Purpose and Requirements of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism

Cybermonk March 21, 2023, early a.m.

Contents:

  • Purpose and Benefit of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
  • What are the harms of not knowing adult-level transcendent knowledge; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism?
  • Requirements
  • Medical
  • Academic
  • Age
  • Additional Points from Wrmspirit

mobile app starter post , voice mis-transcription

wrmspirit commented on the branching-message mushroom trees draft article, these questions.

Crop by Cybermonk — person who knows transcendent knowledge of control stability instructs the cubensis traders. Canterbury Psalter image F145 row 1 left

Purpose and Benefit of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism

What is the purpose and benefit of the theory of Psychedelic Eternalism for the ordinary state world?

mytheme answer: become adult imperishable perfected immortal ; be able not in the ordinary state but be able to enter the altered state. be reconciled with the gods , show reverence , honor them for good fortune good relationships with the stable well formed society according to traditional religious mythology-based societies

, these are benefits of people being completed initiates into transcendent knowledge into the proper well formed adult form.

I start by removing all expectations and marketing promises and saying that we don’t know and we cannot assume and should not assume as in the book way of Zen by Alan Watts:

first you live normal life, and then you get enlightened, and then you live normal life.

The mind matures from the child form to the adult form so what is the benefit of the adult form which is enlightenment which is completion of initiation which is a Transcendent Knowledge Witches Psilocybin which which is psilocybin transforming the mind the mental world model of the world not just of “the self “.

Learning the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism is identical with moving from the immature form to the mature form this is all certified by all traditional mythology.

ask the Greeks what is the benefit of Mystery religion completion of initiation

that is the benefits of knowing this theory.

Means being in relationship with the gods with the higher knowledge

it means knowing what an adult is supposed to know by design

A great other vector another strategy to answer the question is what are the harms of not knowing transcendent knowledge

What are the harms of not knowing adult-level transcendent knowledge; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism?

knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism means coming to your proper form

it means being healthy and correctly well formed in development, whatever the benefits of that are, instead of being developmentally blocked and stunted and childish and limited and immature and failing to understand.

by knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism, we get to comprehend our own religious mythology legacy, instead of being stupefied and incapable of understanding our own religious mythology traditions.

The benefit is comprehending standard knowledge by the standards of religious mythology,

collectively we will no longer be stupid and uncomprehending of our own previous adult level accomplishments and explorations and knowledge

Look at the leader Wouter Hanegraaff fails to comprehend the most basic elementary things and completely gets backwards how the mind develops

he has to delete all the stars in the skies rather than rising up through the Saturn rebirth gate and landing in the stars, which is heimarmene, which is eternalism-thinking

His backwards model of mental development that he’s trying to force onto astral ascent mysticism

he got confused by the complexities and advanced tricks that they did in late antiquity, where they twisted around the basic religious mythology to try to give the false impression, which they did give Hanegraaff the false impression that we move from eternalism to possibilism, giving amplified “freedom” and “personal empowerment”.

That tells you how 100% oblivious academics are and utterly failing and doing massive category errors.

we will no longer be at a childish incomprehension, completely uncomprehending of adult-level things, as we have been all during the 20th century.

so what are the benefits of no longer being at a childish level, with incomprehension of all higher knowledge?

what is the benefit of adult higher knowledge, rather than being limited to childish level of understanding philosophy and religion and mythology?

personally for me it meant that I could relax and avoid perfectionism and stop expecting with a tendency of expecting perfect control.

not that I necessarily ever expected perfect control, but I expected best case —

a good example of people who have and exercise self-control throughout their lives

and my own ability, my proven ability in high school and college to date: I expected to have a familiar level and degree of non-problematic control all the time.

But I did expect a certain kind of “non-dysfunctional cross-time control”, my best phrase.

In high school with homework responsibilities and early college with regarding homework responsibilities I really loved schoolwork but other things to and I was having serious difficulties with cross time self-management by October 1985

But I was in a theoretically ideal very ideal situation where if I could just coordinate myself across time everything would be going as well as possible very excellent

and so that was the project that I said about with to repair this bug and my father gave me all of the knowledge from newage self-help personal transpersonal psychology.

and I was still it was a race between my continued failures with my continued dysfunctional Pour across time self control and a lot of friction

but I had a part of the problem part of the mix was my keeping a positive attitude and believing that things could work out and that I could harness ego transcendence and the knowledge of satori Alan Watts’ “other way of thinking” that he wrote about

that we could discover when the Zen master Brad hit you on the head with a stick while I wasn’t so impressed with Alan Watts’ overuse overreliance on making mystical vague poetry his foundation for explanation —

but in the Way of Zen by Alan Watts did not always use vague poetry as his foundation

sometimes he also wrote in a clear way

he was a mix of clarity and mysticism

the bad awful dysfunctional positive valuation of the worst traits of Mysticism which revels in incomprehension and fog and vagueness and enjoys that and promotes and advocates that

and which is the very exact opposite of stem STEM

in January 1988 when I discovered the essence of this theory this theory was a big complete clearing the blackboard clearing the slate and resetting my expectations regarding cross- time control and removing any particular expectation about this theory delivering cross- time control and becoming non-dysfunctional

I no longer expected the theory to make me non-dysfunctional

that was a relaxing positive development knowing that life will inherently have limited ability

and then it just became a brand new fresh problem for me :

“how then are we to live”

how am I to conduct myself knowing that my future thoughts already exist yet I have a burden to carry of assignments, major extreme heavy Advanced level engineering assignments to do

Upper level advanced heavy academic responsibility workload to execute

and no philosophy arm waving is going to change that

I am having to steer my way and exert control effort and control myself across time remained a extremely real situation

and my new theory that I possess eg May 1988 and I have a good cassette here, voice recording of my grappling with these realities after enlightenment About limited, the inherent inability to reach across time and do posi-control.

there can be no posi-control in that sense.

I did not need to expect that, if I expected it before.

I don’t need to expect and demand that out of myself now.

and so that was a healthy relaxing, even though it did not answer all my practical questions about my very heavy workload that I had to conduct and control and manage and execute and exert.

we need to get real

like Cyberdisciple I ridicule the so-called benefits and

the whole concept of benefits needs to be mocked and rejected,

I mean the way that benefits are thrown around all these promises and all these kinds of promises that are made and these preconceptions and expectations and wishful thinking

I reject and I ridicule the kinds of promises that are made from Transcendent Knowledge

knowing this theory will measurably reduce the size of your ego by as many as several percentage points, and you ought to be proud of that.

knowing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism will measurably reduce the size of your ego compared favorably over the size of the egos of other, inferior, ignorant people,

Requirements

What requirements, limitations, restrictions, and precautions are noted in the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism as related to the stability and health of the mind prior to experiencing Psychedelic Eternalism, such as for those with chronic depression, suicidal ideation and anxiety?

psychedelics cause manic depression they cause depression and

I don’t see the logic of the Psychedelics Science knows that these effects can occur commonly even typically

and why then would psychedelics be useful for treating depression when psychedelics cause depression, they cause manic depression and throw the psyche left and right all over the place

how is that automatically going to be a useful thing

the jury is out

Deceitful Terence McKenna miss lead and misrepresented himself as high dose psilocybin for years after he had stopped using it because of intensive vertigo existential vertigo

that is a self control problem to be taken most seriously

I do not claim that the only challenging experience from caused by Psilocybin is positive control-Chasing whirlwind seizure/ instability.

Another problem that can be as intense is the existential vertigo and manic depression as Terence McKenna experienced to the degree that he stopped taking mushrooms but pretended that he continued

Medical

What medical conditions and medications are listed as possible risk factors and contraindications for experiencing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism, i.e. chronic hypertension, heart disease, and respiratory insufficiency.

What I have to say here would be no different at all then what all the psilocybin Oregon & Colorado psilocybin clinics say.

A big wrinkle for Michael Pollan — How To Change Your Mind – was his heart condition

that was a big concern of his entering into the altered state sessions, but he assessed the risk to be minor.

Search Oregon Health Authority psilocybin

Academic

What academic requirements are necessary for the meaningful understanding of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism as related to ordinary world state of western religion and its religious archetypes?

my writing style targets 8th grade level.

the standard abstracted ideal concept of reading at eighth grade level so-called

ideally everything I write and polish ought to be readable by eighth graders.

this means using every day words and especially means short sentences, short words, short paragraphs, short sections.

complicated by the fact that Apple founder electrical engineer the Woz re-designed computers in seventh grade to reduce the chip count

and complicated by the fact that by my standard I always thought that seventh graders are incapable of reading, and I was officially measured and tested and described as reading at a high school senior level when I was in fifth grade 🤷‍♂️

Age

What age requirements are there for experiencing the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism?

my point of reference is what age are people interested in and drawn towards exploring this realm.

the tradition in mythology is onset of Beard age.

Child equals not knowing transcendent knowledge, adult to be an adult is to know Transcendent Knowledge , aka The mature form of the human

psilocybin is considered integral to human development as is supported by the new book psilocybin connection , a solid book, articulate and directly emphasizes this point, which worked out perfectly for me with good timing.

I rejected this book for my references section just because I’ve run out of word count

but I will consider and

limited word count means that I could only write one sentence about any of these questions

and have to stay focused on the very most core very most interesting and distinctive points that I have to deliver, and not be expending word count discussing other peoples ideas

not even connecting their ideas to my ideas, but the article needs to really just only exclusively be my ideas, because I need to use most of my word count to discuss the features of the art images, more than discussing interaction of my theory with other people’s ideas.

Additional Points from Wrmspirit

Wrmspirit posted a comment to the present page after posting the orig comment on the branching-message mushroom trees article page.

Wrmspirit wrote:

“It’s good when writing a theory that requires a mental shift from the ordinary state into the mystic altered state, to note the purpose and benefit.

“The benefit of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism is primarily for the mystic altered state itself, in avoiding failure of mental transformation.

___

“Regarding the question about what academic requirement is necessary for a meaningful understanding of western religion and its religious archetypes is not about what grade level of writing the theory uses.

“But rather how can the characters within the story of Christianity, used for transformation in the mystic altered state, be understood, if their original role is not familiar.

___

“There is an assumption in the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism of everyone knowing the details of Christianity, which is not true.

Thus, the question of what academic requirement might be necessary for meaningful understanding of transformation through the metaphor of Christianity, remains a valid question.

___

“Not everyone knows about Christianity so how helpful is it to use the characters of Christianity if the entire plot isn’t familiar?

That is the meaning of the question.”

Yes I have been wondering about that; Hatsis had to go hunt down and I have too, non-canonical stories in Christendom – eg stories of saints. Semi-Biblical figures: Enoch, Lamech. Eustace. Martin window two panes, pages 122-123 The Holy Mushroom, color edition.

___

“Also, the critical analysis of vague poetic writing as expression of the experience of the mystic altered state, might reveal a higher level of importance for poetic writing, when remembering the vast amount of reflective metaphor used for expression of the mystic altered state throughout the history of literature and religion.”

I differentiate and integrate two legs of the Egodeath theory: Core theory (no reliance on mythic analogies), and distinctly, religious mythemes and art motifs, as analogies.

The two legs bolster each other, if kept distinct and not conflated.

Right now the field of Psychedelic Science is struggling with “integrate and differentiate”: they think either you have to completely remove mysticism, or else, have mysticism entirely saturate your methodology. Moving Past Mysticism: Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism Provides Scientific Basis, Superseding “Mysticism, Meditation, & Psychotherapy” Framework – 2023/01/15

___

“When poetry sneaks its way into the intellect, not even the guard on duty can deny its entrance.

“Enchanted by the magnetic sound of light dancing its way into the shadows of dark, in rhythm of soulful spirit, gives life to breath and birth to death, throughout the foundation of the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism.”

/ end of wrmspirit comments

Proof that Psychedelic Psychometrics Science Is Pseudoscience: You’re Not Allowed to See the Questionnaires

totally unrelated note 2:55 i grasp canterbury f134 sword is the threat of loss of control or simply loss of control. 🔥 🗡🐉🚪 fire is loss of control aka the threat of loss of control = angel gate guard flaming sword, blade = arrowhead (psalter viewer) = spear = affliction not epilepsy, but the threat of loss of control aka loss of control. PAUL’s affliction on road to Damascus fall from “horse” Balaam donkey angel blocking path is the threat of loss of control = the challenging dread experiencing the threat of loss of control is the challenging experience is the negative mystical experience – I steer my horse donkey that I ride but it lies down on the path of control instability, donkey lie down = the threat of loss of control = sword that the msh tree guy hangs– just a sec–

HEY YOU IN THE TREE! GET DOWN FROM THERE!! IM TRYIN TO THINK HERE, WTF!!

Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk

floating sage with limbless looker means advanced recognition of the wrong hands which (skipping the feet, 1 level of analogy indirection) is wrong basis of ctrl as he receives = ingests the msh from bucket

f134 Row 2 Right

Because his eyes are attached to the floating guy who represents definitely advanced comprehension in contrast to the simple red guy the red youth who has simple basic understanding

given that the funnel hat floating guy his feet are isomorphic with the floating feet of the guy in the tree , that means that the Limbless Looker who is attached as an extra set of eyes — he has no function with his feet or hands, but he serves purely as a pointer to look to point to the {wrong hands} receiving the cubensis

this looking represents the advanced knowledge about the ramifications of having the wrong hand position when receiving the cubensis

Crop by Cybermonk

The limbless youth’s pointer-eyes look at the newbie enthusiast psychonaut’s hands, which has the left hand down

and then the next level of analogy is that the given that the left hand is down

that means that the left foot is down

and the next level of analogy is that the left foot down means relying on possibility branching thinking as the control foundation, which is known by the advanced interpreter of this image to be unstable control, which amounts to the loss of control until the mind is driven and taught and instructed to put the right foot down instead, which means to rely on eternalism thinking world model with two-level dependent control

I see this instruction the session guides in a very intimate a charming relatable and realistic seen an F145 image number F145

Crop by Cybermonk

solved: I have now proved through ESP that the limbless looker in Canterbury image F14501 left is looking at the guy who is floating on the two demons

and this is used to meaningfully–

this pointer is used to connect two appropriate items :

the scroll in row two, and the msh importer’s feet

and also to look simultaneously , so as to connect so as to connect the guy who is floating on the animal-thinking demons, one of them holding a branching pitchfork standing on the left leg, and the other one holding a non-branching rope who is standing on the right claw.

The people who are in charge of stocking the Mushroom lockboxes through foreign imports are teaching the traders advanced knowledge of the two mental models including the instability — see the handheld balance scale — the instability of the Possibility branching mental world model, in contrast with:

The stability of the second, mature mental world model, which has instead of autonomous monolithic ego mental model in a branching world instead has a two-level model of dependent control in a non-branching world, per the eternalism mental model.

The most frequently useful names of the Egodeath Theory

also a correction to my draft of branching message Mushroom trees article

regarding settling the names of my theory I do not think that a good main name is the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism — intuitively I feel that the better trade-off is a shorter name without the problematic awkward heavy word ‘cybernetic’ i

nstead I would rather define

for the purposes of efficient name of theory I would rather redefined the word eternalism and redefine it to focus on cybernetics and to fold the self control topic into it

because yes we do need to emphasize control transformation of mental model more than the word eternalism can bear , BUT:

here’s the problem

does the word ‘cybernetics’ actually succeed at supplementing the word eternalism regarding control?

it brings confusion and alienation without earning it’s wordy word count

it is not a net gain

a Long wordy name is like a formal living room that nobody uses it is maybe technically technically it is the correct name technically but that is distinct from every day practical naming

in naming products you always want to have a long formal verbose name which nobody ever uses and then more practically everyone makes up a short name which might even conflict with the legal formal full long name but everybody ignores the legal formal long name of the product and everybody even the official product in practice everybody uses a shorter name the long name is impractical here is an impractical although technically correct name of the theory:

the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism

awkward technically correct and will never be used it has poor meme propagation it is not nimble it is not agile it is not fast it is a slow name

really is kind of it reminds me all too much of my domain name “CybTrans.com” – Tone deaf as far as practical marketing

it is technically accurate, but and I come back to again a better performance

better performing name that has a better score on word count versus meaning and ease of use is the shorter name from which you can I believe reconstruct the entire theory even without the word cybernetics:

the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism

which is so much snappy like “Egodeath.com” quick to write quick to say it is not incorrect and in theory you could reconstruct the entire theory from this short name even without the word cybernetics A proof of that is that William James complained about block universe because of such control agency implications that the ego kubrrnetes is an illusion

My gut feeling with all things considered an carefully weighing scale of balance regarding the delicate trade-off of the word count of the name of the theory versus what is communicated in that name I I’m really leaning towards favoring the short elegant term this is kind of a compromise

The theory name:

the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism

is an objectively better tradeoff of word count versus meaningfulness than the theory name:

the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism

there is nothing gained there’s not a net game by adding the word cybernetics because although it adds clarity it also brings a lot of cost and so I am thinking of having the long name as a auxiliary miner name but have the short name as the primary main name I feel my gut feeling is that the shorter name has a better market value better utility it is a more useful name in practice we’re not going to have everybody throwing around a long name we will easily have everyone throwing around the short name t

he long name is simply too long , and that’s that; yes it is in fact the name the formal name but it’s not a name that anybody will ever use very much or employ very much in terms of frequency of use it is really sufficient to simply say the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism —

And here’s an interesting argument in favor of that

I’ll bet that you could reconstruct if you did not know anything about the Theory I’ll bet that you could reconstruct it from the short name and you would not need to throw in the word cybernetics

original posting

Mobile app voice mis-transcription

Citations & Secret Item Tallies & References: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#Psychedelics-Questionnaires

After you show me the 11-Factors, put it in my hands, give me the URL that is the questionnaire, cough it up, hand it over, LET US SEE IT, this is not Science.

Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, and Roland Griffiths were unable to obtain the concrete Studerus 11-Factors questionnaire and misunderstood it to only consist of 42 items instead of the full set of 66 OAV 1994 items (psychedelic effects questions).

That explains why they didn’t see the concrete set of all 21 high-level Unpleasant Experiences dimension items, including item 54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.

ICC + ANX + SHA = DED

Why would we trust the obfuscating, complicated blob of math (cluster F analysis) that’s attached to the poor reasoning of a group of people who can’t even do basic adding of numbers up to 21?

Psychedelic “Science” soundly based on unavailable, vague, rumored, mythical psychometrics questionnaires: is this STEM?

Matthew Johnson is unable to add the numbers 7+6+8 = 21 when forming CEQ’s Initial Item Pool 😞

The shadow dragon monster item, the hot potato, behind closed doors in a dark room playing a shell game, Item 54 goes missing.

The Vanishing Dragon Trick

🎩🪄💨🐉 🤷‍♂️

You cannot get a college textbook specifying these mythical phantom questionnaires.

I don’t believe these questionnaires even exist.

There are no wikipedia articles.

Everything is behind closed doors.

nothing is available for you to look at

the articles are so incomprehensible that Roland Griffiths himself misread the 11 factors article and didn’t realize that there are 21 rather than 13 items in the high-level Unpleasant (= DED) dimension.

Do you even realize that there exists a high-level Unpleasant Experiences dimension in 11-factors q’air?

Evidently not, or else Roland Griffiths would have added all 21 Unpleasant experiences (DED) items to the initial item pool for the CEQ.

and would not have been able to make the “accidental” mistake of omitting eight out of the 21 dread “Dread of Ego Dissolution” (DED) Dittrich OAV items.

btw Dittrich in 1985, why did you simply assume , baked right into your name of the dimension, that what we dread is so-called “ego dissolution”?

How do you know, before you’ve even done the research, that what we dread is so-called “ego dissolution” — which a recent article says stop using that term, because it’s too vague to be scientifically useful.

Per the Egodeath theory — the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism — what we dread above all. most gloriously, is the threat of loss of control (control-instability, which is effectively no control) because we are, firstly, control agents — so much so , that we don’t even realize that that’s what we are.

The threat of loss of control = 🔥 = 🐉 guarding the 🏆🏅 treasure of Transcendent Knowledge brought back and enabling you with the correct requisite psychonaut spacesuit new garment to {be able go in and out through the gate} 🔥🗡🚪🍄🌳 as the Bible promises as the reward at the end of time

and when “the ego dissolves”, that means control agency dissolves — along with the world in which it has the power to steer collapses into non-branching, and all the branches get cut off

we are afraid and paranoid our future control thoughts already permanently exist and are created for us and forced upon us

Canterbury f177 Row 2 Left: Left-Leg-Relying Rams in Control-Instability Fire Dragon Mouth

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-rams-sideways.jpg” 1 MB [10:01 p.m. March 19, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom#

Row 2 Middle Right: Balance

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-row2-middle-balance.jpg” 351 KB [2:35 a.m. March 11, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom#

Row 2 Right: Cubensis Lockbox, Stable Buildings

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-row2-right.jpg” 346 KB [1:38 a.m. March 11, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom#

I’m Paranoid About this Cluster F Analysis Scientistic Process

speaking of paranoia Roland Griffiths CEQ article says do not use the paranoia factor that we seat-of-the-pants added out-of-band at the last minute, and we put in an item that doesn’t belong there so don’t use it the aggression item

Some science this is ; real “science” here, that delivers a Paranoia factor while telling you don’t use it because it’s bunk

There is only one paragraph in the 11 factors article admitting the existence of the two high-level scales

Studerus confusingly explains how they “dropped” items 3, 14, 26, 54, & 66-1/2 for either cluster F analysis reason A or reason B,

and that is what is foisted upon us as an explanation for how they magically made the shadow dragon monster vanish into thin air, of item 54: I was afraid to lose my self control and it’s a similar story with HRS questionnaire item: it was difficult to control my thoughts.

but shine the marketing spotlight over here, onto only the low-level 11 factors only which conveniently Photoshops-out the eight undesirable items and the 16 unaccounted for Pleasant items too – the 16 items in the Virtual factor 12 (VIR) and the 8 items in Shadow factor 13 (SHA).

How does it make any sense mathematically according to cluster F analysis (F stands for factor) To confabulate a low level factor named the compound named jumble things together “impaired control and cognition (ICC)”

I have improved the name of the ICC factor by clarifying that its name is “impaired control and impaired cognition (ICIC).

you won’t allow me to see 11-factors questionnaire in your psychedelic pseudoscience

and you won’t even allow Roland Griffiths to see it so that he can conveniently make the “accidental” mistake of deleting and omitting and never seeing in the first place 8 out of the 21 Dread/ DED/ Unpleasant items (38%)

maybe you can do the complex mathematics to tell me what percentage of unpleasant items does that make — 38%

presto-chango, vanished into thin air , because he didn’t have his hands on the concrete, slap it down on the table, 11 factors questionnaire, with count them

meet my tally challenge my tally test:

how many items are in the high-level Unpleasant experiences dimension of the 11-factors questionnaire and tell me the tally count

how many negative experiences items are not a member of any factor within the high-level Unpleasant dimension?

The correct answer is 8 out of the 21 dread angst OAV classic 1994 questionnaire from Dittrich.

See my tables of contents of my pages about these questionnaires for the secret tally counts to track and inventory and keep track of all 21 of the Dread items so that none of them can “accidentally” go missing — to the convenience of people who are trying, more interested in marketing their ordinary-state Grief counseling services, by deleting altogether the entire Dread category of negative challenging psychedelic effects, through sleight-of-hand shell game in the dark; you’re not allowed to look at the questionnaires, you little people.

Stand back, because we, behind closed doors playing shell games in the dark, are not allowing you to see the questionnaires which are the muddy, tottering , unstable foundation of this psychedelic “science”, as Studerus says:

S’s 2010 article page 2 covertly cites, using a mysterious obfuscating citation number 20 claiming that item 20 is the sound solid, tried and true (like the great historian Thomas Hatsis) scientific foundation basis for this tottering tower of mystical psychedelic science

well what is item 20 , secretly obfuscated 🤔 ??

Walter Stace’s 1960 book, Mysticism and Philosophy (out of print).

which says that mystical experiences are purely positive;

no mystic ever had a negative experience

see that reasoning on page 2 of Studerus article 2010 , that a positive experience is “therefore” mystical and a negative experience is “therefore” not mystical but rather a bad trip instead.

item 54, The shadow dragon monster; I was afraid to lose my self-control.

The scientific mysticism basis of this Science, citation 20, dated by 63 years, severely criticized by Charles Stang of Harvard Divinity school saying it fails to match the historical older historical mystics archives of negative experiences, which Studerus p. 2 reasons that these are negative experiences and “therefore” they are not mystical

and that this is “vouchsafed” — to use Erik Davis’s words he says “it must be acknowledged that all of this dubious tottering tower falling over a Psychedelics science vouchsafed by research from Walter Stace that’s 63 years out of date”

(and probably doesn’t even cover psychedelics, I’d have to double check)

and if you doubt the soundness of the foundation basis of our mystical science, the psychedelic science of mystical “complete mystical experiences”, then we’ll hit you with the intimidating citation of William James 1902, hot off the press!

just like Erwin Panofsky giving us the list of all the discussions which the art historians of covered mushrooms — which consists of a single book he calls “little”, that was already 50 years out of date in 1952, a single, 86-page book that only lists the word ‘pilzbaum’ five times

Remember there are so many ways which we are reminded that the most prejudiced, biased and anti-scientific and in-denial field filled with the most bluster and fallacious argumentation

it’s the veritable gallery of , the best place that you can find all fallacious argumentation and posturing and bluffing, is in the field of psychedelics and entheogen scholarship

everyone is shaking in their shoes in terror and fear having a challenging experience of dealing with the name the secret bad guy in John Allegro it’s so everyone is dancing around dance dance trembling in fear –

We need to Photoshop out allegro and ideas that resonate with his ideas for marketing purposes photo shop out John allegro and his book cover

at least the book cover proposes that we can look and see mushrooms in our own religion

so no one’s supposed to propose that now , because that is the third rail, the allegro third rail

and so what kind of a travesty of “science” is going to result?

what kind of a scientific historiography is going to is bound to result from such a situation?

it’s all bluster, it’s all prejudiced, nobody can think straight

So you have Robert M Price , grand editor of the journal of higher criticism, making all kinds of sixth-grader errors when he goes to critique Acharya S’ The Christ Conspiracy book for favorably mentioning Allegro. Price opened his mouth and said something about psychoactives in case you were wondering whether he’s clueless as a rock now you know for sure the answer.

No surprise, since his wife wrote a psychedelics-oblivious book about the rock band Rush, which is a Philosophy band and therefore obviously would never use psychedelics.

but after my 64-page article set Price straight about Allegro, he is so reconciled with Acharya ( as she thanked me for) that Robert Price now has done a super editor re-writing of her book to make it more scholarly and has produced a deluxe version of her book.

and another thing why is there no name of the 11-factors q’air? every time anyone refers to it they refer to that questionnaire by a different name because nobody can get their hands on it

it doesn’t exist

dream: he knows too much! why does he know so much and articulate it so well?

I just remembered a dream that I had again type of dream I had again

I heard a random guy , presumably not very informed, articulately and elegantly reciting my Egodeath theory – Why the hell does this well-spoken guy know literally everything I know?

the answer is: because I was playing recordings of my podcast while sleeping

this has happened to be about three times now

The Shell game, dark-of-night, Magic vanishing dragon trick 🎩🪄💨🐉

it’s a Myth

Psychedelic Science is a myth, it doesn’t exist; you are not allowed to see it, you little person, you are not allowed to see our “science”.

You’re not allowed to give me a URL to concretely see these alleged nonexistent questionnaires.

There is only one paragraph in the 11-factors article by Studerus 2010 that mentions and admits that — despite their marketing of the shiny sparkly new 11 factors– there are actually two secret high-level factors which encompass all 66th of the OAV questionnaire items

hot potato item 54 shell game move 1: 🐉 exists:

Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 Figure S1, banished to a completely separate document by the marketing department, to hide the existence of the high-level dimensions– all 21 items of Studerus Unpleasant dimension = OAV’s Angst/Dread (DED) dimension.

hot potato item 54 shell game move 2: 🐉 still exists:

Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 supplemental separate document Figure S2

PRESTO CHANGE-O, Drakonium Vanishaie! 🎩🪄🎩🪄🎩🪄💨🐉 (gasp!!) 😲

Magicians Erich Studerus, Alex Gamma, and Franz Vollenweider 2010 main well-lit Figure 1 on prominent display in the showroom floor, sparkling polished floodlight lit – shows every single item within the ICC category factor /scale /subscale AND also comprehensively includes every single item within the anxiety (ANX) factor/ scale/subscale — missing not a single item of all two factors of the Unpleasant high level dimension 😑

they are all accounted for, every one, and none of them are missing — and yet, Item 54 is gone! 😯

somehow now there are only 13 instead of 21 Dread (DED) Unpleasant psychedelic effects items, and 54 has successfully gone missing

(takes a bow)

(APPLAUSE) by Psychedelic (Pseudo) Science

The shell game vanishing dragon trick to make item 54 vanish into thin air, so that Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson, and Roland Griffiths can conveniently “accidentally” not see the eight non-factor Unpleasant items, including item 54 , when confabulating the mythical, nonexistent CEQ, which you, little person, you are not allowed to see these q’airs, because this is Science, and we don’t allow you to concretely see our Science.

🚫🤚😑

Sorry, it’s a behind-closed-doors only , private event.

But you’re not allowed to see them, not even Frederick Barrett, Matthew Bradstreet,
Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Matthew Johnson,
and Roland Griffiths are allowed to see them, no one’s allowed to see all 66 items in the Studerus 11-factors questionnaire — which has eight different names, and everyone refers to it differently, because it does not exist, it’s a Myth.

This phantom “Psychedelic Science” doesn’t even exist.

“See Carbonaro article for details” , and the lack of basic explanation of how the CEQ Initial Item Pool relates to Study 1 & Study 2 is even more evident.

you show me the concrete 11 factors questionnaire — whatever the hell it’s name is because it doesn’t have an even have a name and everyone refers to it as the “the 5DASC which has 11 factors” ; it’s all garbled — and maybe I could call this an actual science.

Can’t get any intelligible consistent articles about these questions because nobody is able to get a hold of them nobody is allowed to see them

it’s all behind-the-back, behind closed doors

and even these scientist the pseudoscientists or confused about what the Studerus q’air contains

what its scope is

how many items?

this is my tally test, and you failed this

this science fails the tally test

Tell me, if psychedelic psychometrics science is a science , then tell me the tallies:

how many items are in the Unpleasant experiences high-level dimension of the Studerus 2010 11-factors questionnaire, which has 10 different names and so doesn’t even have a name

what is the Url where I can see and get my hands on Studerus 2010 11-factors questionnaire that doesn’t have a name

The 11-factors actually has 13 factors at the lower level + 2 high-level factors or scales or dimensions on the instrument pretentious bluster jargon jargon using cluster F analysis

The circle journal citation fest , throwing around the stock pseudo-explanation magic words: neuroplasticity, default mode network, ego dissolution, nondual unity oneness 😑

there: we have just explained everything, and can I be a member of your club now pls??

Why is it a great idea according to the mathematics science to have a set of eight unpleasant questions that are not a member of any of one of the 11 factors, and 16 items that are a member of the Pleasant experiences high-level dimension, but are not a member of any factor?

please explain this at a kindergarten level because I’m kind of stupid, I want some basic answers– but none are forthcoming.

what textbook will provide me with these answers? there isn’t any.

The 16 Pleasant experience items which are hidden and in denial that they exist, because the marketing department doesn’t want to shine the spotlight on the high-level dimensions but only wants to advertise and promote promote and market their shiny new sparkly low level 11 factors

and so there are 16 pleasant experience items which are not a member of any low level factor but they do and in fact constitute a set

which I have named since they failed to name it

I have named that set of 16 non-factor member items in the Pleasant Experiences high-level dimension Virtual factor 12 (VIR) 😇😊🦄

and I have named since they have neglected to name, their marketing department neglected to name the eight Unpleasant items which are not part of any of their highly touted advertised 11 factors, I have had to do their work for them in this pseudoscience

and I have named that set of 8 non-factor member items in the Unpleasant Experiences high-level dimension Shadow factor 13 (SHA) 😱😵🐉

well-lit with floodlights on the showroom floor is Figure 1, prominently displayed in the body of the Studerus 11-Factors article which Roland Griffiths was permitted to look at, which conveniently lists only 13 out of the Dread (DED) OAV items, so that the shell game could be successful in bluffing and magically making item 54 vanish into thin air through the smoke and mirrors which is the Psychedelic pseudo Science of psychedelic psychometrics questionnaires

(which are not available for YOU to look at, little person — or for anyone to look at concretely, not even Roland Griffiths).

🦄💨✅ VALIDATED 👍

No one actually has these questionnaires, they’re never published anywhere, they’re not available

all we have is articles about articles about validation of the rumored foggy myst.

we have validated our smoke and we have validated our mirrors too

I ate a can of beans, and after a couple hours they were validated 💨 😑

Presto-chango the magician makes the dragon disappear, the shadow dragon monster: item 54, I was afraid to lose my self control

it’s not a problem, because it doesn’t exist anymore, because you are not able to get your hands on and you are not allowed to see the 11 factors questionnaire which has eight names and has no name

it is “the 5DASC questionnaire which has 11 factors” which how many it fails my Tally Test: tell me, if you say this is a Science, a simple number:

how many items are in the high-level Unpleasant experiences dimension in Studerus 2010 questionnaire?

that spawned the offspring from hell, the CEQ monstrosity malformed Yaldabaoth

The CEQ is the broken wastebasket for the failures of the MEQ.

Timothy Leary’s MEQ. That people claim is from Walter Pahnke. But even Leary would have made a more negative set of items, going by the Tibetan book of the dead.

Cybermonk 9:23 a.m. March 20, 2023

Egodeath Mystery Show Ep234 – Never Surrenderism 🍄🌳💥🐏 (Jan. 29, 2023)

Cybermonk 9:41/10:39 p.m. March 19, 2023

Contents:

Download for 1 week starting p.m. March 19, 2023: https://we.tl/t-WizRic18LG

Length 1:44:33

146 MB stereo. with guitar, especially at end.
1.5 hours of voice, then 14:18 minutes of guitar at 1:30:00.

Content

I reconciled the Egodeath theory with Houot’s dissertation on anti-fear/pro-control psychedelic technology of symbols.

Control Harder! Exert that Left-Foot-Based Possibilism-Thinking!

Page title:
Idea Development page 16
Section heading:
Voice Recording Topics Jan. 29, 2023: Reconciled Houot Dissertation on Anti-Fear/Pro-Control Psychedelic Technology of Symbols
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/01/23/idea-development-page-16/#Voice-Recording-Topicssee the sections below this, for possible topics covered.

My page about Houot’s dissertation against Surrenderism:

Toward a Philosophy of Psychedelic Technology: An Exploration of Fear, Otherness, and Control (Houot 2019)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/01/22/toward-a-philosophy-of-psychedelic-technology-an-exploration-of-fear-otherness-and-control-houot-2019/

Timestamps/Summary

1.5 hours of voice, then 14:18 minutes of guitar at 1:30:00.

  • 0:00 – Intro.
  • 0:34 – Content. Houot’s dissertation
  • 5:00 – Houot puts a negative spin on mystics, and a positive spin on shamans.
  • 10:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 20:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 30:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 40:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 50:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 1:00:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 1:10:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 1:20:00 – hits on ‘surrender’ in dissertation
  • 1:29:04 – Outro for voice content.
  • 1:29:25 – Guitar. Star 40xx 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars. (14:18)
  • 1:43:43 – Outro again, marking end of guitar & episode.
  • 1:44:33 – End.
Guitar

Star 4047 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars
Star 4055 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars
Star 4056 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars
Star 4065 🎸🌌 Rebirth into the Sphere of Shattered Stars

Discussion of this planned episode:

Planned Egodeath Mystery Show episode: Read-through of “surrender” hits in Houot’s dissertation

Reading Houot dissertation hits on “surrender”

  • done: Produce at least recording VOX_TK_4741.wav (Jan 29 2023).
  • Upload .mp3 to WeTransfer.com and maybe to Egodeath.com.
  • Update section in Idea Dev p 16 to point to new dedicated episode page.
  • Post a page dedicated to the new Ep234 – pretty much done. Any notes will go here.
  • Update present section about this, Huot, in Idea Dev p. 18. Point to the new dedicated page.

Holy Sh*t — 23 .wav files recorded that day. This was the final, longest recording one of all day recording/speaking.

The Longest is this 4741, next longest is 4740, lots of other long ones that day –

BASICALLY WE’RE LOOKIN AT 16 HOURS STRAIGHT OF TALKING/ SPOKEN IDEA DEVMT ALL RECORDED ON TAPE THAT ONE DAY, a Sunday following an all-day Saturday reading of journal articles.

Voice was getting locking up, after standing for hours talking loud, but then my voice came back notably well after I sat down for for this 4741 recording.

haha so it seems I have to balance overuse of my hands typing, vs. overuse of my voice.

todo note: I still haven’t done the final polish of reading aloud Mark Hoffman’s Toxicology article 2015, my take 2 that came out professional voiceover quality:

Entheogens and the Ancient Mystery Religions (Evil M. Hoffman 2015)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/06/01/mark-hoffman-entheogens-and-the-ancient-mystery-religions/

Notes Weeks Prior to Production

Images

Ram Standing on Left Foot Causing Control Instability Loss of Control

Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk

Sacrifice of Child-Thinking Which Escalated to Non-Control Caused by Ram’s Left-Foot-Based Effort to Assert Control

Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk

NEVER SURRENDER: BRING BACK THE ETERNALISM-THINKING TREASURE THROUGH THE PSILOCYBIN LOSS-OF-CONTROL DRAGON-GUARDED GATE

Tip for Loose Cognitive Scientists: you may have to sacrifice a thicket-caught ram —

saw a nice one with golden fleece, in a tree with golden apples of immortality, in the garden of the hesperides, btw: guarded by Ladon drakon with zillion eyes who sees too much the loss-of-control vortex vulnerability hole in the side

Tech Notes

Recordings used: 1 only:

VOX_TK_4741.wav Jan 29 2023 1.11 GB

Miking

AT2020 “L” and CAD M39 “R” turned around, sitting below them. L / R switched then.

Brickwall eq assume:
L 4.5 3 -15
R 4.5 3 -10

assume 80 Hz cut, Limiter on the deck

See Also

Toward a Philosophy of Psychedelic Technology: An Exploration of Fear, Otherness, and Control (Houot 2019)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/01/22/toward-a-philosophy-of-psychedelic-technology-an-exploration-of-fear-otherness-and-control-houot-2019/

Page title:
Idea Development page 16
Section heading:
Voice Recording Topics Jan. 29, 2023: Reconciled Houot Dissertation on Anti-Fear/Pro-Control Psychedelic Technology of Symbols
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/01/23/idea-development-page-16/#Voice-Recording-Topics

4-Horses Mushroom Tree Right-Foot Balancing (Great Canterbury Psalter f177)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/12/4-horses-mushroom-tree-right-foot-balancing-great-canterbury-psalter-f177/

Cybermonk

Cybermonk March 19, 2023

Egodeath Mystery Show Ep228 – Complete Newbie Mystical Experience (Jan. 23, 2023)

Cybermonk, first posting of this dedicated page: 2:20 p.m. March 19, 2023, essentially an experiment

  • Download Link (2nd Time Available)
  • Long-Term Download (not available for most episodes)
  • Original Announcement of this Episode, & Description/Summary
  • Motivation for this Post

Download Link (2nd Time Available)

Download for 1 week starting March 19, 2023: https://we.tl/t-nOPwcafjRW

Large size: 293 MB 🐷 🐷

Long length: 3:22:00

Long-Term Download (not available for most episodes)

http://egodeath.com/mp3s/Ep228 Complete Newbie Mystical Experience.mp3

Original Announcement of this Episode, & Description/Summary

Page title:
Idea Development page 16
Section heading:
Egodeath Mystery Show Ep228 – Complete Newbie Mystical Experience (Jan. 23, 2023)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/01/23/idea-development-page-16/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-Ep228

Motivation for this Post

I rarely and only recently posted a page for each episode of Egodeath Mystery Show. So it’s not exactly an error that there’s been no such page. I did announce this episode, at Idea Development page 16.

I’m doing a refresh 2nd upload of this episode (just b/c I’m shifting my approach to make 1 post per episode, and I’m researching.

I’m actually looking for which episode is at Egodeath.com long-term, maybe Ep227?) found them. at the moment available there are … oh i think it’s choking on emoji in filename of Ep233 — removed them, seems working now. Available there are 226, 227, 228 now.

I found this episode very difficult to find, b/c of my previous lack of posting a dedicated page for each episode. B/c of my change of announcement approach.

Instead of only announcing in Idea Dev p, I should post a page for the episode also.

🤔 OPINION; SITE DESIGN DECISION: Yes it was an error that for episode 1-22x, I did not post a page for the episode, but only posted a section within I.D.P. # 1 – ~17.

Each page is a lot of text summary of the episode. An episode is a recording of an idea development working session.

Egodeath Mystery Show Ep233 – Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense (March 14, 2023)

Cybermonk 10:46 a.m. March 19, 2023

Contents:

Download Link

Download for 1 week starting March 19, 2023: https://we.tl/t-UHPftBwmmx

78 MB, stereo miking, no music

Length: 53:25

On bright speakers, I use:
Settings > Music > EQ > Small Speakers or Treble Reduce

Long-Term Egodeath.com Download Link (not available for all episodes)

http://egodeath.com/mp3s/Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg Theory Makes Sense.mp3

I had to remove emojis from filename to upload the file. Orig filename:
“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.mp3”

Content/Timestamps/Summary

Decoding / interpretation breakthroughs re: Canterbury image f134.

Hanging from Right Leg in Mushroom Tree (Canterbury Psalter f134) – Catalog of Image Crops
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/07/19/psalter-rows/

  • 0:00 – Intro.
  • 0:16 – 4788.wav – i just solved the eyes of 134 Row 2 right what are they looking at? Need to draw looking-lines on all of f134 image.
  • Must zoom into FULL high resolution and prove exactly what is each person looking at. 5 sets of eyes there.
  • Funnel Hat is looking at per a.m. March 19, 2023, the feet and knees of leg-hanging guy.
  • attached to Funnel Hat is limbless looker per March 18 2023 yesterday and a few days before, looking at the wrong hands of Psychonaut newbie enthusiast receviging Cubenesis from dispensary and looking at the bucket pouring (is he looking at the two Cubensis bins?? …
  • TODO: see if Limbless Looker (Row 2 Right) is looking at the pouring Cubes, or also possibly angled to look at the Cubensis bins.
  • he connects the feet of hanging guy to the pouring cubes, by attaching the limbless looker to Funnel Hat (two sets of eyes connect the two looking-targets) – 11:29 a.m. March 19, 2023 analysis that extends the points in the recording w/ latest thinking of past couple days]
  • 6:00 – Hanegraaff’s Worst Idea of Any Academic Ever: non-drug entheogens. In the recording I employed the word “mushrooms” and then I WENT OFF I DON’T MEAN FKKING AMANITA!! CARL RUCK!
  • F-you Ruck for forcing me to have to specify idiotically to prevent your retardation, PSILOCYBIN mushrooms else, thanks to YOU, when I say “mushrooms” all my stupid listeners will say “Cybermonk said Amanita”.
  • No I did not say “Amanita!”, dammit! I said “mushrooms”! PSILOCYBIN mushrooms!
  • F*ck Amanita and your old RUCK DEAD-END INFANTILIZATION PARADIGM substitute for my actual adult theory of entheogen scholarship.
  • Principle & Axiom of the Egodeath theory: Amanita in art always means ingesting Psilocybin. No matter how many pitchers of urine Ruck enjoys titillating about. Alchemy/alchemists always ingests Psilocybin, never Amanita, as a matter of principle to enable superior theorizing.
  • 10:00 – the great metaphor of MIS-AIMING THE SPOTLIGHT OF ATTENTION eg onto ergot, onto amanita, onto ANYTHING BUT PSILOCYBIN.
  • Even Psilocybin books spend more time spotlighting Allegro and Ergot and Kykeon and eleusis and Amanita, NEVER AIMING THE SPOTLIGHT AT PSILOCYBIN.
  • 13:00 – They’re all, the entire field of entheogen scholarship is intent on PHOTOSHOPPING-OUT PSILOCYBIN, very much including Paul Stamets, who can barely trouble himself to lift a finger to write a full sentence about Psilocybin in Europe.
  • Why did Stamets let this happen, folk narrative impressionistic painting that led EVERYONE to assert “MYCOLOGISTS REPORT THAT THERE WERE NO PSILOCYBIN IN EUROPE/ENGLAND.”
  • A well-established folk factoid, more example of how this field is — like Hatsis charges — folk myth, not Science; it’s an … entheogen scholarship is an EXTREMELY PREJUDICED field, especially against Psilocybin.
  • 17:00 – “they are awkward inept character faces aiming in random directions, meaningless” – huge fallacy I fell into.
  • [errata: mild brief siren at 17:30 🚨]
  • 18:00 – diagrammatic medieval art is awesome in these features, to convey more meaning than “better” later art uninspired.
  • 20:00 –
  • 23:00 – 4789.wav – once we establish simple rules: right foot on ground means eternalism-thinking. Simple right? BUT TEACHER, WHAT IF… WHAT IF… WHAT IF HANGING FROM TREE BY RIGHT KNEE, THEN YOUR RULES ARE WRECKED.
  • What if…. Row 1 Right: Table Banquet AWKWARD HANDS ON TABLE back of right hand pressed down on table – SOLVED! recently before this March 14 2023 recording.
  • Took me all the way from Nov. 2020 to March 2023 (an entire 2.x years!! As an extremely advanced decoder!) to solve What’s Up With {Awkward Hand on Table}????
  • 30:00 –
  • 32:03 – 4790.wav – you have to discuss all these elements in image f134 [funny, note: it was several days after this recording that it occurred to me to solve/ask / think about {closed scroll in her left hand; open scroll in his right hand} – 11:50 a.m. March 19, 2023 ]
  • 40:00 – gravity will pull down his left leg when hanging by his right leg, therefore it is NOT arbitrary which relative height he holds his left & right hands, from his upside down frame of reference.
  • The Funnel Hat guy is given a challenge: he’s looking at mushroom tree, feet, and analyzing: WHY is the guy’s hand positions correct?
  • You cannot simply apply right-side-up, “standing on right foot” patterns; you have to re-analyze the core points to argue anew why his left hand should be lower closer to ground than right hand.
  • Solution/Answer: His left knee is forced to droop by gravity, therefore (that is the REAL reason) he must droop his left hand (compared to right hand), to be isomorphic.
  • 46:01 – 4791.wav – floating feet guy is looking at floating feet in tree: My latest opinion (as of this speech recording/ analysis session; this idea development recorded session) [REMINDER FROM START OF EGODEATH MYSTERY SHOW FEB 2021: THIS Egodeath Mystery Show IS A WORKING-SESSION, THEORY DEVELOPMENT SESSION, NOT JUST A REPORT OR POP PRESENTATION] is that Funnel Hat, his eyes are aimed at the feet and right knee, more than at Red’s left drooping knee 1 degree lower. It makes sense that Floating Feet Funnel Hat guy is looking at specifically the floating feet of Red in the tree.
  • 50:00 – floating feet guy is looking at floating feet in tree to analyze correct hand positions. = Advanced reading of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching}, as opposed to simple Red guy in Row 2 right.
  • 53:25 – End.

Images

Canterbury Psalter image f134 Row 1 Left: Pink Key Tree and Mushroom Tree
Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f134-key-tree-mushroom-tree.jpg” 598 KB [9:34 a.m. March 19, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#

Site Map sections (d/k which images are discussed in this episode):

Entire Image
Crop by Cybermonk
https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/eadwine-leg-balancing-image-2023-01-09.png

Hanging from Right Leg in Mushroom Tree (Canterbury Psalter f134) – Catalog of Image Crops
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/07/19/psalter-rows/

Proof that the Canterbury Psalter’s Leg-…. main 2020 article alas has Dark Library crops

Filename (removed emojis for Egodeath.com long-term upload)

“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.mp3”

To upload to Egodeath.com, I had to nuke emojis 😭:

“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg Theory Makes Sense.mp3”

Song Title

“Ep233 Hanging from Right Leg 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.aup3”

Playback Tips: Mute Treble

I brickwall’ed the treble but STILL it can be fatiguing with bright speakers.

I play back using music player EQ settings:
Settings > Music > EQ > Small Speakers or try Treble Reduce

Errata

Away from mic sometimes, boosted, should be ok (experiment)

Tech Notes

Recording Numbers Log

All are March 14, 2023:

VOX_TK_4788.wav

VOX_TK_4789.wav

VOX_TK_4790.wav

VOX_TK_4791.wav

Project Name

“Ep233 Hanging from Right Knee 🌳🙃 Theory Makes Sense.aup3”

Miking

same as many previous: AT2020 L, CAD M39 R, treble brickwall, Limiter, 80Hz cut. eq 4.5, 3, -15 L, -10dB R

The Egodeath Mystery Show Is Spoken Theory-Development Sessions (even, God forbid, possibly some typing)

… not pop entertainment of presenting the polished final results.

The activity during recording is to develop ideas during the recordings. I upload the recordings of my developing ideas.

However, OTOH, people have asked for summary episodes where I develop ideas by summarizing them, and yes this sounds exactly what I’ve been needing, so announce idea:

Forthcoming Series of Introductory Episodes Intro to the Egodeath theory

project is totally finished in the Platonic realm in future region of the block universe

See Also

Hanging from Right Leg in Mushroom Tree (Canterbury Psalter f134) – Catalog of Image Crops
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/07/19/psalter-rows/

Cybermonk 10:46 a.m. March 19, 2023

YI Tree Branching Morphology: Formal Theory of Fractal YI Scope of Analysis of Branching-Message Mushroom Trees

Cybermonk March 19, 2023

Cybermonk

Contents:

links work on all platforms:

Introduction

Original Theory/Discovery by Cybermonk March 19, 2023 based on “branching” work back to around 2010 — and back to 2001 without myth integrated, I was posting about “branching” vs. block-universe “determinism” (eternalism) in the Egodeath Yahoo Group (searchable), copied to Egodeath.com.

the facts of the matter: backstory: https://reflection.eleusinianm.co.uk/medieval-literature/yellow-book-of-calbourne/saint-eustace

Mâle, p. 3, The sky, water and trees. From the Legend of St. Eustace. Window at Chartres.

There are many fractal levels of analysis required to comprehend this YI moph’y instances:

  • Zoom in within a tree.
  • Consider a pair of trees.
  • Consider an isolated tree.
  • Consider POV: his vs. ours.
  • Consider tree 4 in isolation.
  • Consider upper level of tree 4.
  • Zoom into upper level of tree 4.

… and independently analyze YI contrasts at/within that scope.

In a Y, the right-hand branch is “good” ie. is mapped to eternalism-thinking; left is “bad” ie is mapped to possibilism-thinking. But you must re-analyze assignments within each scope of consideration; they are not static or single.

A given point in an image is considered as “bad/left-hand”, within one particular scope of consideration, and yet is also considered as “good/right-hand”, within a different scope.

Canterbury Psalter Image f177

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-whole-image.jpg” 529 KB [11:56 March 4, 2023]
https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/canterbury-f177-whole-image.jpg
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom

Canterbury Psalter Image f177 Two Trees

Row 1 Left: Pink Key Tree and Mushroom Tree
Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f134-key-tree-mushroom-tree.jpg” 598 KB [9:34 a.m. March 19, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f134-key-tree-mushroom-tree.jpg” 598 KB [9:34 a.m. March 19, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#

Dancing Man Taught Me

On Christmas 2015, I conjectured {stand on right leg} = eternalism-thinking using this image from Hatsis’ webpage version of his article at PsychedelicWitch.com.

I used that Christmas 2015 hypothesis to successfully decode John Lash’s 2008 f134 Row 1 Left blurry yellowed, with tremendous resounding success.

In March-May 2022 art jackpot decoding, I did a full analysis of all branching and non-branching zones of the entire tree & salamander roasted by the threat of loss of control ({fire}).

Actually Canterbury Ps. image f177 Row 1’s two trees made me understand the fractal scopes principle.

Image from:
Cut Right Trunk in Salamander Bestiary Image (Dancing Man, Roasting Salamander in Bodleian) 

Above: April 13, 2022 (day of discovery of Cut Right Trunk). https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/image_13deda52-0d24-4831-a23e-99b6c32904c7.img_8645.jpg

I Am the Provider of the Image-Processed Eustace Crossing River Image

I am the one who provided to the world wide web the awesome (extremely under-appreciated by me until 2022) image — image processing by me — I photographed in Male book on Medieval art around 2005 and uploaded it with grainy low contrast to my Egodeath.com gallery, then I did image processing on it, and also uploaded that to that gallery/site.

In March-May 2022, milestone date: discussing Kupfer and branching-message mushroom trees for first time with Professor Brown on March 21, 2022, where I realized the bug is the feature/point/message

I at that point in time, switched away from “the whimsical meaningless”[sic] branches added and cut branches added, to grasping at a elementary-only, non-fractal level, “branching-message mushroom trees” when I coined that most-excellent term.

  1. In isolation, comprehend YI pair of trees.
  2. As a completely separate thing, later figured out YI within a single tree (failed to connect to the above formally as principle of fractal-scope equivalence)
  3. Finally because of while decoding Canterbury f177 Row 1 tree L & tree R, then applied to f134 pink key tree, yesterday March 18 2023 or very recently — really, right now I continue that very discovery/deepening, days several days of “theory revision” is NOT INSTANTANEOUS as the jackpot spreads across instances and articles. Paul Thagard book Conceptual Revolutions.
  4. Only now, minutes ago and continuing: last night end of day, BEGAN TO REALIZE that tree 4 in Eustace is a self-contained YI in addition to considering it — like ~March 2022, as the “Y” when considered within the tree pair trees 3+4.

I was only capable of thinking about Eustace Crossing River image in isolation: tree one is Y, tree two is I.

Later, much later, feb 2023???? I still didn’t at all formally connect all the dots. I found myself in a isolated separate context (not integrating my understanding) of a single self-contained tree expressing YI morph’y. BUT didn’t think yet, HEY THIS MEANS THERES A PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE of two sep trees or 1 tree.

In the past couple days, explosion of breakthroughs about applying horizontally and vertically, separate trees or combined trees, and suchlike permutations.

ALL POSSIBLE PERMUTATIONS SPREAD THROUGHOUT A TREE, A PAIR OF TREES, LOWER LEVEL OF A TREE DISTINCT FROM UPPER LEVEL, ETC. Branch out this YI theory in all geometrical directions, a field of branch morphology mathematics.

search: tree data structure
https://www.google.com/search?q=tree+data+structure

eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(data_structure)

search: tree morphology
https://www.google.com/search?q=tree+morphology

eg: https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/5-8-how-to-draw-morphological-trees/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11975332/ — Trees within trees

See writeup in:
Page:
Eustace Window Lion Pilzbaum Pairs of Branching vs. Non-Branching Mushroom Trees, Y I Morphology Contrast, Branching-Message Clover Pairs
Section:
Fractal YI Analysis
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/05/05/eustace-window-lion-pilzbaum-pairs-of-branching-vs-non-branching-mushroom-trees-y-i-morphology-contrast-branching-message-clover-pairs/#Fractal-YI-Analysis

See Also

Cybermonk March 19, 2023

Egodeath Mystery Show Ep232 – Ram Power Cancellation Loss of Control 🌳🐏🔥 (Mar. 16-18, 2023)

Contents:

  • Download Link
  • Filename
  • Song Title
  • Images
  • Title Is “Chef’s Surprise” 🤔 🤨 😱 🤷‍♂️ Fake/ Aspirational-Lookahead
  • The Egodeath theory is not here to make your POS failed less-than theory work and reify your reductionist-away monstrosity
  • I’M NOT HERE TO MAKE YOUR POS YALDABAOTH MONSTROSITY SOMEHOW “WORK”
  • Why Loss of Control Ego Death?
  • Content/Timestamps
  • Actual Dates of Recording
  • Miking
  • See Also

Download Link

Download for 1 week starting March 18, 2023: https://we.tl/t-iB28x5H9kA

Length 1:51:34

Filename:
“Ep232 Ram Power Cancellation Loss of Control 🌳🐏🔥.mp3”

Song Title:
“Ep232 Ram Power Cancellation Loss of Control 🌳🐏🔥”

Content/Timestamps

  • 0:00 – Intro says Mar 14, actually Mar 16 2023
  • 0:19 – Content: Canterbury image f177, morphology of simple key tree.
  • The meaning of the empty ossuaries.
  • Chris Letheby’s lame options for Metaphysics.
  • FAD-Plus only recently added “Fatalistic Determinism” which is like Eternalism except with zero comprehension of anything relevant — it’s warmed-over freewill thinking; “determinism” per egoic thinking. FAIL.
  • Middle ram doesn’t touch ground. Middle tree crown, same. VOX_TK_4792.wav – March 16, 2023
  • 20:00 – very good (probably not long) discussion of RUNAWAY CONTROL EFFORT: the harder you assert possibilism-thinking in loosecog state, the more you reach effective cancellation of control.
  • 30:00 – empty ossuraries in Canterbury f177 Row 2 Left, con’t. Good topic.
  • 36:00 – After uploading the episode, I solved botched cross-under, solution is in f177 page, see right wrist of shroud is visible, guy holding right ankle with left hand blocking is looking at cross-under of simple key tree and at the two — not three (artist demonstrates intention/ control) hidden right feet of rams; {branching veils non-branching, until egodeath sees rightly} <– q.e.d.
    Botched Cross-Under of Mushroom Tree. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/12/4-horses-mushroom-tree-right-foot-balancing-great-canterbury-psalter-f177/#Botched-Cross-Under
  • 48:00 – key concept: local scope relative non-branching. branching-message mushroom trees advanced theory of morphology.
  • 1:14:00 – artists were highly attuned to releative scope of analysis. The “good” ram is the middle one which maps to the semi-middle cap of the key tree which is the I not the Y branch.
  • The true nonbranching branch is occluded like the ram’s right foot; Transcendent Knowledge is hidden from egoic thinking, not “unfurled” yet. The good, nonbranching branch in a YI tree config’n is hidden by the branching; ie, possibilism-thinking “hides” or “veils” eternalism-thinking.
  • 1:21:11 – VOX_TK_4793.wav – March 16, 2023. my work needs to NOT come into alignment with the malformed field. Field needs to jump to my theory, and burn the CEQ.
  • 1:22:36 – VOX_TK_4794.wav – March 17, 2023 mocking Letheby’s dead-end dissertation thesis. “The mind has a model of itself. Now you are enlightened.” Same dead end limitation as Metzinger – GOES NOWHERE. My 1996 Bubble of Simulation article probably covers Control Agent model, but, what about model of world? Check. The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a Virtual Environment — Published in Crash Collusion, 1996. — Find “control”.
  • 1:22:56 – VOX_TK_4795.wav – March 17, 2023 – my ideas are developed so I don’t need to write anything verbose, just present anything, Transcendent Knowledge will get conveyed. No need to belabor. Write in a classic timeless way, like Samo’s 1998 article on mushroom trees in Christian art. Less [text] is more, for my branching-message mushroom trees article.
  • Am I supposed to apply my Copernicus, to repair Ptolemy (repairing fundamentally broken CEQ).
  • 1:30:59 – “surrender to the experience” — I’m here to replace that folk knowledge by Actual Science/ STEM explanatory fwk.
  • 1:38:00 – too much time needed for art; no time for text. Since I’ve written articles about everything EXCEPT this set of 3 motifs, TEXT OF ARTICLE SHOULD JUST FOCUS ON THE 3 MOTIFS, NOT ENTIRE Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism. THE ARTI The article is not the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism; it is about the 3 motifs ({branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching}) from POV of the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism.
  • 1:40:00 — Question: How does the eternalism experiential mode engender eternalism-thinking? Answer: Through a left-foot demon with trident poking you with possibilism-thinking & a right-foot demon with a rope pulling toward eternalism-thinking.
  • 1:41:52 – INTEGRAL GOSSIP: VOX_TK_4796.wav – March 18, 2023 – Integral theory is falling over. To win this roller derby I just have to not fall, while they are fall. I don’t have to push them over; they are falling themselves over. Integral Theory has nothing but “how small is the size of your ego”? Integral Theory has no substance. So, it falls due to petty scandals. Guru Worship Clubs. It’s all they got. A buncha BS “mindfulness meditation” that accomplishes nothing that the oversold marketing claims.
  • A network of competing egoic guru worship clubs.
  • All I got is transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
  • All they got is guru worship clubs falling down ‘cos got no substance, no basis of Transcendent Knowledge. Measuring the size of each others’ egos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDOfH1IzQgs – “Things That Integral Has Not Done Well“, channel: The Integral Stage. (good for wasting time)
  • 1:48:03 – VOX_TK_4797.wav – March 18, 2023 – mentioning “allegro” is a way of eliminiating substantive subject matter.
  • 1:48:21 – VOX_TK_4798.wav – March 18, 2023. Studerus Shell Game, stage magic spotlight indirection, Figure S1 in a separate document. #54 hot potato mysteriously went missing 🤷‍♂️ “we got it covered: all ANX & ICC items” (nvm the 8 SHA (Shadow factor 13) subscale, which doesn’t exist, and contains #54. Who designed the “Impaired Control and also Impaired Cognition” factor? How arbitrary these “factors” are! But we attached the blob of math to this NONSENSENSICAL OUTLINE, so it’s “Scientifically Validated”.
    🦄💨<– VALIDATED 😑👍✅
  • 1:51:14 – Outro.
  • 1:51:34 – End.

🦄💨 <– SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE

ON A FIRM FOUNDATION OF TIMOTHY LEARY’S MEQ BASED ON WALTER STACE’S OUT OF PRINT BOOK 63 YEARS OUTDATED 😑👍✅

NOW I AM GOING TO ASSESS ON THAT SCIENTIFIC BASIS WHETHER YOU HAD A “COMPLETE [STACEAN] MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE

MEANWHILE, 40% HIGH DOSE BAD TRIPS UNDER GRIFFITHS’ OPTIMAL CONDITIONS so you see everythings under control what could possibly go wrong

we’ll just DELETE entirely the Dread (DED) category of psychedelic effects, replace it by OSC-based “Grief”, and do some math trickery to recast our 39% failure rate as only a 30% failure rate – Shadow problem SOLVED!Psychedelic Science

Skipped a Million Voice Recordings

Con: Out of order. Might never hear my previous high-quality recordings of the past couple months.

Pro: The latest theory discussion, immediately. I look forward to hearing the assorted set of recordings from past 3 days, which have been highly productive.

Images

Title Is “Chef’s Surprise” 🤔 🤨 😱 🤷‍♂️ Fake/ Aspirational-Lookahead

I did quick production, so I don’t know yet what to title this set of varying-length recordings.

I’m probably saying: EVERYONE ELSE’S COVERAGE IS TRASH, BURN IT WITH FIRE. Maybe I should title the episode that?

I AM HERE TO REPLACE, NOT REPAIR, YOUR PARADIGM.

The Egodeath theory is not here to make your POS failed less-than theory work and reify your reductionist-away monstrosity

Add a Control-Challenges Subscale to the CEQ

I DON’T LIKE THIS. F THE CEQ, 🔥BURN IT WITH FIRE 🔥 .

I’M NOT HERE TO MAKE YOUR POS YALDABAOTH MONSTROSITY SOMEHOW “WORK”

DO NOT:
Add a Control factor to the CEQ, containing these standard, established items:

  • I was afraid to lose my self-control.
  • I had the feeling of being connected to a superior power.
  • I felt like a puppet or marionette.
  • I had the feeling that I no longer had a will of my own.
  • I felt threatened.
  • Sense of being trapped and helpless.
  • It was difficult to control my thoughts.

Instead of adding the above Control subscale to the CEQ,

🔥BURN IT WITH FIRE!🔥

and start from my ECQ instead: ECQ – “Eternalism and Control Questionnaire”

Debate: Put out a good thing (the Egodeath theory) and only put attention on my Good Thing — or dwell on “Their Thing [wanna-be, less-than theory] Sucks”??

The title is False Advertising (it is aspiration), just like MEQ & CEQ and the field marketed as “Psychedelic Science”. Read it as: “I wish there were less on questionnaires and other people’s BS misconceptions, and more explaining the heart of the Egodeath theory and how exactly — in 7th grader plain lang – how self-control instability works.

Why Loss of Control Ego Death?

I have so strong self-control, that I cannot control myself, and so I FALL DOWN battling against my own control.

And also b/c control-thoughts pre-exist.

And also because helpless puppet of 2-level control.

And also because overpowering deja vu: here is where you fakely remembered being forced out of control.

Input Recordings
  • VOX_TK_4792.wav – March 16, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4793.wav – March 16, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4794.wav – March 17, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4795.wav – March 17, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4796.wav – March 18, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4797.wav – March 18, 2023
  • VOX_TK_4798.wav – March 18, 2023

Actual Dates of Recording

Spot-Errata: beginning says “14”, should say “16”.

Date is not consistent, but close. The Beginning is borrowed and says “mar 14” but these segments are in order recorded March 16 (a.m.) through March 18 (a.m.) 2023.

The end artificially lowers a god via machine to say today’s date, March 18, which is accurate for the last 3 segments.

same as many previous: L AT2020, R CAD M39, treb cut, Limiter, bass cut. No guitar.

See Also

tbd

Egodeath Mystery Show Ep231 – 11-Factors’ Shadow Factor 13 (SHA) 😱😵🐉 (Mar. 14, 2023)

Contents:

Download for 1 week starting March 18, 2023: https://we.tl/t-0EQWj0XHz2

I could possibly upload to Egodeath.com, not sure the server load implications, probably fine.

Images

Canterbury f145 Row 1 Middle

Crop by Cybermonk

Canterbury f134 Row 2 Middle:
Psalter Viewer Seeing that the Possibility Branching Model Causes Loss of Control

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f134-light-showing-branching-causes-loss-of-control-finger-height-footless.jpg” 493 KB [11:32 p.m. March 15, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f134-light-showing-branching-causes-loss-of-control-finger-height-footless.jpg” 493 KB [11:32 p.m. March 15, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#

Decode: {limbless looker behind a person}

[4:43 p.m. March 18, 2023] i’m I’M GONNA CALL IT: [DECODING ATTEMPT 1:] the {limbless looker behind a person} = metaperception. Meta level awareness. God-mode observing. “Meditation”; thought-watching, “Psilocybin mindfulness”. Observation of acting, as opposed to willing & acting.

better to be wrong than to say nothing.

better to put your wrong answer on the board, then to not put it up for consideration to solve rightly.

Instances of {limbless looker behind a person}

Inventory of instances in f134 f145 f177 where there’s a {limbless looker behind a person}:

it would be really great if my crops were cataloged so neatly that I could write URLs from scratch to navigate/ x-link them. Get the above section-links via Site Map. ... one million clicks later …

ok i used the links after editing those pages, so:

[DECODING ATTEMPT 2:] There is nothing at all to analyze other than a pointing mechanism. The artist just wants you to determine what the eyes are aiming at. So list that on the list of {limbless looker behind a person} above.

Content/Timestamps

Notes immediately after recording:
Best Episode of Egodeath Mystery Show EVAR 4787-wav 😲🎉👑🏆
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/14/best-episode-of-egodeath-mystery-show-evar-4787-wav-%f0%9f%98%b2%f0%9f%8e%89%f0%9f%91%91%f0%9f%8f%86/

Critique of about the red-flag filled “Science” of Psychedelic Psychometrics q’airs.

Some parts on other topics, I want to find & emphasize, like maybe self-control seizure.

  • 0:00 – Intro ID
  • 1:00-10:00 – good summaries of control transformation driven by Psilocybin.
  • x:xx – Interesting other topic.
  • x:xx – Interesting other topic. Middle portion is in-depth review of 11-Factors (esp. Studerus’ very poorly presented description of what the hell exactly tangibly, 11-Factors IS (the secret two high-level dimensions only get 1 paragraph, “it’s not in our marketing plan”; the weak poor foundation setup for the CEQ bellyflop.
  • ~23:00 The marketing-narrative *appearance* that Studerus “deleted” item 54 when they merely “dropped” it from their (official) factors — so 54 in practice ended up hidden in Shadow Factor 13 (SHA) which Griffiths “accidentally” therefore didn’t see – PROBLEM 54 (DRAGON PANIC) “SOLVED”: BY SILENTLY OMITTING IT.
  • ~14:00 – The Ruck committee, whose weird writing style is this? 5 authors wrote one chapter, same problem as psychometrics: who is dumb: who screwed up, if there are 6 authors of CEQ? NO ACCOUNTABILITY. WHO APPROVED THIS ARTICLE? ZERO CHECKS AND BALANCES. BUNK ARTICLE NO EFFECTIVE PEER REVIEW AT ALL, total joke!
  • THEY JUST DELETED THE ENTIRE CLASIC DITTRICH’S 1975-BASED “DREAD (DED)” CATEGORY, WITH NO PUSHBACK! WTF!!!
  • HOW the f did the CEQ get approved? It’s a smoking pile of trash, wtf! A model of Exactly how NOT to do Science. Comittee-written vague SMOKE & MIRRORS posing as “Science”.
  • ~23:00 – Monkey business under the veil of darkness of night in the two phantom categories: turn on the light and direct the spotlight where the dragon shadow lies:
    Virtual factor 12 (VIR) [16 items] &
    Shadow factor 13 (SHA) [8 items incl #54]
  • The 11-Factors Shell Game w/ item 54 “I was afraid to lose my self-
  • Griffiths CEQ and “see Carbonaro for details” (you mean, for obscurantist bluff and no simple explanation of relation of Study 1 vs Study 2 vs. Initial Item pool – THEY DON’T EVEN HAVE AN INTELLIGIBLE STORY NARRATIVE of their trajectory. Why did — what was your LOGIC for doing a study 1 with one group, then a study 2 with a opposite group, and somewhere in there is the Initial Item Pool, HOW DO THESE PIECE FIT TOGETHER; WHAT WAS YOUR STRATEGY ARC??
  • Nothing makes sense, nothing coheres. Just a pile of details with no driving coherent strategy narrative: A study 1 appears. A study 2 appears. At some unspecified time, an Initial Item pool materialzies. Why? When? What relation? INCOHERENT “Science”.
  • PLEASE WRITE a TEXTBOOK, “PSYCHEDELIC SCIENCE METRICS 101”, CHAPTER 1: EXPLAIN THE LOGIC OF CEQ STUDY 1, STUDY 2, CARBONARO, AND INITIAL ITEM POOL, AND HOW YOU DISCARDED DED, AND WHY AND WHEN ….
  • Do you guys even HAVE a coherent story behind this heap? I “See Carbonaro for details” and it just raises 20 more elementary questions that aren’t answered.
  • NO ONE CAN MAKE ANY SENSE OUT OF HOW 11 FACTORS PROCESS OF “DROPPING” #54 WAS DESCRIBED AND CEQ AND CARBONARO.
  • It is incomprehensible, this whole development, from Studerus 2010 to CEQ 2016 together with “See Carbonaro’s article for details” — ie, for piling even higher the smoke and mirrors of conjuring-away Dittrich’s Dread (DED) dimension ENTIRELY and replacing it by the totally ordinary-state based “Grief” category. Perfect example of reductionism-away of the explanandum. Magic. Not Science.
  • I have a TON of ELEMENTARY extremely basic questions, no textbook explains this under-cover-of-night “Science”; Griffiths & Johnson’s CEQ answers none of them, even if you add Carbonaro article, they give no intelligible story; no college freshman can track and make sense out of and answer my basic questions (I have have read such attempts; they are garbled).
  • 33:45 – opening the lid on the unlabelled box (Shadow factor 13 (SHA)) — THIS UNLABELLED BOX DOES NOT EXIST, DO NOT OPEN THIS LID — in the dark, unlit part of the 11-Factors Storage room, what’s in this box? —
  • Item 54: I was afraid to lose my self-control.
  • 44:12 – Dittrich falsely in 1985 labeleled bad trip experiences as explaining them as fear of what? Dread OF EGO DISSOLUTION.
    “What you fear is: ego dissolution.” According to Dittrich. For one thing, that’s no explanation, because it is entirely vague (reminds me of Sanders & Zijlmans’ article Moving Past Mysticism as a methodology: “too vague!“, they charge.
  • According to Petter Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell (in Journal of Psychedelic Studies​), your bad trip is your fault, caused by your resisting ego dissolution. There, we have “explained” bad trips. 😑 with our totally vague, totally useless pseudo-“explanation”, while the 40% bad trips continue on.
  • 1:53:50 – near end: Why this branching-message mushroom trees article I’m drafting is the most awesome thing.
  • Why is Eadwine & branching-message mushroom trees the perfect Antidote to BS about psychedelics, and the perfect explanation to map out uncharted “here be shadow dragon monsters”.
  • In lineage of Petter Johnstad’s Day Trip to Hell and CEQ: when you cite those, you have to cite my article about branching-message mushroom trees, because why?
  • Need to talk through that explanation…
  • Panic control ram seizure caught in a thicket.
  • Why is this our mind’s most interesting atttractive interesting dynamic.
  • Why does it make perfect sense to depict this dynamic via {handedness/ rightfoot}, non/branching,
  • how does that map to what Johnstad call for? and “Moving Past Mysticism” calls for.
  • Those authors call for mental model ego dissolution of self but they fail to say:
  • steering branching through world by control agency.
  • My theory agrees with Matthew Johnson & Letheby vector he calls for, exactly: they are aimed at my theory.
  • They are in right direction roughly but I’m way up ahead on the path , non-branching path, angel of death = self control loss & transformation of mental worldmodel , my article takes their direction (CEQ, Petter, S&J Moving Past Mysticism, puts in light speed turbocharged with by Eadwine:
  • Eadwine is moving the field WAY ahead through my theory/ article.
  • Law of universe: session guides have to understand these 3 motifs, as Christian art reports, by making sense out of branching-message mushroom trees genre, how source of control works to get the ram caught in a thicket and instructing you at the same time.
  • against Letheby & Johnson, it’s Not about you choosing an epistemology; the 1st epistemology BLOWS ITSELF UP in a furnace; it’s self-destroying;
  • the “possibilism” mental worldmodel is a self-destroying mental worldmodel.
  • The more you advance it, the more it blows itself to pieces.
  • Contrast against… opposite of Letheby: you are made to change your epistemology because the first epistemology tears itself to pieces;
  • The more you assert possibilism-power, the more it goes unstable, leaving you with the new mental model.
  • [THAT’S A GOOD (despite quick) TRANSCRIPTION OF THE VERY GOOD END of recording]
  • ~2:00:00 – Outro ID.
  • 2:01:06 – End.

Tech Notes

Recorded March 14, 2023. Produced/uploaded March 18, 2023.

1 continuous take! including intro/outro ID.

Source file: VOX_TK_4787.wav

Miking

80 Hz Bass cut, Limiter

L: AT 2020. eq 4.5, 3, -15
R: CAD M39 Cardio . eq 4.5, 3, -10

~3′

See Also

Notes immediately after recording:
Best Episode of Egodeath Mystery Show EVAR 4787-wav 😲🎉👑🏆
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/14/best-episode-of-egodeath-mystery-show-evar-4787-wav-%f0%9f%98%b2%f0%9f%8e%89%f0%9f%91%91%f0%9f%8f%86/

Site Map:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#Psychedelics-Questionnaires

Decoded Brown’s Question Why a Mushroom Tree (when Cutting Branches) Grows on a Stone Tower

Cybermonk, initially posted 12:48 a.m. March 18, 2023 (some sections moved from other page, were posted in a.m. Mar. 17)

Contents:

Intro

Towers of Jerusalem
Photo Credit: Julie M. Brown
https://www.academia.edu/40412411/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels
“Brown Towers of Jerusalem pdf fullscreen.png” 4.1 MB, stamp: [2:25 p.m. February 12, 2023]
f145: Right Full Towers

Crop by Cybermonk
Canterbury-f145-right-full-towers.jpg 358 KB [3:48 March 17, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom

f145: Row 2 Middle

f145 Row 1 Right

Crop by Cybermonk
Canterbury-f145-row1-right 474 KB [3:50 March 17, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom

Row 2 Right: Lockbox, Buildings

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-row2-right.jpg” 346 KB [1:38 a.m. March 11, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom#

He’s looking at middle of red rectangular roof (elaborate building); stable self-control.

Mushroom tree indicates all items in the scene describe Psilocybin peak effects.

Other People’s Theories

url https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows

Browns’ Question

Brown says in 2019 and I note that such as around March 2022, “why a mushroom tree is growing on top (or out of) the roof of a stone tower

why a mushroom tree “towers of Jerusalem”, why towers… why [7:51 p.m. March 17, 2023] — I maybe have an answer for Brown’s question.

We can only speculate why a mushroom tree is growing on top (or out of) the roof of a stone tower.

Browns 2019, Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels, https://www.academia.edu/40412411/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels

I don’t think {rock} = [frozen block-universe eternalism] is the active main primary foreground mytheme referent in the St. Martin’s Church scene Browns’ Entry into Jerusalem.

Decoded Mythemes: {buildings, towers} = {scale balance} = stable, viable self-control

In addition to noticing the broad theme of blue and gold confirming Psilocybin in Canterbury] at about [6:30 a.m. March 17, 2023], I am affirming recent intepretation (with roots in Nov. 2020 re: stable column base motif throughout Eadwine), rapidly now because specifically of f145: doorway gate conditional into stable buildings that don’t fall down into loss of control instability solid right foot foundation.

This deepening of my reading of “blue” and stronger affirming now alot strong that the blue krater in f134 DEFINITELY is Cubensis, is alternating with now (a first-time point, now) observing the blue and tawny colors of the f134 dispensary bins.

2-3 interleaved points I’m stumbling to make:

1) My “history” of blue color reliance/ argumentation/ having a clue: let me try to remember my history of working with this color-based interpretation factor: it all started at 6:30 am this morning! 😅

2) Buildings / towers = viable stability of control.

Answer to: Why a Mushroom Tree (when Cutting Branches) Grows on a Stone Tower

Expanding this morning’s idea in the evening:

What’s the history of that interpretation? (that {buildings/towers} = control stability in peak Psilocybin state)

First, I thought about it in St. Martin when a couple weeks ago like April 2023 when I was saying “where’s the gate” and eg Golden psalter’s Entry into Jerusalem shows…

and Lorenzetti’s version of Entry into Jerusalem shows “town walls” and “gate” and structures.

Also, Brown says eg March 2022 “towers of Jerusalem”, why towers… why [7:51 p.m. March 17, 2023] — I maybe have an answer for Brown’s question.

We can only speculate why a mushroom tree is growing on top (or out of) the roof of a stone tower.

Browns 2019, Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels, https://www.academia.edu/40412411/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels

Why Do Mushroom Trees Grow from Rock Stone Tower? Answer: {tower over gate} = Viable Stability of Self-Control in the Psilocybin State by Removing Possibility Branching

Why do mushroom trees grow from rock stone tower? Answer: Viable Stability of Self-Control in the Psilocybin State by Removing Possibility Branching

Next, a few days ago, March 2023, I re-looked at 4 horses image f177, which has towers, several, and while decoding that motif, initially, I conjectured: Transcendent Knowledge must be built up, it is civilization. NOT WRONG…. that *is* included in new f145.

WE are civilized, WE are able to build towers, YOU travelling traders are ignorant, you fall down, uncultivated self-control, untransformed, you are not able to build buildings.

But I hadn’t yet nailed, when started by pass on decoding 177, didn’t yet see that all motifs considered in tandem, meant that — it is crucial requirement that you must correctly identify the MAIN motif AS SUCH.

Not FALSE MAIN MOTIF.

The true main motif is “stable, enduring, doesn’t fall over/ crumble.”

Also that is treated as interchangeble with “balance”, so, TOWER IS BALANCED AND STABLE/ STURDY like Nov 2020 decoding “stable column base”.

Thus Nov 2020 f134 is maybe start of history of decoding “buildings towers = stable self-control” = scales balanced.

The artists through their motifs are saying this analogy ismorphism: In the peak advanced Psilocybin state (I have SO left Amanita behind in the rear-view mirror!), stable viable control is like being balanced and a stable tower.

Balanced and stable — having a durable sound well-based mental model of control, is like being balanced and stable like towers.

blue stem msh tree identifies blue fruit precious in lockboxes

foreign import traders

Canterbury Image f145: King Orders Incoming Shipments of Blue Fruit to Storage Lockboxes with Blue Stemmed Mushroom Tree

found (more deeply than before) last night p.m. March 16, 2023 by Cybermonk

mobile app announcement

3rd good mushroom tree scene in Canterbury Ps: F145

lockboxes image commentary blue fruit f145

History of Decoding {column, base, tower, building}

Since I started working on decoding Canterbury image f145 five minutes ago (actually 2 days(?) ago), which extends my f177 decoding that started a couple weeks(?) ago, which applies my Nov. 2020 decoding of Eadwine’s {column} = control stability in f134

  1. Nov. 2020: I decoded Eadwine’s {column} = [control stability] in image f134.
  2. ~April 2023: I decoded image f177, which has several towers and a building, and Eadwine’s standard {column} motif often used as a panel divider.
  3. ~1 day ago: I decoded image 145, which has buildings and several towers, and Eadwine’s standard {column} motif often used as a panel divider.

(Those dates are fairly easy to find at this site, I kinda need them; too busy.)

God Has Closed Our Eyes and Aimed Them Away from Explicit Mushroom Imagery

This art decoding business is the most humiliating endeavor because always one fails to see the explicitly obvious, precisely as Brown describes … in fact, pointedly, specifically, regarding Marcia Kupfer —

Brown says in 2016/2019 Kupfer so badly fails to see mushrooms, that she completely mis-identifies St. Martin Church’s Entry into Jerusalem’s Tower and Gate scenes as youths in trees cutting branches(!!!!!), which passage (with his more potent added highlighting to drive his point home) he showed to me the 3rd time to hit me hard over the head to open my tightly closed eyes (about the more-sophisticated-than-Brown theme of mushroom-induced branching experiential insight).

Brown thought her error was a failure to see mushrooms.

My failure was on a sophisticated level: failure to comprehend & recognize the meta-ramifications (I’m branching out into comedy there 😐).

At the moment, I’m working over in other page re: this morning’s work [~ 6:30 to 7:33 am March 17, 2023] interleaved two issues: blue color suddenly proves Psilocybin, and buildings mean control stability

Blue Proves Psilocybin, Providing Consistency

I started tentatively conjecturing blue krater for Cubensis, with no reliance as far as I remember I DONT’ THINK MY ARG A MONTH AGO WAS … TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION AT ALL THE BLUE COLOR AS HAVING ANY POSSIBILITY/ POTENTIAL FOR BEING SIGNIFICANT.

I had become overly dismissive of color-based arg’n b/c of Ruck’s fault, any speck of white or red — even imagined like Hatsis hugely caught Ruck mis-asserting for roasting salamander bestiary tree).

In my mind, color-based indicators were a no-go.

“It cannot have any significance, that the krater is blue.”

— I FALSELY reasoned, OVERCORRECTING FOR Ruck’s fallacious red-and-white argumentation.

Buildings and Towers and Columns with Base Mean Control Stability Instead of Loss of Control Like Ram Seizure

Buildings, towers, but firstly, columns: I definitely, distinctly started toward root of decoding {tower, building} in Nov. 2020 re: Canterbury image f134’s {columns} (which I just figured out today or yesterday, it turns out, these are equivalent: column = building [= scale balance too].

I never considered decoding “buildings” motif until like 1-2 days ago when I started … before starting to decode {buildings} in the “newish-to-me” image f145 last night, very recently a cpl weeks ago I started decoding 4 horses f177 image, which has several towers & a building.

[I REALLY WISH TO KNOW WHEN I STARTED DECODING F177 4 HORSES A CPL WKS AGO – see timestamps and URL dates.]

my history of increasing certainty of interpreting blue and tawny as Cubensis (I nailed blue krater 1-2 months ago yet inconsistently FAILED to look in the damn dispensary bins —

I bragged about being able to see inside , see what’s in the blue Krater by reading Eadwine’s mind b/c I know how he thinks

BUT my E.S.P. had a mega failure to be consistent and say, THEREFORE IF I WERE TO ANGLE MY EYES 15 DEGREES AND STOP SQUEEZING MY EYES TIGHTLY SHUT AND OPEN THEM AND FRIKKIN LOOK INSIDE THE BINS, IT WOULD CONFIRM blue krater = collect Cubensis,

and especially, would provide a boost, an INCREASE of consistency; would effect a jump from consistent “= grain” to consistent “= Cubnesis” .

I’m always telling other people, mental model transformation is about WHOLESALE SYSTEMIC REINDEXING OF EVERYTHING, *not* piecemeal rethinking!

The *worst of all* assertion-combinations is my February 1, 2023-March 16, 2023 assertion, oil & water, “blue krater = collect Cubensis AND bins/bucket = grain.

Had I gone to the massive trouble of OPEN THE EYES and AIM AT BINS, it would have confirmed a couple months ago my claim that I have Julie-Brown level of X-Ray vision to see inside the blue collection krater:

she strictly reports only what she sees (while doing field work in Church of St. Martin), which is that the tops that are above the stems have been somehow painted over or obscured.

Browns’ Writing Is Tops at Pretending to Not Assert the Same Hallucination as Rush [move to St Martin p.]

[“tops” is tricks with words to hide that she’s asserting mushrooms just like John Rush, attempted “plausble deniability”, but indirectly definitely she’s asserting mushroom, b/c phrase “mushroom stem” same page.

She WANTED to write “caps” but KNEW would be caught fabricating shiite that’s NOT THERE, so, she danced around that, by obscuring the unsupported assertion by writing the fake locution “tops” (strange & suspicious term!) – red flag, trying to mislead the reader.

“I never asserted mushrooms, b/c that would be unjustified.” Yeah right. “Tops” 🙄

I merely asserted “plant like gifts”, “stems” (on a page about msh’s) and “tops” (ditto). Reality: Asserting like Rush, that we are shown mushrooms — when in fact, we’re shown sticks, and didn’t even mention feathers, but asserted “tops” …. though “not visible”.

Results in a Wasson-level mess of, what EXACTLY are you asserting, and what EXACTLY are you not asserting, and what EXACTLY are you reporting seeing?

Fishy writing, thoroughly – dancing-about, trying to paint an impressionistic picture of what was asserted, instead of straight-talking.

Who would ever write “stems and tops”, I have never heard caps called “tops”.

Why would you write “tops” unless you’re trying to hide the fact that you’re trying to INSINUATE mushroom caps, without SAYING “caps”.

con’t:

People who lack the John Rush level of perception (he wrote about this fresco feature, “We clearly see mushrooms being handed out here” 😑 ) and Julie Brown, while yet criticizing Rush’s hallucinogens, followed him right into that pit.

For people lacking the hallucinogen vision of John Rush and the X-Ray vision able to see under the paint like Julie Brown, what’s shown is sticks and feathers, which utterly lack any significance. (other than being isomorphic with the contrast between the possibilism & eternalism experiential modes from high-dose Psilocybin)

Like Jesus’ finger-shapes.

Blue Color of Krater & Bins Breaks Through to Radical Consistency

Failure to Simply Look, wtf?!

How I would have needed to formulate that scientific hypothesis and conduct the experiment to disconfirm:

  1. Open eyes.
  2. Look.
  3. Aim eyes at bin.
  4. Stop using Julie Brown X-Ray vision to project grain into the bins.
  5. Stop IMAGINING what i would see IF I were to aim eyes at bins. Science by conjecture? First ought to try LOOKing.
  6. Perceive mushrooms explicitly shown in bins (remember i been lecturing people to stop writing the forbidden word hidden or secret and i retitled my Proof Canterbury Psilocybin article as “explicit mushrooms”).
  7. Register the data input readings from eyes: Mushroom images.
  8. Say “Oh.”
  9. Say “I am blind idiot.”
  10. Engage brain.
  11. ANNOUNCE WITH GREAT FANFARE THE PLAIN AND EXPLICIT MUSHROOMS OPENLY AND OBVIOUSLY DISPLAYED ON THE “GRAIN DISPENSER” BINS
  12. Declare myself the most brilliant and insightful art interpreter EVAR 😑
Row 3 Middle

I’ll announce the conjecture, just so Evil Future Me can’t get a toe in to be more radical [that failed nevertheless! haha on you, Dumb Past-Me — weak! even w/ that conjecture!] but it’s an extremely unlikely long shot that this blue krater collects Cubensis, because we know that grain is shown being distributed in Row 2; and we know blue is proved to be meaningless, because Ruck and Rush err in fetishizing red and white as if meaningful. And there is a guy being shown as so dumb simpleton (not a supersmarty like us moderns) as to be happy about getting grain. Look away from such doltishness.

Cybermonk, yelling out wisdom on world wide web Nov. 2020-March 2023
So dumb, he’s excited about grain – Cybermonk (the smart guy)
Row 2 Right
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk
Cybermonk (actual unretouched photo)
Cybermonk (artist’s impression, contents may not match product packaging)

See Also

Saint Martin Frescos 🌴🔪🍄🖼🔍🔬🧐
Section heading:
Image 3: Towers of Jerusalem

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/11/saint-martin-frescos-%e2%9e%b3%f0%9f%96%96%f0%9f%8c%b4%f0%9f%94%aa%f0%9f%8d%84%f0%9f%96%bc%f0%9f%94%8d%f0%9f%94%ac%f0%9f%a7%90/#Image-3-Towers-of-Jerusalem

Article title:
Canterbury f145: King Orders Shipments of Blue Fruit to Storage Lockboxes with Blue-Stemmed Mushroom Tree (All Image Crops)
Section heading:
Right Full Towers
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/17/canterbury-f145-king-orders-shipments-of-blue-fruit-to-storage-lockboxes-with-blue-stemmed-mushroom-tree/#Right-Full-Towers

Attention Entheogen Scholars: Red and White is Out; Blue and Gold is In

Cybermonk 9:55 a.m. March 17, 2023

Mobile app broken voice transcription

to do copy paste again Canterbury blue containers and stems: done below

Are You Hip to Our In-Group Club’s Trendy Lingo? (Nvm that it explains NOTHING)

to do in my article add to this list of earth centered cosmology Terminology versus sun centered cosmology Terminology lexicon

Column headings:

old failed theory

new successful theory the Egodeath theory the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism

to do : copy paste my forbidden words list from the notes for the article my article branching message Mushroom trees. it gives all of the forbidden words , that are out; and all the correct replacement words , which are in

section : Incorrect Word List (Anti-Lexicon) and Correct Effective Egodeath Conceptual Vocabulary/ Lexicon ,

in idea dev p 18 https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/14/idea-development-page-18/

tho ton of writing about this list’s terms in the Notes for article – the list OUGHT to be in this section: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/25/article-overflow-for-psychedelic-eternalism-mushroom-trees-non-branching-and-handedness/#Focus-on-the-Wrong-Shiite

copy of list from p 18:

todo: add to list:

red and white –> blue and gold

neuroBS neuroscience cognitive neuroscience cognitive delete deletion of cognitive while pretending to do cognitive, you delete the cognitive, good job. Cognitive Neuro-Reductionism Cognitive Neuro-Reductionism

make sure add the 4 bad words:

default mode network

neuroplasticity / Neuroscience / cognitive neuroscience

ego dissolution

nondual unity oneness

The four pillars of pseudo explanation: eliminating, replacing that which is to be explained; explaining away.

How will we deal with the problem of the shadow dragon monster we will explain it away and do our shell game the shell game which is 11 factors questionnaire and CEQ questionnaire

We’re gonna shuffle question 54 here and there and put in ANX vague Anxiety factor where it doesn’t belong, instead of Impaired CONTROL (ICC), and then we’re gonna move it , we’re gonna have our Supplemental figure S one hidden separate document and then we have a hidden separate document supplemental figure ass too and which is a separate hidden document from 11 factors article

Shell Game 54 move 1

Studerus 2010 secret hidden Supplemental Figure S1, not part of Studerus article; doesn’t exist

Shell Game 54 move 2

Studerus 2010 secret hidden Supplemental Figure S2, not part of Studerus article; doesn’t exist

Shell Game 54 move 3 presto changeo shadow dragon monster vanished! 🎩🪄🐉 by Psychedelic 🍄 “Science” 😊👍

LOOK OVER HERE!! 📣 Studerus 2010 OFFISHUL TABLE! now, dragon shadow monster-free 😊🪄

🦄💨🌈 Psychedelic “Science”

Studerus helpfully explains: “items 18, 69, 54, 13, and 17 1/2 were dropped due to math reason A or B”

Letheby’s In-House Concocted Buffet of All Possible Metaphysics Positions incl whoppingly malformatted table major errors

wrong error-packed Psychometrics “Science” table:, ignore

Table 1 in Letheby: Psychedelics Alter [Chis Letheby’s when he’s tripping] Metaphysical Beliefs, 2021.

See the Eternalism row in this Letheby-created table.

Article Presents the MBQ Metaphysical Beliefs Questionnaire, which incorps also some FAD-Plus items inclg all the Fatalistic Determinism items (which competes against the superior Eternalism)

~1994 v1 FAD freewill and determinism questionnaire article, which did not have a subscale /factor called “fatalistic determinism” at all.

~2010 FAD-Plus article: The fatalistic determinism subscale was only added there later as an afterthought in version two, called FAD-Plus. part of The Rock Solid foundation for Chris Letheby.

url https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/10/mbq-metaphysical-beliefs-questionnaire-timmermann-letheby-2021/

Letheby Dissertation: The Philosophy of Psychedelic Transformation

url https://eres.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/104676/2/02whole.pdf

url https://www.bing.com/search?q=Letheby+Dissertation+Philosophy+of+Psychedelic+Transformation

Book: Philosophy of Psychedelics

url https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/03/philosophy-of-psychedelics-letheby-2021/

Scientific Shell Game 54 cont

and finally in our shell game we end up presenting with a big spotlight put on it drawing all attention to the stage trickery of attention

we’re going to draw your attention away from the shadow dragon monster, the high level categories unpleasant experiences item 54

don’t look that direction, look over here at our new sparkling shiny new 11 factors!!

— never mind virtual factor 12 (VIR) and shadow factor 13 (SHA) 😱😵🐉 which doesn’t exist

it’s hidden in a box with no label in the darkest corner of storage, not listed in the accounting books .

what’s in the box ? 🤔🧐 lift the lid its item 54 I was afraid to lose my self control

Along with seven other suppressed and repressed items what a good idea for science lets suppress and repress item 54 and deny that it exists and ditto for the other HRS questionnaire negative items and SOCQ questionnaire negative items like HRS item it was difficult to control my thoughts that doesn’t sound challenging enough to even put in our initial item Paul says role in Griffiths says Matthew Johnson highly qualified expert at complete newbie mystical experiences

just the perfect people who are experts at writing unicorns and rainbows revised version of the so-called mystical experiences not recognized by any authentic mystic in history according to Harvard Divinity school Charles Stang

The king of all reductionism when you reduce the dynamics that are uniquely distinctive of the Psychedelics Psilocybin state and you replace them by Roland Griffiths CEQ questionnaire grief category which sounds nicely familiar it is reductionism to the ordinary state of consciousness to eliminate while pretending to explain the actual bona fide psychedelic experiences we’ll just replace them buy something that sounds as if it is familiar : ordinary state based reductionism,

reductionism on a grandest magnitude, of the first order

the king of all reductionism

CEQ represents the ultimate pinnacle of perfect reductionism : total elimination of that which it pretends to explain

I FOUND A LINK ! for the list: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/14/idea-development-page-18/#Forbidden-word-list – copypaste is below:

Incorrect Word List (Anti-Lexicon) and Correct Effective Egodeath Conceptual Vocabulary/ Lexicon

  • incorrect word – correct word
  • alchemy – esoteric analogy
  • Allegro – Brown, Samorini
  • Amanita – Psilocybin
  • benefit – transformation
  • mushroom – Psilocybin mushroom
  • connectedness – block-universe eternalism
  • cult – ingest
  • default mode network – possibilism-thinking, literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control; possibilism mental worldmodel [POSSIBILITY BRANCHING MODEL has key word branching]
  • ego dissolution – ego transcendence, loose cognitive association binding
  • Eleusis – Canterbury
  • experiment – use, ingest
  • ineffable – mental worldmodel transformation
  • kykeon – sacred meals, rounds of mixed wine, mixed-wine banqueting.
  • mystical – intense mystic altered state, intensely loose cognitive binding
  • nondual – block universe eternalism
  • occasion – cause
  • Plaincourault – Canterbury
  • rite – ingest
  • secret – explicit
  • soma – Psilocybin
  • spiritual – altered state
  • surrender – repudiate, formally transgress
  • therapy – initiation
  • unity – block-universe eternalism
  • Wasson – Samorini, Brown

Asp from the Aberdeen Bestiary (12th c

/ end 🍝

motivation for this page is that as good as it is to say the plane crawled is out and that the plane coral fresco is out and that Canterbury is in plain coral fresco the fresco at the town of Plaincourault France

stupid voice transcription

Plane crawl France is out plane corralled France is out you just got it right stupid voice transcription and now you can’t comprehend what I’m saying

the town of Plaincourault in France is out

The town of Canterbury in England is in

you see this bug a voice transcription approves my point by point I was trying to make is that it is simpler and clear for everybody to say the slogan red and white is out blue and gold is in the voice transcription was 100% successful on the first try which proves my point this is the motivation for this post is that it struck me

I am calling for a paradigm shift I am not here to make slight repairs on a completely totally 100% broken filled psychedelic science

and as Letcher hatsis complains a Malformed embarrassment of a childish infantilization of the field of entheogen scholarship which they correctly identify as the cause is the fixation the allegro red and white kiddie mushroom 🍄 fixation is a gigantic dead-end cul-de-sac that we need to jump out of it onto a proper foundation of adult level thinking

copypaste from last post: 

Folio 145 -1 mushroom tree, mushroom eaves

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom

Probably dark outdated 2020 colors; see library orig zoom in at site for bright 2022 colors

Folio 145 Detail – Right-side Debranched – 1 mushroom tree

Mushroom tree #72

dark, redo:

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom
https://innervisions.nl/wp-content/themes/BLANK-Theme/images/big/zauberpilze-sporen-psilocybe-cubensis-amazonian.jpg

Blue and Tawny Colors of Lockbox Bins Indicates Cubensis

realization around 6:30 a.m. March 17, 2023 in the midst of composing & reviewing these two posts 

/ end copy🍝

copyies from f134 rows panels page :

Row 1 Left
Row 3 Middle Balanced
Crop by Cybermonk
“canterbury-f134-oxen-harvest.jpg” 343 KB [8:59 p.m. Feb. 26, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom#