battling against demon-possessed voice dictation that makes me always speak with impure lips
mobile app is so buggy, i cant even correct typos without it deleting text, so must send this as-is.
Teacher of Right Thinking About Control
Crop by Cybermonk
Force Eyes to Aim and See
Crop by Cybermonk
FORCE EYES TO AIM AND LOOK AND SEE
Crop by Cybermonk
its unlikely this shows mushrooms bc theres no reason for this grain-centered religious image in Great Canterbury Psalter to think of mushrooms. Argues Panofsky the most influential art HISTORIAN (who else utters such wisdoms and markets himself as wanna be historian? 🤔 )
Hatsis.png
From the same unlikely-to-think-of-mushrooms image:
so you see per the art historian historian Panofsky the historian you can see that we have no reason to expect the bins to be distributing mushrooms, to
to justify such an expectation, you would have to require something like a gigantic 10 foot tall mushroom tree depicted in the same image
along with mushroom effects depictions in the same image such as ego death loss of control adjacent attached to the bins
But even if this one image did have a giant 10 foot mushroom tree and depiction of loss of control threat that gives that’s contradicted by the fact that none of the other images in this book include such motifs and depictions
What is wrong with me that in 2.x years of looking, scouring this Canterbury psalter image f134, though I would have LOVED nothing more to to see mushrooms in the bins, it never ONCE even OCCURRED to me to OPEN MY EYES AND LOOK in this direction?
I’m always yelling at McKenna for telling us in 1994 book Food of the Gods, do not attempt to look for Psilocybin in Christianity; it’s a given that it’s not there, because look how morally superior I am, in my glorious loser defeatedness, to the Big Bad Church who eliminated all entheogens.
Isn’t it just terrible the Big Bad Church for having done that? he asks.
And I am the same.
The only rational explanation for my inexplicable neglect, I couldn’t be bothered to ever ONCE just simply aim my eyes in the direction of the bins:
God prevented me from looking in the direction of top of bins.
If you look at eye-tracking record of what spots I aimed my eyes at in this image, i never aimed my eyes at the bins.
God made me so disappointed that the bins contents are not visible and can only be crudely drawn hay bins of disappointing grain, that it — I am reporting remorsefully but intriguingly the fact — WE MUST TAKE A LESSON FROM MY FAILURE TO AIM MY EYES — that it never once occurred to me to ATTEMT to LOOK zoom in on too of bins.
this point is independent of playing the old spot the mushroom childish game debating about whether the liberty cops images in the Benz actually represent wheat.
regardless of whether you claim that the top of the bins shows liberty cabs or wheat grains being distributed the fact remains that I did not even attempt to look it did not even occur to me to try to look and to zoom and to simply look at can we see what’s in the bin and the answer is yes we can see quite a lot of detail of what is in the bin
why in the hell — this is inexplicable — why in the hell did it never occur to me to aim my eyes & zoom in the direction of the top of the bends to see what is being distributed?
This is so basic so elementary but of course I’m drawing an analogy to the entire field what is wrong with people such that when Panofsky said bunch of cockamamie pseudo reasoning that can’t stand up to two seconds of pushback why did everyone simply cave I would expect 1000 people knocking at his door in 1970 with the book Soma reporting Panofsky said that we are historians know all about Mushroom trees I don’t understand why didn’t the entire world stop all of their business
And say “wonderful terrific! this is the best news ever! you art historians have thoroughly studied mushroom trees! wonderful!
please give us the stack of citations!!
I’m sure you must have a lot more than a single 46-year-old book (now in 1970, 64 years outdated) that’s only 86 pages long, and only mentions the word pilzbaum five times, and that nobody’s bothered to translate from German to English.”
What is wrong with everybody in 1970 that they didn’t instantly beat down Petoskey’s door eagerly demanding citations from him to find out all about where exactly specifically did art historians treat this topic please show us the books filled with these mushroom trees discussions between the scholars and how they proved that Italian pine, an Amanita host, has naught to do with Amanita?
this is completely inexplicable
why people didn’t simply open their eyes and simply look, at msh trees ?
why I didn’t simply think of hey why not look at the bin
and this is the same pattern as the inexplicable impossible to explain in Paul Stamets 1996 book psilocybin mushrooms of the world,
Why is there no section heading called all about the copious psilocybin mushrooms that we are Certainly to expect, that we have every reason to expect tons and tons of cubensis and liberty cap and Cubensis in Europe and in England and In the Mediterranean
where does he discuss this obviously the most number one most interesting topic of all regarding psilocybin mushrooms of the world is our high expectation that certainly there must be a lot as he told Graham Hancock in 2007 of course there are always been tons and tons of them and so there must be a lot of evidence for them
where is the section where he discusses this number one top most important interesting question?
he never has such a section
His book amounts to an information black out he delivers only a half of a phrase careless here and a side of mention hear bits and fragments but he never looks he never turns his eyes in the direction to make a statement or explain the expedition that they vigorously may did the research he never describes where he sent out letters to all people mycologists
Asking please send in your reports that there are Cubensis all over you up and that there are liberty cap all over England and please send in your reports he never describes asking that question
why not
Why is everybody constitutionally incapable of asking the question: where is the expected Cubensis and Liberty Cap in England and in Europe and in the Mediterranean
In search of the lost chord, or, short of that, the perfect crop: include The Light, intimate, show the “threat” (ie definitely WILL lose control if), don’t dilute with the solution / breaking bow by lowering right finger meaning right foot meaning using / relying on eternalism-thinking.
And make that damn idiot get the hell down off the tree, so distracting wtf! i’m tryin to fkkin THINK!! 😠 🤨
couldn’t make up mind to show center of sun, so cut in half 🤷♂️ it’s actually (ironically) a bit distracting. i might even try cutting off some more sun; it’s a “feel”, empirical thing — yeah, I REPORT THAT THE CROP WAS STRONGER WITH LESS SUN SHOWN.
file name not bad: Canterbury-f134-light-showing-branching-causes-loss-of-control.png
objectives of the above crop: still wishing for more intimate room zoom-in than this crop. Main motive: wanted more of the Sun Light.
breaking bow is good, but it’s the part 2 of the message that dilutes the main, first phase, 1) PROBLEM!!!!: branching causes loss of control, aiming bow, unsheath sword. 2) SOLUTION: non-branching causes breaking the bow and sheathing the sword.
and WHY IS THERE IS GUY UPSIDE DOWN WTF DISTRACTING,
HEY YOU IN THE TREE! GET DOWN FROM THERE! I’M TRYING READ THE GODDAM BIBLE, WTF!! 🤬wrecking my trip 😠waste of shrooms 😠
The psalter viewer is seeing that the possibility branching model causes loss of control and that the non-branching model prevents loss of control.
btw there’s 2 BINS of msh being distributed even to newbie fools, to the right of the balance
v good. Approved. 😑 👍
Page Titles
ehggh i have to have two pages / titles – “how i did it” vs. “what it is”.
History of How I Decoded Canterbury Psalter Images f134 and f177 as Seeing that the Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
History of How I Decoded Canterbury Psalter Images f134 and f177 as Furnace Ram Blade Threat of Loss of Control from Asserting Branching Model
includes:
Psalter Viewer Seeing Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
includes: the teacher of righteousness = the furnace of destruction (of left-foot-standing rams) = the threat of loss of control
The Teacher Of Righteousness Is Psilocybin Which Teaches the Threat of Loss of Control That Results from Relying on the Branching Possibilism Mental Worldmodel Rather than Non-Branching Eternalism-Thinking
~~
Intro
👇🤚☀️🖼🗡🏹☀️👉 👈🔍🔬🧐 😲 😱 🤯 😵
1-Minute Outline
Solved Dancing Man Standing Right Leg Xmas 2015
Mostly Solved Canterbury f134 in 2020 (attack vector: isolated blurry Lash crop unaware of any context/big image) – then row 1 after got hi-res, then row 2 & 3
The King of All Brown-Certified Blurry Internet Images
The King of All Brown-Certified Blurry Internet Images – was good enough for me — lol except for his pointing finger at foot illusion messed up my first interpretation phase
John Lash 🥇
Solved Finger Shapes/ YI/ branching-message mushroom trees March 21 2022 thru May 2022 (solved whole Dancing Man (Salamander))
Solved f177 March 2023 (magic tool from gods: white lines & boxes, + grid divide-and-conquer analysis / crops)
Finished Solving f134 March 2023
Need space between numbered items, this WordPress isn’t working for my formatting needs.
Roughly in the sequence of events / phases of my discovery process:
xmas 2015: solved the aspect of Dancing man , stand right foot = eternalism-thinking.
Brown asked if we wrote a “Compelling Evidence/ Criteria of Proof for the infantile shallow game of spot-the-msh. Nov 10(?) 2020.
Wrote that article. Mostly filled in, stumbled again on John Lash blurriest of blurry crop but I had exact key to it. instantly 11 pages of decoding.
Cyberdisciple sent hi-res full image/ (full psalter) (dark toned at library site at the time).
Decoded f134 whole first row.
Decoded f134 row 2 & 3.
~Feb 2021 started, then !Feb 2022 published, catalogs of all 75 msh trees of Canterbury psalter, and all the caps tightly cropped (posted, hid, later re-posted).
[research: WHEN DID I FORMULATE “YI” CONCEPT? March-May 2022 i guess]
But the roots of that go back to Brinckmann book late 2020, seeing repeated pattern of {tall branching tree on left, short non-branching tree on right}. Entheos journal 2002 presented Montecassino MS, two versions of scene, w/ short bush next to tall tree.
CONTRAST! HERE ARE TWO CONTRASTED TREES, WHAT IS DIFF? CONTRAST MORPHOLOGY = ??
yet i did not solve / recognize my 2006 “look mummy its a Cubensis” river crossing window St. Eustace, until very late: FINALLY, March-May 2022 era.
I’ll latch onto Eustace as the crystal-clear grasp of “YI tree pairs”, BUT, only recently, it seems to me, it feels like, very recent March Feb 2023 grasp of the principle of EQUIVALENCE: OF TWO SEPARATE TREES OR 1 tree with two parts??
Hard to say, timing is very debatable, my gradual, multi-year, phase-by-phase increasing graps of morphology variants options including “cut”, “cut trunk”, “pair of trees”, “single-cap tree on right” (used for f177 Horses tree).
Panofsky grotesquely defames medieval authors claiming “worked from templates”; they prided themselves on “you HAVE TO put a signature twist on the pattern”. Opposite of Panofsky static zero-intention narrative.
Feb or March 2023, did lots work on the YI pattern, including crop FROM f177 w/o the 177 context. I zoomed out from there to see which whole comic panel , I woke up to find myself standing in f177, and looked around.
I’m chuffed about flipping rams upside down yesterday 5 minutes ago (merely a day or few ago) to prove they are RAMS STANDING ON LEFT FOOT burn their control power up.
Egoic control power is doomed to cancel itself to nullity due to its instability when amplified.
The irony of this picture: I have SO much more profound grasp of the finger-height, w/ Sun Light controlling the going into seizure or stepping away, controlled by your fingertip height, than I did WAY BACK four days ago when i put Egodeath theory meta-picture inside this picture.
That white box — after you add Sun Light to it — is coming from a NEXT-LEVEL GRASP superior to when I added the meta-image and the Egodeath theory.
Also now I grasp and comprehend the BALANCE has jack to do with reference the OSC concept of justice or judgement; i mean IT IS MUCH MORE ABOUT BALANCE OF CYBERNETIC CONTROL LOSS THAN “BE REASONABLE WITH COMPASSIONATE good judgment”.
Sort of like mistaking “shed skin + venom” as if it’s the main aspect that makes snake #1 mytheme.
YES she holds “good judgment” and “mercy” and “compassion”, but, the #1 thing is: control stability = {balance}.
Gotta get your asssociations IN ORDER. #1: shape of snake. #99: venom, shed skin” are mere “bonus” incidental. features.
She holds a balance: #1 connotation is “balance don’t lose control”. connotation #5 is “have good judgment/ compassion”.
Remember: these images, combininatg combining {msh} {handedness} {nonbranching} are FAR ABOVE ANYTHING ELSE, about peak control transcendence; on the order of frenzy mayhem peak of peak, advanced high dose sophisticated super altered state at its MOST CLIMACTIC. Oppoite of moderate.
These are not Newbie Low Dose depictions, scenes, connotations, level of concern.
These images in this genre are not about daily mundane life; they are all about HIGH DOSE PSILOCYBIN ADVANCED SOPHISTICATED PEAK STATE TRANSFORMATION.
These images are the ultimate high gateway moment of passing through the gate of profoundest transformation, shifting from relying on possibilism-thinking to relying on eternalism-thinking — they explain and depict THE MOMENT OF POWER CONVERSION TRANSFORMATION SHIFTING OF FOUNDATION in the ultimate clear light peak window.
Don’t let mundane presuppositions get your connotations out of order.
I solved most of Canterbury image f177 yesterday (I mean past 8 days), and then applied that refined mentality to return to image f134, where I managed to flush out a lot of missed, major connections and answered all of my bothersome remaining questions/ dissonances/ frictions that I still had.
Last thing finally, I COMPREHENDED the {sun} in both f134 & f177.
HUGE POWERFUL OUTSTANDING MILESTONE a cpl days ago: drawing looking-lines on f177, then boxes, then lines/boxes on f134: VERY effective & appropriate here.
It amazes me how far short I was of full grasp in Nov 2020 re: sheathing and unsheathing the sword; that’s clearly doc’d in my Nov 2020 article, yet, last night 5 minutes ago, a day ago, WHEN I DREW THIN WHITE BOX ON HIS FINGERS — important: that was after I drew the many many boxes on everyone’s hands, that was a KEY turning point, to make me appreciate “wow, relative hand position is a really big deal in this pic, I did not know.”
THAT set me up to realize the ramifications of the Psalter viewers finger height, his EXACT FINGER HEIGHT.
During Nov 2020 to the other day, it had NEVER occurred to me to think on the level of his FINGERS [i joked about toes inventory in 2020?] – but after Brown mentioned St. Martin “youths in trees cutting branches” March 21 2022, before and after that date i was horsing around with donkey and other pictures, and I started examining Jesus’ finger shapes. year ago.
March … wow we’re coming up on a year! since Brown & my discussion of youths in trees cutting branches.
Around March 2022, I looked closely at Jesus finger shapes. now a year later for the FIRST TIME it occurred–
[todo: captures of the f134 self-threatening psalter viewer & next to, Jesus’ finger shapes in St Martin’s church Entry into Jerusalem, also important I WAS SO VERY GLAD to find God in a YI tree making the EXACT SAME finger shapes as St Martin church.]
That all prepped me to end up yesterday drawing short wide white box on his fingers, but i didn’t go into that crop expecting that … I think I FIRST did putting specialty white boxes on f134 Row 1 Right right side of table his TWO HANDS SHAPES I BEEN PUZZLING SINCE NOV 2020 🤔 📅 🤔 📅 🤔 wtff — his totally awkward hand positions, brazenly unnatural. What the hell could he possibly be signalling??
ERROR thought: since Nov 2020, i said, and wrote, and carved in stone and signed in blood: “There isn’t handedness in the banquet table scene, it is exempt.” <– with this IQ level, I can join the Hatsis research project to set those Secret Christian Amanita Cult people straight, and I am qualified to contribute to the CEQ “ditch the Dread (DED)” Griffiths team 🦄💨🌈
Cybermonk 😞
There isn’t handedness in the banquet table scene; it is exempt.
Cybermonk shouting on world wide web for 3 years
It was only when I drew white boxes on f134 (copying my f177 breakthrough technique), that I APPRECIATED how “loaded” with and “driven by” the relative hand-heights motif, f134 is.
The unsheathing/ re-sheathing the sword of God’s ego death seizure is directly tied to relative hand height. This is how important hand-height is.
Ok, so yesterday (past cpl days) I put a ROUGH box around hands of … HANDS of stpr the self-threatening psalter viewer , but that didn’t break me out of my 2020 slumber.
The turning point was drawing boxes not around the entire hands of guy at table, but I was forced to draw boxes ONLY on his backs of hands, to obtain the height difference — “yay i solved that”, I’m almost certain that I solved that right before I then applied same precision boxes concept ….
I thought “I should try not merely drawing rough box around his two hands pari pair of hands; “….
I thought ” I should try again putting box on his hands in a specialized way, like i just did with great success to solve FINALLY! the two-bowl-of-cubensis guy at table.
So, I went into the new a new crop of the self-threatening psalter viewer , just knowing I was going to do some sort of “better box” because his hand shapes bothered me; I COULDN’T TELL HOW HIGH HIS FINGER, I still “yesterday” (1-2 days ago?) just had a blurry confused mental reading of his relative hand heights.
So: I go in to do some sort of “better box” on this hand heights, i zoom more and more, you know i did a lot of finger shapes interpretation, with great success, … so it occurs to me to make my white box(es ) target his right hand finger ‘cos i still am scratching my head trying to “read” : “what is the height of his right hand relative to left hand??”
👇🤚☀️🖼🗡🏹☀️👉👈🔍🔬🧐 😲 🤯 😱 😵
In a minute, working close-in, the more i zoomed, the more it dawned on me the chilling perceiving of OMG on the level of fingertips 🖼👉👈🔍🔬🧐 HE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF WHICH MENTAL MODEL to use in high-dose, on the scale of precision of a fingertip height! forget “hands position”, WE’RE TALKING *FINGERTIP RELATIVE HEIGHT!!!” IS what is controlling the sword of God coming toward him or leaving him!
Jumping ahead a tiny bit to the next step in my grasping the exact thoughts that are depicted by the self-threatening psalter viewer: THEN, the sun.
THE SUN
☀️🍄☀️🍄☀️🍄☀️😲☀️🍄☀️🍄☀️🍄☀️
i had blinders, scales over my eyes. sun? what sun? i don’t see a sun.
What does my 2020 article on f134 say about “sun”? NOTHING 😵⚰️
The red circle in f134 & f177 is ☀️ just a meaningless decoration. Nothing to do with PSYCHEDELIC FREEAK OUT WHITE LIGHT CONTROL-TRANSCENDING, SELF-VIOLATION PEAK EXPERIENCING ETC
Cybermonk
f177 was SUCH a Closed Book, EVEN after solving the 4 horses looking — Except, Ironically, the Hardest Part (Stand Right Foot) Was Already in the Bag, and in my pocket ready to apply after the moment I saw “one of the 3 beasts is a ram”, then off to the races: i was VERY well equipped last week when I started decoding f177.
Date I started decoding f134: Nov. ~12, 2020
Date I finished phase 1 of decoding f134: Nov. ~30, 2020(?)
Date I finished phase 2 [define] of decoding f134: (?)
Date I began decoding f177:
event was, very importnat to remember the subjective edperience a week ago, i was apply YI theory to various pictures, then saw 177, not believing it, completely skeptical and doubtful, seeing that 177 msh tree cropped tight, no context, i notice it conforms to YI pattern, ok, no big deal, SO WHAT. When it caught fire was when I had the preposterous thought, “it almost seems as if the horses are looking at the “good” route, the I of this YI tree. Then after i proved that completely unlikely idea, then I zoomed out, then asked what other horses look at — “oh man that means their gaze connects / equates non-branching = stand right leg / depend on 2-level dependent control.
aside: it has been so helpful to alternate between describing ideas & seeing those exact ideas depicted in this genre of art.
Date I finished phase 2 [define] of decoding f134: (?)
Date I finished phase 3 [define] of decoding f134: March 14, 2023
eg today March 15, 2023 I wrote down yesterday’s idea:
Fool receiving msh = ignorance of {handedness}, {non-branching}, & {mushroom trees} (& control instability).
she isn’t “justice” at all; but OSC balance and viable non-harmful reasonableness, innocence in a positive sense.
Cybernetic balance in the intense mystic altered state –> intense loose-cognitive state – NOT mundane concept of “justice”; not the OSC concept of “justice”.
Date I started decoding f177: tbd
Date I finished decoding f177: tbd
Row 2 Right Depicts 3 levels of Understanding Psilocybin Teaching that the Branching Model Causes Loss of Control: Newbie; Basic; Advanced
What if I had known (more than I did) of the comparable puzzle f177 in Nov. 2020? 🤔 Ans: meaningless horses, there is no way anybody could make any sense of them.
Might as well show me Latin. A closed book EXCEPT stand right foot, THAT I understood….
3 Levels of Understanding: Newbie; Basic; Advanced feet in air upside down in tree unsure how to follow Law of Control Stability applied to “stand on right foot or control-death — when you hang in tree.
plan to crop funnel upside down next to tree hanger and vice versa.
Self-Threatening Psalter Viewer with Nice Room & Sun Framing –
Is it time to re-frame/ re-describe him?
The objective is not only or directly to threaten oneself, but to observe and test and demonstrate how control escalates into receiving destructive chaos instability, while learning about 2-level dependent control and pre-existing control thoughts and receiving memories about “here is where you are forced to remember that here is where you catastrophic loss of control” and helpless puppet mode is approached or stepped back from”.
You move toward control imbalance, instability. “Instability” is a bit vague compared to “threaten”. But admit, bow + sword guys (his thoughts that he receives) are threatening him.
What’s the purpose / function of threatening him? Understanding what the threat is. When lift fingertip in light of sun, — REMEMBER F177 ATTACHES SUN TO MSH TREE IN FACT, TO THE BAD CAP OF MSH TREE FWIW.
sun attached to bad cap of msh tree = PERCEIVING THE THREAT THAT RESULTS FROM BRANCHING MENTAL MODEL OF CONTROL IN WORLD.
Psalter Reader Perceiving Threat of Control Instability
that’s pretty good! 😊 👍 🌞 😎 👉 👈 😱 😵
Psalter Reader Perceiving Threat of Control Instability as a Function of Which👎[unnamed? reject] Mental Model
[3 levels of abstraction distance:] Right-hand fingertip height (relative to left-hand fingers) is mapped to [2 levels of abstraction distance:] relying on right foot (vs left foot) or right knee (vs left knee, if hanging upside down above God’s cybernetic sword of control-destruction), which is mapped to referent: [1 level of abstraction distance:] non-branching (vs. branching), which is mapped to referent: eternalism-thinking (vs. possibilism-thinking)
Referent: relying on possibilism-thinking (unstable) vs eternalism-thinking (stable), during advanced loose cognitive peak from Psilocybin
1 Degree of abstraction/analogy: branching vs. non-branching
2 Degrees of abstraction distance: relying on right foot down on ground vs. left foot down on ground
3 Degrees of abstraction distance: right hand down vs. left hand
4 Degrees of abstraction distance: right fingertip down vs. left fingertips
When Moses held arm up, winning battle; down, losing.
Psalter reader is receiving message from God-mode thinking: the message is: when you raise finger associated with relying on possibilism-thinking, loss of control; unstable control = no control = control-death.
A communication about control-death. received from the Light.
Raising right finger above left means relying on possibilism-thinking, which produces control-death; control is non-viable, it destroys itself, goes unbalanced, falls on God’s sword.
Lowering right finger below left means [ie. is mapped to] relying on eternalism-thinking, which produces control-viability.
so:
Psalter Reader Perceiving Threat of Control Death [Instability, non-viability; destruction; failure; catastrophe] from Branching World Model [threat is not strong enough; it’s more determinate than that]
below, i came up with: “seeing that branching model causes loss of control”
“control death” to alien, too special neologicism. whereas “causes loss of control” is ultra standard lang & plain lang.
seeing that the branching world model causes loss of control
aka holding / asserting / relying on possibilism-thinking , the “possibilism” mental worldmodel
relying on pwm control agency pwm the “possibilism” mental worldmodel
relying on the
relying on the “possibilism” mental worldmodel causes loss of control
psalter viewer is seeing that relying on the “possibilism” mental worldmodel causes loss of control
oh here you go:
psalter viewer is seeing that relying on the possibility branching mental worldmodel causes loss of control
now shorten:
psalter viewer is seeing that relying on the possibility branching model causes loss of control
try slight loss of clarity to cut syllable:
psalter viewer is seeing that using the possibility branching model causes loss of control
i dunno– “relying on” is VERY on-point! hate to lose it! alternate between them? solve by elim it ! —
psalter viewer is seeing that the possibility branching model causes loss of control
I like that. a lot. very strong. very strong.
the possibilism mental worldmodel the “possibilism” mental worldmodel
Psalter Reader Perceiving Control Death Caused by Branching Model
that’s not bad
“threatening” is true, but is not nece the ultimate purpose/point. “there’s a threat” is a tiny bit tangential, or a means or intermediate mechanism, it’s not quite the point. and it sounds too much like “THERE’S A CHANCE OF BADNESS”. 😄 uh no, it’s not a “CHANCE” or “risk”. If you jump off cliff, a risk.
Psalter Reader Perceiving Control Destruction Caused by Asserting Branching Model
too wordy.
Psalter Reader Perceiving Control Cancellation Caused by Asserting Branching Model
kinda like ‘cancellation’. BRANCHING MODEL CAUSES CONTROL CANCELLATION.
I don’t like “instability”, for same reason as “threat”. It’s too “maybe”. “a chancy risk”.
wanna say: control WILL/DOES cancel if you assert branching model (possibilism-thinking).
Branching Model Cancels Control Power/Ability
Branching Model Cancels Control Power
nah, I don’t like asserting “here’s how to get power”.
Branching Model Cancels Control
Psalter Viewer Perceiving that the Branching Model Cancels Control
Psalter Viewer Seeing that the Branching Model Cancels Control
Psalter Viewer Seeing that the Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
I LIKE THAT! Everyone can relate to “causes loss of control”. Plain & potent & everyday talk.
and not “holding the branching model poses a threat ” — no. No “pose threat”; it CAUSES loss of control.
Standing left foot causes loss of control. THE
CHILLS –
CHILLS! THE FURNACE– [9:36 p.m. March 15, 2023] the {furnace} is (the threat of) loss of control.
THE FURNACE I CAN’T TYPE TOO INSPIRED
THE {FURNACE} IS LOSS OF CONTROL!!!! DECODED!
not claiming ENTIRELY new idea to me – theory revision is continuous
THE {FURNACE} that purifies and transforms, burning off the perishable/ passing/ childish transient things, IS threat of/ susceptibility to LOSS OF CONTROL!!!! DECODED!
CORRECTIVE SCOURGING THE = THE THREAT OF loss of control , that teaches.
The threat of loss of control teaches.
Golden Teacher Cubensis the THE TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IS PSCILOCYBIN IS THE THREAT OF LOSS OF CONTROL THAT RESULTS FROM RELYING ON THE BRANCHING MENTAL WORLDMODEL
The death we see here is abandoning — made to abandon the old left-foot way because it / when it threatens to death, loss of control, see the snake = see the threat of loss of control, the girls open the lid, see the snake, panic, throw (jettison) themselves off the rock mountain
Seeing 1-D worldline = see the loss of control inherent in it, the more you look & examing with more of Lash liquid transparent LIGHT, the more you see that snake shaped worldline = loss of control. To die cybernetically, receeive communication from the light, about the threat inevitiable and the alternative is 2-level dependent control which calms storm gives peace viable control; the first foundation collapsed when threatened to death by showing it the vulnerability to loss of control; control instabilibty,
losing balance, the twin fell off of Zeus’ ram with golden fleece and fell into the ocean.
crutch = damaged fatally the egoic premise for control by seeeing revealed the vulnerability, seeing that branching model causes loss of control and switches mind to the non-branching model: the adult developmental form, taught by the Golden Teacher, the teacher of right basis of control agency model in world model, the Teacher of Righteousness Psilocybin sun of light of loss of control threat is fastened to the Psilocybin tree, the branching part of the thee tree is where the Absalom prince dies by threat, fatal demonstration of vulnerability hanging helpless from the tree, loss of control is on the branching part of the tree where the sun light is attached revealing THE FATAL PROBLEM FLAW.
The donkey egoic personal control agency model premised on a collapsing, vulnerable foundation that has a fatal flaw vulnerability: when you shine Golden Teacher light, shows that branching model causes and leads to the altar of self-cancelling control and transformation to the perceived new foundation able to see a viable alternative, frozen vulnerable mode is given from outside the system.
Paul vulnerability in the side: vulnerable to Light that demonstrates the problem: loss of control, PAUL’S “AFFLICTION”, “seizure”, imbalance, instability, a foundation that is designed to collapse when the light of Psilocybin loose cog shines on and exposes the dependent nature of personal control thinking.
the furnace flames = threat of loss of control = teacher of righteousness
golden teacher the THE TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IS PSCILOCYBIN IS THE THREAT OF LOSS OF CONTROL THAT RESULTS FROM RELYING ON THE BRANCHING MENTAL WORLDMODEL
THE TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IS PSCILOCYBIN IS THE THREAT OF LOSS OF CONTROL THAT RESULTS FROM RELYING ON THE BRANCHING MENTAL WORLDMODEL
The Teacher Of Righteousness Is Psilocybin Which Teaches the Threat of Loss of Control That Results from Relying on the Branching Possibilism Mental Worldmodel Rather than Non-Branching Eternalism-Thinking
the self-threatening psalter viewer
Psalter Viewer Realizing Loss of Control from Branching Model
who says “model” in real life?? Letheby 😄
Psalter Viewer [is doing what?] Perceiving Loss of Control from Branching Model
i’m being inevitably pulled toward ‘seeing’ re: daily/ plain vocab.
Psalter Viewer [is doing what?] Perceiving Loss of Control from Branching Model
Psalter Viewer Experiencing Loss of Control from Branching Model
Psalter Viewer Demonstrating Loss of Control from Branching Model
ga i kinda like that, stronger or more direct , to the point, than mere “threat”.
Psalter Viewer Demonstrating Loss of Control Caused by Relying on Branching Model
“from” is equivalent, shorthand. vs. “by Relying on”.
Psalter Viewer Demonstrating Loss of Control Caused by Relying on Branching Model
Psalter Viewer Being Shown Loss of Control Caused by Relying on Branching Model
Psalter Viewer Being Shown Loss of Control Results from Relying on Branching Model
Psalter Viewer Being Shown Loss of Control Results from Relying on Branching Model
i kinda like “caused by” better. “results from” = weak
Psalter Viewer Being Shown Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
Psalter Viewer Seeing that Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
100% Hot Words. 👍 ☀️🌞😎 — well, except ‘that’ 😠 🤨
Psalter Viewer Seeing Branching Model Causes Loss of Control
👍 ☀️🌞🌞🌞😎☀️☀️☀️
man i wish i had those 2 suns crops : /
i never given tribute to Sun 😞 , i failed John Lash
so, you see, I’m TRYING to name my filename of the Trip Room, ps. viewer. with big Sun Light.
Psalter Viewer Seeing that Branching Model Causes Loss of Control.png ??
like, WHY is he self-threatening, what is the REsULT or FUNCTION of the self-threatening? the point is, branching thinking causes Loss of control
he’s SEEING (sun light) (message from God next to sun) that X.
I was like the f134 Row 2 Right: Red Guy: I only understood the basic idea / analogy, not in-depth permutations. I only recognized RAMS like a week ago but once I saw curve horn, step aside!! Very much a case of follow Irvin through Hatsis re: stand on right foot (dec 24 2015), rediscover John Lash 2008 knee-hang msh tree blurriest of Brown-certified Blurry Internet Images — YET, “I got this. 😑 “
Motivation for Creating this Page: Capture Headspace, Don’t Block on Perfection
It is better to post the beginnings of a sketch of a page to flesh out later, than nothing and lose the headspace.
f134 Frozen Snapshot to Preserve
from draft article on branching-message mushroom trees:
Great Canterbury Psalter f134
todo: list Psil/msh …. draw white box on all msh in this image: tree, table bowls, 2 bins, bucket, 3 bags, blue krater, sower’s basket is sowing msh seeds. harvesting msh. cultivating msh. HONORARY JOHN RUSH BOXES.
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter, BnF Latin MS 8846, folio f134. 1176-1200 CE.
Great Canterbury Psalter f134 with Highlight Boxes
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter, BnF Latin MS 8846, folio f134. 1176-1200 CE. Annotations by Michael Hoffman.
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter, BnF Latin MS 8846, folio f134. 1176-1200 CE. Annotations by Michael Hoffman.
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter, BnF Latin MS 8846, folio f134. 1176-1200 CE. Annotations by Michael Hoffman.
Features:
Psilocybin caps & stem, therefore every element in this image depicts analogy to peak Psilocybin effect.
Row 2 Right: Naive newbie (stand on left foot), basic understander (stand on right foot), advanced interpreter (hang upside-down from right knee). [awesome todo! crop side by side Funnel Hat and flipped Red Hanging]
Row 2 Middle: Self-Threatening Psalter Reader has right-hand finger lifted to exactly the same height as left-hand fingers, surfing the edge of catastrophic loss of control.
Row 2 Right: Mushroom distributor looking at worried/excited brow of foolish youth.
Sun light below God = intense perception of control dynamics in peak loose cog state.
Row 2 Right: Floating Feet Guy Is Looking at Floating Feet of Right-Knee-Hanging Guy. His feet are same height = advanced surfing the edge of loss of control, furrowed brow. [11:17 p.m. March 14, 2023]
Row 3 Left: Reaper feet both down, surfing the edge of loss of control as he shifts % of weight to L vs. R foot.
Row 2 Right: Limbless youth attached to funnel hat guy is looking at wrong hands of foolish youth receiving Psilocybin.
Systematic mastery of {handedness} requires presenting problematic, non-simple scenarios: hanging upside down by right knee, 3D table perspective of Maiden hands; pair of 1-legged guys (Row 3 Middle).
Candidates for initiation who pass the exam (Row 1 Left) banquet on one or two bowls of Cubensis, such as a secondary delayed dose (Row 1 Right).
Row 1 Left: Pink key tree is isomorphic with the Cubensis tree, indicating left = branching (unstable control), right = non-branching (stable control).
Row 2 Middle: Threatening arrowhead inches from the anxious psalter viewer
Row 2 Middle: Breaking bow to refrain from transgressing control limits, per good judgment and mercy.
Skillful balancing in tree by right foot on cut branch, left foot floating, left hand floating (not relied on), right hand holding onto cut branch.
Left hand touching sword blade of control limits. Reliance on possibilism-thinking has been cut/pierced, like cut branching.
Row 1 Middle: Right hand touching cut major right-hand trunk.
Row 3 Left: Right foot on stable column base.
Row 3 Right: Oxen wisely lifts left foot, stands on right foot.
Row 1 Left: Candidates for initiation, 3 of 4 don’t qualify, not able to demonstrate reliying on right-hand, non-branching thinking.
Row 3 Middle: Blue krater to gather Cubensis.
Foolish youth on left leg, wise youth on right leg, wise man on no leg, with mushroom hem on stable column base, carrying a limbless, non-branching youthful thinking.
Two cybercide guys, transgressing lower, egoic control limits of possibilism-thinking, right foot on stable column base.
John Lash uploaded row 1 left in 2008.
Per John Lash[The Discovery of a Lifetime], BnF Latin MS 8846 has been called the Paris Eadwine Psalter; the Anglo-Catalan Psalter; the Paris MS, or the Great Canterbury Psalter.
from draft article on branching-message mushroom trees:
Great Canterbury Psalter f177
todo: cover topic of Sun attached to msh tree.
The simple tree and the leaf tree teach non/branching therefore each tree is considered as msh tree.
winnow basket for mental model filtering and for msh.
The Psilocybin mushroom tree converts everything in the image to Psilocybin mushrooms / effects.
dirt pile = dung = msh. all aspects of image are msh and peak mature fx intense.
2 bags of msh
3 msh trees (1 converts the others to count as msh)
weighing msh on balance
lockbox filled with msh.
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter f177.
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter f177, with looking-lines and target features added by Michael Hoffman.
Features:
todo: keep the list ultra streamlined, move explanations to the body instead.
Psilocybin caps & stem, therefore every element in this image depicts analogy to peak Psilocybin effect, edge of loss of control depending on which mental model is relied on.
Addresses/ recognizes the q: if “stand right not left foot, what if upside down, what happens to that “simple” rule? The middle ram is relatively good because left foot not touching ground (ceiling), like the simple key tree’s middle cap not touching the ceiling.
Sun light attached to Cubensis tree over horses = intense perception of control dynamics in peak loose cog state.
[condense/move out: good compared to the other can’t be fully bad, because left foot not touching ground. b/c foot not touching (a 2nd layer/ degree of artist problematizing their set-up simplistic rule of “stand on right”)…. what would it mean if one ram left foot not touching ground? Answer: m
The middle ram is relatively good, like the simple key tree’s middle cap not touching the ceiling.
[move from Features to body discussion The artist is telling us to discuss these perverse gray area deviant cases that problematize simplistic rule “left down bad”.]
Row 1 middle, 3 guys stand right foot, 1 by crossing legs, middle’s foot hidden.
Row 2 left: 3 rams stand left foot, middle’s foot hidden.
Right-foot balancing guy standing on stable tower.
Big tall brain of guy with difficult motif-combination {left heel of lame leg stable column base holding balance} + {crutch} indicating inability to use left heel, big brain = understanding of inability of left heel; understanding gives stability. Right foot balancing = eternalism-thinking; crutch + left leg = qualified possibilism-thinking.
Big brain guy looking at Row 1 foot.
Crowd has no legs because they represent the viewer, more than referent of analysis. Left person looks at viewer establishing this connection.
Row 1 middle: Looks left, points left; looks right, points left and right; looks right, points right, lifted garment.
Two horses look at blue non-branching cap, two look and right hand of God.
Crutch is knowledge that left heel is unstable; lame left leg indicates eternalism-thinking, which is stable. Left heel (with crutch negating) is on stable column base.
Simple key tree above ego death rock ossuaries graveyard in row 2 is YI morphology; establishes YI is good. Left = branching = unstable; right = non-branching = stable.
Left tree trunk = YI = Good. Cross-under matches simple key tree.
Right tree trunk = YI = Good. Virtual cross-under would match the two other trees[3:59 a.m. March 11, 2023].
Buildings = stability = towers.
Winnowing basket to sort possibilism-thinking (down chute) vs. eternalism-thinking.
Psilocybin lockbox. Stands in gateway, must understand eternalism to access lockbox and pass through gate. Stability / Instability acts as a lock/gateway to prevent unworthy/ uneducated (about cybernetic eternalism) from accessing the Psilocybin intense mystic altered state. The Bad Trip Barrier, the 39% under optimal conditions have extreme panic terror seizure panic escalation frenzy whirlwind elevator to heaven.
An image viewer (row 1 right) has furrowed brow, dread because relying on unstable possibilism-thinking, indicated by displaying left hand– instead of hiding limbs branching [4:04 a.m. March 11, 2023] to negate.
Left tree’s upper level: IY, I, IY = Bad, Good (because non-branching at trunk level), Bad.
Left tree’s upper level: YI, IY, YI = Good, Bad, Good (because cut branch = non-branching).
Right-hand session guide holds right foot while looking at pink key tree.
Left-hand session guide holds right arm while looking at crutch and left heel.
Standing on right leg held up by right hand by God, left foot in left hand neither used to remain balanced and standing.
Egoic animal thinking down chute sacrificial 3 rams in dragon furnace consumed. Illusion and repudiated animal thinking that causes control instability is repudiated and cast down chute to consuming furnace sacrificial three rams.
Various top-row figures look at left tree, right tree, or right foot.
Toes-balancing guy uses balance to weigh 5g dried from the Psilocybin lockbox.
Balance bag same angle as lockbox bag.
A Driving Research Question
Why didn’t I engage image f177 in Nov. 2020 era, but waited to 2023 to recognize the structuredness around “extreme standing right leg”?
See Also
Nov. 2020 records of initial, main phase of decoding Canterbury image f134:
it took me from Nov. 2020 to March 2023 to think of looking in the bins i just assumed what McKenna told me: “do not open your eyes and look, it’s not there, give up; instead, revel in the glorious moral righteousness of perpetual defeatedness“
The Big Deal: Thin White Box on Fingers Shows them THE SAME HEIGHT! Which means… THE VERY EDGE OF LOSS OF CONTROL, INSTRUCTING THE MIND – man, this is some precision, expert shiite; HOLY!!
White-Box Realization, on Finger of Each Hand, Totally Blew Me Away
Because I zoomed in and added a white box, I found this amazing HUGE ramification finding, maximum meaning-packed, peak ultimate powerful image.
Psalter Reader Has Two Gas Pedals
The psalter reader is like sitting driving a car that has two pedals:
One pedal is “go into control-seizure escalation, unsheath the sword, head into the control-loss vortex”.
The other pedal is “brake, sheath the sword, back away from the control-loss vortex; move away from control-seizure escalation.”
Reaper Shifting Weight Between Left and Right Foot, Going Toward and Away from Ego Death Control Instability Seizure, Control-Loss Seizure Vortex
This means I now have a reading for reaper guy w/ both feet on the ground! 🎉 after 2 years+!
Intro
This totally warrants a semi-redundant post.
This is PEAK OF PEAK depiction, realization, grasp of the full profundity of what’s meant — THIS IS THE FIRST RECOGNITION OF THE FINGER HEIGHT BEING EXACTLY THE SAME(!!) 😲
Sure, I posted a little; at a rough level of inspection — yesterday it was during making white boxes on f134 for the first time, yes, I–
TODO: Gotta redo, go back & add thin white box around fingers on main white-box image. 🤷♂️ b/c the message doesn’t come across – i stupidly only white-boxed his vague broad hands; yeah sure you can see his finger, but, YOU CAN’T TELL IT IS *SAME*(!!) height as right-hand fingers.
The image’s power only HALF comes across 😞 in my v1 too-big, too broad white-boxes. GOT TO have finger-thin white box to GET IT.
Hands Almost Same Height, Finger Extended Approximately/ Roughly, = Merely Moderately Mind Blowing
Here’s What’s Brand New: Yes, I Noted Yesterday, His Hands Generally Are Almost Same Height, and Finger Extended (modestly “wow, ramifications!”)
But, Extra Potency by Further Following Up that Rough Noticing:
OMG His Lifted Finger Is at EXACTLY the SAME Elevation as His Right-Hand Fingers 🤯 😵
you see, yesterday, I thought he was motioning AS IF to raise finger up to level of right-hand fingers.
but NO; he’s holding his fingertip AT the same level, which means he is AT the edge of control loss; not “near” or “threatening to be near”; he is THERE!!!
Huge difference! I wasn’t getting the full message –
Takeaway: Ya Gotta Zoom; Zoom; Zoom!!
The Detail Turns Out to Be 10/10 AWESOME Meaning-Amplification, by Harnessing the Scene’s Dynamics (Sheathing vs. Unsheathing God’s Sword) to the Exact Right-Hand Fingertip Height — Which Is Shown EXACTLY the Same Height as Left Fingers 🤯 🤯
Which Means He Is Controlling / Being Controlled at EXACTLY the PRECISE Tipping Point of Control Escalation Seizure!!
AWESOME DEPICTION!!
Also New, Tonight Is the Comprehending THE SUN LIGHT Above the Sun (David Ulansey; Lash’s Liquid White Light)
[need a bit more of God’s Sun in the crops to convey the “Comprehending the Edge of Control Chaos” experience]
Yes I did a page recently (March 7/ March 8), but WOW!! the effect is SO amplified now that I grasp and comprehend HIS FINGER HEIGHT OH NO MY GOD!! HE IS ON THE EDGE OF PEAK BALANCE CONTROL LOSS PLAYING
THIS IS A DEPICTION OF RIDING SURFING THE EVENT HORIZON AT THE VERY EDGE OF CONTROL STABILITY, WALKING ALONG THE CONTROL STABILITY BOUNDARY.
I plan to do some more crops to get it right — ya gotta zoom on this at the library, keep the Sun Light from God Mode Consciousness — include the center of the Sun Light that John Lash always talks about and
I just realized the sun in f177 is not the sun.
It is the white light that John Lash writes about.
Peak loose cognition meta perception control feedback CLEAR LIGHT OF CONTROL EDGE OF STABILITY TRANSCENDENCE AND ABILITY TO VIOLATE, TO BE MADE TO VIOLATE THE PERSONAL CONTROL SYSTEM.
So this realization of the height of HIS FINGER TIP 😱 changes my reading subtly, of the concept of “self threatening”.
He receives control-thoughts from God, in the clear light ultra perception of cognitive processing and modelling of the personal control system, including how control balance/ stability works.
God demonstrates: I move your finger slightly higher, your left foot slightly down, I make your weight shift slightly to the left foot, you go into control seizure ram fighting thicket caught escalation.
And you perceive how the mind works in that regard so you learn the difference between the two mental models: possibilism-thinking vs. eternalism-thinking.
I make your weight shift to your left foot, I make your finger ascend slightly, and the seizure battle resumes, the storm increases, the sword is being unsheathed.
I make your weight shift to your right foot, I make your finger descend slightly, and the seizure battle stops, the storm subsides, the sword is being sheathed and the bow broken.
Mercy, Judgement, Charity? Viable Life-Sustaining Balance of Control
I wasn’t WRONG in Nov 2020, reading broadly generically “mercy” and “good judgment” but now, knowing f177 the balance guy weighing out 5g dried french fries for Hatsis “the Naturalistic [OSC] Interpretation Is Always Correct and Neutral Unbiased Reading Else Definite Culturecide” sober historian, by the guy balancing on his toes.
I have to WEED OUT my connotations that are mundane. ABSOLUTELY FORGET any whiff of connotations of “wheat” or of mundane “justice” — that’s category error.
Images f134 & f177 are EXCLUSIVELY depicting peak Psilocybe Cubensis.
Nothing else can rise up to that height in connotation level at this highest level of experiencing.
The power of this finger raising/lowering scene comes from the very firm motif-law that propels the engine of this image:
Sun light attached to Cubensis tree over horses = intense perception of control dynamics in peak loose cog state.
11-Factors’ Shadow factor 13 (SHA)
About 11-Factors’ Shadow factor 13 (SHA): defined as the 8 Dread items that are in the Unpleasant Experiences high-level factor[dimension|scale], including the beacon of light guiding us through the dark wormy forest of Psychedelic Pseudoscience, Dread (DED) item #54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.
Ocean/Visionary unaccounted items are Virtual factor 12 (VIR).
Quote Houot’s dissertation: Nearly 40% reported extreme fear in Griffiths hi-dose, under optimal conditions. Yet, CEQ silently omitted the key effects.
Psychedelic “Science” suppressing and repressing the shadow dragon monster by summarily tossing it into Wouter Hanegraaff’s Rejected wastebasket (BURY YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND HARDER) just guarantees continued 40% bad trips (best case) and guarantees failing to bring back the treasure of Transcendent Knowledge.
The above is my 5th try at adding the most interesting white boxes & lines.
Back to School
We also need to re-understand that the classroom isn’t only interrogating the viewer about elementary “stand on right foot”; ultimately, for advanced decoders of this genre, the TRULY QUALIFIED SESSION GUIDE tester row 1 left is interrogating the student about speciifically reasoning the motif logic of what would it mean to rely on Right leg/foot if you are hanging upside down in the tree by your R knee? Advanced-level exam scene.
Can you pass the exam even when hanging upside down by the R knee w/ both your feet floating??
I’m having doubts about my few minutes ago saying he’s looking at God. His hands match God’s, but so does everyone’s. More interesting and uniquely meaningful is:
His floating feet suggest he’s focusing on Red’s floating feet and knees, EXACTLY as I just did.
Take 1: deleted, line not aimed at feet: too many boxes:
I should have been writing “knee-hanging mushroom tree” not “leg-hanging mushroom tree”. Stand on Right foot = hang from right KNEE.
Late note addition:
From standard POV, his feet are in conformity with the rules from right side up POV, yet his hands are not. How to square this?
Ans: From standard POV, he is standing on God’s cloud relying on R foot; R foot down on cloud, L foot higher floating. Add this to below where I pointed out hands & knees agree but feet disagree, from his frame of reference.
Finally Figured Out Correct Reason Sage’s Feet Floating!! SO OBVIOUS NOW OF COURSE!
Upside down Tree guy feet not used – Funnel Hat Is Working Out the Analysis of Upside Down Tree Guy
That would totally explain, b/c right now I feel my feet are off ground b/c I’ve been hanging upside down looking at this red initiate
oh man oh man late late addn, yes, TO HELP EXPLAIN BOTH FEET OFF GROUDN… OH I GOT IT OH I GOT IT I FINALLY EXPLAINED CORRECTLY BOTH FEET OFF THE GROUND AND YES I DO THINK HE REPRESENTS LOOKING AT UPSIDE DOWN GUY AND GODS HANDS AND REPRESEENT THE advanced questions/ advanced viewer; the red young enlighted guy represents merely beginner level comprehension of this image.
It’s pretty elementary (relatively), to comprehend “stand right foot”. But draw white lines from the dangling feet in tree to the funnel hat fguy’s feet. QED! FINALLY FIGURED OUT THE TOTALLY COMPELLING READING OF HIS FLOATING FEET, BEEN WONDERING SINCE NOV 2020!
quick announce copypasta from branching-message mushroom trees article: I should rearrange sections in order of realization, no time stamps here.
Great Canterbury Psalter f134
The purpose of upside down is because handedness permutations are the mechanism, a thorough permutation raises the question of options including upside down.
the stretching challenge of “consistency”.
revealing arb’ness [no, wrong ans: it is to match his knees, not arb’y] of his two hands when:
What would God-mode thinking mean, when employing the analogy mech’m, to hold “L hand higher than R” — when ur upside down??????? 🤔🤔😵🤯🏆🎉
If panic seizure is a function of important holding of L hand higher than R (b/c means L/R feet reliance), the THEN WHAT WOULD THIS ALL-IMPORTANT life-or-death, insanity psychosis control-seizure esc’n depends on which leg is “DOWN”, then what would that ALL IMPORTANT MOTIF MEAN, IF U R UPSDIE DOWN? for full permutations.
Q.E.D.
I’ve answered the mysteries questions that I noted since Nov. 2020!
Noticed other day, now i can articulate: the Maiden has kinda arguabley debateably wrong hands thatT THE ARTIST WANTS US TO DEBATE HER HANDS. Left is higher in that closer tot top of painting, but, BUT!!! with respect to the frame of ref in the scene, HER RIGHT HAND UP ON THE BOWL RIM IS HIGHER THAN HER L HAND FLAT ON TABLE 😱 !!
So Eadwine, genius, is bringing in even more permutation problematic puzzle questions:
what if upside down?
what if 3D angle perspective? is the maiden (ingesting) in danger of psychedelic freakout panic seizure, or not???? Is she following the God-mode-thinking rule, or not? Is her L or R foot on the ground? the right ans is: it’s debatable. depends on which frame of ref.
what if guy only has 1 leg?? (covered months ago)
The Frame of Reference Problem that Eadwine Recognized and Demonstrated as Being Inherent in the Seemingly “Simple” Handedness Rules: What Would “Rely on Right Leg” Mean if Hanging Upside Down?
f177 rams standing on L leg – or middle one floating — is other examples of the Frame of Ref Problem INHERENTLY RAISED by, that this artist identified, inherent in the “simple” rules of {handednesss}. I GET IT! EUREKA! I GET IT!
omg yet more: THE KNEES! THE KNEES! His hands establish that we’ll go with HIS frame of ref – but o noes if we do THAT , alas, his FEET violate that, so seizure disaster right? BUT WAIT!!! HOW he hangs is by his knees not feet, see his left knee is LIFTED higher than R from his POV which we committed to, so he conforms to God-mode thinking.
If God-Mode Thinking Requires Stand R Foot and we say Hand Height Repr’s that, then what if hang upside down BY KNEES not feet? Which knee should be higher? His feet vs his knees.
todo: technically formally analyze per frames of reference. A long math exercise. I ‘ll just say from his FoR, :
L hand higher than R
L foot lower than R BUT *that* is not estab’d as the — WE ARTIST HAS RE-MAPPED TO SAY INSTEAD OF LET HAND HEIGTH REPR FOOT HEIGHT, LET US REMAP, VIOLATING FOOT HEIGHT MAPPING FOR RIGHT-SIDE-UP PPL, AND BREAK THAT MAPPING, AND INSTEAD, DO MAPPING TO KNEE HEIGHT. MUST RELY ON RIGHT NEE KNEE AND HAVE LEFT KNEE RAISED, WHICH RULE WE DO CONFORM TO HERE. to do: add “L” and “R” on hands & feet. When considered right side up, his feet fit rule, his right is closer to ground. When consid updown FoR, his feet violate law, but his knees which he is INSTEAD using, fit the law.
left knee higher than right knee (his FoR) but
left foot lower than right foot (his FoR)
This explains the awkward “arb” knee & foot positions.
todo: red boxes on feet but white on knees.
Q.E.D. 🏆 🎉 👑 🎶 🏅
LOL i missed something, todo, in my previous” “clever’ lists of right leg/foot/hip/heel — I MISSED KNEE 😵⚰️🙃😄
Rely on {right foot/ heel/ leg/ hip /KNEE} 🙃
Challenge: Prove that the L Hand *MUST* (not arb, after all) be higher than right (given upside down FoR) to reflect knee height that forcibly results from hanging from R knee
must point out , as Eadwine I GUARAN TY DOES, that you CANNOT have L knee higher while hanging by R knee, in your FoR. try it.
This justifies the not-so-arb hand positions that continue to be “L hand must be higher than R”, because, when you hang by r knee, your L knee is INEVITABLY higher than R knee – that is the reason why L hand MUST be higher, which HAPPENS to match right-side up FoR reasoning, but, based now on knee geometry, not based on foot geometry, here negated in a way that very strongly asserts “he is coming from God-mode cloud thinking”. fwiw agian, his feet happen to conform to God’s law from a right side up FoR.
Q.E.D.
omg this solves the problem i noted maybe 6 mo ago, (2 yrs ago??) that ACKSHUALLY, ya’know, gotta say: hate to say, but: HIS HANDS ARE IN VIOLATION. If i look i can find where i wrote that his hands are in violation of God’s law. I wrote up somewhere a phony explaining away that I didn’t like, that bugged me. I was forced to make a doesn’t fit exception for him.
Wrong, Pseudo-Answer
a more advanced wrong ans is: “relative to his FoR, his L hand is higher than R” – WRONG ANSWER. We must re-reason from scratch, starting from knee geometry:
Correct Answer
true, correct answer for full credit is:
If you hang by L knee, your R knee dangles higher. So the representative mapped hand height for evil (non-viable) relying in possibilism-thinking , would be what? R hand higher than left.
If you hang by R knee, your L knee dangles higher. So the representative mapped hand height for godly (viable) relying in eternalism-thinking, would be what? L hand higher than right. That is the TRUE expl for his hand height being the correct, non-arb’y “hold L hand higher than R hand”
Figure 1. Great Canterbury Psalter, BnF Latin MS 8846, folio f134. 1176-1200 CE.
Great Canterbury Psalter f134 with Highlight Boxes
Annotations by Cybermonk
Errata/Important Addition
[March 14, 2023] ANNOUNCEMENT on f134 major success by Applying Eye Tracking from f177!
OMG so meaning-filled!
Funnel Hat is looking at God’s command, “left hand higher than right” Addendum an hour later: I do believe we must say: Funnel Hat’s worry also means he is also looking at the upside-down guy whose hands are in violation, reasoning like we are.
His furrowed brow is ours as we struggle to analyze the puzzle including why is the guy upside down and why are his hands in violation (ans: knees).
He is not only worrying about the fool receiving dose w/ hands in violation, he also is worrying about the tree-hanging guy.
Funnel Hat guy represents how advanced WE the Egodeath community viewers are, now working-out the problem as I have been doing since Nov 2020, puzzling over the rule-violating hands of the upside down guy.
The youth he carries IS LOOKING AT WRONG HANDS OF FOOL RECEIVING MSH!
addl followon breakthough/add’l connections highly signiif: very big; brkthru: why must L hand be higher? It means L leg lifted; rely on R leg. R hand down = R foot down = rely on R leg = rely on eternalism-thinking not possibilism-thinking.
omg GOD IS SHOWING US HIS L FOOT LIFTED, R FOOT DOWN; “RELY ON ETERNALISM-THINKING” EUREKA 🏆🎉😲
Also wow my white lines technique is super powerful, must be, to handle Eadwine’s potency.
Regular ol Announcement, con’t:
This is a huge victory for me b/c yesterday I decided to OFFICIALLY CALL B.S. on the notion, the impressionistic narrative picture-painting prejudice, “No Psilocybin in Europe before 1976” spread by Letcher Hatsis though I don’t have quotes handy other than Hatsis’ infamous, zero-context nonsensical assertion (not a proper-formed statement that an [ideal] actual Historian would make):
The shape of the liberty cap is anachronistic.
The Anti-Mushroom Psychedelic Witch, Hatsis
Again, there was no context provided of what the F that’s even asserting. Does Plato approve?
There was no triangle spearhead shape in the heavens over Europe before 1976 🤷♂️
I just yesterday posted my official proclamation to the world: EVERYTHING THEY SAY ABOUT “NO PSIL IN EUROPE IS TOTAL 🐮💩 & impossible & the opposite of the truth.”
THEN the very next day, now, here’s Hancock reporting his 2007 conversation w/ Stamets, who told him: “The claim of ‘No Psilocybin in Europe before 1976’ is total BS & impossible & the opposite of the truth.”
Who is “a famous mycologist” other than Stamets?
Who is spreading this insanity, that puts people in cages, propping up Prohibition?
What “Famous Mycologist” Asserted “No Psilocybin Were in Europe”?
Who Is Spreading These Prohibition-Basis Falsehoods?
In book Supernatural aka Visionary (audio version), Hancock asked Stamets about the popular factoid “no Psilocybin in Europe”, and Stamets said Preposterous! Impossible! Tons of them always.
Too bad Stamets’ lackadaisical writing, avoiding & steering around that topic in 1994 book, condoned that folk factoid misimpression.
I’ve scoured Stamets’ book 3 times: he is unable to think of & look at the topic.
You (the reader) have to do his work of cobbling together his implicit position statement, to guess & deduce (& debate what is) the Stamets position.
Why is it MY responsibility?
Stamets is to blame for vague avoidance of the topic.
Why does Letcher Hatsis want there to be no Psilocybin in Europe/England before 1976?
Takeaway: NEVER TRUST AN ENTHEOGEN SCHOLAR.
They have a conflict of interest, they are invested in commitment to denial of Psilocybin in Europe/England history.
Hatsis to Brown & me: “You’re not allowed to deviate from your basis, who is Allegro, to assert or discuss Psilocybin in Europe history.”
Amateur blogger Hatsis is a closeted lover of Allegro, SMC is his favorite book: Reading Allegro Again (Hatsis 2015) – the true Follower of Allegro, Thomas Hatsis, the real leader of the Discipleia Allegrieae (that’s Latin 😑 ).
Graham Hancock on Psychedelics Today Podcast Just Started
omfg i can’t believe, at 23:00 asserting Stamets says there was tons Psilocybin in Europe. The misimpression is Stamets’ fault b/c he was so lackadaisical in his book Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World.
Stamets couldn’t be bothered to make a clear statement on the topic as a topic.
“Was Jesus a Mushroom?”
oh, man, i just got a hit, new powerful angle on the Row 2 Right f134! funnel hat & mushroom pourer are concerned about the wrong foot/ wrong hand fool receiving msh! March 14, 2023 – this also might be my first announcement that of an idea from 1-2 days ago that like f177, these are NOT french fries from bovine dung harvest being distributed despite Hatsis wisdom that a “naturalistic” reading (ie, mundane OSC-based presupposition-prejudice) is always the neutral, correct assumption (overcorrection against John Rush – actually Rush is totally correct [after slight corrections]: all art means Psil msh fx).
Mocking Hatsis and his articles pays off productively yet again, thx 4 ur contribs!
doomed: right hand lifted while receiving msh distribution Canterbury-f134-happy-fool.png
Look at the expression of bucket man and funnel hat man: zoom in at the library site & read their minds:
“That dumb happy man is doomed to control seizure corrective instructional panic attack, learning the hard way.”
Proposal: funnel isn’t warning overzealous Red Youth against “always use eternalism-thinking”.
Funnel hat is looking at Happy Fool [no, on zoom inspection, turns out, he’s looking at God’s hands!]; so is Bucket man.
New proposal: bag = mushroom pouch stash in f177 & f134.
His raised right foot (bad) touches his stash (= inevitable instability doom).
Incompatible: msh + naive possibilism-thinking. That’s why Funnel has a worried wrinkled forehead.
That’s Hatsis’ Retarded Idiot Debate-Question Formulation that He Wants to Stunt the Field With – But We Do Know, Stamets Was a Mushroom
omfg i can’t believe, at 23:00 asserting Stamets says there was tons Psilocybin in Europe. The misimpression is Stamets’ fault b/c he was so lackadaisical in his book Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World.
Stamets couldn’t be bothered to make a clear statement on the topic as a topic.
Cleaned up extract about Psil in Eur:
Transcription by Cybermonk
Joe of Psychedelics Today podcast/outlet:
In Visionary was this comment about psilocybin-containing mushrooms never existing in Europe, and one famous mycologist you chatted with said there’s no evidence, like before Columbus discovered the Americas, and then you passed this by Stamets, and Stamets said that’s that’s totally absurd.
Hancock:
Yeah of course, and I had another mycologist do the DNA on Psilocybe semilanceata from North America and Psilocybe semilanceata from Europe, and these psilocybes have been evolving separately for tens of thousands of years, probably hundreds of thousands of years, so it’s got absolutely nothing to do with contact between the new world and the old, but there always were psilocybe mushrooms in Europe, just as there always were in the Americas, and you know they’re– the Psilocybe semilanceata of course is just one amongst many, you know, there’s many more; this is a universally available technique.
Transcript: formatting by Cybermonk
22:37 that isn’t all there is to reality and that’s one of the great teachings I think of the plant medicines 22:42 um yeah um now one thing that really struck me
Mushrooms in Europe
22:47 in Visionary was um this this comment about 22:52 um psilocybin containing mushrooms never existing in Europe and one famous Mycologist you chatted with said yeah 22:59 they they there’s no evidence like before Columbus discovered the Americas or whatever and then uh you you pass 23:06 this by stamets and stamets said that’s that’s totally absurd um yeah like of course and I had another 23:14 Mycologist do the DNA on sinus cyber semi lanciata from North America and Simon silicon semi lanciata from Europe 23:21 and these these um psilocytes have been evolving separately for tens of thousands of years probably hundreds of 23:28 thousands of years so it’s got absolutely nothing to do with contact between the new world and the old but they’re always with psilocide mushrooms 23:34 in Europe uh just as they’re always were in the in in the Americas um and and you know they’re the salicide 23:41 sevillanciato [Psilocybe semilanceata] of course is just one amongst many you know there’s many more um this is a 23:47 a universally available um technique for entering a deeply altered state of consciousness yeah and
European Traditions
23:55 a topic I love um to bring up you know uh Europeans have been dealing 24:02 with um the Catholic Church kind of stomping out magic for you know well over a 24:08 thousand years um and uh we don’t really talk about that I I was chatting um I had some 24:15 Twitter comment uh trying to say that you know Europeans had access and somebody was like that’s the worst of 24:21 colonialism suggesting that Europeans had magic and access um that’s how I interpreted the 24:26 statement but you know we have we have all these alchemical texts we 24:32 have all sorts of magicians a large history of Witchcraft um you know where where do you like to 24:37 go with this topic um about like European traditions well first first of all it’s it’s it’s 24:42 it’s it’s obvious it’s I do go into it in Supernatural back in 2005 and I do 24:51 um and and I also wrote the forward to bran Murray rescue’s book The the immortality key because because there’s 24:57 no doubt there’s no doubt that the mainstream monotheistic faiths do have their origin in Altered States Of 25:04 Consciousness I think I think to argue differently would be a mistake but it’s particularly true with Christianity the 25:09 early Christians uh were gnostics and and gnosticism is about revealed 25:14 knowledge it’s not stuff you could teach it’s stuff you have to experience uh and and the experiences Unleashed 25:22 by the plant medicines are exactly the kind of experiences that are described for example at eluses uh the the 25:29 ellucinian mysteries in ancient Greece and these move on into early early Christianity and it was just 25:35 early Christianity as I as I see it and as I’ve researched it was multifaceted there were many different kinds of idea 25:43 uh that defined it that were defined as Christian um it was on it only became 25:49 crystallized into the Roman Catholic Church when Rome made Christianity the 25:57 official religion of the State under Constantine that’s when that’s when one 26:03 particular faction of Christianity pulled on the Jack Boots of the Roman Empire and began to stomp on everyone 26:10 else and stomp out everyone else and to deny uh to deny that there had been any 26:15 such thing as Altered States Of Consciousness and to viciously penalize 26:21 people who explored Altered States Of Consciousness and and in due course of course to burn which is at the stake and 26:29 to burn so-called witches and to burn the the early gnostics were also burned at the stake uh clearly uh early early 26:37 Catholicism has a great deal to answer for uh and and it has limited and narrowed down uh the the potential of 26:45 Christianity look I’m not a Christian I I’m I I don’t I don’t Embrace any of the monotheistic faiths but but I do believe 26:53 uh that that life is is deeply mysterious um and uh that that it’s the spirit in 27:00 us it’s the soul in us that that that matters I I I think we’re much too 27:05 focused in the modern world on things on physical things on ownership on possession on defining ourselves in 27:12 terms of what we own and what we possess um science operates in exactly the same 27:17 way materialist reductionism everything’s got to be reduced to some sort of material process so so 27:23 Consciousness is just an an accidental byproduct of of brain activity you know 27:28 I mean all of these all of these things are very very unhelpful to us and I 27:34 think it’s possible to have a deeply spiritual outlook on life without being you know a Christian or or or a Muslim
The Beacon of Item 54 [I was afraid to lose my self-control]
HRS: It was difficult to control my thoughts.
Ep123: Shadow Factor (SHA)
Ep123: Non-existent Shadow Factor (NSF)
Ep123: The Non-existent Shadow Factor
Orig Post
omg p.m. March 14, 2023 Cybermonk
1106 addendum
2:25:00
inspired voice recording i promise to produce and upload asap
i commit to it out of all the many good solid voice recordings lately
hilarious lexicon
11-Factors psychedelic psychometrics questionnaires & CEQ and DISASTER ANALYSIS of this pseudo science and how to remedy making it an ACTUAL STEM Science.
I “discovered” Factors 12 & 13 before, now I received inspired hilarious PERFECT lexicon
Cluster F Analysis
Virtual Factor 12 (VIR)
(10 non-factor items from Ocean, 6 from Visionary of OAV)
Shadow Factor 13 (SHA)
contains my fav number, 54, my trusty beacon of light through the worm-infested – don’t look under the hood , don’t lift the lid or your childish illusions aboutt this “psychedelic science” will panic you throw of rock cliff to death when you see the snaky worms under the hood of psychedelic “sicnece”
brilliantly perfect analoyg of a storage room with well lit part and poorly lit part, darkest corner has a box, with NO LABEL containing 54 I WAS AFRAID TO LOSE MY SELF CONTROL
I explain ram seizure caught by THE MORE YOU ASSERT POSSIBILISM-THINKING , THE MORE YOU GO OUT OF CONTROL, the furnace monster = possibilism-thinking TEARS ITSELF APART by its own self-defeating efforts.
1106 addendum
i got it!: i now “got” yesterday’s insight that I was struggling to articulate and to hang onto re: with {upside down middle ram is not standing on left leg} maps to {the middle, good simple tree crown} that’s not touching the ceiling/floor.
I’m not claiming that’s super ultra elegant, forced upon us, but it IS meant by artist, I believe: It is good to not touch ground.
The middle ram says “It is good not to touch ground relying on left foot just like the middle crown of simple tree = good b/c non-branching.”
the quirk of:
middle ram left foot not touching ground. <– PUZZLE QUESTION: Explain the particular motif-problem that is presented to us by the artist as a challenge of “what did I mean here?”
/ end of addendum
I explain how all the articles citing CEQ or Sanders Moving Past Mysticism or Letheby or 11-factors or Petter Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell points STRAIGHT to the art genre topics communicated, branching-message mushroom trees is:
the PERFECT ANTIDOTE to bullsh*t pseudo-coverage of bad trips is this art genre about the destruction of standing on left leg = relying on possibilism-thinking.
How the new metaphysics — pursuing exactly Letheby’s call for direction, and Johnson’s call for direction, forces creation of the new mental model of control agency and branching-possibility world.
The vector asserted by Matthew Johnson & Letheby & Johnstad points straight to the ram-seizure furnace depicted perfectly on-point by Eadwine & art genre of branching-message mushroom trees which includes handedness & non/branching;
handedness = mental model transformation about CONTROL;
non/branching = mental model transformation about TIME/ WORLD/ POSSIBILITIES (the alleged world in which alleged control agency kubernetes steersman helmsman king-with-sceptre).
Recorded in 1 take. No music. mostly dead-silent room, so high-fidelity, high intelligibility of my speech, and very easy to produce soon
#1 objective of the world is to eliminate psilcybin so I won’t allow that, I specifiy psil.
110factors is PERFECT RELEVANT example of how NARRATIVE contradicts DATA.
Narrative: there are 11 factors (42 items).
data reality: 66; the 11 factor q’air IF THEY WOULD HAND IT OVER FOR GRRIFITHS TO CONCRETELY SEE WHAT THE F THE 11-FACTORS Q’AIR ACTUALLY CONTAINS, is not just “all 13 ANX + ICC” factors, but also 8 other hidden suppressed items – this is the fault of Erich studerus, alex gamma, & franz vollenweider mis-used of spotlight stage-magic promotional marketing NARRATIVE vs. “technically our q’air contains all 66 OAV items” but narrative = 42 item, not the #54 afraid/control.
Excellent content is topic: My List of 10 Kindergarden Q’s that Psych “Science” Cannot Answer:
why was #54 afraid/control placed into ANX, not ICIC (ICC)?? Figure S1 & S2 Studerus 2010
My lexicon cuttingly mocks, calling it the ICIC category, b/c I see it lacks #54.
Renaming ICC Factor from: Impaired Control & Cognition (ICC) to: Impaired Control & Impaired Cognition (ICIC)
I see what you’ve done in the 11-Factors/CEQ trainwreck of this dragon-infested Pseudo-Science field.
CEQ: UNCHARTED TERRITORY, HERE LIES SHADOW DRAGON MONSTERS, “Almost 40% of Griffiths’ high-dose clients have a bad trip” (see Houot’s dissertation against Surrenderism).
What a disaster, of the first magnitude!!
why do you combine two distinct kinds in a single factor jumbled indiscriminately together, in DIRECT SELF CONTRADICTION OF YOUR SCIENCE OF CLUSTER F ANALYSIS 😅 😅
“DED” = Dread of What? False Theory Baked-in: “of Ego Dissolution”
That’s the standard pseudo-explanation matching that of Journal of Psychedelic Studies‘ Article “Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell”
List of 10 Kindergarden Q’s Psychedelic (Pseudo) Science Can’t Answer
tbd, a few are above
Why can’t Griffiths get a concrete copy of the 11-Factors q’air? So he wouldn’t have been ABLE to “accidentally” delete item #54 and the 8 hidden Unpleasant effects.
Why is there no name of the 11-Factors q’air, so that everyone calls it by a different name; what is the goddam name of 11-Factors q’air? Why doesn’t it have a name? Shoddy sloppy careless lexicon = Pseudo-Science, vs. STEM style of explanatory model construction & communication.
Why does it take me a full month of intensive research to get basics?
If this is a science, how come there’s no Wiki articles about it?
Why is Walter Stace’s the only book as the alleged “scientific basis“, but it’s out of print, and 63 years out of date, and isn’t (i guess, dbl check) psychedelics-informed?
Backup Note from branching-message mushroom trees Article
11-Factors’ Shadow factor 13 (SHA)
About 11-Factors’ Shadow factor 13 (SHA): defined as the 8 Dread items that are in the Unpleasant Experiences high-level factor[dimension|scale], including the beacon of light guiding us through the dark wormy forest of Psychedelic Pseudoscience, Dread (DED) item #54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.
Ocean/Visionary unaccounted items are Virtual factor 12 (VIR).
Quote Houot’s dissertation: Nearly 40% reported extreme fear in Griffiths hi-dose, under optimal conditions. Yet, CEQ silently omitted the key effects.
Psychedelic “Science” suppressing and repressing the shadow dragon monster by summarily tossing it into Wouter Hanegraaff’s Rejected wastebasket (BURY YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND HARDER) just guarantees continued 40% bad trips (best case) and guarantees failing to bring back the treasure of Transcendent Knowledge.
addl bak note
Sun light attached to Cubensis tree over horses = intense perception of control dynamics in peak loose cog state.
row 1: looking at nonbranching and balanced held by right arm, so that non-branching maps to held balanced by right arm maps (at high level) to: row 2: looking at scale balance + looking at ram weight on left foot, equating stand left foot maps to balance scale & death
Therefore the meta level connection is: row 1: non-branching maps to held balanced by right arm is like row 2: stand left foot maps to balance scale & death
so non-branching = balance (ie viable control)
Lines and boxes:
Row 1 left, white box & line: non-branching crown is looked at by horses
Row 2 middle, white box & line: God holding Higher level controller holding guy balanced by right arm, weight on right foot
Row 1, blue line connects {non-branching} with viable/balanced {2-level, dependent control}
Row 2, blue line connects {stand left foot}, {branching}, & {flames destroying} to {balance}
Middle: Vertical red line maps {standing weight on right foot} & {viable balance held up by right arm} to ego death corpse
Red line angled: connects standing viably on right foot vs. ram standing on left foot burnt up by monster flames hell-mouth furnace.
3 small white boxes on 3 cross-unders: right limb of both trees is visually cut; left (wrong) limb of corpse is visually cut.
[2:15 p.m. April 8, 2023] I just realized that this means that in f177, the Shroud ego-dead person = the guy balancing on right foot in that image, directly above Shroud.
Fresh capture & upload of inefficient png as Color Check March 12, 2023 Space-Wasting .png
todo: delete from server to free space, and upload and use a .jpg instead.
Left: Botched Cross-Under of Mushroom Tree & Awkward Right Ram Leg Hidden Under Border
Exactly 100% cut/mis-aligned. Helps indicate it’s deliberate. Errata: I initially claimed maybe on Egodeath Mystery Show that it’s 50% misaligned. No; more interestingly, it is exactly 100% mis-aligned.
The “perfectly botched” cross-under produces/achieves a form of {cut right trunk} and {cut branch}.
This is a {cut right branch} and a {non-branching branch} and a {cut branch} and a {cut right branch}.
Compare the 3 trees in f177 regarding this region of cutting.
Mushroom tree has deliberately botched cross-under.
Row 2 shroud: Right arm/wrist is not hidden of Shroud; in ego death, non-branching reality is visible/ unveiled.
Guy on right of row 2 Middle holding shroud, left hand hides right foot, key tree Y hides I cross-under (branching hides non-branching reality), 2 rams have hidden right foot, he looks at the 2 ram hidden “true” right feet and the key tree’s I branch (“true” branch’s) cross-under veiled by Y branch.
Artist clearly choose to evidently choose to hide some right feet of … showed one ram’s right foot to prove the the other two (most of them) are intentionally/ meaningfully hidden/veiled.
More below, I’m keeping it at the place where discovered b/c solution came from the rams section down there, hidden rams feet problem, why most but not all right feet hidden (very artificially by artist; awkward = meaningful).
Row 1: awkward cross-under.
Row 2: awkward ram #3’s right foot under border.
SLOPPY INEPT ARTIST SHOULDA PLANNED AHEAD BETTER 🤨
why didn’t my sweep pick up this yesterday crop? Did I lose data? Did I forget to upload this? I shouldn’t have to re-upload these. try upload, see if -1 is added. No, evidently I never uploaded it! After my long writing on “pointless loiterers” yesterday.
todo: make crop, of Row 2 panel 1+2. AW MAN SAW LAME TRUE ISOMORPHMWITH PANELS 1 THROUGH 3! his left hand hides — I was complaining 1-2 days ago, that he holds the good right angle with his BAD left hand! it’s isomorphic! Panel 1 and 2 and 3. I have to crop 1-3 not 1-2!
Row 2 Left: Awkward Inconsistent Ram Right Legs Hidden
OMG ITS OFFICIAL i solved the deliberately botched cross-behind in f177 msh tree [10:16 p.m. March 18, 2023] It says to look at the cross-behinds pattern. Branching appearance hides the non-branching reality.
Visible right wrist hiding left, centered on the stable tower. Seeing the veiled non-branching right-hand limb, makes stable control.
Hands crossed over: in the egodeath state, the right limb is no longer obscured by the left. It makes sense that the crossed arms are a focal point of meaning. guy on right: Though his left hand hides the right foot, he’s looking at the 3 cross-unders (2 rams, simple key tree’s I branch). So he is “right-i-fied”. Wrapped person then has:
right shoulder hidden by right hand so that’s OK.
right wrist visible so that is GOOD.
right angle hidden by left hand but owner is looking at 3 cross-unders so that’s OK.
The Egodeath theory 
