When intensity starts to decline, redose the 2nd round of mixed wine.
This safely creates a twin mountain approximating a trapezoid or twin mountain, instead of a triangle.
This redosing technique to flatten curve and sustain the peak is most useful & practical with fast-onset plants, not eg cactus or ibogaine which takes many hours to reach peak.
Simplified model: peak time = 2 hours after t0 of dose 1.
At time of peak = 2 hours, take 2nd round of wine.
As effect from dose 1 declines, effect from dose 2 rises.
The decline & the rise cancel out, giving a flat constant intensity that has a duration that’s the same as the rise time.
Oregon 109’s redose: 25mg then at t-peak= 2 hours, 2nd 25 mg dose.
Resulting shape: 2 hours of rise ramp then 2 hours of constant cruise level then 2 hours of ramp decline to baseline.
Timing and amount of round 2 or 3 causes safe oscillation around target intensity level.
Schedule35 website, or article about Golden TEACHER strain of cubensis, claims 4 hours total – but instead focus on a burst trigger model:
What is the time to rise to peak level? That’s what matters for useful redose timing design, not total duration.
At what time is decline detected? Serve next round of wine when detect decline.
You have no brake pedal, and instead of a variable gas pedal, you have a pushbutton to initiate a ramp up that takes x hours to peak.
Golden Teacher is supposedly short-lasting, has ramp-up time of half of the 4 hours total duration = 2 hours.
Let us do a simple demo curve summation calculation based on 2 hours ramp-up time.
That is the number to focus on: time to peak = 2 hours, therefore after start declining at 2 hours, then do 2nd round; initiate ramp-up to compensate for the decline.
Resulting shape: trapezoid, or twin mountain; or the most sophisticated model/ intensity curve shape to aim for is: ramp up, then oscillate around the target level, then ramp down.
2 hours of climb, then 2 hours of fairly constant cruise intensity level, then 2 hours of decline to baseline.
Can do a 3rd round of mixed wine when start to decline: thus can effect the ideal goal of oscillating safely around the target intensity level.
Activity per Eadwine Image
Test control stability when rely on no-free-will / non-branching possibilities.
Freewill/branching gives control-instability. No-free-will/non-branching gives control stability.
When you give psilocybin, you must teach eternalism, to be equipped; to reduce strain and to successfully transform.
If curriculum for psilocybin trainers doesn’t teach this first principle, the harmful result is mental strain and failure to transform and resolve into the transcendent mature form.
I recorded a week of spoken development of this idea. I want to write a curriculum model about this to lead all psilocybin educational material.
Photo: Julie Brown (unless from the other version i found) – crop by Cybermonk April 2022. Left = branching = ordinary state.
OR Measure 109 & CO Prop 122 are actually mainly about religious use of psilocybin even though couched as therapy clinic. In mythic-described tradition, psilocybin transformation to eternalism is the paradigmatic model of healing. It is malpractice antd anti-healing to give someone psilocybin without teaching them eternalism. The main effect of psilocybin is eternalism transformation.
Freewill thinking is good and valid for the ordinary state, no-free-will for altered state.
Do not disrespect possibilism, bc after transformation we rely on possibilism-thinking; freewill branching type experiential mode though remain able to enter the altered state by relying on eternalism-thinking during loose cognition.
Psychedelics Today org at their website(s) & YouTube has good links related to psilocybin RELIGIOUS/ SPIRITUAL “clinic therapy”.
We demand repeal of Prohibition and companies must support that.
In a recent voice recording not released yet, I refute the implied claim that I’ve ever said:
Only psilocybin is important or present in western religious history.
What I did say is that we should put all attention and all investment on psilocybin.
For one reason, psilocybin is in fact a primary plant, whereas amanita and scopolamine and cannabis are merely secondary, which is to say, they are non-primary.
Another reason why extreme attention is required on Psilocybin is because this is the only way to effectively counter and destroy and smash the status quo that has, just as Thomas Hatsis has complained, the Amanita Primacy theory has driven entheogen scholarship into a dead end, causing the field to lose credibility, to forfeit effectiveness, and to lose believability and relevance.
Carl Ruck paints a cartoonish unreal picture, where only two men in the Church at any point in time know about secret amanita alchemy.
Ruck is obsessed on his one-dimensional, reductionist description of plant history so as to reduce the field of entheogen scholarship and western religion into a tiny little thimble: the Carl Ruck little tiny cage of secret Amanita alchemy.
Allied with Letcher Hatsis, I am dismantling the malformed Amanita false primacy narrative by Wasson Allegro Ruck Heinrich Irvin Rush – the guilty parties, the mis-leaders to fight against and destroy, shove their loud and wrong mythic tale aside to make them stop misleading and mis-directing the field of entheogen scholarship.
Clark Heinrich’s book titles overemphasize secret alchemy, and he collaborates with Ruck to narrow and stunt the field and remove / withhold the thousands of psilocybin images from Hellenistic and Christian art.
Pilocybin, not Amanita ( nor Cannabis nor Scopalamine) is the key, definitive, most relevant plant, which is best suited for decoding myth into its actual ultimate loose cognitive referent.
My values and objectives per the Egodeath theory are superior and true: to bring scientific understanding of Transcendent Knowledge; to create the most important and valuable field of science, which is Loose Cognitive Science.
There is only one plant that is necessary and sufficient to build a completely successful theory of core Transcendent Knowledge and of religious history and myth: psilocybin.
Such type of successful explanatory theory cannot be built on scopolamine alone, and it cannot be built on cannabis alone, and it cannot be built on Amanita alone – but it can be built on psilocybin alone!
The goal is not to make the smallest theory; the goal of scientific explanation models explanatory models is the ratio:
The winner is the model that has the largest explanatory power achieved by the smallest theory.
Too small of a theory rapidly loses its explanatory power, and this is why unfortunately it was necessary for me to formally summarize as an essential basis for explanation a complicated three-level model of Transcendent Knowledge in history:
3) qualified possibilism-thinking (liable to negatively value eternalism revelation)
Abused Myth (Hermetic texts as received and framed by Hanegraaff) overemphasizes moving from phase/level 2 to 3, in order to tell a false story that the main transformation direction is from no-free-will to freewill.
To do this, he covertly moves the fixed stars (heimarmene) down below (ie before) the Saturn rebirth gate.
He cannot allow rebirth into no-free-will; he fabricates a false rebirth into freewill, reversing the cosmic model levels to try to accomplish this herculean impossible task.
My latest four-phase model, that I have spoken about yesterday, is able to handle explaining a complexity which I have been explaining for many years, which is in my 2006 summary article: that the heimarmene worldline snake is treated in myth as both positive and negative in value, when we contrast,
Per Luther H. Martin, I incorporate his description of the contrast between early antiquity, which positively valued eternalism, vs late antiquity, which negatively valued eternalism, and confusing myth resulted.
Their complications which they introduced demand for me to explain them.
It is obligatory and mandatory that if my theory is any good at all, if it has any relevance at all, it is a strict requirement that my theory must explain the confused complexities of three-level, false & garbled religion which tries to tell a false and misleading story of how cognitive development works.
The condensed true, 2-level model (the main altered-state transformation effect) is:
Psilocybin changes from freewill to no-free-will.
They try to tell the lie, a lying form of religious mythology, the Hanegraaff lie which is: the mind transforms on psilocybin from no free will to Freewill – which is only slightly true, a minor reverse eddy current, not the main current/ vector/ trajectory/ direction of altered-state cognitive mental-model development.
Begin here with my latest, four-phase description of the actual developmental trajectory of the mind, the mental model, across the two states of consciousness:
4. tight cognition with possibilism experiencing + eternalism-thinking
3. loose cognition with eternalism experiencing + eternalism-thinking
1. tight cognition with possibilism experiencing + possibilism-thinking
what the late antiquity liars do is exaggerate focus on moving from eternalism revelation to baseline consciousness possibilism experiencing.
They falsely picture salvation as moving from no-free-will to freewill, from eternalism to possibilism, because “I Hate Fate”; they came to perceive and resent the Heimarmene which early antiquity delivered to them and had venerated.
The actual main transformation is from possibilism to eternalism, not eternalism to possibilism as Wouter Hanegraaff is suckered into tale-telling in his June 2022 book Hermetic Spirituality – a lie revealed by his being forced to lower the heimarmene stars to below (ie before) the rebirth gate even though all science and all esotericists declare Hanegraaff’s moving downward of the stars insane and nonstandard and irrational and incoherent to the extreme.
Hanegraaff falsely claims that this book cover image depicts moving from no-free-will to freewill.
The image depicts casting out heimarmene, he falsely claims, via the rebirth process.
In fact, cognitive development goes the other direction, but people hate their egos being undermined, so they fabricated garbled revision of the original true mythology, forming Satanic reversal of myth so as to claim to go through rebirth from no-free-will into freewill.
To support that falsified myth, they abandoned psilocybin and used methods that are guaranteed to not work, to be ineffective at undermining egoic delusion.
These substitute methods are pushed by phony Zen Master Brad precisely because they don’t work, but preserve deluded possibilism-thinking.
Just like in 1925 block-universe relativity eternalism caused the false reaction, the ego-defense reaction, of fabricating quantum physics ideology to rescue and save the ego steersman who wields the kingly power of steering among branching manyworlds.
The poetry-abusing fake fraud priest huckster salemen the Hermetic text authors misled Hanegraaff, selling him snake oil mystic ascent “from no-free-will to freewill” though in truth, that vector is merely minor.
The *main* vector, honorably reflected with integrity in Mithraism, is from freewill-premised thinking to the no-free-will revelation that you do not control the source of your control thoughts.
Ego Death theory is a set of bets, eg Jesus didnt exist, earth went around sun 1300 times between Julius and Ozzy (chronology revision) … but these bets and conjectures are arranged in different priorities:
Inner core /
outer core /
inner periphery /
outer periphery of the Egodeath theory.
it is strategic; there are pros and cons of having a theory actually take a damn stand – instead of wussily and ineffectively claiming everybody is right and every plant is important and every religion is true and every philosophy, every mystic writing is true and everybody’s correct. we are left with delusion ignorance, ambiguous poetry, not STEM-level straightforward comprehension & teaching.
You cannot teach people transcendent knowledge through telling them the lie that Amanita has primacy for theory construction and history, when in fact psilocybin has and deserves primacy instead.
I am all about betting the entire ego death theory; to be a theorist, to define a theory, is to make bets.
Not everyone has the guts and evidence and reasoning to make such bets, to construct and assert a new explanatory paradigm.
I bet the Egodeath theory all the time and produced a long string of wins.
I bet the Egodeath theory on the primacy of psilocybin against damned amanita, dead-end unprofitable phony king, the false king Amanita that brings discredit on the field of entheogen scholarship. But it’s a matter of integrated and distinct theory components.
Entheogen scholarship is not = the Egodeath theory; one component of it, & one component of my entheogen scholarship theory (the Mytheme metaphor theory) is that the ultimate analogy vision inducing plant is psilocybin in western religious history – regardless of how many sessions with each plant. Or how many times the plant is named in texts.
Later Irvin demonizes Ruck as pushing the hell out of Amanita without ever ingesting it.
That wouldn’t surprise me, the passionate pushing of a plant Ruck hasn’t even tested. It’s all about the narrative, the story, the free-form Anthropology poetry that’s this academic genre, as analyzed by Cyberdisciple.
Carl Ruck’s word ‘secret’ is everything wrong with the field of entheogen scholarship.
This is his reductionist paradigm that he forces and steers misdirecting the whole field into his little thimble which ends up taking away our plants from our history.
The function of the false Amanita Primacy doctrine in entheogen scholarship is to remove delete subtract and deny and eliminate Psilocybin from history and from its rightful place of primacy.
100% of our effort ought to be to recognize the primacy of Psilocybin and overthrow the noxious stranglehold that the Amanita Primacy false theory has on entheogen scholarship.
That is totally not an assertion that western religious history lacks scopalamine or amanita or cannabis or acacia rue.
It would be a misrepresentation of the Egodeath theory to claim that the Egodeath theory is betting everything on Psilocybin-only.
The Egodeath theory proposes assertively the primacy of Psilocybin against the false claim by Gordon Wasson, John Allegro, Carl Ruck, Clark Heinrich, Jan Irvin, & John Rush that Amanita has primacy, and against Thomas Hatsis’ Scopalamine primacy, and against Chris Bennett’s Cannabis primacy assertion/claim.
One reason which I recorded out of about five reasons why psilocybin has primacy:
Thomas Hatsis warns us do not try scopolamine it is deadly toxic. Then contrast psilocybin which is harmless (aside from maybe wood lovers paralysis).
Anybody can scientifically test psilocybin to see whether it is the best producer of religious mythology experiencing. Unlike dud failure Amanita.
As far as we know from our near-nonexistent testing of it, Amanita experiencing does not produce religious myth, which describes by analogy, classic psilocybin dynamics.
Myth directly describes psilocybin mental model transformation to the non-branching world model with frozen embedded dependent control, demonstrating the illusion and impotence and disprovabity and instability and vulnerability of the initial control model that’s premised on autonomous control that’s steering in a branching-possibilities world.
And anybody can test swallowing several vials of thc cannabis extract (aching stomach) and scientifically test and prove that it is visionary but not psychedelic; not properly psychedelic, a poor match with religious mythic description of the things experienced in the classic psychedelic state.
Criticisms, or Misrepresentations?
A time-tested rule is that criticisms of the Egodeath theory are always misrepresentations of the Egodeath theory.
Nothing’s stopping anyone from making criticisms, which is to say, making misrepresentations of what I’ve said and asserted.
Idea development is all about increasing clarity, clarification of what I am asserting and what I am not asserting.
Stamets Is Wrong, Biased, and Is Part of the Amanita Primacy Fallacy
My voice recording announcement of a challenge yesterday is yet another example of how:
You cannot formulate an explanatory theory if you are not willing to assert bets against the entire field or the entire world.
Every mycologist is wrong when they claim that cubensis didn’t grow on bovine dung in England until 1976, that cubensis isn’t in Europe before 1976.
This is simply blindness.
All the scholars, all of the learned academics know that there are no psychedelics in our own religious history.
And they will deflect and interpret away and explain away as Thomas Hatsis brags about doing to easily explain away thousands and thousands of evidence, by employing bad wrong false framing of course, as well as sheer ignorance and closing your eyes not even attempting to see psilocybin mushrooms.
The main cognitive effect of ingesting Amanita scholarship is to make you blind to psilocybin.
Everyone in the field of entheogen scholarship knows what I mean:
The art scholars do not even attempt to see the thousands of mushrooms in Christian art, so tell me the names of the Mycologists in England who went around looking at cow dung before and after 1976.
No one looked for mushrooms on cow dung in England in the 20th C, and then Stamets falsely claims that they aren’t there, because they weren’t reported.
We know there are no mushrooms in Christian art, or else art historians would have reported them.
Did you forget the principle that the world moves from ignorance to awareness, per science development? Veiled and then revealed like the branching vs. nonbranching message that I was blind to in the art at top & bottom of my main article from 2006-2022.
🙈 no cubensis were reported in England until 1976, reports the field of entheogen scholarship while pushing their false pseudo-history, of the Amanita Primacy false doctrine.
Paul Stamets requires us to believe the preposterous ramification that there were no cubensis on cow patties until 1976.
Stamets is blind, ignorant, incoherent, and wrong, just as the entire field of entheogen scholarship and religion is wrong.
This declaration that the entire world hass been dead wrong on all important topics about Transcendent Knowledge is precisely the inherent nature of doing science, creating revolutionary paradigm explanatory models that replace the previous garbled heap of mess and confusion and vague suppositions, aka the old “theory”.
1996 Stamets falsely states there was no cubensis in England before 1976, and then Letcher 2007 and Hatsis 2016 assert the same irrational, incoherent proposition: that Cubensis grows on bovine dung – but only after 1976.
Hatsis is dead wrong according to Stamets: “the liberty cap is anachonistic for western religious history” Hatsis tells me, but the 1996 Stamets book Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World: An Identification Guide says Liberty Cap is all around the world.
Letcher Hatsis says no Liberty Caps were in England until 1976.
Stamets himself is blind, biased, and wrong, complicit in the Amanita Primacy false theory, when he claims that despite cubensis growing on bovine dung, there was no cubensis in England before 1976.
Bull 💩! That makes no sense, and is countered by the evidence.
Samorini is in cahoots, part of the problem too: he can’t even find 3 Amanita mushroom trees to fill the left column of his table, and he commits the error of false equivalency as if 50% of mushroom trees are Amanita, but actually, 99% of mushroom trees are Psilocybin.
Plaincourault is singled out for monofocus because it is the only Amanita mushroom tree.
Panofsky said Plaincourault is merely one instance of “hundreds”, but actually, it’s unique and is contrasted against the thousands of normal, psilocybin-based branching-message mushroom trees.
The Ruck-misled pop cult fixates on the lone, deviant, exception case (Plaincourault’s Amanita mushroom tree), so as to ignore the thousands of instances of the normal type of mushroom tree, which is psilocybin.
Browns’ book is around 2/3 Amanita imagery, feeding into the Amanita Primacy fallacy that steered entheogen scholarship into a stagnant, unproductive dead end.
I have made voice recordings summarizing developments in the industry – recordings not produced and uploaded yet – as episodes of Egodeath Mystery Show.
The podcasts describe the first phase of the nascent psychedelics industry which was a boom / hyperoptimism phase. And then the second phase was a bust / skepticism phase.
you will instantly understand the dispute between two camps given that the Psilocybin center approach charges $13,000 for a dose of psilocybin.
1000 times overpriced, overcharging.
as opposed to grassroots/ the people/ popular spirituality use and healing, and indigenous.
Outstanding presentation. (First half and final part are relevant.) Psilocybin and Amanita mushrooms in Christian history; psychedelics in world religion.
Proposed Rules and the November 2022 Public Comment Period
We want to hear from you! Below is a copy of the proposed rules for the November public comment period. We invite you to provide comments on the proposed rules during the public comment period that runs from November 1, 2022 to November 21, 2022 (closing at 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time).
I wish to comment on section 3070 (training practicum), but the 333-333 Proposed Rules Nov 2022 pdf skips that section number.
At bottom is the link to my Requirements for Guides page, based on the cubensis initiation image/scene from the Canterbury psalter illuminated manuscript. Row 1 of 3 shows practicum, facilitator, testing, cubensis administration session, and cubensis banquet administration:
This is public feedback about the proposed rules during the November 2022 public feedback period per webpage:
Add term “group administration session”. I thought it meant a classroom filling out paperwork together prior to the private preparation session.
Add term “administration session”.
Add term “training practicum”, where is document section 3070 about it? Skipped in Nov 2022 pdf proposed rules.
(37) “Lead educator” means a person affiliated with a training program who is responsible for tracking the progress of students throughout the program.
Comment:
“Students” = clients, or facilitators? Specify which. Per (74), facilitators.
The lead educator (facilitator) of initiation candidates (clients) is depicted in the Canterbury psalter image row 1 left, bearded; second figure from left, also shown in row 1 right, at the cubensis banquet table with funnel hat, encouraging the maiden.
(74) “Training program” means a program that has been approved to offer training to psilocybin facilitators as described in ORS 475A.380.
(75) “Training program applicant” means a program that has applied to offer training to psilocybin facilitators as described in ORS 475A.380.
Comment:
My main concern is to deliver my “Requirements for Guides” webpage, to connect it to document section 475A.380.
475A.380 Minimum standards of education and training for psilocybin service facilitators; rules
Comment:
This section is my main concern per my Requirements for Guides webpage.
475A.375 Powers and duties relating to psilocybin service facilitators. The Oregon Health Authority shall:
(1) Determine the qualifications, training, education and fitness of applicants for licenses to facilitate psilocybin services, giving particular consideration to:
(a) Facilitation skills that are affirming, non-judgmental, and non-directive;
Comment:
A facilitator must know the standard established suggestion that to restore stable self control, submit control; submit to trans-personal, greater, overpowering control, if the client experiences the highly predictable, classic psilocybin experience of being a helpless puppet externally controlled.
(b) Support skills for clients during an administration session, including specialized skills for:
(A) Client safety; and
Comment:
The main problem for client safety (with high dose) is the threat of loss of control, while transforming the mental model of control. The standard, known, established solution is to submit control and acknowledge multi-level control. This is the main “specialized skill” required for an adequate and authentic facilitator: the ability to move from control seizure back to stable control, by acknowledging limited personal control.
(B) Clients who may have a mental health condition;
(c) The environment in which psilocybin services should occur; and
(d) Social and cultural considerations.
Comment:
World religion concurs that the solution to control seizure panic attack spiritual emergency is to acknowledge limited personal control. Control stability thereby is restored.
(2) Formulate a code of professional conduct for psilocybin service facilitators, giving particular consideration to a code of ethics;
(3) Establish standards of practice and professional responsibility for individuals licensed by the authority to facilitate psilocybin services;
Comment:
It would be irresponsible, the ultimate classic hubris, and one would be a basically unequipped facilitator, if a facilitator is not able to instruct a client of the standard way to restore control stability in the peak state: submit control; acknowledge limited personal control.
Lacking that specialized skill would be to lack the most basic, fundamental, relevant authority.
This specific knowledge is the very essence of authority in the psilocybin domain of experiencing.
(4) Select licensing examinations for licenses to facilitate psilocybin services;
Comment:
A facilitator must be examined to see if they are able to restore a client’s control stability during a peak state spiritual emergency, solving control seizure.
(5) Provide for waivers of examinations as appropriate; and
(6) Appoint representatives to conduct or supervise examinations of applicants for licenses to facilitate psilocybin services. [2021 c.1 §40]
475A.380 Minimum standards of education and training for psilocybin service facilitators; rules.
(1) The Oregon Health Authority shall adopt by rule minimum standards of education and training requirements for psilocybin service facilitators.
Comment:
Those minimum standards must include the topic of loss of control and transformation of the mental model of personal control per the well-established principle of “submission” (ie. submit to a greater, uncontrollable higher source of control-thoughts).
The established solution to the classic psychedelic peak climactic problem of control instability and panic or spiritual emergency is commonly called “submit control”.
A facilitator absolutely must understand this dynamic and solution, or else they are fundamentally unqualified.
See my “Requirements for Guides” webpage explaining the Canterbury psalter initiation image.
(2) The authority shall approve courses for psilocybin service facilitators. To obtain approval of a course, the provider of a course must submit an outline of instruction to the office and the Department of Education. The outline must include the approved courses, total hours of instruction, hours of lectures in theory and the hours of instruction in application of practical skills. [2021 c.1 §41]
Comment:
Courses must cover panic attack, control seizure, spiritual emergency, and the standard solution of submitting, to align with the higher, ultimate source of control.
Peak classic ego death as described in religious mythology, explained in direct detail by the Egodeath theory, must be expected and thoroughly prepared for, in the course materials, given that control seizure is a peak-state classic effect of psilocybin.
475A.345 Preparation session.
(1) Before a client participates in an administration session, the client must attend a preparation session with a psilocybin service facilitator.
Comment:
I agree with preliminary educating and preparing the initiate or client. This section should mention or differentiate “practicum training” (especially since section 3070 about latter is not found).
Comment:/Objection:
What is covered in the client preparation session? Do Rules now intend to specify this, or out of scope?
The Canterbury psalter cubensis initiation image depicts youths being trained and tested specifically about how to restore control stability by affirming a non-branching world model, which is equivalent to the standard solution of “submit control”.
Do the Rules require course materials that instruct trainers? I believe so and that should be required.
Comment:/Objection:
Do the Rules require course materials that instruct clients? I believe not, but that should be required.
Comment:/Unclear:
Do the Rules require course materials that instruct trainers on how to instruct clients? I believe so, and that should be required.
Comment:/Objection:
Is a single training or preparation meeting with the client sufficient?
The rules should require that the client receive and read adequate peak-state training material, including about panic attack, spiritual emergency, and above all, restoring stable control by the standard classic advice of “submit”.
I would definitely advise and require initiates (clients) to read about control seizure, “the shadow”, the “submit control” solution, prior to the preparation session.
The Rules should cover this educating the client and not imply that a preparation session is sufficient.
The course materials are underspecified in document 475A, perhaps deliberately.
My recommendations and Requirements (webpage url) concern the content of the course training materials, which is apparently not specified in the Rules.
333-333-2015
Allowable Species
Comment:
I agree with selecting Cubensis in particular.
This avoids wood lover’s paralysis.
This agrees with the cubensis initiation scene in the Canterbury psalter illuminated manuscript.
I agree with using a natural extract, though I am open to synthetic psilocybin.
Maybe the Marsh Chapel Good Friday Experiment and Roland Griffiths’ 2008 experiment used synthetic psilocybin – if so, that is a curious disconnect with the interest in natural extracts.
333-333-2310
Packaging and Serving Size
Comment:
The banqueting scene in the cubensis initiation image in the Canterbury psalter suggests that the maiden’s dose is one bowl of cubensis and the youth’s dose is two bowls of cubensis, because his hands are touching two bowls.
333-333-4470
Practicum Site
(1) Any service center may function as a practicum site under OAR 333-333-3070.
Comment:
Where is section OAR 333-333-3070? Skipped by this pdf. Define “practicum site”.
(2) A service center that functions as practicum site must notify the Authority that practicum will be offered at their location and identify any training program affiliated with the practicum prior to practicum taking place at their location.
Comment:
Define “practicum training”; where is section 3070?
The lesser mysteries trained initiates prior to ingesting the sacred meal/sacrament. Row 1 left in the Canterbury psalter cubensis initiation image depicts preliminary education and testing of initiation candidates (regarding understanding non-branching of possibilities and thus understanding limited personal control, to endure psilocybin-induced control seizure & restoration of stability).
(3) A service center that functions as a practicum site must comply with all applicable requirements of these rules, including but not limited to OAR 333-333-5200.
(1) A facilitator must complete a preparation session with every client who will participate in an administration session at least twenty-four hours but no more than 90 days prior to the commencement of the client’s first administration session with the facilitator. If different facilitators will conduct a client’s preparation, administration sessions or integration session, the client must provide written consent as described in subsection (7)(g) of this rule. A client must have an opportunity to approve and meet any facilitator who will provide psilocybin services prior to receiving services from that facilitator.
Comment:
Rules should mention reading materials for clients to read before the preparation session, alerting to loss of control, or transformation of the experience of wielding control, when using high dose.
(2) Preparation sessions required under this rule must be conducted privately with each individual client to allow clients to share personal information.
(3) For every client who will participate in an administration session, a facilitator must receive a completed client information form as described in OAR 333-333-5050.
(4) For every client who will participate in an administration session, a facilitator must complete a transportation plan as described in OAR 333-333-5150 in coordination with the client. The transportation plan may not approve a client to operate a motor vehicle, bicycle, or other form of self-operated transportation immediately following the administration session.
Comment:
Agree with explicitly covering transportation.
(5) For every client who will participate in an administration session, a facilitator must coordinate with the client to complete a client safety plan as described in OAR 333-333-5080.
Comment:
Client safety plan in 5080 = client-specific risks, which is out of scope of my Requirements for Guides that’s part of the Egodeath theory.
(6) A facilitator must provide a client with the following during or prior to a preparation session and review each document with the client during a preparation session:
(a) Informed consent document as described in OAR 333-333-5040.
(b) Client Bill of Rights as described in OAR 333-333-4520.
Comment:
Regarding materials/documents given to client before or prior to prep session, do Rules specify content of such, such as informing client that high dose can cause control loss (/transformation) seizure?
That ultimate peak-state problem is solved by claiming limited personal control, ie “submitting control”.
(f) Applicable sections of the service center emergency plan required by OAR 845-025-4460.
Comment:
Document 4460 is not found at same webpage. Emergency plan a la Stan Grof spiritual emergency needs to cover ego death loss of control seizure panic attack & submitting limited personal control to restore (transformed) control stability.
(7) In addition to the documents required by sections (3)(4)(5) and (6) of this rule, a facilitator must obtain prior written consent from a client during a preparation session for the following activities and circumstances:
(a) Participation in a group administration session, including the opportunity to meet other clients and facilitators participating in the group session as described in OAR 333-333-5020.
(b) Use of supportive touch during an administration session, if any, as described in OAR 333- 333-5120(6).
(c) Participation in a training practicum, including information regarding training program students and instructors who will be present during the client’s administration session. The client must have an opportunity to meet any students or instructors who will be present during their administration session prior to the commencement of an administration session.
Comment:
Unclear; define “training practicum”.
Where is doc section 3070? pdf skips.
(g) The use of different facilitators to conduct a client’s preparation, administration sessions or integration session.
(h) Consuming secondary doses of psilocybin products after the administration session has begun, including the total amount of psilocybin analyte that a client agrees to consume, not to exceed 50 mg of psilocybin analyte.
Comment:
Agree on redosing technique to flatten and extend intensity curve. Determine the duration between redosing to flatten: maybe at t = 1:15:00.
(i) Participating in an administration session where licensed representatives of a service center will be present pursuant to OAR 333-333-5200(9).
(8) During a preparation session, facilitators must provide clients an opportunity to discuss internal and external factors that could impact a psilocybin experience including but not limited to the client’s intention and expectations. If the client will participate in an outdoor administration session, the facilitator must provide an opportunity to discuss the client’s specific concerns that may be relevant to participating in an outdoor administration session, including but not limited to allergies and sensitivity to sun exposure.
Comment:
Agree on avoiding sunburn.
(9) Preparation sessions may be completed in person or virtually using video conferencing technology.
Comment:
Agree online could work well.
(10) The requirements of this rule may be satisfied by conducting multiple preparation sessions.
Comment:
Agree multiple prep sessions often could be best.
(11) A facilitator must complete an initial preparation session with every client before conducting an administration session with that client for the first time. After completing the initial preparation session, a facilitator is not required to complete additional preparation sessions prior to conducting an administration session with that client for a period of 12 months.
(12) If a facilitator does not complete additional preparation sessions as allowed by section (11) of this rule, the facilitator must confirm that the information contained in the client’s previously completed client information form remains accurate prior to conducting additional administration sessions.
(13) A facilitator must discuss the process for verification of license status and process for making complaints to the Authority during a preparation session.
(1) A facilitator must work with every client who will participate in an administration session to draft a safety and support plan that identifies risks and challenges specific to the client’s circumstances and resources available to mitigate those risks and challenges, including the client’s existing support network and appropriate external resources.
Comment:
My “Requirements for Guides” defined in my webpage concern not client-specific risks, but universal standard risks of the peak psilocybin state.
333-333-5020
Group Preparation Sessions
Comment:
Canterbury psalter’s cubensis initiation image depicts group initiation sessions in the banquet scene and mushroom tree scene. Not only using cubensis in a 1-on-1 session with the facilitator.
Objection/comment:
Do the Rules cover group psilocybin sessions? If not, this is an inherent limitation of the “therapy” model, which is distinct from a group spiritual initiation model.
Update: I asked to add the term in Definitions, “group administration session”.
333-333-5240
Consumption Limits
(2) “secondary dose”
Comment:
Agree with strategy of “secondary dose”, to form a rectangular (flattened) intensity curve instead of a hill shape.
Redosing stretches the duration of the optimal intensity level.
end of per-section comments
_____
Please enter this message into the record about defining the nation’s first regulatory framework for psilocybin services.
Egodeath Theory: Qualifications for Guides
In drafting rules for Measure 109, please read these cubensis initiation rules derived from the main illuminated manuscript from the middle ages.
Psilocybin mushrooms are centrally present in Western religious history.
Regarding Western religious history, entheogen scholarship overemphasizes Amanita at the expense of inattention to psilocybin.
Within hellenistic mystery religion, the mixed-wine banqueting tradition, and Christian art of the middle ages inside the Church, there is plentiful evidence in religious mythology and psilocybin mushroom imagery in art.
The crown jewel of such imagery is the great Canterbury psalter’s cubensis ego death initiation panel, which I have interpreted in detail:
Discovered by author John Lash, interpreted and explained by Michael Hoffman (the Egodeath theory).
The image depicts control loss and transformation and shows the initiation training process for high dose re-stabilizing of personal control while directly engaging “the shadow” and submitting to the transcendent controller.
— Michael Hoffman, theorist of the cognitive and control aspects of ego death
Ep223A & Ep223B, 1.5 hours each; 3 hours total. Three 30-second guitar clips, otherwise it’s all on-topic Transcendent Knowledge content. Part A is stereo (bigger), only because there are a couple stereo guitar segments.
0:00 – Intro: CBS false statement that steals Psilocybin from European religious history and demonstrates why an exclusive maximal assertion of Psilocybin is mandatory now.
0:28 – Intro
0:59 – Guitar (stereo, Oct. 24 2022: fader near/far miking two cabs). From ~21:00 of recording VOX_TK_4164.wav.
1:34 – Heavy lifting (challenging Theory articulation) segment: How a vision of death on the cross, extreme blood cross fulfilled sacrifice works, to secure eternalism-thinking and abandon possibilism-thinking – but that particular vision is only one example; Abraham’s Sacrifice of Isaac is equivalent.
The difficulty / problem to solve is how to prevent relapse and forgetting, into possibilism-premised thinking.
Must secure and prove the mind has fully sacrificed and repudiated possibilism-thinking, switched to and retained eternalism-thinking.
19:57 – List of recent posts at this site. Prop 122 actually covers Psilocybin not DMT or Mescaline. Theory of intensity curves, duration, peak window duration. The middle third of a session is optimal level of loose cognitive binding. The middle third of the middle third is the peak window. Why Psilocybin (not 1-hour 4-ACE or 18-hour Mescaline) is the ideal and traditional substance for religious mental model transformation, especially when incorporate redosing to create a rectangular intensity curve, and given the Egodeath theory (1997; 2006; mid-2022).
33:14 – Guitar (stereo, Oct. 24 2022: fader near/far miking two cabs). From ~15:00 of recording VOX_TK_4164.wav.
34:03 – “You could argue that 4-ACE, 1 hour intensity curve + redosing + the Egodeath theory” – duration of intensity curves.
Contrasting the Egodeath theory vs. other fields and theories.
The Egodeath theory must be recognized as refuting other theories and authors: Irvin, Rush, Allegro, Hatsis, Ruck (the Egodeath theory is vigorously defeating and set against the Amanita theory of entheogen scholarship).
THE EGO DEATH THEORY MUST BE RECOGNIZED AS A REFUTATION OF THE AMANITA THEORY OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP, PROVING THE PSILOCYBIN THEORY OF ENTHEOGEN HISTORY INSTEAD.
The Egodeath theory DESTROYS and BATTLES AGAINST and DISPROVES the Amanita theory which = Allegro/ Irvin/ Rush / Ruck, and also refutes the Letcher Hatsis Scopalamine theory of religion.
… 1:23:57 – the Egodeath theory against the standard malformed religion, standard malformed science, standard malformed esotericism, standard malformed entheogen scholarship.
… 1:24:55 – Jan Irvin recent mid-2022 3 podcasts with Steve Jones – They wanted to (but hardly did) get into refuting both Relativity (= block-universe determinism, nonlocal hidden variables Bohmian timeless determinism; no-free-will/ eternalism) & QM quantum physics (= possibilism-thinking; = freewill-premised thinking). Early vs. late Jan Irvin re: various topics.
“Ep223b Psilocybin Is the Traditional Religion.mp3”
1:27:36 68MB (Mono, 210 kbps)
Content – 223b
Post-episode notes:
I will no longer qualify my domain of concern as “Western” religion – that is a given. I shall refute theories of religion, by which I always mean (unless specified otherwise) Ancient Near East / Mediterranean / European religion eg Mystery Religion, mixed wine banqueting tradition, mushroom trees, early & medieval Christianity/ Christendom.
0:00 – My main focus now: a conflict between the Egodeath theory re: role of psilocybin – I disagree with how people advocate for Psilocybin; they have irrelevant arguments. The legalization of Psilocybin will cause RESONATING RECOGNITION of the central role of Psilocybin in religious mythology. We will recognize the centrality of Psilocybin in our religion. Left hand = branching, right hand = nonbranching. We’ll naturally recognize this in the matching state. You do not control the source of your control thoughts. We’ll recognize that psilocybin-revealed theme within the church & mystery religion.
… 22:32 summary of significance of re-legalizing psilocybin + the Egodeath theory.
… 23:19 Intro
23:33 – (same as start of part A) CBS false statement that steals Psilocybin from European religious history
… 23:58 – That demonstrates why an exclusive maximal assertion of Psilocybin is mandatory now. Setting our religious history straight regarding the primary, central role of Psilocybin.
24:51 – Bunk substitutive entheogen scholarship tries to grant lame Amanita & toxic scopaline, serving to remove Psilocybin. … premise must use: zero-sum game. Meditation is for the purpose of removing Psilocybin. Hanegraaff is clueless about this battle. The intense bias against Psilocybin can only be cast off by full vigorous assertion going all-in on Psilocybin in particular – against Amanita, meditation, cannabis, broad pharmacotheon; must focus effort specifically on Psilocybin. Meditation’s purpose is to avoid experiential realization of “You don’t control the source of your control thoughts.” Must advocate Psilocybin far above all else, eg cave meditation – else, will continue to lose.
1:26:52 – Guitar (mono, today, far miking via AT2020 as the vocal mic)
1:27:36 – End of part b.
Topics that fit into the above timestamps:
Why must play to win as a zero-sum game. Spreading credit and attention beyond Psilocybin is guaranteed to lose. Must vigorously defeat & disprove all other alternative theories, else lose. One winner only, winner take all.
Colorado Proposition 122 is exclusively about psilocybin; it is only an illusion that Prop 122 itself has anything to do with Mescaline, DMT, or Ibogaine; it merely mentions those as possibilities for a later possible recommendation.
Why must exclusively push Psilocybin and do so at the expense of Amanita, scopalamine, cannabis, meditation, and imagination exercises. Must maximize focus specifically on Psilocybin.
AT2020 mic also used for one of the guitar tracks (mono, aimed away from single cab, Fender Blues Jr. Input: Plexi distortion, power tube recording 2794).
Other, stereo guitar track segments are 4 mics. from VOX_TK_4164.wav: (~Oct 24 2022)
“NATURAL MEDICINE” MEANS THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANCES IN ANY FORM THAT WOULD CAUSE SUCH PLANT OR FUNGUS TO BE DESCRIBED IN THE “UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT OF 2013”, ARTICLE 18 OF TITLE 18:
AFTER JUNE 1, 2026, IF RECOMMENDED BY THE NATURAL MEDICINE ADVISORY BOARD, THE DEPARTMENT MAY ADD ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING TO THE TERM NATURAL MEDICINE:
Search Link section – trying to get this page to render! trying dup sections. I blame damned automated “helpful” link special rendering in WordPress app – automatically breaks this webpage (thx!).
I compare Jan Irvin’s partial truths and good questions/ suspicions/ scorched-earth accusations vs. the better parts of sound research from entheogen scholars.
Irvin’s latest series never really seems to get into full-on contrarian discussion of Physics, but covers a great set or nexus of relevant topics.
At 6:00, Dan Merkur discusses the pattern across religions, of professional mystics teaching each other while the masses avoid bad trips.
His website covers these professional psychedelicists which is to say, mystics, unpublished.
Merkur asks good questions, like the Conclusions section of Browns’ article about Wasson/ Alleggro/ Plaincourault: what exactly is the psychedelic tradition WITHIN the medieval Catholic church, and when was that tradition forgotten, and why? Merkur can handle nuance and balance, unlike brittle black-and-white coverage by Jan Irvin and John Rush.
Steve Jones 3 videos with Jan Irvin 6 months ago confirms Irvin’s latest brittle simplistic back-and-white anti-entheogen views: https://youtu.be/ThmfrMg5fYk
Irvin, like TRP magazine author James Kent, flipped from simple positive cheerleader to wholesale negative views, only focusing on negative history and effects and potentials of the loose cognitive state.
Irvin covers too many alternative views on too broad a sweep of topics, without really summarizing specifically his views, so it is hard for me to identify my many points of agreement and dispute.
Irvin raises interesting points along with bad takes, jaundiced views, like people complained about the immature 1st edition of Acharya S’ book Christ Conspiracy before Robert Price’ rewritten 2nd edition.
The Egodeath theory 