I’m publishing now on June 25, 2023 this draft page which I made on June 6, 2023 and mp3 file I produced on June 8, containing April 25-26 content. I listened to the episode on June 8.
I haven’t prepped the timestamps to summarize the content.
I also produced “Ep257 Successful Failure of Control.mp3” and listened to it – no page created yet.
My motivation for posting this incomplete page now is that I’m producing now Ep258 and I need to catch up with providing the backlog of prepped couple of episodes (256, 257) so that I can release today: Ep258 Egodeath Mystery Show Ep258 📖🖼🍄🌳🔍 Canterbury Psalter Images Tour (June 17-June ##, 2023)
Gold Clips timestamps
Goal/project ongoing: Identify Gold Clips timestamps for segments about the following, and make a specialized topical episode Clips on:
0:14 – “65 Miking trim VOX_TK_5165” at2020 L, m39 R. eq. Compressors.
0:50 – “VOX_TK_5165” April 25, 2023 “Scrape together hard-to–find segments about control transformation. Translate Eadwin’es msg. Relying on branching model is unstable.
7:39 – VOX_TK_5176 – April 25 2023 11:30 pm. Childish enth scholarship. Prohibition-compliant. Defeatists. Amanita is the smiling face of psil prohibition.
branching is unstable control.
a bit quiet
able to keep balance if you adopt the non-branching model.
cancelling out the v1 control to be stable and reject it.
21:56 – “VOX_TK_5182” Intro. Egodeath Mystery Show. Advanced idea dev session; newbies can follow: SUMMARY for newbies: Ingest psil; loose cog results. Continue to think same way = left leg = unstable model of control.
23:24 – “VOX_TK_5187” – No guitar; voice only. Advanced idea dev. Left-foot standing naive newbie psychonauts beware fatal catastrophic loss of control.
“naturalism” is a euphemism for hardcore extremist materialism/physicalism (Matthew Johnson, possibly Chris Letheby).
Irvin: “not important for/to our study/discussion.”
36:38 – “88 Miking VOX_TK_5188” – Mic: ev 635A.
36:58 – “VOX_TK_5188” – The threat of catastrophic loss of control is tantamount to having loss of control. The control agent suffers loss of control. The world as well burns; burning bush; end of world. The death of the steersman agent, in the end of the world.
1:35:56 – “VOX_TK_5189” – How to bring the field to ego death and transformative failure in the end of the world.
1:37:43 – “VOX_TK_5192” – Isaac sacrificed. The donkey we ride for the rest of our lives. King to be sacrificed, making shapes of branching/non. right leg donkey sacificed king of the puppets, of the ego-dead.
1:49:30 – “VOX_TK_5193” – At Egodeath.com, reading page “technique of ego death” http://egodeath.com/TechniqueofEgoDeath.htm — the world fails and dies/ends. A world rebirth, not only personal. branching emphasis on world, not self. Stable model of world.
[Jan 15, 2025] continuing deepening connections about “one foot forward”: right foot forward / right leg forward is good, stable, equivalent to “weight on right foot”. Best foot forward. Handedness arb maps “R is better than L”. So “best foot forward” means “right foot forward”; “right leg forward”.
King doesn’t put crown directly on king’s head; angel is intermediary doing this.
Stable buildings have scroll of truth-enlightenment message touching sky.
Who owns empty ossuary? Either the king being crowned, or the sage at the stable door of temple – his scroll goes over the ossuary.
There is cut left trunk but not prominent. Prominent cut right trunk/branch – starting at that height, this mushroom-tree is mainly YI form.
[Jan. 16, 2025] Principle of interpreting Eadwine’s images:
Assume he is a mushroom enthusiast and takes every opportunity to signal mushrooms.
Assume that where there is potentially maximum cache of mushrooms, Eadwine has provided evidence of such – look for it; EXPECT confirming clues to be provided.
Assume Eadwine is striving to communicate message of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs – certainly NOT to “hide” and make “secret”.
Making The Shape w/ R hand (= comprehension). Back of hand so IY form from viewer’s POV.
receiving scroll (= comprehension).
Right foot is lower than Left foot (good).
Lion’s front Right paw lower than Left paw (good/ comprehension).
Empty Left Sleeve, Missing Left Arm
lion, no left arm in middle touching liberty cap and axe [this was the 75th, last mushroom tree I discovered], nursing. {empty left sleeve} – 2-3 instances found:
lion claws threaten psychonaut – covered first in voice recording mid-June 2023.
well-formed cubensis on left building roof peak.
lower right theme of oval cloth with upside down person – about 5 instances found: [main list: see Motifs section: “Upside Down Head in Oval Cape/Robe”]
right branch of msh tree (Liberty Cap cap) wraps behind (visually cut) twice, then touches the building roof peak where we’d expect a rear roof mushroom topper – proving that the young cubensis tan ball-and-stem mushroom shape of roof toppers means mushrooms, as in mushroom tree.
Only the rightmost branch — touched by open scroll — touches God’s blue cloud. [June 24, 2023] Compare f177 row 1 left, horses affirming the right cut/offset branch.
His right hand shape is YI, and the tree is YI.
All 5 branches are visually cut.
The way to pass through the gate into the city is by affirming non-branching in the loosecog state.
Lifted garment (outer robe = mental worldmodel of control-in-world)
Demolitioning building, king holds {balance scale}, Christ seated in on throne in entryway of stable building, demon rains fire down on hapless psychonauts, bad left mushroom trees touch the cloud of demon
Mol’s txt: “The psalm tells of the just man’s trust in God.
“God, holding a scroll, is seated in a temple (v. 5, Dominus in templo sancto suo: Dominus in celo sedes eius // The Lord is in his holy temple: the Lord’s throne is in heaven). To the right, turning to look at God, a man holding a pair of scales (v. 8, Quoniam iustus Dominus et iusticias dilexit // For the Lord is just and loves justice) addresses a scroll towards a group of men with spears who gesture up to him (v. 2, In Domino confido //In the Lord I put my trust). Flying away from the man is a bird, to which he is pointing (v. 2, transmigra in montem sicut passer // get you away from hence to the mountain like a sparrow). Below the bird are three seated men in discussion, “the upright of heart”, who are being shot at by three wicked men from below, using bow and arrows; a dark cloud is above them (v. 3, Quoniam ecce peccatores intenderunt arcum: paraverunt sagittas suas in pharetra, ut sagittent in obscuro rectos corde //For the wicked have bent their bow: they have prepared their arrows in the quiver, to shoot in the dark the upright of heart). To the right of the archers three men are demolishing a church with a mallet and pick-axes (v. 4, Quoniam que perfecisti destruxerunt // For they have destroyed the things you have made). Stones from the church walls are falling on the ground.
“At the top right, in a semicircle, is a devil breathing fire and bringing down flames on a group of cowering men, one of them with his cloak billowing in the wind (v. 7, Pluit super peccatores laqueos: ignis, sulphur et spiritus procellarum pars calicis eorum // He shall rain snares upon sinners: fire and brimstone and storms of winds shall be the portion of their cup). The contours of the hillscape frame the various groups.” — Moliero
wheels, {cut right trunk} touches angel’s {lifted garment}
Eadwine pointing out (affirming) the arbitrariness of handedness: This image is left-positive; left = non-branching. upper right tree: hand w/ scroll touches left-branch cap, both left-middle trees have prominent {left cut trunk}, though middle-right tree also has {right cut branch} touching angel’s {lifted garment}.
tree 1 (left): visually {cut left branch} (panaeolus cap). touches God’s circle.
Lower right: angel threatens psychonauts, one who tries to look away (in fear; furrowed brow) from open scroll while falsely affirming branching (displays fingers, no thumb sticking out).
In contrast, two guys display YI hand and look at angel instead of looking away averting eyes.
The angel is taking the first guy’s spear and hitting him w/ its butt.
hammer: YI contrast.
smith furnace in stable entryway of building , looking at Transcendent Knowledge mushroom tree, many lifted garments, sun light of seeing , open book, sun light = almond passageway is His right leg
left branch left arm message touching ossuary, right hand message touch cut right trunk & two right branches, cut right trunk left, chooses the right branch of a Y of a YI tree, unusual choice but fits the rules, branching tree touches stable building. the leftmost leaf & branch touches God’s circle. the higher level in the 2-level control model.
Left Branching, Right Non-Branching Italian Pines – 1 mushroom tree, 2 vine-leaf trees, 1 lifted garment
sleeping on book on stable base, no one on the throne in the entrance of stable cross-topped building, empty throne pointed to by right hand with lifted garment, holds balance scale, walking stick with cut branches at right arm
f60: YI Hands of God, Psychonaut, Angel, {balance scale}
announcing [12:25 a.m. June 17, 2023] from past few days studying Great Canterbury Psalter: {YI hands} = Transcendent Knowledge = knowledge of non-branching = qualified possibilism-thinking + eternalism-thinking.
Like Day 4 in f11, there is a pair of trees: left tree is trident (touched by spear blade), right tree is a YI tree; ie, branching on left; non-branching on right. Same as f11 Day 4.
King seated in mandorla passage-gate.
Spout pitcher on table, open book in right hand, spear tip touching left branch, scrolls and open book, moons and queens and stars, standing in building entrance.
1:41 am June 10, 2023: The Sacrificer is in the middle of the picture. Left side of image: YI Right side of image: IY His hands held evenly & symmetrically reflect that direction-dependent handedness morphology: Right hand: YI Left hand: IY
1:50 am: God’s hands left to right are YI, IY. The right IY is accomplished upside down, so read angels left hands same: upside down then left to right gives IY, so that their hands form YI IY like God. Angel Left angel’s hands align with sacrificer’s hands. King’s hands: read L to R, forms YI IY.
stable altar to left of temple on right side of image. stable tower to right of temple, on left side of image.
ram horns not splayed; non-branching
2:00 am: archer’s back is to us, so that his left hand forms a YI on the left, and an IY on the right, which matches the image theme.
The military invaders on the wrong side of the track are about to be shot down by the archer, 4 of them with 1 spear. The left (bad) left of lower left tree touches the army on the other side of the boundary. They are on left of image yet their making a YI, which is wrong.
Archer’s right, IY hand is in God’s God’s cloud that controls him. and because he puts left hand’s YI toward left side of image.
Wheat is branching.
Red is used for God’s red torch rays in other images.
Figured out 2:17 am the mystery of the contrasting mushroom tops of temple building: Left is nonbranching sphere. Right is “branching” leaf.
2:19 am: ! upper left: {tower} on right of building means, right = stable.
2:21 am building in upper right means the {gate} is on the left; non-branching is on left.
{building entrance} means the passageway through to stable control.
king is standing behind the bull where psil is, per image f134 row 3 middle placement of blue, ribbed vessel to gather cubes.
[12:58 a.m. June 10, 2023] Riddle: YI morphology of middle-right tree: plays with indicating bending the rules or equivalent morphology, ways of depicting IY: sweeping the 3 branches, bottom up:
stem 1: IY, implemented by the equivalence-trick of: terminating the left branch.
stem 2: IY, implemented normally, also has cross-under on right.
stem 3: IY, implemented by the equivalence-trick of visual cutting the left branch, forming a cut branch.
stem 3 has two reds on left, which forms a YY, but they are visually a cut Y branch, and the left is nearer target, the temple.
The visually continuous rightmost branch is a IY b/c left is cut, cross-under.
upper left tree means non-branching (stable, good) is on left. God says right hand up, left hand down. Other figures conforming to or contradicting this is meaningful.
Sacrificer at the altar, washing his hands in a ritual meaning, and sacrificing a bull and two rams.
King’s right foot touches horns of a sacrificial ram.
Left, non-branching (good) branch is touching the right side of temple stable building.
the two trees on left, together signal: YI branching (bad; unstable control) on left, non-branching (good; stable control) on right.
ram at altar = Abraham & Isaac’s ram caught in a thicket.
donkey lying down ~= ram caught in thicket
left could touch tower but it doesn’t; the “bad” branching leftmost branch refrains from touching the tower.
bottom-left tree’s upper level, the trident, the rightmost (good) leaf touches the transcendent river boundary divider.
God hands king bow and arrows used to take down youths chariots with red spear/arrows, fired through the altar.
God holds closed book in left hand down.
Hands for washing held at same level: about to move rightt hand up like God.
the youths on chariots contradict God: right hand down. feet = right down
YI morph’y of lower left tree: YI, YI, YI, through several implementations.
sun & moon , banquet table, standing in entryway of building,
entryway is touched by God’s {open scroll in right hand, closed scroll in left hand}
[10:53 pm June 6, 2023] – God holding a closed & an open scroll provides valuable corrob’n of f134 row 2 middle: psalter viewing viewer {open scroll in right hand}, woman with left heel on stable column base holds {closed scroll in left hand} and holds balance scale.
Handedness mapping: This image is left-positive, mapping non-branching to Left.
reverse morphology on right: left = good = non-branching
left cut trunk touches stable temple
upper right tree: non-branching left branch is visually cut by cross-under. tree 2’s right limb crosses over to the left, and forms a {cut right trunk}.
table, temple stable building entrance passageway; goats, oxen, ram & sheep , covers left hand, angel R hand
standing on gate scroll right arm , the city that’s open to those of Christ as ruler, revealing uncontrollable higher-level control-source, temple altar entryway censor
standing with Christ in city/building fortress entrance, standing on gate scroll right arm , the city that’s open to those of Christ , temple altar entryway censor
upper right: blue circles building mushroom stability toppers [1:57 a.m. June 11, 2023] match f145‘s blue fruit that’s collected and stored in lockboxes, and distributed by display case bins in f134.
One motif in Eadwine: building mushroom stability toppers.
f90: O with Crouching Guy {stand right foot} and Y/IY Hands
God holds open book touching scroll held, God’s message = non-branching of control-in-world
God’s held book = scroll = open book on right that’s touching the right side of a branching-message tree; non-branching = God’s message = non-branching of control-in-world; eternalism experienced and mind re-shaped as vulnerable to puppetmaster, fully defined by the puppetmaster; the angel gives you food to eat. God’s clever serpent made Eve ingest the blue
lamb at altar of Jesus’ building, child outside adult building entryway, torch & God’s red control-rays touching the mystic psychonaut’s head. cut right trunk. tents of armies , Christ’s right hand with torch of seeing holds his right wrist.
{fire} {torch} {shield} {furnace} {fire pit} {fiery hell jaws} tormented by angels and demons
2:48 a.m. June 11, 2023] {shields} are not for military, they are for avoiding thinking, fear of thinking, trying not to think, desperately, pleading, trying to avert gaze to not get pulled into testing the peak danger threat of catastrophic loss of control just around the next bend, going into seizure and striving to exert inherently possibilism-premised will to control so as to avoid thinking.
stable tripod censor, demon fire pit, demon of egoic possibilism-thinking uncooked, not processed to become in line with Transcendent Knowledge, actual nature of control; the eternalism experiential perspective on exerting control-action.
Summoned to City Gate Entrance Past Ossuary Corpse
Stable Building Protected by Cloth Washed Clean
May 24, 2025: created page dedicated to f109; copied the below to there. That is now the master; keep the below as-is [I didn’t; I moved out/ deleted most content from below 🤷♂️].
todo: check history of the present page to see when I wrote about Aberdeen Asp = dog in lower right of f109, proving that: The meaning of dog’s L & R feet against man’s arms & torso = Asp’s L & R feet touching parts of tree: L = higher, branching of tree; R = lower, trunk.
ie you can totally cross-interpret across artists in the the medieval art genre of {mushroom-trees} — and I take that to the extreme per guild body of knowledge:
To interpret an art work from 900, you can apply the interp that’s provable in an art work from 1400 (backwards-in-time influence is justifiable as-if).
demons pull foolhardy cubensis psychonauts into flames vortex of trying to avoid thinking of catastrophic loss of control. This instance is mouth, not pit.
blue liberty cap topped stable tower at entryway
{caught in a net} invited to the city gate entrance past an ossuary corpse
Need to –without creating a page necessarily — have a way to tour / gather all instances of each motif of interest to see the variations and best understand the motif. eg a Findable flag. Not always mouth; can be pit. always fire. {fire} + hell mouth, fire pit… tended by demon/angels.
compare cowering holding shields and averting gaze when angels throw spears/ arrows down on hapless psychonauts.
demons afflicting Job, Job right foot on stable column base. 2 demons have right leg on column, open scroll touches demon. 2x right foot on addl col base. floating left legs.
f145: 👑 King Ordering Cubensis Collection, {balance scale}, {lockbox}
altar in building entryway tripod detail censor, holds feathers, harp, David
open scroll touches parted cloths of entryway , touched by God’s God’s red rays of right hand, mushroom hem = building stable foundation at battle tent to prevent seeing.
Motif of temple entryway with unveiled/ veil parted to reveal and cause transformation of mental worldmodel
a column has dots matching f11 cubensis cap
f159: Blue and Tan Pointed Cubensis Temple Roof Toppers
“In a semicircle at the top centre, God rests asleep on a bed protected by a curtain (v. 23, Exurge quare obdormis, Domine? //
“Arise, why do you sleep, Lord?). Flanking him on each side are two groups of men seated on benches and holding books and scrolls (v. 2, Deus auribus nostris audivimus. Patres nostri annuntiaverunt nobis //
“We have heard, God, with our ears. Our fathers have declared to us).
“Below, a city is being attacked by many soldiers on horseback with swords, battle-axes and spears (v. 4, Nec enim in gladio suo possederunt terram // For they got not possession of the land by their own sword). Some of them are entering in through the city gate (v. 11, Avertisti nos retrorsum post inimicos nostros “You have made us turn our back on our enemies).
“At the front, among the soldiers, are sheep and goats, and a man lying dead on the ground (v. 12, Dedisti nos tanquam oves escarum // You have given us up like sheep to be eaten; v. 22, Quoniam propter te mortificamur tota die, estimati sumus sicut oves occisionis // Because for your sake we are killed all day long, we are counted as sheep for the slaughter).
“Inside the walls of the city, on the left, a group of men is prostrated before an altar in a church (v. 25, Quoniam humiliata est in pulvere anima nostra, conglutinatus est in terra venter noster // For our soul is humbled down to the dust, our belly cleaves to the earth).
“On the right, a man holding a large scroll, shield and spear stands before a broken sword, bow and horn on the ground (v. 6, In te inimicos nostros ventilabimus cornu, et in nomine tuo spernemus insurgentes in nobis // We will push down our enemies with the horn, and through your name will despise them that rise up against us; v. 7, Non enim in arcu meo sperabo, et gladius meus non salvabit me // For I will not trust in my bow, neither shall my sword save me).
“Behind him stand a group of men holding shields and spears.” — Moliero
f166: Anointed King Standing on Ape at Column Base, Scribe, Rulers Bearing Gifts
2 oxen on altar, both right feet touch equating stable column base = stable building entrance, 2 guys in entrances of the City of the Stable hold sickle and / harpe pruning knife and bowl , woman in entrance of building entryway clothes parted
f190: Upside Down with Right Foot on Seat in Building Entryway
[1:31 pm December 11, 2024] – all 3 ways — make that 4 ways — of showing {cut right branch}, in one pilzbaum!
At [2:00 pm December 11, 2024] I had to change “three” to “four” and add points about the {sword}!
Great Canterbury Psalter f193 row 1 left, pilzbaum:
Cut right trunk.
Visually cut right branch; crosses under other branch.
Cut right branch, above that (same branch as above, continued).
Sword cut right cap, inside that it cuts right cap of lib cap that’s inside the big cubensis cap.
— Identified by Cybermonk, December 11, 2024 – per my theory of branching morphology developed 2020-2023, which is part of my theory of the main four motifs that are involved and integrated into pilzbaum:
The above image has nav junk in upper right, and fails to show the entire sword, as was intended. The below, bigger crop additionally shows features:
{bent left leg}; {weight on right foot}
{right hand lower than left hand} per major motif in f134.
sword/blade held in right hand, cut item (head branching like a limb off of body) held in left hand.
[3:15 pm December 11, 2024] – just noticed: the red right cap that’s cut by the sword, is also cut visually where its stem crosses behind blue cap’s branch.
I don’t intend to do a full morphy inventory of this tree here now, but, also: left cut branch = another double-cut branch: visually cut + terminally cut above that (to the left of blue cap).
Remember how puzzled I was by the “botched cross-under” in f177 row 1 left, perhaps in 2023.
I had not yet realized, or recognized, the theme/ motif/ technique: {visually cut branch by crossing behind another branch}
Huge misleading thing I just noticed about image paths: The date that’s shown in the image path is not the date of uploading the image to the gallery directory (December 2024); rather, it’s the date on which the present webpage was created (June 2023).
{YI hand} & {mushroom building topper} are examples of: when you gather all variants / instances of a motif, the most detailed and explicit instance enables strong interp & id’n of the most hazy & weak, non-detailed instance. It’s mandatory to work across the images, tracing a given motif.
{mushroom} Motifs
{mushroom building roof peak topper} = mushroom
These instances couldn’t be more mushroom-like. If you wanted to depict a literal closed-veil young cubensis (ball on stem), you’d draw this.
f29 left – cubensis (cream/tan) on temple roof peak:
These mushrooms being poured into a lockbox while standing in a building entryway (right leg touching tower base) are brown, but the mushrooms being similarly poured in f145 are blue, exactly matching this tower topper.
{donkey} = egoic exerter agent; control agent as center of experience of exertion, asserting and inspecting that control-system and experiential worldmodel in the loosecog state causes not having viable control.
To heal is to distinguish between the two states / modes of experiential mental model — what is it like to change how you exert so as to be stable, to receive stability and be given a new garment.
todo: explain the best readings of rider on horse / rider on donkey on path.
Balaam donkey vineyard path nowhere to turn = Paul horse road to Damascus.
by arrows, spears, swords, axe (f34), flames (f47), pickaxes (f47), whip/scourge/cat-o- tails (f96) (f115 donkey) f126 right, f141 right leering at furrowed-brow
Discussed in recording TK_VOX_ 5785.wav, 22 min. vulnerability is your entire existence as a control agent, child is unaware and subject to panic/ {movability}/ reaction to grasping total vulnerability of your control thinking always.
Accustomed to seeing the vulnerability, the open scroll touching the lion’s den and another touching the archers who are shooting at him, once you come to grips with your profound vulnerability, now aware of your control thoughts that have already been crerated and given to you always, now consciously.
Your source of control thoughts is your insider threat, the inner vulnerable womb control insertion receiver, the control receiver = the local control agent, monolithic autonomous control agency or 2-level control relationship of dependence on the creator of the train of control-thought frozen pre-existing in the blue frozen timeless block universe.
{hell-mouth flames}, {furnace}, {fire pit}, {pulled upside down into flames}, {net} = stability
This could be quite a broad theme with many variants: some type of harassing of psychonauts (extreme dread; extreme fear of thinking) is in almost every image, even {furrowed brow} which is ubiquitous.
Plan: group the subtypes here.
applies specifically to advanced psychonauts who have it all under control
{naked} = control vulnerability b/c you aren’t the source of your control-thoughts or will.
removed the egoic thinking {garment}; possibilism-thinking husk that gets cast off at the command of the gods, possibilism-thinking is demonstrated to be unstable and not viable — exerting it causes loss of control when in loosecog state. Ego death transformative control cancellation occurs when God feels like taking the psyche.
Upside Down Head in Oval Cape/Robe = stability
lower right theme of oval cloth with upside down person – about 5 instances found: [main list: see Motifs section]
f14 row 2 left – king vs Goliath f14 row 2 middle – king outfits David for Goliath f14 row 3 middle – king receives Goliath’s head f14 row 3 right – king swords himself f14 row 4 left – youth crowned king f14 row 4 right – king Herod and Salome at table receive head of John the Baptist
f17 – 3 kings in middle
f18 row 2 left – 3 kings traveling f18 row 2 middle – 3 kings meet sitting king (Herod?) f18 row 2 right – astronomers meet sitting king (Herod?) f18 row 3 left – the 3 kings bring child Jesus mushroom gifts f18 row 3 middle – the 3 kings sleep, meet angel f18 row 4 middle – slaughter of innocents, king Herod f18 row 4 right – demon pulls youth from king Herod’s mouth, bringing wafer/cap
f20: above & below same king on Right f22: garlands f27: king in oss , add lib cap carried f29: god/angel crowning f38: left building king f47: Demolitioning Building, King Holds {balance scale} f49: Wheels, Forge — fearing king f53: Snake Columns Throne f73: king in mandorla f76: Chariot Wipeout king washes sacrs hands 78 angel crowns king f102: Mushroom Ball Stability Toppers, Demon Fire Pit, Cross-Topped Temple, Liberty Cap Tower Tree — king left at temple 145 f166: Anointed King Standing on Ape at Column Base, Scribe, Rulers Bearing Gifts f186: Two Oxen on Altar f190: Upside Down with Right Foot on Seat in Building Entryway f193: Seated in Archway, Open Scroll on Tower Column Base
{YI & IY hands}
Motif: {left thumb touch right arm}
Identify the main form and & variants.
Figured this out about 24 hours ago, as far as a generalized rule. Now is [5:07 p.m. Feb. 7, 2026].
Before solving for the general rule, solved specific case: von Trimberg’s thumb on Right arm.
Inferior, poor comprehension, and failed theorizing, would merely group all similar instances, with little structuring/ org’n.
Superior theorizing elects “best” and “main” vs. variants.
Best theorizing sits in judgment over history: throughout history, the BEST myth and BEST mythic art depicts X; depicts integrated possibilism/eternalism thinking.
Close, but inferior art, or “common-core mysticism and perennialism”, would, eg: depict a valua non-ranked, non-value-ranked, laundry list of variants:
this image affirms Y
this image affirms I
this image affirms YI
this image affirms Y’I
this image affirms YI’
this image affirms Y’I’
Permutations of Lower & Upper Hand YI Forms
Superior proposal: There is ONE master form:
lower hand Y, upper hand YI
has pros/cons
The other 35 forms, regardless of frequency %, are derivative.
eg von Trimberg form might be the best for master form:
lower hand YI, upper hand YI
has pros/cons
Upper Hand = Y Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand Y
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand Y
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand Y
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand Y
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand Y
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand Y
Upper Hand = I Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand I
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand I
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand I
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand I
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand I
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand I
Upper Hand = YI Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand YI
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand YI
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand YI
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand YI
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand YI
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand YI
Upper Hand = Y’I Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand Y’I
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand Y’I
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand Y’I
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand Y’I
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand Y’I
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand Y’I
Upper Hand = YI’ Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand YI’
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand YI’
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand YI’
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand YI’
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand YI’
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand YI’
Upper Hand = Y’I’ Form
this image asserts lower hand Y, upper hand Y’I’
this image asserts lower hand I, upper hand Y’I’
this image asserts lower hand YI, upper hand Y’I’
this image asserts lower hand Y’I, upper hand Y’I’
this image asserts lower hand YI’, upper hand Y’I’
this image asserts lower hand Y’I’, upper hand Y’I’
Intro
Cybermonk, page initially created: 2 p.m. June 11, 2023.
At start of psalter is about 10 image-pages, 3×4 Grids (8; 96 panels).
Commentary on All Eadwine Images from Great Canterbury Psalter 🐑 🔥🌳🐏
Mid-June 2023, I made voice recordings covering EVERY panel of every Eadwine image in Great Canterbury Psalter. todo: listen and add notes here.
June 25, 2023: I’m producing those recordings now; part A & B done (2 hours each, about 3 more parts to go). It will be webpage: Egodeath Mystery Show Ep258 📖🖼🍄🌳🔍 Canterbury Psalter Images Tour (June 18-June ##, 2023)
Functional motivation for why this page exists: it is a pressure release valve and lightning rod to offload extra burden from the Gallery page.
May 26, 2025: I’ve created several dedicated pages, for Great Canterbury Psalter images:
The first application / usage of the completed gallery: find, crop, and put at top of this page an image of demons roasting and pulling sages, FOOLHARDY CUBENSIS PSYCHONAUTS and would-be Loose Cognitive Science researchers into hell-mouth fire pit vortex net trap, in desperate need of rescue from outside the system into stable temple altar gateway.
todo: images of angels harassing psychonauts desperately trying to avert their gaze and shield themselves against seeing their vulnerability. This will go in section: Motifs > {instability} > {threatened}
Motivation for Creating this Page
For technical reasons, need the Gallery page to be streamlined. Will add commentary to the present webpage instead.
“Full Screen” at Art Websites Means “Ok We’ll Only Waste Half of Your Screen”
Update Dec. 2024: On some computers, you can move mouse to right side of screen, wait 3 seconds, for UI to fade out.
“Full Screen” means, the art website only wastes 30% of your available screen space on unwanted UI cruft & pointless unused blank space, instead of wasting 40%.
The whole idea of Chrome was to not have UI chrome, yet art website designers still are too proud to get rid of their damned UI when you select “Full Screen”.
Website designers: What is so hard to understand by “Full Screen”? Show us the damn art, NOT your stupid screen-wasting UI design.
How to Be Pulled by a Demon into the Hell Fire Pit
Flames Mouth Pit Furnace Net Thicket and Be Rescued into Stable Temple Gate Lamb Altar Gateway in Learned Balance of Left and Right Foot, Terror and Confidence Fear of God
The gallery is ready to gaze and shield your eyes from, and desperately struggle to avert your gaze from and defend against thinking your way into the thicket net demon hell flames fire vortex pit furnace hell-jaws, drawn into the {hell-mouth furnace pit} vortex.
As part of troubleshooting tech issues, I moved some content (tips & substantive commentary) from this page to auxiliary pages:
How much commentary to put here vs. in another page?
Experience from Golden Psalter gallery shows that having two parallel pages with full x-linking is VERY unmanageable and time wasting and futile, way easier said than done. don’t expect to do full x-linking.
OTOH, this page is already overloaded, pushing the limits – it is risky adding commentary into the present page, I lost much content due to STUCK IN A loop for eternity, “AUTOSAVING…”, dirty, impure code need exorcism.
Detailed crops for the following images go in a dedicated page for the image, not in the present, general-purpose Details page (still, have a heading for these in the present page, including links):
f11
f107
f109
f134
f145
f177
Todo
todo: create 100 pages, one per folio page that contains an image.
todo: put copy of entire picture in each section. including 4 sep. rows for the 4×3 grid pages.
todo: move content from Gallery to this page (done? check this). Make the gallery be high-level survey, with links to this page. issue: need Findable key words near images.
Looking forward to actually having opportunity to just focus on looking at the pics and “read”/ decode/ translate/ interpret them, instead of the labor of implementing the gallery.
🖼 🖼 🖼 🖼 🖼 📸 👷♂️ 🚧
Tech Issues
I lost hours of work. It’s not clear that the page can be restored and moved forward. It’s a corrupt page, stuck on “autosave”, not able to save changes.
Might need to re-implement, maximally streamlined (no old bloated .png crops, no commentary):
Below are the recent images added to that page. Without the lost notes, commentary, analysis.
Analyzing any Motif in an Eadwine Image Requires Efficient Gallery of All Eadwine Images
To provide a sure reading of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs in images f134, f145, and f177, it’s necessary to analyze all of the Eadwine images in Great Canterbury Psalter.
{balance scale} Motif
For example, there are 7 instances of {balance scale}.
There are many instances of building, tower, entryway, altar, throne/seat.
Wishy-Washy Use of {handedness} Demands Flexibility and Rationalization
{handedness} orientation is used in highly variable ways, ranging from inconsistent, confusing, systematic (f134), symmetrical, exceptions, and poorly communicated.
Some motifs are exasperating and annoying, a confusing and unhelpful implementation that’s not satisfying.
Between lack of the motif, inversion of the motif, and standard use of the motif — within a given image — I want to yell at Eadwine, “make up your mind, be clear, be consistent” — ranging from sloppy inconsistency, to clever variants, the result is more a raging MESS than masterful.
These images are psilocybin experience puzzles. Some of Eadwine’s puzzles are poorly implemented and are more annoying than impressive.
An unwise number of variants and degrees of variant, Eadwine too often buries the signal in his noise, degenerating to failure to communicate.
If you learn the rules, in a flexible way, and the rules still can’t be applied to many of the images because Eadwine didn’t follow his own rules, it’s a mess.
There’s lots of signal — and tons of noise, that’s inelegant. Eadwine constantly is making up motif patterns and variants and experimenting with options inconsistently, as he goes along.
Image f134 is probably later than others, after Eadwine figured out advanced patterns and used them highly consistently. Be consistent and comprehensible.
Images that I Added to Gallery but Changes Were Lost in that Page
Content Temporarily Moved from Gallery Page to Streamline It
Motivation for this post, design of this page
Motivation for this post, design of this page: Need optimal way to navigate through from blurry thumbnails in this page then click to see MEGA RESolution directly at the library. 🖼🍄🌳🔬🔍🧐
Issue: Server space limit. 🍄TOO 🍄MANY MUSHROOMS! 🍄🍄 😵🍄
put 2023 jpgs here.
Scope: All of Eadwine’s images in Great Canterbury Psalter, not Illuminated Initials, No Text (and not Just the Mushroom-Including Pictures) – this page has no focus on (physical) mushroom imagery.
More interested in {branching} and {handedness} and {stability}.
The first of the four is the least interest: (mere {mushrooms}), {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs.
You Must Click into the Library Pictures – Details Such as Looking-Targets Are Major Motifs – Use the Gallery Page to Navigate.
Keywords differentiate the images.
The Gallery Web Page Is Blurry Thumbnails Only – Click to View the Real Library Full-Res Zoomable Image
CLICK TO 🖼🍄🌳🔬🔍🧐 eg it is impossible to see eye-pointing angles without full mega res zoom.
I used straightedge and magnifying lenses to prove the angle/ looking-target. or multiple potential targets.
Angles and pointing are major motifs.
What am I looking at, what’s the unique distinctive distinguishing features of each image?
Motif: {stable building entryway}
todo: at top or bottom of Commentary page, add section headings about specific motifs, w/ list of all Eadwine images that use that motif.
Tons of {building entrance}, that’s a *major*, #1 motif. Lots of crazy out of control branching trees.
{building entrance} = stability of control, = altar lamb censor hung in balance by 3 cables. serpent fountains at building entryway. to fill bowls of the elect sages.
Mapping Lyrics, Myth, & Motifs to Control-Model Transformation, per the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
Lyrics, myth, & motifs — covered by the Egodeath theory > the the Mytheme theory.
The Mytheme theory: psychedelic eternalism
Mytheme = Lyric Theme = Art Motif
Art & poetry & myth are, above all, depictions of transformation of the mental worldmodel from possibilism to the eternalism model of control-in-world.
🍄TOO 🍄MANY MUSHROOMS! 🍄🍄 😵🍄
limited server space, will have to nuke 2020 dark .png files and replace by 2023 bright .jpg files.
todo: Copy the Spain images from the “no text” gallery page to the present, “gallery” page. Move any detailed crops from that “no text” page to the “details” gallery page or, for in-depth images, the dedicated image page: f11, f107, f109, f134, f145, f177.
“Ep255a Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control” “Ep255b Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control” “Ep255G 🎸🌌 Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control”
🎙🐷🐷🎙
in pointless stereo, 210 kbps
Download Link (v1)
Download for 1 week starting June 4, 2023: v1: one giant mp3 file: v1: Original 3-hour mp3: https://we.tl/t-E7VyVYNOvq
“Ep255 Demonstrating Stable vs Unstable Control.mp3” – 3:00:00, 262 MB
“Ep255 Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control”
The original 3-hour mp3 seems too big to transfer to & play on my device. It started transferring to my device, then quit, which I haven’t seen before. The v2 shorter separate .mp3 files loaded ok.
How to Listen in Browser instead of Downloading
Features are not always available at WeTransfer site.
Preview at WeTransfer site – that worked. I was able to listen to the entire 3-hour .mp3 in-browser, or for my v2, the 3 separate shorter files (parts a, b, & G).
On mobile device, I clicked a Download link, a confirmation dialog opened having View and Download links; I clicked View.
In desktop browser, at WeTransfer site, click Preview. Can play any of the 3 .mps files in the browser.
Had to Break Up into Two .mp3 Files
I MIGHT CUT IT IN TWO [done]
💾💥🗡🤨
Collideascope Everything looks topsy turvy You will see one young girl split into two One half who’s false, one half true You better get your glue ready
This episode contains some of the discussion of “loss of control” ie control re-stabilization I’ve been looking for. Find: “Gold Clip”; 4 identified below.
Segments About Control Re-Stabilization (Gold Clips)
To extract to a Gold Clips Special Episode of Egodeath Mystery Show:
Ep255a 28:59-34:25 (5:26)
Ep255a 45:46-47:07 (1:21)
Ep255a 48:36-1:01:38 (13:02)
E255b 11:23-1:14:11 (end) (62:48)
“Ep255a Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control”
The first recording (5123.wav) is from April 24, 2023. The remainder are April 25, 2023.
0:00 – Intro (moved from start of 5154.wav, the next day).
0:25 – 5123.wav
10:00 –
This dynamic is a blind spot, article is good so I’m obliged to give advice, act pompous not the reverse affectation of over-modest posturing. at (17:49 orig.) — “clever question: is Amanita a suggestogen?”
20:00 –
(~21:00 in orig. rec.g) I have no idea of which writing is Ruck’s vs. Heinrich’s, b/c they are hiding in the Ruck committee.
Does Irvin now in 2022 say that Amanita or “the mushroom” causes religious experience like he cites p 152 of The Holy Mushroom?
“Closely guarded secret.” <– WAY overplayed, played out.
What I think about Irvin 2008.
This morning I discovered that Irvin 2008 writes “we are going to discuss ALL entheogens – until he hits the Psilocybin references by Allegro.
Gold Clip 1: Control Re-Stabilization – Ep255a 28:59-34:25
~29:00-34:00, also ~46:00-__
28:59 (in 5123.wav): “Now back to the real topic to avoid: the main topic to avoid is: i like that … Why does salvation occur at exact moment you discover fatal control instability? It’s a single body of knowledge.
Why the new model of control arrives right when the old model fails: because the mind systemically learns to demonstrate the different stability that’s caused by asserting the two contrasting mental worldmodels.
30:00 –
(~37:00 in orig rec’g) — Shifting weight from autonomous control to 2-level dependent control, you study the branching model, alongside non-branching model.
Jesus contrasting finger-shapes; higher knowledge is of [branching contrasted with non-branching], more detailed representation than “knowledge of non-branching”.
It is equivalent to {pass through the guarded gate} in any direction: Rev 22 (last page of the Bible): you become able to go {in/out/up/down through the guarded gate} “into” the city of God. (40:00 in orig rec’g)
34:25 – end of stability discussion.
end of that Control-Stability Segment
40:00 –
My “branching-message mushroom trees” article requires extra points to be made at the Conclusions section, to provide leadership. (41:00 in orig. rec’g)
Do not write “mushrooms” or “psychedelics” or “entheogens”. Write “Amanita” or “Psilocybin” specifically.
How to express that in fewest word count:
“Conclusions: Don’t write ‘entheogens’, ‘psychedelics’, or ‘mushrooms’; write ‘psilocybin’ or ‘Amanita’.”
— that wording consumes just 10 words, in my article’s wordcount. (43:00 in orig. rec’g)
Amanita is the smiling face of Psilocybin prohibition (46:00 in orig. rec’g).
CUT AFTER; quiet talking (audible) at desk as i edit pages.
(53:00) — voice comes back close, added … word prohibition list. word prohibition schedules.
(56:40) — throw taboo question at academic, iq 200 –> 50, prohibition-caused retardation.
uses bunk lexicon obfuscation dirty term’y.
position on psychedelics, superstitious crude simple minded folk =
allegro.
baby talk “simple minded, the mushroom”.
Interesting mistake by me: I say that Allegro is writing about “red and white” mushrooms — but surprisingly, days later, I realized John Allegro is actually talking about psilocybin mushrooms.
This is probably surprising or disappointing to Jan Irvin, too.
I mis-say “red and white shapes”. But Allegro here means psil, surprising Irvin, the Way of Wasson = the Way of the Obfuscationist.
and now Irvin writes this way.
“Shifting” the Goalpost — by Flipping the Entire Stadium & Universe Repeatedly: The Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy
Shifting the goalpost is always a different, extreme fallacy: Flipping the univrse 180 deg 59:40.
What’s the name of this jumbo-sized “shifting the goalpost” fallacy? — Cyberdisciple provided the answer in a Comment below:
Make an aggressive and hard-to-defend claim. When challenged, lie and pretend you made a modest, easily defensible (modest/ worthless/ trivial) claim. When possible, switch back to the aggressive and hard-to-defend claim. Repeat.
Big claim: No one in Europe ever thought of psychoactive mushrooms.
Tiny claim: There’s no evidence for a secret heretical underground counterculture cult sect fringe rites rituals tradition that started with a secret Amanita cult in the Ural mountains and then spread around the world, that’s the foundation of all religions. (Therefore, we know that no one ever ingested psychoactive mushrooms in Europe.)
The Way of STEM.
Gold Clip 2: Control Re-Stabilization – Ep255a 45:46-47:07
Clip 2 About Control Re-Stabilization
45:46 – (the very end of my trimmed 5123.wav) – We study and learn both mental models together: The branching instability model contrasted with the non-branching stability model.
46:00 – 5137.wav – Intro.
Show Intro (dark/dry).
April 25, 2023
46:19 – 5137.wav – Miking: ev 635A
Miking: dark dry/ 1″ ultra-close mono mic: 635a stand mount – demonstrates why 8″ instead is the standard.
46:31 – 5137.wav – Content.
Advanced idea dev session. This is advanced idea development in control re-stabilization. Great phrase.
/ end of topic
47:07 – Prohibited Word List.
Wow, this is where I go to finally retrieve the book yet again, now specifically to read the opening statement of page 31 of Jan Irvin’s book The Holy Mushroom about scope! Amanita madness. “The holy mushroom, Amanita.”
Here’s where I really make the connection.
/h
Gold Clip 3: Control Re-Stabilization – Ep255a 48:36-1:01:38
48:36 – 5146.wav Fatal loss of control = non-viable control = control instability. Sacrifice of the cybernetic control agent. Your life as a childish agent comes to a real end.
mute-gate echo gtr at start.
Ego death is a real death, Eadwine depicts it as such.
50:00 –
1:00:00 –
End of topic: 1:01:38
end of clip
1:01:38 – single-plant fallacy.
1:02:25 – mapping the concretistic physical amanita lifecycle & usage cycle production process to the cognitive transformation mental worldmodel transformation.
How is their poor argument (90% unstated bias that he unthinkingly assumes the audience shares) supposed to constitute an argument?
“Too many mushrooms” Panofsky blurts out his “argument” – Wasson censors it, so bad.
1:05:01 – Entheogen scholars didn’t give a DAMN about the hundreds of mushroom trees that Panofsky announced. They only have their ONE tree, our fly-agaric fresco.
Dancing man Salamander roasting image as treated in THM
reading THM: Caduuceus overuse. The poor “symbols” approach. Salamander roasting image. Dancing man. The intensive anti-psilocybin bias in THM gallery 2008. The Holy Mushroom.
Self-control instaibilty terms: what am I reading here? reading key phrases.
Overemphaisis on Amanita vs. Ergot. Both hypotheses failed. Entheogen scholarship wrote up tons of promises, and then Ergot failed, and Amanita failed to … PALED next to Psilocybin. Yes a total bias against Psilocybin in Europe remained, in entheogen scholarship.
1:20:00 –
“All entheogens” in THM actually means Amanita only.
1:30:00 –
Cubensis grows on bovine dung.
Irvin’s misuse of griffiths ‘ Psil findings in the Amanita book THM.
1:35:00 – Gordon “Blunder” Wasson. Looked up definition of ‘blunder’. blunder made by Wasson: Allowed us to read the two letters by Panofsky.
1:40:00 –
1:41:54 – End of Ep255a.
“Ep255b Demonstrating Stable vs. Unstable Control”
0:00 – 5154.wav Intro (1:41:32 in orig single long mp3) – 5154.wav
Intro for Egodeath Mystery Show (bright stereo room mics). April 25, 2023.
0:25 – 5154.wav Content
advanced session.
STEM math.
Letheby’s irrelevant Physicalism vs Fatalistic Detm concepts are Possibilism-thinking.
8:08 – 5137.wav Intro (borrowed from Ep255a)
8:26 – 5137.wav Miking (borrowed from Ep255a)
8:38 – 5156.wav Content (dark mic) 1:49:16
Show. gtr intro. too long quiet between pulses after echos died off. Core Concepts Catalog, psil-based cybics testing.
Advantage of saying “Psilocybin” not the ergot word(s)
Erik Davis: “Keep Ergot Weird”, now that Big Pharma therapy industry has “ruined psilocybin by taking it away from the counterculture”.
11:23 – (in 5152.wav produced) Cybernetic Non-control
20:00 –
22:48 – 5157.wav Content – 2:03:27
A king is a virtual control source . Covering/ extending to you.
Reading aloud.
30:00 –
40:00 –
49:35 – the field of entheogen scholarship must die and be reborn in its adult mature form.
50:00 – continue reading aloud long passages from my articles: the Control Loss section of my 1997 & 2006 main articles.
1:00:00 –
1:00:19 – 5159.wav Content 2:40:57
Running amok. That can’t be right, would lead to self-destruction. Continue reading my 1997 or 2006 article’s sections about control stability. Egodeath.com page about demonstrating safely the transformation of control.
How could Abraham live to inherit?
Reading Egodeath.com page about formal loss of control demonstration.
Egoically acting out egoic loss of control.
This rec’g 5159 is part of a series; see also my reading aloud my 2007 and 1997 main articles sections: readings of selections too, in VOX_TK_5387.wav (not produced yet). See below.
1:10:00 –
1:14:11 – Outro (edmsEchoConst) 2:54:49
1:14:27 – End of part Ep225b.
Ep255G – Guitar (5 min.) only; sep. mp3 file
0:00 – tbd
5:00 – End.
In old long mp3, guitar started at 2:55:01 – Guitar segments (5 min.) 5123.wav excerpt snippets: two, short.
Notes About Recording 5387.wav (not part of this Episode)
Good mix of reading and commentary/critique of my writing.
A mode of stability.
The other stable col base to the left has upside down cybercide guy on a differnet basis.
Right vs. left foot in the OSC or ASC.
Cybercide = demonstrating conditional control stability, OSC ordinary-state possibilism-thinking = Left limb, and stable control = {touching the blade to the left limb}.
We are stable by repudiation of the branching world-model, which gives stable control (right foot down).
Touching blade with left limb and touching cut right trunk with right limb, that is stability. <– guy in tree upside down.
Row 2 cybercide guy: right limb touching column base, blade touching his left limb –> stable.
Have stability of control because touching blade with left limb = asserting non-branching (right foot) .
At 44:30 in this recording, I switch from reading the 1997 to 2007 article excerpts.
The section “Self control and the hidden source of control-thoughts”… headings 2007 in the 4th , Cybernetics section.
I read most of this ultimate quarter of the 2007 article.
My main articles need (lack) coverage of branching – a missing theme that fits right in, for closure/ completion of the Core theory; the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence and its later, mytheme/motif theory of lyrics & myth & art motifs: the Mytheme theory.
Myth is depiction via analogy of transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
Myth depicts psychedelic eternalism.
Religious myth (& art motifs) is description of psychedelic eternalism.
Lyrics, myth, & motifs are description of psychedelic eternalism.
Go through my 2007 article’s Bibliography, selected entires mentioned.
repudiate branching model of control-in-world = {touching blade to left limb}
asserting non-branching = {standing on right foot} = {right hand lower than left}
Control is stable in the psilocybin altered state IF you use the non-branching model and actively repudiate the branching model of control-in-world.
Equivalent: negate branching assert non-branching
Equivalent: negate left assert right
stability vs. instability
Art themes: {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs.
In the simplified, 2-phase model of mental transformation in the religious altered state: transformation from possibilism to eternalism:
Phase 1: assert branching assert left gives instability
Phase 2: negate branching; assert non-branching assert right gives stability
Tech Notes
Miking
When noisy room, used ev 635a 1″ (dark/dry).
When quiet room, used usual previous setup: AT2020 L, CAD M39 R.
More info: “Recordings Log Egodeath Mystery Show.md”
Options: I don’t know if it’s possible to download just 1 file, on desktop or mobile. Lately, I’ve been able to “preview”; listen to parts of .mp3s in the browser at WeTransfer.com – on both mobile and desktop. Inconsistent results with long files.
Filename
“Ep254 Psychedelics vs Amanita.mp3” “Ep254G Psychedelics vs Amanita.mp3” – G = Guitar
Song Name
“Ep254 Psychedelics vs. Amanita” “Ep254G 🎸🌌 Psychedelics vs. Amanita”
Content/Timestamps
0:00-42:49 is from April 21, covers Irvin, Allegro, “The Mushroom”, The Holy Mushroom. 42:49-2:07:19 is from April 28, covers that, and also adds coverage of Michael Williams: The Immovable Race/Theme of Stability.
I am about to produce some other April 28 recordings. I’m trying to find segments where I discuss the threat of loss of control; transcendent loss of control; re-stabilizing of control in the altered state.
the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism and the Psilocybin Eucharist theory is based on psychedelics, based on psychedelic effects, within the loose cognitive state.
Amanita is not that, it’s superficial Anthropology, 1880 theory of Sociology.
‘entheogens’ means Psychedelics replaced by ordinary-state-based Anthropology theorizing about “entheogens” which replaces psychedelics, in a standard 3-step move: equate, then substitute , then shut out the thing (psilocybin) and omit and delete psychedelics.
1) equate an inert thing with psilocybin, then 2) study psychedelics (psilocybin) in history to substitute Anthopology in place of psychedelics, and then 3) delete psychedelics (psilocybin).
Amanita-focused “Ethnobotany” is a fraud, a ploy, one of the approaches that are not what they claim to be: that approach pretends to be about ingesting visionary chemicals, but its actual purpose is to deliver neutered OSC-based academic theory-construction instead.
My theory is 100x simpler. The Egodeath theory ; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism. The theory of analogical psychedelic eternalism cybernetics.
Enth’s are a placebo, not psychedelic: getting high on bad anthropology theory.
A delirant (Dittrich who created OAV questionnaire, 1993 article in 50 Years of LSD proceedings, concurs.)
Amanita is better classified as a mere deliriant; it doesn’t fit in the class of Classic Psychedelics.
Amanita contains scopolamine (so to speak).
In terms of confalting Amanita w/ psilocybin – GTFO, mere deliriant Amanita, 3rd-rate to Psilocybin.
It’s way more practical and targeted and relevant and directed toward known dynamics.
Amanita gives random deliriant effects.
The dirtiest visionary psychoactive: Amanita.
10:00 –
15:11 – 5084.wav – the Simplest Theory.
Amanita theory is not psychedelic.
Anthropology treats Amanita as a physical (not cognitive) talisman.
Slagging on Amanita primacy scholarship.
15:59 – 5085.wav – Miking change: ev635A close mic.
16:09 – 5085.wav – The simplest theory.
Amanita not entheogenic.
Psilocybin is entheogenic, but the word ‘entheogen’ and ‘amanita’ are on the forbidden word list.
In Jan. 1988: I haven’t heard of “entheogen scholarship”, and I do not at all rely on that term. Construct a theory without using any of the forbidden words; my own lexicon that’s domain-appropriate unlike the lexicon used by entheogen scholarship.
20:00 –
30:00 –
40:00 –
The {stability} Motif: Michael Williams’ Book on the Theme of Stability in Late Antiquity
0:20 – 5071.wav Content – Prohibition-friendly Entheogen Suppression Scholarship: “the mainstream inherently suppresses entheogens and prohibits psychedelics”.
5:59 – 5072.wav – Cyberdisciple article addendum: The influence of early Anthropology theorizing around ‘entheogen’ scholarship.
Bait & switch: you came for the psychedelic effects, but were instead given a bunch of off-base, outdated Social & Anthropology theory instead, that Andy Letcher in book Shroom identified as a disproved “cultural evolution” paradigm from 1880.
1:05:16 – 5079.wav – Entheogen Prohibitionist scholarship. Simplicity of theory, above all.
Amanita demonizing = Prohibition-compliant, entheogen prohibitionist vs. entheogen repeal, but aim for beyond mere “repeal”, to mainstream normalcy, not in a perpetual “we are repealing” frame for eternity.
Forget “repeal”. Be post-repeal.
Psilocybin Eucharist entheogen Prohibitionist scholarship vs. Enth post-Repeal.
Temporarily only, aim toward repeal — but then aim way beyond that to mainstream normalcy of psilocybin.
Entheogen scholars: don’t say “legal”, “legalize”, or even “repeal” — beware of these frames.
Entheogen Prohibitionist Scholarship vs. Entheogen Repealer Scholarship
Most entheogen scholars treat the topic of suppression in pre-modernity as if the suppressors themselves were sober and wanted to suppress the altered state entirely.
I think that this attitude transposes the rhetoric of modern Prohibition and War on Drugs into a pre-modern context.
___
The attitude shapes research, by shaping the sorts of questions the researcher allows themselves to ask.
Many researchers automatically assume that some authority (usually the Roman Empire or the Catholic Church) was opposed to the altered state entirely and sought to suppress psychedelics.
___
The researchers who think this way treat their research as telling a story about suppression. Their story becomes one-sided.
They do not think to look for evidence in the mainstream Roman Empire society or the mainstream Middle Ages or the mainstream Renaissance.
Any evidence they find in those contexts automatically becomes a sign of an oppressed group or a fringe survival or a secretive elite.
___
As a matter of research assumptions I do not assume that there was suppression of drugs.
I am interested in looking for evidence more broadly than most researchers.
___
I find that many entheogen scholars are committed to demonizing the mainstream of past societies.
I think that they have internalized the rhetoric of modern Prohibition, War on Drugs, and the counter-culture, and project that idea onto the past, consciously or unconsciously.
Because the entheogen scholars understand drugs to be counter-cultural today, they think that they were counter-cultural in the past.
___
I’m interested in the question: “what does it mean for drugs to be a part of mainstream culture?”
I’m not interested in trying to find a drug counter-culture that just so happens to mirror 20th century counter-culture.
Many entheogen scholars seems to be interested in finding a drug counter-culture in pre-modernity.
stereo 210 kbps, guitar in background. 4 minutes of guitar at end.
Filename
“Ep252 The Wall Built by Entheogen Scholars.mp3”
Song Name
“Ep252 The Wall Built by Entheogen Scholars”
Content/Timestamps
I’m especially looking for discussion of a couple key topics:
How exactly control re-stabilization works.
0:00 – 5067.wav Intro
0:34 – 5067.wav Content
4:42 – 5067.wav Miking
5:02 – 5068.wav Intro
5:11 – 5068.wav Content – Amanita overemphasis. Hatsis told me Psilocybin is off-limits for theorizing about The Mushroom in Christian history.
Per Hatsis, who reflects the biased and mentally blinded mentality in entheogen scholarship, the only mushroom theory is solely about whether there is Amanita or not.
Brown hasn’t succumbed to full-on Amanita Madness, though Browns’ 2016/2019 publications are more like 2/3 Amanita than 50% Amanita, 50% Psilocybin.
How much does Brown use the malformed phrasing, “the mushroom” (a false, fake singular)?
10:00 –
20:00 –
~27:00 – story of opposition & suppression. “The arrangement of Christendom is one of opposition: the mainstream Prohibitionist group vs. and against the counterculture entheogenics group” –
Under the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, entheogen scholarship is committed to digging us ever deeper into a Social Drama Story of two groups, perpetually and timelessly, Prohibition Forever.
Opposition Forever; the suppression premise, the premise of suppresion of psychedelics in pre-Modernity.
Cyberdisciple – article: Against the Assumption of Suppression of Psychedelics in Pre-Modernity. (I plan to make a local page copy of it)
30:00 –
40:00 –
50:00 –
56:56 – 5068.wav Outro
57:08 – 5069.wav Intro. April 21, 2023.
57:40 – 5069.wav Miking.
57:56 – 5069.wav Content – Cyberdisciple — reading aloud: Against the Assumption of Suppression of Psychedelics in Pre-Modernity.
1:00:00 –
1:10:00 –
1:11:41 – 5070.wav — John Lash writes we cannot allow Bible figures to use psilocybin.
1:20:00 –
1:30:00 –
1:40:00 –
1:50:00 –
2:00:00 –
2:12:34 – 5070.wav — Outro.
2:12:56 – 5068.wav — Outro. Guitar (4 minutes).
2:17:09 – End.
Tech Notes
Input Recordings
VOX_TK_5067.wav – USE. 10:00. voice starts 1:44. Intro: EMS. April 19, 2023. (actually 20th?? per timestamp) Content starts: 3:15 what up to?
Content?
cmp levels. 5′ apart the two mics, aimed down at the back cabs.
Content? quasi?
Parts a, b, c of Ep246a, b, c. C has best sound and content, cheated: reading good writing aloud.
VOX_TK_5068.wav – USE. 1:08:00 April 20, 2023.
VOX_TK_5069.wav – USE. 18:00 April 21, 2023. EMS Intro. compressor talk continues at 17:30; delete most. 1:45 still eq. Content starts 2:30. cb page , podcast title: Against Assump of Supp of Psy in Premody. Read that aloud.
The Egodeath theory 
