                                California than of America, because America is = “the world at large”, with
                                                                “Europe having disappeared and ceased to exist” for me per Jean Baudrillard.
                                                                Thus I am *so* much a product of America that there’s nothing consciously
                                                                distinctive about this cultural context for me.)

                                                                I *have* felt an identification with these groupings as I have developed my
                                                                Theory of transcendent knowledge; for example, I pointed this out
                                                                prominently, 3 years into it, in my commencement party, pointing out that
                                                                it’s very distinctive that I’m developing a Theory of transcendent knowledge
                                                                *as* an engineer, with that mentality and character.

                                                                Even though I highlight my personal stature being concomitant with the
                                                                success of my Theory, I have also always felt a strong social sense of
                                                                identification with these groups, institutions, and societies. A Great
                                                                Theory, thus necessarily a proud theorist, and thus also a proud member (and
                                                                representative) of these social groups. Our society is packed full of
                                                                taboos, including the taboo solutions to the long-lasting puzzles about
                                                                religious origins and religious knowledge. I have had to be the one to
                                                                concertedly break all of these taboos together; it was inherently necessary
                                                                as part of creating the Theory.

                                                                Even as I break these taboos, and offend publicly all groups including the
                                                                groups that created me, these groups are at the same time forced to
                                                                acknowledge me as their representative, their product. I am a product of my
                                                                society and upbringing, of the many adults who inducted me, often
                                                                deliberately, into subcultures and entrenched taboo cultural practices that
                                                                are as normal and entrenched as they are officially tabooed. For example,
                                                                in 8th Grade graduation, we were initiated with an oil light show and the
                                                                David Bowie song Space Oddity.

                                                                I am a product of my church; I represent my church even as I propose
                                                                throwing Christianity into the garbage can as ill-suited and ill-fitting for
                                                                today’s modern world or any world after the Roman Empire. I represent my
                                                                university even while I condemn the universities for self-censoring
                                                                themselves about entheogens and the drug origins of the religions, providing
                                                                a false pseudo-education that lacks actual initiation and lacks real
                                                                Philosophy, which was multi-state, altered-state-based Philosophy. I am a
                                                                representative of Engineering and the many Engineers of cybercult (for
                                                                example) who straightforwardly affirm the value of entheogens or
                                                                psychedelics — even if official culture makes-believe that Engineering is
                                                                “too straight-laced for drugs”.

                                                                Against the official version of Engineering, I truly do represent Engineers
                                                                in their entheogen-positive views. Against the official modern version of
                                                                Christianity, I truly do represent many Christians across history in their
                                                                entheogen-positive Eucharistic views, like it or not. When I assert the
                                                                Egodeath theory, I do so as a proud Christian, a proud member and product of
                                                                my church congregation, a proud member of my troubled and taboo-haunted
                                                                society, a proud member of my engineering society, a proud alumni of my
                                                                university (even though I often felt depressed about that university at the
                                                                time and a few years afterward), a proud American and product of America,
                                                                and now most recently (in the future from here on out) a proud confirmed
                                                                Jew.

                                                                People worked hard to produce me as a Christian, as an American, as a
                                                                Californian, as a Jew, as an engineer, and what they have produced instead
                                                                is this taboo-trampling monster instead: I am a proud product of and
                                                                representative of Christianity, America, California, engineering school, and
                                                                my university, and the many adults who deliberately shaped me into the
                                                                fullness of our culture and its tabooed views and practices, as well as my
                                                                peers. What have you wrought? What is the product of your efforts, your
                                                                systems, our social forms? The Egodeath theory, me, my Theory.

                                                                This is what I give back to the society that formed me; this is its product,
                                                                through me, this is the best and most valuable thing I could possibly offer:
                                                                the Egodeath theory. Like it or not, pretend to like it or not, be shocked
                                                                or offended or not, or cheer and praise it or not — you get what you get,
                                                                you get what you sowed, you get your return on your investment. People gave
                                                                their lives and shed their blood in battle, and I gave my life energy, in
                                                                order to bring forth this ultimate, paradigm-shattering product, the
                                                                Egodeath theory: systematized explicit transcendent knowledge.
                                                                Group: egodeath Message: 5110 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/12/2007
                                                                Subject: Emergent missional post-church practice, entheogen house-church move
                                                                Attachments :
                                                                  I often puzzle over what role or practice I could possibly do to be a
                                                                  meaningful part of Christianity and Christian practice. I researched
                                                                  “missional”, “emergent”, “house church” and “dying church”. My grandfather
                                                                  wanted me to preach the gospel. In a sense the answer is in front of me:
                                                                  studying, theorizing, and writing about religion and the New Testament
                                                                  online is *already* “participating in emerging church” in the way that is
                                                                  uniquely suited for me as Egodeath theorist. I’ve already been doing it (my
                                                                  suitable appropriate equivalent for church participation), without realizing
                                                                  it. I’ve always thought that the best contribution I could possibly have
                                                                  for the bride of Christ (that is, the Christian church) is to set straight
                                                                  the original meaning of the New Testament.

                                                                  ‘Missional’ means mentally doing away with church buildings and professional
                                                                  pastors, and doing more like early house-church practice prior to
                                                                  Constantine, and taking “the church” more out within the normal,
                                                                  non-“church” world. The diversity inherent in Emergent or Emerging church
                                                                  suggests that no one single uniform model of “being church” or “doing
                                                                  church” is suited for everyone. We’re seeing a live-and-let-living
                                                                  diversity of versions of Christianity that is more like prior to the forced
                                                                  uniformity that occurred under Constantine and under the ruling-class bishop
                                                                  takeover movement.

                                                                  I have mixed feelings about the potential of Christianity. It can never
                                                                  attain the relevance it had in the Roman Empire, yet it remains the most
                                                                  important religion, and a theory of religion cannot possibly avoid
                                                                  Christianity, be must take it on and take it over, going *through* rather
                                                                  than around Christianity. This includes abandoning the idea of the
                                                                  perfectibility of Christianity and the Christian societal project.
                                                                  Christianity will remain always a broken tool. Yet we must perfect and
                                                                  repair to the extent possible this broken tool, this solution that perfectly
                                                                  fits a problem (the Roman Empire) that’s different than today’s problem. At
                                                                  best, a repaired Christianity can only be half-successful, because it no
                                                                  longer has the Roman Empire to push against and to serve as a more desirable
                                                                  alternative to.

                                                                  Many Christians are coming to feel “I can’t stand the church”. Many
                                                                  Christians are concluding that “the church” must be killed to make way for
                                                                  *the church*, meaning the expanding alternative network-community of
                                                                  followers of Jesus against empire. This requires throwing away the
                                                                  institutional church which has become merely an arm of empire, a tool to
                                                                  prop up empire, and doing away with Christendom.

                                                                  For “house church”, think “Ayahuasca Christian worship, with the Social
                                                                  Gospel”. Christianity is thus strategic and fitting for the Egodeath theory
                                                                  and the maximal entheogen theory of religion. If entheogenists just ignore
                                                                  Christianity, then they cannot *leverage* its huge potential, given that New
                                                                  Testament Christianity was the use of visionary plants within a
                                                                  kingdom-of-God metaphor-framework, serving to construct a just
                                                                  social-political configuration.

                                                                  Many Christian group leaders have incorporated the true psychoactive
                                                                  Eucharist into their group worship practices. These would be today’s
                                                                  persecuted Christian groups, although I must reiterate that Christians were
                                                                  not persecuted for drug use (which was the cultural norm), but, if anything,
                                                                  for rejecting the social-political system of the Roman Empire (as well as
                                                                  resisting the later ruling-class bishop takeover movement).

                                                                  If you wish that there were an existing influential religion that was based
                                                                  on psychedelics and was used for social justice, there is, and it is New
                                                                  Testament Christianity in the Roman Empire. It is no coincidence that the
                                                                  peyote and Ayahuasca Christian micro-churches so readily manage to integrate
                                                                  psychoactives into their Eucharistic practice, because until the modern era,
                                                                  ever since early proto-Christianity, the Eucharist was understood in
                                                                  mainstream Christianity to be visionary plants. Where is the power to win
                                                                  new converts? The power to win new converts to the Christian faith is in
                                                                  the psychoactive flesh and blood of Christ our savior, who has come in the
                                                                  likeness of sinful flesh.

                                                                  Many Christians agree that we must destroy Christianity (or that which has
                                                                  passed for such) in order to save it.

                                                                  Given that the Roman Empire doesn’t exist for the gospel’s alternate savior
                                                                  figure to push against, the best we can do is to explain the Roman Empire as
                                                                  that which Christianity was a rebuttal to, and equate the Roman Empire with
                                                                  today’s empire — something like “Jesus and his rejected sacramental body,
                                                                  not Bush/Cheney and their Evangelical Right support-base, is my lord and
                                                                  savior.” Now *this* is the true gospel, of spiritual salvation and the
                                                                  kingdom of God, that’s worth proselytizing, worth inviting others into.

                                                                  Entheogenic house churches have the sacrament-administering advantage over
                                                                  mere home bible-study and prayer groups that are limited to the ordinary
                                                                  state of consciousness decorated with emotionalism. The New Testament
                                                                  serves as the guide to righteously and justly interpret and shape the
                                                                  intense altered-state Holy Spirit experiencing that results from ingesting
                                                                  the Eucharistic flesh of the savior.


                                                                  Reference: books:

                                                                  The Forgotten Ways: Reactivating the Missional Church
                                                                  by Alan Hirsch
                                                                  http://www.amazon.com/dp/1587431645/
                                                                  Jan. 2007

                                                                  Starting a House Church
                                                                  by Larry Kreider, Floyd McClung
                                                                  http://www.amazon.com/dp/0830743650/
                                                                  April 2007

                                                                  See the associated books and book lists, with an eye toward radical
                                                                  replacement of “churches” and “Christian culture” with entirely new forms.
                                                                  These are the leading edge of change and vitality within an otherwise
                                                                  stagnant, dead, and inert topic.
                                                                  Group: egodeath Message: 5111 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2007
                                                                  Subject: Re: Emergent missional post-church practice, entheogen house-church
                                                                  Attachments :
                                                                    Podcast of this posting:

                                                                    7 minutes, 5 MB

                                                                    One way to download the file: at
                                                                    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/5111 (intended to be the
                                                                    number of the present message)
                                                                    right-click the URL
                                                                    http://www.egodeath.com/mp3s/EmergentEntheogenChurch.mp3
                                                                    and Save As.
                                                                    Group: egodeath Message: 5112 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/12/2007
                                                                    Subject: Re: Technical voice-recording notes
                                                                    Attachments :
                                                                      On my latest spoken-word file, reading the posting “Emergent missional
                                                                      post-church practice, entheogen house-church movement”, I spoke louder (at
                                                                      presentation-level, risking a “shouting” impression), to get above the noise
                                                                      floor, and amplified the result by 3dB to push it into momentary distortion,
                                                                      to make the playback level louder. I completely disconnected all unneeded
                                                                      cables to the mixer, to eliminate potential whine-feedback paths — for that
                                                                      reason or by luck, I think the mic had zero nuisance noise during this
                                                                      session — just the hiss floor, only.

                                                                      I’m hoping that this recording achieves my best signal-noise ratio ever, and
                                                                      achieves louder, standard levels. No compression or other processing; this
                                                                      should achieve an intense immediacy of presence (even though this risks
                                                                      too-punchy volume spikes and requires “manual” voice control while
                                                                      speaking). With no compressor, the risk is that you’re always alternately
                                                                      either shouting at the listener, or somnambulantly mumbling, as if you’ve
                                                                      run out of energy — it’s hard, it takes skilled control, to speak and
                                                                      project at the natural, just-right level, without the crutch of a
                                                                      compressor.

                                                                      I should deaden the room reverberation.

                                                                      To create a pretty clean recording with pretty fast, minimal editing
                                                                      required, I used the mixer master volume as a Mute, to create a quiet raw
                                                                      track, and then did quick minimal editing-out silences longer than 2
                                                                      seconds.

                                                                      Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 80: 2005-07-03

                                                                      Site Map


                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4023 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4024 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Psychoactives in Daumal’s “Night of Serious Drinking”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Alexandria journal contents
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Erik Davis: Led Zeppelin’s Zoso album
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4028 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Artic: Rogers: Angelical Stone, alchemy, visionary plants
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4029 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, & metaphor in Esotericism
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4030 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: She’s an Illusion, by Daybreak
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4031 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Journal: CoSM — Alex Grey
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4033 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Entheogen advocates disparaging other drugs
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4034 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Visionary plants in modern Western high culture
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Markoff: What Dormouse Said: 60s Counterculture Shaped PC
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4036 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4037 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: What kind of writing was the Gospel Jesus lifestory?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4038 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Charges against James Arthur
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4039 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: James Arthur’s claimed original discoveries
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4040 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4041 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Integrating psychoactives into culture
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4042 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 13/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk: Freke/Gandy: Laughing J.: Relig. Lies & Gnos. Wisdom
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4043 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 14/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Metaphor: astral immortality, stars/sparks/flames/fire/torches/light
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4044 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 14/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Metaphor: astral immortality, stars/sparks/flames/fire/torches/
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4045 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Michell: Dimensions of Paradise
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4046 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neuroscience
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4047 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Documentaries: Transpersonal Psychology, Grof, Vaughan, Metzner, Ta
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4048 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Acad. Estab’ent commitment to reject’g enth theory relig
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4049 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Visionary plants and astral ascent mysticism (mystic cosmology)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4050 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neurosc
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4051 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neurosc
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4052 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: ‘Fraud’ is a category error in characterizing sacred history
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4053 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Wilber diagram band-aid “also: altered states”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4054 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4055 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: ‘Fraud’ is a category error in characterizing sacred history
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4056 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Haoma in Mithraism
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4057 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bookstore starts ‘Gnosis’ section
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4058 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Monk to Needleman: “things 1000 times better than yoga”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4059 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Nietzsche as ecstatic entheogen shaman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Amazon book wishlists: esotericism/egodeath
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4061 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Richard Tarnas: Cosmos & Psyche (mystic astrology)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4062 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk: Richard Tarnas: Cosmos & Psyche (mystic astrology)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: bks: King thought of as divine
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Rush ‘Feedback’ album w/ psychedelic cover, psych covers
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4065 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Ken Wilber on some Western Esotericism
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4066 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bks: Christian Ratsch, in German
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4067 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Baigent & Leigh “Elixir & Stone” esoteric magic/alchemy
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4068 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Sergius Golowin: visionary plants in fairy tales
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4069 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Skallagrimsson: Scientific Magic (incl. visionary plants)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4070 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Matrix of views: Hist. Jesus & Paulines authenticity
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4071 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 26/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Johnson: N. Star Rd: Sham’m, Witchcraft, Otherworld Journey



                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      Huston Smith wrote in 1964 [condensed excerpts]:

                                                                      __________________

                                                                      http://www.psychedelic-library.org/hsmith.htm

                                                                      Do Drugs Have Religious Import?
                                                                      Huston Smith, Ph.D.
                                                                      CThe Journal of Philosophy, Vol LXI, No. 18, September 17, 1964


                                                                      Drugs have light to throw on the history of religion, the
                                                                      phenomenology of religion, and the philosophy of religion. Vegetables
                                                                      and actions altered states of consciousness; these altered states are
                                                                      the products of changes in brain chemistry. These states historically
                                                                      tended to be connected in some way with religion. These
                                                                      consciousness-changing devices have been linked with religion. They
                                                                      may have actually initiated many of the religious perspectives which
                                                                      continued after their psychedelic origins were forgotten.

                                                                      Robert Graves, Gordon Wasson, and Alan Watts have suggested that most
                                                                      religions arose from such chemically-induced theophanies. In a 1963
                                                                      journal of Phi Beta Kappa, Mary Barnard wrote “Which was more likely
                                                                      to happen first:

                                                                      o The spontaneously generated idea of an afterlife in which the
                                                                      disembodied soul, liberated from the restrictions of time and space,
                                                                      experiences eternal bliss

                                                                      o The accidental discovery of hallucinogenic plants that give a sense
                                                                      of euphoria, dislocate the center of consciousness, and distort time
                                                                      and space, making them balloon outward in greatly expanded vistas

                                                                      “The latter experience might have had an explosive effect on the
                                                                      largely dormant minds of men, causing them to think of things they had
                                                                      never thought of before. This is direct revelation. Fifty
                                                                      theo-botanists working for fifty years would make the current theories
                                                                      concerning the origins of much mythology and theology as out-of-date
                                                                      as pre-Copernican astronomy.”

                                                                      This is an important hypothesis, which must surely engage the
                                                                      attention of historians of religion for some time to come. The crux
                                                                      of the historical question is: What is the extent to which drugs
                                                                      generate or shape theologies, rather than merely duplicating or
                                                                      simulating theologically sponsored experiences?

                                                                      Phenomenology attempts a careful description of human experience.
                                                                      Therefore the drugs pose the following question for the phenomenology
                                                                      of religion: Do the experiences induced by drugs differ from religious
                                                                      experiences reached without drugs? If they differ, how do they
                                                                      differ?

                                                                      Even the Bible notes that chemically induced psychic states bear some
                                                                      resemblance to religious ones. Are such comparisons, paralleled in
                                                                      the accounts of virtually every religion, superficial? How far can
                                                                      they be pushed? Not all the way, students of religion have thus far
                                                                      insisted. R. C. Zaehner has drawn the line emphatically. “The
                                                                      importance of Huxley’s Doors of Perception is that the author claims
                                                                      that what he experienced under the influence of mescalin is closely
                                                                      comparable to a genuine mystical experience. If he is right, the
                                                                      conclusions are alarming.” Zaehner thinks Huxley is not right — but
                                                                      actually, Huxley is correct.

                                                                      __________________


                                                                      Gnosis 10th anniv. issue, p. 35
                                                                      http://www.lumen.org/issue_contents/contents37.html
                                                                      Interview with Huston Smith.

                                                                      He holds that there is spotty evidence for the theory that all the
                                                                      religions originated from entheogens.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4023 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      Gnosis 10th anniv. issue, p. 35
                                                                      http://www.lumen.org/issue_contents/contents37.html
                                                                      Interview with Huston Smith.

                                                                      Smoley and Kinney, editors of Gnosis journal and two book compilations
                                                                      from it, asked Huston Smith essentially about the maximal entheogen
                                                                      theory of religion — showing that they are to some extent aware of
                                                                      the basic idea of the maximal entheogen theory of religion, the thesis
                                                                      that “all religions had their start in psychedelic experiences”.


                                                                      Kinney: “Some proponents of psychedelics seem to say that all
                                                                      religions had their start in psychedelic experiences. Do you agree?”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4024 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Huston Smith on entheogen theory of relig. origins
                                                                      The maximal entheogen theory of myth/religion/Esotericism is not
                                                                      identical to the thesis that all religions had their start in
                                                                      psychedelic experiences. According to the truly maximal theory, which
                                                                      I have defined and emphasized to fill-in, the *ongoing* origin or
                                                                      wellspring of myth and religion has always been visionary plants —
                                                                      not merely the long-ago *temporal* origin.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Psychoactives in Daumal’s “Night of Serious Drinking”
                                                                      Mount Daumal: A review of “Rene Daumal: The Life and Work of a Mystic
                                                                      Guide”, by Kathleen Ferrick Rosenblatt
                                                                      Review by Erik Davis
                                                                      http://www.techgnosis.com/daumal.html
                                                                      Erik Davis wrote:
                                                                      “… 36-year-old Rene Daumal died in Paris near the close of World War
                                                                      II … Daumal’s first claim to fame was the precociously weird group
                                                                      he formed with three teenage pals known as Le Grand Jeu. They wanted
                                                                      political, psychological, and metaphysical revolution, with
                                                                      pretentious rants and all (“No more free will! No more whim or
                                                                      fantasy! No more pretty things!”). Anticipating the 1960s, they dived
                                                                      into automatic handwriting, astral travel, sensory deprivation and
                                                                      drugs. Daumal’s most notable experiments involved carbon
                                                                      tetrachloride, an impressively toxic dry-cleaning solvent that
                                                                      launched him into a near-death experience that eventually crystallized
                                                                      into his essay “Determining Memory,” a play-by-play of druggy gnosis
                                                                      worthy of William James. The chemical also probably contributed to
                                                                      the TB that killed Daumal in 1944, though a lifetime of Gaulois
                                                                      probably didn’t help things much.”


                                                                      I would define ‘scientism’ as, a materialistic scientific view of the
                                                                      world that is based in the ordinary state of consciousness and has not
                                                                      integrated data from the dissociative state.


                                                                      James O’Meara wrote:
                                                                      >>A night of serious drinking” (http://tinyurl.com/b8lhr) contains
                                                                      this passage that may have some hidden significance: a “true
                                                                      scientist” has developed a method to cure the disease of “scientism”:

                                                                      _______________

                                                                      “So it’s a microbic disease?”

                                                                      “Yes, and the microbe has been around for a long time. The protozoa
                                                                      swarmed even on the tree of knowledge. ….To preserve us against this
                                                                      microbe, we have but one radical remedy: the sap of the tree of
                                                                      life….But how could we get hold of it? It was only after ten years
                                                                      research that it came to me. The serum had really existed from time
                                                                      immemorial; specialists have been making it daily, and it would be
                                                                      quite possible to make industrial quantities at practically no cost at
                                                                      all…”

                                                                      “I thought, ‘does he mean wine?’….”

                                                                      “Holy water, young man, holy water! … For the most suitable cases
                                                                      we adopt the following procedure: With the first inoculation, the
                                                                      Scienter concludes that the miracles of Lourdes are real. After the
                                                                      second, the Holy Virgin appears to him. With the third, he recognizes
                                                                      the infallibility of the Pope. By the fourth, he is going to
                                                                      confession and mass. By the fifth, hope speaks within him: ‘Thou
                                                                      shalt live in Paradise.’ By the sixth, charity speaks within him: ‘
                                                                      Inoculate others as you yourself have been inoculated.’ By the
                                                                      seventh, faith speaks within him: ‘Seek no more to understand.’ At
                                                                      this point, I claim that he is cured. Unfortunately the Authorities,
                                                                      who still live in the shadow of crude materialistic superstitions, are
                                                                      reluctant to acknowledge the effectiveness of my cure.”

                                                                      _______________

                                                                      James O’Meara wrote:
                                                                      >>Note the possible references to psychoactive substances and gnostic
                                                                      themes: tree of life, sap, wine, holy water, made in industrial
                                                                      quantities, 7 inoculations, opposition from materialistic authorities.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Alexandria journal contents
                                                                      Issue 3
                                                                      The Alchemy of Art — Arthur Versluis. (Listed because I found a
                                                                      passage in a book by Versluis (not Godwin?) about his use of LSD and
                                                                      his awakening from it.)


                                                                      The passage might actually be in the book

                                                                      The Elements of Shamanism
                                                                      Nevill Drury
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1852300698/
                                                                      1989
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 07/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Erik Davis: Led Zeppelin’s Zoso album
                                                                      Led Zeppelin (33 1/3)
                                                                      Erik Davis
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0826416586/

                                                                      Condensed blurbs:
                                                                      >>In this entertaining and informed homage to one of Rock’s towering
                                                                      pinnacles, Erik Davis investigates the magic that surrounds this
                                                                      album. Peeling the layers from each song, Davis reveals their dark
                                                                      mystical roots, considering this inspired, brilliantly played rock
                                                                      album as a form of occult induction.

                                                                      >>Erik Davis has been writing about music, subcultures, and technology
                                                                      for fifteen years. His cult book Techgnosis: Myth, Magic, and
                                                                      Mysticism in the Age of Information (1998), was translated into five
                                                                      languages and has recently been republished with a new introduction by
                                                                      Serpents Tail. He is a regular contributor to Wired, and lives in San
                                                                      Francisco, where he is currently researching the history of California
                                                                      counterculture.

                                                                      Condensed excerpt:
                                                                      >>Stripping Led Zeppelin’s famous name off the record let their Great
                                                                      Work symbolically stand on its own two feet. The wordless jacket lent
                                                                      the album charisma, as fans hunted for hidden meanings. This helped
                                                                      create a Rock paradox: an esoteric megahit, a blockbuster arcanum.
                                                                      Stripped of words, the album no longer referred to anything but
                                                                      itself: a concrete talisman that drew you into its world. All our
                                                                      stopgap titles are lame: Led Zeppelin IV, Untitled, Runes, Zoso, Four
                                                                      Symbols… The album was nameless in a Lovecraftian fashion, a thing
                                                                      from beyond, charged with mana. And yet this uncanny artifact was easy
                                                                      to buy.”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4028 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 08/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Artic: Rogers: Angelical Stone, alchemy, visionary plants
                                                                      This article in the new issue of Aires: Journal for the Study of
                                                                      Western Esotericism may be the first published scholarly work in
                                                                      alchemy that recognizes the work of Clark Heinrich to identify
                                                                      visionary plants in Western Esotericism, particularly in alchemy.

                                                                      The Angelical Stone of Elias Ashmole
                                                                      Matthew Rogers
                                                                      Source: Aries, 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 61-90(30)
                                                                      Publisher: Brill Academic Publishers
                                                                      Document Type: Research article
                                                                      http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/arie/2005/00000005/0000000
                                                                      1/art00003
                                                                      PDF – 30-page article


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4029 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, & metaphor in Esotericism
                                                                      Per my discussion group/weblog the past year or two (
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/ ), all Western Esotericism is
                                                                      based on the 4 themes I’ve been combining and emphasizing, summarized
                                                                      as ‘dissociation’ [theme 1], ‘determinism’ [2], ‘cybernetics’ [3], and
                                                                      ‘metaphor’ [4].

                                                                      There’s a continuous history of Western Esotericism, even if in recent
                                                                      centuries some official version of what’s called “scientific
                                                                      rationalism” has apparently hogged the limelight of publicity and
                                                                      people perceive Esotericism as being relatively underground — though
                                                                      it’s becoming easy to poke holes in that official claim of the strong
                                                                      predominance of that scientific rationalism, which has to struggle to
                                                                      maintain its semblance of a clear-cut hegemony.

                                                                      Each “cell” of Western Esotericism (each system, in each period, in
                                                                      each location) has always been based around the combination of themes
                                                                      about:
                                                                      [1] The cognitive dissociative state that is best induced by
                                                                      visionary plants
                                                                      [2] The problem of timeless cosmic determinism and trans-rationally
                                                                      transcending that determinism
                                                                      [3] Autonomous self-government and the origin of one’s will
                                                                      [4] Metaphors for such plants and the resulting dissociative-state
                                                                      phenomena.

                                                                      I am not particularly interested in alchemy — I am interested in all
                                                                      forms of Western Esotericism and how this combination of 4 concerns
                                                                      manifests in every form of Western Esotericism. Every article in
                                                                      Gnosis magazine is really about, or ought to be explicitly about, this
                                                                      combination of thematic concerns. If you look hard enough at any of
                                                                      the 51 thematic issues of Gnosis magazine, this set of 4 themes is
                                                                      present at the core. It has now become routine and cookbook to
                                                                      identify and highlight these 4 themes throughout books about Gnosis,
                                                                      mysticism, myth, and esotericism.

                                                                      One connection I’m looking for, that would be convenient to bolster
                                                                      the case, would be several clear, direct connections between astral
                                                                      ascent mysticism [2] and visionary plants [1]. So far, I’ve only come
                                                                      across some 4 hints, or sheer proximity, of these two themes.

                                                                      Astral ascent mysticism is the clearest organizing frame of reference
                                                                      from which to order and analyze all schemes of Western Esotericism,
                                                                      which is why it would be nice to identify several direct connections
                                                                      between sacred eating/drinking [1] and astral ascent mysticism [2].
                                                                      Transcending cosmic determinism [2] is already an explicit theme built
                                                                      into astral ascent mysticism, and ASC-based experiential metaphor [4]
                                                                      is clear enough in astral ascent mysticism, including themes of
                                                                      governing-agency and will [3].

                                                                      I have contributed various aspects of entheogen scholarship, but the
                                                                      real and ultimate contribution is not only to correct and improve each
                                                                      of these 4 theories (dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and
                                                                      metaphor), but to show how the resulting combination of the resulting
                                                                      corrected and improved theories fits together to provide the solution
                                                                      to understanding myth-religion or transcendent knowledge.

                                                                      When books such as Versluis’ _Philosophy of Magic_ talk about
                                                                      “Traditional culture”, “Tradition”, and “Traditional religion”, they
                                                                      are really talking about ASC-based culture as opposed to OSC-based
                                                                      culture, ASC-based myth-religion/esotericism as opposed to modern-era,
                                                                      which is to say OSC-based, culture/myth/religion/esotericism. Altered
                                                                      state of cognition (ASC); ordinary state of cognition (OSC); that is,
                                                                      the cognitive state of loose/fluid/dynamic mental association binding
                                                                      vs. tight/fixed/static mental association binding.

                                                                      The most effective way to induce loose cognitive binding is visionary
                                                                      plants, particularly the clean entheogens such as psilocybin
                                                                      mushrooms. The best way to think of Greco-Roman ‘mixed wine’, in
                                                                      terms of its resulting effects, is as a psilocybin-mushroom beverage,
                                                                      with variable plants being utilized to bring about the desired
                                                                      resulting effect that approximates to some extent the classic
                                                                      psilocybin-mushroom phenomena.

                                                                      A clarifying comparison and idea is that if you switched Ken Kesey’s
                                                                      Electric Kool-Aid with Greco-Roman ‘mixed wine’ (per symposium,
                                                                      Passover meal, and mystery religion), neither party would notice the
                                                                      difference; ‘mixed wine’ was phenomenologically identical to ‘electric
                                                                      Kool-Aid’. Scholars can pretend this was due to their alien culture
                                                                      and psychology (and physiology, per Freke & Gandy’s post-censoring
                                                                      passage in their book The Jesus Mysteries), but phenomenologically,
                                                                      it’s clear enough that for whatever reason, the experiences associated
                                                                      with ‘mixed wine’ were identical to the experiences induced by
                                                                      electric Kool-Aid.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4030 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 10/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: She’s an Illusion, by Daybreak
                                                                      Song: She’s an Illusion
                                                                      Artist: Daybreak (Lyn La Salle)
                                                                      http://members.aol.com/FoggVelvet/LSD3.html – “Lyn La Salle – Randee
                                                                      Ram Jet (Hy Nibble 9241; later A&M 889) Duluth, MN 1967 Flip is Takin’
                                                                      It Easy. This music is so classic that it might take a few listenings
                                                                      to appreciate the outrageousness of the lyrics. La Salle was also in
                                                                      the Duluth band Daybreak, who put out the 45 She’s An Illusion / Evil
                                                                      Eyed Woman (Westchester UA-424-42749)”
                                                                      MP3 track info (relevance unclear): shes_an_illusion.mp3 (don’t know
                                                                      how I got this file — from Web I think, can’t find it) JFProducer
                                                                      2000 Length: 3:11

                                                                      Transcribed by Michael Hoffman (quick initial try)


                                                                      Safe within the tangles of her flowing hair
                                                                      Fingers probing secrets of her mind
                                                                      Safe within the softness of the stitch in hand
                                                                      Dream of golden treasures you can find

                                                                      See her running slowly cross the meadow
                                                                      See her in the sand forbidding yellow
                                                                      She’s something else to everyone who sees her
                                                                      It’s sad to know it’s just a dream you’re after

                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion of your mind

                                                                      See her have the kind of love that laughs always
                                                                      Hoping for the time still yet to come
                                                                      See her hands her shortened skirt of shining light
                                                                      Never staying long with men in once

                                                                      Is she there or is she just a shadow?
                                                                      Changing with the ever changing yellows
                                                                      Her liquid body there before your eyes
                                                                      How long before you start to realize

                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion of your mind

                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion
                                                                      She’s an illusion of your mind



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4031 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      The website is popular and overloaded. Try 5 or 6 times for each HTML
                                                                      page and RAM file, if necessary.


                                                                      The philosophy and politics (far right and far left) of German and
                                                                      French mescaline circles in Europe between the two world wars.
                                                                      Martin Lee
                                                                      Entheogenesis Conference
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3761.html
                                                                      1 hr 5 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 13 Jun 2005

                                                                      Martin A Lee is the Author of Acid Dreams – The Complete Social
                                                                      History Of LSD: The CIA, the Sixties and Beyond.

                                                                      Sartre, Walter Benjamin, Jung, Lewin, Scott Thompson’s recent research
                                                                      on Benjamin, Frankl’s morphine suicide, Benjamin writing on mescaline
                                                                      and hashish (compared to politicized use of pot and acid in the
                                                                      1960s), Benjamin: the hallucinatory power of drugs penetrates the
                                                                      hallucinatory/intoxicating power of capitalism-culture
                                                                      (phantasmagorical marketing) 40:00, rightist Ernst Juenger (coined the
                                                                      term ‘psychonaut’ — ether, cocaine, absinthe, LSD, ), Juenger wrote a
                                                                      450-page book on his drug experiences _Approaches_ in 1970 and was an
                                                                      elitist who didn’t want “the masses” using visionary drugs; 1951
                                                                      Hofmann and Juenger took LSD per book _LSD: My Problem Child_. Some
                                                                      of Hofmann’s books were inscribed by Juenger.

                                                                      Harvard refused to do as Scott Thompson prepared: gather into 1 volume
                                                                      all of Walter Benjamin’s drug-related writing. So use this search:

                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=Thompson+%22walter+Benjamin%22+mescalin
                                                                      e

                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=Thompson+%22walter+Benjamin%22+hashish

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/MaximalEntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — Mark
                                                                      Stahlman of Newmedia, Sent: October 11, 2003, To: maps-forum

                                                                      http://www.maps.org/pipermail/maps_forum/1997-July/000027.html
                                                                      MAPS: FEATURE: FROM RAUSCH TO REBELLION: Walter Benjamin’s Uncompleted
                                                                      Book on Hashish, By Scott Thompson

                                                                      Scott J. Thompson —
                                                                      Hashish in Berlin: An Introduction to Walter Benjamin’s Uncompleted
                                                                      Work On Hashish
                                                                      — Paper read at the Walter Benjamin Congress 1997

                                                                      From ‘Rausch’ to Rebellion: Walter Benjamin’s “On Hashish and the
                                                                      Aesthetic Dimensions of Prohibitionist Realism” —
                                                                      An introductory essay by Scott J. Thompson
                                                                      http://www.wbenjamin.org/rausch.html



                                                                      The importance of drugs in literature and to literary studies
                                                                      Greg
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3799.html
                                                                      28 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 30 Jun 2005

                                                                      Beginning with Rabelais’ Gargantua and Pantagruel, concentrates on the
                                                                      importance of drug use in the writing of the following luminaries:

                                                                      Samuel Taylor Coleridge

                                                                      John Keats

                                                                      Thomas De Quincey

                                                                      Charles Baudelaire

                                                                      Fritz Hugh Ludlow

                                                                      Jack Kerouac

                                                                      William S. Burroughs

                                                                      Allen Ginsberg

                                                                      Phillip K. Dick

                                                                      Hunter S. Thompson

                                                                      The importance of the study of drug use in contemporary literary
                                                                      studies (especially in the work of Jacques Derrida and Avital
                                                                      Ronnell).

                                                                      Greg was born in England and has lived in Vancouver since 1990. He
                                                                      received a First Class Honors B.A. from Simon Fraser University in
                                                                      1994 and a Master of Arts (English) from SFU in 2004. He is the
                                                                      interested in researching the “rhetoric of drugs” and the author of
                                                                      Crystal Children.



                                                                      Kenneth Tupper
                                                                      Entheogenesis 2 Conference
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3780.html
                                                                      1 hr 0 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 28 Jun 2005

                                                                      >>Ayahuasca, an entheogenic tea, was until relatively recently unheard
                                                                      of by most people in modern Western societies, despite a long history
                                                                      of use among indigenous people of the Amazon. The “psychedelic” 1960s
                                                                      saw an explosion of interest in plant-based spiritual healing tools
                                                                      such as cannabis, peyote and psilocybin mushrooms. However, for a
                                                                      variety of reasons, ayahuasca remained known only to a few
                                                                      anthropologists and travelers to remoter regions of South America and
                                                                      was not among the panoply of substances that began to be used
                                                                      recreationally at that time.

                                                                      >>At the end of the 20 th century, a rapid rise of interest in and use
                                                                      of ayahuasca began outside its native environment. Although some
                                                                      syncretistic religions had been using ayahuasca as a sacrament for a
                                                                      number of decades in Brazil, by the 1990s these practices had spread
                                                                      both to urban centres within Brazil and to communities beyond its
                                                                      borders. At the same time, ayahuasca tourism to Amazonian regions has
                                                                      started to become a significant industry, and assorted plant materials
                                                                      to make home-brewed “anahuasca” mixtures have become readily available
                                                                      online.



                                                                      Witch Hunts and the War on Weed
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3747.html
                                                                      46 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 06 Jun 2005

                                                                      >>As an Entheogenesis presentation, Witch hunts and the war on weed
                                                                      will first compare important social, artistic, legal, and
                                                                      pharmacologicalsimilarities between the medieval inquisition and
                                                                      today’s drug war. The second part of the presentation will explore the
                                                                      role of the Black Death as the historical incentive for the
                                                                      inquisition, and then inquire into the evolution of scapegoating in
                                                                      the early 20th Century.

                                                                      >>The Rev. Damuzi is a writer for Cannabis Culture, co-host of Fane of
                                                                      the Cosmos radio and POT-TV show, reverend of the Church of the
                                                                      Universe, director of the Nelson Compassion Club.



                                                                      From Witches To Crack Moms
                                                                      Susan Boyd
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3776.html
                                                                      58 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 20 Jun 2005

                                                                      >>Susan Boyd will be reading from her new book, From Witches to Crack
                                                                      Moms: Women, Drug Law, and Policy. She will examine how drugs are a
                                                                      source of peace and the current war on drug is a war on any form of
                                                                      consciousness that competes with the ideology of hierarchal power.

                                                                      >>Susan Boyd is a community activist working with drug user groups and
                                                                      an associate professor in Studies in Policy and Practice at the
                                                                      University of Victoria. She is the author of From Witches to Crack
                                                                      Moms: Women, Drug Law, and Policy (2004) and Mothers and Illicit
                                                                      Drugs: Transcending the Myths (1999).



                                                                      Roman Villagrana
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3804.html
                                                                      1 hr 10 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 05 Jul 2005

                                                                      >>Roman represents a harmonious universe portrayed by dancing beings,
                                                                      galactic councils, sychromystics and other enlightened perspectives
                                                                      symbolizing the ever-changing moment he calls the eternal party. Roman
                                                                      loves to make art but ultimately he believes it’s a duty to his
                                                                      community and our existence as a visual representation of the world we
                                                                      want or have. He invites everyone to participate in a conscious
                                                                      movement declaring interdependence through the act of creating it.

                                                                      >>Includes an open mic session hosted by Chris Bennett and Marc Emery.


                                                                      Women and the Drug Experience
                                                                      Cynthia Palmer and Michael Horowits
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-2484.html
                                                                      Sister’s of the Extreme authors

                                                                      >>About their lifetime of research following psychedelic culture and
                                                                      about their business, Flashback Books, which had a booth at
                                                                      entheogenesis and which offers rare, out of print books on
                                                                      psychedelics and related subjects.

                                                                      >>Set decorated with the art of Luke Brown, whose entheogen inspired
                                                                      artwork was featured at Entheogenesis 2004

                                                                      >>Renee Boje talks to Cynthia Palmer & Michael Horowitz, authors of
                                                                      ‘Sister’s of the Extreme: Women and the Drug Experience’.



                                                                      Francis Thackeray on Shakespeare’s Pipes
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3730.html
                                                                      1 hr 12 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 05 Jun 2005

                                                                      >>Marc Emery gives some short opening comments and introduces the
                                                                      first Presenter, Prof. Francis Thackeray of the Transvaal Museum in
                                                                      South Africa, who discusses his research connecting Shakespeare with
                                                                      Cannabis use. Careful analysis of Shakespearean texts suggests that
                                                                      William Shakespeare, a prolific wordsmith, was aware of the
                                                                      stimulating properties of Cannabis sativa. Chemical analysis of
                                                                      residues in clay pipes from Startford-upon-Avon and elsewhere supports
                                                                      the view that Cannabis and other “compounds” were being smoked in 17th
                                                                      century England, even after the Pope had declared Cannabis to be
                                                                      associated with witchcraft.


                                                                      _________________________

                                                                      Entheogenesis 1 conference:


                                                                      Psychedelics, Altered Consciousness, and Visionary Art
                                                                      Jon Hanna
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-2471.html
                                                                      45 min, Date Entered: 09 Feb 2004

                                                                      Jon Hanna — Organizer of the Mind States Conferences and Editor of
                                                                      the Enthogen Review

                                                                      >>Altered consciousness resulting from the consumption of various
                                                                      drugs has had a creative effect on art throughout the ages. The use of
                                                                      psychedelics in current times has greatly influenced the visions
                                                                      depicted by modern artists from the 1960s to today. This lecture and
                                                                      slide presentation–a visual delight–will introduce and discuss works
                                                                      by artists who have been inspired by their drug use. The primary focus
                                                                      will be contemporary art, and the incredible twists and turns that it
                                                                      has taken on the psychedelic path.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Journal: CoSM — Alex Grey
                                                                      http://www.cosm.org/ – Chapel of Sacred Mirrors

                                                                      CoSM Journal is for the integration of wisdom and the arts.

                                                                      Click “Back Issues” for Summer 2004 – Issue 1

                                                                      Click “CoSM Journal” for Winter 2005 — Issue 2

                                                                      CoSM Journal, published by the Chapel of Sacred Mirrors, provides a
                                                                      forum for the emergence of Visionary Culture. … The work and
                                                                      stories of artists, thinkers, and community builders who are dedicated
                                                                      to transformative living, and committed to the integration of wisdom
                                                                      and the arts … to inform, connect, and inspire this evolving global
                                                                      awareness.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4033 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Entheogen advocates disparaging other drugs
                                                                      >>The importance of drugs in literature and to literary studies
                                                                      >>Greg
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3799.html
                                                                      >>28 min
                                                                      >>Date Entered: 30 Jun 2005

                                                                      >>Beginning with Rabelais’ Gargantua and Pantagruel, concentrates on
                                                                      the importance of drug use in the writing of the following luminaries:



                                                                      Greg includes many acid-inspired Rock lyricists in the opening list.

                                                                      Discusses interesting politics of entheogenists’ demonization and
                                                                      attempt to distance their “approved” entheogens from demonized crystal
                                                                      meth — their hypocricy and the heel of prohibition. “… Vancouver
                                                                      is poised to leave the game of necessary hypocricy aobut drugs … I
                                                                      understand Rick’s concern, and Doctor Holland’s concerns, and after
                                                                      many years in the trenches, I have a lot of concerns myself;
                                                                      nevertheless, I don’t believe that self-censorship is the way to go,
                                                                      if we want to really accurately learn about drugs.”

                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22crystal+children%22+greg

                                                                      http://cannabisculture.com/articles/1656.html — [condensed:] The
                                                                      1997 book Crystal Children continues the speed saga — it’s a
                                                                      collection of tales about the intersection of electronic music and
                                                                      dance culture with drugs, especially crystal methamphetamine. The
                                                                      term ‘crystal’ has been used to describe illicit, powdered
                                                                      methamphetamine since the early 1960’s, when Desoxyn (pharmaceutical,
                                                                      legal methamphetamine, usually available in a liquid) was refined by
                                                                      underground chemists to a more concentrated crystalline or glassy
                                                                      compound. Smokeable speed appeared about ten years after the early
                                                                      70’s, when a drug called ‘Ice’ hit the streets — a highly purified
                                                                      form of crystal meth that appears in a rock form, smoked.



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4034 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Visionary plants in modern Western high culture
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/MaximalEntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — My
                                                                      condensed excerpts from that webpage and discussion thread, with book
                                                                      and documentary links added.


                                                                      Hofmann and perhaps the Stolls were already nature mystics as opposed
                                                                      to simple lab-rat chemists, when they first came in contact with
                                                                      psychedelics. This potentially changes the whole story.

                                                                      Captain Al Hubbard had been seeing angels since he was a boy in
                                                                      Kentucky, according to conversations with Willis Harman. Hubbard’s
                                                                      conversion to become the Johnny Appleseed of LSD came in a vision in a
                                                                      wooded clearing outside of Seattle — before he was aware of the
                                                                      specifics of LSD, which had just appeared in Vancouver at Hollywood
                                                                      Hospital.

                                                                      In Connie Littlefield’s documentary Hofmann’s Potion, Albert Hofmann
                                                                      recounts an experience as a child while hiking in the Alps — before
                                                                      he became a chemist or found out anything about psychedelics. The use
                                                                      of hallucinogens — certainly various mushrooms and maybe ergot
                                                                      preparations — by artistic/phiosophical/mystic circles in and around
                                                                      Basle and other places predated any of the LSD lab work in the 20th
                                                                      century by a 100 years or more.

                                                                      Nietzsche heavily used various drugs including psychedelics.
                                                                      Nietzsche began his career in Basle in the 1860’s. Rudolf Steiner was
                                                                      Nietzche’s librarian for awhile, so he knew about Nietzsche’s drug use
                                                                      and interest. Knowledge of the religious implications of the whole
                                                                      pharmacopeia was widespread in Theosophical groups by the late 1800’s.
                                                                      The Cosmic Circle around Ludwig Klages (in Munich and elsewhere like
                                                                      Ascona) were well versed in the use of hallucinogens — their acting
                                                                      out Eleusis suggests use of ergot as well.

                                                                      LSD-like chemicals didn’t come as a surprise to those who were working
                                                                      at Sandoz in the 1930/40’s. There was a long history of interest in
                                                                      visionary plants and extracts, which finally found its expression in
                                                                      synthetic organic chemisty in the 20th century. Research would prove
                                                                      that those involved, such as Hofmann and the Stolls, were not
                                                                      ignorant; we should stop assuming they were ignorant of psychoactive
                                                                      plant derivatives.

                                                                      Scott Thompson writes about the use of mescaline by Frankfurt School
                                                                      philosopher Walter Benjamin in the 1930’s:
                                                                      http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/2jcl/2JCL21.htm. Benjamin followed
                                                                      the trail blazed by Ludwig Klages and his early 20th century Cosmic
                                                                      Circle in Munich. Klages employed mescaline along with other
                                                                      psychoactives in his exploration of the intoxication of cosmic
                                                                      experience, starting around 1900. The Klages scene extended to Zurich
                                                                      and Ascona, and is summarized in Martin Green’s book _Mountain of
                                                                      Truth: The Counterculture Begins, Ascona 1900-1920_ as well as in
                                                                      Robert Norton’s book _Secret Germany_.

                                                                      It would be far-fetched to presume that this early counterculture
                                                                      didn’t use synthetic mescaline and was unaware of psilocybe mushrooms
                                                                      and peyote. Scholars haven’t dwelt on this aspect because drug use in
                                                                      modern culture was treated with discreteness; scholars have not
                                                                      ignored, denied, and dismissed drug use in modern Western high
                                                                      culture.

                                                                      Richard Noll in his _The Aryan Christ_ described Carl Jung as having
                                                                      believed he was the reincarnation of the Mithratic deity Aeon. This
                                                                      was a controversial claim for Noll. Many who write on this period and
                                                                      its prominent figures are reluctant to bring drugs into their writings
                                                                      because they are afraid they might be attacked like Noll was.

                                                                      It would be far-fetched to imagine that Jung wasn’t familiar with
                                                                      mescaline and the psychedelic pharmacopeia. Harry Murray closely
                                                                      emulated Jung in the U.S. (to the extent of recreating in the woods of
                                                                      Massachusetts the “Bollingen” stone tower in which Jung worked and
                                                                      carried out his famous “affair”) and hired Tim Leary at Harvard. He
                                                                      was a top CIA personality profiler — Leary’s speciality as well.

                                                                      Freud used cocaine and he hired Lou Salome (the woman who came closest
                                                                      to becoming Nietzsche’s wife) as the governess for his children. The
                                                                      personal overlaps between Freud, Jung, Nietzsche, Steiner, Crowley,
                                                                      Klages and many others were numerous and extensive; it was a small
                                                                      world.

                                                                      By the late-1800/early-1900’s there was substantial interest in the
                                                                      details of cult practices in antiquity, including attempts to reinact
                                                                      the initiations of Eleusis, Isis, and Mithraism, and in the use of
                                                                      plants by various tribes around the world. These matters were widely
                                                                      known to those who were interested. There were ongoing Western
                                                                      traditions that used natural psychedelics in association with mystical
                                                                      religious practices. There are many reasons why modern science
                                                                      uncovered much of this long before Hofmann’s discovery.

                                                                      The modern-era mass interest in psychedelics happened around the Cold
                                                                      War. The widespread popularization of LSD reflects the desire to use
                                                                      psychedelics as a peace-bomb in the 1950/60’s. This was not the
                                                                      situation in the 1800’s or early 1900’s. The private use of
                                                                      psychedelics predates the synthesis of LSD and was continuous
                                                                      throughout human history.

                                                                      The pre-LSD history of psychedelic use can be traced in the context of
                                                                      little-known groups carrying out their versions of ancient practices.
                                                                      There was a thread of knowledge that was maintained from ancient times
                                                                      about the psychedelic properties of ergot. Use by these groups and
                                                                      individuals was never in the public record in the first place, so
                                                                      there was no public record to be later deleted. This makes sense
                                                                      because the word ‘occult’ means hidden, obscured from view, secret.

                                                                      Now we need a clear explanation of why and how psychedelics research
                                                                      was divorced from the powerful, occult historical knowledge of ancient
                                                                      tribal and religious rituals using these substances.

                                                                      Before the discovery of LSD, and the surge of interest and research in
                                                                      psychedelics that followed in its wake, how much knowledge was there
                                                                      about ancient tribal and religious rituals using these substances?
                                                                      How much interest and knowledge was there about entheogens used in
                                                                      Europe? Is there really any divorce that needs to be explained or
                                                                      perhaps is it more likely that the future couple (tribal religious use
                                                                      of psychedelics, and post-LSD psychedelics research) had not yet met?

                                                                      How much knowledge was there? Especially, was any significant
                                                                      knowledge of these substances maintained continuously since
                                                                      pre-Christian, tribal times — even if only by a few interested
                                                                      scholars, esoteric group members and assorted, ostracized heretics?
                                                                      Mark Stahlman and Dan Merkur supplied some names and groups.

                                                                      There doesn’t appear to be any occult connection with psychedelics in
                                                                      Europe to delete from the public record because until the discovery of
                                                                      LSD there was not much knowledge or interest in psychedelics in
                                                                      Europe. Probably because there doesn’t seem to have been widespread
                                                                      use or even distribution of any indole tryptamines, no phenethylamines
                                                                      and not even widespread use of Amanita in most of Europe. The
                                                                      tropanes yes, but these are different from what Dr Hoffman and
                                                                      associates encountered.

                                                                      Was there any continuous use among a few curious, brave, heretical
                                                                      counter-culturalists, mostly hidden from public record because of the
                                                                      hostile laws of state and religion?

                                                                      It is similar to the way use of psilocybe receded, but did not
                                                                      disappear in Mexico over the last 500 years, with unsubstantiated
                                                                      whispers in academic and adventurer circles of continued, hidden
                                                                      mushroom ceremonies, which were not substantiated in the west until
                                                                      the years around WW II by Heim, Wasson, etc. We’ve all heard of the
                                                                      folk-lore record of the magical properties of amanita in Europe and of
                                                                      the repressed herbalists there who similarly the hexing herbs in
                                                                      secret from the Christian witch hunters. Inquiries by scholars,
                                                                      clerics at the leading edge, and esoteric groups maintained or
                                                                      rediscovered knowledge of the use of ergot.

                                                                      Peyote is a good case to understand how “Psychedelics” have been
                                                                      artificially acculturated in the West. Researching the
                                                                      anthropological, psychological, psychiatric, and pharmacological
                                                                      literatures on peyote and mescaline, from 1886 up to 2003 reveals that
                                                                      the cultural takeover process has been standardized as follows.

                                                                      The modern Western research culture takes the plant, tears the
                                                                      cultural use of the plant apart from the active agent, immediately
                                                                      discards and ignores the social science field studies that report the
                                                                      traditional knowledge attached to that plant, and transfers the
                                                                      production of academically and politically valuable information to
                                                                      biomedical and psychological lab sciences, isolates and purifies an
                                                                      active agent, and treat that active agent as a brand new
                                                                      cultural/scientific object.


                                                                      — end of condensed discussion thread


                                                                      Hofmann’s Potion
                                                                      Connie Littlefield, director
                                                                      http://www.nfb.ca/trouverunfilm/fichefilm.php?lg=en&id=51064&v=h
                                                                      Produced by Kent Martin
                                                                      Writing by Connie Littlefield
                                                                      2002
                                                                      56 min 35 s

                                                                      Interviews with many LSD pioneers, Hofmann´s Potion is a chronicle of
                                                                      the drug´s early days. Interviews, music, and cinematography. An
                                                                      invitation to look at LSD ­ and our world ­with an open, compassionate
                                                                      mind.


                                                                      The Mountain of Truth: The Counterculture Begins, Ascona, 1900-1920
                                                                      Martin Burgess Green
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0874513650/
                                                                      1986

                                                                      Secret Germany: Stefan George and His Circle
                                                                      Robert Edward Norton
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0801433541/
                                                                      2002
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Markoff: What Dormouse Said: 60s Counterculture Shaped PC
                                                                      What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal
                                                                      Computer
                                                                      John Markoff
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0670033820/
                                                                      April 21, 2005

                                                                      >>Shows how almost every feature of today’s home computers, from the
                                                                      graphical interface to the mouse control, can be traced to two
                                                                      Stanford research facilities that were completely immersed in the
                                                                      counterculture. Crackling profiles of figures like Fred Moore (a
                                                                      pioneering pacifist and antiwar activist who tried to build political
                                                                      bridges through his work in digital connectivity) and Doug Engelbart
                                                                      (a research director who was driven by the drug-fueled vision that
                                                                      digital computers could augment human memory and performance)
                                                                      telescope the era and the ways its earnest idealism fueled a passion
                                                                      for a computing society.

                                                                      Search Inside:

                                                                      lsd — 41 hits

                                                                      drug — 37

                                                                      psychedelic — 36

                                                                      acid — 18

                                                                      mushroom — 1


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4036 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Kenneth Tupper
                                                                      Entheogenesis 2 Conference
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-3780.html
                                                                      1 hr 0 min
                                                                      Date Entered: 28 Jun 2005

                                                                      The video has coverage of Bob Wallace (a founder of Microsoft) at
                                                                      34:00 speculating that his use of psychedelics helped generate his
                                                                      idea of ‘shareware’.

                                                                      I have several of Tupper’s publications on the potential of entheogens
                                                                      in education.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4037 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 11/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: What kind of writing was the Gospel Jesus lifestory?
                                                                      Klaus,

                                                                      Your available relevant categories for the presumed character of the
                                                                      Gospel story are:

                                                                      >>1. The gospel story was meant as literal historical report

                                                                      >>2. The story was meant as social/political midrashic teaching, no
                                                                      mysticism/mystics involved

                                                                      >>3. The story was meant as natural mystical approach of ominous
                                                                      natural phenomena e.g. involving stars and drugs

                                                                      >>4. The story was meant as description for existential/psychological
                                                                      human experience

                                                                      >>5. The story was a treatise on idealist metaphysics


                                                                      That proposed GS (Gospel Story character) category system is limited
                                                                      because it assumes mutually exclusive categories of social/political
                                                                      midrash vs. drug-induced astral ascent mysticism. The Jesus figure
                                                                      was constructed through putting a twist on stock Roman socio-political
                                                                      themes (divine Caesar and Pax Romana) and *intermixing* this thematic
                                                                      domain with themes from the domain of drug-induced astral ascent
                                                                      mysticism. So where would ‘Michael Hoffman’ fit — your GS category
                                                                      2, or 3?

                                                                      Jesus as considered in the late-antique context could be said to have
                                                                      been a matter of psychological/existential phenomena but not in the
                                                                      sense you intend, because 20th Century ‘Psychology’ is axiomatically
                                                                      based in the ordinary state of consciousness, whereas the kind of
                                                                      “psychology” relevant for religion is specifically the opposite:
                                                                      psychology that’s grounded in the intense altered state of
                                                                      consciousness.

                                                                      The Jesus figure expresses GS category 5, “idealist metaphysics”, but
                                                                      again with a similar correction/objection to the usual definitions: in
                                                                      the Greco-Roman context, “idealist metaphysics” means quite different
                                                                      than in the modern mental scheme; it meant metaphysics emphatically
                                                                      based in the intense altered state.

                                                                      A problem with #3 is that it tends to commit or allow the mistake of
                                                                      reversing symbol and referent; per J.Z. Smith, mystics utilized stars
                                                                      to talk about mystic-state experiences; it’s not the case that they
                                                                      were concerned with “natural phenomena” such as stars and erected, per
                                                                      Acharya S, an encoded mystical system of meaning that ultimately means
                                                                      the stars.

                                                                      Use the terms ‘nature’ and ‘natural’ with caution — by 150 CE, the
                                                                      predominant popular idea and goal was to leap beyond the Natural,
                                                                      heimarmene-ruled realm, into the divine, magical, super-natural realm.


                                                                      Regarding your placement of Wilber and Watts with Grof in category 3:

                                                                      Ken Wilber has written so little about Jesus, mystery religions, and
                                                                      Greco-Roman myth, it is difficult to find passages where he makes any
                                                                      statements on the matter — it’s practically a giant gaping hole in
                                                                      Wilber’s presumably all-encompassing system. Wilber really has
                                                                      developed no theory of mystery-religion; he only has made a couple
                                                                      fumbling, uninformed comments on it. Instead, he only writes a little
                                                                      about Plotinus.

                                                                      Wilber takes it for granted that Jesus existed, and theorizes that
                                                                      Jesus attained an unusually elevated level of
                                                                      existential/psychospiritual functioning for that era (and that
                                                                      collectively, we have evolved in our level of psychospiritual
                                                                      development since then). Ken Wilber fits your category 4; that the
                                                                      events reported in the gospel passion report match as a description of
                                                                      existential/psychological human experience.

                                                                      Similarly, Alan Watts takes it for granted that Jesus existed, though
                                                                      he does explicitly and clearly define his position (p. 55-56, _Behold
                                                                      the Spirit_) on the relation between Jesus’ historicity, possible
                                                                      mythic-only existence, and the mystical meaning of the purported
                                                                      historical events. Your wording of category 3 is strange; I’m looking
                                                                      to place Watts’ view of the gospel Jesus story into a plain “mystic
                                                                      metaphor, acted out in actuality” category, but you seem to begin that
                                                                      category with “mystical” but then force “mystical” to end up as
                                                                      “natural phenomena involving stars”.

                                                                      Actually, more to the point than whether Jesus was a mystical symbol
                                                                      or a symbol for psycho-spiritual development, or a metaphysical
                                                                      symbol, is the broader issue of whether we should picture the
                                                                      mystical, psychological, existential, and metaphysical as grounded
                                                                      mainly in the ordinary state of consciousness, or in the intense
                                                                      altered state of consciousness.

                                                                      Your category 3 (“natural mystical approach of ominous … phenomena
                                                                      … involving stars and drugs”) is worded to better lend itself to
                                                                      grounding in “phenomena” encountered in the intense altered state of
                                                                      consciousness, whereas per the predominant modern-era conceptions,
                                                                      your category 4 (“existential/psychological human experience”) and 5
                                                                      (“treatise on idealist metaphysics”) connote being based in
                                                                      “experience” that’s merely in the ordinary state of consciousness.

                                                                      Entheogen scholar Clark Heinrich, noting John Allegro, explicitly
                                                                      points out that Jesus might be mythic-only, in his Jesus and Amanita
                                                                      chapter; however, he chooses to continue writing under the conscious
                                                                      assumption that Jesus did exist.

                                                                      Watts fits into category 3 easily, for both straight-up mystical
                                                                      reasons and the drug phenomenology metaphor connection, but Wilber
                                                                      cannot be as easily fit into category 3 as category 4. From the early
                                                                      60s to early 70s, Watts used LSD numerous times and has written a book
                                                                      on the subject, as well as articles and passages. Ken Wilber has
                                                                      never used psychedelics (only Ecstasy), and has written practically
                                                                      nothing directly on the topic of entheogens (he just theorizes about
                                                                      ‘altered states’ in general).

                                                                      I insist on putting myself in a combination of 2 and 3; that is my
                                                                      trademark position; that is my contribution, to show that the gospel
                                                                      Jesus figure precisely was formed by the deliberate, skillful mixture
                                                                      and combination of 2 and 3.

                                                                      It is hard to predict where David Ulansey will place Jesus, in the
                                                                      book _The Other Christ: The Mysteries of Mithras and the Origins of
                                                                      Christianity_. After I asked him to address the mythic-only Jesus
                                                                      theory, his book no longer appears forthcoming. Ulansey has appeared
                                                                      in a documentary about entheogens this year. Category GS 3 seems the
                                                                      most natural spot for Ulansey’s Jesus.

                                                                      David Ulansey is in this new documentary about entheogens:
                                                                      Entheogen: Awakening The God Within
                                                                      http://www.maps.org/sys/nq.pl?id=308&fmt=none
                                                                      http://www.bruceeisner.com/new_culture/2005/01/new_film_entheo.html

                                                                      >>David Ulansey, Ph.D. Professor of philosophy and religion at CIIS.
                                                                      Ancient Hellenic mystery religions / history and theory of shamanism.

                                                                      The Other Christ: The Mysteries of Mithras and the Origins of
                                                                      Christianity
                                                                      David Ulansey
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195153464/
                                                                      Planned: May 2005

                                                                      http://www.ciis.edu/pcc/conferencearchive.html#davidulansey
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4038 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Charges against James Arthur
                                                                      http://jamesarthurfans.20fr.com/photo.html

                                                                      I don’t know why the subsite is titled “James Arthur Fans” — that
                                                                      gives the impression that whoever named it was trying to be a
                                                                      tasteless jerk. That ambiguous impression aside, it’s good to see the
                                                                      legal information, though it would be better if we could talk with
                                                                      James Arthur himself about his views and see whether he says the
                                                                      report is factually accurate. Maybe he has written on the general
                                                                      subject of adult/child relations in cultural history. Maybe there are
                                                                      other resources that would suggest his views.

                                                                      According to the report, Arthur had repeated sexual relations with 3
                                                                      girls, age 8, 5, and 10 years.

                                                                      I continue to be pretty uninterested in sex in relation to
                                                                      transcendent knowledge — or, no more interested in the relation of
                                                                      sex to transcendent knowledge, than the relation of any other part of
                                                                      life to transcendent knowledge.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4039 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: James Arthur’s claimed original discoveries
                                                                      Scholarly innovation and priority of discovery is a complex matter
                                                                      because researchers influence each other, so it is a matter of degree,
                                                                      of clarity, of the special angle each thinker pulls together. Anyone
                                                                      who claims that Arthur didn’t contribute any single idea or
                                                                      combination of ideas, or an additional valuable view on the history of
                                                                      visionary plants, is choosing a difficult position to defend and
                                                                      uphold. His contributions were more or less of the same magnitude of
                                                                      any of the all-too-few books and articles on the history of the
                                                                      religious aspects of visionary plant use.

                                                                      There are too few books and articles to reject any of them as
                                                                      redundant and superfluous. I only know of one book that tries to
                                                                      contribute something in this area and seems to fail to contribute
                                                                      anything — a rambling, hardcover book that is supposedly about ergot,
                                                                      but seems to actually be about nothing in particular. It’s not
                                                                      trivially easy to assess the relative merits of the available handful
                                                                      of books about the religious aspects of the history of visionary plant
                                                                      use. Who contributed more, which book: Merkur, Heinrich, Allegro,
                                                                      Ott, Ratsch, Arthur, Hofmann, Ruck, Freke & Gandy, Graves, Wasson, or
                                                                      the other few important researchers?

                                                                      It would be a research project to put together even a list of
                                                                      *claimed* or *possible* contributions of each researcher of entheogen
                                                                      history. One way of contributing is through publicizing — not only
                                                                      publicizing and propagating one’s own distinctive findings, but also,
                                                                      publicizing the general awareness of historical entheogen use in
                                                                      religion and culture. With his popular book and his radio
                                                                      appearances, many people were exposed or re-exposed to the entheogen
                                                                      theory of religion through the work of James Arthur.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4040 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Women and the Drug Experience
                                                                      Cynthia Palmer and Michael Horowits
                                                                      http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-2484.html
                                                                      Sister’s of the Extreme authors

                                                                      >>About their lifetime of research following psychedelic culture and
                                                                      about their business, Flashback Books, which had a booth at
                                                                      entheogenesis and which offers rare, out of print books on
                                                                      psychedelics and related subjects.

                                                                      >>Set decorated with the art of Luke Brown, whose entheogen inspired
                                                                      artwork was featured at Entheogenesis 2004

                                                                      >>Renee Boje talks to Cynthia Palmer & Michael Horowitz, authors of
                                                                      ‘Sisters of the Extreme: Women and the Drug Experience’.


                                                                      12:00 — the editors discovered that Louisa May Alcott, great
                                                                      children’s author, under pseudonym, wrote about Majoon (hashish candy)
                                                                      in shops on the U.S. East Coast 1860-1869. How psychoactive drugs
                                                                      have been written out of history, but are being restored to their
                                                                      role.

                                                                      The editors’ library, Fitz Hugh Ludlow library will be online as
                                                                      “Ludlow …” something else. Flashback Books.
                                                                      http://flashbackbooks.com/

                                                                      Little Women
                                                                      Louisa May Alcott
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0451529308/


                                                                      Sisters of the Extreme: Women Writing on the Drug Experience,
                                                                      Including Charlotte Bronte, Louisa May Alcott, Anais Nin, Maya
                                                                      Angelou, Billie Holiday, Nina Hagen, Carrie Fisher, and Others
                                                                      Cynthia Palmer (Editor), Michael Horowitz (Editor)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0892817577/
                                                                      2000
                                                                      Illustrated, updated

                                                                      Shaman Woman, Mainline Lady: Women’s Writings on the Drug Experience
                                                                      Cynthia & Horowitz, Michael Palmer (Editors)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688013872/
                                                                      1982

                                                                      Moksha: Aldous Huxley’s Classic Writings on Psychedelics and the
                                                                      Visionary Experience
                                                                      Aldous Huxley, Michael Horowitz (Editor), Cynthia Palmer (Editor)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0892817585
                                                                      1999
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4041 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 12/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Integrating psychoactives into culture
                                                                      Someone wrote [edited]:

                                                                      Uncovering the many instances of individuals’ use of drugs throughout
                                                                      the history of the literary world, and the world of art in general,
                                                                      and then portraying as mainstream the use of drugs through the weight
                                                                      of those prominent people, may show how drugs influence expansion of
                                                                      consciousness. But by no means does that, in and of itself, become
                                                                      supportive for the use of drugs, or make it normal, or make drug use
                                                                      integrated into society.

                                                                      Given that drug usage is the norm among artists, many artists can be
                                                                      pulled out randomly, such as Vincent Van Gogh who cut off his ear and
                                                                      subsequently died from a self-imposed gunshot wound, and the tired,
                                                                      overused, prohibition-funded, lurid MTV storyline about pop musicians’
                                                                      rise, fall through drugs, then redemption. When the potential of what
                                                                      drugs can do is not culturally integrated into the society that uses
                                                                      them, there is little room for their survival as a means of enhancing
                                                                      life.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4042 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 13/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk: Freke/Gandy: Laughing J.: Relig. Lies & Gnos. Wisdom
                                                                      This book is available now.

                                                                      The Laughing Jesus: Religious Lies and Gnostic Wisdom Timothy Freke,
                                                                      Peter Gandy
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1400082781
                                                                      Around July 2005

                                                                      http://www.randomhouse.com/crown/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=1400082781
                                                                      Religion – Mysticism Hardcover

                                                                      All Freke’s books:
                                                                      http://www.campusi.com/author_Timothy_Freke.htm
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4043 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 14/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Metaphor: astral immortality, stars/sparks/flames/fire/torches/light
                                                                      In the intense peak altered state, it is common to experience flashes
                                                                      of points of light, and other light phenomena, including white-light
                                                                      perceptual feedback. These experiential phenomena have been
                                                                      metaphorized as stars, sun, fire, flames, sparks, furnace, torches,
                                                                      and light. This peak state also includes the feeling of timelessness
                                                                      and motionless and embeddedness as the sphere of the fixed stars as
                                                                      opposed to the moving planets.

                                                                      The conjunction of the experiences of motionlessness and star-sparks
                                                                      is easily metaphorically compared to the sphere of the fixed stars.
                                                                      The unfurled soul or spirit in ecstasy is portrayed sometimes as a
                                                                      curved cape with stars, a miniature of the sphere of fixed stars.

                                                                      __________

                                                                      Condensed quotes from scriptures:

                                                                      Unless God shall free you from this imprisonment in the body, you can
                                                                      have no admission to this place.

                                                                      A soul has been supplied to them from those eternal fires which you
                                                                      call constellations and stars animated with divine spirit.

                                                                      They that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament.
                                                                      They turn to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.

                                                                      God will raise you to the heights; he will fix you firmly in the
                                                                      heavens of the stars.

                                                                      Lighting the way of your star-like piety, stand in honor before God,
                                                                      being firmly set in heaven.

                                                                      They will live in the heights of that world. They will be like the
                                                                      angels and be equal to the stars.

                                                                      The ligaments joining his bones were severed — transformed by fire
                                                                      into immortality, he endured the rackings.

                                                                      __________

                                                                      While they are studying texts with their electron microscopes,
                                                                      scholars ought to learn how to read; mind your interpretive framework
                                                                      and become conscious of it; know the alternative interpretive
                                                                      frameworks and stop to consider and apply multiple frameworks to the
                                                                      passages in question.

                                                                      A perfect example of careless misinterpretation and projection of
                                                                      one’s interpretive framework onto a passage is that committed by Alan
                                                                      Segal in the book Life After Death, in which he quotes a passage that
                                                                      talks about “when the soul leaves the body”, and the comments on that
                                                                      passage saying “when you die”. But against his commentary, the
                                                                      passage absolutely does not say “when you die”. Nowhere does the
                                                                      passage say anything at all about dying — Segal has imported that
                                                                      meaning and projected it into the text. The passage he quotes says
                                                                      “when the soul leaves the body”. Not the same thing!

                                                                      A common theme in Greco-Roman art is the cape flowing behind the head.
                                                                      This is a portrayal of ecstasy — the soul leaving the head and
                                                                      unfurling as a sail, blown by the divine wind of inspiration.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4044 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 14/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Metaphor: astral immortality, stars/sparks/flames/fire/torches/
                                                                      “The ligaments joining his bones were severed — transformed by fire
                                                                      into immortality, he endured the rackings.”

                                                                      Body falling apart or being pulled apart or disintegrating into hands
                                                                      and feet and arms is a theme from schizoid, fragmented, altered,
                                                                      ecstatic cognitive state — a theme preserved in the Passion storyline
                                                                      as ‘scourging’, and in myths of Osiris, Dionysus/King Pentheus, and
                                                                      Kali as being torn to pieces.

                                                                      Before the Enlightenment and modern era, Western culture was grounded
                                                                      in the visionary-plant-induced altered cognitive state. Punitive
                                                                      torture was considered and approached in a mystiform way; flaying and
                                                                      scourging and dismemberment were considered in light of the mystic
                                                                      schizoid experience of bodymind dis-integration.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4045 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 15/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Michell: Dimensions of Paradise
                                                                      Nunnatsunega wrote:
                                                                      >>You should add this book to your book lists. It’s relevant to your
                                                                      model and theory of transcendent knowledge.


                                                                      The Dimensions of Paradise: The Proportions and Symbolic Numbers of
                                                                      Ancient Cosmology
                                                                      John Michell
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0062505874/
                                                                      1988
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4046 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neuroscience
                                                                      Regarding the book LSD by Otto Snow:

                                                                      How to be a top 100 reviewer: be a moron and don’t hesitate to talk
                                                                      with authority but with totally off-base assumptions, about things you
                                                                      know nothing about (talk about “armchair theorizing”). This is a new
                                                                      low in reductionist, standing-off-to-the-side “science”, a total
                                                                      travesty of the idea of “disinterested observation”. How could one
                                                                      *possibly* read more than a few pages about LSD and come away with the
                                                                      totally mistaken idea, which appears in none of the materials, that
                                                                      LSD is purely a visual effect?

                                                                      The reviewer gives a bad name to “Neuroscience” and shows how to do
                                                                      Neuroscience in the worst way possible. He almost seems to have a
                                                                      hidden agenda of pretending to speak for Neuroscience in order to
                                                                      defame that field by attributing ridiculous approaches to it that no
                                                                      one would seriously advocate.


                                                                      4 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

                                                                      Detailed discussion of the infamous drug, September 17, 2004
                                                                      Reviewer: magellan

                                                                      This is a detailed book on the chemistry, manufacture, and
                                                                      physiological effects of LSD. It includes comments by doctors and
                                                                      therapists who have used it in their practice, and information on some
                                                                      of the other medical uses. For example, until I saw this book, I
                                                                      wasn’t aware that it had an application in the treatment of
                                                                      specialized stroke-like migraines, which is how the author first
                                                                      became involved with the drug. So apparently there is at least one
                                                                      legitimate medical use of the drug, if one credits the information and
                                                                      statements here.

                                                                      I personally never understood the fascination with LSD. All it’s
                                                                      really doing is altering the chemical reactions in the lower strata
                                                                      and cells of the retina, the retina being composed neuronally of the
                                                                      rods and cones, amacrine cells, bipolar cells, Muller cells,
                                                                      horizontal cells, and ganglion cells in more or less distinct layers,
                                                                      although there is some mixing to some extent. It’s not even a retinal
                                                                      ganglional effect in the lateral geniculate nucleus, the main visual
                                                                      system ganglion, let alone a visual cortical effect. In other words,
                                                                      it’s a pretty primitive effect that occurs “up front” at the sensory
                                                                      transducer of the visual system and doesn’t affect, at least from a
                                                                      perception and sensation standpoint, the advanced visual information
                                                                      processing centers further down the line.

                                                                      Now if there was something that actually affected the three cortical
                                                                      primary visual receiving areas in the occipital lobe, or
                                                                      cytoarchitectonic areas 17, 18, and 19 of Brodmann, you’d really have
                                                                      something, maybe something really mind expanding and mind blowing,
                                                                      instead of what you have with LSD.

                                                                      And as for LSD being mind-expanding, well, it certainly is
                                                                      perception-altering, but the people I knew back in the 60s who took it
                                                                      certainly didn’t became any brighter or more brilliant taking it, from
                                                                      what I could see. On the other hand, they seemed to think it was
                                                                      something important. Still, they didn’t seem any more perceptive,
                                                                      creative, insightful, or smarter to me, although they often thought
                                                                      so. As someone once observed about Aldous Huxley’s book, The Doors of
                                                                      Perception, in which he reported on his experiences, it wasn’t so much
                                                                      that LSD helped him write more and better, so much as it helped him
                                                                      write more about LSD.

                                                                      Anyway, I apologize for waxing a little nerdy, but the neurobiology of
                                                                      perception and sensation is a subject I know something about, that
                                                                      having been my area of interest for my master’s and doctoral work.
                                                                      Although I’ve been out of school for a while, this was the consensus
                                                                      on the neurophysiological effects of LSD at the time, and perhaps
                                                                      you’ll find my comments there useful.


                                                                      — end of magellan’s 1-paragraph book review followed by 4 paragraphs
                                                                      of misinformed nonsense


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4047 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Documentaries: Transpersonal Psychology, Grof, Vaughan, Metzner, Ta
                                                                      The 6-part series Transpersonal Conversations: Founders and Leaders
                                                                      became available on DVD and video on May 6, 2005.

                                                                      “Wisdom Library”

                                                                      Formed in 2004, Transpersonal Media is the first documentary film
                                                                      company in the world to focus exclusively on films about transpersonal
                                                                      psychology and the consciousness movement. To date the company has
                                                                      acquired over 35 interviews with Ph. D. psychologists (all on
                                                                      high-definition video) for the series: Transpersonal Conversations:
                                                                      Founders and Leaders. This DVD series includes detailed interviews
                                                                      with: Stanislav Grof, Christina Grof, Frances Vaughan, Charles T.
                                                                      Tart, Ralph Metzner and many more.

                                                                      CustomFlix TRANSPERSONAL CONVERSATIONS DVD

                                                                      http://www.tpconversations.com/news.htm
                                                                      http://www.tpconversations.com/
                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=customflix+transpersonal+dvd
                                                                      <http://www.google.com/search?q=CustomFlix+TRANSPERSONAL+CONVERSATIONS
                                                                      +DVD >

                                                                      Transpersonal Conversations is a six-part series of cinema-quality
                                                                      documentary interviews with the founders and leaders of Transpersonal
                                                                      Psychology, the field of psychology that scientifically studies Human
                                                                      spirituality and consciousness.

                                                                      The series includes never before seen interview footage with:
                                                                      Dr. Stanislav Grof
                                                                      Charles T. Tart, Ph. D.
                                                                      Frances Vaughan, Ph. D.
                                                                      Ralph Metzner, Ph. D.
                                                                      James Fadiman, Ph. D.
                                                                      Christina Grof

                                                                      “We are very excited to be presenting these unique and intimate
                                                                      interviews with the greatest theoretical minds of transpersonal
                                                                      psychology,” said Transpersonal Media’s president, Kevin Page.
                                                                      “Without the support of several institutions like The Institute of
                                                                      Transpersonal Psychology and the Association for Transpersonal
                                                                      Psychology a project of this size and scope would never have been
                                                                      possible. This series is not only a labor of love for our
                                                                      company…but it has historical significance for the field.”

                                                                      Kevin Page
                                                                      President
                                                                      Transpersonal Media


                                                                      So you’d like to… Grok LSD on DVD!
                                                                      A guide by transpersonalfriend [I strongly suspect this is Kevin
                                                                      Page], Psychedelic Filmmaker/ Consciousness Filmmaker

                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/KHQMSZNSRT
                                                                      EU/ref=cm_bg_dp_m_2/002-5482766-6672010 — “‘TRANSPERSONAL
                                                                      CONVERSATIONS: 6-DVD Special Edition BOXED-SET!’is a six-part
                                                                      documentary series of cinema-quality interviews … with the founders
                                                                      of transpersonal psychology, the field of psychology that focuses on
                                                                      Human spirituality and consciousness. As it turns out…many of the
                                                                      founders of Transpersonal [Psychology] were also the leading
                                                                      researchers of LSD and other psychedelic substances in the 1950s and
                                                                      60s. That makes this set of videos a unique two-for-one experience.”


                                                                      TRANSPERSONAL CONVERSATIONS is a 6-part series of in-depth,
                                                                      cinema-quality documentary interviews with the founders and leaders of
                                                                      Transpersonal Psychology, the field of modern science that focuses on
                                                                      Human consciousness and spirituality. Interviews include:

                                                                      Stanislav Grof, M. D., early psychedelic researcher and co-founder of
                                                                      the transpersonal field;

                                                                      Charles, T. Tart, Ph. D., major theorist in transpersonal,
                                                                      consciousness research and scientific parapsychology;

                                                                      Frances Vaughan, Ph. D., author of the classic: “The Inward Arc” and
                                                                      former president of both the Transpersonal and Humanistic Psychology
                                                                      Associations;

                                                                      Ralph Metzner, Ph. D., one of the classic figures in Western
                                                                      consciousness research, along with Harvard professors

                                                                      Timothy Leary and

                                                                      Richard Alpert (AKA: Ram Dass) he wrote: “The Psychedelic Experience.”


                                                                      And others.
                                                                      _____________________

                                                                      In late 2005, Transpersonal Media will release the documentary feature
                                                                      “Science of the Soul”, about Transpersonal Psychology from its
                                                                      founding in the 1960s to its current cultural influence.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4048 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Acad. Estab’ent commitment to reject’g enth theory relig
                                                                      The academic Establishment’s commitment to rejecting the entheogen
                                                                      theory of religion


                                                                      Example of religious scholarly books mentioning drugs in passing in
                                                                      the preface/forward purely in order to “deal with” the subject by
                                                                      demonizing and disparaging it and refusing to grant the topic the
                                                                      dignity of any coverage in the body of the book.

                                                                      Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret
                                                                      Cults
                                                                      Michael Cosmopoulos
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0415248728/
                                                                      2003

                                                                      A full-text search reveals that this book is 100% pure from any
                                                                      coverage of: ‘drug’, ‘mushroom’, ‘opium’, … ‘wine’ has 17 hits.
                                                                      Front Matter: “And yet our age experiences a surge of private cults
                                                                      and religious sects, of drugs and abuse, of violence and materialism,
                                                                      forcefully proving how desperately we need to regain our
                                                                      spirituality.”

                                                                      Were these scholars to admit and allow the enthegen theory of
                                                                      religion, they know their entire industry’s paradigm would have to
                                                                      immediately give way and they know that the entheogen theory would
                                                                      have to become all-dominant; it’s obvious to everyone that there are
                                                                      only two possible paradigms: the entheogen theory is wrong and
                                                                      entheogens are of no real importance in religious history; or else,
                                                                      the entheogen theory is right, and the recently predominant scholarly
                                                                      paradigm (with its hazy “we can’t know, we don’t know, we can’t
                                                                      understand those mysterious ancients” attitude) is worthless and bunk
                                                                      and needs to be cast into the rubbish-bin in favor of the soundly
                                                                      solidly entheogen-based theory of religion.

                                                                      Either the entheogen hypothesis is totally wrong, or it is totally
                                                                      right. Given that the academic establishment is committed to the
                                                                      paradigm in which the entheogen hypothesis is not allowed, the only
                                                                      books permitted into print are those which toe the Establishment line
                                                                      that the enthoegen hypothesis is totally wrong and a mere minor
                                                                      curiosity that has little merit and explanatory potential.

                                                                      To admit that the entheogen hypothesis amounts to a complete and
                                                                      compelling solution with complete explanatory potential is to reject
                                                                      and go against the Establishment paradigm of “we can’t make heads or
                                                                      tails out of those mysterious ancients”, and call for that predominant
                                                                      paradigm-of-cluelessness to be completely dismissed and overturned.



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4049 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Visionary plants and astral ascent mysticism (mystic cosmology)
                                                                      Visionary plants are important in religion/myth/mysticism, and astral
                                                                      ascent mysticism is important and key in the history of Western
                                                                      religion/culture. Identifying firm connections between the two is
                                                                      powerful.

                                                                      The Ptolemaic cosmology, astral ascent mysticism, or mystic cosmology,
                                                                      is the key to understanding much of Gnostic mythic metaphor,
                                                                      Platonism, Western Esotericism, and Christian mythic metaphor. Astral
                                                                      ascent mysticism is a tangible, clear model of ascending through the
                                                                      planetary spheres (1st-7th) to the determinism-aware sphere (8th) of
                                                                      the fixed stars, and then beyond that to reach the realm (9th) that
                                                                      transcends determinism.

                                                                      Visionary plants are the key to understanding much of world mysticism
                                                                      including Western Esotericism. Astral ascent mysticism was induced
                                                                      through ingesting visionary plants.

                                                                      It is thus important to find evidence and signs of the connection
                                                                      between and close association between visionary plants and astral
                                                                      ascent mysticism.

                                                                      In the book Plants of the Gods, 1st edition, page 86, at the start of
                                                                      the section “The Hexing Herbs”, there is a woodcut showing a witch in
                                                                      herbal garden with the celestial sphere overhead.

                                                                      In the Hermetic writings, ‘drinking the cup of Mind’ appears in
                                                                      proximity with ascent to the 8th and 9th.

                                                                      The Religious Context of Early Christianity: A Guide to Graeco-Roman
                                                                      Religions
                                                                      Hans-Josef Klauck
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0800635930/
                                                                      2003
                                                                      The author also wrote “Magic and Paganism in Early Christianity: The
                                                                      World of the Acts of the Apostles” (2003)

                                                                      p. 486 — In Manichaeism, “the electi are saved and enter the real of
                                                                      light, … the auditores guilt … can be forgiven … their souls …
                                                                      will come afresh to the world in a plant that contains light and that
                                                                      will then be eaten by one of the electi … the souls … will be
                                                                      changed into … the food of their elect, so that they may be purified
                                                                      there and may avoid returning into a body (Augustine).”

                                                                      p. 496 — anointing & ascent to the pleroma: “In the hour of death,
                                                                      … the anointing gives the dying person the certainty that he will
                                                                      come victoriously through the perilous ascent of the soul. He can
                                                                      leave his body, relinquishing the particles of the soul in the
                                                                      individual stages through which he will pass, and thus can enter into
                                                                      the pleroma as a spiritual being. … the process of redemption.”

                                                                      p. 110 – tear living animals to pieces; [Dionysus’] representative is
                                                                      dismembered and served as food … by eating the bloody flesh they
                                                                      receive the god into themselves … it fits the ecstatic trait which
                                                                      is fundamental to the Dionysiac religion with its bursting of personal
                                                                      limits … theophagy, ‘eating a god’ …

                                                                      Compare that to the gnostic theme of eating plants that contain divine
                                                                      light-sparks to ascend past the sphere of the stars and return to the
                                                                      divine origin, the realm of light. -mh

                                                                      p. 96 — raises the hypothesis of kykeon as fungi/opium/drug, then
                                                                      dismisses it vaguely and carelessly with “the great majority of
                                                                      specialist literature [argues] against … that narcotics were
                                                                      involved” by footnoting Richardson p 345 and the worthless coverage in
                                                                      Burkert’s book Ancient Mystery Cults. Burkert is a bad and entirely
                                                                      too dominant scholar of ancient religion: his books are so worthless,
                                                                      dull, and uninspired because he invents feeble, arbitrary, forced,
                                                                      artificial, implausible theories in place of the entheogen theory.

                                                                      The Homeric Hymn to Demeter
                                                                      Nicholas James Richardson
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0198141998/
                                                                      1974
                                                                      p. 345

                                                                      Ancient Mystery Cults
                                                                      Walter Burkert
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0674033876/
                                                                      1987


                                                                      There is evidence of the connection between sacred eating & drinking
                                                                      and astrology in Klauck’s section “Astrology”, p. 231-249: it’s an
                                                                      excellent section on astrology and heimarmene, leaving the astute sage
                                                                      to merely highlight every instance of plants & plant products (applied
                                                                      or ingested, eating & drinking, medicine, poison, ointments) mixed
                                                                      into this section:

                                                                      p.236 — Mithras liturgy …. iatromathematics, … diagnosed
                                                                      illnesses … therapies … the cult and the art of healing … the
                                                                      festal calendar

                                                                      240 — Petronius — ‘Trimalchio’s feast’ from Petronius’ Satryicon …
                                                                      At the entrance to the dining room … stoppers … A round tray …
                                                                      pastry … cake … lecture given by the host … grocers and
                                                                      apothecaries …those who mix poison … taverns

                                                                      242 — ointments; even when she lies sick in bed … iatromathematics,
                                                                      the employment of astrology for medicinal purposes.

                                                                      244 — doctors

                                                                      245 — nocturnal sacrificial celebrations … persons who eat
                                                                      forbidden foods … poisoners

                                                                      246 — “I am indeed mortal … a creature of the day. Yet in my
                                                                      meditation I accompany the path of the stars, as they circle the pole,
                                                                      and my foot no longer touches the earth: with Zeus himself at my side,
                                                                      I feed on ambrosia at the divine meal.” — epigram attributed to
                                                                      Ptolemy.

                                                                      Regarding that passage, Klauck writes “the reserved pride of the
                                                                      astrologer who is able to free himself from earthly fetters through
                                                                      the … observation of the sky, and to rise up to the divine being.”
                                                                      Instead, he ought to write “through ingesting a divine meal of
                                                                      ambrosia”.

                                                                      The subsequent section, about Valens, focuses on predetermination,
                                                                      freedom, fatalism, freeing from this servitude, gaining mastery over
                                                                      fate. Klauck writes “For him, astrology is like a mystery cult into
                                                                      which one must be initiated by a mystagogue before one can become an
                                                                      initiate of this science.”


                                                                      Most history-books that cover astral ascent mysticism and also cover
                                                                      plants (less consciously) omit astral ascent mysticism from the
                                                                      coverage of ancient Greek religion, and fail to treat there the
                                                                      Platonism theme of ascent to the divine light. This gives the
                                                                      impression that we have to wait until 150 CE to see the theme of
                                                                      astral ascent mysticism.

                                                                      You have to switch to a different kind of book to see coverage of
                                                                      ancient Greek religion that does acknowledge the Platonism theme of
                                                                      ascent to the divine light. Both there and in the later
                                                                      Ptolemaic/Neoplatonic/Gnostic astral ascent mysticism, you can then
                                                                      look for the presence of plants, plant products, and sacred eating &
                                                                      drinking.


                                                                      The research approach to discover evidence of the connection between
                                                                      entheogens and astral ascent mysticism is to look for passages about
                                                                      astral ascent/heimamene and highlight plant-product references; and
                                                                      conversely, look for plant references first and then highlight
                                                                      mentions of astral ascent/heimarmene, in the appropriate books and
                                                                      magazines, such as the Astrology issue of Gnosis magazine.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4050 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neurosc
                                                                      >>And as for LSD being mind-expanding, well, it certainly is
                                                                      perception-altering, but the people I knew back in the 60s who took it
                                                                      certainly didn’t became any brighter or more brilliant taking it, from
                                                                      what I could see. On the other hand, they seemed to think it was
                                                                      something important. Still, they didn’t seem any more perceptive,
                                                                      creative, insightful, or smarter to me, although they often thought
                                                                      so.


                                                                      He ought to consider that visionary plants weren’t integrated into the
                                                                      culture, and by mid-60s, it was becoming career-damaging for anyone,
                                                                      such as the best thinkers, to be associated with visionary plants and
                                                                      substances.


                                                                      >>As someone once observed about Aldous Huxley’s book, The Doors of
                                                                      Perception, in which he reported on his experiences, it wasn’t so much
                                                                      that LSD helped him write more and better, so much as it helped him
                                                                      write more about LSD.


                                                                      >>Anyway, I apologize for waxing a little nerdy, but the neurobiology
                                                                      of perception and sensation is a subject I know something about, that
                                                                      having been my area of interest for my master’s and doctoral work.


                                                                      Waxing stupid, actually. Can that writer be serious? It’s less
                                                                      painful to believe the writer is insincere and is playing a hoax. How
                                                                      could you know about “the neurobiology of perception and sensation”,
                                                                      with that being your “area of interest for” your “master’s and
                                                                      doctoral work”, and how could you claim to know “the consensus on the
                                                                      neurophysiological effects of LSD”, while not even knowing which
                                                                      substance — mescaline, not LSD — Aldous Huxley experienced and wrote
                                                                      about?

                                                                      This is another exhibit of “I believe X, and I’m manifestly a moron
                                                                      and a fool”, which suggests that anyone who agrees with the writer is
                                                                      probably similarly foolish. Morons and idiots everywhere agree: LSD
                                                                      is purely visual, and doesn’t make people more perceptive, creative,
                                                                      insightful, or smart. Huxley himself wrote comparable ignorant
                                                                      chowderhead tommyrot about drugs when he was an objective armchair
                                                                      observer, prior to his first real first-hand observation of mescaline.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4051 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Absurd book review assumes LSD is visual only; armchair neurosc
                                                                      >>This is another exhibit of “I believe X, and I’m manifestly a moron
                                                                      and a fool”, which suggests that anyone who agrees with the writer is
                                                                      probably similarly foolish. Morons and idiots everywhere agree: LSD
                                                                      is purely visual, and doesn’t make people more perceptive, creative,
                                                                      insightful, or smart. Huxley himself wrote comparable ignorant
                                                                      chowderhead tommyrot about drugs when he was an objective armchair
                                                                      observer, prior to his first real first-hand observation of mescaline.


                                                                      Norma wrote:

                                                                      The word ‘smart’ doesn’t fit in well with ‘perceptive’, ‘creative’,
                                                                      and ‘insightful’. ‘Perceptive’, ‘creative’, and ‘insightful’
                                                                      intermingle, whereas ‘smart’ just pokes around with itself, with smart
                                                                      scholars often demonstrating little insight and perception.

                                                                      The ordinary realm of intelligence is not informed by experience with
                                                                      the dissociative state, so it cannot truly monitor or assess the frame
                                                                      of mind and then form thoughts to fittingly interpret the reported,
                                                                      described experiences. The ordinary world and realm of
                                                                      mundane-experience-based intelligence tries to judge that which it
                                                                      does not understand. Through that judgment comes mere criticism devoid
                                                                      of experience-based substantiation, because the worldmodel based only
                                                                      in the ordinary state of experiencing can’t ever substantiate that
                                                                      which it does not understand.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4052 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: ‘Fraud’ is a category error in characterizing sacred history
                                                                      Modern scholars/researchers are typically careless and sloppy in their
                                                                      framing of motives, particularly they neglect to consider the
                                                                      constructive esoteric aspect of mythmaking, instead rushing to frame
                                                                      what could well be esoteric metaphorical myth-construction instead as
                                                                      “a con” and “conspiracy”; a colossal category error can result, like
                                                                      mis-filing a fairy tale as “historical revisionist lies and forgery”.


                                                                      Did Hansel and Gretel really go to the old woman’s house, or is that
                                                                      claim a con, conspiracy, forgery, and false, revisionist history?

                                                                      We should pause, stop, put it in reverse, go back, and reconsider:
                                                                      what kind of writing is religious writing? Is it squarely a
                                                                      con/conspiracy/forgery plain and simple, or can we possibly think of
                                                                      some other category of writing which serves as a better fit, to
                                                                      *understand* first of all what *kind* of writing a religious writing
                                                                      is, and what intent and motive the writing has? What are the real,
                                                                      actual concerns, motives, and meanings, of writers of religious
                                                                      materials? Are the familiar conceptual categories such as “forgery”
                                                                      and “Gnosticism” introducing explanatory power and clarity, or
                                                                      introducing confusion, misreading, and distortion?

                                                                      I recommend extensively reading about Western Esotericism, such as
                                                                      Gnosis magazine, before attempting to critique and compare the
                                                                      historical origins and motives of early Christianities and recent
                                                                      variants. The attempt to do historical research without an adept
                                                                      familiarity with the culture of Western Esotericism is bound to
                                                                      produce distorted models of the concerns and motives of the
                                                                      originators, and thus, is bound to produce a broken, off-base
                                                                      reconstructed history.

                                                                      The attempt to historically reconstruct Christian origins without a
                                                                      strong grasp of Western Esotericism is bound to produce false
                                                                      historical conclusions and a broken reconstruction-model, involving
                                                                      misplaced confidence such as “the early Christians prove to us their
                                                                      belief in Jesus’ historicity, by their willingness to be martyred” —
                                                                      producing a confident view that amounts to a hall of mirrors (a
                                                                      network of systemically insufficiently considered assumptions).

                                                                      The hallmark of bad historical scholarship is a failure to seriously
                                                                      and consciously consider, in full awareness, one’s assumptions,
                                                                      including assumptions about what conceptual categories are available
                                                                      for consideration. “Perhaps hypothesis B is better than A, but have
                                                                      you considered the third alternative, C? Have you even stopped to
                                                                      consider whether there could be a third alternative?” People tend to
                                                                      get caught and frozen in the trap of binary thinking: for example, one
                                                                      such unproductive perpetual standoff is the assumption that “either
                                                                      religion is true, or science is true” (relying on a particular,
                                                                      arbitrary conception of ‘religion’ and ‘science’).


                                                                      Imperial Ruler Cult, early Christianity, and Mormonism were all
                                                                      efforts to utilize themes from Western Esotericism to leverage and
                                                                      legitimate social/political schemes or systems. First, Imperial Ruler
                                                                      Cult sought with some success to utilize themes from ancient Western
                                                                      Esotericism to leverage and legitimate the social/political scheme and
                                                                      system of Imperial Pax Romana.

                                                                      As a counter-movement, the various vying creators of Christianity made
                                                                      a show of explicitly modifying Ruler Cult to provide a competing way
                                                                      of utilizing themes from ancient Western Esotericism to leverage and
                                                                      legitimate a Jewish/Christian social/political scheme and system, the
                                                                      Kingdom of God.

                                                                      As an equivalent founding creator of a modern-era religion, Joseph
                                                                      Smith modified and formed a new variant of the Christian scheme to
                                                                      provide his own way of utilizing themes from Western Esotericism to
                                                                      leverage and legitimate a Mormon social/political scheme and system.
                                                                      Formation of schemes that utilize themes from Western Esotericism to
                                                                      leverage and legitimate a desired social/political scheme and system
                                                                      are by definition socio-politically self-interested in one way or
                                                                      another.

                                                                      We can call it “propaganda, con, forgery, and fraud”, but to truly,
                                                                      actually, and accurately understand such schemes requires recognizing
                                                                      as distinct factors the thing utilized (recognizing the stock themes
                                                                      and patterns from Western Esotericism) as distinct from the desired,
                                                                      promoted social/political scheme and system. The objective is
                                                                      twofold: have Western Esotericism (as a valuable goal and possession
                                                                      in itself), and utilize Western Esotericism to attain various,
                                                                      pragmatic, mundane, desired social/political configurations and
                                                                      objectives.

                                                                      The result is a complex/compound construction, myth-religion propping
                                                                      up a social scheme, not only a “fraud” serving the single purpose of
                                                                      propping up the social scheme. Those who utilized Esotericism to prop
                                                                      up Imperial Pax Romana didn’t *only* care about social/political
                                                                      concerns — the charge of “propaganda” fails to account for all the
                                                                      main parts of the system. Those who utilized Esotericism to prop up
                                                                      early Christianities didn’t *only* care about social/political
                                                                      concerns — the charge of “propaganda” fails to account for all they
                                                                      valued and were concerned with.

                                                                      Joseph Smith utilized Esotericism to prop up his new variant of
                                                                      Christian-style religion including self-interested social/political
                                                                      ends, but his scheme didn’t *only* care about social/political
                                                                      concerns — the charge of “propaganda” fails to account for all he
                                                                      valued and was concerned with. Any talk of ‘sincerity’, ‘faking’,
                                                                      ‘inventing stories’, and ‘fraud’, and the goals and purposes of
                                                                      religious invention, needs to take into account how the inventors of
                                                                      religions valued Esotericism and didn’t *only* care about
                                                                      mundane-realm social/political ends.

                                                                      Purely social/political explanations of religious origins are
                                                                      reductionist in that they are too woefully incomplete to afford an
                                                                      adequate understanding and explanation of what goals, objectives, and
                                                                      strategies were actually involved. “Rank forgery for mundane ends” is
                                                                      a grossly incomplete explanation of the goals, concerns, meaning, and
                                                                      motives for Christian origins.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4053 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Wilber diagram band-aid “also: altered states”
                                                                      Embracing Reality: The Integral Vision of Ken Wilber : A Historical
                                                                      Survey and Chapter-By-Chapter Review of Wilber’s Major Works
                                                                      Brad Reynolds
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1585423173/
                                                                      Nov. 2004

                                                                      The cover illustration of this book shows the tacked-on bubble “also:
                                                                      altered states” in the upper left. This indicates Wilber’s lack of
                                                                      integration of the topic of ‘dissociation’ (the intense,
                                                                      plant-induced, mystic altered state of loose cognitive association)
                                                                      into his overall theorizing.

                                                                      Search ‘drug’ —

                                                                      p. 318 — Altered States are nonordinary or non-normal stares of
                                                                      consciousness that are always temporary, including peak experiences,
                                                                      which range from “drug- induced states to near-death experiences to
                                                                      meditative states,” such that “Peak experiences can occur to
                                                                      individuals at almost any stage


                                                                      1 page with references to ‘chemical’ in this book:

                                                                      1. from Front Matter:
                                                                      “… a potential “peak experience” (Maslow’s well-known psychological
                                                                      term for an ultimate life experience). Wilber, however, quickly
                                                                      realized that although these chemical substances may give a person an
                                                                      experiential “peek” (his humorous modification of Maslow’s phrase)
                                                                      into the higher states and stages …”

                                                                      That page has the usual forked-tongue double-talk along the lines of
                                                                      “Drugs induce the mystic state. Drugs don’t work. Esoteric study
                                                                      doesn’t work. You have to have integrate the mystic state with
                                                                      esoteric study.”

                                                                      p. 7 — “Books … are only part of the picture; actual life
                                                                      experience is what really counts, as Wilber was always quick to point
                                                                      out from the very beginning of his first book and thereafter.”

                                                                      A partial truth, partial bull. Wilber’s first book starts off
                                                                      literally at the very beginning by censoring the lead-in from William
                                                                      James, “it has often occurred to me under the influence of nitrous
                                                                      oxide that” (the mind is a reducing valve/veil etc.).

                                                                      [Wilber] “experimented with the plethora of new ideas and novel
                                                                      techniques [in] the late 1960s and early 1970s … he generally
                                                                      steered clear of psychedelics even though he was surrounded by the
                                                                      radical cultural movement of those times (he did experimented, however
                                                                      briefly).”

                                                                      That’s uncertain or misleading. Wilber states in the CD interview
                                                                      that he has used Ecstasy and that he might have experienced LSD only 1
                                                                      time, if at all, and that he doesn’t know, because he just started
                                                                      feeling odd after a party, in college.


                                                                      “It was … claimed … if properly used, … psychoactive drugs
                                                                      promised a spiritual awakening … although … chemical substances
                                                                      may give … an experiential ‘peek’ … into the higher states and
                                                                      stages of consciousness, the real cleansing of perception requires a
                                                                      whole-body and integral lifestyle. This daily approach combines or
                                                                      integrates both personal and transpersonal practice, not just
                                                                      mind-blowing weekend ‘trips’ or esoteric libraries of bound books. …
                                                                      a person couldn’t just drop acid or read books at lightning speeds …
                                                                      to find the Holy Grail, the fabled elixir of immortality, the …
                                                                      Secret Essence he … sought during … his late teens and early
                                                                      twenties. Instead, … he must actually practice the methods and
                                                                      techniques he was intellectually hearing and reading about from the
                                                                      many teachers and spiritual masters … in unison … across the
                                                                      centuries, from every culture, covering every continent.”

                                                                      Wilber is quoted: “It’s a fundamental error to assume that moving into
                                                                      the higher stages of spiritual development is easy — something you
                                                                      can do in a weekend workshop, or by reading a book, or by taking LSD.
                                                                      Only through long-term disciplines can you make these experiences
                                                                      stable, permanent structures of consciousness. It’s very hard work.
                                                                      The truth is that transforming oneself is a long, laborious, painful
                                                                      process.”

                                                                      This argumentation sets up a fallacy: LSD isn’t instant enlightenment,
                                                                      therefore instead of drugs, you need to do daily drug-free sitting
                                                                      meditation, optionally supplemented by books. He doesn’t even
                                                                      consider or at all discuss the more sensible combination: utilizing a
                                                                      series of visionary plant sessions integrated with a series of books
                                                                      studied, which is the most ergonomic and straightforward approach to
                                                                      basic transcendent knowledge, gained and retained.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4054 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
                                                                      This text file is automatically posted to the Egodeath Yahoo group every two
                                                                      weeks.

                                                                      The Egodeath Yahoo group is a newsletter or Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman.


                                                                      This Yahoo group covers the cybernetic theory of ego death and
                                                                      ego transcendence, including:

                                                                      o Nonreductionistic block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
                                                                      and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
                                                                      holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

                                                                      o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
                                                                      ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
                                                                      self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
                                                                      and self-government.

                                                                      o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
                                                                      transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

                                                                      o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, the Eleusinian mysteries and
                                                                      cracking the allegorical code of the mystery religions, mythic
                                                                      metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
                                                                      and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
                                                                      Acid Rock mysticism.

                                                                      o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
                                                                      psychosis and schizophrenia.


                                                                      To post on these subjects, you can join the group
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeathunmoderated
                                                                      and then send email to:
                                                                      egodeathunmoderated@yahoogroups.com


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4055 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 17/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: ‘Fraud’ is a category error in characterizing sacred history
                                                                      Joseph Smith: America’s Hermetic Prophet
                                                                      Lance Owens
                                                                      http://gnosis.org/ahp.htm
                                                                      Article in Gnosis magazine about Joseph Smith as Western Esotericist
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4056 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Haoma in Mithraism
                                                                      About Mithaism from New Advent, the Catholic encylopedia:
                                                                      “The chief of the fathers, a sort of pope, who always lived at Rome,
                                                                      was called “Pater Patrum” or Pater Patratus.” The members below the
                                                                      degree of pater called one another “brother,” and social distinctions
                                                                      were forgotten in Mithraic unity. The ceremonies of initiation for
                                                                      each degree must have been elaborate, but they are only vaguely known
                                                                      — lustrations and bathings, branding with red-hot metal, anointing
                                                                      with honey, and others. A sacred meal was celebrated of bread and
                                                                      haoma juice for which in the West wine was substituted.”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4057 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bookstore starts ‘Gnosis’ section
                                                                      A Barnes & Noble bookstore has broken out a new section from
                                                                      ‘Christianity’ — ‘Gnosis and Christianity’. This is substantial
                                                                      because they don’t subdivide sections much in the Christianity
                                                                      section. The sections are now along the lines of:

                                                                      Comparative Religions
                                                                      Islam
                                                                      Latter Day Saints
                                                                      Christianity
                                                                      Gnosis and Christianity
                                                                      Christian Reference
                                                                      Devotional
                                                                      Jewish
                                                                      Buddhism


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4058 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Monk to Needleman: “things 1000 times better than yoga”
                                                                      Lost Christianity is back in print and is online. Here is the quote.

                                                                      Lost Christianity: A Journey of Rediscovery to the Center of Christian
                                                                      Experience
                                                                      Jacob Needleman
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1585422533/
                                                                      Search Inside: “thousand” —

                                                                      p. 36 — “an unforgettable moment … Father Vasileios … startled
                                                                      … me and our interpreter by saying, “I could tell you of things a
                                                                      thousand times better than your Yoga.” But he never said more, not
                                                                      even when pressed by the stunned interpreter. I asked … Anthony …
                                                                      about the work with the body, … the methods, the exercises … in
                                                                      the Christian tradition — somewhere, in some time. Where did they
                                                                      come from? Where have they gone? The whole modern world is beginning
                                                                      to look for them as an indispensable element of what has been lost
                                                                      from the Christian path. … Are these methods written down somewhere?
                                                                      Is there a text that has not yet been rediscovered which speaks about
                                                                      them in a way that could guide this new search for the practical
                                                                      mysticism of the Christan Path? … He said something about the …
                                                                      Christians having this work with the body, and then paused once again
                                                                      … “The exercises you ask about originated … from the Fathers
                                                                      observing what happened to them when they were in a state of prayer.””


                                                                      —–Original Message—–
                                                                      From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:mhoffman@…]
                                                                      Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:46 AM
                                                                      To: Egodeath Group
                                                                      Subject: [egodeath] Monk: “things a thousand times better than yoga”

                                                                      Inner Christianity: A Guide to the Esoteric Tradition Richard Smoley
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1570628106
                                                                      2002

                                                                      Richard Smoley writes:
                                                                      p. 156: “… there is a rich heritage of spiritual techniques and
                                                                      practices in Christianity, though it has often been buried or hidden.
                                                                      During a visit to the Greek peninsula of Mount Athos, the center of
                                                                      Orthodox monasticism, Jacob Needleman had a monk say to him, “I could
                                                                      tell you of things a thousand times better than your yoga.” But,
                                                                      Needleman adds, “he never said more, not even when pressed by the
                                                                      stunned interpreter.”(2) While we will never know what the monk had
                                                                      in mind, some of the inner practices of Christianity have begun to
                                                                      come to the surface again.”

                                                                      2 – Lost Christianity, p. 36

                                                                      Lost Christianity: A Journey of Rediscovery to the Center of Christian
                                                                      Experience Jacob Needleman
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1852301325

                                                                      Lost? Needleman and Smoley are the ones lost. The Holy Grail
                                                                      containing Christ’s redeeming blood, and being his redeeming flesh, is
                                                                      where it has always been, fastened to the tree in the forest. Why not
                                                                      start here:

                                                                      Gnosis magazine, issue #26 (Winter ’93): Psychedelics & The Path
                                                                      Richard Smoley, editor
                                                                      http://www.lumen.org/issue_contents/contents26.html

                                                                      >And here, the final issue:
                                                                      >Gnosis magazine, issue #51 (Spring ’99): The Grail
                                                                      http://www.lumen.org/issue_contents/contents51.html
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4059 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Nietzsche as ecstatic entheogen shaman
                                                                      To Nietzsche: Dionysus, I Love You! Ariadne
                                                                      by Claudia Crawford
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0791421503/
                                                                      1994

                                                                      Condensed review excerpts:

                                                                      >>Crawford’s book provides a good argument against the Syphilis myth.
                                                                      As Bataille said, Nietzsche’s madness is one of the most horrifying
                                                                      challenges to the whole mindset of the West in this century. Scholars
                                                                      fell for the trite and too-neat myth of Nietzsche the Syphilitic.
                                                                      Crawford dethrones this myth and assembles many key points and quotes.
                                                                      She poses a theory that he was faking madness. Against Crawford, we
                                                                      have sunk far from our shaman fire-gazing ancestors who let the holy
                                                                      spirit often tear off the roof of their mind and toss them into the
                                                                      vast oblivion. Meher Baba’s work with the Masts is probably the key
                                                                      information needed by Crawford to correct the ‘faking madness’ thesis.
                                                                      This book is a step in the right direction, closer to the cliff.


                                                                      —–Original Message—–
                                                                      From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com [mailto:egodeath@yahoogroups.com] On
                                                                      Behalf Of Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 7:01 PM
                                                                      To: egodeath@yahoogroups.com
                                                                      Subject: [egodeath] Visionary plants in modern Western high culture

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/MaximalEntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — My
                                                                      condensed excerpts from that webpage and discussion thread, with book
                                                                      and documentary links added.



                                                                      Nietzsche heavily used various drugs including psychedelics.
                                                                      Nietzsche began his career in Basle in the 1860’s. Rudolf Steiner was
                                                                      Nietzche’s librarian for awhile, so he knew about Nietzsche’s drug use
                                                                      and interest. Knowledge of the religious implications of the whole
                                                                      pharmacopeia was widespread in Theosophical groups by the late 1800’s.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Amazon book wishlists: esotericism/egodeath
                                                                      Now that one’s personal wishlist can be divided into multiple
                                                                      wishlists, there are Listmania lists (25 items), ‘So you’d like to’
                                                                      lists (50 items), and personal wishlists (unlimited items, multiple
                                                                      lists).

                                                                      I am subdividing my personal wishlist into 24 lists, so far, covering
                                                                      some 850 books total.
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/2T3HS82WX1RZ5/
                                                                      These wishlist lists are valuable, though they don’t necessarily
                                                                      represent my best recommendations, because these generally are books I
                                                                      have not read, aside from reading excerpts and reviews at Amazon.


                                                                      My Amazon book wishlists, useful for research, cover:

                                                                      Apocalypticism
                                                                      Astrology
                                                                      Christianity
                                                                      Chronology
                                                                      Consciousness Studies
                                                                      Entheogens
                                                                      Free Will and Determinism
                                                                      Gnosticism
                                                                      Greco-Roman
                                                                      Jewish
                                                                      Magic and Witchcraft
                                                                      Music
                                                                      Myth and Metaphor
                                                                      Otherworld
                                                                      Philosophy of Science
                                                                      Politics
                                                                      Religion
                                                                      Religious Experience
                                                                      Shamanism
                                                                      Western Esotericism



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4061 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Richard Tarnas: Cosmos & Psyche (mystic astrology)
                                                                      What Is Enlightenment, June-Aug 2005, page 28, ‘the passion of the
                                                                      planets’, says that Richard Tarnas, author of the book The Passion of
                                                                      the Western Mind, will release a new book in Nov. 2005: Cosmos and
                                                                      Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. It provides an explanation
                                                                      of astrology.

                                                                      The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas that Have
                                                                      Shaped Our World View
                                                                      Richard Tarnas
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345368096
                                                                      1991


                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Richard+Tarnas%22+%22Cosmos+and+Psyc
                                                                      he%22


                                                                      In an interview http://www.scottlondon.com/insight/scripts/tarnas.html
                                                                      Tarnas said: “The title is Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New
                                                                      Worldview and it’s basically the sequel to The Passion of the Western
                                                                      Mind. I actually teach a course with that title at the graduate
                                                                      program that I teach in San Francisco. Stan Grof and I teach the
                                                                      course together. We teach in the philosophy and religion program and
                                                                      there is particular part of that program that I oversee called
                                                                      “Cosmology and Consciousness.” Stan, myself, Brian Swimme, Charlene
                                                                      Spretnak, William Irwin Thompson, Robert McDermott, David Ulancey are
                                                                      all faculty members in it.”


                                                                      http://www.cpalondon.com/conferences/sky.html

                                                                      Richard Tarnas (California Institute of Integral Studies)
                                                                      Understanding the Modern Disenchantment of the Cosmos

                                                                      >>In the lecture I would, like the conference, be moving towards the
                                                                      emerging re-enchantment of the cosmos and the recognition of a
                                                                      psyche-pervaded world that contemporary astrology, archetypal
                                                                      psychology, and many other disciplines are pointing to. But a
                                                                      reconsideration of the modern cosmological situation–historically,
                                                                      epistemologically, and psychologically–might be a helpful point of
                                                                      departure for the conference.

                                                                      >>Richard Tarnas, Ph.D., is professor of philosophy and religionat the
                                                                      California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, where he
                                                                      founded the graduate program in Philosophy, Cosmology, and
                                                                      Consciousness. He also serves on the faculty of the Pacifica Graduate
                                                                      Institute in Santa Barbara. Formerly the director of programs at
                                                                      Esalen Institute, he is the author of The Passion of the Western Mind,
                                                                      a history of the Western world view from the Greek to the postmodern
                                                                      that is used as a text in many universities. Cosmos and Psyche:
                                                                      Intimations of a New World View, will be published by Viking in the
                                                                      fall of 2005.


                                                                      http://www.springpub.com/springauthors.html — “Richard Tarnas is
                                                                      professor of philosophy and psychology at the California Institute of
                                                                      Integral Studies in San Francisco, and founding director of its
                                                                      graduate program in Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness. He is
                                                                      also adjunct faculty at Pacifica Graduate Institute in Santa Barbara,
                                                                      where he teaches in the clinical and depth psychology programs.
                                                                      Formerly director of programs and education at Esalen Institute, he is
                                                                      the author of Prometheus the Awakener and The Passion of the Western
                                                                      Mind, a history of the Western world view that has become both a
                                                                      bestseller and a widely used text in universities. Its long awaited
                                                                      sequel, Cosmos and Psyche, will be published in 2005.”



                                                                      http://www.galaxymind.com/!!Grof-Tarnes%20%20Astro.htm
                                                                      Psyche and Cosmos
                                                                      Stanislav Grof & Richard Tarnas
                                                                      Week of June 21-26

                                                                      >>As Jung was the first modern psychologist to suggest, astrology
                                                                      possesses an extraordinary capacity to illuminate the archetypal
                                                                      dynamics of the human psyche. During the past twenty years of their
                                                                      collaboration, beginning at Esalen in the 1970s, Richard Tarnas and
                                                                      Stanislav Grof repeatedly encountered a surprisingly rich and
                                                                      consistent correlation between specific planetary positions and a wide
                                                                      range of psychological states. Besides providing invaluable insight
                                                                      into both the timing and the archetypal character of psychotherapeutic
                                                                      transformations and other significant experiences of human life, these
                                                                      correlations suggested that the relationship between cosmos and psyche
                                                                      is very different from that assumed in the disenchanted worldview of
                                                                      conventional modern science.

                                                                      >>This seminar presents both the practical applications of this
                                                                      research and its larger implications, beginning with the vastly
                                                                      extended map of the psyche suggested by modern consciousness research
                                                                      and experiential therapies. Topics will include precise descriptions
                                                                      of the correlations observed, the phenomenon of synchronicity,
                                                                      instructions for calculating and evaluating one’s own transits, major
                                                                      past and current planetary alignments, and coinciding archetypal
                                                                      patterns in history and culture. The workshop will address the
                                                                      relevance of this work to the larger depth psychology tradition
                                                                      initiated by Freud and Jung, and present an overview of the evolution
                                                                      of the Western mind as illuminated by this recovery of the intimate
                                                                      relationship between the human being and the cosmos–“the return of
                                                                      soul to the world.”

                                                                      >>Though useful, prior background in astrology is not necessary.
                                                                      Participants should bring a copy of their birth chart.

                                                                      >>Recommended reading: the epilogue to Richard Tarnas’s The Passion of
                                                                      the Western Mind, and any book by Stanislav Grof.


                                                                      — end of webpage excerpts
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4062 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk: Richard Tarnas: Cosmos & Psyche (mystic astrology)
                                                                      Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View
                                                                      Richard Tarnas
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0670032921/
                                                                      Dec. 29, 2005

                                                                      Condensed blurb: “reframes our understanding of the universe …
                                                                      correspondence between planetary movements and the unfolding of human
                                                                      history. Begins with the ancient Greeks and culminates in our own era
                                                                      and its transformative potential, commenting on modern tumultuous
                                                                      times from the sixties to September 11, 2001 and pointing the way
                                                                      towards the future.

                                                                      “In terms of planetary cycles, our present moment in history is most
                                                                      comparable to the period five hundred years ago — that era of
                                                                      “extraordinary turbulence and creativity,” the High Renaissance. Not
                                                                      since Copernicus conceived the heliocentric theory have we face such a
                                                                      mental realignment. A vast canvas of research and analysis, the
                                                                      conclusions reunite religion and science and restore a transcendent
                                                                      dimension to the universe.”
                                                                      ________

                                                                      My own view per the Egodeath theory is that astrology, insofar as it
                                                                      is valid, is purely metaphorical description of intense altered-state
                                                                      experiential insight. Only in a restricted sense is humanity evolving
                                                                      in level of consciousness. There is no significant correlation
                                                                      between planets and individual personalities — to want such is
                                                                      literalism and may have involved deliberate misleading away from the
                                                                      higher, purely metaphorical/descriptive meaning. I systemically and
                                                                      in-principle reject personality-type or OSC-based psychological
                                                                      astrology and reject predictive astrology.

                                                                      The personality types that are relevant are purely standard generic
                                                                      mystic experiences: fear-into-trust, rescue, dependency, sense of
                                                                      discovery and revelation, pride and humility, and so on.
                                                                      Reincarnation and stopping it refer to a sequence of mystic-state ego
                                                                      deaths finally retaining higher thinking; my theory is consistent in
                                                                      systemically rejecting all literalism and embracing mystic-state
                                                                      metaphor including radically transcendent thinking and a certain
                                                                      restricted sense of ‘super-natural’ transcendence.

                                                                      Western Esotericism books are typically weak this way; having a weak
                                                                      grasp on the intercombination of {dissociation, determinism,
                                                                      cybernetics, and metaphor}, they tend to combine hand-wringing,
                                                                      cluelessness, literalism, vagueness, and overreliance on the past
                                                                      (Tradition), as opposed to the novel, bold, authentic, self-sufficient
                                                                      mystic expression seen in acid-based Rock (the authentic esoteric
                                                                      tradition of the late 20th Century). Such esoteric scholars rise to
                                                                      heights of sterling mediocrity, while the acid adepts / artists run
                                                                      laughing in circles around the staid hand-wringing scholars, strenuous
                                                                      dabblers.


                                                                      This article looks worth reading, mentions Tarnas’ planed book:
                                                                      http://www.rednova.com/news/science/144468/counterpoints_in_transperso
                                                                      nal_theory_toward_an_astrological_resolution/
                                                                      It seems to confirm my observation that Wilber is thick as a brick
                                                                      regarding Western Esotericism including dissociation, determinism,
                                                                      cybernetics, and metaphor, having written practically no analysis of
                                                                      the subject.

                                                                      However, that article, like all outsider scholarship that doesn’t
                                                                      grasp dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and metaphor, replaces a
                                                                      straightforward grasp of esotericist metaphorical ASC description with
                                                                      overheated, acrid, smoky gear-grinding academics — tortured off-base
                                                                      analysis, and confusion about what esotericism is most essentially
                                                                      concerned with.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: bks: King thought of as divine
                                                                      The King’s Body: Sacred Rituals of Power in Medieval and Early Modern
                                                                      Europe
                                                                      Sergio Bertelli
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0271023449
                                                                      2001
                                                                      Condensed blurb: “From the early Middle Ages through the 17th century,
                                                                      the centrality of the sovereign provided the key element in
                                                                      maintaining the order of society. Societies thought of their kings as
                                                                      divine. The king’s body was the ground where the sacred and the
                                                                      profane, the supernatural and the natural intersected. Rituals
                                                                      emphasized the divine sovereignty of the king. The death of a
                                                                      sovereign led to an interregnum where the law was suspended
                                                                      temporarily as the realm waited for a new ruler. Sacred rituals
                                                                      surrounding birth, enthronement and death defined kingship. The
                                                                      modern distinction between the political and the religious didn’t
                                                                      exist.”

                                                                      Holy Rulers and Blessed Princesses: Dynastic Cults in Medieval Central
                                                                      Europe
                                                                      Gabor Klaniczay, et al
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0521420180/
                                                                      2002

                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0691017042/
                                                                      Condensed blurbs: “The arcane mysteries of medieval political
                                                                      theology. Traces the historical problem posed by the “King’s two
                                                                      bodies”–the body politic and the body natural–back to the Middle
                                                                      Ages. Places the concept in its proper setting of medieval thought
                                                                      and political theory. How the early-modern Western monarchies
                                                                      developed a political theology. Political theology relating to
                                                                      kingship during the middle ages. Issues and developments regarding the
                                                                      place of the king, the idea of law. Medieval political
                                                                      thought/theology, Medieval notions of kingship. Traces the
                                                                      development of this English legal theory. History of sacral kingship
                                                                      in medieval Christendom. European monarchy in its sublime and
                                                                      eccentric qualities.”

                                                                      The King’s Two Bodies
                                                                      Ernst Kantorowicz
                                                                      Laudes Regiae: A Study in Liturgical Acclamations and Mediaeval Ruler
                                                                      Worship
                                                                      Ernst Hartwig Kantorowicz
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0007EHOEY/
                                                                      1946

                                                                      Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty
                                                                      (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought)
                                                                      Carl Schmitt
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0262691248/
                                                                      Analysis of sovereignty with a “political theology” that claims that
                                                                      all the important concepts of modern political thought are secularized
                                                                      theological concepts.


                                                                      Jesus figure as rebuttal to Caesar cult:
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/20B96K00E
                                                                      YKQL/



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Rush ‘Feedback’ album w/ psychedelic cover, psych covers
                                                                      Rush has released an album of late ’60s classic rock covers with a
                                                                      psych-styled cover

                                                                      Album: Feedback
                                                                      Artist: Rush
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00028HBIY/
                                                                      June 2004
                                                                      Songs (orig. artist):

                                                                      Summertime Blues (Blue Cheer)
                                                                      Heart Full Of Soul (Yardbirds)
                                                                      The Seeker (The Who)
                                                                      For What It’s Worth (Buffalo Springfield)
                                                                      Shapes Of Things (Yardbirds)
                                                                      Mr. Soul (Buffalo Springfield)
                                                                      Crossroads (Robert Johnson, Eric Clapton)
                                                                      Seven And Seven Is (Love)


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4065 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Ken Wilber on some Western Esotericism
                                                                      Thanks for the person who pointed this out. I have various
                                                                      disagreements with the following, but taking it with the usual grain
                                                                      of salt, it’s worth reading.


                                                                      <http://www.shambhalasun.com/Archives/Features/1996/Sept96/KenWilber.h
                                                                      tm>
                                                                      http://www.shambhalasun.com/Archives/Features/1996/Sept96/KenWilber.ht
                                                                      m


                                                                      Q: One of the most confusing things about being a practitioner of
                                                                      Asian mystical traditions is the fact that before the Enlightenment
                                                                      the West had a thousand year tradition of civilization based on a
                                                                      highly mystical religion, Christianity. And yet in Sex, Ecology,
                                                                      Spirituality you characterize this thousand year period as one that
                                                                      promised but did not deliver genuine transcendence. Why do you say
                                                                      that? How could a whole civilization miss the point for so long when
                                                                      it had expressions of the idea in Plato, the Corpus Hermeticum,
                                                                      Neoplatonism, mystical Christianity, and so on?

                                                                      Imagine if, the very day Buddha attained his enlightenment, he was
                                                                      taken out and hanged precisely because of his realization. and if any
                                                                      of his followers claimed to have the same realization, they were also
                                                                      hanged. Speaking for myself, I would find this something of a
                                                                      disincentive to practice.

                                                                      But that’s exactly what happened with Jesus of Nazareth. “Why do you
                                                                      stone me?” he asks at one point. “Is it for good deeds?” And the crowd
                                                                      responds, “No, it is because you, being a man, make yourself out to be
                                                                      God.” The individual Atman is not allowed to realize that it is one
                                                                      with Brahman. “I and my Father are One”-among other complicated
                                                                      factors that realization got this gentleman crucified.

                                                                      The reasons for this are involved, but the fact remains: as soon as
                                                                      any spiritual practitioner began to get too close to the realization
                                                                      that Atman and Brahman are one-that one’s own mind is intrinsically
                                                                      one with primordial Spirit-then frighteningly severe repercussions
                                                                      usually followed.

                                                                      Of course there were wonderful currents of Neoplatonic and other very
                                                                      high teachings operating in the background (and underground) in the
                                                                      West, but wherever the Church had political influence-and it dominated
                                                                      the Western scene for a thousand years-if you stepped over that line
                                                                      between Atman and Brahman, you were in very dangerous waters. St. John
                                                                      of the Cross and his friend St. Teresa of Avila stepped over the line,
                                                                      but couched their journeys in such careful and pious language they
                                                                      pulled it off, barely. Meister Eckhart stepped over the line, a little
                                                                      too boldly, and had his teachings officially condemned, which meant he
                                                                      wouldn’t fry in hell but his words apparently would. Giordano Bruno
                                                                      stepped way over the line, and was burned at the stake. This is a
                                                                      typical pattern.


                                                                      Q: You say the reasons are complicated, and I’m sure they are, but
                                                                      could you briefly mention a few?

                                                                      Well, I’ll give you one, which is perhaps the most interesting. The
                                                                      early history of the Church was dominated by traveling “pneumatics,”
                                                                      those in whom “spirit was alive.” Their spirituality was based largely
                                                                      on direct experience, a type of Christ consciousness, we might suppose
                                                                      (“Let this consciousness be in you which was in Christ Jesus”). We
                                                                      might charitably say that the nirmanakaya physical body] of each
                                                                      pneumatic realized the dharmakaya [absolute body] of Christ via the
                                                                      sambhogakaya [body of bliss] of the transformative fire of the Holy
                                                                      Ghost-not to put too fine a point on it. But they were clearly alive
                                                                      to some very real, very direct experiences.

                                                                      But over a several hundred year span, with the codification of the
                                                                      Canon and the Apostle’s Creed, a series of necessary beliefs replaced
                                                                      actual experience. The Church slowly switched from the pneumatics to
                                                                      the ekklesia, the ecclesastic assembly of Christ, and the governor of
                                                                      the ekklesia was the local bishop, who possessed “right dogma,” and
                                                                      not the pneumatic or prophet, who might possess spirit but couldn’t be
                                                                      “controlled.” The Church was no longer defined as the assembly of
                                                                      realizers but as the assembly of bishops.

                                                                      With Tertullian the relationship becomes almost legal, and with
                                                                      Cyprian spirituality actually is bound to the legal office of the
                                                                      Church. You could become a priest merely by ordination, not by
                                                                      awakening. A priest was no longer holy (sanctus) if he was personally
                                                                      awakened or enlightened or sanctified, but if he held the office.
                                                                      Likewise, you could become “saved” not by waking up yourself, but
                                                                      merely by taking the legal sacraments. As Cyprian put it, “He who does
                                                                      not have the Church as Mother cannot have God as Father.”

                                                                      Well, that puts a damper on it, what? Salvation now belonged to the
                                                                      lawyers. And the lawyers said, basically, we will allow that one
                                                                      megadude became fully one with God, but that’s it! No more of that
                                                                      pure Oneness crap.


                                                                      Q: But why?

                                                                      This part of it was simple, raw, political power. Because, you know,
                                                                      the unsettling thing about direct mystical experience is that it has a
                                                                      nasty habit of going straight from Spirit to you, thus bypassing the
                                                                      middleman, namely, the bishop, not to mention the middleman’s
                                                                      collection plate. This is the same reason the oil companies do not
                                                                      like solar power, if you get my drift.

                                                                      And so, anybody who had a direct pipeline to God was thus pronounced
                                                                      guilty not only of religious heresy, or the violation of the legal
                                                                      codes of the Church, for which you could have your heavenly soul
                                                                      eternally damned, but also of political treason, for which you could
                                                                      have your earthly body separated into several sections.

                                                                      For all these reasons, the summum bonum of spiritual awareness-the
                                                                      supreme identity of Atman and Brahman, or ordinary mind and intrinsic
                                                                      spirit-was officially taboo in the West for a thousand years, more or
                                                                      less. All the wonderful currents that you mention, from Neoplatonism
                                                                      to Hermeticism, were definitely present but severely marginalized, to
                                                                      put it mildly. And thus the West produced an extraordinary number of
                                                                      subtle-level (or sambhogakaya) mystics, who only claimed that the soul
                                                                      and God can share a union; but very few causal (dharmakaya) and very
                                                                      few nondual (svabhavikakaya) mystics, who went further and claimed not
                                                                      just a union but a supreme identity of soul and God in pure Godhead,
                                                                      just that claim got you toasted.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4066 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bks: Christian Ratsch, in German
                                                                      Smoking Materials, the Breath Kites
                                                                      Christian Raetsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3855025452/qid%3D11221785
                                                                      14/sr%3D1-3/ref%3Dsr_1_11_3/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      200 sides
                                                                      February 2002
                                                                      ISBN: 3855025452

                                                                      Encyclopedia of the smoking materials — Offers 72 detailed
                                                                      Pflanzenportraits, likewise to an illustrated part in that the plant
                                                                      parts, which one smokes, is shown. Each individual smoking off is
                                                                      described with its medical application, its use in rituals and its
                                                                      history. It is particularly great that the author enters with the
                                                                      different mistake possibilities with others smoke-openly and points
                                                                      the differences out. Likewise also with the psychoaktiven plants and
                                                                      their use one enters. For humans, who used up themselves smoking with
                                                                      aromatic smoke-openly, it is a true find pit.


                                                                      Schamanenpflanze Tobacco (2 volumes)
                                                                      Christian Raetsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3037881070/qid%3D11221785
                                                                      14/sr%3D1-18/ref%3Dsr_1_11_18/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      Kategorie(n): Cooking & Lifestyle , religion & Esoterik
                                                                      700 sides – night shade publishers
                                                                      November 2003
                                                                      ISBN: 3037881070


                                                                      Weihrauch and Copal
                                                                      Christian Raetsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3855028613/qid%3D11221785
                                                                      14/sr%3D1-15/ref%3Dsr_1_11_15/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      96 sides
                                                                      October 2004
                                                                      ISBN: 3855028613

                                                                      Resins and aromatic woods belong to the world-wide most important
                                                                      ritual smoke-openly. Since age they become ago as valuable substances
                                                                      estimated and schamanisch, magically, medically and religiously uses.
                                                                      One smokes at sources, wasserfaellen, at the seashore, at lakes and
                                                                      rivers, at holy places, at force places, in sweating huts and baths,
                                                                      in Peyotetipis, in temples and at shrines, in monasteries and in
                                                                      Einsiedeleien, in churches and mosques, in government buildings and
                                                                      seminar centers, even on Goa Trance parties and in Techno Discos.

                                                                      In this book the most important resins and aromatic woods, which are
                                                                      generally summarized as Weihrauch or Copal, in word and picture are
                                                                      introduced. The book offers an entrance in the fascinating world of
                                                                      the smoking materials and an overview of the most important old-lay
                                                                      and again-lay smoking resins, their identification and ritual
                                                                      application.

                                                                      To smoke the nature of the outside can naeherbringen u lp interior
                                                                      world to humans and support it on the mirror-image-ritual way. With
                                                                      smoking schamanische journeys can be supported be accompanied,
                                                                      Meditationen and Yoga exercises, deepened mirror-image-ritual
                                                                      experiences, accomplished magic rituals, operated flavour therapy and
                                                                      produced religious cult. To smoke the life can enrich, which promotes
                                                                      health and the nature experience.

                                                                      Short and concise descriptions of smoking plant — this new smoking
                                                                      book is somewhat more, than only a small folder of the smoking plant
                                                                      encyclopedia “the breath kites”. But the reader should quite
                                                                      differentiate, what he needs for itself and its requirements. Who
                                                                      loves short and concise descriptions, lies here perfectly correctly
                                                                      and straight for smoking beginners is recommended this book much.
                                                                      Since it describes 30 smoking plants and abandons many smoking
                                                                      mixtures.

                                                                      For me however straight this book is a completely special source,
                                                                      there it over some smoking plants, e.g. the Copalharz unbelievably
                                                                      well informs. Because not everything which in the smoking plant trade
                                                                      as Copal is defined, may also with the smoking resin of the Mayas and
                                                                      Aztecs is equated. And these small however fine differences are very
                                                                      well discussed particularly in this book. Likewise rare smoking plants
                                                                      are described like the Breuzinho, Palo Santo, Indian Weihrauch and the
                                                                      different Styrax sorts.

                                                                      Like that this book is a good addition of the more comprehensive
                                                                      smoking plant encyclopedia of Christian Raetsch and for the readers,
                                                                      that do not look for a good and so expensive a riser reading to simply
                                                                      only recommend. The available book is arranged clear, describes
                                                                      approx. 30 smoking materials and contains many “rough” prescriptions.
                                                                      A well recheriertes book … already one of Raetsch: the breath kites
                                                                      and another mad book to the topic: Fischer Rizzi: Message to the sky.


                                                                      Rituals of the Heilens
                                                                      von Franz-Theo Gottwald, Christian Ratsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3855026998/qid%3D11221790
                                                                      55/sr%3D1-27/ref%3Dsr_1_2_27/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      2000

                                                                      Nature-understand, nature realization and the Transzendentrale — The
                                                                      entrance to nature and their forces we can provide in very various
                                                                      way. Many however wander through only the landscapes without to see,
                                                                      understand or the mental dimensions to notice. And the different
                                                                      contributions of the authors set exactly here, in order to make a new
                                                                      nature understanding possible.

                                                                      Thus the chapters concern themselves with the topics nature, visions,
                                                                      shame anise mash, nature admiration and the rituals – the art of the
                                                                      Heilens. In the topic nature goes it around deeper recognizing and
                                                                      also understanding, where we are with nature still one and where we
                                                                      are to stand ourselves “separately in the way” and be found above all
                                                                      where our roots.

                                                                      With the visions report some authors of their vision experiences, in
                                                                      the topic shame anise mash goes it around animal spirit and tools of
                                                                      the Schamanen as well as Geomantie, in the chapter of the nature
                                                                      admiration around Aphrodisiaka and the Aphroditekult as well as around
                                                                      circle rituals and with the art of the Heilens point out authors, how
                                                                      they integrated rituals into their medical and therapeutic practice.

                                                                      The special at this book is that for each chapter different and
                                                                      particularly authors different in their fields of knowledge give a
                                                                      deeper entrance to its work and its experiences. Above all also the
                                                                      different Herangehens and aspect are clear, to give which have
                                                                      nevertheless a common origin to come i.e. to a better nature
                                                                      understanding and rituals and changed consciousness conditions area.


                                                                      Shamanismus, Techno & Cyberspace. Of ‘Natural’ and ‘Artificial’
                                                                      Paradiesen
                                                                      Christian Raetsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3907080602/qid%3D11221785
                                                                      14/sr%3D2-3/ref%3Dsr_2_11_3/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      Kategorie(n): Religion & Esoterik
                                                                      Paperback – night shade publishing house
                                                                      Publication date: October 2001
                                                                      ISBN: 3907080602

                                                                      Christian Raetsch takes more in this booklet, once the virtual world
                                                                      under observation. He regards himself here not as exponent of these
                                                                      phenomena, but lights up her from Kulturanthropologi perspective and
                                                                      represents connections between the “natural and artificial
                                                                      paradiesen”.

                                                                      Raetsch assumes, that the schamanische matrix of human consciousness,
                                                                      which Techno and Cyberia created. Being based on this basis, he
                                                                      compares the Shamanismus, Techno and the Cyperspace. These
                                                                      connections are made narrations and studies clear on the basis
                                                                      transmissions, which represents an informative source of information
                                                                      at the end for the reader.


                                                                      The Holy Hain
                                                                      Christian Raetsch
                                                                      http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%
                                                                      7Cen&u=http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3038002046/qid%3D11221785
                                                                      14/sr%3D1-1/ref%3Dsr_1_11_1/028-9594626-9470146&prev=/language_tools
                                                                      Bound expenditure – 96 sides (April 2005)

                                                                      Table of contents
                                                                      – Germanic shame anise mash
                                                                      – the holy Hain
                                                                      – holy ones of trees
                                                                      – the world tree and the well of the memory
                                                                      – Schamanenbaeume and sponges
                                                                      – charm plants and plant charms
                                                                      – shark plants
                                                                      – runes and Alraunen
                                                                      – rune charms
                                                                      – Voelvas, Alrunas and Hildegard of being gene
                                                                      – genuine ones and wrong Alraunen
                                                                      – the Met of the enthusiasm
                                                                      – Wotan, the Schamanengott
                                                                      – Thor, its hammer and the thunder wedges
                                                                      – Germanic drinking rituals
                                                                      – beer and bilsenkraut
                                                                      – Sumpfporst, Gagel and CO.
                                                                      – Berserker, the Baerenhaeuter
                                                                      – Wotan and the savage hunt
                                                                      – Perchten and Perchtenpflanzen
                                                                      – bear and wolf plants
                                                                      – Hagazussas, witches and Zauberei
                                                                      – Freia, the dear goddess
                                                                      – dear charms and Aphrodisiaka
                                                                      – “our Mrs. Bettstroh”
                                                                      – “Neunerlei”: Herbs and woods
                                                                      – Weihrauch: Germanic smoking materials
                                                                      – amber: The “gold” of the holy Hains
                                                                      – smoking for the rough nights
                                                                      – the God dawn
                                                                      – the three Nornen
                                                                      – Balder and the Mistel
                                                                      – the cyclic cosmos

                                                                      The Germanic culture was carried by a schamanischen mythology, its
                                                                      Spiritualitaet was inspired by Entheogene, by holy plants,
                                                                      psychoaktives perfumes and intoxication watering place. The temple of
                                                                      the Teutons was not an artificial building, it was the forest, the
                                                                      holy Hain. The trees were divinities and the plants had charm
                                                                      strength. The Germanic Schamanentum coined/shaped by Alrunas, the wise
                                                                      seeing gutters, the Skalden inspired by Berserkern, the ritual
                                                                      kriegern, the kraeuterkundigen brewing gutters and.

                                                                      We have a direct entrance to the Schamanentum in the Germanic
                                                                      mythology. The God Wotan is the Urschamane, the schamanistischste of
                                                                      all indogermanischen Gods. Wotan is the file of the universe, the
                                                                      Ekstatiker, after knowledge and realization the striving, the soul gel
                                                                      pus, the gentleman of the Entheogene, the large Zauberer and
                                                                      protecting krieger.

                                                                      This book reported of Germanic world trees, fool sponges, charm
                                                                      plants, Orakelblumen, perfumes, Rausc and rune charms htraenken. It
                                                                      opens the nearly forgotten gates in the holy Hain and to its miracle
                                                                      plants. Rituals, schamanische practices, the use are represented by
                                                                      domestic charm plants. It offers an entrance to our heidnischen
                                                                      inheritance and to our schamanischen roots.

                                                                      I read some books about Germanic mythology one in addition books
                                                                      sometimes supercritically to regard. This book however I can put to
                                                                      everyone for this topic enthusiastically GET-roasted to the heart.
                                                                      Fast turn consulting is recommended by its way of writing and pictures
                                                                      for a risers and for people with the subject is already been versed
                                                                      as. It each topic whether mythology or plants briefly treated without
                                                                      all too deep and/or scientifically einzusteigen(was usually then much
                                                                      drying works) to read all in all very well.

                                                                      Of the native plant charm and schamanischen rites — Christian Raetsch
                                                                      is received on our schamanische culture history and of them used
                                                                      plants, i.e. that of the Teutons, thus actually over our northEuropean
                                                                      roots. Books concerning shame anise mash, exotic smoking plants and
                                                                      also rituals gibts zuhauf. But literature over our “schamanischen”
                                                                      native plants and also rituals in addition, are very thinly sown. And
                                                                      thus straight this book is a true find pit, for all, which are
                                                                      interested with mythologischen history, Ethnobotanik and use of native
                                                                      plants, which grow as it were directly before our entry door.

                                                                      Thus with the holy trees are entered, the so-called holy Hain, the
                                                                      plants of the Mrs. Holle and the Freya, the charm mushrooms and
                                                                      special herbs, like the Mistel or the Johanniskraeuter. But one
                                                                      reports not only of plants, but also over the Germanic customs, runes,
                                                                      myths and legends in this book, itself in the Edda, to which
                                                                      nordischen legend world and excessive quantities from the Roman time
                                                                      find. Thus to deliver tries a picture of the Germanic Schamanentum, of
                                                                      which unfortunately only little certification remained.

                                                                      Above all the smoking friends become straight this book love, since a
                                                                      whole chapter dedicates itself to the Germanic smoking plants and also
                                                                      the consciousness-extending charm plants and it again each quantity
                                                                      gives to smoking and Knasterrezepte. And who yet does not have enough,
                                                                      finds innumerable resuming reading material in the sources of
                                                                      literature to the plants and Teutons.

                                                                      Charm plants, holy trees, rituals — “back to the roots”, so the
                                                                      quintessence of the book by Christian Raetsch, to which in its book
                                                                      “the holy Hain” gives a good overview of plants, trees and shame anise
                                                                      tables of rituals. Its partly personal opinions quite give reason to
                                                                      discuss this topic and set themselves with the total topic more near
                                                                      apart.

                                                                      I was of the statement Christian Raetsch “the natives am fascinated
                                                                      we”, who again and again Schamanen from all world tries us close to
                                                                      bring. Also the statement: “flees you not into other culture areas,
                                                                      does not look not for strange religions – everything which it needs is
                                                                      here”, is quite discussable.

                                                                      With many illustrations, designs and quotations Christian Raetsch
                                                                      naeherbringt its conception of the world a little to us. One cannot
                                                                      turn the time back, one can however with its past openly and honestly
                                                                      argue and from this learn, this should this book also cause.

                                                                      The detailed description of most diverse plants and schamanistischer
                                                                      implements draws this book out and even the somewhat belesenere buyer
                                                                      or other suggestion to pull out here will surely be able. Reading of
                                                                      the book made fun personal for me and even if I do not agree with all
                                                                      statements in such a way find I the book nevertheless recommendable,
                                                                      since one notices that itself Christian Raetsch has very much trouble
                                                                      approximately and its work should receive quite praising mention. I
                                                                      would like to emphasize the references to the native plant world and
                                                                      to the production of native smoking mixtures therefore praising.

                                                                      A good book to set itself with praise-worth tendency, more with the
                                                                      own roots apart. Because only who correctly verwurzelt is, exists in
                                                                      the today’s storms.

                                                                      The author developed in the last decades to the first authority for
                                                                      the topic shame anise mash, Hexerei and welfare plants in Germany. It
                                                                      writes on high level, founded and with persuasive power. The books are
                                                                      made optically really very beautiful, owing to the rich picture
                                                                      collection, which Christian Raetsch can have. One experiences here
                                                                      numerous ethnologische and mythologische details over the Teutons,
                                                                      whom one could not read so yet anywhere. The book is suitable for
                                                                      university graduates exactly the same as for interested one. Favour
                                                                      becomes it all.

                                                                      The notes also always make very much fun stimulating, halluzinogenen
                                                                      medicines, which the author of full leaving merges into prescriptions.
                                                                      To Bilsenkrautbier one experiences not only the composition and that
                                                                      one it 2 – 3 months cool are, until it receives its best flavour that
                                                                      it is red like all witch beer, but also that it can make and also kill
                                                                      bloede depending upon dose beschwingend, geil or. This catful equal
                                                                      courage in the telling attitude impresses to me, I hopes however that
                                                                      not too many relatively unreife dte rodents clean-pull themselves this
                                                                      reading.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4067 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Baigent & Leigh “Elixir & Stone” esoteric magic/alchemy
                                                                      The Elixir and the Stone: The Tradition of Magic and Alchemy
                                                                      Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0099490021/
                                                                      Paperback: 454 pages
                                                                      September 27, 2005

                                                                      Condensed blurbs/excerpts/reviews:

                                                                      Hermeticism gave more than a mere abstract or theoretical
                                                                      understanding, something more than a general philosophical
                                                                      orientation. It enabled seeing how certain of its own essential
                                                                      principles and dynamics had been hijacked and implemented for
                                                                      ultimately venal ends. In the modern world, ‘magic’ emerged as a
                                                                      metaphor for certain insidious kinds of manipulation — for ‘the art
                                                                      of making things happen’, in a fashion inimical to Hermeticism itself.

                                                                      In modernity, domains of knowledge which had previously been puddles
                                                                      now became bottomless wells or pools, wherein a researcher could sink
                                                                      for a lifetime, and often drown… The Renaissance concept of
                                                                      encyclopedic knowledge gave way to a plethora of specializations, each
                                                                      of which became divorced and dissociated from all others. Integration
                                                                      was supplanted by fragmentation and the exaltation of fragments.
                                                                      Synthesis was supplanted by analysis that was so intoxicated with its
                                                                      own capacity for dissection, it lost the ability to reassemble what it
                                                                      had dismantled.

                                                                      Since the seventeenth century, science has been contending with
                                                                      philosophy, organized religion and the arts for domination over
                                                                      Western civilization and society. By the middle of the twentieth
                                                                      century, the battle appeared to be won; scientific rationalism and
                                                                      skepticism were triumphant. Yet in the last few decades a strong and
                                                                      potent counter-current has emerged. One manifestation of this has been
                                                                      the occult revival.

                                                                      This occult revival and the revolution in attitudes which has taken
                                                                      place recently owes a profound debt to Hermeticism, a body of esoteric
                                                                      teaching which flourished in Alexandria two thousand years ago and
                                                                      which then went underground [disagree -mh]. The authors trace the
                                                                      history of this intriguing and all-encompassing philosophy — which
                                                                      has much in common with contemporary holistic thought — charting its
                                                                      origin in the Egyptian mysteries, and demonstrating how it continued
                                                                      to exercise enormous influence through the magicians and magi of the
                                                                      Middle Ages and the Renaissance.

                                                                      Many remarkable characters feature in the narrative, including the
                                                                      Franciscan friar Roger Bacon and the Elizabethan magus John Dee;
                                                                      prototype of Shakespeare’s Prospero in The Tempest, but the central
                                                                      figure that emerges is Faust — one of the defining myths of Western
                                                                      civilization.

                                                                      A rich and ambitious book that provides an alternative history of the
                                                                      intellectual world. It puts into their true context those shadowy
                                                                      alchemists and magicians who have haunted the imaginations of people
                                                                      for centuries. Moreover it offers a way of looking at the world that
                                                                      is in one sense ‘alternative’, but in another, deeply historical.

                                                                      Michael Baigent has a degree in psychology. He switched from
                                                                      photojournalism to researching the Templars for a film project.
                                                                      Richard Leigh has postgraduate degrees in comparative literature and a
                                                                      thorough knowledge of history, philosophy, psychology, and esoterica.

                                                                      A wonderful read, full of pungent insight and demonstrating an
                                                                      encyclopedic knowledge of Western European history as it relates to
                                                                      individual autonomy in exploring and expressing an understanding of
                                                                      the sacred.

                                                                      The first thirteen chapters follow the thread of the Hermetic way of
                                                                      seeing the world and the most notable individuals practicing this art
                                                                      over the past three millennia. It provides fresh information to
                                                                      enhance our understanding of the Renaissance, the history of science,
                                                                      and the history of human development.

                                                                      The seven chapters of Part Two offer a damning broadside of the way
                                                                      the media, and commercial and political interests work their control
                                                                      over the modern mind and obstruct and obfuscate our pursuit of the
                                                                      truthful and the numinous.

                                                                      Blends current affairs with cosmic verities. Thoth was the god of
                                                                      writing as well as magic. Per Northrup Frye, the written word
                                                                      re-creates the past in the present, and gives us, not the familiar
                                                                      remembered thing, but the glittering intensity of the summoned-up
                                                                      hallucination.

                                                                      —– end of condensed blurbs/excerpts/reviews —


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4068 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Sergius Golowin: visionary plants in fairy tales
                                                                      The magic of the forbidden fairy tales (Die Magie der verbotenen
                                                                      Märchen)
                                                                      Sergius Golowin
                                                                      http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3875361792/
                                                                      August 2004

                                                                      http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.de%2Fe
                                                                      xec%2Fobidos%2Ftg%2Fbrowse%2F-%2F188795%2Fref%3Dbr_cp_dp_2%2F028-75838
                                                                      81-1722164&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&safe=off&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Fl
                                                                      anguage_tools
                                                                      ISBN: 3875361792

                                                                      Witches, gnomes and dwarves of the German fairy tale world placing in
                                                                      this book their masks. The Volkskundler, legend collecting tank and
                                                                      Bernese politician Sergius Golowin it presents to us as inaugurated
                                                                      witnesses of the forbidden sciences of the human Unterbewusstseins.
                                                                      It decodes the symbolsprache of the fairy tales and makes the secret
                                                                      theories of the keltischen priests, the magic knowledge of the
                                                                      nordischen Gottzauberer transparency.

                                                                      Golowin shows that Mandragora [mandrake] and bilsenkraut, iron hat
                                                                      [Eisenhut] and fly mushroom [Amanita] already in the days of the cave
                                                                      people did their effect. That, which knew their secrets, they lent
                                                                      strength and wisdom to over uebermenschliche. The ability to the
                                                                      cosmic schau, the possibility, of opening for the human spirit new
                                                                      “realities” is brought here as uraeltestes, although always outlawed
                                                                      human knowledge in memory.

                                                                      The author entmystifiziert here fairy tales and legends and makes
                                                                      interesting declarations to them. Thus one experiences e.g., what
                                                                      actually hides itself behind the nutshell with the evening gown in the
                                                                      Aschenputtel or how it came to Kobolden. Golowin attributes everything
                                                                      to different halluzinoge/poisonous plants and dedicates straight fly
                                                                      mushroom, Alraune, hashish, bilsenkraut and iron hat very much area.


                                                                      Links to related books include:
                                                                      The intoxication drugs of the witches and their effects
                                                                      The secret knowledge of the herb witches
                                                                      Witch ointments and night shade plants
                                                                      Which the herb witches say



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4069 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Skallagrimsson: Scientific Magic (incl. visionary plants)
                                                                      Online electronic book:

                                                                      Scientific Magic
                                                                      Wayland Skallagrimsson
                                                                      http://www.winterscapes.com/scientific_magic/
                                                                      2003
                                                                      An investigation into the scientific principles underlying the
                                                                      practice of magic.


                                                                      I initially excerpt only the passages about visionary plants, rather
                                                                      than commenting on the transcendent knowledge and metaphors for
                                                                      experiential insight that are provided by the plants, because the
                                                                      plants are the key and doorway into the latter. It is crucial to
                                                                      discover passages in Western Esotericism about visionary plants, and
                                                                      to emphatically point out that visionary plants are the key. The
                                                                      initial emphasis needs to be placed on visionary plants as the key,
                                                                      establishing the fundamental interpretive principle that visionary
                                                                      plants should be taken for granted as lying behind all Western
                                                                      Esotericism.

                                                                      After that initial emphasis has been secured and established
                                                                      (visionary plants as the foundation of Esotericism), then we will come
                                                                      to the main emphasis: descriptions of experiential insight regarding
                                                                      transcendent knowledge.

                                                                      Regarding selecting the dosage intensity, it’s most effective to
                                                                      moderately loosen cognitive structures, not shatter them into
                                                                      scattered fragments.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      ____________

                                                                      Skallagrimsson’s full abstract of his book Scientific Magic:

                                                                      Recent discoveries in the fields of neurobiology and psychology have
                                                                      opened up new avenues of exploration into and explanation of the
                                                                      practice of magic, a field hitherto resistant to scientific analysis,
                                                                      due to the highly subjective nature of its practices. I have
                                                                      formulated hypotheses to explain the particular claims made by
                                                                      magicians as to the effectiveness of their rituals, as well as why
                                                                      such practices continue even in rational, materialistic societies
                                                                      skeptical and dismissive of them. I have presented traditional magical
                                                                      lore side by side with scientific explanations for that lore, as well
                                                                      as analyses of relevant philosophical issues.

                                                                      I have also provided a course of instruction designed to take the
                                                                      student through basic initiation in the practices of magic to
                                                                      proficiency in them. I have presented two traditional systems of
                                                                      magical practice (runic and cabalistic), from two rather different
                                                                      cultures, and compared them for the purpose of finding commonalities
                                                                      that would indicate the presence of real, analysable phenomena,
                                                                      divorced from simple cultural prejudices and superstitions. Hypotheses
                                                                      were formed from looking at these commonalities in the light of the
                                                                      results of the new neurobiological and psychological discoveries. I
                                                                      used my own experiences as well as those of other practicing magicians
                                                                      as a data pool.

                                                                      The practice of magic is no mere superstition or escapist fantasy. It
                                                                      is instead a badly misunderstood, embryonic science dealing with
                                                                      reprogramming the mind and altering the state of physiology to improve
                                                                      the functionality of its practitioners in highly specific and unusual
                                                                      ways. Contrary to the standard views of most modern sciences, the only
                                                                      differences between commonly accepted scientific understandings and
                                                                      occult lore are philosophical in nature. The seeming antagonism
                                                                      between the two schools of thought are rooted in a misunderstanding of
                                                                      each other’s basic philosophies and languages. The practice of magic
                                                                      is a real phenomenon, though poorly understood, with real benefits to
                                                                      its practitioners.

                                                                      — Wayland Skallagrimsson, 2003
                                                                      ____________

                                                                      Condensed excerpts about visionary plants in the history of magic:

                                                                      In addition to ritual elements, some magicians make use of certain
                                                                      herbs and such substances, that are holy in nature and spiritually
                                                                      powerful enough to be of aid to the magician who partakes of them in
                                                                      the right way. These substances are entheogens. Where this tool is
                                                                      chosen great care must be taken. Entheogens, while having a history of
                                                                      centuries or millennia of use, are powerful drugs. Safe use requires
                                                                      knowledge and experience, something lacking in most modern Western
                                                                      cultures in general. Begin with the lowest possible dose and work up
                                                                      from there, in small steps, to the most effective dose. (Which is not
                                                                      always that much. Overuse of entheogens distracts and diffuses the
                                                                      mind.)

                                                                      Alcohol relaxes the mind and soothes the spirit, enabling better
                                                                      control over magical power, and greater ease of raising and releasing
                                                                      it, though if consumed in excess it inhibits any meaningful control.
                                                                      Marijuana balances the spirit, and sends it soaring through the
                                                                      spirit-worlds. Syrian rue is used to contact spirits, as is the
                                                                      mushroom amanita muscaria. LSD can send the magician deep into the
                                                                      spirit-worlds without effort, even if undesired, and so should only be
                                                                      used ritually by experienced magicians.
                                                                      An excellent mixture for attaining contact with the spirits is smoking
                                                                      a 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 mixture of marijuana, Syrian rue, and amanita.

                                                                      Entheogens should be used with care. They are used to “scout ahead”,
                                                                      allowing them to open the magician’s mind and spirit, to see new
                                                                      vistas, new possibilities, to take the magician through the door.
                                                                      Then learn to practice magic without the entheogen. Once this is done
                                                                      the entheogen may again be used to go even farther.

                                                                      [large jump]

                                                                      Another important and basic element of unitary state ritual is the use
                                                                      of entheogens. Entheogens are a certain class of psychoactive plant
                                                                      that have various effects on the mind that promote the attainment of
                                                                      the unitary state. In many modern Western cultures the use of most
                                                                      mind-altering drugs is not only frowned upon, it is actually illegal.
                                                                      While this may seem a controversial issue to some, it is nothing more
                                                                      than an offshoot of the prejudices modern Western societies have for
                                                                      certain types of religious and spiritual practice, and against certain
                                                                      others. No credible argument has ever been advanced as to why any
                                                                      society has a compelling need to prohibit individuals’ use of such
                                                                      substances.

                                                                      The most popular “argument” used by lawmakers in such countries is
                                                                      that all drugs are inherently so addictive to everyone that if drug
                                                                      use is allowed to flourish an epidemic will run through society that
                                                                      will, because drugs only have negative effects on the brain,
                                                                      completely destroy society by turning it into a “Land of the
                                                                      Lotus-Eaters”. This idea is spurious, and laughable on the face of it.
                                                                      The human race has been around some 200,000 years or so, and so have
                                                                      drugs. And all of a sudden, just within this last century, we’ve
                                                                      suddenly realized they are so dangerous that they will destroy
                                                                      society? No one with the least bit of intellectual honesty could
                                                                      possibly swallow such a ridiculous notion.

                                                                      Most people don’t like drugs. After all, opening the mind up to
                                                                      hidden, deep, buried subconscious influences while simultaneously
                                                                      rearranging the way the mind and perceptions function into an unusual
                                                                      order is not most people’s idea of fun. Most users “find their level”
                                                                      with a little experimentation, which is to say, they find a level of
                                                                      usage that brings them pleasure but does not interfere with necessary
                                                                      daily functioning.

                                                                      In the 200,000 years of unregulated drug use history our species had,
                                                                      drug-users would have bred themselves out of existence were the
                                                                      dangers credited to them true. Examination of the history of the
                                                                      majority of drug laws reveals the true motives behind such
                                                                      legislation. Sometimes they are the result of powerful
                                                                      special-interest political lobbies. Such was the case with the
                                                                      outlawing of marijuana. The legislation was proposed by, and the
                                                                      campaigning was funded by, paper companies owning tree-made paper
                                                                      processes, who feared being driven out of business by hemp farmers,
                                                                      because hemp is a much more efficient and less expensive source of
                                                                      paper.

                                                                      The arguments they use against marijuana, since the real motivation
                                                                      would be publicly unacceptable, are spurious. It affects the brain no
                                                                      more than alcohol, a legal drug, does. And whereas people under the
                                                                      influence of alcohol can turn violent, no one ever got stoned and went
                                                                      and knocked over a convenience store. It usually produces a sense of
                                                                      peace and joy, nothing ever worse than a little paranoia and confused
                                                                      thinking.

                                                                      Sometimes the sources of such legislation are religious groups that
                                                                      feel such drugs are sinful and have convinced themselves they have a
                                                                      divine mandate to force their beliefs on others. Their own frail egos,
                                                                      coupled with a subconscious fear of being wrong, causes them to lash
                                                                      out against anything that might cause them to doubt their own beliefs
                                                                      and actions. Since they are frightened of anyone who holds different
                                                                      beliefs and practices from their own, they seek to prevent them from
                                                                      living their own lives in their own way.

                                                                      The action of most drugs is to depress the functioning of the
                                                                      conscious mind. As most people live entirely in and by the actions of
                                                                      their conscious minds, this amounts to no more than simply making them
                                                                      smaller, less competent versions of their normal selves. No benefit,
                                                                      not because of the drugs, but because the person using them does not
                                                                      have the right kind of mind to make use of them. This depressing of
                                                                      the conscious mind is of great benefit, allowing them to more easily
                                                                      access parts of their mind, such as the subconscious, such as deeply
                                                                      buried archetypes, that normally cannot be reached because of the
                                                                      interference of the conscious mind. People who approach drug use in a
                                                                      ritual and deliberate context, knowing what they are doing, can get
                                                                      great benefit from the drug.

                                                                      There is evidence from the field of biology that says that occasional
                                                                      drug use by almost all people is necessary for healthy mental
                                                                      functioning. Any psychologist can tell that habit-energy is both
                                                                      insidious and strong. Over years of acting the same ways in the same
                                                                      circumstances, habits can become so strong that they start coloring
                                                                      all one’s thinking, and can even become difficult, if not impossible,
                                                                      to break free from. This is not a healthy thing.

                                                                      The mind needs occasional, radical change; it needs to be forced,
                                                                      every once in a while, to see things from a really different point of
                                                                      view. Nearly all species of animal periodically take them.

                                                                      Prohibition is simple ignorant prejudice against certain philosophies,
                                                                      lifestyles, religions, and spiritual practices, as well as political
                                                                      manipulation and possibly the fact that there are, in many modern
                                                                      Western countries, such entrenched bureaucracies paid to eliminate
                                                                      drugs, that it is against the financial interests of these governments
                                                                      to allow them to be legal.

                                                                      One of the most common entheogens is alcohol. Depressing the
                                                                      activities of the forebrain and lowering inhibitions have uses for the
                                                                      magician. Lowering the inhibitions can aid a ritual by increasing the
                                                                      self-confidence of the magician and lowering the magician’s overall
                                                                      stress level, as both low confidence and stress can ruin a unitary
                                                                      state.

                                                                      Depressing the activity of the forebrain allows for greater access to
                                                                      the subconscious mind. The major drawback alcohol has as a ritual
                                                                      entheogen is that it is a little too effective at shutting off the
                                                                      forebrain. It can become so difficult to focus under the influence of
                                                                      alcohol that the ritual is ruined. For this reason the magician must
                                                                      be familiar with his or her tolerance level, and carefully balance the
                                                                      dosage used during ritual to achieve maximum benefit and minimum
                                                                      detriment.

                                                                      Marijuana is another common one. It has the same benefits as alcohol,
                                                                      and fewer drawbacks, for while marijuana does make it difficult to
                                                                      focus, it does not make it as difficult as alcohol. Additionally
                                                                      marijuana gives a greater sense of peace and balance, and greatly
                                                                      increases the ease with which the subconscious mind associates
                                                                      thoughts and emotions. For this reason it directly increases the
                                                                      mind’s ability to achieve a unitary state.

                                                                      The seeds of peganum harmala, also called Syrian rue, when smoked, act
                                                                      as a potentiator, greatly increasing the effects of other drugs they
                                                                      are taken with, though having little effect of their own. They prevent
                                                                      the breakdown of serotonin and DMT in the brain (two naturally
                                                                      occurring neurological chemicals), substances that seem to play a role
                                                                      in having visions.

                                                                      Amanita Muscaria is a mushroom with strong psychedelic properties. It
                                                                      is the traditional entheogen of many shamanistic practices. It brings
                                                                      hallucinations and spiritual experiences, including out-of-body
                                                                      experiences. It is of benefit to the magician, as the hallucinatory
                                                                      effects greatly aid in the attainment of the unitary state, as do the
                                                                      greater associative powers the mushroom gives to the mind.

                                                                      An excellent ritual entheogen can be made by combining marijuana,
                                                                      peganum, and amanita and smoking them. The effects are highly
                                                                      synergistic, and make unitary states considerably easier to attain
                                                                      than would be possible for the magician using any of the ingredients
                                                                      alone.

                                                                      LSD is a less common entheogen but a powerful one nonetheless. A
                                                                      powerful hallucinogen, it occupies sites in the brain usually occupied
                                                                      by serotonin, thus preventing serotonin from working. As serotonin
                                                                      regulates the speed with which the brain operates, this greatly speeds
                                                                      up the rate at which the brain operates, speeding up the associative
                                                                      processes of the subconscious so greatly that hallucinations result.

                                                                      This makes unitary states so easy to achieve that they become
                                                                      effortless. And for this reason the magician should not only be
                                                                      experienced with LSD before ever using it ritually, no inexperienced
                                                                      magician should ever use it ritually. It becomes very easy to form
                                                                      unitary states with the wrong elements, and this can be very hazardous
                                                                      to the magician, never mind obviously ruining the ritual in question.

                                                                      The occult and scientific descriptions say essentially the same
                                                                      things. It might be argued by some that spiritual states attained
                                                                      through drug use are somehow “invalid”, but nearly all old traditions
                                                                      of occult practice anywhere in the world would differ with this
                                                                      opinion. As described in the occult section, they have a definite use
                                                                      as a sort of “door-opener”. It is a purely philosophical matter, the
                                                                      usual merely academic sort, of whether the drugs cause hallucinations
                                                                      of spirits and spirit-related forces, or whether they open the mind up
                                                                      to them. In either case, the mind experiences them and uses them in
                                                                      achieving the unitary state.

                                                                      — end of excerpts from Scientific Magic, Copyright (C) 2003 Wayland
                                                                      Skallagrimsson http://www.winterscapes.com/scientific_magic/



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4070 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Matrix of views: Hist. Jesus & Paulines authenticity
                                                                      I created this new webpage:

                                                                      Matrix of Scholars’ Views on Historical Jesus and Pauline Authenticity
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/ScholarViewsHistJesusPaulAuth.htm



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 4071 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 26/07/2005
                                                                      Subject: Bk: Johnson: N. Star Rd: Sham’m, Witchcraft, Otherworld Journey
                                                                      North Star Road: Shamanism, Witchcraft & the Otherworld Journey
                                                                      Kenneth Johnson
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1567183700/
                                                                      Llewellyn’s World Religion and Magic Series

                                                                      Condensed reviews:

                                                                      A Grand Synthesis. Presents a convincing case for locating the roots
                                                                      of all magical practices in the original spiritual path of shamanism.
                                                                      True Wicca and other similar traditions have a legitimate claim to
                                                                      extremely ancient and profound practices. Shows parallels between the
                                                                      beliefs and practices in culture after culture (Mayan, Plains Indian,
                                                                      Siberian, Norse, Celtic, Chinese, Tibetan, Polynesian, Hindu, Greek,
                                                                      etc.) Then shows connections with more recent traditions in Germany,
                                                                      Switzerland, France, Ireland, Italy, England, etc. A magnificent and
                                                                      convincing synthesis. This book about common roots uses the symbol of
                                                                      the World Tree as a starting point.

                                                                      When a society ceases to listen to the messages of the otherworldly
                                                                      dimension the results are listlessness, depression, addiction,
                                                                      inhumanity, and malaise. This is the result of “loss of soul.” The
                                                                      function of the shaman is to maintain the connection with the
                                                                      otherworld and to reclaim lost souls.

                                                                      Explores the connection between early Christianity and Shamanism:
                                                                      estatic states, speaking in tongues, spirit journeys to higher realms,
                                                                      helping spirits, and crucifixion on the World Tree.

                                                                      Thinking Man’s Shamanism. A mix of legends, myths, and history, with
                                                                      something for everyone with even the slightest interest Shamanism or
                                                                      witchcraft. Includes shamanic exercises at the back of the book,
                                                                      which are well thought out and easy to follow. Shows that many of the
                                                                      older religions like witchcraft may have had a similar foundation.
                                                                      Written in plain English with a flowing style.

                                                                      — end of condensed reviews



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

                                                                      Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 60: 2004-01-20

                                                                      Site Map


                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3015 From: Cheryl Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mystic-state mythic allegory as game vs. puzzle
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Miracle = conscious transcendent use of freewill illusion
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3018 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Why the hierarchical Church needed the Old Testament
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3019 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Why the hierarchical Church needed the Old Testament
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3020 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Coherent mystic meaning of ‘Hell’. Views on decision agency
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3021 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: OT: Test from mail app
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: OT: Test from Yahoo website GUI
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3023 From: blueluxuryphone Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: BIG DREAM PACKAGE
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3024 From: webmaster Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: inter-group exchange: egodeath vs divisiontheory
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Endless spirituality research as denial of entheogen solution
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Online writing strategies
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3028 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3029 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Jesus’ life story based on reworked Caesar cult/play
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3030 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Against notion of “proof” in Christian origins; circular framew
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3031 From: Cheryl Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word-play
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: White-like perceptual feedback: fire-altars beyond fixed stars
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3033 From: Cheryl Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: loss of enlightenment
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3034 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Mystical determinism metaphors
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Ethics against literalism, loss of enth. key
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3036 From: Melody Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mystical determinism metaphors
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3037 From: Melody Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Initiation – how to
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3038 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Steven Katz
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3039 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Metaphoric theme: Messianic Secret
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3040 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: (no subject)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3041 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Language of man and God
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3042 From: merker2002 Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3043 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3044 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3045 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Head beyond sphere of fixed stars
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3046 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3047 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3048 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3049 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Icon: Mark/lion halo w/ white dots on red edge
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3050 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Right way to study mythic symbology: as alt-state insights
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3051 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: 4 Ezra: Firey inspiring drink
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3052 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Against notion of “proof” in Christian origins; circular framew
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3053 From: Cheryl Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Right way to study mythic symbology: as alt-state insights
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3054 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: The Matrix themes tied to the Mythic Godman, The Chosen One.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3055 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3056 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Quasi-historical existence of founder-figures
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3057 From: merker2002 Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: No Rest For The Wicked
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3058 From: tcherril ofearth Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: The Matrix themes tied to the Mythic Godman, The Chosen One.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3059 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Endless spirituality research as denial of entheogen solution
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Snake referring to visual distortion, turning staff to snake
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3061 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Eysinga: The Old Testament as Christian Scripture
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3062 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Eysinga: Mythological Background of NT Miracles
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Quasi-historical existence of founder-figures
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3065 From: jamesjomeara Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available



                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3015 From: Cheryl Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mystic-state mythic allegory as game vs. puzzle
                                                                      Hello Jas,

                                                                      In attempt to stay ‘on-topic’ I shall clasify this reply post as
                                                                      possibly having to do with

                                                                      “mental construct processing, mental models
                                                                      Nonreductionistic”

                                                                      Jas said,> All of them ARE true , cuz you can’t tell me whats
                                                                      false… but I can tell you what is false and that is something that
                                                                      isn’t true

                                                                      Tell me, Jas, in your humble opinion,…might what you’re saying
                                                                      have anything to do with the sound of the railroad down the block
                                                                      turning into music, really good music?




                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, Jas Pierce <jas_pierce@y…> wrote

                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Merker wrote (paraphrased):
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >>There’s no clear distinction which can be made on a single-word
                                                                      basis. As
                                                                      > you increase the string being analyzed to include the adjacent
                                                                      words in a
                                                                      > sentence, the meaning progressively becomes more focused, with
                                                                      many possible
                                                                      > meanings falling away, ideally converging and crystallizing to a
                                                                      single
                                                                      > specific meaning. More realistically, whole sentences are often
                                                                      still
                                                                      > ambiguous.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > OK MISTER SMARTY PANTS and Know it ALL
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Why does : SeptemberEleventh=194 and TwoThousandOne=194
                                                                      >
                                                                      > You think way to deep and it is simple….
                                                                      > But if you want me to complecate it I will
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Everything ADDS up… and of course I havent show you the real
                                                                      good ones that I have found out….
                                                                      >
                                                                      > The whole purpose is to find what is linked to you….
                                                                      mathematically when you see that you can begin to understand… I
                                                                      have an ADVANTAGE… i have a Database and ETC….. but as time
                                                                      passes I will give a blank database on the internet so that ANYONE
                                                                      CAN DO IT and i will show you the true connections of the SUPER-
                                                                      STRING fact embedded in the MYSTIC ALTERED STATE…..
                                                                      >
                                                                      > AND 2 answer
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >>Which of these statements is true?
                                                                      > >>Physical life is imaginary.
                                                                      > >>Imaginary is imaginary, and physical is physical.
                                                                      > >>Physical is imaginary, and imaginary is physical.
                                                                      > >>Life is Reality.
                                                                      > >>Imagination is Theory.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > All of them ARE true , cuz you can’t tell me whats false… but I
                                                                      can tell you what is false and that is something that isn’t true
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > ==========================================
                                                                      > The farther you dig for the truth,
                                                                      > The deeper the hole to bury you in… – Jas
                                                                      > ==========================================
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > ———————————
                                                                      > Do you Yahoo!?
                                                                      > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the “Signing Bonus” Sweepstakes
                                                                      >
                                                                      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Miracle = conscious transcendent use of freewill illusion
                                                                      >sweet miracle -> miracle of (pseudo) freewill will


                                                                      The miracle is also the mind’s ability to discover no-free-will but then
                                                                      transcendently re-postulate the impossible — free will, personal power — in
                                                                      order to bring practical controllership stability back again. This is divine
                                                                      thinking: neither naive freewill, nor denying determinism, but now, the
                                                                      freewill illusion deliberately utilized; delusion now gone, illusion is
                                                                      transcendently embraced and utilized. Virtual freewill has consciously become
                                                                      my possession.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3018 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 20/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Why the hierarchical Church needed the Old Testament
                                                                      Arne wrote:
                                                                      >>If early Christianity is so closely linked to Judaism and the Old Testament,
                                                                      how come the gospels in general and John in particular are so extremely
                                                                      anti-Jewish?


                                                                      The goal of those bishops who were intent on hierarchy-building in the first
                                                                      centuries CE was to glorify the ancient legacy of the Jewish religion and
                                                                      co-opt that legacy, through tearing that legacy out of the hands of the Jews
                                                                      of the first centuries CE. By assigning all negative value to the recent
                                                                      Jews, those bishops were able to commandeer the ancient Jewish legacy and
                                                                      effectively claim themselves as the real Jews moving forward; that is, the
                                                                      real owners of the Jewish legacy moving forward.

                                                                      Gnostics generally portrayed the ancient Jewish legacy negatively, but
                                                                      probably merely in a mystic metaphoric sense, applying all negative value to
                                                                      the ancient Jewish god and religion. The key is to separately discuss
                                                                      official attitudes toward the ancient Jewish religion up to before Jesus,
                                                                      versus toward the Jews at the time of Jesus and later — toward pre-Jesus Jews
                                                                      and post-Jesus Jews.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3019 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Why the hierarchical Church needed the Old Testament
                                                                      One source of negativity that was already directed against some Jews
                                                                      in some era was the Qumran Dead Sea Scrolls community, who likely
                                                                      used a combination of literal criticism of the Jewish theocracy
                                                                      together with mystic metaphorical assignment of all negative value to
                                                                      the Jewish theocracy.

                                                                      The mystic, Gnostic, or esoteric Jewish community and its poetic-
                                                                      religious writers criticized the official Jewish theocracy because it
                                                                      was politically oppressive and these writers used that group as a
                                                                      foil, assigning all metaphysical delusion to it: “Those official
                                                                      priests are politically oppressive and are metaphysically deluded and
                                                                      don’t provide actual primary religious experiencing.”

                                                                      Generally, Gnostics used metaphorical meaning while Roman theocrats
                                                                      used literalism. A more detailed analysis takes into consideration
                                                                      the ways Gnostics used one combination of literalist and metaphorical
                                                                      meaning, while Roman theocrats used a different combination.

                                                                      Extreme negative metaphor was used by the mystic Jews, interwoven
                                                                      with strong socio-political condemnation, against the official Jewish
                                                                      theocracy.

                                                                      That combined repudiation and condemnation of the official Jewish
                                                                      theocracy by the Qumran Jewish mystics may have been a useful source
                                                                      for the hierarchy-intent Roman-centered Catholic bishops in their
                                                                      effort to glorify and commandeer the Jewish legacy, to prop up their
                                                                      authoritarian hierarchy, while assigning all negative value to the
                                                                      post-Jesus Jews and denying their legitimate ownership of the Jewish
                                                                      legacy and authority.

                                                                      Pagels’ book Origins of Satan discusses such value-assignment
                                                                      reversals.

                                                                      The Origin of Satan
                                                                      Elaine Pagels
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0679731180

                                                                      Once one group puts together negative screeds against another group,
                                                                      someone else can simply modify the writings — standard practice in
                                                                      Hellenistic writing — and alter which groups the positive and
                                                                      negative qualities are assigned to. These qualities can include a
                                                                      metaphysical mystical mythic meaning and a distinct but interwoven
                                                                      literalist meaning.

                                                                      The standard religious contrast between ‘divine wrath’ and ‘divine
                                                                      compassion/mercy’ plays into this assignment of negative and positive
                                                                      values.

                                                                      Gnostics assigned ‘divine wrath’ to the Jehovah cosmos-creator
                                                                      figure, and assigned ‘divine compassion/mercy’ to the radically
                                                                      cosmos-transcendent God figure; whereas the Roman hierarchy-builders
                                                                      had reason to assign both ‘divine wrath’ and ‘divine
                                                                      compassion/mercy’ to the single combined Jehovah/God figure, and
                                                                      assign any fully negative attributes (such as evil and delusion) to
                                                                      the Satan figure.

                                                                      Groups involved in value-assignment reversals included Jewish
                                                                      mystics, Gnostics, Jewish theocrats, and Roman theocrats. The same
                                                                      patterns may be present in the Reformation era with respect to
                                                                      wrestling over which group owns Paul, and who he writes against.

                                                                      Extreme negative metaphorical mystical constructs included the Qumran
                                                                      conceptual play along the general lines of “We are the elect true
                                                                      Jews, true Israel, beloved of God, predestined for inheriting the
                                                                      promised land. You official theocratic priests are of the devil,
                                                                      deluded, accursed, false Israel, blocking the way, neither going in
                                                                      yourselves nor letting others enter.”

                                                                      Such mystical metaphorical play, blended with literal condemnation
                                                                      for socio-political oppression, was a potent tool anyone could take
                                                                      and us against their own opponents, such as the Roman hierarchy-
                                                                      building bishops wielded against the egalitarian, loosely networked
                                                                      Gnostic version of eucharistic gatherings and against all types of
                                                                      post-Jesus Jews, and against the Gnostic “heretics” who worshipped
                                                                      Jesus as mystical redeemer but rejected the hierarchical ecclesiastic
                                                                      structure.


                                                                      Books about the essence of the early ‘churches’ being literally and
                                                                      first of all, ‘eucharistic meal gatherings’:

                                                                      Eucharist, Bishop, Church: The Unity of the Church in the Divine
                                                                      Eucharist and the Bishop During the First Three Centuries
                                                                      John Zizioulas
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/1885652518

                                                                      >From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early Christian World
                                                                      Dennis Smith
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0800634896

                                                                      The Lord’s Supper
                                                                      William Barclay
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0664223826


                                                                      What was to be gained by demonizing the various post-Jesus Jews and
                                                                      the many Gnostic “heretic” groups was control of versions of the
                                                                      canon and control of versions of the Christian religion, bringing
                                                                      together more like a single controllable system, even coercing the
                                                                      semi-independent loosely networked eucharistic assemblies together,
                                                                      resulting in a financially profitable, profitably governable
                                                                      corporate universal franchisement of eucharistic assemblies, just as
                                                                      a chain-store corporation takes over independent stores and small
                                                                      chains of stores.

                                                                      Direct religious experiencing was divisive and thus was moderated and
                                                                      downplayed — even while given some lip service and controlled,
                                                                      regulated spin as best they could — by the Roman-based bishops, who
                                                                      were, first and foremost, intent on building their fiefdoms within a
                                                                      hierarchical theocracy.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman



                                                                      JesusMysteries Home Page:
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JesusMysteries
                                                                      From the Home Page click the options to the left for current and past
                                                                      Messages/Archive, the Files, Bookmarks, and Database.

                                                                      Don’t miss Peter Kirby’s, “Historical Jesus Theories”:
                                                                      http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html or his “Christian Origins”
                                                                      page: http://christianorigins.com/

                                                                      Duplicate archive at eScribe:
                                                                      http://escribe.com/history/JesusMysteries/index.html
                                                                      Type in User ID: JM — And then: mysteries

                                                                      JesusMysteries Moderators:
                                                                      JesusMysteries-owner@yahoogroups.com

                                                                      Yahoo! Groups Links

                                                                      To visit your group on the web, go to:
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JesusMysteries/

                                                                      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                                                      JesusMysteries-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

                                                                      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
                                                                      http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3020 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Coherent mystic meaning of ‘Hell’. Views on decision agency
                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>>>Before his resurrection, Jesus stormed the gates of hell and raised up the
                                                                      Old Testament saints, including Noah, Adam, and Abraham.


                                                                      Merker wrote:
                                                                      >>>Why should these saints be in hell in the first place ?


                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>It’s an official doctrine of the Middle Ages. I can explain it
                                                                      esoterically/mystically (that is, in terms of intense mystic-state
                                                                      experiencing and experiential insight), but first must find more about the
                                                                      doctrine — should be easy, because it’s an official doctrine.


                                                                      Ephesians 4:1-16:
                                                                      >>>But grace was given to each of us according to the measure of Christ’s
                                                                      gift. Therefore it is said, “When he ascended on high he led a host of
                                                                      captives, and he gave gifts to men.”


                                                                      Java Fusion wrote:
                                                                      >>In saying, “He ascended,” what does it mean but that he had also descended
                                                                      into the lower parts of the earth? He who descended is he who also ascended
                                                                      far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.


                                                                      In Neoplatonism and Hermeticism, the minimum number of levels is 3: naive
                                                                      freewill, consciousness of determinism, and transcendence of the deterministic
                                                                      cosmos. Map any “down/up” movement along that ladder; Jesus’ descent to the
                                                                      saints in Hell best maps between levels 2 and 3: fatally problematic
                                                                      consciousness of one’s helpless embeddedness in cosmic determinism
                                                                      (self-control seizure), moving up to divine transcendent thinking (“being
                                                                      given the mind of Christ which descends to rescue you and redeem you,
                                                                      purchasing you back up to your metaphysical true home”).

                                                                      This view maps ‘Hell’ to “deterministic self-control seizure discovery”, and
                                                                      Jesus descends from the trans-deterministic realm fully outside the
                                                                      deterministic cosmos, to come down to the high level where people are
                                                                      undergoing self-control seizure due to stumbling onto the discovery of the
                                                                      embeddedness of their thoughts in the deterministic cosmos (Metallica’s Heavy
                                                                      Metal Acid Rock song “Trapped Under Ice”), lifting and fishing them up out of
                                                                      that Hell-realm.


                                                                      Ephesians 4:1-16 continues:
                                                                      >>>And his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some
                                                                      evangelists, some pastors and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of
                                                                      ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity
                                                                      of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the
                                                                      measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ; so that we may no longer be
                                                                      children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by
                                                                      the cunning of men, by their craftiness in deceitful wiles. Rather, speaking
                                                                      the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head,
                                                                      into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by every joint
                                                                      with which it is supplied, when each part is working properly, makes bodily
                                                                      growth and upbuilds itself in love.


                                                                      Where is the canonical reference to a series of visionary-plant initiations
                                                                      for esoteric Protestants, comparable to Purgatory for esoteric Catholics?
                                                                      There are levels of angels, possibly levels of church members in the
                                                                      Protestant Bible. Paul differentiates hylics, psychics, and pneumatics, and
                                                                      mentions his own ascent to the 3rd or 4th heaven, meeting Jesus who came down
                                                                      to that level. There is a head vs. body distinction among the Christian
                                                                      community members.

                                                                      There is also the system of stations of the Cross, but that seems like a
                                                                      Catholic scheme laid onto the gospels, actively picking out selected elements
                                                                      of the passion story.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3021 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: OT: Test from mail app
                                                                      Test for uploading the archives. Ignore.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: OT: Test from Yahoo website GUI
                                                                      Test for uploading the archives. Ignore.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3023 From: blueluxuryphone Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: BIG DREAM PACKAGE
                                                                      Hello,

                                                                      I’ve spent the last two and a half months teaching myself how to create a web
                                                                      site and assembling BIGDREAMPACKAGE.com. I left my job and totally
                                                                      committed myself to this project. This site has music videos, mp3’s, poetry,
                                                                      artwork, stories and a great links page. I needed an outlet to express that
                                                                      there is an alternative to living in this existence beyond what we have become
                                                                      accustomed to. Please feel free to email me with your comments, anything
                                                                      you see that needs improvement or employment suggestions
                                                                      Enjoy!
                                                                      http://bigdreampackage.com/

                                                                      LOVE and LIGHT,
                                                                      Brian.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3024 From: webmaster Date: 21/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: inter-group exchange: egodeath vs divisiontheory
                                                                      Michael.

                                                                      Can you, please, respond to this passage? Point me to a post/refrence
                                                                      that disputes it? It came from a discussion group
                                                                      called “divisiontheory” that discusses “Afterlife Phenomena and our
                                                                      Binary Soul”.

                                                                      ” While I remain surprised that a drug could facilitate the soul-
                                                                      searching and life-review DT prescribes for soul-spirit integration
                                                                      and spiritual health, it seems an unnecessarily dangerous road
                                                                      towards that destination. Surely the history of the last 40 years has
                                                                      impressed us all with the dangers inherent in psychoactive drugs. I
                                                                      am inclined to seek hints about our proper path in the history and
                                                                      practices of the earliest Christians, and I can confidently say I’ve
                                                                      not heard anything about them including any sort of psychoactives in
                                                                      their practices. “

                                                                      Thank you.
                                                                      Slava
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Endless spirituality research as denial of entheogen solution
                                                                      My general proposal is that in general, all these hand-wringing queries about
                                                                      searching for spirituality should quit beating around the bush and turn their
                                                                      attention toward where it is already constantly being pulled anyway. What
                                                                      more clear “sign from God” are they looking for, than the reappearance of
                                                                      entheogens again and again throughout pop spirituality? They keep acting like
                                                                      it’s uncear, yet nothing could be more obvious. So all these serious,
                                                                      in-depth searches are just so much smoke and noise based on pretending that
                                                                      the answer or key is difficult and unknown.

                                                                      At some point it is obstinate irrationality to keep looking when you’ve
                                                                      already found the solution to a search and puzzle. Entheogens fit as the
                                                                      solution to the mysterious puzzle. It’s like someone reading the stack of
                                                                      books about No-Historical-Jesus and then still coming back with that same old,
                                                                      in-denial canard, “But this is all speculation and we can never know for
                                                                      sure.”

                                                                      Past a point, the claim to not know become obstinate irrationality, because
                                                                      rationality was never based on knowing anything absolutely for sure; we can be
                                                                      relatively sure and confident about all things we know, though *none* of them
                                                                      are known “absolutely for sure”.

                                                                      In the case of this seminar, the rational thing to do would be to focus
                                                                      heavily on entheogens, a focus which is clearly warranted. But more likely,
                                                                      the seminar will try to play the old card of putting it both ways: entheogens
                                                                      are extremely interesting, but entheogens are not to get more than a bit of
                                                                      emphasis — one book that is relatively innocent of this mistake, however, is
                                                                      the book Rational Mysticism, which gives entheogens the fully central place
                                                                      they clearly deserve.


                                                                      The first paragraph in the seminar announcement lists the following:
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      Aldous Huxley
                                                                      Starhawk
                                                                      Carlos Castaneda
                                                                      mystical nature poet Robinson Jeffers (?)
                                                                      mystical nature poet Gary Snyder (?)
                                                                      Jim Jones
                                                                      Heaven’s Gate
                                                                      Church of Satan
                                                                      Church of Scientology
                                                                      The first Zen monastery and first Hindu temple in the western hemisphere
                                                                      UFO cults
                                                                      Esalen
                                                                      The Grateful Dead
                                                                      Burning Man
                                                                      soul surfers (?)
                                                                      Sierra club

                                                                      The following, at least, are related to entheogens:
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      Aldous Huxley
                                                                      Carlos Castaneda
                                                                      Church of Satan
                                                                      Esalen
                                                                      The Grateful Dead
                                                                      Burning Man


                                                                      That’s at least 7 out of 17 forms of “alternative spirituality” that are
                                                                      related to entheogens — making entheogens by far the leading so-called
                                                                      “eccentric alternative spirituality”.


                                                                      >>the idea that California’s alternative spirituality stands as a distinct
                                                                      religious tradition on its own

                                                                      >>sects, cultures, and spiritual techniques

                                                                      >>our core predicament: how to rediscover spirituality in a modern world
                                                                      defined by technology, consumer culture, and a scientific cosmology

                                                                      >>California’s maverick tradition of spiritual innovation.

                                                                      >>an overview of California spirituality

                                                                      >>reasons why this peculiar sensibility set down roots here on the west coast

                                                                      >>the “California Tao”: nature, the body, and the evolution of consciousness
                                                                      … is inseparable from California’s unique technological experience.
                                                                      California … has led the way towards a postmodern culture of media,
                                                                      subcultures, computer technology, aero-space, and rootless consumerism. Its
                                                                      alternative spiritual movements both mirror this process and attempt to
                                                                      compensate for its considerable problems.

                                                                      >>He has given lectures at conferences all over the world on topics ranging
                                                                      from psychedelic culture to cyberspace to postmodern spirituality


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman


                                                                      ____________

                                                                      —–Original Message—–
                                                                      From: Erik Davis [mailto:erik@…]
                                                                      Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:00 PM
                                                                      To: erik@…
                                                                      Subject: [Erik Davis] Upcoming Bay Area seminar


                                                                      People living in the Bay Area might be interested in the following seminar
                                                                      that I will be leading at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San
                                                                      Francisco later this winter. It is the first time I will be publicly
                                                                      presenting some of the strange and marvelous fruits of my research into the
                                                                      history of alternative spirituality in California, and I’m very excited about
                                                                      it.


                                                                      Please contact me with any questions you might have.


                                                                      Erik




                                                                      “The Altered State: California’s Spiritual Frontiers”
                                                                      a four-week seminar by Erik Davis

                                                                      Tuesday nights 7 to 9:30 pm
                                                                      Feb 17, 24 March 2, March 16.
                                                                      California Institute of Integral Studies
                                                                      695 Minna Street
                                                                      San Francisco

                                                                      Alongside its body obsessions and media dreams, California is perhaps best
                                                                      known for its spiritual eccentricity. For well over a century, the state has
                                                                      been host to a dizzying number of exotic religions, ad-hoc cults, and all
                                                                      manner of mind-and-body-altering fads and fantasies. California has been home
                                                                      to spiritual mavericks like Alan Watts and Aldous Huxley, to popular
                                                                      visionaries like Starhawk and Carlos Castaneda, to mystical nature poets like
                                                                      Robinson Jeffers and Gary Snyder, and to living nightmares like Jim Jones and
                                                                      Heaven’s Gate. It cradles the Church of Satan and the Church of Scientology;
                                                                      looking east, it built the first Zen monastery and first Hindu temple in the
                                                                      western hemisphere. California is responsible for UFO cults and Esalen, for
                                                                      the Grateful Dead and Burning Man, for soul surfers and the Sierra club. If
                                                                      consciousness is truly evolving, than California has served as its American
                                                                      Petri dish.


                                                                      This four-week seminar, which will include slideshows, film clips, and music,
                                                                      is devoted to the idea that California’s alternative spirituality stands as a
                                                                      distinct religious tradition on its own-a kind of improvised and hedonistic
                                                                      Hinduism, full of contradictory sects, cultures, and spiritual techniques, but
                                                                      all speaking to our core predicament: how to rediscover spirituality in a
                                                                      modern world defined by technology, consumer culture, and a scientific
                                                                      cosmology. In the class, we will encounter unknown ancestors, sacred spots,
                                                                      and secret histories buried in the cultural landscape. Such discoveries may
                                                                      provide a regional sense of “rootless roots” at a time when so many of us are
                                                                      feeling unmoored. Indeed, many of our contemporary concerns with deep ecology,
                                                                      human transformation, body-positive spirituality, and the techno-science of
                                                                      mind are rooted in California’s maverick tradition of spiritual innovation.


                                                                      The first class will provide an overview of California spirituality, and
                                                                      suggest some reasons why this peculiar sensibility set down roots here on the
                                                                      west coast. The remaining three classes will focus on major dimensions of the
                                                                      “California Tao”: nature, the body, and the evolution of consciousness-a
                                                                      notion that, I will argue, is inseparable from California’s unique
                                                                      technological experience. California, after all, has led the way towards a
                                                                      postmodern culture of media, subcultures, computer technology, aero-space, and
                                                                      rootless consumerism. Its alternative spiritual movements both mirror this
                                                                      process and attempt to compensate for its considerable problems. By
                                                                      understanding these dynamics, we can better approach the transformations and
                                                                      disruptions that lay ahead for all of us.


                                                                      About the lecturer: Erik Davis wrote the cult classic Techgnosis: Myth, Magic,
                                                                      and Mysticism in the Age of Information, which has been translated into five
                                                                      languages. He has given lectures at conferences all over the world on topics
                                                                      ranging from psychedelic culture to cyberspace to postmodern spirituality,
                                                                      including programs at Stanford, Swarthmore, Esalen, and London’s ICA. He has
                                                                      given workshops on the I Ching and Technological Future. He is currently
                                                                      collaborating with Michael Rauner on a photo essay book about the history of
                                                                      California spirituality.

                                                                      For non-CIIIS students, the fee for the four-week program is $225 per person.
                                                                      Folks may
                                                                      register online at http://www.ciis.edu/lifelong, or call 415-575-6175. People may
                                                                      also pre-register up to the day before the first class meeting, or if space
                                                                      available, at the door.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Online writing strategies
                                                                      My standards for clear, effective postings:


                                                                      Every posting must include *explicit* indication of how it is related to the
                                                                      group’s charter. During the posting, every few short paragraphs should prove
                                                                      that the post is *directly* on-topic. Meta-discussion is permissible if one
                                                                      states every few paragraphs why such an analysis is important for the group’s
                                                                      stated goals.

                                                                      General points are on topic only *if* the writer explicitly connects them to
                                                                      the central topics in the group’s charter. Analogies are helpful only if the
                                                                      point is also made directly, explaining how the analogy illustrates the direct
                                                                      point.

                                                                      My postings in discussion groups try to adhere to being so driven to be
                                                                      on-topic and contribute useful, easy-to-apply points.

                                                                      I think that some critical moderators in the Christ Conspiracy no-Jesus group
                                                                      don’t actually have trouble with my communication clarity, but rather, with my
                                                                      position that religion is a more or less distorted expression of something
                                                                      legitimate. The moderator wants postings to either be *for* Christianity, in
                                                                      which case he can fire at them and block them, or *against* Christianity;
                                                                      anything else — anything above such kindergarten black-and-white thinking, is
                                                                      labeled “unclear, confusing”.

                                                                      “Keep it simple”, the author of the book told me in the group. Translation:
                                                                      adhere to our two-party politics of black-and-white, us-versus-them, “rational
                                                                      scientific atheists” versus “idiot junk Christians”.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      I am in the middle of reformatting my 2001-2004 postings onto standard Web
                                                                      pages. Then I will be able to point you to an easy-to-use collection of my
                                                                      writings on the subject.
                                                                      For now:
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/messagesearch?query=maximal
                                                                      Click the Next link.


                                                                      Someone wrote:
                                                                      >>>While I remain surprised that a drug could facilitate the soul- searching
                                                                      and life-review DT prescribes for soul-spirit integration and spiritual
                                                                      health, it seems an unnecessarily dangerous road towards that destination.
                                                                      Surely the history of the last 40 years has impressed us all with the dangers
                                                                      inherent in psychoactive drugs. I am inclined to seek hints about our proper
                                                                      path in the history and practices of the earliest Christians, and I can
                                                                      confidently say I’ve not heard anything about them including any sort of
                                                                      psychoactives in their practices.


                                                                      Slava wrote:
                                                                      >>Can you point me to a posting or reference that disputes it? It came from a
                                                                      discussion group called “divisiontheory” that discusses “Afterlife Phenomena
                                                                      and our Binary Soul”.


                                                                      By far the main meaning of ‘afterlife’ in higher, esoteric religion is the
                                                                      remainder of one’s life after a series of entheogenic mystic state sessions
                                                                      resulting in deterministic egodeath and transcendent rebirth where freewill
                                                                      and separate self are fully understood as illusions, rather than remaining as
                                                                      returning delusions. Permanent ego death, resulting in the full conversion
                                                                      from delusion to mere conscious illusion, occurs typically after a series of
                                                                      some 9 visionary-plant initiations, in Traditional and esoteric
                                                                      religion/initiation systems.

                                                                      That former, deluded self is metaphorized as one’s “mortal life”. After full
                                                                      lasting ego death, one has burned away one’s mortality and gained everlasting
                                                                      imperishability, metaphorized as “immortality”, an idea which also alludes to
                                                                      the mystic-state experience of timelessness, or frozen block-universe
                                                                      determinism in which egoic personal control agency is seen to be essentially
                                                                      illusory, frozen helplessly and impotently into spacetime.

                                                                      There are warnings of danger all throughout religion and esotericism —
                                                                      various wrathful deities, imprisonment, traps, dangers. Authentic
                                                                      spirituality is inherently dangerous, leading to one’s Golem and Centaur
                                                                      running out of control, building up to weilding such power of personal egoic
                                                                      control, the egoic agent can no longer control its own runaway power. The
                                                                      result is self-control seizure and enlightenment when one’s power is
                                                                      reconceived as empty — depending on how the mind conceives of this mysterious
                                                                      “oneself” who is held to wield the runaway power.

                                                                      According to the maximal entheogen theory of religion, visionary plants don’t
                                                                      *simulate* the traditional religious methods, they *are* the main traditional
                                                                      methods, by far. Safe methods are safe because they are relatively
                                                                      ineffective; they become ways of effectively *avoiding* direct primary
                                                                      religious experiencing, typically excused by redefinining spirituality to
                                                                      denude it of all intense mystic altered-state experiencing and relabelling the
                                                                      resulting ordinary state of consicousness as “spiritual”, in a sense which is
                                                                      a recent post-1960s invention in reaction to the completely and embarrassingly
                                                                      impressive efficacy of entheogens at reliably and ergonomically producing
                                                                      intense primary mystic experiences.

                                                                      Those who haven’t heard about early Christians using entheogens are always
                                                                      those who haven’t tried to look for and recognize the references that are
                                                                      available in reasonable abundance. Theirs is a paradigm-based blindness. The
                                                                      concept of “church” originally meant “a eucharistic meal gathering”. The
                                                                      heart of the Death Star that blows it all up as having an entheogen-shaped
                                                                      core is the question, what exactly was the eucharistic meal — it was “mixed
                                                                      wine”. Then the entire question becomes, “What exactly and speicifically was
                                                                      in the ‘mixed wine’?”

                                                                      What’s needed today is a bulleted list of all the indications — actually,
                                                                      indications-with-interpretations — that support the maximal entheogen theory
                                                                      of religion. Only now are there enough books and websites, a handful, that
                                                                      cover the evidence and provide the interpretations. Today’s entheogenists
                                                                      think small and assume the minimal entheogen theory of religion, supposing
                                                                      that enthoegen use in religion was rare and suppressed.

                                                                      It is easy to provide a list of books about entheogens in religious history.
                                                                      Using online resources, one can glean much of the worldview that enables
                                                                      recognizing the evidence that is ample for even the maximal entheogen theory
                                                                      of Christian history all before the modern era; that not only early
                                                                      Christians, but the Christian tradition overall during the ancient and
                                                                      medeival/Renaissance eras was based on the use of visionary plants, and not
                                                                      rarely or by a deviant few, but throughout popular and eccelesiastical
                                                                      culture.

                                                                      It is easy to construct an interpretive framework or paradigm in which
                                                                      religious themes in general are recognized as perennially emanating from the
                                                                      visinoary-plant based altered state of cognition. Such a paradigm, today’s
                                                                      “minimalist entheogen paradigm”, then argues against the “minimalist”
                                                                      assumption still used by today’s tepid and self-defeating entheogen scholars,
                                                                      who inadvertantly end up giving more of an impression that entheogens were
                                                                      just the deviant and minor method that the probhitionists and
                                                                      enthoegen-diminishing meditation advocates claim they were.


                                                                      Book lists:
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/#BookLists
                                                                      Original, experiential, mystical Christianity
                                                                      Mystery Religion, Myth, and the Mystical State
                                                                      Religious Experiencing
                                                                      Holy Spirit and Christian Spirituality
                                                                      Word and Power (doctrine and spiritual experience)
                                                                      Gnosticism
                                                                      Western Esotericism
                                                                      Ecstatic Alchemy
                                                                      Hermeticism and Ancient Mystic Astrology
                                                                      Jewish Mysticism
                                                                      Entheogen theory of religion —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/KDBM4IID0J82
                                                                      The active eucharist that reveals the kingdom of God —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/1WMWVXJ8FZPJD
                                                                      Eucharist (Catholic authors)
                                                                      Eucharist (Catholic authors II)
                                                                      Lord’s Supper (Prot., E. Orth, Ecum.)
                                                                      Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/286BVZYFN78Z9
                                                                      Mythic-only Christ theory
                                                                      Religious myth: allegorical metaphor of mystic experiencing
                                                                      The kingdom of God is at hand
                                                                      Christianity as political rebellion against “divine” Caesar
                                                                      Earliest Christianity
                                                                      Ancient Near Eastern religion
                                                                      Philosophy of Mother of God
                                                                      Mary “John” Magdalene, The Beloved Disciple
                                                                      Sophia, religious comprehension
                                                                      Theology of Religious Pluralism


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience. The essence, paradigm, origin, and fountainhead of religion is
                                                                      the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered
                                                                      state, producing loose cognitive association binding, which then produces an
                                                                      experience of frozen block-universe determinism with a single, pre-existing,
                                                                      ever-existing future. The return of the ordinary state of consciousness is
                                                                      allegorized as a transcendence of Necessity or cosmic determinism. Myth
                                                                      describes this mystic-state experience. Initiation is classically a series of
                                                                      some 8 visionary-plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial
                                                                      philosophy. Most religion is a distortion, corruption, literalization, and
                                                                      cooptation of this standard initiation system.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3028 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      [Re-posting with typos fixed and 1 error corrected]


                                                                      I am in the middle of reformatting my 2001-2004 postings onto standard Web
                                                                      pages. Then I will be able to point you to an easy-to-use collection of my
                                                                      writings on the subject.
                                                                      For now:
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/messagesearch?query=maximal
                                                                      Click the Next link.


                                                                      Someone wrote:
                                                                      >>>While I remain surprised that a drug could facilitate the soul- searching
                                                                      and life-review DT prescribes for soul-spirit integration and spiritual
                                                                      health, it seems an unnecessarily dangerous road towards that destination.
                                                                      Surely the history of the last 40 years has impressed us all with the dangers
                                                                      inherent in psychoactive drugs. I am inclined to seek hints about our proper
                                                                      path in the history and practices of the earliest Christians, and I can
                                                                      confidently say I’ve not heard anything about them including any sort of
                                                                      psychoactives in their practices.


                                                                      Slava wrote:
                                                                      >>Can you point me to a posting or reference that disputes it? It came from a
                                                                      discussion group called “divisiontheory” that discusses “Afterlife Phenomena
                                                                      and our Binary Soul”.


                                                                      By far the main meaning of ‘afterlife’ in higher, esoteric religion is the
                                                                      remainder of one’s life after a series of entheogenic mystic state sessions
                                                                      resulting in deterministic egodeath and transcendent rebirth where freewill
                                                                      and separate self are fully understood as illusions, rather than remaining as
                                                                      returning delusions. Permanent ego death, resulting in the full conversion
                                                                      from delusion to mere conscious illusion, occurs typically after a series of
                                                                      some 9 visionary-plant initiations, in Traditional and esoteric
                                                                      religion/initiation systems.

                                                                      That former, deluded self is metaphorized as one’s “mortal life”. After full
                                                                      lasting ego death, one has burned away one’s mortality and gained everlasting
                                                                      imperishability, metaphorized as “immortality”, an idea which also alludes to
                                                                      the mystic-state experience of timelessness, or frozen block-universe
                                                                      determinism in which egoic personal control agency is seen to be essentially
                                                                      illusory, frozen helplessly and impotently into spacetime.

                                                                      There are warnings of danger all throughout religion and esotericism —
                                                                      various wrathful deities, imprisonment, traps, dangers. Authentic
                                                                      spirituality is inherently dangerous, leading to one’s Golem and Centaur
                                                                      running out of control, building up to wielding such power of personal egoic
                                                                      control, the egoic agent can no longer control its own runaway power. The
                                                                      result is self-control seizure and enlightenment when one’s power is
                                                                      reconceived as empty — depending on how the mind conceives of this mysterious
                                                                      “oneself” who is held to wield the runaway power.

                                                                      According to the maximal entheogen theory of religion, visionary plants don’t
                                                                      *simulate* the traditional religious methods, they *are* the main traditional
                                                                      methods, by far. Safe methods are safe because they are relatively
                                                                      ineffective; they become ways of effectively *avoiding* direct primary
                                                                      religious experiencing, typically excused by redefining spirituality to denude
                                                                      it of all intense mystic altered-state experiencing and relabelling the
                                                                      resulting ordinary state of consciousness as “spiritual”, in a sense which is
                                                                      a recent post-1960s invention in reaction to the completely and embarrassingly
                                                                      impressive efficacy of entheogens at reliably and ergonomically producing
                                                                      intense primary mystic experiences.

                                                                      Those who haven’t heard about early Christians using entheogens are always
                                                                      those who haven’t tried to look for and recognize the references that are
                                                                      available in reasonable abundance. Theirs is a paradigm-based blindness. The
                                                                      concept of “church” originally meant “a eucharistic meal gathering”. The
                                                                      heart of the Death Star that blows it all up as having an entheogen-shaped
                                                                      core is the question, what exactly was the eucharistic meal — it was “mixed
                                                                      wine”. Then the entire question becomes, “What exactly and specifically was
                                                                      in the ‘mixed wine’?”

                                                                      What’s needed today is a bulleted list of all the indications — actually,
                                                                      indications-with-interpretations — that support the maximal entheogen theory
                                                                      of religion. Only now are there enough books and websites, a handful, that
                                                                      cover the evidence and provide the interpretations. Today’s entheogenists
                                                                      think small and assume the minimal entheogen theory of religion, supposing
                                                                      that entheogen use in religion was rare and suppressed.

                                                                      It is easy to provide a list of books about entheogens in religious history.
                                                                      Using online resources, one can glean much of the worldview that enables
                                                                      recognizing the evidence that is ample for even the maximal entheogen theory
                                                                      of Christian history all before the modern era; that not only early
                                                                      Christians, but the Christian tradition overall during the ancient and
                                                                      medieval/Renaissance eras was based on the use of visionary plants, and not
                                                                      rarely or by a deviant few, but throughout popular and ecclesiastical culture.

                                                                      It is easy to construct an interpretive framework or paradigm in which
                                                                      religious themes in general are recognized as perennially emanating from the
                                                                      visionary-plant based altered state of cognition. Such a paradigm, the
                                                                      just-now-forming “maximal entheogen paradigm”, argues against the “minimalist”
                                                                      assumption still used by today’s tepid and self-defeating entheogen scholars,
                                                                      who inadvertently end up giving more of an impression that entheogens were
                                                                      just the deviant and minor method that the prohibitionists and
                                                                      entheogen-diminishing meditation advocates claim they were.


                                                                      Book lists:
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/#BookLists
                                                                      Original, experiential, mystical Christianity
                                                                      Mystery Religion, Myth, and the Mystical State
                                                                      Religious Experiencing
                                                                      Holy Spirit and Christian Spirituality
                                                                      Word and Power (doctrine and spiritual experience)
                                                                      Gnosticism
                                                                      Western Esotericism
                                                                      Ecstatic Alchemy
                                                                      Hermeticism and Ancient Mystic Astrology
                                                                      Jewish Mysticism
                                                                      Entheogen theory of religion —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/KDBM4IID0J82
                                                                      The active eucharist that reveals the kingdom of God —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/1WMWVXJ8FZPJD
                                                                      Eucharist (Catholic authors)
                                                                      Eucharist (Catholic authors II)
                                                                      Lord’s Supper (Prot., E. Orth, Ecum.)
                                                                      Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage —
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/286BVZYFN78Z9
                                                                      Mythic-only Christ theory
                                                                      Religious myth: allegorical metaphor of mystic experiencing
                                                                      The kingdom of God is at hand
                                                                      Christianity as political rebellion against “divine” Caesar
                                                                      Earliest Christianity
                                                                      Ancient Near Eastern religion
                                                                      Philosophy of Mother of God
                                                                      Mary “John” Magdalene, The Beloved Disciple
                                                                      Sophia, religious comprehension
                                                                      Theology of Religious Pluralism


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience. The essence, paradigm, origin, and fountainhead of religion is
                                                                      the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered
                                                                      state, producing loose cognitive association binding, which then produces an
                                                                      experience of frozen block-universe determinism with a single, pre-existing,
                                                                      ever-existing future. The return of the ordinary state of consciousness is
                                                                      allegorized as a transcendence of Necessity or cosmic determinism. Myth
                                                                      describes this mystic-state experience. Initiation is classically a series of
                                                                      some 8 visionary-plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial
                                                                      philosophy. Most religion is a distortion, corruption, literalization, and
                                                                      cooptation of this standard initiation system.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3029 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Jesus’ life story based on reworked Caesar cult/play
                                                                      >>>Is there a popular hypothesis according to which Flavius Josephus is just a
                                                                      pseudonym or at least an agent of the Roman politician Arius Calpurnius Piso
                                                                      who plotted the Jewish war?


                                                                      >>There is an hypothesis on Piso and the Jesus myth, but in my humble view it
                                                                      is the most extreme of conspiracy theories. I’ve never seen much reason to
                                                                      give it credibility.


                                                                      There is good reason to selectively draw upon the Flavius/Piso theory, because
                                                                      Christianity was largely a rewriting and rebuttal to Ruler Cult themes. We
                                                                      cannot be all-or-nothing in evaluating radical theories. A useful attitude is
                                                                      that all radical or alternative theories are correct and insightful in some
                                                                      way, the challenge being to specifically identify that way.

                                                                      I am still waiting for the books on the subject to become widely available. I
                                                                      don’t know the details of the theories, such as whether anyone proposes that
                                                                      ‘Flavius’ is a pseudonym for Piso.

                                                                      The books on this subject suffer from mono-explanation, trying to derive all
                                                                      Christianity — which was nothing if not radically thematically
                                                                      syncretistic — from a single thematic source.

                                                                      An easy and rewardingly insight-providing approach now in studying the origins
                                                                      of Christianity is the study of Christian themes as a rebuttal and
                                                                      modification of the themes of Ruler Cult.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3030 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Against notion of “proof” in Christian origins; circular framew
                                                                      Wendy wrote:
                                                                      >>G.A. Wells has changed his mind and now believes that Jesus DID exist?

                                                                      >>In the JesusMysteries discussion group, I mostly see arguments for the
                                                                      mythicist point of view. Do we often see it argued that Jesus DID exist, with
                                                                      backup info?


                                                                      The arguments for Jesus’ historicity are already well-defined based on
                                                                      standard published arguments; the dominant paradigm is usefully seen as
                                                                      including and integrating one large set of arguments for Jesus’ historicity.
                                                                      Such reasoning, such a type of interpretive framework, is the familiar
                                                                      established received view, the given. That was Phase I.

                                                                      In the Internet era, the argument for nonhistoricity of Jesus is easier to
                                                                      publish and develop. That is Phase II, which is still struggling to formulate
                                                                      a typical and standardized scenario and interpretive framework that is as
                                                                      focused and standardized as the familiar received story of Christian origins.

                                                                      It will take awhile longer for the no-Historical-Jesus model of Christian
                                                                      origins to become comparably distinct, stable, and standardized, and
                                                                      positively expressed. Most books, exemplified by comparing Doherty, Freke &
                                                                      Gandy, and Acharya, emphasize disproof of the received paradigm, and do so
                                                                      consistently, without having a consistent, distinct, positively specific,
                                                                      uniform, and consensus proposed paradigm as a compelling alternative to the
                                                                      received view.

                                                                      The no-Historical-Jesus researchers need to reach some comparable degree of
                                                                      consensus on how Christianity actually did form if not by the currently
                                                                      predominant “big-bang historical Jesus” story of Christian origins. After
                                                                      that, Phase III will be the response to that specific proposed alternative
                                                                      story of origins from the adherents of the currently predominant
                                                                      historical-Jesus paradigm.

                                                                      It is unlikely that the purely negative disproof that currently predominates
                                                                      in the no-Jesus books will compel a response from the comfortably established
                                                                      Historicist camp. Only when a highly compelling and uniform and coherent
                                                                      positive alternative story of Christian origins is formulated by the no-Jesus
                                                                      community of researchers will there be a sufficient challenge and threat to
                                                                      the dominant paradigm to elicit a response.

                                                                      Lacking such a consensus alternative story of Christian origins, today’s
                                                                      exchange between Phase I and Phase II adherents is bound to be limited to a
                                                                      paradigm status-quo standoff of “The official historical writings are
                                                                      basically reliable.” “No they’re not!” “Yes they are!” The Phase II
                                                                      paradigm is still too weak, too scattered; it can be ignored safely and
                                                                      comfortably: “Never mind those kooks over there who doubt everything ever
                                                                      written, seeing forgery everywhere throughout the entire canon of early
                                                                      Christian writings.”


                                                                      Also challenging the effort to formulate a no-Jesus paradigm is the “endless
                                                                      fence-sitting” attitude, which effectively amounts to accepting the familiar
                                                                      received Historicist way of thinking by default, with the excuse “Because we
                                                                      can’t know Jesus’ historicity absolutely for certain, the only rational thing
                                                                      to do is assign his historicity a plausibility of 50%.” I disagree with the
                                                                      common and too-easily-made assertion or defense strategy of “We can’t know
                                                                      Jesus’ historicity absolutely for certain.”

                                                                      Such an assertion overemphasizes the role of certainty in epistemology, and
                                                                      underemphasizes the importance of interpretive frameworks which facts,
                                                                      knowledge, and certainty are importantly relative to.

                                                                      Within a mature, fully-developed ahistoricist interpretive framework, we *can*
                                                                      be effectively reasonably certain that the Jesus figure is essentially a
                                                                      composite figure, such that the facticity of Jesus’ existence becomes entirely
                                                                      a matter of definition: if ‘Jesus’ is defined as a single historical man
                                                                      serving as necessary kernel for the eventual composite mythic-accretion
                                                                      figure, we know things didn’t work that way; all evidence indicates Jesus was
                                                                      a radically composite figure incorporating *multiple, not single* historical
                                                                      individuals as input sources.

                                                                      Based on paradigm-aware analysis, we *can* say we can know there was no
                                                                      historical Jesus, about as much as anything is certain in history. I reject
                                                                      as simplistic and paradigm-naive the too-easy assertion that “We can’t know
                                                                      for certain whether Jesus existed”, an assertion that ends up being biased in
                                                                      favor of the Historicist story of Christian origins.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3031 From: Cheryl Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word-play
                                                                      Question: Is the intense mystic state also a seeming metaphore when
                                                                      viewed from the mystic state?

                                                                      Would you consider the following words to portray a type of answer
                                                                      to the above question, and in what way?

                                                                      “The loosened mind can feel remotely monitored and controlled by a
                                                                      dominant observer-and-controller entity who is in a position of
                                                                      power; one becomes a cybernetic puppet, and the perceived locus of
                                                                      control shifts up to a separate control agent who resides on a
                                                                      higher level in the control hierarchy.” -Hoffman

                                                                      Also,

                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…>
                                                                      wrote:
                                                                      > >sweet miracle -> miracle of (pseudo) freewill will

                                                                      > The miracle is also the mind’s ability to discover no-free-will
                                                                      but then
                                                                      > transcendently re-postulate the impossible — free will, personal
                                                                      power — in
                                                                      > order to bring practical controllership stability back again. “


                                                                      Another question: In constructing a mental model of egodeath and
                                                                      determinism do you conceptualize “practical controlership stability”
                                                                      as seeming to portray a hierarchy of “(psuedo) freewill will”? Do
                                                                      you choose to portray the hierarchy as theoretically (mental egoic
                                                                      logic here)infinite?









                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Cheryl” <tcherril@y…> wrote:
                                                                      > — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Cheryl” <tcherril@y…> wrote:
                                                                      > >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > > The essence, origin, fountainhead and paradigm of religion
                                                                      > > …in this order the paradigm of religion follows the essence…
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Religion itself is only metaphorical in nature. Life is a
                                                                      metaphore,
                                                                      > in that the surface contructs are completely metaphorical. This
                                                                      is
                                                                      > because the surface contructs can be seen as contructs of the ego,
                                                                      > illusory and metaphorical in nature.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Question: Is the intense mystic state also a metaphore when
                                                                      viewed
                                                                      > from the mystical state? Or when viewed from the model of solid
                                                                      > block deteminism? Or when understood from a mystical metaphoric
                                                                      > model?
                                                                      >
                                                                      > When viewed from the metaphorical freewillist contruct it is
                                                                      > contructed as another metaphore of an even deeper unexperienced
                                                                      > essence.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: White-like perceptual feedback: fire-altars beyond fixed stars
                                                                      http://www.well.com/user/davidu/eighthgate.html

                                                                      I point out that the fire altars outside the cosmic deterministic sphere of
                                                                      the fixed stars, in Mithraism and Hellenistic thinking, represent the standard
                                                                      mystic-state experience of bright white light.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3033 From: Cheryl Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: loss of enlightenment
                                                                      History questions:

                                                                      What kind of historical accounts exist
                                                                      to help describe the transtion from general widespread
                                                                      cheap as dirt mystic enlightenment
                                                                      to loss of enlightenment to literalism?

                                                                      Since metaphysical enlightenment is distinct from
                                                                      ethical application of mystical enlightenment,
                                                                      could it be that “trickster-gamesters-of-the-race”
                                                                      played the game for the games’ sake,
                                                                      choosing to allow literalists to play a literilist game,
                                                                      with no consideration of ethical implications?

                                                                      As a meta-discussion related to the topic of
                                                                      the formulation of an effective ergonomic egodeath model,
                                                                      may I ask if you are *choosing*
                                                                      to apply your metaphysical enlightenment
                                                                      to the realm of social and ethical issues?
                                                                      Or is this a trickster action for the sake of the game itself,
                                                                      and only for the game?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3034 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Mystical determinism metaphors
                                                                      Cheryl wrote:
                                                                      >>>Is the intense mystic state also a seeming metaphor when viewed from the
                                                                      mystic state?


                                                                      The mystic state is not a metaphor. It is a directly self-existing mode of
                                                                      cognition, largely characterized by loose cognitive-association binding
                                                                      between and within mental-contruct matrixes, something commonly and typically
                                                                      described by metaphor, in pre-modern culture. I keep referents separate from
                                                                      metaphor; a metaphor describes a non-metaphorical referent. The mystic state
                                                                      is a given that is later described by using metaphors.


                                                                      >>>Would you consider the following words to portray a type of answer to the
                                                                      above question, and in what way?


                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>The loosened mind can feel remotely monitored and controlled by a dominant
                                                                      observer-and-controller entity who is in a position of power; one becomes a
                                                                      cybernetic puppet, and the perceived locus of control shifts up to a separate
                                                                      control agent who resides on a higher level in the control hierarchy.


                                                                      Metaphors do inform and give substance — they provide ways of thinking about
                                                                      and concretizing more abstract experiential phenomena. The mystic state
                                                                      includes a “closing-in labyrinth” experience; it is important to have a large
                                                                      set of conceptual metaphors and less-metaphorical idea constructs, to most
                                                                      fully experience and latch onto and amplify the potential phenomena of the
                                                                      mystic state.

                                                                      I’m generally against Steven Katz’ theory that mysticism is nothing but
                                                                      language, a linguistic construct; I keep the layers separate: there exists a
                                                                      universal thing, “the mystic state” — characterized by loose cognitive
                                                                      association binding — that is comprehended and richly experienced by using a
                                                                      separate, distinct overlay of metaphor and language to engage with it. This
                                                                      layered model is more powerful than munging the two together — the mystic
                                                                      state and the metaphor used to intellectually interface with it and explore
                                                                      it.

                                                                      Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis
                                                                      Steven Katz
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/019520011X

                                                                      Language is inherently metaphor-drenched, but it is most productive to
                                                                      differentiate between layers or aspects of mystic thinking: the mystic state
                                                                      of loose cognition, metaphor to describe experiential insights potentially
                                                                      encountered in that state, and relatively non-metaphorical language to
                                                                      theoretically and systematically model the mystic state. Though distinct,
                                                                      there is rich interaction between the mystic state, non-metaphorical theory,
                                                                      and metaphor — that’s why it is absurd to praise experiencing while
                                                                      disparaging theory or myth.

                                                                      You could say that there are 3 required components for maximizing gnosis:
                                                                      mastery of the mystic state, mastery of theory, and mastery of myth.
                                                                      Neoplatonism is somewhat like mastery of theory, but it was theory so much in
                                                                      an ancient mode. The ancients get high marks for mastering the mystic state
                                                                      and myth, but low marks for theory.

                                                                      Modernity is potentially better than antiquity at all three, through an
                                                                      Integral Theory approach of both differentiating and integrating the three
                                                                      components; do mysticism separately through myth, mystic-state (loose
                                                                      cognition), and theory, and also integrate and interpenetrate these 3
                                                                      components. Ancient thinking fully integrated — that is, fused without
                                                                      differentiation — the mystic state and myth, leaving out the theory in any
                                                                      sense modern thinking would recognize.


                                                                      >>>In constructing a mental model of egodeath and determinism, do you
                                                                      conceptualize “practical controllership stability” as seeming to portray a
                                                                      hierarchy of “(pseudo) freewill will”? Do you choose to portray the hierarchy
                                                                      as theoretically infinite?


                                                                      Against the spiritualists who never find the classic mystic climax experience
                                                                      but talk of an endless path, I follow the ancient perennial initiation-series
                                                                      model, which is also a hierarchy, which is also an inward or outward vector.
                                                                      With ergonomic study of perennial philosophy, and entheogens ready-to-hand,
                                                                      only around 9 visionary-plant initiation sessions are required for full basic
                                                                      enlightenment, salvation, redemption, and satori.

                                                                      This movement centers around the central issue of no-free-will, immediately
                                                                      forming 3 main levels, but these aren’t usually matched to 3 initiation
                                                                      sessions. The first few sessions are done within the naive freewill
                                                                      assumption. The later are dominated by comprehending and experiencing
                                                                      determinism, and the final sessions break through to transcendent need for
                                                                      something beyond determinism and the practical self-control limitations and
                                                                      drawbacks of ordinary rationality.

                                                                      First there is naive freewill-styled thinking and general feeling of control
                                                                      power; then there is determinism-consciousness leading to self-control
                                                                      seizure; then there is leaping out of the system in order to regain practical
                                                                      control power even though freewill has switched from delusion to consciously
                                                                      seen-through illusion. I am glad to at last have a place for magic and for
                                                                      transrationality as Ken Wilber has had (and some sort of transcendent form of
                                                                      a kind of freewill), but without his clumsy literalism about it.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Ethics against literalism, loss of enth. key
                                                                      Cheryl wrote:
                                                                      >>What kind of historical accounts exist to help describe the transition from
                                                                      general widespread cheap as dirt mystic enlightenment to loss of enlightenment
                                                                      to literalism?


                                                                      What percentage of Hellenistic-era, Medieval/Renaissance era, and Modern era
                                                                      thinking was metaphysically enlightened, and what percentage literalist
                                                                      instead, missing what the pre-moderns comprehended, grasped, and understood?
                                                                      It’s early for that question, since modern researchers have been too clueless
                                                                      and literalist to ask until recently.

                                                                      When we stop being clueless and recognize 2-layer meaning-flipping in myth,
                                                                      with myth as metaphor for mystic-state phenomena, it is clear that pre-modern
                                                                      thinking was characteristically based in the entheogenic mystic state, whereas
                                                                      modernity is characteristically restricted to the non-entheogenic, ordinary
                                                                      state of consciousness, mystified by the former availability of the Holy
                                                                      Spirit routinely on tap. One hypothesis is that women were the plant experts
                                                                      but became oppressed.

                                                                      Another speculation is that in modernity, people moved away from the land and
                                                                      cows, losing their entheogenic keys. Dan Russell, like most entheogenists,
                                                                      doesn’t understand myth, but has written about the suppression and loss of
                                                                      knowledge about entheogens (_Drug War_, _Shamanism & Propaganda_); same with
                                                                      Jonathan Ott (_The Entheogenic Reformation_). From the loss of entheogen
                                                                      knowledge directly results the loss of understanding myth as mystic-state
                                                                      metaphor.


                                                                      >>Since metaphysical enlightenment is distinct from ethical application of
                                                                      mystical enlightenment, could it be that “trickster-gamesters-of-the-race”
                                                                      played the game for the games’ sake, choosing to allow literalists to play a
                                                                      literalist game, with no consideration of ethical implications?


                                                                      I don’t know why pre-moderns and assorted tricksters were secretive about
                                                                      entheogens and about the actual meaning encoded by myth. There is some merit
                                                                      to feeding the literalists their own literalist thinking in such a way as to
                                                                      convey two opposed specific systems of meaning at once to divide thinking
                                                                      asunder into two.

                                                                      The hallmark of a truly modern scientific approach to theorizing mystic gnosis
                                                                      is to explain myth without limiting oneself to the mythic mode: make instead
                                                                      the nonmythic mode of analysis primary, doing a better more explicit job than
                                                                      the writings we have of the Neoplatonists. A common mistake today is to try
                                                                      to use the nonmythic mode of analysis while remaining weak and clueless on the
                                                                      two other key legs: utilizing the mystic state, and comprehending the
                                                                      “flippable 2-layered meaning” nature of mythic metaphor.


                                                                      >>In the effort to formulate an effective ergonomic egodeath model, are you
                                                                      *choosing* to apply your metaphysical enlightenment to the realm of social and
                                                                      ethical issues? Or is this a trickster action for the sake of the game
                                                                      itself, and only for the game?


                                                                      I am all focused on formulating an effective ergonomic egodeath model;
                                                                      applying this metaphysical enlightenment model to the realm of social and
                                                                      ethical issues is specifically a non-goal of this project in its initial phase
                                                                      I’m dedicated to. This is a point of contention against the stance of popular
                                                                      spirituality, which insists on conceptualizing egodeath theory construction as
                                                                      simultaneously theoretical and socio-politically practical.

                                                                      All recent books on spirituality begin by saying “We should become mystically
                                                                      enlightened in order to improve the practical world.” I reject that strategy,
                                                                      which has delivered neither on the promise of improving the world nor of
                                                                      metaphysical enlightenment. I’ve always adhered to a one-at-a-time approach,
                                                                      or compartmentalizing and strongly differentiating metaphysical enlightenment
                                                                      from improving the world.

                                                                      This is partly just a practical necessity for me as a leading-edge theorist;
                                                                      Einstein *first* thought of his Physics systems, and *then* set out to improve
                                                                      the world: today’s spiritualists would condemn him for not doing both in one,
                                                                      at the same time — but that is idealistic and impractical for the individual
                                                                      involved; it’s easy and simplistic for the critiques to idealistically demand
                                                                      the world of each theorist.

                                                                      My motive was originally personal increase of self-management and self-control
                                                                      power; nirvana through increased mental and cognitive integrity as a
                                                                      self-controller agent. Inherent frustrations with that project led to
                                                                      discovering ego death and enlightenment, as the Paul figure in the New
                                                                      Testament describes in recounting his former struggle to adhere to “the law”
                                                                      (an egoic semi-formalized system of conduct one gives to oneself prior to
                                                                      maturity of initiation) and do what he ought to do.

                                                                      The main activism I promote to improve the world, an area of activism that is
                                                                      interrelated with improving higher knowledge, is drug policy reform.
                                                                      http://www.reformnav.org


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3036 From: Melody Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mystical determinism metaphors
                                                                      Michael wrote:

                                                                      >>The loosened mind can feel remotely monitored and controlled by a
                                                                      dominant observer-and-controller entity who is in a position of
                                                                      power; one becomes a cybernetic puppet, and the perceived locus of
                                                                      control shifts up to a separate control agent who resides on a
                                                                      higher level in the control hierarchy.<<

                                                                      Hi Michael,

                                                                      This is often the exact scenario inherent in a person’s first
                                                                      psychotic episode. Unfortunately today someone undergoing this ego
                                                                      control crisis gets drugged right out of it, instead of receiving a
                                                                      a much-needed form of shamanistic initiation.

                                                                      Melody
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3037 From: Melody Date: 22/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Initiation – how to
                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…>
                                                                      wrote:

                                                                      With ergonomic study of perennial philosophy, and entheogens ready-
                                                                      to-hand, only around 9 visionary-plant initiation sessions are
                                                                      required for full basic enlightenment, salvation, redemption, and
                                                                      satori.

                                                                      Does one need someone to lead/oversee the initiation? Where can one
                                                                      find specific information on how-to?

                                                                      Thanks,
                                                                      Melody
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3038 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Steven Katz
                                                                      Assuming
                                                                      that the mystical experience is

                                                                      experienced
                                                                      or
                                                                      understood

                                                                      to have a core,

                                                                      what can be said about the reason some trips are

                                                                      experienced as

                                                                      seemingly

                                                                      different one from the other and among different persons

                                                                      (….as in “bad” or “good” or “different” ….)

                                                                      (to include differences in personified experiences)?

                                                                      Was your experience “influenced” by your egoic knowledge?

                                                                      “You might say I discovered the key to secular metaphysical
                                                                      philosophy in 1988,
                                                                      but didn’t discover the essence of transcendent religion until
                                                                      around 1995.
                                                                      Around 1995 I still assumed much of the New Testament should be read
                                                                      literally; that there was a historical Jesus and crew, even though I
                                                                      had
                                                                      experienced rising up to meet the *heavenly*, spiritual Jesus as
                                                                      personified
                                                                      principle halfway up in the air, as in the “third or fourth heaven”
                                                                      in a
                                                                      system where the sphere of deterministic fixed stars to penetrate is
                                                                      level 8.”

                                                                      In what way would you compare your experience of mystic state now
                                                                      that you’ve “climbed further up the ladder” as it were with earlier
                                                                      mystic state experiences. In what way does the theory of cybernetic
                                                                      ego death, or any theory, or lack of theory , or varieties of
                                                                      cultural mental contructs affect the experience of mystic state.

                                                                      Do you concieve the core of mystic state as universal in a brain
                                                                      chemical way (analogous to eyesight is universal in a biological
                                                                      way), and then the mystic state “influences” egoic constructs or
                                                                      worldview or perceptual sense of world when also combined with
                                                                      various worldviews or theories?



                                                                      concerning cultural difference…
                                                                      “after we have normalized for cultural differences, “

                                                                      “my modern whole-system of transcendence works by combining
                                                                      unprecedentedly *direct* and effective explanation, with any amount
                                                                      of
                                                                      tripping. My systematization (the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Death) is
                                                                      clearer
                                                                      not just to today’s audience, but to any audience; it is clearer in
                                                                      absolute
                                                                      terms, not just relative to its contemporary audience.


                                                                      One way it is better is that it has much higher *for its intended
                                                                      audience*
                                                                      than the old attempted systematizations had *for their intended
                                                                      audiences*.
                                                                      Thus

                                                                      after we have normalized for cultural differences,

                                                                      my theory still comes
                                                                      out far ahead. Previous systems were confused and hazy *to their own
                                                                      audiences*; they were *not* clear and direct and ergonomic to the
                                                                      audience of
                                                                      their day.”

                                                                      Would this include a cultural acknowledging the value of critical
                                                                      thinking? Would this groundwork be helpful?

                                                                      Do you think cultural differences account for the seeming resistance
                                                                      to positively embracing this theory? Such as in the cultural
                                                                      negativity toward embracing herbs? Or as in an educational system
                                                                      that promotes a worldview antagonistic toward “book knowledge”?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3039 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Metaphoric theme: Messianic Secret
                                                                      The theme of the ‘Messianic Secret’, like all religious themes, needs to be
                                                                      considered from the interpretive framework of “myth is metaphorical
                                                                      description of mystic experiencing”.

                                                                      Scholars reconstructing Christian origins need to focus on texts and need a
                                                                      conscious, explicit methodology for approaching texts, rather than defaulting
                                                                      to some familiar modern literalist methodology. A crucial factor is the issue
                                                                      of how one processes and interprets the texts; what kind of texts are these?
                                                                      They are Hellenistic double-meaning texts, with one layer of systematic
                                                                      network-meaning for the uninitiated, and another, different layer of
                                                                      systematic network-meaning for the initiated.

                                                                      The question then becomes: What are the two systematic layers of meaning of
                                                                      the theme of ‘Messianic Secret’? If we attempt to be serious textual scholars
                                                                      without looking for these two layers — one for the uninitiated and another
                                                                      for the initiated — then we’re adopting a theory and method of interpretation
                                                                      that is counterindicated by what we know about Hellenistic literature and
                                                                      culture.

                                                                      The ‘Messianic Secret’ theme represents the hidden nature of
                                                                      Heimarmene/Necessity/Fate, revealed after partaking of the Eucharistic meal at
                                                                      the Last Supper. During that meal, the disciples go from cluelessness to
                                                                      comprehension of Jesus’ mystic kingship, and become apostles. On the road
                                                                      afterward, Jesus walked with two followers who didn’t recognize him until he
                                                                      gave them something to eat. Only after he gave them something to eat did they
                                                                      perceive what was formerly hidden to them, Jesus the lord.

                                                                      Prior to the last supper, the disciples are puzzled and clueless about the one
                                                                      they follow. What is puzzling, illogical, irrational, and inconsistent to the
                                                                      literalist analysis — the reasons for the ‘Messianic Secret’ — comes
                                                                      naturally to the analysis based on the interpretive framework of “myth is
                                                                      metaphorical description of mystic experiencing”.


                                                                      May be relevant:
                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Messianic+Secret%22


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3040 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: (no subject)
                                                                      Language of man and God

                                                                      The languages of men are many.
                                                                      There is the language of music, the language of art, the language
                                                                      of ritual, the language of celebrations, the language of word spoken
                                                                      and written, the language of culture, the language of facial
                                                                      _expression, the language of touch , the language of taste and
                                                                      smell, etc etc etc. These and many many many many more are the
                                                                      languages of man in societal communication and communion.. There is
                                                                      no end to these languages, for they continue to be many and
                                                                      endless in their expressions of man’s multitude of relationships
                                                                      not just with other people, with himself, but with nature in all its
                                                                      endless ways, as well. Overlap upon overlap and endless overlap.
                                                                      But man’s infinity is circumscribed.

                                                                      The language of God circumscribes the language of man.
                                                                      When God speaks, it is man that comes out of his mouth. From the
                                                                      mouth of God come the plants and all the creation, And from the
                                                                      mouth of God comes the mind of men, in all the potential
                                                                      constructs, these are all words in the language of God.

                                                                      In this way, the mystical state is a symbol in the language of God.
                                                                      And does the symbol know what meaning is assigned it in the language
                                                                      of God?

                                                                      In this way, the mystical state is a foriegn idea, from a foriegn
                                                                      tongue, from the language of God.

                                                                      In this context, the mystical state is a metaphor describing a non-
                                                                      metaphorical referent. The words ‘metaphor’ and ‘non-metaphorical’
                                                                      reference being used in a relational way (meaning network) in a
                                                                      broader context.


                                                                      This was the line of thinking behind the question “is the mystic
                                                                      state a seeming metaphor when viewed from the mystic state.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3041 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Language of man and God
                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Cheryl” <tcherril@y…> wrote:

                                                                      > Language of man and God
                                                                      >
                                                                      This is the subject line to the previous post.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3042 From: merker2002 Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      I think i have discovered (recovered?) the true, most divine way of
                                                                      reading the symbol of The Cross.

                                                                      The horizontal bar represents the lifeline of a human being which is
                                                                      destined to experience enlightenment.
                                                                      This enlightenment (which is the revelation that all things and
                                                                      actions originate from the ground of being) is represented in the
                                                                      vertical bar which is joined to the ground [of being].
                                                                      Also note how the *whole* of the horizontal bar (lifeline) is
                                                                      sustained by the vertical bar (originating from the ground): This
                                                                      represents the knowledge that *all* of ones actions originate from the
                                                                      ground *not* only those after enlightenment has happened (or for the
                                                                      completeness of argument, not only those prior to enlightenment; even
                                                                      after enlightenment one is still subject to fate)



                                                                      merkur
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3043 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      This seems to be an insightful way to interpret the symbol of the
                                                                      cross. Your interpretation includes the concepts of enlightenment
                                                                      and also ground of being.

                                                                      The cross is such an archetypal symbol used an interpreted in a lot
                                                                      of ways. Perhaps you have indeed discoverd (recovered) something
                                                                      here.

                                                                      I’d like to offer an interpretation which should still incorporate
                                                                      your key concepts. This involves a symbol to be found in the cross,
                                                                      a kind of hidden symbol. In this interpretation, the ground of
                                                                      being is the point where the horizontal and vertical lines meet.
                                                                      The point is the metaphysical void, the ground of all being. The
                                                                      vortex of the never ending spiral. The vertical and horizontal
                                                                      lines find their origin in the point. The 4 directional lines are
                                                                      meant to symbolize unity of all things, emanating from the point.





                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “merker2002” <stemmer02@g…> wrote:
                                                                      > I think i have discovered (recovered?) the true, most divine way of
                                                                      > reading the symbol of The Cross.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > The horizontal bar represents the lifeline of a human being which
                                                                      is
                                                                      > destined to experience enlightenment.
                                                                      > This enlightenment (which is the revelation that all things and
                                                                      > actions originate from the ground of being) is represented in the
                                                                      > vertical bar which is joined to the ground [of being].
                                                                      > Also note how the *whole* of the horizontal bar (lifeline) is
                                                                      > sustained by the vertical bar (originating from the ground): This
                                                                      > represents the knowledge that *all* of ones actions originate from
                                                                      the
                                                                      > ground *not* only those after enlightenment has happened (or for
                                                                      the
                                                                      > completeness of argument, not only those prior to enlightenment;
                                                                      even
                                                                      > after enlightenment one is still subject to fate)
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > merkur
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3044 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      One can experience being fastened to spacetime. Actual crucifixion was
                                                                      deliberately a perverse allusion to that mystic experience, so that even
                                                                      corporal punishment was integrated into pre-modern
                                                                      myth-religion-philosophy-politics-etc. The cross was also interpreted later
                                                                      in abstract, theoretical-mystical ways.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3045 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Head beyond sphere of fixed stars
                                                                      In Mithraism, the lion-ruler’s body is wrapped by the cosmic snake, while his
                                                                      head is sometimes shown outside the cosmic determinism experiential-ascent
                                                                      boundary of the zodiac or fixed stars. Similarly with the well-known woodcut
                                                                      showing the spiritual pilgrim with head (and hand) outside the sphere of the
                                                                      fixed stars. The body is in the deterministic spacetime prison, but the
                                                                      spirit — experientially and trans-rationally — is conceptualized as outside
                                                                      of determinism.

                                                                      This way, deterministic mystics can affirm cosmic determinism, repudiating
                                                                      naive freewill, while including our divine ability to transcendently
                                                                      postulate, for practical reasons of self-control stability, and to describe
                                                                      higher experiencing, a level of existence outside of the deterministic
                                                                      universe.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience



                                                                      >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      >From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:mhoffman@…]
                                                                      >Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:07 PM
                                                                      >To: egodeath@yahoogroups.com
                                                                      >Subject: [egodeath] White-like perceptual feedback: fire-altars beyond
                                                                      >fixed stars
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >http://www.well.com/user/davidu/eighthgate.html
                                                                      >
                                                                      >I point out that the fire altars outside the cosmic deterministic sphere of
                                                                      >the fixed stars, in Mithraism and Hellenistic thinking, represent
                                                                      >the standard
                                                                      >mystic-state experience of bright white light.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >– Michael Hoffman
                                                                      >Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3046 From: Cheryl Date: 23/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: the Cross != space-time cross
                                                                      When the cross was interpreted in abstract, theoretical-mystical
                                                                      ways, the underlay of sacred geometry was employed. This sacred
                                                                      geometry can be seen as another model to explain another referent .

                                                                      The mathematical cognition is one more model. No doubt those in
                                                                      antiquity drawn to use these constructs had also the experience of
                                                                      plant communication mystical states. Intersting thing about plants,
                                                                      the golden ratio vibrates out strongly.

                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…>
                                                                      wrote:
                                                                      >
                                                                      > One can experience being fastened to spacetime. Actual
                                                                      crucifixion was
                                                                      > deliberately a perverse allusion to that mystic experience, so
                                                                      that even
                                                                      > corporal punishment was integrated into pre-modern
                                                                      > myth-religion-philosophy-politics-etc. The cross was also
                                                                      interpreted later
                                                                      > in abstract, theoretical-mystical ways.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3047 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Maximal entheogen theory of religion; “lone deviant subculture”
                                                                      Someone wrote:
                                                                      >>>While I remain surprised that a drug could facilitate the soul- searching
                                                                      and life-review DT prescribes for soul-spirit integration and spiritual
                                                                      health, it seems an unnecessarily dangerous road towards that destination.
                                                                      Surely the history of the last 40 years has impressed us all with the dangers
                                                                      inherent in psychoactive drugs. …


                                                                      A child’s lightweight plastic toy hammer is safe: it can neither be used for
                                                                      real work, nor is it dangerous. There is a correlation between the danger and
                                                                      potency, or power, of many items. Meditation is safe, and, concomitantly, it
                                                                      is ineffective. Entheogens are potentially dangerous, and are potentially
                                                                      powerful. Alternative methods of inducing the mystic altered state, such as
                                                                      meditation, lack the potential to be dangerous and lack the potential to be
                                                                      effective.

                                                                      Furthermore, it is an error of extremism and propaganda to overgeneralize
                                                                      about the danger of entheogens. If you go to the point of extreme overkill
                                                                      with most anything, that is dangerous. Entheogens are safe if used in
                                                                      moderation. The anti-entheogen mentality always makes the most extreme and
                                                                      unreasonable assumptions, silently, covertly, and unconsciously, such that all
                                                                      drug use is amplified to use maximum quantities: that mindset never pictures
                                                                      doing a single 100-mic tab of acid; no, it’s always envisioned as 5 to 10
                                                                      tabs.

                                                                      The possibility of measured doses taken in moderation is eliminated from
                                                                      consideration, resulting in a uselessly biased conception of entheogen use and
                                                                      intensity, so that moderate meditation is compared to extreme dosing. The
                                                                      truth of the matter is that meditation ranges typically from ineffective to
                                                                      only slightly effective and negligibly intense, whereas entheogens can be
                                                                      taken in a controlled quantity anywhere one wants, from a tenth of a 100-mic
                                                                      hit of acid, for example, up to 10 hits.

                                                                      The larger the dose — assuming no tolerance is in effect; assuming at least
                                                                      half a week since the last session — the more dangerous; and likewise, the
                                                                      smaller the dose, the safer. Meditation is uselessly limited to a typical
                                                                      range that’s low-intensity and ineffective, as though you were to brag about
                                                                      your car’s safety after restricting it to going 1 mile per hour: it’s safe,
                                                                      but you’ll never get anywhere. Entheogens are potentially effective as well
                                                                      as safe; meditation is limited to being safe but ineffective.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3048 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      —–Original Message—–
                                                                      From: Chris Bennett [mailto:info@…]
                                                                      Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:57 PM


                                                                      Now that ticket sales are getting close to being finished, it is OK to alert
                                                                      anybody and everybody that you want to, that Entheogenesis
                                                                      http://www.entheogenesis.ca will be broadcast live over the Internet at
                                                                      http://www.pot-tv.net where it will be enjoyed by a global audience.

                                                                      If the pen is mightier than the sword, then the pc is mightier than the
                                                                      atomic bomb.
                                                                      Cheers,
                                                                      CB



                                                                      >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      >From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:mhoffman@…]
                                                                      >Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 5:33 PM
                                                                      >To: Egodeath Group
                                                                      >Subject: [egodeath] Entheogenesis conference in Vancouver
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      >From: owner-freerenee drugsense.org
                                                                      >Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 1:45 PM
                                                                      >Subject: RB: Cannabis/Sacred medicine Conference in Vancouver
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Hello friends…
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Spiraling warm winter solstice wishes to everyone!
                                                                      >
                                                                      >I just wanted to let you all know about the Entheogen Conference coming up
                                                                      >in January in Vancouver, because I think it is something many of my friends
                                                                      >and acquaintances would enjoy attending and the tickets are limited & going
                                                                      >fast!!! One of my personal heros in the cannabis movement, Dr. Ethan Russo,
                                                                      >will be speaking as well as many other heros & heroines in the cannabis &
                                                                      >entheobotanical community. It will be another magikal gathering of like
                                                                      >minded activists joining together to share with one another & to co-create
                                                                      >positive changes on this planet for the freedom of Gaia’s sacred plant
                                                                      >medicines & sacraments!
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Here is the info:
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Entheogenesis: Exploring Humanity’s Relationship with Entheogens, Past,
                                                                      >Present and Future
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Saturday & Sunday, Jan 31st to Feb 1st, 2004
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Featuring 2 days of lectures & slide presentations, Psychedelic art on
                                                                      >display, and one evening gathering with Guest DJ’s, A live acid jazz band, a
                                                                      >chill room with special film screenings, treats, prizes & more!
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Featured Speakers, thus far:
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Prof. Carl Ruck & Prof. Blaise Staples;
                                                                      >Lecture 1: The Entheogenic Eucharist of Mithras
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Lecture 2: Survivals of Pagan Shamanism
                                                                      >a) European Fairy Tales
                                                                      >b) Heretical Visionary Sacraments
                                                                      >http://www.entheomedia.com/
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Prof. Benny Shanon;
                                                                      >Entheogens in the Hebrew Bible – Some speculations.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Mike Crowley:
                                                                      >Secret Drugs Of Buddhism.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Prof. Thomas Roberts:
                                                                      >The New Gutenberg Reformation – Entheogenic Experience as the Basis of
                                                                      >Religion
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Jean Millay
                                                                      >PSI and Psychedelics: stories from the Underground
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Dr. Ethan Russo;
                                                                      >Lecture 1: Bhang, Ganja and Charas. Ancient Cannabis Claims and their
                                                                      >Scientific
                                                                      >Rationale
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Lecture 2: The Myth of Schedule I: Medical Uses of Forbidden Plants and
                                                                      >Compounds
                                                                      >http://www.maps.org/media/potpioneer.html
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Rick Doblin, Ph.D
                                                                      >Founder Of MAPS.org
                                                                      >”Psychedelics: Return of The Repressed.”
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Marc Emery & Sandra Karpetas
                                                                      >Iboga Therapy House
                                                                      >http://www.ibogatherapyhouse.org/
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Chris Bennett
                                                                      >Kaneh Bosem: The Hidden Story of Cannabis in the Bible
                                                                      >http://www.forbiddenfruitpublishing.com
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Jon Hanna
                                                                      >Psychedelics, Altered Consciousness, and Visionary Art
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* David Aaron
                                                                      >Liberating the Plants of Consciousness: The Law is on Our Side
                                                                      >http://www.goadave.org
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Phil Lucas
                                                                      >Science, Spirituality, and Compassion: the Modern Cultivation and
                                                                      >Distribution of an Ancient Healing Plant
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Renee Boje
                                                                      >Trials of the Ancient and Modern Witch
                                                                      >http://www.reneeboje.com
                                                                      >http://www.urbanshaman.net
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Aurora Catamo
                                                                      >Introducing her new entheobotanical forum
                                                                      >http://www.psychoaction.org
                                                                      >
                                                                      >* Luke Brown
                                                                      >Art Show: Entheogen inspired Creations.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >DJ’s Include: Nils, Androgynoid
                                                                      >Acid Jazz Band: Charley Higgins Quartet
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Tickets: Canadian $125.oo, American $95.oo
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Make Check or money order Payable to: Pot TV
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Mail to: 307 West Hastings St., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6B 1H6
                                                                      >
                                                                      >For more information, Visit: http://www.entheogenesis.ca
                                                                      >Phone: 604-682-0039
                                                                      >email: info@…
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Sponsored By: http://www.pot-tv.net, http://www.theibogatherapyhouse.org,
                                                                      >http://www.urbanshaman.net
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Accomadation: http://www.expedia.ca
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Please visit the website for more detailed information, at:
                                                                      >http://www.entheogenesis.ca
                                                                      >
                                                                      >In unity & love,
                                                                      >Renee Boje


                                                                      >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      >From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:mhoffman@…]
                                                                      >Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:15 PM
                                                                      >To: Egodeath Group
                                                                      >Subject: [egodeath] Entheogenesis Conference, Ruck & Staples
                                                                      >publications
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Entheogenesis: Exploring Humanity’s Relationship with Sacred Plants, Past,
                                                                      >Present and Future
                                                                      >Jan 31st to Feb 1st
                                                                      >
                                                                      >http://www.entheogenesis.ca/index2.html
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Featured Speakers
                                                                      >Prof. Carl Ruck, Prof. Blaise Staples;
                                                                      >Lecture 1: The entheogenic Eucharist of Mithras
                                                                      >Lecture 2: Survivals of Pagan Shamanism
                                                                      >a) European Fairy Tales
                                                                      >b) Heretical Visionary Sacraments
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Dr. Ethan Russo;
                                                                      >Day 1: Bhang, Ganja and Charas. Ancient Cannabis Claims and their Scientific
                                                                      >Rationale
                                                                      >Day 2: The Myth of Schedule I: Medical Uses of Forbidden Plants and Compounds
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Marc Emery
                                                                      >Iboga Therapy House
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Chris Bennett
                                                                      >Kaneh Bosem: The Hidden Story of Cannabis in the Bible
                                                                      >www.forbiddenfruitpublishing.com
                                                                      >
                                                                      >David Aaron
                                                                      >Liberating the Plants of Consciousness: The Law is on Our Side
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Renee Boje
                                                                      >Trials of the Ancient and Modern Witch
                                                                      >www.urbanshaman.net
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Luke Brown
                                                                      >Art Show: Entheogen inspired Creations.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Sponsors:
                                                                      >www.pot-tv.net
                                                                      >www.theibogatherapyhouse.org
                                                                      >www.urbanshaman.net
                                                                      >
                                                                      >_________________________
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Author, Lecturer and Proffessor of Classical Mythology at Boston University,
                                                                      >Carl P. Ruck,was instrumental in coining the term “entheogens”, (‘becoming
                                                                      >divine within’) that designates the use of psycho-active sacraments in the
                                                                      >context of spiritual practice..
                                                                      >
                                                                      >CARL ANTON PAUL RUCK
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Carl Ruck
                                                                      >Born: December 8, 1935, Bridgeport, CT, USA
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Clark University, psychology 1953
                                                                      >Yale University, pre-medical, psychology, Classical philology: BA
                                                                      >University of Michigan, Classical philology: MA 1959
                                                                      >Harvard University, Classical philology: PhD 1965
                                                                      >
                                                                      >New since last report: Entries on “Diana” “Castor and Pollux” Encyclopedia of
                                                                      >Myth, Brown Publishing Group, London Entries on “entheogens (Psychedelic
                                                                      >Drugs) and Shamanism” (with Mark Hoffman) “Shamanism in the Classical World”
                                                                      >“European Shamanism” (introductory overview) Encyclopedia of Shamanism,
                                                                      >ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara, CA “Snow White, Odysseus, and the Mushroom: Soma’s
                                                                      >Fairytale Ending in the West,” (with José Alfredo González Celdrán, Mark
                                                                      >Hoffman, & Blaise Daniel Staples), Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic
                                                                      >Spirituality, vol. 2, no. 2, (Winter), 2002.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >IG II2 2323 The List of Victors in Comedy at the Dionysia, Leiden, Brill,
                                                                      >1967.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Pindar: Selected Odes (with W. Matheson) (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan
                                                                      >Press, 1967.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Ancient Greek: A New Approach, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press 1968, 1972.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Ancient Greek: A New Approach, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 19792, new
                                                                      >completely
                                                                      >revised edition.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries (R. Gordon Wasson,
                                                                      >Albert Hofmann, & B.D. Staples) (New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
                                                                      >1978: Los
                                                                      >Angeles, Hermes 1998.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Translations of The Road to Eleusis:
                                                                      >El camino a Eleusis: Una solution al enigma de los misterios, Fondo
                                                                      >de Cultura
                                                                      >Economico, Mexico, DF, 1980.
                                                                      >O Dromos yia ten Eleusina, Synergatikes Ekdoseis Koinoteta, Athens, 1982.
                                                                      >Der Weg nach Eleusis: Das Geheimnis der Mysterien, Insel Verlag, 1984,
                                                                      >Suhrkamp, 1990.
                                                                      >Alla Scoperta dei Misteri Eleusini, Apogeo, Milan, 1996.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries, (20th year
                                                                      >commemorative augmented reissue, Los Angeles, Hermes Press, 1998.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Strategies in Teaching Greek and Latin: Two Decades of
                                                                      >Experimentation, (Floyd
                                                                      >L. Moreland, ed.), ‘Reading Greek,’ Scholars Press, 1981.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >On Nature (L:. Rouner, ed.) “The Wild and the Cultivated in Greek Religion,”
                                                                      >Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame, 1984.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Persephone’s Quest: entheogens and the Origins of Religion (with R. Gordon
                                                                      >Wasson et al.) New Haven, CT, Yale 1986.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Translation of Persephone’s Quest:
                                                                      >La busqueda de Persefone. Los enteogenos y los origenes de la religio, Fondo
                                                                      >de Cultura Economico, Mexico, DF, 1996.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Latin: A Concise Structural Course, University Press of America, 1987.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Sacred Mushroom Seeker (T. Riedlinger, ed.) ‘Mr. Wasson and the Greeks,’
                                                                      >(Portland, OR, Dioscorides Press, 1990)
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The World of Classical Myth: Gods and Goddesses, Heroines and Heroes (with
                                                                      >B.D. Staples), (Carolina Academic Press 1994)
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline (Richard Evans Schultes & Siri von
                                                                      >Reis, eds.) “Gods and Plants in the Classical World,” Portland, OR,
                                                                      >Dioscorides Press, 1995.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Decisions, Decisions: Ancient Empires (academic advisor for computer tutorial
                                                                      >Program) (Watertown, MA, Tom Snyder Productions, 1996).
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Mushroom (consultant for video program):”a 26 minute journey into Americans’
                                                                      >passions for an extraordinary product of the earth” Premiered March
                                                                      >30th, 1996
                                                                      >at Boston Museum of Fine Arts: Tied to the Tracks Films, Inc (by Angelica
                                                                      >Allende Brisk & Rachel Libert).
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Consultant for video program on R. Gordon Wasson, prepared for German Public
                                                                      >Television, Third Program (broadcast November, 1996).
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Blackwell Dictionary of Anthropology (Thomas J. Bayfield, ed.) entry on
                                                                      >“Myth.”
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Intensive Latin: First year and Review (with computer tutorial Vade Mecum)
                                                                      >Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 1997.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist (with
                                                                      >Clark Heinrich and B.D. Staples), Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2000.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Ancient Greek: Intensive Review and Reference, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic
                                                                      >Press, 2001.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Essays published in scholarly journals:
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Marginalia Pindarica I-VI,” Hermes, 1968-1972.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Euripides’ Mother: Vegetables and the Phallos in Aristophanes,” Arion 1975.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“On the Sacred Names of Iamos and Ion: Ethnobotanical Referents in the Hero’s
                                                                      >Parentage,” Classical Journal, 1976.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Duality and the Madness of Herakles,” Arethusa, 1976.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“A Mythic Search for Identity in a Male to Female Transsexual,” (with M.
                                                                      >Fleming), Journal of Analytical Psychology, 1979.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Mushrooms and Mysteries: On Aristophanes and the Necromancy of Socrates,”
                                                                      >Helios, 1981.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Mushrooms and Philosophers,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 1981
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“The Wild and the Cultivated: Wine in Euripides’ Bacchae,” Journal of
                                                                      >Ethnopharmacology 1982
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“The Offerings from the Hyperboreans,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1983
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Mistletoe, Centaurs, and Datura,” (with B.D. Staples) Eleusis n.s. 1.2 1999,
                                                                      >3-23.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Perseus, the Mushroom Picker,” (with Clark Heinrich & B.D. Staples), Eleusis
                                                                      >n.s. 1.2 1999, 25-55.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Jason, the Drug Man,” (with Clark Heinrich & B.D. Staples) Eleusis n.s. 1.3,
                                                                      >1999, 27-68.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Mixing the Kykeon,” (with Peter Webster & Daniel M. Perrine), Eleusis n.s.
                                                                      >1.4 2000, 55-86
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Conjuring Eden: Art and the entheogenic Vision of Paradise,” (with Mark
                                                                      >Hoffman & Blaise Staples, Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality, vol.
                                                                      >1, no. 1, Summer 2001, 13-50. Website gallery of additional images
                                                                      >cued to the
                                                                      >text at <http://www.entheomedia.com/eden1.htm&gt;
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“entheogens,” (with Bigwood, Ott, Staples, & Wasson), reprint of 1979,
                                                                      >Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality, vol. 1, no. 1, Summer
                                                                      >2001, 4-5.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“Daturas and the Virgin,” (with José Alfredo González Celdrán), Entheos:
                                                                      >Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality, vol. 1, no. 2, 2001 (Winter), 49-74.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“The Miskwedo of the Ahnisinaubeg,” (CAPR editor, unpublished
                                                                      >manuscript of R.
                                                                      >Gordon Wasson, Harvard Botanical Archives), Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic
                                                                      >Spirituality, vol. 1, no. 2, (Winter) 2001, 3-12.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“The entheogenic Eucharist of Mithras,” (with Mark Hoffman and B.D. Staples),
                                                                      >Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality, vol. 2, no. 1, (Summer), 2002.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“De rebus Mithraicis POSTSCRIPTM,” (translated by CAPR from the Spanish of
                                                                      >José Alfredo González), Entheos: Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality, vol. 2,
                                                                      >no. 1, (Summer), 2002.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >“An Entheobotanical Interpretation of Two Paintings by J.M. Turner,”
                                                                      >(translated by CAPR from the French of Vincent Wattiaux), Entheos: Journal of
                                                                      >Psychedelic Spirituality, vol. 2, no. 1, (Summer), 2002.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >_________________________
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Prof. Blaise Staples:
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Classical scholar, Blaise Staples, of Boston University worked along side R.
                                                                      >Gordon Wasson, Johnathan Ott, and Carl Ruck to coin the term entheogen. He is
                                                                      >the co-author of such entheo-botanical classics as Persephone’s Quest and
                                                                      >Apples of Apollo.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Blaise Daniel Staples
                                                                      >Date of birth: July 13, 1948
                                                                      >Place of birth: Massachusetts, U.S.A.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Education:
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Boston University, B.A., Comparative Religion, Greek Language and Literature,
                                                                      >1972
                                                                      >Brown University, post-graduate studies, Classics
                                                                      >Boston University, Ph.D, Classical Studies, 1978
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Dissertation: (unpublished)
                                                                      >
                                                                      >PEA PTEROENTA: Plot and Metaphor in Aristophanes
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Publications: books
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist
                                                                      >(with C.A.P. Ruck and Clark Heinrich) Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC,
                                                                      >U.S.A., 2000
                                                                      >ISBN 0-89089-924-X
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The World of Classical Myth: Gods and Goddesses, Heroines and Heroes
                                                                      >(with C.A.P. Ruck) Carolina Academic Press, 1994 ISBN 0-89089-575-9
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries
                                                                      >(with R. Gordon Wasson, Albert Hofmann & C.A.P. Ruck)
                                                                      >translation of the Homeric Hymn to Demeter
                                                                      >Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York, 1978; reissued commemorative edition,
                                                                      >1998 ISBN 0-915148-20-x
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Publications: articles
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Entheogens (with R. Gordon Wasson, J. Bigwood, J. Ott, C.A.P. Ruck)
                                                                      >Journal of
                                                                      >Psychedelic Drugs, 11 (1-2), 1979
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Mistletoe, Centaurs, and Datura (with C.A.P. Ruck) Eleusis n.s. 1.2, 1999
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Perseus the Mushroom Picker (with C.A.P. Ruck and Clark Heinrich) Eleusis
                                                                      >n.s., 1.2, 1999
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Jason the Drug Man (with C.A.P. Ruck and Clark Heinrich) Eleusis n.s., 1.3.,
                                                                      >1999
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3049 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Icon: Mark/lion halo w/ white dots on red edge
                                                                      >Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:09 PM

                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >Check out the very distinct white dots against red background on this Amanita
                                                                      >halo edge in this iconographic painting on the cover of this book. I think
                                                                      >the Lion is Mark’s symbol. This is the first time I’ve seen a lion with an
                                                                      >Amanita halo.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianisation of the Roman World
                                                                      >by Peter Brown
                                                                      >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0521595576
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Click the cover picture to zoom it, which displays:
                                                                      >http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/books/0521595576
                                                                      /reader/1
                                                                      /


                                                                      In the book

                                                                      Medieval Panorama
                                                                      Robert Bartlett
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0892366427
                                                                      2001

                                                                      page 53 shows that picture and says it is from the “Gospel Books of Godescalc”
                                                                      in Aachen, northern Italy, 781 CE.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3050 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Right way to study mythic symbology: as alt-state insights
                                                                      >>Michael Hoffman used to speak in the JesusMysteries discussion group a lot
                                                                      about multiple Historical Jesuses, mystery religion connections, etc. Was
                                                                      there a methodology being used?


                                                                      My methodology of reading myth-religion texts is to assume that they are
                                                                      designed to be read from two states of consciousness (ordinary vs. intense
                                                                      mystic-state) with two distinct meaning-networks: one for the uninitiated, and
                                                                      one for the initiated. Myth is metaphorical description and reporting of
                                                                      intense mystic-state experiences. Myth is not grounded and based in the
                                                                      ordinary state of consciousness, but in the intense mystic altered state of
                                                                      consciousness.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3051 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: 4 Ezra: Firey inspiring drink
                                                                      Dave H. wrote:
                                                                      >>Some of the Jewish merkabah mystical writings also suggest that a
                                                                      psychoactive substance was used, but these writings describe a method of
                                                                      inducing an ascent in which passages of scripture are repeated in various
                                                                      combinations until they sort of unlock a gateway into a trance state.
                                                                      However, look at 4 Ezra 14:37-43 (a.k.a. the Latin Apocalypse of Ezra) for a
                                                                      description Ezra going into a trance to receive the lost books of scripture
                                                                      by revelation, after being handed a bowl of a liquid like water but with the
                                                                      color of fire.


                                                                      From 4 Ezra, chapter 14:
                                                                      http://wyllie.lib.virginia.edu:8086/perl/toccer-new?id=Rsv4Ezr.sgm&images=imag
                                                                      es/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=14&division=div2


                                                                      37: So I took the five men, as he commanded me, and we proceeded to the field,
                                                                      and remained there.
                                                                      38: And on the next day, behold, a voice called me, saying, “Ezra, open your
                                                                      mouth and drink what I give you to drink.”
                                                                      39: Then I opened my mouth, and behold, a full cup was offered to me; it was
                                                                      full of something like water, but its color was like fire.
                                                                      40: And I took it and drank; and when I had drunk it, my heart poured forth
                                                                      understanding, and wisdom increased in my breast, for my spirit retained its
                                                                      memory;
                                                                      41: and my mouth was opened, and was no longer closed.
                                                                      42: And the Most High gave understanding to the five men, and by turns they
                                                                      wrote what was dictated, in characters which they did not know. They sat forty
                                                                      days, and wrote during the daytime, and ate their bread at night.
                                                                      43: As for me, I spoke in the daytime and was not silent at night.
                                                                      44: So during the forty days ninety-four books were written.
                                                                      45: And when the forty days were ended, the Most High spoke to me, saying,
                                                                      “Make public the twenty-four books that you wrote first and let the worthy and
                                                                      the unworthy read them;
                                                                      46: but keep the seventy that were written last, in order to give them to the
                                                                      wise among your people.
                                                                      47: For in them is the spring of understanding, the fountain of wisdom, and
                                                                      the river of knowledge.”
                                                                      48: And I did so.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3052 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Against notion of “proof” in Christian origins; circular framew
                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>>Within a mature, fully-developed ahistoricist interpretive framework, we
                                                                      *can* be effectively reasonably certain that the Jesus figure is essentially a
                                                                      composite figure, such that the facticity of Jesus’ existence becomes entirely
                                                                      a matter of definition: if ‘Jesus’ is defined as a single historical man
                                                                      serving as necessary kernel for the eventual composite mythic- accretion
                                                                      figure, we know things didn’t work that way; all evidence indicates Jesus was
                                                                      a radically composite figure incorporating *multiple, not single* historical
                                                                      individuals as input sources.


                                                                      Kelly wrote:
                                                                      >>_How_ do we _know_ that these source figures were _historical_ individuals?
                                                                      Could they not be ahistorical figures, mythic figures? Could not some of them
                                                                      have been historical and others not?

                                                                      >>I’m not sure I agree with your assertion.


                                                                      In the interpretive framework and research paradigm I advocate, the Jesus
                                                                      figure is conceived as essentially a composite drawn from as many actual
                                                                      people, legends, mythic figures, personified principles, etc. as possible,
                                                                      driven by competition and by the quest to create a single universal religion.
                                                                      For example, one source for the Jesus figure and for the themes involved was
                                                                      the historical individual Julius Caesar. Any given saying attributed to the
                                                                      Jesus figure may have been held by multiple actual partially Jesus-like
                                                                      individuals.



                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>>Based on paradigm-aware analysis, we *can* say we can know there was no
                                                                      historical Jesus, about as much as anything is certain in history. I reject
                                                                      as simplistic and paradigm-naive the too-easy assertion that “We can’t know
                                                                      for certain whether Jesus existed”, an assertion that ends up being biased in
                                                                      favor of the Historicist story of Christian origins.


                                                                      Kelly wrote:
                                                                      >>>… I disagree. I think that the “agnostic” position on the historicity is
                                                                      just that, agnostic. As an assertion, it is no more biased in favor of the
                                                                      historicist position than it is the ahistoricist position. Indeed, I’d say
                                                                      it’s a slap in the face of the historicist position, because it is explicitly
                                                                      stating that his historicity is unsupportable with the historical evidence
                                                                      available… directly contrary to most historicists’ positions on Jesus.


                                                                      To merely claim that the evidence does not support historicity does little to
                                                                      change one’s overall conceptual framework and mental mindset about the
                                                                      original nature of Christianity in its cultural context. It’s a negation of
                                                                      certain aspects of one way of thinking about the origins of the Jesus figure,
                                                                      without a sufficiently compelling, clear and distinct replacement conception
                                                                      of the origins of the Jesus figure.

                                                                      The result in practice is that one accepts the overall worldview of the
                                                                      official history, while subtracting, in a manner like modern demythologizing,
                                                                      individual elements of that official history.

                                                                      The liberal demythologizing historicist and the eternally fence-sitting
                                                                      agnostics about Jesus’ historicity share the same general style of conceiving
                                                                      of both the Jesus figure and the cultural context; the fence-sitting agnostics
                                                                      just put a ‘not’ in front of the historical-individual aspect of the eventual
                                                                      composite Jesus figure, and make a few statements of Jesus being thematically
                                                                      like the other mystery saviors — that’s not as much of a difference as people
                                                                      play it up to be.

                                                                      So the familiar effortless conversation-terminating assertion that, “Well, in
                                                                      the end, we can’t know for sure” causes the much-needed mental investigation
                                                                      to halt in a state in which researchers’ thinking has just slightly moved away
                                                                      from the whole ancient worldmodel that is put forth by the received,
                                                                      historicist type of thinking. Thus agnosticism about Jesus’ historicity
                                                                      usually is found together with a model of antiquity that is close to the
                                                                      pedestrian, familiar liberal demythologizing picture.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3053 From: Cheryl Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Right way to study mythic symbology: as alt-state insights
                                                                      This makes perfect sense. The mythical meaning networks in the
                                                                      mythic mapping of the experience can only be mapped directly to the
                                                                      experience by one familiar with the experience.

                                                                      Now anyone could coopt these mythical structures and overlay their
                                                                      own interpretation. But this overlay would not be born of the
                                                                      mythic state experience.

                                                                      It would be wise for the non-initiated to use a mythical meaning
                                                                      construct of their own making to map whatever experiences are being
                                                                      mapped.

                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…>
                                                                      wrote:
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >>Michael Hoffman used to speak in the JesusMysteries discussion
                                                                      group a lot
                                                                      > about multiple Historical Jesuses, mystery religion connections,
                                                                      etc. Was
                                                                      > there a methodology being used?
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > My methodology of reading myth-religion texts is to assume that
                                                                      they are
                                                                      > designed to be read from two states of consciousness (ordinary vs.
                                                                      intense
                                                                      > mystic-state) with two distinct meaning-networks: one for the
                                                                      uninitiated, and
                                                                      > one for the initiated. Myth is metaphorical description and
                                                                      reporting of
                                                                      > intense mystic-state experiences. Myth is not grounded and based
                                                                      in the
                                                                      > ordinary state of consciousness, but in the intense mystic altered
                                                                      state of
                                                                      > consciousness.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3054 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: The Matrix themes tied to the Mythic Godman, The Chosen One.
                                                                      The movie series The Matrix is much more mystic and gnostic than the movie
                                                                      series Lord of the Rings. I like Matrix and dislike Rings. Are there any
                                                                      Matrix philosophy books yet that include coverage of the final part of the
                                                                      trilogy?


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3055 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available
                                                                      I’m making my Egodeath discussion group postings available as articles. As a
                                                                      preliminary format, here is a 2.8 MB zipped .doc file that I’m currently
                                                                      working in.

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/HoffEgodeathGroupPosts.zip

                                                                      I’m doing various cleanup and outline rearranging.

                                                                      This document provides a clear view and fast navigation.

                                                                      I recommend it and would like to know if it opens up my theory writings to
                                                                      you.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3056 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Quasi-historical existence of founder-figures
                                                                      Despite some sort of historical John the Baptist coming into view, I maintain
                                                                      the interpretive framework that “All characters in the Bible are essentially
                                                                      fictional composites very loosely based on multiple types of source figures,
                                                                      historical and mythical.”

                                                                      If you want baptizers in animal skins, there may well have been many of
                                                                      them — but I advocate approaching John the Baptist as essentially and first
                                                                      of all, a mythic composite, even if the attribute of “real existence” is
                                                                      assigned to him by some allegorists who liked to create their conceptual art
                                                                      in the quasi-historical mode of religious allegory.


                                                                      >>Robert Price has a nice piece on John the Baptist on the Internet.
                                                                      >>http://www.courses.drew.edu/sp2000/BIBST189.001/pricejj.html

                                                                      Price wrote:
                                                                      >>”Finally, if the case set forth here is judged plausible, it would provide
                                                                      the answer to a thorny question aimed at the Christ Myth theory nowadays
                                                                      dismissed out of hand by apologists and even some skeptics but still beloved
                                                                      by many freethinkers. It is easy to show that, at least in its most famous
                                                                      form, the testimony of Josephus to Jesus is a Christian interpolation. But no
                                                                      such case can be made in respect of Josephus’ reference to John’s baptism and
                                                                      his fate at the hands of Antipas. So apologists have asked, is it really
                                                                      likely that Jesus was not a historical figure but John the Baptist was? That
                                                                      is exactly the implication if John the Baptist was the original “Jesus,” and
                                                                      if the gospel Jesus is a figment of faith in the resurrected John. Only now it
                                                                      makes sense. That John should be a historical figure and Jesus a myth makes
                                                                      plenty of sense once you understand the relationship between the two figures
                                                                      as I have sketched it here.”


                                                                      Lynn Picknett shows through art analysis that Da Vinci advocated some church
                                                                      of John, associated somehow with Mary Magdalene, against the church of Jesus.
                                                                      There seems to have been some sort of John-oriented church through the
                                                                      pre-modern eras, but it’s not yet clear what it amounted to, such as its views
                                                                      on Jesus’ historicity. Anyone interested in learning all the radical theories
                                                                      and alternate histories about the gospel Maries and Johns will find such
                                                                      hypotheses in Picknett’s books.

                                                                      Mary Magdalene: Christianity’s Hidden Goddess
                                                                      Lynn Picknett
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0786713119
                                                                      2003
                                                                      17 hits for “Da Vinci”.

                                                                      The Templar Revelation: Secret Guardians of the True Identity of Christ
                                                                      Lynn Picknett, Clive Prince
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0684848910
                                                                      1997
                                                                      25 hits for “Da Vinci”

                                                                      Lynn Picknett may have some connection with:
                                                                      Holy Blood, Holy Grail
                                                                      Richard Leigh, Henry Lincoln, Michael Baigent
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0440136482
                                                                      1983
                                                                      8 hits for “Da Vinci”


                                                                      A subtle distinction that historical-Jesus doubters should be attuned to is
                                                                      whether people in the past were arguing about Jesus’ actual historicity or
                                                                      about how to properly tell edifying mystic tall tales: “No, the storyline goes
                                                                      this way! John was real, and Jesus was mystic-metaphor!” “No, the mystic
                                                                      tall-tale storyline is that they were both real in their respective ways!”

                                                                      It’s like a debate over which is the most moral way to tell a morality tale,
                                                                      or the right way to write a Star Trek episode with accurate, correct
                                                                      characterizations. An unrealistic portrayal of Kirk, Spock, or McCoy would be
                                                                      unacceptable.

                                                                      Suppose I start a church of Mary “John” Magdalene, against that of Jesus —
                                                                      this would not necessarily mean that I hold any of them to have existed as
                                                                      literal historical individuals. Now imagine that my church doctrine holds
                                                                      John to have been the pre-initiation, earthly or “mortal” early phase of the
                                                                      founder-figure, with Jesus as the new name given to the post-initiation,
                                                                      divine heavenly “imperishable” phase of the founder-figure.

                                                                      In neither figure would I be asserting and claiming literal existence as a
                                                                      historical individual. Rather, I could hold that the figure of John stands
                                                                      for the principle of the initiate’s old, perishable self before spiritual
                                                                      regeneration, while the figure of Jesus stands for the initiate’s new,
                                                                      spiritual, transcendent self.

                                                                      I could then position this reading of the edifying mystic tall-tale
                                                                      story-cycle against that of the competing doctrinal story-cycle of the
                                                                      competing church which I could disparagingly call the “church of Peter” or
                                                                      even the “church of Jesus”, which (in contrast) holds that it’s better to use
                                                                      the figure of Jesus as the pre-initiation self and the figure of Christ to
                                                                      represent the post-initiation self. Even that disparagement wouldn’t
                                                                      necessarily involve attributing the modern literalist idea of Jesus’ or John’s
                                                                      existence to the competing church.

                                                                      This would be like arguing over whether the exploits of Hercules, Zeus,
                                                                      Osiris, or Dionysus are more lofty or edifying. Even if the notion of an
                                                                      earthly mortal is involved, this may have put all accent on the
                                                                      mystic-metaphorical aspects of the religio-philosophical or mythic-religious
                                                                      tall-tales, without implying such mundane, profane, literal historicity as
                                                                      modern thinking is inclined to assume.

                                                                      The ancients may have believed in a historical John in some sense, such as
                                                                      that the idea made sense within an edifying mystic tall-tale, but did they
                                                                      believe that John literally existed as a historical individual in our familiar
                                                                      modern sense? Veyne’s book makes it hard to have any confidence about this
                                                                      matter.

                                                                      Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive
                                                                      Imagination
                                                                      Paul Veyne
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/0226854345


                                                                      Charles Crittenden – The Metaphysics of Fictional Objects – p. 1 wrote:
                                                                      “In this book I consider the ancient problem of nonbeing, the problem whether
                                                                      there are non-existent objects. Holding that there are seems to imply the
                                                                      contradiction that there exist things that do not exist. On the other hand, in
                                                                      common parlance we very often speak of things that do not exist. Sherlock
                                                                      Holmes does not exist, he is a fictional character. Pegasus is mythical and
                                                                      hence non-existent. Phlogiston has turned out not to exist. Extinct species no
                                                                      longer exist, future items do not exist yet, there are all sorts of possible
                                                                      things that do not exist. Atheists certainly believe that God does not exist.
                                                                      So we employ the notion of nonexistence widely and quite comfortably.
                                                                      Furthermore, non-existent things seem to have properties: Sherlock Holmes is a
                                                                      detective who plays the violin, he is not a banker; Pegasus is a winged horse,
                                                                      not a flying fish. The appearance is that ordinary discourse is committed to
                                                                      items that are some- how there and have properties, and yet are said not to
                                                                      exist. Does common language then assume contradictory entities? Surely there
                                                                      cannot be such things. But if not, what are we talking about in these cases?
                                                                      This is a tangle indeed; my purpose in this book is to sort through the
                                                                      strands wound together here and to use the resulting clarifications to deal
                                                                      with various philosophical issues.”


                                                                      Research page:
                                                                      A contribution to the history of the theories on non-existent objects
                                                                      http://www.formalontology.it/meontology.htm


                                                                      There are modes of Jesus’ possibly historicity other than simple existence or
                                                                      nonexistence, as Eysinga wrote in his 1930 article “Leeft Jezus – of Heeft Hij
                                                                      Alleen Maar Geleefd? Een Studie over Het Dogma der Historiciteit” (Does Jesus
                                                                      Live, or Has He Only Lived? A Study of the Doctrine of Historicity).
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/eysingadoesjesuslive.htm

                                                                      Eysinga wrote (translated/summarized):
                                                                      >>Many other figures of legend and literature are seen in a similar light,
                                                                      such as Pallas Athena, Don Quixote, Romulus, Yahveh, and Osiris. They “lived”
                                                                      in those real people who contributed to the tales, and are to be understood
                                                                      within their historical context. So these mythic figures have a life, but not
                                                                      in the direct sense held by modern historians.

                                                                      >>Goguel noted that many details in the gospels appear in order to
                                                                      specifically imply the fleshliness of Jesus. This shows that at the time when
                                                                      the gospels were written, doubts abounded about Jesus’ carnality. Goguel
                                                                      wants to put this forward as a proof of Jesus’ historicity. But, just as the
                                                                      post-resurrection hints of carnality are added polemically against the docetic
                                                                      school, also the pre-crucifixion part is painted anti-docetically. And this
                                                                      does not make Jesus a historical person.

                                                                      >>Unlike the Gnostic tale of the redeemer descending straight from heaven (for
                                                                      example, in the Naasseni hymn), the Roman Catholic reformer needed a
                                                                      “realistic” tale of a son of God in the shape of an itinerant healer and
                                                                      preacher. Originally, the “realistic” life of Jesus just consisted of birth,
                                                                      passion, and resurrection, but the Jesus lifestory was gradually extended.

                                                                      >>The celestial Christ of Paul was morphed into a quasi-historical individual,
                                                                      as Couchoud put it. This gradually increasing reification went hand in hand
                                                                      with the polemic refutation of the Gnostic heresies. The faith in a “living
                                                                      Jesus” was a necessary forerunner for the belief in a “Jesus that had lived”.
                                                                      The gospel is a parable about the Christ mystery. Raschke’s famous formula
                                                                      concerning the evolution of Jesus from the Pauline metaphysical force of the
                                                                      Gnosis to the quasi-historical Jesus of the gospels is mentioned again.

                                                                      >>According to Goguel, docetism was not an assertion about Jesus’ historicity,
                                                                      but was merely a theological position, so docetism does not entail a denial of
                                                                      the Historical Jesus. But one would have to admit the same for early
                                                                      anti-docetism as well. Doctrine just stands against doctrine, and neither of
                                                                      them centers on asserting historical facts. The ancient type of
                                                                      historification of the Christ mystery does not turn Jesus into a historical
                                                                      fact.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3057 From: merker2002 Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: No Rest For The Wicked
                                                                      What does “No Rest For The Wicked” (ozzy osbourne) refer to?

                                                                      Wicked means “wicked way of thinking” (blieve in freewill) in contrast
                                                                      to the “pure /holy/ sanctified way of thinking” (believe in Fate,
                                                                      ground of being Mother of AllThatIs)

                                                                      Living purified still uses egoic-logic but has transcended it and does
                                                                      not believe in it. Only the Wicked believe that they can be even
                                                                      metaphysically (ie. truly) a rebel. Also> They believe they do what
                                                                      they do for *themselves* rather than out of *devine/holy necessity*.

                                                                      So , what does NO REST for the wicked mean?
                                                                      Well, by conceiving of the world as utterly fated, ie. as being like a
                                                                      rock (cmp. to shifting sands) one gains a kind of metaphysical peace
                                                                      because nothing can go wrong (because everything went all wrong
                                                                      already -> insight into being a prisoner of Spacetime)

                                                                      So while the doves enjoy *metaphysical* PEACE,
                                                                      the wicked are damned to shifting sands perception:
                                                                      they only focus on all that which ist unstable (sensory perception,
                                                                      including stream of thought, which is in some sense *just another
                                                                      sensory perception stream*) rather than on the fact that the world
                                                                      seen from “outside” can be grasped as being perfectly complete, ie.
                                                                      like all times have already happend.
                                                                      (note : time description “PRESENT PERFECT”: who coined this term? who
                                                                      were the first to read and write? MYSTIC MONKS high on Psilocybin!)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3058 From: tcherril ofearth Date: 24/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: The Matrix themes tied to the Mythic Godman, The Chosen One.
                                                                      I just watched the movie Freaky Friday with my daughter and I’m sure you’ll agree that this, also, is a modern thematic depiction of the mystic state experience and enlightenment. It was entertaining to watch it from that perspective.

                                                                      Michael Hoffman <mhoffman@…> wrote:
                                                                      The movie series The Matrix is much more mystic and gnostic than the movie
                                                                      series Lord of the Rings. I like Matrix and dislike Rings. Are there any
                                                                      Matrix philosophy books yet that include coverage of the final part of the
                                                                      trilogy?


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman




                                                                      egodeath@yahoogroups.com (to post)
                                                                      egodeath-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com



                                                                      ———————————
                                                                      Yahoo! Groups Links

                                                                      To visit your group on the web, go to:
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/

                                                                      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                                                      egodeath-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

                                                                      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




                                                                      ———————————
                                                                      Do you Yahoo!?
                                                                      Yahoo! SiteBuilder – Free web site building tool. Try it!

                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3059 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Endless spirituality research as denial of entheogen solution
                                                                      It is so obvious surveying the Gnosis magazine issues — visionary plants keep
                                                                      reappearing regularly throughout articles and reviews, yet the special issue
                                                                      on psychedelics works to diminish and restrain and restrict the perpetual
                                                                      historical credit that plants deserve. It is child’s play to spot entheogen
                                                                      references throughout the articles.

                                                                      Those on the outside, not recognizing the interpretive keys they’ve been
                                                                      holding the whole time like Dorothy’s shoes in Wizard of Oz, talk about
                                                                      “mystic gardens”, “fasting” followed by “wine”, and suchlike with zero
                                                                      conscious recognition of visionary plants that serve as tree-ladders into the
                                                                      heavens.

                                                                      _________________


                                                                      Perennial philosophy is simply the observation that we’re made of color.

                                                                      This is not an occult science. This is not one of those crazy systems of
                                                                      divination and astrology. That stuff is hooey and you’ve got to have a screw
                                                                      loose to go in for that. Humankind is simply materialized color operating on
                                                                      the 49th vibration. You’d make that conclusion walking down the street or
                                                                      going to the store.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3060 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Snake referring to visual distortion, turning staff to snake
                                                                      Moses magically turned a staff into a snake. To do this, use entheogens which
                                                                      cause visual distortion.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3061 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Eysinga: The Old Testament as Christian Scripture
                                                                      Translation/summary now available:

                                                                      The Old Testament as Christian Scripture
                                                                      van den Bergh van Eysinga
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/eysingaotaschristianscripture.htm


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3062 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Eysinga: Mythological Background of NT Miracles
                                                                      Translation/summary now available:

                                                                      On the Mythological Background of the New Testament Miracles
                                                                      van den Bergh van Eysinga
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/eysingamythbgndntmiracles.htm


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3063 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Quasi-historical existence of founder-figures
                                                                      Many scholars lack an accurate whole ancient worldmodel, but there is enough
                                                                      evidence so that alternative researchers are reconstructing a clear, viable
                                                                      alternative, involving the gradual composite back-projected Jesus figure.

                                                                      The composite Jesus model has only recently taken shape among current
                                                                      researchers, but there is enough evidence and enough support for an
                                                                      interpretive framework to make it the strongest candidate we have. What are
                                                                      the alternative, competing models: that Jesus *was* a single historical
                                                                      individual, without whom the eventual mythic figure couldn’t have formed?
                                                                      That Jesus recovered from crucifixion and legends grew into myth?

                                                                      The fully composite mythic model of the formation of the Jesus figure is
                                                                      clear, strong, and viable. I see no reason to hang onto the historicity
                                                                      assumption — it only enables more complicated, implauible, anachronistic
                                                                      reconstructions or scenarios for Christian origins. I don’t agree that we
                                                                      have little evidence. We have a great deal of evidence about the nature of
                                                                      Hellenistic-era religion.

                                                                      If we can’t see the greater merits of the composite-Jesus scenario *now*, when
                                                                      will we *ever*? If this amount of evidence isn’t enough to pull people off
                                                                      the fence, what more evidence are the agnostics about Jesus’ historicity
                                                                      waiting for? What would be the ideal kind of evidence that would pull the
                                                                      agnostics off the fence? We have a pile of evidence — literally a bookshelf
                                                                      full of books.

                                                                      Book list:
                                                                      Mythic-only Christ theory
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/3W44V7JX4UH9I

                                                                      If reading these books isn’t enough to provide a much stronger theory of
                                                                      Christian origins based on the composite formation of the Jesus figure, then
                                                                      what further books, evidence, and interpretation would be ideal? What would a
                                                                      smoking gun, persuasive to the agnostics, amount to, if not this very set of
                                                                      books, evidence, and interpretation we’ve recently had access to?

                                                                      I don’t think we need more texts discovered, but rather, more time to
                                                                      profitably and insightfully interpret the wealth of texts we already have. A
                                                                      better understanding of esotericism, the mystic state of consciousness, and
                                                                      mythic metaphor are needed as well. An interesting way of looking at the
                                                                      problem amounts to asking, “What would it take to bring the discussion group
                                                                      to some further conclusions, and even an ultimate conclusion about Jesus’
                                                                      historicity?” I see progress of insight but not a direction toward the goal
                                                                      of a conclusion.

                                                                      How does one know when one has “enough information”? Does one keep pushing
                                                                      bits of texts here and there forever, gaining a little insight here and a
                                                                      little there? How does one side, or one model of Christian origins, ever
                                                                      achieve a clear win or victory? I suppose this is the age of questioning and
                                                                      investigating and raising the question of historicity, more than the age of of
                                                                      concluding and answering the question.

                                                                      Will we all become better and better fence-sitters, perched ever more
                                                                      steadily, so that we are bound to stay affixed there until the end of time,
                                                                      holding out forever for ever more texts and more reliable texts? Or is there
                                                                      some specific game plan to bring the conclusion down to one side or the other?


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3064 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available
                                                                      Updated (minor).


                                                                      >I’m making my Egodeath discussion group postings available as articles. As a
                                                                      >preliminary format, here is a 2.8 MB zipped .doc file that I’m currently
                                                                      >working in.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >http://www.egodeath.com/HoffEgodeathGroupPosts.zip
                                                                      >
                                                                      >I’m doing various cleanup and outline rearranging.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >This document provides a clear view and fast navigation.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >I recommend it and would like to know if it opens up my theory writings to
                                                                      >you.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 3065 From: jamesjomeara Date: 25/01/2004
                                                                      Subject: Re: Word .doc file containing all my posts is available
                                                                      Wowie wow zowie! No more need to download posts, reformat, and store
                                                                      away in bulky binders. And here I was, thinking of using my boss’s
                                                                      photocopier to double-side the pages to save space! Now I’ve got a
                                                                      2400 page file I suppose I could put on a cd for safety, with
                                                                      printing and search capabilities!

                                                                      On the other hand, my copies have the date of posing, which might
                                                                      faciliate reference. They are of course chronological, which is good
                                                                      for following the development of your thought. For example, I’ve
                                                                      broken the binders not by year but by “key insight” alerts you post
                                                                      from time to time (“I thought xyz from June 1987 to today, but
                                                                      now….” I can’t see the nature of the arrangement you’ve made. Is
                                                                      there an outline of topics? For example, for this “update”, is
                                                                      material added within the main text, or will more just be appended as
                                                                      it comes online?

                                                                      Again, woo hoo!


                                                                      — In egodeath@yahoogroups.com, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…>
                                                                      wrote:
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Updated (minor).
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >I’m making my Egodeath discussion group postings available as
                                                                      articles. As a
                                                                      > >preliminary format, here is a 2.8 MB zipped .doc file that I’m
                                                                      currently
                                                                      > >working in.
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >http://www.egodeath.com/HoffEgodeathGroupPosts.zip
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >I’m doing various cleanup and outline rearranging.
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >This document provides a clear view and fast navigation.
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >I recommend it and would like to know if it opens up my theory
                                                                      writings to
                                                                      > >you.

                                                                      Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 40: 2003-06-30

                                                                      Site Map


                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1991 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Violent willing sacrif: symbol of complete repud’n of freewill delu
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1992 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Julius Caesar on TV; Revelation of the Method?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1993 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Updated website
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1994 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Is understanding Cross myth nece. for enlightenment?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1995 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Is understanding Cross myth nece. for enlightenment?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1996 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Mythic concepts of ransom, threat, and release-price
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1997 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Myth-relig-mystm themes in Caesar miniseries
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1998 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Fatal Necessity
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1999 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Historical development of godman ransom allegory
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2000 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Myth-relig-mystm themes in Caesar miniseries
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2001 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: What books did Neil Peart read by 1976?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2002 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Jesus storyline partly based on Julius Caesar storyline
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2003 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Heinrich remains agnostic on historicity of Jesus
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2004 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2005 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Review of Dan Merkur’s book The Psychedelic Sacrament
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2006 From: merker2002 Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Other Languages than English
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2007 From: merker2002 Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2008 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Apprehension of succeeding at revealing no-free-will etc.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2009 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Ancients didn’t believe in free will, used entheogens constantly
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2010 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Heinrich remains agnostic on historicity of Jesus
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2011 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Other Languages than English
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2012 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2013 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Appeal of early, anti-Jewish JC: moral resistance figure
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2014 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Book lists: Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2015 From: merker2002 Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Book lists: Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2016 From: merker2002 Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Apprehension of succeeding at revealing no-free-will etc.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2018 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Modern adulthood is spiritually retarded, not normal
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2019 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Appeal & comparison of various godmen over time
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2020 From: wrmspirit Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2021 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Ecstatic metaphor: God’s repentance, yet still closed future
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2023 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2024 From: ichang1497 Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2028 From: wrmspirit Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2029 From: ichang1497 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2030 From: ichang1497 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2031 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Misguided critique of “seriousness” in Rock
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: New Testament, hist. Jesus, & drug policy reform
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2033 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Acid-based rock mysticism vs. Christianity: false dichotomy
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2034 From: merker2002 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: One man’s honour/owner (maiden lyrics)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2036 From: ichang1497 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: “seriousness” in Rock and definition of “modern day Christianity”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2037 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: “seriousness” in Rock and definition of “modern day Christian
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2038 From: merker2002 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Magic harmonies (Rime of the ancient mariner)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2039 From: merker2002 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Sound perception in the altered state
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2040 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathPostingRules.txt



                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1991 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Violent willing sacrif: symbol of complete repud’n of freewill delu
                                                                      Covering:

                                                                      Jesus Symbolic Representation of Complete Repudiation of Freewill Delusion

                                                                      Lesson and Representation of Complete Experience and Comprehension of the
                                                                      Overpowering of the Personal Will

                                                                      How Thinking of a Symbol of Willing Violent Death and Timeless Affixion to the
                                                                      Physical World Restabilizes the Psyche during Self-Control Seizure



                                                                      An ancient king might have reasoned, I will completely cancel and overcome and
                                                                      repudiate my freewill delusion and ego sense, to the most extreme degree
                                                                      possible, to get the fullest benefits and favor from the gods for my kingdom.
                                                                      If a little sacrifice of egoic freewill delusion by repudiating freewill and
                                                                      kneeling to the gods gives the spiritual benefit of divinization and calming
                                                                      the psyche storm, then a more perfect, more complete sacrifice will magically
                                                                      correlate with even better favors from the gods for my kingdom.

                                                                      If the uncontrollable transcendent controller has full power over the will of
                                                                      a local locus of control — a personal control agent — then logically, the
                                                                      personal control agent must admit that its will power is completely vulnerable
                                                                      to be made to turn against the full strength of the greatest will of the
                                                                      personal control agent, even the will to preserve the bodily health.

                                                                      This logical insight is the experience of personal power being completely
                                                                      overwhelmed — crying uncle, the logic when seen is experienced as a
                                                                      stranglehold, a noose. The uncontrollable transcendent controller shows this
                                                                      to the mind, and makes the mind fully acknowledge and reflect the fact, and
                                                                      concede the logical good sense of the archetypal idea of a person being made
                                                                      willing to prove this.

                                                                      This logical concession isn’t a matter of action, but of comprehending action.
                                                                      Zen: “I have no real personal desire. Then why do I act? If there is a
                                                                      reason for it, may my head be cut off.” There is something to this logic
                                                                      of — rather, about — sacrificial violence. Our modern era is strange: we
                                                                      say we are against violence, and yet the media and entertainment industry is
                                                                      all violence, all the time, it seems — one reason I never want to watch it.

                                                                      Are we not a blood-soaked society, claiming that it doesn’t count because it’s
                                                                      just amusing video games? Some of the highest insights are elucidated by
                                                                      thinking of force, violence, coercion of will, concession, and release — and
                                                                      relief! And deification. Part of the challenge of investigating the subject
                                                                      of enlightenment and of the history of world religion is that we want all the
                                                                      uplifting parts of religion, without the shocking history of transcendent
                                                                      violence, force, and power.

                                                                      Historically, mysticism commonly is a matter of experiencing being overpowered
                                                                      by the transcendent saying “Admit it — I can and could and might force you to
                                                                      even will your own violent demise, even if that’s the thing you, as control
                                                                      agent, least want to do. That’s the power I have as uncontrollable
                                                                      transcendent controller, over your will.

                                                                      I could make you either fight against me and lose, whatever that might mean,
                                                                      or I could show you the truth about the nothingness and absolute dependence of
                                                                      your power with respect to mine, and then return stable virtual power to you,
                                                                      now informed by the truth. Now go, you shall run your kingdom, knowing the
                                                                      relationship between my power, the uncontrollable transcendent controller, and
                                                                      your power, as a puppet, a merely secondary, local locus of control.”

                                                                      By this extreme and logically perfected view, the godman is a logical
                                                                      representation of the ability of the higher power to absolutely bend and take
                                                                      over the will of the secondary controller, demonstrating to the extreme, this
                                                                      relative power relationship.

                                                                      This representation of extreme overpowering of personal will keeps mental
                                                                      harmony and transforms the mind’s mental worldmodel as the assumed power is
                                                                      completely taken away from egoic thinking, ego’s arm is twisted and instructed
                                                                      in a kind of absolute overpowering of personal will power from betrayal by
                                                                      one’s Achilles’ heel: the betraying spring of one’s own control-thoughts.

                                                                      I do anything I want, as secondary controller — but the catch is, what I want
                                                                      is controlled entirely by the mysterious uncontrollable transcendent
                                                                      controller, who taught me an instructive lesson by putting in my head the
                                                                      willingness to do that which I, as personal control locus, would never want to
                                                                      do: bodily self-destruction. What is the goal in this present analysis? To
                                                                      understand truth, and to understand the history of religion.

                                                                      Let us change the subject to harmless Buddhism. Levy’s book Buddhism: a
                                                                      ‘Mystery Religion’? describes Buddhist monks who willingly burning themselves
                                                                      alive just to earn the community divine favor — a somewhat convincing
                                                                      demonstration of transcendence of the personal will, but I prefer to merely
                                                                      give the nod to a willingly violently sacrificed mythic godman figure such as
                                                                      Attis: it seems more to the point and less superstitious.

                                                                      Buddhism: a ‘Mystery Religion’? Paul Levy. NY: Schocken Books, 1968.
                                                                      Hardcover – 111 pages. Six lectures on aspects of Buddhism. Subjects include:
                                                                      Ordination and the Buddhist Hierarchy in Theravadin Communities; ‘The March
                                                                      Toward the Light’ Among the Northern Buddhists; The First Council, The Corpus
                                                                      of the Law, and Ananda, Prototype of the Candidate for Ordination; Saints’
                                                                      Lives or Initiation Themes; and Primitive Buddhism and ‘Mystery Religions’.

                                                                      To be enlightened, you must in some sense become (be made) willing to endure
                                                                      bodily suffering and death. It is not at all necessary to harm the body; in
                                                                      fact the actuality of harming the body is utterly irrelevant, and doing so is
                                                                      arguably a failure of comprehension, a misunderstanding.

                                                                      ________________________________

                                                                      Self-Control Cybernetics of the Experience of Being Ransomed and Suddenly
                                                                      Released from Doomed Loss of Control by the Godman’s Willing Captivity and
                                                                      Complete Suffering and Death

                                                                      Chapter: “Esoteric Christianity: The Greek Mystery Religions and Their Impact
                                                                      on Christianity”
                                                                      From Andrew Benson’s book The Origins of Christianity and the Bible.
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/bensonmysteryrels.htm — “According to another
                                                                      version, Baal was arrested (like Jesus). He was sentenced, chastised, and was
                                                                      sent away to die with a criminal (Jesus was crucified with two robbers), while
                                                                      another criminal was freed (Barabbas was freed in place of Jesus). According
                                                                      to this version, a woman cleansed away the blood that was oozing from the
                                                                      heart of Baal , which had apparently been pierced by a spear or a javelin.
                                                                      Afterward, Baal was found in a mountain, where he was being watched over. The
                                                                      goddess Anath prepared a nest for him and cared for him. (Women went to the
                                                                      grave of Jesus to care for his body.) Finally, Baal, or Bel-Marduk, came back
                                                                      alive and well from the mountain. Such myths circulated before the birth of
                                                                      Christianity.”


                                                                      What are the cognitive dynamics of the idea “Jesus (or equivalent mythic
                                                                      godman) gave up his life to redeem us?”, and the “ransom 1 to release many”
                                                                      idea? Always remember that myths are first of all a report of mystic-state
                                                                      *experiencing*. The strategy in asking what the “ransom sacrifice of Jesus”
                                                                      legitimately and coherently means, is to first ask “How does entheogenic
                                                                      enlightenment, as an experience, match the dynamic pattern of “releasing many
                                                                      people when capturing one person”?

                                                                      During self-control seizure and the feeling of being trapped and frozen into
                                                                      the frozen timeless spacetime block, when the mind grasps and comprehends the
                                                                      meaning of the sacrificed-and-ascended mythic godman, as indicating
                                                                      no-free-will and being mysteriously granted practical self-control again (a
                                                                      new lease on life with a new understanding), the mind suddenly is released
                                                                      from self-control struggle and made stable again.

                                                                      That this happens is a universally reported phenomenon. The single archetypal
                                                                      notion — being given the comprehension of the godman figure as representing
                                                                      the discovery of no-free-will and as representing that egoically-died godman
                                                                      being brought back to a higher mode of life — is given to many minds, under
                                                                      many godman-names. By this one universal Idea, Concept, Logos, Word, or
                                                                      Archetype, many minds are transformed into the transcendent mental worldmodel.

                                                                      When this transformation happens, it is a sudden homeostatic state shift from
                                                                      the experience of a freewill agent desperately struggling to retain
                                                                      self-control power, to the experience of being mysterious injected with the
                                                                      comprehension of the godman’s dying and being injected with confident reliance
                                                                      on the godhead, the uncontrollable transcendent controller. The saving idea
                                                                      is given to many minds. The saving idea is that of an Archetype.

                                                                      The moment the mind is made to picture and comprehend this archetype of a
                                                                      chained and ego-dead godman, the mind experiences a type of release from a
                                                                      closing-in prison. This is the good sense of “God sacrificed his son as a
                                                                      ransom sacrifice to set us free.” The godman idea helps the mind make the
                                                                      move that is represented by the godman idea. This dynamic could happen
                                                                      without the godman.

                                                                      First some minds experienced the core experience of “release-upon-repudiating
                                                                      freewill thinking”, then to represent this dynamic, they invented the
                                                                      archetypal idea and told others. After that point, to think of the idea and
                                                                      comprehend it was to immediately follow the same pattern as the idea, and thus
                                                                      it became experienced as “the willing spacetime-fastening death of the mythic
                                                                      godman *caused* my experience of release and enlightenment.”

                                                                      The willing self-sacrifice of the mythic archetypal godman’s lower, freewill
                                                                      mode of thinking, serves as a way-showing conceptual pattern to guide one’s
                                                                      own willing self-sacrifice of the lower, freewill mode of thinking, and
                                                                      thereby experience the same kind of release and new mode of life that is
                                                                      described in the story of the archetypal godman figure.

                                                                      Not the literal ransom sacrifice of Jesus sets us free from the jaws of hell
                                                                      and death, but rather, *comprehending the idea* of the egoic-thinking
                                                                      sacrificing figure and his being given faith and reliance on the
                                                                      uncontrollable transcendent controller, causes that same dynamic to happen in
                                                                      the reflecting mind during control-instability escalation.

                                                                      The vividness of the picture of the godman and his receiving faith and new
                                                                      life upon sacrificing his freewill thinking, enables the mind to most easily
                                                                      grasp the idea of repudiating freewill thinking, being given faith and
                                                                      reliance on the utterly mysterious controllable transcendent controller, and
                                                                      thereby regaining practical control stability combined with knowledge of the
                                                                      secondary-only nature of our control agency.

                                                                      What about the blood and violence? What dynamic function does it fulfill? It
                                                                      is key that these mythic heroes and warriors willingly sacrificed their
                                                                      freewill thinking; they were made to will that which most emphatically and
                                                                      extremely and absolutely contradicted their egoic accustomed desire. What is
                                                                      the strongest egoic desire? To avoid pain and mayhem and preserve one’s
                                                                      bodily well-being.

                                                                      There is a religious connection between the idea of bloody violence and
                                                                      calming — look at Kali, look at Jesus’ death, look at the Iliad heroes,
                                                                      Caesar’s 23 stabbing wounds, the story of the Passover skipping the houses
                                                                      that were marked with the blood of the lamb. Here is where the entheogen
                                                                      researchers haven’t ventured near. Yes, blood is the entheogenic wine, but
                                                                      violence and blood figures in all myth, at least in all the godman myths and
                                                                      suchlike in world religion.

                                                                      How does spilling the victim’s blood on the priest purify the priest — is it
                                                                      just the notion of ingesting the entheogen? No, the victim represents the
                                                                      desire, the self-protecting controllership of the sacrificer. The heart of
                                                                      egoic will power is the drive to first of all, avoid bodily harm to oneself.
                                                                      When the mind is brought to a state in which *even this most fundamental
                                                                      personal desire* is cancelled and suspended, the mind is ready to be made to
                                                                      sacrifice the freewill delusion.

                                                                      However, the key thing is the cancellation of self-will and freewill
                                                                      thinking — not of physical harm. The mind is reformed by mentally
                                                                      repudiating freewill thinking, not by causing harm to oneself. The godman
                                                                      idea, as a symbolic embodiment of these self-will dynamics, includes the
                                                                      portrayal of being made willing even to allow harm — the loose cognition
                                                                      state suspends all accustomed mental construct structures, even including the
                                                                      will to avoid bodily harm to oneself.

                                                                      The mind can gain full understanding of these relationships by merely thinking
                                                                      of the idea of a single mythic figure who willingly accepts bodily harm. The
                                                                      lightweight pop Buddhists yammer emptily about needing to abandon all desires.
                                                                      They don’t realize that such sanity is close to psychotic bodily harm to
                                                                      oneself.

                                                                      Trendoids get piercings, the radicals get scarification as body art — but
                                                                      real religion is a matter of being made willing, against all the most
                                                                      fundamental egoic mental structures of self-preservation and personal
                                                                      controllership, to accept bodily harm as a way of crossing out egoic freewill
                                                                      thinking.

                                                                      The main basis of mental-model transformation is not at all any harmful
                                                                      physical action such as against one’s accustomed bodily self-preservation
                                                                      drive, but rather, to bypass that and get to the real point, which is more
                                                                      abstract: repudiating the notion of freewill agency. Willing and permitting
                                                                      physical violence against oneself to the point of bodily death is merely a
                                                                      *metaphor* or the most extremely clear theoretical example of cancellation of
                                                                      freewill personal power.

                                                                      The godhead could very well turn the mind’s will in *any* direction, even the
                                                                      direction of harming oneself against one’s deepest desire — this idea is the
                                                                      idea of being overpowered in the extreme by the godhead.

                                                                      One’s sense of personal power is most extremely exemplified by one’s power to
                                                                      avoid willing bodily harm, but one’s vulnerable spot is that one cannot, as a
                                                                      merely secondary locus of control, control what one wills; theoretically, the
                                                                      godhead could inject one with the desire to demonstrate overcoming one’s own
                                                                      egoic natural inclination to avoid bodily harm.

                                                                      The mystic said “I wish I could give up all desire.” May you get your wish.
                                                                      “I don’t like where this train of thought is being directed… I really,
                                                                      really don’t like where this is going.” Do rational Buddhists believe in Mara
                                                                      the tempting devil, causer of stormy lightning? Buddha’s touching the ground,
                                                                      perhaps with other hand out in gesture of divine mysterious gratuitous
                                                                      compassion and calm and no-fear, may be functionally equivalent to the calming
                                                                      effect of the idea of the violent willing sacrifice of the Hellenistic godmen.

                                                                      “If there’s a bustle in your hedgerow, don’t be alarmed now, it’s just a
                                                                      spring clean for the May queen; there are two paths you can go by; there’s
                                                                      still time to change the road you’re on.”

                                                                      To change away from the road (deadly unstable train of thought) of extreme
                                                                      turmoil and practical loss of control of the will, when the devil is
                                                                      fascinating the mind with deadly tempting questions and tests about control
                                                                      power, rebuke the devil by understanding the godman sacrifice as symbol of
                                                                      complete repudiation of freewill delusion and mysteriously receive trusting
                                                                      dependence on the godhead.

                                                                      Picturing the “pleasing to god” idea of the willing complete sacrificed godman
                                                                      as representing no-free-will sets the thinker free from control instability.
                                                                      The idea is the saving thing.

                                                                      God gave his son, a meaningful mythic figure representing a cybernetic
                                                                      self-control relationship, encountered high in the air at the end of time,
                                                                      judgment day, and second coming, descending on a cloud, as a ransom sacrifice
                                                                      to release the trembling mystic from the jaws of hell, delusion, confused
                                                                      thinking, and practical control instability. Satan falls from heaven like
                                                                      lightning and the mind’s spirit is ascended to rule with God as adopted son.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1992 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Julius Caesar on TV; Revelation of the Method?
                                                                      Part I is somewhat interesting. How I wish they’d portray entheogenic wine
                                                                      and mystery initiations.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1993 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Updated website
                                                                      I did some much-needed organizing of the home page, and properly broke up the
                                                                      “main theory” pages into shorter pages. Most material at the site is years
                                                                      behind my postings in this discussion group, but it is somewhat organized and
                                                                      centered around the main theory outline. Even years ago, I wanted to discard
                                                                      those pages and start fresh.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1994 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Is understanding Cross myth nece. for enlightenment?
                                                                      Is understanding the Christian myth-religion necessary for enlightenment?

                                                                      What is the relation between minimal, “straightforward” Zen enlightenment, the
                                                                      Core Theory of cybernetic enlightenment, and decoding the Christian
                                                                      myth-religion?

                                                                      Must cybernetic religionists study and understand the cross? Must they study
                                                                      Attis, Dionysus, Jesus, Osiris?

                                                                      Can one be said to be enlightened without understanding that type of religious
                                                                      myth — understanding that category of conceptual language — even if one
                                                                      wants to have myth-free enlightenment?

                                                                      What can we modern cyberneticists do to symbolically represent and model the
                                                                      release and complete repudiation of the freewill delusion, comparably to the
                                                                      Cross myth?

                                                                      One can have enlightenment without understanding how the Hellenistic godman
                                                                      myth works during mystery-religion initiation, so why study the latter, when
                                                                      straightforward and efficient enlightenment itself is the main thing desired?


                                                                      Any Core Theory of enlightenment worth its salt simply *must* be capable of
                                                                      explaining, and include a fully compelling explanation of, world religions, or
                                                                      world myth-religion, particularly Christianity — which means explaining how
                                                                      the typical Hellenistic godman myth works during mystery-religion initiation.

                                                                      Before the cybernetic theory of enlightenment was applied to explaining how
                                                                      the Hellenistic godman myth works during mystery-religion initiation, we had
                                                                      no effective understanding. Today’s books on Christianity and gnosticism and
                                                                      mystery-religions don’t come very close to grasping how mystery-religion
                                                                      initiation works in the psyche to effect transformation of the mental
                                                                      worldmodel.

                                                                      Even the entheogen scholars reach a dead end upon recognizing how the myths
                                                                      point to entheogens themselves — they are merely standing at the entrance,
                                                                      the opening act, and have not yet penetrated into the main act.

                                                                      We are at odds in our goals — they are intent on exposing the entheogenic
                                                                      foundation of mystery-religion, while I have never considered entheogens to be
                                                                      an end in themselves — I have always had a much more looming goal, an
                                                                      exclusive goal, of gaining enlightenment (per Watts’ Zen) about self-control
                                                                      power and then decoding how that same enlightenment is present in Christian
                                                                      mystery-religion.

                                                                      My goal during the 1990s was to decode how my existing core theory of
                                                                      cybernetic enlightenment is present in the Christian mystery-religion — not
                                                                      first of all to discover the entheogenic basis of religions. Entheogens have
                                                                      always been just one of several foundation stones, toward the real goal of
                                                                      understanding how enlightenment (per my Core Theory) is reflected in world
                                                                      religions. I was always reluctant to include entheogens in the Core Theory,
                                                                      because loose cognition, not entheogens, is important.

                                                                      However, because they are by far the most ergonomic method, and because they
                                                                      are the historical basis for the major religions, it is logically justified to
                                                                      include entheogens in the Core Theory — as long as loose cognition remains
                                                                      the highlight, with entheogens as merely the most classic and effective
                                                                      trigger of loose cognition. That is the approach I took in the
                                                                      Introduction/Summary posted at the website, at the Principia Cybernetica site,
                                                                      and the newsgroups.

                                                                      My first goal was enlightenment as a coherent mental model about self, time,
                                                                      world, will, control, and change — the Core Theory. By the mid-1990s I
                                                                      basically accomplished that, and then continued to study the mental dynamics
                                                                      of the Cross — at that time, I still assumed the historicity of Jesus, and
                                                                      knew nothing about mystery-religions or world myth-religion-mysticism.

                                                                      I was certain that the New Testament and overall Christian Bible contained the
                                                                      same meaning as the Core Theory, like my understanding of Zen as portrayed by
                                                                      Alan Watts (a cybernetic state-shift of understanding about personal
                                                                      controllership). I could very well have stopped there and correctly said that
                                                                      my Core Theory is closed and complete.

                                                                      But I was determined to enter the conceptual world of Christian myth-religion
                                                                      (while still considering Jesus to be historical) and put the Core Theory to
                                                                      the test, and bolster the Core Theory by using it to successfully understand
                                                                      and explain Christianity in terms of a cybernetic state-shift of understanding
                                                                      about personal controllership. Originally, I didn’t particularly think much
                                                                      at all about Christianity, any more than any self-help and typical New Age
                                                                      person does.

                                                                      I used Watts’ Zen, not Christianity, to discover the heart of the Core
                                                                      Theory — no-free-will on Dec. 12, 1997 and then block-universe determinism on
                                                                      Jan. 11, 1988. At that point, I immediately had the ability, for the first
                                                                      time, to write a compact summary of cybernetic enlightenment, and it was then
                                                                      natural to attempt, for the first time, to explain Christian concepts in terms
                                                                      of the Core Theory and include them to a limited extent in the basic summary.

                                                                      You can see this minor coverage of Christian concepts reflected in the Jan. 2,
                                                                      1997 summary at the Principia Cybernetica website:
                                                                      http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Annotations/PHILOSI.0.html. But as the 1990s
                                                                      progressed, although satisfied with the Core Theory in itself and my progress
                                                                      in fleshing it out, the balance of attention shifted away from refining a
                                                                      clarified Wattsian cybernetics explanation of Zen enlightenment toward
                                                                      explanation of the cybernetics of Christianity.

                                                                      My historical strategy was: first I clarified Watts’ cybernetics explanation
                                                                      of Zen, to form the Core Theory, and then I used that Core Theory to similarly
                                                                      decode and explain the cybernetics of the Christian myth-religion — a much
                                                                      harder task, especially when starting with the assumption of a historical
                                                                      Jesus as opposed to focusing on the mental dynamics of the *idea* of a
                                                                      dying/rising godman (as an idea that rescues/restabilizes controllership at
                                                                      the same time as enlightening about controllership).

                                                                      As I recall, I read Hofstadter’s Godel Escher Bach and The Mind’s I *after*
                                                                      formulating the Core Theory based on Watts’ Zen. These Hofstadter books were
                                                                      helpful stylistically, but I never felt dependent on them — more like they
                                                                      resonated *with* my thinking and generally strengthened it, rather than giving
                                                                      me new insight and new knowledge.

                                                                      What books *did* I lean on when applying the Core Theory to figure out how the
                                                                      Bible reflects the Core Theory? Here, no one book leaps to mind, and none of
                                                                      them seem all that close as Way of Zen was — because almost all the books
                                                                      assume a historical Jesus, weakening their conceptual grasp of the symbolic
                                                                      mystical mythic meaning of the Cross, and they failed to recognize the
                                                                      entheogenic foundation and obsession of the Greco-Roman world.

                                                                      Wine was the be-all and end-all, the universal touch-point for all topics in
                                                                      the Greco-Roman world; the Romans were absolutely serious in saying “in vino
                                                                      veritas”, In Wine Is Truth — of course the wine they meant by that was
                                                                      actually “visionary plant beverage”, so the *real* statement was “in visionary
                                                                      plants is truth”. Every time you read “wine” in Greco-Roman culture, always
                                                                      translate that to “visionary plants”.

                                                                      “The king drank wine and died and was miraculously brought back from the dead,
                                                                      and was divinized, and sacrificed to the gods in gratitude for protection and
                                                                      enlightenment” means “the egoic initiate ingested visionary plants,
                                                                      experienced self-control cancellation and cybernetic ego death, and was given
                                                                      the semblance of controllership again, now conceptually corrected to account
                                                                      for the secondary-only nature of the power wielded by personal control
                                                                      agency.”

                                                                      The greatest irony is that my father gave me the book Way of Zen as a gift,
                                                                      but I was so not into books and intellect, I wanted to give it back to him —
                                                                      I believe he said to keep it anyway. Later that year, I was inspired to look
                                                                      to that book because of a quest for control, and it was the main book I
                                                                      studied during 1996 and 1997.

                                                                      I adhered to studying that book because it framed enlightenment in terms of
                                                                      personal self-control cybernetics and sudden change of understanding, which is
                                                                      what I wanted and battled for and pursued with all my ability for two full
                                                                      years.

                                                                      In effect, I used Watts’ cybernetics explanation of Zen enlightenment to
                                                                      decode the Christian myth-religion’s salvation, regeneration, and conversion.
                                                                      The moment I secured a clarified understanding, the Core Theory, from Watts’
                                                                      system, I immediately turned toward using that Core Theory to similarly decode
                                                                      the Christian system. It was natural to assume that surely Christianity must
                                                                      be a garbled expression of the Core Theory, just as Zen Buddhism is a
                                                                      different garbled expression of the Core Theory.

                                                                      I did read other Watts books, and bought the Watts library, largely out of the
                                                                      principle of gratitude, because he was my enlightener, garbled and ill-focused
                                                                      as he was. I didn’t actually read his coverage of Christianity, though, until
                                                                      around when I was completing my theory-development of Christian myth-religion,
                                                                      2001-2003.

                                                                      Watts’ view of Christian has many valuable insights, helpful for
                                                                      world-religion perspective. However, like Wilber, he has little feel for
                                                                      Hellenistic mythic thinking; his style is conventional official Christianity
                                                                      and especially Indian metaphysics.

                                                                      A theory of enlightenment that fails to reveal the essential meaning and
                                                                      operation of the major world religions is worth much less and has not been
                                                                      proven and demonstrated as a sound theory.

                                                                      A theory of enlightenment that is successful in revealing the essential
                                                                      meaning and operation of the major world religions is worth much more, having
                                                                      been tested and proven and demonstrated as a sound theory. The ability to
                                                                      fully reveal the mystical meaning and dynamic operation of the major world
                                                                      religions is the greatest proof of the soundness and relevance of the theory.

                                                                      I am not committed to an in-depth study of Islam and Sufism, but I have a
                                                                      solid grasp of Christianity, and a good grasp of Zen, Buddhism, and world
                                                                      myth-religion in terms of the core theory.

                                                                      No theory of enlightenment is worth enough if it fails to fully and clearly
                                                                      reveal the mystical meaning and dynamic operation of the major world
                                                                      religions. If one has to look to the core theory to clearly and coherently
                                                                      see meaning in the world religions, that theory is well-supported and is the
                                                                      best and most adequate and effective theory available.

                                                                      The work of defining a core theory cannot be complete until the core theory is
                                                                      integrated into a whole theory that includes the peripheral application of the
                                                                      theory to explain and reveal clearly the meaning of the major world religions.
                                                                      In this sense, a person can’t be enlightened if they lack understanding of how
                                                                      enlightenment is reflected, in a distorted and garbled and obscured manner, in
                                                                      the world religions.


                                                                      References:

                                                                      The Way of Zen
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375705104

                                                                      Behold the Spirit: A Study in the Necessity of Mystical Religion
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0394717619

                                                                      Beyond Theology: The Art of Godmanship
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0394719239

                                                                      Myth and Ritual in Christianity
                                                                      Alan Watts
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0807013757


                                                                      Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
                                                                      Douglas Hofstadter
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465026567

                                                                      The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self & Soul
                                                                      Douglas Hofstadter (Editor), Daniel C. Dennett (Editor)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465030912


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1995 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Is understanding Cross myth nece. for enlightenment?
                                                                      >I used Watts’ Zen, not Christianity, to discover the heart of the Core
                                                                      >Theory — no-free-will on Dec. 12, 1997 and then block-universe
                                                                      >determinism on
                                                                      >Jan. 11, 1988.


                                                                      Correction: no-free-will on Dec. 12, 1987


                                                                      >The greatest irony is that my father gave me the book Way of Zen as a gift,
                                                                      >but I was so not into books and intellect, I wanted to give it back to him —
                                                                      >I believe he said to keep it anyway. Later that year, I was inspired to look
                                                                      >to that book because of a quest for control, and it was the main book I
                                                                      >studied during 1996 and 1997.


                                                                      Correction: Watts’ The Way of Zen was the main book I studied during *1986 and
                                                                      1987*.


                                                                      — Michael
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1996 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Mythic concepts of ransom, threat, and release-price
                                                                      Jesus-myth related ideas to consider from perspective of Roman culture:

                                                                      Paid the costly ransom price to set many prisoners/hostages free.

                                                                      Exchange negotiated: if you do X, we’ll free Y individuals and release the
                                                                      captives and permit them to live.

                                                                      How did the idea of the cross and ransom of prisoners develop?

                                                                      God/Fate/Ground of Being puts you as self-control agent in a self-control
                                                                      bind, where extreme doom is a vivid serious threat, and then makes a deal and
                                                                      releases you. This is the type of thinking needed to comprehend the mystical
                                                                      meaning of the Cross and similar godman saviors and divine sacrifices.

                                                                      Who and when rejected pure no-fw and insisted on genuine simple moral
                                                                      responsibility?


                                                                      Power-coercion dealing: I have the power to kill you or let you live. I will
                                                                      let you live if you do X. Coercively forcing someone’s will.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1997 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Myth-relig-mystm themes in Caesar miniseries
                                                                      Myth-religion-mysticism themes in the current Caesar 2-part TV miniseries

                                                                      According to part 1 of the , around 50 BC, Julius Caesar’s daughter’s teacher,
                                                                      Appolonius, a slave knowing all about philosophy, was released by the daughter
                                                                      from prison and from pending crucifixion. But he explained to her that he
                                                                      wanted to be crucified, because that was the way to his dignity. This was
                                                                      well before Christianity, and the logic is explained to some extent by Riley’s
                                                                      book. Slaves and many crucified men are shown in the movie.

                                                                      Crucifixion and ransomed release was portrayed. Julius and fellow travellers
                                                                      were tied to crosses in the rising sea by pirates. Breathing challenges and
                                                                      the slow unavoidable, inevitable, predestined, fatal necessity of death would
                                                                      be similar to that of regular crucifixion. After the prisoners were put in
                                                                      this situation of fatal destiny, they bargained a ransom/release price with
                                                                      the pirates.

                                                                      A main theme was that the pirate empire/kingdom cut off Rome’s Egyptian grain
                                                                      supply and the city was destined to run out of grain.

                                                                      The goths are walled in and the men have to decide whether to eat each other
                                                                      to survive, or release their women and children like a sacrifice to the gods
                                                                      to keep their gods alive.


                                                                      Cupbearing pretty dolled-up boys are shown. (Cupbearers are supposed to drink
                                                                      the king’s wine to test it for poison. The dictator is poisoned to death.

                                                                      Distrust of kings (dictators) is portrayed vividly, and the fear that Julius
                                                                      would be made king — part of the basis for the Jesus lifestory. The senate
                                                                      is terrified of themselves, of each other, with complete paranoia, fearing
                                                                      that giving too much power to one of them will surely corrupt the leader,
                                                                      forming a tyrannical dictatorship that discards all civilized laws and
                                                                      rampantly murders many enemies. The problem of enmity and trust dominates,
                                                                      and allies switching sides, and complete inability to trust anyone.

                                                                      Power-coercion deals are shown several times. I have the power to kill you or
                                                                      let you live. I will let you live if you do X (that benefits me).

                                                                      When standing up to the dictator, Julius claims descent from the gods, and has
                                                                      a (coat of arms?) to prove it.

                                                                      Coercively forcing someone’s will: unlike Julius, (Proclus?) caved into the
                                                                      dictator and let his will be coercively forced: the dictator permitted him to
                                                                      live, and P. divorced his wife in return.


                                                                      One Jesus, Many Christs: The Truth About Christian Origins
                                                                      Gregory Riley
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060667990/qid=1057004340/sr=1-1
                                                                      /ref=sr_1_1/103-0050335-6858258?v=glance&s=books
                                                                      Jesus as Greco-Roman hero. Myth and divinisation in hero stories of the day.

                                                                      Heroism as a mystical metaphor is opening up to my Core Theory. Being a hero
                                                                      means to choose death and personal integrity (and perfect willingness even to
                                                                      suffer) over life and non-integrity. Always read “death” first as “ego
                                                                      death”, not bodily death.


                                                                      When the dictator said to bring the heart of Julius, a pig’s heart was passed
                                                                      off as that of Julius. This would explain sacrifice of pigs: their hearts
                                                                      look just like a human heart. A pig’s heart is given to represent you giving
                                                                      up your own heart.

                                                                      A pierced heart in Greco-Roman myth symbolizes “inevitable, unavoidable, fated
                                                                      death” — death by realizing fatedness.


                                                                      A tragic mask, perhaps a gorgon death-mask (like a decaying head) was shown,
                                                                      used by a childrens’ entertainer. The subject is Alexander cutting the
                                                                      gordion knot prior to world conquest. I think the god Apollo was shown
                                                                      whispering the solution to Alexander.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1998 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Fatal Necessity
                                                                      The concept of Fated Necessity ties into the Cross symbol in two ways: pierced
                                                                      heart means inevitable death, and being hung from the cross is a “death by
                                                                      eventual inevitability”.

                                                                      The ideas ‘fatal’ and ‘fated’ are closely related. Fatal necessity and fated
                                                                      necessity are synomyns, and ‘fate’ and ‘death’ may be closely related. You
                                                                      abandon an infant “to its fate”, which we would say “to its death”. Death
                                                                      (bodily death) is the fate in store for all of us; we merely lack knowledge of
                                                                      its time (something like this was said to gladiators in the movie Gladiator).

                                                                      A fatal wound, often by poisoned blade, especially means that one is still
                                                                      alive and in command of oneself, but inevitably fated to soon die. A recovery
                                                                      would be a miracle in a classic sense.

                                                                      Recovery from the state of powerless ego death is a classic kind of miracle;
                                                                      stable personal control is returned to the mystic for no comprehensible
                                                                      (logical, tangible) reason; stable controllership is now experienced as a pure
                                                                      generous gift descending upon the mind from the transcendent realm. This idea
                                                                      is reflected in the idea of compassionate generous protector deities
                                                                      throughout world religion, including taking refuge in the Buddha.

                                                                      If the mythic godman idea restores stability and new, lasting integrity to the
                                                                      psyche during ego death, so may we allegorically say through parallelling ego
                                                                      death and bodily death, that the godman gives us new, lasting integrity and
                                                                      eternal life after bodily death. Also, heros are divinized and perpetually
                                                                      remembered and thereby made immortal after bodily death — living in memory as
                                                                      divinized.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1999 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Historical development of godman ransom allegory
                                                                      Consider how ransom works in a Roman battle, where the war is between our
                                                                      power as personal (perhaps “egoic”) control agents and God’s power.

                                                                      Who can pay an infinite ransom price to God? What person do we have that is
                                                                      so valued by God, he’ll gladly release us in exchange? As “leader of the
                                                                      enemy army”, God doesn’t really want to kill us; he wants to *use* us as
                                                                      ransomed hostages, using the threat of killing us, to coerce the collective
                                                                      will of our people, or our leaders, to hand over our most valuable leader, our
                                                                      king.

                                                                      So we are made to want to have a king that we can hand over to God in order to
                                                                      set all of us (members of that king’s kingdom and army) free.

                                                                      A battle of us against God: he has us in his grip; he has captured us and is
                                                                      holding us ransom. His deal is that if our side gives over our most valuable
                                                                      person on our side — our king & military leader — God will permit us to live
                                                                      and release us. How can we have such a valuable king? God gives his son as
                                                                      the king for us to give to God to fulfill God’s high ransom price to release
                                                                      us and set us free.

                                                                      There was some debate over whether the ransom price was paid to the Devil
                                                                      (personification of egoic deluded freewill controllership) or paid by God to
                                                                      himself.

                                                                      Within this framework of thinking, the moment the spacetime-affixed,
                                                                      fate-threatened captive mystic calls out “ok, we will hand over our king
                                                                      (Jesus) if you release us”, God sets the mystics free and there is peace
                                                                      between the military force of God and the control-power of our side. The
                                                                      military enemy leader, God, demands a high ransom price to release us — an
                                                                      extremely valuable king. We do not have, of ourselves, such an extremely or
                                                                      infinitely valuable king. Then how can we be set free?

                                                                      God the hostile military commander holding us captive with a death threat, out
                                                                      of infinite undeserved generosity, provides us with such a valuable king —
                                                                      his own son. Because it is his own son, provided now as our own military
                                                                      leader and king, God thereby effectively brings us over to his side, away from
                                                                      the Devil’s armies. We are released and now owned by God, and have been —
                                                                      switching the ideas around symmetrically — ransomed from being held by the
                                                                      Devil.

                                                                      This is the general type of analysis to use in making sense out of the idea of
                                                                      Jesus as ransom sacrifice to set us free — it makes sense if viewed from the
                                                                      proper context of Roman warfare conventions. This does not mean that
                                                                      enlightenment, mystic ego death and release into new reconciled and
                                                                      enlightened freedom is “the” way to understand transcendent knowledge or the
                                                                      Jesus figure or mythic godmen.

                                                                      This is one of many allegories describing the experience of spacetime fixity,
                                                                      coercion of the mystic’s will by the uncontrollable transcendent controller,
                                                                      and the homeostatic state shift from one stable controllership state (egoic
                                                                      thinking) to another (transcendent thinking).

                                                                      Unfortunately for me as intellectual laborer pressed for time, this means that
                                                                      there is no single reading of the Cross as allegory, or Christian myth. I’m
                                                                      still forced to spend time doing a separate analysis of Abraham’s willingness
                                                                      to sacrifice Isaac, and the idea of the sacrificial lamb — even explaining
                                                                      two such close things as Abraham’s lamb sacrifice and the Passover lamb
                                                                      sacrifice require two distinct explanations in terms of the cybernetic
                                                                      self-control model of mystic experiencing and insight.

                                                                      The Christian myth-system is complex, not a single meaning or a single puzzle.
                                                                      It is a complex, large set of mythic-mystic-experiencing puzzles to solve.
                                                                      However, the idea of “ransom” is one of the main descriptions of the main myth
                                                                      (the Cross) of the main religion (Christianity). I have justified why a
                                                                      cybernetics theory of enlightenment must explain Christianity, but I have yet
                                                                      to select which of the Christian mythic episodes or aspects are most
                                                                      important.

                                                                      I have yet to pin down exactly who and why, the Jesus version of the
                                                                      Hellenistic mystery-religion & myth took off. Who actually “pushed” it, who
                                                                      actually initially created it, who so loved the later idea of adding the Jesus
                                                                      lifestory to the totally abstract “Jesus’ cross” Pauline idea?

                                                                      Who created, promoted, and embraced the gospel story (with the Romans, last
                                                                      supper, trial, betrayal, crucifixion, removal, and ascension), when, and why?
                                                                      Who liked it at the very start, and why — and who liked it later, and why?
                                                                      When did the “ransom” notion become prominent: is it “original”, starting when
                                                                      the gospel storyline was created, or is it earlier, in the Pauline letters?

                                                                      Does the ransom idea appear in the other mythic mystery-religions, such as
                                                                      Attis and Osiris and Dionysus? Was the Jesus myth embraced because the
                                                                      military ransom and political theme was so relevant and moving to people of
                                                                      various classes, while Attis, Osisis, and Dionysus seemed too fantastic and
                                                                      not the most worthy allegorical framework to lay over the standard Hellenistic
                                                                      core entheogenic initiation technology?

                                                                      A strong candidate I’m proposing lately is that everyone understood the
                                                                      mythic-mystic-state meaning of all the myths and recognized the brilliant
                                                                      relevance of this particular story, which was set among “the Jews” as a
                                                                      fictional backdrop because the Jews generally represented the idea of loathing
                                                                      and resisting the domination system of Caesar. Maybe everyone was rooting for
                                                                      the Jews and loved them because they dared resist the Romans so much and chose
                                                                      death with integrity over honoring the system of Caesar.

                                                                      Maybe people didn’t give a damn about the Jews themselves, but *loved* the
                                                                      *idea* of choosing death with integrity over honoring the system of Caesar,
                                                                      and the Jews served well to represent that idea. The mythmakers and initiates
                                                                      were idea-people — moderns don’t grasp that, and assume that people had
                                                                      simple political and racial and religious divisions like we do.

                                                                      Perhaps the idea of “Jew” became synonymous with the idea of refusal to the
                                                                      death of honoring the system of Caesar; maybe “Jew” meant “one who refuses to
                                                                      honor the system of Caesar”. We can suppose with some confidence that the
                                                                      idea was hugely popular, of refusing to honor the system of Caesar, and this
                                                                      was the main reason why people loved the Jewish-extracted version of the
                                                                      Hellenistic godman.

                                                                      “I sure don’t want to literally be a Jew, but I’m all for the idea of refusing
                                                                      to honor the system of Caesar.” This would explain the rapidly growing
                                                                      popularity of the Jesus religion after the gospel storyline was created and
                                                                      prior to its takeover by the power hierarchy. Phases to analyze are then:

                                                                      1 CE — Gnostic godman, no Roman crucifixion storyline yet; Jesus is abstract
                                                                      wisdom personification per Paul.

                                                                      150 CE — Gospel storyline created: the Romans, last supper, trial, betrayal,
                                                                      crucifixion, removal, and ascension. Becomes popular in lower and middle
                                                                      classes. Starts becoming an independent State within the State.

                                                                      313 CE — Christianity co-opted and taken over by the power-hierarchy that it
                                                                      was designed to resist and repudiate.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2000 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/06/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Myth-relig-mystm themes in Caesar miniseries
                                                                      Fixed hyperlink:

                                                                      One Jesus, Many Christs: The Truth About Christian Origins
                                                                      Gregory Riley
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060667990
                                                                      Jesus as Greco-Roman hero
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2001 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: What books did Neil Peart read by 1976?
                                                                      >>reminisences about my days at a two-bit Canadian university, during
                                                                      1973-1976, where the students and faculty were light years ahead of any I’ve
                                                                      ever encountered down south

                                                                      >>Peart .. likely knew more about Greek myths, and Western culture in general,
                                                                      than the entire graduating class of NYU or Brown today.



                                                                      “In Germany … When you are 10 years old, you have to learn Latin and you
                                                                      translate Julius Caesar when you are 11″



                                                                      http://www.calendarlive.com/tv/cl-tv-coverstory29jun29,0,7073199.story?coll=cl
                                                                      -tvent — “‘Caesar’: A look at the man behind the icon — The makers of a new
                                                                      four-hour miniseries wanted to explore the ancient Roman leader’s early years
                                                                      and his rise to power.

                                                                      >>”On the set we did the ‘Monty Python’ test,” says director Uli Edel (“The
                                                                      Mists of Avalon”), referring to the genre spoofs performed by the famed
                                                                      British comedy troupe, particularly “Life of Brian,” set in biblical times.
                                                                      “Did it look like something from ‘Monty Python’? If it did then something must
                                                                      be wrong.”

                                                                      >>”I tried to be as truthful as possible and also find something new to say
                                                                      about Julius Caesar,” says Edel … “What do we know about Caesar? We know
                                                                      about Caesar and Cleopatra — the world-famous love story. But that is the old
                                                                      Caesar. He was over 50 when he met Cleopatra, and nobody has done anything
                                                                      about how he became that person. How did this man come from obscurity and
                                                                      become the most powerful man in the known world at the time?”

                                                                      >>Edel, who grew up in Germany, had long been a fan of Caesar. “I had nine
                                                                      years of Latin,” he says. “When you are 10 years old, you have to learn Latin
                                                                      and you translate Julius Caesar when you are 11. So he is around with you in
                                                                      your early age, torturing you! Actually he wrote very clear, very simple. I
                                                                      felt I was the right guy to do this. You can call it a dream project.”
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2002 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Jesus storyline partly based on Julius Caesar storyline
                                                                      Various important elements to construct the Jesus story were taken from the
                                                                      Julius Caesar story, but that the Jesus figure drew from many other sources as
                                                                      well — myths, legends, heroes, Jewish figures, Hellenistic literature,
                                                                      mystery religions, and so on.

                                                                      The simple story in the forthcoming books is that surprise, there was no
                                                                      Jesus, he is the Julius Caesar legend with some adjustments. Or some other
                                                                      single figure. But truth is more complex and compound and nuanced than that.

                                                                      The Jesus figure is essentially a composite figure drawing from all possible
                                                                      sources, spurred on by the drive to assimilate as much meaning and worth and
                                                                      glory onto a single figure as possible, in an arms race of extreme
                                                                      hyper-apotheosis. Why would those who are invested in him pass by a chance?

                                                                      They slapped on any and all additions they could possibly think of, to make a
                                                                      universal top dog figure. Even military victory is his, when he returns to
                                                                      set things straight. Scholars have to get it through their heads how
                                                                      mythmaking and literature of the day worked. The right frame of mind is
                                                                      suggested by thinking of it as deadly serious war of ink. Watch how
                                                                      desperately the Church Fathers scramble to force the Old Testament to support
                                                                      the legitimacy of their New Testament.

                                                                      It’s like the huge cover-up of what the War on Drugs is about: there are
                                                                      millions of dollars hanging on the propaganda and spin. Who profits from each
                                                                      addition to the Jesus figure; what are the motives? This is the only way to
                                                                      have a chance of unravelling the buried actuality behind the construction and
                                                                      development of the Jesus figure over time.

                                                                      Don’t underestimate the Greco-Romans: they were *geniuses* at this kind of
                                                                      syncretic mythmaking. Modern thinking doesn’t stand a chance until we can
                                                                      also mentally become those Greco-Romans. Even though I have my own candidate
                                                                      for the key source of meaning for constructing the Jesus figure — that wine
                                                                      is the touchpoint and key to all aspects of Greco-Roman culture — the wine
                                                                      theme must also be relegated to just one domain of *many* that were drawn
                                                                      from.

                                                                      Which theme or which man or which domain was the *real* source for
                                                                      constructing the Jesus figure? The entirety of Greco-Roman culture. To
                                                                      fathom the history of constructing the Jesus figure, firmly grasp all aspects
                                                                      of Greco-Roman culture and mentally exist in it.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2003 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Heinrich remains agnostic on historicity of Jesus
                                                                      Michael wrote:
                                                                      >>Jesus is an entirely mythic representation of the specific metaphysical
                                                                      experience and conceptual realization which Hellenistic mystery-religion
                                                                      initiates and Jewish mystics underwent subsequent to ingesting the sacred food
                                                                      and mixed wine of the ritual meals that were standard and ubiquitous in the
                                                                      Hellenistic world.

                                                                      >>Clark Heinrich conceded that, in contrast to the new edition of Strange
                                                                      Fruit (Magic Mushrooms), which takes for granted the literal existence of a
                                                                      historical Jesus.


                                                                      Correction: Heinrich’s 2nd edition, and his current view, is agnostic about
                                                                      the historicity of Jesus.

                                                                      Page 107: “That Jesus even existed is a matter of some debate, but whether or
                                                                      not he ever lived is unimportant for the purpose of our hypothesis, because
                                                                      even if he did, many events of his life could have been invented and ordered
                                                                      in such a way that the unwritten secrets of his cult were hidden within the
                                                                      story… There may well have been a real Jesus… who performed the duties of
                                                                      hierophant … It is also possible that Jesus… was a cultic title
                                                                      designating the position of Initiator within the cult… We also know that
                                                                      the name “Jesus,” the Greek version of Yeshua, was considered to have magical
                                                                      properties of its own… My intention was not to prove whether or not Jesus
                                                                      existed but rather to look for correspondences between the Jesus *story* and
                                                                      the life cycle of the fly agaric mushroom.”


                                                                      Magic Mushrooms in Religion and Alchemy
                                                                      Clark Heinrich
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0892819979


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2004 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      This is my book review — or rather recommendation — posted today. There is
                                                                      already plenty of description of the content of the book at Amazon. Although
                                                                      some of my reviews have been detailed, I instead want to be more forcefully
                                                                      persuasive in getting people to actually buy and read these books. Merkur’s
                                                                      books are an invaluable contribution to a field that urgently needs more
                                                                      books, to provide a new paradigm strong and broad enough to convert people
                                                                      from the old paradigm of puzzlement.


                                                                      The Mystery of Manna: The Psychedelic Sacrament of the Bible
                                                                      Dan Merkur
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0892817720
                                                                      Jan. 2000

                                                                      5 stars

                                                                      Anyone interested in the entheogen theory of religion should definitely read
                                                                      this book. It is well-written and scholarly. The field is inherently
                                                                      speculative at this early point. This is a much-needed valuable contribution
                                                                      to religion studies.

                                                                      Today’s situation is a perfect example of a paradigm shift: if you examine
                                                                      each hypothesis separately and each book on the subject separately, and assume
                                                                      the dominant paradigm or non-theory of “those crazy and primitive ancients are
                                                                      simply unfathomable and alien to our way of thinking,” you’ll be able to
                                                                      easily dismiss each hypothesis and each book.

                                                                      But when you consider the still-small set of all books and articles about the
                                                                      entheogen theory of religion, a viable alternative paradigm is coming into
                                                                      view. This new paradigm, within which Merkur is only one of a growing number
                                                                      of researchers, is readily yielding specific plausible hypotheses, while the
                                                                      official dominant view has no hypotheses other than “the ancients’ minds
                                                                      operated differently than ours, and we simple can’t comprehend them, and they
                                                                      were remarkably excitable by wine — lightweights, unlike us.”

                                                                      Therefore, any one book in this field cannot be reasonably evaluated in
                                                                      isolation; instead, read Merkur’s book Psychedelic Sacrament, Clark Heinrich’s
                                                                      1995 book Strange Fruit, which also has coverage of ergot in the Old
                                                                      Testament, and several other books in the field of the entheogen theory of
                                                                      religion. Only then are you reasonably equipped to assess how much this book
                                                                      contributes to our understanding of the history of religion and the nature of
                                                                      religious experiencing.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2005 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Review of Dan Merkur’s book The Psychedelic Sacrament
                                                                      Here is my updated Amazon review, posted today. I’ve updated my phrasing and
                                                                      expressions, and switched from a paradigm of “entheogens are rare and
                                                                      suppressed” to a paradigm of “entheogens are ubiquitous, standard, and
                                                                      somewhat suppressed”.


                                                                      The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical Experience
                                                                      Dan Merkur
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/089281862X
                                                                      http://www.parkstpress.com/titles/psysac.htm
                                                                      http://shop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?isbn=089281862X


                                                                      Entheogenic, rational, short-session mysticism
                                                                      5 stars

                                                                      Merkur shows the existence of a more or less continuous tradition of
                                                                      psychoactive Western religion. Various separate threads of mystic techniques
                                                                      have sometimes come together to form an approach to the mystic altered state
                                                                      that is based on rational reflection, together with short-session use of
                                                                      visionary plants, rather than continuous long-term meditation.

                                                                      This book associates a seemingly overlooked tradition of short-session
                                                                      meditation with the use of psychoactive, visionary plants. The use of
                                                                      psychoactives enables a more rationality-oriented approach and obviates the
                                                                      need to constantly meditate for long-term periods. This entheogen-using,
                                                                      short-session, rational form of mysticism is being increasingly recognized
                                                                      throughout Western history. Meditation, psychoactives, and rational thinking
                                                                      can be and historically have been brought together to augment each other.

                                                                      Merkur helps entheogen researchers focus not only on revealing the presence of
                                                                      particular plants in mystic-state practices, but also on the traditions of
                                                                      using the plants in a shared religious framework and reflecting on the
                                                                      experiences produced by the visionary plants. The field of mysticism greatly
                                                                      needs such coverage of the important and challenging semi-secret tradition of
                                                                      not only entheogen use, but entheogen use combined with rational mysticism and
                                                                      short-session meditation.

                                                                      I don’t think Merkur is claiming that the mystics who combine these approaches
                                                                      claim that every aspect of mystic experiencing is entirely rationally
                                                                      explainable and conceptually tangible; the vision of the transcendent cosmic
                                                                      throne may still include a certain aspect that is, in a way, beyond the reach
                                                                      of complete, direct conceptualization.

                                                                      Despite the seemingly entrenched assumptions that mysticism is inherently slow
                                                                      and laborious, drug-free, and non-rational, rational short-session meditation
                                                                      forms an effective alternative tradition or alternative view of what approach
                                                                      makes sense. This proposal contradicts the dominant assumptions about the
                                                                      techniques and conventions of mysticism: the assumption, perhaps misguided,
                                                                      that mysticism ideally should not use psychoactives, is not
                                                                      rationality-oriented, and must be conducted for extended, endlessly long
                                                                      meditation periods. In some semi-obscured traditions that are recently coming
                                                                      to light, these approaches have come together naturally and effectively.

                                                                      This seems similar to the “lightning-bolt” short-path variety of Buddhist
                                                                      meditation technique as portrayed by James Arthur in Mushrooms and Mankind,
                                                                      which points out that Vajrayana was created by combining Tantric Buddhism and
                                                                      the native Bon shamanism of Tibet. The approach Merkur describes also seems
                                                                      equivalent to the evident visionary-state experiencing on tap in the
                                                                      Hellenistic mystery-religions, in which a person commonly undergoes a moderate
                                                                      number of limited-duration initiations to achieve spiritual purification and
                                                                      mental transformation, reshaping the mind’s conception of the self by the
                                                                      encounter with transcendent experiencing.

                                                                      Merkur, as psychologist, contrasts the experience of loss of the sense of
                                                                      personal freedom, which he portrays as being conventional mysticism, with a
                                                                      supposedly different experience of a psychoactive rational mysticism that
                                                                      involves panic attacks. However, I’d point out that the loss of the sense of
                                                                      being a metaphysically free agent is integral to a mystic-state panic attack.
                                                                      When the psychoactive perspective and self-sense, combined with rational
                                                                      analysis about our assumption of personal sovereign agency, suspends the sense
                                                                      of wielding metaphysically free power, that is the very cause and central
                                                                      vortex of the panic attack. The self-commanding part of the mind panics
                                                                      because the mind perceives the lack of metaphysical freedom and self-control,
                                                                      and sees the mind’s vulnerable dependence on the mysterious uncontrollable
                                                                      arising of personal control-thoughts, like discovering that one’s
                                                                      controllership is dependent on whatever happens to come up from an underground
                                                                      spring in a cave.

                                                                      Merkur uses the Psychology interpretive paradigm, but that would be
                                                                      strengthened by a stronger Philosophy of Metaphysics background, including the
                                                                      philosophy of time and responsible control agents. The book doesn’t really
                                                                      explain what the union with God experience, or the vision of the invisible
                                                                      transcendent controller on the cosmic throne above one’s personal
                                                                      controllership level, would be like for a modern entheogenic rational mystic.

                                                                      Merkur reveals the occasional conjunction of Western religion and
                                                                      psychoactives, and also a kind of rationality which I would call, with Ken
                                                                      Wilber, “vision-logic” or visionary rationality.

                                                                      Fortunately, this book does not depend on identifying mystic sacraments as any
                                                                      one visionary plant. There is consensus in the field of the entheogen theory
                                                                      of religion that it is more important to identify scriptural allusions to
                                                                      psychoactives, and find how psychoactives were combined with meditation and
                                                                      visionary rationality, than to identify the main and minor entheogens used.
                                                                      The important point is to recognize the terms “sacrament” or “manna” as
                                                                      meaning visionary plants.

                                                                      Subsections include The Necessity of Vision; Philo’s Meditative Practices;
                                                                      Other Varieties of Ecstasy in Philo; The Contemplative Practice of Aristotle;
                                                                      Discursive Meditations in Islam; Bernard on Intellectualist Mysticism; Bernard
                                                                      on Trance-Based Mysticism; Death and Resurrection at Sinai; Maimonides on
                                                                      Meditation, and others.

                                                                      Merkur provides essential coverage of primary religious experiencing at the
                                                                      origin and heart of Judeo-Christianity, providing highly valuable
                                                                      contributions that help to discovering the semi-suppressed tradition and
                                                                      history of entheogens in Western religion, as well as expanding our
                                                                      expectations about the nature of mystic experiencing. This book is a step
                                                                      toward covering entheogens casually as just one part, not especially novel or
                                                                      controversial, of a system of philosophy and religion.

                                                                      This scholarly book is clear, organized, and presents a focused and
                                                                      well-supported thesis — an excellent source for researchers to cite. Merkur
                                                                      is a clear writer who states where he’s headed, states why he’s covering
                                                                      subjects, and summarizes what he has established.

                                                                      An invaluable, much needed, must-have contribution to research in the history
                                                                      of mysticism, theory of mystic-state insight and experiencing, and the
                                                                      entheogen theory of religion.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2006 From: merker2002 Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Other Languages than English
                                                                      Most of the Entheogen-Theory of Religion books are only available in
                                                                      English. The German market on books of these types seems to be
                                                                      nonexistant. In fact “Chemische Ekstase. Drogen und Religion. “,
                                                                      1971, by Walter Houston Clark ist the only title i found at
                                                                      Amazon.de. It’s out of print.

                                                                      I imagine that the other major European languages are no different
                                                                      (except English itself of course). No wonder people have not heard
                                                                      anything of these new ways of conceiving of Religion.

                                                                      This resource (the yahoo group) esp. your postings are very valuable
                                                                      because they offer highly interesting new facts/theories which serve
                                                                      as a basis (the blockuniverse theory of egodeath) as well as means
                                                                      of further exploration of the field.

                                                                      As i see it, this seems to be a quite singular group.
                                                                      Other groups with similar topics (determinism)(religions &
                                                                      entheogens) seem very uninspired to this one.

                                                                      So what i was getting at is: I’m wondering why this stuff still
                                                                      hasn’t found its way to more people. But i guess that will take
                                                                      care of itself once a critical mass has heard of this.

                                                                      regards,
                                                                      merker
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2007 From: merker2002 Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      Amazon does not list your review.
                                                                      review count: 2
                                                                      latest from 2001.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2008 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Apprehension of succeeding at revealing no-free-will etc.
                                                                      The significance for entheogen research is immense and near-total. This
                                                                      paradigm changes nearly everything. The entheogen scholars are far more
                                                                      correct than they have ever imagined, to the point that they no longer even
                                                                      know their own field.

                                                                      I am concerned that freewill consciousness and the official type of religion
                                                                      that supported it might collapse because of my work and others’ subsequent
                                                                      work in this area. Wilber has always agreed with the Hegelian notion of
                                                                      progress of consciousness through prehistoric, ancient, classic, medieval,
                                                                      modern, and postmodern eras.

                                                                      I’ve always felt there is some sort of consciousness development over Western
                                                                      history, but that Wilber is misreading key aspects of the heart of this
                                                                      consciousness development: I have always read it as a movement from
                                                                      no-free-will, to freewill thinking during the Christianity-dominated era, to
                                                                      eventual no-free-will thinking again, perhaps in the 21st Century.

                                                                      Recently I wondered if Wilber was completely wrong — that the supposed
                                                                      Hegelian history of consciousness is a sheer delusion of the scholars — I
                                                                      said this based on the theory that the Greeks were not mysteriously different
                                                                      in their psychology, but that they merely used entheogens.

                                                                      My ideas today are the same as those I formerly held, but now, I realize just
                                                                      how sweeping and extensive the use of entheogenic “wine” was: imagine a
                                                                      society that has the same brains as moderns, and basically the same mental
                                                                      models through adolescence, but then everyone uses entheogenic “wine” all the
                                                                      time — not just in 1-time or occasional initiations, not just in religion,
                                                                      but all the time, in all activities, practically every day.

                                                                      I previously imagined, like the entheogen scholars, that the Greeks had just a
                                                                      tiny bit of entheogen use, completely lost later during the Christian era.

                                                                      The true essence of historical development of psychology may be from
                                                                      ubiquitous use of entheogens, entirely eliminating freewill thinking from the
                                                                      adult world, resulting in an entire society based on no-free-will thinking,
                                                                      among other such societies. During the Christian era, entheogens were common,
                                                                      but were semi-suppressed, and the Church officially insisted on freewill
                                                                      thinking, even while always insisting on God’s sovereignty and even cosmic
                                                                      determinism. That lasted through the modern era.

                                                                      The fate of postmodernity may well be a return to no-free-will thinking
                                                                      combined with entheogen use, perhaps while retaining modern, ordinary
                                                                      state-of-consciousness, adult egoic thinking and the social structures founded
                                                                      on such thinking. I propose using entheogens in moderation and adopting
                                                                      no-free-will thinking in moderation, and instead of mourning for freewill
                                                                      deluded thinking, take it fairly seriously: value it, protect and preserve it.

                                                                      When an individual in the modern era, in the 1960s through 1980s, was brought
                                                                      to realization of no-free-will, it was apocalyptic: a revelation of the actual
                                                                      nearness of the end of the dominance of modern egoic societal consciousness.

                                                                      “Jump Into The Fire”
                                                                      Harry Nilsson, 1971

                                                                      You can climb a mountain
                                                                      You can swim the sea
                                                                      You can jump into the fire
                                                                      But you’ll never be free, no no

                                                                      On a 1997 radio show “The History of Classic Rock”, I heard the apocalypse of
                                                                      the early 1970s, the day the music died; some 26 years earlier, freewill
                                                                      thinking took a fatal spearing of the heart, leading inevitably to its death.
                                                                      Through bubbling audio distortion, the full album Led Zeppelin IV played, time
                                                                      stopped, this passing age had been speared and the end was inevitably near for
                                                                      collective freewill thinking.

                                                                      Led Zeppelin IV
                                                                      http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Ace8m968o3ep1
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000002J09

                                                                      This is the secret apocalypse of early 1970s Rock (but now we look back and
                                                                      even more strongly realize the scale of this change when we realize that the
                                                                      foundation of our culture, the Greeks, used entheogens constantly, not rarely,
                                                                      and thereby didn’t based their culture on freewill thinking, but rather, on
                                                                      no-free-will thinking. The fact that they thought in that mode, makes for a
                                                                      much more awesome effect than if we had just discovered no-free-will like some
                                                                      modern technological discovery.

                                                                      The realization and recognition that the ancients used entheogens infinitely
                                                                      more than we could have imagined, and that they, as a result, considered
                                                                      freewill thinking only fit for ignorant children and beasts, when added to the
                                                                      purely modern discovery of no-free-will, adds up to a massive, compelling
                                                                      effect.

                                                                      Our first move should be to affirm the priceless preciousness of building a
                                                                      culture based on freewill thinking, and retain all the value and goodness of
                                                                      such a culture of freewill thinking, a culture that produced many mental and
                                                                      cultural structures that are valuable. Then we should seek to *integrate* the
                                                                      new/old no-free-will thinking with the modern freewill thinking, and then we
                                                                      should seek to better grasp no-free-will thinking.

                                                                      Did I ever want to be the chosen one to break the news? I was injected with
                                                                      desire to discover transcendent knowledge and spread it; like so many
                                                                      self-help writers and thinkers, that has been my purpose ever since halfway
                                                                      through my struggle toward experientially discovering no-free-will and the
                                                                      block universe.

                                                                      Many have wanted to break the spell and bring enlightenment, but the
                                                                      enlightenment I found is not the one most are looking for, except Ramesh
                                                                      Balsekar – but he has no entheogen theory or historical revelations of that
                                                                      surprising root of Greek culture.

                                                                      I don’t want to be the chosen one, of the real end of modern consciousness, to
                                                                      fully and clearly break such powerful and potentially dangerous news, like
                                                                      Einstein pointing to the possibility of the bomb, with all its dangerous
                                                                      ambiguity and chilling neutrality: it’s just a tool, a tool that could be used
                                                                      for good or not. No one can say what will happen, only that they
                                                                      possibilities are alien and superhuman, like Hofmann’s discovery of LSD on the
                                                                      white bicycle, or Leary’s discovery of the effects of psilocybin by the pool.

                                                                      To strive for what I now know I’m striving for is like flying the
                                                                      bomb-dropping airplane and then having second thoughts while following orders,
                                                                      just before arriving at the target. I can only suppose that if I don’t
                                                                      deliver this surprising, unexpected, ambiguous and not necessarily
                                                                      well-received news, there are many more people waiting in the wings to do the
                                                                      job.

                                                                      The highly ambiguous news I bring is: no-free-will, entheogens reveal
                                                                      no-free-will, Jesus figure means entheogens & no-free-will, all ancient
                                                                      “wine”/”mead” was effectively psilocybin beverage and their culture was, as a
                                                                      result, based on no-free-will.

                                                                      If I don’t break this news, someone else will, and the world could do worse
                                                                      than to have me as the messenger. I advocate simple reasonable freewill
                                                                      moral-agency ethics even though freewill is largely a conventional illusion.
                                                                      Convention is priceless and the greatest collective gift and treasure.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2009 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Ancients didn’t believe in free will, used entheogens constantly
                                                                      Ken Wilber and other scholars have subtle speculative theories about how
                                                                      ancient man’s consciousness was different — for example, in ancient Greece.
                                                                      But more than anything, it comes down to two closely related things:

                                                                      1. They didn’t believe in freewill; they saw right through that delusion and
                                                                      ego death was common, standard and integrated into their worldmodel.

                                                                      2. They used entheogens all the time. We are not far from understanding anew,
                                                                      if we consider that whenever they say “wine” or “mead”, they mean powdered
                                                                      psilocybin mushroom beverage or another visionary plant, such as henbane.

                                                                      Both of these are enormous paradigm shifts in our understanding of religion
                                                                      and sociopolitical consciousness — particularly when considered together as
                                                                      one. The constant, very frequent use of entheogenic “wine” prevented an
                                                                      egoic-thinking based sociopolitical consciousness and psychology from
                                                                      developing.

                                                                      We can be grateful to the official Christian church for suppressing entheogens
                                                                      and repudiating Augustine’s weak acceptance of freewill, and its insistence on
                                                                      taking freewill seriously even while attempting to retain transcendent
                                                                      determinism. The Church did, through force of power and suppression of
                                                                      entheogens, what is logically impossible: in effect, insisting on both genuine
                                                                      metaphysical freewill moral agency and transcendent determinism.

                                                                      We’ve been a society mainly of what the ancients would say is deluded and
                                                                      psychically dirty, impure children — a society dominated by the uninitiated
                                                                      consciousness. You know that feeling of being an independent modern freewill
                                                                      agent — modern consciousness? That’s the result of taking freewill seriously
                                                                      even into adulthood, and eliminating genuine initiation which is initiation
                                                                      into the consciousness of no-free-will, which reshapes the mental worldmodel.
                                                                      We are a global society of minds that are, for the most part, unshaped by
                                                                      contact with transcendent mental dynamics.

                                                                      These individual points I have posted before, but today when continuing to
                                                                      read Burkert’s book Greek Religion, it struck me with full force as an
                                                                      enormous paradigm shift, a kind of major breakthrough. I previously read
                                                                      books that either treated “Greek myths”, or treated “Hellenistic
                                                                      mystery-religions”. Even Luther Martin’s book “Hellenistic Religion” omits
                                                                      too much myth and omits all the rest of culture though every aspect of Greek
                                                                      culture was directly linked to religion. Our modern mistake is to consider
                                                                      Hellenistic “religion” as something isolated from other areas.

                                                                      Greek Religion
                                                                      Walter Burkert
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674362810

                                                                      The book has many entheogenic egodeath metaphors — “wine” is everywhere, and
                                                                      mythic metaphors are everywhere. For example: The two girls in the sacred
                                                                      mountain sanctuary opened the basket lid, and what they saw so frightened
                                                                      them, they fell over the edge to their death.

                                                                      Even if the “wine” was only entheogenic a minority of the time, it was clearly
                                                                      thought of as entheogenic all the time, and the whole culture was based on the
                                                                      idea and influence of entheogenic wine, which is to say, based on
                                                                      no-free-will.

                                                                      Now that I have studied mystery-religions, myth, religious experiencing
                                                                      separately, I picked up Burkert’s book for the second time and this time, it
                                                                      all makes sense, based on the key assumptions: that “wine” means effectively
                                                                      “psilocybin beverage” (and they always were drinking “wine”), and that they —
                                                                      the adults — didn’t believe in freewill.

                                                                      First I asked entheogen scholars to try discarding the historical Jesus
                                                                      assumption and framework of thinking and try the benefits and potentials of a
                                                                      no-literal-Jesus framework of thinking. They have made that step. Next, I
                                                                      have a less moderate proposal that is far more than they ever signed on for:
                                                                      not only did they use entheogens secretly in some mystery-religion initiations
                                                                      once in a lifetime, but rather, they used entheogens more like constantly, all
                                                                      the time, every day.

                                                                      Entheogens were totally integrated and not only that, but were the very
                                                                      foundation of not just mystery initiation, not just religion, but every aspect
                                                                      of war, sacrifice, religion, psychology, philosophy, literature, marriage,
                                                                      banquets, festivals, travel, sports, politics, and every other aspect of
                                                                      culture. Just as modern atheist sobriety and the ordinary state of
                                                                      consciousness is our touchpoint and reality basis, their touchpoint and
                                                                      reality basis was entheogenic “wine”.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2010 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Heinrich remains agnostic on historicity of Jesus
                                                                      Heinrich published the same view back in the 1995 edition of the book, Strange
                                                                      Fruit.

                                                                      This means Heinrich is an author I read (cover to cover) shortly before I
                                                                      started reading the mythic-only Jesus books. I was trying to remember the
                                                                      details of when my view changed and why. That is, I credit Heinrich as one
                                                                      person who sparked my serious consideration of the question.

                                                                      The first time I heard of no-Jesus was when searching on “jesus and mushroom”
                                                                      in the univ. library, and found the Christian rebuttal of Allegro. Then I
                                                                      read Allegro, then Strange Fruit, and then, probably after, read Doherty’s
                                                                      Jesus Puzzle, then the other no-Jesus books.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2011 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Other Languages than English
                                                                      >Most of the Entheogen-Theory of Religion books are only available in
                                                                      >English. The German market on books of these types seems to be
                                                                      >nonexistant. In fact “Chemische Ekstase. Drogen und Religion. “,
                                                                      >1971, by Walter Houston Clark ist the only title i found at
                                                                      >Amazon.de. It’s out of print.


                                                                      >I imagine that the other major European languages are no different
                                                                      >(except English itself of course). No wonder people have not heard
                                                                      >anything of these new ways of conceiving of Religion.


                                                                      German-language scholarship about the roots of Christianty seems to be decades
                                                                      ahead of the English-speaking scholarship, which gave itself a lobotomy in
                                                                      fear of what it was discovering in the early 20th Century.

                                                                      http://www.hermann-detering.de


                                                                      >This resource (the yahoo group) esp. your postings are very valuable
                                                                      >because they offer highly interesting new facts/theories which serve
                                                                      >as a basis (the blockuniverse theory of egodeath) as well as means
                                                                      >of further exploration of the field.


                                                                      >As i see it, this seems to be a quite singular group.
                                                                      >Other groups with similar topics (determinism)(religions &
                                                                      >entheogens) seem very uninspired to this one.


                                                                      I’m trying to get all the elephant, not just stopping upon feeling one leg of
                                                                      it or just the trunk or tail.


                                                                      >I’m wondering why this stuff still
                                                                      >hasn’t found its way to more people. But i guess that will take
                                                                      >care of itself once a critical mass has heard of this.


                                                                      By working with no-free-will, entheogen theory of religion, and mythic-only
                                                                      Jesus together, this has formed the right, effective key to leap years ahead
                                                                      of those who retain conventional paradigm and try to only change one of these
                                                                      at a time. This theory sits atop the other theories but also greatly modifies
                                                                      them; this theory is possible by combining a potently modified version of each
                                                                      of the other more bounded theories.

                                                                      For example, I really shake my head at those who show there was no Jesus, and
                                                                      think their work is done — and same with those who find mythic allusion to
                                                                      visionary plants themselves and think they are done. The atheist no-Jesus
                                                                      scholars don’t even know their own area of research, because they lack the key
                                                                      context, the bigger framework that as much revolutionizes seemingly unrelated
                                                                      domains. Similarly, most entheogen researchers have no more familiarity with
                                                                      no-free-will than any educated person.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2012 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Bk review: Merkur: Mystery of Manna
                                                                      >Amazon does not list your review.
                                                                      >review count: 2
                                                                      >latest from 2001.

                                                                      Check in a week.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2013 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Appeal of early, anti-Jewish JC: moral resistance figure
                                                                      Explanation of the wide appeal of the early, anti-Jewish Jesus — essentially
                                                                      a moral-resistance version of the idea of a hero/godman


                                                                      Why was there such a widespread appeal of the “Jewish” version of the godman
                                                                      savior hero figure Jesus? The following portrayal is incorrect in various
                                                                      points — but is a fitting solution to the problem. The basic strategy is
                                                                      two-phase:

                                                                      Phase 1, diverse schools and very diverse versions of Jesus — most with a
                                                                      Cross, some without — varying degrees of Jewishness. That becomes popular,
                                                                      and shouldn’t be thought of as an emphatically *Jewish* crucified figure yet.
                                                                      When figuring out the main mystical functioning of “the” Jesus figure and
                                                                      “the” Cross, *this* is the Jesus — or set of Jesuses to abstract from — to
                                                                      figure out and decode mystically. In this phase, people liked this flexible
                                                                      Jesus figure as an effective moral resistance figurehead, and there was no
                                                                      oppressively Jewish element yet, and no Old Testament welded in that one had
                                                                      to read and consider.

                                                                      Phase 2, forced joining of these Jesuses and these groups into the appearance
                                                                      of a single religion, with Old Testament stolen away from the Jews, to use as
                                                                      a ready-made source of ancient authorization for the new religion. Inject OT
                                                                      elements and more Jewish elements into the earlier Jesus lifestory, eventually
                                                                      add Acts, Revelation, and pastoral epistles.


                                                                      Reading Acharya S’ book Christ Conspiracy,
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/ChristConspiracyTableOfContents.htm
                                                                      together with other research, the Jesus figure seems to have been constructed
                                                                      in phases such as the following. Marcion’s gnostic-Pauline Jesus figure
                                                                      wasn’t originally oppressively Jewish to an alienating extent; he was made
                                                                      into an emphatically Jewish figure, with lots of desperately “discovered” Old
                                                                      Testament connections, around 170 CE.

                                                                      http://www.webcom.com/~gnosis/library/marcion.htm – The Gospel of the Lord


                                                                      1. The diversity-of-prototypes phase. Marcion (Asia Minor & Alexandria)
                                                                      writes prototypes of the Pauline epistles ~140 – these epistles have little
                                                                      Jewish content, no Jesus lifestory, abstract Cross per canonical “genuine”
                                                                      Paulines. Then Marcion writes “Gospel of the Lord” – a Jesus lifestory
                                                                      without an oppressive amount of alienating Jewish elements (this Jesus
                                                                      lifestory doesn’t assume that it is packaged together with the Jewish, “Old
                                                                      Testament” scriptures — it’s more standalone).

                                                                      The Marcion bible is the first version of New Testament — and Marcion rejects
                                                                      the Old Testament; wants an NT that stands on its own, packaged without the
                                                                      OT, and making little reference to the OT. Imagine today’s Bible minus the OT
                                                                      and minus the Jewish features, Acts, and Revelation. Just one proto-gospel
                                                                      with a merely mildly Jewish Jesus, and some ten proto-Pauline epistles with
                                                                      little Jewish content — that’s it, that’s the first version of a Bible and
                                                                      presents the first version of the Jesus lifestory.

                                                                      Marcion’s reconstructed proto-epistles and proto-gospel may be online. At
                                                                      this point, there is a gnostic, merely mildly Jewish lifestory of Jesus, the
                                                                      crucified godman — set in Israel, perhaps based partly on the Julius Caesar
                                                                      story, but drawing from many other sources as well. This figure, a divinized
                                                                      hero figure alluding to slave resistance to the overall domination system,
                                                                      becomes popular as a gnostic mystery-religion and social support network.

                                                                      The motive of the Marcionites is to have a religion (including
                                                                      mystery-religion initiation) that is also an effective and relevant resistance
                                                                      movement and social support network. At this point, popularity of joining
                                                                      synagogues may be a separate equivalent movement. In addition to Marcionite
                                                                      groups, many other equivalent groups form, holding in common some sort of not
                                                                      particularly Jewish Jesus figure. This is the era of many diverse prototypes
                                                                      of Jesus-based schools, with many very different Jesuses and quasi-Jesus
                                                                      figures.


                                                                      2. The “make-uniform, forcibly gather together” phase.

                                                                      ~170, power-mongering bishops co-opt Marcion’s non-Jewish minimalist NT-only
                                                                      Bible from Marcion, co-opt the Jewish scriptures as the Old Testament to give
                                                                      a highly valuable “ancient lineage” (required, to appear authoritative), and
                                                                      insert Jewish elements in the Jesus lifestory and various references to the
                                                                      OT. At this point, there is now a specifically Jewish lifestory of Jesus, the
                                                                      crucified godman.

                                                                      The motive of these text manipulating mythmakers is to sweep together the
                                                                      synagogue social support networks, convert them to functionally equivalent
                                                                      Christian social support networks, increase their own control as bishops of
                                                                      these developing organizations. Sweep together the various gnostic schools.

                                                                      Gain full benefit of ancient Jewish heritage, but completely neuter the
                                                                      Jewishness of it, do away with all the following of the law — though if some
                                                                      schools exist that want to follow law, try to sweep them in, too — don’t be
                                                                      too rigid; be vague and lenient and universal. Sweep together as many
                                                                      schools, sects, groups as possible — use the appeal of the popular
                                                                      resistance-shaped mystery-religion and social support networks, to rope and
                                                                      coerce in as many of the diverse, various groups possible.


                                                                      So this two-phase analysis would largely explain the puzzling widespread
                                                                      appeal of a *Jewish* crucified figure as the basis for a mystery-religion and
                                                                      support network — the trick is, he *wasn’t* a very oppressively *Jewish*
                                                                      crucified godman figure, but just a more general crucified godman figure, who
                                                                      happened to be loosely a Jew, but more strongly set against Judaism — an
                                                                      anti-Jewish Jew.

                                                                      Therefore, I don’t think it makes much sense to ask what the earliest
                                                                      Christians saw of value in a *Jewish* crucified godman figure. The real
                                                                      situation to analyze is what the earliest Christians saw of value in a general
                                                                      crucified godman figure, or an anti-Jewish Jewish crucified godman figure.

                                                                      Forgetting about the Jewish aspect, except to note that Jews resisted Rome and
                                                                      were crucified, the question is, what did the earliest Christians see of value
                                                                      in a crucified godman figure, who had a lifestory like in Marcion’s Gospel of
                                                                      the Lord?

                                                                      This also might help solve the problem of how the earliest Christians could be
                                                                      associated with synagogues and claim the Jewish exemptions. Their Jesus
                                                                      figure was the least-Jewish possible — as anti-Jewish as possible while still
                                                                      remaining within the general Jewish religion.

                                                                      Later, when ripping the OT away from the Jews, to utilize it for authority and
                                                                      for the semblance of antiquity, at that time the Christians would have to make
                                                                      a firm break with the synagogues, forming their own equivalent support
                                                                      networks, the burgeoning state within a state. Strangely, as the official
                                                                      Jewishness of Jesus and presence of the OT in Christianity was artificially,
                                                                      strategically, officially increased (around 170), the actual Jews were booted
                                                                      out and defamed.

                                                                      The power-mongering hierarchy-building bishops had to wrest the pseudo-ancient
                                                                      “Old Testament” and the authoritative *claim* of Jewishness away from the
                                                                      actual Jews, both at the same time. The power-driven bishops took the
                                                                      attitude of “We Christians are the real, true, blessed Jews, the real
                                                                      inheritors of the value in Judaism. You guys are the false, bad, cursed type
                                                                      of Jews.”


                                                                      What did the earliest Christians see of value in an anti-Jewish Jewish
                                                                      crucified godman figure that originally made this figure so popular to so many
                                                                      diverse groups? Such a figure resisted his own society’s domination system,
                                                                      representing by parallel Romans’ desire to resist their own society’s
                                                                      domination system. The key appealing point wasn’t Jewishness, but rather,
                                                                      moral resistance. Jesus was the *moral resistance* version of the generalized
                                                                      idea of the mystery-religion godman — understandably appealing to many within
                                                                      that era of the Roman Empire.

                                                                      *Because* the Jesus figure started out in such extreme diversity, drawing from
                                                                      and drawing together many diverse groups, the Jesus figure was well-suited to
                                                                      take on attributes of an amazingly broad array of figures, so that the
                                                                      power-mongering hierarchy-building bishops were, in phase 2, able to
                                                                      coercively sweep together an enormous, broad assortment of groups.


                                                                      Why was the Jewish Jesus crucified godman figure (like in the canonical Bible)
                                                                      so popular in earliest Christianity, as soon as his lifestory was constructed?
                                                                      Because the Jesus figure’s original lifestyle and packaging *didn’t*
                                                                      forcefully include the OT. With the original early versions of the Jesus
                                                                      lifestory and Jesus religion, the least appealing, most-Jewish aspects were
                                                                      not included.

                                                                      According to the first Jesus lifestories, before the hierarchy-builders
                                                                      co-opted it all, Jesus was portrayed and packaged almost as an anti-Jewish
                                                                      Jewish figure, chastising the Jewish domination system in a way that suggested
                                                                      to the early Christians a parallel moral resistance movement against the Roman
                                                                      domination system.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2014 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Book lists: Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage
                                                                      In Greco-Roman context, always read “wine” first as “entheogenic beverage” or
                                                                      “visionary plant beverage”.


                                                                      Added these book lists to Egodeath website:

                                                                      Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/286BVZYFN78Z9

                                                                      Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage (2)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/YBPI1UHQSVIN


                                                                      Locally, I should at least keep a log of the ISBN numbers in case Amazon lists
                                                                      are losts.

                                                                      Some of these books have bibliographies, to find other related books. For
                                                                      interpreting myth and religion, I simply assume “wine” means “entheogen”.
                                                                      However, this should be proven.

                                                                      This is the Star Wars-like “Death Star vulnerability”: if we can show that
                                                                      “wine” in Greco-Roman times means, refers to, and symbolizes “entheogenic
                                                                      beverage”, suddenly all existing scholarship that mentions “wine” — including
                                                                      countless books about early Christianity, and Jewish religion — is
                                                                      transformed to support the entheogen theory and the extreme entheogen paradigm
                                                                      of what ancient religion was about.

                                                                      This is a paradigm shift even for entheogen scholars, changing from an
                                                                      assumption of rare usage such as 1 time during 1 initiation at Eleusis, to
                                                                      potentially ubiquitous usage all throughout Greco-Roman culture. And then, if
                                                                      entheogens and visionary plants were that ubuiquitous, we need to rethink
                                                                      concepts about ancient consciousness and initiation and modern notions about
                                                                      enlightenment.

                                                                      If everyone was very familiar with the altered state, if the culture was
                                                                      founded on and thoroughly saturated with the visionary altered state, we
                                                                      should consider whether the modern idea of “enlightenment through entheogens”
                                                                      has to be heavily revised — if the overall ancient world qualifies as what we
                                                                      call “enlightened” or “mystically illuminated”, our dichotomy
                                                                      “unenlightened/enlightened” needs to be revised, and the notion of
                                                                      “enlightenment” as something rare and a glorified panacea needs to be sobered
                                                                      up and taken off its pedestal.

                                                                      For the ancient Greeks, it was so natural that all adults are what we’d call
                                                                      “metaphysically and spiritually enlightened”, being “enlightened” was such the
                                                                      universal norm, it was merely ordinary, normal adult consciousness. War,
                                                                      politics, sports, and all areas of culture were based on what moderns would
                                                                      label as “metaphysically enlightened consciousness”, because the whole culture
                                                                      was based on everyday use of entheogens.

                                                                      Discard the notion of rarity of entheogens, rarity of metaphysical or psyche
                                                                      enlightenment, and automatic panacea of metaphysical enlightenment and
                                                                      entheogens. This is a paradigm shift in contrast to current entheogen
                                                                      religion scholarship, and in contrast to modern-era notions about the
                                                                      difficulty and promise of metaphysical enlightenment and entheogens.

                                                                      All that Huxley was amazed to find, and more, was routinely present as the
                                                                      norm or basis for the norm in Greco-Roman times. Every “banquet”, all “wine”,
                                                                      every “symposium”, every “feast” and “agape meal” was normally or ideally
                                                                      about entheogenic or visionary plant usage, with myth, philosophy, literature,
                                                                      politics, war, and other fields using the phenomena of the what we moderns
                                                                      think of as the “mystic altered state” — what Greco-Romans thought of as
                                                                      common, everyday divine inebriation.

                                                                      The Romans were talking about entheogen mixtures, not alcohol alone, when they
                                                                      said “In Vino Veritas” — In Wine Is Truth.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
                                                                      experience
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2015 From: merker2002 Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Book lists: Ancient wine as visionary plant beverage
                                                                      > The Romans were talking about entheogen mixtures, not alcohol
                                                                      alone, when they
                                                                      > said “In Vino Veritas” — In Wine Is Truth.

                                                                      Funny enough , just an hour ago i read that saying at
                                                                      a news website and was annoyed by exactly this extremely off-base
                                                                      conception of Vino as mere stupifying alcohol. It’s just
                                                                      such a great joke. How deep the entheogenic mysteries are
                                                                      entwined even in the reality of those who have no clue bout it.
                                                                      Sometimes it’s only funny how stupid modern man is.
                                                                      He thinks he is the most clever ever and in truth he’s
                                                                      just incredibly ignorant of the truth.


                                                                      This is not the first time that i thougth about something
                                                                      regarding something ontopic here just to read about the exact
                                                                      same line of thought here some hours afterwards.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2016 From: merker2002 Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Apprehension of succeeding at revealing no-free-will etc.
                                                                      It would be quite a blast if it developed like this.
                                                                      Looking at the current environment there’s actually no way
                                                                      the big no-free-will revelation can be kept out much longer.
                                                                      With today’s internet it’s just a matter of time.
                                                                      What would happen to the Christian Churches?
                                                                      Will they deliver the real body & blood ?
                                                                      At some point they can’t be taken serious anymore by
                                                                      the average person.

                                                                      Imagine a picture of a Entheogen like Vine drinking society.
                                                                      In some way it seems a logical necessity yet such a picture
                                                                      seems so far-off of current culture.

                                                                      I guess like most natural processes it will not be a linear phenomenon
                                                                      but rather an exponential one. So the big change will _not_ occur
                                                                      over decades but rather in quite a short time like a few years.

                                                                      How far is this BIG change ahead?
                                                                      5 years? 10 years? 20 years?

                                                                      20 years seems a very long time considering how developed the
                                                                      entheogenic position already is right now.
                                                                      Take that and the compared to past times incredible fast information
                                                                      spread it seems rather like ca. 10 years.

                                                                      2012 anyone? I think there *is* more to than most think of…

                                                                      “By 2012 we will have reached a total collapse of time as we know it
                                                                      and an entry of humanity into post history.
                                                                      Part of the Mayan prophecy was the Harmonic Convergence Prophecy
                                                                      which said the Age of Materialism must end at this time and we must
                                                                      return to Nature to save ourselves and the planet, our biosphere.”

                                                                      http://www.bluehoney.org/MayaNotes.htm

                                                                      Perhaps most people got the Mayans wrong? What about reading these
                                                                      descriptions as experiences of the mystic state?

                                                                      We *have* gone as far as is good for us with our current culture,
                                                                      we *have* to change if escalation is to be avoided.

                                                                      The collapse of time is of course the *experience* of time
                                                                      stopping /fading away during the intense altered state. It’s not
                                                                      actually meant as a real physical world phenomenon.

                                                                      Entry into post history: It’s already here. With the revelations of
                                                                      the dramatic shift from freewill/realJesus/noEntheogens to
                                                                      nofreewill/nohistoricalJesus/EntheogensEverywhere (etc, See
                                                                      HOW deep the rabbit hole goes…) a new Age is about to begin.

                                                                      2012… if it’s not exact, it seems real close
                                                                      2012 is not only about planet shifting cycles … or is it?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Abmev97edkrat
                                                                      Album info: Fallen


                                                                      I haven’t heard this album, so couldn’t do the best analysis. The following
                                                                      lyrics seem most clearly related to the mystic altered state phenomena. I
                                                                      should post analysis notes here, but you should be able to easily spot the
                                                                      thematic patterns I’ve covered in previous postings about Rock lyrics alluding
                                                                      to the phenomena of the mystic altered state.

                                                                      I have covered these themes thoroughly and will not write much more on the
                                                                      subject, though I will continue to draw vocabulary from lyrics; it’s part of
                                                                      how I think, and altered-state Rock lyrics remain the closest the modern era
                                                                      has come to ancient myth-religion poetry and literature, acting as the best
                                                                      and surest bridge between the modern and ancient world.

                                                                      The line “You must be sacrificed” alludes to ideas of human/divine mediation,
                                                                      conflict of power realms, and ego-sacrifice.


                                                                      Bring Me To Life

                                                                      How can you see into my eyes like open doors?
                                                                      Leading you down into my core
                                                                      Where I’ve become so numb

                                                                      Without a soul
                                                                      My spirit’s sleeping somewhere cold
                                                                      Until you find it there and lead it back home

                                                                      [Chorus]
                                                                      (wake me up) Wake me up inside
                                                                      (I can’t wake up) Wake me up inside
                                                                      (Save me) Call my name and save me from the dark
                                                                      (Wake me up) Bid my blood to run
                                                                      (I can’t wake up) Before I come undone
                                                                      (Save me) Save me from the nothing I’ve become

                                                                      Now that I know what I’m without
                                                                      You can’t just leave me
                                                                      Breathe into me and (make me real)
                                                                      Bring me
                                                                      To life

                                                                      [Repeat Chorus]

                                                                      (Bring me to life)
                                                                      (Ive been living a lie…Theres nothing inside)
                                                                      (Bring me to life)

                                                                      Frozen inside without your touch
                                                                      Without your love, darling
                                                                      Only you are the life among the dead

                                                                      (All of this I, I can’t believe I couldn’t see
                                                                      Kept in the dark, but you were there in front of me)

                                                                      Ive been sleeping a thousand years it seems
                                                                      Got to open my eyes to everything

                                                                      (Without a thought, without a voice, without a soul)
                                                                      (Dont let me die here)(You must be sacrificed)
                                                                      Bring me to life

                                                                      [Repeat Chorus]

                                                                      Bring me to life
                                                                      (I’ve been living a lie… There’s nothing inside)
                                                                      Bring me to life

                                                                      _________________________

                                                                      From the middle of “Going Under”:

                                                                      blurring and stirring the truth and the lies
                                                                      so I don’t know what’s real and what’s not
                                                                      always confusing the thoughts in my head
                                                                      so I can’t trust myself anymore
                                                                      I’m dying again

                                                                      I’m going under
                                                                      drowning in you
                                                                      I’m falling forever
                                                                      I’ve got to break through
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2018 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Modern adulthood is spiritually retarded, not normal
                                                                      >Sometimes it’s only funny how stupid modern man is.
                                                                      >He thinks he is the most clever ever and in truth he’s
                                                                      >just incredibly ignorant of the truth.


                                                                      Modern man uses only the lower half of the mind, and fully develops that in
                                                                      isolation from the upper half, and produces an entire civilization with its
                                                                      so-called “religion” and “sprirituality” that is all confined within and
                                                                      informed by just the lower half of the mind. Thus we end up with the clueless
                                                                      egoic version of “higher knowledge” and “enlightenment” and “transcendence” —
                                                                      a civilization of mental children, adult-age children, spiritual retards.

                                                                      Modern adults consider enlightenment “advanced”, but really, today’s adulthood
                                                                      is retarded and hardly has a right to call itself “mature” or “adult”. These
                                                                      “adults” have never been through a real initiation; they are still spiritual
                                                                      virgins, have never had a mystical climax — unlike the normal adults of the
                                                                      Greco-Roman era.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2019 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 02/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Appeal & comparison of various godmen over time
                                                                      Within the context of Greco-Roman culture (religion, philosophy, myth,
                                                                      initiation, cult, literature), how does the crucified Jesus figure work? Are
                                                                      there “main” threads of meaning? The challenge is that so many threads were
                                                                      woven into the figure from so many sources — an uncanny number of threads, as
                                                                      time passed. What were the main meanings of the earliest versions of the
                                                                      Jesus figure, perhaps 120-170 CE? I consider that to be the period of most
                                                                      greatest development of the Jesus figure. When he was first available as a
                                                                      figure with a lifestory, why did that figure appeal to people?

                                                                      Identify the appeal and meaning of the Jesus figure in 3 periods:
                                                                      1. Abstract Pauline died-and-risen figure with no lifestory.
                                                                      2. Earliest, barebones lifestory (perhaps Marcion’s “Gospel of the Lord”).
                                                                      3. Elaborated lifestory with heavy Old Testament connections.


                                                                      Phase 1: To members of the diverse Greco-Roman culture, what was the appeal
                                                                      and meaning of the Jesus figure when conceived of as an abstract Pauline
                                                                      died-and-risen figure with no lifestory? (Perhaps the proto-Jesus figure of
                                                                      100 BCE to 140 CE.) Certain kinds of people voluntarily joined this type of
                                                                      group or movement — why? (“Stupid gullible belief in literal incarnation”
                                                                      isn’t a possible explanation, since the notion of literal incarnation didn’t
                                                                      happen until late in this period.) In this phase, I suppose there are various
                                                                      non-integrated versions of the Jesus figure: the Pauline abstract dying/rising
                                                                      cross-based version, and the wisdom teacher version.


                                                                      Phase 2: To members of the diverse Greco-Roman culture, what was the appeal
                                                                      and meaning of the Jesus figure when conceived of with an earliest, barebones
                                                                      lifestory (perhaps Marcion’s “Gospel of the Lord”)? (Perhaps 140 to 170 CE.)
                                                                      Certain kinds of people voluntarily joined this type of group or movement —
                                                                      why? (Surely not because of gullible literalism — that hadn’t really gotten
                                                                      started yet.

                                                                      Most likely, in this phase, the Jesus figure was still considered to be
                                                                      essentially like the many other legendary, mythic, or allegorical figures —
                                                                      he’s still essentially viewed as a mystical personification and ethics
                                                                      teacher.) This is the first phase in which a single Jesus figure *integrates*
                                                                      and brings together elements including ethics/wisdom teacher, lifestory, and
                                                                      cross-based dying-rising. These elements are not brought together in a way
                                                                      that is optimized for an authoritarian hierarchy.


                                                                      Phase 3a: To members of the diverse Greco-Roman culture, what was the appeal
                                                                      and meaning of the Jesus figure when conceived of as having an elaborated
                                                                      lifestory with heavy Old Testament connections? (Perhaps 170 CE to 313 CE and
                                                                      later.) Certain kinds of people voluntarily joined this type of group or
                                                                      movement — why? (Stupid gullible belief in Jesus’ literal existence and
                                                                      miraculous resurrection is probably not the best explanation.) In this phase
                                                                      is heavy, evenly balanced competition between free-form Jesus technicians and
                                                                      the hierarchy-builders who ultimately seek larger-scale uniformity.

                                                                      Phase 3b: 313 (Constantine/Eusebius) to 393(?) when Christianity becomes the
                                                                      mandatory state religion. To members of the diverse Greco-Roman culture, what
                                                                      was the appeal and meaning of the Jesus figure when conceived of as having a
                                                                      fixed and orthodox lifestory with heavy Old Testament connections? Certain
                                                                      kinds of people voluntarily joined this type of group or movement — why?
                                                                      (Stupid gullible belief in Jesus’ literal existence and miraculous
                                                                      resurrection is probably not the best explanation.)


                                                                      The hierarchy-building *bishops* talked about voluntary martyrdom and
                                                                      supernaturalist literalism, but did the people who voluntarily joined join for
                                                                      those reasons? Some pagans criticized the stupidity and gullibility of
                                                                      Christians, but were those the real reasons for joining, and were those
                                                                      actually the beliefs of those who joined?

                                                                      “Gullibility” is probably a bluff, a smokescreen created by the
                                                                      power-mongering bishops, to cover the actual socio-political and ethical and
                                                                      mystical motives and dynamic conflicts throughout the Christian groups and
                                                                      between the Christian groups and the rest of the culture. Given that there
                                                                      was a competitive groups-takeover war, especially instigated by power-hungry
                                                                      bishops, it’s a state of war and thus a state of propaganda in which reported
                                                                      circumstances and the supposed nature of group disagreements are not to be
                                                                      believed.


                                                                      I simply want to comprehend what the Jesus figure really meant to the real
                                                                      people when he became available — but the problem is, the Jesus figure
                                                                      developed over a long period, and the Greco-Roman context and competitive
                                                                      philosophical systems, religious systems, and ideas developed over this period
                                                                      as well.

                                                                      Understanding the “creation of the Jesus figure in cultural context” sounds
                                                                      simple and static, but it’s actually a moving target set within a broader
                                                                      cultural moving target. I’m not used to such dynamic historical thinking and
                                                                      puzzle-solving. This degree of dynamic change, intertwined with the challenge
                                                                      of penetrating the mystical and sociopolitical meaning of mystery-religions is
                                                                      all the more challenging.

                                                                      It’s like a puzzle within a puzzle, both changing over time. And the whole
                                                                      interpretive paradigm is uncertain and variable. A study of ancient Greek
                                                                      religion of Dionysus and other myth-religion around 500 BCE can only
                                                                      contribute a limited explanation of what the Jesus figure meant to the
                                                                      Greco-Romans around 120-180 CE, when the recognizable Jesus figure was born
                                                                      and voluntarily embraced.



                                                                      Mithras seems not to be a mediator: he seems not to himself be a sacrifice.
                                                                      How many Greco-Roman godmen are specifically *sacrificial* godmen? Consider
                                                                      Prometheus as well. How many are sacrificially given from the divine to
                                                                      itself? Prometheus seems to be set up in opposition to Zeus, whereas Jesus
                                                                      is set up as aligned with God, proceeding from God.

                                                                      As a mediator, the Jesus figure seems more perfect and symmetrically balanced.
                                                                      Prometheus is like a man set up against the divine. The *idea* of a perfect
                                                                      mediator who is all in one sacrament, sacrifice, priestly sacrificer,
                                                                      monotheistic god, and generalized man, and representative of the initiate, is
                                                                      highly developed in the Jesus figure.

                                                                      The idea of “godman” may be too narrow to grasp the dynamic of
                                                                      mystery-religion-type ideas. Something is amiss if Prometheus and Mithras are
                                                                      omitted because they fail a stringent “godman” qualification test. The Jewish
                                                                      or Neoplatonic mediator-logos idea may also need to be considered.


                                                                      The Cults of the Roman Empire
                                                                      Robert Turcan
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0631200479

                                                                      Reviewer — “…offers psychological explanations for the victory of
                                                                      Christianity over the cults … but I think he glossed over the
                                                                      socio-political explanation: episcopal Christianity alone provided the
                                                                      strongest social cohesiveness enforced by ecclesiastical sanctions. It was
                                                                      this strength that moved Constantine to attempt to co-opt the episcopal church
                                                                      rather than throw the future of his empire in with Mithras or Isis.”


                                                                      Christianizing the Roman Empire (A.D. 100-400)
                                                                      Ramsay MacMullen
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0300036426

                                                                      This is supposedly an objective book (as opposed to Peter Brown’s
                                                                      committed-Christian platform), yet the author apparently includes “miracles”,
                                                                      the day of Pentecost (read as a literal event), and mass conversions in his
                                                                      explanation for the appeal of Christianity. Sounds as untrustworthy as any
                                                                      book operating within the received paradigm; he’s not really outside the
                                                                      dominant paradigm.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2020 From: wrmspirit Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      Interesting info below regarding the group, Evanescence. It looks like
                                                                      literal christianity is having a difficult time with ‘higer’ lyrics….


                                                                      http://littlerock.about.com/cs/localmusic/a/aaevanescence.htm

                                                                      Local Group Gone Big Time


                                                                      If you’ve seen the hit movie “<A HREF=”http://clk.about.com/?zi=7/5d&sdn=littlerock&zms=%252Fmsrch%252Findex.jhtml%253Fc%253Dmusic%2526artist%253D%2526format%253DCD%2526pgid%253Dshop%2526ps%253Dt%2526song%253D%2526title%253Ddaredevil%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526label%253D%2526kw%253Dfallen%2526v%253D1%2526pid%253D476856%2526pg%253D1%2526key%253DUC_20030408_192139_0984690322″>Daredevil</A>,” you’ve heard a Little Rock band
                                                                      that is making it’s way up the Billboard Charts! That’s right, the group
                                                                      Evanescence is actually from Little Rock, AR! Their song, “Bring Me To Life” off their
                                                                      album “<A HREF=”http://clk.about.com/?zi=7/5d&sdn=littlerock&zms=%252Fmsrch%252Findex.jhtml%253Fc%253Dmusic%2526artist%253DEvanescence%252B%2526format%253DCD%2526pgid%253Dshop%2526ps%253Dt%2526song%253D%2526title%253DFallen%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526label%253D%2526kw%253Dfallen%2526v%253D1%2526pid%253D475041%2526pg%253D1%2526key%253DUC_20030408_191854_0618461093″>Fallen</A>,” was chosen to be featured on the soundtrack of the latest Ben
                                                                      Affleck

                                                                      Ben Moody and Amy Lee, the founders of the group, actually met at a church
                                                                      youth camp when they were teenagers. Moody was playing with a praise and
                                                                      worship group and Lee was a camper. According to Moody, he heard Lee playing the
                                                                      piano and later heard her singing. He was blown away and they have been together
                                                                      ever since. The actual band was started in the late 1990s in Little Rock.
                                                                      They’ve had a large local following since the beginning. Their song
                                                                      “Understanding” got radio play before the two ever did any live performances. Their latest
                                                                      single, “Bring Me To Life,” is a “piano ballad-turned-riff-driven barnburner.”
                                                                      Amy Lee’s voice is like something I’ve never heard before. The song is
                                                                      definitely worth a listen and perfect for the movie “Daredevil”. The song “My
                                                                      Immortal” is also featured on the “<A HREF=”http://clk.about.com/?zi=7/5d&sdn=littlerock&zms=%252Fmsrch%252Findex.jhtml%253Fc%253Dmusic%2526artist%253D%2526format%253DCD%2526pgid%253Dshop%2526ps%253Dt%2526song%253D%2526title%253Ddaredevil%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526_ttag%253Dmsrch%2526label%253D%2526kw%253Dfallen%2526v%253D1%2526pid%253D476856%2526pg%253D1%2526key%253DUC_20030408_192139_0984690322″>Daredevil</A>” soundtrack. I imagine we’ll hear more
                                                                      from Evanescence in the coming months. Interestingly enough, even though the
                                                                      group started out as Christian Rock, their new album has gotten some criticism
                                                                      from Christian groups. Some groups even went as far as to suggest Christian
                                                                      stores and radio stations pull the cds. The group also seems to be trying to
                                                                      distance itself from the Christian genre and go into the more lucrative secular
                                                                      market. Perhaps “Fallen” is the perfect name for the album! Rounding out the duo
                                                                      of Lee and Moody are John LeCompt on guitar and Rocky Gray on drums. Moody
                                                                      says, “As a four-piece, we are able to carry out the intricate harmonies and
                                                                      orchestrations of the memorable material on Fallen.”







                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2021 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Ecstatic metaphor: God’s repentance, yet still closed future
                                                                      “God’s repentance” is the biblical story pattern: God says “I’m going to
                                                                      destroy idolaters.” The idolaters repent. As a result, God repents and says
                                                                      ok, I won’t destroy them.

                                                                      Freewill or open-future theologians think that God’s repentance throughout the
                                                                      Old Testament indicates that he doesn’t know the future; the future is open
                                                                      (not yet established or visible) to God. That is incorrect. In reading
                                                                      religious texts, remember to always consider each idea first as a description
                                                                      of an intense mystic-altered state phenomenon.


                                                                      1. When the mystic starts to discover that control-thoughts are mysteriously
                                                                      given to the mind timelessly, and are frozen into the timeless spacetime
                                                                      block, there is commonly a sense of increasing doom; a felt pull inward toward
                                                                      a control vortex; a dimly remembered (so it feels) terrible holy transgression
                                                                      awaiting ahead on the worldline; self-reinforcing out-of-control feedback
                                                                      buildup of some virtually remembered fatal doom, a tragic future lying in
                                                                      store like a monster poised over a railroad track — a monster that draws you
                                                                      toward it through controlling your memories and control-thoughts, a devouring
                                                                      strange attractor steering the mind’s train of thought towards it.

                                                                      The mind virtually remembers that it is to be coerced into willing the
                                                                      cancellation of the will, a dreadful sense of coerced will and the forceful
                                                                      truth of having to “must” do something tremendous, some essential generalized
                                                                      transcendent crime that breaks law itself, tears the very legal fabric of
                                                                      society itself, some type of fearsome sacrifice. This state is metaphorically
                                                                      described as “God has decided to destroy you as an idolater.”


                                                                      2. As soon as the mind coherently realizes its situation and control dynamics
                                                                      correctly, that conceptual grasp is the logos given to the mind — the divine
                                                                      reasoning about personal controllership and then about having to receive
                                                                      transcendent resetting of the personal controllership delusion, now qualified
                                                                      and purified. It may take some seven “purification” sessions to gradually
                                                                      conform the mind’s mental worldmodel to this dynamic relationship about
                                                                      control agency.

                                                                      When the mind is finally brought into the holy of holies, brought to an
                                                                      understanding of its vulnerable dependence on a completely mysterious
                                                                      uncontrollable transcendent controller, this is “repenting” and
                                                                      “converting” — that is, the mind is made to acknowledge or credit or praise
                                                                      God.


                                                                      3. When the mind is brought to credit the critical role of the mysterious
                                                                      uncontrollable transcendent controller as the very source of the mind’s
                                                                      control-thoughts, normally or formerly completely hidden, God repents, and the
                                                                      risk of being forced to do some horrible coerced willful crime against the
                                                                      moral fabric itself vanishes. One has been brought into the true Israel and
                                                                      into the promised land.


                                                                      The above frightening realization and insight is premised on a no-free-will,
                                                                      preexisting future model of spacetime and control. The fact of being given a
                                                                      new mental model and being reprieved from what you could have been made to do
                                                                      through coercion of your will by the transcendent mysterious will, in no way
                                                                      implies an open future, or metaphysically free will.

                                                                      One can spiritually be caught up into the mysterious transcendent controller
                                                                      outside the spacetime block, but the spacetime block remains the foundation
                                                                      for this mystic experience.

                                                                      Official theologians who have no experience with the mystic altered state can
                                                                      hardly contribute much of any great insight regarding the nature of personal
                                                                      responsible agency and its relation to God’s sovereignty.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2022 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 03/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Lyrics: Bring Me To Life
                                                                      I don’t know why the literalist Christians are objecting to this music.

                                                                      In Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) fashion, it is best described as
                                                                      acid-oriented Rock, which has a strong connection to genuine mystical
                                                                      Christianity, which has always been at odds with official Christianity since
                                                                      about the year 313, when official Christianity was invented.

                                                                      It is certain that some number of Christian Rock songs are LSD-inspired. The
                                                                      only question is, how many?

                                                                      The category of Christian Rock is largely fake and artificial, a sham, an
                                                                      illusory construct, a pretense. A veritable genre of rock songs by so-called
                                                                      “secular” groups is acid-inspired songs about Christ’s saving effect. Such
                                                                      “secular” groups are higher than so-called “believing” Christian groups. A
                                                                      true Christian Rock song is Believer, by Ozzy Osbourne: “I’m a believer, I
                                                                      ain’t no deceiver… destiny planned out… speculation of the wise.”

                                                                      Believe the tomb is empty, and you shall be saved. The body is a tomb; the
                                                                      soma is a sema.

                                                                      Many Holy Spirit-inspired Rock groups want to have songs about mystical
                                                                      salvation through Jesus Christ but ditch the shallow moralism that the lowbrow
                                                                      Christian literalists mistake for the essential ethical aspect of
                                                                      Christianity.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2023 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      This modified URL shows all 81 retablos currently available for sale at this
                                                                      site.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2f..%2fpages%2fgallery.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipR
                                                                      ecords=0&-maxRecords=81&-search

                                                                      I assume the Mexicans or Central American Catholocized Indians used a variety
                                                                      of entheogens in conjunction with Catholicism, inspiring these “icons” or
                                                                      rather, symbol-filled religious picture-diagrams. I don’t even have a word
                                                                      for these — they are not the same as Eastern orthodox icons or European
                                                                      religious paintings — they are more explicitly symbolic, such as a cross
                                                                      containing various objects, almost an alchemical or Masonic explicit
                                                                      symbolism.


                                                                      Standard pictures (arrangements/groupings of elements), and elements in
                                                                      retablos include the following. What is the origin of the “originals” of these
                                                                      pictorial symbol-arrangements? European paintings or icons?


                                                                      I’m nearly certain the following URLs will quickly go out of sync. The best
                                                                      bet to see the correct pictures is to use the comprehensive URL above, then
                                                                      Find the picture name or inventory number in the page. Note to self: use Sent
                                                                      copy of this post, so URLs don’t have carriage return in the middle.


                                                                      Common combination: Rose & lily (lily = datura per Entheos mag v1#2).
                                                                      Revelation idea is “washing white robes in the red blood of the lamb”.

                                                                      Consider similarity:
                                                                      rose = crown of thorns around pierced heart
                                                                      white roses = lily-datura
                                                                      white roses and red roses = lily-datura and crown of thorns around pierced
                                                                      heart

                                                                      ____________________________________


                                                                      Baby Jesus is handing a flaming heart to a sinner who Virgin Mary/Queen of
                                                                      Heaven is lifting up from the flaming beastly jaws of hell. Jesus’ left hand
                                                                      hands the heart; Jesus’ right hand holds another heart, in front of his chest.
                                                                      The mouth and teeth of hell are like a gorgon (decaying death head grimace).
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=57&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de la Luz” by Augustin Barajas
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#L 0041


                                                                      Empty skull in front of chest, holding crucifix with small literal body of
                                                                      Jesus on it
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=36&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Francisco de Asis”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      5×7
                                                                      Inventory#M 0370


                                                                      Cross, Jesus, crown of thorns, INRI sign, pierced side, blood from side caught
                                                                      in one tiny cup — from left hand into another — from right into another —
                                                                      from feet blood flows up to another tiny cup. Candle on either side — seems
                                                                      to be equivalent to two crucified rebels, or sun and moon, or leg-crossed
                                                                      small guys next to Mithras.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=31&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “El Cristo de Saucito” by the “Saucito Master”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      5×7
                                                                      Inventory#M 0609


                                                                      Empty skull on bible, holding crucifix with small literal body of Jesus on it,
                                                                      w/ INRI sign, holding lily/datura aimed like swords to heart
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=32&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Luis Gonzaga” in original wood frame
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#M 0558


                                                                      Sword piercing virgin’s heart (per Homer, punctured heart = inevitable death,
                                                                      means the type of death given by encounter with unavoidable
                                                                      inevitability/Necessity/heimarmene)
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=61&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search


                                                                      Jesus on cross, pierced heart, crown of thorns, INRI sign, 3 women: Virgin
                                                                      with sword-pierced heart, woman embracing cross, and Mary Magdalene
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=61&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search
                                                                      “El Calvario con Maria Magdalena”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      6×8.5
                                                                      Inventory#K 1046


                                                                      Sheep emerging unscathed from furnace (perhaps picture is called “San
                                                                      Francisco de Paula”) (the incorruptable “remnant” after the purgatorial
                                                                      purifying fires; compare Demeter’s burning away the queen’s son’s mortality
                                                                      over a series of nights. Ruck & Heinrich’s interpretation system could
                                                                      suggest this as the amanita cap heated to increase potency some sixfold times.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=74&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search
                                                                      San Francisco de Paula”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#J 0229

                                                                      This copy also has two red flames on chest, and several other pictures have
                                                                      red areas near shoulders.
                                                                      Apparently the two flames on chest theme is a symbol of the similar two
                                                                      flaming wings labeled “caridad” (charity, = gratuitous kindness, transcendent
                                                                      love) — this might relate to the two candlesticks bracketing virgin Mary in
                                                                      some pictures.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=70&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search
                                                                      “San Francisco Paula”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#J 1202


                                                                      Skull at foot of cross.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=49&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Bonifacio Martir” (rare)
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#L 0353


                                                                      Queen releasing the wrist-chained prisoner from prison.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=48&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “Santa Eduviges” by Augustin Barajas
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#L 0414


                                                                      Wrist-chained souls in purgatory.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=62&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search
                                                                      “Animas en Purgatorio”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on wood
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      8×11.5
                                                                      Inventory#K 0936


                                                                      Flaming heart, holding literalized crucifix
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=67&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Juan de Dios” (rare)
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#K 0048



                                                                      Crown with cross atop, object-like spreading gown, resting on moon crescent,
                                                                      female, rayed halo, roses on garment, standing on pedestal, bracketed by two
                                                                      flaming candlesticks. Curtains above, with 0, 2, or 4 tassles.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=6&-s
                                                                      earch&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de San Juan de los Lagos”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#N 0563

                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=18&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de San Juan de los Lagos”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#N 0338

                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=73&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Virgen de San Juan de los Lagos”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#J 0548

                                                                      This copy is different – monstrance, lily-daturas instead of flaming
                                                                      candlesticks, possible purple&gold grape&grain theme.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=43&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de San Juan de los Lagos” double-sided
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#M 0327


                                                                      Similar to “N.S. de San Juan de los Lagos” is the praying head-topped cloaked
                                                                      body with crescent base, holding seemingly a combined rose/lily plant, holding
                                                                      crowned baby Jesus who also holds combined rose-lily, both hold a bead-chain.
                                                                      Bracked by rose vases. No curtain.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=46&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. del Rosario” by the “Saucito Master”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      9×13
                                                                      Inventory#L 0706


                                                                      San Jose is male equiv. of “refugio”, with lily holding baby Jesus who has
                                                                      cosmic globe w/ X. In this copy, like theotokos he is crowned (not sitting
                                                                      like theotokos though)
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=34&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San José” Bolivia
                                                                      Bolivia
                                                                      oil on metal
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#M 0457

                                                                      In this copy of San Jose, holds full-length thriasus pole — top is like rose
                                                                      w/ lily-like leaves (combined lily-rose symbol), and only has ring halo.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=54&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Jose & Guadalupe” by “Left-Handed Ptr”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×8.5
                                                                      Inventory#L 0096

                                                                      In this copy, San Jose has ring halo (not crown). Odd red/white splotches in
                                                                      thriassus, gives impression of amanitas against pine tree.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=71&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San José y la Virgen” by the “Halloween Skull ptr.”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×10
                                                                      Inventory#J 1145


                                                                      Flaming heart — pierced, flames coming out pierce, crowned around with
                                                                      thorns, cross on top, flaming top.
                                                                      I don’t like this copy (it is like Ken Wilber’s bunk denatured Christ-heart in
                                                                      the book Up From Eden — like a thornless rose [aha, rose = crown of thorns
                                                                      around pierced heart]), because it omits the crown of thorns from the heart
                                                                      and omits the pierced side of the heart: (in this copy, he points at the
                                                                      heart, and he has nimbus halo)
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=37&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “El Sagrado Corazon de Jesus”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#M 0365

                                                                      I like this copy — pierced heart, crown of thorns around heart, lamb licking
                                                                      blood (compare dog licking Mithra’s bull), and also — extra bonus points —
                                                                      the heart is against an amanita-cap backdrop (golden inner flames, orange-red
                                                                      outer flames). (in this copy, he points up.) Nimbus halo.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=20&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “El Sagrado Corazon de Jesus”
                                                                      “Saucito Master”, Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#N 0249

                                                                      In this copy, ring halo. Heart has crown of thorns and pierce.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=75&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “El Sgdo Corazon de Cristo” by Concepcion Avila
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#G 0926


                                                                      Picture “La Cruz de Animas” is particularly dense with symbols. Usually
                                                                      includes: cross containing or surrounded by instruments of torture including
                                                                      nails, rod with sponge, spear (latter two as tall X behind Jesus), love-dove,
                                                                      ladder, bag of 30 silver coins, slave whipping post, cock, a couple tong-like
                                                                      devices (hammer?, pliers?), dice, scourge; praying souls in purgatory under
                                                                      the arms of the cross, adam/tree/snake/eve, sun & moon, INRI sign, God atop
                                                                      lifting arm and hand on heart, monstrance (Amanita-cap stand), crowned
                                                                      skeleton piercing heart of tightly wrapped corpse, Virgin Mary w/
                                                                      sword-pierced heart, grail cup, Michael archangel with scales of judgment &
                                                                      sword.

                                                                      In this copy, there is no Michael archangel, God has 1 hand up, 1 hand on
                                                                      heart, cosmic globe in front of heart, no triangle.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-table=c
                                                                      opy&-response=%2fpages%2fdetail.lasso&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-skipRecords=77&-max
                                                                      Records=1&-token=Retablo&-search
                                                                      “La Cruz de Animas”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      5.5×6.5
                                                                      Inventory#J 0372

                                                                      In this copy, Michael archangel is above the monstrance, God has both hands
                                                                      up, triangle behind head, no cosmic globe.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=42&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Cruz de Animas”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#M 0341

                                                                      In this copy, Michael is below the monstrance, God has 1 hand up, 1 hand on
                                                                      heart, cosmic globe in front of heart, triangle behind head.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=15&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “Cruz de Animas” d.1930
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      dated 1 930
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#N 0405


                                                                      Similar to the “La Cruz de Animas”, “La Alegoria de la Redención” has
                                                                      sun/moon, Jesus on cross, INRI, piercings, God above raising his hands,
                                                                      love-dove descending, Virgin Mary with sword-pierced heart on left, Michael
                                                                      archangel w/ sword & scales of judgment on right, skull at base of cross,
                                                                      rod-sponge-vinegar and spear crossed behind cross, torture implements,
                                                                      adam/eve below cross, souls in purgatory under the arms of the cross.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=5&-s
                                                                      earch&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Alegoria de la Redención”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#N 0573


                                                                      Baby Jesus leapt into arms of queen of heaven, his left foot often hidden, or
                                                                      sandal missing. Jesus’ halo overlaps with and unites with Virgin Mary’s halo.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=47&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de Refugio” by Bruno Sanches
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#L 0476

                                                                      In “N.S. de Refugio”, baby Jesus doesn’t hold the cosmic globe w/ X.


                                                                      This “Santa Ana” shows the lilies positioned the same as the multiple swords
                                                                      piercing Virgin Mary’s heart in another picture.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=7&-s
                                                                      earch&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “Santa Ana”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#N 0562


                                                                      Virgin Mary holding cross-removed adult body of Jesus, her heart
                                                                      sword-pierced, cock, some of the standard set of torture implements (implying
                                                                      the entire set) – here are shown 3 nails, hammer(?), pliers(?), removed crown
                                                                      of thorns, 11 stars around her head, cross on either side of her. No crescent
                                                                      at her feet. No cosmic globe with X in his hand.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=10&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Piedad” by Concepcion Avila
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#N 0433


                                                                      Queen of Heaven standing on crescent, angel holding up, 2-star bible, golden
                                                                      rays & red ring (almost amanita cap theme), crown, praying hands, roses.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=19&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “N.S. de Guadalupe”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      5×7
                                                                      Inventory#N 0255


                                                                      Hand of Christ from clouds, pierced palm, blood into grail cup, 7 lambs drink
                                                                      from blood, 7 letters at bottom “drink” from base of grail, 5 figures above
                                                                      hand touching it, each have 1 foot visible.
                                                                      Figure 1: 3 lilies pointed to heart like swords sometimes are. Circle halo.
                                                                      Hands crossed over heart. Woman w/ covered head.
                                                                      Figure 2: Praying hands. Ray halo. Woman w/ uncovered head.
                                                                      Figure 3: Left hand on heart, right hand two fingers up and two down, ray
                                                                      halo, stand on cosmic globe w/ +, young unbearded male.
                                                                      Figure 4: Man w/ split beard, brown long parted hair, hands crossed over
                                                                      heart, olds “thriasus” like Dionysian pine cone on a pole — pole w/ 4 roses
                                                                      against green ray leaves. Rayed halo.
                                                                      Figure 5: Ring halo, man w/ beard, balding, long pole w/ handle, hands crossed
                                                                      over heart. light flame(?) on head.
                                                                      Spear, pole w/ vinegar sponge, 1 other pole(?) Gender = FFmMM here.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=22&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Mano Poderosa” by the “Master of the Refugio”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#N 0176

                                                                      Interesting to compare this different Poderosa. The hand comes not from
                                                                      clouds, but from blood-filled grail-fountain w/ lambs drinking from the cup.
                                                                      Grain on left, grape vines on right (no lilies here). God is up in clouds,
                                                                      love-dove between. All 5 main “finger figures” appear to have ring halos
                                                                      here. Various other differences. Gender = MFmFM here. On the 4 adults,
                                                                      clothing color combinations is generally the same; easy to correlate between
                                                                      the two pictures. Only 4 lambs here.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=27&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo

                                                                      Who are the five figures? (Research could probably nail these down easily.)
                                                                      Could be father Joseph & virgin Mary, Mary Magdalene, Peter, John evangelist
                                                                      or John baptist, John’s parents Elizabeth & Zacharias, Moses & Zipporah,
                                                                      Abraham & Sarah, Elijah. Possibly James, Paul; Adam & Eve. Out of these,
                                                                      perhaps the set is


                                                                      Trumpet spitting blood from clouds, holding literalized crucifix, armband w/
                                                                      blood (?), flagellant scourge, red robe w/ gold plusses and white inside —
                                                                      like amanita cap, lion looking at him w/ rayed mane, 1 foot showing,
                                                                      scriptures in front of him, on knees, ring halo.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=53&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Geronimo” by the “Chunky Ptr.”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#L 0097


                                                                      Holding literalized crucifix, looking at it, cradling empty skull near heart
                                                                      (in position of theotokos’ infant).
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=29&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “Santa Rita”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      7×10
                                                                      Inventory#M 0868


                                                                      Almost gives impression of Amanita — 1-leg table, gold leg, red tabletop,
                                                                      gold crowns like veil remnants. Pointing at tabletop. The 3 crowns seem to
                                                                      remotely imply Jesus on the cross bracketed by two lower crosses. Compare the
                                                                      sword with flaming tip to the flaming candlestick shown in many other of these
                                                                      pictures — this suggests that these are synonymous symbols:
                                                                      flaming candlestick
                                                                      flame-tipped sword
                                                                      spear in heart
                                                                      sword-pierced heart
                                                                      lily-datura pointing to heart
                                                                      finger pointing to pierced heart
                                                                      roses in vase?
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=68&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San Elias” (rare)
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#K 0047


                                                                      Lamb in front of person’s chest/heart. Apparently left figure with lamb on
                                                                      chest & piercings is Jesus, middle w/ heart & pointing up at his own head is
                                                                      God, right with dove(?) & hands crossed on heart is Holy Spirit. They stand
                                                                      on cosmic globe with +, but Jesus has one foot in space. Each person has
                                                                      triangle “halo”.
                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=78&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “La Santisima Trinidad”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×14
                                                                      Inventory#P 0034


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2024 From: ichang1497 Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      I began listening to Rush back in the early 1980’s and really
                                                                      enjoyed the music as well as the message. However, my listening
                                                                      only got as far as the Signals album, which was about the time
                                                                      the style of music changed somewhat. I have not actively listened
                                                                      to Grace Under Pressure, Power Windows nor the albums that followed.
                                                                      Today I purchased Vapor Trails to try to become an active listener
                                                                      again.

                                                                      My question is what have I missed? From what I can surmise from
                                                                      the Signals album, the music takes a rather drastic turn from nature
                                                                      themes (The Trees, Natural Science, etc.) to the cyberage (Digital
                                                                      Man, The Analog Kid, New World Man, etc.) I get the feeling that
                                                                      the music contains clues about how to return to nature and experience
                                                                      egodeath, yet still thrive in the modern world which requires
                                                                      nurturing the ego.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2025 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      I uploaded the previous posting as http://www.egodeath.com/retablos.htm so the
                                                                      links work — but use the page quickly before the links go out of sync.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2026 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      (added to the uploaded page http://www.egodeath.com/retablos.htm):


                                                                      …suggests that these are synonymous symbols for “being made to spear one’s
                                                                      own cybernetic heart with the flaming sword of Necessity/Heimarmene (timeless
                                                                      block-universe determinism)”:
                                                                      flaming candlestick
                                                                      flame-tipped sword
                                                                      spear in heart
                                                                      sword-pierced heart
                                                                      lily-datura pointing to heart
                                                                      finger pointing to pierced heart
                                                                      roses in vase?


                                                                      I would say that the Virgin Mary (right side of below picture) has just been
                                                                      made to spear her own cybernetic heart with the flaming sword of
                                                                      Necessity/Heimarmene (timeless block-universe determinism).

                                                                      http://www.historia-antiques.com/pages/Action.Lasso?-database=JCH_Web&-respons
                                                                      e=detail.lasso&-table=copy&-op=bw&type=Retablo&-maxRecords=1&-skipRecords=71&-
                                                                      search&-Token=Retablo
                                                                      “San José y la Virgen” by the “Halloween Skull ptr.”
                                                                      Mexico
                                                                      oil on tin
                                                                      19th century
                                                                      10×10
                                                                      Inventory#J 1145
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2027 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      You and I probably aren’t the only ones who treat Rush like a band that broke
                                                                      up after the 1982 album Signals. I sincerely tried, as much as I could stand,
                                                                      but of what I heard after that, neither the music nor the lyrics happen to
                                                                      appeal to me; I had to conclude that they were no longer inspired, but were
                                                                      going by rote, and became too old to rock and roll (dose with lysergic acid)
                                                                      and to young to die. I maintain that the 1984 album Grace Under Pressure fits
                                                                      with early Rush, not late Rush.

                                                                      Grace Under Pressure has many altered-state songs, and innovative style, even
                                                                      if generally bleak and obsessed with paranoia and modern doom and alienation.
                                                                      It’s a kind of low point, as far as mood — nuclear war, concentration camps,
                                                                      and paranoia — their answer to Pink Floyd’s angst album, The Wall?

                                                                      Reviews of Rush albums (just 1 unreliable data point among many that are
                                                                      needed):
                                                                      http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=By690s35ba3ng
                                                                      They propose that you and I listen to the 1989 album Presto.


                                                                      Presto does have some good philosophy lyrics, that don’t fail to have much
                                                                      about Dionysus in them. The Pass is good lyrically. Presto, the title track,
                                                                      says
                                                                      If I could wave my magic wand
                                                                      I’d set everybody free
                                                                      This implies that the biggest point of the album is that we’re not
                                                                      metaphysically free.

                                                                      In “Superconductor” that must be God.
                                                                      Watch his every move
                                                                      SUPERCONDUCTOR
                                                                      Orchestrate illusions
                                                                      SUPERCONDUCTOR
                                                                      Watch his every move
                                                                      SUPERCONDUCTOR
                                                                      Hoping you’ll believe
                                                                      Designing to deceive
                                                                      That’s entertainment

                                                                      They use a phrase Ozzy used in Over the Mountain: “disappear into the crowd”.
                                                                      The album has thick allusions to mystic altered state phenomena — don’t know
                                                                      if I could stand the music though. I don’t think I’ve ever heard any of the
                                                                      songs on this album.



                                                                      At http://www.egodeath.com/rushlyrics.htm see the songs listed below Signals,
                                                                      which are currently:

                                                                      Album: Grace Under Pressure
                                                                      Distant Early Warning
                                                                      Afterimage
                                                                      The Enemy Within (Part I of Fear)
                                                                      The Body Electric
                                                                      Red Lenses
                                                                      Between the Wheels

                                                                      Album: Counterparts
                                                                      Stick It Out

                                                                      Album: Test for Echo
                                                                      Driven
                                                                      Virtuality


                                                                      One of the top philosophically important Rush songs is The Body Electric
                                                                      (100-100-1, SOS, android egodeath). It’s a key song for the cybernetic theory
                                                                      of ego death — it neither uses fantasy nor myth.

                                                                      The Enemy Within is fairly important.

                                                                      Between the Wheels is dense with allusions to ego death and mystical
                                                                      phenomena — I should complete the analysis; for example, these refer to the
                                                                      ascension of egoic thinking up to heaven, only to meet the angel with the
                                                                      flaming sword, who casts out the demonic freewill agency delusion and ego goes
                                                                      falling way down to the depths, leading often to desperate dependence on the
                                                                      gratuitous goodness of the uncontrollable transcendent controller — where
                                                                      rational Heavy Rock guys like Peart are brought to pray and beg and depend on
                                                                      God:

                                                                      We can go from boom to bust
                                                                      From dreams to a bowl of dust
                                                                      We can fall from rockets’ red glare
                                                                      Down to “Brother can you spare –“

                                                                      I read the last as Peart reporting that after falling upon attaining a high
                                                                      ecstatic state — “stumbling” — he had to beg and depend on the One that is
                                                                      outside and prior to Peart’s control-thoughts.


                                                                      The song “Distant Early Warning” ends with a lament of Absolom, king David’s
                                                                      son in the Bible, and is a reference to mystical ego death. See:
                                                                      Tue 4/30/2002 11:00 AM
                                                                      RE: [egodeath] Labyrinth, Balaam’s donkey, Golden Ass, Damascus
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/789


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2028 From: wrmspirit Date: 04/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      In a message dated 7/4/2003 12:38:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
                                                                      mhoffman@… writes:


                                                                      > appeal to me; I had to conclude that they were no longer inspired, but were
                                                                      > going by rote, and became too old to rock and roll

                                                                      It’s an interesting statement…..especially when the word inspiration is
                                                                      carried into the breath….for then there is always inspiration as well as
                                                                      expiration until there is no one left to notice…

                                                                      When the word, ‘inspired,’ remains as a metaphor for the
                                                                      term,’enlightenment,’ only, it leans toward the act of doing, through the awareness of what
                                                                      is…And truly, all acts of doing, whether through awareness or not, are
                                                                      inspired…..I don’t see an end to inspiration, but rather only it transforming
                                                                      itself….




                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2029 From: ichang1497 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: post-Signals Rush albums
                                                                      I just purchased Grace Under Pressure and Power Windows yesterday.
                                                                      Grace Under Pressure sounds like Signals. Vapor Trails will takes
                                                                      some getting used to. I will have to make up for lost time. At
                                                                      least I am back on track again. I hope I don’t discover that Rush
                                                                      is taking their own lyrics way too seriously, but I guess a lot of
                                                                      the art rock bands of the 70’s are guilty of that. Ozzy Osbourne
                                                                      definitely is not guilty of that.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2030 From: ichang1497 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence
                                                                      I am having difficulty expressing my knowledge about this
                                                                      subject. The terminology used in this newsgroup is very
                                                                      technical and academic whereas I come from another reference
                                                                      point or orientation. I relate better to music rather than
                                                                      words, so I can only feel what you are describing with all
                                                                      this terminology when I listen to the Beatles, Rush, or other
                                                                      acid rock.

                                                                      I do recognize certain themes in the older Rush music that
                                                                      deal with Greek mythology and even The Lord of the Rings trilogy
                                                                      (Rivendell, The Trees).

                                                                      Another theme I noticed is that of making distinctions and recognizing
                                                                      differences. (Different Strings, Entre Nous <“the differences we
                                                                      sometimes feared to show”>, Vital Signs<“everybody got to deviate
                                                                      from the norm”>, Subdivisions).

                                                                      That is really the extent of my knowledge or interpretation of this
                                                                      topic. I tend to shy away from the religious, or Christian themes
                                                                      because I feel that acid rock mysticism and modern day Christianity
                                                                      do not mix. The key is to recognize this as a false dichotomy and
                                                                      to transcend it. This may be what is keeping me stuck in ego death
                                                                      and preventing me from achieving transcendence.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2031 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Misguided critique of “seriousness” in Rock
                                                                      >>I hope I don’t discover that Rush is taking their own lyrics way too
                                                                      seriously, but I guess a lot of the art rock bands of the 70’s are guilty of
                                                                      that.


                                                                      Criticizing “taking lyrics too seriously” gives a feeling of superioriority,
                                                                      but that’s often a sign of incomprehension of the meaning in lyrics. Do
                                                                      people really want to limit Rock to the mindless Boogie Rock of the
                                                                      self-titled Rush album, or the Ramones as the ideal scope of Punk thematic
                                                                      materials?


                                                                      It’s not immediately clear what “taking their own lyrics too seriously” means.
                                                                      Generally, the most standard single theme or motive of Classic Rock (1960s and
                                                                      70s Rock from Freakbeat to Psychedelic Rock, Acid Rock, Heavy Rock, Heavy
                                                                      Metal, then Metal) is to reflect the phenomena of the LSD altered state.
                                                                      Consider Heavy Rock, such as Queen’s song Bohemian Rhapsody or Rush’s song No
                                                                      One at the Bridge.

                                                                      Punk Rock is “guilty” of the same supposed crime. For all of its *talk* about
                                                                      offering a “less pretentious and serious” approach to Rock, Punk treated
                                                                      politics every bit as seriously as Classic Rock treated the LSD altered state
                                                                      and its phenomena.


                                                                      >>Ozzy Osbourne definitely is not guilty of that.


                                                                      No album takes its lyrics more seriously than Ozzy Osbourne’s album Diary of a
                                                                      Madman. Similarly, Sabotage is also insanely serious and grandiose.

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/sablyrics.htm


                                                                      Listen as well to Osbourne’s song Revelation (Mother Earth):

                                                                      Mother please forgive them
                                                                      For they know not what they do
                                                                      Looking back in history’s books
                                                                      It seems it’s nothing new
                                                                      Oh! Let my mother live

                                                                      Heaven is for heroes
                                                                      And hell is full of fools
                                                                      Stupidity, no will to live
                                                                      They’re breaking God’s own rules
                                                                      Please let my mother live

                                                                      Father, of all creation
                                                                      I think we’re all going wrong
                                                                      The course they’re taking
                                                                      Seems to be breaking
                                                                      And it won’t take too long

                                                                      Children of the future
                                                                      Watching empires fall
                                                                      Madness the cup they drink from
                                                                      Self destruction the toll

                                                                      I had a vision, l saw the world burn
                                                                      And the seas had turned red
                                                                      The sun had fallen, the final curtain
                                                                      In the land of the dead

                                                                      Mother, please show the children
                                                                      Before it’s too late
                                                                      To fight each other, there’s no-one winning
                                                                      We must fight all the hate


                                                                      Rock doesn’t get any more serious and grandiose and cosmic than that. So much
                                                                      for “taking their own lyrics … seriously … Ozzy Osbourne definitely is not
                                                                      guilty of that.”


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2032 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: New Testament, hist. Jesus, & drug policy reform
                                                                      Based on the article in the Salvia Divinorum issue #1, Doc Kunda adheres
                                                                      either to the paradigm “Jesus as entheogenic hierophant” or “Jesus as teacher
                                                                      of Christhood”, a teaching also accessible through entheogens.”

                                                                      http://www.dockunda.com — I didn’t find relevant articles.

                                                                      Entheogen scholars have a fairly even spread of views:

                                                                      o Jesus as entheogenic hierophant
                                                                      o Jesus as teacher of Christhood, a teaching also accessible through
                                                                      entheogens.
                                                                      o Jesus as entheogenic hierophant, though Jesus might possibly not exist
                                                                      o Jesus as mythic-only metaphor for the entheogen, like Dionysus
                                                                      o Jesus as mythic-only complex composite figure based on many themes
                                                                      including the entheogen and the experiences and insights it produces.

                                                                      Many mythic-only Jesus researchers are favorably interested in the “Jesus as
                                                                      entheogen” theme. Many entheogen scholars are interested in “Jesus as
                                                                      mythic-only metaphor for the entheogen”. The day is past when entheogen
                                                                      scholars could take it for granted that there was a historical Jesus. All
                                                                      entheogen scholars are now more or less aware of the existence, seriousness,
                                                                      and relevance of the mythic-only Jesus theory.

                                                                      Entheogen scholars may be tempted to enlist the historical Jesus as ally for
                                                                      drug policy reform, but they have increasingly become aware that to do so is
                                                                      to build a house on a foundation of sand. Yes, Jesus per the scriptures is
                                                                      against prohibition of visionary plants, but Jesus is just a synthetic figure
                                                                      expressing, among other things, the use of so-called “wine” in Greco-Roman
                                                                      culture to produce ecstatic experiences and insight into the nature of
                                                                      personal agency.

                                                                      Instead of saying that Mr. Jesus personally endorsed drug policy reform, a
                                                                      more relevant and enduring line of research is to establish that *all*
                                                                      Greco-Roman religion was based on the use of visionary plants in wine,
                                                                      including all the cultic banquets and mystery-religions, including Judaism and
                                                                      Christianity.

                                                                      Strategically, it may be best for drug policy reformers to argue and win both
                                                                      scenarios: that if there was a historical Jesus, he was against drug
                                                                      prohibition, and even if there wasn’t a historical Jesus, Christianity, like
                                                                      Judaism and all the Greco-Roman religions and philosophy schools, was based on
                                                                      the use of visionary plants in wine.

                                                                      Few if any prohibitionists today put forth an explicit, reasoned argument that
                                                                      Jesus forbade drugs, or that the New Testament is prohibitionist. The moment
                                                                      they try, they find that the scriptures offer much better support for
                                                                      legalization. If the New Testament provides a basis for deciding on
                                                                      prohibition, it supports legalization, not prohibition.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2033 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Acid-based rock mysticism vs. Christianity: false dichotomy
                                                                      >>[In thinking about the meaning of Classic Rock lyrics,] I tend to shy away
                                                                      from the religious, or Christian themes because I feel that acid rock
                                                                      mysticism and modern day Christianity do not mix.


                                                                      To clarify what you mean by “modern day Christianity”, we need to somehow
                                                                      mention esoteric or mystic Christianity, which *is* close to Acid Rock
                                                                      mysticism. There is and always has been a minority interest, yet a strong and
                                                                      important interest, in esoteric or mystic Christianity — less common, but
                                                                      more significant than the official version of Christianity that the masses
                                                                      know of.


                                                                      >The key is to recognize this as a false dichotomy and to transcend it. This
                                                                      may be what is keeping me stuck in ego death and preventing me from achieving
                                                                      transcendence.


                                                                      There are numerous key false dichotomies:

                                                                      You are either a Believer or not. (Implies that the only kind of Christianity
                                                                      that has ever been held by anyone is my version of Christianity — that only
                                                                      kind of which I am aware; the one type of Christianity of which I’m not
                                                                      totally oblivious.)

                                                                      People should use Christian mysticism techniques, rather than drug-based
                                                                      mysticism. (Actually, there is evidence that real Christian mysticism *was*
                                                                      drug-based mysticism.)

                                                                      Christianity is set against science. (Actually, bunk Christianity is set
                                                                      against bunk Science; authentic Christianity accords with authentic Science.)

                                                                      Old Testament god vs. New Testament god. (Actually, both contain significant
                                                                      amounts of “wrathful justice” and “generous loving mercy” — two universal
                                                                      standard attributes of mystically experienced divinity.)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2034 From: merker2002 Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: One man’s honour/owner (maiden lyrics)
                                                                      the IronMaiden Powerslave album is excellent.
                                                                      the sound production is amazing.

                                                                      4. Flash Of The Blade

                                                                      [Dickinson]

                                                                      As a young boy chasing Dragons [understood as “drunk boy”=entheogenic
                                                                      drunkeness]
                                                                      with your wooden sword so mightly, [compare “clenching plastic fist”]
                                                                      You’re St. George you’re David and you always
                                                                      killed the beast
                                                                      Times change very quickly
                                                                      And you had to grow up early
                                                                      A house in smoking ruins and the bodies
                                                                      at your feet

                                                                      [Chorus:]
                                                                      You’ll die as you lived
                                                                      In a flash of the blade
                                                                      In a corner forgotten by no-one [everyone has to face ego-death]
                                                                      You lived for the touch
                                                                      For the feel of the steel
                                                                      One man, and his Honour. [understood as “and his Owner”]

                                                                      The smell of resined leather
                                                                      The steely iron mask
                                                                      As you cut and thrust and parried at the
                                                                      fencing master’s call [you act to his call, to His command]
                                                                      He taught you all he ever knew
                                                                      To fear no mortal man
                                                                      And now you’ll wreak your vengeance in the
                                                                      Screams of evil man.

                                                                      [Chorus:]
                                                                      [Repeat chorus]

                                                                      the follow-up song “the duelists” has the following chorus
                                                                      [Chorus:]
                                                                      OH…OH… Fight for the Honour
                                                                      Fight for the Splendour
                                                                      Fight for the Pleasure
                                                                      OH…OH… Fight for the Honour
                                                                      Fight for the Splendour
                                                                      Fight for your Life!

                                                                      In the mystic state substitut again “Honour” with “Owner”. A clever
                                                                      play of words.
                                                                      The ego which helds itself real fights for its Honour.
                                                                      In the mystic state, where one’s own reliance upon Him (Your Owner)
                                                                      is revealed one must *fight* for the Owner.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2035 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 05/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: Mexican Catholic retablos (oil paint on tin)
                                                                      I added some book links and some possibly more stable links to images,
                                                                      including grail images, Christ in fountain of blood flagellating himself with
                                                                      grape vine.

                                                                      Noticed similarity between lone soul in purgatory, sometimes shown almost like
                                                                      an egg in a cup or nest of flames, and the “Jesus in cup of blood” symbol in
                                                                      Grail art.

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/retablos.htm
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2036 From: ichang1497 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: “seriousness” in Rock and definition of “modern day Christianity”
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >>Ozzy Osbourne definitely is not guilty of that.
                                                                      > No album takes its lyrics more seriously than Ozzy Osbourne’s album
                                                                      Diary of a
                                                                      > Madman. Similarly, Sabotage is also insanely serious and grandiose.
                                                                      >


                                                                      Let me clarify my earlier remark about Ozzy Osbourne. I meant
                                                                      that the phenomenon of “The Osbournes” TV show shows that Ozzy
                                                                      the man has a sense of humour about himself. I actually know
                                                                      very little about his music.

                                                                      I started on this journey by listening to and researching the Beatles
                                                                      who tried to capture the feeling one gets from transcendental
                                                                      meditation and eastern religion in their music. Of course, the acid
                                                                      experience is a huge part of that experience.

                                                                      Perhaps my critique of “seriousness” in Rock comes from the technical
                                                                      and academic nature of the posts on this newsgroup. I recently
                                                                      dropped out of a Master’s Program, so I am in an anti-academic frame
                                                                      of mind at the moment. I have more faith in my own intuition and
                                                                      intellectual efforts than in institutional knowledge, much to my own
                                                                      detriment.

                                                                      I have relied heavily on the works of Joseph Campbell for a roadmap
                                                                      of my journey. As you may or may not know, Campbell has become
                                                                      popular through his populist approach to mythology and Jungian
                                                                      psychology. I am trying to reconcile my familiarity with Campbell
                                                                      to “modern day Christianity”, which I define the Christian Church
                                                                      as an institution, which deems salvation is achieved primarily
                                                                      through works rather than faith.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2037 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Re: “seriousness” in Rock and definition of “modern day Christian
                                                                      >>I started on this journey by listening to and researching the Beatles who
                                                                      tried to capture the feeling one gets from transcendental meditation and
                                                                      eastern religion in their music. Of course, the acid experience is a huge
                                                                      part of that experience.


                                                                      The music of Ozzy and Beatles has much in common — playful taboo crossing and
                                                                      the mystic altered state, mystery-religion, cosmic gnostic footloose
                                                                      profundity, ultimate concerns transcendently freely mixed with British wacky
                                                                      absurd humor.

                                                                      Metal such as Iron Maiden and Metallica can cover only half the themes or mood
                                                                      of the intense mystic altered state; that genre as an expressive medium is
                                                                      restricted. Mainstream acid-oriented Rock can cover more ground in exploring
                                                                      the world of the intense mystic altered state, because it does not have to
                                                                      restrict itself to constant heaviness.

                                                                      Ozzy/Sabbath is ultimately superior to Metallica as an expressive style
                                                                      because Ozzy/Sabbath has always had full room for humor and light beauty,
                                                                      unlike the Metal genre. Much of the Iron Maiden lyrics seem to have their
                                                                      inspired quality handicapped by a rigid rule of always having to be dark,
                                                                      negative, hardcore.


                                                                      >>Perhaps my critique of “seriousness” in Rock comes from the technical and
                                                                      academic nature of the posts on this newsgroup.

                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/#AlteredStateLyrics
                                                                      It doesn’t get any more straightforward than this set of Web pages. An
                                                                      explanation of allusions to the mystic altered state is potentially as
                                                                      straightforward and explicit than this. Where can people find a less
                                                                      “technical and academic” explanation of Rock mysticism than this? The present
                                                                      posting would as well, and as absurdly, be called “technical and academic”.

                                                                      This discussion group is technical and academic compared to postings saying
                                                                      just “Dude, too much tripping and my soul’s worn thin.” One step simpler than
                                                                      this discussion group will land you in the public newsgroups.

                                                                      If you hate academic bluster, you’ll love to hate the existing books that fail
                                                                      to even see the presence of primary religious experiencing in Heavy Rock. The
                                                                      allusions go right over their heads, so we end up with the familiar
                                                                      combination of sophisticated-sounding blustery explanation, that completely
                                                                      misses the essence, producing a study that pretends to be about certain Rock
                                                                      lyrics, but really ends up being about the ideas embraced by Academia.

                                                                      I would like to search more of the books about Rock for real insight — not
                                                                      just saying that bands used LSD, not just saying that Lucy… is about LSD,
                                                                      but spelling out the allusions to altered-state phenomena in songs far and
                                                                      wide. The books I’ve seen have nothing even remotely like that.


                                                                      Book lists:

                                                                      Rock as philosophical mystery-religion
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/2PTKEDT3LYDKZ/
                                                                      Some of these books on Heavy Rock *might* provide insight. I wouldn’t count
                                                                      on it, but look up “acid”, “mystic”, “lsd”, “psychedelics”, and “drugs” in the
                                                                      indexes.

                                                                      Rush books (Rock group)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/listmania/list-browse/-/2RLOST1ROMDCA



                                                                      >>I recently dropped out of a Master’s Program, so I am in an anti-academic
                                                                      frame of mind at the moment. I have more faith in my own intuition and
                                                                      intellectual efforts than in institutional knowledge, much to my own
                                                                      detriment.


                                                                      Reading today’s quarter-baked scholarship is a necessary evil. I have to do a
                                                                      major mental transformation to extract value out of most books.

                                                                      The biggest mistake of so-called “higher education” is modern ignorance of the
                                                                      use of visionary plants throughout human history. That fault may be laid on
                                                                      academia rather than outside it.


                                                                      >>I have relied heavily on the works of Joseph Campbell for a roadmap of my
                                                                      journey.


                                                                      From what I’ve read so far, Campbell seems more insightful than Jung. The
                                                                      problem is the whole modern Psychology paradigm, which distorts its own field
                                                                      as much as shining light on it. Both of them are grounded in the era before
                                                                      the late 1960s, and therefore they are almost wholly ignorant of the
                                                                      explanatory solution provided by visionary plants.

                                                                      Scholarship in psychology and symbols will eventually be divided into before
                                                                      and after the era of the rediscovery of entheogens, which had a turning point
                                                                      around 1972. By 1972, any scholar of myth-religion-mysticism who was not
                                                                      aware of the entheogen theory of religion is guilty of professional
                                                                      incompetence and inexcusable oblivious ignorance. Prior to around 1972,
                                                                      theories of myth-religion-mysticism can be excused for ignorance of the
                                                                      entheogen solution to their questions — not so after about 1972.


                                                                      Jung on Christianity
                                                                      Murray Stein (Introduction), Carl Gustav Jung
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0691006970


                                                                      >>Campbell has become popular through his populist approach to mythology and
                                                                      Jungian psychology. I am trying to reconcile my familiarity with Campbell to
                                                                      “modern day Christianity”, which I define the Christian Church as an
                                                                      institution, which deems salvation is achieved primarily through works rather
                                                                      than faith.


                                                                      Official Christianity is a system of salvation through works, with a veneer of
                                                                      salvation through faith and regeneration through the Holy Spirit laid on top.
                                                                      Because the official Church in fact lacks the Holy Spirit, the masses fall
                                                                      back onto striving for salvation through works.

                                                                      Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor (covers Christian
                                                                      myth-religion, fine content)
                                                                      Joseph Campbell
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1577312023
                                                                      Oct. 2001


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2038 From: merker2002 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Magic harmonies (Rime of the ancient mariner)
                                                                      In Rime of the ancient mariner(Powerslave album) there is a passage
                                                                      of appegio harmonies played with accoustic guitar (beginning at 5’07)
                                                                      which seem to have some strange evocative quality in the mystic
                                                                      altered state.
                                                                      They seem to evoke the egodeath quarrel. The harmonies create a
                                                                      certain sphere which is created not only of sound but also colours
                                                                      and it feels like some distinct remembering. There is a sound of a
                                                                      cracking door layed underneath which additionaly seems relevant in
                                                                      the mystic state. It sounds like something is short of bursting, like
                                                                      a ballon just about to burst apart any moment.

                                                                      regs
                                                                      ,merker
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2039 From: merker2002 Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: Sound perception in the altered state
                                                                      It’s sheer amazing how much better music can sound in the altered
                                                                      state.
                                                                      The sound becomes wider sounds crystal clear and it seems one can
                                                                      perceive any instrument simultaneously and yet very distinctly.
                                                                      Sounds which are nearly impossible to hear when not mystified are
                                                                      impossible to ignore when heard in the mystical state.

                                                                      Only thing is one should not dose too high in order to be still able
                                                                      to understand the lyrics.
                                                                      Also the time-stretching is sometimes sheer amazing. It seems like
                                                                      one 4minute song goes on for eternity.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 2040 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 06/07/2003
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathPostingRules.txt
                                                                      This text file is automatically posted to the discussion group every two
                                                                      weeks, in order to provide guidelines for writers, to keep the postings
                                                                      on-topic and help writers know what subjects are considered most desirable
                                                                      by this audience.

                                                                      It is possible to write on most any topic and have it be relevant for this
                                                                      Egodeath discussion group if you show how the posting is related to the
                                                                      in-scope topics for this discussion group. This group is not formally
                                                                      moderated, but it is consistently focused on the defined topics, including
                                                                      peripheral topics if the writer explicitly connects them to the core topics.

                                                                      Vague, unclear, hazy postings are off-topic and out of scope and are subject to moderation. Contributors must make the effort for rational, clear, explicit, intellectual, articulate, and comprehensible presentation of particular points.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman

                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath — describes
                                                                      in-scope discussion topics, as follows.

                                                                      This discussion group covers the cybernetic theory of ego death and
                                                                      ego transcendence, including:

                                                                      o Nonreductionistic block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
                                                                      and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
                                                                      holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

                                                                      o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
                                                                      ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
                                                                      self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
                                                                      and self-government.

                                                                      o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
                                                                      transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

                                                                      o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, the Eleusinian mysteries and
                                                                      cracking the allegorical code of the mystery religions, mythic
                                                                      metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
                                                                      and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
                                                                      Acid Rock mysticism.

                                                                      o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
                                                                      psychosis and schizophrenia.

                                                                      Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 20: 2002-08-18

                                                                      Site Map


                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 970 From: Coraxo Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 971 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 972 From: Coraxo Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 973 From: egodeath Date: 19/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathTopics.txt
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 974 From: peter zedak Date: 19/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 975 From: peter zedak Date: 20/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 976 From: Coraxo Date: 20/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Digest Number 258
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 977 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 978 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 979 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 980 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 981 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 982 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 983 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 984 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 985 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 986 From: wrmspirit Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 987 From: theecorax Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 988 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 989 From: theecorax Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 990 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: FW: Christ Conspiracy Christian Bashing?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 991 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 992 From: merker2002 Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 994 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Only 2 denominations: Literalist & esoteric
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 995 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 996 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 997 From: George Douvris Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: petty comments
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 998 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: petty comments
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 999 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1000 From: eldoreth2002 Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Refuge
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1001 From: wrmspirit Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1002 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1003 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1004 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Enth. theory relig., evidence vs. paradigms
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1005 From: Coraxo Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Enth. theory relig., evidence vs. paradigms
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1006 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: “Clueless apostles” = uninitiated Christians
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1007 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1008 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: Last Time Around
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1009 From: theecorax Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Farewell
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1010 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Trumpets of Heaven: Van Halen Amp Tone
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1011 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegorythrough intense peak-state filter
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1012 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Amazon book lists about mythic Christianity
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1013 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Trumpets of Heaven: The Datura Annunciation
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1014 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1015 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1016 From: wrmspirit Date: 26/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Import. of myth-only Paul to myth-only Jesus rsrch
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1018 From: Jennifer Jackson Date: 27/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Import. of myth-only Paul to myth-only Jesus rsrch
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1019 From: merker2002 Date: 29/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: motive: thunderbolt through skull
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1020 From: c3273 Date: 29/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Consciouness model of universe



                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 970 From: Coraxo Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Hi Michael:

                                                                      I stand by my use of the term abuse.

                                                                      I am not using the term “abuse” in the connotative term like Barry McCaffrey
                                                                      and other “Drug Czar” types, I am using the term specifically to distinguish
                                                                      the entheogenic use versus the pseudoshamanic “lets play Indian” type of
                                                                      hippy tripping characteristic of McKenna’s seriously flawed work.

                                                                      Even still, much entheogenic use of these materials is not “shamanic”;
                                                                      taking these plants is not a shamanic act in itself. Shamanism requires a
                                                                      certain setting, one which is divinatory and usually in the healing context
                                                                      – not merely self-exploration which is the usual context of most serious,
                                                                      non-abusive exploratory use.

                                                                      There are people who have used these materials seriously in exploring the
                                                                      mind and spirit – for example Strassman’s research with DMT and Shulgin’s
                                                                      documented experimentation, many however appear to abuse these substances
                                                                      seeking the next radical trip – to see how ripped they can get.

                                                                      I am not using the term “abuse” in the prohibitionist style you
                                                                      characterize, rather I am critiquing McKenna’s material as a type of
                                                                      misleading fake shamanism which has spurred interest in the abuse of, rather
                                                                      than the serious use of entheogens in a sacred context – of which the Uniao
                                                                      do Vegetal is an example.

                                                                      I hope that clears this up.

                                                                      Corax


                                                                      From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman>
                                                                      Reply-To: egodeath
                                                                      Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 22:36:49 -0700
                                                                      To: “Egodeath Group” <egodeath>
                                                                      Subject: [egodeath] Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens



                                                                      >Some people claim to be “shamans” to support their abuse of mind-altering
                                                                      chemicals.


                                                                      “Abuse”? That is a totally empty, nebulous, and meaningless term. One
                                                                      should
                                                                      say “use”, which sticks to the facts and is not a judgement based on the
                                                                      sand
                                                                      of arbitrariness. There cannot be any debate about whether he used; the
                                                                      most
                                                                      debatable thing in the world is that he abused. Why not stay on more solid
                                                                      ground, rather than speaking the forked-tongue language of deceipt crafted
                                                                      for
                                                                      us by those of the evil, phony prohibitionist gravy-train, vicars of
                                                                      Antichrist and haters of the true Christ.

                                                                      There are plenty of things to criticize about McKenna without stooping so
                                                                      low
                                                                      as to hurl the prefabricated refuse at him provided by the prohibitionist,
                                                                      amoral, profiteering deceivers. They are eager to say “abuse” as a synonym
                                                                      for “use”, when one should reserve the term to a strict and narrow usage,
                                                                      for
                                                                      cases where the prohibitionists and decriminalizers can both agree that
                                                                      willful, voluntary use has crossed over into serious unwilled abuse.


                                                                      >McKenna evidently lacked Gnosis, but he can be considered a Gnostic in that
                                                                      he encountered some sort of Intelligences like the noetic agencies alluded
                                                                      to
                                                                      in Gnostic scriptures.


                                                                      McKenna should be dismissed because of his airhead nonsense about alien
                                                                      encounters. We do sense being pulled and fabricated in every thought by an
                                                                      alien hidden God, Fate, or transcendent Puppetmastering force, but
                                                                      encounters
                                                                      with literalized personifications is weak thinking. Again we see that a
                                                                      distinction is needed between Literalist supersitious Gnosticism and
                                                                      esoteric,
                                                                      rational Gnosticism — low vs. high Gnosticism.


                                                                      >The Gnostics didn’t necessarily take entheogens. Noetic agencies can be
                                                                      apprehended through non-chemical means as well as through entheogens; they
                                                                      can
                                                                      be intuited through introspection.


                                                                      Entheogens are not needed to trigger the mystic altered state; meditation in
                                                                      a
                                                                      cave of sensory deprivation can cause one to be born from a rock, born a
                                                                      second time from the cosmic womb. However, entheogens enjoy pride of place
                                                                      as
                                                                      the main, reliable method. All mystery religions and related religions of
                                                                      antiquity, had sacred meals, symposions, Seder meals, and love feasts in
                                                                      dead
                                                                      center of their practice. Search on “sacrament of apolytrosis”.
                                                                      http://www.google.com/search?q=sacrament+of+apolytrosis

                                                                      To the esoteric, higher Gnostics, circular time is a description of what is
                                                                      directly experienced in the mystic altered state — profound deja-vu
                                                                      “remembering”. To the Literalist, supernatural, lower Gnostics, circular
                                                                      time
                                                                      is theory of how time and years actually work.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com




                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 971 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Popular entheogenics requires more critical evaluation. The term “drug abuse”
                                                                      shouldn’t be used for that evaluation, though, because whatever errors are
                                                                      found in popular entheogenics, the error isn’t what’s called “drug abuse”,
                                                                      which phrase already has an established, different usage, an inherently
                                                                      propagandist usage. The phrase “drug abuse” is essentially and inherently a
                                                                      propagandist term, as it is popularly used.

                                                                      The term “drug abuse” could be used to criticize neo-shamanism. The
                                                                      legitimacy of usage of a phrase depends largely on how the user defines it.

                                                                      To assume that a phrase has only a single, fixed meaning would be a failure to
                                                                      master language. The term “drug abuse” does also have a legitimate,
                                                                      technical, medical, non-propagandist usage. But neither the correct medical
                                                                      usage nor the propagandist usage fits a novel usage of the term “drug abuse”
                                                                      to describe distorted, fake, pseudo-shamanism, or domesticated, ersatz
                                                                      shamanism.

                                                                      Although such a novel usage is perhaps justifiable, it is generally misleading
                                                                      and incongruous to use the term “drug abuse” to describe ersatz shamanism, and
                                                                      of gravest concern, such a usage implies support for the dishonest and immoral
                                                                      prohibitionism scam. It’s dangerous to use the term “drug abuse” to criticize
                                                                      ersatz shamanism. We should seek a way to criticize drug-motivated ersatz
                                                                      shamanism without employing a novel usage of the highly problematic and
                                                                      oppressive term “drug abuse”.

                                                                      We shouldn’t distort shamanism and shouldn’t distort drug usage. However,
                                                                      there is nothing wrong with innovative new blends of drug use and shamanism,
                                                                      forming a neo-shamanism. Who are we to judge and condemn drug-oriented
                                                                      neo-shamanism as “ersatz shamanism” — why not call it “genuine, valid,
                                                                      authentic neo-shamanism”?

                                                                      Any new usage of the term “drug abuse”, even if defined, should be done with
                                                                      caution and seriousness for the sake of the persecuted martyrs, and to avoid
                                                                      supporting the evil, phony drug war. Criticism of popular entheogen mysticism
                                                                      should be done cautiously, so that our words and criticisms don’t support the
                                                                      abusers of authority who rob, kill, poison, and imprison in the name of
                                                                      prohibition.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 972 From: Coraxo Date: 18/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      If you re-read my original post I did not use the term “drug abuse”; that is
                                                                      your reading of what I wrote.

                                                                      I wrote : “As such McKenna falls into the category of individuals claiming
                                                                      to be “shamans” to support their abuse of mind altering chemicals. “



                                                                      Corax

                                                                      From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman>
                                                                      Reply-To: egodeath
                                                                      Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:42:06 -0700
                                                                      To: <egodeath>
                                                                      Subject: RE: [egodeath] Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens


                                                                      Popular entheogenics requires more critical evaluation. The term “drug
                                                                      abuse”
                                                                      shouldn’t be used for that evaluation, though, because whatever errors are
                                                                      found in popular entheogenics, the error isn’t what’s called “drug abuse”,
                                                                      which phrase already has an established, different usage, an inherently
                                                                      propagandist usage. The phrase “drug abuse” is essentially and inherently a
                                                                      propagandist term, as it is popularly used.




                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 973 From: egodeath Date: 19/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: File – EgodeathTopics.txt
                                                                      This text file is automatically posted to the discussion group every two
                                                                      weeks, in order to provide guidelines for writers, to keep the postings
                                                                      on-topic and help writers know what subjects are considered most desirable
                                                                      by this audience.

                                                                      It is possible to write on most any topic and have it be relevant for this
                                                                      Egodeath discussion group if you show how the posting is related to the
                                                                      in-scope topics for this discussion group. This group is not formally
                                                                      moderated, but it is consistently focused on the defined topics, including
                                                                      peripheral topics if the writer explicitly connects them to the core topics.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman

                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath — describes
                                                                      in-scope discussion topics, as follows.

                                                                      This discussion group covers the cybernetic theory of ego death and
                                                                      ego transcendence, including:

                                                                      o Nonreductionistic block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
                                                                      and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
                                                                      holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

                                                                      o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
                                                                      ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
                                                                      self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
                                                                      and self-government.

                                                                      o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
                                                                      transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

                                                                      o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, the Eleusinian mysteries and
                                                                      cracking the allegorical code of the mystery religions, mythic
                                                                      metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
                                                                      and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
                                                                      Acid Rock mysticism.

                                                                      o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
                                                                      psychosis and schizophrenia.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 974 From: peter zedak Date: 19/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      Note: forwarded message attached.


                                                                      __________________________________________________
                                                                      Do You Yahoo!?
                                                                      HotJobs – Search Thousands of New Jobs
                                                                      http://www.hotjobs.com

                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 975 From: peter zedak Date: 20/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      regarding this crap from “corax” –


                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics &
                                                                      entheogens

                                                                      If you re-read my original post I did not use the
                                                                      term “drug abuse”; that is
                                                                      your reading of what I wrote.

                                                                      I wrote : “As such McKenna falls into the category of
                                                                      individuals claiming
                                                                      to be “shamans” to support their abuse of mind
                                                                      altering chemicals. “

                                                                      Corax


                                                                      it’s great to have a bit of the old commissar
                                                                      mentality creep into the discussion.
                                                                      please, oh great corax, tell us all who should be
                                                                      allowed to use (NOT abuse) “mind
                                                                      altering chemicals” (NOT drugs). you might also
                                                                      reveal the proper “sacred context”
                                                                      (NOT frivolous) that the elect use to injest their
                                                                      “mind altering chemicals” (NOT
                                                                      drugs).

                                                                      jesus christ, don’t these guys ever give up??
                                                                      anybody who’s first inclination is to proscribe the
                                                                      use of pyschedelics or
                                                                      attempt to foist his own idea of “authentic”
                                                                      shamanism, doesn’t get it.


                                                                      and as for the statement below –


                                                                      There are people who have used these materials
                                                                      seriously in exploring the
                                                                      mind and spirit – for example Strassman’s research
                                                                      with DMT and Shulgin’s
                                                                      documented experimentation, many however appear to
                                                                      abuse these substances
                                                                      seeking the next radical trip – to see how ripped
                                                                      they can get.


                                                                      well, i can’t say much about strassman or his
                                                                      research but give me a break
                                                                      with shulgin. he get’s 10 or 15 of his test group
                                                                      together and they all
                                                                      proceed to get ripped to the tits (or not, that’s the
                                                                      thing, mr corax, about
                                                                      mind altering chemicals and the individual, it seems
                                                                      to be different for
                                                                      everybody). the only difference between them and any
                                                                      group of like-minded
                                                                      people are the trip reports shulgin would demand.

                                                                      by the way, mr or ms corax, how “radical” have your
                                                                      trips (if any) been?? just
                                                                      wondering if we’re talking about the same thing.

                                                                      peter zedak







                                                                      __________________________________________________
                                                                      Do You Yahoo!?
                                                                      HotJobs – Search Thousands of New Jobs
                                                                      http://www.hotjobs.com

                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 976 From: Coraxo Date: 20/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Digest Number 258
                                                                      Well Peter;

                                                                      When the dialog descends into personal attacks the dialog is over.
                                                                      There is nothing I care to write in response to your diatribe.

                                                                      Corax

                                                                      From: peter zedak <pzedak>
                                                                      Reply-To: egodeath
                                                                      Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
                                                                      To: egodeath
                                                                      Cc: pzedak
                                                                      Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258



                                                                      regarding this crap from “corax” –


                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics &
                                                                      entheogens

                                                                      If you re-read my original post I did not use the
                                                                      term “drug abuse”; that is
                                                                      your reading of what I wrote.

                                                                      I wrote : “As such McKenna falls into the category of
                                                                      individuals claiming
                                                                      to be “shamans” to support their abuse of mind
                                                                      altering chemicals. “

                                                                      Corax


                                                                      it’s great to have a bit of the old commissar
                                                                      mentality creep into the discussion.
                                                                      please, oh great corax, tell us all who should be
                                                                      allowed to use (NOT abuse) “mind
                                                                      altering chemicals” (NOT drugs). you might also
                                                                      reveal the proper “sacred context”
                                                                      (NOT frivolous) that the elect use to injest their
                                                                      “mind altering chemicals” (NOT
                                                                      drugs).

                                                                      jesus christ, don’t these guys ever give up??
                                                                      anybody who’s first inclination is to proscribe the
                                                                      use of pyschedelics or
                                                                      attempt to foist his own idea of “authentic”
                                                                      shamanism, doesn’t get it.


                                                                      and as for the statement below –


                                                                      There are people who have used these materials
                                                                      seriously in exploring the
                                                                      mind and spirit – for example Strassman’s research
                                                                      with DMT and Shulgin’s
                                                                      documented experimentation, many however appear to
                                                                      abuse these substances
                                                                      seeking the next radical trip – to see how ripped
                                                                      they can get.


                                                                      well, i can’t say much about strassman or his
                                                                      research but give me a break
                                                                      with shulgin. he get’s 10 or 15 of his test group
                                                                      together and they all
                                                                      proceed to get ripped to the tits (or not, that’s the
                                                                      thing, mr corax, about
                                                                      mind altering chemicals and the individual, it seems
                                                                      to be different for
                                                                      everybody). the only difference between them and any
                                                                      group of like-minded
                                                                      people are the trip reports shulgin would demand.

                                                                      by the way, mr or ms corax, how “radical” have your
                                                                      trips (if any) been?? just
                                                                      wondering if we’re talking about the same thing.

                                                                      peter zedak







                                                                      __________________________________________________
                                                                      Do You Yahoo!?
                                                                      HotJobs – Search Thousands of New Jobs
                                                                      http://www.hotjobs.com

                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


                                                                      Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                                                                      <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=229641.2166546.3626727.1829184/D=egroupweb/S=17056892
                                                                      58:HM/A=1142329/R=0/*http://promo.yahoo.com/debtscape/>
                                                                      egodeath (to post)
                                                                      egodeath-unsubscribe
                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com

                                                                      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
                                                                      <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 977 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      I didn’t see a forwarded or attached message.

                                                                      >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      >From: peter zedak
                                                                      >Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:35 PM
                                                                      >Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Note: forwarded message attached.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 978 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      — In egodeath@y…, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…> wrote:
                                                                      > I didn’t see a forwarded or attached message.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > >—–Original Message—–
                                                                      > >From: peter zedak
                                                                      > >Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:35 PM
                                                                      > >Subject: Fwd: FW: [egodeath] Digest Number 258
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >Note: forwarded message attached.
                                                                      > >
                                                                      > >

                                                                      Maybe you need to look here:

                                                                      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/975
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 979 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Some aspects of popular use of entheogens can be criticized, but the concept
                                                                      of “abuse” of entheogens is too problematic to be useful, because it asserts
                                                                      that there is a “right way” and a “wrong way” to use entheogens, or a legit
                                                                      and illegit way. In contemporary entheogenic neo-shamanism, the worst abuse
                                                                      might be merely the abuse of language, redefining the term “shaman” so as to
                                                                      simply equate it with use of entheogens. That might be an abuse of
                                                                      definitions, but isn’t the “abuse” of mind-altering chemicals.

                                                                      Some spiritual use of entheogens may be described as pseudoshamanic, or neo-
                                                                      or quasi-shamanic, “let’s play Indian” type of hippie-style tripping. That
                                                                      kind of use of entheogens isn’t automatically or inherently “abuse” of
                                                                      mind-altering chemicals. We can only evaluate the “abuse” of entheogens if we
                                                                      have some standards for assessing use versus abuse. The mere fact alone of
                                                                      claiming to be shaman-identified, whether legit or not, isn’t enough to
                                                                      determine whether one is “abusing” entheogens.

                                                                      There are two distinct issues:

                                                                      1. What qualifications are required to grant certain entheogen use as
                                                                      “legitimate” shamanic entheogen use?

                                                                      2. What constitutes “proper use” versus “abuse” of entheogens?

                                                                      A certain moralist attitude asserts that legitimate use of entheogens occurs
                                                                      only in serious exploration of mind and spirit. But intentions don’t control
                                                                      the outcome; from fun intentions can come the highest fall of enlightenment,
                                                                      as attested by Led Zeppelin.

                                                                      In My Time of Dying:

                                                                      If my wings should fail me,
                                                                      Lord. Please meet me with another pair
                                                                      Well, well, well, so I can die easy
                                                                      Oh, Saint Peter, at the gates of heaven…
                                                                      Won’t you let me in?
                                                                      I never did no harm.
                                                                      I never did no wrong
                                                                      I never thought I’d do anybody no wrong
                                                                      Oh, Lord, deliver me
                                                                      All the wrong I’ve done
                                                                      You can deliver me, Lord
                                                                      I only wanted to have some fun.

                                                                      http://tinpan.fortunecity.com/haight/687/zeppg.html


                                                                      The moralists assume that we can divide entheogen use into these categories
                                                                      and then assign “abuse” to the last category:

                                                                      A. Shamanism: divinatory, healing (legitimate use of entheogens)
                                                                      B. Serious self-exploration of mind and spirit (legitimate use of entheogens)
                                                                      C. Recreational and casual, or nonstructured exploration, experimenting with
                                                                      ascent (illegitimate use of entheogens; abuse)

                                                                      We could just as well use dismissive language for A and B, and use respectful
                                                                      language to identify C, and then attach the word “abuse” to A and B and the
                                                                      notion of “proper use” to C.

                                                                      A. Superstitious, primitive animal-identified wishful thinking (abuse of
                                                                      entheogens)
                                                                      B. New-age mush-headed escapism and entity-multiplying frenetic Gnostic
                                                                      pseudo-spirituality (abuse of entheogens)
                                                                      C. Contemporary, exploratory, open-ended experimentation with high-intensity
                                                                      ascent, with multimedia and varied contexts of activities (legitimate use of
                                                                      entheogens)

                                                                      We should be both generous *and* critical of authentic shamanistic use of
                                                                      entheogens — that’s what it means to be a fair and trustworthy critic with
                                                                      balanced judgement.

                                                                      We should be both generous *and* critical of use of entheogens for
                                                                      self-exploration of mind and spirit.

                                                                      We should be both generous *and* critical of open-ended, social, exploratory,
                                                                      recreational, or adventure-seeking use of entheogens.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 980 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      I think I was being generous and critical. Those who are using
                                                                      the materials for fun and categorize their thrill seeking as
                                                                      “shamanism” invite criticism. there is nothing wrong with being
                                                                      critical of the self-proclaimed experts like McKenna and Leary,
                                                                      they in my estimation got it wrong in many regards despite their
                                                                      use of “entheogens”.

                                                                      Case in point is the Leary-Wilson 8-Circuit Model which is not
                                                                      based in any solid science at all.

                                                                      If we cannot be critical and MUST assume that anything goes
                                                                      then the principle of virtue leaves your system, Michael.

                                                                      Corax

                                                                      > We should be both generous *and* critical of open-ended,
                                                                      social, exploratory,
                                                                      > recreational, or adventure-seeking use of entheogens.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 981 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      — In egodeath@y…, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…> wrote:

                                                                      > The moralists assume that we can divide entheogen use into
                                                                      these categories
                                                                      > and then assign “abuse” to the last category:
                                                                      >
                                                                      > A. Shamanism: divinatory, healing (legitimate use of
                                                                      entheogens)

                                                                      Actually I was not making a moral position at all with regard to
                                                                      shamanism.

                                                                      I was speaking from a cultural and anthropological perspective.

                                                                      Shamans, in the strictests sense, are Siberian healers and
                                                                      visionaries who use trance-like states to heal and divine. This
                                                                      term has been broadened now to mean anything people would
                                                                      like it to mean.

                                                                      The term has been misapplied to Native American,
                                                                      Mesoamerican and Amazonian healers and diviners and their
                                                                      practices.

                                                                      I was criticizing McKenna’s further misuse of the terminology to
                                                                      define his own use of DMT as somehow being of the same
                                                                      nature and type of experience as Siberian of Native American
                                                                      visionary experience. It was not – there is no way he can have the
                                                                      type of emic perspective necessary to see what a “shamanic”
                                                                      experience really is like – he is an outsider, and like you or me,
                                                                      cannot have the inside information to characterize his experience
                                                                      as ‘shamanic”.

                                                                      Reports from indigenous perspectives have characterized the
                                                                      use of visionary plants in a recreational setting as “abuse” in as
                                                                      much as this usage deviates from the original intent as
                                                                      perceived by the indigenous user.

                                                                      Take some time to read for yourself the comments Maria Sabina
                                                                      made with regard to the popularization of the mushroom, no
                                                                      small number of indigenous have protested the “misuse” of their
                                                                      sacred medicines by outsiders.

                                                                      The arguments that you put forth lack cultural insight and speak
                                                                      only from a libertarian perspective, one which does not appear to
                                                                      have much insight into cultures outside of the current American
                                                                      dialog on “drug abuse”.

                                                                      We are all familiar with the arbitrariness of “morality” from the
                                                                      modern cynical perspective, as well as the arbitrariness of drug
                                                                      laws. However, does this give us the ethical imperative to
                                                                      redefine the cultural practices of indigenous people to lend
                                                                      validity to the non-traditional use of visionary plants among
                                                                      segments of the dominator society?

                                                                      Why use the term “shaman” at all? Why redefine it to suit one’s
                                                                      purposes? I suppose that one can do whatever one likes and
                                                                      make words mean whatever one likes, but then like Alice in her
                                                                      argument with Humpty Dumpty one gets nowhere.

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 982 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      >I think I was being generous and critical. Those who are using
                                                                      >the materials for fun and categorize their thrill seeking as
                                                                      >”shamanism” invite criticism. there is nothing wrong with being
                                                                      >critical of the self-proclaimed experts like McKenna and Leary,
                                                                      >they in my estimation got it wrong in many regards despite their
                                                                      >use of “entheogens”.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Case in point is the Leary-Wilson 8-Circuit Model which is not
                                                                      >based in any solid science at all.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >If we cannot be critical and MUST assume that anything goes
                                                                      >then the principle of virtue leaves your system, Michael.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Corax

                                                                      I probably essentially agree with your criticism, and hope you further detail
                                                                      it. Given the crisis situation of prohibition, I strongly caution against
                                                                      using the term “abuse” — a much-abused term of abuse — without specifying
                                                                      what’s meant. I’m interested in clear criticisms of McKenna, Leary, and other
                                                                      entheogenists, including the assertion that they dissemble about their real
                                                                      motives. If people take entheogens within one framework with its motives,
                                                                      they shouldn’t twist reality and claim to be using entheogens within a
                                                                      different framework and motives — one which has greater credibility.

                                                                      The entheogenic neoshamans might be guilty of stealing credibility from the
                                                                      shamans. Don Juan seems to have been fiction dishonestly posed as literal
                                                                      truth (I have a book about this). Entheogenists shouldn’t be dishonest, and
                                                                      shouldn’t distort shamanism, entheogen use, and their own motives in order to
                                                                      dishonestly inflate the own legitimacy of their own use.

                                                                      As explained in the book On Drugs by Lenson, the contemporary West needs to
                                                                      stand on its own feet instead of assuming that all entheogenic legit tradition
                                                                      lies elsewhere, among the Other — American Indians, shamans, the East. This
                                                                      is complicated by the certainly legitimate need to, while we find our own
                                                                      truly native entheogen framework, relate and connect it to previous
                                                                      frameworks.

                                                                      Ken Wilber has predicted the rise of a true native contemporary Western
                                                                      religion via combining Course In Miracles (a Christian framework) with LSD.
                                                                      Similarly, I have highlighted acid-oriented Rock as the authentic
                                                                      mystery-religion of our time.

                                                                      — Michael
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 983 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      >Actually I was not making a moral position at all with regard to
                                                                      >shamanism.

                                                                      Yes, I thought afterwards that my use of the term “moral” was incorrect.

                                                                      Thanks for the specific critiques.

                                                                      You caution against the term “shaman” in a contemporary entheogenic context; I
                                                                      caution against the term “abuse” given today’s prohibition climate. Both
                                                                      terms may be more misleading and distorting than enlightening.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 984 From: theecorax Date: 21/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      — In egodeath@y…, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@e…> wrote:
                                                                      > >Actually I was not making a moral position at all with regard to
                                                                      > >shamanism.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Yes, I thought afterwards that my use of the term “moral” was
                                                                      incorrect.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Thanks for the specific critiques.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > You caution against the term “shaman” in a contemporary
                                                                      entheogenic context; I
                                                                      > caution against the term “abuse” given today’s prohibition
                                                                      climate. Both
                                                                      > terms may be more misleading and distorting than
                                                                      enlightening.

                                                                      Your points are well taken.

                                                                      I understand that the term “abuse” is so laden with Prohibition
                                                                      and Drug War context that I should have used a different term or
                                                                      phrase to characterize my critique of McKenna’s post-modernist
                                                                      use of the term “shaman”.

                                                                      Hopefully I have cleared up some level of misunderstanding in
                                                                      our discourse.

                                                                      Thanks for your input and feedback.

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 985 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      There are 3 main positions:
                                                                      A. All entheogen use is bad; all use is mis-use.
                                                                      B. Some entheogen use is legitimate use, some use is mis-use.
                                                                      C. All entheogen use is legitimate; there are no grounds for the concept of
                                                                      “mis-use”.

                                                                      I don’t understand position B, which Maria Sabina, Wasson, and possibly Huxley
                                                                      hold. What would drive a curando or Gnostic to label other people’s use of
                                                                      entheogens as “mis-use”? Does that claim have any objective grounds, or is it
                                                                      purely a free-floating value-judgement that can’t have any basis but personal
                                                                      worldview-preference? Suppose a hippie in the early 1960s in Oaxaca who takes
                                                                      mushrooms casually and recreationally, and has a traumatic or crazy
                                                                      experience — is that “mis-use”? On what basis can such a judgment rest?
                                                                      Casual or foolish use is casual, foolish use — but is it mis-use?

                                                                      I hold position C: some use is foolish, harmful, ill-advised — but generally,
                                                                      the concept of “mis-use” or “proper use” doesn’t apply to entheogens any more
                                                                      than to coffee, cola, or tobacco.

                                                                      By some measure, Leary was East Coast in attitude, treating LSD as a
                                                                      ceremonial serious tool (position B), compared to the Ken Kesey, West Coast
                                                                      attitude of deliberately pushing LSD to the crazy limit (position C).

                                                                      Position B is hardly viable, because any given entheogen session can include
                                                                      supposed mis-use and supposed correct use. When the mind loosens and largely
                                                                      dis-integrates into a blizzard of thoughts and attitudes, one can only laugh
                                                                      at the notion of pinning down a trip to characterize it as “correct” or
                                                                      “incorrect”, “proper” or “mis-use”. If a session includes both careless
                                                                      levity and profound revelations about the nature of the self, is the one part
                                                                      of the session then “misuse” and the other “proper use”?

                                                                      It’s an arbitrary judgement to say that person 1 in circumstance 1 is using
                                                                      entheogens legitimately, while person 2 in circumstance 2 is mis-using
                                                                      entheogens. On what basis does the throne of judgment rest, from which a
                                                                      Judge can declare the Acid Test festival to be “mis-use”? Personal vision,
                                                                      personal preference, personal taste for what the “right attitude of respect
                                                                      and seriousness” is — a basis of a stack of turtles standing on cosmic sand.

                                                                      __________

                                                                      Jerry Garcia, 1971, quoted in Guitar Player magazine, Oct. 2002, page 152:

                                                                      [Ken Kesey] lived a block away from where we were all living in Palo Alto, in
                                                                      ’62 or ’63, and he started having these scenes in La Honda and we would go up
                                                                      there and play. All of a sudden there was a big commotion: “Hey, what are
                                                                      these acid tests? What’s LSD?” Anthropologists like Stewart Brand and other
                                                                      guys decided, why not have a gathering of these new infant forms that are
                                                                      coming up and are mostly related to getting high? So they had the Trips
                                                                      Festival for three nights in San Francisco. Nobody had ever seen anything
                                                                      like it. Time magazine did a big story, and reporters are coming around, and
                                                                      somebody came up with the term “hippies.” What’s a hippie? All of a sudden
                                                                      we were all hippies. These labels– none of it has a whole lot to do with
                                                                      music. Playing music is playing music, no matter who you are. You’ve got to
                                                                      have discipline, and al the rest of it. We’ve been trying to undo the whole
                                                                      thing of labels and “acid rock.” It was something that was laid on us, and it
                                                                      really doesn’t have anything to do with how we play.

                                                                      Q. Where do you thing the new culture is going?

                                                                      Everything is going to pieces on the one hand, and coming together on the
                                                                      other. The revolution is over. The important changes have already happened.
                                                                      It’s mostly a matter of everything else catching up. Music is one thing left
                                                                      that isn’t devoid of meaning. You listen to a politician and it’s like
                                                                      hearing nothing. Whereas, music goes way back before language, and it’s the
                                                                      key to a spiritual existence this society doesn’t talk about. The Grateful
                                                                      Dead plays at religious services, essentially — religious services for the
                                                                      new age.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 986 From: wrmspirit Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      In a message dated 08/21/2002 5:15:09 PM Alaskan Daylight Time,
                                                                      mhoffman writes:

                                                                      << hold. What would drive a curando or Gnostic to label other people’s use of
                                                                      entheogens as “mis-use”? Does that claim have any objective grounds, or is
                                                                      it
                                                                      purely a free-floating value-judgement that can’t have any basis but personal
                                                                      worldview-preference?>>

                                                                      Two scenarios come to mind….One…when it is used for power…..Secondly,
                                                                      when it is used in ignorance such as the recent broadcast of a rap singer,
                                                                      the name has escaped me, who, while on PCP, killed a female friend by cutting
                                                                      her open and eating her guts….He stated that all he can remember is that
                                                                      “he had to get rid of the devil”…
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 987 From: theecorax Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      In order to understand the position of indigenous peoples with regard to the
                                                                      use of materials they consider sacred, one has to abandon the humanist,
                                                                      libertarian view you seem to espouse in your argument.

                                                                      In order to understand this, you will have to expand beyond the confines of the
                                                                      modern, humanist perspective towards ethics, morality and the sacred, and
                                                                      rather than assume that all cultural standards are arbitrary, try and respect
                                                                      that Mesoamerican cultures have developed views towards these medicines
                                                                      over a period of at least two millenia if not longer.

                                                                      As such, the psychedelic 60’s type of viewpoint is foreign to these people, and
                                                                      also lacks the depth of tradition and experience that people in these cultures
                                                                      developed in relation to these plants.

                                                                      I see the Catholic Inquisition and Psychedelic 60’s as being two sides of the
                                                                      same coin, both of which disrespect the traditions of the indigenous people
                                                                      and their knowledge of these plants and their contextual use; one as the
                                                                      agency of the Devil, the other as “ignorant superstitious natives” – in both
                                                                      cases there is no validity ascribed to the very real possibility that these
                                                                      people who have had millenia of experience with these plants might know
                                                                      something about the experience that Jerry Garcia never had a clue about.

                                                                      Corax

                                                                      — In egodeath@y…, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman> wrote:
                                                                      > There are 3 main positions:
                                                                      > A. All entheogen use is bad; all use is mis-use.
                                                                      > B. Some entheogen use is legitimate use, some use is mis-use.
                                                                      > C. All entheogen use is legitimate; there are no grounds for the concept of
                                                                      > “mis-use”.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > I don’t understand position B, which Maria Sabina, Wasson, and possibly
                                                                      Huxley
                                                                      > hold. What would drive a curando or Gnostic to label other people’s use of
                                                                      > entheogens as “mis-use”? Does that claim have any objective grounds, or is
                                                                      it
                                                                      > purely a free-floating value-judgement that can’t have any basis but
                                                                      personal
                                                                      > worldview-preference? Suppose a hippie in the early 1960s in Oaxaca who
                                                                      takes
                                                                      > mushrooms casually and recreationally, and has a traumatic or crazy
                                                                      > experience — is that “mis-use”? On what basis can such a judgment rest?
                                                                      > Casual or foolish use is casual, foolish use — but is it mis-use?
                                                                      >
                                                                      > I hold position C: some use is foolish, harmful, ill-advised — but generally,
                                                                      > the concept of “mis-use” or “proper use” doesn’t apply to entheogens any
                                                                      more
                                                                      > than to coffee, cola, or tobacco.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > By some measure, Leary was East Coast in attitude, treating LSD as a
                                                                      > ceremonial serious tool (position B), compared to the Ken Kesey, West Coast
                                                                      > attitude of deliberately pushing LSD to the crazy limit (position C).
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Position B is hardly viable, because any given entheogen session can include
                                                                      > supposed mis-use and supposed correct use. When the mind loosens and
                                                                      largely
                                                                      > dis-integrates into a blizzard of thoughts and attitudes, one can only laugh
                                                                      > at the notion of pinning down a trip to characterize it as “correct” or
                                                                      > “incorrect”, “proper” or “mis-use”. If a session includes both careless
                                                                      > levity and profound revelations about the nature of the self, is the one part
                                                                      > of the session then “misuse” and the other “proper use”?
                                                                      >
                                                                      > It’s an arbitrary judgement to say that person 1 in circumstance 1 is using
                                                                      > entheogens legitimately, while person 2 in circumstance 2 is mis-using
                                                                      > entheogens. On what basis does the throne of judgment rest, from which a
                                                                      > Judge can declare the Acid Test festival to be “mis-use”? Personal vision,
                                                                      > personal preference, personal taste for what the “right attitude of respect
                                                                      > and seriousness” is — a basis of a stack of turtles standing on cosmic sand.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > __________
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Jerry Garcia, 1971, quoted in Guitar Player magazine, Oct. 2002, page 152:
                                                                      >
                                                                      > [Ken Kesey] lived a block away from where we were all living in Palo Alto, in
                                                                      > ’62 or ’63, and he started having these scenes in La Honda and we would go up
                                                                      > there and play. All of a sudden there was a big commotion: “Hey, what are
                                                                      > these acid tests? What’s LSD?” Anthropologists like Stewart Brand and
                                                                      other
                                                                      > guys decided, why not have a gathering of these new infant forms that are
                                                                      > coming up and are mostly related to getting high? So they had the Trips
                                                                      > Festival for three nights in San Francisco. Nobody had ever seen anything
                                                                      > like it. Time magazine did a big story, and reporters are coming around, and
                                                                      > somebody came up with the term “hippies.” What’s a hippie? All of a sudden
                                                                      > we were all hippies. These labels– none of it has a whole lot to do with
                                                                      > music. Playing music is playing music, no matter who you are. You’ve got to
                                                                      > have discipline, and al the rest of it. We’ve been trying to undo the whole
                                                                      > thing of labels and “acid rock.” It was something that was laid on us, and it
                                                                      > really doesn’t have anything to do with how we play.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Q. Where do you thing the new culture is going?
                                                                      >
                                                                      > Everything is going to pieces on the one hand, and coming together on the
                                                                      > other. The revolution is over. The important changes have already happened.
                                                                      > It’s mostly a matter of everything else catching up. Music is one thing left
                                                                      > that isn’t devoid of meaning. You listen to a politician and it’s like
                                                                      > hearing nothing. Whereas, music goes way back before language, and it’s the
                                                                      > key to a spiritual existence this society doesn’t talk about. The Grateful
                                                                      > Dead plays at religious services, essentially — religious services for the
                                                                      > new age.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 988 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      Strategically using entheogens in order to gain power over others can fairly
                                                                      be called “mis-use of entheogens”.

                                                                      Trampling someone with a horse while on drugs is bad, but would we call it a
                                                                      “mis-use of drugs”? That would miss the main point and put the focus on the
                                                                      drug rather than the action. Let’s stay with more physically inactive type of
                                                                      scenarios.

                                                                      The main scenarios under contention are:
                                                                      1) Reverent spiritual or philosophical use, or serious scientific use
                                                                      2) Recreational use, daredevil use, casual experimental or exploratory use out
                                                                      of curiosity

                                                                      Is the former “legitimate use” and the latter “mis-use”? What is particularly
                                                                      at issue in this thread is:

                                                                      Can we fairly call it “mis-use of mind-altering chemicals” if someone actually
                                                                      initiates an entheogen session for reason #2 but tries to legitimize their use
                                                                      by appealing to reason #1? I say no, that may be dishonesty, that may be
                                                                      foolishness, that may be a lame approach to entheogen use — but it can’t
                                                                      fairly be called “mis-use of mind-altering chemicals”.

                                                                      Whatever aspects can be criticized about McKenna and Leary, “entheogen
                                                                      mis-use” is not among them, because the concept of entheogen mis-use in this
                                                                      type of case is too nebulous and confuses criticism of their philosophical and
                                                                      historical and anthropological methods and interpretations with criticism of
                                                                      their use of entheogens.

                                                                      They may possibly mis-interpret entheogens and shamanism, they may possibly be
                                                                      reality-twisting credibility thieves who abuse anthropology and history, but
                                                                      it’s meaningless and vague to say that they “mis-use” entheogens. More
                                                                      likely, they mis-use scholarship.

                                                                      Entheogenists ought to fully study shamanic use of entheogens, and ought to
                                                                      create a distinct contemporary approach to entheogens, but shouldn’t distort
                                                                      their contemporary approach and the research about shamans to artificially
                                                                      cheat and force shamanism to offer some kind of support to contemporary use.
                                                                      Shamanism in fact supports and justifies contemporary entheogen use in certain
                                                                      limited ways, but the two aren’t the same and should be differentiated rather
                                                                      than conflated.

                                                                      There is no inherent harm in affecting a certain “neo-shamanism”, and that
                                                                      couldn’t be a “mis-use of mind-altering chemicals”, but only a misuse of
                                                                      scholarship and justification.

                                                                      Leary’s 8-circuit model of the mind is only bad because it’s so ordinary and
                                                                      standard, with only a veneer of novelty. His may be a lame theory of the
                                                                      mind’s interaction with drugs, but coming up with a lame theory has nothing to
                                                                      do with “mis-use of mind-altering chemicals”. Accusing him of “mis-use” here
                                                                      is simply using the term “mis-use” as a generalized term of abuse; that is, an
                                                                      epithet, name-calling. A poor theory of mind and entheogens can’t be called
                                                                      “mis-use” of entheogens, but only a “poor theory”.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 989 From: theecorax Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      — In egodeath@y…, “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman> wrote:
                                                                      Michael;

                                                                      I am going to email you some articles that I used in a paper I wrote on the use
                                                                      of Peyotl as a medicine in the Native American Church/

                                                                      Peyotl has a very high success rate for curinf alcoholism and is instrumental
                                                                      in some southwestern tribes in solidifying ethical and community values.

                                                                      For example, among the Dineh (Navaho) who are members of the NAC (which
                                                                      uses peyotl as sacrament) the absitinence rate from alcohol is over 80
                                                                      percent, compared to areas on the Rez where alcohol treatement is based on
                                                                      AA or standard drug treatment where the rate of abstinence is only 30 percent
                                                                      or less.

                                                                      I knew someone who had a very aggressive stomach cancer who for over 50
                                                                      years went for treatments with peyotl to a Navaho medicine man. This person
                                                                      was also an alcoholic and suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in
                                                                      World War II. The peyotle kept his cancer in remission until last year when he
                                                                      passed at the age of 79. He was cured of his alcoholism and his PTSD. There is
                                                                      more to the entheogen use than the psychotropic experience. Yet this man was
                                                                      one of the wisest people I ever knew.

                                                                      Peyotl is IMO the model of medicinal and ritual entheogen use among United
                                                                      States indigenous and the use is based in a ceremonial setting where Peyotl is
                                                                      regarded as the Christ.

                                                                      In addition to its use as a spiritual tool, peyotl is also used to treat cancer,
                                                                      diabetes and other physical diseases – with a high degree of success, and I
                                                                      know this because of my own knowledge of this use through people that I know
                                                                      personally who have been treated in this manner – sorry there are no academic
                                                                      papers on this, this is my own anecdotal knowledge.

                                                                      So what the psychedelic or modernist entheogenist is NOT seeing is how the
                                                                      sacrament of peyotl is used to treat illness, not only addiction, but
                                                                      physiologic disorders.

                                                                      This is what I am saying with regard to the ignorance of people like Leary,
                                                                      etc., who only look at a small and very narrow use of these medicines the
                                                                      psychotropic effects. These guys have no clue.

                                                                      For example, ibogaine has been found to be the most efficacious treatment for
                                                                      heroin and cocaine addiction – why is this? Is it merely the result of
                                                                      re-arranging neuroreceptors, or is it because of the experience of the Bwiti –
                                                                      the spirit of Iboga?

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 990 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: FW: Christ Conspiracy Christian Bashing?
                                                                      Full and detailed discussion of the reasons for the entrenchment of Literalism
                                                                      is needed. Most Literalists haven’t heard of mysticism, Gnosticism,
                                                                      esotericism, allegorism, and what little they’ve heard has been what other
                                                                      Literalists have written.

                                                                      Critical analysis can be on-topic if it’s not just motivated by the desire to
                                                                      venting, but is instead constructive toward the goal of understanding the
                                                                      Literalist framework of thinking. Part of this framework is bound to be a
                                                                      certain, sometimes shocking, level of ignorance.

                                                                      Some venting is natural, as we throw up arms exclaiming, how did we get in
                                                                      this wretched situation? Literalist history of Christianity is entirely
                                                                      wrong, down to the core, and Christian history needs to be entirely scrapped
                                                                      and entirely rewritten. How can people have been so completely, profoundly
                                                                      misguided in their way of understanding Christianity and its history? That
                                                                      question is inherent in investigating the Christ Conspiracy.

                                                                      I had an interesting, unclear discussion with a retirement-age Epicopalian and
                                                                      Catholic couple, who did alot of time in church. The Catholic was rejecting
                                                                      the official religion, asserting that Christianity is really a simple ethical
                                                                      system. I responded that that ethics is no religion at all, and asserted that
                                                                      religion cannot be reduced to ethics or the socio-political realm.

                                                                      The Episcopalian didn’t reduce Christianity to ethics, but she is a
                                                                      supernaturalist, who considers the essence of Christianity to be going to
                                                                      heaven after bodily death, as a reward for faith in Jesus and for good works.
                                                                      I asked if they knew anything about the Essenes, the Gnostics, and the
                                                                      Christian mystics. They said no, they didn’t, and wanted to learn.

                                                                      How can people be so involved in a religion and yet so ignorant of that
                                                                      religion? This question is as on-topic as they come, for the Christ
                                                                      Conspiracy discussion group. We have to understand it in order to study the
                                                                      relation of Literalist Christianity and esoteric Christianity, and how to move
                                                                      people — including scholars — from Literalism to an understanding of
                                                                      esotericism and pure allegorization of mystic experiencing, or at least to a
                                                                      dim awareness that such an alternative exists, as an alternative to
                                                                      conservative Literalist supernaturalism, liberal Christian ethicism (Jesus as
                                                                      mundane moral example), and blockheaded atheism that is as pristinely naive
                                                                      and uninformed as Literalism.

                                                                      Some amount of frank analysis that could be characterized as Christian-bashing
                                                                      may be necessary to analyze where we went wrong and how to dig ourselves out
                                                                      of this Literalist mess.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 991 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      What does sun worship, inability to stand, and slaying of the head mean to the
                                                                      true high-intensity mystic?

                                                                      Reading through the filter of intense mystic state allegorism:

                                                                      Realization forces one to bow to the Ground that creates all one’s thoughts,
                                                                      rather than standing as a self-steering, self-creating, self-originating and
                                                                      self-controlling ego-self. (Mythic allegory is, above all, a *report* of what
                                                                      one encountered in the intense mystic altered state.)

                                                                      The sun is a metaphor for white-light feedback of metaperception, which occurs
                                                                      in the peak of the mystic altered state. (Mythic allegory is, above all, a
                                                                      *report* of what one encountered in the intense mystic altered state.)

                                                                      The slain head is the lower mind; the rulership notions held by the lower,
                                                                      animal/child self. This mental slaying or death of the lower, animalistically
                                                                      illogical self-model occurs in the peak of the mystic altered state. (Mythic
                                                                      allegory is, above all, a *report* of what one encountered in the intense
                                                                      mystic altered state.)

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 992 From: merker2002 Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      how often did you trip in recent times and overall?
                                                                      why do you continue to trip if you got the point of it?

                                                                      also i just read a text by you saying:
                                                                      “lsd is much more powerful and interesting than psylocibin”
                                                                      and then goes on to say
                                                                      “the only difference between lsd and psylocybin is the time
                                                                      of the duration of the trip”

                                                                      the text says also that leary lost interest in psylocybin [even in
                                                                      pure form]
                                                                      when encountering lsd. i’m not really in the know here but perhaps
                                                                      mushrooms are much more potent nowadays than in the 60’s. i never
                                                                      did lsd but i once shroomed on copelandia cyanescens and it really
                                                                      was like “watching my own nerves / sliding along my own brain
                                                                      structure in technicolor”.

                                                                      regards,
                                                                      merker
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 994 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Only 2 denominations: Literalist & esoteric
                                                                      It’s interesting to see the expressions and conceptual vocabulary at the
                                                                      Amazon page.

                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0945241097

                                                                      Those who favor this book talk of “believers” and “non-believers”, as though
                                                                      there are only two worldviews: the official Christian worldview and the
                                                                      non-Christian worldview. So what are those of the allegorist semi-suppressed
                                                                      but ever-arising tradition: believers, or unbelievers?

                                                                      Another manipulative option-denying expression is “discrediting the authority
                                                                      of Christianity”, as though there are only two possible views: Christianity
                                                                      has the official type of authority, or doesn’t have any authority. What about
                                                                      the mystic-experiencing allegorist type of authority, the authority of the
                                                                      perennial philosophy that is expressed through the form of Christianity? That
                                                                      option is shoved under the carpet by the expression “discrediting the
                                                                      authority of Christianity”.

                                                                      Another manifestation of this false menu of two options is the idea that the
                                                                      Gospels are either valid in the Literalist sense, or invalidated.

                                                                      The mystery-religions developed alongside Christianity and rabbinical Judaism.
                                                                      They all had their sacred eating and drinking, and all had their primary
                                                                      religious experiencing, and all had their allegorical mythic expressions and
                                                                      embodiments. They all grew directly out of the ground of direct
                                                                      religious-state experiencing, and all also influenced each other.

                                                                      A book of this sort, written by a Literalist Christian, can hardly prove
                                                                      anything. Evidence is too malleable. Determined Literalists and determined
                                                                      mythicists could continue to churn out their respective books indefinitely, by
                                                                      adhering to different methods, assumptions, axioms, and goals — different
                                                                      paradigms for viewing the world and its evidence.

                                                                      Literalist Christians, especially those who haven’t discovered the positive
                                                                      alternative offered by esoteric, higher Christianity, reach for these books
                                                                      with a certain desperate relief — “please, save my rickety, crumbling type of
                                                                      faith!”

                                                                      A similarly motivated book:

                                                                      The Historical Reliability of the Gospels
                                                                      by Craig L. Blomberg
                                                                      July 1987, rank 28K (very popular)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0877849927
                                                                      “I had just previously finished a book by John Dominic Crossan, which threw me
                                                                      for a loop. Not only did my mouth drop about a foot, I had this empty feeling
                                                                      about all the things I have believed all these years. He and Marcus Borg seem
                                                                      to take a real liberal approach to interpretation of biblical history, to the
                                                                      point of invalidation. This book was a refreshing alternative to that
                                                                      previous one.”

                                                                      Notice that the main spirit of the battle right now is between the liberal
                                                                      Christian scholars and the Literalists. Although there is some flurry of
                                                                      contention about the fairly sophisticated esoteric-Christianity book The Jesus
                                                                      Mysteries, the mass of the argument is still stuck in a battle of the Jesus
                                                                      Seminar against Literalism. People don’t yet grasp that there are three main
                                                                      views or reference points: Literalism, atheism, and esotericism.

                                                                      The argument has a false and unprofitable flavor because only two of the three
                                                                      main positions are considered. I consider such books more in terms of what
                                                                      worldview they self-consistently inhabit, than the merits of their
                                                                      “arguments”. http://www.egodeath.com/christviewstaxonomy.htm


                                                                      In the worldview or paradigm of such books, there are only two alternatives:
                                                                      Literalism or atheism, the latter being effectively equivalent to paganism
                                                                      (the Greek mystery-religions).

                                                                      In the esoteric worldview, which is ultimately centered so far from official
                                                                      Christianity that even Paul is understood as potent myth, there are three
                                                                      alternatives: Literalism, atheism, and esotericism, and atheism is
                                                                      inconsequential, so there are really only two alternatives: Literalism and
                                                                      esotericism.


                                                                      Ultimately there are only two denominations: Literalist Christianity and
                                                                      esoteric Christianity, which Freke and Gandy call Gnostic Christianity.
                                                                      Although it is profitable to study the varieties of Literalism, the varieties
                                                                      of esoteric Christianity, and the varieties of combinations, all these can be
                                                                      analyzed in terms of their resonance with two ways of thinking: the Literalist
                                                                      supernaturalist way of thinking, and the esoteric or Gnostic way of thinking.

                                                                      That’s not to say that each person neatly falls into a perfect Literalist camp
                                                                      or a perfect esoteric camp, but that these form two definite, distinctive,
                                                                      exemplary, archetypal poles. For example, people looking for an anti-orthodox
                                                                      Mary Magdalene might hold that she is John, the Beloved Disciple, while other
                                                                      scholars may latch onto the anti-orthodox idea that the archangel Gabriel
                                                                      holds a Datura “lily” in the anunciation, while failing to discover the Mary
                                                                      “John” Magdalene anti-orthodox tradition.

                                                                      Both of the above are imperfect or incomplete esoteric Christianity, having
                                                                      hold of one part of the anti-orthodox elephant. Nevertheless there is a whole
                                                                      standard elephant, even if each individual grasps only a part of it.

                                                                      The main work now is to start putting the various anti-orthodox components and
                                                                      puzzle pieces together to build a more complete alternative, a full-fledged
                                                                      esoteric Christianity, which has manifested itself in fits and starts,
                                                                      sometimes rising up to take fuller form, then to be suppressed again insofar
                                                                      as Truth can be forcibly suppressed back down into the Ground from whence it
                                                                      keeps being thrust back up through the available forms of religious myth.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 995 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Don’t say drug “abuse”; Gnostics & entheogens
                                                                      >This is what I am saying with regard to the ignorance of people like Leary,
                                                                      >etc., who only look at a small and very narrow use of these medicines the
                                                                      >psychotropic effects. These guys have no clue.

                                                                      Dan Russell’s excellent book Drug War has enlightening coverage of Indian
                                                                      medicine vs. white man’s medicine.
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0965025349
                                                                      http://www.drugwar.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 996 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      >how often did you trip in recent times and overall?

                                                                      Today’s conditions of prohibition cause people in most countries to limit
                                                                      their experience.

                                                                      >why do you continue to trip if you got the point of it?

                                                                      Why would one discontinue taking the sacrament? Why do anything or refrain
                                                                      from anything? What a load of arbitrary assumptions lie behind that noxious
                                                                      platitude of quitting after using — if people choose to use then quit, that’s
                                                                      their trip, but they shouldn’t tell others they should do the same and hold
                                                                      the same values.

                                                                      Some people use entheogens but then try to tell other people how they should
                                                                      use them, how they Ought to use them — these are the entheogenic
                                                                      authoritarians and moralists. I’m thinking of either Ram Dass or Ralph
                                                                      Abraham.

                                                                      In contrast, James Arthur and Jonathan Ott have their heads screwed on
                                                                      straight. Use is use, tools are tools; they are what you make of them.
                                                                      People ought to take more responsibility for their own conception of what
                                                                      entheogens are all about.


                                                                      >also i just read a text by you saying: “lsd is much more powerful and
                                                                      interesting than psylocibin” and then goes on to say “the only difference
                                                                      between lsd and psylocybin is the time of the duration of the trip”
                                                                      >
                                                                      >the text says also that leary lost interest in psylocybin [even in pure form]
                                                                      when encountering lsd. i’m not really in the know here but perhaps mushrooms
                                                                      are much more potent nowadays than in the 60’s. i never did lsd but i once
                                                                      shroomed on copelandia cyanescens and it really was like “watching my own
                                                                      nerves / sliding along my own brain structure in technicolor”.


                                                                      Mushrooms vary in potency by a factor of 10, even in the same batch. They can
                                                                      be strong. I’m surprised how readily Leary dropped synthetic psilocybin in
                                                                      favor of LSD, and apparently never looked back.

                                                                      I’m glad to hear that mushrooms — can we say “psilocybin”? — can be strong.
                                                                      Those who want a peak on the peak, can combine it with THC for a successful
                                                                      climax with the deity, passing through the rebirth canal into reincarnation,
                                                                      in a Groffian birthing trauma, a spiritual emergency with Wilberian
                                                                      death-seizure.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 997 From: George Douvris Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: petty comments
                                                                      Lately the usually higher quality and perspectives of
                                                                      this e group have been falling at a sadly quickening
                                                                      pace. What has stood out over the months of reading
                                                                      the messages has been the well written scholarship and
                                                                      appropriate commentary on fallacies within the
                                                                      spiritual community’s less than honorable notice of
                                                                      the entheogenic relevance of the psychedelics.
                                                                      Clearly the origin of all sincere spiritual
                                                                      traditions have been these power plants and their
                                                                      opening of the doors to perception of higher
                                                                      realities. The either-or verbal battles as to weather
                                                                      hippies of the 60’s respected the indigenous roots or
                                                                      weather there is indeed a materialistic vacuum as well
                                                                      as a spiritual portal are petty and miss the point.
                                                                      These plants and chemicals indeed take us to deeper
                                                                      dimensions of mind, emotion, and soul. Weather they
                                                                      touch the same places in all of everyone who uses them
                                                                      is an individual story. We need to respect and share
                                                                      compassion with each one’s map of consciousness and
                                                                      not throw out the baby with the bath .water. The
                                                                      semantics and history in the articles are great, but
                                                                      academics is a limiting parameter if we want to talk
                                                                      honestly about the psychedelic journey. Even the name
                                                                      “ego death” implies an aggressive quality. Perhaps
                                                                      “ego surrender” might be a more pleasant definition of
                                                                      premise. Since the 60’s, I personally have had many
                                                                      spiritual experiences with psychedelics. Also I have
                                                                      read and met many of the courageous pioneers of our
                                                                      contemporay scene including Timothy Leary and Terrence
                                                                      McKenna. It is shocking and absurd to read the trash
                                                                      that is falling into this group with petty comments
                                                                      about both these wonderful and inspiring people. Why
                                                                      the crucifixions when they as well as others have been
                                                                      beacons through the darkness. Both have been
                                                                      significant and positive influences on me as well as
                                                                      for masses of others. No need to be insecure and stuck
                                                                      with word games. Tim was a saint in not only his
                                                                      taking the holy sacrament out of the elite and like
                                                                      Prometheus sharing the light with the rest of us on
                                                                      planet earth. His psychological models and fine
                                                                      writing are multi dimensional portals and very
                                                                      helpful. Terrence also has been a maestro in opening
                                                                      veils to true history and genetic birth rights.
                                                                      Perhaps a key to the problem has been in the dogmatic
                                                                      attachment as well to Rush as an enlightened musical
                                                                      persona. Sorry, as a musical aficionado of sacred
                                                                      psychedelic musical texts, they have always sounded
                                                                      irritating and insipid. For me the magic works with
                                                                      Hendrix, Miles Davis, Beatles, Led Zep, Stones, Pink
                                                                      Floyd, Grateful Dead, etc. So there again , we can
                                                                      launch another divide and conquer crusade of arguing
                                                                      with each other instead of taking hints from the
                                                                      phrase “may the lord Jesus open your mind and close
                                                                      your mouth. Let’s all share psychedelic space and let
                                                                      the current flow as it may.
                                                                      Blessings, George Douvris gsrain


                                                                      __________________________________________________
                                                                      Do You Yahoo!?
                                                                      Yahoo! Finance – Get real-time stock quotes
                                                                      http://finance.yahoo.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 998 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: petty comments
                                                                      Hello:

                                                                      There is a need to look critically at the materials these individuals
                                                                      produced. As such I have no great esteem for the 60’s ethos or our
                                                                      “courageous pioneers” as you call them. There is a LOT that is
                                                                      characteristically unsound in their materials that individuals gobble up
                                                                      without the sort of critical thought that is required of those approaching
                                                                      cosmologuical viewpoints.

                                                                      One was Leary’s 8 circuit model – unscientific and purely irrational based
                                                                      entirely on his own anecdotal experiences. Another is McKenna’s time wave
                                                                      theory of eschatological closure. It is misapplication of his millnarial
                                                                      sense to that timeless Aeon he intuits within his own mind.

                                                                      I have also criticised McKenna’s ethnology and mischaracterizations of
                                                                      shamanism – something which tends to get people’s goat – everyone wants to
                                                                      be a shaman these days it seems and can’t seem to understand why a middle
                                                                      aged, Irish guy from the middle class probably does not fit that model just
                                                                      because he takes a few DMT trips now and then and traveled to the Amazon on
                                                                      occasion. People get very annoyed when I also point out that the Shamanic
                                                                      “journeys” and workshops that New Agers love to go to to learn all about
                                                                      “shamanism” are nothing but commercialized ventures which teach nothing
                                                                      about shamanism.

                                                                      So yes I can understand why you are annoyed by some of my comments – but let
                                                                      us look at what Leary REALLY did for entheogen studies.

                                                                      Leary and that other less than intelligent fellow – Ken Kesey – managed
                                                                      single handedly to get entheogens made into Class1 drugs by the DEA – and
                                                                      totally KILLED any serious research for a quarter of a century. Only now are
                                                                      there limited studies going on which allow investigations of these things
                                                                      (Strassman’s DMT studies at UNM for example). People like to view Leary as a
                                                                      martyr – he was a gratuitous self promoter who in his grandiose and cavalier
                                                                      approach to psychedelic studies – in this case LSD – managed to bring down
                                                                      the wrath of the Feds. Some have even suspected him of working for the CIA
                                                                      in order to cause such a ruckus over LSD that the public would approve of
                                                                      the government ban.

                                                                      So no, I don’t see Leary as a hero.

                                                                      Finally, what is enlightened about Leary’s insight?

                                                                      What is substantive in his understanding of the human spirit?

                                                                      Did he experience ego-death and Michael calls it? Or did he use his
                                                                      privilege of pioneership to be a shameless self promoter on the book and
                                                                      lecture circuit – enjoying the wide eyed accolades of the youth of the 80’s
                                                                      and 90’s wanting that revival of the 60’s that never came through computer
                                                                      culture and rave parties? Hardly any dead egos there.

                                                                      There is a lot to be critical of with Leary and McKenna –

                                                                      Corax


                                                                      From: George Douvris <gdouvris1>
                                                                      Since the 60’s, I personally have had many
                                                                      spiritual experiences with psychedelics. Also I have
                                                                      read and met many of the courageous pioneers of our
                                                                      contemporay scene including Timothy Leary and Terrence
                                                                      McKenna. It is shocking and absurd to read the trash
                                                                      that is falling into this group with petty comments
                                                                      about both these wonderful and inspiring people.


                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 999 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      I’m glad Coraxo, in the past couple postings, detailed what lies behind his
                                                                      original assertion that Leary and McKenna abused or mis-used mind-altering
                                                                      chemicals. I do think the accusation of Leary and McKenna’s “mis-use of
                                                                      entheogens” can be reasonable *if* one defines, to Coraxo’s recent level of
                                                                      detail, what specifically is meant. The accusation may possibly still be
                                                                      wrong, but when detail is provided, an enlightening, detailed, nuanced debate
                                                                      can follow.

                                                                      The fact itself of Coraxo’s disparagment of Leary and McKenna is not at all
                                                                      the problem. Leary and McKenna can jump off a cliff, and everyone else too.
                                                                      It’s not my goal to protect and praise the 20th Century entheogen fathers.
                                                                      The goal is an *accurate assessment* of the concepts that have been proposed
                                                                      regarding mind, entheogens, and religious experiencing.

                                                                      The great crime Coraxo is guilty of is not negativity or being judgmental of
                                                                      some entheogen use; his significant violation is initially *being vague* in
                                                                      his assertion of Leary’s “abuse”, and tending to think in oversimplistic
                                                                      prefabricated cliched categories that don’t necessarily accurately fit the
                                                                      other person’s debate position. Sometimes it’s hard to initially be so clear
                                                                      as one ought.

                                                                      We must be flexible about metaphorical use of language, and communication in
                                                                      general. Expressions have a degree of truth. The main problem is, people use
                                                                      terms as a *brittle* shorthand. There is some truth in “Leary abused
                                                                      mind-altering chemicals”, but that assertion isn’t viable until more details
                                                                      are provided to clarify and more or less justify what is being asserted.

                                                                      Coraxo’s redemption as a debater is that he works to *eventually* clarify his
                                                                      own position and to have a more accurate grasp of the other person’s position.
                                                                      Most debate is a method of clarifying the respective positions, to find the
                                                                      great degree of worldview agreement, even if the two positions remain distinct
                                                                      paradigms that highlight different aspects and interpretations of the world.

                                                                      Eventually, he posts defensibly “well-written scholarship and appropriate
                                                                      commentary on fallacies within the spiritual community’s less than honorable
                                                                      notice of the entheogenic relevance of the psychedelics”.

                                                                      My general position is that entheogens are the origin of religion. It is
                                                                      important, not petty and missing the point, to debate details such as whether
                                                                      psychedelic figureheads “respected the indigenous roots” or “had a
                                                                      materialistic vacuum as well as a spiritual portal”. We just have to be clear
                                                                      that the main point is “entheogens are the basis of religion” and that the
                                                                      minor point is “arguably, some psychedelic figureheads might not properly and
                                                                      reasonably respect indigenous entheogen traditions”.

                                                                      Even if we respect each other’s map of consciousness, to gain insight we must
                                                                      criticize, accuse, defend, argue, debate, analyze, investigate.

                                                                      It is possible to interpret the term “ego death” as aggression, such as the
                                                                      aggression of Zeus in possessing mortal womenly souls. Spirituality is false
                                                                      and distorted if it downplays the Hard Rock intensity of peak religious
                                                                      experiencing, death, rebirth, Groffian spiritual emergency, Keseyian
                                                                      freak-out, and Hoffmanian or Stephan __ “ego death”. Leary and Alpert wrote
                                                                      an entire book centered around the ego death metaphor.

                                                                      The Psychedelic Experience: A Manual Based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead
                                                                      Ralph Metzner, Richard Alpert, Karma-Glin-Pa Bar do, Timothy Leary
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0806516526
                                                                      rank 39K (very popular)
                                                                      I like Drum’s comments: “Take everywhere it says LSD and replace it with
                                                                      Amanita muscaria (which was the real entheogen this manual is experientially
                                                                      based upon). Then you have it! Keep in mind that NONE of the world’s religions
                                                                      tell the whole truth, and this includes Tibetan Buddhism [and shamanism, I’d
                                                                      add – mh]. All patriarchal religions have severe problems and you should know
                                                                      what those problems (false dogmas) are before experimenting. The discovery
                                                                      that this book is not necessarily a book for the dead but a book to map the
                                                                      consciousness of those experiencing the shamanistic ‘death experience’ is
                                                                      crucial to humanity’s understanding of Tibetan Buddhism and other world
                                                                      religion.”

                                                                      Coraxo has potential as a debater if he starts a debate with a more nuanced
                                                                      and balanced and detailed position. But online postings are voluntary and
                                                                      have no guarantee of compensation; where is the incentive to post the best
                                                                      quality material you’re capable of? There’s no guarantee other post’ers will
                                                                      work with you to develop the debate toward enlightening insight.

                                                                      Leary has always been controversial among entheogenists. Did he give us the
                                                                      gift of psilocybin and LSD, or did he take them away from us? Prohibition
                                                                      can’t be blamed on any one person, but Leary is the one person most associated
                                                                      with LSD, so all debates about LSD and entheogen prohibitions have Leary as
                                                                      the center of contention. I’m trying to think of books or articles that
                                                                      critically evaluate whether Leary is responsible for giving us psilocybin and
                                                                      LSD or for having them taken away.

                                                                      It is not a goal of this discussion group to have a positive mood. It’s not a
                                                                      social group at all. It’s not a positive spirituality group at all. It’s not
                                                                      a good vibes group at all. It is strictly an information group: what is ego
                                                                      death, how does it work, how does it connect to religious and philosophical
                                                                      traditions and fields.

                                                                      Spirituality has various insights and moods. I am intent on cracking the
                                                                      puzzles of the mystic-state phenomena that are most jarring, panicking,
                                                                      mind-shattering, devastating, mind-blowing, and spiritual-emergency causing.
                                                                      Anything else already has enough researchers and spiritual socializers and
                                                                      loving communities working on it.

                                                                      Negativity is relevant, on-topic, welcome and needed to the extent it
                                                                      constructively sheds light on the egodeath experience.
                                                                      Negativity is irrelevant, off-topic, unwelcome and not needed, to the extent
                                                                      it destructively fails to shed light on the egodeath experience.

                                                                      There are many discussion groups that are driven by the main goal of spiritual
                                                                      peace and light and community; positive-feeling spirituality, emphasizing
                                                                      heart and soul and emotion. This discussion group is a tool specializing in
                                                                      mind, logic, rationality, reason, debate, specific argument, expose, paradigm
                                                                      definition, and being specific.

                                                                      Coraxo is sometimes a slow starter in focusing and elaborating his criticisms,
                                                                      starting off a debate by punching at shadows in the wrong direction. But he
                                                                      has shown his commitment in the long run to clarifying and elaborating his
                                                                      position and more accurately grasping my position. I highly respect sustained
                                                                      improvement over time. Coraxo has continued his work of sustained
                                                                      constructive debate after I have changed to other subjects.

                                                                      People motivated by positive spiritual vibes are uncomfortable with sustained
                                                                      rational constructive debate involving the development of complaints,
                                                                      accusations, defenses, sustained constructive argument.

                                                                      Some psychedelic figureheads (possibly Kesey, Leary, McKenna, Ott) held the
                                                                      libertarian position that drug “mis-use” is an empty notion. Other
                                                                      psychedelic figureheads (Wasson, possibly Huxley and Huston Smith) held the
                                                                      traditionalist or restrictive position that entheogens have a proper use and
                                                                      an improper use. Coraxo argues for the latter position, which often blames
                                                                      the libertarian psychedelic figureheads for prohibition and accuses them of
                                                                      failing to have the proper respect they ought to have for indigenous entheogen
                                                                      traditions.

                                                                      Coraxo’s position is nothing new; it’s one of the two main positions held by
                                                                      entheogen scholars. Many entheogen scholars make essentially the same
                                                                      accusations Coraxo makes. Regardless of his particular words, Coraxo
                                                                      expresses one of the standard main positions. If you criticize Coraxo’s
                                                                      assertions, you must realize and admit that you are criticizing an entire
                                                                      *group* of entheogenists.

                                                                      There is no escape from judging, praising, and rejecting entheogen scholars.
                                                                      Either you do as I do and praise the libertarian entheogenists, and reject the
                                                                      restrictive entheogenists’ position; or, you do as Coraxo does and praise the
                                                                      restrictive entheogenists, and reject the libertarian entheogenists’ position.
                                                                      We all should admit that we hold some beliefs and reject the beliefs that are
                                                                      different.

                                                                      Let us not forget that Wasson’s position, while cautious and elitist and
                                                                      restrictive, contradicts the bare fact that he did wildly break and flaunt the
                                                                      restrictions that Sabina’s culture held. Sabina’s culture was secretive about
                                                                      entheogenic mushrooms because the Catholic authoritarians persecuted entheogen
                                                                      sacrament users and commanded that only users of the official church placebo
                                                                      sacrament be allowed to live.

                                                                      Sabina and Wasson both publically endorsed restricted use of entheogenic
                                                                      mushrooms, but their actions contradict their official position. Her culture
                                                                      said “restrict”, and Wasson’s elite background said “restrict”, yet look at
                                                                      what they did together: they set the bird free — essentially a move pointed
                                                                      relatively in the libertarian direction, moving away from their restrictive
                                                                      cultural traditions.

                                                                      Wasson and Sabina were effectively in cahoots, in league, to tear entheogens
                                                                      away from the Catholic-enforced secrecy and hold them up in the light for all
                                                                      the world to gaze upon and worship openly — even if Wasson and Sabina made
                                                                      loud noises about the need to restrict and respect and not mis-use the
                                                                      mushrooms.

                                                                      The 20th-Century entheogen movement is not solely based on Sabina’s act of
                                                                      handing the mushrooms to Wasson, but that act was the most influential channel
                                                                      through which official Western civilization received entheogens from the
                                                                      shamanic culture, after the Catholic officials previously rejected such
                                                                      indigenous entheogen active sacraments and enforced with the sword exclusively
                                                                      using the official Church’s placebo sacrament.

                                                                      With a fair investigation, it turns out that Wasson, Sabina, and Leary are all
                                                                      harder to categorize as restrictive or libertarian than it might initially
                                                                      appear. Sabina, while yammering about mis-use, was in fact guilty of
                                                                      violating her culture’s restriction against giving Wasson the mushrooms.
                                                                      Wasson, despite his wish to restrict mushroom use to the elite, did in fact
                                                                      popularize it.

                                                                      Leary, while seeking to make entheogens universally available for all kinds of
                                                                      use, did in fact adhere to a relatively serious, East-coast approach, as
                                                                      opposed to Kesey’s truly libertarian anything-goes conception of unqualifiedly
                                                                      legitimate, or outside-legitimacy, entheogen use.

                                                                      Anyone who holds the libertarian position that all entheogen use is legit as
                                                                      long as no one is harmed (see Leary’s libertarian commandments about this),
                                                                      should accept that they are taking a stance against those who are more
                                                                      restrictive about which use is legit and which is mis-use. Both camps can be
                                                                      called “judgmental” of the other: they both actively endorse once stance and
                                                                      refute the other.

                                                                      It’s a huge mistake, poor-quality thinking, to sweepingly reject everything
                                                                      about Leary or McKenna, or to unqualifiedly praise Leary and McKenna.
                                                                      Critical thinking always assesses the good and the bad of each character. No
                                                                      psychedelic figurehead is entirely good or entirely bad.


                                                                      Early Rush is the single most profitable group to study for an investigation
                                                                      of lyrical double-entendres in acid-oriented rock alluding to the phenomena of
                                                                      the mystic altered state. This doesn’t mean their music is the best or most
                                                                      enjoyable.

                                                                      I have also thoroughly analyzed such encoding in other artists’ lyrics,
                                                                      including Beatles, Ozzy, Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maiden, Queen, Led Zeppelin,
                                                                      Cheap Trick, and Hendrix, and other post’ers have made valuable contributions
                                                                      to confirm that such lyrical techniques are not rare, but rather are
                                                                      *standard* for High Classic Rock, the authentic mystery-religion of our time
                                                                      and the authentic Western contemporary shamanism of the late 20th Century.

                                                                      No metaphor or expression is entirely accurate or entirely incorrect. Coraxo
                                                                      tends to take a surprisingly rigid view that a metaphorical expression
                                                                      (McKenna’s “shamanism”) is *entirely* incorrect. Sophisticated and nuanced
                                                                      analysis instead sees the truth and limitation of each such expression. In
                                                                      grilling Coraxo, I seek to clarify what he’s asserting, to find in what way it
                                                                      might be true. Now I can consider whether we can possibly say, in Coraxo’s
                                                                      sense, that Leary “abused mind-altering chemicals”. If I disagree, I might
                                                                      say that such as assertion is unfair or misguided, or lacks a foundation, or
                                                                      is moralistic or restrictive, but I would *not* so much defend Leary’s
                                                                      “character”.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1000 From: eldoreth2002 Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Refuge
                                                                      I came across one of your messages, Michael, as I was doing a search
                                                                      under ‘monastery refuge “mental illness” Christian’ on a search
                                                                      engine. I have, living with me, a lover named Steve, and an
                                                                      obsessive-compulsive ex-lover named Lester. Steve has become so
                                                                      furious with Lester that he has decided to leave, today, for 30 days
                                                                      until I can find another place for Lester to live. Both Steve and
                                                                      Lester have IQ’s around 180.

                                                                      Lester did a lot of LSD years ago, likes Alan Watts, rides bicycles,
                                                                      and his OCD problem is currently being mitigated by a new medication
                                                                      that has apparently freed him of his usual compulsions enough to
                                                                      allow him to think . . . but this thinking goes only so far (about 2-
                                                                      1/2 weeks on the new medication) as to make him (apparently, I’m just
                                                                      an observer, not in his head) remember his OLD compulsions . . . he
                                                                      has been a ‘homeless person’ for a long time, and COULD be blessing
                                                                      his lucky stars to be living in a home again; but instead he’s just
                                                                      repeatedly asking to BUY a bunch of stuff, including bike helmets,
                                                                      getting his bike fixed, scuba gear, pipes, special quality tobaccos,
                                                                      and so forth.

                                                                      Steve learned to read electrical schematics at the age of 7, is
                                                                      expert in electronics, and has in recent years been a counsellor,
                                                                      yes, a substance abuse counsellor, as well as being quite skilled as
                                                                      a mental health counsellor. It is his counselling ability that has
                                                                      recognized Lester’s overwhelming OCD problem and has allowed us to
                                                                      get the new medication.

                                                                      I love Steve, but have for a long time been involved in “taking care”
                                                                      of Lester; this has led me deeply into Christianity, and I am
                                                                      currently concerned about my own tendency to be “co-dependent” and
                                                                      the “empty cup syndrome” i.e., you can’t give from an empty cup; you
                                                                      have to look after yourself before you can look after others.

                                                                      And today Steve is sleeping off the Adavans he took last night to get
                                                                      a good night’s sleep through Lester’s repeated knocking at our door
                                                                      at 5:00 a.m. in the mornings, asking for tobacco, pipes, coffee,
                                                                      whatever; all of which we have decided to keep in our room to
                                                                      prevent his blatant wasting of all materials in his complete
                                                                      unconcern for money and his complete over-usage of all such
                                                                      materials.

                                                                      As you may know, in Christianity, the husband is supposed to have the
                                                                      final word over the wife; but the husband is supposed to cherish the
                                                                      wife. Steve has in the past asked me to find another place for
                                                                      Lester to live. But there IS no such place in the town, and probably
                                                                      the state, in which we live. This is the optimal place I know of for
                                                                      Lester to live. Yesterday we went to the pipe store to buy Lester
                                                                      two new pipes to replace his last one that fell apart on him —
                                                                      (a “Meerschaum” pipe that finally disintegrated around the base as a
                                                                      result of repeated use and bashing) only to find on our return Lester
                                                                      standing in the kitchen, wearing his camouflage gear, dangling a
                                                                      spatula, cooking bratwursts on his beloved electric grill on the
                                                                      counter. We had already taken away the electric grill as a fire
                                                                      hazard, but I had given it back to Lester with the stricture that we
                                                                      would use it occasionally but that he was not to use it himself.
                                                                      Lester has several times started fires by dumping his ash tray with a
                                                                      lit cigarette end in the wastebasket; he has NO sensibility. Steve
                                                                      says this was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Wants Lester
                                                                      OUT, today.

                                                                      What to do?
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1001 From: wrmspirit Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      Intellect becomes viably important in sharing when it speaks through
                                                                      expansion rather than through conditions in effort of promoting the
                                                                      realization of the common bond in each of us. In doing so, it has moved
                                                                      through the necessity of defining the need to promote itself and begins to
                                                                      concentrate on the whole instead…
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1002 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Sustained constructive debate, entheogens
                                                                      From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@…>

                                                                      The great crime Coraxo is guilty of is not negativity or being judgmental of
                                                                      some entheogen use; his significant violation is initially *being vague* in
                                                                      his assertion of Leary’s “abuse”, and tending to think in oversimplistic
                                                                      prefabricated cliched categories that don’t necessarily accurately fit the
                                                                      other person’s debate position. Sometimes it’s hard to initially be so
                                                                      clear
                                                                      as one ought.

                                                                      Sometimes it is important to be vague in order to get a feel for the
                                                                      terrain, especially is discussions such as this.

                                                                      To see what intial reactions and underlying assumptions are held among some
                                                                      of the readership.

                                                                      Other than your own replies, Michael. I cannot say my comments have been met
                                                                      with response that demonstrate critical thinking.

                                                                      One response was a typical kneejerk ad hominem – one which is quickly
                                                                      dismissed as lacking merit.

                                                                      The last one, a little better thought out, was more a complaint and an
                                                                      uncritical review of the hippy 60’s – I did however, take some effort to
                                                                      clarify my position on Leary and McKenna – as individuals who have done more
                                                                      of a disservice to psychedelic studies than have done anything creditable.

                                                                      So while we are discussing the merits or lack thereof on my own debating
                                                                      style, perhaps we should turn our critical eye to those members of this list
                                                                      who came out with those particularly less than edifying posts?

                                                                      Or your own style – when you jump to conclusions that I am speaking from a
                                                                      “moralist” perspective, when in fact I am using criticism from medical
                                                                      anthropology to make my point.

                                                                      Developing theory Michael requires that one look at one’s own positions and
                                                                      the literature one uses to support one’s theory.


                                                                      Let us look at Wasson’s work on Soma. He goes through great pains to make
                                                                      the equivalent that Soma or Haoma was the Amanita muscaria and this mushroom
                                                                      was used by the Vedics. Well, there is really no proof of that; his theory
                                                                      is conjectural, and based on broad interpretations of the Vedas and Avestan
                                                                      literature.

                                                                      Now instead of your list members getting all hot under the collar because I
                                                                      have said something contrary to some cherished belief – how about a serious
                                                                      refutation of my statement?

                                                                      Carlos Castaneda – another fave among the archaic revival types – a complete
                                                                      fraud. Even Wasson challenged his ethnobotany. His ethnography is also
                                                                      lacking if not entirely missing and his described use of peyotl, datura, and
                                                                      mushrooms are completely erroneous – and in the case of datura – dangerous.

                                                                      Yet, despite the strong critical scholarship that has debunked Castaneda ,
                                                                      people still buy his books, go to seminars by the hundreds and fatten the
                                                                      purse of Florinda Donner Grau. Don Muguel Ruiz – another fake, nothing
                                                                      Toltec in his teachings at all, I went to a talk he gave with some elders of
                                                                      some tribal indigenous from Mexico who were appalled by his
                                                                      mischaracterizations of their traditions; and I was out 20 bucks, but it was
                                                                      worth seeing what these pseudo-Toltecs are teaching.

                                                                      Negativity? I am sorry, but to get to any SERIOUS discussion we have to
                                                                      first play some hard ball with assumptions; assumptions about the 60’s. the
                                                                      “entheogenic forefathers” . Castaneda. and even good old Wasson.

                                                                      Wasson, while he was thorough in his ethnobotany and ethnography of the
                                                                      people he actually studied, as I have said falls apart when he speculates as
                                                                      to what Soma was.

                                                                      “In a word, my belief is that Soma is the Divine Mushroom of Immortality,
                                                                      and that in the early days of our culture, before we made use of reading and
                                                                      writing, when the RgVeda was being composed, the prestige of this miraculous
                                                                      mushroom ran by word of mouth far and wide throughout Eurasia, well beyond
                                                                      the regions where it grew and was worshipped. (Chapter 1: The Problem, page
                                                                      9)”

                                                                      “On the contrary I now suggest that the source and focus of diffusion of all
                                                                      these myths and tales and figures of speech-all this poetic imagery-were the
                                                                      birch forests of Eurasia. The peoples who emigrated from the forest belt to
                                                                      the southern latitudes took with them vivid memories of the herb and the
                                                                      imagery. The renown of the Herb of Immortality and the Tree of Life spread
                                                                      also by word of mouth far and wide, and in the South where the birch and the
                                                                      fly-agaric were little more than cherished tales generations and a thousand
                                                                      miles removed from the source of inspiration, the concepts were still
                                                                      stirring the imaginations of poets, story-tellers, and sages. In these alien
                                                                      lands, far from the birch forests of Siberia, botanical substitutions were
                                                                      made for Herb and Tree. Here is where absurdities were introduced into the
                                                                      legends, where fabulous variations proliferated, where peoples who had never
                                                                      known the North such as the Semites were influenced by the ideas and in one
                                                                      way or another incorporated them into their religious traditions. The
                                                                      end-products of these extravaganzas have caused scholars much (and I think
                                                                      needless) trouble as they subjected them to sober exegesis and tried to
                                                                      reconcile them. (Epilogue, page 215)”

                                                                      Nice theory, but without evidence except what he has gleaned from legends of
                                                                      the reideer herding peoples and Mongolian shamans.

                                                                      Eleusis – again, there is no proof that they used any sort of ergot compound
                                                                      in their mysteries – yet this theory is being promoted as if it were fact,
                                                                      disregarding the fact that natural ergot is toxic – causing vasocontriction
                                                                      and ischemia to various limbs and organs – possibly even capable of causing
                                                                      stroke. So the use of ergot at Eleusis defies credulity.

                                                                      Allegros Manna Mushrooms – again conjectural – there is no evidence to
                                                                      support his hypothesis based on his textual analysis.

                                                                      James Arthur – seeing the mushroom Amanita in everything.

                                                                      The major civilizations where “psychedelics” are known to have been used are
                                                                      among the cultures of the Americas.

                                                                      Albert Hoffman states “In conclusion I now answer Wasson’s question. The
                                                                      answer is yes, Early Man in ancient Greece could have arrived at an
                                                                      hallucinogen from ergot. He might have done this from ergot growing on wheat
                                                                      or barley. An easier way would have been to use the ergot growing on the
                                                                      common wild grass Paspalum. This is based on the assumption that herbalists
                                                                      of ancient Greece were as intelligent and resourceful as the herbalists of
                                                                      pre-Columbian Mexico. (The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the
                                                                      Mysteries. page 34)

                                                                      But note his language – “it is based on the assumption that….” Hoffman is
                                                                      assuming, but an assumption does not make a fact.

                                                                      We have no reason to believe that because Wasson found Psilocybe sp. in
                                                                      Mexico and Hoffmann accidentally found the properties of LSD that they are
                                                                      in any way qualified to speculate on things for which there is no evidence
                                                                      and make official pronouncements AS IF these were facts.

                                                                      We have no evidence that the Greeks were as sophisticated as botanists as
                                                                      the Mesoamericans – and the Mesoamericans were and are VERY sophisticated
                                                                      medical botanists.

                                                                      Yet the words of Hoffmann and Wasson in this regard are taken as factual by
                                                                      those wanting to ascribe credibility to these words.

                                                                      Nevertheless, when looked at carefully there is no evidence to support the
                                                                      entheogenic involvement for the development of Hellenistic and Semitic
                                                                      religious though other than the conjecture of these authors.

                                                                      Now, rather than getting irate – members of this list should summon their
                                                                      resources in meeting these critiques.

                                                                      Knee jerk personal attacks and appeals to the character of Hoffman, Allegro
                                                                      and whether or not they were nice guys and pioneers will not do.

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1003 From: Coraxo Date: 24/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      > From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@…>
                                                                      >
                                                                      > The sun is a metaphor for white-light feedback of metaperception, which occurs
                                                                      > in the peak of the mystic altered state. (Mythic allegory is, above all, a
                                                                      > *report* of what one encountered in the intense mystic altered state.)
                                                                      >
                                                                      > The slain head is the lower mind; the rulership notions held by the lower,
                                                                      > animal/child self. This mental slaying or death of the lower, animalistically
                                                                      > illogical self-model occurs in the peak of the mystic altered state. (Mythic
                                                                      > allegory is, above all, a *report* of what one encountered in the intense
                                                                      > mystic altered state.)
                                                                      >
                                                                      > — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      > Egodeath.com

                                                                      With all respect;

                                                                      The ecstatic experience is not the endpoint of gnosticism.

                                                                      The concept of altered consciousness may really be simply altered sensorium
                                                                      and the apparent sense of elevation of consciousness is not necessarily the
                                                                      Gnosis.

                                                                      For example – the sufis use various techniques to reach ecstatic states –
                                                                      none of which among traditionalists use intoxicants (yes there are some
                                                                      reports of hash and opium use among the fringe) – and these states, called
                                                                      “Hal” are not the endpoint – they are rather used to illustrate the
                                                                      possibility of a level of awareness beyond ordinary waking states.

                                                                      Warnings are given not to attach to the state itself since it can also be a
                                                                      distraction.

                                                                      HAL

                                                                      haal.

                                                                      (Lit, “state” or “condition.”) A special-purpose, temporary state of
                                                                      consciousness, generally a product of spiritual practices. A hal (pl.
                                                                      “awhal”) is by nature gratuitous and one should not attempt to prolong it.
                                                                      For every true hal (and there are tests for this, part of the “
                                                                      ‘Ilm-i-Awhal,” the “Science of States”), there is a counterfeit of it based
                                                                      on personal emotion and fantasy.

                                                                      MAQAM

                                                                      ma-qam.

                                                                      (Lit., “station.”) One’s spiritual station or developmental level, as
                                                                      distinct from one’s hal, or state of consciousness. This is seen as the
                                                                      outcome of one’s effort to transform oneself, whereas the hal is a gift.
                                                                      “Maqam” is also a term for “scale” or “mode” in Near-Eastern music.

                                                                      So in sufi use, the isolated alteration of consciousness is of limited
                                                                      utility. It is the spiritual state of changed perception – not altered
                                                                      sensorium – which is valued as a stage of development. This is accompanied
                                                                      by inspiration and by change in behavior, it is the transformation of the
                                                                      self – called in sufism – nafs.

                                                                      The modern problem is to focus on the ecstatic state as the aim of
                                                                      spirituality – and thus we see interest in things like tantra and shamanism.

                                                                      In actuality, there is a level of spiritual transformation which does not
                                                                      rely upon states of ecstacy – but in which one has become transformed
                                                                      through the realignment of the self. This more closely fits the description
                                                                      of maqam.

                                                                      Similarly, dzoqchen practitioners use practices like visualization, dark
                                                                      retreat and dream yoga to develop not the ecstatic state – but to maintain
                                                                      the locus of awareness in each state. This is an important distinction,
                                                                      because rather than get caught up in the experience, the actual nature of
                                                                      the self is seen in the light of pure awareness, all of this can be
                                                                      accomplished through practice and discipline with regular results.

                                                                      So no, the ecstatic state is just a point along the road, it is not the goal
                                                                      in itself.

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1004 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Enth. theory relig., evidence vs. paradigms
                                                                      The entheogen theory of the origins of religion has only recently been
                                                                      assembled; in fact the basic framework or model is still being put together.
                                                                      We’re only in the early initial stages of formulating the hypothesis, *much
                                                                      less* conclusively supporting it. At this point we need many researchers and
                                                                      theorists to commit to trying on this lens and interpretive framework.

                                                                      Conjectural assertion of a new hypothesis can be mistaken for a final
                                                                      conclusion put forth as certain. The entheogen theory shouldn’t be taken as
                                                                      anything more than a “plausible and promising hypothesis” and the entheogen
                                                                      scholars shouldn’t be read as claiming any more than that. Just because
                                                                      someone says “the ancients used entheogens heavily” doesn’t mean that that
                                                                      assertion is being put forth as a certain fact — rather, it’s put forth as a
                                                                      “conjectured fact”.

                                                                      Castaneda is the entheogenist most guilty of dishonestly putting forth
                                                                      conjectural fact as certain fact. There is a spectrum or degrees of this
                                                                      distortion, with entheogenists at the other extreme always being cautious and
                                                                      saying “it appears possible and interesting that the ancients used entheogens
                                                                      heavily”. It should all be read as promising conjecture, at this early point.

                                                                      It’s unprofitable to debate about particular points of argument. The real
                                                                      action happens at the level of paradigms and interpretive frameworks.
                                                                      Individual doubts about particular entheogen-religion evidence is of little
                                                                      import. One can doubt the entheogen-religion evidence of Wasson, and doubt
                                                                      that of Graves, and doubt that of Watts, and so on. Yet the overall paradigm,
                                                                      “entheogens are the main origin of religion”, is unaffected by an infinite
                                                                      number of such doubts.

                                                                      A long list of such doubts, no matter how long, fails to call into question
                                                                      the entheogen explanation of the origin of religion. Listing such doubts
                                                                      reminds me of the Literalist Christians, how they explain away each problem
                                                                      raised against their worldview. The entheogenist today must be resigned to
                                                                      the fact that we have to conjecture without any forcefully persuasive
                                                                      evidence. We have to take it on faith that the evidence will come in its own
                                                                      sweet time.

                                                                      It’s the same situation in mythic-only Christ research. It’s a matter of
                                                                      faith and beauty contest whether we accept the Literalist Christian
                                                                      explanation of the origin of Christianity, or accept the
                                                                      mystic/Gnostic/allegorist explanation. Even science has the same problem; no
                                                                      evidence is absolutely compelling, and evidence is extremely subject to
                                                                      interpretation — consider Bohr/Heisenberg Copenhagenism vs. Bohm/Einstein
                                                                      Hidden Variables, for example.

                                                                      The entheogen theory of the origin of religion deserves commitment because it
                                                                      is simple, beautiful, and elegant. It would explain everything effortlessly.
                                                                      There is currently no evidence that will force people to accept this theory if
                                                                      they are committed to some other theory of the origin of religion. Such
                                                                      forcefully compelling evidence may or may not turn up, at some time.

                                                                      Look from the plane of Theory: if the evidence doesn’t fit the Theory, then
                                                                      too bad for the evidence; the Theory is correct. The entheogen theory of the
                                                                      origin of religion makes sense; other theories don’t make sense. And this
                                                                      theory is more beautiful and elegant than the others, and more deserving of
                                                                      commitment — regardless of the evidence that we happen to have today and
                                                                      tomorrow.

                                                                      Researchers of the mythic-only Jesus and of the entheogenic origin of religion
                                                                      shouldn’t let themselves be slowed down by anything so temporary and weak as
                                                                      the lack of evidence. A superior explanation is vastly more important than
                                                                      evidence, because evidence can always be plugged into bad theories as well as
                                                                      good theories. What’s required for progress of knowledge is a complete
                                                                      appreciation for the effective total malleability of evidence.

                                                                      The eyes deceive. Evidence can just as well lie as tell the truth. Evidence
                                                                      can only suggest a worldview or interpretive framework. In a contest of the
                                                                      importance of paradigms versus evidence, paradigms win by a long shot. A good
                                                                      paradigm is worth more than thousands of pieces of evidence. Evidence is
                                                                      valuable, but subservient to (or less important than) paradigms. In practice,
                                                                      knowledge proceeds by the appeal of paradigms, much more than the appeal of
                                                                      evidence.

                                                                      Established paradigms are impervious to evidence, just as Josh McDowell’s
                                                                      apologetics book “Evidence that Demands a Verdict” is a demonstration that no
                                                                      amount of evidence can persuade those who are committed to preserving a
                                                                      paradigm. Nothing is easier than plugging any and all evidence into whatever
                                                                      paradigm you happen to be committed to. Evidence *is* important, but far less
                                                                      so than interpretive frameworks. One paradigm is worth about two thousand
                                                                      pieces of evidence.



                                                                      Cornelius Van Til (1895-I987) was Professor of Apologetics at Westminster
                                                                      Theological Seminary. From pages 704 -705 of THE NEW DICTIONARY OF THEOLOGY
                                                                      edited by Sinclair B. Ferguson, et al. — “Van Til’s distinctive approach is
                                                                      ‘presuppositionalism’, which may be defined as insistence on an ultimate
                                                                      category of thought or a conceptual framework which one must assume in order
                                                                      to make a sensible interpretation of reality: ‘The issue between believers and
                                                                      non-believers in Christian theism cannot be settled by a direct appeal to
                                                                      “facts” or “laws” whose nature and significance is already agreed upon by both
                                                                      parties to the debate. The question is rather as to what is the final
                                                                      reference-point required to make the “facts” and the “laws” intelligible. The
                                                                      question is as to what the “facts” and “laws”really are. Are they what the
                                                                      non-Christian methodology assumes they are? Are they what the Christian
                                                                      theistic methodology presupposes they are?’ (Defense of the Faith,
                                                                      Philadelphia, 1967). … Van Til vigorously criticized the traditional
                                                                      apologetic approach of both Catholics and Protestants as failing to challenge
                                                                      the non-Christian view of knowledge, as allowing sinners to be judges of
                                                                      ultimate reality, and of arguing merely for the probability of Christianity.
                                                                      He considered himself in the line of Kuyper and Bavinck in his
                                                                      presuppositionalism and opposed the ‘evidentialism, of Thomas Aquinas, Joseph
                                                                      Butler and Warfield.”


                                                                      In today’s age of reason and facts, proof, rationality, and evidence, how can
                                                                      the superstition and impossible miracles of Literalist Christianity be upheld?
                                                                      Only by being impervious to evidence.

                                                                      The only way to be impervious to evidence (rather than vulnerable to evidence)
                                                                      is to be able to plug any evidence into your framework of interpretation.
                                                                      That’s why it’s nearly hopeless to expect that we can dig up some lost ancient
                                                                      textual evidence that will “threaten”, in a brute-force compelling way, the
                                                                      Literalist Christianity paradigm.


                                                                      From the article “Now Playing: The Gospel of Thomas” by Stephen J. Patterson,
                                                                      in the December 2000 issue of Bible Review
                                                                      (http://www.bib-arch.org/bswb_BR/brd00thomas.html): “No text, no matter how
                                                                      dramatic its contents, could “bring down the church as we know it.” In the
                                                                      Gospel of Philip, a third-century apocryphal text well known among scholars,
                                                                      Jesus is said to have “kissed” Mary Magdalene “on the lips.” If that didn’t
                                                                      bring down the house, I can’t imagine what would!”

                                                                      The Gnostic gospels *will* likely eventually cause Literalist Christianity to
                                                                      collapse into a heap of rubble. I’m not asserting that evidence is of no
                                                                      import and completely inconsequential. The power of evidence has been greatly
                                                                      overestimated and the power of paradigms — interpretive frameworks — has
                                                                      been greatly *under*-estimated.

                                                                      We used to think that a handful of pieces of evidence — or maybe a larger
                                                                      number — would be enough to change one’s worldview. But now it’s clear that
                                                                      it takes more like two thousand pieces of evidence to even *begin* to
                                                                      seriously start shaking a paradigm.

                                                                      We need to acknowledge that evidential proof goes both ways: Literalist
                                                                      Christians begin by adopting that paradigm, and then claim that there’s not
                                                                      enough evidence to warrant adopting a different paradigm. There isn’t enough
                                                                      evidence to compell people to adopt the entheogen theory of the origin of
                                                                      religion, but there isn’t enough evidence to compell rejecting that theory,
                                                                      either.

                                                                      It’s early and we don’t have *nearly* enough evidence to support rejecting or
                                                                      adhering to the entheogen theory. Same with the mythic-only Jesus theory: it’s
                                                                      still quite early and we’re only beginning to clearly formulate the
                                                                      hypothesis, paradigm, or interpretive framework. It’s too early to talk of
                                                                      compelling evidence that can forcefully persuade inveterate doubters.

                                                                      In the domain of mythic-experiencing allegory and the study of religious
                                                                      experiencing, and the nature and origin of religion, we’re now in the Age Of
                                                                      Hypothesis Formation, not the Age Of Compelling Evidence. So all writings
                                                                      about shamanism, entheogens, Christian origins, religious experiencing, and
                                                                      the mind are *all* conjectural — not just the entheogen theory of the origin
                                                                      of religion.

                                                                      *All* the books about mind, cognition, shamanism, mystery-religion, religious
                                                                      experiencing, and ego death (and quantum mechanics) are conjectural and
                                                                      subject to revision and obsolescence. It took centuries for philosophy of
                                                                      science to realize that all science is conjectural, interpretive, and subject
                                                                      to profound revision.

                                                                      We are still in the midst of the Dark Ages, only beginning to struggle to wake
                                                                      up — strangely, despite assumptions of Progress, this situation seems nothing
                                                                      new. As always, the apocalyptic revelation of world enlightenment is dawning,
                                                                      as it has so often been. In this Web Age, the Truth will stand up taller and
                                                                      manifest more of its complete shape than the many previous times it has
                                                                      managed to arise more or less before being suppressed by the aristocrats in
                                                                      league with the clergy.


                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1005 From: Coraxo Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Enth. theory relig., evidence vs. paradigms
                                                                      > From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@…>
                                                                      >
                                                                      > In the domain of mythic-experiencing allegory and the study of religious
                                                                      > experiencing, and the nature and origin of religion, we’re now in the Age Of
                                                                      > Hypothesis Formation, not the Age Of Compelling Evidence. So all writings
                                                                      > about shamanism, entheogens, Christian origins, religious experiencing, and
                                                                      > the mind are *all* conjectural — not just the entheogen theory of the origin
                                                                      > of religion.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > *All* the books about mind, cognition, shamanism, mystery-religion, religious
                                                                      > experiencing, and ego death (and quantum mechanics) are conjectural and
                                                                      > subject to revision and obsolescence. It took centuries for philosophy of
                                                                      > science to realize that all science is conjectural, interpretive, and subject
                                                                      > to profound revision.
                                                                      >
                                                                      > We are still in the midst of the Dark Ages, only beginning to struggle to wake
                                                                      > up — strangely, despite assumptions of Progress, this situation seems nothing
                                                                      > new. As always, the apocalyptic revelation of world enlightenment is dawning,
                                                                      > as it has so often been. In this Web Age, the Truth will stand up taller and
                                                                      > manifest more of its complete shape than the many previous times it has
                                                                      > managed to arise more or less before being suppressed by the aristocrats in
                                                                      > league with the clergy.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >
                                                                      > — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      > Egodeath.com

                                                                      These are reasonable statements Michael. We are in a dark age.

                                                                      Corax



                                                                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1006 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: “Clueless apostles” = uninitiated Christians
                                                                      >The whole story of the New Testament is about everyone (the Disciples, plus
                                                                      the multitudes) not being able to see and understand what it was that was
                                                                      happening around them and the teachings being given. Supposedly, no one really
                                                                      knew what was going on or understood what was being expressed until Jesus’s
                                                                      resurrection.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >daimonic666


                                                                      “Before the resurrection” means “before one’s initiation”. “After Jesus’
                                                                      resurrection” means “after one’s initiation and enlightenment”. Beginners at
                                                                      Christianity are lower Christians who fail to understand Jesus. After their
                                                                      initiation they become mature, perfected, completed Christians, who understand
                                                                      Jesus.

                                                                      The originally clueless apostles, followers of Jesus, represent the
                                                                      uninitiated Christian. Only after the Holy Spirit descends at Pentecost do
                                                                      Jesus’ disciples — that’s us, after initiation — understand Jesus. We when
                                                                      uninitiated are the clueless followers of Jesus who fail to understand him; we
                                                                      claim to follow him but are unable to follow him.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1007 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegory through intense peak-state filter
                                                                      White Heat
                                                                      by Lou Reed

                                                                      White light gonna drive me out of my brain
                                                                      White light gonna make me feel so insane
                                                                      White heat White shapin’ them down to my toes
                                                                      White light’s got it now – goodness knows

                                                                      White light gonna drive me out of my mind
                                                                      White light’s surely gonna make me blind
                                                                      White heat – White shaping way down to my toes
                                                                      White light could kill me now – goodness knows

                                                                      Oh – Oh – White light
                                                                      Oh – Oh – White light
                                                                      Oh – Oh – White heat
                                                                      Oh – Oh – White heat

                                                                      White light’s a-flashing

                                                                      White light
                                                                      Still feels right
                                                                      What’s that sound – what’s that sound
                                                                      Don’t turn on – be dead or alive
                                                                      No feeling
                                                                      Here she comes
                                                                      Oww – yeah

                                                                      ________________

                                                                      I’ve written on the relation between the loosecog state and enlightenment, for
                                                                      years. The loosecog state enables the shift from the egoic worldmodel to the
                                                                      transcendent worldmodel, by enabling reindexing of all mental construct
                                                                      association sets. The loosecog state is the means, the doorway and gateway,
                                                                      to the destination, which is discovering the transcendent worldmodel.

                                                                      In Christianity, metanoia or repentence or the event of regeneration isn’t the
                                                                      *goal*, but is the *means* to salvation and deliverance, the gateway to enter
                                                                      the kingdom of heaven. Heaven is not Heaven’s gate. Heaven is not the
                                                                      stairway to heaven. We angels and perfected saints are able to walk up and
                                                                      down the stairway to heaven, and we live in heaven all the time. In Heaven,
                                                                      the forbidden fruit is available for all.

                                                                      The goal is the availability/use of loosecog *and* the resulting mental
                                                                      worldmodel. That’s the relationship of the altered state to the transformed
                                                                      permanent stage. Wilber’s been writing good material on this relationship
                                                                      lately, and he’s said he’ll be incorporating the theory of altered states more
                                                                      into Integral Theory, along with stages, threads, and quadrants.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1008 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Lyrics: Last Time Around
                                                                      Unlike most I’m inspired to post, this song is so popular, the lyrics are
                                                                      online.


                                                                      Last Time Around
                                                                      by Dennis Dahlquist recorded by Chicago garage-punk by the Del-Vetts

                                                                      Well – I’m sittin’ here sinking on deeper down
                                                                      My head is a-spinning around and ’round
                                                                      I can’t seem to shake this feelin’
                                                                      Oh – my body is a-rockin’ and reelin’
                                                                      Oh – it’s such a funny feelin’
                                                                      Well – I know this is the last time around for me – oh yeah

                                                                      Oh/Well I’m sinking – oh – I’m sinking on deeper down
                                                                      My eyes are blurred and I can’t hear a sound
                                                                      Fight it – help me fight it
                                                                      ‘Cause I know this is the last time around for me – oh yeah

                                                                      Oh – it’s taken me over and swallowed me up
                                                                      I’m caught in a landslide – I can’t run or duck
                                                                      I’ve run out of time and I’ve run out of luck
                                                                      I know this is the last time around

                                                                      Oh – yeah
                                                                      Last time around

                                                                      Well – I know this is the last time around for me



                                                                      Analysis:

                                                                      Well – I’m sittin’ here sinking on deeper down
                                                                      My head is a-spinning around and ’round [spinning is a common vision with LSD]
                                                                      I can’t seem to shake this feelin’ [strange feelings]
                                                                      Oh – my body is a-rockin’ and reelin’ [cognitive distortion, wavering body
                                                                      sense]
                                                                      Oh – it’s such a funny feelin’
                                                                      Well – I know this is the last time around for me – oh yeah [egodeath panic
                                                                      typically causes vows to abstain, swearing that if one survives, they’ll never
                                                                      do that foolishness again]

                                                                      Oh/Well I’m sinking – oh – I’m sinking on deeper down
                                                                      My eyes are blurred and I can’t hear a sound [blurred vision]
                                                                      Fight it – help me fight it [fighting to hang onto egoic control, against
                                                                      egodeath’s control-cancellation]
                                                                      ‘Cause I know this is the last time around for me – oh yeah

                                                                      Oh – it’s taken me over and swallowed me up [Ground experienced as
                                                                      puppetmaster over one’s will and thoughts]
                                                                      I’m caught in a landslide – I can’t run or duck [Ground of being undermines
                                                                      and trumps egoic control efforts, being the cause and parent of them and true
                                                                      owner of them]
                                                                      I’ve run out of time and I’ve run out of luck [timeless block-universe
                                                                      eternity] [luck is often grouped with Necessity, Fate, heimarmene]
                                                                      I know this is the last time around

                                                                      Oh – yeah
                                                                      Last time around

                                                                      Well – I know this is the last time around for me [ego dies; egoic worldmodel
                                                                      dies forever, continuing on only as a ghost in the underworld of Hades]
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1009 From: theecorax Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Farewell
                                                                      I have to say the topic of entheogens does not interest me much, and so I think
                                                                      I need to respectfully disenroll from this list.

                                                                      We all have so much time and energy in the day, and this is a topic that I have
                                                                      studied extensively and for me it lacks merit for a number of reasons that I
                                                                      will not trouble you with. It is not a topic I care to pursue any longer.

                                                                      Good luck to you.

                                                                      Corax
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1010 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Trumpets of Heaven: Van Halen Amp Tone
                                                                      If one were to play electric guitar through this rig while in the spirit, one
                                                                      would feel one in the cosmic Rock with Eddie Van Halen.

                                                                      Electric guitar *through power-tube saturation* is the authentic contemporary
                                                                      harp played in Heaven. It would be unthinkable to have altered-state electric
                                                                      guitar without power-tube saturation.

                                                                      It would be really good if I could post samples at my Distortion Valve artist
                                                                      area.

                                                                      Posted to the guitar amp discussion area:


                                                                      I’m off doing philosophy and occasionally playing guitar a few minutes a day,
                                                                      but it’s a crime to withhold this Tone from you. I have died and gone to Van
                                                                      Halen heaven. Completely independent of volume.

                                                                      Bridge double-coil pickup
                                                                      Slow phaser mixed with bypass to make subtle
                                                                      Frown curve EQ
                                                                      Preamp distortion
                                                                      Moderate smile curve EQ
                                                                      Power-tube saturation
                                                                      Dummy load
                                                                      Moderate smile curve EQ
                                                                      Right channel: amplifier, guitar speaker
                                                                      Left channel: reverb, amplifier, guitar speaker

                                                                      Optional: feedback device

                                                                      This sounds exactly like Van Halen I because this is the signal processing
                                                                      chain used on that album.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman, Amptone.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1011 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Reading allegorythrough intense peak-state filter
                                                                      “Enlightenment” is a universal concept reflecting the transformation from
                                                                      egoic to transcendent thinking. This transformation is reflected in various
                                                                      ways and degrees in different religions, such as Gnosticism and Buddhism.
                                                                      Enlightenment is the goal of the higher mode of Buddhism.

                                                                      Buddhism, like all religions, is the awakening of the mind through techniques,
                                                                      most notably entheogen use, which allow one to discern the nature of the mind
                                                                      through disciplined use of such techniques. To become a Buddha, to understand
                                                                      Jesus’ teachings, to attain the Gnosis, and so on in equivalent metaphors,
                                                                      means that one has understood the nature of the mind.

                                                                      Altered states are an essential integrated component in practically all
                                                                      systems of spirituality and religious mythic metaphor. The modern view of
                                                                      “altered states”, such as in the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence,
                                                                      produces the definitive, explicit, systematic explanation of the higher level
                                                                      of spirituality.

                                                                      The mystic or loose-cognition altered state is the fully effective way to
                                                                      grasp and comprehend the essence of spiritualities of all cultures, being
                                                                      based on a model of cognition describing the universal dynamic shift from
                                                                      lower, childish, animal-like thinking to higher, mature, rational thinking.

                                                                      Theoretical understanding of “altered states” is required, to produce the most
                                                                      profound and philosophical grasp of spirituality.

                                                                      The mystic altered state, coupled with Theory of time, self, control, and
                                                                      combined with the study of relgious mythic metaphor, is the fastest and most
                                                                      effective way to produce complete, meaningful religious insight. Garage punk,
                                                                      pop-sike lyrics don’t reflect such completed religious insight, but clearly
                                                                      reflect experiential and insight milestones toward such transformed
                                                                      understanding of the mind, self, time, and control.

                                                                      Study of the altered state, combined with theorizing and model construction,
                                                                      together with study of religious mythic allegory, reliably produce the
                                                                      specific worldmodel that is systematically formulated in the Introduction to
                                                                      the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence, http://www.egodeath.com/intro.htm.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1012 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Amazon book lists about mythic Christianity
                                                                      http://www.radikalkritik.de — Radical Criticism: Contributions for the
                                                                      Radical Criticism of Early Christian History

                                                                      Dr. theol. Hermann Detering,


                                                                      I’ve done alot of bibliographical work lately. Amazon’s features are
                                                                      revolutionarily useful.

                                                                      I’ve made great progress on interpreting Christian myth in terms of the
                                                                      phenomena that are encountered in the mystic state of cognition. Given any
                                                                      passage, I can tell the esoteric mystic-state meaning. This method is more
                                                                      concrete than usually assumed; it’s like looking through a particular
                                                                      interpretive lens based on metaphorical allusions to the specific phenomena of
                                                                      the mystic state.

                                                                      The book lists below are surprisingly potent and influential. They are
                                                                      shockingly prominent at Amazon. Far more people are seeing these innovative
                                                                      and highly unorthodox groupings of books than are reading my Web site and
                                                                      discussion group postings.


                                                                      My recent online work is reflected in two places: these lists, and my
                                                                      discussion group postings.

                                                                      I have two new Web pages:

                                                                      Chapter Summaries of The Jesus Mysteries —
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/jesusmysterieschapsumm.htm — a great study guide and
                                                                      useful outline of the book. I’ve read the book twice, cover to cover.

                                                                      Taxonomy of Christ Views (Taxonomy of Ways of Thinking about Christianity) —
                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/christviewstaxonomy.htm. There are only two
                                                                      archetypal main denominations: Literalist Christianity (official Christianity)
                                                                      and esoteric Christianity (mythic-experiencing allegory). Esoteric,
                                                                      mythic-only Christianity has actually been the main, popular, dominant form —
                                                                      and the official version of Christianity is only *claimed* to have been the
                                                                      “main” and “traditional” and “standard” version.

                                                                      Primary religious experiencing demonstrates that the main action in
                                                                      Christianity is experiential insight in this life, like the character Paul’s
                                                                      experience on the road to Damascus. I also base my inversion of “main vs.
                                                                      deviant” Christianity on the evidently very strong tradition of a female Most
                                                                      Beloved Disciple, shown clearly in all the good paintings of the Last Supper.

                                                                      A recent article about Gabriel’s Datura “lily” in the Anunciation in Entheos
                                                                      journal also implies that esoteric Christianity was likely the main popular
                                                                      version of Christianity, despite the official history books’ claim to report
                                                                      “official, traditional” Literalist Christianity having clear dominance.

                                                                      Something that shook me into seeing esoteric Christianity in the midst of
                                                                      Catholic Christianity was a book of Mexican Christian iconographic art: it was
                                                                      obvious at last that purgatory and the Cross were *reports* of mystic-state
                                                                      experiences the esoteric Christians had, including through use of the
                                                                      traditional Mexican-Indian sacraments as opposed to the phony Catholic Church
                                                                      placebo sacrament.

                                                                      We could even have a contest between the two forms of Catholic/esoteric
                                                                      Christianity: the genuine folk sacraments of Europe, and their mythic
                                                                      representation through European Catholic iconography, versus the different
                                                                      genuine folk sacraments of Mexico and *their* different mythic manifestation
                                                                      in Mexican Catholic iconography.

                                                                      The *majority* of Catholic symbolism was truly inspired by genuine sacraments,
                                                                      and the official aristocratic Church “leaders” only *pretended* to lead and
                                                                      control the religion, forcibly trying — and failing — to force the
                                                                      Literalist version of Christianity onto the commonfolk, although all the
                                                                      commonfolk knew full well that the true version of Christianity is the
                                                                      esoteric-only version. “Witches and sorcerors” were ordinary popular
                                                                      esoteric-only, anti-Literalist Christians who used the true sacraments.

                                                                      There was both a continuous tradition of true Christianity, called “heresy” by
                                                                      the officials, and, the true version of Christianity was continually directly
                                                                      rediscovered directly from the Ground of being — from primary religious
                                                                      experience — in other words, *the Holy Spirit kept teaching people about
                                                                      esoteric Christianity* and kept teaching them so rise above the lower, “milk
                                                                      Christianity” of Literalism. Also, the Crusades brought back knowledge of the
                                                                      true sacraments from the Eastern Orthodox tradition.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com


                                                                      http://www.egodeath.com/#_Listmania_Book_Lists
                                                                      (This #anchor could change)

                                                                      Another view of my lists:
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/cm/member-fil/-/A1YFCQT60M4XAJ


                                                                      Lists 1-10
                                                                      Ego death as deterministic self-control cancellation
                                                                      Original, experiential, mystical Christianity
                                                                      Christianity as political rebellion against “divine” Caesar
                                                                      Mythic-only Christ theory
                                                                      Entheogen theory of the origin of religions
                                                                      Block-universe determinism, Necessity, divine predestination
                                                                      Historical Jesus, or Christ Myth?
                                                                      Reformed/Calvinist theology and determinism
                                                                      Tenseless time, eternity, and timelessness
                                                                      Religious myth: allegorical metaphor of mystic experiencing

                                                                      Lists 11-20
                                                                      The kingdom of God is at hand
                                                                      The active eucharist that reveals the kingdom of God
                                                                      Mystery Religion, Myth, and the Mystical State
                                                                      Rock as philosophical mystery-religion
                                                                      Ancient Near Eastern religion
                                                                      Religious Experiencing
                                                                      Philosophy of Mother of God
                                                                      Mary “John” Magdalene, The Beloved Disciple
                                                                      Picture story Bibles
                                                                      Picture story Bibles 2

                                                                      Lists 21-24
                                                                      Picture story Bibles 3: Baby Bibles
                                                                      Sophia, religious comprehension
                                                                      Holy Spirit and Christian Spirituality
                                                                      Word and Power (doctrine and spiritual experience)
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1013 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Trumpets of Heaven: The Datura Annunciation
                                                                      Picture of a trumpet of Heaven:
                                                                      http://www.erowid.org/plants/show_image.php3?image=datura/datura_inoxia_flower
                                                                      4.jpg

                                                                      Datura info:
                                                                      http://entheogen.com/datura/links.html

                                                                      Good Egyptian picture of Daturas:
                                                                      http://members.tripod.com/~parvati/datura.html – “The light is the light of
                                                                      Horus, realized in the psychoactive flowers of Datura which “illuminate”
                                                                      Tuth-Shena in allegorical fashion. It is the power of Horus before which she
                                                                      throws up her hands in awe. Vitis, Nymphaea, and Datura are the intoxicating
                                                                      elements portrayed in this scene of shamanic manifestation.”

                                                                      http://www.entheomedia.com/Entheos_Issue_2.htm — Daturas for the Virgin

                                                                      Annunciation
                                                                      n 1: a quarter day in England, Wales, and Ireland [syn: Annunciation, Lady
                                                                      Day, Annunciation Day, March 25] 2: (in Christian religions) the announcement
                                                                      to the Virgin Mary by the angel Gabriel of the incarnation of Christ [syn:
                                                                      Annunciation] 3: a formal public statement; “the government made an
                                                                      announcement about changes in the drug war” [syn: announcement, proclamation,
                                                                      promulgation]
                                                                      Source: WordNet R 1.6, C 1997 Princeton University

                                                                      Is Gabriel a chick angel or a dude angel? The orthodox say dude, the
                                                                      esoterics say chick — like the Beloved Disciple.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1014 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      >Is the concept of “altered states” modern usage? Do cultures use the
                                                                      classification “altered state”? Does the conceptual framework of the “altered
                                                                      state” have a specific foundation? What is the “altered state”? How is it
                                                                      essential to understanding spirituality?

                                                                      The named *concept* “altered state” is modern and explains the *use* of
                                                                      altered states in cultures in any era.

                                                                      The essence of the mystic altered state is loose cognition. The loosening of
                                                                      cognitive associations enables re-indexing mental constructs to shift
                                                                      worldmodels, include reconceptualizing self, time, will, and control. There
                                                                      are various techniques for bringing about loose cognition.


                                                                      >Is the altered state in the realm of spirit, or body?

                                                                      The Holy Spirit is the mystical state of cognition in contrast with the
                                                                      default state. A theory of Gnosticism relevant to Christianity requires a
                                                                      theory of the Holy Spirit and Pentecost.


                                                                      >Does the altered state arise from the body? Is it centrally about the mind?

                                                                      The Holy Spirit acts mainly in the mind, raising it up to the realm of spirit.
                                                                      In the Incarnation, the Holy Spirit descends to engender the second birth in
                                                                      the psyche, residing in the body.


                                                                      >Does Buddhism rely on “altered states”? Are “altered states” levels of
                                                                      awareness called Samadhi? Is this an altered sensorium? Is it the focused
                                                                      and clear concentration of the mind?

                                                                      Buddhist mental techniques are diverse, including Tibetan Vajrayana
                                                                      inner-circle traditions based on Bon shamanism.
                                                                      http://www.jamesarthur.yage.net/mushroom3.html — search on “vaj”.
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1015 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      >>Does Buddhism rely on “altered states”? Are “altered states” levels of
                                                                      >awareness called Samadhi? Is this an altered sensorium? Is it the focused
                                                                      >and clear concentration of the mind?
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Buddhist mental techniques are diverse, including Tibetan Vajrayana
                                                                      >inner-circle traditions based on Bon shamanism.
                                                                      >http://www.jamesarthur.yage.net/mushroom3.html — search on “vaj”.

                                                                      Research has hardly begun on this; we’ve hardly started to consider whether
                                                                      Buddhism uses entheogens. It’s much too early to be sure what the *extent*
                                                                      and influence of entheogen use is in Buddhism. Research here lags decades
                                                                      behind looking for entheogen influence in Christianity, Vedic religion, and
                                                                      shamanism. It’s surprising that the 1960s chasing after the Other religions
                                                                      didn’t connect the origin and inspiration of Buddhism with entheogens.

                                                                      Zig Zag Zen: Buddhism and Psychedelics
                                                                      by Allan Hunt Badiner (Editor), Alex Grey (Editor), Stephen Batchelor, Huston
                                                                      Smith (Preface)
                                                                      June 2002, rank 2K (*very* popular)
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0811832864
                                                                      Some articles about entheogenic roots of Buddhism.

                                                                      Persephone’s Quest: Entheogens and the Origins of Religion
                                                                      by R. Gordon Wasson, Stella Kramrisch, Jonathan Ott, Carl A. P. Ruck
                                                                      (Contributor), Jonathon Ott (Contributor)
                                                                      1992, rank 85K
                                                                      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0300052669
                                                                      Buddha’s mushroom death
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1016 From: wrmspirit Date: 26/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Altered states: a modern concept?
                                                                      For promotion of liberation from false beliefs,especially those passed down
                                                                      through religions,
                                                                      it might not be such a bad idea to begin discussing the development of ego,
                                                                      as a transposition, and as a mechanism for the instillation of programs on a
                                                                      biological level which rob life of its originality.

                                                                      And how, at a specific point, overload begins to occur which immediately
                                                                      begins the purging process…When this process is allowed without
                                                                      interference it goes well…But when it is resisted than, of course, that’s
                                                                      the onset of disease and dysfunction….A lack of balance and alignment.
                                                                      Some guidance is necessary from another who has experienced this if
                                                                      difficulties arise.

                                                                      It seems reasonable that entheogens are one method of helping this process
                                                                      along as are others, such as meditation…

                                                                      However, the method is not what becomes unleashed and therefore, should not
                                                                      be made out to be more than what it is…to prevent the creation of a new
                                                                      type of external worshipping…
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1017 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Import. of myth-only Paul to myth-only Jesus rsrch
                                                                      The importance of mythic-only Paul to mythic-only Jesus research

                                                                      The non-existence of Saint Paul the Apostle is the litmus test for
                                                                      mythic-only Jesus researchers to see if they get it or fail to get
                                                                      it. You can’t take Paul for granted and simultaneously declare Jesus
                                                                      mythic-only. The real task isn’t to tell whether Jesus existed, but
                                                                      rather, to account for the origin of Christianity.

                                                                      Convention says that Christianity was created by Jesus and Paul. A
                                                                      full non-orthodox explanation must say that both figures are
                                                                      creations. Surprisingly, merely revising Jesus to be fictional
                                                                      (while leaving the official framework in place) isn’t enough to tell
                                                                      a different origin of Christianity. The framework must change; the
                                                                      way of thinking about founder figures must change — Paul must change.

                                                                      Max Rieser, Acharya S, Michael Conley, Hermann Detering, and the
                                                                      Dutch Radical Critics all sweep far past mythic-only Jesus research
                                                                      by proposing that Paul is a fictional construct.

                                                                      Ways of thinking are far more important than revising any isolated
                                                                      idea or assumption. Most mythic-only Jesus researchers revise the
                                                                      assumption of the existence of a single historical Jesus, while
                                                                      leaving all the rest of the official story of the historical origin
                                                                      of Christianity intact and unaffected. The result is merely modified
                                                                      official history, not an alternative history.

                                                                      A modified official history is still dominanted by implausibilities
                                                                      and magical, unrealistic thinking. Only a wholly alternative,
                                                                      completely revised history with a different framework of thinking can
                                                                      be plausible and realistic.

                                                                      Peter is also centrally important. It’s irrational and inconsistent
                                                                      to study the existence of Jesus without also considering the
                                                                      existence of Paul and Peter. Arthur Drews, in addition to writing
                                                                      the book The Christ Myth, wrote Saint Peter, showing his non-
                                                                      existence as well. One cannot study Jesus’ non-existence in
                                                                      isolation from the entire framework of a completely revised model of
                                                                      the origin of Christianity.

                                                                      The main action in revising our explanation of Jesus’ non-existence
                                                                      is at the level of ways of thinking, or paradigms, not down at the
                                                                      level of isolated elements of official history such as the existence
                                                                      of a single figure.

                                                                      We are also practically required to study how allegorical religious
                                                                      myth works; you can’t understand Jesus’ non-existence and tell a
                                                                      coherent, plausible, rational story of the rise of Christianity
                                                                      without a firm understanding of how allegorical religious mythic
                                                                      thinking works. Such thinking underlies the production of characters
                                                                      such as Jesus, Paul, and Peter.

                                                                      — Michael Hoffman
                                                                      Egodeath.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1018 From: Jennifer Jackson Date: 27/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Re: Import. of myth-only Paul to myth-only Jesus rsrch
                                                                      Have you ever read C.S. Lewis’s _Chronicles of Narnia_
                                                                      — the book called _The Silver Chair_, where the witch is slowly strumming
                                                                      her guitar in a room full of druggy smoke deep down in a cave under the
                                                                      earth, saying “and what is this SUN you have imagined? And what is this
                                                                      SKY?? Hoo hoo hoo, what fine imaginations you little children have!”


                                                                      >From: “Michael Hoffman” <mhoffman@…>
                                                                      >Reply-To: egodeath
                                                                      >To: “Egodeath Group” <egodeath>
                                                                      >Subject: [egodeath] Import. of myth-only Paul to myth-only Jesus rsrch
                                                                      >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:19:49 -0700
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The importance of mythic-only Paul to mythic-only Jesus research
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The non-existence of Saint Paul the Apostle is the litmus test for
                                                                      >mythic-only Jesus researchers to see if they get it or fail to get
                                                                      >it. You can’t take Paul for granted and simultaneously declare Jesus
                                                                      >mythic-only. The real task isn’t to tell whether Jesus existed, but
                                                                      >rather, to account for the origin of Christianity.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Convention says that Christianity was created by Jesus and Paul. A
                                                                      >full non-orthodox explanation must say that both figures are
                                                                      >creations. Surprisingly, merely revising Jesus to be fictional
                                                                      >(while leaving the official framework in place) isn’t enough to tell
                                                                      >a different origin of Christianity. The framework must change; the
                                                                      >way of thinking about founder figures must change — Paul must change.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Max Rieser, Acharya S, Michael Conley, Hermann Detering, and the
                                                                      >Dutch Radical Critics all sweep far past mythic-only Jesus research
                                                                      >by proposing that Paul is a fictional construct.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Ways of thinking are far more important than revising any isolated
                                                                      >idea or assumption. Most mythic-only Jesus researchers revise the
                                                                      >assumption of the existence of a single historical Jesus, while
                                                                      >leaving all the rest of the official story of the historical origin
                                                                      >of Christianity intact and unaffected. The result is merely modified
                                                                      >official history, not an alternative history.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >A modified official history is still dominanted by implausibilities
                                                                      >and magical, unrealistic thinking. Only a wholly alternative,
                                                                      >completely revised history with a different framework of thinking can
                                                                      >be plausible and realistic.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >Peter is also centrally important. It’s irrational and inconsistent
                                                                      >to study the existence of Jesus without also considering the
                                                                      >existence of Paul and Peter. Arthur Drews, in addition to writing
                                                                      >the book The Christ Myth, wrote Saint Peter, showing his non-
                                                                      >existence as well. One cannot study Jesus’ non-existence in
                                                                      >isolation from the entire framework of a completely revised model of
                                                                      >the origin of Christianity.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >The main action in revising our explanation of Jesus’ non-existence
                                                                      >is at the level of ways of thinking, or paradigms, not down at the
                                                                      >level of isolated elements of official history such as the existence
                                                                      >of a single figure.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >We are also practically required to study how allegorical religious
                                                                      >myth works; you can’t understand Jesus’ non-existence and tell a
                                                                      >coherent, plausible, rational story of the rise of Christianity
                                                                      >without a firm understanding of how allegorical religious mythic
                                                                      >thinking works. Such thinking underlies the production of characters
                                                                      >such as Jesus, Paul, and Peter.
                                                                      >
                                                                      >– Michael Hoffman
                                                                      >Egodeath.com
                                                                      >




                                                                      _________________________________________________________________
                                                                      Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
                                                                      http://www.hotmail.com
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1019 From: merker2002 Date: 29/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: motive: thunderbolt through skull
                                                                      hi again,
                                                                      i’d like to know where the “thunderbolt through skull” motive
                                                                      you have used on your website belongs to.
                                                                      i’d like to have a poster with this motive, it’s got that certain
                                                                      something, a reminder of that magic moment.

                                                                      regards,
                                                                      merker
                                                                      Group: egodeath Message: 1020 From: c3273 Date: 29/08/2002
                                                                      Subject: Consciouness model of universe
                                                                      If you’re interested Michael’s model of ego transcendance you may find the following site to be a most interesting adjunct.

                                                                      http://home.earthlink.net/~dolascetta/MetaFrameSet.html

                                                                      Dick Dolan ties in the nature of self, block universe and other parts of the cybernetic ego death model into a pure consciousness model of the universe. The site is well written, referenced and scholarly. With some work I think the two could be tied into a coherent world view.

                                                                      ~Matt