Idea Development page 12

Site Map

Contents:

x https://we.tl/t-sQsWGFcHJI

Incoming Ideas

definitely parasols of victory – positively identified

Debating in isolation about the Plaincourault fresco is a proxy, a cop-out. Scholars don’t want to engage and admit mushrooms in (Hellenistic and) Christian history, so instead of scholars engaging honestly and directly with my trademark question:

“To what extent mushrooms in Christian history?”

scholars instead limit the spotlight to a single, proxy topic, treated as if the entire subject can be settled by treating this single case as the whole theory stands or falls based on it. Just like Eleusis is mis-used as a proxy (and replacement) for the use of visionary plants in all Hellenistic mystery religion.

A dirty, deception-based strategy that scholars use: eliminate all use of visionary plants throughout Hellenistic mystery religion, by exclusively focusing on Eleusis, as a proxy.

A dirty, deception-based strategy that scholars use: eliminate all use of visionary plants throughout Christian history, by exclusively focusing on Plaincourault, as a proxy.

‘Mushrooms’ here means psilocybe and amanita, but mostly psilocybe, due to its reliable effects and no plant-preparation required. In art, 4 forms: panaeolus, cubensis, liberty cap, amanita.

Parasols of victory (not Italian pine trees, as the top art expert claimed).

Being a Witch who Coaches Roller Derby Is Fine, but Self-Presentation as Threatening, Aggressive, Ego-focused, and Intimidating Prevents Being Perceived as an Idea-Focused Scholar

It would be an ad hominem fallacy to criticize a person’s scholarship because the person is (self-identified as) a witch and roller-derby coach.

It is fair and relevant and valid to avoid interacting with a person who strives to act intimidating, who strives to act threatening (“I will crush your ego!!”), who strives to act aggressive, in the field and conduct of scholarship, who strives to conduct themselves as a witch in a roller derby instead of conducting themselves like a scholar is (ideally) expected to self-present, as civil and cooperative in working together to move the field ahead, and focused on the ideas in the field rather than on destroying the ego of other personalities in the field as if we are separate competing teams in a roller derby league, adopting and committing to an emphatically adversarial stance on a personal (or personality) level.

If a person demands to be perceived as a historian, then act like it; conduct yourself like one would expect a historian to present themselves.

If you present yourself as a witch that coaches roller derby, in the field of scholarship, instead of demonstrating your focus on the ideas in the field, how can you demand that people perceive you as a scholar and interact with you as a scholar, when you also demand that they interact with you as one would expect in a contact-sport roller derby?

If your motivating concern is to crush the opponent team’s egos, you demonstrate lack of being motivated by the ideas in the field. These are ideally considered to be mutually exclusive motivations.

As a scholar, why do you interact with scholars: to crush their egos? Or to move the ideas in the field forward? Which is it? It is self-defeating to present oneself as threatening, aggressive, and intimidating on a personal level, while claiming to also want to be respected as a historian (or scholar, or theorist).

Livestream: Psychedelic Mysteries and Entheogenic Sacraments: A Critical Historical Perspective (Sep. 27, 2021)

Psychedelic Mysteries and Entheogenic Sacraments: A Critical Historical Perspective
Casey McFarlane, Chris Bennett, Dennis McKenna & Tom Hatsis

https://www.facebook.com/psychedelichistorian/videos/1673793052823419

Tom Hatsis’ Reply to Me

September 28, 2021

Hi Michael, 

Doing quite well, as I hope you are too. 
Thanks for tuning in yesterday. 

The shape of the Liberty Cap is anachronistic. The thing is, you are all looking for mushrooms in Christian art because Allegro said there were amanita muscaria (not psilocybe) buried in text (not art). I’ve talked to Carl Ruck about this and he agrees with me – Allegro was wrong about the etymological thing. So you are sort of in this hypocritical position where you don’t even believe the very foundation from which you base your theory. There is an irony here that is so symphonic in its poetical implications. So, in short, the Liberty Cap claim does not amount to much. You want to move the conversation away from the fly agaric because there is no evidence for it. Sorry, dude, but I’m not fooled by your sleight of hand at all. 

I never said that every supposed image was a parasol of victory. There are in fact 5 different categories that every mushroom you or anyone else has ever put forth falls into. I wrote about them in an article that appears in PsyPress UK (though it’s about ten years old at this point), titled “The Dogmatists’ Debacle.” Peep it. 

I focus on amanita muscaria because that’s what Allegro based this whole nonsensical conspiracy theory on. It seems that you all (you, Jerry Brown, John Rush, etc) want me to move away from it because it undermines your entire conspiracy theory hypothesis. And I agree. It completely annihilates it, which is easy because you are literally using the same “logic” that “flat earthers” use. 

Bestiaries are secular texts. Baseball games are secular activities. Sorry to be the one to tell you this. I really don’t know what else to say. I don’t need to exaggerate anything because your arguments are so poorly constructed it really is child’s play to dismantle them. Also – it’s not just bestiaries. I can point to many of the same image problems in any medieval medium you prefer. It all comes out of the wash the same. 

I have discussed your coverage of my work in the past. My colleagues think you’re a laughing stock and we’ve gotten more than a few chuckles out of you. However, I have a heart and after several of them started to insult you in ways that I found uncalled for and mean, I stopped mentioning you at all. In short, I avoid mentioning you because, quite frankly, I’m embarrassed for you and leave your work out of discussions for the same reason I don’t steal candy from babies. 

I’m interested in finding the historical truth of these topics. If there are mushrooms in Christian art, I’d be more than happy to change my mind. But you have proved unpersuasive to me and everyone else who has thought about these issues in a serious and sincere way. 

The Canterbury Psalter does not show psilocybe mushrooms. Saying it over and over to yourself like a mantra does not make it so. 

I’m still willing to do a live interview with you on these topics, but I’m guessing you are a little too worried to speak to someone like me (who knows what they are talking about) because we both know that your ego – not any real evidence – is driving your belief. And we both know I can crush that. 
So step up to the plate or it’s time we go our separate ways. 

While you decide how you’d like to move forward, I leave you with this to consider.
Since you are pretending to be a historian, let’s put you through the kind of rigorous exercises that historians use to gauge historical probabilities. You want to play with the big kids, so please consider that the “holy mushroom” fails all the safeguards of history that protect good ideas from ridiculous ones. If not, please explain your hypothesis in the following terms. 

1.Multiple Independent Contemporary Attestation 
2. Explanatory Scope
3. Anachronisms (y’all got a BIG problem here!) 
4. Ad Hoc explanations (here too 😉 ) 
5. Hard to Vary (holy shit is this a VERY BIG problem for you!)
6. Explanatory Power (ditto)

Or just ignore this email. I really don’t care either way. You aren’t bringing any good arguments to the table, so this is really just becoming a waste of my time anyway. Otherwise, please engage with the criteria above and prove me wrong. If not, then there is no reason for me or any other historian to take you seriously. 

That said, I wish you peace and happiness in life. 

– Tom

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/10/31/psychedelic-mystery-traditions-hatsis/#biblio – it lists the article:
The Dogmatist’s Debacle: Questioning Holy Mushroom History as Found in the Writings of Jan Irvin
https://psychedelichistorian.com/the-dogmatists-debacle

Looks like a bluff: he shows no specific evidence of knowing my ideas, only generic, universal, vague insults. What he shows instead is total mischaracterization of my work so what he’s describing is his own thinking and that of eg Irvin, in place of showing any hints/clues that he knows my perspective. He just seems like on autopilot; generic responses, no advancement of his thinking.

He gives both directions of indication that he is bluffing and/or so totally wrapped in his own thinking, he doesn’t my view (writings). I demonstrate that I’ve read his works; he gives zero demonstration of having looked at my writings.

Hatsis projects the “historian” identification onto me, but I am a theorist, of mytheme interpretation, and of the altered state; I’m not self-identified as a “historian”.  That’s projection by Tom of his own values & brand positioning/aspiration onto me/us. I even signed my name to him as “the theorist of…”; not “historian”.

He doesn’t seem to understand my position about Liberty Caps.  When he says ‘parasol’, he must say also ‘Liberty Cap’ and address that.  He says that is “anachronism”(?)

I’m not following his list of criteria.  We’re not engaging.

His first sentence is remarkable: “You look for msh in art because Allegro …”  He projects his roots (his early gullibility that he reports being embarrassed about) onto me/us.  My trajectory 1985-1998-2002-2006-2021 has nothing to do with Allegro, but Hatsis cannot imagine not being initially influenced by Allegro, as Tom was.  He’s mad at his past self, and is now lashing out at others for making the mistakes he made.

“You want to move the conversation away from the fly agaric because there is no evidence for it.” I want the field to stop putting Amanita at the center and put Psilocybe at the center because Psilocybe reliably (as McK arg’d yest. against scopalamine) induces the classic loose-cognitive experiences matching world religious mythemes, and Psilocybe requires no preparation, and is ubiquitous in several forms (paneolus, liberty cap, cubensis) throughout eras and regions.

He’s incorrect in every aspect of trying to characterize my view. I assert that there is evidence for Amanita; but nevertheless, I call to stop putting Amanita in the center and put Psilocybe in the center instead.

I haven’t read any discussion of my writings, so I don’t know if Hatsis read my articles at all.  I see no evidence of such.  His email is bafflingly vague and abstract.  I’d have to properly rewrite his email for him and then reply to that.  Don’t know if I’ll reply any time soon; he’s free to read my writings, if he actually cares about the field.

He says I didn’t go on his show because of my ego and how he’d crush it.  We learn about his thinking/ center of emphasis here, not mine.  His eager relishing in lobbing acerbic insults (a mis-focus) and the excess exposure, are why I declined his initial invitation.  I would first have phone calls with him, because it seems he doesn’t understand me at all. He seems totally incurious.

“Ep72a Christian Mushroom Art.mp3” & 72b

September 28, 2021

Reading aloud Cyberdisciple’s article / weblog posting of September 26, 2021, titled:

Criticism of mushrooms in Christian art by Tom Hatsis and Chris Bennett
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2021/09/26/criticism-of-mushrooms-in-christian-art-by-tom-hatsis-and-chris-bennett/

If you get Left channel only, re-download using updated wetransfer.com links.

Download Info

4:26:00 total.  Two 2-hour .mp3 files.  4:26:00 total.

  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-09-28:
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • I read-aloud Cyberdisciple’s article.
      • Made several lengthy side-commentaries
      • Gathered typo fixes.  
    • At the end of Episode 72b, I read-aloud Tom Hatsis’ reply to me, and comment on it.
    • Motivation: To understand Cyb’s article in detail and listen to it read aloud. To hear ribbon mic on voice & on guitar speaker.
    • I didn’t do a practice read-through; this is the practice read-through.
  • Filename: “Ep72a Christian Mushroom Art.mp3” (2 files, of 2 hours each?)
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: ~4.5 hours total; ~2:15:00 each.
  • Filesize: 129MB + 133MB
  • Bitrate: 260. Mono. Erring on the side of hi-fi, to hear Ribbon mic (no upper treble).

Timestamps in “Ep72a Christian Mushroom Art.mp3”

  • 0:00 – start reading Cyb’s article, up to critique of concept “followers of Allegro”.
  • 44:06 – continues not reading article, but my John Lash comparison where Lash equates everyone on earth for all time as a Follower of Wasson (vs. of Allegro) – himself silently excepted, of course.
  • ~49:00 – i resent being (indirectly, implicitly) misrep’d as “follower of Allegro”, that’s false in every way, it’s a cheap smear effort to elevate oneself.
  • 51:15 – Lash and Heinrich screwed up and wrote that Allegro asserted that Mr. Historical Jesus used mushrooms.
  • 1:00:47 – resume Cyber’s article , section “John Marco Allegro, SMC, and his “Students”
  • 1:10:00 “brazenly combining the ahistoricity…” (article) “distracted many scholars”. I ask Cyb “which scholars cited allegro favorably/championed him?”
  • ~1:20:00 Hatsis is serving a needed role of correcting pop approval of Allegro
  • ~1:23:00 I’m midway along a spectrum of “scholar” and “popularizer” but it’s complicated. I’m an original theorist, first of the nature of ego transcendence (summarized at Principia Cybernetica on www in Feb 1997, core theory), not so much about entheogens in history (made perceptible by my system of mytheme decoding as analogy describing ASC experience of non-control) until 2000-2003 then especially 2006.
  • ~1:27:00 scholars, stop using the word & concept ‘secret’. ask neutral question, “to what extent mushrooms in Christian history” (a big part of the climax point of my 2006 Plaincourault article).
  • 1:30:45 “stop citing allegro positively. drop Allegro” (I slightly disagree)
  • 1:34:00 odd that Hatsis connects topic of Art with Allegro, who was text.
  • 1:40:00 “nonetheless, the categories “discipuli allegri” and “holy mushroom theory”, “
  • 1:44:24 mic level check, music moment
  • ~1:48:00 surveying all the h2 headings of the article, with electric guitar in background
  • ~1:51:07 Hatsis rightly treats the problem not of Allegro but of the pop use of pop version of Allegro. skimming section headings, “”Scholar” as Brand and Style”. Cyb contributes / tackles articulating the need to focus on ideas in the field, not personalities, low, content-ignoring personal attacks & insults (see Hatsis’ content-thin, insult-filled email to me today). “Psychedelic Witch” / .com, pushing Scopalamine pet plant fixation, rebranded to “Psychedelic Historian”.
  • 1:55:00 Hatsis himself initially fell into pop culture so now he’s lashing out overcompensating slurring and smearing everyone else for what he originally did, embracing mushrooms or probably, Amanita conflated with mushrooms. / stop being shackled by ‘secret’. Need to re-conceptualize ‘secret’, not make the familiar connotations the center.
  • 1:57:00 Dr. Carl “Mr. Secret” Ruck. stop ‘secret’, stop Allegro as center of field, stop posturing as “Real Historian” and be it. Secret. Allegro. Brand (= topic of personality smears/ attacks/ insults).
  • 2:00:00 finished surveying the headings of the article. “Finding Psychedelic in History and the Understanding of “Secrecy and Mystery” – after short break. Brief electric guitar, ice water.
  • Reading section: “Finding Psychedelics in History and the Understanding of “Secrecy and Mystery”. Confirmed ~2:04:00 the Figure 8 mic polar pattern rejects this quiet keyboard, barely audible.
  • The purpose of these podcasts (Egodeath Mystery Show) is not to popularize the Egodeath theory, but to test microphones. Discovered I been using a Limiter (not really triggering it tho, it appears) – found that Phantom Power is on, to a ribbon mic (thought to cause death of mic/ a severe violation).
  • ~2:07:00 YouTube vid of trying to destroy 4 ribbon mics b/c Bandrew of Podcastage wussed out and wouldn’t do his Pizza Plosive test (which he always does for every mic) on the precursor of my R40 ribbon mic, the MXL R144 ribbon mic.
  • 2:10:00 have I been plosiving this mic?
  • The subject of this podcast (the Egodeath Mystery Show) is microphone demonstrations for myself. To do these mic demonstrations, I’m employing Cyber’s article that he wrote yesterday.
  • 2:11:00 – Pausing to cool the room. Electric guitar.

Timestamps in “Ep72b Christian Mushroom Art.mp3”

  • 0:00 – 42% down the article. “Here I have to say that they are on to something” “wrong direction”. Overemph “secret”.
  • 1:30 – list of overuse of “secret” – Robert Graves: Cyb’s correct approach of asking “What is his contributions and limitations?” Not “is he a good guy, or a bad guy (wholesale)? in-group, or out-group?”
  • 4:30 example: Allegro doesn’t belong in the field, but he employs “secret”.
  • Ergot itself is … my aside: the secrete that’s revealed is not the entheogen, tho closely “associated”.
  • My aside: my critique of “it could be the accomplishment of a lifetime to discover evidence of msh in Christian art” (Chris said in stream yesterday). “Discovering evidence’ requires forming a good Theory framework to perceive and gather data/evidence. Methodology/theory reveals the evidence, like perceiving a 3-d stereogram requires the right suitable focusing.
  • 8:12 they act like what’s revealed in Mystery Religions is the plant itself.
  • …
  • ~1:34:45 Reading Hatsis’ email reply to me.
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #72
    • 10a.m. September 28, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
    • 1988 gentle stressed out engineering punk trying to apply and articulate transcendence theory.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: MXL/Marshall R40 ribbon mic.
    • Polar pattern: Figure 8, back of mic.
    • Distance: 9″, slightly off axis.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): no processing.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • skip: normalize vol of Mic wavs
  • done: copy heading to TOC
  • done: link TOC heading to present section
  • done: test the TOC link
  • export mp3 of Mic wavs
  • transfer mp3s to music players
  • upload mp3s to wetransfer.com
  • copy download links to this Download section
  • redo:
  • test the download links/previews, make sure correct files
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 25°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • DSTREC_2561.wav
    • guitar speaker. Mic: Figure 8, mouth at back of mic, guitar speaker cab at front of mic.
    • mic
    • preamp
    • tape deck
  • Mic tracking file: 
    VO-REC_2596.wav (3:22:47) (for “Ep72a Christian Mushroom Art.mp3”) +
    VO-REC_2597.wav (1:05:45) (for “Ep72b Christian Mushroom Art.mp3”) – Hatsis’ email at end.
  • Project path: drive > Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Ep72 Christian Mushroom Art/
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

Deciding now how to handle text reaction to Hatsis’ email, eg post it here & comment on it? [done, a little] My voice commentary at end of the 4.5-hour recording covers my reply well, though most of his email is obscure/abstract/vague to me. I might record a clean, straight-through reading of Cyb’s article, later.

Playlist

We’re listening to Illumination Valve, loft session 3. Distortion: Fender Blues Jr. III with two EL84 valves, driven by MXR 10-band EQ, through the stock Eminence Fender Special Design guitar speaker.

134__ The timestamp is x. (after intro)

The Content Segment

  • Read the posting.
  • every time, read the phrase aloud as:

discipuli Allegri (“students of Allegro”)

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

3:22:47 + 1:05:45 = 4.5 hours. timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Broken Keyboard Keys: a, e, >

I probably have to replace this keyboard. Thanks to typing at WordPress to create this site.

Email to Tom Hatsis after livestream with McKenna & Bennett

September 27, 2021

Points to cover about mushrooms in Greek & Christian art & mythology

Hi Tom, 
Hope it’s going well.

Suggestions Re: today’s livestream:

Mention the shape of Liberty Caps. 

Explain how the wide range of mushroom shapes in Christian art can all be dismissed as parasols of victory.

Mention my article proving 70 psychoactive mushroom trees in the Psalter.

Don’t overfocus on Amanita, narrowly, conflating Amanita with mushrooms as if synonyms.  

Don’t exaggerate the distinction between “secular” vs. “religious” works, in the case of the bestiary.  

Address my coverage of your work.

You are interested in finding mushrooms in Christianity, so you should mention my analysis of the Canterbury Psalter.

This section of my (2nd) website:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#flagship-Mushrooms-Greek-Christian-Art
consists of these two articles and a gallery:

I am looking forward to your book or books, about psilocybe and related topics in (broadly) Greek and Christian history.  The field needs internal critique, done well.  I encourage people to bridge and co-solve two domains together: Hellenistic & Christian.  That combination has paid off for me, in reading mythemes as description of the mystic altered state.

Chris said discovering evidence and proof of mushrooms in Christian art would be the achievement of a lifetime, but as I see it, that doesn’t go as far as it needs to.  

The real, overall achievement is to explain ego transcendence as an altered-state experience of pre-existence of future control-thoughts and frozen time, and to decode mythology as focusing on branching (the “tree” model of time, possibility, & control) vs. non-branching (the “snake” model of control). 

Proving mushrooms in Christian art, as in the Great Canterbury Psalter, is not a standalone achievement, but is a part of that broader achievement.

The full set of key religious mythemes needs to be decoded and recognized as description of the altered state from sacred eating and drinking.  
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/15/mytheme-list/

— Michael Hoffman, the theorist of ego death (as analogical psychedelic eternalism & non-control), Egodeath.com & egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Cyberdisciple’s Posts September 2021

Cyb’s Summary Review of the book The Immortality Key

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2021/05/10/cyberdisciple-reviews-brian-murareskus-the-immortality-key-summary-and-collection-of-posts/

Heading

About the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology & psychedelics –

Psychedelic Induced Transpersonal Experiences, Therapies, and Their Implications for Transpersonal Psychology
Thomas Roberts & Michael Winkelman, 2013
https://www.academia.edu/4674528/Psychedelic_Induced_Transpersonal_Experiences_Therapies_and_Their_Implications_for_Transpersonal_Psychology

May 1988 Voice Recording:
Transcendence Theory

It sounds very high pitch (my voice is mostly unrecognizable) as if speed of this tape playback is too fast (confirmed the speed is slightly too fast) – but, the speed of speaking is natural. It sounds scrawny, thin-nasally, and young punk. I pronounce “now” like “naa-ah”, almost southern (no “oh” at the end). I hear traces of the lazy-tongue slurring. The articulation/enunciation is mostly clear.

Side A 1/4 through seems to prove that this was made not with a boombox, but with a 4-track deck at std speed. Two different talking, in L & R ch. I say calmly “Is it really so necessary to be so agitated, …” am I playing a previous recording?? “Maybe this recording is a completion of my first recording.” “The previous tape, a motivational tape, was made at a time when as I recall, …. now I’m so much calmer. The previous recording was so agitated against myself. Now I can’t imagine being in that state… in the last couple days since I made that tape.” “Now I’m so calm, could I even make a serious tape like that now? … I should try doing that now. My underlying attitude now is different.” I talk about, essentially, tone of voice and egoic overtones of self-command attempts, attempting to talk sternly to command oneself across time like I did in 1986 in frustration / expectation of self-control. There is a laxness of pronunciation, under-enunciation (not slop though; just over-relaxed).

Side A starts with is a metaprogramming self-cajoling project, commanding myself separately in Left & Right channels separately, simultaneously. Pretty long. Is this dubbed from 4-track cassette deck/mixer to boombox? But the mic sounds really odd, like a midrangy/bright built-in mic…? No bass. Because my 1988 voice has no bass??

Side A, 8% in, I list classes/topics:

  • Atomic Physics
  • Signals and Systems
  • Thermodynamics
  • Electromagnetics
  • Physics, Science

“Tomorrow” came out as “tomorrah” a little.

The special features include alternating mic w/ from radio, FM stereo, the studio track by Santana – Black Magic Woman, which I can use to check the tape speed and thus my speaking pitch in 1988, 33 years ago.

Confirmed: The tape is running slightly fast/ high pitch on this player, but, only a little; my voice must have been about 80% as elevated-pitch as this tape makes it sound. I could slow down the recording.

Tape Side A label is “Voice – study intent”, the case is marked “Dialogue”, TDK SA90, Side A, song snippets & guitar lead are mostly through side A, left supply reel is almost at the first bar eg 80% through side A. His guitar lead is at eg 4:34 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wT1s96JIb0 “Santana – Black Magic Woman (Official Audio)”. Maybe it’s a cassette recorder boombox with electret condenser mic, but maybe 4-track.

Bonus: at the end of the Santana song, the tape has my electric guitar playing too (probably Marshall 4010 JCM 800 50-watt tube amp).

Light-hearted playful tone, some solid content reveling commentary on cross-time self-struggle, and casual cussing in a relaxed tone. talking about worrying, stress, but the tone sounds pretty relaxed/casual/playful, not stern, I joke about yelling at myself but even then it sounds playful. “That tape represents me, so I’m worrying about the quality” (I say jokingly). I talk about making a tape that doesn’t bore the future audience. Too bad the speed is a little fast/ high pitch, not sure how nasally/ thin/ high my voice actually was – I may have to slow playback.

Idea of missing a hw assignment; pretty heavy stress is evident, joking about getting a degree and failure, “this is serious sht” (I joke ironically), “wheres a tall building”, death… light-style joking, about heavy stuff.

Little bass in voice. Light, high pitch, thnner, nasal, gentle (though w/ intense stress – held at an ironic distance – and casual heavy cussing). 1988 When I mimic a tone of anger, it’s still thin and joking sounding, not “heavy/ serious” in tone. in 1988 my speech is fairly clear but not particularly cultivated – it’s hit-or-miss articulation/enunciation.

occasional mouth-smacking

My 1988 articulation/ pronunciation, “accent” is so different in many ways. A light, young, gentle tone of voice. Sounds like an early 1980s Metal/Stoner young high school / college kid. No heavy bass pitch or frequencies, and no substantial emphasis – a gentle, scrawny voice. I’ll have to watch my videotape of the Summer 1988 Theory Announcement Party, and listen to my voice there.

1988 when I talk quietly, it sounds more balanced than now, its not a ton of bass + hoarse treble; it has some midrange instead of all that bass. higher pitch = more midrange than bass, when quiet.

“I’m beyond stress” The voice seems natural/ regional accent, not a cultivated deliberate wway; seems like surfer/stoner casual. Not very sloppy; it’s just an accent, slightly. High pitch — partly from tape speed slightly fast, but mostly true high pitch.

“Am I gonna get myself into a panic” … “that transcendence development sht, it’s all negative development, I’ve had enough negative development! (cussing) Is transcendence theory nothing more than negative?” “Pessimistic sht, does it have to be so negative?” Stressed.

my 1988 voice has so much light weight, high pitch… while wrestling w/ stress. It’s such a tiptoeing light weight delicate way of talking, with lots of cussing.

“toward transcendence theory”. I keep mentioning “transcendence theory“.

I pronounce “now” as “naa ah”. Side B 50% through: “studying in the next week, for finals” suggests late May, 1988.

I mention getting 91 (of 100), A-, on an exam, as an outstanding achievement: this would be the exam about Spacetime and Relativity, in which I got an all-time high grade that professor ever saw. The professor I knew from high school, college Greek Dance class. That semester, I was not living on campus, so I recorded it at my cottage – which is unusual so I should be able to reconstruct the memory of recording the tape.

I also have a set of 3 90-minute tapes from Dec 31 1989, includes mono good left-of-dial college radio in background. Same gentle, high pitch, narrow-band proununciation with “naa ah” instead of “now”. A little sloppy/casual tech/engineer discussion talking style. No aggression, but analysis in tone of voice. Passive gentle tone of voice, while analytical idea development. Pretty clean recording technique… no real problem with filler words, eg. Mouth smacking is the only thing that really stands out, and the “now” … the casual lax enunciation of college techie. thin nasal / “has a cold” type of voice. Which I’ve heard lately in my morning voice and wondered about.

Heading

mic tracking file 210406_2365.wav reading Cyberdisciple re: modes vs models vs description of modes/models. Miking/voicing: SM57 direct rec’g, Noon.

todo: extract good parts from April 1 tracking files.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=alan+watts+grooves+limerick

Limerick by Alan Watts

There once was a man who said “Damn,
For it certainly seems that I am
a creature that moves
in determinate grooves,
I’m not even a bus, I’m a tram”

“A tram is a public transport vehicle, usually powered by electricity from wires above it, which travels along rails laid in the surface of a street [rock pavement].”

There was a young man who said though,
it seems that I know that I know
what I would like to see is the I that knows me
when I know that I know that I know

Ep71 TK28 Reaction Video

“Ep71 Core – TK28 Reaction Video.mp3” – new – half the length

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-04-04:
    https://we.tl/t-UlA4T0L1uq – core
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Half the length of the full version of the episode.
    • Reaction commentary playing back Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 28 about Egodeath theory basics – my comments only, not any audio from the original podcast by Max & Cyb.
    • Clearer audio: Applied mud cut smile-frown EQ in software. -4dB @ 125Hz, +4dB @ 2kHz except -2dB@20kHz.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:36:00 (vs. 3:24:00)
  • Filesize: 81 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps mono
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • copy track
  • delete Max & Cyb audio.
  • normalize.
  • eq.
  • auto-delete silence (1s; aggressive)
  • restore silence at start/end.
  • export mp3
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link

“Ep71 TK28 Reaction Video.mp3”

Download Info

Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-04-03:
https://we.tl/t-0Ce4FeISKD

Episode theme; overall description:

Reaction commentary playing back Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 28 about Egodeath theory basics.

The first 3 1/4 hours is discussing IP philosophy problems & obstacles. The final 5 minutes is reaction content.

Filename: see section heading above.

Track name: same as filename, without extension.

Length: 3:24:00

Filesize: 178 MB

Bitrate: plan 210 kbps mono

Timestamps in .mp3:

0:00 –

Errata
  • Mic tone matching: Too little midrange, too much bass. Solution: move mic back from 8″ to 14″, and speak louder. At 14″, ok to switch from Omni to Cardioid. This distance, voice volume, and polar pattern will match the Blue – Yeti typical main usage.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wavs
  • conjoin wavs
  • split, discard Left ch, pan to Center
  • expect to skip: normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details
  • Angle: 22°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck (no recording)
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 2103##_####.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210403_2410.wav (~3:22:00) & 11.wav (~2 minutes)
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #71
    • p.m., April 3, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Reaction commentary playing back Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 28 about Egodeath theory basics.
    • ~3:24:00
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Turn gain to edge-of-distortion, talk with quiet attack at start of words; speak with smooth volume. Using compressor meter calibrated to match audible distortion when speak too loud.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Omni.
    • Distance: 8″, 22°. No gate/limiter/eq. Mixer deck, no mic deck recording. Max has stereo mic drift, but I might discard left channel, to get stable clearest result. No editing is planned, so I can easily try either way. Max was louder in right-drift channel, so his voice is probably clearer in Right channel.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, Episode 28

Transcendent Knowledge Podcast Episode 28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO7hBuvUmiI

Max and Cyber explain the core, phase 1 part of the ego death theory. Topics covered include:

  • Mental modelling
  • The egoic and transcendent mental worldmodels
  • States of consciousness, ordinary and altered
  • Stages of psychospiritual development
  • Tight and loose cognitive association binding, dissociation
  • Mental representations and their referents
  • Metaperception, explicit representationalism
  • Conceptions of person-hood
  • Cybernetic homunculus, control agency
  • Popular attitudes and misperceptions about ego death
  • Cybernetic instability, control-death
  • Fatedness and its transcendence
  • The will to exist in Schopenhauer’s philosophy
  • Postulating higher control, humble prayer
  • Helpless dependence on higher control, Schleiermacher’s theology
  • Struggling to control the future, panic-attack freakout
  • Physical metabolism and thought-processes

Headache > Gnosis

I had a headache during the first voice recording of 2021: “My followers are taking something that is the epitome of simple …” – “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3″

Glut of Exoteric Esotericism: All “Esotericism” Is Fake

What Is Relevant

Long Form without Jargon

Transcendent Knowledge (gnosis) is mental worldmodel transformation
from
autonomous control within a possibility-branching world with open, non-existent future
to
dependent control within an eternally pre-existing world with closed, pre-existent future

Short Form without Jargon

Transcendent Knowledge (gnosis) is mental worldmodel transformation
from
autonomous control within a possibility-branching world
to
dependent control within an eternally pre-existing world

Short Form with Jargon

mental worldmodel transformation from
autonomous control within possibilism
to
dependent control within eternalism

Inferior Religion, Science, and Esotericism That Have All Lost Their Way

Transcendent Knowledge (Gnosis) is mental worldmodel transformation from [autonomous control within possibilism] to [dependent control within eternalism]. Systems of esotericism tend to obscure this, not deliver this.

  • “religion” = a bunch of irrelevant BS
  • “Science” = a bunch of irrelevant BS
  • “spirituality/gnosis/esotericism” = a bunch of irrelevant BS

in theory, there’s exoteric & esoteric. in practice, there’s exoteric & exoteric pseudo-esoteric. Nothing is less relevant to Transcendent Knowledge than what passes for “esotericism”.

Exoteric Christianity is far from Transcendent Knowledge. Is pseudo-esoteric Christianity really any better than exoteric Christianity, any closer to actual Transcendent Knowledge? All pop spirituality is a fake alternative; fake 3rd option; fake esotericism; it *claims* to be contrasted to exoteric religion, but it’s a dud; exoteric esotericism.

What evidence is there for Transcendent Knowledge being mental worldmodel transformation from autonomous control within possibilism to dependent control within eternalism, given that so few people – when lacking a highly cultivated societal initiation system to guide this transformation – actually undergo this transformation? What is the evidence?

  • mythology
  • Rock lyrics in select songs, typically the most intense psychedelic inspired songs
  • the 10 psychedelic effects (on newbies; not tracing the trajectory leading to mental worldmodel transformation)
  • the centrality of the topic of no-free-will in religious philosophy in world religion.

This is the way the mind is supposed to (& designed to) transform and react to the series of immersions in loosecog when pursuing greater more coherent model of personal control:
mental worldmodel transformation from autonomous control within possibilism to dependent control within eternalism.

Mystery Toys

I had this puzzle. I’m looking for a mysterious Sufi puzzle, probably Unicef.

I solved this puzzle.
https://www.facebook.com/unicefpuzzlecollection/photos/a.602639993232260/604081646421428/

I was raised a spiritual occult child, an experiment hazy non-direction some vague high expectation, lack of particular objectives.

1973: colorful astrology trays, better colors than anything I’m finding.

Egodeath Mystery Show episode 70 1/2 – Wisdom Folly – recorded April 1, 2021, uploaded June 11, 2022

see also Idea Dev pg 13 for info: Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 70.5 – Wisdom Folly – recorded April 1, 2021 – June 11, 2022

“Ep70.5 Wisdom Folly.mp3”

“Ep# Idea Dev page 12.mp3” (on hold)

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Voice compress.
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #, 9 p.m., April 1, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • I’m switching from covering drug-based entheogens to non-drug entheogens, per Hanegraaff who is rummaging around in the trash-can of rejected knowledge (= gnosis). 🗑 = 💡
    • New focus: Dismantling social structures, which are the opposite of mystic gnosis, per Christopher Partridge. The more you dismantle all structures, the more mystical you are. Mysticism = countering culture; this is how Partridge steers and pursues Wisdom. All structures are flawed; the solution is to get rid of structure.
    • Read-aloud the text I developed in Idea Development page 12 as outcome of voice recording.
    • Transcendent Knowledge podcast More Basic 28.
    • No one actually switches form from literalist ordinary-state possibilism to analogical psychedelic eternalism, but they are wrong; the Theory is correct.
    • Possibly re-read Brown’s articles.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • No more attention to vocalizing: I’m reverting to my default tone of irate, overcaffeinated, sharp, bitter cussing.
    • They’ve been miniaturizing the 1176 volume-dynamics compressor, it’s so small now, i accidentally swallowed it, lodged in my throat, and so my voice can’t go loud anymore, but the side-effect is that i finally have that even, smooth voice i’ve been trying to get.
      • Intonation, prosody, smooth flow calm relaxed – no direct attention to pitch varying is actually needed; I now instead think that the main problem I’ve had is too-loud attack of each syllable or word (compared to the body of the syllable, or compared to the other words in the phrase), and that the opposite, good tone I sometimes produce isn’t actually marked by varying pitch, but rather, by smoothness/evenness of volume across a syllable and across a phrase. Install voice compress. (Audio terminology: By convention, “equalize” means equalize the volume across the frequency spectrum, and “compress” means equalize the volume across time.)
  • Miking:
    • Mic: I’m switching back to just using the $3 headset that came with my computer. In early 2007 when I first tried to use that dynamic headset mic to read-aloud my 2006 main article, the hiss was louder than my voice, but my fixation on such details just got me sidetracked into irrelevant audio high-fidelity focus.
    • Polar pattern: Wide Cardioid
    • Distance: 7″ 45° aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Playlist

We’re listening to __

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Voice compress.

Agenda items about the show format should be in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

Agenda items about Voice & Mic Technique should be in the “Voice & Mic Technique” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Voice compress.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda
  • x

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • x

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-__:
    TBD
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • __
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: __
  • Filesize: __
  • Bitrate: __
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • todo:
  • create audio project file
  • add recg’s from Apr 1 a.m., condense. find Partridge & Hanegraaff passages.
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq – for cardioid, -3dB basscut, 8k/16k cut (gentle smilefrown)
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210401_2241.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 2103##_####.wav – n/a
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

/ end of section ““Ep71.mp3”

Heading – Brown

https://www.spreaker.com/user/freespeechnetwork/jerry-julie-brown-confessions-of-psyched
Richard Miller’s podcast
Jerry & Julie Brown
mindbodyhealthpolitics.org
“I welcome Jerry B. Brown, PhD and Julie Brown, coauthors of The Psychedelic Gospels.

“Jerry B. Brown, Ph.D., is an anthropologist and the Founding Professor of Anthropology at Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, where he teaches an online course on “Psychedelics and Culture.”

“Professor Brown researches, writes and teaches on psychedelics and religion as well as on psychedelic therapy.

“Hear about their extensive research throughout Europe as well as their Confessions as Psychedelic Elders and why they think this is an exceptional time for psychedelics.

“Jerry and Julie are married and are veteran psychonauts as well as diligent scholarly researchers.”
March 31, 2021

“Mystical Experience and Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy,” Psychedelics Today, 2020. https://psychedelicstoday.com/2020/05/28/mystical-experience-and-psychedelic-assisted-psychotherapy-insights-from-guided-imagery-therapy-with-cancer-patients/

The Psychedelic Society of London, Events section https://psychedelicsociety.org.uk – several interesting workshops – looking for Browns’ in May 2022 = https://dandelion.earth/events/601d44ca20afba000da3f999
“Foundations of Psychedelic Study with Jerry Brown, Ph.D.
Mon 3rd May 2021, 7pm – Mon 24th May 2021, 9pm UK time

“Psychedelics are a hot topic in the news these days. But they have been an object of fascination and study for centuries. In this four week course, we will take an academic approach to psychedelics as we explore their historical origins, the current role of the Psychedelic Renaissance, and the potential future of these drugs as therapeutic treatments.

If you’d like to get a foundation in the historical context of psychedelic movements and learn about the ways these drugs are shaping new movements, this is the course for you.

COURSE OUTLINE

WEEK 1: Ten Landmarks in Psychedelics History
An overview of the field from Albert Hoffman’s discovery of LSD in 1938 and to current decriminalization movements, including:

discovery of a living magic mushroom cult in Mexico
identification of Soma in the Hindu Rigveda
milestones in ethnomycology
psychedelic initiations of Timothy Leary, Michael Harner
Woodstock Music Festival
1970s U.S. Controlled Substances Act
Old World vs. New World narcotics
Johns Hopkins pioneering psilocybin studies
Psychedelic Renaissance; and the New Science of Brain Neuroimaging https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=phrenology – where is the “gullibility to PR propaganda” part of the brain?? 🤔 🧠 i think its indicated by orange 🔶

WEEK 2: Past: Psychedelics in Shamanism and World Religions
Does Christianity have a Psychedelic History? Based on stunning images of psychoactive mushrooms (both Amanita muscaria and Psilocybe varieties) in early and medieval Christian art, we explore Christianity’s hidden psychedelic history.

Beyond Christianity, there is growing evidence of entheogens both in shamanism (reindeer herders, Mazatec) and in major world religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Ancient Greece (Eleusis).

WEEK 3: Present: Psychedelics for Passion and Purpose
While there is robust discussion about seeking the divine through psychedelics, these “mind scopes” may also lead to personal transformations by resolving conflicts or challenges that we all face from time to time.

Participate in an intimate conversation about personal psychedelic journeys that allowed me to find a passionate life purpose ( through psilocybin mushrooms); to choose love over fear in entering into a lifelong relationship (through LSD); to and overcome a deep, rare, late-in-life depression (through ayahuasca).

WEEK 4: Future: Mystical Experience and Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy
The Johns Hopkins and NYU studies of psilocybin’s impact on cancer patients found that “In both trials, the intensity of the mystical experience described by patients correlated with the degree to which their depression and anxiety decreased.”

This final week explores the future role of mystical experience in psychedelic therapy, for both psychological (depression) and possible physical (cancer) healing, in the context of emerging psychedelic-assisted therapy centers in the U.S. and Europe.

About your Facilitator

“Jerry B. Brown, PhD, is an anthropologist, author and activist. He is Founding Professor of Anthropology at Florida International University (FIU) in Miami, where he currently teaches an online course on “Psychedelics and Culture.” Professor Brown writes on psychedelics and religion as well as on psychedelic therapy.

  • He is the lead co-author of The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity (2016);
  • “Entheogens in Christian Art: Wasson, Allegro and the Psychedelic Gospels,” Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 2019;
  • “Ayahuasca, Depression and Me,” Chacruna Institute, 2019; and
  • “Mystical Experience and Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy,” Psychedelics Today, 2020.”

Psychedelics and Religion, with Darren Springer
https://dandelion.earth/events/5ffc803cc3b62e000d633c7d
Thu 29th Apr 2021, 7pm – 9:30pm UK
“How do holy books refer to the use of psychedelics?

“What esoteric and occult practices do these religions contain that are connected to psychedelics?

“Darren Springer and Sanae Orchi will share their personal research, taking you on an exciting exploration of these questions and how they can impact your life today.

“In Africa, ancient glyphs and writings suggest that psychedelics have played a pivotal role in the development of various cultures on the African continent and continue their world wide influence today.

“We will explore the crucial role of magic mushrooms and sacred plants in the foundations of organised religions such as Christianity, Islam and Judaism, as well as fraternities and secret societies.

“Delving into holy texts, Darren and Sanae will share numerous references to psychedelic plant use and entheogenic ceremonial rites.

“You will be taken on a thought provoking journey exploring hidden and taboo teachings, and how they have become encoded or suppressed in religions today.

“Darren Springer and Sanae Orchi will bring it all home.

“This knowledge can empower and bring you closer to the roots of your religious foundations regardless of your current relationship to religion.

“The esoteric practices taught in ancient times are as relevant now as ever, and are key to our liberation once you have true understanding of these teachings.

“Ep70 Anti-Art Historian.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2022-03-19:
    https://we.tl/t-9ovHjb4PsM
    For immediate listening, there’s an in-browser “preview” feature (.mp3 player) in the download dialog box – it’s magnifying glass on Desktop, a “View” link on mobile). No login or email needed.
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-30:
    https://we.tl/t-Y462aQxabX
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Critique of Hatsis’ anti-art evidence premise. The Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image supports his argument against the idea that “the Church was intent on suppressing visionary plants and that’s why there’s no mushrooms in Christian texts” (as he would describe the position he’s against).
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 45:37
  • Filesize: 52 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Errata
  • “70 mushroom trees” – should be “75”. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/the-75-mushroom-trees-of-the-canterbury-psalter/
  • All throughout this re’g, I under-represent the text evidence, saying there’s little text evidence. Actually there is lots of text evidence, using description but not direct statement that Euch = mshr. This rec’g fails to represent the description of Eucharist msh in Fathers writings eg. Check my summary below of Cyberdisciple’s outline of types of evidence:
    • Literal depictions of mushrooms (in texts) <- Hatsis arbitrarily dismisses all evidence except for this one type, even though the other evidence helps his case against the premise that “the Church suppressed visionary plants”
    • Stylized depictions of mushrooms (in texts)
    • Depictions of mushroom effects (in texts)
    • Literal depictions of mushrooms (in art)
    • Stylized depictions of mushrooms (in art)
    • Depictions of mushroom effects (in art)
  • This small, omni mic of field recorder is insanely bright. I want to upload and hear it — working with this bright mic Jan 20-Feb 7 is suspect of causing me to slur and mute my s’s & t’s to compensate. Here I produce s’s & t’s at full volume here, DANGER of hearing-strain, too much treble. BEWARE TOO MUCH TREBLE during playback.
  • I need to voice it better. It’s not bad, but I should aim higher.
    • Transcribe to text, fix the text, then read-aloud the text with good voicing. this deck has halfspeed playback.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav & intro wav
  • append 3/30 recg to the 3/29 recg, prepend intro
  • tighten Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #70
    • First 15 minutes from March 29 (yesterday 4pm) + another half-hour (today March 30 a.m.), 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
  • Miking:
    • Mic: DR-05
    • Polar pattern: Omni
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Miking Details
  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Mic tracking file: 210330_2188.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Voice Recording: Mushrooms Support Hatsis

update March 30, 2021: made a pretty good morning 48:00 recording (same tape deck/bright mic) outlining what Hatsis and I need to discuss.

Before I tightened the *total* of the 18+45 min. recgs down to 45:37 total, I wrote:

  • with a intro and outro to form an episode of Egodeath Mystery Show. 48+19 minuutes = 67 minutes episode. need more discussion of broad tratmnt of the egodeath theory not just isolating my entheogen scholarship and apologizing for & ignoring Ahistoricity & Thjeory of mental worldmodel transformation.
  • Hatsis’ new Henbane (scopolamine) vid this morning, IS HENBANE EUCHARIST? NO; MUSHROOMS ARE SUPERIOR TO HENBANE FOR THEORY, B/C MSH = EUCHARIST.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lG8xRGJDV0k
    Magic Herbs: Henbane
    “In this video, I discuss the history of henbane as a magical, a medicinal, and an entheogenic plant.
  • Topics discussed:
    • Effects of henbane ingestion
    • Magical practices with henbane from medieval times
    • Medieval medicinal prescriptions
    • Its use in early modern flying (or “witches’) ointments
Download Info

DEPRECATED: (USE EPISODE 70 INSTEAD, ABOVE; TIGHTENED THE BELOW + APPENDED TO THE BELOW):

  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-29:
    https://we.tl/t-gSCHXmdx9s (i plan to replace/extend this rec’g)
  • Content theme; overall description:
    • Hatsis should leverage my decoding of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.
    • Bright treble, might be fatiguing.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 18:48
  • Filesize: 21 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –

A pretty good 18:47 voice recording about Hatsis needing my art evidence to support his recent video’s argument against “the church elim’d visionary plants from Day 1”.

Errata: see Ep70 section above.

Mushrooms in Support of Hatsis’ Argument Against Big Bad Church Eliminating Visionary Plants

Video talk:
Medieval Christians and Psychedelics
YT ch: Psychedelic Historian (Thomas Hatsis)
March 24, 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCPiAIbid1w
“In this video I show a few ways medieval Christians used psychoactive plants. This process challenges one of the more prominent current myths about psychedelics and religion: namely, that said Christians engaged in a “cover up” of these practices.”

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details
  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210329_2187.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 2103##_####.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
  • Time and date:
    • voice rec’g
    • 4:00 p.m., March 29, 2021.
  • Theme; overall description:
    • Hatsis should leverage my decoding of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image
  • Vocalization theme:
    • stay conscious/mindful/ controlled
  • Miking:
    • Mic: TASCAM DR-05 w/ small-diaphragm condenser, right ch, stereo mode, discard left, balance right center
    • Polar pattern: omni
    • Distance: 1/2″ + (7″ 45°)
    • EQ (on mixer recording): n/a

Jumbojies

put emoji in h2, save, view rendered heading (emoji), select, copy, paste into edit mode anywhere – result: jumbo:

🤨

 🎸

 🎙

 🐉

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=ketos+myth
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=cetus+myth

🍄 🎙 🐉 🕰 🐲 🎸

Johnny Mac Bible

John MacArthur has just released a Bible translation (New Testament, Psalms, & Proverbs) striving to go back to authorial intent. per Grace to You YT ch new vid. The Legacy Standard Bible (LS).
https://www.gty.org/store/bibles/44LSBNT/the-legacy-standard-bible-new-testament-pocketsized –
“Pocket-Edition New Testament, Psalms, and Proverbs
The Legacy Standard Bible preserves the accuracy and integrity of your favorite translations, while refining the clarity and consistency of the text. Developed by the faculty of The Master’s University and Seminary, this pocket edition of the New Testament, Psalms, and Proverbs is perfect to keep with you on the go.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeplRwavGUs

The Precise Parallel New Testament

re: NT, I’m spoiled by a Parallel New Testament and multiple translations online eg BibleGateway. http://biblegateway.com “Which translation?” My answer: “These 7 and the Greek all at the same time.” (re: New Testament)

Book:
The Precise Parallel New Testament
John Kohlenberger (Editor)
Amplified Bible
Hardcover, 1995
http://amzn.com/0195284127

  • Greek Text
  • King James Version
  • The Amplified Bible [synonym list]
  • Rheims Bible [Catholic]
  • New American Bible [Catholic]
  • New International Version [Evangelical]
  • New Revised Standard Version
  • New American Standard Bible [Evangelical]

“The Precise Parallel New Testament presents seven of the most well-known New Testament translations side by side on each page along with the original Greek text.

Comparing these translations verse by verse brings to light important differences in language and interpretation among seven works based on the same original language documents.

The translations included in The Precise Parallel New Testament have all at one time been considered the most accurate versions of their eras.

This volume reveals how the perception of accuracy has changed over the years.

The emergence of new scholarship and the growing importance of issues such as inclusive language have forced revisions of older versions such as the King James and the Rheims.

These changes have caused more contemporary translations to emerge including The New American Standard, considered the closest approximation to a word-for-word translation of the original texts, and The Amplified Bible, which reflects word for word accuracy in a different way by providing alternative translations of certain words within the text to make their meaning clearer.

The Precise Parallel New Testament includes translations spanning the widest range of Christian perspectives.

The Rheims and the more contemporary New American Bible are preferred by Catholics.

The New International Version and The New American Standard present a more evangelical view in their interpretation.

The New Revised Standard Version is favored by mainline Protestants for its accuracy and sensitivity to issues such as inclusive language.

This volume gives remarkable insight into the effects time and different faith orientations have had on translation of this fundamental work.

The Precise Parallel New Testament is an invaluable resource for readers with a deep interest in the study of language and the Bible.

It is also an excellent reference tool for pastors and language scholars.

  • Gives insight into the influences of different faiths and social views on translation of the Bible.
  • Presents seven of the most well-known Bible translations side by side for comparison with the original Greek.”

“Ep69 One Good Science.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-28:
    https://we.tl/t-GSruQ0oql0
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Critique of Tart’s article States of Consciousness and State-Specific Sciences
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:20:58
  • Filesize: 85 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –

The contributions and limitations (missteps) of Tart’s article. His self-contradiction about the capability of Science to use more than just materialist explanation. Bad call for “sciences” isolated from each other as “state-specific sciences”.

Cognitive Science has already succeeded at explaining the psychedelic state, which is the loose cognitive association binding state. In proper appropriate terms (engaging with the explanandum, not reductionistically avoiding the explanandum); in terms of cognitive phenomenology. “Based in” both states. Explaining relation of ordinary state & altered state, how they react/ interact in a series. How a series of immersions in the loosecog state works to transform the mental worldmodel.

Cognitive Science (the egodeath theory; Transcendent Knowledge as modelling the mental worldmodel transformation from analogical psychedelic eternalism to literalist ordinary-state possibilism to analogical psychedelic eternalism; from autonomous control within possibilism, to dependent-control within eternalism) has already succeeded at explaining the psychedelic state, which is the loose cognitive state (other states are mere footnotes eg schizophrenia, dreaming, cannabis, meditation).

Ambiguity and shifting meaning of Tart’s phrases eg “a state-specific science”. WHAT’S THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN? Tart too much isolates states; he reifies & erects needless and unhelpful barriers and boundaries.

An SSS means a state-specific science.

  • Tart implies we need the following state-specific sciences eg:
    • Ordinary state: need a SSS of how the ordinary state works and a SSS about how each field of science works per the ordinary state.
    • Dreaming state: need a SSS of how the dreaming state works and a SSS about how each field of science works per the dreaming state.
    • Psychedelic state: need a SSS of how the psychedelic state works and a SSS about how each field of science works per the psychedelic state.
  • eg:
  • SSS’s based in the Ordinary state
    • A SSS[in ordinary state][about how the ordinary state works]
    • A SSS[in ordinary state][about how Chemistry works]
    • A SSS[in ordinary state][about how Physics works]
    • A SSS[in ordinary state][about how (general) Cog Sci/Cog Phen’y works] <– Cog Sci
  • SSS’s based in the Dreaming state
    • A SSS[in dreaming state][about how the dreaming state works]
    • A SSS[in dreaming state][about how Chemistry works]
    • A SSS[in dreaming state][about how Physics works]
    • A SSS[in dreaming state][about how (general) Cog Sci/Cog Phen’y works]
  • SSS’s based in the Psychedelic state
    • A SSS[in psychedelic state][about how the psychedelic state works] <– Loose Cognitive Science
    • A SSS[in psychedelic state][about how Chemistry works]
    • A SSS[in psychedelic state][about how Physics works]
    • A SSS[in psychedelic state][about how (general) Cog Sci/Cog Phen’y works]
Errata
  • the mastering might be perfect. or maybe, too bright, maybe, for some speakers, because I cut mud too much. even though i cut air. result is (maybe) too much 2k-4k. can’t go back and use mic deck, b/c I heavily edited the mixer deck rec’g.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • split to mono centered balance
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • remove silences, typing sessions
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210328_2186.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210328_2409.wav < use (has mudcut/aircut)
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header (only 30 seconds to finish entire Intro segment!)
  • Time and date:
    • 10a.m., March 28, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • __ read again Tart SSS article, rewriting it
  • Vocalization theme:
    • vary pitch, access full range of pitch, stay mindful & in control of voicing
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid (reference)
    • Distance: 1″+7″ 45°
    • Mic deck processing: Limiter>Gate
    • Mixer deck processing, add: eq mudcut, aircut

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_44_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

Esoteric Agenda

~~block list: blah blah. imitating buzzer sound. hate. well,

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

“Ep69 take 1 – Reading Voice.mp3”

a bunch of interesting developments came out of this 6.5 hour tracking session.

  • my criticisms of Tart’s 1972 article in Science magazine are peripheral and superficial eg his butchering of language by writing “marijuana intoxication”. my biggest and only real dispute has been the ‘s’ at the end of “we need state-specific sciences”.
  • I’m only interested in Loose Cognitive Science, which studies mental transformation in the loose cognitive association binding state. That is the most important and gateway of all the plural sciences he’s calling for, and that (Loose Cognitive Science) is practically the point of this article.
  • His wording … I only have quibbles about Tart’s wording, not his substance to any major extent.
  • “eastern religion” is a big issue with lots of connotations, in the 1972 “science vs mysticism ” context.
  • the best Science students were driven off by malformed, hostile “science”; science was recognized as acting suicidal by denying & demonizing & pathologizing everything except hard physical science. Students of 1972 said “THIS IDIOTIC STANDOFF OF RETARDED “RELIGION” VS. RETARDED “SCIENCE” IS STUPIDITY.
    • EASTERN RELIGION = ALTERED STATES = NEITHER IDIOT Christianity NOR IDIOT HARD-SCIENCE. (“eastern religion” = gnosis = the altered state; gnosis = the gem of the altered state, = meditation, = Eastern (not stupid retard 1950 exoteric-only Christianity). Eastern religion doesn’t throw away or pathologize the mystic state like brain-dead modern Christianity and brain-dead modern Science do. WORTHLESS MODERN RELIGION, AS WELL AS BLIND & WORTHLESS AND RUDE HARD-SCIENCE MODERN SCIENCE… BOTH ARE GOD-FORSAKEN, LACKING HIGHER TRUTH THEY FALSELY CLAIM TO OWN. THE 3RD OPTION OR TOUCHPOINT OF AUTHORITY IS THE MYSTIC STATE, WHICH RELIGION SHOULD DELIVER AND SCIENCE SHOULD ENGAGE TO EXPLAIN AND MAP OUT.
  • Science is not limited to physical world explanation, Tart argues. science is an approach, not welded to physical-only realm. Science is about figuring sht out — regardless of physical or mystic-state cognitive phenomenological/ experiential, Tart argues.

Voice findings:

  • for deliberate, cultivated, control intonation: breaking the boundaries between reading writing speaking listening.
  • desire retaining high pitch, broaden downward from there.

Miking findings:

  • off-axis means less bright and wetter, pairing factors differently than the polar pattern dial.
  • huge extent of voice’s midrange cut when quiet talking, means need midrange boost at night.
  • farther is more stable, and wetter is needed at night.
    • but hiss factors-in when quiet.
  • close-in is good for isolation. you might supercardioid on-axis closemic purely for isolation, then add eq/rev as needed from there.

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
Recording Header (only 30 seconds to finish entire Intro segment!)
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #69
    • 1:30 p.m., March 27, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
    • LOOSEN-UP THE VOCAL TRACT/ MENTALITY.
    • open exploratory varying the pitch/tone. neutral-positive, unbounded intonation.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: continuously varying, handheld
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mic recording): expander & limiter
    • EQ (on mixer recording): not sure if will use mixer deck
Playlist

We’re listening to __

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_46_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_54_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about the show format should be in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_934_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_945_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • LOOSEN-UP THE VOCAL TRACT/ MENTALITY.
  • open exploratory varying the pitch/tone. neutral-positive, unbounded intonation.

Voice & Mic Technique

takeaway – best idea – COMBINE WRITING READING SPEAKING THINKING all at the same time; FEEDBACK, LEVERAGE MULTI MODES TOGETHER

discovery : 7″ means 8″. 7″ from 1″ in front of upper lip = 8″

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_32425_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
32433__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_44026_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_44032_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda
  • x~~

ersatz
[ˈerˌzäts, ˈerˌsäts]ADJECTIVE(of a product)
made as, or used as, a substitute, typically an inferior one, for something else.
“ersatz coffee” <- evil
synonyms: artificial · substitute · imitation · synthetic · fake · false · faux · mock · simulated · pseudo · sham · bogus · spurious · counterfeit · forged · pretended · so-called · plastic · [more]not real or genuine.”ersatz emotion”synonyms:imaginary · imagined · pretended · make-believe · made-up · fantasy · fantasized · fancied · dream · dreamed-up · unreal · fanciful · invented · fictitious · fictive · [more]

  • put damn on block list

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Varying” technique.
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

timestamp after stop recording:
210327_2185.wav = 6:27:39 mic deck
210327_2408.wav = 1:36:34 mixr deck which started late

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-__:
    TBD
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • __
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: __
  • Filesize: __
  • Bitrate: __
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • todo:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 2103##_####.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 2103##_####.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Gnostics Believed Whatever You Are Against – THOSE DAMNED GNOSTICS!!

Book:
Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category
Michael A. Williams, 1996
http://amzn.com/0691005427 –
“Most anyone interested in such topics as creation mythology, Jungian theory, or the idea of “secret teachings” in ancient Judaism and Christianity has found “gnosticism” compelling.

“Yet the term “gnosticism,” which often connotes a single rebellious movement against the prevailing religions of late antiquity, gives the false impression of a monolithic religious phenomenon.

“Here Michael Williams challenges the validity of the widely invoked category of ancient “gnosticism” and the ways it has been described.

“Presenting such famous writings and movements as the Apocryphon of John and Valentinian Christianity, Williams uncovers the similarities and differences among some major traditions widely categorized as gnostic.

“He provides an eloquent, systematic argument for a more accurate way to discuss these interpretive approaches.

“The modern construct “gnosticism” is not justified by any ancient self-definition, and many of the most commonly cited religious features that supposedly define gnosticism phenomenologically turn out to be questionable.

“Exploring the sample sets of “gnostic” teachings, Williams refutes generalizations concerning asceticism and libertinism, attitudes toward the body and the created world, and alleged features of protest, parasitism, and elitism.

“He sketches a fresh model for understanding ancient innovations on more “mainstream” Judaism and Christianity, a model that is informed by modern research on dynamics in new religious movements and is freed from the false stereotypes from which the category “gnosticism” has been constructed.”

reviewer: “The word ‘Gnostic’ has been adopted and applied to any number of teachers and philosophies and theologies and all too many [such characterizations] are not that well researched and all too many self-serving rather than serving a higher cause.”

All you who disparage “Gnostics”: you are full of it and I cannot take you seriously. You’re just making sht up, freely fabricating cartoonish bad-guys of your own creation.

If you are a determinist: gnostics were freewillists.
If you are a freewillist: gnostics were determinists.

If you are an ascetic: gnostics were libertines.
If you are libertine: gnostics were ascetics.

If you are Protestant: Catholics are Gnostics.
If you are Catholic: Protestants are Gnostics.

If you advocate X: gnostics advocate X’.

If your keys went missing: those damn Gnostics took em! 😡

“Gnostics” are a handy, completely flexible projection-canvas – one reason Michael A Williams book ditches the concept of “gnostics”.

Gnostic Media Forever 🎉

1970 cover image art
2009 cover image art

The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross:
A study of the nature and origins of Christianity within the fertility cults of the ancient Near East

Anniversary Edition
John M. Allegro (Author),
Jan Irvin (Introduction),
Carl A. P. Ruck (Foreword),
Judith Anne Brown (Foreword) (daughter)

Irvin’s edition printed Plainc on back cover.
Hatsis said:

  • 1st printing of SMC had the front cover image plus maybe Michelel Boury’s repro’n or orig.
  • later removed Plaincour image. (d/k about cover art)
  • Hatsis pointed out that Irvin put Plainc img back into SMC reprint.
2009 Reprint by Gnostic Media
  • Publisher : Gnostic Media Research & Publishing; Anniversary edition (November 12, 2009)
  • 416 pages

Front flap of first ed.

I think this is claimed to be hardcover, w/ its front flap also shown. At the site it’s cropped too close to see that it’s hardcover.

Gnostic Irvin Confirmed Shallow

explain what was meant by “Irvin 2009 is shallow”. Irvin 2021 vs Irvin 2009.

gnosticmedia became logosmedia

Irvin 2019 says
Logos is good, Gnosticism is bad.
does he say gnosis is bad?

Irvin wants to say
Aristotle is good, Plato is bad.
Irvin 2019 mentions multiple, different Plato conceptions.

Pick Any Poisoned Option

Which one do you support:

  • clown-mode “religion”
  • clown-mode “science”
  • clown-mode “gnosis”

🤡 🤡 🤡

  • Clown 1: Malformed, corrupt, faux, imposter “religion” (what passes for “religion”; what’s passed-off and foisted-off on us as “religion”)
  • Clown 2: Malformed, corrupt, faux, imposter “science” (what passes for “science”; what’s passed-off and foisted-off on us as “science”)
  • Clown 3: Malformed, corrupt, faux, imposter “gnosis” (what passes for “gnosis”; what’s passed-off and foisted-off on us as “gnosis”) – a phony, ersatz “solution” to a phony, ersatz, false dichotomy of fake, imposter religion vs. fake, imposter science.
Pick Any Poisoned Option (in 1972, 1986, or 2021)
  • 1972 – Tart article in Science mag says students are rejecting Science in University because Science strove to be butthead idiocy, it put down religion, mystic state, altered state, consciousness; Idiot Jerk (imposter) “Science”.
  • 1986 – I read everything, and instantly saw that no one has a clue. Not mystics, not Transpersonal Psychology, not the Altered States people. Roll-up sleeves, STEP ASIDE, I’ll handle this and make sense; IT’S NOT HARD, you just have to try for actual understanding and not be gleefully reveling in anti-rationality “ineffable” spouting nonsense “You create reality; one’s mind creates reality”, & defeatist “Only poetry can state Transcendent Knowledge.”
  • 2021 – current year.

A False Dichotomy with a False 3rd Option

Shifting Sands and Positions

not clear what position Irvin is heading toward in:

  • Persian mysticism/ gnosticism (bad, per Irvin) vs Perennial Philosophy (good, per Irvin) – unspun 175 37:45. primacy of consciousness is false version of Christianity per Irvin.
  • a contradiction is not necessarily false <- irvin / jones say bad idea, against Logos.
  • I’m mad about changing “physically measuring affects the thing” to “conscious observation affects the thing”. My critique agrees w/ Irvin’s critique of Quantum Physics interp. Harriman 2011 series on Unspun is recommended by Irvin 2019 here. 175 50:00~
  • Trivium,
  • gnosticism,
  • “Hermeticism is literally the same as Gnosticism” – Steve Jones
  • dead sea scrolls intrigues,
  • shroud of Turin intrigue,
  • Sufi mysticism,
  • the modern fairytales (literally)
  • the psychedelic revolution,
  • Francis Yates / Bruno
  • Platonism,
  • Ficino,
  • Hanegraaff’s correction of Ficino vs the L guy,
  • Hermeticism,
  • the false doctrine that “there is no truth”, “mind creates reality”
  • the Humanists,
  • early modern occultism,
  • promoting the fall of humanity,
  • debunking QM,
  • ahistoricity.
  • Transpersonal Psychology, Humanism, Human Potential movement,
  • Christianity per the feel-good and “primacy of consciousness” selling of Christianity (create your own reality = false Christianity)
  • Philosophia Perennis
  • Satan the father of lies
  • Jones & Irvin assert that truth is conformity of mind to reality. I agree.
  • Against pushing the idea of reality conforming to one’s mind.
  • I’m against logical contradiction, as is Logos / Trivium. Mind needs to conform to reality, not vice versa.
  • Destroying the trivium & Logos , Steve Jones”What Christianity is really about = the Trivium / Logos”, John 1-17. argument betwen Kant vs Decartes – Oxford free lectures on Thomas Reed [“he is the Protestant version of the Logos”] prebyterians (guest Steve Jones), the logical foundation of common sense = foundation for u.s.
  • I would expect Irvin to go too far and discard the valid aspects of Plato. I consider Plato and Perennial Wisdom malformed.
  • I HOLD THAT EVERYTHING IS MALFORMED; all existing systems of High Philosophy are malformed and irrational. The real, rational basis for high knowledge is mental worldmodel transformation from literalist ordinary-state possibilism to analogical psychedelic eternalism. Including from mental model of autonomous control to dependent control.
  • Steve Jones
  • 2019
  • book:
  • http://amzn.com/0359965989
  • blurb: “An analysis of the events surrounding the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and their influence on Church theology particularly the influence on Vatican II. The book asks whether there was a covert agenda by examining actual historical accounts and quotes by those involved. “
  • i think Jones said (importance of enunciating!) “remember, Christianity isn’t just only religion”. Irvin’s series “Debunking Quantum Physics”. “A lot of this hits people pretty hard. Maybe after a lifetime, maybe there’s another way.”
  • The Death of Tradition: The Creation of the Dead Sea Scrolls Myth

i think Jones said at the end of first episode, “remember, Christianity isn’t just only religion”. Irvin’s series “Debunking Quantum Physics”. “A lot of this hits ppl pretty hard. Maybe after a lifetime, maybe there’s another way.”

“Zoroastrian cult rather than on “truth is God”. scholars doubted authenticity of DSS. the 1940s Catholic theologians were all in on this way of thinking, they needed a way to rationalize the direction they were about to take the church.” – Jones.

Irvin is against pope … Irvin may be against Plato-type mysticism, and is for Aristotle. (probly false dichot). How to know when you are being duped, = the Logos/Trivium. The study of false argumentation.

Aristotelian logic is the foundation of understanding reality.
Plato is bad because he teaches the primacy of consciousness. That’s egoic, Irvin says. [define ‘consciousness’, whose, which -cm]

The newager is god. You create … one’s mind creates reality. To Irvin, gnosis doctrine = mind creates reality, so “gnosis” is = falsehood, lying, anti-reality.

does Irvin explicitly disparage gnosis?

what is gnosis?

per the egodeath theory:

gnosis (Transcendent Knowledge) is mental worldmodel transformation
from
literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous-control
(autonomous control within possibilism),
to
analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent-control
(dependent control within eternalism).

gnosis (Transcendent Knowledge) is mental worldmodel transformation from (autonomous control within possibilism), to (dependent control within eternalism).

I reject gnosis and perennial philosophiy insofar as it’s irrational and garbled, not conforming to reality. ditto Christianity & science – or what passes for them. Beware malformed version of Perennial Philosophy.

Blavaatsky – legitimize the corpus Hermeticum, re-found in Renassance, knit back together the E and W church. Plethon re-indoctrinates Christianity with Corpus Hermeticum. (which Hane is revising the history of). Golden Dawn is being let into the church, bringing with them the condemned Corp Herm, undoing Christian doctrine.

  • Irvin: “expose Acharya S, Baigent & Leigh, Atwill, Freke & Gandy, promoting all this….; (failed to complete sentence!) “a conspir to attack Christianity to promote this….” irvin probably means: bad people, like Gnostics are advocating that reality conforms to mind, against the Logos/ Trivium, which says that Reason says one’s mind conforms to reality.

Irvin 2009 != Irvin 2021.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvokGS33w4I –
UnSpun 174 – Steve Jones: “Philosophia Perennis: The Rise & Fall of Tradition
“exposing the attempted destruction of Christianity and the west through Gnosticism and fake Christian history. A reasonable Christianity is what Irvin praises… Logic, logos, Reaasson. Irvin de-mythologize Logos to reveal that Logos is Reason instead, not a mythology figure. “Conspiracy to delegitimate Christianity, the past 2-3 yeas, trying to mislead ppl away from Christianity, selling it as a love cult . Christianity is actually about Logos, non-contradiction, understanding Logos, truth is God, Jesus is the truth/ way / life, Satan is the father of lie/lying”

Steve Jones has been researching the fall of the Christian Church for nearly twenty years. He is former faculty of both Nashotah Episcopal Seminary as well as St. John’s/Northwestern Military Academy. He was also formerly in charge of Liturgy & Music for the Episcopal Diocese of Milwaukee. Jones is perhaps most noted for his research and compilation of the Divine Liturgy of the Sarum Rite, a work now accepted by many Eastern Orthodox as an authentic liturgy of the Church. He has several books to his credit including research into the authenticity of the Book of Esther. His present interest is in the clandestine leveraging of the Dead Sea Scrolls.”

My touchpoint is analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control, is the driver of Trivium, Gnosticism, perennial philosophy, Christianity, Christian mysticism, Catholicism experiential revelation, and everything else.

POS butterfly keyboard is failing! TOO MUCH TYPING BROKE MY HANDS AND KEYBOARD TOO.

the cultural battles between:

  • phony posturing imposter “religion” (exoteric all the way),
  • phony posturing imposter “science” (the “hard science” put-on; consciousness is an embarrassment to be disavowed and denied) , and
  • phony posturing imposter “perennialism” (purportedly “a-rational ineffable spiritual gnosis & paranormal”)
  • We are given a choice of 3 poison brands to pick from, 3 false, malformed armies or “sides” to join.
  • (a pox on all three of your houses: we do need a revolution, my kind of revolution, the Egodeath Theory revolution (analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control)
  • http://amzn.com/0595151965
  • “States of Consciousness, a classic by world authority Charles T. Tart, is a basic understanding of how the mind is a dynamic, culturally biased, semi-arbitrary construction and system.
  • A systematic exploration of how and why altered states can come about and their possibilities.
  • As a student of his remarked, For the first weeks of class I didnt understand what those diagrams were about, but Ive realized the book is all about the way my own mind works!
  • Useful in understanding some of the important ways your mind works before you start altering it.”
  • Strangely, I don’t think I have this book. Does the book include the article from Science?

Same pdf, at Academia.edu:
https://www.academia.edu/25585623/States_of_Consciousness_and_State_Specific_Sciences

http://amzn.com/0062508563 –

Transpersonal Psychologies: Perspectives on the Mind from Seven Great Spiritual Traditions
1992
Charles T. Tart (Editor)

Book:
Self-Initiation: Secrets of Spiritual Enlightenment
Mike Bhangu, 2020
http://amzn.com/198873570X

“Ep68 Multistate Science.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-25:
    https://we.tl/t-EpJGIm7xyD
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Read Charles Tart’s 2015 webpage about State-Specific Sciences.
    • Read Charles Tart’s State-Specific Sciences 1972 article in Science magazine.
      • Roughly, the article body is the whole recording except the first 35 minutes and final 35 minutes. Although 3.5 hours is long, the episode has high integrity: reading his page about the article, then the article body, then the end-matter of the article. With the right amount of critique.
      • Including 4 letters and his reply.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 3:30:16
  • Filesize: 162 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – intro 1
  • 0:46 – intro 2
  • 1:28 – Tart’s webpage 2015 about the 1972-1973 SSS article in Science
    • 34:27 – recording header for Tart article body
  • 35:11 – Tart’s State-Specific Sciences article body (length: ~ 2 hours 15 minutes)
    • 2:52:51 – “that is the end of the article body”. transition to reading end-matter of article.
  • 2:53:33 – References at end of article
    • 3:03:19 – Four Letters to the Editor of Science
    • 3:21:23 – Tart’s reply to the 4 of 100 letters
    • 3:29:56 – miking & Outro
    • 3:30:16 – end

There are good ideas in Tart’s article, along with flaws.

  • weak: state-specific sciences
  • fair: multistate Science
  • best: Loose Cognitive Science

Errata

  • two intro’s at start
  • 1:25~ ftp diversion, final page of his pdf
  • too long – should make one mp3 per document, regardless of length.
    • i hate not knowing what document i’m currently listening to. one mp3 per document. Use the “show” & “music” format (or a distinctive vocal clip) to differentiate & announce the documents I’m reading. imagine NPR use of short music clips.
    • Separate the end-material from the main article body of Tart article, two mp3s. Similar principle as fade-up music in-between sections.
    • 68a: Tart webpage
    • 68b: Tart article body. Music not needed at sections: Progress shows where you are in article.
    • 68c: Reference & Letters at bottom of article PDF
  • when speaking quiet at night, mic can sound too dark & dry.
    • Prefer the wet mic patterns; Figure 8 sounds better, more open than in-between Supercardioid & Figure 8. When very quiet talking, try full-on Omni (bright/wet).
    • Figure 8 in bluebuds too mud + too bright.
  • todo: write letter to editor of Science magazine critiquing the article & letters.
  • add to Block List:
    • boy (exclamatory)
    • quite
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210324_2167.wav+ (many takes) – Tart webpage & my commentary
  • Mixer tracking file: 2103##_####.wav (n/a)
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header

end of header, 0:37 (tart’s webpage). _42_ (Science article)

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

/ end of section ““Ep68.mp3”

“Ep68prep Pre-Tart.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-25:
  • Episode theme; overall description: 
    • No Egodeath theory content. Mainly research on pronunciation.
    • Ended up being a semi-“private”, Take 1 that was intended for Ep68 but never did get to the Tart content.
    • Pretty in-depth main focus on General American Accent vs. Received Pronunciation.
    • Good soundtrack – Pop Sike Comp: An Overdose of Heavy Psych.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 3:41:54
  • Filesize: 277 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
American Announcer Accent
Announcer Accent
Broadcast/Announcer Voice
Broadcast English
Casual Standard Voice

affable[ˈafəb(ə)l]ADJECTIVEfriendly, good-natured, or easy to talk to.”an affable and agreeable companion”synonyms:friendly · amiable · genial · congenial · cordial · warm · pleasant · pleasing · nice · likable · personable · charming · agreeable · sympathetic · benevolent · benign · good-humored · good-natured · kindly · kind · courteous · civil · gracious · approachable · [more]

General American
General American Accent
NBC Standard Pronunciation
Network English
Network Pronunciation
Network Standard
Standard American
Standard American English

prosody
the patterns of rhythm and sound used in poetry.
the theory or study of prosody.
the patterns of stress and intonation in a language.
“the salience of prosody in child language acquisition” · [more]

Standard Speech

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_American_English
General American is thus sometimes associated with the speech of North American radio and television announcers, promoted as prestigious in their industry,[45][time needed][46] where it is sometimes called “Broadcast English“[47] “Network English“,[4][48][49][50] or “Network Standard“.[2][49][51] Instructional classes in the United States that promise “accent reduction“, “accent modification”, or “accent neutralization” usually attempt to teach General American patterns.[citation needed] A common experience among many American celebrities is having worked hard to lose their native regional accents in favor of a more mainstream General American sound,[citation needed] including television journalist Linda Ellerbee, who stated that “in television you are not supposed to sound like you’re from anywhere“,[52] as well as political comedian Stephen Colbert, who said he consciously avoided developing a Southern American accent in response to media portrayals of Southerners as stupid and uneducated.[45][46]“

aka Standard American English (SAE), or “Standard American” – JESUS WHAT IS THE NAME OF IT, THE CAN’T EVEN AGREE AT ALL WHAT THE DAMN THING IS CALLED. EVERY SINGLE EXPERT CALLS IT DIFFERENT.

One expert uses the phrase “network pronunciation“, then “the NBC standard” : 37:08
Do You Speak American? Doc’y by Robert MacNeil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOTzkejL7ks&t=2220s

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Standard+American+English

https://www.pbs.org/speak/seatosea/standardamerican/ –

“The “unaccented” variety that is sometimes called Standard American or Standard Speech is one taught by accent coaches. This form is actually an idealized dialect – meaning, it’s not really spoken anywhere, but instead is acquired through professional training. Actors and professional communicators (including some from the Midlands!) often take classes in “accent reduction” to lose any regional or social sounds in their speech. It takes a lot of work.

Natalie Baker-Shirer, an accent coach and acting teacher at Carngie Mellon University explains:

“Standard Speech” is spoken nowhere in America, as such. It is based on RP (British Received Pronunciation) which was adopted with American alterations in the early 20th century by linguist William Tilly. These alterations, this authentic “American” sound was loosely based on the speech of North Eastern population of the US. It was spoken by the cultured, well educated, well traveled people of the time. Listen to old movies to hear it.”

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details
  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter yes
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate yes
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210323_2164.wav take 1
  • Mixer tracking file: 210323_2404.wav take 1
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Ep68prep Pre-Tart/Ep68prep Pre-Tart.aup”
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #__
    • _7:00 p.m., March _23, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Angry vs. Happy elucution
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Figure 8.
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): smilefrown -2dB, +1dB
Playlist

We’re listening to the Pop Sike Comp An Overdose of Heavy Psych.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_150_ The timestamp is x. also repeated at 2:24:10, & 32135
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_224_ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_504_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_547_ The timestamp is x.

  • todo: in Voice/Mic page, add section on Fun/ Serious/ Angry tone.

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_14823_ The timestamp is x.

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
15050_ The timestamp is x.

Critique of Voicing
  • When I use tone of voice to express disagreement, it sometimes comes across sounding really angry & serious & condemnatory – which is misrepresentative. Solution: practice reading-aloud critiques. Interesting how much of my speech does not have this problem… since my mood is steady. If my mood is steadily the mood of critique, how come *sometimes* – almost at random points – I sound really angry? I’m going to have to set up a watch/flag for hearing and halting when my voice sounds angry – not sure I’m able to hear this, though.
    • That is a top factor. When I clean-up files (micro-editing), I delete cuss words and condemnatory or inflammatory or “charged” or “strong” words. They are jarring, off-putting, harsh, unpleasant. A “sharp” tone reads really harshly. Like when I say, sharply, “That’s FALSE!!” 😡 😡
    • There are places where it’s totally clear that I’m doing a routine functional read-aloud and yet I have that sharp tone in my voicing of some words. It’s a mis-voicing using some type of sharp or staccato elocution that needs analysis & control.
    • Practice read-aloud in an angry vs serious vs fun vs neutral tone. eg the A Curious Myth passage from Rolfe. Imagine that Panofsky & the Art Historians Squad (Scholars for Hire) are reading this controverted passage.

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_22453_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Hanegraaff on Mushrooms

https://www.academia.edu/33982045/Academic_Suicide_on_John_Allegro_and_the_Mushroom_Hypothesis_

In footnote 4, Hanegraaff states Irvin’s old domain, “www.gnosticmedia.com”

1996 Cover:

https://www.boekenplatform.nl/new-age-religion-and-western-culture-550392
https://s.boekenplatform.nl/bk/15/83/ea/new-age-religion-and-western-culture.jpg

Mycological Esotericism

Fairy ring at Hanegraaff’s About page
https://www.wouterjhanegraaff.net/about
https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/17c6c-3cb226_8e3a058ac10040b584eb25a85ea7db1emv2.png

“… a scholar in the humanities, it actually fits this pattern that as a teenager I joined the Dutch Mycological Society and became a devoted collector of mushrooms. I found myself instinctively attracted to those twilight realms of the natural world that tend to be overlooked by biologists concerned with daytime creatures such as animals and plants… But while I enjoyed their fairy-tale aura of mystery and magic, studying mushrooms in fact gave me an early training in empirical research, attention to detail, and systematic scientific thinking from which I have profited ever since.” – WH

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_ring#/media/File:Plucked_from_the_Fairy_Circle.png
https://www.wouterjhanegraaff.net/western-esotericism-a-guide-for-the
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/3cb226_3a2298a593734ad7bc275a1b6b86badb~mv2_d_1672_2458_s_2.png

“Western esotericism has been a pervasive presence in Western culture from late antiquity to the present day, but until recently it was largely ignored by scholars and surrounded by misconceptions and prejudice.

This accessible guide provides readers with the basic knowledge and tools that will allow them to find their way in this bewildering but fascinating field.

What is it that unites phenomena as diverse as ancient gnosticism and hermetism, the ‘occult sciences‘ of astrology, alchemy, and magic, rosicrucianism, as well as Christian theosophy, occultism, spiritualism, and contemporary New Age spiritualities?

What can the study of them teach us about our common cultural and intellectual heritage, and what is it that makes them relevant to contemporary concerns?

How do we distinguish reliable historical knowledge from legends and fictions about esoteric traditions?

These and many other questions are answered clearly and succinctly, so that the reader can find his or her way into the labyrinth of Western esotericism and out of it again.”

(I’ve read that book)

“Ep67b Hanextravaganza part 2.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-21:
    https://we.tl/t-3fSuV6cNhC (Part 2 of Episode 67)
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Read-aloud Hanegraaff’s site & linked articles; see below
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 2:16:44
  • Filesize: 114 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps mono
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
  • 5:00 – poorly framed Gnosis vs poorly framed Science vs poorly framed Religion.
  • 6:15 – rejecting Jungianist psychologized religion (I might agree w/ that critique on some points, but since I slice everything differently than everyone else, it’s always a complex “I partly agree and partly disagree”).
  • 37:00 Charles Tart’s multi-state science https://www.bing.com/search?q=Charles+Tart%27s+multi-state+science https://blog.paradigm-sys.com/state-specific-sciences-altered-state-origin-of-the-proposal/
  • ~45:00 Hane’s article Humanities – important critique from me, about the right balance between 3 factors he discusses:
    • gnosis/ altered state
    • primary literary sources
    • Theory; explanatory framework/ interpretive lens

“Ep67a Hanextravaganza part 1.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-21:
    https://we.tl/t-rpbFvNhi0B (Part 1 of Episode 67)
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Read-aloud Hanegraaff’s site & linked articles
    • Reading portions of Hanegraaff keynote lecture (more)
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 2:17:49
  • Filesize: 118 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps mono
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
  • ~2:11:00 – A stupid, dumb, low-IQ way of dividing things (hopeless & beyond any redemption; a God-forsaken fundamental false dichotomy):
    • the intellect, rationality, Science, Reason, things we can talk about;
      “vs.”
    • the altered state, the mystic state; gnosis
  • ~2:15:00 (wrapping to Part 2/ Episode 67b 0:50 – I’ve already done it, proving that everyone is wrong about the nature of gnosis and they grossly overstate the limits of Reason and language.) Another idiotic, futile, self-defeating division, tripartate, overused: A self-defeating division:
    • faith
    • Reason
    • gnosis
  • What’s really going on: the single-state Science fallacy; the “single-state Reason” fallacy. The proper approach is per Charles Tart: multi-state Reason/ Science/ knowledge/ discursive language/ rationalism/ intellect. Stop conflating ordinary/altered states with reason/unreason. Similar to Wilber: don’t conflate States & Stages.
  • GNOSIS, Transcendent Knowledge, CAN AND SHOULD BE FULLY DESCRIBED DIRECTLY IN MODERN, SCIENTIFIC, CLEAR, DIRECT LANGUAGE & DIAGRAMS. JUST LIKE ANY TOPIC. LANGUAGE IS AS ADEQUATE TO DESCRIBE & EXPLAIN GNOSIS (Transcendent Knowledge), AS ANY TOPIC SUCH AS FISHING OR BODYBUILDING.
Esoteric Agenda

https://www.academia.edu/31610387/The_First_Psychonaut_Louis_Alphonse_Cahagnets_Experiments_with_Narcotics_2016_
The First Psychonaut? Louis-Alphonse Cahagnet’s Experiments with Narcotics (2016)
“This article calls attention to the important but neglected French Mesmer-ist, Spiritualist, Swedenborgian, and occultist Louis-Alphonse Cahagnet (1809–1885), while concentrating on his significance as a forgotten pioneer of modern entheogenic esotericism. Like other occultist practitioners during the period prior to modern Theosophy (notably Emma Hardinge Britten and Paschal Beverley Randolph), Cahagnet was convinced about the spiritual potential of narcotics as a powerful tool for inducing transcendental vision. The article describes and contextualizes his systematic experiments with narcotic suffumigations made from plants traditionally associated with necro-mancy and witchcraft, as well as his spiritual visions induced by the eating of Hashisch dissolved in coffee. Cahagnet appears to stand at the origin of an underground tradition of visionary practice that would be continued and further developed by Britten, Randolph, and other esoteric practitioners since the 1860s. While most scholars have tended to play down the role of narcotics in these contexts, these may well have been crucial to how spiritual vision came to be understood in the occultist movement.”

“J: You wrote an article about Louis-Alphonse Cahagnet, who you consider to be perhaps one of the very first psychonauts. Can you describe his story?

H: Well, you’ve really been reading my stuff. Thank you, I feel flattered! [both laughs] 

Cahagnet was a French spiritualist. An interesting guy, not an intellectual, he worked with his hands but was very smart, very intelligent. I have a liking for him. He was working with somnambulic visionaries. Artificial somnambulism, as it was called, was this technique for bringing people into a trance state, during which they would claim to travel into spiritual realms and to other worlds. It was very popular at that time. Magnetizers were mostly men and the persons who went into a trance were usually women. So Cahagnet wrote three volumes about his experiments with somnambulic women. They told him the most amazing stories about other realities, other worlds, they traveled to other planets, they saw angels and all kinds of stuff like that. So Cahagnet got quite frustrated: he wanted to see it all for himself too. But he had no talent for trance himself; and even if you did go into somnambulic trance, you would lose you consciousness and afterwards wouldn’t remember anymore. But he wanted to go there in a conscious state, he wanted to experience it himself. And so he started experimenting with drugs. He tried to find old recipes and hallucinogenic plants. He was really willing to go out there, but nothing worked. He actually poisoned himself several times, got very sick, but nothing worked. Until one day he found “hashish of the orient.” Just in a pharmacy: it was legal at that time, you could just buy it.

J: Really?

H: Yes, that’s a bit hard to imagine now. Hashisch had this aura of “oriental mystery.” Cahagnet didn’t smoke it, he dissolved it in coffee, drunk it, and then a couple of hours later it begun to work. He had this absolutely amazing experience, that he say answered all his questions: he got the sense of a complete overview of his whole life. It’s actually quite funny to read the “trip report” of somebody who had no predecessors and absolutely no idea of what to expect. After this, he started to organize sessions with people that he invited to his apartment in Paris. He handed out the hashish to them and became the center of a kind of psychonautic community. And he wrote a book about it. It’s almost never quoted but I think it’s actually a very important text. It was read by most of the founders of the occultist movement for decades after that, and was quite influential. 

J: And what’s the name of the book?

H: In French: Sanctuaire du spiritualisme (Sanctuary of Spiritualism, 1850). It was translated into English as The Celestial Telegraph (same year).

“The Celestial Telegraph” Cahagnet
The complete photographed book:
https://archive.org/details/celestialtelegra00caha/page/n5/mode/2up

J: Why did this entheogenic breakthrough remain hidden from the wider public?

H: Well, it was basically a minority religion. I don’t think that it was kept secret deliberately. Spiritualism was actually a kind of mass movement at that time, and entheogenic practices spread to some extent in that context. Occultists came out of spiritualism but developed their own rituals, techniques and practices. There was a discrete culture of entheogenic usage in occultism, which has not been systematically studied until quite recently: see Christopher Partridge’s book High culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World, which is very valuable. Still, much of this is still largely unexplored territory.

J: How does Aleister Crowley and his famous love for drugs and bizarre sexuality fit into this atmosphere?

H: I have to say that I’m not a specialist of Crowley. I prefer to look at things that are people are not studying, and it almost seems as though everybody is studying nothing but Crowley these days…

J: OK, I understand.

H: But anyway, Crowley was experimenting certainly with mescaline, with hashish, at one point with heroin, and that got pretty fatal, because he ended his life as an addict. We just heard at this conference that this was the cause of his death – I didn’t know that. Basically I can repeat what was said earlier [in the conference]. On the one hand there is this practice of ritual magic, which requires disciplines, focus, attention and so on. On the other hand, there is the use of drugs in occultism, because they open up the mind to other dimensions than normal rational consciousness. Basically, it seems that Crowley was interested in anything that could get him there. And there’s a certain tension I think, between those two approaches.”

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wavs
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • re-split to two ~2hr parts
  • export mp3 1 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 2 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 1 to music player
  • transfer mp3 2 to music player
  • upload mp3 1
  • upload mp3 2
  • copy download link 1 to this Download section
  • copy download link 2 to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy headings to TOC
  • link TOC headings to present section
  • test the TOC links
Miking Details
  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 
    • 210321_2161.wav &
    • 210321_2163.wav (62 was a trick to check whether 61 was paused and missed content; it didn’t miss content and wasn’t paused).
  • Mixer tracking file: none
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 67
    • 9a.m., March 21, 2021
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
    • low pitch, fun tone, casual wording
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Wide Cardioid (a little toward Omni)
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_0:36_ The timestamp is x.

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_2:52:09 in _2163.wav_ The timestamp is x.

“Ep66 Core – Entheogens BTFOd.mp3” – new, Mar. 21, half the length

  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-21:
    https://we.tl/t-DBYgSnfHti
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • No music. Direct mic recording.
    • Tightened & cleaned-up.
    • Christopher Partridge’s 2018 book:
      High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World
      http://amzn.com/0190459115
      • Read the publisher’s blurb about the book.
      • Read the entire TOC (some subheads).
      • Read-aloud & critique the Intro chapter.
      • psyche delic = merely psyche level, not pneuma level, so psyche-showing means makes visible egoic thinking.
      • Partridge articulates the pointlessness and futility and baggage of the word ‘entheogen’.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 59:39
  • Filesize: 50 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Errata
  • The term ‘entheogen’ is nice to have; it’s not “needed”. All things benefit from multiple names.

“Ep66 Entheogens BTFOd.mp3”

A Core version of this episode is available, above, half the length.

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-20:
    https://we.tl/t-D0exJNLHwD
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Show-format walkthrough; no agenda prepped.
    • Pop Sike Comp A Lethal Dose of Hard Psych.
      Egodeath Theory content:
    • Christopher Partridge’s 2018 book:
      High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World
      http://amzn.com/0190459115
      • 44:50 – I read the blurb (garbled/incomplete).
      • 48:00 – I read the entire TOC (some subheads), now available.
      • 53:00 (first two sentences only),
      • 55:45 (2nd sentence+) – I read-aloud & critique the Intro chapter of Christopher Partridge’s 2018 book High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World.
      • 1:14:00 – psyche delic merely psyche level not pneuma level, so psyche-showing means makes visible egoic thinking.
      • 1:21:45 Partridge articulates the pointlessness and futility and baggage of the word ‘entheogen’, and I actually agree with him, and his wording, for the first time ever.
        • 1:25:00 ‘hallucinate’
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 2:01:31
  • Filesize: 163 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Errata
  • Partridge repeats Hanegraaff’s error of saying the word ‘entheogens’ was coined in 1979 (it was coined in 1976, published in some Journal of Psychedelics – three years, enough to affect the critique).
  • ~52:00 (first two sentences only), 56:00 (2nd sentence+).
  • done, in the Core version of this episode: omit “jump cliff Hux”, delete “shut up”, “hate this”. conjoin the first sentences in the Intro ch (done?)
  • done: Make a Core version: only include my mic-only version of reading of the High Culture book. Switching between mic polar patterns, ended up 25% from Cardioid to Supercardioid (ie, dark).
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details
  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber – Mixer rec used slight Room revb.
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210320_2161.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210320_2403.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header (only 30 seconds to finish entire Intro segment!)
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #66
    • 9 p.m., March 20, 2021
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Show Format Walkthrough.
    • Pop Sike Comp A Lethal Dose of Hard Psych.
    • I read-aloud the Intro chapter of Christopher Partridge’s 2018 book High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World.
      • Read-aloud practice – http://amzn.com/0190459115 – Amazon’s new Look Inside format is showing more of his book now (whole TOC).
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Neutral-positive tone, never negative
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: varying
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): complement the polar pattern.
      • Omni: slight frownsmile like +-2dB
      • 80% from Omni to Wide Cardioid: flat eq
      • Wide Cardioid: slight smileflat like -1dB
      • Cardioid: moderate smileflat like -2dB/0dB
      • Supercardioid: moderate smilefrown like -3dB/+2dB
Playlist

We’re listening to the Pop Sike compilation A Lethal Dose of Hard Psych.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_1:38_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_202_ The timestamp is x.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
__7:57 The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_913_ The timestamp is x.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
__1111 The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_11:41_ The timestamp is x.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_2424_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_2707_ The timestamp is x.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_15610_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
_15726_ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
_15737_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

_2:01:31_ timestamp after stop recording

“Ep65 Pushing Amanita.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-20:
    https://we.tl/t-TcVJey72cU
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • After
    • Vocalization Review
    • Conversation with Brown about
      • who asserted the entheogen theory of religion first, and
      • ratio of Amanita vs. Psilocybe in Christian art.
    • Abstracts from the February 2020 Religious Drugs workshop/conference.
      • Keynote by Hanegraaff.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 2:06:00
  • Filesize: __
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps mono
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • convert/split/balance from stereo to mono
  • skip normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • tighten
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
  • todo:
  • transfer mp3 to music player
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: none
  • Mixer tracking file: 210320_2402.wav, 2:15:05
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 65
    • 11a.m., March 20, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • reading email about wrongly centering attention on Amanita instead of Psilocybe
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Fun tone while low pitch
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Supercardioid.
    • Distance: 7″. noise gate. touch of Room revb
    • EQ (on mixer recording): -3dB smile bass, +2dB frown treble, 10band

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_43_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_55_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Voice & Mic Technique should be in the “Voice & Mic Technique” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_1328_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_1341_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_1431_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Email” Segment

This is the start of the “Email” segment.
_1440_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Email” segment.
_14625_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_14652_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda
  • x

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_21445_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • x

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

“Religious Drugs” Workshop/Conference Feb. 2020 – Keynote: Hanegraaff

Interview of Hanegraaff on Entheogens, 2020:
https://wouterjhanegraaff.blogspot.com/2020/09/enter-gods-interview-with-jana.html?fbclid=IwAR3JHBirFRTR00NBsAMy0Z_ON9jSPd0fC467tCodfkSig3wXR3mC6PLNiO8

http://religiousdrugs.com

http://religiousdrugs.com/program/

The Reasonable Irrational: History of Religions and the Pathologization of Entheogenic Experience

Hanegraaff keynote:
The Reasonable Irrational: History of Religions and the Pathologization of Entheogenic Experience

Confirmed Keyspeaker

Wouter Jacobus Hanegraaff – professor of History of Hermetic Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

Wouter J. Hanegraaff  (1961) studied classical guitar at the Municipal Conservatory at Zwolle (1982-1987) and Cultural History at the University of Utrecht (1986-1990), with a specialization in alternative religious movements in the 20th century.

From 1992-1996 he was  a research assistant at the department for Study of Religions of the University of Utrecht, where he defendedhis dissertation 
New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought on 30 november 1995 (cum laude). [thanks for writing exactly the book I had been wanting: esotericism in New Age]

From 1996 to 2000 he held a postdoctoral fellowship from the Dutch Assocation for Scientific Research (NWO), and spent a period working in Paris.

On 1 september 1999 he was appointed full professor of History of Hermetic Philosophy and Related Currents at the University of Amsterdam.

From 2002-2006 he was president of the Dutch Society for the Study of Religion (NGG). From 2005-2013 he was President of the European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism (ESSWE).

In 2006 he was elected member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, KNAW); since 2013 he is an honorary member of the European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism.

The Reasonable Irrational: History of Religions and the Pathologization of Entheogenic Experience

On the basis of several case studies of entheogenic religion from late antiquity and the early modern period, I will be making some general points about the widespread tendency among scholars of religion to neglect straightforward empirical evidence for the use of psychoactive substances or dismiss its relevance.

There are some perfectly understandable reasons why specialists are wary or afraid to discuss this topic seriously and prefer to avoid it.

Yet, in some specific cases we have direct and irrefutable proof that impressive visionary experiences were induced by the ritual ingestion of entheogens, while in some other cases the entheogenic hypothesis has superior explanatory power in comparison to alternative interpretations.

Dismissing this hypothesis without solid arguments has the effect of unnecessarily pathologizing radical visionary experiences for which we have in fact a perfectly rational explanation.

What does mean “mystical” in context of experience with psychedelics? Critique of perennialism in experimental psychology

Jana Nenadalová and Adam Karásek
Department for the Study of Religions, Masaryk University
http://religiousdrugs.com/jana-nenadalova-and-adam-karasek/

“Experimental research on mystical experience induced by psychedelics suffer by two major problems.

“General theoretical problem lies in conceptualization of mystical experience, specifically in the idea, that mystical experience is sui generis and that psychedelics like psilocybin or LSD are controllable shortcuts to this kind of experience.

“Major methodological problem concerns primarily theoretical background of mysticism scales, which are composed in the same (perennialistic) way as the theory.

“Thus, psychedelic experience with sustained positive outcome is primarily seen as mystical.

“We will try to show, that considering experience with psychedelics mystical is not theoretically tenable.

“However, we cannot ignore that higher subjective ratings of mystical experience can predict sustainable positive changes in participants.

“Thus, we argue that concept of universal mystical experience should be replaced by more empirically valuable subjective ratings of experience with psychedelics.”

Myopic Metaphors in Mind [Against ‘Ineffable’]

Reanne Crane
University of Kent
http://religiousdrugs.com/reanne-crane/

“In my paper, I critique the ubiquity of the term ‘ineffable’.

“I do not dispute that religious experiences/psychedelic states of consciousness are incompatible with ‘normal’ rhetoric.

“However, it seems that ‘ineffable’ has become simply another reductionist category that discourages further inquiry;

“‘ineffable’ dissuades users and researchers from devoting critical and creative attention to narratives, and also undermines the evidence that some linguistic capacities appear to be enhanced by altered states of consciousness.

“I will explore the metaphysical implications of the metaphors through which we tend to talk about extraordinary experiences, semantic activation in altered states, and the importance of replacing the concept of ‘ineffable’ with ‘incompatible’.”

Reconfiguring Christian Experience with LSD

Robert Dickins
Queen Mary, University of London
http://religiousdrugs.com/robert-dickins/

The emergence of the Psychology of Religion in the work of philosopher William James was in part predicated on his experiences with psychoactive substances, particularly nitrous oxide and mescaline.

Placing them within the context of mysticism, he believed no account of religious psychology would be complete without taking into account the effects of certain visionary plants and substances.

In the 1950s and 60s a large-scale engagement with this thesis was undertaken by psychologists, psychotherapists and philosophers researching d-Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).

Paying particular attention to a Christian context, this paper explores LSD’s role as a form of experimental heresy, which took religious claims about the mystical experience seriously while attempting to use a secular, scientific approach.

Of particular interest is the Marsh Chapel experiment, the writings of Adelle Davis, and countercultural approaches within Christian communities.

Utilizing a historical and literary approach, this paper explores these experimental heresies as a boundary that deterritorialized both scientific and religious orthodoxy during the mid-twentieth century.

Irvin Skeptical About Narrative

Irvin recounts his discovery of fakeness, around 1:04:00 UnSpun 201, October 6, 2020, Steve Jones episode. 47:00 in the YT vid 47 * 60 = 2820 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeWhpKWLlks&t=2820s
Article: Gordon Wasson: The Man, the Legend, the Myth (Jan 2009, Purdue had wanted to house Irvin’s research, until this article).

The entire field attacked Irvin then, uniformly & in chorus, which caused him to turn critical attention to the entire field and fact-checking down the primary sources.

They’re complicit in an agenda.

Then more attacks came, but never addressing Irvin’s citations.

The field tried to get Irvin back onto the official narrative.

Joe Rogan turned against Irvin then. They had been friends for 8 years.

Rogan took Irvin’s early work and ran with it and became the poster boy for psychedelics, then when Irvin turned against his earlier work, …

if Irvin had continued pushing his early work, he’d be a popular, top podcaster. 52:20 guest asks what was Irvin’s aha moment.

55:16 (YoutTube not podcast) “The moment I had that epiphany that something was wrong. Used bookstore in Chico CA, book with painting by Ivan Bilibin.

Ivan Biliban’s paintings showing Amanita and/or Psilocybe, possibly before 1939
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=ivan+bilibin+mushroom

https://readrussia.org/images/uploads/563/russian-tales.jpg

After Irvin turned against Wasson and went against the narrative…

1:11:30 – in a bookstore history section, painting by Russian painter Ivan Bilibin 1890s book, showing both Psilocybe and Amanita together in one painting.

That was Irvin’s moment of questioning the entire field of entheogen scholarship.

That made him question the official historical narrative of the entire field of ethnomycology.

Irvin’s Brain says re: date of identifying psilocybin mushrooms,

“the credit for discovering the magic mushrooms has been given to Richard Schultes (1939), and later R.G. Wasson.

“Actually, at the time Schultes was in the Sierra Mazateca, working on his PhD thesis (Schultes 1941).

“He was accompanying Reko, who had been puzzling out the mushroom mystery since 1919.

“During the late 1930s Reko sent specimens he had collected to various American taxonomists for identification. He later said this about the American botanist:

“I have to mention these details, now that an ambitious young Harvard student, having turned literary pirate, has taken credit for my discoveries (The identification of Teonanacatl, by Richard E. Schultes, Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University, Febr. 21, 1939), after I had communicated to him the results of my prolonged investigations and invited him on a botanical expedition to Huautla de Jiménez during the summer of 1938, where I gave him numerous samples of the aforesaid mushroom, which had been finally positively identified by Dr. Linder as Paneolus campanulatus L. var. sphinctrinus (Fr.) Bresadola. “

The Early History of Salvia divinorum
Leander J. Valdés III
http://www.sagewisdom.org/earlysdhistory.html
HTML with permission and changes from
The Entheogen Review (2001) X: 73-75

THE ENTHEOGEN REVIEW
The Journal of Unauthorized Research
on Visionary Plants and Drugs

http://www.entheogenreview.com

Overemphasis on Amanita in European Religious History

Historical Roots of Making Amanita the False Center of European Mushroom History

Winkelman’s Introduction Article in the Special Issue on Psychedelics in History and World Religions – Asserts Global Psilocybin, Yet Obsesses on Amanita, in Europe

Introduction: Evidence for entheogen use in prehistory and world religions
Michael Winkelman
https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2054/3/2/article-p43.xml

Winkelman’s long introduction article focuses on psilocybin worldwide, and mentions Brown’s findings of psilocybe in Christian art. BUT nevertheless, when it comes to Europe, he ignores psilocybin and goes *crazy* striving to use the word “Amanita Muscaria” at every possible opportunity – when he could & should have used the neutral, broad word ‘mushroom’.

In the Europe sections, count the number of times Winkelman chooses to use the word ‘mushroom’, ‘Amanita’/’Muscaria’, ‘psilocyb’, & ‘entheogen’.

Winkelman uses Amanita far, far too often – his entire mission in life, in those sections, is to use the word ‘Amanita’ or ‘Muscaria’ as often as possible, at every possible opportunity.

SECRET teachings

Book:
Secret Teachings of All Ages
Manly Hall (1928)
http://manlyhallsociety.com/secret-teachings/

Rolfe’s Book The Romance of the Fungus World (1925) – No Psychoactive Mushrooms Other than Amanita

Mycologists in 1925 (until 1939) had no awareness of psilocybin; the only psychoactive mushroom the 1925 mycologists are aware of is Amanita.

Book:
The Romance of the Fungus World: An Account of Fungus Life in its Numerous Guises, both Real and Legendary
Robert Rolfe; R. T. Rolfe & F. W. Rolfe
1925
https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf/mode/2up
Foreword by John Ramsbottom (1924)
ISBN: 0486231054
1925 (1974 reprint)

Dover changed to “Imaginary”, orig = “Legendary”

University Course on Religion ie Psychedelics. Southern Oregon University, “Introduction to Religion”

“Humanities depts are closing”. – Martin Ball

“Southern Oregon University is a public university in Ashland, Oregon. It was founded in 1872 as the Ashland Academy, has been in its current location since 1926, and was known by nine other names before assuming its current name in 1997. Its Ashland campus – just 14 miles from Oregon’s border with California – encompasses 175 acres. Headquarters for Jefferson Public Radio, and public access station Rogue Valley Community Television.”

Martin Ball’s YT ch:
https://www.youtube.com/user/EntheogenicEvolution/videos

One of Martin Ball’s podcast guests was with https://circle.tamintegration.com/courses/2020-psilocybin-summit/

Around 41:00 in this podcast , with Thomas Roberts, for the book Mindapps, Martin Ball says that his course on religion before laid off due to low enrollment in the humanities, he taught as a course on psychedelics. https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/entheogenic/episodes/2020-08-17T10_59_25-07_00

Book:
Mindapps: Multistate Theory and Tools for Mind Design
Thomas B. Roberts
Foreward by James Fadiman
http://amzn.com/B07JZFXRDY
Park Street Press
June 18, 2019

“An exploration of “mind design” technologies and practices–mindapps–that boost intellectual capacity and enable new ways of thought and action

• Reveals how mindapps transform the patterns of our mind-body complex and help generate new ideas by enabling access to new mind states

• Examines the singlestate fallacy–the myth that useful thinking only occurs in our ordinary awake mental state

• Explores a wealth of mindapp practices and techniques, including

  • microdosing with psychedelics,
  • yoga and
  • martial arts,
  • hypnosis,
  • breathing techniques,
  • lucid dreaming,
  • rites of passage,
  • biofeedback and
  • neurofeedback, and
  • transcranial brain stimulation

Just as we can write and install apps in our electronic devices, we can construct “mindapps” and install them in our brain-mind complex, and as just as digital apps add capabilities to our devices, mindapps can expand our mental powers and creative abilities, allowing us to intentionally redesign our minds.

Using psychedelics as the prime example, Thomas B. Roberts explores the many different kinds of mindapps, including meditation, other psychoactive plants and chemicals, sensory overload and deprivation, biofeedback and neurofeedback, hypnosis and suggestion, sleep and lucid dreaming, creative imagery, transcranial brain stimulation and optical brain stimulation, rites of passage, martial arts and exercise routines, yoga, breathing techniques, and contemplative prayer.

He also looks at the future of mindapps, the potential for new mindapps yet to be invented, and how installing multiple mindapps can produce new, yet to be explored mind states.

Drawing on decades of research, he shows how psychedelics in particular are “ideagens”–powerful tools for generating new ideas and new ways of thinking.

Uniting the many forms of mindapps into one overall Multistate Mind Theory, Roberts examines the singlestate fallacy–the myth that useful thinking only occurs in our ordinary awake mental state–and demonstrates the many mind-body states we are capable of. He shows how mindapps not only allow us to design and redesign our own minds but also offer benefits for

  • artistic performance,
  • mystical and spiritual experience, and
  • scientific research

by improving

  • creativity,
  • open-mindedness,
  • problem solving, and
  • inner-brain connections.

Reformulating how we think about the human mind, Mindapps unveils the new multistate landscape of the mind and how we can each enter the world of mind design.”

Voice Recording Reading Selections from Bennett & Hanegraaff
“Bennett Hanegraaff Lost Key.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-18:
    https://we.tl/t-7nuHxb3Dnh
  • Theme; overall description: 
    • For links, see a couple pages below. I did a little tightening and cleanup but the raw file was already pretty listenable.
  • 0:00 – Typing then reading-aloud then deleting the typing segment will produce a good recording AND good text.
  • 0:38 – Chris Bennett’s critique of Muraresku.
  • _ – Hanegraaff’s Feb 2020 interview about entheogens
  • Talks from the Religious Drugs workshop conference.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: __31:49
  • Filesize: __27 MB
  • Bitrate: __ 210
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –

http://religiousdrugs.com/call-for-papers/

“The purpose of this workshop is to explore the role of entheogens in its various religious and spiritual expressions: historically, culturally and finally from the methodological approach taken by various research fields. It will be moreover, directed at clarifying the purpose, importance and relevance that the various forms of entheogens and mind-altering substances cover for the individual mystical and religious traditions. Emphasis will also be placed on the combination with ritual, meditation and biofeedback.

“The workshop will moreover encourage the discussion, analysis and questioning of research methods and methodologies such as: The ethics of the researcher in connection to the use of substances as part of participatory observation. Enquiries into the analysis of ecstatic and religious states in cooperation and compared to the descriptions of laboratory tested altered states of consciousness. Comparative methodologies and cooperation in different fields of research are encouraged.”

Post-keynote Interview of Hanegraaff on Entheogens, maybe Feb/March/Sep 2020: originally in Dutch, translated to English:

https://wouterjhanegraaff.blogspot.com/2020/09/enter-gods-interview-with-jana.html?fbclid=IwAR3JHBirFRTR00NBsAMy0Z_ON9jSPd0fC467tCodfkSig3wXR3mC6PLNiO8

http://religiousdrugs.com

http://religiousdrugs.com/program/

https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2021/03/14/the-immortality-key-lost-on-the-road-to-eleusis/

Type while recording (a lot/ often), read-aloud what was typed (this is the payoff: produces good text in the idea development page and produces good audio), then delete the typing session from the recording.

Every 10 minutes, state the context: what am I doing? In a recording.

Read-aloud Bennett’s critique of TIK.

  • Time and date:
    • Episode #__
    • 9am, March 18, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
  • Vocalization theme:
    • a.m. read-aloud
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: 75% from Omni to Wide Cardioid.
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol
  • export mp3
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210318_2160.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: none
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

“Ep64 Ideal Esotericism.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-17:
    https://we.tl/t-S7UFvEX7zY
  • Episode theme; overall description: 
    • Almost all of this episode is Egodeath Theory commentary – reading and commenting on the Journal of Psychedelic Studies, special issue on Psychedelics in History and World Religions https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2054/3/2/2054.3.issue-2.xml ; Volume 3 (2019): Issue 2 (Jun 2019): Editor: Michael Winkelman. Includes Browns’ article.
    • I read parts of Winkelman’s long introduction article, which focuses on psilocybin worldwide BUT when it comes to Europe, he ignores psilocybin and goes *crazy* using the word “Amanita Muscaria” at every possible opportunity: https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2054/3/2/article-p43.xml
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:32:22
  • Filesize: 78 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • clean up
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210317_2159.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: none
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 64
    • 8p.m., March 17, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Critique of wiki “Western Esotericism”
    • Imagining the good aspects of the book TIK. Cyberdisciple’s review of Brown’s review of Muraresku’s book.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Impossible to do controlled voicing while speaking off-the-cuff?
    • Should I resort to transcribing then read-aloud text?
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: 75% of the way from Omni to Wide Cardioid.
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_45_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_52_ The timestamp is x.

  • Vocalization theme:
    • Impossible to do controlled voicing while speaking off-the-cuff?
    • Should I resort to transcribing then read-aloud text?

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_555_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

Esoteric Agenda
  • Egodeath theory:
    • Read-aloud Cyberdisciple re: Brown’s “maximal”
    • Critique of wiki “Western Esotericism”.
    • Possible critique of Brown’s critique of Mur’s book.
    • My critique is pretty minor or insubstantial: Mur’s inflated claim, bragging combined with diminution of goals: “By reducing our ambition, we have out-done the mysteries.”

Rolfe Book Online

Rolfe book from University of British Columbia Library is back online at archive.org! The Romance of the Fungus World

🎉 📗 📖 📚 🏛️ 🏫

https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf/page/n7/mode/2up

Controlled Voicing While Speaking Off-the Cuff – Effectively Impossible?

The Ideal Results from the Alternative Approach: Transcribe to Text & then Read-Aloud

My attempt was mostly a failure. I failed to criticize Brad in a controlled voice. Instead, which would help, I could demonstrate exactly the ideal desired result by transcribing to text and reading-aloud that transcription:

  • play back my off-the-cuff, poorly voiced, harshing on Brad the Enlightened Zen Master,
  • transcribe that to text
  • edit that text
  • read-aloud that text
    • revoice from text as casual standard voice;
    • low pitch, fun tone, casual wording
    • not high pitch, serious tone, formal wording
  • voice actor / voiceover artist / elocution
  • the “write->speak->rewrite” feedback loop, combines the powers of speech & text.

“Ep63 The Esotericism Key.mp3”

  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-17:
    https://we.tl/t-TiVZRwvAd6
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • A pretty clean take, not much requiring cleanup. If I read a passage twice to get it right, that gives the benefit of double-reading.
    • A clean read-aloud of Cyberdisciple’s and Brown’s critiques of the book The Immortality Key. No critique from me yet.
    • A clean read-aloud of the wiki article Western Esotericism. No critique from me yet.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:44:01
  • Filesize: 86 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file “Ep63 The Esotericism Key”
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck preview wav
  • normalize vol of Mic preview wav
  • export mp3 of Mic preview wav
  • transfer preview mp3 to music player
  • upload preview mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link

“Ep63 preview Esotericism Key.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-16:
    https://we.tl/t-MQhj9iITqv (truncated preview version. real version is above)
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • śNot cleaned up yet, but it’s a clean take. If I read a passage twice to get it right, that gives the benefit of double-reading.
    • A clean read-aloud of Cyberdisciple’s and Brown’s critiques of the book The Immortality Key. No critique from me yet.
    • Not complete content yet: 2/3 through a clean read-aloud of the wiki article Western Esotericism. No critique from me yet.
    • No outro yet.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:24:30
  • Filesize: 69 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file “Ep63 The Esotericism Key”
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck preview wav
  • normalize vol of Mic preview wav
  • export mp3 of Mic preview wav
  • transfer preview mp3 to music player
  • upload preview mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 45°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • gate
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file:
    • 210316_2156.wav – 1:24:30 (not finished; create a 2nd recording for final part of wiki Western Esotericism article).
    • 210317_2157.wav – failed to unpause, had to stop recording in order to listen to where it left off: restart from top of Academic Study section. Not in Preview mp3.
    • 210317_2158.wav – Academic Study section of wiki article W Esotericism; Outro. Not in Preview mp3.
  • Mixer tracking file: 210316_2401.wav – aborted at 23:15 since identical to mic deck except stereo.
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 63
    • 8p.m., March 16, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Read-aloud Cyberdisciple’s updated review of Immortality Key, Brown’s review of Immortality key, and the Wiki article “Western Esotericism”.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Is off-the-cuff controlled voicing impossible?
    • Get better at read-aloud.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Halfway between Omni & Wide Cardioid (position 2 of 9). Try 2.5; compare 50%, 67%, 75% of the way from Omni to Wide Cardioid.
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ on mixer recording: none.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_45_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_52_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda
  • Read-aloud Wiki article Western Esotericism (good article) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_esotericism
  • 39:30 start
  • 1:24:30 ending in mid-article for the night with “His Traditionalist ideas would have a strong influence on later esotericists like Julius Evola (1898–1974) and Frithjof Schuon (1907–1998).” Resume here. (2157.wav, 9:17 then it failed to unpause. last phrase caught: “external links”. Resume w/ section heading “Academic study”, added 210317_2158.wav w/ end & outro.
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiLB_Mm6qic
    “13 questions to Wouter Hanegraaff” on YouTube. An interview of Hanegraaff, including autobio. sons of ministers become historians of religion. Classical Guitar major. Cultural History after, did dissertation on New Age movement, became his book. Esoteric Currents in W Culture. Halfway through studying Guitar, switched to cultural intellectual history, history of religion. History of Ideas, U of Utrecht Amsterdam. Found book in German, folklore renaiss early model book Pansophie: A History of White & Black Magic. Forgotten traditions, neglected, marginalized by mainstream histroiography. The other book: dutch edited , 3 main components: Reason, Faith, Gnosis.
  • __ end
  • Find SAMORINI GIORGIO, 1997, L’albero-fungo di Plaincourault/ The mushroom-tree of Plaincourault, Eleusis, 8:29-37

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • x

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

/ end of section ““Ep#.mp3”

Moderate, Reasonable Brown vs. the Too-Far Maximalists

Brown argues against the maximal entheogen theory of religion – in contrast, I agree with Muraresku about how religion works when done right, not nece’ly how ppl attempted to access the mystic altered state.

I reject Brown’s list of “alternative ways of the mystic altered state” – list of bunk futile — ie I agree with Muraresku’s position as stated by Brown and rejected by Brown; I side with Muraresku against Brown here.

If I can trust Brown’s depiction of Muraresku’s position.

All true religion esotericism comes from plants, not from other, fake, ineffective positions.

I agree with the position statement that Brown attributes to Muraresku on this point aka the maximal entheogen theory of religion.

Muraresku and I both assert and commit to the explanatory framework of the maximal entheogen theory of religion.

“TIK argues that this entheogen-induced ecstatic vision, the ego-death experience that allows you to “die before you die” thus granting the living a reassuring glimpse of immortality, has over millennia and in diverse cultures served as the common element in the “religion with no name.”

“The pervasive underlying premise of TIK is that all religion originates from the ingestion of psychedelic concoctions of mind-altering beer and wine. And, conversely, that the only religious experience sufficiently reliable, fast-acting and powerful enough to convert the masses into true believers is an altered state of consciousness induced by psychedelics.”

Component Phrases from Brown’s Characterization of Muraresku’s Position (= the maximal entheogen theory of religion)

this entheogen-induced ecstatic vision, the ego-death experience

die before you die

granting immortality

the common element in the ecstatic source of religion

all religion originates from psychedelic

the only religious experience sufficiently reliable, fast-acting and powerful enough

altered state of consciousness induced by psychedelics

Cyberdisciple’s Analysis

Chris Bennett posted a long criticism of The Immortality Key: 

https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2021/03/14/the-immortality-key-lost-on-the-road-to-eleusis/

Bennett complains that his books weren’t cited, even though Muraresku had privately praised them.

Michael Rinella makes a similar complaint in a 1-star Amazon review of The Immorality Key: 
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R16N1YOEHHDUQ6/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1250207142

(“I don’t see how a book like this could be published in 2020 and yet somehow lack a single reference to a scholarly work on virtually the same subject, my own Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity (2010).

“Instead, it seems to be a rehash of arguments of The Road to Eleusis, a work originally published in the late 1970s, with some additional material on the early Christian era.

“Hillman’s work is a chapter he was forced to excise from his dissertation, stretched out to the length of a book.” – Rinella)

“Authors are annoyed that Muraresku’s Da Vinci Code-like book is a best-seller with lots of media hype, while their scholarly books attract a fraction of the interest.

“I think Brown is overstating Muraresku’s position about the origin of all religions. I do not think that Muraresku asserts and commits “to the explanatory framework of the maximal entheogen theory of religion”.

“It’s hard to tell because Muraresku does not clearly state what his position is on “the origin of all religions.”

[that’s always the problem; how to fill-in the Grid Game (of where plants were used, when) when writers obscure what their position is – cm]

“When Brown writes “the pervasive underlying premise of TIK is that all religion originates from the ingestion of psychedelic concoctions of mind-altering beer and wine,” he attributes more to Muraresku than Muraresku actually asserts. Brown reads that “pervasive underlying premise” into Muraresku’s book.

“Brown should define “originates” more clearly. Does he mean historically / chronologically or does he mean that the basic, starting point of ‘religion’ lies in drug experiencing for everyone regardless of the time they live in.

“There’s a chance that I’m wrong about the above and that somewhere in his book Muraresku states something like Brown wants about the origin of all religion.

“Certainly Muraresku does not practice “the maximal entheogen theory of religion” in our Egodeath community way when he discusses Greek, Christian, Roman, Near-Eastern, Prehistoric religions. 

“He writes as though evidence of psychedelics is hard to find and routinely forbids himself from looking for evidence in religious groups due to arbitrary social categories.

“Even if Muraresku does state something like the “maximal entheogen theory of religion” (I doubt he does), he fails to use the maximal theory when discussing religions.

“In one part when discussing ‘paleo-Christianity’ vs. ‘Church Fathers,’ Muaresku opposes “mystics” (authentic psychedelic eucharist takers) and “bureaucrats” (offering substitute eucharist).

“In another place he opposes “elites” (who guard the psychedelic sacrament for themselves) and “common people” (who are prevented from taking the psychedelic).

“In another place he opposes “Greek” psychedelic users to “Roman” non-psychedelic users.

“In other spots “women” know how to prepare the psychedelic drink while “men” do not. 

“In other spots he seems to claim that psychedelic religion is built into the DNA of Indo-Europeans (by implication not in the genetics of other groups).

“One of the editors of the journal where Brown published the review is Michael Winkelman, author of Shamanism: A Biopsychosocial Paradigm of Consciousness and Healing.
https://www.amazon.com/Shamanism-Biopsychosocial-Paradigm-Consciousness-Healing/dp/031338181X

“In his book, Winkelman treats drugs as just one way of “altering consciousness,” lumping them together with hypnosis, dance, and meditation (at least in the table of contents).

“Winkelman edited the special issue of the journal devoted to “Psychedelics in History and World Religions” in which Jerry and Julie Brown’s article “Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels” appeared.”

Cyberdisciple’s Updated Review of Muraresku’s book The Immortality Key

Cyberdisciple wrote:

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2020/11/24/correcting-key-points-in-muraresku-the-immortality-key/#comment-2451
“Brown’s comment [linked above] prodded me to update my post [critique of Muraresku’s book The Immortality Key], now with critiques of Chapter 13.”

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2020/11/24/correcting-key-points-in-muraresku-the-immortality-key — “Updated 15 March 2021 with Table of Contents” + ch. 13

copy of w’s comment for reading/analysis

“the word ‘maximal’ as in the maximal entheogen theory of religion may sound like the broadest view, the greatest possible highest view for religious experience.”

[maximal can be broadened to apply to: maximal plants, maximal exp’c, & maximal esotericism (per my definition) -cm]

“When ‘maximal’ is placed into context as descriptive for religious esotericism, ‘maximal’ becomes limiting for the mystic altered state when it refers to only plant-based psychedelics.

“The focus should be placed upon the mystic altered state, regardless of all possible means of attaining the mystic altered state. Then what is labeled as ‘moderate’ becomes less restrictive and limiting for the mystic altered state than the use of the word ‘maximal.”

[my 1988-1997 Theory’s wording didn’t push chemicals, and was surprisingly open to other alleged means of accessing the loose cognitive association state, including schizophrenia because I believe schizophrenia does give loose cognitive mystic-state experiences. 1998-2002 I added “maximal” and specified chemicals -cm]

“Christianity may provide evidence of plants.”

“Christianity is not an original religion.”

[I don’t know what ‘original’ means here. -cm]

“There may be other catalysts beside plants that transition the mind into the mystic altered state.”

[That is 100% hazy, vague, & vaporous. What are these other alleged catalysts, and why should they be elevated to the efficacy level of plants? I’ll stick with the proven (plants), until some concrete, specific alternative is proved. To be saved, we must ingest the flesh of Christ. -cm]

“Focus should be placed on the importance of the mystic altered state, rather than on the catalyst for that state.”

“The word ‘maximal’ is limiting and restrictive for the mystic altered state by only including plant-based entheogens.”

[this move is “limiting” and “restrictive” only in a totally vague, hypothetical, vaporous, conjectured sense. I took the above strategy of staying open in 1997, and got no benefit from doing so. My explanatory emphasis has always been on the loose cognitive state, not the trigger for it. -cm]

Brown – Book Review of The Immortality Key, Journal of Psychedelic Studies

Hello Michael,

Here’s my recent Book Review of the NYTimes Bestseller, 
The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name.

Review link:  
https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2054/aop/article-10.1556-2054.2021.00170/article-10.1556-2054.2021.00170.xml

Jerry B. Brown, Ph.D.
Founding Professor of Anthropology
Florida International University
Coauthor, The Psychedelic Gospels
www.psychedelicgospels.com

Show Format/ Segment Length

  • Fake placeholder quick “segment length” mockup:
    • Intro segment done at 1:00
    • private only – Show Format segment done at 3:00
    • private only – Vocalization Review segment done at 5:00
    • Warmup Reading segment done at 7:00
    • Egodeath Theory segment done at 1:30:00
    • Not a Music Show segment done at 1:58:00
    • Outro segment done at 1:59:00

“Ep62 Hidden Agenda.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-14:
    https://we.tl/t-YO3mF4MKVf
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Entirely Egodeath Theory content: reading & commenting.
    • Read from the removed Rolfe book Romance of the Fungus world.
    • Read Wiki article on Mystery Religions.
    • Read Dale Pendell book blurbs.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:31:55
  • Filesize: 100 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 (mono source)
  • Timestamps in .mp3: (these won’t be much use – they are for the original master tape, not for the greatly trimmed mp3. the “+” items are retained in the .mp3 file)
  • +0:00 – Intro
  • +045 miking summary
  • done~~-1:07 distance talk
  • ~~+1:51 eq: none. “finished intro”
  • done~~-2:07 “this is start of Show Format seg”
  • -9:54 demo of mic patterns (made sep. mp3 from “Show Format” track, 7:38-11:14).
    • good voicing/talking about mic & voice & show format.
  • +1:16:48 critique of Meditation bad arg at wiki Ego Death article
  • done~~-12541 resume Voczn review
  • -12934 everyone jealous of broadcaster skills. need to create Instructional material about casual standard voice separated/divorced from “broadcaster” concept. Body of Knowledge about how to speak properly, is much needed. the broadcasters at YT have way way better voice & mic technique than the poser amateurs who strawman their skills.
  • -15116 resume Vocalization Review.
  • ~~+20100 “start of Warmup Reading segment”. Meditation Hucksters more.
  • done~~-20536 voczn review for Warmup reading.
  • ~~+20656 modified reading of Romance of the Fungus World.
  • done~~-21242 BAD NEWS the nice green yellow Rolfe book has been removed!! from archive.org.
  • -21641 “read the subheadings”
  • ~~+21918 Preface of Rolfe book
  • +25523 Dale Pendell
  • +30609 Rolfe book more reading
  • +32056 Dale Pendell
  • wikip articles especially mystery-religions. all the rest is Egodeath Theory content. Detailed original timestamps/topics are below, in Warmup Reading segment.
orig timestamps logged during recording:
  • done: Vary & demo the mic polar patterns.
  • 3 review outlines
    • Feb 7 review outline (could transcribe by modding the Feb 15 outline)
    • Feb 15 snapshot (archived in the Egodeath Mystery Show page)
    • Subsection “Standard Voice Practice” in “Voice & Mic Technique” page – longer.
  • 15:30 been talking about where to keep show format & voice/mic agenda items.
  • 25:00 ” watching mic & voice vids, web.
  • 3450 critiquing voicing / tone of previous episode.
  • 4127 repitched electronically.
  • 50:01 updating agenda in voicing page.
  • 58:02 Voice Review, updating the page/agenda/ TOC. Reorg’d page.
  • 1:05:25 Review of Voczn
  • ~1:24:00 critique of meditation hucksters, to try to voice in casual standard voice
  • 1:30:00, 14126 – Against critiques of announcer voice
  • 1:50:10 – abstracting out casual standard voice body of knowledge from various bickering applications that strawman this body of knowledge/ skill -set.
  • 2:00:39 – finished Review of Voczn
  • 2:10:35 warmup reading, substituting the egodeath theory for fungi hobby.
  • 2:22:56 reading India library Rolfe preface.
  • 24303 reading Intro chap of Rolfe from India copy of book
  • 3:02:47 read amazon Dale Pendell’s book that’s an alchemy play (20014), and 2nd edition of PharmakoGnosis (2010).
  • 3:13:15 reading subheads of ch 4 of Rolfe
  • 3:23:06 read more subheads. Pendell Poea book 2nd edition.
  • next, wiki mystery-religions.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Roman_mysteries <– done
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_esotericism <– only read Contents
  • 3:33:13 reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Roman_mysteries
  • 3:43:00 “
  • 4:03:14 finished Mysteries article, commented on two slicing approaches in “perennial phil” –
    • mine is exo/eso regardless of religious brand.
    • other major perennnialists advocate that “perennialism means affirming non-bible brands, & rejecting Bible religions – big mistake.

I am not releasing the 4-hour Full episode; I am only releasing this ALL-EGODEATH-CONTENT, essentially a Core version of the episode is the only publicly released version. I removed the Agenda-management discussion (retained in source .wav and audio project). Removed great discussion on Broadcasters and removing from them the casual standard voice technique to be general-use.

Total length 1:31:55 after removing voice/mic/show-format content and condensing. The removed, good Voicing content and Mic demo content is separate tracks in the audio project file.

  • “Mic Patterns Demo from Ep62.mp3” – not included in episode 62. 7MB. 320kbps. uploaded https://we.tl/t-IEuAKtOpCf “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Ep62 Hidden Agenda/Mic Patterns Demo from Ep62.mp3″
    • not from episode:
      • Feb 26: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Polar Patterns demo/Polar Patterns demo.mp3″
      • Mar 14: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Pattern Eq Demo/Pattern Eq Demo.mp3″
      • Mar 14: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Pattern Eq Demo/Pattern Eq Demo All 9 Rapidly.mp3″

“Broadcasters from Ep62.mp3” – same. 320kbps. 89 MB. not uploaded

“Show Format Voicing from Ep62.mp3” – same. 320kbps. 171 MB. not cleaned up. not uploaded

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • mark timestamps
  • somehow trim .wav or move non-publish parts to sep track.
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of mic demo
  • transfer mp3 to music player
    • transfer mp3 to music player: mic demo
    • transfer mp3 to music player: broadcasters
    • transfer mp3 to music player: show-format/voice
  • upload mp3
  • upload mp3 of mic demo? broadcasters? show-format/voice?
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210314_2150.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: none
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

this will be 2-part, or 2-version: 4:07:45 total.

  1. public-use: Intro + Egodeath Theory content + Outro
  2. private-use: The removed parts (show format, voice, mic, music discussion).
  • part 1: voice/mic / show format.
  • part 2: readings. Rolfe Romance of the Fungus world; Dale Pendell, ; wiki: mystery-religion initiation articles.

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 62, 11a.m., March 14, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    (about 12 words, to bake into the audio, predicting topics & differentiating from other episodes. Only 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!)
    • Whatever happens to be in the rolling agenda.
    • I’m now an expert on miking for speech.
    • Using the timer every 10 minutes to log a timestamp and topic of what I’ve been talking about.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Moving among the 3 modes
      • Pitch Grounding technique
      • Force Pitch Down technique
      • Casual standard voice
    • Hearing the various polar patterns of a dual-capsule LDCM mic.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: I’m starting by using the Wide Cardioid pattern, in-between the bright/wet Omnidirectional pattern, and dark/dry Cardioid pattern.
    • Distance: 7″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Playlist

We’re listening to nothing.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_202_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_217_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about the show format should be in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

  • 7:33 discussing spectrum of #keystrokes to begin recording a show, where are agenda items maintained.

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_918_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
931__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Voice & Mic Technique should be in the “Voice & Mic Technique” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Voice & Mic Technique
Subsection: Agenda Items to Work on During the Show

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
20101 The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_20111_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda

  • Genesis 2 (you may eat from Tree of Life), 3 (you are kicked out b/c you might eat from Tree of Life), & 4 (Cain & Abel)
  • I’m an expert on miking for speech, given that I watched a bunch of vids today and learned almost nothing.
    • Need to highlight both:
      • Where is mouth aimed
      • Where is mic aimed
  • Search for vids and webpages about casual standard voice. Still coming up next-to empty handed.
Enlightenment’s Evil Twin: The Control Vortex Guarded Gate?

From wik: Ego Death article:

“Shinzen Young, an American Buddhist teacher, has pointed at the difficulty integrating the experience of no self.

“He calls this “the Dark Night”, or “falling into the Pit of the Void.”

“It entails an authentic and irreversible insight into Emptiness and No Self.

“What makes it problematic is that the person interprets it as a bad trip.

“Instead of being empowering and fulfilling, the way Buddhist literature claims it will be, it turns into the opposite.

“In a sense, it’s Enlightenment’s Evil Twin.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_death#Dark_Night_and_depersonalisation – “Willoughby Britton is conducting research on such phenomena which may occur during meditation, in a research program called
“The Dark Night of the Soul“.

She has searched texts from various traditions to find descriptions of difficult periods on the spiritual path,[web 5] and conducted interviews to find out more on the difficult sides of meditation.[web 4][note 8]”

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
__ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • x

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

/ end of section ““Ep62.mp3”

“Ep61 Back in Golden Era.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-12:
    https://we.tl/t-28yOSgJHWC
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:25:34
  • Filesize: 100 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
    • 0:00 – Intro: Pub recording from end of Satanic Majesties.
    • _ – Legacy vintage reading of Vocalization principles from the golden era back when the Show used to be good (Feb. 15, 2021).
    • _ – Goals for these recordings; measure of success: to produce clips.
    • 56:00 – Readings from Rolfe’s 1925 book The Romance of the Fungus World.
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 61
    • 9p.m., March 12, 2021.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Egodeath content: Start here: At ~56:00, Readings from Rolfe’s 1925 book The Romance of the Fungus World.
    • Goals for these recordings; measure of success: produce clips.
    • Not much Egodeath content. Largely for my show-structuring work, show-strategizing. This is a mechanical practice episode, focused on the show format.
    • Live-show format is hard. But there have been lots of good clips, and I do have a process to mark timestamps and produce a Core version of an episode.
      • The show is a clip-generating machine/approach.
      • Last episode has good content / clip – reading Ego Death article at Wiki.
    • A legacy, vintage reading of the Vocalization Review points like way back in the golden era of February 15th, almost a month ago.
    • Frequent varying of mic pattern.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Points of failure:
      • immediately getting to the point, right from the start
      • completing sentences, and
      • keeping pitch down (ie transcendently managing my voice, or, using casual standard voice) while speaking off-the-cuff.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Continuously varying among Omni, Wide Cardioid, Cardioid, Supercardioid, & Figure 8.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Errata
  • 50:00 I underestimate the previous episode, #60. Episode 60 has Egodeath content at the end, as asserted here, but also, that episode has a lot of good Egodeath content throughout; so I made a Core version of the episode (Ep60 Core).
  • Next up, need to work on tone: This recording at one point has angry tone, oddly/strangely, when discussing viable expectations/standards for voice recordings.
    • Not a Pitch error; maybe it’s a Mindfulness error; it’s definitely a “serious tone vs fun tone” error, but I haven’t yet analyzed “fun tone”.
    • I’d expect a neutral-toned discussion, not an angry tone – this is evidence of a sheer habit of framing ideas with a negative tone or stance or perspective.
    • I can think of other incongruous use of a tone that reads as angry: a technical gear-usage technique summary video I made for someone.
    • I just watched a YT’er on mic technique, he seemed just like me: in discussing technical options for mic placement with pros/cons, he read (came across) as hyper-caffeinated and angry; “angry energy”.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • tighten gaps
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: none
  • Mixer tracking file: 210312_2400.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Playlist

We’re listening to the recording at the end of Their Satanic Majesties Request. At the end, again, plus part of the song Gomper.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_148_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_154_ The timestamp is x.

  • Status of Agenda Management: TRAINWRECK. There’s no good way. For speed of moving through the episode fast (while live on-air w/ continuous music & timestamps), I need to put top priority on my needs for scrolling through the episode’s template, with a finite amount of material copied to there; the rolling agenda items for:
    • show-format work
    • voice/miking technique development
    • egodeath theory topics

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_354_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_400_ The timestamp is x.

Vintage Golden-Era Traditional High-Point Copy / Reconstruction of This Section Just Before I Moved It To the Ambitious New Page “Voice & Mic Techniques” (but note it was *constantly* changing)

Legacy Vocalization Section, February 15, 2021; Preserve As-Is:

[I’m keeping this copy in idea development page 12, but the main bak of this section is now at bottom of Egodeath Mystery Show page]

The following was from the final read-alouds of this section/segment in episodes of the Egodeath Mystery Show, just on the cusp of creating the page “Voice & Mic Technique”, where I moved these items out to become, mostly, the section “Standard Voice Practice” in that new page.

Review of Vocalization; “this is the start of the Vocalization Review segment” (legacy)

Special Focus for Vocalizing in This Episode
  • Open the back-of-mouth chambers and top of throat.
    • Exercises. Pull up and back. Experiment from tight to pressed open and upward.
  • Push pitch down consistently, continuously.
    • Pitch Grounding technique while off-the-cuff speaking, as an exercise.
  • Staying mindful of vocalization techniques while doing off-the-cuff commentary in the main segments. No particular focus but just trying to stay cognizant overall.
  • Off-the-cuff mindfulness: controlled vocalizing while doing off-the-cuff speaking.
  • Standard voice; transcendent voice.
Read-Aloud Techniques
  • Read each heading twice.
  • Read each sentence twice, defined as 3 lines.
  • Read each paragraph twice, defined as 7 lines.
  • Read a complete paragraph before commenting.
  • Separate the reading of a paragraph from the commenting on a paragraph.
  • Contiguous unbroken long stretches of reading.
  • State my commentary at end of paragraph. debatable!
  • Turn any text into standard vocalization.
  • Double-reading.
  • Read-aloud each sentence twice.
  • Don’t read footnote numbers in mid-sentence.
  • Don’t read author citations that are in mid-sentence.
Standard Reference Speaking and Tone
  • Exaggerate the bass, treble, and pitch swing.
  • Practice standard reference vocalizing.
  • Speak low pitch with a neutral-positive tone.
  • Speak low pitch with a smile, or neutral at least.
  • How to speak low-pitch without sounding forceful, but rather, neutral; nor soft.
  • No particular character or inflection of feeling.
  • No odd resonance.
  • No character or attitude skew.
  • Generic reference speech.
  • Standard voice.
  • Straight-up standard pronunciation.
  • Neutral-medium pace as mid-point.
  • Not lax, not edgy.
  • Neutral non-emphasis.
  • Neither soft tone nor aggressive.
  • Neutral in tone.
  • Functional & plain.
  • Regular matter-of-fact speech.
  • No attitude or tone skew.
Vocal Apparatus
  • Back top of throat.
  • Lower chest.
  • Tip of tongue.
Pitch
  • Force pitch downward hard.
  • Vary the pitch from low to very low.
Pronunciation & Enunciation
  • Consistently hype the letters: ‘c d s t w x z’.
  • Never slur; always pronounce the ‘s’.
  • Separate each word.
  • Pronounce every letter of every word.
Speed
  • Neutral fast low-pitch.
  • Vary the speed from slow to fast (fast & smooth).
  • Separate each word.
  • Pronounce every letter of every word.
  • Repeat botched statement correctly.
Conversation Technique
  • Start a sentence, then finish it.
    • Don’t produce uncompleted sentences.
    • Don’t interrupt myself.
  • Talk about “we, us, community, conversation”.
  • Skip straight to the point.
    • Think of key words, then construct statement around them.
    • What are the 5 key words you need to say? Start by saying those.
  • Speak simply, with only 1st-order detail.
  • Stay on a topic more, without jumping among topics.
  • Use segments to stay on-topic and separate the topics.
Mic Technique
  • Ride the mic gain.
  • Move aside/back from the mic slightly, to inhale.
  • Ride the music gain.
  • Fade-up guitar leads.

/ end of Preserve/Legacy section

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_3255_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_3304_ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_3500_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_3508_ The timestamp is x.

Esoteric Agenda
  • Live-show format is hard. But there have been lots of good clips, and I do have a process to mark timestamps and produce a Core version of an episode.The show is a clip-generating machine/approach.
  • Last episode has good content / clip – reading Ego Death article at Wiki.
  • A legacy, vintage reading of the Vocalization Review points like way back in the golden era of February 15th, almost a month ago.
  • Frequent varying of mic pattern.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Points of failure:
      • immediately getting to the point, right from the start
      • completing sentences, and
      • keeping pitch down (ie transcendently managing my voice, or, using casual standard voice) while speaking off-the-cuff.

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_13945_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
_13956_ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

/ end of section ““Ep# Key Words.mp3”

“Ep60 Core – Loosecog Trajectory.mp3” – new, Mar. 13

This is a shorter, tightened, Core version of the episode.

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-13:
    https://we.tl/t-2mhAYe9zt6
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • The newbie mind has 10 standard experiences in the loose cog state. These must be structured and directed, to lead to the mind’s potential transformation. To understand esotericism & Transcendent Knowledge.
    • My commentary on Wiki article Ego Death.
    • Background music: album: Their Satanic Majesties Request.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 46:33 (vs. Full version 1:33:54; as typical, 50% the length)
  • Filesize: 118 MB
  • Bitrate: 320 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – Intro. Briefly: Ten standard effects of loosecog, vs. trajectory; & Wiki article Ego Death.
  • 3:51 – Ten standard effects of loosecog, vs. trajectory.
  • 13:32 – Wiki article Ego Death.
Errata
  • A mic-tech comment slipped-in at the start.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • copy the Mixer wav used for Full episode
  • tighten Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link

“Ep60 Loosecog Trajectory.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-11:
    https://we.tl/t-KGYHM89EKS
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • 1. Because people don’t identify the key driving themes (as a coherent set & trajectory giving a 2nd worldmodel) from the mind in the altered state, there’s confusion.
      • Analogical psychedelic eternalism + dependent control. Mental worldmodel transformation.
    • 2. Read latest version of wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_death
      • The oldest page of History has my edits of this page, 1 year 1 month into the article’s history.
      • “Ego dissolution” & “Ego loss redirects to “Ego death”; the bad guys lost. Wiki should reflect language usage (“ego death”), not engineer language usage (“people ought to instead say ‘ego dissolution'”).
    • Vary the mic polar pattern.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:33:54
  • Filesize: 171 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • +0:00 – Intro
  • -1:15 – start of Show Format segment
  • +2:50 – read verbose agenda about the egodeath theory
  • done~~-5:02 voice mic tech
  • ~~+11:39 “I really do like the idea of see what happens, the egodeath theory
  • done~~-13:50 about segments, voicing
  • ~~+36:16[modded] keep, after the the egodeath theory segment announce.
  • done~~-36:10 – Egodeath Theory segment announce. Music: end of album end of song (On with the Show), then start of album (Sing This All Together).
  • modded: 36:23 supercardioid
  • ~~+39:08 START HERE for Core content[sort of; there’s some hidden before this – see the Core version of this episode] – Egodeath Theory content. The mind has 10 standard experiences in the altered state, but those need to be structured and directed, to reach the potential mental worldmodel transformation.
  • +41:05 – Music: Citadel.
  • ~~-41:17 – Music comment
  • -41:50 – New polar pattern: Figure 8. Mic demo.
  • -43:43 – Music: end of Citadel. Song: In Another Land.
  • modded: +44:44 keep
  • ~~-44:53 – wrestled mic cable. (handheld)
  • ~~+45:47 – Egodeath theory con’t: mystery-religion initiation did the coherent complete trajectory, not just newbie 10 experiences that the newbie mind undergoes in altered state.
  • done~~-51:39 – Mic: Omni pattern.
  • _______________________
    ~~+52:20 – Egodeath theory: Ego Death article at Wikipedia.
  • done~~-53:20 – Music: Sing This All Together (See What Happens) climax gateway passage.
  • ~~+53:48 – going through the gate
  • done~~-53:50 – Music
  • ~~+54:23 – Grof literalism.
  • done~~-55:39 – Music
  • ~~+56:02 – Ego Death wiki.
  • done~~-1:12:01 music
  • ~~+1:14:31 – Ego Death wiki.
  • done~~-1:27:52 music
  • ~~+1:28:17 – Ego Death end of wiki statement.
  • done~~-1:28:25 – Music, segment announcements.
  • ~~+1:32:19 – Outro announce.
  • 1:33:54 – end.
Errata
  • In header I said “no eq”. Actually the entire episode has -3dB broad mudcut; slight smile-flat curve.
    • Notes: That mistake probably gave ideal results (compromise) for the variety of polar patterns; that gentle eq curve probably made the Omnidirectional pattern slightly too bright and the Supercardioid pattern slightly too dark (relative to the music & depending on the particular playback system frequency response).
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: none, which means I can’t create a Core version of the episode with purely mic, or with a smooth auto-ducked music background.
  • Mixer tracking file: 210311_2398.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
Recording Header
  • Voice & Mic Technique:
    • 3. Vary the mic polar pattern.
    • Contrast the 3 voices:
      • Pitch Grounding
      • Force Pitch Down
      • casual standard voice
    • Do confusing alternation between:
      • reading-aloud,
      • off-the-cuff or commenting, and
      • playing a past voice recording.
  • Show Format:
    • Lots of short defined segments, flexible list of them.
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    (about 12 words, to bake into the audio, predicting topics & differentiating from other episodes. Only 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!)
    • __
  • Vocalization theme:
    • __
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 60
    • 8p.m., March 11, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser mic.
    • Polar pattern: All of them. (Omnidirectional, Wide Cardioid, Cardioid, Supercardioid, & Figure 8.)
    • Distance: 6″, 45°, aimed 1″ in front of upper lip.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none. broad mud-cut -3dB, used w/ all polar patterns.
Playlist

We’re listening to the album Their Satanic Majesties Request.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_54_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_118_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about the show format should be in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_1804_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_1827_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Voice & Mic Technique should be in the “Voice & Mic Technique” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_3242_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_3333_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_3559_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_3614_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • Egodeath Theory:
    • 1. Because people don’t identify the key driving themes from the mind in the altered state, there’s confusion.
      • analogical psychedelic eternalism + dependent control. mental worldmodel transformation.
    • 2. Read latest wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_death
      • The oldest History has my edits of this page, 1 year 1 month in.
      • “Ego dissolution” redirects to there; the bad guys lost.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda
  • x

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_1:28:48_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
_12954_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
  • x

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
_13128_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

_13354_ timestamp after stop recording

/ end of section ““Ep# Key Words.mp3”

“Ep59 Anczyk Review of Contemporary Exotericism.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-11:
    https://we.tl/t-WXGUzi586D
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Read-aloud of this 4-page book review, with a little commentary at the end.
  • https://www.academia.edu/12287041/Contemporary_Esotericism_edited_by_Egil_Asprem_and_Kennet_Granholm_New_York_Routledge_2013
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 22:41
  • Filesize: 29 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – Intro/header
  • 0:59 – Reading (1x, straight-through)
  • 11:50 – reduce bass (indirectly increases the treble). bass: “The conclusion a reader may reach…”, 3s silence, then treble: “is that a study of these trends and their cultural expressions,”
  • 13:56 – Meta-commentary/technical
  • 16:23 – My comments about the field
More Comments

Adam Anczyka & Halina Grzymała-Moszczyńska write:

“The editors mention in their chapter on ‘Constructing Esotericism’ (25–48) some of the terminological issues implicated in the use of the term ‘esotericism.’ They suggest that it is more a constructed idea than an analytical, natural category. They point out that the main problem is that historically and doctrinally diverse movements and ideas were gathered together under the umbrella term ‘esotericism’ by believers and academics alike. It resulted in specifically sociological and psychological effects, as many people affiliate themselves with the ‘esoteric’ and sometimes use the term to self-depict their beliefs. However, it is difficult to stop using the term in scholarly research, simply because it has become a part of a popular discourse. Most people know intuitively what ‘esoteric’ means, and to which religious or spiritual groups the term may refer. Even the editors of the book entitled it ‘Contemporary Esotericism,’ which illustrates the power of the term. Certainly they do explain in what context the notion is used, and on what bias it was constructed, but – concerning the variety of content found inside – we thought that a better title would be a plural form of the concept like ‘Contemporary Esotericisms’ or ‘Contemporary Esoteric Movements,’ which would be in line with the editors’ plea concerning the watchful usage of ‘esotericism’ in scholarly works (37–38).”

That pluralization of a term is a trope; a stock move. Scholars have similarly recommended we talk about “Christianities” or “Gnosticisms”.

I have specified “the esotericism of Valentinian gnostics as described by Pagels’ first 3 books”. Pagels in those books doesn’t use the term ‘esotericism’. Freke & Gandy use the term ‘esotericism’ in their book The Jesus Mysteries.

Regardless of all discussion of whatever, the key and highest thing is always: mental worldmodel transformation from literalist ordinary-state possibilism (with autonomous control) to analogical psychedelic eternalism (with dependent control). That core is easy to see in mystery-religion initiation; in the Mystery Religions. What varies is surface theme; what’s constant is the underlying essence (analogical psychedelic eternalism).

Partridge thinks bad = Christendom, good = anti-Christendom revolution & rebellion (counter-, alternative, non-mainstream, etc). Then he notes he’s painted himself in a corner, when the non-mainstream (ie the non-Christendom) becomes normal and dominant, he has to invent the self-countering term, “occulture”, which is intended by him as an ironic oxymoron (when considered within his explanatory framework).

In contrast, I think bad = the exoteric layer of all brands of religion, good = the esoteric layer of all brands of religion.

Mic: Noise Report

Amazingly, even with no Noise Gate, the background noise is only audible at points, such as 11:17 & 11:08. The Supercardioid polar pattern rejects most off-axis noise (45° back angle rejection), and (the slight) body noises were worse than external noises. I wish I had done part of the recording with Omni mode, for comparison. Can the Supercardioid polar pattern be used in place of a noise gate? The relation between EQ, polar pattern, and noise rejection. I’d like to have some recordings / episodes that freely vary the polar pattern.

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • cut gaps
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    (about 12 words, to bake into the audio, predicting topics & differentiating from other episodes. Only 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!)
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Casual standard voice with Pitch Forced Down technique.
  • Time and date:
    • Episode #59
    • 8am, March 11, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Supercardioid.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): About 60% through (12:22 in raw rec’g; 11:50 in .mp3, “is that a study of these trends and their cultural expressions,”), I added eq to to mud-cut, and turned on Expander / Noise Gate. Before that, it’s raw mic + Limiter.
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210311_2149.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210311_2396.wav <- used
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

/ end “ep59”

“Ep58 Contemporary Exotericism.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-10:
    https://we.tl/t-n2yWIY8L4h
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Conference keynote presentations for Contemporary Esotericism book http://amzn.com/1138856118
    • https://contern.org/online-lectures/
    • “Introduction and Welcome” – Egil Asprem & Kennet Granholm. With my clarifications/ commentary/ reaction. Conference on Contemporary Esotericism, 2012. ContERN, the theme of the conference, interdisciplinary research on contemporary esotericism.
    • Christopher Partridge: Occulture Is Ordinary article presentation. Only the start & audience questions. With my reaction/clarifications/ commentary.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 2:12:51
  • Filesize: 157 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Playlist

Album: Their Satanic Majesties Request. Songs:

  • sing this all together (see what happens) 7:58 long
  • she’s a rainbow 4:35
  • the lantern 4:24
  • gomper 5:12
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210310#_2148.wav (gaps b/c reaction vid)
  • Mixer tracking file: 210310_2395.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.
Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    (about 12 words, to bake into the audio, predicting topics & differentiating from other episodes. Only 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!)
    • Hanegraaff keynote video reaction (in three artificial voicings)
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Alternating between three artificial voicings.
  • Time and date:
    • Episode 58
    • _:00 p.m., March 10, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Wide Cardioid.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ (on mixer recording): none.
Playlist

We’re listening to the album Their Satanic Majesties Request. Songs:

  • sing this all together (see what happens) 7:58
  • she’s a rainbow 4:35
  • the lantern 4:24
  • gomper 5:12

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
_53_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Show Format” Segment

This is the start of the “Show Format” segment.
_126_ The timestamp is x.

Agenda items about the show format should be in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Page: Egodeath Mystery Show
Subsection: Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Agenda-Items-for-Working-on-the-Show-Format

We’ve finished the “Show Format” segment.
_528_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_633_ The timestamp is x.

Agenda items about Voice & Mic Technique should be in the “Voice & Mic Technique” page, but they could also be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_2352_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_2412_ The timestamp is x.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_2618_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Segment

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_2742_ The timestamp is x.

  • Alternate between:
    • The “Pitch Grounding” technique.
    • The “Pitch Forced Down” technique.
    • Casual standard voice.

Agenda items about Egodeath Theory should be in this episode template in the “Intro” segment or in the “Egodeath Theory” segment.

Esoteric Agenda

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” segment.
_20212_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
_20849_ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
_21148_ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

_21254_ timestamp after stop recording

/ end “2021-03-__ Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

Next Episode

The next voicing-intensive episode or practice session, has to:

  • make a strong distinction between mere read-aloud, and the incomparably harder off-the-cuff voicing.
  • Use artificial-sounding voicing the entire episode.
  • Re-demo Broad Cardioid polar pattern w/o TEN TIMES making mistakes of naming! Get It Straight, poser, stop making mistakes in polar pattern names! Clearly, my attention to artificial voicing was extremely distracting, so I made wording mistakes left & right.
  • plan accurately which segments will need to use which voicing technique. You can’t say “use Pitch Grounding the entire episode” and then say as part of the episode, “practice revoicing the previous episode”, without resolving that disparity/ contradiction.

“Ep57 Over the Voice Hump.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-09:
    https://we.tl/t-6qvjlbpuUm
  • Length: 2:14:48
  • Filesize: 161 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Mostly Mic demo, Voice work, & Music. Egodeath theory content starts at 1:48:44.
    • This episode (until the Egodeath content) uses a mix of “Pitch Grounding Technique” (artificial sounding) & new, “Force Pitch Down” Technique (semi-natural sounding).
    • Mic Tech Demo of using the continuously variable Polar Pattern pot on the large-diaphragm condenser mic as a Tone control (a tilt eq) by swinging around Wide Cardioid (from Omnidirectional = too bright, to Wide Cardioid = balanced eq, to Cardioid = too dark).
    • Here I try to revoice the previous (High Performance) episode, but it was voiced so well [yeah but much of that was merely read-aloud, which is 100x easier than off-the-cuff], there’s not much room for improvement – which is good news.
      • This revoicing practice is a Long segment; main segment of this episode. Not sure how listenable the main, “revoicing” segment is. Some is amusing. That segment is successful [yeah but largely just read-aloud, which is easy to voice well & doesn’t count] – unlike my Esotericism coverage here, where I revert from Cultivated to Wild voicing.
    • 1:48:44 Hanegraaff and Esotericism coverage.
      • New critique of his self-contradiction about hyperventilation:
        • Hane: “Hyperventilation can be entheogenic in its effect.”
        • Also Hane: “Grof was forced to switch from plants to hyperventilation, otherwise he certainly would have stayed with plants.”
      • Mostly my usual criticisms of the first pages of his Entheogenic Esotericism article, which he paraphrases. This is a few minutes of my doing a Reaction Video.
    • Album: Side 1 of Satanic Majesties Request.
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – Intro segment
  • 2:05 – Voice & Mic Technique segment
    • Brief mention of using the Wide Cardioid continuously variable Polar Pattern pot at a Tone control.
  • 5:02 – Warmup Reading segment
    • 5:30 – Warmup reading of the paragraph that was censored by Wasson from Panofsky’s letter. Read using the “Pitch Grounding” Technique (extremely artificial).
  • 7:03 – Egodeath Theory topical segments (incidental Egodeath Theory content only)
    • 7:32 – read the entire short Esoteric Agenda (read using the “Pitch Grounding” Technique).
    • 8:15 – Miking: Mic Tech Demo: Using the continuously variable Polar Pattern pot on the large-diaphragm condenser mic as a Tone control (a tilt eq) by swinging around Wide Cardioid (from Omnidirectional = too bright, to Wide Cardioid = balanced eq, to Cardioid = too dark).
      • The twist: this demo uses the “Pitch Grounding” Technique (extremely artificial).
    • 12:34 – Voicing: the Pitch Grounding Technique is easy b/c it’s so extreme, it’s easier to remember to do, than the “Force Pitch Downward” (less extreme) technique.
    • 13:46 – Voicing: LONGEST SEGMENT OF THIS EPISODE: Voicing exercise/demo: Revoicing previous recording of complaining/critical statements about negativity & pseudo-critique of Transcendent Knowledge development (complaining/criticizing is challenging material to revoice well).
      • I create or at least officially/formally define the “Force Pitch Downward” technique, which is less unnatural than the extreme “Pitch Grounding” Technique.
    • 1:18:28 – Music: Citadel.
    • 1:19:24 – Music: The albums I played in late 1987 while working up to explaining Satori in the Way of Zen by Alan Watts by adding no-free-will.
  • 1:21:34 – Agenda navigation.
  • 1:22:31 – The “Not a Music Show” segment.
    • 1:23:11 – “Transcendent Distancing from Voicing“; Mindful Voicing.
      • Defining:
        • 1. the “pitch grounding” technique (so extreme, easy to lock-in).
        • 2. the “driving pitch down” technique (semi-natural). aka the “pitch force downward” technique.
        • 3. “casual standard voice” (ideal; the goal I’m approaching).
      • The steps toward Transcending the voice – the first step is to distance from the accustomed, “egoic”, automatic voice by using any artificial voice consistently.
      • Wild vs. Cultivated; Egoic vs. Transcendent use of voice. To *perform* voicing = to *transcend* the voice.
      • Establishing a transcendently distanced relation to the voice.
      • At this next, temporary stage, I’m purely trying to “break” the lack of mindfulness of voicing, by using artificial voice, *not* yet the ideal desired voicing.
      • 1:35:11 – in next episode, alternate “pitch force downward” technique & casual standard voice.
      • 1:35:40 – I AM PRONOUNCING THAT I HAVE MADE IT OVER THE HUMP IN THIS EPISODE THROUGH ALT’G PITCH FORCE DOWNWARD & PITCH GROUNDING TECHNIQUES & THAT I MADE GREAT IMPROVEMENTS IN “HIGH PERF” EPISODE. [then i immediately forget, and revert from Cultivated to Wild Voicing for the rest of the episode]
    • 1:36:12 – Music: Influential album Satanic Majesties. Remastering. Artwork too small unless album sleeve. 3D cover. The exciting Psychedelic era of 1987 when all these albums were coming out, sparkly newer-than-ever, crystal clearer than listeners ever heard before.
      • 1:43:46 – Agenda check. Music continues.
      • 1:45:49 – Voicing check [I rate my revoicing segment too highly, b/c much of it was just read-aloud, which is easy. I’m about to entirely forget voicing for the rest of the episode.]. Music continues.
      • 1:46:22 – Mention finding Hanegraaff keynote (YouTube audio). Music continues.
  • +1:48:44 – EGODEATH THEORY CONTENT STARTS HERE, and my controlled voicing totally gets thrown out the window, just like that: My reaction to video playback of Hanegraaff’s keynote talk, Entheogenic Esotericism. 2012 keynote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrIMjjPg7uU
    • 1:51:05 is a new criticism – hyperventilation; Hane contradicts himself, citing breathing techniques as if an effective trad’l technique, but he says too, that Grof was forced to change to it, from plants. Get your story straight.
    • Most are my usual criticisms, worth hearing again here, for the first few pages.
    • 1:58:19 – Reading text at the video, about ContERN conference.
    • 1:59:54 – Scope out website ContERN.org; Contemporary Esotericism Research Network.
    • 2:07:19 – I react to the Comment by P. at https://contern.org/online-lectures/wouter-j-hanegraaff-entheogenic-esotericism/ : “Is there any evidence of “entheogenic esotericism” in the Western world from between, say, the 1750’s and the 1850’s? I read the (brilliant) Deveney book on Paschal Beverly Randolph, which mentions entheogenic drug use amongst certain French Spiritualists in the 1850’s. So I wonder: How much further back can we trace this thing [entheogens], in a modern Western context?“
  • 2:09:14 – Music: 2000 Man
  • 2:11:50 – end of “Not a Music Show” segment
  • 2:12:27 – About important Psych jam freakout song “Sing This All Together“, 8 minutes, influential.
  • 2:14:10 – Outro
Errata
  • Analyze: how the hell did the Voice/Mic segment not contain the massive Voice work, and why did the massive Voice work happen within the Egodeath Topical segment???? wtf. too complicated with 3 agendas spread among 3 pages (idea development, voice/mic, show-format page).
  • In Hanegraaff reaction, I pretty much totally forget controlled voicing.
    • My plan to use the “Pitch Grounding” technique the whole episode was incoherent: to execute the plan to revoice playback of the previous episode, I had to, in midstream, invent/define the milder “Force Pitch Down” technique, and also I had to use Casual Standard Voice. The ill-considered original plan fell apart by the time I hit the most difficult scenario, of off-the-cuff reaction to Hanegraaff video.
    • Next episode: *start* with off-the-cuff reaction to Hanegraaff video alternating between “pitch grounding” & “force pitch down” (a near-impossible challenge?)
    • A success: Until the “revoice the previous episode” part, I remembered to use Pitch Grounding (easy extreme technique).
    • A success: All the way until the Hanegraaff vid, I remembered to use either Pitch Grounding (extreme), or the newly identified Force Pitch Down technique (less extreme).
    • A failure: Only at, starting with the Hanegraaff vid toward the end of the episode, did I forget mindful voicing.
  • During Mic Demo, I said “Supercardioid” instead of “Wide Cardioid”, multiple times. (The mistake is obvious, from the context, when I hear it played back.)
  • During start of playing Clip of Complaining, I incorrectly said “I’m now using Omni mode, of LDCM mic.” Idiot! Obviously I’m using Wide Cardioid, as I had just stated. Jesus, get it straight!
  • I said “wording” instead of “voicing”, 4 times.
How Suddenly My Controlled Voicing Was Forgotten, at 1:48:44 out of 2:14:10

I hope, upon playback, there are only a few spots where I fail to deliberately control my vocalizing. As a transitional, stepping stone phase, I hope this entire episode sounds artificially voiced, it’s probably 90%, and climbing.

Nope; fail at maybe 3/4 of the way through; during Hanegraaff video, I forget to use distanced, artificial, transcendent voicing. Reborn again into Egoic Sleep.

This is why I still have to use beginner level training wheels of using nothing but the extreme (thus easy) “Pitch Grounding” technique for the *entire* episode no matter what type of segment comes up.

Or, I need to toggle among:

  • pitch grounding (extreme, so easy to remember to do)
  • force pitch down (less extreme, so more difficult to remember to do)
  • casual standard voice (hard to remember to do; tend to revert to my mindless default wild voice)
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 35° [relative to the aim-point], aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210309_2391.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210309_2141.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!
    • Play & Pause the previous episode, to revoice the most criticizing-toned passages.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Use the Pitch Grounding Technique during entire episode. Bass. Pitch. On. Every. Word.
    • On the mic, use variable Wide Cardioid polar pattern as a Tone control.
  • Time and date:
    • 4p.m., March 9, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Wide Cardioid. Demo of using as a Tilt Eq.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: none, or inverse of the Wide Cardioid setting.
Playlist

We’re listening to the album Their Satanic Majesties Request, by the Rolling Stones.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_210_ The timestamp is x.

Voice & Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
434__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
_507_ The timestamp is x.

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
641__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Topical Segments

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments.
709__ The timestamp is x.

Esoteric Agenda
  • done: Play & Pause the previous episode, to revoice the most criticizing-toned passages. 46:54 start of final, Mindful section of previous episode.
    • uclip 31:26-32:04 – thats what critical input amounts to, provide
      shorter version: -__31:37~~
  • done: Use the Pitch Grounding Technique during entire episode.
  • done: Miking:
    • Use variable Wide Cardioid polar pattern as tilt eq (Tone control). No eq.
    • Also in-between Supercardioid & Figure 8, as tilt eq.

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments.
1 22 08__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda.
1:22:38__ The timestamp is x.

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
2 11 55__ The timestamp is x.
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show. 2 14 20

2 14 48__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

/ end “2021-03-__ Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

Variable Mic Polar Patterns

Variable Mic Polar Patterns
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/03/06/voice-and-mic-technique/#Variable-Mic-Polar-Patterns

Next Episode

  • Play & Pause the previous episode, to revoice the most criticizing-toned passages.
  • Use the Pitch Grounding Technique during entire episode.
  • Miking:
    • Use variable Wide Cardioid polar pattern as tilt eq (Tone control). No eq.
    • Also in-between Supercardioid & Figure 8, as tilt eq.

“Ep56 Core – High Performance.mp3”

This is a Core version of the episode “Ep56 High Performance”.

  • Half the length of the full episode.
  • No music focus.
  • No voice & mic technique focus, except to practice critical commentary while using controlled voicing with deep pitch/ fun tone/ casual wording (instead of high pitch, serious tone, and formal wording).
  • Slight cleanup/tightening.
  • Clips about a topic are now contiguous.
    • Grouped the final passage on Audience Feedback (where I focus more on repeating for re-voicing) with the other, earlier passages.
Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-08:
    https://we.tl/t-LlGWncsDvp
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    Core (50% shorter) version of the episode.
    • In-depth analysis of Panofsky’s uncensored letter to Wasson, and the accompanying copies of paintings.
    • Audience Feedback channel.
    • Christopher Partridge’s reductionist, heavy-handed framework of “contemporary esotericism = social rebellion against Christendom”.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:41:58
  • Filesize: 176 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – Intro. War against the audience. Goal: Complain using low-pitch tone.
  • 3:03 – Deep analysis/critique of Panofsky’s letter that Wasson censored.
  • 28:25 – New! Audience Feedback channel.
  • 55:58 – Christopher Partridge’s anti-Christianity agit-prop reductionism of mystic experiencing to Social Science counter-Christendom rebellion.
    • 1975-1985 wasn’t “counter” culture enough, so he simply deletes & skips over that period.
    • Hanegraaff fills-in that period with New Age & Shamanism entheogens.
    • I fill-in that period with Inspired Rock.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • move Aud Fdbk from end to main
  • in audio project file, copy track
  • normalize vol of clip
  • note final timestamps.
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav, using short format.
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link

“Ep56 High Performance.mp3”

Above, a Core version of this episode is also available.

I’m trying reverting to an old naming pattern, for simple episode numbering + maximum keywords on narrow music player display.

filename pattern not used:
“2021-03-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – High Performance.mp3”

Download Info
  • group the clips about:
    • Panofsky/Brinckmann (2 clips, divided by song)
    • Partridge good parts
    • criticizing the audience (3-4 clips)
    • Lightning Hail
    • Live revoicing transcribing song lyrics
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-07:
    https://we.tl/t-r44kMt8Rmm
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • 58:45 clip – Audience input -> 🗑
    • Warmup segment
      • 22:30 (START HERE) – A deep critical reading of Panofsky’s letter that Wasson censored
        – Gold Clip-set 🎙 👑 🏆 🍄
      • the two art “specimens” attached to the letter: from 50% mushroom-shaped italian pine, to 100% mushroid tree. 2nd part at ~48:00-~54:00+
    • i ought to have logged these – check show notes ~1:35:00-2:48:00+ Christopher Partridge occludes 1975-1985 Rock Festival culture because it fails to support his extremist “counter-culture rebellion” narrative. I try to read preview pages from 2-3 of his books, but several pages of the Re-Enchantment book’s “Festival Culture” section are not available. Sociology Reductionism per Robert Segal’s advocacy of Reductionism. Hanegraaff is specifically against saying “occult is really about social rebelling” – exactly what Partridge does; Hane likely is quietly criticizing Partridges’ extremist reductionism, “all contemporary non-Christian religion is propelled and centrally focused as rebelling against Christendom.” It’s easy to parody Partridges position, he’s so over-the-top reductionist, hell-bent on forcing all spiritiaulity into “rebel against the social system”. CP reads like a propagandist, an anti-Christian activist. For CP, “counter” = Good, “traditional (= Christian) culture” = Bad. Cartoonish Partridge.
      • What does Hanegraaff say against Partridge’s Occulture(tm)?
      • CP pushes “occult = rebelling against social structures” a la
        Robert Segal’s Reductionism of Religion to Social Science
    • Hail storm via Omnidirectional microphone.
    • Voice Actor samples – nothing surprising, but Voices.com has interesting categories & many clips. My “Voice & Mic Techniques” page could be made into an outstanding, leading page, probably, unless I can find some decent URLs.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 3:03:51
  • Filesize: 226 MB
  • Bitrate: 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • +0:00aup – intro. delet Hane. band Wildflowers, song More Than Me.
  • +1:00aup – Announce “fin’d Intro”.
  • +1:26aup – “This is the start of the Voice/Mic seg”.
  • done~~-1:32aup – music continues (More Than Me)
  • -14500aup – voice/mic content.
  • ~~+4:57aup – “I was crit’g ppl in high pitch”
  • done~~-5:50aup Chris Carpenter song The World is Closing In on Me
  • -637aup “do entire episode using pitch grounding”
  • ~~+7:11aup “complain while using pitch grounding” [delete some snippets within here]
  • +7:42aup “war against audience”
  • done~~-8:10aup urls for voice
  • -903aup next track Brink of Death
  • -9:21aup “I’m gonna cross off”
  • -949aup Agenda
  • -19:34: Voice & Mic Technique; straighten out Agenda items (skip)
  • ~~+20:28aup “finished Voice/Mic segment”
  • +20:46aup “Start of Warmup reading segment”
  • done~~-20:51aup The song “Brink of Death” (produced by W Carlos) starts.
    ________________________
  • ~~+21:11aup I start a serious reading… of Plainc. “Panofsky’s letter censored by Wasson”
  • done~~-21:36aup “here comes Carlos” ; w. carlos produced song w/ synth.
  • ~~+23:21aup “The Plain is only one example” Plaincourault/ Panofsky‘s letter
  • +25:22aup Echo on Panofsky
    • done~~-35:53aup – Synth where? Lyrics search (Brink of Death, by Childe Harold) [move out?]
    • -40:21aup “Most likely I would have to transcribe it myself”. Vocal Transcription.
    • -46:11aup “Clocks floyd first?”
    • ~~+47:08aup– Panofsky resumes, “If you are interested, little book”
    • done~~-58:30aup “looking for the next good track” – Fly, by JK & Co. keep music?
    • ~~+59:33aup – i read aloud my writing about Panofsky leetter “Transcribed by me…”
    • +10011aup – “We fin’d Warmup”
      ______________________
  • +10033aup “This is the start of “egodeath theory topical segments”.
  • done~~-1:00:45aup “new show format
  • ~~+1:01:05aup “We have an audi fdbk ch, I’ll play clip.” Audience Feedback channel -> 🗑 Playing a new clip that was made for this episode.
  • done~~-1:04:41aup Fly resumes.
  • –1:04:51aup “Had to reboot”
    • ~~+1:05:57aup – Audience Feedback: A reading from a private document, similar to the clip.
    • done~~-1:10:09aup band (1:08:30 per flaky timestamp): Cabaret Voltaire – song: Nag Nag Nag, punk low-fi connection: speaker -> mic
    • ~~+1:11:58aup – Audience Feedback: Resume reading similar to clip.
      timestamps lacking “aup” are inaccurate by 2 minutes
    • done~~-1:13:04aup “Im reading”
    • ~~+1:13:10aup reading cont
    • done~~-1:18:40aup format of show, or, switching topics, working session, obstacle to progress. “audience feedback: done: 1:19:40”
    • -1:20:00 – Format of show: the 5 pages for the show
    • -1:22:39aup – filename format of the show episodes, need short
    • ~~+1:24:59aup – “It was a big big project, which is why I don’t need” Audience Feedback (aka poison “input” & vague negativity).
      • 1:22:04 per flaky timestamp: It took a full two days to organize the 55 episodes so far!
      • The # of times I’ve taken input from other people since 1985: 0.
      • Ignoring other people’s input, because axiomatically, input from onlookers is always, reliably, wrong/ false/ defeatist/ bad/ toxic/ negative/ naysaying/ etc.
        (now at 47:11aup2 ~~ in aup2;/ move the final part to here.done)
    • done~~-1:29:01aup “Show format version 56” (Agenda)
      __________________
  • ~~+1:30:36aup “I do want to get on the fest cult” Re-Enchantment of the West, Vol 1. Music chapter: Festival Culture section. page 156 the ch starts.
    • done~~-1:30:46aup “mixer issue” done dele’g at 1:30:45 but del mic posn after that
    • done~~~-1:32:29aup(now, after del’g some) initial diversion: mic aim 1/2″ in front of mouth.
    • ~~~+1:34:41aup(now, after deleting some) “Adorno and popular music”
    • -1:31:17aup song: Fly.
    • ~~+1:32:37aup “I want to talk about Festival culture” (start of Partr.)
    • +1:33:30 Re-Enchantment TOC. Finding page 156 hits on festival culture.
  • DONE~~-2:20:50aup – Agenda (no more Partr.)
  • ~~+2:22:12aup – “we’ve fin’d topical segments”
    __________________
  • +2:23:28aup (now 1:34:40 in aup2)- “This is the start of the Not a Music Show segment”. Audience Feedback. (more emphasis on voicing, this time) [group with other clips above]
  • done~~-2:32:29aup – Voice/Miking, Voice Actors site
  • ~~+3:00:04aup – “we’ve finished the Not a Music Show segment” [keep with the Start announcement above] (now ends at 1:43:47aup2)
  • done~~-3:00:12aup – song announcement: Picture, song: Evolution.
  • -3:00:54aup – “ive been doing vocal transcriptions”
  • ~~+3:02:55aup – “we’ve finished the Not a Music Show segment”
  • +3:03:17aup – outro announce
  • +3:03:51aup – end

“aup” = reference timestamps from audio project file.

done: 13400aup2 is a mess, clean up.

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drive
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 25°, aimed 1/2″ in front of upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210307_2388.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210307_2138.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: “2021-03-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – High Performance.aup”

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
fade music

Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    (about 12 words, to bake into the audio, predicting topics & differentiating from other episodes. Only 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!)
    • Hanegraaff’s Keynote talk, Entheogenic Esotericism
    • Festival Culture in Partridge’s Re-Enchantment book or Lyre of Orpheus
    • We now have a channel for audience feedback about this show.
    • Episode numbering.
    • The use of the Rolling Agenda.
  • Vocalization theme THROUGHOUT THIS EPISODE:
    • Practice. The. Pitch. Grounding. Technique.
      to. revoice. from high serious formal to low fun casual.
  • Time and date:
    • 12:30 p.m., March 7, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Omni.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: none.
Playlist
  • We’re listening to:
    • Compilation: A Heavy Dose of Lyte Psych
    • Band: Wildflowers
    • Song: More than Me

fade music

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
102_ The timestamp is x. fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
130__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Casual Standard Voice

Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
_1934_ The timestamp is x. fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
2048__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
10014 The timestamp is x. fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

“Egodeath Theory” Topical Segments

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments.
10037__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Esoteric Agenda

~~

Move to here, the items that didn’t get covered/resolved in the latest episode of Egodeath Mystery Show.

  • done: Audience feedback channel -> 🗑
    • done: clip: “New Recording 84”
    • done: reading draft
  • done: Episode numbering
    • done: Show format version 56 –
  • done: Rolling Agenda
    • done: Warmup Readings: Panofsky Letter
  • done: ~~Festival Culture in Partridge’s Re-Enchantment book or Lyre of Orpheus
  • skip, hook up mixer first: Hanegraaff’s Keynote talk, Entheogenic Esotericism

Site map: Refactored pages for the Egodeath Mystery Show. a copy is below.

Hanegraaff Keynote
Group: egodeathMessage: 3335From: Michael HoffmanDate: 12/06/2004
Subject: Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism
Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism.

Entheogens are the key to esotericism.

This is the simplest possible theory of esotericism, and the most natural, the least contrived and strained.

Theories of esotericism that are not based on entheogens suffer from the problem of grandiose verbiage, unmet promises and claims, chronic vagueness, excuses for lack of potent and prompt efficacy, and no ability to deliver the experiences which are talked about.

Drug-free esotericism doesn’t work; it is not effectively ergonomic.

— Michael Hoffman

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments.
22222__ The timestamp is x. fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment, to do selected work items from the Esoteric Agenda. [EGODEATH THEORY ITEMS, VOICE & MIC ITEMS, SHOW-FORMAT ITEMS]
22238__ The timestamp is x. fade music

  • x

fade music

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
__30258 The timestamp is x. fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

The “Outro” Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

__ timestamp after stop recording

Publishing the Episode

sections to move to top when publishing the episode

/ end “2021-03-07a Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

Refactored Pages for Egodeath Mystery Show

master copy is at site map
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show

Experimental & Exploratory Audio Medium/Format for Transcendent Knowledge Development

People would be wise to copy whatever content they get from me, because my way is to suddenly stop producing content in that domain, while I’m working in a different domain.

Cowbell Found in the Field Recording

I just heard what I’ve been looking out for since Feb. 8: at 1:10:45 in Egodeath Mystery Show episode 2021-02-08c, audience shouts “more cowbell”, in my field recording of animals.

Made-Up, Artificial Critical Statement

I posted the following comment at https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/transcendent-knowledge-podcast-ep-26/ —

Regarding my statement or construction “It is impressive and admirable, the consistent dedication to falsehood which the Exoteric Paradigm has.” —

Wrmspirit makes sound points regarding the statement. The context for making the quoted statement is important.

My only purpose of formulating the quoted statement was to explore the challenge of how to combine a positive tone of voice, with a productive critical mentality.

The fear is that if I speak in a positive tone of voice, I will lose the ability to provide useful critique of anything.

The quoted statement is just a quick, artificial, made-up, throwaway example of trying to say some extremely critical point in a positive tone of voice.

The topic of positive vs. negative tone applies to both text and speech. When writing my main 2006 main article, I was advised to make positive statements (in text) about what is the case, rather than focusing on making critical, negative statements about incorrect ideas.

/ end of copy of Comment

Strategy/Notes for Refactoring Pages & Content
  • p1: separate the rolling agenda from the template instance.
  • Separate the agenda items that are about Egodeath Theory from the agenda items that are about voicing, miking, & show-format.
    • pages:
      • show-episode template – Store this to be in a dedicated template-only page.
      • template instance – Store this in a “per-episode templates w timestamps” page.
      • agenda – Store this in the idea development page, at least the items that are Egodeath Theory content. not voice & miking, not show-format.
      • voice/mic tech – Store these agenda items in the “voice & mic technique” page.
      • show-format agenda items – Store these in the overall “Egodeath Mystery Show” page.
      • download info – Store this in the idea development pages.
      • warmup readings – Store this in the “warmup readings” page
The Least Info Needed in the Idea Development Pages
  • download info
  • the agenda items/notes/outcomes/ idea development that are about Egodeath Theory
  • (not the agenda items about voice/ mic/ show-format)

“2021-03-05b Egodeath Mystery Show – Reading Madly Backwards.mp3” 1:46:10

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-06:
    https://we.tl/t-ewM8oPqnL2
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Only a little Egodeath theory content.
      • 26:00 – Ruck’s {wild vs. cultivated} mytheme = egoic vs transcendent thinking.
    • 2 hours of Voice/Mic/Warmup.
    • Tried new flatter set of segments.
    • ~1:33:00 – Reading paragraphs’ phrases’ words in reverse order.
    • Read most of the “Voice & Mic Techniques” page.
    • Played the first half of a Pop Sike compilation on Repeat Track, read liner notes.
    • discussed? Making a show-format that is simple, repeatable, and flexible.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:46:10
  • Filesize: 169 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project file
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210305_2384.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210305_2135.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
fade music

Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: 30 seconds to get through the Intro segment!!
    • see Download section above
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Only a single segment to discuss Vocal Skills Report, Voice Principles Review, and/or Mic Technique, with large amount of variation in each episode.
  • Time and date:
    • 9:20 p.m., March 5, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid, mostly Omni (announced throughout show; explicit)
    • Noise Gate: yes
    • Limiter: yes
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: smile-flat (mud-cut).
Playlist

fade music

We’re listening to the Pop Sike compilation, A Heavy Dose of Lyte Psych.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnG-8Bne6KU

The Gurus

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
112 The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Voice & Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
132__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Casual Standard Voice

Mic Technique

We’ve finished the “Voice & Mic Technique” segment.
11257__ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
11533__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
14147 / 2:02:07 The timestamp is x. fade music

end of episode

/ end “2021-03-5b Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

Wait

We’re listening to the Pop Sike compilation, A Lethal Dose of Hard Psych.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnG-8Bne6KU

“2021-03-05a Egodeath Mystery Show – Heavy Dose of Re-Enchantment.mp3” 2:51:35

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-05:

    https://we.tl/t-OqAHGPrAte (210 kbps, 216 MB) – I’ll evaluate this smaller lo-fi file to see how swishy the music sounds, since the music already had lossy compression. The voice/mic will sound fine at this rate.

    https://we.tl/t-4BEZg66Hmd (320 kbps, 412 MB 🐷 )
  • Length: 2:51:35
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Hanegraaff (& Partridge)
      • My 2016 posts mentioning Re-Enchantment book & Hanegraaff’s sudden awakening to psychedelics in contemporary esotericism in 2009.
      • Hanegraaff’s web search failed to find my on-point hard-hitting use of the phrase “Entheogenic Esotericism” in 2004 (on the WWW), eight years before him. So, he incorrectly says in his keynote talk, that he’s the first to coin the term.
    • 1:27:00 – Partridge – 2-volume 2004 books, Christopher Partridge, The Re-Enchantment of the West.
      • I critically read the Tables of Contents & book blurbs about both volumes.
      • I confirm that Partridge (2005) has a giant gap 1975-1985 where, according to him, there was no psychedelics culture.
    • Music compilation: A Heavy Dose of Lyte Psych.
    • Show Format: I give more structure to the segment “Esoteric Agenda”, to more highlight “Egodeath Theory topical segments”.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
The Gurus

We’re listening to:

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • skip import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • hand-normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav 320 kbps
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav 210 kbps
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3 320 kbps
  • upload mp3 210 kbps
  • copy download link to this Download section (both bitrates)
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file (both bitrates)
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: 0-25°, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Chain:
    • mic
    • preamp
    • limiter
    • volume pot
    • mic deck
    • eq
    • echoplex
    • reverb chamber
    • mixer (2-Track = mic; Line = stereo feed)
    • mixer deck (stereo)
  • Mic tracking file: 210305_2382.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210305_2133.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Download Info section)
    • A minimalist, speed-walkthrough of the Show segments.
    • Scope out Partridge’s Re-Enchantment volumes 1 & 2.
    • Do selected work items from the Agenda, during the “Not a Music Show” segment.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Vocal Report: Reverse voicing of read-aloud vs. commentary.
    • Mic Tech: Excess Compressor/Limiter.
    • Vocal Review: Repeat Phrase using the Pitch Grounding Method.
  • Time and date:
    • 10:00 a.m., March 5, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: slight mud-cut, slight air-cut.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
__206 The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Vocal Report” Segment

This is the start of the “Vocal Report” segment.
2:33__ The timestamp is x. fade music

We’ve finished the “Vocal Report” segment.
12:42__ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Vocal Review” Segment

This is the start of the “Vocal Review” segment.
13:07__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Casual Standard Voice

We’ve finished the “Vocal Review” segment.
_14:30_ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Mic Technique” Segment

This is the start of the “Mic Technique” segment.
_19:51_ The timestamp is x. fade music

Mic Technique
done: demo of excess Compression (of volume dynamics)
done: demo of Noise Gate

We’ve finished the “Mic Technique” segment.
30:06__ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
__30:40 The timestamp is x. fade music

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment.
33:47__ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment

This is the start of the “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment. In this Super-Segment, the Board of Mystics does the following:

  1. DONE (after I initially forgot): First, do a fast read-through of the Agenda.
  2. DONE: Then, do one or more Egodeath Theory topical segments from the Agenda.

done: After those topical segments, during the “Not a Music Show” segment, do work-items from the agenda.
35:03__ The timestamp is x. fade music

“Egodeath Theory” Topical Segments

This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments. The timestamp is __ done: COPY THESE NEW “EGODEATH THEORY TOPICAL SEGMENTS” HEADINGS TO THE SHOW TEMPLATE.

“Egodeath Theory” Topical Segment #1: Re-Enchantment
  • Read TOCs:
    The Re-Enchantment of the West: Volume 1 & 2
    Christopher Partridge, 2005 –
  • done: Read blurb (with reversing voices:
    • read the sentences using “off-the-cuff” voice;
    • critique the sentences using “read-aloud” voice):
  • “As a book about emergent spirituality in the contemporary [16 years ago] West, this books focuses on the nature, evolution and significance of new forms of religion and alternative spiritualities.
  • Part One of the book provides the theoretical background and guides the reader through some of the principal debates.
  • After an overview of the secularization thesis, which argues that the West is becoming increasingly disenchanted, the second chapter turns to the sociological analysis of new religions and alternative spiritualities.
  • Particular attention is given to the ideas of the sociologist of religion Ernst Troeltsch, especially his enigmatic analysis of the emergence mystical religion[sic], which presciently provides helpful insights into understanding the contemporary alternative religious milieu.
  • Against sociologists such as Bryan Wilson and Steve Bruce, this and the subsequent chapter argues that, rather than being insignificant, new forms of spirituality are actually proving to be a significant part of Western re-enchantment.
  • Chapter 3 constructs a general theory of the re-enchantment of the West.”
  • done: Read my “Re-Enchantment” posts:
  • done: read blurb for vol 2 :
  • “The Re-Enchantment of the West challenges those theories that predict widespread secularization beyond traditional institutional religiosity.
  • Spiritualities are emerging that are not only quite different from the those forms of religion that are in decline, but are often defined over against them and articulated and passed on in ways quite different from those of traditional religion.
  • In particular, it is argued that such contemporary Western spirituality is fed by a constantly replenished reservoir of ideas, practices, and methodologies, which is here termed ‘occulture’.
  • Moreover, such occultural ideas both feed into and are resourced by popular culture.
  • Indeed, popular occulture is a key feature of the re-enchantment of the West.
  • Demonstrating the significance and ubiquity of these ideas, this book examines, for example, healthcare and nursing, contemporary environmentalism, psychedelia and drug use, the Internet and cyberspirituality, belief in UFOs and extraterrestrial life, demonology and the contemporary fascination with the figure of Satan, the heavy metal subculture, popular apocalypticism, and millennial violence.”
“Egodeath Theory” Topical Segment #2: Hanegraaff 2012
  • Hanegraaff’s web search for “Entheogenic Esotericism” failed to find my 2004 posting (there was a world-wide web URL until Yahoo Groups removed their web UI around October 2020(?)); Hanegraaff said in his keynote talk that “therefore” he was the first to coin the term. Hanegraaff was not, in fact, the first to coin the term; I posted the term to the Web 8 years before his 2012 chapter/article.
    https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-66/#message3335 – June 12, 2004:
Group: egodeathMessage: 3335From: Michael HoffmanDate: 12/06/2004
Subject: Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism
Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism. Entheogens are the key to
esotericism. This is the simplest possible theory of esotericism, and the
most natural, the least contrived and strained. Theories of esotericism that
are not based on entheogens suffer from the problem of grandiose verbiage,
unmet promises and claims, chronic vagueness, excuses for lack of potent and prompt efficacy, and no ability to deliver the experiences which are talked about. Drug-free esotericism doesn’t work; it is not effectively ergonomic.

— Michael Hoffman

We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments. The timestamp is __

Show Format
  • DONE: p2: Add the segment Intro/Outro clips to the Intro/Outro audio project.
  • done: record sub-segment intros outros for within Agenda supersegment.
    • scripts:
      • This is the start of the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments. The timestamp is
      • We’ve finished the “Egodeath Theory” topical segments. The timestamp is
  • p4: Record “Special-Episode” intros: “Core episode”, “Clips episode”. Print mud-cut eq. Scripts:
    • This is a Core version of a previous, full episode.
    • This is a Clips version of a previous, full episode.
  • done: p1: Flatten the “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment, keep the emphasis on recurring “Egodeath Theory” Topical Segments. vs. the come-and-go other segments.
Vocalizing
  • done: p1: Practice reverse voicing: read-aloud a book in my soft off-the-cuff voice, alternate w/ commenting / critique in casual standard voice.
  • Vocal Report: Reverse voicing of read-aloud vs. commentary.
  • done: Mic Tech: Excess Compressor/Limiter.
  • done: Vocal Review: Repeat Phrase using the Pitch Grounding Method.

We’ve finished the “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment.
20135__ The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Not a Music Show” Segment

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment.
In the “Not a Music Show” segment, the Board of Mystics does selected work-items from the Esoteric Agenda.
20206__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Playlist

We’re listening to:

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment.
25011 The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Outro” Segment

This is the start of the “Outro” segment.
25108 The timestamp is x. fade music

2:53:08__ timestamp after stop recording

/ end “2021-03-05a Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

Do?

  • Maybe record the following clips:this is the  ego  death  mystery  show,  with  cyber  monk.  
  • ego death  theory  dot  word  press  dot  com.
  • we’ve finished the “intro” segment.  the timestamp is
  • this is the start of the “voice & mic technique” segment.  the timestamp is
  • we’ve finished the “voice & mic technique” segment.  the timestamp is
  • this is the start of the “warmup reading” segment. the timestamp is
  • we’ve finished the “warmup reading” segment.  the timestamp is
  • this is the start of the “ego death theory” topical segments.  the timestamp is
  • we’ve finished the “ego death theory” topical segments.  the timestamp is
  • this is the start of the “not a music show” segment, to do selected work items from the esoteric agenda.  the timestamp is
  • we’ve finished the “not a music show” segment.  the timestamp is
  • this was the  ego  death  mystery  show

Done Agenda Items

  • done: Record segment Intro/Outro clips. Print mud-cut eq. Scripts:
    mic deck: 210305_2381.wav – dry, only Limiter.
    mixer deck: 210305_2132.wav – reverb, mud-cut, air-cut. CAD M39 cardioid 6″ 20° mid-upper-lip.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Vocal Report” segment. The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Vocal Report” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Vocal Review” segment. The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Vocal Review” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Mic Technique” segment. The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Mic Technique” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment. The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Warmup Reading” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment. In this Super-Segment, the Board of Mystics does the following:

  1. First, do a fast read-through of the Agenda.
  2. Then, do one or more Egodeath Theory topical segments from the Agenda.
  3. After those topical segments, then during the “Not a Music Show” segment, do work-items from the agenda.
    The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Not a Music Show” segment. In the “Not a Music Show” segment, the Board of Mystics does selected work-items from the Esoteric Agenda.
The timestamp is

We’ve finished the “Not a Music Show” segment. The timestamp is

This is the start of the “Outro” segment. The timestamp is

  • done: Communication: Sophisticated vs 8th grade use of language.
  • done: Hanegraaff’s efforts to redefine all words, starting with ‘esotericism’ & ‘entheogens’.
  • done: Main topic: Implement a “Turn the Crank” approach: Using the Rolling Agenda + show template, to support a “hit record and jump in” approach (2 takes) producing a good episode every time, with least effort (1 planned prep/throwaway take). “fill in the blank” + pre-filled / pre-readied agenda carried over from last episode.
    • done: Take 1 (throwaway/warmup): paste empty show template & move-in the rollover agenda items, clean them up.
      • done: next episode: during warmup, improve the template.
    • done: Take 2 (keeper): do the show using the quick-prepped template/agenda.
    • done: Design the show template to enable doing purely practice shows w/ (if nece) token content in the Agenda segment.
    • done: Abandon “bad” takes, but keep the agenda items & template fixes that were made during the “bad” takes. Take 1 = updating the agenda and overall episode template or this copy of the episode template.
  • done: Understand and use the 3 distinct functions of the 3 topical outlines in the episode template:
    • In the Recording Header section, it starts with a “12-Word Content Plan” within the first 20 seconds of the episode, to immediately differentiate the episode from the other episodes, in audio form during playback.
    • The “Rolling Agenda” (aka the “Esoteric Agenda for the Board of Mystics”) is the main, complete, detailed outline.
    • In the Download Info section, the “24-Word Overall Description Summary” describes the episode after-the-fact, to differentiate the episode from the other episodes, when reading in text form at an Idea Development page.
  • done: Keep focus on the Board of Mystics.
  • done: Make a long list of short potential segments.
    • Intro
    • Voczn Report
    • Voczn Review
    • Voc Warmup Reading
    • Mic Tech
    • Rolling Agenda
    • This Is Not a Music Show
    • Outro
      ____
    • done: Add/define the segment “This Is Not a Music Show”. -> play music while doing Agenda item work. to do during next episode Take 1 warmup/prep.
    • done: Add/define the segment: “Vocalization Report”. discuss now, implement/do during next episode Take 1 warmup/prep.
      • Distinct from Voczn Review.
      • Where to store outline list of points to re-assess? in the show template.
      • Recent results and grade for:
      • pitch
      • smoothness
      • pacing/speed
      • mindfulness: found great tech: Expander.
      • casual wording
      • fun tone
      • remembering Pitch Grounding
      • NR tech
  • done: Stop going into mumble mode – don’t alternate between casual standard voice & mumble (which is, quiet, sloppy, & high pitch). Use Noise Gate to help enforce this: IF YOU MUMBLE, YOU WILL GET MUTED!!
    • An aggressive Threshold setting on the Noise Gate can help force you to
    • Teaches you to clean up voczn.
    • Teaches you to never mumble.
    • Teaches you to become hyper-aware of vocalizing with deliberation! 🎉 🤯 🤐 😇 😃 🎙
    • Teaches you to type quietly and speak loudly.
    • This mere, narrow, “volume” focus successfully drives & enforces my entire Mindfulness of deliberate vocalizing! 🎉 😃 🎙
    • Teaches you to improve your signal/noise ratio of speaking: either full volume, or shut up/ complete silence.
    • The Right Target to Aim for in Creating Any Voice Recording is:
      • Always produce voice recordings with maximally sharp contrast between speaking with deliberation, vs. dead silence; being completely quiet.
    • Beware of the hyper-enunciation that the Noise Gate encourages. (We *do* need practices with hyper-enunciation.)
Mic Technique
  • done: Break Mic Technique out from Vocalization Technique segment & page; Create a Mic Techniques page.
  • done: Make diagram of gear chain & recording decks.
  • done: Mix eq’d mic rec’g w/ reference music, to get rid of mismatch where bassy mic + bright music.

“2021-03-04a Egodeath Mystery Show – Eden Partridge.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-04:
    https://we.tl/t-wKus0A6FfQ
    Fast-paced, content-packed, long; I expect this episode is solid. I ran out of time or would’ve done the “This Is Not a Music Show” segment while doing some work-items on the Agenda.
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • 1) Read the agenda items for improving format of the show to make it repeatable good quality/structure.
    • 2) Discuss Eden, Garden, two trees (of death & life), & guarded gate. See notes in Agenda segment below.
    • 3) 59:10 Survey/critique two recent books by Partridge: High Culture, & Orpheus pop music book. See notes in Agenda segment below.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 3:14:40
  • Filesize: 254 MB
  • Bitrate: 210
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
  • 59:10 Survey (initial blurb) two recent books by Partridge: High Culture, & Orpheus pop music book.
  • 1:37:00 read from book Lyre of Orpheus
  • 1:55:00 read from book High Culture
    • 2:24:00 I say: a far better model is provided by mystery-religion initiation, of what is comprehensible and teachable about the otherworld mode. When you talk about mystic experience, you must check it with the mystery-religion initiation ancients who produced completed initiates. I proved that words ARE capable of extensively describing the altered-state experience. I explained the full course of completed initiation: eg, my 2006 main article, and Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image article.
    • 2:26:00 ” completed mystery-religion initiation breaks the false model of mysticism.
Errata
  • 1:07:00 annoying pasting Partridge info from Amazon to here – should have Paused to do this work.
  • Should have closed window & turned off fan. White noise halo is annoying.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create project
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • skip import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Limiter: MXR, on Mic recording.
  • Chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
  • Mic tracking file: 210304_2377.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210304_2128.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

Stuff I Read-Aloud During Show

The “Intro” Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
fade music

Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Download Info section)
    • A “can’t fail” show template.
      • Using the Rolling Agenda.
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Noise Gate to enforce mindfulness.
    • Repeat Phrase using the Pitch Grounding Method, for low pitch, fun tone, and casual wording.
  • Time and date:
    • 12:30 Noon, March 4, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser.
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid, maybe variable.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: slight mud cut & air cut. may be variable.
Playlist

We’re listening to the song __, from the album, by the band __.

fade music

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
046 The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Vocalization Success Report” Segment
The “Review of Casual Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the segment “Review of Casual Standard Voice, and Mic Technique”.
101 The timestamp is x. fade music

open for edit: Casual Standard Voice

We’ve finished the segment “Review of Casual Standard Voice, and

205 (end voc) The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
344 The timestamp is x. fade music

open for edit: Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
634 The timestamp is x. fade music

The “Mic Technique” Segment

Ths is the Mic Technique”.

214__ start of mic tech segment:
335 END OF Mic segment.

The “Esoteric Agenda” Super-Segment

In this next segment, the Board of Mystics goes through the rolling agenda.
641 The timestamp is x. fade music

First do a breadth-first pass, NO EDITS!
timesstamp: 15:55
Next, in this episode, depth coverage of the “Egodeath theory” agenda items/segments. start: 1646

Idea! do work items (from Agenda)/typing during the “This Is Not a Music Show” segment

Egodeath Theory

Gen2:

15 And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every* tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:

17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

*that would include the Tree of Life, eating from which grants living forever!

Gen3:

22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

NIV:

ch 2:

8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree* in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

*that would include the Tree of Life, eating from which grants living forever!

ch3:

22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” 23 So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. 24 After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side[e] of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

Addendum after the show:

Tree of Immortality in Garden

https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/cherubim-1/ –

“2. The Garden as the Abode of the Gods:

“If we read between the lines of the Paradise account in Ge (compare Genesis 3:8), the garden of Eden, the primeval abode of man, reveals itself as more than that:

“it was apparently the dwelling-place of God. In the polytheistic story of the creation of the world and early life of man, which, while in several respects analogous (compare Genesis 3:22), is devoid of the more spiritual notions of Hebraism, the garden was the abode of the gods who alone had access to the tree of life from the fruit of which they derived their immortality.

“Adam, before the fall, is conceived as a superhuman being; for while he is forbidden to taste of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, the way to immortality is open to him; for it is only after transgressing the Divine command that he merits death and becomes mortal.

“The choice of immortal innocence and mortal knowledge lay before him; he elected death with knowledge.”

/ end of Addendum after the show

Cain & Abel is next: Gen4:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%204&version=KJV

that ends the topical segment on the angel guarded eden gate: 57:16.

Topical Segment: Partridge
start time: 59:10

  • Scope out Partridge books:
  • The Lyre of Orpheus: Popular Music, the Sacred, and the Profane
  • by Christopher Partridge | Nov 18, 2013 (2021 – 2013 = 8 years ago) [copyrigtht page: 2014]
  • “The myth of Orpheus articulates what social theorists have known since Plato: music matters.
  • It is uniquely able to move us, to guide the imagination, to evoke memories, and to create spaces within which meaning is made.
  • Popular music occupies a place of particular social and cultural significance.
  • Christopher Partridge explores this significance, analyzing its complex relationships with the values and norms, texts and discourses, rituals and symbols, and codes and narratives of modern Western cultures.
  • He shows how popular music’s power to move, to agitate, to control listeners, to shape their identities, and to structure their everyday lives is central to constructions of the sacred and the profane.
  • In particular, he argues that popular music can be important ‘edgework,’ challenging dominant constructions of the sacred in modern societies.
  • Drawing on a wide range of musicians and musical genres, as well as a number of theoretical approaches from critical musicology, cultural theory, sociology, theology, and the study of religion,
  • The Lyre of Orpheus reveals the significance and the progressive potential of popular music.”
  • Book: High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World (Partridge)
  • High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World 
    Hardcover – July 3, 2018 (2021 – 2018 = 3 years ago)
  • by Christopher Partridge (Author) –
  • “History is littered with evidence of humanity’s fascination with drugs and the pursuit of altered states.
  • From early Romanticism to late-nineteenth-century occultism and from fin de siècle Paris to contemporary psychedelic shamanism, psychoactive substances have played catalyzing people[sic].
  • Yet serious analysis of the religious dimensions of modern drug use is still lacking.
  • the use of drugs and the pursuit of transcendence from the nineteenth century to the present day.
  • Beginning with the Romantic fascination with opium, it chronicles the discovery of anesthetics, the psychiatric and religious interest in hashish, the bewitching power of mescaline and hallucinogenic fungi, the more recent uses of LSD, as well as the debates surrounding drugs and religious experience.
  • This fascinating and wide-ranging sociological and cultural history fills a major gap in the study of religion in the modern world and our understanding of the importance of countercultural thought, offering new and timely insights into the controversial relationship between drugs and mystical experience.”

Topical Segment: Partridge
end time: __3:13:41

Done
  • Done: In the Intro/Outro audio project, takes: From episode “2021-02-23a Egodeath Mystery Show – DJs per Time of Day.mp3”, CLIP THIS FOR REUSE – 14:11-16:40 – “This is the morning DJ” announcements – Add it to the intros/outros audio project. ego mystery death show etc DJ Gruff -> DJ Cyber rock -> DJ Frozen Rock; “the morning DJ Frozen Rock” “new dawn” (leads into 16:20 topic of Max Frost song lyrics) Mystery Death Ego Show / Death Show (etc)

“2021-03-02b Egodeath Mystery Show – Excess Effects.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-03:

    https://we.tl/t-tNRQRozgwK – 320 kbps, 486 MB 🐷
    “2021-03-02b Egodeath Mystery Show – Excess Effects.mp3”

    https://we.tl/t-V9FSz5Bxue – 210 kbps, 252 MB
    “2021-03-02b Egodeath Mystery Show – Excess Effects 210.mp3”
    This ok-fidelity version should be good for most people; there’s nothing particularly special in this episode, little Egodeath theory content.
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Esoteric Agenda)
    • not much Egodeath theory content.
    • demo of Mic Processing (Expander, Limiter, Looper/Layerer, etc)
    • Vocalization Report
    • demo of skills required to read-aloud from article “Cog Phen’y of Metaperception”. Pacing. Adding gaps/inhale-spots. Adding line breaks.
    • demo of Revoicing an Idea Development recording
      • wow, speech during idea development is crazy fast-paced!
        • need to develop Fast Casual Standard Voice,
          including Fast Quiet Casual Standard Voice.
    • Music: Compilation: A Deadly Dose of Wylde Psych
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 3:22:30 (we got a lot done in the long Agenda)
  • Filesize:
    • 486 MB 🐷 (320 kbps) <- the Excess mascot. i wanted to see how big a 3:22:47 (max tape deck length) mp3 file can be: half a Gig.
    • 252 MB for the 210 kbps lower-fidelity version.
  • Bitrate: 320 kbps & 210 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Esoteric Agenda
  • Repeat Phrase using the Pitch Grounding Method, for
    • done: low pitch [Pitch Grounding will help].
    • done: casual wording [rapid progress].
  • Drama of the Feb 28 production effort.
    • done: Mic demo took two major edit cleanups to get it right.
    • done: my Feb 28 Hanegraaff critique take (recording effort) paid off – glad I stuck to it and didn’t trashcan that recording. There are moments when I complain too much, but the voicing is 6 out of 10 (not too bad; semi-conscious/mindful – but tons of room for improvement)
      • done: Demo revoicing this “critique of Hanegraaff” recording during the present episode.
        • Finding: wow, idea development is FAST PACED!!! no wonder it’s so hard to stay mindful & do casual standard voice.
    • done: I trashcanned my Feb 28 initial reading of Cog Phen article, smartly. The fresh read-aloud today was faster, easier, better, than pointlessly reclaiming (hopeless) Feb 28th’s Take 1.5.
  • done: Applying excess processing & looping/layering on the mic.
  • done: reading-technique “1.5x reading” is really good, to pull pitch down.
    • done: Pacing is bad tho: too-fast read-aloud followed by too-slow semi-off-the-cuff. Bring these two to parity.
  • how it’s coming with vocalization;
    • done: “2021-03-01a Egodeath Mystery Show – Pitch, Grounding, Technique.mp3” – a really good effective technique
    • done: I feared my 7-hour Feb 28 recording session incl Hane, I thought my complaining would be badly voiced, but pretty good – but SO much better at 1:36:30 when I go into Deliberate/Conscious/Mindfulness mode. So much room for improvement.
    • done: Real good voicing during reading today of Cog Phen article.
    • done: Bass EQ vs bass pitch; Cardioid prox’y-effect bass-boost, vs. bass spectrum resonance in voice.
    • done: When did the “Vocalization Review/Warmup” tradition start? ans: by episode 3, Jan 30 2021.
      • a long-standing tradition since this show started many decades ago since… what was the first voice recording in 2021 that I did a Vocalization Review/Warmup? ~kind of: voice rec’g file: “Vocalization Troubleshooting.mp3” on Jan 23, 2021. episode 1 of “the Egodeath Show” was Jan 28.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • create audio project
  • connect mixer recorder
  • skip import Mic Deck wav 210302_2354.wav, and 1-2 previous
  • import Mixer Deck wav 210302_2111.wav (max; 3:22:47), runs into 210302_2112.wav (8s)
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Limiter: MXR, on Mic recording.
  • Chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
  • Mic tracking file: 2102##_####.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 2102##_####.wav
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Download Info section)
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Casual standard voice.
    • Repeat Phrase using the Pitch Grounding Method, for low pitch [Grounding will help], fun tone [yet to really address/explore this], and casual wording [rapid progress].
  • Time and date:
    • 9_:00 p.m., March _, 2021.
  • Miking theme:
    • Dynamics:
      • excess expander.
      • excess compressor.
    • Time Effects:
      • excess delay.
      • excess reverb.
    • Re-miking: Do some Mic Recording/Playback in realtime.
    • Looper/layerer: Record a demo piece, “Why Looping Playback Is Super Annoying”.
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser.
    • Polar pattern: random variable.
    • Distance: random variable.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: excess random variable.
Playlist

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
508 The timestamp is x. fade music

Review of Casual Standard Voice, and Mic Technique

This is the start of the segment “Review of Casual Standard Voice, and Mic Technique”.
1109__ The timestamp is x. fade music

CURRENT SEGMENT

Warmup Reading [not done – instead I read from article “Cog Phen’y of Metaperception”]

🎵 Not a Music Show 🎶 🎸 🥁 🎹

idea for episode of Egodeath Mystery Show, w/ lots of music. eg:
“2021-02-29a Egodeath Mystery Show – This Is Not a Music Show.mp3”
(there are no 02-29 episodes)

“Cog Pheny of Metaperception (raw mic rec’g).mp3”

For my own technical comparison purposes, I’m providing myself with this near-raw mic deck tracking recording. (The only processing I printed to this recording is Limiter.)

  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-02:
    https://we.tl/t-lW2Vac0VYW
  • Description: 
    • Raw mic recording; no processing or clean-up.
    • Read-aloud of the article Cognitive Phenomenology of Metaperception.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 54:49
  • Filesize: 132 MB
  • Bitrate: 320
  • No gap-reduction.
  • No Egodeath Mystery Show intro or outro.
  • No cleanup of the Header at start, or the Footer at end.
  • No expander (background noise reduction).
  • Has limiter.
  • No eq.
  • No normalizing the volume.
  • No aggressive use of 210 kbps; this is 320 kbps mp3, from mono file.
  • The filename is for a standalone voice recording, not for an episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Main motivation for adding this alternate version of the recording: it bugs me, the lack of bass in my trebly mobile speakers, from the 02a episode version of this recording.

The main sonic difference vs the equivalent episode of Egodeath Mystery Show: This mp3 has more bass; no eq was applied. Cardioid polar pattern at 6″ = proximity effect = bass boost, which complements mobile device speakers and earbuds which are too trebly and weak in the bass.

ALTERNATE SOLUTION, TO PLAY “2021-03-02a Egodeath Mystery Show – Cog Pheny of Metaperception.mp3” WITH MORE BASS: ON MOBILE DEVICE, SETTINGS: MUSIC: EQ: BASS BOOST.

I want to compare raw recording vs. the dynamics expander – the level of nuisance noise in the background.

Errata
  • I have a limiter on the mic deck (heard here), not only on the mixer deck.

In “2021-03-02a Egodeath Mystery Show – Cog Pheny of Metaperception.mp3”, I removed too much bass, for my trebly speakers. I also aggressively did lossy compression. I should’ve merely applied an industry-standard slight mud-reduction around 250 Hz, instead of a full-on -6dB smile in the bass freqs.

“2021-03-02a Egodeath Mystery Show – Cog Pheny of Metaperception.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-02:
    https://we.tl/t-QqzL9Fg6al
  • Episode theme; overall description: 
    • Read-aloud of the article Cognitive Phenomenology of Metaperception.
      • Reading pattern: Read a sentence verbatim, then re-read key phrases, to paraphrase. Similar to my reading of M. Hoffman’s article Entheogens and the Ancient Mystery Religions. Not double-reading, but 1.5x reading.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 53:21
  • Filesize: 66 MB
  • Bitrate: 210
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create audio project
  • skip import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • trim intro
  • add intro
  • trim outro
  • add outro
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Limiter: MXR, on Mic recording.
  • Chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
  • Mic tracking file: 210302_2350.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 210302_2110.wav – adds expander, eq (bass cut -6dB smile via 10-band), & limiter (plan to use this, not the mic rec’g – I want to hear processed)
  • Project path: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-03-02a Egodeath Mystery Show – Cog Pheny of Metaperception”
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Morning casual standard voice.
  • Time and date:
    • 12:30 p.m., March 2, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: smile-flat.

Use “analogical psychedelic eternalism” as Shorthand Abbreviation for “analogical psychedelic eternalism & dependent-control”

analogical psychedelic eternalism ~= analogical psychedelic eternalism control-dependent-control

Art Mytheme {pulled out from the jaws of Hell} ~= {human head, snake body}

the mouth of hell, Jesus pulling the saints out from, as, a serpent. Thus we have the common art mytheme of “person with snake body”.

“2021-03-01a Egodeath Mystery Show – Pitch, Grounding, Technique.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-01:
    https://we.tl/t-Rdcjv6hErI
  • Length: 1:00:06
  • Filesize: 144 MB
  • Episode theme; overall description:
    • Morning vocal warmup.
    • Demo of reverberative space.
    • Demo of the Pitch Grounding Technique.
    • How it’s going with last night’s show that I have to finish recording.
    • Egodeath theory content, scattered throughout the episode: Toward a Parody of Hanegraaff’s position:
      • Never try to understand passing through the dragon-guarded gate to Completion of Initiation.
      • Always restrict yourselves to studying, in detail, the superficial surface forms of Esotericism.
      • Define the field, explicitly, as: the Exoteric, outsiders’ study of Esotericism’s surface forms.
      • Grid Game/ Forgot Plots, ultimately litmus test: the plots represent *real* esotericism; that is: the Forgot plot (the Forgot curve) ultimately represents: to what extent did people pass through the dragon-guarded gate of control-basis transformation?
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Bitrate: mobile device app’s “Lossy” option, then 320 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • transfer voice recording from mobile to computer
  • import Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • delete bang
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Project path: __
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension

Stuff I Read-Aloud During Show

Intro Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see the Download Info section)
  • Vocalization theme:
    • Morning casual standard voice.
    • Repeat phrase for low pitch, fun tone, and casual wording.
    • Repeat phrase with the Pitch Grounding Technique.
  • Time and date:
    • ~11 a.m., March 1, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: phone bottom mic
    • Polar pattern: Omni
    • Distance: 6″, 0° (+- 30°). Also arm’s length reverb demo.
Outro

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

“2021-02-28b Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff vs the Dragon Gate.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-02:
    https://we.tl/t-T7UxjCiA9J
  • Episode theme; overall description: 
    • Hanegraaff’s irrelevant, superficial Western Esotericism, from his 1995 article where he summarizes Faivre’s six features of Esotericism.
      • The irrelevance of Hanegraaff’s “esotericism”.
      • Critique of Faivre’s 6 attributes of Esotericism, in Hanegraaff’s 1995 article.
      • Esotericism vs Exotericism – analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control.
      • Faivre & Hanegraaff are superficial and irrelevant, studying not analogical psychedelic eternalism, but, surface forms (while ignorant of analogical psychedelic eternalism & dependent-control).
      • The result is a detailed survey of confusion, with no sense of what’s most important (analogical psychedelic eternalism).
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:49:11
  • Filesize: 262 MB
  • Bitrate: 320
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • In audio project, copy 1st wav, omit parts.
  • copy 2nd wav, omit parts.
  • copy shortened copy of 2nd wav to end of 1st wav
  • add outro.
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Limiter: MXR, on Mic recording.
  • Chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
  • Mic tracking file: 2102##_####.wav
  • Mixer tracking file: 2102##_####.wav – see my hidden draft page “Bak – The Egodeath Mystery Show” for intensive 2/28 details.
  • Project path: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-28 Egodeath Mystery Show – MicCalib Hane CogPhen”
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
Recording Header
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see the Download Info section)
  • Vocalization theme:
    • x
  • Time and date:
    • 1:00 p.m.-10 p.m., February 28, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid. (double-check my records)
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: smile-frown.
Playlist

We’re listening to the song __, from the album, by the band __.

  • Song: Flowers, by Tea Company. 2-3 other songs. From a pop sike comp or two.

“2021-02-28a v2 Egodeath Mystery Show – Mic Rec Tricks.mp3” – fixed; v2

Motivation for v2 replacing v1 (which had filename
“2021-02-28a Egodeath Mystery Show – Mic Rec Tricks.mp3”):

  • v1 had random playing of mic recordings, because I couldn’t figure out how to get out of a certain play mode.
  • v1 had fast-forwarding through a voice recording, which sounds broken.
Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-02:
    https://we.tl/t-ZB3gCe5q1k <- v2
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Demo of mic recording/playback/processing techniques.
    • A few Pop Sike songs, liner notes.
    • Incidental Egodeath theory content.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension. Includes “v2”.
  • Length: 34:05
  • Filesize: 82 MB
  • Bitrate: 320 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3: these timestamps after 12:33 are for the deprecated v1. List of the topics sequence & durations.
    • 0:00 false start, phaser on mic
    • 0:46 real Intro
    • 3:31 “finished intro segment”
    • 3:35 music , “liner notes take time to read” band: Waters; song: Mother Samwell. tape flanging.
    • 5:53 “this is not a music show”
      • 5:49 – song Roxanne starts, by Chaparral Trio.
    • 6:08 “This episode will demo:
      • eq’ing mic
      • Demo of live remiking
      • For substance in this episode, I might read:
        • Hanegraaff 1995 [see episode 02-28b] &
        • Cognitive Phen’y [see episode 03-02a]
      • ~6:00 Deleting fluff words during editing
      • ~6:00 Defining “casual wording”
      • ~6:24 Many tricks are possible from audio voice editing.”
    • 7:43 (7:08 in v2) (agenda continues) “Irrelevance of Hanegraaff’s esotericism”
    • 8:02 (7:25 in v2) “I’m using 8b clips to demo remiking. revoicing defined.
    • 9:07 “remiking defined.”
    • 10:34 “I’m stopping mic recording now, to make a test/calib recording”
    • 10:53 creating the mic calibration recording: “beginning of loop … ” (fade out)
    • 11:05 first playback of the calib rec’g: “beginning of loop…” (1.5 minutes)
    • 12:33 2nd playback of the calib rec’g: “beginning of loop…” (1.5 minutes)
      — timestamps above might be good for v2. below are for v1, not v2: —
    • 14:23 live mic again
    • 14:40 demo of phaser
    • 15:59 “I will next re-play the new calib file 210228_2328.wav that I made above, now through Phaser.”
    • 16:32 – intro w/ phaser.
    • 17:37 good: i find and play the correct loop
    • 18:00 two different takes of show intro, with phaser.
    • 18:42 “I’m not so much demo’ing eq at the moment; 4 different modes of Phaser”.
    • 19:10 another intro / phaser
    • 19:32 “a new loop, …” <– I start playing the desired file, not at start.
    • 20:27 live mic through phaser: “As gray traces of dawn tinge the Eastern sky, three men of Willowdale…“
    • 21:20 seems to be back to playing the desired file, through phaser. continues…
    • 21:51 “beginning of loop”
    • 22:27 live mic w/ delay
    • 23:12 “found the manual. useful mic rec’g techniques.”
    • 23:54 play 8b clips. phaser.
    • 25:36 continue playing, now w/ slow, now especially, Fast playback.
    • 26:11 add reverb. phaser cont
    • 34:47 reverb w/ 8b clip.
    • 36:18 delay w/ 8b clip.
    • 37:19 eq w/ 8b clip.
    • 38:46 philosophy of bias of eq. music.
    • 39:27 Agenda review.
    • 27:10 v2 (was 40:28 for v1) liner notes: “this… is tea company. the song is “come and have”… “and i can get more info”
    • 40:52 music resumes
    • 41:04 liner notes
    • 43:47 this is not a music show
    • 44:18 record changer
    • 45:04 Flowers (song)
    • 46:26 new segment, “This is not a music show”
    • 47:28: outro/end.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
Miking Details

For basic miking info, see the “Recording Header” section.

  • Angle: on-axis, aimed at upper lip.
  • Pop filter/windscreen: none.
  • Limiter: MXR, on Mic recording.
  • Chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
  • Mic tracking file: 210228_2327.wav-~210228_2337.wav
    • for gory details, see Private: Site: Posts: Drafts: “Bak – The Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • Mixer tracking file: 210228_2106.wav
  • Project path: “/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-28 Egodeath Mystery Show – MicCalib Hane CogPhen”
  • Project filename: same, with .aup extension
  • Track within project: “Mic Tricks v2 – clips from 210228_2106.wav to become “2021-02-28a Egodeath Mystery Show – Stupid Mic Tricks.mp3””

Stuff I Read-Aloud During Show

Recording Header
  • Time and date:
    • 1:00 p.m., February 28, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • EQ on mic recording: none.
    • EQ on mixer recording: smile-frown, or various (demo).
Playlist
  • song: Mother Samwell. band: Waters.
  • song: Roxanne. band: Chaparral Trio. eg at 5:49 & 8:50 in this v2 episode.
  • song: Flowers. band: Tea Company.
  • song: Come and Have Some Tea with Me. band: Tea Company.

Those songs are from a below comp. I have the set of four compilations including these two.

Deleting Junk from the Recalled “2021-02-28a Egodeath Mystery Show – Mic Rec Tricks.mp3”

Timestamps for the v1 reject mp3 (not for v2 mp3):

  • 0:00 false start, phaser on mic
  • 0:46 real Intro
  • 3:31 “finished intro segment”
  • 3:35 music , “liner notes take time to read” band: Waters; song: Mother Samwell. tape flanging.
  • 5:53 “this is not a music show”
  • 6:08 “this ep will demo eq’ing mic”, “demo of live remiking; substance: I might read… deleting fluff words during editing; casual wording. many tricks possible from audio voice editing.”
  • 7:43 (agenda continues) “Irrelevance of Hanegraaff’s esotericism”
  • 8:02 “I’m using 8b clips to demo remiking. revoicing defined.
  • 9:07 “remiking defined.”
  • 10:34 “I’m stopping mic recording now, to make a test/calib recording”
  • 10:53 creating the mic calibration recording: “beginning of loop … ” (fade out)
    done: keep entire first loop, then fade-out beginning of loop 2, delete loop 3:
  • 11:05 first playback of the calib rec’g: “beginning of loop…” (1.5 minutes)
    done: 2nd playback: fade out after the start:
  • 12:33 2nd playback of the calib rec’g: “beginning of loop…” (1.5 minutes) seems fair quality. muddy, then bright, then good.
  • done:14:00 3rd playback of the calib rec’g: “beginning of loop…” (1.5 minutes)
  • 14:23 live mic again
  • 14:40 demo of phaser
  • 15:59 “I will next re-play the new calib file 210228_2328.wav that I made above, now through Phaser.”
  • done:16:15 – I SCREW UP AND DON’T KNOW HOW TO GET OUT OF “PLAY AREA = FOLDER” MODE TO SELECT THAT FILE. So you confusingly hear me fumbling playing many different voice recordings, totally not planned or wanted or controlled. CHAOS.
  • 16:32 – intro w/ phaser.
  • done: 16:42 – random pbk, delete.
  • 17:37 good: i find and play the correct loop (but next,….)
  • done:17:56 i terminate that recording pbk… not nece a problem… random recordings CHAOS.
  • 18:00 two different takes of show intro, with phaser.
  • done:18:25 “I’m stuck in Playlist mode, need the instructions”
  • 18:42 “I’m not so much demo’ing eq at the moment; 4 different modes of Phaser”.
  • done:18:59 resume random chaos playing wrong files.
  • 19:10 another intro / phaser
  • done:19:20 random chaos files.
  • 19:32 “a new loop, …” <– seems like I start playing the desired file, not at the start.
  • 20:27 live mic through phaser: “as gray traces of dawn, tinge the Eastern sky, three men of Willowdale”
  • 21:20 seems to be back to playing the desired file, through phaser. continues…
  • 21:51 “beginning of loop”
  • done:22:15 live mic again – really? or not??
  • 22:27 live mic w/ delay
  • 23:12 “found the manual. useful mic rec’g techniques.”
  • 23:54 play 8b clips. phaser.
  • 25:36 continue playing, now w/ slow, now especially, Fast playback.
  • 26:11 add reverb. phaser cont
  • done:26:56 annoying jump. and pointlessly play entire 8b clip, why? delete. annoying jumping.
  • 34:47 reverb w/ 8b clip.
  • 36:18 delay w/ 8b clip.
  • 37:19 eq w/ 8b clip.
  • 38:46 philosophy of bias of eq. music.
  • 39:27 Agenda review.
  • done:39:56 mic adjust – DELETE. (keep music bits around here)
  • 40:28 liner notes: exact words: “this… is tea company. the song is “come and have”… “and i can get more info” = new 27:10
  • done40:47 stupid comment, delete
  • 40:52 music resumes
  • 41:04 liner notes
  • 43:47 this is not a music show
  • 44:18 record changer
  • 45:04 Flowers (song)
  • 46:26 new segment, “This is not a music show”
  • Outro: it’s a sep track to mix.
  • 47:28: end.

“2021-02-27a Egodeath Mystery Show – Revoicing 10c in Realtime.mp3” 🧪 ⚗️

🧪 ⚗️

Download Info

This experiment gathered lots of valuable data, but it’s a failure as far as the quality of the re-voicing. I had to go back to the source, 10c clips, and alter that to make that more amenable to re-voicing. This mp3 might be supplemented/replaced by another pass.

  • Download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-PjpJ9RmKJm
  • Length: 1:35:54
  • Filesize: 106 MB
  • Overall description: Experimental. 🧪 ⚗️
    • Realtime revoicing of “2021-02-10c Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3” by listening to the master recording for that episode in headphones, and recording the mic of my saying aloud (in morning casual standard voice) the words I’m hearing.
      • Initial proof-of-concept demo: Ideally, this recording would be an ideally voiced version (in morning casual standard voice) of the same words that are in the original 10c Clips episode.
      • Aiming for medium, standard speed.
      • The 10c Clips recording is bad: it has no inhale-gaps; it is much too fast-paced; for example, sentencesentence with no gap at all. Inhale gaps ought to be 2s or 3s; 5s when changing topics. I was forced to quickly develop techniques of using Playback Pause & Record Pause.
      • Another, ideal-sounding Proof-of-Concept demo would be to first transcribe to text, a recording of my spoken off-the-cuff idea development, such as “My followers” from “Voice Recording 1” of 2021, and then *read-aloud* that text transcription, at the optimal rate & voicing.
    • Guitar auto-ducking demo. 20:39 long, from 32:09 to 52:48. Also a few minutes at end.
    • Includes some demo of quiet casual standard voice.
  • Timestamps:
  • 0:00 –
Errata
  • I say aloud, “smilefrown eq”, but this .mp3 has no EQ on the mic.
    • This .mp3 has music, but that doesn’t mean that this mp3 uses the Mixer deck recording; the music was added by importing the guitar mp3 into the audio project, then applying ducking to destructively modify that imported guitar track.
    • I didn’t end up using the Mixer recording (which has EQ on the mic).
    • I used the mic deck recording, which has no EQ.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • connect recorder drives
  • create audio project file
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • add guitar track
  • add some 6s silences to voice track
  • apply Auto Duck to guitar track
  • clean up/ delete/tighten voice track
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link

Intro Segment/Header (0:30)

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

  • Recording header:
  • Content:
    • A live re-voicing of “2021-02-10c Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3”
  • Vocalization:
    • Morning casual standard voice.
    • Repeat phrase for low pitch, fun tone, and casual wording.
  • Time and Date:
    • 9 a.m., February 27, 2021.
  • Miking:
    • Mic: CAD M39 large-diaphragm condenser.
    • Distance: 6″.
    • Position: On-axis, aimed at upper lip.
    • No pop filter.
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid.
    • Limiter.
    • EQ: smile/frown.
    • Mic tracking file: 210227_2102.wav
    • Mixer tracking file: 210227_2326.wav
  • BE DONE AT 0:30!
  • The timestamp is x.131

fade music

Playlist

We’re listening to:

  • Song: Hang Back Freaky, by Illumination Valve (with Auto-Duck 🦆).
    20:39 long, from 32:09 to 52:48.
    Added in Post-Production, by importing .mp3.

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

“Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
143__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Read from Casual Standard Voice, then return here.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
34:14 The timestamp is x. fade music

“Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
3424__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Read from Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show, then return here.

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
3553__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Main Agenda

In this next segment, the Board of Mystics goes through the esoteric agenda.
3608__ The timestamp is x. fade music

  • revoice the master tape cleaned up of “2021-02-10c Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3” in morning casual standard voice.
  • practice and define “morning fast casual standard voice“
  • practice using Playback Pause and Record Pause.

That ends the main agenda, and the discussion of x.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

  • 2:01:26 timestamp, filename

Production Info

Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 210 kbps
  • normal miking: CAD M39 6″ distance. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. 0 degrees. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. +-3dB Smilefrown eq on mixer deck which I halted halfway; use the mic deck rec’g only (that recording, which is heard in the final result “__.mp3”, has no EQ).
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Heading

The cleaned-up voice recording with feet, that I only did 1 pass thru to re-process:
“2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
“2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.aup”

“2021-02-25a Egodeath Mystery Show – Psychohallucidelyticogens.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-nRitD3k49b
  • description:
    • Entirely on-topic Egodeath theory substance; no off-topic or peripheral.
    • Words for psychedelics; pros/cons of the words on offer to “fix” previous names of loosecog agents:
      • psychotomimetics
      • hallucinogens
      • psychedelics
      • psycholytics
      • entheogens
      • cognitive loosening agents
    • That’s from 1) a Feb 23 phone mic recording (unreleased; clips only); 2) yesterday’s Feb 24 episode of Egodeath Mystery Show.
    • The below, afterwards, is also from that Feb 24 episode:
      • 59:53 Avoiding characterizing the completed initiate as “surfing/approaching loss of control”, because that’s the perspective from the beginner’s point of view. The {balance} mytheme; new balance; new mode of control-stability.
      • Why am I the first to inventory the mushrooms in the Canterbury psalter?
  • filesize: 101 MB
  • length: 1:06:56
Playlist
  • Pop Sike compilations (snippets embedded in Feb 24 clips; may include):
    • Psychedelic Crown Jewels, Vol. 1
    • A Deadly Dose of Wylde Psych – Authentic Way Col Sixties Artifacts

Intro Segment

Header (to be finished at 0:30!):

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
Content: This episode covers:

  • words for psychedelics;
  • avoiding saying “approaching loss of control”, because that’s the perspective from the beginner’s point of view;
  • and: why am I the first to inventory the mushrooms in the Canterbury psalter?

This episode consists of voice recording clips from an unreleased phone-mic recording from Feb 23rd (two days ago), and from yesterday’s Feb 24th Egodeath Mystery Show.

Voicing: repeat phrase for low pitch, fun tone, casual wording.

Date/time: It’s now 5pm on February 25, 2021.

Miking: I’m using the CAD M39 LDCM, 4.5″, 0°, aimed at upper lip, no pop filter, set to polar pattern of Wide Cardioid (halfway between Cardioid & Omnidirectional, to get only half the bass boost, and to let in half the room reverb).

repeating the header: I plan to repeat this header info later in this show.

  • DONE AT 0:30!

This episode will combine:

  1. intro / header for Part 1 (from Phone)
    1. content:
      1. Discussion of words for ‘psychedelics’; 30 minutes of discussion form phone mic on Feb 23, two daays ago. points that will be covered (as clips previously voiced).
    2. master recording/tracking file: “New Recording 63.m4a”.
    3. voicing: the Feb 23 phone clips were done in the middle of hardcore voice/mic technique practice, so should be great (“low pitch, fun tone, casual wording”).
    4. date/time: __
    5. miking: __
  2. Feb 23 undeleted phone-mic walkaround discussion of the pros &cons of the words on offer: ‘psychotomimetics, hallucinogens, psychedelics, psycholytics, entheogens, cognitive looseners’.
  3. intro/header for Part 2 (lg dia condender mic on – initially, for “words” section, Omni pattern).
    1. content:
      1. 1st group of clips from that episode:
        orig wav = “210224_2078.wav”.
        0:00-3:03 keep intro.
        Omit junk here
        orig wav 41:34.358–50:40 essentially done; covered, by conjoining two recording sessions, in episode __: clip this: “entheogen is not the real word”.
        done: Omit junk here
      2. orig wav 59:01–1:07:54. could clip this: Reading from M Hoffman article, critiquing the section “25.2 HERMENEUTICS AND A DEFINITION OF TERMS”, about etymology “Do I have any other points about the words on offer?”
        done: Omit junk here
      3. orig wav 1:38:22–1:43:56. could clip this: I covered all the points about the different words. They don’t cause hallucinations.
        done: Omit junk here
        2nd group of clips from that episode: contiguous, no need to edit:
      4. orig wav 3:01:24-3:02:05 Could clip this: Dancing with the two sides of the dragon gate.
        no need to omit anything here
      5. orig wav 3:02:05-3:04:49 clip this: entheogens scholars are driven away from Psalter.
        no need to omit anything here
      6. oriv wav 3:04:49-3:07:40 clip this: {balance}, far side of dragon gate; don’t say “surfing w/ loss of ctrl”.
        done: omit end
    1. master recording/tracking file: ““2021-02-24a Egodeath Mystery Show – Pop Myke.mp3”, which is to say, audio project file w/ extention .aup, same filename; the real master is “210224_2078.wav”.
    2. voicing: casual/relaxed/ unhurried; same as the microcassette 1995 tone of voice.
    3. date/time: around 9pm, Feb 24, 2021.
    4. miking: CAD M39, initially in Omni polar pattern (for the “words” part), 0°, 4.5″, aimed at upper lip, no pop filter. Limiter (MXR – M76), no EQ. Later, Cardioid polar pattern, for bass boost and no room reverb.
  4. Play the Feb 24a clips (new clips; things I said within the 24a episode
    1. Mostly “the words on offer”; also
    2. why am I the first to inventory msh trees in the Psalter?
    3. {balance} mytheme.
  5. outro

I’m using the CAD M39 microphone, at 4.5″ distance, in Wide Cardioid polar pattern, with no EQ, with MXR limiter. fade music

Production Info

Post-Processing Steps

I produced this differently:

  1. I imported the .m4a into the audio project and omitted parts.
  2. I imported the Feb 24 .wav file and omitted parts.
  3. I recorded CAD mic to DR05 to record intro, outro, and mid-show re-intro reminder-header.
  4. I imported the intro/outro (210225_2079.wav).
  5. I sequenced the intro, m4a, mid-show re-intro, feb 24 wav, & outro, selected all, then Tracks: Align Tracks: Align End-to-End.
  6. Muted the unwanted intro/outro tracking-track.
  7. Selected all desired tracks, then exported as mp3.
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
    • optional: import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
    • optional: normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
    • optional: export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes

see track names in project file:

  • New Rec 63; “New Recording 63.m4a”
  • 2078 clips; 210224_2078.wav
  • intro outro tracking – 210225_2079.wav
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • miking:
    • iPhone bottom mic 4.5″ 0°.
    • CAD M39 same. Aimed at upper lip. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. No eq.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

“New Recording 63.m4a”

I will incorp the “words for psychedelics” discussion from that Feb 23 phone-mic recording into episode 25a of Egodeath Mystery Show. Timestamps of the parts to clip: (done: reduced to 30:19)

  • omit __ “Remarkable speed of improvement toward low pitch, fun casual.”
  • 0:10-0:22 header
  • omit “end header, 23 seconds, wanto check the date but, 23 is accurate, it is remarkable the rate of increase by this technique…”
  • 6:37.750-10:41 starting with: “‘Thus’ is one…” – names of psychedelics.
  • done: omit “because.. there i swallowed on mic” “the newest idea is repeat idea, not repeat phrase”
  • 11:28-15:40 words for ‘psychedelics’
  • done: omit “put it this way…”
  • 17:37-17:53 “Psychedelic was the first adequate…”
  • done: omit “clearing throat mic violation”
  • 18:30-40:02 “the word psychedelic…”
  • done: omit to end: “now back to low pitch, fun tone, causual wording”

“2021-02-24a Egodeath Mystery Show – Pop Myke.mp3”

Production Info

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-XUiaCwVQNU
  • description:
    • Casual show w/ lots of Pop Sike rare singles.
    • Demo’d CAD M39 mic.
    • Previous day’s hardcore series of handheld miking/voicing practice recordings.
    • Pros/cons of words like ‘entheogens’.
    • Scoped-out Feb 10’s four episodes, looking to extract clips from them.
  • filesize: 337 MB
  • length: 3:09:09

Content

Timestamps for clips from “2021-02-24a Egodeath Mystery Show – Pop Myke.mp3” that were (together w/ un-deleted phone mic rec’g of New Recording 63 (42:30 long)) used to form 25a episode
  • 41:34-50:40 could clip this: “entheogen is not the real word”.
  • 59:01-1:07:54 could clip this: Reading from M Hoffman article, critiquing the section “25.2 HERMENEUTICS AND A DEFINITION OF TERMS”, about etymology “Do I have any other points about the words on offer?”
  • 1:38:22-1:43:56 could clip this: I covered all the points about the different words. They don’t cause hallucinations.
  • done, I think: create a show / clip , clip rollup show, combining:
    • 1. the recovered recording 23 from Feb 23, 42:30 minutes long (iPhone bottom mic (nominally Omnidirectional) 4.5″ 0° upper lip),
    • 2. then followed by the clips from ep 24a (find “clip this” in present section), about the words on offer (what miking? CAD M39 4.5″ 0° upper lip, which polar pattern? definitely not Cardioid; most likely True Omnidirectional, per 50:38. 34:05 pretty much proves; “This is still the Omni polar pattern.”)
Content

Feb 25 Content:

  • Feb 25:
    • mobile recording discarded: the words on offer to “fix” previous names of loosecog agents. Pros/cons of the words:
      • hallucinogens
      • psychotomimetics
      • psychedelics
      • entheogens
      • psycholytics
      • cognitive loosening agents
  • voice focus planned
    • got CAD M39 large diaphragm condender mic (sounds like SM57, but no hiss – good for Late Night quiet).
      • Demonstrations of cardioid polar pattern vs. Omni, ramif for bass & reverb.
      • Continuously variable polar pattern pot.
    • Yesterday, I did some 8 hours of hardcore miking/vocal practice with handheld recorder/mic.
      • “parking” the mic to point at cloth; only delivering phrases to mic (not mouth noises or throat clearing)
    • Got goodies from storage – albums, mic, tapes of voice 1989, windscreen for SM57.
    • Albums & pop sike singles compilation albums incl
      A (Foo) Dose of (Bar) Psych, x4
      We Can Fly – vol 1-4
      Beyond the Calico Wall
    • thick folder of Hanegraaff article printouts- proof i read tons of his articles every line
    • cad m39 lg dia cond mic
    • microcassette player w tape that says Good Content, could be from ~1995
    • theres probly a 1987 good voice cassette tape (good voicing and miking and content), did i copy/upload to egodeath site?
  • date & time of day
  • what mic/ miking/position
    be DONE AT 0:30
  • done: incorp latest header from voice recordings into Egodeath Mystery Show template. Must say date, time, miking, including ep# eg “24a”, “24b”.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • connect recorder drives
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • 210224_2078.wav – mixer
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • normal miking: CAD M39 large dia cond mi. Variable polar patterns demo’d, from Omni to Cardiod (& some Figure 8). 4.5″ distance. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. 0°. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. No eq. Occasional fx.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).
Playlist
  • Pop Sike compilations:
    • Psychedelic Crown Jewels, Vol. 1
    • A Deadly Dose of Wylde Psych – Authentic Way Col Sixties Artifacts
Errata/ Things to Improve
  • Get to the damn point! START by saying the 5 key words, the conclusion, the executive takeaway FIRST! There are times here where I do the ol’ “There’s somethign I found, which I’m not sure if I mentioned it, but I think blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah: The cat sat on the mat.
  • Music too quiet. Watch the meter. Force music up to -20dB.
  • Negative song looped while I was busy w/ mic off, typing. “Daddy drop dead” song.

“2021-02-23a Egodeath Mystery Show – DJs per Time of Day.mp3”

Download Info
Content
  • This episode is mostly about voice at time of day. This entire recording has been cleaned up; clean/efficient/fast-paced.
    • 3 or 4 different voices at different times of day
  • 12:29 “I’ve been sss- Tripped” (echo on tripped) – Blue Oyster Cult lyrics processing (the printed lyrics i saw online wrongly said “t-tripped”; Errata for the 22a episode); the correct Egodeath lyrics transcription is “s-tripped”. I think the printed liner lyrics might say “stripped” (check my LP), but he actually sings “sss tripped” w/ echo on “tripped”.
  • 13:43 2 seconds of singing range explore – pursue this more.
  • 14:11 “This is the morning DJ” announcements – From episode “2021-02-23a Egodeath Mystery Show – DJs per Time of Day.mp3”, CLIP THIS FOR REUSE; add it to the intros/outros audio project. ego mystery death show etc DJ Gruff -> DJ Cyber rock -> DJ Frozen Rock; “the morning DJ Frozen Rock” “new dawn” (leads into 16:20 topic of Max Frost song lyrics) Mystery Death Ego Show / Death Show (etc)
  • 16:40 Show-Intro announcements like lyrics of Shape of Things to Come (from memory; inaccurate lyrics)
  • 17:24 I’ve been meeting some really well-informed people in dream land
  • 18:42 Max Frost actual lyrics of song Shape of Things to Come: “There are new thoughts, ready and waiting…”
  • 22:50 changing the worldmodel vs. destroying the world
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • share rec’g from mobile to computer
  • import m4a into new project
  • cleanup wav
  • export mp3
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • mobile device bottom mic 4.5″ 30° aimed at upper lip (so, no eq, no limiter, no popfilt)
    • keyboard shortcut for degrees: Shift+Option+8 aka Shift+Alt+8

Added to show page template, to say what time of day:

  • the show header
    • must say
      • what mic
      • what time of day <– important for research about voicing
    • Nice to say:
      • date
      • planned intended topics; motivation for hitting Record. even if i don’t cover those topics, it’s good context to know.

The original “structured recording header” concept, that begat the Egodeath Mystery Show. I first defined the Header concept in https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Voice-Recording-2-for-Jan-26

  • 2 content ideas
  • 2 vocalization focus ideas
  • 2 technical points, usually what mic/miking, and what date. Date has been forgotten, and I should practice saying header – or even going so far as to artificially add it, post-recording.

“2021-02-22a Egodeath Mystery Show – Blue Axis Sabbath.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-fFhLz8KvNw (260 kbps, 250 MB)
    • filesize: 260 kbps = 250 MB: C.E. album sounds swishy
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-OEOKym9zAa (320 kbps, 343 MB)
    • filename: “2021-02-22a Egodeath Mystery Show – Blue Axis Sabbath 320.mp3”
    • title: “2021-02-22a Egodeath Mystery Show – Blue Axis Sabbath 320”
    • Assessed whether 320 kbps 🐷 sounds less swishy. Inconclusive, so far.
  • length: 2:23:05

Content

  • Read-aloud & vocal technique, mic technique, and music/lyrics.
    • Mixing practice.
    • On-axis 4.5″ mic technique
    • Started w/ pop filter, then ditched it to be able to see.
    • Placed mic setup off-center, to enable moving out of or into the miking pickup zone.
    • Working on no breathing or mouth noises, while on-axis in sweet spot.
  • I read-aloud all the book titles from my Bibliography of my 2006 main article, looking for Astral Ascent Mysticism.
  • Read-aloud lyrics for 2-3 of the Classic Rock songs played in the background.
  • Developed a piano-referencing pitch range to find my desired voice character, eg for read-aloud of M Hoffman’s article Entheogens and the Ancient Mystery Religions.
    • I read-aloud random passages, adjusting pitch-range.
Playlist

I read some lyrics aloud.

Read-Aloud Bibliography
  • I read-aloud book titles from my Bibliography of my 2006 main article, looking for Astral Ascent Mysticism:

Arbel, V. Beholders of Divine Secrets: Mysticism and Myth in the Hekhalot and Merkavah Literature. Albany: SUNY, 2003.

Ashton, J. The Religion of Paul the Apostle. New Haven: Yale, 2000.

Balsekar, R. Who Cares? The Unique Teaching of Ramesh S. Balsekar. Redondo Beach: Advaita, 1999.

Barton, T. Ancient Astrology. London: Routledge, 1994.

Bryan, C. Render to Caesar: Jesus, the Early Church, and the Roman Superpower. New York: Oxford, 2005.

Collins, J. J. (editor), and M. Fishbane (editor). Death, Ecstasy, and Other Worldly Journeys. Albany: SUNY, 1995.

Crowley, M. Secret Drugs of Buddhism. Forthcoming, and presented at Entheogenesis Conference 2004.

Culiano, I. Out of This World: Otherworldly Journeys from Gilgamesh to Albert Einstein. Boston: Shambhala, 1991.

Cumont, F. Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans. New York: Dover, 1960 (1912).

Davies, S. Jesus the Healer: Possession, Trance, and the Origins of Christianity. New York: Continuum, 1995.

Detering, H. Der Gefälschte Paulus; The Fabricated Paul: Early Christianity in the Twilight. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1995.

Doherty, E. The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus. Ottawa: Canadian Humanist. 1999.

Drews, A. Die Petruslegende; The Legend of Saint Peter: A Contribution to the Mythology of Christianity. Frankfurt: Neuer Frankfurter, 1910, 1924.

Fishbane, M. The Kiss of God: Spiritual and Mystical Death in Judaism. Seattle: University of Washington, 1994.

Forte, R. (editor). Entheogens and the Future of Religion. San Francisco: Council on Spiritual Practices, 1997.

Fowden, G. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Princeton: Princeton University, 1986.

Freke, T.; and P. Gandy. The Complete Guide to World Mysticism. London: Piatkus, 1997.

Grof, S. (editor), and C. Grof (editor). Spiritual Emergency: When Personal Transformation Becomes a Crisis. New York: Tarcher/Putnam, 1989.

Grof, S.; and C. Grof. Beyond Death: The Gates of Consciousness. London: Thames and Hudson, 1980.

Heinrich, C. Strange Fruit: Alchemy and Religion: The Hidden Truth. London: Bloomsbury, 1994.

Hoffman, M. A. (editor). Entheos: The Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality. Entheomedia.org, 2001-2002.

Hoffman, M. A., C. A. P. Ruck, and B. Staples. “The Entheogenic Eucharist of Mithras”. Entheos 2.1:13-46 (2002).

Hoffman, M. S. “Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita”. Journal of Higher Criticism, in press, 2007.

Hoffman, M. S. “The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a Virtual Environment”. Fringe Ware Review 5:22-24, 1994.

Hofmann, A.; R. E. Schultes; and C. Ratsch. Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers. Rochester: Healing Arts, 1992 (1979).

Johnson, L. T. Religious Experience in Earliest Christianity: A Missing Dimension in New Testament Studies. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1998.

Kubby, S. The Politics of Consciousness: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom. Port Townsend: Loompanics, 1995.

Martin, L. H. Hellenistic Religions: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University, 1987.

Merkur, D. Gnosis: An Esoteric Tradition of Mystical Visions and Unions. Albany: SUNY, 1993.

Merkur, D. The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical Experience. Rochester: Park Street, 2001.

Metzner, R. The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative Experience. Novato: Origin, 1997 (1986).

Nasrallah, L. An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early Christianity. Cambridge: Harvard, 2003.

Oaklander, L. N. (editor), and Q. Smith (editor). The New Theory of Time. New Haven: Yale, 1994.

Oaklander, L. N., and Q. Smith. Time, Change and Freedom: An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge, 1995.

Pagels, E. The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters. Harrisburg: Trinity, 1992 (1975).

Pleket, H. W. “An Aspect of the Emperor Cult: Imperial Mysteries.” Harvard Theological Review 58:331-47 (1965).

Pilch, J. J. Visions and Healing in the Acts of the Apostles: How the Early Believers Experienced God. Collegeville: Liturgical, 2004.

Ruck, C.; B. Staples; and C. Heinrich. The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist. Durham: Carolina Academic, 2001.

Rucker, R. The Fourth Dimension: A Guided Tour of the Higher Universes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984.

Russell, D. Shamanism and the Drug Propaganda: Patriarchy and the Drug War. Camden: Kalyx, 1998.

Shanon, B. The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of the Ayahuasca Experience. New York: Oxford University, 2002.

Smith, D. E. From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early Christian World. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.

Taylor-Perry, R. The God Who Comes: Dionysian Mysteries Reclaimed. New York: Algora, 2003.

Thagard, P. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University, 1992.

Thompson, M. M. The God of the Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.

Ulansey, D. “The Eighth Gate: The Mithraic Lion-Headed Figure and the Platonic World-Soul”. Forthcoming; online.

Vernant, J-P.; and P. Vidal-Naquet. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. New York: Zone, 1988 (1972).

Wasson, R. G.; A. Hofmann, and C. Ruck. The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries. Los Angeles: Hermes, 1998 (1978).

Watts, A. “Zen and the Problem of Control”, in This Is It and Other Essays. New York: Vintage, 1973 (1958).

Wegner, D. White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts: Suppression, Obsession, and the Psychology of Mental Control. New York: Guilford, 1989.

White, R. Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1997.

Williams, M. A. The Immovable Race: Gnostic Designation and the Theme of Stability in Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
    • optional: import Mic Deck wav n/a
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
    • optional: normalize vol of Mic wav n/a
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
    • optional: export mp3 of Mic wav n/a
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy heading to TOC, link
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
Log of Takes
  • filename
    • 210222_2077.wav – mixer
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • normal miking: Shure SM57 mic. 4.5″, on-axis. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. Limiter. No eq.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

Heading

Added “riding the mic sweet spot” to casual standard voice page, to read-aloud those mic principles.

“2021-02-21a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Master Tape.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-SusEhbnlwn
  • description:
    • Reading Comments at Cyberdisciple’s site.
    • Preparing to do a double-reading of M. Hoffman’s article Entheogens and the Ancient Mystery Religions. Testing a brighter mic position.
    • A somewhat scattered tour of master tape Egodeath Mystery Show episode:
      “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3” (it would be nice to get more familiar with this master tape and add more timestamps, practice this more.)
    • See Esoteric Agenda below.
  • filesize: 253 MB
  • length: 2:33:30
Esoteric Agenda
  • Read Comments at Cyberdisciple’s page on Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 26. Mostly Wrmspirit’s Comments, & one of my Comments.
    https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/transcendent-knowledge-podcast-ep-26
  • Discussed miking and voicing a re- double-reading of Hoffman’s article. Did some practice double-reading of M. Hoffman’s article Entheogens and the Ancient Mystery Religions.
    • Discussed mic positions’ effect on bass and treble, in preparation for a re-do of reading Hoffman article.
  • Played master tape of the beloved, solid, ambitious Feb. 7 episode of Egodeath Mystery Show, “Plastic Cloud”. 💕 🎙 🕰 🎶
    • Whimsical hyper-reading of Rolfe book passage (twice).
    • Despite some slurring on Feb 7, I nailed the exercise of saying “botched statement”.
    • Within the master tape, I found the {balance} mytheme discussion, = retaining control. Added the 42:00-46:00 timestamp to idea development page 11 in those show-notes. Played that entire “clip” (directly playing portions of that master tape).
    • I updated the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page, to add another “recording type”: I didn’t literally prepare any clips (as such) from Feb 7 show, but I played passages from that master tape; EXPLORED the previous episode and discussed passages from that show (interesting approach, using an entire master tape, not an mp3, nor a wav clip).
    • This suggests a Mystery Show format: giving a tour of the master-tapes archive.
    • 1 57 31 “new” variant of recording types: loading a previous episode’s master tape and exploring it during the current episode.
    • 2 12 06 critiquing Feb 7 Plastic Cloud episode master tape. Inconsistent ‘s’ slurring.
    • Again playing the full first 5 minutes of the Feb 7 show, a lovely show episode (while learning to press P key to pause and freshly comment about that episode).
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
    • optional: import Mic Deck wav
  • delete loud parts at end
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
    • optional: normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
    • optional: export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210221_2072.wav – mixer
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • normal miking: Shure SM57 mic. 4.5″ distance. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. 0-25 degrees. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. No eq.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode (didn’t record) > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

Intro Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
February 21, 2021.
To differentiate this episode: I might cover the following: 30 seconds; 4 items, 6 words each

I’m using the Shure SM57 microphone, at 4″ distance, approximately on-axis, with no EQ, with limiter. 

Playlist

We’re listening to:

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

“Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Read from Casual Standard Voice, then return here.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

“Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Read from Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show, then return here.

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

That ends the main agenda, and the discussion of x.
__ The timestamp is x. fade music

Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

  • __ timestamp, filename
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Forgot Plots:
“Forgot Late/ Forgot Steadily/ Forgot Early”
= the Maximal/ Moderate/ Minimal Entheogen Theories

Maximal theory (Hoffman): ……. 10 9 0 – “falls late” curve
Moderate theory (Ruck): …………. 10 5 0 – “falls steadily” curve
Minimalist theory (McKenna): … 10 1 0 – “falls early” curve

Forgot Plots:
“Logarithmic vs. Exponential Fall” Is Ambiguous;
“Falls Late/ Falls Steadily/ Falls Early” Is Direct Description; or:
“Forgot Late/ Forgot Steadily/ Forgot Early”

When it comes to decline-curves, the terminology of “logarithmic vs exponential” is inconclusive.

According to the Maths synth module:
The “falls early” curve (Minimalist; McKenna) is an exponential decline (not logarithmic, as I’ve been saying).
The “falls late” curve (Maximalist; M. Hoffman) is a logarithmic decline (not exponential, as I’ve been saying).

After looking at image search results, the terms “exponential” and “logarithmic” are ambiguous, for declines.

It might be justifiable to call the “falls late” curve “exponential decline”, as I’ve been doing. I’d have to get into the math to check how the terminology usage works.

In recordings, I described the “falls late” curve as “exponential decline” as, “at first, the decrease per year is slight, and then later, the decrease-per-year becomes greater; an exponential increase in the rate of decline”.

It’s probably best to avoid the vague, indirect “log/exp” terms, and simply describe, instead, “the declines early” & “the declines late” curves. McKenna’s curve falls-off early; Hoffman’s curve falls late.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=logarithmic+fall
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=logarithmic+decline
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=logarithmic+reduction
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=logarithmic+decrease

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=exponential+fall
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=exponential+decline
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=exponential+reduction
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=exponential+decrease

The Two-Level Personal Control System (Personal + Transpersonal)

At present, I have not read the comments at the below page.

I posted a Comment at:
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/transcendent-knowledge-podcast-ep-26/ –

The person in the mystic state experiences being God as higher, transpersonal controller.

Sophia discovers her higher partner.

Everything in myth is aspects of oneself, the initiate.

The personal, lower self is distinct from the transpersonal, higher self.

The “overall person” (or initiate) includes the formerly unknown, higher, transpersonal component of control, as well as the lower, personal, controller portion of the “personal+transpersonal” control system.

The ‘personal’ control system includes the lower, ‘personal’ component of the personal control system, and the higher, transpersonal component of the personal control system.

See the image of Jesus and Sophia dancing, both with lifted garment indicating the higher state of awareness about the two levels of control.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/13/lifted-garment-mushroom-folds-in-christian-greek-art-indicating-the-ecstatic-holy-spirit-altered-state/#Jesus-and-Dancer

Compare the two snakes (male ruler/controller & female ruler/controller) intertwined in the caduceus.

The word ‘person’ or ‘personal’ is ambiguous, and means both:
o Specifically the lower control-component (the passive thought receiver).
o Both of the levels of control: the control-thought inserter and the control-thought receiver); the personal and transpersonal levels.

In gnosticism, when Sophia wasn’t aware of her higher partner, and she tried to produce enlightenment, the result was a monster, Yaldabaoth: the lion-headed serpent-monster.

The well-formed mental worldmodel of control requires accounting for one’s higher, transpersonal level of control (the uncontrollable higher controller, uncontrollable by the lower, local locus of control), and recognizing the limits & dependency of the lower, local locus of control.

Double Reading of M. Hoffman Article Entheogens and Ancient Mystery Religions

Consider doing a morning double-reading of M. Hoffman’s article Entheogens and Ancient Mystery Religions.

Not like my first time’s approach I gave to M. Hoffman, “read a paragraph, then paraphrase it”. I should listen to that full recording first.

A double-reading would give higher comprehension and better overall result, than my initial format (“paragraph then paraphrase”).

My first read-aloud recording of this article (Feb 2) was a reading of each paragraph (ie on a per-paragraph scale), followed by a paraphrase of the paragraph. Included References/Biblio at end.

A double-reading would replace my own, choppy paraphrase, by a smooth 2nd reading, on a per-sentence scale. And would replace the initial read-through of a paragraph, by a per-sentence doulbe-reading. Omit References. Focus just on learning Hoffman’s headings & sentences, as-is. Far more scalable and repeatable than inventing a paraphrase on the spot.

New addl type of modifcation of a read-through:

  1. Create recording of double-reading an article body.
  2. Read footnotes / Biblio, not recording.
  3. Record various critiques, as a prep.
  4. Then Play back and Pause the double-reading, and intersperse my reaction/critique/ comments.

Extracting Panofsky Clips

Consider clipping just the Art portions from the first 47 minutes of the “Ourgument” episode of Egodeath Mystery Show. What are all the passages I’ve ever recorded re: Panofsky? Do a “clips rollup episode” of all those.

1:45 – Art: represent all artists, especially esoteric religious artists. always mean mushrooms.
~10:00 Art: the book will convince
~12:00 “I’m scrolling down” <- del
13:00 Grid: the grid game explained/summarized, from last show, to be here independent of previous episode. Points explained. 200 vs -200, don’t change; we’ll change never.
~15:45 Art: the book will convince, devastating. bedtime cover story.
17:00 Art: artists given messed-up templates
19:00 Art: asked boss, copy machine. job desc. ital pines templates, badly malformed due to incompetence. follow your directives.
23:30 Grid: grid game again. briefly? unreasonable committed believer in plants.

Defining “clips rollup episode“, “full episode“, “core episode“, & “clip“, for Egodeath Mystery Show

Spectrum of recording complexity approaches:

see Egodeath Mystery Show page

Robert Segal’s Reductionism of Religion/ Myth as Social Structures

Shouldn’t Cyberdisciple list Robert A. Segal himself as a theorist specifically within the category of “Myth-ritualist theory” or “Functionalism“? Is Segal a good guide to categories of theories/ interpretations of religion/ myth? Segal advocates a Social Science interpretation/ explanation of religion/ myth.

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/evaluating-theories-of-mythology/ – begins by mentioning Segal, but doesn’t list Segal himself in any view in section “Variants and Theorists”.

The post only mentions Segal as a *guide to* theories of myth, in paragraph 1, and doesn’t present Segal himself as a particular theorist advocating specifically the Reductionist (ie Social Science) approach to the interpretation of religion/myth and/or the historiography of religion/myth.

What theory of Myth does Segal himself believe and advocate? Segal owns the advocacy of the Social-Science Reductionist approach to interpretation of religion, I tentatively suggest.

Cyberdisciple’s post begins:

“Evaluating Theories of Mythology

“This post will evaluate theories of mythology. Initially I drew from Robert A. Segal, Myth. A Very Short Introduction and Eric Csapo, Theories of Mythology for 19th and 20th century theories. Like a reviewer of Csapo’s book on Amazon, I find Segal’s a better introduction, Csapo’s a better analysis and critique. Read Segal for the quick and dirty, dig into Csapo for social context and method. Both make clear how 19th century all theories of myth have been, even the 20th century ones, before the Egodeath theory. Mythology as a discipline is tied to European imperialism and social Darwinism, ‘evolutionism’.

“I’m added summaries of ancient Greek approaches, mostly drawn from Luc Brisson, How Philosophers Saved Myths. I’m considering these summaries of ancient Greek approaches partial approximations because our understanding of what the Greeks meant needs to be revised in light of the Egodeath Theory.”

from “Empirical_Method_in_the_Study_of_Esoteri.pdf” 1995 Hanegraaff article:

article, Robert A. Segal, 1983, In defense of reductionism,

“In defense of reductionism” robert segal
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22In+defense+of+reductionism%22+robert+segal

The article:
https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article-abstract/LI/1/97/683591

In Defense of Reductionism
Robert A. Segal
Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume LI, Issue 1, March 1983, Pages 97–124, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LI.1.97
Published: 01 March 1983

wik lacks a Robert Segal page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_interpretation_of_religion#Gnosticism – “On the other hand, it is clear from a comparison of Jung’s writings and that of ancient Gnostics, that Jung disagreed with them on the ultimate goal of the individual. Gnostics in ancient times clearly sought a return to a supreme, other-worldly Godhead. In a study of Jung, Robert Segal claimed that the eminent psychologist would have found the psychological interpretation of the goal of ancient Gnosticism (that is, re-unification with the Pleroma, or the unknown God) to be psychically ‘dangerous’, as being a total identification with the unconscious. To contend that there is at least some disagreement between Jung and Gnosticism is at least supportable: the Jungian process of individuation involves the addition of unconscious psychic tropes to consciousness in order to achieve a trans-conscious centre to the personality. Jung did not intend this addition to take the form of a complete identification of the Self with the Unconscious.”

The terms ‘the conscious’ and ‘the unconscious’ are terrible, vague, off-base, ineffective theory-constructs.

2nd line of footer says:

Segal = the social-scientific study of religion and myth

reductionism means the theory/interpretation

religion & myth is social science

religion and myth are understood by science of sociology.

Religion and myth are sociological constructs

Religion/myth is social stuff, so is understood by social science.

To scientifically understand and study religion/myth, we must use social science.

The right way to understand religion/myth, is through social science.
That view is known as “Reductionism”; the Reductionist view.

The Reductionist view of Western Esotericism is the Social Science approach/perspective on Western Esotericism.

Western Esotericism = Social Science.

To understand Western Esotericism, approach Western Esotericism through the Social Science approach.

March 8, 2021 Addition

Evaluating Theories of Mythology
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/evaluating-theories-of-mythology/

From what I gather from Hanegraaff’s 1995 article, Robert Segal himself should be listed as a theorist in the body of the article.  Not just at the top, as a provider of a categorization scheme to place other scholars into.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#Robert-Segal’s-Reductionism-of-Religion-Myth-as-Social-Structures

from “Empirical_Method_in_the_Study_of_Esoteri.pdf” 1995 Hanegraaff article:
article, Robert A. Segal, 1983, In defense of reductionism

Wouter Hanegraaff’s 1995 article: “Empirical method in the study of esotericism”
https://www.academia.edu/1761692/Empirical_Method_in_the_Study_of_Esotericism_1995_
3 approaches: Religionism, Reductionism, Empiricism
Journal: “Method & Theory in the Study of Religion”

Segal is the leading advocate of “Reductionism”.  In the context of Theory of Religion, this “Reductionism” means that to explain religion, mysticism, or spirituality, means explaining those in terms of Social Science.  

Per Segal’s Reductionism, when you have explained religion, mysticism, or spirituality in terms of Social Science, you have finished explaining religion, mysticism, or spirituality.
___

Christopher Partridge appears to be this type of reductionist.  His area of research is contemporary counter culture, with extreme hyper-emphasis on “counter”, which for him, means an entire, heavy interpretive framework: his trademark term ‘occulture’. 

His model seems as breathtakingly superficial as any exoteric esotericism.

“2021-02-20a Egodeath Mystery Show – At War with the Exoteric Mystics.mp3”

Recommended re: what’s wrong with Mystics. Entire episode is on-topic.

Throwaway morning vocal warmup show with no Egodeath core theory content, except that there’s no vocal warmup, and it’s only Egodeath core theory content.

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-MpvumYS97K
  • Filename: see Heading above.
  • description:
    • what’s wrong with Mystics.
    • Exoteric esotericism.
    • The Forgot Plots of enlightenment, corresponding to of plants.
    • Hanegraaff is a crypto-Reductionist; Hanegraaff approves of Clifford Geertz’ definition of ‘esotericism’ as “skilled concealment and skilled revealing FOR THE PURPOSE OF HAVING SOCIAL CONTROL OVER OTHER PEOPLE”. I recommend that Hanegraaff combine good Religionism with good Empiricism; but instead, it appears that Hanegraaff approves of combining Reductionism (ie Social Science explanatory approach) with Empiricism, to explain religion/ myth/ esotericism.
  • filesize: 47 MB
  • length: 50:54

Errata

Hanegraaff’s 2012 article – I said “Clifford Geertz”, meant “Michael Taussig” said…. –

“after its sensational and exhibitionistic public phase during the 1960s, the use of psychedelics in a spiritual context evolved after 1970 into a private and discreet, individualist practice, which continued to have a considerable impact on New Age religion because of the types of religious experiences and visions that it produced or facilitated.

This makes it into an aspect of “esotericism” in the specific dictionary sense of secrecy and concealment – but not of the well-known discursive practice of secrecy as “skilled revelation of skilled concealment” (as elegantly formulated by Michael Taussig (in “Viscerality, Faith, and Skepticism”, 273)), where secrets are forms of social capital that impart power to those who are in a position to hide or reveal them.

Instead, we are dealing with practices of secrecy and concealment born simply out of social or legal necessity.

The obvious difficulties of finding hard data under such conditions are not a sufficient reason to ignore this dimension of New Age, for at least two reasons.

First, simply by being more attentive to it, evidence relevant to entheogenic esotericism may be noted and recognized that would otherwise be overlooked: authors and practitioners do make references to it, but often just in passing and by means of coded language (e.g. “power plants” and “psychotechnologies” rather than “drugs” or “psychedelics”).

Second, even where there is no strict empirical proof of entheogenic esotericism, it may still be the most plausible explanation in specific cases, such as those discussed above.

The assumption that spectacular experiences as reported by Capra and Roberts [or any esotericists ever, in any era -cm] happened “just like that” (because we cannot think of anything better), are unsatisfactory and in fact rather lazy from an intellectual point of view [for an example of such laziness, see Hanegraaff himself re: any esotericism in pre-modern eras -cm]: until somebody comes up with a better explanation, it seems much more reasonable to attribute them, at least provisionally, to the use of substances that are known from clinical research to have exactly these kinds of effects.”

Post-Processing Steps

from mobile device mono Voice memo app, not sm57/dr-05.

  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
    • optional: import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
    • optional: normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
    • optional: export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps

“1997 Egodeath Core Theory Spec.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-XjtdmBg2Av
  • description: Read-aloud of 1997 Core Theory Spec; the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence. Double-reading; each sentence twice. No music.
  • filesize: 135 MB
  • length: 56:20
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • connect recorder drives
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • remove silences/gaps
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename;
    “2021-02-19a Egodeath Mystery Show – 1997 Core Theory.aup”
  • bitrate: 320 kbps
  • normal miking: Shure SM57 mic. 4″ distance. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. ~45 degrees. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. No eq.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

“2021-02-19a Egodeath Mystery Show – 1997 Core Theory.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-7F2FjnDBra
  • description:
    • Updated, streamlined template for the Egodeath Mystery Show.
    • 3 techniques for revoicing speech to casual standard voice.
    • New WordPress page, “casual standard voice”.
    • Several possibilities for long show episodes, shortened episodes, and extracted clips.
    • Reading aloud the 1997 Core Theory article.
    • LP: Volume 4, by Black Sabbath.
  • filesize: 228 MB
  • length: 1:35:14
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • connect recorder drives
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Detailed Description

In the main segment, the Board of Mystics goes through the esoteric agenda:

  • Updated, streamlined template for the Egodeath Mystery Show.
  • 3 techniques for revoicing speech to casual standard voice.
    • while speaking, no recorder, repeat phrase.
    • record speech, play in headphones while revoicing to create a fresh new 2nd-gen recording with only the 1st-gen words, but not the 1st gen voicing.
    • mix playback of 1st-gen speech, pause it, the record 2nd gen speech; result recording alternates between 1st gen and 2nd gen voicing.
  • New WordPress page, “casual standard voice”.
  • FORGOT to do this – critique & revoice with vary-pitch 17d (the lozenge episode, which starts to define “quiet casual standard voice”.
    • findings in episode 17d:
      • the mouth noises are bad,
      • the voicing is good, toward defining “quiet casual standard voice”.
      • quiet casual standard voice – add varying the pitch
  • Several possibilities for multiple forms of a given recording, for the Egodeath Mystery Show; various multiple possible versions/ formats/ outputs/ clips.
    • long show episodes, “full version of the episode”
    • shortened episodes “core version of the episode”
    • extracted standalone clips.
  • Reading aloud the 1997 Core Theory article.
    • I read the first sections from WordPress copy of the article. I read the later sections from Principia Cybernetica website, as posted
    • plans for multi-recording the 1997 article. two versions simultaneously produced – “dance mix” & the condensed voice-only mix (both a double-reading and a single-reading version)
    • engage the mic recorder
    • 8 pages, 3247 words
    • Using a revoicing technique: Repeat Sentence form, to target casual standard voice.
    • Haven’t pre-read.
    • Voice state right now: Average.
    • Early evening volume; 7/10. (3 p.m. = 10/10; 3 a.m. = 1/10).
Log of Takes
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 320 kbps
  • normal miking: Shure SM57 mic. 4″ distance. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. ~45 degrees. No pop filter or windscreen. Limiter. No eq.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

Intro Segment

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
This episode covers: 30 seconds; 4 items, 6 words each

  • Updated, streamlined template for the Egodeath Mystery Show.
  • 3 techniques for revoicing speech to casual standard voice.
  • New WordPress page, “casual standard voice”.
  • Several possibilities for long show episodes, shortened episodes, and extracted clips.
  • Reading aloud the 1997 Core Theory article.

I’m using the Shure SM57 microphone, at 4″ distance, with no EQ, with limiter.

Playlist

We’re listening to:

“Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.

Read from Casual Standard Voice, then return here.

“Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.

Read from Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show, then return here.

Main Agenda

In this next segment, the Board of Mystics goes through the esoteric agenda.

Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

OFF AIR

Episode Agenda for the Egodeath Mystery Show <- follow realtime live updates here as the Board of Mystics updates the Esoteric Agenda
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/

Making a Voice Assessment/Revoicing Routine

to make next episode: record half hour start. Play that back, mixing in new mic – pause and revoice.

Not the best approach: making a 3-hour recording, then hearing it the next day and hearing that it was all voiced not very well. Instead, leverage the power of .wav playback in the visual, audio editor app, on a shorter , near-real-time scale.

  1. Do: Record my voice as I type & talk.
  2. Generate half an hour of voice recording
  3. load that into the audio editor app
  4. Play/ pause/ re-record/ re-voice the first voice rec’g, as “layer 2”.
  5. Read-aloud, and talk about, the new, “casual standard voice” page.

This new page has helped a lot! I did a read-aloud of it, came out pretty great:
Casual Standard Voice – combine that page with:

  1. Speak off the cuff, record that.
  2. Play back that recording while generating a new, fresh voice recording.
  3. Pause playback and revoice correctly.
  4. Listen to 2nd recording – it is great, the revoicing that I achieved/produced.

Not sure there’s any point to my doing that exercise over older recordings. My time is better spent on refining / revoicing brand new recordings. Focus on developing my ear, hearing and recogtnizing the great intended voicing result, casual standard voice.

My most recent results fixed many errors, and introduced some new errors (hyper-enunciation).
The Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-07) Plastic Cloud
eg:
11:58 “time stamp 12 minutesh” – not a middle-of-tongue slurring; it’s closer to the tip, almost a whistle, sometimes a whistle.
13:10 “I want to make a shingle mp3″ (I slurred it w/ front of tongue, not middle of tongue)
14:08 “hear the flawsh“

  1. My phase 1 was: slurring and tight honky back of throat and high pitch.
  2. My phase 2 was: hyper enunciation and high too-gentle pitch.
  3. My phase 3 is: Casual Standard Voice

Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

Site Map

Contents:

Warmup Reading Prep

separate each word, pronounce every letter of every word

The whole point and purpose of this warmup reading is to continue enunciating and properly vocalizing in this same way (casual standard voice) through the rest of the show.

After I finish reading this passage, I will continue to vocalize in this same way (casual standard voice) for the rest of the show.

  • exaggerate the bass, treble, and pitch swing
  • pitch swing within the lower half of the spectrum
  • repeat statement, keeping it within the lower half of the spectrum
  • vary speed from fast to medium
  • neutral standard reference tone; no accent, no hyper-enunciation
  • separate each word
  • pronounce every letter of every word

Summary of the Main Article

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death – Summary

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death explains what is revealed in religious revelation and in enlightenment, including the nature of personal control agency.

The essence and origin of religion is the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered state, producing loose binding of cognitive associations. This loose cognitive binding then produces an experience of being controlled by frozen block-universe determinism with a single, pre-existing, ever-existing future.

Experiencing this model of control and time initially destabilizes self-control power, and amounts to the death of the self that was conceived of as an autonomous control-agent. Self-control stability is restored upon transforming one’s mental model to take into account the dependence of personal control on a hidden, separate thought-source, such as Necessity or a divine level that transcends Necessity.

Myth describes this mystic-state experiential insight and transformation. Religious initiation teaches and causes this transformation of the self considered as a control-agent, through a series of visionary-plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial philosophy. Most modern-era religion has been a distortion of this standard initiation system, reducing these concepts to a weak interpretation that is based in the ordinary state of consciousness.

Miscellaneous Sentences

How the Egodeath Mystery Show was started:

My followers are taking something that is the epitome of simple and clear, and then they’re applying their big-brain analysis to it; and quickly, by the time they touch it, they leave it a smoking complicated ruin and wreck, that’s all complicated and broken, and the opposite of what it is.

It is impressive and admirable, the consistent dedication to falsehood which the Exoteric paradigm has.

The Romance of the Fungus World

1924 Rolfe book https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf

Example link: https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf/page/282/mode/2up?q=plaincourault

Book:
The Romance of the Fungus World: An Account of Fungus Life in Its Numerous Guises, Both Real and Legendary
Rolfe (1925)

R. T. Rolfe & F. W. Rolfe.  The Romance of the Fungus World: An Account of Fungus Life in Its Numerous Guises, Both Real and Legendary.  ISBN: 0486231054.  1925 (1974).  Foreword by John Ramsbottom, 1924 <- same year as Manly Hall’s book Secret Teachings of All Ages.

Dover changed to “Imaginary”, orig = “Legendary”
https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf/page/272/mode/1up
https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf/page/n346/mode/1up

Transcription copied on Dec. 31, 2024 from http://egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm#_Toc135889187 —

“A Curious Myth.  

“We may close this chapter with a fitting historical reference to the fungi, relating to a curious myth, connecting them with our reputed ancestors, Adam and Eve.  

This is seen in a fresco in a ruined chapel at Plaincourault, in France, dating back to 1291, and purporting to depict the fall of man.  

A reproduction of this is shown,1 and the Tree of Life* is represented as a branching Amanita muscaria, with the Serpent twining himself in its “branches,” while Eve, having eaten of the forbidden fruit, appears from her attitude to be in some doubt as to its after effects, which it is gratifying to know caused her no serious harm.  

It is impossible to say whether this picture is merely a quaint conception on the part of the artist, or whether it has any better traditional foundation.”

– Rolfe, Romance of the Fungus World, 1925, p. 291, chapter “Some Historical Aspects of Fungi”

1. (1911) Bull. Soc. Mycologique de France, xxvii., p. 31.

“It is impossible to say whether this picture is merely a quaint conception on the part of the artist, or whether it has any better traditional foundation.”

Given mushrooms in Christian art eg pilzbaum, interpreted as psychedelic eternalism including integrated motifs of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs, against Rolfe:

It is possible to say that this picture is not merely a quaint conception on the part of the artist, but has a traditional foundation.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/16/branching-message-mushroom-trees-psychedelic-eternalism-depicted-in-medieval-art-as-branching-mushrooms-handedness-and-non-branching/

My 2006 Wasson article is quite good, not just for this passage. The one gap is that I made it only 99% of the way toward realizing that Wasson’s ellipses(!) in Panofsky’s letter (of two!) MUST be a deleted citation that I was wanting. I did accuse Wasson of seeming to withhold citations, but should have specified: at the ellipses.

*I pointed out in 2006: “The tree would actually be the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, not the tree of life.” I recently (late 2024) saw that someone eg. Ruck wrote that all the trees are interchangeable.

I am glad Dec. 31, 2024 that my 2006 article says:

“The final sentence seems to be asserting that it is unknown whether this portrayal of the Amanita mushrooms in a chapel indicates that Amanita mushrooms were used by those Christians, and that it is unknown whether there is a tradition of portraying Amanita in Christian art. 

The Virtual Ego and the Illusory Aspect of its Control Power

The ego exists, but in a way that is more limited and complex than is usually felt. The Enlightenment conceived of the ego as an autonomous self-steering entity, rather than as a slave or puppet of gods or Fate. The cognitive structures of the semi-illusory ego must be preserved even while discovering that its thoughts and actions originate from the underlying plane, rather than originating from the ego. The ego exists virtually, or in certain limited aspects, the naive concept of ego is distorted, accepting the projected ego image as being as real as the egoic cognitive structures.

The ego-entity exists as a real set of patterns and dynamics, but the ego is not as solid, continuous, or powerful as it seems. The ego is both a set of real patterns, but also a projected, constructed image. In a way, the perceived ego exists, and in a way, it does not. The mind usually projects and constructs a fairly solid and simple image of oneself. Seeing the illusory aspects of this mental representation and feeling the absence of the accustomed sense of personal solidity can be experienced as death, as literal cessation of personal existence, because the naive mind strongly identifies with the projected image and the sense. Mental processing is structured with the conscious ego-representation as the center of control and experiencing. This representation of the ego is a dynamic set of mental constructs. This deceivingly tangible representation of the self or ego is only a part of the ego.

In a dissociative cognitive state, the usual cognitive structures constituting the ego cease, and the projection of the ego image also ceases. Oneself still exists in many ways, such as a body, a brain, a mind, possessions, and a personal past. One genuine aspect of oneself has temporarily ceased to firmly exist: the egoic cognitive processing, which is largely but not entirely suspended. The projection of the self-image is also partly suspended. Insofar as the mind confuses the projected self-image with that part of the self which is genuine, that projected self never existed, other than a perceptual illusion, and so could not cease to exist. If the ego is defined strictly as the natural assumption that the mentally projected self-representation is literally oneself, then it can be said that “the ego is only an illusion”. But such a narrowed definition of “ego” raises the question of what to call the real cognitive structures that reliably project that illusion. The ego is more than just an illusion. It’s a large, complex, and dynamic set of mental processes, of which the deceivingly tangible mental representation is only one part.

The will exerts control power, but this power is virtual rather than literal. There is some control-power, but the normal perception of this power is distorted. The sense of having control power is taken too literally and too simply. Ego structures are refined after enlightenment, not eliminated. Physics cannot provide a legitimate dwelling place for the ego entity, because the ego is largely illusory. Delusion or enlightenment are collective: first there is a uniform interegoic control field, deluded about control agency, then the rational, cybernetics explanation of enlightenment is discovered and communicated. There is a shocking feeling of helplessness upon realizing the insubstantiality of the cross-time ego.

Panofsky’s Letter Censored by Wasson

“The plant in this fresco has nothing whatever to do with mushrooms, and the similarity with Amanita muscaria is purely fortuitous. The Plaincourault fresco is only one example – and, since the style is provincial, a particularly deceptive one – of a conventionalized tree type, prevalent in Romanesque and early Gothic art, which art historians actually refer to as a ‘mushroom tree’ or in German, Pilzbaum.  It comes about by the gradual schematization of the impressionistically rendered Italian pine tree in Roman and early Christian painting, and there are hundreds of instances exemplifying this development – unknown of course to mycologists. … What the mycologists have overlooked is that the medieval artists hardly ever worked from nature but from classical prototypes which in the course of repeated copying became quite unrecognizable.”

– Erwin Panofsky in a 1952 letter to Wasson excerpted in Soma, pp. 179-180

Note the ellipses, where Wasson omitted Panofsky’s recommendation of Brinckmann’s book; Wasson’s book SOMA shows only ellipses here, and Brinckmann’s name doesn’t appear in SOMA.

For clarity, I here break out the restored text as a separate paragraph:

“The plant in this fresco has nothing whatever to do with mushrooms, and the similarity with Amanita muscaria is purely fortuitous. The Plaincourault fresco is only one example – and, since the style is provincial, a particularly deceptive one – of a conventionalized tree type, prevalent in Romanesque and early Gothic art, which art historians actually refer to as a ‘mushroom tree’ or in German, Pilzbaum.  It comes about by the gradual schematization of the impressionistically rendered Italian pine tree in Roman and early Christian painting, and there are hundreds of instances exemplifying this development – unknown of course to mycologists.

If you are interested, I recommend a little book by A. E. Brinckmann, Die Baumdarstellung im Mittelalter (or something like it), where the process is described in detail. Just to show what I mean, I enclose two specimens: a miniature of ca. 990 which shows the inception of the process, viz., the gradual hardening of the pine into a mushroom-like shape, and a glass painting of the thirteenth century, that is to say about a century later than your fresco, which shows an even more emphatic schematization of the mushroom-like crown.

What the mycologists have overlooked is that the medieval artists hardly ever worked from nature but from classical prototypes which in the course of repeated copying became quite unrecognizable.”

– Transcribed from the photograph of Panofsky’s letter in Figure 2 (in Brown’s article): Letter of Erwin Panofsky to R. Gordon Wasson, May 2, 1952. Wasson Archives, Harvard University Herbarium, Cambridge, Mass. Page 145.

Salverte – Occult Sciences, 1846

The aspirants to initiation, and those who came to request prophetic dreams of the Gods, were prepared by a fast, after which they partook of meals expressly prepared; and also of mysterious drinks, such as the Ciceion in the mysteries of the Eleusinia.  Different drugs were easily mixed up with the drinks, according to the state of mind into which it was necessary to throw the recipient, and the nature of the visions he was desirous of procuring.

– Salverte, Occult Sciences, 1846, quoted in Hall, Secret Teachings, 1928, pp. 353-354.

Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky, 1877

Plants also have like mystical properties in a most wonderful degree, and the secret of the herbs of dreams and enchantments are only lost to European science, and useless to say, too, are unknown to it, except in a few marked instances, such as opium and hashish.  Yet, the psychical effects of even these few upon the human system are regarded as evidences of a temporary mental disorder.  The women of Thessaly and Epirus, the female hierophants of the rites of Sabazius, did not carry their secrets away with the downfall of their sanctuaries.  They are still preserved, and those who are aware of the nature of Soma know the properties of other plants as well.  

– Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, 1877, quoted in Hall, Secret Teachings, 1928, p. 353

Motivation of This Page
  • Remove from flow of live broadcast instructions/steps for the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 27

Site Map

Contents:

  • Links
  • Outline
  • Commentary
  • Machine Transcription

Links

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI

Outline

  • The meaning of the word ‘mystic’
  • Precise definition of mystical transformation
  • Setting the bar for attaining mystichood
  • How special are mystics?
  • Idealisation of mystics
  • The relevance of mystics to the egodeath theory
  • Mystics tripping frequently
  • Comparable concepts such as gnostics, hierophants and prophets
  • Verbal communication compared to written communication
  • The relevance of Ramesh Balsekar’s thinking compared to other self-help gurus
  • Fusing the two states of consciousness; joining vs blending
  • Hesychasm as a natural means of accessing the altered state
  • The incompatibility between Jimmy’s book knowledge and his experiential knowledge

Commentary

  • The word ‘gnostic’ is recently controverted. April D. DeConick defends its use, in her book The Gnostic New Age. Reclaiming and redefining it better.
  • Like Max said here, I too have a tepid idea about the usefulness of the term ‘mystics’, it’s kind of a joke, not a respected concept to me.
  • ~”none of them impress me that much. … What’s impressive [re: brands of mysticism] when you’ve got the Egodeath theory ? … Ramesh weak compared to.” 24:44 quotable
    24*60 + 44 = 1484s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI&t=1484s
  • “jimmy is a mega advanced mystic” ~29:00 “but i don’t like the concept of ‘mystic’”
  • he wants something more than, perhaps, a panic-stricken psychotic trip to Hell” ~47:29 todo: audio clip.
    47*60+29 = 2849s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI&t=2849s
    • That gives me an idea for a new marketing/branding plan:
      the Egodeath theory = a panic-stricken psychotic trip to Hell

Machine Transcription

hello and welcome to transcendent knowledge podcast episode number 27. now this episode is subtitled the mystic episode this episode is going to be a solo podcast with just myself max freakout experimenting with a new podcasting format going to see how this goes so the last episode of the podcast was a three-way conversation between myself cyber disciple and jimmy and it generated a large amount of discussion and analysis and also controversy and even about the fundamental issue of whether or not it is even appropriate for me to have jimmy as a guest on the podcast given his whole disorganized conversational style and also his disorganized and incomplete understanding of the ego death theory so with this episode i wanted to carefully respond to what came up in the time since episode 26 came out and i also wanted to clarify my own point of view point of view on the various issues which i think is much needed at this point so in particular i need to fully explain why i said several times that we are not mystics and that the ego death theory is not relevant to mystics or it doesn’t address mystics because during the conversation with jimmy and cyber i never really said what i personally think because i was purely split between either paraphrasing the ego death theory or else paraphrasing jimmy kind of saying stuff back to him what i understood him to be saying or implying but maybe the recording didn’t go exactly according to plan i didn’t keep it focused enough i failed in that endeavor because before we did the recording i had planned to try to make the conversation focus very specifically on the topic of determinism so that we could clear up some specific misconceptions about the ego death theory in jimmy’s understanding but so i didn’t exactly succeed in that name because jimmy does have an exceptional ability to throw curveballs into the conversation so we ended up talking about some topics that i hadn’t planned at all and indeed i hadn’t even really ever thought much about a lot of the issues that that we talked about during that episode

so it mostly centers around the meaning of the word mystic and the connotations of that word it was maybe the the point when the podcast was thrown off track in terms of what i had planned for it was the moment when the word mystics reared large in in the conversation so i want to state absolutely precisely what i think about the word mystic and about the definition of the word mystic as well well so first of all the basic point of grammar is that the word mystic has two forms it can either be an adjective or a noun and the ego death theory already contains a very clear robust definition of the word mystic in the adjective form as in the the phrase mystic altered state which appears all over the ego death theory

so when you’re just considering the adjective form of the word mystic it very straightforwardly just means the same as loose cognitive but i think something about in the specific etymology of the words is to do with the two-stage dynamic of first secret and then revealed

however the ego death theory does not have a corresponding definition of the word mystic in the noun form unless i’ve missed it i think this now this kind of recent discussion this is the first time that this has come up as a big issue in addition to jimmy saying explicitly like i think that the ego death theory should cover mystics to to a greater extent so the real problematic issue here is about the meaning of the noun form of the word mystic plural mystics which is shorthand for a mystic person so it’s like you’ve got these two definitions these two grammatical forms where the adjective form refers to a state of consciousness and at least partially it describes that state of consciousness so it picks out a certain crucial feature of the the altered state of consciousness this hidden and then revealed aspect but the noun form of the word mystic refers to a person either to a type of person or else to a specific person and it doesn’t really describe that person it merely designates them it’s a sign as opposed to a symbol

so my basic position about the noun form of the word mystic is that i am skeptical that it’s useful or helpful or meaningful as a concept and furthermore i suspect that it might simply amount to a kind of modern era mistake or a misreading of religious mysticism and what that’s all about so in other words i’m saying the word mystic makes perfect sense it’s easy to define when it’s an adjective describing the altered state of consciousness but it makes far less sense it becomes ambiguous and perhaps even misleads and distorts understanding when it’s used as a noun as in designating a person a mystic person

and i think um if i remember correctly some some writer it might have been elaine pagels made a very similar point about uh about the word gnostic in one of her books might have been um the gnostic gospels she said something like it’s not an accurate concept uh gnostic that is it it’s not a natural kind or it’s not an accurate sociological kind it’s more like a modern misunderstanding projected onto a past era so the people themselves the people who modern people refer to as gnostics wouldn’t have wouldn’t have seen themselves that way so it’s an anachronistic understanding of what agnostic is and also exactly in line with the ego death theory you can make this this kind of point about jesus does jesus refer to a person or does jesus refer to the altered state or does jesus refer to something else like um astrological symbolism or some some other theory so the attitude of the ego death theory is something like jesus as a historical person is essentially a modern era mistake uh the mistaken assumption of historicism and the ego death theory then clarifies that jesus is properly or esoterically interpreted as an altered state or at least a meta metaphorical arrow pointing to the altered state so the claim i’m making here uh is i basically i suspect that something similar to this is the case when when we consider the noun form of the word mystic it’s like perhaps it’s a distorted exoteric inaccuracy to interpret the word mystic as referring to a person

and also just with the definition itself the category of mystic the way i see it could be as arbitrarily broad or narrow as you choose to define it so it could mean any person who has ever taken acid and tripped becomes a mystic or you could narrow the definition uh it could only be people who have been through the the classic initiation progression culminating in ego death maybe those are the the mystics or it could mean only people who know about the ego death theory so it’s a question of how high do you set the bar for attaining mystic hood and it’s arbitrary and the dictionary definitions are completely inadequate for clarifying this matter they don’t tell you that they don’t even uh incorporate and integrate the information from the ego death theory to be able to think of mystic hood in this way

and it and also like jimmy was playing this exact same definitional game that’s a large part of what he was saying was attempting to set a bar for being a mystic for attaining mystic hood and i think one one issue that came up in if you combine transcendent knowledge podcast episode 26 with all of the discussion that came after it was one clear indicator of how fuzzily defined the word the noun form of the word mystic it’s because there were so many different qualifiers that got added on to that word without really even commenting on on the qualifiers all that much so for example during that conversation we hear about great mystics and professional mystics shamanistic mystics dictionary defined mystics aspiring mystics and so on so all these different qualifiers which are going to subtly change the the meaning of what we’re talking about and also looking at the various dictionary definitions they’re they’re mostly quite vague and imprecise uh in the sense that you can clearly make all of them basically can be made more precise by integrating the information from the ego death theory which none of them have done so so for example there was one one definition that i saw in the merriam-webster dictionary which defined mystic as a follower of a mystical way of life or an advocate of a theory of mysticism and it strikes me both of those are quite vague and both of them stand to be corrected by the ego death theory to say a follower of a mystical way of life needs to be clarified precisely in terms of what changes in a in a person’s daily conduct before and after psychedelic initiation um and to say the second definition they’re an advocate of a theory of mysticism well that’s you can straightforwardly just just just say an advocate of the ego death theory perhaps i mean are there other forms are there other theories of mysticism that you know would also compete for that title of turning a person into a mystic but anyway having said that i would also say that any definition of what a mystic person is would surely have to include people like me uh and jimmy and michael hoffman and cyber disciple you know us like altered state explorers and thinkers to have any any real meaning if i mean it’s like if if we are not mystics in this world then nobody is i mean like that’s crazy to think of what you would have to do if if if we didn’t fit the bill so jimmy said twice that he thinks he’s an aspiring mystic and i take that to mean like like not really a mystic especially in the way that he couched it of like oh you know i i should trip more often to be to be like the mystics were you know he wasn’t including himself in the in the group known as mystics by calling himself an aspiring mystic but you know i would i would be more inclined to say no he’s not aspiring he’s a highly advanced mystic because well two reasons first of all because of his personal experience he’s had really hardcore bad trip on mushrooms which is such a central part of of understanding mysticism understanding religious metaphor but also because because of the fact that he’s engaging in this dialogue he’s coming on the transcendent knowledge podcast and even though he might not be fully able and and you know as as competent with understanding the theory of some other people that have been on the podcast at least he’s engaging in a dialogue at least he’s not just ignoring it and or turning the other way like not wanting to engage with it at all so he’s actually you know he’s he’s an advanced mystic uh he just doesn’t think of himself that way but so to be absolutely clear that’s my opinion that’s what i think personally which i explicitly avoided saying during episode 26 of the podcast because it’s too it’s too complicated and nuanced and it was completely not relevant to what i was trying to achieve with with jimmy which is to have a a a conversation about the intricacies of the concept of determinism and we we’d gone off course by that point uh so yeah that’s that’s how i understand mystical like a fairly you know unhelpful concept i think i have a tepid opinion about about the word mystic in the noun form of the word so i need to explain very carefully why i said and why i repeated several times the claim that we are not mystics

so it’s crucial to understand the context of that claim in light of the conversational dynamics that i was immersed in at the time rather than just isolating that claim we are not mystics you know to do that is to take it out of context it was a highly unusual highly specific context that i was saying that in uh because i i as i said i i planned that conversation to be very specifically just about the com the the concept of determinism just to clear up what i a crucial place where jimmy seemed to be getting the ego death theory wrong but at the same time i knew from experience i know from a lot of uh dialogues that i’ve had with jimmy that it is difficult typically to pin him down um to keep a conversation focused on a specific topic and to get him to come to a specific concrete conclusion about any particular topic it’s it’s a challenge and it’s something that i’ve tried to do a lot in the past and been met with a lot of frustration when i’ve been doing it so i was very much in the mental mode of i must just keep this conversation on track keep bringing it back to the core focus this time i’m i’m going to succeed with jimmy like i have to achieve what i failed to do last time so i was really psyched up to lock horns with jimmy and try to keep his mind focused and just have a productive conversation that actually goes somewhere you know goes towards further clarification and no longer repeating errors misunderstandings um but then so the conversation was progressing and then at some point it occurred to me that jimmy was talking about a concept that he had constructed in his own head and he was he was uniquely defining this thing which he was calling mystics sometimes he said shamans i think once or twice he used the word shamans to mean more or less the same thing but mostly he was saying mystics and he was explicitly defining this this concept is a group of people there’s various things that he said about mystics various characteristics that he picked out in his his idea his idealization of of what mystics are he said things like they were from a bygone era he said they don’t really exist in the modern world and he said that he didn’t say maybe but he implied that they’re holier than we are they’re more special than we are because they have better ethical conduct for example um like we were talking about jainism at one point where they’re known for being you know highly you know morally um conscious on the on a day-to-day level um and also he said not just not just better ethical conduct but that they trip more often he he said that they were frequenting the altered state and that he doesn’t see anybody in the modern world including himself frequenting the the altered state like these ancient mystics uh were um and he said that these mystics they lived in like secluded temples in the forest in some places and also he said mystics can sometimes uh access the psychedelic state by natural means like hazy chasm he didn’t go into much detail about hazy chasm i looked it up afterwards it’s like uh the christian concept of contemplation like um basically probably something like sitting around meditating probably but he didn’t really define that he just said yeah they go into the psychedelic state by natural means they don’t need to take drugs those are all things that jimmy said more or less explicitly during that conversation in episode 26 um about what mystics are like that was his concept of a mystic so he was setting his own bar for the level of specialness that mystics have he was suggesting his own definition of what mystics are and generally at least like i strongly got the impression that he was defining mystics in such a way that uh it’s like he wanted to push them out of reach of us make them more special or better like he was striving to just define mystics as a special class of people somehow above everybody else different from everybody else and yet crucially he was including himself in the set of non-mystics he wasn’t claiming to be a mystic uh like aspiring mystic to me means failing to attain mystical and he said that he himself didn’t he didn’t trip often enough uh he was even if it was like he was lamenting himself and not tripping often enough to be a proper mystic he felt guilty about it because he said he does it once a year

so so i explained like how i personally i think that the concept of the noun form of mystic in general is poorly defined i think that’s that’s a broad overall opinion that i have it’s not a concept that i would normally use myself i wouldn’t bring a concept like that into a conversation it was it was very much prompted strongly prompted by jimmy to even start talking about mystics in this way and so then like it’s like so i i start out by thinking uh without really thinking about it very much i just have this general feeling that the word mystic is poorly defined and not very useful and then jimmy is saying all these things about um mystics in the forest and mystics who uh have really good ethical conduct don’t kill insects uh that kind of thing and at that point i got the feeling that he was basically pushing the concept of mystic even further into the the realms of feeble definition than they already are

i mean i think that probably inevitably a big part of this is simply the fact that the nature of verbal communication compared to written communication it’s a completely different thing like in in a written conversation like on a web forum or email exchange it would be so much easier to explicitly spell out the respective definitions of the word mystic you know the the truly philosophical approach to a you know breaking down a discussion like this but given like you have to understand this was a spontaneous unscripted verbal conversation and furthermore like it was a conversation with jimmy like of all people like this very particular type of person with a very particular style of communicating you know michael hoffman was talking about um adhd attention deficit um asperger’s um to characterize you know this this way of communicating

so it’s like whenever i’m talking with jimmy like what’s going on in my head is you know if i’m the one that’s doing the talking at the time like okay i’ve maybe got a few more seconds to make a point to say something and then jimmy is going to start talking again and he’s gonna come up with some other tangent you know plucked out of some place he’ll say something like i don’t know if you’ve heard of this person i don’t know if you’ve heard of this idea and then i have to listen to him say talk about this and figure out how to integrate it into the theme of the conversation and it’s almost inevitably going to be some trites predictable pop spiritualism you know making the same kind of predictable familiar mistakes when compared alongside the ego death theory and what they’re trying to explain spiritual issues uh nothing really impressive um he doesn’t he’s like he impresses me with the breadth of his his book knowledge like it’s impressive that he’s he’s got a good bibliography attached to to him to his message but none of the individual writers impressed me that much like like what’s impressive when you’ve got the ego death theory you know ramesh bolsakar is feeble compared to the ego death theory in terms of you know the depth of the explanation and so so the conversation with jimmy is just not a particularly organized situation on the contrary it’s chaotic and disorganized you know to have that like hour and a half period of engaging in in verbal dialogue with this guy it’s like i want him to be a part of the conversation because like the alternative approach would be to just say to him okay jimmy sit down shut your mouth and i’m going to lecture you about the ego death theory talk to me at the end ask questions at the end but it’s it’s that’s not the way i’m doing it that’s not what not the way i do things you know i’m hoping that his comprehension will gradually just kind of come about um over time via like this back and forth communication so i give i give him all the space that he needs to spell out what he wants to talk about but i’m always trying to link it back to to the the core concept of the ego death theory i mean that’s one thing about jimmy that did impress me is like sure he’s kind of all over the place with his citations of different writers but i like the way that he um really gives so much attention to ramesh balsa car like he’s got an instinct about that at least that ramesh balsa carl probably one of the most um like explicitly relevant writers uh in in the the domain of pop spiritualism for the ego death theory like in like given that basically ramesh bolsikar’s whole presentation was a self-help guru um and if you take all the self-help gurus and then measure them up you know for the criteria of um relevance uh applicability to the ego death theory like so he’s you know he jimmy jimmy has focused on ramesh bolsikar um because he recognizes i i hope he does the had the closeness of the the model uh so yeah i mean written communication is just so much more organized than verbal communication because it allows for the possibility of re-reading um when you write a comment you can like go over it and i always do this when i’m when i’m engaging in written discussions on like by emails or um web forums like i don’t i will edit and re-edit and keep reading and refining um the way that i write something but it’s completely different in verbal communication because you just you know as soon as as soon as a comment a sentence has left your mouth that’s it you can’t go back and and change it so invariably the you know the quality of the communication is going to be sub-optimal compared to written anyway um so jimmy mentioned being an aspiring mystic he said that three times in total over the course of the the episode so one time he said i am an aspiring mystic so it’s like he was in some way he was characterizing his relationship with with mystics um but then a second time he said like hey remember that i am an aspiring mystic he was like putting that issue back into the the conversation like but then on a third okay a separate occasion i don’t know if it was before or after he said he actually contradicted himself on that point and he said if i was an aspiring mystic i would trip more often than once a year so that implies that he’s not even an aspiring mystic let alone an actual mystic so in other words uh jimmy stated three times the logical equivalent of i am not a mystic um but you know that that contrasts with like what i said a minute ago that the way i see jimmy personally in my opinion um is like if someone put a gun to my head and insisted on pain of death that i have to answer the question is jimmy a mystic i would say well yeah that’s a no-brainer of course he’s a he’s a mega advanced mystic even though he doesn’t think he is from my point of view he’s a mega advanced mystic he’s quite close to the cutting edge like the the growing tip of of mysticism which is the ego death theory but but of course in any normal situation i would never do that because i don’t like the concept of mystic in the noun form it’s a sub-optimal concept i never use that concept naturally you know of my own volition because i just i don’t really agree with the whole edifice the whole network of associations of using the word mystic to refer to a person instead of a state of consciousness so i think that that definition of mystic it’s it’s like a suspicion like i suspect that it’s grounded in modern era distortion concerning what mysticism is really all about i mean it’s like i think there’s a question that comes up here is who exactly gets to do the etymology in cases like this like who’s on whose authority do we take the etymology do we leave the etymology up to the kind of people that write the dictionaries who don’t incorporate the ego death theory and who knows if if they themselves are psychedelic initiates or not um but they they don’t explicitly incorporate uh the concepts of psychedelic initiation into their dictionary definitions of the word mystic um or or can we trust ourselves as as psychedelic initiates as advanced initiates who know about the ego death theory can we decide ourselves so michael hoffman has talked about this issue in regard to the the etymology of the word baccalaureate and whether it relates to bacchus and laurel um and he asked the same question like who who do we leave it up to who is the correct authority in etymology for these you know very central relevant concepts um like like like like the meaning of mystic the meaning of what a laurel represents that kind of thing

so so like i get to this point in the conversation with jimmy in episode 26 where i suddenly realized that he’s doing he’s doing this he’s talking about mystics in this way like it’s like i felt that he had succeeded in throwing the conversation off track away from determinism and into irrelevance like like concepts about mystics that i don’t even agree with that i’ve never even thought about when i still hadn’t achieved my goal of pinning him down on a clear understanding of the way that determinism is relevant to or the way that it applies to the ego death theory and so i said emphatically like several times i said we are not mystics and like when i said that i was basically paraphrasing jimmy i wasn’t expressing my own opinion i was repeating back to jimmy what i understood him to be saying that we are not mystic so he was saying that he isn’t mystic and then i guess uh i guess to establish kinship with him like put myself at the same in the same bracket maybe i i don’t know um what was going through my head exactly at that point but according to his definition of what a mystic is as i understood him to be said these ancient uh forest dwelling people who trip very regularly by natural means etc this idealized concept of a mystic who’s basically better than us above us more holy than than we are uh but that’s not that’s not what i think at all um my opinion on the question of is jimmy a mystic or am i a mystic is far more nuanced than a simple binary yes or no answer we are mystics we are not mystics and i i’ve never thought about it in this much depth and like spelled it out in this much depth because it had never mattered to me that much like

so i think that my strategy in the conversation at that point saying uh i am not no we are not mystics i think what i was really saying is like something along the lines of jimmy i don’t want to talk about your artificial conception of what mystics are please stop talking about mystics they are irrelevant to this conversation let’s go back to talking about determinism like i have planned to

uh another thing that i said which i need to carefully address here um saying that the ego death theory is not relevant to mystics and i think when i said that specific comment i was uh somehow tacitly using the same kind of definition of mystic which belongs only to jimmy you know this um this idealized way of like special forest dwelling people who who trip very often that set of associations that jimmy was using um it’s like the the the kind of definition of mystic that pushes them away artificially from the scope of the ego death theory um you know for example just to explain this like as i see it irrelevance between lack of relevance between the ego death theory and jimmy’s conception of a mystic it’s like the ego death theory contains no account of the psychological effect of tripping very frequently which is distinct from its account of the psychological effect of the standard initiation sequence which culminates in mystical ego death death and rebirth experience um the ego death theory doesn’t explicitly um distinguish that from what jimmy mentioned about like mystics tripping frequently as like almost a daily thing because because you know the standard initiation sequence it’s like michael hoffman has clearly spelled that out it’s it just requires a small handful of psychedelic sessions it’s not about some some unknown number done very very frequently as like a a major life practice it’s a circumscribed thing psychedelic initiation it takes a finite amount of time to it has a beginning a middle and a and a completion to it which didn’t sound like like what jimmy was describing at all so no i could clarify then i suppose what i exactly meant i think that mystics are as irrelevant to the ego death theory as jimmy’s sense of frequenting the psychedelic state of consciousness is irrelevant to the ego death theory given that the ego death theory is about this um this progression this psychological progression that happens during a finite number of sessions and similarly the ego death theory contains a completely different model of the meaning of the transformation in morality the transformation in moral consciousness which accompanies psychedelic initiation which actually denies the kind of egoic free will based idea of moral transformation that jimmy was talking about so he he said he gave the specific example of he found it harder to kill insects since his psychedelic tripping experience so that’s that’s an egoic style of um modeling morality and and modeling the transformation immorality whereas the ego death theory has this much deeper issue of this much deeper way of describing it as like there’s whether you kill insects or not according to the ego death theory any actor killing an insect or or refraining from killing an insect or whatever is eternally contained within the four-dimensional crystalline block universe the the pre-existing future and so god the sculptor of the block is ultimately responsible for all acts whether they are good or evil in the conventional egoic sense of of morality but again in in my own personal opinion which i did not express on the last podcast i think that the ego death theory is relevant to mystics but to mystics who are defined differently you know it does it so it may be irrelevant to jimmy’s definition of mystics but it’s relevant to a different definition of mystics and and then to to further flesh that out i would say that the optimal definition of what a mystic is which would then bring mystics within the explanatory scope of the ego death theory is probably going to be some combination of the various dictionary definitions of the word from the various dictionaries but then additionally upgraded or clarified by the information which the ego death theory reveals so you need to look at the dictionary definitions with the ego death theory in mind and then come up with a new

combination like a a new absolutely airtight version of uh how to define mystic which takes the ego ditherian into consideration

um but but then when you think about that that’s like a blatant tautology it’s circular logic because what you’re saying is the ego death theory is relevant to the ego death theory’s own inferred definition of what a mystic is as opposed to jimmy’s irrelevant definition of what a mystic is but there’s so many other um words and phrases that we can use to try to define what exactly we are like our small group who are actually engaged in in this uh this conversation so it’s like are we mystics are we gnostics are we shamans are we hierophants are we wise men are we shepherds are we god’s chosen elect etc and and many others um you know shorthand words for psychedelic initiate

so i mean personally my preferred my my favorite word which i prefer to think in terms of in trying to conceptualize my role michael hoffman’s role you know where we fit in in the work in the world is the word profit i think that’s a much more powerful term much more directly relevant to the ego death theory than mystic because it contains this um this implicit part of the etymology is like seeing the future as the reference to the pre-existence of the future is built into the word prophet and also it contains a connotation of rarity and alienation from non-profits so i mean in that regard i’d be fascinated to hear jimmy comment on whether or not he’s an aspiring prophet or who does he can consider to be prophets does he think that ramesh bolsika for instance is a prophet

so another issue that came up um with the whole concept of fusing the the two states of consciousness uh that was michael’s word that like michael was the one who brought that into the the the discussion um the way i said it in the last podcast it was something like collapsing the distinction between the two states of consciousness so the way i see it the way i understand the ego death theory it’s like in some sense the two states are as a matter of fact fused or they become fused in some sense at the point of ego death but in a different sense of being fused a different sense of what it means to be fused the two states of consciousness are not fused so again it’s not a binary straightforward issue of fused or not fused like there’s a semantic challenge here to define the sense in which the two states of consciousness are fused and the sense in which the two states of consciousness are not fused so it’s an ambiguity in the meaning of the word fuse because fuse can mean blend or it can also mean like like blend as in mix but it can also mean join or or fix like join together fix together so i think that the best way of saying it the two states of consciousness are joined but they’re not blended so they’re fused in the sense of joined but they’re not fused in the sense of blended they don’t become one but they do become attached to each other it’s like this is in line with the ego their theory like the two states are joined because they are contiguous with each other you go from the ordinary state into the altered state and then back again but the memory of each state is present in the other state so you can remember the ordinary state when you are tripping and you can remember what it’s like to trip when you’re back in the ordinary state it’s like a yin yang symbol with like that’s that’s the the shape of the join between the two states of consciousness

so i think the way that jimmy was defining the way that the mystics access the altered state of consciousness suggested to me a blending to some extent of the two states as opposed to mere joining jimmy was was veering in the direction of blending so for example he talked about mystics tripping frequently he didn’t i don’t think he spelled out exactly how frequently he had in mind but that that suggested to me like a blending of the altered state of consciousness into ordinary life to make it part of daily routine instead of a special thing set apart in circumscribed trip sessions and similarly he was talking about like he thinks that mystics use natural means like hazy chasm to access the altered state without taking drugs and that also suggests to me a kind of blending i mean so okay so maybe he’s not precisely defining it that way but it’s like i get the impression that’s what he’s that’s what he’s pushing towards that’s something like what he has in mind i mean so maybe i’m i’m stretching jimmy to make jimmy fit into the concept of blending of the two states of consciousness but i think it’s more general than that it’s a like a general i’m trying to understand jimmy’s whole mindset and i don’t i suppose the way i see it it’s like he’s got two competing forces in his head i think that’s a good way of understanding what’s going on with him um his book knowledge and his experiential knowledge compete and so he does understand the distinction between the two states of consciousness but at the same time he strives to blur that distinction

i think i get the impression that maybe jimmy is disappointed by enlightenment he’s expecting something more than deterministic non-control he wants something more blissful perhaps than a panic-stricken psychotic trip to hell and he’s seeing that blissful thing in the pop spirituality books that he’s reading because those those books like uh ken wilbur and ramesh balsa car people like that they’re so typically they’re based at most in the premature beginner stage um of the the non-dual style of thinking and then mistaking that for advanced enlightenment and ego death you know against his own personal experience of the altered state so he he did actually express explicit disagreement with michael’s characterization of non-dual experience as beginner’s level um he wants that non-dual blissful thing he wants to elevate that to the advanced level enlightenment so that’s why he comes up with this idealistic concept of a mystic for whom the distinction between the two states is different to how the ego death theory describes it

and and then because the ego death theory is for ordinary people it doesn’t apply to mystics in in that regard

so i think i’m going to leave it there for this episode but i think the next thing that should happen maybe is another trialog with jimmy um so we will see how that goes so until next time

Egodeath Mystery Show

Site Map

Contents:

Finding Episodes

See the latest idea development page:
Site Map: Idea Development
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#idea-development
Find: mp3

Agenda Items for Working on the Show-Format

Segments Design
  • Making a show-format that is simple, repeatable, and flexible.
    • There is a spectrum of #keystrokes to begin recording a show, based on where are agenda items maintained (for Show Format, Voice/Mic, the egodeath theory).
  • Specify duration of segments. 6 / 2 hours 120 min / 6 segments = 20.
  • Do a basic show to practice walking through the show format with timed segments.
  • Fewer Segments, More Focus on Egodeath Theory topical segments, more room for music while doing work-items (typing).
Gear
  • Hook up the Big Mixer?

Template for Episodes & Announcement of Download

Motivation of Creating the Page: Reduce the number of keystrokes total, from “I’m going to do a show”, to “Announced at idea development page”.

Show Prep

  1. Copy template from
    Episode Template for Egodeath Mystery Show
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/28/episode-template-for-egodeath-mystery-show/, paste into latest Idea Development page, fill-in there.
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

New Format Concepts

State the “header” every half hour: content, voicing, date/time, miking.

repeat idea, not repeat phrase. repeat with: low pitch, fun tone, casual wording.

Names of the Show

  • The Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk
  • The Egodeath Show, with Cybermonk
  • The Egodeath Mystery Show
  • The Egodeath Show

What 1987 me thinks about these show names:

  • It’s a mystery to me.
  • It’s a strange loop.
  • It does nothing but raise questions.

Content Sources to Read From

  • the Egodeath.com site
  • My WordPress site
  • the Egodeath Yahoo Group (site)
  • Cyberdisciple’s site
  • Email
  • my personal library
  • my recordings
  • Amazon
  • Academia.edu
  • Archive.org
  • YouTube

Show Format: Independent Voice Recordings or Voice Takes

  • clips roll-up episode
  • “full” version of an episode
  • “core” version of an episode
  • standalone clip (no header??)
  • proto-show format, with “header” stating 2 content points, 2 vocalzn points, 2 technical points
  • standalone voice recording (similar to standalone clip).

First versions of the Egodeath Mystery Show were one-off DR-05 voice recordings, literally was no concept of “the Egodeath Mystery Show”, but they are branded afterwards that way.

Describe these voice recording files as date-named episodes/ instances/ manifestations/ components of the Egodeath Mystery Show, though no show intro/outro/framing within the mp3. I already dubbed the first, voice recg files later as the Egodeath Mystery Show. “the Egodeath Mystery Show is not a format, but a Mystery.

IT’S NOT ARBITRARY CHAOS – IT’S A *MYSTERY*. IT JUST *LOOKS* LIKE ARBITRARY CHAOS.

Complex Intro Segment Settings Procedure

Initial settings, for canned Intro segment:
1. Music player: track at 0:00. vol 40%. main vol 80%.
2. Mixer deck: arm Rec.
3. Mic deck: Not Rec mod. Select track 2222, Single mode, at 0:00.
4. uMixer: Turn down mic (Ch 1 Gain).
5. Turn down eq level to -10.5 dB for canned announcement from Deck 1.
6. Turn Delay’s FX Level to 1:30 for canned announcement.
___________
1. Press Record on Mixer Deck.
2. Press Play on keyboard to start music.
3. Press Play on Mic Deck to trigger announcement.
4. Ride mixer’s Line level from Noon to 10:30 during announcement.
Return to normal settings, for Mic intro segment:
5. … Turn up eq level to 0 dB for mic signal from Deck 1.
6. … Turn Delay’s FX Level to None.
7. … uMixer: Turn up mic (Ch 1 Gain) to Noon.

Sets of Recordings

  1. Create direct mic recordings.
  2. Process & mix the direct mic recordings.

57’s proximity bass boost complements the bright speakers of mobile devices.

Create lots of voice recordings like orig Classic-era Egodeath Mystery Show before the Mystery was revealed. (but hold the angry midget pls) NO RULES except must be Professional Reference VO; 100% conscious mindfulness of vocalization 100% of the time. No forgetting. THE OPEN BINDER PAGES OF APRIL 1987.

Show Format Version 2: freeform but keep log. delete all structure; ROLLING STRUCTURE. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER, AND RESUME THE NORMAL FLOW, PERPETUAL ROLLING MEETING, TAKING NOTES, CHOPPING REUSL T INTO ARB HARD-CUT 2-HOUR PIECES (AT NEAREST SEGMENT BREAK) – WHICH EVER SEGEMENT TOPIC CHANGE IS BEOFE FORE THE 2:00. HARD-CUT EPISODES AT THE CLOSEST TOPIC BREAK LESS THAAN 2:00:00.

*MUCH* more freeform, get rid of concept of “start” of “show” and “end” of “show”. It’s an on-going thing, no start or stop. GOT TO ELIM OVERHEAD. TOO HEAVY STRUCTURE. lightweight! just only work on logging. ZERO OVERHEAD *NOW*! BUT, DO LOGGING only – nothing else!! put all focus on loggin instead of any other overhead.

Misc

todo: clip “My followers…”, pitch it down, play it in the show– wav file:
It’s the start of a track in “2-Level Egodeath Model.aup”
see also:
The Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-01-20) 2-Level Egodeath Model

Purpose and Rules

  • The “2 hour limit” must *never* impede producing hours of copious solid content – when on a roll, keep on a roll. new major rule for the show. never let it break the momentum.
    • Use 2-part episode.
      • mp3 #1 has intro, voc’zn, topical segment 1
      • mp3 #2 (part 2 of ep) has topical segmenet 2, 3, 4, & Outro.

Prep Agenda and Audio Project File

Note: always delete bad takes immediately when possible; *must* save space and reduce noise on drives.

Mic Closet

TASCAM – DR-05 stereo field recorder, R or L – omni, small dia cond. Handheld, or desk stand clip mount. No pop filter needed.

Shure – SM57 – cardioid dynamic. 4″ gives not too much bass boost proximity effect, and enables more on-axis without pop filter required, such as 30 degrees.

CAD – M39 – servo large dia cond – standard LDC tone. quiet except when whine decides to manifest; unreliable re: whine. Remarkably same curve as SM57. Variable polar pattern.

Phone bottom mic – hi-fi, omni, probably comparable response to DR-05.

earbud mic, usually dangling. Were I to do lifted (thus using an arm), I’d instead Pause, unplug earbuds, resume recording, then use bottom mic instead of earbud mic. up-ramp response. Used for some Morning Vocal Warmup recordings.

Computer built-in mic – 12″ distance, usually, to see the screen

CAD – M100 – servo large dia cond. Supercardioid (so, dark). Equivalent EQ to e609.

Sennheiser – e609 – less treble than e906; midrangy.

Recording Log

Types of Recording-Files to Track

  • .wav tracking files
  • .mp3 delivered files
  • .m4a tracking files
  • .aup audio project files

Info needed about a recording-file:

  • what miking (mic, position, eq)
  • description of content / topic
  • stereo/mono
  • date (auto-included in some cases, both in filename & timestamp)

Miking Approaches

  1. hand-held, all-in-one recorder <- first voice recordings of 2021
  2. mic-stand-mounted, all-in-one recorder <- this episode
  3. separate mic, preamp, recorder <- first used for Feb 2 reading of M Hoffman article https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#Egodeath-Show-2021-02-02b
  4. separate mic, preamp, mixer, multiple sound sources, recorder(s)
  5. separate mic, preamp, mic-recorder, mixer, multiple sound sources, mixer-recorder

Types of Voice Recordings

1-5 minute voice notes made in isolation. Nice to state which mic.

core version of Egodeath Mystery Show episode – omit non-core segments/passages; keep intro/outro

master tape of an episode – playing freeform exploring

handy to have existing outline of timestamp.

voice recording with structured header

An intermediate type of voice recording that’s becoming an episode, is when I started adding a structured header to voice recordings. eg Jan 26b opens by defining what the structure of a recording header will be:

  • 2 points about the content plan
  • 2 points about vocalization
  • 2 points about technical

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Voice-Recording-2-for-Jan-26

clips (or voice recordings) rollup episode

a special type of new episode – intro, clips from multiple previous older episodes, outro.

full episode

full version of Egodeath Mystery Show episode

full episode – intro, prelim/warmup segments, topical segments, outro. A normal, sprawling episode like (in spirit at least) a 4-hour episode.

core episode

Contains an intro, the main egodeath core theory topical clips from that episode, and an outro. 1-hour or at most, a 2-hour condensation of a 4-hour sprawling, “full” episode.

voice recording without header

“2021-02-06b Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.mp3” at 1:23:00 says “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” is the first episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show ”, but actually, that’s a “voice recording without a header”.
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Voice-Recording-1-2021-01-20
“2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” lacks intro or header, lacks outro, and lacks a miking statement. Therefore it’s a (standalone-created) voice recording, not an episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show.

A “voice recording” (without header) can be included within any episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show.

article-reading voice recording with header

Has a header. It’s not framed as an episode.

clip

Can contain only talking.

A new, standalone “voice recording” – with or without a structured recording header – is equivalent to a clip.

An extracted clip taken from longer context in which the clip was created. eg a portion of quietly reading Hanegraaff’s 2021 article Entheogenic Esotericism over the song I Robot, with effects.

A new standalone voice recording without a header is the same thing — derived/ generated in a different context — as an extracted voice-only clip.

A clip could be stereo and have music or previous voice-generation mixed.

A clip has no “show” wrapper/intro/outro.

A clip can be included within any episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show.
eg the 5-minute “Eleusis” piece

standalone mic voice recording

eg “Veil metaphor CAD M39.mp3”

mono

reamped standalone mic voice recording

eg “Veil metaphor CAD M39 fx.mp3”

stereo

Re-construction of the “Review of Vocalization” Section Feb. 15, 2021

Frozen Backup; Legacy; Do Not Change: Feb 15 2021 snapshot of Review of Vocalization

Legacy Vocalization Section, February 15, 2021; Preserve As-Is.

Vintage Golden-Era Traditional High-Point Copy / Reconstruction of This Section Just Before I Moved It To the Ambitious New Page “Voice & Mic Techniques” (but note it was *constantly* changing)

The following was from the final read-alouds of this section/segment in episodes of the Egodeath Mystery Show, just on the cusp of creating the page “Voice & Mic Technique”, where I moved these items out to become, mostly, the section “Standard Voice Practice” in that new page.

Review of Vocalization

This is the start of the Vocalization Review segment.

Special Focus for Vocalizing in This [2021-02-15a/b/c] Episode
  • Open the back-of-mouth chambers and top of throat.
    • Exercises. Pull up and back. Experiment from tight to pressed open and upward.
  • Push pitch down consistently, continuously.
    • Pitch Grounding technique while off-the-cuff speaking, as an exercise.
  • Staying mindful of vocalization techniques while doing off-the-cuff commentary in the main segments. No particular focus but just trying to stay cognizant overall.
  • Off-the-cuff mindfulness: controlled vocalizing while doing off-the-cuff speaking.
  • Standard voice; transcendent voice.
Read-Aloud Techniques
  • Read each heading twice.
  • Read each sentence twice, defined as 3 lines.
  • Read each paragraph twice, defined as 7 lines.
  • Read a complete paragraph before commenting.
  • Separate the reading of a paragraph from the commenting on a paragraph.
  • Contiguous unbroken long stretches of reading.
  • State my commentary at end of paragraph.
  • Turn any text into standard vocalization.
  • Double-reading.
  • Read-aloud each sentence twice.
  • Don’t read footnote numbers in mid-sentence.
  • Don’t read author citations that are in mid-sentence.
Standard Reference Speaking and Tone
  • Exaggerate the bass, treble, and pitch swing.
  • Practice standard reference vocalizing.
  • Speak low pitch with a neutral-positive tone.
  • Speak low pitch with a smile, or neutral at least.
  • How to speak low-pitch without sounding forceful, but rather, neutral; nor soft.
  • No particular character or inflection of feeling.
  • No odd resonance.
  • No character or attitude skew.
  • Generic reference speech.
  • Standard voice.
  • Straight-up standard pronunciation.
  • Neutral-medium pace as mid-point.
  • Not lax, not edgy.
  • Neutral non-emphasis.
  • Neither soft tone nor aggressive.
  • Neutral in tone.
  • Functional & plain.
  • Regular matter-of-fact speech.
  • No attitude or tone skew.
Vocal Apparatus
  • Back top of throat.
  • Lower chest.
  • Tip of tongue.
Pitch
  • Force pitch downward hard.
  • Vary the pitch from low to very low.
Pronunciation & Enunciation
  • Enunciation: Consistently hype the letters: ‘c d s t w x z’.
  • Never slur; always pronounce the ‘s’.
  • Separate each word.
  • Pronounce every letter of every word.
Speed
  • Nuetral fast low-pitch.
  • Vary the speed from slow to fast (fast & smooth).
  • Separate each word.
  • Pronounce every letter of every word.
  • Repeat botched statement correctly.
Conversation Technique
  • Start a sentence, then finish it.
  • Don’t interrupt myself.
  • Talk about “we, us , community, conversation”.
  • Skip straight to the point.
  • Think of key words, then construct statement around them.
  • What are the 5 key words you need to say?
  • Speak simply, with only 1st-order detail.
  • Stay on a topic more, without jumping among topics.
  • Use segments to stay on-topic and separate the topics.
Mic Technique
  • Ride the mic gain.
  • Move aside/back from the mic slightly, to inhale.
  • Ride the music gain.
  • Fade-up guitar leads.

/ end of Preserve/Legacy section

Re-Constructing the Development of the “Standard Voice Practice” Section in Early February 2021

I have now painstakingly reconstructed the 2021-02-15c snapshot of the Vocalization Review segment just prior to moving that section to the present section. At the moment, that’s in the Egodeath Mystery Show

Feb10a has a very short, probably too early version. Find an ideal classic version of this section, after Feb10. o2-11 “Vocal Warmup Reminders”.

Feb 11 is still short.

02-12a: does it have “Vocal Warmup Reminders” segment? timestamp? how long is it? skipped “vocalization warmup”.

Feb 13 is pretty good representation (and, represents the ever-changing wording). 02-13a: smoking complicated ruin does it have “Vocal Warmup Reminders” segment? timestamp? how long is it? “I’m going to playing a clip of commentary on Hane 1995, “criticized negatively” (Merkur). And take 1 of Hanegraaff 1995 reaction. Then ‘my followers’ clip. Then alternative approaches to making clips/shows. sm57 no eq.” 2:45 MTCDT passage, Tim Held. 3:15 Review of Vocalization. Special focuses for voczn in this ep. Exercises: “as usual, never slur, (4:18) learn how to turn any text… Pron & Enun: consis hype czstwxz. Alphabet recital (w/ voc apparatus note). pitch forced downward hard. vary the pitch from medium to very low. vary the speed from slow to fast. speak with a neutral positive tone. speak w/ a smile . Repeat Botched statement coorrect.ly . bass treb pitch swing. etc etc. conversation technique: don’t interrupt myself . start a sentence then finish it. skip straight to the point. speak simply. (pause, to type out: with only first-order detail. what are the five keywords you need to say?) Segments. stay on a topic more. read a complete para before commenting. separate the reading of a paragraph from the commenting on the paragraph. Contiguous unbroken long stretches of reading. talk about we, us, community, conv. mic tech: ride the mic gain (added “when adjust mic stand). move aside from the mic slightly, to inahl. rid the music gain. fade up gtr leads. Fin, 9:00.

02-13b: does it have “Vocal Warmup Reminders” segment? timestamp? how long is it? practice reading Hane 2012 chapter. Music to Come Down To. skipped his first section, coverd in 13a. No voc review.

This could be ideal. 02-14a Ironic Distancing Through Sound. Added Limiter (1:51). 2:17 fin’d Intro. 2:45 – Next, a review of Vocalization. start of the Vocalization Review Segment. 3:00. 3:25 “I’ll read some points twice. Short items/lines.” 4:20+, blah blah blah blah, voice professor’s instructions. Added nw section “Standard Reference speaking”, and “vocal apparatus”. 4:50: “pronunciation and enunciation.”

2-15a vocn review – 2:15. open the back of mouth chambers and top of throat. exercises. to pull up and back, as opposed to letting clamp. push the pitch down consistently, continuously. exercise. the origin of the article (example of off the cuff with downward pitch/ open throat). 5:00: read-aloud techniques: read a complete paragraph beffore commentimng. 5:30 doulbe: Special focus for vocalizing in this jpisode. Open the back of mouh chambers and top of throad. Exercises. x2. / read-aloud techniques. read each heading twice. read a complete paragraph before commenting. 6:20. adding: read each sentence twice, defined as 3 lines. then read each paragraph twice, defeined as 7 lines. separate the reading of a paragraph from the commening on a paragraph. contiguous long unbroken. std ref’c speaking and tone: exagerate the bass, treb & pitch string. practice std ref voc’g. speak low pitch with a neutral positive tone. …. no particular character or inflection of feeling. no odd resonance. no character or attitude skew. generic reference speech. striaght up std pronunciation. neutral medium pace as midpoint. not lax, not edgy; neutral non-emphasis. neither soft tone, nor agreessive. neutral in tone. functional and plain. regular mattter-of-=fact speech. no attitude or tone skew. vocal apparatus: back top of throat. lower chest. tip of tongue. reading techqnieque: 10:08. (moving that gruop up read-aloud technique). Pitch: force pitchdownward hard and vary the pitch from low to very low. Pronunciation & Enunciation: consistently hype the letters cdstwxz. never slur; always pronounce the s. sep each word, pronounce every letter of every word. Speed: 13:09. (I need more items). vary the speed from slow to fast; fast and smooth. sep each word; pronounce eveyr letter of every word. low pitch, neutral tone slowly. repeat bot hed statement correcly. concersation technique: start a sen t then fin it. dont interrupt myslef. talk about us, we community, conversation. think of key words, then construct senetnece around them. …. Mic technique: Ride the mic gain. 16:30. Move aside back from the mic. (getting rid of aside; changing to “move back” from mic). move back from the mic slightly to inhale. ride .. gain. fade up leads… [good example: double saying each item].

What date was final inline form, before moved to sep page an d moved all around?

02-15b pipe organ. Double Critique. The secret conspiracy exo/eso standoff. Cyberdisciple’s latest post, Hesiod. sm57 no eq, with limiter. 15b 1:30 fin’d Intro. (probably still had red text to say exactly what to say aloud). “Next a review of vocn. Voczn Reveiw segment. 15b 2:30 – staying mindful of voczn techniques while doing off cuff cmtry in main segs. Read-Aloud Techniques: 15b 4:20 blah blah blah. off the cuff mindfulness = special focus in this episode. Read-Aloud Techniques: Turn any text into std voczn. Double reading. reading aloud any sent twice. read each sent twice… skip rest. Std Ref .. NEW SECTION . practice std ref’c voczn. Exaggerate the bass, treble, & pitch swing. low pitch w/ n-pos tone. low pitch smile. w/ o . no particular character or inflection of feeling. No odd resonance. No character or attitude skew. Generic ref’c speech. Straight-up std pronunciation. neutral medium pace as midpoint. not lax, not edgy. neutral non-emphasis. Neither soft tone nor aggressive. neutral-positive tone. … … … No attitude or tone skew. Regular matter of fact speech. functional and plain. soft/aggressive. Vocal Apparatus: tip of tongue. Pitch: force pitch downward hard.

02-15c https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#2021-02-15c-Egodeath-Mystery-Show is part 2 of an episode w/ 15b. 1:15 “it’s time for me to review the vocalization standards’, voczn review segment. special for this episode: ….
open the back of mouth chambers and top of thrat. exercises. push pitch down, consistently. off-the-cuff mindfulness. controlled vocalizaing. Standard Voice (new addition now). transcendent voice (new addition now). My default voice is egoic and I’m trying to transcend it.

  • push pitch down consistently, continuously.
  • read-aloud techniques. std ref’c speaking and tone: exagerrate… speak low pitch w…. smile. no odd res…. no char/att skew. generic ref’c speech. “I need to add in this section, standard voice.” straight-up std pron. neut. not lax. nor aggressive. func’l & plain. no atttone skew.
  • voc apparatus: force ppitch dward hard.
  • P&E: consisten cdstwxz. never slur. always pron s.
  • Speed: vary the .. separate.
  • Conv techniue… to point.
  • Mic Technique: 5:00
    -blah blah. 57 working well. …. 5:47. 3 simple tricks to using this low-profile slip mic. podium. nice mellow tone. i like to not even eq it. not flat spks. bright spks. why eq? this mic is muddy if you’re listening to perfect flat spks. 7:30 blah blah. 8:00 boost treble demo OW harsh. 10:20 I’m actually reading text off the screen right now. Entheogens, Myth, and Human Consciousness. 12:30 Ruck’s book, crossed with Metzner’s book, purely to try to off-cuff controlled casual standard voice. JESUS DO I EVER FINISH TEH VOCZN SEGMENT WTF.

the above is the final reading of the section when it was inline

02-16a morning edition

02-16b Repeat Phrase for Standard Voice – sm57 no eq, with limiter. Kicks by Paul Rev, Shape of Things, Prunes x2. 1:25. REview of Std Voice seg. 144. Repeat Phras. During off the cuff spekaing, during idea dev, repeat phrase in std voice. finished. 2:14. [skipped]

02-17a Morning vocal warmup wo. Outlining 15b-15c Episode. No std segs.

02-17b – https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#2021-02-17b-Egodeath-Mystery-Show 108 review of std voice segment, 1:08. SKIPPED. 1:27.

02-17c – https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#2021-02-17c-Egodeath-Mystery-Show — NOTEs imply skipped pretty much. “2021-02-17c Egodeath Mystery Show – Never Repeat Phrase.mp3” 142 fin’d Intro seg. Review of Std Voice: 1:53. Repeat Phrase: during off-the-cuff during idea development, … Breathing. skipped.

02-17d – ??

02-18a – morning show

02-19a – i had moved vocal review to separate page. Volume 4. 1997 Core Theory reading. new WordPress page, Casual Standard Voice. sm57, 4″, no eq, with limiter. Review of Std voice segment. from new page casual standard voice. bad is Uncontrolled Sloppinness, good is… bad is… gentrl lush soft drawl. bad is serious, sloppy comical. Defining the Chaacter of Casusal Std Voice. This page is an early draft. Speak low pitch with a smile, no 3:27. Not lax, not edgy. Neutral in tone. functional and plain. No attitude or tone skew. General purpose, not any partic. [I lost something charming, from Voczn segment, when I moved to expansive casual standard voice page. in some way, restore access to the inline longest inline version b4 it got moved to amibitious new page. Take a backup frozen snapshot of the section right before it got moved from the Egodeath Mystery Show / template page. ]

02-21a https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#2021-02-21a-Egodeath-Mystery-Show “2021-02-21a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Master Tape.mp3” seems unlikely to have the segment.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#2021-02-22a-Egodeath-Mystery-Show. 5:45 “I better do a vocal warmup”. but I seem to skip it. 8:08 I’m reading Bibliog of main article.

Idea Development page 11

Site Map

Contents:

Incoming Ideas

Idea Development page 12
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12

zNew page has helped a lot:
Casual Standard Voice

“2021-02-18b Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3” – probably wasn’t created; master tapes only

I doubt I’ll upload this long utility episode. I might listen to it. You can see the topics below in the show notes/agenda. No core Egodeath theory content, I think. Meta ideas about show format, vocal use.

March 6, 2021 – I doubt I created project or mp3. only have wavs?

OFF AIR

Episode Agenda for the Egodeath Mystery Show (Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda) – the live meeting is here

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: TBD (doubt mp3 was created)
  • description: __
  • filesize: __
  • length: __
Post-Processing Steps
  • todo: (I doubt any of this was done)
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 1. 210218_####.wav – mixer – desc reached 3:22:00
    • 2. 210218_####.wav – mixer – desc auto-started, then chip filled.
    • 3. 210218_2056.wav – mixer – desc new chip. As of 2018/03/06, it’s on a green/white SD card, “TK Audio 2”: “/Volumes/TK Audio 2/DR-05 Mixer Deck 2021-02-25/210218_2056.wav”
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Esoteric Agenda

Misc. Items
  • x

1. Intro Segment

  • __ timestamp started fade music

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

This episode covers:

Topic ideas:

  • Need to develop habit (temporarily) of Repeat Phrase to accomplish revoicing per Standard Voice.
  • Errata: lozenge, MacArthur
  • Timer to add timestamp every 15 minutes & say what I’ve been talking about.
    • Moved timestamps to leftmost part of each list item, for future episodes. (Improvements to the Show-page template.)
  • A SHORTENED VERSION OF AN EPISODE W/ CORE EGODEATH THEORY CONTENT ONLY.
  • Assessment of previous / development of Standard Voice over past weeks/shows.
    • Remarkable variance / inconsistency of my voice. Gruff, flowery… Standard Voice when I remember it, establishes a determinate consistent tone.
    • 2018/2019 play some voice clips, critique them during show.
    • Slurring/ closed-throat phase. Play some Jan 20 Voice Recordings.
    • Hyper-enunciation phase. Play some ~Feb. 7 the Egodeath Mystery Show episodes.
    • Repeat Phrase seems to be sometimes challenging to execute.
  • timestamp. topic: show agenda
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
139 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

2. “Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
209 timestamp fade music

  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
Repeat Phrase
  • During off-the-cuff speaking during idea development, repeat phrase, in Standard Voice.
Breathing
  • Practice it.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
241 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
304 timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • __ timestamp. topic: __

do a reading from the below page, then return here
Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
602__ timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

4. First Topical Segment:
Develop a “Repeat Phrase” Habit to Learn/Develop Casual Standard Voice

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
701__ timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • Need to develop habit (temporarily) of Repeat Phrase to accomplish revoicing per Standard Voice.
    • Repeat Phrase seems to be sometimes challenging to execute.
    • _1135 timestamp. topic: challenges of repeat phrase during off the cuff idea development.
    • Ear training by listening to previous voice recordings. (& revoicing them)
    • Guard function: eg if hear high pitch, triggers revoicing/repeat phrase.
  • 2642 timestamp. topic: the above + mouth noises per next, errata segment
  • __ timestamp. topic: __

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
3111 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

5. Second Topical Segment:
Errata for Previous Episode 17d

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
3139__ timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • Errata:
    • mouth noises are worse when speaking quietly
      • lozenge amplifies the problem severely.
      • speaking quietly relatively amplifies mouth noises; take actions to counter that. back off, close lips.
    • John MacArthur

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
~4200__ timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

6. Third Topical Segment:
Casual Standard Voice

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
11457 timestamp started fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • new idea: “standard voice proper, vs standard voice casual”
    • 4200__ timestamp. topic: “standard voice casual”, ear training virtue of listening to these voice recordings / shows
  • 5630__ timestamp. topic: __ “standard voice casual” ditto above
  • voice physical exercises, singing during show
    • possible: tip of tongue exercises (c s v w x z etc)
      • upper top back throat chamber physical stretching/exercises
      • bottom chest bass spectrum physical stretching/exercises
      • ear training / guard function is working well; leverage it even more fully. take a constant critical stance asseessing/listening to my voice character, as a voice actor. “I am a voice actor”. amateur voiceover artist.
    • church groups singing (small or choir or online virtual choir).
    • 1:10:10, 11725__ timestamp. topic: the above two topics
  • 12639__ timestamp. topic: __ gentleman amateur scholars polymaths. becoming/identifying/ embracing / enjoying prospect of interest in “voiceover artist”: tech, analysis, communication, fixes ghastly voice characters that I’ve been projecting. VO “VO guy”. broadcaster voice casual mic standard voice.
  • 14134 timestamp. topic: wiki “voice-over” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice-over
  • Done: make webpage “transcendent cultivated casual standard voice” distinct from any specific application; general purpose body of knowledge.
    • url = casual standard voice
    • title = “How to Master General-Purpose Casual Standard Voice”
    • notes: transcendent, cultivated
    • link to various *applications* of standard voice. but, … general purpose core body of knowledge.
    • 1:56:38 timestamp. topic: created webpage General-Purpose Casual Standard Voice
    • done: move voice tips warmup section from the Egodeath Mystery Show page to the new page.
    • 2 12 07 timestamp. topic: agenda segment refresh/retitling, retitled the new page.
  • 2 24 51__ timestamp. topic: moved voice tips from the Egodeath Mystery Show page to the new casual standard voice page.
  • done: DISCUSS HAND TENSION AS ANALOGY FOR EXERCISING THE VOICE APPARATUS
    • 2 36 55 timestamp. topic: __
    • note about representing timestamps:
      • say “two , 36, 55” not “the timestamp is 2 hours and thirty six minutes and fifty five seconds”.
      • use space instead of colon.
  • 2 48 14 timestamp. topic: updated the Egodeath Mystery Show page to put template at bottom.
Timestamp Management
  • done: Timer to add timestamp every 15 minutes & say what I’ve been talking about.
    • done: Moved timestamps to leftmost part of each list item, for future episodes. (Improvements to the Show-page template.)
    • done: Merged timestamp templates into the esoteric agenda within each segment.
    • 11655 timestamp. topic: timestamp mgmt

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
2 50 40 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

7. Fourth Topical Segment:
Compressed Version of Episodes

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
2 52 00 timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • A SHORTENED VERSION OF A GIVEN EPISODE of the Egodeath Mystery Show, W/ CORE EGODEATH THEORY CONTENT ONLY.
    • eg yesterday’s 17b “full episode” vs 17b “core episode” (made today).
  • 2 58 20 timestamp. topic: update my segment breakouts/ agenda list. experience today creating compressed “clips” version of ep 17b.
  • 3 07 30 timestamp. topic: started playing Black Sabbath album: Volume 4.
  • This approach vs “voice rec’g” vs “clips” isolated mp3s.
    • turns out, avoid saying “best”, use neutral filename/title of “clips”.
  • 3 17 30 timestamp. topic: discussed “best” vs “clips”. long, “deep cuts” version of an episode, vs. the shortened, “radio cut” version of the episode.
  • 3 22 00 + 4 16 [NOTE – TAPE DECK STARTS NEW .WAV FILE AUTO’LY AT 3 HRS 22 MIN; CLOCK RESETS TO 0:00 THEN] timestamp. topic: 4 hour mystery episode then make 2 hour shortened version.
    • 1. Record a 4-hour “variety show” version of the episode.
    • 2. Create a shortened 2-hour “core Egodeath theory topics only” version of the (same) episode. (an “empirical” show-creation approach)
    • the show (just like anything) has a long name and a short name; similarly, an episode has a long version and a short version.
  • timestamp. topic: show agenda [move this way up near start of show]
  • 3 22 00 + 24 05 timestamp. topic: whether to deliver clips as standalone voice rec’g vs. several clips within a “shortened episode” format w/ timestamps to locate a desired clip.
  • 3 22 00 + 34 02 timestamp. topic: scoping out YT ch “United by Rock” = Classic Metal + Classic Rock albums. Looked up double album “We Sold Our Soul for Rock n Roll”
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • OUTCOME: RESOLUTION:
    • The Board of Mystics has decided to not use much the utilitarian standalone clips of isolated voice recordings (use it selectively); USE ALL THE OPTIONS.
      • long episode (“full episode”)
      • shortened same episode (“core episode”), with list of retained topics, but no timestamps needed – decide whether to use this format, on a per-case basis.
      • isolated voice clips – decide whether to use this format, on a per-case basis. eg Hane 2012 double-reading the other day.
    • We surmise from experience with the 2007 & 2018 standalone voice recordings, that shortened “core” versions of the “full” episodes of the Egodeath Mystery Show will get more usage/plays, than isolated voice recordings. this will require timestamps/guide.
      • In some cases, can freely choose to deliver isolated voice rec’g clips instead or in addition to the shortened, “core” episode. Selectively provide certain clips as isolated voice rec’gs, as done with the Hane 2012 EE article double-sentence read-aloud.
    • Producing/managing/presenting a set of isolated voice recordings just isn’t, or doesn’t seem, very inspiring/exciting – except, do this in some cases.
  • 3 22 00 + 54 07 timestamp. topic: making decisions on format after having discussed.
  • 3 22 00 + 1 04 17 timestamp. topic: listed OPTIONS, both “core version” shortened same ep, AND option of isolated voice clips; choose option on per-case basis (ie per-episode basis)
  • 0:00 timestamp. topic: [note: timestamp was reset to 0:00 again b/c chip filled; this is the 3rd .wav file for this episode. error: should have noted file length & name before ejecting storage]
  • 0 14 48 timestamp. topic: low pitch is not the goal;
    • varying pitch med-to-low is the goal. for my ideal “dream voice” that I’d *love* to have. just a *great* neutral, natural sounding voice. an ear-training driven, aesthetics-definition-driven, approach to transcending the voice; transcendent control of the voice. define dream target; train ear, train the GUARD FUNCTION to alert to re-voice a phrase/utterance.
      • make the “pitch > medium” range off-limits; alert when that happens, to revoice.
  • 26 21 timestamp. topic:
    • Defined the aesthetics of “casual standard voice”.
    • Deciding whether to pitch the “topical segment” heavy structuring.

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
30 03 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

8. Topical Segment:
Read-Aloud New Page: Casual Standard Voice

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
30 42 timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • 34 58 timestamp. topic: created this new Segment Section.
  • 46 00 timestamp. topic: retrieved “left behind” agenda item: play older voice recordings to critique voice.
  • 56 06 timestamp. topic: updated description of the “Core version of episode” idea in idea development page 11.
  • Read-aloud new page:
  • https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/casual-standard-voice/
  • 1 06 32 timestamp: Regained orientation in segment sections, started reading new page: Casual standard voice.
  • 1 16 05 timestamp. topic: cleaned up new page, some basic cleanup
  • 1 26 04 timestamp. topic: reading and tweaking new page
  • 1 36 14 timestamp. topic: reading the main part of the page
  • 1 46 15 timestamp. topic: “
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
1 51 04 timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

9. Topical Segment:
Critique Past Voice Recordings

CURRENT SEGMENT

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
1 51 43 timestamp fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • Assessment of previous voice & of development of Standard Voice over past weeks/shows. Remarkable variance/ inconsistency of my voice. Gruff, flowery… Standard Voice when I remember it.
    • The previous episode; ie, 02-18a
    • Standard voice establishes a determinate consistent tone.
    • 2018/2019 voice recordings
    • 2021 voice recordings including the Egodeath Mystery Show
    • trivia: When was the first episode that opened with saying “the Egodeath Mystery Show”?
  • todo: decide whether to retire/demote the “Topical Segment” approach and just use rolling outline list. low overhead/ streamlined/ lightweight/flexible/fast/agile. Try the non-segment approach on next episode, in the Agenda page, w/o changing yet the template in the “Egodeath Mystery Show” page.
  • 1 56 39 timestamp. topic: trying to find first mention of “this is the Egodeath Mystery Show” – Feb 5?
  • 2 07 14 timestamp. topic: critiquing the first show mentioning the Egodeath Mystery Show – “Egodeath Show 2021-02-05.mp3” – severe slurring of ‘s’ as ‘sh’
  • 2 16 35 timestamp. topic: assessed that mp3. shutting down; outro ran
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __
  • __ timestamp. topic: __

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
__ timestamp fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

  • __ timestamp. topic: __

“2021-02-18a Egodeath Mystery Show – Esotericism Forgot Plots.mp3”

Download Info
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • .m4a – mic|mixer – desc – mobile Voice Memos app, earbud mic
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes

false? 210? earbud mic, not 57, no Limiter, no TASCAM.

  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono <- from stereo?
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

Contents

“2021-02-18a Egodeath Mystery Show – Esotericism Forgot Plots.mp3” Morning Vocal Warmup Edition Throwaway with Guaranteed No Egodeath Content Except for Breakthrough
Replacement of ‘Entheogens’ by ‘Esotericism’ an Order of Magnitude Broadening of
the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion as
the Maximal Esotericism Theory of Religion
re:
why no evidence for ahistoricity?
why no evidence for visionary plants?
why no evidence for no-free-will?
why no evidence that Valentinian Gnostics existed?
– “Revoicing/ Repeat Phrase” Technique Demonstration/Practice

🎙 🎶

minor note: all future voice recordings will be sung instead of spoken

self-within-world = Cybernetics within Eternalism

transformation of the mental worldmodel from self-in-world model A to self-in-world model B; self-within-world = Cybernetics within Eternalism

23:00
transformation of the mental worldmodel from
autonomous-control WITHIN POSSIBILISM-BRANCHING WORLD
to
dependent-control WITHIN NONBRANCHING WORLD
thus
Cybernetics *within* Eternalism

“2021-02-17d Egodeath Mystery Show – Always Repeat Phrase.mp3”

Download Info
Description
  • 1:07:55 starting new Quiet segment.speaking quietly, exploring “quiet time standard voice”.
  • 1:13:32 reading aloud the lyrics to the song “Face Behind the Sun” by the Plastic Cloud.
  • 11836 in middle of reading aloud (w/ Repeat Phrase!) Face Behind the Sun lyrics.
  • 1:29:00 finished Face reading/ lyrics correction, proposed giving a tour of Rush songs on this show.
  • 1:35:05 finished reading-aloud (w/ Repeat Phrase) the lyrics to “Epistle to Paradise” (Plastic Cloud).
  • 1:38:16 settling in to Double Mellow DJ Mode with my new, 4″ distance and the gentle, reassuring ROARING HISS OF THIS DYNAMIC MIC.
  • 1:48:12 turned off music, about to do Repeat Phrase Idea development.
  • 1:58:19 James MacArthur “no secret knowledge/esoteric non-quantifiable experience that’s going to catapult you to another level”.
  • https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/11/john-macarthur-strange-fire-transcendent-knowledge/
  • 2:18:31 remarkable when I engage standard voice, it *really* stands out, next to my all-over-the-map random, out of control voicing.
  • 2:29:07 mic demo: distance, 8″, 4″, 2.5″, 60 vs 45 degrees, amount of resulting hiss & room reverb, and amount of bass due to proximity effect.2:31:30 todo: playback (17d), does it sound clogged nose?
  • filesize: 265 MB
  • length: 2:35:25
Errata

🤨 😵 💥 🎙 🙉

  • John MacArthur, dammit, not “James Arthur”, not “James MacArthur”, not “John Arthur” 😵
  • Mouth noises during quiet-speaking portion. 🤨 😵 💥 🎙 🙉
    • TOP PRIORITY FOR QUIET SPEAKING: BE EXTRA QUIET W/ MOUTH NOISES.
    • No lozenge allowed at mic, especially when speaking quietly.
    • Ride the gain a lot during quiet time.
  • Typing is an issue during quiet time.
Post-Processing Steps

17d:

  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • n/a; none – import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • n/a normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • n/a export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210217_2051.wav – mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc no mic rec’g for this show
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono <- from stereo?
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Esoteric Agenda

Misc. Items
  • x

1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

This episode covers:

  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 942] fade music

2. “Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1130] fade music

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
Repeat Phrase
  • During off-the-cuff speaking during idea development, repeat phrase, in Standard Voice.
Breathing
  • Practice it.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 1219] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1231] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

do a reading from the below page, then return here
Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 1452] fade music

4. First Topical Segment:
Normal-Volume Demo of the Repeat Phrase Technique During Spoken Idea Development

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1513] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: successful at remembering to repeat phrase while idea development re: “secret esotericism” [timestamp: 2300] 🎉 🎸
  • topic: mic distance 2.5″ moving to 4″ and speaking quietly, exploring “quiet time standard voice” [timestamp: 4348]
  • topic: finished reconfig mic/gain/speaking volume. now resume demo’ing REPEAT PHRASE [timestamp: 5205]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 10431] fade music
move “current segment” sign to next segment

5. Second Topical Segment:
Quiet-Time Demo of the Repeat Phrase Technique During Spoken Idea Development

CURRENT SEGMENT

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • Before this segment, I moved the mic from 2.5″ to 4″, and re-gain-staged. Hiss city.
  • i moved the timestamps / topics to top of whole section above

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

6. Third Topical Segment:
__

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

7. Fourth Topical Segment:
Unplanned Segment

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

“2021-02-17c Egodeath Mystery Show – Never Repeat Phrase.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-tZ6cRQIe0G
  • description: __ try looking below
    • hypothesis: previous recording 17b has better Egodeath content, this 17c has better voicing
  • filesize: 143 MB
  • length: 2:01:06
Post-Processing Steps

17c:

  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • skip import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210217_2050.wav – mixer
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 210 kbps
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Esoteric Agenda

Misc. Items
  • x

1. Intro Segment

CURRENT SEGMENT

[timestamp started: 0:00, 12330] fade music

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

This episode covers:

  • Demo of Always Repeat Phrase
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 142, 12432] fade music

2. “Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 153, 12503] fade music

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
Repeat Phrase
  • During off-the-cuff speaking during idea development, repeat phrase, in Standard Voice.
Breathing
  • Practice it.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 222, 12535] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 233, 12608] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: sample of computer’s built-in mic at 12″ [timestamp: 349-512]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

do a reading from the below page, then return here
Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 927, 12758] fade music

4. First Topical Segment:
Discover that Take 1 Failed to Repeat Phrase But Just Did Good Idea Development

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 12850] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: play 1st take’s 22:00 re: Kore 210217_2049.wav [timestamp: 13:44]
  • topic: play 1st take’s 24:39 re: I have not said “there’s never any secrecy” [timestamp: 23:17] – note: in Take 1, I 99% failed to remember to REPEAT PHRASE
  • topic: THE merit of “it’s like”, 29:11 in Take 1 [timestamp: 45:00]
  • topic: 32:54 in Take1 , resume Secret. __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • todo: extract the great discussions on Secret, & Kore, from the “failed take” 210217_2049.wav
  • topic: listening to good Secret discussion in Take 1 37:32 [timestamp: 56:36]
  • topic: todo: release the failed Take 1 as episode 17b b/c great content. [timestamp: 10640]
  • topic: next episode: start w/ repeat-phrase version of Intro, repeat *everything* in entire episode [timestamp: 11759]
  • todo: alternate short “warmup readings” with idea development w/ Repeat Phrase.

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 13240] fade music

5. Second Topical Segment:
Take 2: Actually Demonstrate “Always Repeat Phrase” During Off-the-Cuff Idea Development

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 13400] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • todo: 1:51:30 compare my revoicing now vs. Take 1 (they alternate).
  • topic: incoming producer track [timestamp: 13854]
  • topic: reviewing the warmup reading voice in Take 1 [timestamp: 14820]
  • topic: critiquing 23:13 and re-voicing Take 1 [timestamp: 15858]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

6. Third Topical Segment:
__

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

7. Fourth Topical Segment:
Unplanned Segment

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes
  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

“2021-02-17b clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.mp3” – Best Of Episode, Trimmed/Condensed

This should be very interesting, to hear an “episode” as an episode, but w/ the “noise” / “filler” removed. Reduced to half the duration/length!

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-LxkdpKcSqr
  • description:
    • The secret conspiracy to suppress all of esotericism, not merely ahistoricity or entheogens.
    • Toward listing the views which differentiate exoteric vs. esoteric.
    • Elaine Pagels’ contrasts of the two sets of views, in Valentinian Gnosticism.
  • filesize: 76 MB
  • length: 1:05:34 (vs. 2:01:06 orig)
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • skip:connect recorder drives
  • skip:determine which wavs
  • skip: import Mic Deck wav
  • skip:import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip:normalize vol of Mic wav
  • skip:normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip:export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • project file:
    “2021-02-17b Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.aup”
    track: “Trim ep17b 210217_2049”
  • bitrate: 210 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

“2021-02-17b Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-hDZ7arOlJr
  • description:
    • todo: from this episode, clip (extract) the Egodeath theory idea development content, which is solid.
      • timestamp start, timestamp stop, topic
      • plan: create a smaller version of ep 17b w/ “the Egodeath Mystery Show” Intro & Outro, containing only the good clips.
      • todo: think about this pattern: record a verbose sprawling episode, then create a “highlights-only” version of the ep while still framed as “the same episode”. GIVES me elbow room to be casual & verbose, plus, deliver a later trimmed optimized shorter “best-of episode” version, but more of an “whole episode” experience than just a “clips-only” recording.
        • A COMPRESSED VERSION OF AN EPISODE W/ THE BEST EGODEATH THEORY CONTENT ONLY. & cleaned up of cussing, lozenge gross-out, dead air, off-topic, plosives, phone ringing, typing-session, “timestamp-log eggtimer alarm”, etc.
      • 1. note: old time stamps here before removed gaps: 20:28-21:21, 22:00-28:17 Kore, & grid game, Canterbury “don’t dare gaze at it”, secret, I have not said “there’s never any secrecy”
      • 2. 32:57-40:06 resume Kore, Demeter, Persephone are only mentioned. Secrecy.
      • 3. 40:40-42:06 Pagels’ exoteric/ esoteric contrast (then fading energy/break)
      • 4. 43:55-47:17 pagels (then falling asleep)
      • 5. 48:01-1:30:23 pagels — delete the GROSS lozenge and mic adjustment near start; the *slightest* lozenge mouth sounds is *absolutely* gross & offensive & grating, 100% as bad as eating Snickers bar at mic.
        • delete at 49:24.
        • 59:17 gross talking w/ lozenge, delete “I’m kinda disappionted”.
        • delete to 1:00:13 (lozenge discussion)
        • ~1:04:55-1:30:23 long discussion of my 2013 bad non-summary of Pagels. then falling asleep.
      • 6. 1:39:58-1:43:47 need sep page to summarize pagels
      • Phase 2 of condensing ep 17b:
      • 2. nuke 0:22-0:48
      • keep 0:49-1:03
      • 1. nuke 1:03-20:08
      • 20:08+: keep.
    • good discussion of the “repeat phrase to revoice” technique. (zero execution though.)
    • wrestling with voice in bad state, what exercises to re-access my full lower voice.
    • defining “esoteric/ exoteric” per Pagels per my book reviews. incredibly awful total fail at writing these as a simple SUMMARY of the points of difference. I’m trying to confirm and expand this list of what constitutes exoteric vs. esoteric:
      • no-free-will &
      • ahistoricity &
      • entheogens
      • literalism vs metaphoricity
      • …. true?? anything else?
    • secret esotericism as opposed to a careless vague exaggerated concept of a “secret conspiracy to suppress/ eliminate” plants & ahistoricity & no-free-will = esotericism )
  • filesize: 156 MB
  • length: __
  • 210217_2049.wav – rough timestamps for clips
    • 22:00 Kore
    • 24:39 I have not said “there’s never any secrecy”
    • 32:54 resume Secret
    • 37:32 Secret discussion
Post-Processing Steps

17a = 210217_2046.wav
17b = 210217_2049.wav
17c = 210217_2050.wav
17d = 210217_2051.wav

17b:

  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • skip import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mic wav
  • skip normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210217_2049.wav – mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 210 kbps
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

Content

There’s more than just this topic:
todo: list other topics:

This take (17b) Failed its intention of demo’ing Repeat Phrase; colossal Fail at Repeat Phrase 🗑 😭 🤨 😵, but has good Egodeath theory content, so, I’ll release this take (“take 1”), for its great Egodeath theory content.

Hypothesis: my chest was in awful state, and that distracted me from remembering to do Repeat Phrase. Proof: Even my read-aloud sounds pretty bad chest-vocals (“lost access to the bottom half of my chest”).

In a later replay (17c recording), I was easily able to out-do & revoice even my warmup read-aloud, which is usually quite good.

After this 17b take, I was mad at this take for forgetting to Repeat Phrase – but, I had to admit that the content of idea development here was quite solid (and the voicing is fairly good).

I almost trashcanned this 17b recording, for failing to Repeat Phrase!

This recording just needs a couple timestamps, there are worthy gems here (the discussion of voicing is good, too; just not on-topic for Egodeath).

4. First Topical Segment:
Working-up Toward a Demonstration of the “Repeat Phrase” Technique While Speaking Off-the-Cuff

In this segment, and throughout this entire episode, I demonstrate the “repeat phrase” technique whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud.

  • reminder: repeat phrase whenever speaking off-the-cuff, and whenever reading-aloud
  • policy: log a timestamp every 10 minutes

“2021-02-17a Egodeath Mystery Show – Outlining 15b-15c Episode.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-lq2hR7LUXC
  • description:
    • best clips from “2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.mp3”
      • “I guarantee there will be no content in this throwaway warmup show”
      • In standard voice, I read-aloud the lyrics of the song Kicks.
      • 3 grids in the Grid Game (amount of presence of visionary plants throughout history)single-religion grid (diachronic)
        • single-region grid (diachronic)
        • single-era grid (synchronic) (not useful for extracting a Forgot Plot)
        • each with 2 variables from list: [religion, region, era]
      • clip about Hanegraaff, “the worst idea ever written by an academic”; Hanegraaff non-drug entheogens
        • Adding Hanegraaff’s non-drug entheogens to the Hall of Shame. “broaden”, “literal”, “entheogens (in the wider sense)” – several sentences from article Entheogenic Esotericism. “This is the #1 WORST IDEA I’VE EVER SEEN“
    • 18:02 Warmup reading: Romance of the Fungus World – nice deep smooth non-hyper-enunciation reading; good example to listen to, example of Standard Voice for read-aloud.
  • filesize: 213 MB
  • length: 3:00:28
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav – skip
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip – normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • skip – export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Esoteric Agenda

Misc. Items
  • when playing clips into the show, mark start stop timestamps.
  • go through episode 15b 15c 5:22:00, go through it and mark timestamps.

1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

This episode covers:

  • Play clip copy: “2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.aup”[1:09:42] – I read-aloud in Standard Voice (neutral) the lyrics to the song Kicks by Paul Revere & the Raiders.
  • Play clip copy: “2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.aup”[10:10, 34:00] Same recording: play 2 clips of Grid Game
    • 3 grids in the Grid Game (amount of presence of visionary plants throughout history)single-religion grid (diachronic)
    • single-region grid (diachronic)
    • single-era grid (synchronic) (not useful for extracting a Forgot Plot)
    • each with 2 variables from list: [religion, region, era]
  • Same recording: play clip about Hanegraaff, “the worst idea ever written by an academic”
  • Critique and re-voice as Standard Voice: Find the worst voicing (farthest from Standard Voice) in that recording.
  • I can’t find clip, so instead, read-aloud now this section of idea development page: 1:00:00 read a summary as I typed into idea development page 11. Next to emojis; find “new extreme double-reading approach” “off the cuff as well” “more granular and universal” – mic recording of reading-aloud this section while typing it:The “Repeat Phrase” Technique Breakthrough for Transcendent Control of Voicing
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 17:18] fade music

2. “Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1728] fade music

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
Repeat Phrase
  • During off-the-cuff speaking during idea development, repeat phrase, in Standard Voice.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 1754] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 18:02] fade music

  • 18:02 Warmup reading: Romance of the Fungus World – nice deep smooth non-hyper-enunciation reading; good example to listen to, example of Standard Voice for read-aloud.
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

do a reading from the below page, then return here
Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 1919] fade music

4. First Topical Segment:
__

CURRENT SEGMENT

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

“2021-02-15b Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”

“2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”

  • discussed segment vs topics
  • What topics are discussed in episode 15b/c (5:21:57 long), 15b then 15c.
Timestamps for Part 1 (b) –
“2021-02-15b Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • 25:13 Virtual Ego reading
  • 3240 – talking = idea development , for me
  • 3833 – Discuss technique of repeat phrase while off the cuff.
  • 4826 transcending voice
  • 5300, 1:00:54, 1 wild vs cultivated (while using Std Vpoiec)
    • 1:02:50 “my transcendent voice” vs “my former, egoic voice”. mimicked high pitch then lost my transcendent voice.
    • 1:07:20 forgetting / remembering the two voices: egoic/t’t.
    • 1:11:00 sacrificing eogic voice, transcendent voice attained. here i do actual high-idea development while using standard voice.
    • 1:11:21 Kore
    • 1:14:08 probably end of Kore discussion
  • 1:14:57 “sentence” problematic
  • 11749 auto gap removal feature
  • 12035 revisit cultivated voice. (brief mention)
  • 12145 flowery voice
  • 12501 my experienced character (intended tone of voice) during speaking vs. character upon playback (actual resulting tone of voice) – very shockingly difference.
  • 12535 Arnold’s photograph driven appraoch to bodybuilding.
  • 12657 report on my double-read-aloud of 2012 hane artic. many critqieuses, how to remember them.
  • 13120 deciding to keep going and not terminate my show-recording at 2 hours, keep momentum.
  • 13329 “secret”, need better framework. ‘conspiracy’.
    • 13700 exoteric hegemony. are academics anti-plant?
    • 14343 – preparing to do a critique of 2012 article in the ofrm in the form of pausing pback and saying critque. “Contributions & Limitation”.
    • 14509 ahistoricity – why not written about more? Richard Carrier: Jesus from Outer Space
    • “secret” has baggage 14906
    • 15405 critiquing my voicing of a read-aloud of hane.
  • 20745 re-stating words from a recording of my speaking, to close the gap toward standard voice.
  • todo: 1″37″00 in 17a recording, compare my current revoicing to the recording
    • result: my new voicing in 17a is *way* better than in 15b at this point. No fair: my 17a voice was in peak, strong, awake, state; super deep and full. in 17b, my voice apparatus was in its weak state. THEREFORE: TODO: *REPEAT PHRASE*. Do a recording (17b) where I talk off-the-cuff, using *repeat phrase* as the whole point ; 17b = demo of repeat phrase for off-the-cuff speaking.
  • 20905 how to critique how far I am from standard voice
  • 20922 Vial
  • 2:11:22 behavior change course at uni
  • 2:14:00 mis-voiced during 2012 readaloud “two” as if “to”
  • 2:16:00 – major value topic: Hane’s logic about New Age suspect visionary plants — his logic implies he should recognize all of Western Esotericism as plants.
  • 22345 if it sounds like mushrooms it is. transition to topic: Vial article’s min mod max argment.
  • 23009 criticizing field of entheogen scholarship for failing to recog myth describing fx of msh; only limited to descrip5tion of mushroom physical form.
  • 23146 the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image proves what Letcher-0Hatsis said an’t be done: deliberate mushrooms for religious experience.
  • 23321 returrn to general subject: limits in field of entheogen scholarship . dale pendell,
  • i think here i discsus combining Ruck book “Entheogens, Myth, and Human Consciousness” vs. Metzner book “The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative Experience” <–
  • 24651 degrees of literalness of depictions of mushrooms: Y-stem of msh trees.
  • 25157 myth is analogy describes *fx* of msh’s.
  • 25411 memorizing title of Ruck book
  • 25633 look for in Ruck & Metzner: does it see myth as description of msh fx? to what extent transfoormation of consciciousness resulting from msh?
Timestamps for Part 2 (c) –
“2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • Timestamps for Part 2 (c) –
  • “2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • 0:31 – how was my voicing. review of voicing poitns.
  • 7:08 don’t eq dark (prox’y) sm57; good for bright spks. demo of eq applying.
  • 847 benefit of dark mic miakes use tip tongue bright trebnel enuciation more.
  • 10:31 Ruck levels of evidence omits fx. Metzner.
  • 12;30 metzner: Varieties of Transformative Experiencee.
  • 0:23:25 2 hour length limit is bad for the Egodeath Mystery Show
  • 02655 add voczn reminder right withint the Agenda segment sections.
  • 03203 Metzner
  • 03302 the Psychedelics Integration Handbook
  • 03525 must do your own Lyrics Transceioptoin optimized for the egodeath theory
  • 03642 “shadow” chapter in the Psychedelics Integration Handbook
  • 03846 why academic is so Exoteric?? re: plants & ahistoricity. hegemony anti-Pagan, really? “crypto-Protestants vs heretics & pagans” — FOR REAL???
  • 04654 – HOW TO comment over my playback of readaloud of Hane article
  • 04853 – 2-hour limit for the Egodeath Mystery Show doesn’t work.
  • 54:44 – entheogens taboo in academia
  • 58:42 – evaluate taboos and “censorship” in terms of the exoteric/eso ongoing tension.
  • 1:02:40 meta discussion of “segments” concept
  • 10323: How it went when I did a readaloud of Hane 2012 article. The post-processing went great, everything went great. criticquigin playback of readaloud of Hane article
  • 10950 suggest todo: read 1997 article “double sentence” approach (now id say using the “double phrase approach”)
  • 11119 tool saved massive time by auto removing gaps. there’s no overhead. Should I do more such readings? All the overhead vanished. So, yes.
  • 11254 no overhead for post-production or prerparion pre-read-aloud, so, do more of these double-phrase readings. (i wasn’t aware of it, but here, I was developing toward idea of “repeat phrase” as universal solution to both read-alloud technique and off-cuff speaking).
  • 11647 ahistoricity in academia taboo?? plants taboo??
  • 12557 attitudes have improved in academia re: plants, Ruck reports. “what’s the big deal?”
  • 13237 acadamia pushes Exotericism.
  • 13315 Hane read-aloud went great (not re: prep; re: the recording tracking/vocalizing using “repeat sentence”, and post-production.)
  • 13437 good strong critique over playback of readaloud of Hane 2012 article. Laughing and mocking Hane’s reasoning.
  • 14710 looping/mocking “that may trigger” (from Hane article).
  • 14808 critique Hane’s pressupposition that Western Esotericism != plants.
  • 14916 Luck says Theurgy = plants.
  • 15819 Hane’s arg for plants in New Age implies by same token, by same arg, plants in all of Western Esotericism
  • 20123 mystics either use plants or fraud/fake. (re Hane article Abulafia)
  • 20141 “plants are contentious” – I retort “no, what’s contentious is your violent redefinition of the word ‘entheogens’. book length treatment on Western Esotericism ‘s use of plants — not merely New Age’s use of plants as Hane argues “needs a book-length trreatment”.
  • 20323 be aware of my “entheogen diminisihment fallacies”
  • 20416 Hane participates in the UNSTATED PRESUMPTIONS that our own religion / Western Esotericism is NOT plants.
  • 20952 plethora of my critiques of 2012 article means I must *NOT* comment on every sentence, but be selective.
  • 21116 Hane’s presuppostion that Western Esotericism lacks plants.
  • 21429 Christopher Partridge says there was no plants 1977-1984. fail.
  • 21548 go to Amazon to read TOC in both volumes of Partridge’s books-set.
  • 22036 Christopher Partridge avoids the word “entheogens” in favor of psychedelic.
    • The Re-enchantment of the West, vol. 2, 82–134; see also parts of the chapter on “Cyberspirituality” (135–64).
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

5. Second Topical Segment:
__

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

6. Third Topical Segment:
__

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

7. Fourth Topical Segment:
Unplanned Segment

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • x
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210217_2046.wav – mixer – desc
    • 210217_2293.wav – mic – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 210 kbps from mono <- from stereo?
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
“2021-02-17a Egodeath Mystery Show – Outlining 15b-15c Episode.mp3”

Topic ideas for Egodeath Mystery Show:

  • Play: At 1:10:50 in “2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.mp3”, I read-aloud in Standard Voice (neutral) the lyrics to the song Kicks by Paul Revere & the Raiders.
  • Same recording: play 2 clips of Grid Game
  • Same recording: play clip about Hanegraaff, “the worst idea ever written by an academic”
  • Critique and re-voice as Standard Voice: Find the worst voicing (farthest from Standard Voice) in that recording.
  • 1:00:00 read a summary as I typed into idea development page 11. Next to emojis; find “new extreme double-reading approach” “off the cuff as well” “more granular and universal” – mic recording of reading-aloud this section while typing it:

“2021-02-16b Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Phrase for Standard Voice.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-jWXABsl1l8
  • description:
    • The “repeat phrase” approach to transcending one’s voice
    • Assessment of the previous, 5-hour show
    • A “repeat-phrase” reading of Cyberdisciple’s latest posting, Hesiod, Theogony
  • filesize: 211 MB
  • length: 2:10:55
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav skip
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav skip
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    Board of Mystics – Esoteric Agenda
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

Esoteric Agenda

Misc. Items
  • x

1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk.
egodeaththeory.wordpress.com

This episode covers:

  • The “repeat phrase” approach to transcending one’s voice
  • Assessment of the previous, 5-hour show
  • A “repeat-phrase” reading of Cyberdisciple’s latest posting, Hesiod, Theogony
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

We’ve finished the “Intro” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 125] fade music

2. “Review of Standard Voice” Segment

This is the start of the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1:44] fade music

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
Repeat Phrase
  • During off-the-cuff speaking during idea development, repeat phrase, in Standard Voice.

We’ve finished the “Review of Standard Voice” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 2:14] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

This is the start of the “Warmup Reading” segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 2:27] fade music

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

do a reading from the below page, then return here
Warmup Readings for the Egodeath Mystery Show

That ends the Warmup Reading segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 6:41] fade music

4. First Topical Segment:
The “repeat phrase” approach to transcending one’s voice

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 7:00] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 32:20] fade music

5. Second Topical Segment:
Assessment of the previous, 5-hour show

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 32:52] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • todo: more than the major planned topical segments, record what topics and timestamp i’m actually discussing, throughout the show. WRITE DOWN MANY MANY MORE TIMESTAMPS WITH WHATEVER TOPIC. GOAL IS *NOT* TO PRE-PLAN TOPICS. GOAL IS TO RECORD WHAT TOPICS I DID ACTUALLY COVER, AND WHEN.
  • flaw: try quiet speaking at 4″ instead of 2.5″, to give reverb & reduce claustrophobia effect.
  • flaw: failed to note unplanned diversion topics & timestamps
  • flaw: preplanned segments didn’t really work, two were too similar
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 1:31:48] fade music

6. Third Topical Segment:
A “repeat-phrase” reading of Cyberdisciple’s latest posting:
Hesiod, Theogony

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: 1:33:26] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: 2:08:35] fade music

7. Fourth Topical Segment:
Unplanned Segment

In this next segment, we discuss x.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp started: ] fade music

reminder: repeat phrase

  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]
  • topic: __ [timestamp: ___]

That ends the x segment.
The timestamp is x. write timestamp below
[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

This was the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210216_2044.wav – mixer
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

The “Repeat Phrase” Technique Breakthrough for Transcendent Control of Voicing

the key is “repeat phrase”!

Big milestone announcement: modified prophecy that I made:

The universal solution to all voice problems or goals is: repeat phrase.

This “repeat phrase” technique is even better than “double reading each sentence”, and applies to all forms of writing and speaking, eg lists of items, mega long compound sentences from Hanegraaff/ academia.edu, all forms of vocal utterances.

Thus “repeat phrase” is a UNIVERSAL technique for all types of voicing (reading, off-the-cuff), and for all stylistic goals, such as: affectation, sarcasm, AND voice actor work.

CYBERNETIC LOOP LOCKED-IN TO GOAL PURSUIT! 🎉

🎙 🎶 🎉

🍄 🏆 🍄 🏆

To reach that double holy grail at last, of Standard (neutral, non-affectation) Voice, *even* while doing off-the-cuff speaking/idea development: repeat phrase.

No matter what your goal tone/voicing is, the “repeat phrase” technique always works, and directly works to head straight to the target.

Announcement: new extreme double-reading approach, more granular and universal, and applies to speaking off-the-cuff as well! Repeat each *phrase*/clause/utterance (not “sentence”) twice.

So, this episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show is focused on demonstrating “repeat phrase”, both while reading aloud and while off-the-cuff speaking.

Including — but not depending on — brand new technique idea this morning, of playing back an immediately previous recording of off-the-cuff speaking, while critiquing it (ear training).

maybe a series of two recorders, mic then mixer

whether during read-aloud or during off-the-cuff speaking.

Vary pitch/vol/speed/enunciation.

Add — after mastering Standard Voice – then add “vary affection” as opposed to having *NO* affectation but only varying pitch/ speed/ vol/ enunciation.

Kicks – Song Lyrics

At 1:10:50 in
“2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.mp3”,
I read-aloud in Standard Voice (neutral) the lyrics to the song Kicks by Paul Revere & the Raiders:

Paul Revere & the Raiders

Girl, you thought you found the answer
On that magic carpet ride last night
But when you wake up in the mornin’
The world still gets you uptight

Well, there’s nothin’ that you ain’t tried
To fill the emptiness inside
But when you come back down, girl
Still ain’t feelin’ right

And don’t it seem like
Kicks just keep gettin’ harder to find
And all your kicks ain’t bringin’ you peace of mind
Before you find out it’s too late, girl
You better get straight

No, but not with kicks
You just need help, girl

Well you think you’re gonna find yourself
A little piece of paradise
But it ain’t happened yet
So girl, you better think twice

Don’t you see, no matter what you do
You’ll never run away from you
And if you keep on runnin’
You’ll have to pay the price

And don’t it seem like
Kicks just keep gettin’ harder to find
And all your kicks ain’t bringin’ you peace of mind
Before you find out it’s too late, girl
You better get straight

No, you don’t need kicks
To help you face the world each day
That road goes nowhere
I’m gonna help you find yourself another way

Kicks just keep gettin’ harder to find
And all your kicks ain’t bringin’ you peace of mind
Before you find out it’s too late, girl
You better get straight

And don’t it seem like
Kicks just keep gettin’ harder to find
And all your kicks ain’t bringin’ you peace of mind
Before you find out it’s too late, girl
You better get straight

Songwriters: Barry Mann & Cynthia Weil
http://mann-weil.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_songs_written_by_Barry_Mann_and_Cynthia_Weil
They also wrote the true ASC song:
The Shape of Things to Come
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEqWCH_4srU

Prunes’ song Too Much to Dream was by songwriters: Annette Tucker, Nancie Mantz

Prunes’ song Get Me to the World on Time was written by Jones, Tucker (probably Annette)

“2021-02-16a Egodeath Mystery Show – Repeat Foo Morning Vocal Warmup.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-XQf9YGLYSc
  • description:
    • 80% voice warmup
      • Standard Voice
      • the Repeat Phrase method.
      • my theory of Standard Voice has been corroborated, by a guy in my dream – I got external corroboration that my approach is right, by that guy in my dream
    • 20% Egodeath theory content:
      • 10:10, 34:00 3 grids in the Grid Game (amount of presence of visionary plants throughout history)
        • single-religion grid (diachronic)
        • single-region grid (diachronic)
        • single-era grid (synchronic) (not useful for extracting a Forgot Plot)
        • each with 2 variables from list: [religion, region, era]
      • 47:00-52:00 Hanegraaff non-drug entheogens
      • 1:10:50 read-aloud in Standard Voice (neutral) the lyrics to song Kicks by Paul Revere & the Raiders
  • filesize: 89 MB
  • length: 1:50:18
Post-Processing Steps
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Log of Takes
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210216_2285.wav – mic – Morning, handheld stereo field rec
    • 210216_2286.wav – mic – Morning, now hooked up to SM57 mono (concat’d to the R ch of the above)
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 210 kbps from mono
  • mic:
    • 1st part: DR-05 R.
    • 2nd part: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
      • mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode

“2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-49pvGq4fvh
  • description
    • the 2nd half of 5:21:32 episode. 15b is the first part.
  • filesize: 224 MB
  • length: 2:24:45
Timestamps for Part 2 (c) –
“2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • Timestamps for Part 2 (c) –
  • “2021-02-15c Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • 0:31 – how was my voicing. review of voicing points.
  • 7:08 don’t eq dark (prox’y) sm57; good for bright spks. demo of eq applying.
  • 847 benefit of dark mic makes use tip tongue bright trebnel enuciation more.
  • 10:31 Ruck levels of evidence omits fx. Metzner.
  • 12;30 metzner: Varieties of Transformative Experience.
  • 0:23:25 2 hour length limit is bad for the Egodeath Mystery Show
  • 02655 add voczn reminder right within the Agenda segment sections.
  • 03203 Metzner
  • 03302 the Psychedelics Integration Handbook
  • 03525 must do your own Lyrics Transcription optimized for the egodeath theory
  • 03642 “shadow” chapter in the Psychedelics Integration Handbook
  • 03846 why academia is so Exoteric?? re: plants & ahistoricity. hegemony anti-Pagan, really? “crypto-Protestants vs heretics & pagans” — FOR REAL???
  • 04654 – HOW TO comment over my playback of readaloud of Hane article
  • 04853 – 2-hour limit for the Egodeath Mystery Show doesn’t work.
  • 54:44 – entheogens taboo in academia
  • 58:42 – evaluate taboos and “censorship” in terms of the exoteric/eso ongoing tension.
  • 1:02:40 meta discussion of “segments” concept
  • 10323: How it went when I did a read-aloud of Hanegraaff 2012 article. The post-processing went great, everything went great. criticquigin playback of readaloud of Hane article
  • 10950 suggest todo: read 1997 article “double sentence” approach (now id say using the “double phrase approach“)
  • 11119 tool saved massive time by auto removing gaps. there’s no overhead. Should I do more such readings? All the overhead vanished. So, yes.
  • 11254 no overhead for post-production or prerparion pre-read-aloud, so, do more of these double-phrase readings. (i wasn’t aware of it, but here, I was developing toward idea of “repeat phrase” as universal solution to both read-alloud technique and off-cuff speaking).
  • 11647 ahistoricity in academia taboo?? plants taboo??
  • 12557 attitudes have improved in academia re: plants, Ruck reports. “what’s the big deal?”
  • 13237 academia pushes Exotericism.
  • 13315 Hane read-aloud went great (not re: prep; re: the recording tracking/vocalizing using “repeat sentence”, and post-production.)
  • 13437 good strong critique over playback of readaloud of Hane 2012 article. Laughing and mocking Hane’s reasoning.
    • 14710 looping/mocking “that may trigger” (from Hane article).
    • 14808 critique Hane’s presupposition that Western Esotericism != plants.
    • 14916 Luck says Theurgy = plants.
    • 15819 Hane’s arg for plants in New Age implies by same token, by same arg, plants in all of Western Esotericism
    • 20123 mystics either use plants or fraud/fake. (re Hane article Abulafia)
    • 20141 “plants are contentious” – I retort “no, what’s contentious is your violent redefinition of the word ‘entheogens’. book length treatment on Western Esotericism ‘s use of plants — not merely New Age’s use of plants as Hane argues “needs a book-length treatment”.
    • 20323 be aware of my “entheogen diminishment fallacies”
    • 20416 Hane participates in the UNSTATED PRESUMPTIONS that our own religion / Western Esotericism is NOT plants.
    • 20952 plethora of my critiques of 2012 article means I must *NOT* comment on every sentence, but be selective.
    • 21116 Hane’s presupposition that Western Esotericism lacks plants.
  • 21429 Christopher Partridge says there was no plants 1977-1984. fail.
    • The Re-enchantment of the West, vol. 2, 82–134; see also parts of the chapter on “Cyberspirituality” (135–64).
    • 21548 go to Amazon to read TOC in both volumes of Partridge’s books-set.
    • 22036 Christopher Partridge avoids the word “entheogens” in favor of psychedelic.

“2021-02-15b Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”

New policy: never let a 2-hour “limit” make me switch from being on a roll, to hitting a brick wall. If I’m zooming along, KEEP ZOOMING ALONG. don’t break the momentum.

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-DqbEiwTurE
  • description
    • mushrooms, Hanegraaff, double reading
    • First half of a 5:21:32 mega-episode. 15c is 2nd half.
  • filesize: 297 MB
  • length: 2:57:12
Timestamps for Part 1 (b) –
“2021-02-15b Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Critique.mp3”
  • 25:13 Virtual Ego reading
  • 3240 – talking = idea development , for me
  • 3833 – Discuss technique of repeat phrase while off the cuff.
  • 4826 transcending voice
  • 5300, 1:00:54, 1 wild vs cultivated (while using Std Vpoiec)
    • 1:02:50 “my transcendent voice” vs “my former, egoic voice”. mimicked high pitch then lost my transcendent voice.
    • 1:07:20 forgetting / remembering the two voices: egoic/t’t.
    • 1:11:00 sacrificing eogic voice, transcendent voice attained. here i do actual high-idea development while using standard voice.
    • 1:11:21 Kore
    • 1:14:08 probably end of Kore discussion
  • 1:14:57 “sentence” problematic
  • 1:17:49 auto gap removal feature
  • 1:20:35 revisit cultivated voice. (brief mention)
  • 1:21:45 flowery voice
  • 12501 my experienced character (intended tone of voice) during speaking vs. character upon playback (actual resulting tone of voice) – very shockingly difference.
  • 12535 Arnold’s photograph driven appraoch to bodybuilding.
  • 12657 report on my double-read-aloud of 2012 hane artic. many critqieuses, how to remember them.
  • 13120 deciding to keep going and not terminate my show-recording at 2 hours, keep momentum.
  • 13329 “secret”, need better framework. ‘conspiracy’.
    • 13700 exoteric hegemony. are academics anti-plant?
    • 14343 – preparing to do a critique of 2012 article in the ofrm in the form of pausing pback and saying critque. “Contributions & Limitation”.
    • 14509 ahistoricity – why not written about more? Richard Carrier: Jesus from Outer Space
    • “secret” has baggage 14906
    • 15405 critiquing my voicing of a read-aloud of hane.
  • 20745 re-stating words from a recording of my speaking, to close the gap toward standard voice.
  • todo: 1″37″00 in 17a recording, compare my current revoicing to the recording
  • 20905 how to critique how far I am from standard voice
  • 20922 Vial
  • 2:11:22 behavior change course at uni
  • 2:14:00 mis-voiced during 2012 readaloud “two” as if “to”
  • 2:16:00 – major value topic: Hane’s logic about New Age suspect visionary plants — his logic implies he should recognize all of Western Esotericism as plants.
  • 22345 if it sounds like mushrooms it is. transition to topic: Vial article’s min mod max argment.
  • 23009 criticizing field of entheogen scholarship for failing to recog myth describing fx of msh; only limited to descrip5tion of mushroom physical form.
  • 23146 the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image proves what Letcher-Hatsis said an’t be done: deliberate mushrooms for religious experience.
  • 23321 return to general subject: limits in field of entheogen scholarship . Dale Pendell book set including the Psych’s one.
  • combining Ruck book “Entheogens, Myth, and Human Consciousness” vs. Metzner book “The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative Experience” <–
  • 24651 degrees of literalness of depictions of mushrooms: Y-stem of msh trees.
  • 25157 myth is analogy describes *fx* of msh’s.
  • 25411 memorizing title of Ruck book
  • 25633 look for in Ruck & Metzner: does it see myth as description of msh fx? to what extent transfoormation of consciciousness resulting from msh?
Music for the Show
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode.
  • project file: same as mp3 filename, .aup
Post-Processing Steps
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav – skip
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav -skip
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav 1
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav 2
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

Esoteric Agenda

Possible Topics in this Episode
  • done: play “last night’s” recording/show to hear “flowery” personality/voice.
  • partly done: secret c0nsp!r@cy exoteric/ esoteric (= /”gnostics”/”gnosticism” – as the demonized “other” of exotericists) standoff. ie
    • esotericists are the demonized “other” of the exotericists. including eg no-free-will, plants, ahistoricity.
    • covered: what does Jesus from Outer Space Richard Carrier say about why ahistoricity was not widely explicitly discussed?
    • Hane is asking academics to cover entheogens, but the subject is (for some of them) taboo. Is that taboo to be considered as “censorship”? “secrecy”? “suppression”? “conspir”? we need a more neutral analytical framwework eg re: some existing academics balking at no-free-will , ahistoricity, plants.
Misc. Items
  • todo: read aloud double, 1997 theory-spec.
  • todo: partial/selective double read-aloud of Cyberdisciple’s posting. only doulbe the hard sentences.
1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 1:30] fade music

2. “Vocalization Review” Segment

[timestamp started: 2:03] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 1652] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

[timestamp started: 17:23] fade music

[timestamp of reading started: 2436] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 2737] fade music

4. Segment Topic: How it went in this morning’s double read-aloud Hane Entheogenic Esotericism
  • homework: read side by side,
    • Ruck & Hoffman’s book Entheogens, Myth, and Human Consciousness
      http://amzn.com/B00BSEQOPW
    • Ralph Metzner’s book The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative Experience http://amzn.com/098183180X
    • Write essay on why not combine the two books/ theories/ treatments/ perspectives/ analyses?
    • Does Ruck fail to attempt to recognize how myth describes by analogy transformation of mental worldmodel induced by plants?
    • What is the limitation and contribution of Rucks book and of Metzner’s book?
    • Does Ruck’s book treat entheogens & mythology & consciousness (transformations of experiential mental worldmodel)?
    • Does Metzner’s book treat entheogens & mythology & consciousness (transformations of experiential mental worldmodel)?

[timestamp started: 29:30] fade music

write the timestamp

review vocalization standards, for any off-the-cuff talking! stay conscious/mindful!

Standard Voice

Standard Reference Speaking and Tone

  • exaggerate the bass, treble, and pitch swing
  • Practice standard reference vocalizing
  • speak low pitch with a neutral-positive tone
  • speak low pitch with a smile
  • No particular character or inflection of feeling
  • No odd resonance
  • No character or attitude skew
  • Generic Reference speech, standard voice
  • Straight-up standard pronunciation
  • Neutral medium pace as midpoint
  • Not lax, not edgy (neutral non-emphasis)
  • Neither soft tone, nor aggressive
  • Neutral in tone
  • Functional and plain
  • Regular matter-of-fact speech
  • No attitude or tone skew
  • todo: improve lexicon about controlled vocalizing.
    • target voicing
    • vocal standards
    • voice standard
    • “my transcendent voice”
    • “my former, egoic voice”
    • nonstandard egoic former voice = high pitch + slurring + tight top-back of thr
    • standard voice
    • cultivated voice vs wild uncultivated voice
    • “previous voice” “former voice” = analogy: standing outside ego. talking about my “former”; challenge of avoiding reincarnation into possibilism-thinking.
      • Talk in terms of “my former voice”. puts a transcending distance between my new vs old consciousness/personality/voice.
        • [6:50 p.m. February 15, 2021] – Ruck’s focus-idea of {wild vs. cultivated} = egoic vs transcendent ; egoic thinking vs transcendent thinking.
          • egoic ~= my default uncultivated voice ~= Ruck’s “wild”.
          • transcendent ~= my “standard voice” I worked to develop & engage ~= Ruck’s “the cultivated”.
          • todo: check Ruck’s writings about wild vs. cultivated, isn’t it equiv/isolmorphic w/ child/animal vs. adult/human?
          • wild vs cultivated
          • egoic vs. transcendent
          • my default voice vs my “standard voice” that I designed and installed
          • child vs. adult
    • target voice
      CONTROLLED VOCALIZING (target vocalizing voice) WHILE SPEAKING OFF THE CUFF (= doing idea development off-the-cuff)
      (BOTH DURING IDEA DEVELOPMENT AND NOT(??) do i ever speak w/o doing idea development?? NO.)

write the timestamp

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

5. Read aloud Cyb’s posting: Hesiod, Theogony. Commentary (work-in-progress) [didnt get to this]

[timestamp started: ] fade music

write the timestamp

review vocalization, for any off-the-cuff talking! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

write the timestamp

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

6. Unplanned Segment

[timestamp started: ] fade music

write the timestamp

review vocalization, for any off-the-cuff talking! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

write the timestamp

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

7. Segment Topic

[timestamp started: ] fade music

write the timestamp

review vocalization! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

write the timestamp

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

[timestamp started: ] fade music

write the timestamp

  • x

write the timestamp

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

Log of Takes

  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210215_2039.wav – mixer – desc
    • 210215_2040.wav – mixer – desc
    • 210215_2284.wav – mic – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc

“Entheogenic Esotericism Double-Reading.mp3” (No music, removed long silences)

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-vU7KO6BtoM
  • description
    • I read-aloud Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism, reading each sentence twice.
    • Cleaned up the direct microphone-only recording: removed gaps; a simple voice recording file.
  • filesize: 115 MB
  • length: 1:47:38

Exported from the project file “2021-02-15a Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Entheogenic Esotericism.aup”

“2021-02-15a Egodeath Mystery Show – Double Entheogenic Esotericism.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-3D5GMo2tre correct link
    https://we.tl/t-IrDqGCze2S wrong link
  • description
    • 31:32-2:39:00 – the actual reading of the article.
    • I read-aloud Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism, reading each sentence twice.
    • This particular .mp3 file is a “Show” format: flute & piano between paragraphs.
      • I plan to later clean up the direct microphone-only recording: remove gaps (and ideally, remove false takes), and make that recording available as a non-show .mp3 file; a simple voice recording file.
  • filesize: 266.4 MB
  • length: 2:41:11

Article:
Entheogenic Esotericism
Wouter Hanegraaff
https://www.academia.edu/3461770/Entheogenic_Esotericism_2012_

Music for the Show
  • Song: “Singing Theramin DLFO”, by Illumination Valve
  • 2 songs: flute and piano practice. Playlist: “2020-01-19 flute piano”
    • “01 – piano & flute rehearsal 1”
    • “02 – piano & flute rehearsal 2”
    • Recording Engineer & Producer: Illumination Valve.
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic, no eq. Limiter.
    mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode.
  • project file: same as mp3 filename, .aup
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav 210215_2283.wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav 210215_2037.wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav – skip/delay, remove gaps first.
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

todo: go through the feb 14 morning takes – look for a good intro w/ sep words w/ good timing.

Esoteric Agenda

Possible Topics in this Episode
  • Read-aloud double-reading Hanegraaff article Entheogenic Esotericism.
Misc. Items
  • x
1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 1:21] fade music

2. “Vocalization Review” Segment

[timestamp started: 1:49] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 17:16] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

[timestamp started: 17:48] fade music

[timestamp ended: 24:44] fade music

4. Read-aloud double-reading Hanegraaff article Entheogenic Esotericism

[timestamp started: 26:46, 31:32, actually 40:43] fade music

note the timestamp

review vocalization standards, for any off-the-cuff talking! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

note the timestamp

[timestamp ended: 2:39:25] fade music

5. Segment Topic

[timestamp started: ] fade music

review vocalization standards! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

6. Segment Topic

[timestamp started: ] fade music

review vocalization! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

7. Segment Topic

[timestamp started: ] fade music

review vocalization! stay conscious/mindful!

  • x

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

8. Outro Segment

[timestamp started: ~2:39:45] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

Log of Takes

  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc

OFF AIR

“2021-02-14a Egodeath Mystery Show- Ironic Distancing Through Sound.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-lbzvo2Vw1x
  • description
    • Play clips of reading-aloud Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism with I Robot music and effects, in which I start developing techniques of reading-aloud, a week ago:
      • Ironic distancing from the article by music + effects + speaking quietly + repeating for emphasis
      • Repeating a phrase or statement for ironic emphasis. Led to developing a reading-aloud technique of reading each sentence twice.
  • filesize: 249.9 MB
  • length: 2:28:39
Music for the Show
  • Song: Hang Back Freaky, by Illumination Valve
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic > Pyle mixer > M76 limiter > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq (bypassed) > B mixer > TASCAM DR05 in Stereo mode.
  • project file: same as mp3 filename, .aup
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav (__ kbps from mono)
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • todo:
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

Esoteric Agenda

Possible Topics in this Episode
  • 4. Progress on this Show Format and an approach to combining recordings with a live broadcasting format.
  • 5. Playing some of the February 7 night reading of that article, to hear me developing the technique of “reading-aloud for meaning”, and double-reading for emphasis.
  • 6. Practicing double-reading of Hanegraaff’s 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism.
Misc. Items
  • todo: Silence an f-word; todo: edit Mixer deck 210214_2017.wav @40:50, a good take of practice run of the Egodeath Mystery Show. is there anything actually worth keeping??
  • 210214_2025.wav & 2027 (better input take) – processed intro deep-pitch straight-ahead intro. Loaded into project “[mbp]/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Intro Outro/Intro Outro.aup”
1. Intro Segment

[timestamp started: 0:00] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 2:17] fade music

2. “Vocalization Review” Segment

[timestamp started: 3:00] fade music

  • diversion on breaking up sentences and paragraphs during read-aloud

[timestamp ended: 27:12] fade music

3. “Warmup Reading” Segment

[timestamp started: 28:58] fade music

  • Diversion about __ and __.

[timestamp ended: 50:53] fade music

4. Run Through the Follow-the-Numbers Show Format with Double-Reading

[timestamp started: 53:01] fade music

  • Show format, discuss double-reading the show flow
  • Limiter
  • Improved show-flow pages
  • Data Management: not sure whether to save direct mic rec’g or only the mixed show. Need to reduce the minutes of .wav files generated.
  • Discuss verbose ideas in Idea Development Page 11 top of page – show format.
  • Diversions: reviewed Vial history and forgot-plots, Brown’s conversion from Moderate to Maximal entheogen theory of religion.

[timestamp ended: 1:51:29] fade music

5. Precursor to Ironic Distancing + Double-Reading Technique, in the Episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show, “At War with the Mystics” (Feb. 7) – Play Clips

[timestamp started: ~1:51:29] fade music

  • Play 1:45:00 in “/Users/michaelhoffman/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-07b Egodeath Mystery Show – At War with the Mystics”
    That’s the start of Hane EE article “traditional methods of the mystics may…”
    • 1:49:36 “Dare to take… (not at all comparable to the eucharist)” (sarcasm editorializing) – but play before/after that point. as well as clipping this.
    • Play Feb7 final 45 minutes, listen for double-reading/ reading-aloud for meaning-emphasis. Sarcastic demo; demonstrate during this show, the type of reading I was doing feb7 pm.
    • 2:02:20 in that aup. clipped for present show.
    • Turned his article into an ironically distanced art-piece. The echo and background music and the requirement to speak quietly, added up to a “bracketed-off context” as opposed to a “take the author seriously” tone — plus Hane’s own tone is ironic/disbelieving/ scare-quotes. This “scare-quote” reading was the *mindset* of repeating twice; thus was invented double-reading.
    • Info about that episode:
      The Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-07) At War with the Mystics
      https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-2021-02-07

[timestamp ended: 2:27:00] fade music

6. Practice Double-Reading Hanegraaff EE Article

[timestamp started: ] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: ] fade music

Outro Segment

[timestamp started: ~2:27:30] fade music

  • x

[timestamp ended: 2:28:39] fade music

Log of Takes

  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210214_2030.wav – mixer – 2:28:39 show episode
    • 210214_2279.wav – mic-only; SM57 mic>preamp>limiter M76>volpot>deck (no eq). 2.5″ 60 degrees aimed middle of upper lip. (monitored via earbuds yay no mega swamping with bass)
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc

Leveraging the Separation of Concerns: Record Purely a Reading of an Article, then Play that Recording on my Show, Pausing to Add Commentary as if a Separate “Track” – Need to “DJ” my own *clips* that are *separately* recorded.

the playback of the reading to add my peanut gallery commentary/ explnations/ critrqieu/ objections

My attempts to do a single perfect live take of 2 hours of variety show, ends up squandering massive amounts of storage space and thus drowning my good clips (signal) among mountains of noise.

It is *easy* to do a “killer take” of an Intro segment, when I’m not also, simultaneously, trying to talk to create a 2-hour show.

  1. Generate & gather 2 hours of clips, none of which reference the show. No timestamp statements in these recordings.
  2. Hit Record, do a DJ continuous take, 2 hours, with timestamps, where I play back the clips that I have gathered into the audio project file for the episode.

Mic Demo & Vocalization Victory Lap (I Hope)

  • https://we.tl/t-BfQubKBBq9 320kbps mp3. Preview (Magnifying Glass icon) for in-browser listening is only available for .mp3 files, not for .wav files (below).
    (no real Egodeath content (Brinckmann random demo read-aloud’s))
  • The full-fidelity .wav version is only 2x the filesize! so .wav dl is: https://we.tl/t-Tq3jfnbtR4
  • Microphone demo Shure SM57 with & without Limiter, several distances / angles.
  • Cardioid mic (therefore has bass proximity effect)
  • Vocal lessons learned about my two “impediments” I corrected.
  • No pop filter (yay!) – 60 degrees off-axis, plus Limiter, obviates evil pop filter.
  • Handling-noise demo with and without Limiter engaged.

“2021-02-13b Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff Entheogenic Esotericism Double Reading Practice.mp3”

Download Info
  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-UkQCEmmIAS – warning: contains semi-edited cussing, and “b.s.” about 8 times in 1-2 minutes
  • description [topics/segments; 4 items of few words each; 20 words total – not details]
    • several critical-commentary sections by me.
    • I played some of my Feb 7b obscured read-aloud where I started developing a read-to-amplify technique.
    • worked out (planned) a new reading-aloud strategy for this article.
      • Don’t take “paragraph” and “sentence” literally; use shorter definitions of those.
  • filesize: 275 MB
  • length: 2:00:09

Practice Run of Hanegraaff 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism w/ double reading & warning commentaries that he’s FULL OF IT

Music for the Show
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 320 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic > Pyle mixer > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode.
  • project file: same as mp3 filename, .aup
Post-Processing Steps
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • todo:
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

Practice Run of Hanegraaff 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism w/ double reading & warning commentaries that he’s FULL OF IT

Content

Practice Double-Reading Hanegraaff 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism

[timestamp started]

  • Reading policies:
    • Disclaimer before start
    • Define ‘paragraph’ as like 1/4 page. Define “paragraph” loosely, as eg ~10 lines.
    • Read title twice
    • Read section headings twice
    • Read each sentence twice. Define “sentence” loosely, as eg ~4 lines.
    • Don’t read most quote-marks.
    • Break up long sentences as if multiple sentences.
    • Don’t mention footnotes
    • End of paragraph:
      • Paraphrase/ loose/informal quick reading of the paragraph (nominally 1-time) – it can be as-is.
    • Commentary on the paragraph

[timestamp ended]

Play feb 7 night reading of EE article where i devd “reading with amplified meaning” technique

[timestamp started]

[timestamp ended]

Log of Takes

  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210213_1988.wav – mixer <- export as mp3
    • 210213_2270.wav – mic
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 2102##_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc

“2021-02-13a Egodeath Mystery Show – Smoking Complicated Ruin and Wreck.mp3”

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-GuBDjMm184
  • description [topics/segments; 4 items of few words each; 20 words total – not details]
    • x
  • filesize: __ MB
  • length: __
Music for the Show
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: __ kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic > Pyle mixer > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode.
  • project file: same as mp3 filename, .aup
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

Esoteric Agenda [for Ruin episode] – tbd, clean up after recording next episode starting now…

  • todo: how is hard drive full if storing on cloud???
  • todo: how were the jan 2021 voice recordings so substantive, and no gaps, needing no editing, with no planning, no show format?
Play a Clip of Commentary from Reading Hanegraaff’s 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism, “May Induce”

[timestamp started]

  • x

[timestamp ended]

Play a Clip of Commentary from Reading Hanegraaff’s 1995 article where Dan Merkur writes “Criticized Negatively”

[timestamp started]

  • x

[timestamp ended]

Play a Clip of Commentary from Take 1 of Reading Hanegraaff’s 1995 article on Empirical Historiography

[timestamp started]

  • x

[timestamp ended]

Play a Clip of the First Episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show, “My Followers”

[timestamp started]

  • x

[timestamp ended]

A double-reading of Wouter Hanegraaff’s 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism

[timestamp started]

  • A double-reading of Wouter Hanegraaff’s 2012 article Entheogenic Esotericism.
  • Decide the reading approach eg read each sentence twice, then at end of paragraph, paraphrase the paragraph by doing a loose read-aloud of paragraph ie skip fluff words and replace some words by simpler words.
    • decide if will do commentary/ explanation & critique, of entire article & on a per paragraph.
    • scale/scope of summary/critique:
    • book or article
    • entire
    • chapter or section
    • paragraph

[timestamp ended]

Generating Fewer Hours of Recording, with More Content Ratio, Piecing Together a Show from That, without Micro Editing

[timestamp started]

  • Use of Stop often, Pause often, mute , to generate less recording time, more content. Increase ratio of content to recording time.
  • todo: Decide the extent to which to use the audio editor.
  • make show structure ; get format set up to guide you to it
  • check past to do items

[timestamp ended]

Log of Takes

several intro takes

  • added to show project:
    • Comments while doing reading Take 1 of Hane 1995 article dr05. thats:
    • project file: “2021-02-11b Egodeath Mystery Show – Empirical Method Esotericism.aup”,
    • added to show project: 24:10-31:31 Dan Merkur writes “should be criticized negatively”. critique, commentary
    • added to show project: 45:38-48:32 “even more exciting section” named “Wisdom of Clowns”, rescuing enlightenment from the mystics, who are not worthy
  • mic deck 210212_2257.wav (sm57 into DR-05) (no mixer deck)
  • filename – mic|mixer – content to use
    • 210212_2264.wav – mic – hane “May Induce” 7:54-13:00 laughing at Hane’s list of nondrug entheogens – in a reading of his intro, just add plants. re: Reading of Hane EE article.
    • 210213_2267.wav – mic – producing fewest rec’gs
    • 210213_1983.wav – mixer – ruin & wreck delay
    • 210212_1968.wav – mixer – sep-word intro w/ reverb
    • 210213_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc
    • 210213_####.wav – mic|mixer – desc

finished episode: mixer: 2102-13_1986.wav <– export as mp3 (added to the project file)
mic: 210213_2268.wav

Download Info

copy the below template to Agenda page, fill-in there, then move from there to idea development page

Download Info

“2021-02-12a Egodeath Mystery Show – Double-Reading Communication Breakthrough.mp3″

For agenda during show creation/recording, see new page:
Board of Mystics – The Esoteric Agenda

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-h1RmivL1jg
  • filesize: 248.5 MB
  • length: 2:28:17
  • desc:
    • Segment 1: New breakthrough Communication technique-invention today: Reading each sentence twice, to read-aloud an article.
      • 46:22 I play the exact spot in the read-aloud recording, where I discovered/invented the double-reading technique.
      • 1:38:06 Feb 11 Take 1 of 1995 reading, with bright mic (TASCAM DR-05 omnidir) & voice in bad state.
      • 1:40:34 Feb 12 Take 2 of 1995 reading, with dark mic (Shure SM57 cardioid) & voice in good state.
        • Errata 1:41:03 I said “that’s today’s bright mic that I’m using now” – I meant, dark mic.
    • Segment 2 & end: The point of Hanegraaff’s 1995 article advocating Empirical method against the Religionist method.
      • 2:17:40 At final segment near end of mp3, I say Hanegraaff must combine:
        • empiricism
        • religionism
        • the egodeath theory; “analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control”.
          • correct, productive historical research must specifically trace the history and differences of “analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control” (synchronic & diachronic).
          • The right/correct brand of religionism for empiricism (as a method of academic historiography of esotericism) to track & integrate is analogical psychedelic eternalism cybernetics.
          • In religionism, the Signal is analogical psychedelic eternalism; the Noise is everything else. Good, relevant, substantive empirical historiography is that which tracks Signal (analogical psychedelic eternalism), not Noise (everything else).
    • Segment 3: Spectrum of various formats combining, of the Egodeath Mystery Show as a broad umbrella, from individual voice recordings, to multimedia extravaganza.
      • A sliding scale of structure is available.
      • The only rule is, Standard Reference vocalizing.
      • 1:17:39 drums w/ delay
    • Segment 4: Vocalizing-work paid off, and combines with this great double-reading technique.
      • Pronounced a curse on the web page that strawmans broadcasters. In fact, broadcasters work hard to speak correctly and clearly and naturally.
Production Notes
  • bitrate: try 260 kbps
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic > Pyle mixer > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode. During the show, I played some of
    • today’s great SM57 (cardioid/prox’y/dark) (good voice state) reading of Hane1995, side-by-side with
    • yesterdays’ (omni/bright) (bad voice state) reading, of the Abstract.
    • To hear the eq difference & voice quality difference.
  • mic deck: 210212_2263.wav
  • mixer deck: 210212_1959.wav
  • project file: “2021-02-12a Egodeath Mystery Show – Double-Reading Communication Breakthrough.aup”
  • done:
  • determine which wavs
  • connect recorder drives
  • create music project containing both wavs
    • 2021-02-12a Egodeath Mystery Show – Double-Reading Communication Breakthrough
  • import Mic Deck wav
    • import Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav (skip)
    • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav (skip)
    • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • todo:
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • done: copy heading to TOC

Content

Double-Reading
  • My new, Double-Reading technique
  • special Board of Celebration edition- hit it out of the park w/ vocalizing & diamond-run 10/10 difficulty article.
  • remember my prophecy i made: “the universal solution to all vocalization problems is “repeat statement””.
  • double – my listening repeatedly to cds of Teaching Co
  • double reading: Cybernetics = communication
Hanegraaff 1995 Article
  • explain the point of the article, 3 positions.
  • Explaining Hanegraaff’s article about empiricism vs. (the false-dichotomy debate between religionism vs reductionism)
  • conversation w hanegraaff, the email i sent him
  • explain Hanegraaff’s 1995 article
    • mysticism/theosophy, gnosticism, esotericism
    • religionism, reductionism, empiricism
  • read aloud Hane 2012 article , double-reading –
    • todo: decide reading approach eg read each sentence twice, then at end of paragraph, paraphrase the paragraph by doing a loose read-aloud of paragraph ie skip fluff words and replace some words by simpler words.
      • decide if will do comentary/ explanation & criqique, of entire article & on a per paragraph. scale/scope of summary/critiqieu:
        • book or article entire
        • chapter or section
        • paragraph
  • read aloud M Hoffman article, double-reading
  • first take, last night – uploaded: some good commentary.
New Formats of the Egodeath Mystery Show
  • Format of the show – like Carl “Professor Secret” Ruck, the format of this show will be present but absent
  • need to extract clips – worry about that later.
  • show format: pros/cons of clipping/breaking-up an episode/take/recording session.
  • whether to use audio editor & how much.
  • new format for the show: each episode will use a completely different, unitque format
    • why? it’s a mystery
    • looking for the late night point in time where I received the word ‘mystery’
    • the Egodeath Mystery Show is an umbrella for all kinds of my recordings, download files.
    • insanity tunnel: i play shows within shows, the resampling workflow:
    • during the show, i play a section of a previous show,
      • in which i play a section of a previous show,
        • in which i play a section of a previous show,
          • in which i play a section of a previous show,
            • in which i play a section of a previous show,
              • in which i play a section of a previous show, 😱🤯😵
Vocalizing, Voiceover, & Microphones
  • hammer pitch down down down — result: it sounds full and normal, not bassy. only sounds resonant, not “bass pitch”.
  • Voiceover / vocalization breakthrough/remedial recovery.
  • voice before & after demo
  • done: 2 mics – play samples
  • vocal: beware of overconfidence & poor speaking
  • vocal: how bright mic caused slurring
  • voice professor : open up back/top of throat
  • vocal: play nightmarish reject 57->dr05 night takes? from when i switched to 57.
  • vocal: hate for web page against broadcasters – logical fallacies

About today’s Cybernetic Communication Breakthrough: Double-Reading – Hanegraaff article voiceover reading take 2, reading every sentence twice

planned commentary show-episode about this newly discovered method of reading/vocalizing.

“Empirical method in the study of esotericism (Hanegraaff).mp3” – Take 2, with new, double-reading technique 🎙👍 👍 👍 🎉 🏆 🔥 (Feb. 12)

Black Diamond Run

⛷♦︎

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-jZ0bWg5Ljl
  • filesize: 136.3 MB
  • length: 2:07:45
  • desc:
    • Read Hanegraaff’s 1995 article “Empirical method in the study of esotericism”, reading every sentence twice.
    • He defines 3 approaches:
      • religionist
      • reductionist
      • empiricist <- he advocates, against the other two approaches.
  • Communication breakthrough: at 46:12, I discover/create the technique of deliberately, strategically reading each sentence twice.
    • Standard practice for voiceover.
    • Increases my comprehension & vocalization.
    • Produces far higher comprehension for the listener.
  • Take 2 read-aloud of Wouter Hanegraaff’s 1995 article: “Empirical method in the study of esotericism”. In this take, I discovered/invented the breakthrough “double-reading” technique of vocalizing & comprehension & comprehensibility.
    https://www.academia.edu/1761692/Empirical_Method_in_the_Study_of_Esotericism_1995_ (religionist/ reductionist/ empiricist)
    Journal: “Method & Theory in the Study of Religion”
Production Notes
  • bitrate: 260 kbps from mono
  • mic: Shure SM57 mic > Pyle mixer > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode.
  • mic deck 210212_2257.wav (sm57)mixer deck n/a
  • project file: “Empirical method in the study of esotericism (Hanegraaff).aup”
  • I discovered this technique about 1/3 through the article, started using it at that point of time. A communication breakthrough, right here on the show live on-air.
    • Vocalization apparatus usage:
      • Open bottom of chest;
      • Open top/back of throat;
      • Open back of mouth;
      • Focus activity tongue-tip.
      • Push pitch down, hard.
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav
    • import Mixer Deck wav (n/a)
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
    • normalize vol of Mixer wav (n/a)
  • export mp3 of Mic wav (260 kbps from mono)
    • export mp3 of Mixer wav (n/a)
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • TODO:
  • copy heading to TOC

based on my “failed” late-night reading of Hanegraaff’s ch19 Entheogenic Esotericism (music/fx too loud), then, I re-read for effect & clarity, selected phrases. Now, while reading-aloud (a 2nd time) the much harder 1995 Hanegraaff article “Empirical method in the study of esotericism”, I full-on discovered, a few minutes ago, around 9:30 am feb 12 2021, a new way of communication — read every sentence twice.

I just discovered a breakthrough new way of communication: reading-aloud every sentence twice. This really provides a great value-add opportunity for me; for the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Today’s vocalization & comprehensibility is *great*; solidly professional (don’t let down my mindfulness-guard though! always keep pushing for correct std ref’c speaking!)

“2021-02-11b Egodeath Mystery Show – Empirical Method Esotericism.mp3” – Hanegraaff article voiceover reading, with suitable commentary – Take 1

See also the Feb 12 “double-reading” version instead:

“Empirical method in the study of esotericism (Hanegraaff).mp3” – Take 2, with new, double-reading technique 🎙👍 👍 👍 🎉 🏆 🔥 (Feb. 12)

The below, version 1 voiceover take, is interesting just for its commentary in the middle.

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-1E5axGzHRx
  • length: 1:50:53
  • desc: the reading, raw voiceover take – raw…
    • 24:10-31:31 WARNING: CONTAINS HEAVY CUSSING, right about where Dan Merkur writes “should be criticized negatively”. critique, commentary
    • 45:00 – i read the section titles, about 10 of them.
    • 47:00, 49:00 Look up diachronic & synchronic.
    • 48:00 critique, rescuing enlightenment from the mystics, who are not worthy
Errata
  • Failed to say title immediately before the read-through that started w/ Abstract.
  • done (b):
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of dr05 wav
  • todo (b):
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC
  • mic deck wav:
    • 210211_1956.wav
    • 210211_1957.wav
  • mixer deck wav: n/a, dr-05 only
  • project file:
    “2021-02-11b Egodeath Mystery Show – Empirical Method Esotericism.aup”
  • the orig was 45 min pre-stuff, including Conclusion pre-read, then 1:50:00 to read the article, to end.
  • 3.5 hours of content – split, omitted recorder discussion, omitted vocalizging discussion.
  • Full semi-smooth reading of the article. 1st take, never read before, ui awkward (pdf of photocopies).

“2021-02-11a Egodeath Mystery Show – 2- 3- 5-Level Models.mp3” – pre-reading commentary/ theorizing, Conclusion pre-read

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-LxLUF12hfB
  • length: 45:10
  • pre-reading commentary & theory-development
    • title of article
    • skeptical of hanegraaff
    • newage bunk cover story of “no plants”.
    • 2- 3- 5-level models.
    • the “stuck in the middle bucket” syndrome.
    • pre-read of the Conclusion
  • mic deck wav:
    • 210211_1956.wav
    • 210211_1957.wav
  • mixer deck wav: n/a, dr-05 only
  • project file:
  • “2021-02-11b Egodeath Mystery Show – Empirical Method Esotericism.aup”
  • done (a):
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of dr05 wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC
Black Diamond Run Confirmed

⛷♦︎

Their knowledge level, on a scale of 0-10: -1
Their pomposity level: 11

Finished reading-aloud the article and recording, 26 pages.
My resulting I.Q. decrease: 20 points

😵

Vocalization

Voiceover takes approach: deliver a recording to piece together a good reading & shorten gaps.

Emphasis here is on trying to open bottom chest and lift and open upper throat; more resonant cav (actively open /lift the top back of throat), less “tight throat” odd, bad tonality.

Take control of the full vocal aparatus, engage, exercise it, contrast bad operation/muscle patterns.

Judge, assess, identify problem spots, analyze, remedy.

Do not ever again think “I can quit trying, I can tune out and forget about trying to improve and judge my speech firmly.

Shocking how poor, sloppy, inattention, out of touch w/ own totally hit or miss voice.

was worse than embarrassed, upon listening critically, about a week ago wtf i thought and announced that my gear was broken.

omg i was delusional and out of touch w/ my own vocal sound.

resting on laurels.

i carefully measured my ego and determined that it was much too large in size.

i thought i was quite good, and in fact I was quite bad.

“My recorder is surely broken.”

Esoteric Agenda

  • todo:
  • listen to the recordding and decide whether to clean it up (removing bad takes, separating segments / clips.
    • Evaluate my vocalization.
    • Study the article by listening to this reading-aloud of it.
    • Decide whether to clean up the reading, or re-vocalize better this time and then do a fresh cleaner recording.
    • The relevance of this article and its value are in doubt; understanding this article amounts to following propellerhead debates per this 1995 article about 3 positions:
      • reductionists
      • religionists <– this article says religionists are evil. Analyze.
      • empiricists (Hanegraaff advocates this position)
      • todo: listen and identify the point of each section.
  • Policies for reading this particular article:
    • don’t read footnotes,
    • don’t comment (not even after paragraph),
    • don’t read list of citations;
    • don’t read References section.
  • add to vocal warmup at the Egodeath Mystery Show page: Anatomy section:
    • add notes about inhaling
    • open lower chest
    • open & lift top of throat and back of mouth
    • open front of mouth, tip of tongue
  • 5 levels of esotericism
    • the egodeath theory
    • irvin
    • hanegraaff
    • Western Esotericism scholar unaware of entheogens & the egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control)

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Journal of the North American Association for the Study of Religion

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion publishes articles, notes, book reviews and letters which explicitly address the problems of methodology and theory in the academic study of religion.

This includes such traditional points of departure as history, philosophy, anthropology, psychology, and sociology, but also the natural sciences, and such other approaches as feminist theory, discourse analysis, and ideology critique. 

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion also concentrates on
the critical analysis of the history of the study of religion itself. 

Publisher: Brill
Print Only
ISSN: 0943-3058OnlineISSN: 1570-0682

“2021-02-11 Egodeath Mystery Show – Critique of Reading.mp3”

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-2xFowQlAVi
  • desc:
    • read the conclusion section of Hane article, with open throat/back of mouth.
    • played & critiqued samples of my readings from yesterday’s episodes of the Egodeath Mystery Show.
  • mic deck 210211_2255.wav
  • mixer deck 210211_1955.wav
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC
Esoteric Agenda
  • done: Intro
  • mic deck 210211_2255.wav
  • mixer deck 210211_1955.wav
  • done: Vocal Warmup reminders
    • More bassy! PUSH PITCH DOWNWARD!
    • FINISH EACH SENTENCE; DON’T INTERRUPT.
  • done: Vocal Warmup reading
  • done: put this agenda in a page that doesn’t scroll around.
  • done: play sample of 3 readings from yestday.
  • done: Critique of yesterday’s readings, there are very good clips buried in there – but, they need editing and cleanup.
    • OPEN UP THE TOP OF THROAT/ BACK OF MOUTH.
    • a: 27
    • b: hanegraaff
    • c: played most of “best clips from show feb 08b”, critiqued “surfing w/ loss of control” as egoic pov.
    • d: reading from book The Hidden Passion: A Novel of the Gnostic Christ
    • Not bassy enough. Not consistent effort. STEP IT UP 100FOLD!
    • Too stop & start; requires extensive editing to piece together a listenable result.
    • 27 reading was good as a warmup prep ONLY. NEED TO REDO- OR TAKEAWAY LESSON LEARNED: PUSH BASS, CONTIGUOUS.
      • policy: 2 takes max (on a phrase), then move on.
    • Way too many interruptions, breaks, gaps, etc. – except fiction reading was smooth/continuous.
      • GOAL: MORE CONTINUOUS READING; obviate post-tracking edit cleanup pass.
  • not control loss or transformn or restabl
    • 1. egoic
    • 2. trannsfmn
    • 3. perma new the personal control system that’s stable, has long been reconfigured; monolithic pseudo-autonomous control replaced by transpersonal 2-level-aware the personal control system (todo later: polish that concept-label).
  • todo: stop the throat clearing tic.
  • todo: analyse funny tone of saying
    • church
    • show
    • hypoth: open up top of throad/ back of mouth. try flipping between bad vs good.
      • always monitor for failure tone here.
  • todo: Read Hanegraaff’s 1990s unreadable article against religionists, comment on it. skill level: 10 (black diamond run)
  • 1:40:00 finished re-levelling mic & drums reversed fade-in. to stop clipping when full-throated vocal at mic.
  • FINDING: OPEN UP THE TOP OF THROAT AND BACK OF MOUTH.
  • 1:45:00-1:47:00 read-aloud hane conclusion.
  • 1:49:00 todo: read-aloud regarding vocal anatomy. https://www.bing.com/search?q=vocal+anatomy –
    https://voicedoctorla.com/vocal-anatomy
    https://www.bing.com/search?q=vocal%20anatomy%20voiceover

How to Develop Your Voice for TV or Radio <– i hated this page the first time, and I hate it now. fake amateur career site, “let’s write an article about everything EXCEPT proper normal standard reference vocalizing, and say nothing but disparagement & demonizing about correct standard vocalizing.” COMPLETELY USELESS PAGE, NOTHING BUT PERIPHERAL “LOOK HOW SAVVY I AM” — OOPS, FORGOT THE BASIC SUBSTANCE!!

Extracting Clips from the Four Feb 10 Episodes

this section was written Feb 26 or 27, within idea development page 12, when I created clips:

It’s been a huge project, trying to extract all my Egodeath clips from the four Feb 10 episodes.

It took time to add timestamps — and develop a better approach to do that. I scoped-out the potential clips from episodes 2021-02-10a through 2021-02-10d.

It’s taken a long time to clean up the projects and start noting timestamps in a clean, standard way. I’m only half done (finished A & B, need to do C & D). A 2-day project! done: I’m not even done w/ B — I need to make sure my commentary is timestamped separately from reading Hane’s words.

done: From B, I’m going to omit my readings of Hane’s EE article, and only keep my commentary – I’m sick of some passages of the article.

“2021-02-10d Egodeath Mystery Show – Hidden Passion.mp3”

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-8r77lTcjND
  • Description/content/timestamps:
    • Overall description: Read-aloud from Preview pages of Laurence Caruana’s book The Hidden Passion: A Novel of the Gnostic Christ.
    • 0:00-1:15 overhead for the show is as low as a micro size dot
    • 2:15-x:xx short episodes
    • 3:45-x:xx rolling agenda
    • 8:00-x:xx switched from Hang Back Freaky (music) to Test Coast.
    • 10:22-13:54 Advanced mystic state is about stability, the other side of the coin as egoic fear of loss of control. step through dragon gate w/ right foot, to shift basis of control from possibilism-thinking to transcendent thinking / eternalism-thinking. through the guard gate.
    • 19:42-x:xx song Vanishing Girl by Dukes of Stratosphear
    • 21:00-x:xx vocalization rules
    • x:xx-x:xx __ My Love Explodes, What in the World. album Chips from the Choc fireball, Dukes of S.
    • 23:30-x:xx Conversation rules
    • 25:24 -2624 dragon gate jumping topics = jumping through gateway.
    • 2624-x:xx __ finish read-aloud entire paragraph b4 commenting
    • 29:00-x:xx __ song: What in the World starts.
    • x:xx-29:00 __review of vocalization finishes.
    • 30:16-31:30 Rolfe warmup reading.
    • continue here extracting timestamps
    • 44:03-x:xx the readings
    • x:xx-x:xx __
    • x:xx-x:xx __
  • Mic Deck .wav: 210210_2243.wav
  • Mixer Deck .wav: 210210_1949.wav
  • Mic vs. Mixer recording length/timestamps: same
  • Project location: Green/white label SD card “TK Audio 2” – “/Volumes/TK Audio 2/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-10d Egodeath Mystery Show – Hidden Passion/2021-02-10d Egodeath Mystery Show – Hidden Passion.aup”
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • todo:
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

The Esoteric Agenda

  • done: Review vocalization rules.
  • meeting rules:
  • resolved: create project, named same as mp3.
  • done: Decide which reading to do. Caruana http://amzn.com/0978263707
    • The Hidden Passion: A Novel of the Gnostic Christ
    • Laurence Caruana
    • Based on the Nag Hammadi Texts Paperback
    • 2013
  • done: Do the selected reading.
  • done: write the wav filenames for this meeting.
  • done: Define a *minimalist* template for downloading the show.
    • todo: “Voice Recording log file”: in the Egodeath Mystery Show page, list all mp3 files (w/ dl link / desc; ie MINIMALIST TEMPLATE).
    • also must announce each mp3 in the idea development page. Must update TOC of idea development page.
  • pick musci – DONE
  • DONE: think-aloud to work-out a new thought, in a low pitch.
  • DONE: review “2 sides of “loss of control” coin”, new lexicon/usage.
  • DELAY: make a list of themes of not “loss of control” but of “new balance”; discuss.
    • 1:50:00
    • leopard fountain
    • kylix
    • pink initiate in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image
    • etc.

“2021-02-10c Clips Fx – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3”

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week from Feb. 27, 2021: https://we.tl/t-dePZ8sRiU2
  • Length: 36:59
  • Filesize: 89 MB
  • Overall description: Demo of EQ & Fx on “2021-02-10c Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3”.
    The SM57 mic, close-miked at ~3″ 45° (as in 02-08 & 02-10c), is dark – which is good for some trebly speakers. It’s hard to master for mobile speakers/bluetooth earbuds. I instead mastered for Apple earbuds & my good pair of Sony 7506 headphones, bouncing between them.
  • EQ: Gentle U eq variants, freshly dialed (U; not much smilefrown). Mastered for speakers: Apple earbuds & SONY 7506 closed-back headphones. One or the other, at a time, different mild U variants.
  • Timestamps:
  • 0:00 –
  • Recording header:
  • Content:
    • __
  • Vocalization:
    • Evening. See 02-10c.
  • Time and Date:
    • eq/fx 11:00 p.m., February 27, 2021.
  • Miking: Based on 02-08b, which was prior to the 02-10 episodes.
    • Mic: SM57
    • Distance: 3″.
    • Position: 45°, aimed at upper lip.
    • No pop filter.
    • Polar pattern: Cardioid.
    • Limiter: none
    • EQ: explored U via MXR 10-band.
    • FX: yes
    • Mic tracking file: Fed by 2021-02-10c Clips v2.
    • Mixer tracking file: 210227_2105.wav
  • BE DONE AT 0:30!
  • The timestamp is x.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • skip: normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
Production Notes
  • Track title & project file: same as mp3 filename.
  • bitrate: 260 kbps
  • normal miking was likely:
    Shure SM57 mic. 3-4″ distance.
    Previous episode, 2021-02-08b, uses:
    Shure SM57 3″, 45 degrees. Aimed at upper lip or 1/4″ in front of upper lip. ~45 degrees. No pop filter or windscreen. Probably no Limiter. No eq. Check the previous episode’s miking.
  • normal chain: mic > Pyle mixer > MXR M76 > JHS volume pot > TASCAM DR-05 in Mono mode > eq > mixer > TASCAM DR-05 in Stereo mode
Show Prep
  1. Prep the agenda: Copy template from Show page to Agenda page
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/board-of-mystics-meeting-agenda/
  2. Prep the audio project file, named same as mp3 (no keywords necessary yet, after show name).

“2021-02-10c Clips v2 – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3″ – new, Feb. 27, 2021 (replaces Feb. 26 v1)

I cleaned-up this Clips episode, then subsequently made an Effects version of this cleaned-up episode (see above section).

I made a Clips (or Core) shortened version, of Feb 10 3rd episode (02-10c). Forthe Clips version of the ep, I used the dry direct mic recording (no music). Has the intro & outro. I omitted the 8b clips segment, since that’s available separately and I want to give full attention to the new content. At the start, I retained the list of types of readings & recordings that I can incorp into any episode, but I omitted the recorded, 8c cleaned-up clip.

v2 (Feb 27):
  • increased the gaps to allow read-aloud & inhaling.
  • various fixes.
  • removed fluff words.
  • cleaned up (nice & clean now for re-use such as remixing).
  • added one statement at the end.
  • reorged the end sentences a little.
Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week (starting Feb 27, 2021):
    https://we.tl/t-WbCQned14u <- v2, super-clean, better timing/gaps
  • Length: 31:56 32:23 (deleted some words, added space/gaps, added 1 sentence)
  • Filesize: 33 MB 78 MB (320 kbps this time, not 210 or 260)
  • Overall description: See v2 notes above. The below remains true, for v2.
    A Clips (or Core) shortened version, of the Feb. 10, 3rd episode (10c). I used the dry direct mic recording (no music). Has the intro & outro. I omitted the 8b clips segment, since that’s available separately and I want to give full attention to the new content. At the start, I retained the list of types of readings & recordings that I can incorp into any episode, but I omitted the recorded, 8c cleaned-up clip.
  • Timestamps (per the original episode):
  • 0:22 – Voice intro announcement/spot.
  • 1:40 – “The candidates for types of readings or voice recordings, on this show, are… ” I mention the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image content from clip “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show [– Drums on the Wing].mp3″ – touching the column base is enough. board of mystics.
  • 54:45 – Dancing stability – Eadwine, not “Erdwine”. Shipment of msh images has been delivered (during late Nov 2020), in art, past the censor squad. No one has written about the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image. Cybercide guys. Secret field of entheogen scholarship. Dragon gate. dancing image.
  • 1:03:20 – Title of “lifted garment” page.
  • 1:05:22 – Her lifted garment. Dragon gate. Transpersonal 2-level control system.
  • 1:12:18 – Dragon gate.
  • 1:18:55 – I just now found that her garment is lifted [Errata: I had actually noted her lifted garment in the bottom of the image some weeks ago, but whatever.]
  • 1:19:31 – Jesus is barefoot.
  • 1:19:56 – Hand wrapped around cartoon cell border.
  • 1:21:03 – Factors keeping the “spot the mushroom” scholars from covering the Psalter on the order of magnitude warranted. Once they spot 1 mushroom, they are done; they have no provision for order of magnitude. Inability to deal with a huge gold mine that the Psalter is. Overfocus on just a few of the msh trees in the Psalter. Bad PR for Pop Sike Cult. Cybercide.
  • 1:26:44 – I had been wanting to look at the Dancing image. No coverage of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image? Levels in the field of entheogen scholarship. What should the field of entheogen scholarship be?
  • 1:32:59 – Non-headphone state of consciousness.
  • 1:34:08 – Entheogen scholarship has little coverage of Psalter. Foundation column pillar. Egoic thinking says “loss of control threat”. Dragon gate.
  • 1:41:47 – Foundation. Female lifted garment.
  • 1:43:20 – Leaky metaphors.
  • 1:46:20 – Dragon gate.
  • 2:00:09 – End of show.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • todo:
  • copy heading to TOC, link
  • test that link
  • announce in idea development page 12
  • link from idea development page 12 to section here
  • test that link
  • done: below, mark the old v1 download link as superseded

“2021-02-10c Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3” – new, Feb. 26, 2021

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-knrOGmhfGl – version 1, about to be superceded by an improved v2, above
  • Length: 31:56
  • Filesize: 33 MB
  • Overall description: A Clips (or Core) shortened version, of the Feb. 10, 3rd episode (10c). I used the dry direct mic recording (no music). Has the intro & outro. I omitted the 8b clips segment, since that’s available separately and I want to give full attention to the new content. At the start, I retained the list of types of readings & recordings that I can incorp into any episode, but I omitted the recorded, 8c cleaned-up clip.
  • Timestamps (per the original episode):
  • 0:22 – Voice intro announcement/spot.
  • 1:40 – “The candidates for types of readings or voice recordings, on this show, are… ” I mention the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image content from clip “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show [– Drums on the Wing].mp3″ – touching the column base is enough. board of mystics.
  • 54:45 – Dancing stability – Eadwine, not “Erdwine”. Shipment of msh images has been delivered (during late Nov 2020), in art, past the censor squad. No one has written about the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image. Cybercide guys. Secret field of entheogen scholarship. Dragon gate. dancing image.
  • 1:03:20 – Title of “lifted garment” page.
  • 1:05:22 – Her lifted garment. Dragon gate. Transpersonal 2-level control system.
  • 1:12:18 – Dragon gate.
  • 1:18:55 – I just now found that her garment is lifted [Errata: I had actually noted her lifted garment in the bottom of the image some weeks ago, but whatever.]
  • 1:19:31 – Jesus is barefoot.
  • 1:19:56 – Hand wrapped around cartoon cell border.
  • 1:21:03 – Factors keeping the “spot the mushroom” scholars from covering the Psalter on the order of magnitude warranted. Once they spot 1 mushroom, they are done; they have no provision for order of magnitude. Inability to deal with a huge gold mine that the Psalter is. Overfocus on just a few of the msh trees in the Psalter. Bad PR for Pop Sike Cult. Cybercide.
  • 1:26:44 – I had been wanting to look at the Dancing image. No coverage of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image? Levels in the field of entheogen scholarship. What should the field of entheogen scholarship be?
  • 1:32:59 – Non-headphone state of consciousness.
  • 1:34:08 – Entheogen scholarship has little coverage of Psalter. Foundation column pillar. Egoic thinking says “loss of control threat”. Dragon gate.
  • 1:41:47 – Foundation. Female lifted garment.
  • 1:43:20 – Leaky metaphors.
  • 1:46:20 – Dragon gate.
  • 2:00:09 – End of show.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
  • test that link
  • announce in idea development page 12
  • link from idea development page 12 to section here
  • test that link

“2021-02-10c Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.mp3” – reissue of the entire episode

Feb 26 resissue of entire episode, with _ filelanme.

This is a pretty solid episode, but it was still good to make a “Core” version of this episode. It’s a Core version of an episode that contains clips from another episode.

The Core version is labelled as a “Clips” episode, but it is packaged as a real episode – a shortened version of an episode – not just as standalone clips out-of-context. The episode does include an actual Clip, that is, from another episode – confusing the distinction. It’s a “Core, with Clips from elsewhere” episode.

Most of the episode is on-topic Egodeath theory-development content.

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week, starting from Feb. 26, 2021:
  • Length: 2:00:09
  • Filesize: 283 MB
  • Overall description:
    • Best clips from another show – Includes most of the top-clips track “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
      • Forgot Plots; Grid Game; segment about receiving vision of segment format, vulnerability spotted
      • (omitted most of the feet discussion of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image).
    • New content for this episode, after the clip – Dancing with the 2 Sides of the control stability coin.
      • Saying that the altered state is dancing/surfing the edge of loss of control, that’s the egoic point of view. The transcendent point of view = using the higher form of control stability.
      • Control-transformation -> transcendent control system.
      • Female garment lifting.
      • The dragon gate.
  • Timestamps:
  • 0:00 – Guitar intro (song: Hang Back Freaky, by Illumination Valve)
  • 0:22 – Voice intro announcement/spot.
  • 0:30 – “This episode covers”
  • 0:37 – Brief guitar
  • 0:40 – “Then some kind of a reading”
  • 1:25 – Guitar
  • 1:30 – “Now I have to decide what I will read next” (Instead, I played long clip of voice, from episode Feb 8b.)
  • 1:35 – Guitar
  • 1:40 – “The candidates for reading, on this show, are”
  • 2:18 – Guitar, ‘but’ delay
  • 2:44 – The egodeath.com site, I can read from …
  • 3:19 – “Such as “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show [– Drums on the Wing].mp3″ – the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image – touching the column base is enough. board of mystics.
  • 7:57 – Hard to find the outline, too much scrolling. guitar passages in this segment.
  • 13:51 – Guitar stops, mention plan to review vocalization rules.
    __________________________
  • 22:31 – Play 02-08b dry mic cleaned-up clip. But I kinda ruin it by critiquing instead of a straight play-through. todo: replace the clip-section by 8b clip wav.
  • 52:07 – End of clip. Transition from playing the clip; start the guitar again.
  • 52:22 – Guitar resumes. meeting room sizing reverb. board of mystics meeting room. next on the agenda is deciding what’s next on agenda.
  • 54:22 – The timestamp is, according to the deck… we have finished playing 8b & commenting on it.
    __________________________
  • 54:45 – Dancing stability (remainder of episode) – Eadwine, not “Erdwine”. shipment delivered, in art, censors. no one has written about the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image. Cybercide guys. secret field. dragon gate. dancing image.
  • 1:01:04 – Pasting Dancing image.
  • 1:03:20 – Title of “lifted garment” page.
  • 1:03:43 – Pasting Dancing image.
  • 1:05:22 – Her lifted garment. dragon gate. transpersonal 2-level control system.
  • 1:09: 34 – “but” echo section.
  • 1:09:37 – Tech echo – omit.
  • 1:09:55 – Guitar + but echo
  • 1:12:18 – End of echo “but” section. Dragon gate.
  • 1:18:02 – Guitar
  • 1:18: 36 – Turn down mic while typing.
  • 1:18:55 – I found that her garment is lifted [Errata: I had actually noted her lifted garment in the bottom of the image some weeks ago, but whatever.]
  • 1:19:31 – Jesus is barefoot.
  • 1:19:56 – Hand wrapped around cartoon cell border.
  • 1:21:03 – Factors keeping the “spot the mushroom” scholars from covering the Psalter on the order of magnitude warranted. Once they spot 1 mushroom, they are done; they have no provision for order of magnitude. Inability to deal with a huge gold mine that the Psalter is. Overfocus on just a few of the msh trees in the Psalter. Bad PR for Pop Sike Cult. Cybercide.
  • 1:25:58 – Echo & levels.
  • 1:26:44 – I had been wanting to look at the Dancing image. No coverage of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image? Levels in the field of entheogen scholarship. What should the field of entheogen scholarship be?
  • 1:32:23 – Dark mic helps make me enunciate.
  • 1:32:59 – Non-headphone state of consciousness. echo.
  • 1:33:51 – Pitch range.
  • 1:34:08 – Entheogen scholarship has little coverage of Psalter. Foundation column pillar. Egoic thinking says “loss of control threat”. Dragon gate.
  • 1:41:47 – Foundation. Female lifted garment.
  • 1:43:20 – Leaky metaphors.
  • 1:43:35 – Don’t know how to low pitch while doing idea development.
  • 1:46:20 – Dragon gate. Rest of show includes typing-up the same points.
  • 2:00:09 – End of show.
Production Notes
  • Mic Deck .wav: 210210_2242.wav
  • Mixer Deck .wav: 210210_1948.wav
  • Mic vs. Mixer recording length/timestamps: they start to differ around 13:00 b/c stereo has long clip from other episode, while Mic rec was Paused.
  • Project location: Green/white label SD card “TK Audio 2” – “/Volumes/TK Audio 2/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-10c Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability/2021-02-10c Egodeath Mystery Show – Dancing Stability.aup”
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC
Meeting Agenda
  • Review vocalization rules. didn’t get to that.
  • Play the mic recording 08b, comment.
  • entheogen scholars are driven away or mis-led/distracted away from the 70 mush trees the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image by swords like “ego death” drives ppl away (dragon-threat). i’m the only “spot the msh” scholar to dare look at the sword image (bad pr for Pop Sike), leaving me, alone, to decode these msh images.
    • why did it wait until 2020 for a spot-the-mushroom scholar to inventory Psalter 70 trees & decode (or *mention*) the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.
  • [4:31 p.m. February 10, 2021] – identified the woman in the … as having lifted garment, held by Jesus/God. Noted also the sun and moon faces above them.
  • Decide which reading to do.
  • Do the selected reading.
  • todo: think-aloud to work-out a new thought, in a low pitch.
  • todo: make a list of themes of not “loss of control” but of “new balance”; discuss.
    • 1:50:00
    • leopard fountain
    • kylix
    • pink initiate in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image
    • etc.
    • TWO SIDES OF SAME COIN: EGOIC POV = “LOSS OF CONTROL THREAT”; TRANSCENDENT POV = *STABILITY* BUT, TRANSPERSONAL MODE OF STABILITY.
      • 1. EGOIC LOSS OF CONTROL
      • 2. CONTROL TRANSFORMATION PROCESS/ RE-STABILIZATION OF CONTROL
      • 3. END-STATE = TRANSCENDENT *HAVING* OF CONTROL, AGAIN, BUT IN TRANSPERSONAL 2-LEVEL CONSCIOUS CONFIGURATION. = “balance” mytheme & column base stability foundation = the new configuration of HAVING STABLE CONTROL. DONTSAY “THE MYSTIC STA IMAS IMAS THE MYSTIC ALTERED STATE = sufring the loos of control”. instead, say the mystic altered state = having the transpersonal stable control, depicted by the art mytheeme of “balance” and “stability” eg amanita w/ round stembottom & pink in the the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image, and the coloumn base in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image. “higher-mode control is stable” – *not* “loss of control”, that’s egoic thinking/talking. 2 sides of coin = egoic says “loss of control”; transcendent transcendent thinking says “presence of transpersonal control”

Mystic Jesus: Hanged Man and Dancer: Gnostic Heresy in the Paris Eadwine Psalter
https://web.archive.org/web/20111019025829/http://www.metahistory.org/psychonautics/Eadwine/MysticJesus.php

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f8/52/3c/f8523c7d7d01a68398008139eed8efdf.jpg
red garment lifted on left, lifted pink cloth on shoulder. <– this older note proves i didn’t discover today her lifted garment, but went deeper merely.

“2021-02-10b Clips from Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff.mp3” – new Feb. 26, 2021

Only the on-topic, my-own-words parts (shown in bloack bold in the timestmps section of …. Not my reading Hanegraaff’s words. Not my non-Egodeath content.

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after Feb. 26, 2021: https://we.tl/t-nOgc61NDPN
  • Length: 38:41
  • Filesize: 41 MB
  • Overall description: Clips from episode where I read much of Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism.
  • Timestamps: [not very useful here; they’re per the original episode]
  • 0:00 – Intro initial part.
  • 10:43 – Board of Mystics. Purpose of theory channelling muses.
  • 49:11 – Reading (pre-reading). The book Contemporary Esotericism is the context.
  • 56:31 – Commentary: “magic vs. religion”, “manipulation”. author failed to define spiritual result, scholars framework theory, a certain theory as of myth.
  • 58:30 – Choosing to ingest Eucharist is “magic”/”manipulation”, by their same argument. trying to delegitimate.
  • 1:02:20 – Take note of footnotes & ellipses. using footnotes strategically deployed. Hanegraaff’s bunk footnote.
  • 1:09:34 – What does he mean by “they”?
  • 1:12:30 – commentary on ‘manipulative’
  • 1:13:02 – “sorry for interrupting the reading”
  • 1:20:03 – Commentary (a break from the reading): I explain the pretext story, that Hanegraaff said he got misled by, he should have been more sensitive to the realities. The New Agers’ “Non-Plants” Lie. New Age is based on visionary plants, but they have to lie `about that and pretend they switched to “meditation”.
  • 1:25:27 – The remarkable extent to which Hanegraaff says New Age = closeted psychedelic spirituality.
  • 1:32:21 – Real esotericists use skills concealing of Foo, then revealing of Foo, = analogical psychedelic eternalism, ahistoricity, unity of religions at the top
  • 1:35:12 – Partridge’s periods.
  • 1:38:33 – Partridge’s periods. (more)
  • 2:19:53 – My summary of the point of the Hanegraaff article.
  • 2:22:00 – Christopher Partridge has a gap in plants usage 1977-1983. <– I’m very interested in this ignored period which has been written out of history; Hanegraaff is trying to fill in the grid. Grid Game.
  • 2:33:42 – “That a widespread shift happened” … Hanegraaff contradicts himself.
  • 2:36:03 – I’m defining my word-usage of ‘mediation’ and ‘plants’. ‘meditation’ and ‘plants’. By ‘meditation’, I by default mean non-drg.
  • 2:41:52 – Outro.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • Copy heading to TOC, link.
  • Demote orig episode in TOC.
  • Test this page’s TOC links.
  • announce in present heading.
  • Announce in main episode section.
  • Announce in new TOC entry.
  • Announce this clip-episode in idea development page 12.
  • Link to this section from idea development page 12.
  • Test that link.

“2021-02-10b Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff.mp3”

A Clips version of this episode is available, above, as of Feb 26, 2021.

Hanegraaff’s chapter 19 of book Contemporary Esotericism: Entheogenic Esotericism.

  • what pages were read?
  • is there any commentary / clarification of mine, mixed-in with reading Hanegraaff’s writing?
    • I’d like to hear my commentary in isolation, without any reading of his article.
Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-UTM47te1Ma
  • Length: 2:42:14
  • Filesize: 389 MB
  • Overall description: Read-aloud part of Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism, with interspersed commentary and summary of the article.
  • Timestamp – Topic:
    • 0:00 – Drums, Intro initial part
    • 0:13 – More intro
    • 2:00 – Vocal pitch, treble, alphabet letters pronunciation: how much treble does each letter-name have, where? (start/middle/end)
    • 4:00 – Drums/typing. vocal principles review. pitch range. speed.
    • 8:27 – Drums
    • 8:57 – Formats of Egodeath Mystery Show available w/ degrees of formality. too many overhead steps. Overhead of explaining what’s in the recording, full outline w/ timestamps. log overhead (a log can be empowering).
    • 10:28 – Agenda. Added formats range; formats of show & recordings available.
    • 10:43 – Board of Mystics. Purpose of theory channelling muses.
    • 11:28 – Review of Vocalization segment continues. Don’t interrupt myself. Conversation reminders. Don’t slur.
    • 16:25 – Warmup reading: Rolfe.
    • 18:37 – Deciding what to read in this episode.
    • 20:29 – Goals for practice vocalizing in this episode.
    • 21:14 – Practicing standard reference vocalizing to turn any text into speech. standard reference vocalizing. turn any text into speech. Cybernetics = Communication.
    • 22:00 – Receiving ideas about formats for the show. Low overhead. No rules except use casual standard voice & repeat phrase. Vocalizing, standards/techniques.
    • 30:03 – It’s nice to have elaborate show format available.
    • 31:40 – Advantage of recording the mic.
    • 33:30 – Dark SM57 complements bright mobile speakers; no eq needed.
    • 36:15 – Merits of separately recording the direct mic vs. produced show (mixer).
    • 36:48 – Spectrum from casual recordings to formal “show” format. Pros and Cons of heavyweight Egodeath Mystery Show format.
    • 42:05 – Agenda. Hard to remember voicing consciously.
    • 44:36 – Like falling back into egoic thinking. End of Show-Formats discussion.
    • 45:48 – Deciding what articles to read from. Vocalizing review.
    • 49:11 – Reading (pre-reading). The book Contemporary Esotericism is the context.
    • 51:30 – My reading of part of the Hanegraaff article Entheogenic Esotericism – section: Entheogens and Religion – Conceptual Pitfalls and Prejudices – it’s entirely his words.
    • 53:16 – Headphones.
    • 54:10 – Read-aloud Hanegraaff continues: “highly problematic assumptions, theories of religion/legitimacy norms, hegemonic, can’t claim scholarly validity. anti-paganism.”
    • 55:03 – Inhaling.
    • 56:00 – Reading continues: “Ultimately based upon the theological battle against paganism…”
    • 56:31 – Commentary: “magic vs. religion”, “manipulation”. author failed to define spiritual result, scholars framework theory, a certain theory as of myth.
    • 58:30 – Choosing to ingest Eucharist is “magic”/”manipulation”, by their same argument. trying to delegitimate.
    • 1:00:23 – This is not a Commentary pass; this is purely a vocalizing-practice pass. Purpose is not to explain his article.
    • 1:00:50 – Resume reading: “A second cause of controversy is…”
    • 1:02:20 – Take note of footnotes & ellipses. using footnotes strategically deployed. Hanegraaff’s bunk footnote.
    • 1:03:34 – transitional junk
    • 1:03:53 – Continue the Reading of Hanegraaff article.
    • 1:05:47 – End of paragraph. comment on inhaling.
    • 1:06:46 – Planned pro-level reading of this article. Will speed-read next paragraph.
    • 1:08:55 – Resume reading the article at next paragraph.
    • 1:09:34 – What does he mean by “they”?
    • 1:11:17 – Resume reading, “Almost inevitably, “
    • 1:12:30 – commentary on ‘manipulative’
    • 1:12:45 – reading continues, “The ‘drugs’ category further”
    • 1:13:02 – “sorry for interrupting the reading”
    • 1:14:11 – reading continues, “The bottom line”
    • 1:15:35 – How much to repeat myself to get articulation right?
    • 1:16:13 – Reading continues. “In this chapter, “
    • 1:17:04 – Drums
    • 1:17:35 – Miking positioning, sweet spot.
    • 1:19:27 – Resume reading at next section & paragraph: Entheogens and the New Age – but then I skip it.
    • 1:20:03 – Commentary (a break from the reading): I explain the pretext story, that Hanegraaff said he got misled by, he should have been more sensitive to the realities. The New Agers’ “Non-Plants” Lie. New Age is based on visionary plants, but they have to lie `about that and pretend they switched to “meditation”.
    • 1:24:41 – Drums (= silence in mic track)
    • 1:25:27 – The remarkable extent to which Hanegraaff says New Age = closeted psychedelic spirituality.
    • 1:32:21 – Real esotericists use skills concealing of Foo, then revealing of Foo, = analogical psychedelic eternalism, ahistoricity, unity of religions at the top
    • 1:33:47 – Deciding what to read.
    • 1:34:26 – Continue Hanegraaff article reading. Entheogenic Shamanism section.
    • 1:35:12 – Partridge’s periods.
    • 1:38:06 – Reading continues. “Publishing his book in 2005, Partridge…”
    • 1:38:33 – Partridge’s periods. (more)
    • 1:38:45 – “I should just read”
    • 1:38:57 – Reading continues. “While such a periodization…”
    • 1:39:26 – “i swear i’m gonna do a straight reading”
    • 1:40:09 – Reading continues. “Neoshamanism has drawn…”
    • 1:45:37 – End of paragraph. I am hungry. Speed demo’s.
    • 1:46:52 – Resume reading. “The main outlines of the pre-Prohibition phase…”
    • 2:04:40 – Break from reading. song: Hang Back Freaky, by Illumination Valve.
    • 2:06:12 – Resume Hanegraaff article reading, now over guitar background from Cybermonk. “Pinchbeck, for his part, “
    • 2:13:10 – End of reading the article. “That’s the last word on the final page.” Deciding what to do next. Level change; gain staging.
    • 2:19:53 – My summary of the point of the Hanegraaff article.
    • 2:22:00 – Christopher Partridge has a gap in plants usage 1977-1983. <– I’m very interested in this ignored period which has been written out of history; Hanegraaff is trying to fill in the grid. Grid Game.
    • 2:29:30 – I can play background music w/o me hearing it. Headphones nixed.
    • 2:33:42 – “That a widespread shift happened” … Hanegraaff contradicts himself.
    • 2:33:59 – I slowly work up toward finally saying that I have taken a meeting note that I’m defining my word-usage of something (UNSPECIFIED), which I fail here to specify – FINISH YOUR STATEMENTS; MAKE COMPLETE STATMENTS. STOP MAKING PARTIAL FRAGMENT STATEMENTS. Secretary Meeting of the Board of Mystics: Cybernetics = Communication.
    • 2:36:03 – I’m defining my word-usage of ‘mediation’ and ‘plants’. ‘mediation’ and ‘plants’. By ‘meditation’, I by default mean non-drg.
    • 2:36:40 – Vocal pitch range target.
    • 2:39:44 – “end of segment” Timestamps on the two decks. Mixer deck timestamp is off bc ran out of space.
    • 2:41:52 – Outro.
Production info
  • Mic Deck .wav: 210210_2241.wav
  • Mixer Deck .wav: 210210_1946.wav
    • 2nd part: 210210_1947.wav
  • Mic vs. Mixer recording length/timestamps: complicated, but same after patching the 13-minute gap in Mixer stereo rec’g by copying-in the Mic mono rec’g.
  • Project location: Green/white label SD card “TK Audio 2” – “/Volumes/TK Audio 2/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-10b Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff/2021-02-10b Egodeath Mystery Show – Hanegraaff.aup”
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
    • Done: patch-in 13 min from mic deck to mixer deck track(s). got up to 1:53:07, in Mic & Mixer decks. 2:04:46 in the Mic Deck is the end of the dropped portion.
    • append part 2, but omit junk at start; use 6:21 to end.
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC

the bad news: I failed to check Space Remaining on the Mixer Deck, lost apparently 13 minutes of pretty good read-aloud of Hane artic Entheogenic Esotericism. I’m waiting for files to transfer, to clear space, so I can resume recording/reading.

the good news: I’m doing a good job of vocalizing – excerpt for the re-takes, the clarifying value-add commentary interrupting the paragraph-reading.

“2021-02-10a clips from Egodeath Mystery Show – TK Podcast 27 Mystic.mp3” – new, Feb 26, 2021

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week starting Feb. 26, 2010: https://we.tl/t-el8zBoami4
  • Length: 15:15
  • Filesize: 16 MB
  • Overall description: clips of my own commentary from episode “2021-02-10a Egodeath Mystery Show – TK Podcast 27 Mystic.mp3”.
  • Timestamps:
  • 0:00 – Intro (Egodeath Mystery Show)
  • 1:44:00* – Nondual experiencing is beginner’s nonduality. Kafei asked for clarification of my position, he didn’t say “I disagree with MH position”. Nondual experiencing is beginners’ level.
  • 1:46:30* – Two types of nondual experiencing: Beginner vs Advanced Nondual Experience.
  • 1:51:38* – Dancing with higher stable control. Jesus & Sophia dancing, image from Eadwine. Cybernetic Nonduality is depicted. personal and transpersonal self layers, dancing. Lifted garments.
  • 1:53:12* – Eadwine shipment of images , prohibitionist art authorities. Exoteric suppression/blocking the msh images.
  • 1:55:21* – Eadwine’s image of dancing: use it as to represent the control transformation advanced nonduality experience. Nonduality depicted as dance of Jesus/Sophia. egoic point of view: “dancing w/ loss of control”, but transcendent point of view: conscious dance between (in mystic state) the two levels: transpersonal consciousness, personal thinking. Become aware of the dance that’s always going on.
  • 1:56:44* – Theme of elegant balance, not just “desperate balance”. Touching Demeter’s snake w/ the right hand.
  • 1:59:07* – “That’s gold, that’s a clip”.
  • 2:05:52* – Actual Outro.

* subtract about 1:44:00

Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
  • test the toc link
  • announce at this heading
  • announce at top of this page
  • announce at idea development page 12.
  • test the cross-link to this page from page 12.

“2021-02-10a Egodeath Mystery Show – TK Podcast 27 Mystic.mp3”

  • download/preview link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-1663cMYiPv
  • Description/content/timestamps:
    • Overall description: A full good reading of the entire machine transcription of Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 27 – the Mystic episode.
    • 0:00 – Intro (Egodeath Mystery Show)
    • 0:45 – Voczn review
    • 2:15 – Now have volume pot after mic
    • 6:11 – Warmup reading #1: misc sentences
    • 11:45 – Drumming to replace typing
    • 25:00 – Warmup reading #2: Rolfe.
    • 28:46 – Lead-in to reading of Transcendent Knowledge podcast 25.
    • 30:48 – The actual reading; read-aloud the machine transcription of Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 27.
    • 1:44:00 – Nondual experiencing is beginner’s nonduality. Kafei asked for clarification of my position, he didn’t say “I disagree with MH position”. Nondual experiencing is beginners’ level.
    • 1:46:30 – Two types of nondual experiencing: Beginner vs Advanced Nondual Experience.
    • 1:51:38 – Dancing with higher stable control. Jesus & Sophia dancing, image from Eadwine. Cybernetic Nonduality is depicted. personal and transpersonal self layers, dancing. Lifted garments.
    • 1:53:12 – Eadwine shipment of images , prohibitionist art authorities. Exoteric suppression/blocking the msh images.
    • 1:55:21 – Eadwine’s image of dancing: use it as to represent the control transformation advanced nonduality experience. Nonduality depicted as dance of Jesus/Sophia. egoic point of view: “dancing w/ loss of control”, but transcendent point of view: conscious dance between (in mystic state) the two levels: transpersonal consciousness, personal thinking. Become aware of the dance that’s always going on.
    • 1:56:44 – Theme of elegant balance, not just “desperate balance”. Touching Demeter’s snake w/ the right hand.
    • 1:59:07 – “That’s gold, that’s a clip”.
    • 1:59:45 – post-reading vocalization comments/struggles/injunctions.
    • 20146 – miking, windscreen dull, prox’y effect.
    • 20334-20527 volca synth music keyboard to reference my voice pitch against.
    • 2:05:52 – Actual Outro.
  • Mic Deck .wav: 210210_2240.wav
  • Mixer Deck .wav: 210210_1945.wav
  • Mic vs. Mixer recording length/timestamps: same
  • Project location:
    • was at: DataTraveller USB thumbdrive “100 G3 64GB” titled “KINGSTON 1” – “/Volumes/KINGSTON 1/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-10a Egodeath Mystery Show – TK Podcast 27 Mystic/2021-02-10a Egodeath Mystery Show – TK Podcast 27 Mystic.aup”
    • moved entire project to main drive for processing.
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • create music project
  • import Mic Deck wav & Mixer Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link here
  • test the dl link/preview
  • copy heading to TOC
Content
  • A full good reading of transcription of entire Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 27 – the Mystic episode.
  • Vocalization exercises. That paid off – I did a good reading, afterwards (maybe there is hope – but don’t be overconfident!)

I did use my “Show” format, but here, I plan to eliminate all possible overhead. I will provide the download link here, the file name could be as shown.

The Full Experience – Battery-powered recorder + mic stand clip, 2 approaches to holding

  • handheld
  • mic stand <- no cable needed; offers a standalone wireless desk mic stand.

When I started the 2021 voice recordings, all of the recordings were made with battery-powered field recorder, sometimes mounted on med-small desk mic boom stand w/ clip, no pop filter. Have to say, it was pretty cool and clever to simply clip-mount the recorder and use batteries, is the most fun – it’s fully mobile; can:

  1. walk around holding recorder as close-mic and backing it away between speaking at the mic (move arm)
  2. press Pause
  3. put recorder in desk mic stand clip
  4. press Rec
  5. now sitting at a battery-powered recorder – move away from mic between speaking at the mic (move torso)

if you are willing to lose a little high-end by mic placement of 45 degrees off axis, no pop filter is necessary. No cable is necessary. Can place stand anywhere, no cable. or hold and walk around.

Highly Selective Logging of Timestamps when Recording My Speaking

Often, when recording my talking, I deliver a 10/10 10-minute segment, then I go… uh, what do I do now?

In that case, I can write down the timestamp (and optionally, the filename), so I can spot-target *that* clip. *NOT* a massive project of inventorying everything, nor of constantly writing down every minute of timestamp.

That highly selective approach is similar to when I decode a mytheme, I use [acro]/keyboard shortcuts to mark the time or date:
[February 9, 2021]
[ p.m. February 9, 2021]

Pure Voice Recordings vs. Egodeath Mystery Show

Differentiating (and recording/capturing) Pure Voice Recordings/Clips vs. Remix DJ multimedia “the Egodeath Mystery Show” which Remixes the Pure Voice Recordings (while also capturing the dry mic during the show, to later extract the best 5% from, as pure voice clips, to share and to reuse) <– skyrocketing the quality/density of value

my totally live shows (w/o playing-back my voice recordings) are a disservice to my followers: the content & quality is too thin, too hit-or-miss.

I can hugely increase the density of substance, by playing back the best *clips* of my occasional, best voice commentary. 

I did some great new speaking (with substance) while DJ’ing last night in the Egodeath Mystery Show, but, that was only like 5% of the time. 

SO: i can *clip* my best 5% from my dry mic recording (yay!) and then play back those clips in a “live show” subsequently. 

This is why it is such a *great* idea to record the mic directly, as well as recording the fully mixed show. 

I ran two recorders at same time – good call; I have a perfect mic-capture w/ no eq/fx/mixing, to extract my 5% best clips from, that I spoke last night — it’s always the unplanned, spontaneous discussions I do, that are the good ones!

My current thinking: *forget* logging the timestamps when making the content. Purely focus on good vocal delivery/ideas, during the show.

EXTRACTING TIMESTAMPS IS USUALLY HAS TO BE DONE AS A SECOND, LISTENING PASS.

The best way to think about it – 2 phased approach:

Phase 1: make the best pure voice recordings i can (for example, extract my best voice-clips)

Phase 2: the Egodeath Mystery Show: do a *little* live DJ mic work, but *mainly* play-back *recordings* of my best voice work. Then, the branding/concept of “the Egodeath Mystery Show” would refer *not* to my pure voice recordings, but rather, would refer to my *playback* of those voice recordings. Thus:

  • purely Voice Recordings (no eq/fx/mixing)
  • the Egodeath Mystery Show – I apply eq/fx/mixing-music, while playing-back my collection of pure voice recordings (best clips).

I keep forgetting:

  • DR-05 SOUNDS CLEAR B/C OMNI POLAR PATTERN SO NO PROXIMITY EFFECT.
  • SM57 MIC HAS CARDIOID POLAR PATTERN, SO, HAS PROXIMITY EFFECT – IE, MUDDY BASS.

stop forgetting that!

Back to Basics: Voice Recordings, No Overhead Concepts – Bracket-off All Signal Processing & Packaging & Timestamp Logging & Delivery Considerations

  • 210209_2233.wav = dr-05 no eq
  • 210209_2231.wav = sm57 no eq

“show” (the Egodeath Mystery Show ) connotes taking a collection of direct mic recordings (no eq/fx/musicmix baked-in), then combining many separate clean pure mic voice recordings, w/ eq/fx/music/mixing — DON’T DO ALLTHAT AT ONCE, LIVE. can’t do good job.

“live broadcast” would only work if I play recordings of pure miked-voice ideal recordings. then dj casually over that, but don’t expect to generate good speaking/content in the “do everything at once” mode. extreme overhead/distraction, of the “live broadcast mulltimedia” aaproach.

use time-separation/ phases. can do a far, far better results/approach, by dividing:

  1. phase 1: capture direct mic pure voice recording, vocazn. focus purely on ideas (content) + best-possible vocalization.
  2. phae 2, later: mix various voice recordings (thru eq/fx) mixed with music or other(?) audio – *possilby* adding live dj mic at that time, maybe.

external mic 57 caused me to think of show format with massive overhead. go back to deskmount dr05 field recorder even w/ batteries. nice standalone. no nonsense. no overhead. no log file. NO NOTHIN but voice, mic, recorder. zero overhead.

Use the Minimal Approach: (= nothing to remove):

  • Voice
  • Mic
  • Preamp [don’t use eq/mixer function, if present]
  • Recorder

all other considerations are agnostic, separate, later.

Create non-show, pure voice recordings.

but, using lessons learned, about the need to log timestamp ideally every minute. don’t even think about it. just give me raw mic recgs! w/ good voczn. Focus on voczn & capturing the mic; *none* of the other questions.

debate: record raw mic and share that? options: [doesn’t matter; that’s all a SEPARATE ISSUE; don’t even think about it. just give me raw mic recgs!]

options:

  • mic>recorder>export as mp3 <– some mics will sound like mud / random, but works well for the slightly bright & bass-shy field recorder 🤷‍♂️
  • mic>eq>recorder>export as mp3 <– bad approach; follow pro-audio rule: “never print eq; separate the mic rec’g from the applying of eq”
  • mic>recorder>daw-eq>export as mp3 <– recommended

New Streamlined/Focused Format for the Egodeath Mystery Show – Vision: Received, for the Show’s Nature

Rolling Log Approach, cut at 2 hours, no special start or end, no 2-hour structure

most will be straight voice

in future, will log timestamp like every minute. more is better. the more frequently, the better; every 1 minute would be good.

Generations of 2021 Voice Recordings
  1. Jan 20 – __ – no structure, no concept of “show”
  2. __ – Feb 8 – heavy-weight structure attempt, after thought of “show” – became so heavyweight, it fell over, leaving a streamlined new lightweight approach.
  3. Feb 9+ – no structure, but packaged as loose “show” concept (rolling log <2hr files, ZERO OVERHEAD. livestream w/ logging segments, <2hr.
    Periodic “station identification” – not “start of a show”, not structured as a show.

its purpose was revealed to me [12:36 a.m. February 9, 2021] is a rolling, logged hangout freeform, in 2-hour .mp3 format.

end the audio idea development file – just like creating fresh idea development page. Audio version of creating a new idea dev page.

logging overhead for this wav/mp3, and exporting/sharing it, = toc maint overhead.

Zero Overhead. Log the

  • .wav filename SEPARATE THE CREATION OF WAV, FROM SHARING OF MP3. CREATE ONGOING FREEFORM 2-HOUR REC’S, W/ REQUIREMENT OF MAINTAINING A LOG ROLLING FORMAT. GET RID OF CONCEPT OF “STRUCTURE FOR START VS END OF SHOW”.
  • date
  • time. and which mp3 # of the day.

Minimal Overhead to Produce a Rolling Log of Segments, No Start or Stop, cut <2hr at nearest segment end; still structureed… no strong segment concept, but *log meeting notes* ongonig. don’t even need to invent fancy names. ELIM SPECIAL FILENAMES. WHAT WE NEED IS JUST <2HR MP3 FILES, WITH GOOD LOGGING MAINTAINED LIKE MEETING NOTES DURING ANY … A LOG APPROACH. JUST INCIDATE: TIMESTAMP, IN FILE. FILENAME + TIMESTAMP; BREAK THIS PAGE PER FILE.

New template:

– Rolling Log, No Start or Stop. Sucky Dud Segments Alternating with Top-Tier Segments, all logged, sliced at segment closest to 2hr.

“2021-02-08c Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3” (continues seamlessly from 08b; this is part 2 of episode 08b)

used the >2hrs cut from 08b‘s .wav file.

  • filename of mp3: “2021-02-08c Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
    • maybe i should have suffix: Pigs on the Wing
  • display name/title of mp3: “2021-02-08c Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • download/preview: https://we.tl/t-8OR00hvWbk (voice+eq, + music+eq)
    • mixer source file: 210208_1932.wav (voice+eq, + music)
  • download/preview: TODO (>2hr portion. voice, raw mic; no eq; no music)
    • mic source file: 210208_2227.wav (voice, raw mic; no eq; no music)
  • project file: 2021-02-08c Egodeath Mystery Show.aup

Eadwine

“2021-02-08b Clips Fx – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”

fx & eq on voice-only best clips

  • mp3 Filename: “2021-02-08b Clips Fx – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-AKH9rR9dGs <- merely a trial run and test to see what works and what DOESNT. first take
    • lessons learned:
      • avoid looping a segment
      • try only eq and subtle reverb, to subtly highlight the orginal dry-mic great sound/focus.
      • manual jumpback is ok.
      • looping is too repetitive.
      • delay too obscures the great dry-mic sound.
  • Description: the 2021-02-08b show’s direct-mic best-clips through eq/fx.
    • Notes/expl: “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.wav” -> thru eq/signal processing -> 210210_1938.wav (Mixer Deck)
      much eq explore.
    • Clips include (see further below too):
      • fast talking to capture ideas.
      • feet in the the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.
      • double-signalling in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.
      • it’s sufficient for foot to touch the column base.
      • diversions work well, eg Eleusis satire.
      • increasing focus on segment topics & timestamps.
      • shipment of msh images. 3 theories of… min mod max; forgot plots.
      • provider of mushroom images.
  • Production:
    • sm57 mic
    • project file: 2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.aup
  • done:
  • connect deck to computer
  • open wav into project
    “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.aup”
  • export solo track as mp3
  • xfer mobile
  • upload
  • post link
  • place link in correct pages/announcement sections.
  • source file for intro: 210208_2222.wav 1-shot in Playlist, Mic Deck.
  • 210210_19##.wav Mixer Deck for intro
  • 210210_1942.wav Mixer Deck for outro, best take.

“2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3” (Drums on the Wing)

  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-yY0VW59NCo <- best clips of the show. v1.1 [10:55 p.m. February 9, 2021]
    • Desc: Canterbury, Forgot Plots/ Grid Game (entheogen scholarship)
  • Filename of mp3: “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
  • Display name/title: “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • Filesize: 63.3 MB
  • Length: 26:23

Voice only, best clips. Removed from music context.

  • Project filename: “2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show Best Clips.aup”
    Exported .wav filename: “2021-02-08b Clips – Egodeath Mystery Show.wav”

deprecated: https://we.tl/t-s15BIoPuiv – had 3 flaws. Eadwine remains.

“2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show – Drums on the Wing.mp3” – reissued Feb 28, with “Drums on the Wing” added to filename & track name

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-02-28:
    https://we.tl/t-qlMsLNF8V9 <– reissue, with ” – Drums on the Wing” added to name.
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • See the below several pages.
  • Filename: see section heading above; added ” – Drums on the Wing” compared to v1
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension; added ” – Drums on the Wing” compared to v1
  • Length: 1:56:28 (same as v1)
  • Filesize: 280 MB (same as v1)
  • Bitrate: 320 kbps (same as v1 (orig Feb 8))
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 –
  • Project path: green/white label SD card 64 GB. “/Volumes/TK Audio 2/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • Project filename: “2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show.aup” (includes 08c too; so no key words)
    Track within audio project: “Mixer Deck First 2 Hours – the master for “2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show – Drums on the Wing.mp3″”
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • todo:
  • test the TOC link
  • Announce reissue in present idea development page (11)
  • Announce reissue in idea development page 12
  • Test links for announcements

/ end of Reissue section Feb 28 2021
orig section Feb 8 2021:

  • filename of mp3: “2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show.mp3”
  • display name/title of mp3: “2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show”
    • maybe upload w/ suffix: Drums on the Wing
  • download/preview: https://we.tl/t-IEO9n19oL3 (voice->eq/fx/mixer/music)
    • Reissued – For a later download link (with ” – Drums on the Wing” added to mp3 filename & track title), see above.
    • Length: 1:56:28
      • no “end of show” concept/ announcement – do “station identification” at random times instead, and at start of show but can be very low-key, no heavy structure or “DJ pot dance” like I had to do to create this opening while live (too hard & distracting – but, can reuse clip!)
    • mixer source file: 210208_1932.wav <- load, trunc, export
  • download/preview: TODO (<2hr portion. voice, raw mic; no eq; no music) – this raw isolated track was not designed to be heard alone. STATUS: EXPERIMENTAL 🧪 ⚗️
    • mic source file: 210208_2227.wav (voice, raw mic; no eq; no music)
  • project file: 2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show.aup
    • containing 1932.wav broken into 1:56 + xtra, 2 trks, export sep’ly as b & c.

i was running mic through fx in the show – added clean clips of the straight-up mic (leak from spks into mic is Pigs on the Wing)
sm57 3″, 45 degrees, upper lip, no damn pop filter, no windscreen (that would make it even more mellow – make sure to produce treble consistently – i’m still hearing lisp/slur sometimes. Hammer against the proximity effect; give that cardioid proximity effect a run for its money: blast that prox effect & windscreen with full-on treble edge assault: cut through the load of prox mud; by adding a windscreen, that would make me really want to hammer the mic with treble on as many letters as possible: [ c d f g h j k p q s t v w x z ]).

Extracting Best Clip from Dry Mic Recording
  • todo: extract the best clip from approx 35:00 to 1:04:00 –
  • play that range, take notes
  • copy/paste to new track.
  • export new track as mp3.
  • upload.
  • transfer to mobile device.
  • paste link above.
Best Clips from 210208_2227.wav (2021-02-08b Egodeath Mystery Show)
  • got 15:57-17:04 fast speaking is needed when capturing ideas
    • got 20:03-20:29
    • got 21:02-21:18 need to become conscious of communication apparatus voice, for cybernetics.
    • got 21:33-21:51
  • got 26:50-27:00 speakers, mystic friends lp record changer
  • got 34:24-46:04 Canterbury Psalter as receiving a communication transmission. Difficulty in interpreting red initiate pulled by angle’s feet on column base.
  • got 46:04-47:48 Eleusis piece was spontaneous
  • got 49:40-50:07 muses rush of info, fast capturing
  • got 51:32-54:56 mystics meeting communication receptor notes secretary, Grid Game
  • got 55:26-5728 Art historian mshroom art confiscation squad. Grid Game.
  • got 5802-10145 con’t
  • got 10249- 10402 con’t
  • got 10435-10724 logging good clips. good diversions. attractive vulnerability = timestamps of segments
  • got 10825-10922 logging good diversion segments/clips
  • got 11215-11250 diversions, segment logging, falling into pit
  • got 11415-11441 – cybernetics = communication
  • got 11509-11540 designing receiving vision
  • got 11558-11616

Lessons Learned from this Productive Experiment

  • be extremely against any overhead. eg STATING THE INTRO OF THE SHOW AT START, IS *OVERHEAD*!!! IT IS PROHIBITIVE! RETURN TO NEUTRAL GENERIC “VOICE RECORDING”.
    • pure mic/voice recordings w/ timestamp logs are good.
    • “show” is dangerous concept, it can backfire into counterproductive overhead!!!
  • heavy structure overhead doesn’t work. abandon “show” format in that sense.
  • eliminate all structure – but, *log* every minute (w/ .wav filename, then after, .mp3 filename).
  • do “station identification”, not “start of show” or “end of show” announcement.
  • it’s more like an ongoing radio station/ livestream, than a bounded-duration “show”.
  • later can chop “clip-out” 5-minute segments… somehow, track the timestamps/filenames(both .wav/.mp3) to manage this. then can re-use those “best clips” (use .wav master of dry mic rec’g when possible).
  • must be able to instantly terminate (at a given topic-transition < 2 hours). Any time there’s a topic-switch, can razor-blade cut the tape there, now & later.
  • on “ongoing, open” show format.
  • The Egodeath Mystery Show is a Perpetual Meeting of the Mystic Board of Directors (the Board of Mystics directors), directing the inrushing torrent of inspiration at the current problems posted on the board by Martin Luther’s massive railroad spike that shattered the church door and demolished the entire entryway of the exoteric church.
  • supporting any length 5minutes to 2 hours is a requirement.
  • make it more like a perpetual rolling meeting with no start or stop
  • need *way* more timestamps, once per minute would be ideal.
  • must be *extreme lightweight* format overall. must be *able* to mix-in music, but it’s basically AN ONGOING NONSTOP PERPETUAL MEETING, DELIVERED AS ANYWHERE FROM 5MINUTE TO 2HOUR MP3S, THE KEY IS FILENAME+TIMESTAMP(PER-MINUTE).
  • REPLACE “RADIO SHOW SEGMENT” IDEA BY MEETING NOTES W/ TIMESTAMPS. PERPETUAL ROLLING MEETING W/ TIMESTAMPS LOG.
  • MORE SOLO VOICE, LESS MUSIC.

🧪 ⚗️

This is a transitional experimental … thing. Many lessons learned.

The Egodeath substantive content is spread out – use the timestamps.

Special handling for this final episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show that starts with complex structure at start:

  • done:
  • load the wav
  • save project
  • move > 2hr to be sep track
  • solo the 2hr 1st part
  • export the first 2 hrs as mp3 08b
  • copy to player
  • upload
  • paste link above.
  • normalize the >2 remainder-track
  • export >2hr as mp3 08c
  • copy to player
  • upload
  • paste link above.

Final show that has “show” structure at the start eg list of what will cover.

A briefly used format for the show (overly structured).

Music for the Show
  • a drummer played & recorded this acoustic drum kit for this episode of the Egodeath Mystery Show, a few minutes before recording this show.
  • my field recording of band Pigs on the Wing
Planned Content [abbreviated outline plan]
  • This episode covers:
    fade music
    • Defining a vocalization style that’s deep and resonant, and *fast*, for doing intensive work sessions.
      fade music
    • Increasing my focus on stating show *segments*, & logging segment timestamps and topics.
      fade music
    • The nature of this Egodeath Mystery Show as a multimedia working session.
      fade music
    • Directly recording the microphone, to enable using all types of recordings.
      fade music
    • Extending the concept of “idea development pages”, to integrate spoken idea development and audio content for both mystics and prophets.
      fade music
    • Multimedia ideas for voice, including reading-aloud text, speaking off-the-cuff, and recorded speech, mixed with music.
      fade music
    • The {balance} mytheme; transcending the loss of control and mastering the transpersonal mode of control.
      fade music
  • I’m using the SM57 mic recorded directly, for reuse and playback.
  • We’re listening to a Producer, who played drums a few minutes ago for this episode. Later I might play some live cover band, Pink Floyd, that I recorded – it was the first time I tried this field recorder for a Rock band – had I known how good this recorder is, I would have recorded the entire show.
    fade music

  • This episode covers:
    • Defining a vocalization style that’s deep and resonant, and *fast*, for doing intensive work sessions.
    • Increasing my focus on stating show *segments*, & logging segment timestamps and topics.
    • The nature of this Egodeath Mystery Show as a multimedia working session.
    • Directly recording the microphone, to enable using all types of recordings.
    • Extending the concept of “idea development pages”, to integrate spoken idea development and audio content for both mystics and prophets.
    • Multimedia ideas for voice, including reading-aloud text, speaking off-the-cuff, and recorded speech, mixed with music.
    • The {balance} mytheme; transcending the loss of control and mastering the transpersonal mode of control.
  • I’m using the SM57 mic recorded directly, for reuse and playback.
  • We’re listening to a Producer, who played drums a few minutes ago for this episode. Later I might play some live cover band, Pink Floyd, that I recorded – it was the first time I tried this field recorder for a Rock band – had I known how good this recorder is, I would have recorded the entire show.
  1. We’ve finished the intro segment of this show. The timestamp is x.3:00

    Next is my review of my vocalization conventions.
  2. Switch to other tab and read the “Review of Vocalization” section).
  3. Return to this tab, and note the timestamp for completion of the Vocal Warmup segment.
  4. Review the Agenda/Log below, “Working Session Agenda and Log of Topics Covered and Timestamps”.
  • Vary pitch
  • Vary speed
  • Vary volume
  • Vary enunciation

This is a THINK TANK WORKING SHOW, which produces gems in the outline below, and many other outputs:

  • working session on website
  • check emails
  • incidentally: produce an mp3 for mystic couch potatoes
Todo: Listen to the entire 3-hour show from start to finish, logging the timestamp & topic every minute; like running meeting notes (write-up from scratch in a fresh new Minutes Log format)

in future shows/meetings: log the time & topic as often as every minute, during the meeting/show, in future; “mystery meeting minutes log”

12:00 start, 34:00: Define a vocalization style that’s deep, full, resonant, and *fast* for doing intensive work sessions. Use that for off-the-cuff, too – mono-speed fallacy:

  • 35:00 start:
    [Diversion segment 1: Start time: __, End time: __ Canterbury Psycalter as receiving a communication transmission. difficulty in interpreting red initiate pulled by angle’s feet on column base.]
    [Diversion segment 2: Start time: __, End time: 1:04:00 finished diverseion segment: Forgot Plots.]
    35:00 start: end: 1:13:00 – Increasing my focus on stating segments & logging segment topics and timestamps – step it up all the way.
    • (pre-segment) what I’m going to talk about in this next segment.
      • timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
      • timestamp & filename in final tape deck
    • (mid-segment) what I’m currently talking about in this next segment.
      • timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
      • timestamp & filename in final tape deck
    • (post-segment) what I’m going to talk about in this next segment.
    • timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
    • timestamp & filename in final tape deck
  • Review of progress in the Egodeath topics in the previous show:skip.
  • 1:15:00 [confirmed then, that the next 4 topics can be treated together]
    [start reading the extant notes for these 4 topics: 1:37:00]
  • #1 Designing a way to receive a vision for the nature of this show as a multimedia working session.
  • #2 Directly recording the microphone; what that enables, for using all types of recordings – the Reamp approach/concept to miking the voice then later re-processing that dry recording, This Reamp approach is the motivation of this episode: the show-format VISION-RECEPTION PROJECT: both gear-usage (recording-usage [eg making & using dry mic recording during the show]) opportunities AND, distinctly, the function/purpose of this show, as a vehicle to receive visions [eg the top-tier realization during and surrounding the past couple shows re: {balance} metheme & the equivalent themes] and Transcendent Knowledge development.
  • This episode is a project to receive/articulate/ develop a vision for the format & purpose/function of this show.
  • #3 Extending the application / concept of “idea development pages” to integrate recorded & audio idea development
    • eg the Egodeath Mystery Show – eg my talking + recording + writing at same time = DEVELOP & RECEIVE VISIONS/ MAKE CONNECTIONS. THE “SECRETARY” ROLE AS PART OF THE COMMUNICATIONS/CYBERNETICS USED FOR HIGH IDEA DEVMT. or something like that
  • idea development – this show is where Transcendent Knowledge development occurs.
    todo: demonstrate last night’s mystic reading technical of Haneg artic.
  • #4. Multimedia ideas for voice ie reading-aloud or speaking off-the-cuff, mixed with music – a hookup and gear usage framework putting to use all “mystic speaking” ALWAYS CAPTURE THE DRY MIC (COMBINED W/ WORK HARD TO PRODUCE A CLEAN VOCAL PERFORMANCE). always capture the dry mic. then re-play/ re-process/ re-mix the playback of that recording later.
    • In support of the awesome ideal Reamp approach of capturing the cleanest [mystic-]vocalization possible [various read-aloud styles/conventions supported]:
      • Mimic my horrific speaking tonality, learn it consciously, in order to avoid / not do that.hoarse; not resonant diaphragm usage
      • Practice my bad vocalizing. I could gather samples of horrendous slurring, lisping, odd bad sounding traits. I’m noticing/spotting *many* — it’s all too easy. “loshes all my balanch levelsh”
    • lisping/slurring
    • back of mouth nasally
    • leverage voice actor concept – my awful voice – learn how to consciously deliberately mimic this – in order to not do this.
    • ideal broadcaster/voiceover straight.
    • hyper-enunciation comparable to mid-Atlantic accent; video: “Why do early 20th C actors talk that funny affected distinctive non-normal way? The “actor accent” from early mid 20th C.

2:08:00 completed the 4 topics + diversions into {balance}/ control restabilization. <– consider this word;= control -transformation.

  • 2:08:00 (guessing from note at below item #4 below), and
  • The {balance} mytheme; mastering/transcending the loss of control;
    • Touching the Sword of God
      • touching the sword (in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image)
    • Touching the Snake of Demeter
      • TOUCHING DEMETER’S SNAKE W/ RIGHT HAND AFTER PURIFICATION
    • Jesus (w/ lifted garment) dancing w/ woman
    • “surfing control-loss”
    • the bridal chamber, knowing that one can enter that intercourse door room and experience the transpersonal control-awareness/ control seizure loss borderline situation.
    • pass through the dragon-guarded gate
      • dance/ surf/ touch the sword on the other side, the sword-touching gate
    • {balance}
    • CONTROLLED LOSS of control
      • TRANSCENDING THE LOSS OF CONTROL.
    • touching w/ right hand Demeter’s snake [8:14 a.m. Febuary 8, 2021] 8:17 am. the bigger … snowballing effect of more and more connections jackpot. re: NATURE OF BREAKTHROUGHS.
      • i had that idea as part of the jackpot cluster immed in the hour after the nov 2013 breakthrough –
        • the bridal chamber, knowing that one can enter that intercourse door room and experience the transpersonal-control awareness borderline situation.
        • the bridal chamber, knowing that one can enter that intercourse door room and experience the control seizure loss borderline situation.
      • = pass through the dragon-guarded gate, to dance/ surf/ touch the sword on the other side, the sword-touching gate
    • see the below section “Touching Sword of God = Touching Snake of Demeter = Jesus (w/ lifted garment) dancing w/ woman = “surfing control-loss” = {balance}”
  • 2:08:00 completed the 4 topics + diversions into {balance}/ control restabilization. <– consider this word;= control -transformation.
    • WISDOM = CONTROL-TRANSFORMATION = CONTROL RESTABILIZATION.

Vision for the Show, Balance (2021-02-08b)

Download-File Info
  • Filename: see above
  • Track name:
  • Length: #:##:##
  • Download/preview for 1 week: __
  • Filesize: # MB
  1. We’ve finished the intro segment of this show. The timestamp is x.3:00
    Fade up music.
    Next is my review of my vocalization conventions.
  2. Switch to other tab and read the “Review of Vocalization” section).
  3. Return to this tab, and note the timestamp for completion of the Vocal Warmup segment.
  4. Review the Agenda/Log below, “Working Session Agenda and Log of Topics Covered and Timestamps”.

This is a THINK TANK WORKING SHOW, which produces gems in the outline below, and many other outputs:

  • working session on website
  • check emails
  • incidentally: produce an mp3 for mystic couch potatoes

During the show, fill-in the episode-info template below.

Working Session Agenda and Log of Topics Covered and Timestamps

  • [timestamp] Finished the Intro segment.
  • [timestamp] Finished the Vocal Warmup segment.
  • [timestamp] Began segment about __.
  • [timestamp] Began segment about __.

Now to review the Working Session Agenda and Log of Topics Covered and Timestamps:

Errata
Production Notes
  • Tracking file
    • Filename: 210207_####.wav, stereo, __ GB
    • 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, stereo
  • Mic:
    • SM57
    • 3.5″
    • 45 degrees off axis
    • no popfilt/windscreen
  • Eq: -4.5dB, +2dB <– STATIC EQ FALLACY – double-mellow night dj quiet, vs. daytime loud:
    • 3pm loud = midrangy voice; -4.5dB, +2dB
    • 3am quiet = bassy voice (no midrange); attenuate bass like -9dB
  • MP3 export
    • Bitrate: 320 kbps
    • Stereo/Mono: stereo

“Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-08 Mic-Deck Fx Mixer-Deck.mp3” (functionally episode 02-08a)

Download-File Info
  • Filename: “Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-08 Mic-Deck Fx Mixer-Deck.mp3”
  • Track name: “Egodeath 2021-02-08 Mic Deck > Fx > Mixer Deck”
  • Length: 2:42:56
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-ipBhbla4rx
  • Filesize: 391 MB
  • Project path: USB thumbdrive: “/Volumes/KINGSTON 1/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-08a Egodeath Mystery Show – Mic Deck Fx Mixer Deck”
  • Project file: “Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-08 Mic Deck Fx Mixer Deck.aup”
Music for the Show

none

Content
  • A much superior Mic recording deck & eq/fx hooked up. 🎉 thx to levels-monitoring failure in last night’s end of show.
  • Unplanned coverage emphasis: Grid Game & Forgot-Plots; developed theory. Developed the grid concept (as stated 1:28:00):
    • “I deviated from the plan for this episode, but I have been highly productive, and am (fortunately) highly aware of segment-tracking.”
    • Then the recording halted/choked at 1:30:00. Had to re-start a new recording file. That didn’t help me get on-track for this 2-hour, planned episode …. I failed, ran out of time, and had to punt *all* the planned topics to the next episode! 😭 To avoid any more 5-hour episodes.
  1. [1:30] Finished the Intro segment.
  2. ~14:00 Grad Student work crew working on the Grid Game / Forgot Plot analysis tools. Entheogen scholarship. Grid Game construction team.
    1. [22:00] Finished the Intro segment.
  3. [22:00] Began Vocal Warmup segment.
    1. This room reverb reminds me of… never mind, private autobiography.
    2. Failure of mixing voice and music at correct ratio.
    1. [34:00-37:00] reading: Rolfe 1925 Amanita. Aiming for semi-hyper-enunciation.
    2. [36:00] mentioned grid game forgot plot
    3. 38:30 mocking the “needed” word ‘entheogen’. I want to discuss more, I found a great writeup, highly insightful sarcastic deconstruction of the word ‘entheogen’ – oh, it’s mine.
      1. 40:00 My forgetting and my alienation from my own past writings.
      2. I recognized my set of concepts I created, even though the columnist plagiarized my work and used somewhat different words.
    4. [43:00] almost finished warmup but, during Warmup, did a diversion segment about difficulty of continuing that practiced enunciation into the show.
    5. I am devoted to this take even though it’s gone ADHD. “I swear we’ll get to substance in this episode!”
    6. 44:00 two “guard gates”: at source of thoughts before vocalizing, and one after vocalizing (which caught the word ‘um’).
    7. 45:00 Yeti mic has a mute knob.
    8. Added note “the whole point of vocal warmup is continue that way”.
    9. 46:00 restarted vocal warmup segment.
    10. 47:00 finished vocal warmup segment.
    11. 48:00 Why, in each episode, I talk about the show format first, then talk about substance at end of show.
    12. 49:00 Vision for the Egodeath Mystery Show – this show is to engineer and construct receiving a vision — today, to receive a vision for the nature of this show.
    13. 51:00 The {balance} mytheme is of top importance, but so is receiving a vision for this show as a venue for discovering & developing ideas such as {balance} mytheme.
  4. (lead-in to Grid Game) Saying a metaphorical truth. an approximate and 1st-order way of speaking ie “All entheogen scholars agree that visionary plants are in archaic not modern era.” <– true as a broad-brush, 1st-order statement – not as a 2nd-order statement/assertion.
    1. 55:00 Review summary/overview of the Grid Game.
      Construction crew is building analysis tools.
    2. 57:00 defining “1st-order model vs. 2nd-order model” – transistor amplification curve.
      1. 1:00:00 1st-order model of transistor: Output = Input * 10. Linear. Simplified.
      2. A good glossary definition should first have a 1st-order sentence (clear, not precise), then a precise, 2nd-order sentence/definition (not so clear, but it is precise).
      3. 1:02:00 random inspiration spontaneous segments above. private vs publicly declared statements, to fill-in the grid. Allegro implies, but doesn’t state, that Greeks (surrounding the Christians) lacked plants; he implicitly asserts the absence of plants in Greek religion around 1st C. Further discussions along analysis along these lines are needed, for example, [listed in recording].
      4. we’re in the middle of a spontaneous segment about grid game & forgot-plot.
      5. took notes (below) about grid game discussion. “THIS SHOW IS A SERIES OF WORK SESSIONS”. “I COULD USE MUSIC HERE WHILE I TYPE”.
    3. [1:06:00] Finished segment about Grid Game. Good progress in adding details:
    1. A pair of grids:
      1. left grid: time is left to right. each row is a religion. the grid represents a single region eg Mediterranean.
      2. right grid: time is left to right. each row is a region. the grid represents a single religion eg Christianity.
    1. spontaneous topic
    1. The idea of “forgot plots”:
      1. Must differentiate between private vs. published statements by a given author.
      2. If author lies (misrepresents his beliefs), that means: he explicitly makes published statements that contradict his private belief about that grid cell.
    1. A writer’s explicit statements vs. implicit implications of how grid is filled in.
    2. etc. WHAT DOES A GIVEN FILLING-IN (+ OR -) OF THE GRID REPRESENT – INDIV WRITER, PUBLIC, PRIVATE, COLLECTIVE ALL WRITERS AVERAGED??
  5. ~1:13:00 Ended segment about 1st-order models vs. 2nd-order models
    1. spontaneous topic; not planned for this episode.
    1. ; or, max’ly simplified model vs. / and (integrated with but differentiated from) a 2nd- order model.
    1. spontaneous topic as i had finished the warmup segment and was explaining I would first discuss tech topics and only then cover the planned TOPIC-OF-SUBSTANCE, the “breakthrough” of the past day, THE {BALANCE} MYTHEME
    1. interwoven w/ topic “grid game”
  6. 1:14:00 purpose of this episode: engineer the receiving of a vision for this show.
    1. bad level mixing of last night’s part 2 of that show, poor monitoring, good ultra-quiet vocalizing, good mode of “mystic reading” developed but the recording is unintelligible b/c levels bad.
  7. 1:18:00 Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism says “Writers don’t believe what they write; hiding their post-1967 entheogen use, lying that that they use non-plant-based meditation.” I vocalized that article (first part) last night, but FAILED TO RECORD THE MIC directly, which I’ll do from now on.
    1. They made Hanegraaff in 1996 look like a gullible fool.
    2. Similarly, we’ll hit the same issue when filling-in the grid in the grid game.
    3. What New Age writers write, vs. what they do & believe. Two different things.
    4. 1:21:00 What entheogen scholars write, vs. what they believe. Two different things.
    5. 1:22:00 Religions come from plants, so, obviously we should fill-in the whole grid and then just argue about the exact level; how much were plants present in each cell of this grid.
    6. Metaphor “down through history”, vs. “left to right through history”. Grid uses left to right; converts to “forgot-plot” from upper left to lower right corner
    7. 1:27:00 Pick 2 out of 3 for a given grid drawn:
      1. Left Grid: time (eras), multiple religions, single region.
      2. Right Grid: time (eras), single religion, multiple regions.
  8. The show equipment went down at 1:30:00 b/c the Mixer Deck ran out of space.
  9. Discussed where to put the show template for each episode, vs. the download-data/ info section for each episode. (“the Egodeath Mystery Show” page vs. “Idea development page”)
    1. 1:36:00 The rest of the episode (I think) is these MECHANICS OF THE SHOW info; talking+typing-fest.
    2. 1:48:00 doing vocal warmup then when done, forget about it; “ok, done, lets have a shlur-fest”.
  10. 2:31:00 finished segment discussing how to finish current episode & start next episode by using the Show Episode Template.
    TIME RAN OUT, 2:36:00; moved the below items (the ones I planned, the whole damn reason for this episode!😭) to the next, planned show’s outline:
  11. the Reamp approach/concept to miking the voice then later re-processing that dry recording,
    1. This Reamp approach is the motivation of this episode: the show-format VISION-RECEPTION PROJECT: both gear-usage (recording-usage [eg making & using dry mic rec’gs during the show]) opportunities AND, distinctly, the function/purpose of this show, as a vehicle to receive visions [eg the top-tier realization during and surrounding the past couple shows re: {balance} metheme & the equivalt themes] and Transcendent Knowledge development. This ep is a project to receive/artitculate/ develop a vision for the format & purpose/function of this show.
    2. Extending the application / concept of “idea development pages” to integrate recorded/audio idea development eg the Egodeath Mystery Show – eg my talking + recording + writing at same time = DEVLEOP & RECEIVE VISISIONS/ MAKE CONNECTIONS. THE “SECRETARY” ROLE AS PART OF THE COMMUNICATIONS/CYBERNETICS USED FOR HIGH IDEA DEVMT. or somethin like that
      1. idea development – this show is where Transcendent Knowledge development occurs.
      2. Multimedia ideas – a hookup and gear usage framework putting to use all “mystic speaking” ALWAYS CAPTURE THE DRY MIC (COMBINED W/ WORK HARD TO PRODUCE A CLEAN VOCAL PERFORMANCE). always capture the dry mic. then re-play/ re-process/ re-mix the playback of that recording later.
    1. In support of the awesome ideal Reamp approach of capturing the cleanest [mystic-]vocalization possible [various read-aloud styles/conventions supported], Mimic my horrific speaking tonality, learn it consciously, in order to avoid / not do that.
      1. hoarse; not resonant diaphragm usage
      2. lisping/slurring
      3. back of mouth nasally
      4. leverage voice actor concept
        1. my awful voice – learn how to consciously deliberately mimic this – in order to not do this.
        2. ideal broadcaster/voiceover straight.
        3. hyper-enunciation comparable to mid-Atlantic accent; video: “Why do early 20th C actors talk that funny affected distinctive non-normal way? The “actor accent” from early mid 20th C.
  12. Increasing my focus on stating segments & logging segment topics and timestamps – step it up all the way.
    1. (pre-segment) what I’m going to talk about in this next segment.
      1. timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
      2. timestamp & filename in final tape deck
    2. (mid-segment) what I’m currently talking about in this next segment.
      1. timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
      2. timestamp & filename in final tape deck
    3. (post-segment) what I’m going to talk about in this next segment.
      1. timestamp & filename in mic tape deck
      2. timestamp & filename in final tape deck
  13. Review of progress in the Egodeath topics in the previous show:
    1. skip.
  14. The balance mytheme; mastering/transcending the loss of control; Touching the Sword of God; Touching the Snake of Demeter = Jesus (w/ lifted garment) dancing w/ woman = “surfing control-loss” = {balance}= TOUCHING SWORD OF GOD = TOUCHING DEMETER’S SNAKE W/ RIGHT HAND AFTER PURIFICATION = CONTROLLED LOSSS…. TRANSCENDING THE LOSS OF CONTROL.
    1. touching the sword (in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image ) = touching w/ right hand Demeter’s snake [8:14 a.m. Febuary 8, 2021] 8:17 am. the bigger … snowballing effect of more and more connections jackpot. re: NATURE OF BREAKTHROUGHS. and, i had that idea as part of the jackpot cluster immed in the hour after the nov 2013 breakthrough – the bridal chamber, knowing that one can enter that intercourse door room and experience the transpersonal control-awareness/ control seizure loss borderline situation. = pass through the dragon-guarded gate, to dance/ surf/ touch the sword on the other side, the sword-touching gate
Errata
  • lots of typing toward end, what cn u do? 🤷‍♂️ its a working session, and great ideas
Production Notes
  • Tracking file
    • Mic deck: Filename: 210208_2223.wav, stereo, 827 MB
      210208_2222.wav = A nice Intro announcement take; added to chip’s PLAYLIST
      Mixer deck: Filename: 210208_1923.wav, stereo, 952.3 MB [rec’g ended b/c ran out of space]
      note: 210208_1924.wav was a throwaway to make sure changed the folder that recordings are getting stored into.
      Filename: 210208_1925.wav, stereo, 777.7 MB
    • 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, stereo
  • Mic:
    • SM57
    • 3.5″
    • 45 degrees off axis
    • no popfilt/windscreen
  • Eq: slight smilefrown on 10-band (downstream deck; none for Mic Deck)
  • Eq: -4.5dB, +2dB <– STATIC EQ FALLACY – double-mellow night dj quiet, vs. daytime loud:
    • 3pm loud = midrangy voice; -4.5dB, +2dB
    • 3am quiet = bassy voice (no midrange); attenuate bass like -9dB
  • MP3 export
    • Bitrate: 320 kbps
    • Stereo/Mono: stereo
  • ONE RECORDER JUST RAN OUT OF SPACE AND HALTED THE SHOW….
  • DONE:
  • empty the chip except for guitar files and 1923.wav, then start recording a new file on that chip.
  • finish recording the show, ran 44 minutes over 2 hours, yet still failed to get to the two tech-vision topics + 1 Egodeath theory breakthrough topic.
  • Decided to leave the previous, “At War w/ the Mystics” show as-is.
  • Fill-in the below data about this episode.
  • Export as mp3.
  • Upload this episode.
  • paste dl link below.

Recording the Mic Directly, Plus Results, Will Enable Everything Awesome & Inspiring

new approach to miking: 2 tape decks recording:

  • record the mic directly
  • record the mix of mic + music
  • play back the direct mic recording, thru eq/fx / mix w/ music
  • this is the reamp approach

HUGE IDEA 1: when speaking/mic/recording the mic, just put all focus on clear speaking, clean miking – not eq, at all. don’t eq at all, in the raw rec’g. THE REAMP APPROACH.

HUGE IDEA 2: log, log log – both dry voice recgs & processed.

  • add a log entry before talking about x or doing a reading of x
  • add a log entry in middle, if forgot
  • add a log entry afterwards, like when siad “I like how i said, that gold, thats a clip”
  • log the .wav and the .mp3 timestamp and filename

Touching Sword of God = Touching Snake of Demeter = Jesus (w/ lifted garment) dancing w/ woman = “surfing control-loss” = {balance}

  • touching the sword (in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image ) = touching w/ right hand Demeter’s snake [8:14 a.m. Febuary 8, 2021] 8:17 am. the bigger … snowballing effect of more and more connections jackpot. re: NATURE OF BREAKTHROUGHS. and, i had that idea as part of the jackpot cluster immediately in the hour after the Nov 2013 breakthrough – the bridal chamber, knowing that one can enter that intercourse door room and experience the transpersonal control-awareness/ control seizure loss borderline situation. = pass through the dragon-guarded gate, to dance/ surf/ touch the sword on the other side, the sword-touching gate
    • demonstrate the Reamp approach: play on the show, the dry mic recording of talking-through the above, w/ no eq/fx/music, then with eq/fx/music mixed in. no goddam lisping/slurring! do a *clean* offf-the-cuff vocaliizing, cpature that – but don’t capture any eq/fx. double-entry recording: live, mix my realtime micing w/ fx/music, BUT, capture dry direct mic. then on dshow, play the dry rec’g again, now w/ diff eq/fx/ music. read-aloud ep 26, rec’d dry mic. play that dry mic rec’g back, twice, mixed w/ diff music/fx.
    • new policy for the Egodeath Mystery Show – pause/halt/interrupt the background music is allowed. continuous 40-minute studio album in the background is *not* the experience target.
    • answer to the question “whats the point of reading-aloud an article? why not just have ppl read the article?” capture my reading of it, stylized voicing of it, then process/mix that dry stylized reading-aloud/ “mystic-vocalizing the article”, then don’t put that on the show, so much as, put on the show, the eq/fx/music-mixed playback of that dry mystic-vocalization of the text.

The Record Changer Expeience – side a alb 1, side a alb 2, side b alb 2, …

Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-07) At War with the Mystics:
“The Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-07b At War with the Mystics.mp3” 2:27:54

Download Info
  • Filename: “The Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-07b At War with the Mystics.mp3”
  • Track name: “Egodeath 2021-02-07b At War with the Mystics”
  • Length: 2:27:54
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-A4wzmyfA24 <– nuke this b/c final 45min is failure? that final part is (MOSTLY, probably) so bad (unintelligible) – partly failed experiment – that I created a whole new approach to the show, tbd. I want to re-upload w/o the final (Alan Parsons I Robot) part – but doing so is not top priority. DECISION: FOR NOW: THAT PART HAS POTENTIAL, I’M NOT WILLING TO JUST NUKE IT… I’ll leave it as-is for now. 🤷‍♂️
    • idea: i should separate the 2nd part; the first part is too good to be burdened by the 2nd.
  • Filesize: # MB
Content Summary
  • Only has peripheral Egodeath theory content.
  • Motivations:
    • Practice hyper-enunciating.
    • Practice background music, especially levels (music still too quiet – and, mic too loud, partly due to fx)
    • Hook up eq + fx to mic.
  • Read Cyberdisciple’s recent ~5 weblog postings, slowly, with hyper-pronunciation and FX, with Lips behind it. Allegro, Graves.
  • Read first pages of Hanegraaff’s chapter 19, but not the first paragraph, slowly, with hyper-pronunciation and FX, with I, Robot behind it.
Music for the Show
Errata
  • Music still much too quiet, in first file. Was aiming for -20dB. Aim mic & music at -10dB.
  • Failed to update the outline as I went along.
  • Final 45:00 is mostly unintelligible. FAILED: SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN ECHO, SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN MUSIC. OVERALL, THIS SHOW PROVED THAT MY SLOPPY MONITORING WHEN COMBINED WITH SIGNAL PROCESSING , DOESN’T WORK.
  • Too bright?
Production Notes
  • Update: [February 14, 2021] I created an audio project file:
    Audio project file path: “mbp drive/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-07b Egodeath Mystery Show – At War with the Mystics”
  • Tracking file
    • Filename: 210207_1921.wav, stereo, 1.08 GB <- GOOD, EXPORT THIS as first portion of show
    • Filename: 210207_1922.wav, stereo, 487 GB <- Mostly unintelligible, unfortunately didn’t record the mic directly – lesson learned (but, recording the mic directly, risks filling hard drives with massive mountains of noise/junk/waste). Failed experiment/EXECUTION DUE TO LACK OF MONITORING TO HEAR THAT IT’S AN UNINTELLIGIBLE MUSH [yeah but it is a *good* unintelligible mush]
    • 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, stereo
  • Mic:
    • SM57
    • 3.5″
    • 45 degrees off axis
    • no popfilt/windscreen
  • Eq: -4.5dB, +2dB <– STATIC EQ FALLACY – double-mellow night dj quiet, vs. daytime loud:
    • 3pm loud = midrangy voice; -4.5dB, +2dB
    • 3am quiet = bassy voice (no midrange); attenuate bass like -9dB
  • MP3 export
    • Bitrate: 320 kbps
    • Stereo/Mono: stereo

Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-07) Plastic Cloud:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3”
Re-released as:
“2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud.mp3” (Episode 16)

Re-Released “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3” as “2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud.mp3”, on Feb. 22

see also re Way of Zen: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Ep82Core-Hierophants-v2

also re: Forgot Plots: the Psalter proves strong high presence of mushrooms in Middle Ages.

I removed the duplicate Eleusis passage at the end, and boosted that passage.

  • old Download/preview for 1 week [after Feb 7]: https://we.tl/t-9bVWNDNvHi
  • new Download/preview for 1 week [after Feb 22]: https://we.tl/t-uDrUVrQVv4
  • old Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3”
  • new Filename: “2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud.mp3”
  • old Track name: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud”
  • new Track name: “2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud”
  • old Length: 1:33:15
    new Length: 1:28:23 omg < 1.5 hrs; a mini-episode
  • old Filesize: 223.8 MB
  • new Filesize: 212.1 MB
Changes to the “new” version (Feb 22):
  • Removed duplicate “Eleusis” piece
  • Boosted volume of that piece.
  • Changed filename to display date (in Title) better on narrow mobile screen.
Music for the Show
Content
  1. The length of show episodes.
    1. Limit to 2 hours. To do more, do a separate episode.
    1. Scale/scope this outline at 2 hours.
    2. Scope the music selection at 2 hours.
  2. Logging the outline of topics and timestamps during the show.
    1. During the show, continuously update the outline & note timestamps. Note what I’m starting to cover, time, what i finished covering, time. State aloud, explicitly, the topic as “THE CURRENT … STARTING SEGMENT ON X, AT TIME X. WE’RE IN MIDDL OF SEG X , TIME IS X. WE FINISHED SEG X, AT TIME X.”Log each topic that I bring in. LOG TIMESTAMP!
    2. Add topics to cover.
    1. Maintaining this running outline during the show.
    1. Talk explicitly about what segment we’re starting/ in / finished, & timestamp.
      1. Continuously state “I’ve now started the segment on topic x. The timestamp is x. We’re in middle of segment on topic x, time is x. We finished the segment on x, timestamp is x.” (Assumes policy: don’t re-edit post-show).
    1. To do more, do multiple distinct episodes per day.
  3. Setting the mic eq; that is, Mastering, to make the mic sound good in at least two speakers.
    1. multiple headphones & speakers, eq curve applying to mic by chaining preamps. Listen to the eq’d result in multiple speakers, so that no speaker sucks too bad; finding best compromise.
    1. At least 2 of: avoid the single-speakers fallacy.
    1. Good laptop speakers
    2. JVC bluetooth earbuds
    3. lightning earbuds
    4. Sony 7506 headphones – don’t *optimize* *only* for these headphones; rather, balance the eq to sound least bad among *all* my current set of speakers/headphones, while also playing reference albums through those.
  4. Filesize of this show.
    1. mp3 bitrate 320 kbps; filesize.
  5. Tour of my available audio files.
    ______________________
  6. Review of progress made in Egodeath topics in the previous show:
    1. 2-level vs 3-level models.
    2. Birth of the Egodeath community 2001.
    3. 42:00 (or 42:30) -46:00 The {balance} mytheme
      = control stability; pink initiate = red initiate. blade, control, loss of balance.
    1. 52:00 The 3 falloff curves of visionary plants – 3 entheogen scholars, Min Mod Max, 3 eras of history: Archaic era, Mid-History era, Modern era.
    2. 55:00-1:05:00 My history with the book the Way of Zen by Alan Watts. rejected it then extracted the info from it.
  7. 1:05:00-1:07:56 water break, restructured show template, music interlude
  8. 1:07:56-1:16:29 critiqued the first post by wrmspirit that argued “plants have risk, therefore shouldn’t use”. https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-2/#message99
  9. The problem of too-long episodes. I could patch-in an existing recording to bring the length to 2 hours….
    1. 1:17:47: such as the Eleusis piece… Types of my recordings. Defining a “show” vs. a “voice recording”.
  10. 1:21:03-[1:26:58 in v2 of this episode] Eleusis satire (quiet-voice handheld recorder voice-only piece), with Plastic Cloud album in the background in the present episode.
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Comedy-Eleusis
Production Notes for the 2nd Release of this Episode

I did that (on Feb. 22, 2021) by deleting from “unique strain” where Face Behind the Sun in the background ended, to the 2nd “unique strain”. Boosted the level of that Eleusis passage. Normalized (boosted) entire program.

Re-release “Feb 7 Plastic Cloud” episode of Egodeath Mystery Show.
Here’s the approach I actually used: just delete dup. dlete 12545- “unique strain in fact”

Source file (not used here; I just deleted dup passage between “unique strain”, then re-normalized): “__” = Eleusis satire master tape. green on white SD card Kingston 64 GB “TK Audio”:
“/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/2LevelModel/__.wav”
Length: 5:30
song len: 25:54-30:42
30:42
-25:54
=
29:102
-25:54
= 4:48
speech len 5:30
– song len 4:48
=
4:90
-4:48
= 42s
/2 = 21 s of song, then speech then 21s song
recording that mix onto 210222_2320.wav… done but not used. ended up w/ Face ending early, started next song I don’t like, then I clumsily restarted album in background (w/ Epistle to Paradise).

On Feb 22, I created a new audio project:
main: “Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud/2021-02-07a Egodeath Mystery Show – Plastic Cloud.aup”
Re-export mp3, re-upload, announce.

I could have re-created [that approach was not used] the Eleusis satire reading at the end, with good music behind the entire piece. “Auto-Duck” is supported.

[orig; superseded w/ dup-eleusis removed] Download-File Info
  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3”
  • Track name: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud”
  • Length: 1:33:15
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-9bVWNDNvHi
  • Filesize: 223.8 MB
Errata
Production Notes
  • Tracking file
    • Filename: 210207_1919.wav, stereo, 986.9 GB
    • 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, stereo
  • Mic:
    • SM57
    • 3.5″
    • 45 degrees off axis
    • no popfilt/windscreen
  • Eq: -4.5dB, +2dB
  • MP3 export
    • Bitrate: 320 kbps
    • Stereo/Mono: stereo

“2021-02-06bc Core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.mp3” – not created from the audio project file yet

  • done:
  • create project “2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.aup”
  • todo:
  • mark timestamps for 06b
  • mark timestamps for 06c
  • copy track within project
  • delete portions
  • export
  • upload
  • announce

Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-06) Caress of Steel
(“Egodeath Show 2021-02-06b Caress of Steel.mp3″ &
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel.mp3″) (Episode 15 (2 parts))

Cross-link: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#Levels-of-Western-Esotericism-Clipping-2021-02-06

Download-File Info
  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06b Caress of Steel.mp3″
    (the non-b, non-Caress mp3 file, elsewhere, is today’s earlier, morning show)
    • Name in music player: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06 Caress of Steel.mp3”
      • ‘b‘ suffix is missing. earlier show lacks “Caress of Steel”, to differentiate.
    • Length: 3:22:48
      • Future episodes will be capped at 2 hours; shorter shows, more episodes, 1 mp3 per dowload link/ episode.
    • Filesize: 486.7 MB
    • mp3 Bitrate: 320 kbps
      • orig .wav file itself sounds warbly.🤷‍♂️ work on steadiness of voice??
  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel.mp3″
    • Name in music player: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel”
    • Length: 1:21:22
    • Filesize: 195.3 MB
    • mp3 Bitrate: 320 kbps – still seems swishy to me; todo: compare to .wav

Content

Summary List of Substantive Topics
  • 2-level vs 3-level models.
  • file c, 5:00 Birth of the Egodeath community 2001.
  • The {balance} mytheme.
  • The 1925 Rolfe Amanita passage. (not substantive)
  • The first words spoken in the Egodeath Mystery Show. (not substantive)
  • file b, 1:40:00, 1:49:00. file c, 0:00, 17:00 – The 3 falloff curves of visionary plants – 3 entheogen scholars, Min Mod Max, 3 eras of history: Archaic era, Mid-History era, Modern era.
  • My history with the book the Way of Zen by Alan Watts. rejected it then extracted the info from it.
  • also notable: got background music set up, got studio speakers set up to monitor just the music.

It would be good to mark the timestamp of each of the above.
Solution: during recording the show, update the outline & timestamp. Talk explicitly about what segment we’re starting/ in / finished, & timestamp.

Background Music
  • Blue Oyster Cult song The Alchemist, multiple times
  • Rush, La Villa song, live, multiple times
  • Rush, Fly by Night album
  • Rush, Caress of Steel album, multiple times
Show Notes – Mystery Revealed Outcome/ Output of this Idea Development Production Mystery Show
  1. Hyper-enunciation vs. lisping.
  2. The birth of the Egodeath Mystery Show with the Angry Midget aka 2-level model of Egodeath .mp3, Jan 20 2021.
    1. 2-level vs 3-level models.
    2. When was my first use of the phrase “exoteric esotericism”? 2003-09-08
      https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-45/#message2254
  3. Birth of the Egodeath community 2001.
    1. The Egodeath community (in the Egodeath Yahoo Group) contributed the Dionysus mosaic.
  4. I recently discovered the {balance} mytheme in the Dionysus mosaic.
    1. During and after the show, I recognized the equivalence [7:30-7:55 a.m. February 7, 2021] – & the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image. keeping control stability = balance. Feb 7 added that point to the new {balance} entry.
    1. During the show, I created the Key Mythemes page entry for the {balance} mytheme.
      https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/15/mytheme-list/#balance
  5. Advocating the Communication layer of High Cybernetics, embodied by
    the Egodeath Concepts Collection:
    1. the Core Concepts page
    2. the Key Mythemes page
  6. Read a little about the new Blue Oyster Cult song The Alchemist
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4TFfTSUbto
    1. part of a video doc’y about Blue Oyster Cult.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WprUq_gxkJg
  7. “Rush – La Villa Strangiato (Official Music Video)” – Live
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK1hmDpa8bo
  8. fileb, 2:09:00 Hooked up front speakers, then back speakers.
  9. Got continuous background music going.
    1. When I do a typing session, I can fade mic/music.
    1. Song: The Alchemist, by Blue Oyster Cult.
    2. Album: Fly By Night, by Rush
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGJ0wHkkT-8
  10. Quiet hyper-enunciation of reading the 1925 Rolfe Amanita passage.
  11. Quiet hyper-enunciation of & voice-actor irritation reading of the first words spoken in the Egodeath Mystery Show: How the Egodeath Mystery Show was started: “My followers are taking something that is the epitome of simple and clear, and then they’re applying their big-brain analysis to it; and quickly, by the time they touch it, they leave it a smoking complicated ruin and wreck, that’s all complicated and broken, and the opposite of what it is.”
  12. file 1, 1:40:00, 1:49:00 Discussion of the 3 falloff curves of visionary plants in the 3 eras of history, aka the “Forgot curves”
    1. Maximal = Hoffman
    2. Minimal = McKenna
    3. Moderate = Ruck
    4. Archaic era – 10 10 10
    5. Mid-History era – Min: 1, Mod: 5, Max: 9 <- todo: PROVE
    6. Modern era – 0 0 0
  13. Background music: Album: Caress of Steel, by Rush
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYbeuri1ptY
  14. LP stack on record changer.
  15. How old is the Egodeath community? Almost 20 years old.
    1. Michael Anderson posted the first posting, #21, 2001-06-18 = June 18, 2001. <– very worthy start of the Egodeath community; excellent post, it appears.
      https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-1/#message21
      2021-02-06
      -2001-06-18
      =
      2020-13-36
      -2001-06-18
      = 19 years 7 months 18 days; almost 20 years old.
      BIRTHDATE OF THE EGODEATH COMMUNITY: JUNE 18, 2001
      AGE OF THE EGODEATH COMMUNITY AS OF FEB 6, 2021:
      19 years 7 months 18 days; almost 20 years old
    1. wrmspirit’s first post: #99, 2001-08-06. https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-2/#message99
  16. Read-aloud the raw machine transcription of Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode 26 as-is, then “translated” into intelligible.
    1. My history with the book the Way of Zen by Alan Watts. Initial rejection of the book.
Errata
  • Scope and cap each episode at 2 hours. Then break out a separate episode.
  • Length: ~4:44:10 (I could have skipped joining the two .wav files together… and produced Part 1 & 2, two separate .mp3 files🤔)
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-3W4sQKHhLT (260 kbps, sure sounds quite swishy)
  • Filesize: 485.7 MB
    • This is probably excessive. I did lower compression from 320 to 260 kbps. The problem is, sheer show length. I made huge progress during this episode, on show format; that will help keep shows to like 2.5 hour daily show.
  • DONE: I’ll split this into two and re-export with higher fidelity as two separate .mp3 files, and re-upload. Seems unsteady sound.(it *could* be my voice but it sure sounds like lossy compression).
    • todo: I’ll listen to the raw wav files compared to the 260 kbps .mp3, and decide whether to re-export/re-upload [DONE] as two 320 kbps mp3 files. I suspect an inferior codex is being used, ever since I updated some software recently. it sounds like shiite at 260. update: it sounds bad at 320 too; swishy/unsteady.
Production Notes
  • Tracking file
    • Filename: 210206_1914.wav, stereo, 2.15 GB
    • Filename: 210206_1915.wav, stereo, 861.2 MB
    • 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, stereo
  • Mic:
    • SM57
    • 3.5″
    • 45 degrees off axis
    • no popfilt/windscreen
  • Eq: -2dB, 0dB. Need to do full eq, w/ 2 different headphones/spks.
  • MP3 export
    • Bitrate: 320 kbps
    • Stereo/Mono: stereo

Mind-Blowing Lesson Learned from Last Night’s Playback Freakout “My Recorder Is Broken!”

  • Check recordings using multiple headphones/speakers.
  • Warmup/practice readings: separate each word. exaggerated state-actor hyper-enunciation of every letter of every word. d, t, v, w, x, etc. Send pitch soaring way high then plummetting to the depths, on each separated word.
  • I HAD BEEN GIVING MYSELF AN ‘A’ GRADE FOR PRONUNCIATION. NOW I GIVE A ‘C-‘ INSTEAD. I NOW BUMP THE STANDARDS FOR READ-ALOUD PRONUNCIATION WAY, WAY HIGHER. EVERY LETTER, LET ME CLEARLY HEAR EACH WORD, EACH SYLLABLE, LETTER.
    • REPEAT EACH WORD TO SHOWCASE EVERY SYLLABLE, EVERY LETTER.
  • SPEAK WITH AS MUCH BASS-SPECTRUM AND TREBLE V-SHAPE CONTENT AS POSSIBLE.
  • hype the letters: c d s t w x z
  • SM57 curve: bass -2dB, treb 0dB seems good per my good pair of 7506 headphones. That flat treble (w/ SM57) will be a touch mellow for NON-FATIGUING 3-hour show playback.

I just did an excellent exercise, hyping my musical pitch-swing and enunciation, reading this:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/egodeath-mystery-show/#Romance-of-Fungus-World

The Romance of the Fungus World: An Account of Fungus Life in Its Numerous Guises, Both Real and Legendary
Rolfe

exaggerate the bass, treble, and pitch swing
separate each word, pronounce every letter of every word

Takeaway: I can’t fix runny chest (post-meal) or hoarse or constricted end of day, but anyway, AIM FOR VOCALIZATIN A “V” CURVE: BASSSY AND FULL BASS SPECTRUM AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AND, LOUDLY PRONOUNCE EVERY ‘S’ AND ‘T’. SPEAK IN A “HYPED EQ CURVE” WAY. REGARDLESS OF HEADPHONES OR NOT, OR PARTICULAR MIC. IGNORE MIC, IGNORE HEADPHONES, IGNORE E-EQ; GIVE THE MIC ALL THE BASS AND TREBLE I CAN VOCALLY PRODUCE.

maybe todo: rename filename of every mp3 and every “song name” of all the Egodeath Mystery Show since #1 in 2021-01-20, re-upload every one, good for 1 week.

Length of filename and song name: try like: HAVE TO EXPERIMENT, DONT GUESS

problem: date fails to give hint of distinctive. they all look exactly identical show name, only date differs – meaningless.

“Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-06.mp3”
“Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-06 Mixing-in past recordings, Prohibitionist Art Historians.mp3”
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-06 Mixing-in past recordings, Prohibitionist Art Historians.mp3”
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-06 Mix prev recgs, Prohib Art Hists.mp3”
“Egodeath 2021-02-06 Mix prev recgs, Prohib Art Hists.mp3”

Loss of Control of Speaking

omg it’s looking like the mic was accurate last night , not broken. I WAS SLURRING B/C VERY VERY TIRED – scary. plus, the other big factor, is a different set of headphones, which i consider my best hedaphones, which i hadn’t beeing using for a long time, for vocals or guitar. combination of tired slurring + good headphones = revealed slurring. scary.

what if my gear wasn’t broken last night, but i had a speaking impediment, wtf.

😳 🤦‍♂️ 🤯 🤨 😵

Vocalizing errors:

  • hoarse
  • end of day
  • quiet talking
  • very very tired
  • slurring half the s’s
  • tried to avoid bass freq’s
  • RESULT –> awful, awful, voice sound. blew my frikkin mind, “omg my gear is broken!”

but i learned and figured out a lot of miking stuff to run my show

Boy, I better guarantee i’m enunciating correctly! else i can’t troubleshoot my gear.

  • my gear’s broken: it’s playing too fast, and dropping bits.
    • nope, you’re speaking too fast.
  • my gear’s broken: it’s warbling.
    • nope, you need to get chest under control.
  • my gear’s broken: it’s playing high-pitched.
    • nope, you’re speaking too high-pitched.
  • my gear’s broken: it’s garbling the treble making me sound like awful lisp.
    • nope; you need to work on louder s & t.
  • my gear’s broken: swishy lossy compression.
    • nope, you need to work on voice steadiness.

Warmup Readings, for the Egodeath Mystery Show

My followers are taking something that is the epitome of simple and clear, and then they’re applying their big-brain analysis to it; and quickly, by the time they touch it, they leave it a smoking complicated ruin and wreck, that’s all complicated and broken, and the opposite of what it is.

Cybermonk, the very beginning of episode 1 of the Egodeath Mystery Show (“2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3″)

todo: clip the above, pitch it down, play it in the show.

PERFECT! TURN IT INTO THE SHOW MOTTO “HOW THE EGODEATH MYSTERY SHOW WAS STARTED”

😄 🎉

Shpeech Impedimensh Due to Bright Mic/Eq/Headphonesh

hypoth: bright mic/eq/headphone caushes me to shlur my mouth-treble, sho the reshult ish shpeaking with a shlur.

solution: turn down eq, speak more brightly -> no slurring; mellow yet clearly enunciated result.

“2021-02-06 core Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.mp3”

This is the “core” version of this Feb. 6 episode.

Download Info
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine which wavs
  • import Mixer Deck wav
    • optional: import Mic Deck wav
  • normalize vol of Mixer wav
    • optional: normalize vol of Mic wav
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
    • optional: export mp3 of Mic wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC, link
  • 210 kbps
  • “2021-02-06 core Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.aup”

Levels of Western Esotericism – Clipping or Condensing the 2021-02-06 Episodes

I’m set up to condense the later, “Caress of Steel” ep that day (parts b & c) – that “full” episode is 4:44:04 long.

Created “2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.aup”

“Egodeath Show 2021-02-07 Plastic Cloud.mp3” recommends clipping my discussion of the amount to which the different levels of Western Esotericism get the airplane off the ground. That’s in episode 06 or o6b/c. “the main show of 06” (seems to imply 06, not 06b/c).

Feb 20: I now have two audio project files, cleaned/normalized/prepped:

  • “2021-02-06 core Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.aup”
    • x
  • “2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.aup”
    • x

Next, scope those out to find core content timestamps. But these (06, 06b, 06c) have already been scoped-out at

The Topics That I Wanted to “Clip” from an 2021-02-06 “main” Episode

the amount to which the different levels of Western Esotericism get the airplane off the ground

the field of entheogen scholarship = field of “spot the mushroom” but only on the lower level (depictions of physical form, sheer presence, of mushrooms – failing to perceive depictions of msh *effects*, especially mental worldmodel transformation re: time/control; eternalism & cybernetics; model of self in world; model of cybernetics within eternalism.

  • Should I have called the 17b “clips” mp3 file “core” instead of “clips”? Yes, because:
    • This is a shortened version of the episode.
    • This is not an individual clip that’s modular/ context-free.
    • This is not a new, rollup-clips episode.
  • https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/03/idea-development-page-11/#2021-02-17b-clips-Egodeath-Mystery-Show
    • mp3 filename I used:
      “2021-02-17b clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.mp3”
      mp3 filename i perhaps should have used:
      “2021-02-17b core Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.mp3”
  • clear drive space
    • locate file 210206_1901.wav – found on green 64GB SD card named “TK Audio” at path “/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/DR-05 TK Voice starting 2021-02-05”
    • import that 210206_1901.wav into the audio project:
      “2021-02-06 clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians”
    • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06.mp3” – Make a “core” version of this episode. Create audio project from 210206_1901.wav (that’s not quite at location “/Volumes/KINGSTON 1/TK/TK Voice Recordings Mostly Mixer Deck Feb 10 2021”, which starts w/ 210206_1902.wav).
      latest filename pattern, for a “core” version of an episode mp3: tbd
      • create audio project using latest filename pattern
        Audio project planned name:
        “2021-02-06 clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.aup”
        “2021-02-06 clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.mp3”
    • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06b Caress of Steel.mp3″
      • Filename: 210206_1914.wav – found on Kingston black thum dribe “KINGSTON 1” at path “/Volumes/KINGSTON 1/TK/TK Voice Recordings Mostly Mixer Deck Feb 10 2021” – loading wav into aup now… 2.15 GB!
    • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel.mp3″
      • Filename: 210206_1915.wav – 861 MB
      • Audio project planned name (containing – if not too long – b & c content/clips:)
        Created: main drive: “/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel/
        2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.aup”
        to export as mp3 after copy track, assess timestamps, & omit sections:
        “2021-02-06bc core Egodeath Mystery Show – Caress of Steel.mp3” (not done, as of Mar 6 2021)

for latest filename pattern see
“eg yesterday’s 17b “full episode” vs 17b “core episode” (made today).” the latest pattern is:
“2021-02-17b clips Egodeath Mystery Show – Secret Esotericism and Kore.mp3”

Note: I fixed several bad TOC links in “idea development page 11” near 2021-02-06.

There are 3 mp3 files for 2021-02-06:

  • 1. First show of day:
    • mp3 filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06.mp3”
    • Title in music player: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06”
    • Heading in idea development page 11: __
  • 2. Second show of day, first part:
    • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06b Caress of Steel.mp3”
    • Title in music player: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06 Caress of Steel”
    • Heading in idea development page 11: __
  • 3. Second show of day, second part:
    • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel.mp3”
    • Title in music player: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06c Caress of Steel”
    • Heading in idea development page 11: __

Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-06) Mixing-in past recordings, Prohibitionist Art Historians 🔥 “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06.mp3” (Episode 14) 2:24:25

I also made a “core” version of this episode, 45:00 instead of 2:24:25 long.
Cross-link: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/idea-development-page-12/#Levels-of-Western-Esotericism-Clipping-2021-02-06

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-06.mp3”
  • Length: 2:24:25
  • Download/preview for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-bvSkREchgo
  • Filesize: 346.6 MB
    • i didn’t want to over-compress yet; doing other experiments first. smaller files maybe in future.
Production Notes
  • Source filename: 210206_1901.wav, st, 1.53gb
  • Mic: sm57, eq: -6, +1
  • Bitrate: trying 320 (stereo)
Content

Started as a gear hookup episode — then it caught fire with Egodeath theory topical substance toward the end.

YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT LIES AHEAD ON THE ROAD, IN THE EGODEATH MYSTERY SHOW

SOMEONE OUGHTTA MAKE CLIPS FROM THESE SHOWS, OF THE SUBSTANTIVE PASSAGES

[February 20, 2021] – I created today a project file “2021-02-06 core Egodeath Mystery Show – Prohibitionist Art Historians.aup”, imported wav there, cleaned/norm’d. Below, add timestamps, then produce a “core”, shortened mp3 output. Pos

  • Practicing following this structured show format.
    1. consider “loosely following” – this could work really well. zero overhead show, but with structure *available* if/when desired. no *requirements* AT ALL.
  • Mixing-in music into this show.
    • How to use studio headphones.
    • My special fx voice recording from 2018 mixed in w/ Esoteric Rock and mic.
    • 1:16:00-1:20:00 (if clock is true) — mixing my voice fx with Esoteric Rock – you have to turn up the volume bc i messed up the levels
    • During the show, I found & fixed a ground-loop noise problem.
  • Editing-in (post-show) or mixing-in (live) my past voice recordings.
    1. List of all my 2021 voice recordings from idea development page 10 & 11.
  • Reading from the mystic episode of the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast.
  • Scoping out wassonwest.com
    • Ruck’s background
    • M. Hoffman’s background
    • Muraresku’s background
  • 0-:09 intro, keep
  • nuked interv for “core” version of ep.
  • 0:38-0:46 “scoping out wasson west)
  • nuked interv for “core” version of ep.
  • 1:24:08-1:31:06 work crew grid game CLIP THIS
  • nuked interv for “core” version of ep.
  • 1:33:04-1:46:08 – rolfe is how many yrs b4 allegro? CLIP THIS
  • nuked interv for “core” version of ep.
  • 1:56:10-end scoping out wassonwest.com, 4-level model of Western Esotericism/ entheogen scholarship – clip this
  • Critique of levels in Western Esotericism and in entheogen scholarship aka the field of Spot the Mushroom.
    • Entheogen scholars are “mushroom spotters”. They are spot-the-mushroom scholars. That’s the only perspective they contribute. No cognitive phenomenology.
    • Entheogen scholars are spot-the-mushroom scholars.
    • I’m not an entheogen scholar; I’m not just a spot-the-mushroom scholar.
    • When entheogen scholars are based *within* the field, unlike me, who am based *above* the field.
    • When entheogen scholars say the word ‘consciousness’, or ‘spirituality’, they mean: Spot the Mushroom.
    • “What we do is fill-in the Grid Game. That’s what we do. That’s the purpose of the field of entheogen history scholarship: to play spot-the-mushroom; to fill-in the Grid Game.
  • Hanegraaff demonizing those evil Religionists / Eranos school. Now he’s telling people in Western Esotericism to start playing spot-the-mushroom.
    • Low esotericism; med-lev esotericism; authentic high esotericism.
    • Spot-the-mushroom “esotericism”.
    • LOW Western Esotericism = AN AIRPLANE STUCK ON THE GROUND.
    • IRVIN/RUCK GETS THE AIRPLANE 1′ OFF THE GROUND.
    • THE EGODEATH THEORY ACTUALLY FLIES THE AIRPLANE (ACTUAL ESOTERICISM) = ANALOGICAL PSYCHEDELIC ETERNALISM CONTROL-TRANSCENDENCE.
  • Theoretically identified 4 levels of the Grid Game aka Spot the Mushroom.
  • 3 plots, for min/mod/max the maximal entheogen theory of religion — all start upper left, all end in lower right;
    • Logarithmic Forgot Curve,
    • Linear Forgot Curve,
    • Exponential Forgot Curve.
  • Prohibitionist-Owned Art Historians, conflict of interest, artists make mushrooms, people consume the art mushrs, then the Exoteric Squad confiscates the art mshrms. Roasting the “Scholars for Hire” – pay us, tell us your prohibitionist exoteric tale, and we’ll scholar-it-up for you”🔥 – we don’t even need to write any books & arguments & research; we’ll just agree to tell the paid lie, all together. Brinckmann’s book didn’t work out, so we won’t go with that approach, of actually writing any scholarly works – we’ll just show our diplomas and tell our lies (with impressive celerity!)

Shorter Voice Files – Paste into a Show? Content Idea for a Show Episode: Paste-in Shorter Recordings eg Eleusis 5-min comedy piece

Did Some Practice Takes Instead of a Worthy Evening Show

I heavily revised my script or structured page for the Egodeath Mystery Show [ems] by using the technique I recommend: reading-aloud some draft text, then revising the draft text. I did about 10 takes – portions meet the bar, but no entire take meets the bar. I did various practice and fixes, tried a mic boom arm but not compatible (too heavy-duty). My energy is gone, but I got good practice in, improved my guidelines and reminders, I practiced reading the machine transcription of the mystic show.

I kinda wanted to hear my eq results, but I already know it’s dialed-in now (-6, +1), for SM57 mic. My main motivation for this evening practice was “following the script” – but that ended up being, modifying the script/structure of my show format page.

This session was good setup for a later, real take when I can be loud and have energy.

It’s good that — even if my entire shows aren’t solid from start to finish – there are many good segments/clips present within the Egodeath Mystery Show.

Part of the purpose of the 2021 voice recordings is prepping to guest on Transcendent Knowledge podcast. d/k if i’ll have the Mystic content Kafei wants.

How about a Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode with two people discussing mysticism which both of them don’t …. two people critiquing mysticism.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/ideas-for-podcast-topics/#Quick-Ideas-for-Topics

Headphones

Using headphones when miking:
More monitoring of self = more control of self. Headphone monitoring is like lifting the eye of awareness out from egoic mental construct/ structures.

Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-05) Polished the Format; Mythology = Communication Part of Cybernetics; Entheogen Scholarship
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-05.mp3” 2:12:13

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-05.mp3”
  • Length: 2:12:13
  • Filesize: 144.3 MB
  • Download or preview link: https://we.tl/t-1I2zwn2QlX
    • 1 week to download
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps, “Force to mono” checkbox
  • Raw filename: 210205_1879.wav

At the start: “This is the Egodeath Mystery Show, with Cybermonk. My website is egodeaththeory.wordpress.com. This episode…”

Content – Solid Entheogen Scholarship Segments alternating w/ show format discussion. Communication in Cybernetics, Analogies. Amanita as gateway, Allegro/Plaincourault as Barrier. Wasson’s Censoring of Brinckmann’s Book.
  • New page about this show.
    • About the Egodeath Mystery Show.
  • Last night’s revelation of the nature of this show.
    • Gear and everything came together.
      • (Low volume, excess bass.)
  • History of Adding Communication / Myth / Analogy layer of the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence
    • Myth in communication layer of cybernetics theory, & history of phases of planned figuring out enlightenment & self-control, planned writeup of enlightenment
    • During 1988, I developed the Direct part of the Communication layer of the Transcendent Cybernetics theory.
    • By 1997 I dev’d the Analogy part of the Communication layer of the Cybernetics theory, coming together including the Full communication layer of the Transcendent Cybernetics theory in 2006.
    • myth description closure reached in 2013. app’n to the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image in 2020.
  • More discussion of last nights show.
  • Adding the machine transcription to a new page, “Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 27”.
  • Appreciating Amanita scholarship. Solid segments.
    • Irvin’s contributions are sound.
    • Against Plaincourault/Allegro misuse.
  • Really solid summary at end of show, about why Wasson censored Brinkmann’s book. The Panofsky cover-up story (mentioned).
Errata
  • I said many entheogen scholars have tension with J.I. I spoke a little too certainly; I want to soften my statements there. I’ve heard from one or two scholars who have made claims. I don’t know the facts of the matter.

Heading

1924 Rolfe book https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/quotes-from-the-great-mystics-of-egodeath/#Experiencing-the-Block-Universe

That’s a beautiful description of the classic, standard, normal, mystic experience that everybody has, and which the Egodeath theory explains. 

“2021-02-04b Core – Egodeath Mystery Show – Quiet Mystery Test.mp3” – new: Core version, 1:22:00, downloadable March 4-March 11

Download Info
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-03-04:
    https://we.tl/t-N3BL716XXW
  • Episode theme; overall description: (see also the Recording Header section)
    • Best of the episode.
      • Tested a 3-way mixer for the show (initial test hookup)
        • mic (SM57);
        • album music – song: Divine Wind, by Blue Oyster Cult, at start;
        • guitar, at end (by Illumination Valve)
      • Locate Rolfe’s 1924 Romance/Fungi book at Archive.org; describe, read, screen capture.
      • Received & developed the idea of a Mystery Show.
      • The name Cybermonk.
      • Intellectual autobiography.
  • Filename: see section heading above.
  • Track name: same as filename, without extension.
  • Length: 1:22:00 (the original, full episode is 3:05:51)
  • Filesize: 133 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Timestamps in .mp3:
  • 0:00 – see idea development page 11.
Post-Processing Steps
  • done:
  • create project file (see idea development page 11 for details)
  • import Mixer Deck wav
  • log all timestamps
  • mark – or + to omit or keep
  • copy the track within the project file
  • delete sections
  • delete micro junk until get sick of doing that
  • export mp3 of Mixer wav
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy download link to this Download section
  • test the download link/preview, make sure correct file
  • copy heading to TOC
  • link TOC heading to present section
  • test the TOC link
  • announce in idea development page 11

Egodeath Show/ Egodeath Mystery Show (2021-02-04b) Quiet Mystery Test:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-04b.mp3” 3:05:51 (Episode 12)

March 4, 2021: Newly available: Core version of this episode, half the length; tightened up. See above.

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-04b.mp3”
  • Length: 3:05:51
  • Filesize: 304 MB
  • Download or preview link: https://we.tl/t-swl3G7MKRs
    • 1 week to download
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps, stereo
    • Stereo is for ext. audio, and for guitar, which was initially hooked up wrong, so guitar tape deck is only at the end.
  • At 1:16:00 & especially at 1:24:55, I say the word ‘mystery’ for the first time, regarding “the Egodeath show”.

Origin of the Name & Concept of “the Egodeath Mystery Show” (Transcription & Timestamps)

Timestamps:

At 1:16:00 & especially at 1:24:55, I say the word ‘mystery’ for the first time, regarding “the Egodeath Show”:

the below timestamps are for the .aup project file/ master tape, until you hit the (orig, v1 Full Show) .mp3 timestamps. The project file has about 2 minutes of junk (dud guitar mixer attempt) that was removed from the orig mp3.

  • +0:00 aup start, 3 sound sources.
  • done-0:34 aup that’s one sound source,
  • done~~-1:56 guitar fails to play but I don’t realize that.
  • ~~+5:38 “I’ll use the playlist at yt” music
  • done~~-744 what do i call this
  • ~~+8:16 Deadline
  • done~~-8:24 junk
  • ~~+8:37 lets find leads
  • done-10:43 want mellow flowing
  • +13:48 turning point throw away takes
  • done~~-14:05 which i did mention
  • ~~+14:33 motivation discuss show format came from… except vocal warmup
  • done~~-14:45 it’s getting quiet time, water
  • ~~+15:13 and then i’ll do warmup , then discuss format 30 years
  • done-15:24 fading in after unpause
  • +22:55 the title of the book the romance of the fungus world
  • done-23:05 headphones
  • +24:06 The Romance of the
  • done-24:20 i’m a little surprised
  • +24:45 archive .org nice photo
  • -25:44 practice riding pot
  • done+26:52 The Romance [delete lots of junk/slow/repet.]
  • +29:41 Start reading
  • done~~-30:16 footnote
  • ~~+30:36 reading
  • done~~-31:21 bass resonance
  • done~~-37:25 aup my new capture, Dover changed subtitle from “Legendary” to “Imaginary”.
    37:25 aup (“36:00”?)
    37:25
    -36:00
    =1:25
  • ~~+40:46 aup (“38:50”)
    40:38
    -38:50
    =39:98
    -38:50
    = 1:48
    let me read what I wrote so far, about the unlikely “show”, the origin of the Egodeath show, 18 hours ago I thought of this show and it came crashing together. Where did this show come from? That’s the big… the surprising thing. In some ways, it’s highly predictable that this format would work for me. My approach to making a “show”, in many ways, it’s very distinctive, unique. The pieces are still falling together as we speak. I’ve stumbled into this gold mine of potential, I’m still scoping out the potential. A breakthrough feeling, like 1988 the pieces fell together. That was planned, the breakthrough I was counting on, completely deliberately planned. Jan 1988 was not a “surprise breakthrough”. It was a planned breakthrough. That’s the curious thing.
  • +42:55 (“42:17″mp3) You can look in my notebooks in 1987 and I’m tracking my progress toward satori. Nov 2011, 2012, & 2013 breakthrough 3 years in a row, how does that work? You tell me. See book Thagard.
  • done~~-43:32 aup stop clearing throat
  • ~~+43:46 aup reflected on planned
  • done~~-45:41 aup levels
  • ~~+51:11 aup (49:32mp3) – How can I talk about this show when it’s just now coming into view? In the midst of start of breakthrough rush just opening and revealing itself to me right now; i’m in the midst of it, the opportunity for this highly flexible vehicle, wheat it what is this show format, I don’t even know, it hasn’t finished happening yet.
  • +50:50 Its only started to happened, the show as it has revealed itself to me so far. Potentialities are only starting to reveal itself to me now. I’m live-capturing the unfolding history as the event unfolds, half-day by half-day.
  • +52:00 Guidelines written for myself, mixed feelings about reading them. Main purp of this episode , the motivation for … to capture the history, but it’s in midst of unfolding, so this is a live recording of the hist as it unfolds. I’ve done a lot of hard work on the pieces, I felt was wrestling against the equipment than good results, but suddenly everything just seems to work. No pop filter for 57! No need to speak directly into it. Learned how to aim SM57 at upper lip, for close miking. [this night quiet rec’g is much too dark/dry due to too close-mic -Cybermonk March 3 2021]
  • done~~-54:39 aup mic is working suddenly.
  • -55:15 no pop filter needed, I hate them, I don’t want them, don’t block my view.
  • -1:01:01 aup (59:00mp3) new kinds of problems are coming visible: organizing my speaking. There was no show format before, so these errors of non-continuity in my speaking wasn’t apparent. I worked on these distinct errors. I’ve solved most of my vocalization problems.
  • -1:00:20 mics now, “just work”, in my experience
  • -1:00:51 vocalizing. my hard work in 2007 etc.
  • -1:03:47 aup /1:01:40 2007 inspired to do a voice rec’g of main article. hissy headset mic.
  • -1:04:25 aup 2007 posts about mic tech
  • ~~+1:05:46 aup / 1:04:00 had to rewrite long sentences. write by reading-aloud.
  • +1:08:47 aup how does this connect back to
  • 1:06:55 this show is in the midst of the history happening. I had no notion of doing a podcast or “show”. this show is very distinctive to me. As I play back my recent recordings, it seems really unique. I discover that now that this show format has revealed itself to me, I pour myself, it brings out this outpouring.
  • 1:09:00 i feel this rush of and … will it continue? fleeting? cut back on keystrokes. always was impatient w/ typing; micro cassettes. writing -> typing -> voice recording, to speed up my thinking. so-called “show” format. Looking for a voice approach that would work for me. Low-fi. No audience.
  • +1:12:36 aup why didn’t micro cassettes work. 1:10:45mp3: “If I were to play back a ucassette on this show, we’d see the content….
  • 1:11:37mp3 How I can do a show 2021 vs 1995.
  • 1:12:30mp3 too much typing, slowing me down
  • +1:13:00 better tech & vocalization in 2021 than 1995. Mic technique & internet, everything came together. content, miking-tech, voczn.
  • (Core episode: ~25:00) +1:14:21 Transcendent Knowledge podcast & the Egodeath community now exists (and has existed, the great prophets of egodeath). I helped Martin Ball get started with his podcast. I never envisioned myself doing a show per se, I never pulled the pieces together to see a show as such. when
  • +1:15:52 “the egodeath show” started only a few days ago,
  • (Core episode: 26:00) +1:16:00 it’s still a mystery that’s unfolding right now, like Demeter opening the chest… been trying to do voice idea development since 95, the conditions have changed.
  • +1:17:43 every sign suggests this format will come together for me
  • done~~12006aup-12151aup -1:18:00 MP3? will talking quietly in this mic SM57 work, too much hiss?
  • +1:19:15 MP3? the YT’er whose tm is to “whisper”. my late night show.
  • +1:19:45 ppl know i have a variety of [micing volumes]. my show is a kind of ego death variety show.
  • (Core episode: ~30:00) +1:20:30 my early morning messing around/ substantial idea development, is my morning show. My midday show. My late evening show where I’m exploring, like right now, very exploratory.
  • +1:21:20 we shall see what works, when I play it [this rec’g] back after I know it has gone live. Will Rock albums too much dilute? Bracket-aside IP consideration.
  • +1:22:10 “Private distribution” like d live.
  • +1:22:40 If I can play albums, then it would be my unique approach to doing that, the egodeath approach to playing rock music in the context of an Egodeath show, what does that mean?
  • (Core episode: ~30:15) +1:23:08 no one knows, we have to try it and see. that is a new point about this show: there’s not a fixed format, but rather, it is an exploratory format/process, to explore idea development and the show format itself is an exploration of what works, what doesn’t. The whole very concept of “an Egodeath Show”, what does it mean, I want to keep that as an open-ended question mark.
  • (Core episode: ~31:15)+1:24:10 I want to present the question to the egodeath community: what does the concept of “an egodeath show” mean? Let’s keep that as an unknown, let’s keep that as a variable wildcard exploration, let’s call it sort of a exploratory “show” w/ scare quotes around the word “show”; what would it mean to have an Egodeath show?
  • (Core episode: ~31:45) +1:24:55(master tape / orig mp3 of full episode) – Let’s keep that a mystery. Let’s keep it as “the Egodeath Mystery Show.” [<– 1st mention of “Egodeath Mystery Show” 🎉 🎂 ] I kinda like that, I kinda like that. “The Egodeath Show” is pretty good; it’s a pretty good name, “the Egodeath show”, for short filenames.
  • (Core episode: ~32:30) +1:25:50 – What if we were to say that the name of the show is “the Egodeath Mystery Show” with the connotation [that the…] being… [left unspecified! i checked my mic gain levels instead!]
  • done~~-1:28:13 aup – how’s my level — I suddenly worry about the mic gain level in the DR-05 and abandon the topic of “the Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • -1:26:21 you really have to go spelunking with that dr05 ultra quiet mic, no noise/hiss. But this mic (57) is hissy. re: gain level worries. 57 is hissy. the tape deck is silent, so level is not critical.
  • -1:29:30 Several tricks to get the SM57 mic to work w/ quiet talking without hiss. Eager to try other mics too. Basic mistakes to avoid.
  • -1:32:00 Vocalizing technique, I’m still working it out. I’m over the hump. I’m surfing above the waves.
  • (Core episode: ~33:00) ~~+1:36:07 aup 1:34:00mp3 “The Content front: I could have had enough to feed my show in 1995, but now is more/better. I can read emails, I have more scholarly knowledge, the vial debate, the Dionysus mosaic is a whole saga in itself… the Egodeath community provided mosaic. All the books I have, zines I could read aloud. The resources I have are amazing. My vocal skills have come over the hump, it will soon become 2nd nature. … done
  • ~~-1:38:23 aup -13630 “Repeat Statement” is the universal solution. idea for warmup. I need a static page for my vocal warmup.
  • –14246aup 1:41:00mp3 “typing sessions are forbidden, maybe.
  • (Core episode: ~35:00) -+1:43:20 aup Live now Im going to create a new page called Vocal Warmup Page for the Egodeath Mystery Show.” or “Egodeath Mystery Show Warmup Page?”
  • ~~+1:44:02 aup / 1:42:04 “Maybe I should create a page just called the Egodeath Mystery Show”
  • +1:58:43-2:02:30. Show name, informally: Quiet Mystery Test (received the word: ‘mystery’ late at night; (“the Egodeath Mystery Show”): “Let’s assume the word ‘show’. Now let’s consider the question of ‘mystery show’.” Then I say “mystery religions”, “the ancient mysteries”. “initiation”. “‘Egodeath show’ is nice and tight, unlike “Egodeath Mystery Show’, but you always need multiple names.”
  • done~~-2:03:35 aup implementing multiple names, lull
  • ~~+2:05:54 aup the longest name will be
  • done~~-2:06:04 aup impl junk
  • ~~+2:08:55 aup by having multnanmes
  • done~~-2:09:16 aup meditate on that
  • ~~+2:16:14 aup stopped using cybermonk
  • +2:24:34 aup mult theory names
  • done~~-2:28:04 aup typing
  • +2:30:48 one connot mystery
  • done~~-2:35:33 2 hours 36 minutes
  • +2:36:24 aup about the totally unplanned show format
  • done-2:37:20 typing
  • +2:37:49 show, what’s that
  • done-2:39:08 typing
  • +2:39:24 what can it become
  • done-2:42:04 web search for “mystery show”
  • +2:46:12 mult names
  • done-3:01:15 aup no interrupt, vocal review
  • +3:02:32 aup now music

Assessment after listening: Quiet talking seems fine, except turn down bass *if* using closed-back headphones – as prophecied 2 shows ago, that I’d end up cutting bass.

It’s a mystery. Experimental. 2nd half has some Egodeath development history.

Content
  • Late night speaking quietly as possible.
  • 1st part: Audio hookup test – trying cross-fading between 3 sources:
    • Mic
    • external audio (song Divine Wind by BOC)
    • 2nd external audio – I failed to engage the mixer’s “2-TRACK ^ MAIN MIX” switch until the end – so I don’t expect my guitar until the Outro.
  • 2nd part: I started to discuss the history/story of this show, but then realized that the show has only begun to reveal itself – history is happening at high rate right now, so I’m assessing the history so far, as the show rapidly starts to reveal itself.
  • The full name of the show revealed itself. Discussed connotations. Why I don’t say “weblog” or “podcast” re: this site & show aka “voice recordings”.
  • Created a webpage for the show; surprisingly, I haven’t created any dedicated pages for my 2021 voice recordings until this.
Errata

omfg the world’s most THE WORLD’S MOST ANNOYING LEAD-UP TO READING ROLFE’S PASSAGE. 45 MINUTES OF ADHD DIVERSIONS TO *FINALLY*, *FINALLY* GET TO READING THE FRICKIN PASSAGE! K!LL ME AGGHHHHH JESSU %^&#$*@@&!!! AGGGGHHH 😵 😵 😵

Production Notes
  • Source file: green/white 64 GB SD card: “/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/DR-05 TK Voice starting 2021-01-26/210204_2218.wav“
  • Is there an .aup yet? Apparently not, so create one; not found on “TK Audio 2”, main drive, or “KINGSTON 1” thumbdrive. Found some near-dated aup’s but probably I didn’t save, used only transient project. A near-dated aup, eg: “/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/Egodeath Show 2021-02-03/Egodeath Show 2021-02-03.aup”
  • New .aup, created March 3, 2021, on main drive:
    “/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/2021-02-04b Egodeath Mystery Show – Quiet Mystery Test/2021-02-04b Egodeath Mystery Show – Quiet Mystery Test.aup”
  • Old heading, above, showing orig mp3 filename & length:
    Egodeath Show (2021-02-04b) Quiet Mystery Test:
    “Egodeath Show 2021-02-04b.mp3” 3:05:51
  • Microphone: SM57
    • no eq
    • super quiet talking: hiss an issue? No; faint traditional audible.
    • Need to turn down mic bass to -4.5dB due to proximity effect from close-mic dynamic mic (that’s good news, to help w/ headphones).
    • 3″ (closer-miking than usual).
  • Hookup
    • 2nd DR-05 tape deck patched in, for guitar feed.
      • I should’ve monitored via tape deck, not mixer – would’ve caught error.
      • 2nd external audio – I failed to engage the mixer’s “2-TRACK ^ MAIN MIX” switch until the end – so I don’t expect my guitar until the Outro.
    • See “XENYX” for more desc of hookup, in page 10 or 11 here.

About the Totally Unplanned Egodeath “Show” Format/Concept/ Vehicle – It’s a Mystery to Me

About the Totally Unplanned Egodeath Show Concept – 100% accidental, and yet, the pieces were all intensively developed (with no plan) since 2007… with many roots in audio tech since … uh… 1980 … or before that…

I struggled over the years to work on each element, of pieces that I had no intention of steering into a show.

I never thought of myself as an entertainer – quite the opposite, more like. Maybe an eduator though, eg April 1987 “I’m gonna figure out self control and teach the world it (via writing).”

I wrestled hard against microphones, always a big struggle… and now, “it just works”. My skills seem to fade into the background; “nothing to it” – except years of hard work. I make it look easy to myself, now — it was anything but! Why is the gear “just working” now?

🤯 🤷‍♂️ 🤔

In *no* way did I *ever* envision doing a “podcast” or “show”, or think that this format had any interesting potential for me – for my aptitudes & interests.

kinda like the Vial -> Criteria aritcle -> Proof (the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image ) decoding — IT JUST FELL IN MY LAP, FELL TOGETHER.

‘Show’? What’s that supposed to mean?

It’s a mystery to me.

Accidentally Stumbed Across a Combination of Aspects that Work Really Really Well for Me (2 or even 3 Reallys, on the Really scale by Max)

will this format hold my interest? Highly likely. Mic tech highly appealing. Zero production is highly appealing. A vehicle for me to go on and on about wonderful me (ie, Transcendent Knowledge, my writings / thoughts about Transcendent Knowledge).

Why does this format , that i stumbled across 18 hours ago, seem to work so very well for me? Why does it bring out a set of aptitudes – and interests – i didn’t think I had? What’s the nature of this show? What will it become? WHAT’S *THAT* SUPPOSED TO MEAN?

🤨

It’s a mystery to me.

The mystery is: WHAT THE HELL IS THIS SHOW??!!

I have every reason to believe that this format will continue to fit like a glove, and that I will have endless content to fill this format. Is this just a moment of enthusiasm that will fade?

  • been interested in mic & voice since at least 2007 when I got the idea to record…
  • look at my many microcassette voice Transcendent Knowledge development cassettes of 1995.
  • I been trying *hard* to make vocal recording Transcendent Knowledge development work, since… some time after 1985 when I couldn’t handwrite fast enough — or type fast enough, to do Transcendent Knowledge development.

A complete surprise “out of nowhere” …. with a TON of precedent. As they say of bands: “an overnight success that came out of nowhere” — after decades of working hard on the elements.

5 Big Themes came together in Jan 1988 — the breakthrough was REQUIRED completely planned and tracked by % progress during 1987. INTENSE URGENCY, EVERYTHING WAS RIDING ON THIS BREAKTHROUGH. Not sure I’ve told the story.

Thoughts about this show format, or, my voice-recording format, which i never planned

A solid show. Good job, me.

  • topic to discuss: how did … the history of how this show great format accidentally fell together “by accident” after years of hard work on audio. Where did this show idea/format come from? Uhhh…. I have no idea. By accident, luck, and a ton of hard work & precursors. Sort of a “breakthough instance”. Accidental deliberate breakthrough, the result of many years of hard work, fell together by accident.
  • topic: Will I continue this format? Likely, bc:
    • I get to play w/ mics <– the #1 main benefit of the Egodeath Show
    • I get to read my past writings
    • I get to work on my sh*t personality (negative tone of voice + criticizing everything [look in the mirror, buddy])
    • dumbly, i discover an aptitude for on-the-fly cobbling together fun + profound content.
      • bring together my own music production knowledge
      • gear-fest
      • tons and tons of content from my Transcendent Knowledge development history.
      • great content online that i can read
    • The “show” format – surprisingly – works/fits really well for me. I never would have thought. There may be *hints* of this in my 2007 recordings at Egodeath.com. The “show” format seems capable of “packaging” any of my previous recording types… I’ve done so many (2007, 2018) different types of recordings, long list of types:
      • 2007 voice pratice rec’s where I speed-talk throughthe Auust 2007 Psychonautica episode 13 hosted by Max Freakout.
      • Guesting on Psychonautica.
      • Guesting on Erik Davis’ show.
      • 2018 voice readings of my writings.
      • 2018 special-effects processing of my speaking (tons of these are on my music player; my Egodeath playlist has all kinds of 2018 (and now 2021) recordings of mine.
      • Some rare video-website livestreams, just barely enough to kick my butt and get humiliated by the tech (eg the wrong mic is being used by computer/ livestream – fail! super frustrating)
      • My 2007 recordings with my guitar in the background. <– a sign/ indicator, you could predict from this, I’d likely end up doing a “show” format.
      • WHO THE HELL WOULDA THOUGHT THAT A “SHOW” FORMAT COULD WORK WELL FOR Transcendent Knowledge development?!
      • But I reject any whiff of “high production ” — DISCUSS THE TREND AWAY FROM EDITED YOUTUBE VIDS, TOWARD LIVESTREAMS — it’s way, way easier to do a “live broadcast” format than “carefully edited painstaking format pre-crafted”.
      • We’re moving back to a 1930s Radio Live Show In-Studio format, w/o recording technology per later recording/playback format.
      • Can mix-in prerecorded / pre-produced content. Like a radio DJ; live talking + playing re-recorded / pre-produced music content.

The idea “what about an Egodeath Show format?” is an idea I thought of 18 hours ago, and it “caught fire” and rocketed into the heavens. I *did* work really hard on the elements, but I never thought of a show format. I was slightly influenced by Max, but …

I can’t believe the pieces are finally coming together [but in no way am i implying that the “show” format ever crossed my mind], after years of such mixed results. I never thought of doing this, and it’s falling together, I never dreamed of doing a “show”, . I’ve even had big failures, but the clouds are parting and I can’t believe the good quality that accidentally fell together… including new good ideas for content. I never planned this, but I did work really hard, as everyone extremely knows since 2007 focus on audio. I never planned “I want to develop my speaking, voice, mic/recording technique to do a show”, and it’s been hard work, with many failures, many successes, but much difficulty over the years 2007, 2018, 2021.

Read – w/o self-interruption – the 1924 Rolfe book https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf
challenge – scope out (on-air), but in a non-spazzy way.

The song Divine Wind sounded great, despite low-fi via mic. TRY MORE CROSS-FADE VOICE & EXTERNAL AUDIO. MESS W/ GUITAR REC’G MIX-IN or my other field music rec’gs.

MORE CONTINUITY, LESS FRAGMENTED HERKY-JERKY SPEAKING/SENTENCES/SELF-INTERRUPTION.

read-aloud WITH NO DAMN SELF-INTERRUPTION DAMMIT! my plaincourault article. STFU AND READ!! cn u b any more annoying??!! spazzo

errata – instead of saying “assert / waffle / deny”, clearer is:

“presence [of plants] / waffle / absence [assertion, about plants}
“PRESENCE / WAFFLE / ABSENCE”
PRESENCE / “PRESENCE THEN ABSENCE” / ABSENCE
PRESENCE / “PRESENCE BUT ABSENCE” / ABSENCE

IE, “assert” is too ambiguous., same w/ “deny”. “presence” is unambig, so, is better. “assert” stands for “assert plants”, deny means “deny plants” — but better, singlee-word that’s clear, is:

presence/absence <– 1 word, yet unambiguous.

“the forgot curve” = how quickly, according to a given scholar, the plants were reduced, in 2nd gen vs the 1st gen. In a 2-gen model.

see if I can substantiate anything about Samorini claims. rather; repeat that I’m reporting the truth of my feeling from going through his article. It’s a “vibe” thing, not only a fact of his actual assertions. Comparing my vibe vs his vibe.

todo: make list or talk through a list, of “debate” publications re: Plaincourault.

todo: discuss / scope out http://wassonwest.com

M. Hoffman recommends (or at least, likes) Randall Carlson. https://www.bing.com/search?q=Randall+Carlson

Contributions of Jan Irvin – the Most Favorable Possible View; Appreciation of Jan Irvin. Everything Irvin says is right. His limitations != being wrong; errors of fact. I really don’t care if he were to be factually incorrect – small beans.

I disagree that “Irvin is completely irrelevant”, as an amateur witch told me other day. Irvin is solid; reliable. Just limited. I trust Irvin’s research.

Early Mycologists Books

below section copied from a Hatsis page of mine:

What Hatsis mis-calls “the Allegro theory, of mushrooms in Christian art”, is actually, in fact, “the 1924 Rolfe-Ramsbottom-Brightman interpretation of the Plaincourault tree“.

Article:
Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita
Michael Hoffman, 2006, Journal of Higher Criticism
Subsection: Ramsbottom, 1953
http://www.egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm#_Toc135889189

It is unambigous and safe to say that there were positions taken, about the Plaincourault tree. There was no real debate about that image.

Among Rolfe, Ramsbottom, Brightman; Brinckmann, Panofsky, Wasson; & Allegro, there was neither discussion, defined positions, nor debate, about the relevantly scoped questions:

  • To what extent mushrooms in Greek & Christian religion & culture?
    • To what extent mushrooms in Christianity?
      • To what extent was the Eucharist recognized as mushrooms?

Instead, all of them halted as if taboo, getting themselves completely stuck on A SINGLE ART INSTANCE. Why?

Because none of them are entheogen scholars.

Of Rolfe, Ramsbottom, Brightman; Brinckmann, Panofsky, Wasson; & Allegro, only Wasson took the mantle of an entheogen scholar, but with the Pope, as his banker, Wasson instead censored Brinckmann’s book, and like Terrence McFakea, and like Hatsis, Wasson says

DO NOT LOOK FOR MUSHROOMS IN CHRISTIAN ART.

THESE AREN’T THE SHROOMS YOU’RE LOOKING FOR.

There are no mushrooms in Christianity, because I, Pope’s banker, say so – in my completely evasive, mealy-mouth, roundabout way that could mean anything, by my universally confusing and vague statement “I said there was no … I was wrong”.

Robert Graves 1957-1973 may be the first to pose these properly framed questions.

Rolfe’s Book (1925)

1924 Rolfe book https://archive.org/details/romanceoffungusw00rolf

R. T. Rolfe & F. W. Rolfe.  The Romance of the Fungus World: An Account of Fungus Life in Its Numerous Guises, Both Real and Legendary.  ISBN: 0486231054.  1925 (1974).  Foreword by John Ramsbottom, 1924 <- same year as Manly Hall’s book Secret Teachings of All Ages.

Dover changed to “Imaginary”, orig = “Legendary”
Ramsbottom’s Books (1949, 1953)

John Ramsbottom.  A Handbook of the Larger British Fungi.  ISBN: B0007JA6VC.  1949.

John Ramsbottom.  Mushrooms & Toadstools: A Study of the Activities of Fungi.  ISBN: B0007JALQC.  1953.

Brightman’s Book (1966)

The Oxford Book of Flowerless Plants: Ferns, Fungi, Mosses and Liverworts, Lichens, and Seaweeds
Frank H. Brightman & B. E. Nicholson Brightman
ISBN: B0007AKM3I.  1966.
http://amzn.com/B0000CN6AA
http://amzn.com/090740846X

1966
1979

Rotating Among Mics

Hi Scholar,

Thanks for confirming that the Yeti❤️ is good.I automatically know that your recordings are clear, b/c the Yeti is reliably clear (unless aimed at one’s lap or placed far away).

🎙
🎶
👑

I want a Blue – Yeti, to add to my mic closet, to rotate among mics (that’s a big goal, in itself; for peak fun). 

A big plan and motivation I’m enthusiastic about: I really want to have an assortment of mics and rotate among them.

I love the videos that use Yeti – bright and clear. 

I got to hold a blue-colored Yeti, and it feels heavy/solid, pleasant packaging, great look & feel, I was surprised.

The Yeti really delivers the great results at YouTube, and I’m always glad to see people using it, because I know that the video, at YouTube, won’t sound muddy.

Common Yeti usage mistake:

Speak into the side of the Yeti, not the top/end; the Yeti is a side-address mic, not an end-address mic (or whatever the latter term is). 

That is, the Yeti should tilt away, not toward the mouth.

Advise Yeti in Mono mode

I advise Mono mode, not Stereo mode, for the Yeti, when doing solo vocal work. 

To focus and stabilize the sound.In my podcast today, I again dared to speculate that Max Freakout (for the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast) uses a Blue – Yeti in Stereo mode, because I hear him drifting left and right.  

I’m very happy, elated – surprisingly – with the Shure – SM57 dynamic mic.I had been struggling with it before, for voice; but yesterday, all the pieces came together.  

Solved hiss problem of SM57 by learning how to close-mic: 

The Yeti large-diaphragm condenser mic has much less hiss than my SM57 dynamic mic – but with 3.5″ close-miking (off to the side of my mouth), hiss isn’t an issue.

YouTube main competitor to Yeti is Shure – SM7b (but I’d engage its bass cut & treble boost switches) – also, RE20

At YouTube, I dislike the muddy tone of Shure – SM7b dynamic broadcasters’ mic. 

People call the Shure – SM57 a “poor man’s Shure – SM7b”.

The popular electro-voice – RE20 dynamic (broadcasters’) mic seems clearer (brighter) than the SM7b.

The SM57 is used for the U.S. presidential podium, so that encouraged me to keep trying.

My great, epic show yesterday, used the SM57 and I credited switching to that mic for my good luck for everything coming together.

Egodeath Show (2021-02-04) Constructing Analysis Tools:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-04.mp3” (Episode 11) 3:04:11

Assessment after listening: A solid show.

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-04.mp3”
    • There’s a false start (2 start-of-show passages) when I realized I had gain at 0 instead of 55. Too bad I didn’t also realize so quick that it was in mono and I should have then switched it to stereo. I like the first start, so I kept it.
  • Length: 3:04:11 (at end of show I thought it was 2.5 hours, I forgot there was the 1st part too).
  • Filesize: 345.2 MB
  • Download or preview link: https://we.tl/t-pGMM8l4vOc
    • 1 week to download
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
  • Source files:
    • 210204_2215.wav (mono beginning of show)
    • 210204_2217.wav (stereo main part of show)
  • Microphone:
    • Initial part: TASCAM DR-05 stereo field recorder, handheld, in monophonic (I initially said, incorrectly, that it was in stereo mode).
    • Main part: in stereo mode, handheld, then on mic stand.

Started as morning throwaway show, but, became the main show – good discussion of many analysis tools for the maximal entheogen theory of religion and assessing where to put each scholar on the spectrum from min/mod/max.

Egodeath Show (2021-02-03b) Reaction Podcast Hookup:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-03b 260kbps.mp3” 1:14:35

  • “Egodeath Show 2021-02-03b 260kbps.mp3″
  • Length: 1:14:35
  • Download or listen in-browser (magnifying glass icon):
  • Filesize: 76 MB
  • Bitrate: 260 kbps
Content
  • hook-up / patch-in the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast or other external audio signal, mixing that with my external mic (SM57). That’s working well. I did some “reaction podcast” format here, alternating playing (the end of) the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, “Mystics” episode 27, alternating with my commentary. “Only a trial run” — yet, I provide substance/analysis.
    • That means, necessitates, monitoring w/ headphones – which has pros/cons; it’s a different way of working. Usually I don’t monitor, this 2021 series of voice rec’gs.
  • Try flat eq with SM57 mic. done; I have to listen to playback now.
  • My vocalization was careless; my focus was largely on gear hookup, distracted (but I did talk about substantial topics).
  • I did a full show, 1:14:35, with 2-3 substantial topics:
    • I “proved” that the sequence really is 1) eternalism nonduality experience, then after that, 2) control-nonduality experience — not the other way round.
    • I added to the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast Ideas page: per Max, clarify why I’m the only theorist who claims that the ego is above all, a control agent.
    • Hard drive is full, gotta deal w/ that. I have just enough space /clever way, to produce this new episode.
  • ‘gnostics’ as a garbage-can to throw any enemy into
  • ~55:00 why the main article is in the sequence it is, w/ eternalism THEN cybernetics.
    • Order of main sections of 2006 main article – eternalism then cybernetics.
    • Order of puzzle pieces in 2006 main article — they are in random order – artist didn’t ask me about order.
    • ~55:00 How to make the case that eternalism nonduality comes before cybernetic nonduality. Try the reverse order, does it match reports? NO.
    • ~59:00, 1:01:00 Max’s question of why ego = controller, and egoic transcendence = the control-transcendence. Added to Possible Transcendent Knowledge Podcast Topics to cover page. top of https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/ideas-for-podcast-topics
Morning/Midday/Evening Shows

The way it’s shaped up:

  • Morning show – vocal warmup/ vocalization analysis. Messing around w/ bassy voice.
  • Midday show – Main show; loud full-volume talking, solid content.
  • Evening show – voice worn out, can’t talk loud, out of practice since the morning warmup. Chill.
  • I recommend the above download link instead.
    • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-03b.mp3”
    • Slightly lower fidelity: https://we.tl/t-BySY7OPGiN (57.7 MB, 210 kbps)
      = “Egodeath Show 2021-02-03b.mp3”
      I believe this sounds a bit swishy/unsteady treble.
  • Source file: 210203_2214.wav
  • I exported back to the chip the .mp3 files since hard drive is full.

Draft to Brown (Not Sent)

My process for emailing scholars:

  • in email app, write 12 pages. 
  • Move that to a weblog page. 
  • Try again, briefly this time. 
  • Outcome: 12 new pages of email. 
  • Move that to a weblog page. 
  • Repeat.

Holy smokes my radio show came together today. 

🤩 🎙 📻 😳

Maybe my change to the SM57 mic was good luck.  

There’s room for improvement of course, but still. 

So many dud aspects of previous recordings, then this.

I talked in one segment about the front cover of the Golden Guide .pdf 1976 book I sent, showing in lower left, a serrated bulb quite similar to the vial held by the saint.  

Happy Critiquing  😄 👎

My tone of voice is almost there — but I’m attuned critically to my tone of voice now, and I still sound bitter when I critique. 

I fear I’ve developed a very negative tone I had to try hard to undo, very recently. 

It’s hard to critique scholars, while keeping a warm, pleasant tone.  

I need to force a “smile” tone all the time, to get a “neutral” resulting tone.

I withdrew from guesting on Hatsis’ show partly b/c his adversarial tone — but I’m the worst. 

I merely try to communicate my disagreement/ disapproval, and my tone immediately “reads” as angry/ condemnatory, sharply bitter.  

It’s remarkable, that so much of personality is simply the tone of speaking.

Waffle Gang Member

Everyone needs to change their position to improve their position – and needs to be forthright about it.

When I make a mistake – which I don’t, but were I to – I would say so; “I was wrong about X, so I changed my position to Y.”


I’m far from understanding Hatsis’ tangled, confused mess of a non-position “position”.

Figuring out Hatsis’ position (of the week) is on my priority list, somewhere a ways below “Polish my bottle-cap collection”.

His position is slip-n-slide. Which is not properly a position.

Let us know, when you have a stable, determinate, actual position.

My motto expressing my Philosophy of Science

THE “OLD THEORY” AINT REALLY MUCH OF A THEORY, but a shifting, incoherent, UNSTABLE heap of presumptions – really, biases, which is to say, *a set of attitudes*, not a “theory”.

An un-considered heap of assorted assumptions.

RUSH WOULDN’T USE PSYCHEDELICS, BECAUSE THEY ARE A PHILOSOPHY BAND. <– THE “OLD THEORY” – (IF YOU CAN EVEN CALL IT A “THEORY”)

Email to M. Hoffman

I’ll check out and talk about wassonwest.  I’ve criticized Wasson.  Constructive, is the goal.

I’m now better positioned to re-try a critique of the article – no promises, I have no thoughts except I’m amazed I was able to paraphrase it w/o getting swept up (carried away) by critique-mode, this time.

The attention required to publish books, vs. the headspace and shelter to think, & do more research.

1. My paraphrasing of each paragraph has too much gaps, it has to be smoother but I don’t want to accomplish that by editing it.  I have to speak my own words slower, smoother.  For better comprehensibility.  I felt like oh no it wasn’t good enough to send.

2. Amazingly, miraculously, I refrained from any critique!  Usually I give way too much critique, I get lost in critique, and fail to read-aloud the text that I’m trying to critique.  My first attempts (discarded takes) to read-aloud the article while jumbling my critique (mixing my critique into my reading of the article at the same time), were a disaster; I got nowhere in reading the article (made zero progress), and made awful confusion mistakes.

I need to read-aloud slower.

My “radio show” today omg, came out great and I talk about doing a better job of reading/paraphrasing / critiquing articles. 

I’ll read paragraphs at Amazon & Academia.edu:

1. Read paragraph

2. Paraphrase author’s assertions.

3. Critique.  (Step 3, not step 1!!)

I’m listening to my radio show today’s, now.  I think in the 2nd half I talk about a smoother reading-aloud format. 

I critique my yesterday’s reading of your article.  1:47:45

I’m very happy about the format I figured out yesterday, but it has to be smoother delivery.

Egodeath Show (2021-02-03) Big Game Hunting, along with Winning “Spot the Mushroom”:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-03.mp3” 2:57:54

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-03.mp3”
  • Length: 2:57:54
  • Download or listen in-browser (magnifying glass icon): https://we.tl/t-6wT9KeeGGu
    • No login or account is needed, at that WeTransfer website.
  • Filesize: Even bigger than my ego (I carefully measured the size of both, to confirm).
    • Excessive! half a GB! its just mono. try the “force to mono” option. future: lower bitrate mp3. My hard drive is full! 😵
  • Mic: SM57
    • Bass -2dB, Treble +2dB.
    • Reduce Bass more, like -6dB, as already proved in 2019, and re-proved early Feb 2021.
    • If want treble actually mellow (to avoid hearing fatigue), do 0dB Treble.

My other episodes, which falsely claim to be a 10, are btfo’d.

Content
  • Talking about reading-aloud Hoffman’s Entheogens Mystery Religions article
  • Errata – WHAT THE HELL AM I TALKING ABOUT REWRITING MAIN ARTICLE – FALSE. Not gonna happen, stupid idea, don’t want, don’t need. Aint broke dont fix.
  • Big Game Hunting – Playing (& winning) the “Spot the Mushroom” game * 100 isn’t enough. Need to be victorious at proving not just the maximal entheogen theory of religion but rather:
    the maximal entheogenic-esotericism theory of religion & Transcendent Knowledge.
    • The Big Game Hunting Claim: I have scientifically proved
      the maximal entheogenic-esotericism theory of religion.
    • My October 2002 claim amounts to:
      I’M AGAINST THE PREMISE WHICH MODERATE ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP ASSERTS, WHICH IS THAT ENTHEOGEN USE DECREASED OVER TIME; THAT (PER JAMES KENT) AS CULTURE EVOLVES, VISIONARY PLANT USE DECREASES. THAT PLANTS WERE IN PRE-HISTORY, THEN DECREASED.
    • 2002, I announced the more productive alternative to the “ENTHEOGENS SOON DECREASED” premise, which is self-defeating.
      Entheogen use didn’t decrease, but is constant throughout history.
      *Now*, with that premise, what do we perceive?
      Answer: My premise, the Maximal premise — but *not* the waffle-gang’s Moderate premise – reveals the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image; = 70 mshroom trees in heart of Christian art; = scientific proof that Transcendent Knowledge = religion = entheogenic esotericism = plants, and that’s ubiquitous in all religions, eras, & regions.
      • I cheated; had advantage – I had full the egodeath theory core theory , the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence, in hand, before I entered their game of “spot the mushroom”.
      • To win the little game, of spot the mshroom, you need the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence, and ideally the mytheme theory too; ie, my full the egodeath theory.
      • but we shouldn’t just
        play to win the little game, of “spot the mushroom”;
        we should
        play to win the big game, of spot the entheogenic esotericism,
        which =
        proper esotericism
        AUTHENTIC ESOTERICISM
        actual esotericism
        vs.
        exoteric esotericism
        fake esotericism
        pseudo-esotericism
        fake esotericism
        poser esotericism
        PHONY “ESOTERICISM”
        Western Ersatzocism
    • “proper esotericism” = analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent-control; control-transformation, passing through the gateway, guarded by angel, sword, flame, dragon/serpent/monster.
    • For angel+sword, see the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image, connected to God: angel on the right of God, sword on left of God in the image. No flame, no serpent, no dragon in that image.
    • In that image, the gateway from
      the eternalism beginner-level nonduality-experiencing to
      the cybernetics advanced-level nonduality-experiencing,
      is represented by the themes:
      • non-branching, angel, mshroom, sword, self-threatening, relenting.
    • Not discussed: the great Exo/Eso “w@r” (that’s explicitly discussed in a previous episode).
    • Motto of the Moderate Entheogen Theory Scholars –
      “PLAY TO LOSE, OR TIE”.
  • todo: make this episode available for longer than 1 week.
  • todo: add timestamp for each segment of this great episode.
    • The “grandiose claim/ don’t leave any cash on the table” segment is long / highly repetitive. 🤨 🕰
    • i’m gonna skip from now on, when listening to this otherwise pleasant episode. It *is* the most ultimate point in the world, true; but still.
    • Crafting the ultimate big claim:
      I HAVE SCIENTIFICALLY PROVED THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGENIC-ESOTERICISM THEORY OF RELIGION.
      There, saved you like … many minutes.
  • 1:09:30 Does the word ‘secret’ = an entheogen diminishment fallacy?
  • 1:12:00-1:22:35 (10.5 minutes) The Amanita vial as an example of why the Moderate entheogen theory of religion is a disaster, that blinds entheogen scholars, compared to the Maximal theory.
    • 1:38:00-1:42:45 Golden Guide to Serrated Amanita Bulbs
      • 1:38:26 <– MOMENT OF DISCOVERY! that the cover of the book has an amanita with serrations very similar to the vial. Disproving an argument for the Moderate entheogen theory (sry for wrecking your pub’d article)
  • 1:47:45 Read-aloud of M. Hoffman’s article on Entheogens & Mystery Religions: 1st paragraph only, and afterwards, smooth paraphrasing of it.
  • Read-aloud the first, long paragraph of Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism. And my attempted smooth paraphrasing – I develop technique of “To do the paraphrase pass, do a 2nd-pass reading, but loosely“. That will trigger my objections, which I can — in the 2nd or 3rd phase — critique.
    “I agree with the author to the extent that he means A; I disagree, to the extent he means B.”
  • Segment: Designing a format (challenging to do w/o editing) for READ-ALOUD FROM AMAZON & ACADEMIA.EDU:
    • Smooth pleasant (thus, high-comprehensibility) recording:
      • Read a paragraph.
      • Paraphrase the author’s message.
      • Critique.
  • I’m still working-out a lot of wrinkles for show production & show format, while on-air, admittedly. But good potentials for future show format are clear, and the content here is as solid as any of my shows; not to be topped.
  • Rock bands 1970s did smooth playing, easy recording.
  • 2000s bands can’t play smoothly; crutch of DAW editing.
    • But my show – the deal is – is a “live broadcast” format, = no editing pass exists; it goes straight to “live/airwaves”.
    • My producer friends cannot grasp this; they say “Just fix it in Edit.” I’m all like THERE IS NO “EDIT” PHASE, IT’S LIVE BROADCAST, DODO HEAD!! YOU DAW-ADDICT POSERS JUST DON’T GET IT. 🤦‍♂️

Fact Check of me: TRUE! Proof that I’m always right. And 8 years quicker than Hanegraaff. I wrote the phrase, extremely boldly with maximum force (“sh00t to k1ll”), “entheogenic esotericism” on the World-Wide Web on June 12, 2004: https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-66/#message3335
See, *that’s* how u should write, waffle gang; the very opposite of “soften the blow to ingratiate yourself with the dominant establishment hegemonic paradigm Exotericism received view, so reasonable, so anti-plant.”

Group: egodeathMessage: 3335From: Michael HoffmanDate: 12/06/2004
Subject: Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism
Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism. Entheogens are the key to
esotericism. This is the simplest possible theory of esotericism, and the
most natural, the least contrived and strained. Theories of esotericism that
are not based on entheogens suffer from the problem of grandiose verbiage,
unmet promises and claims, chronic vagueness, excuses for lack of potent and prompt efficacy, and no ability to deliver the experiences which are talked about. Drug-free esotericism doesn’t work; it is not effectively ergonomic.

— Michael Hoffman
Burn #3

Hanegraaff’s 2012 article Entheogenic Exotericism, in the book Contemporary Exotericism.

Contemporary Exotericism
Egil Asprem, Kennet Granholm
2014
http://amzn.com/1908049324
$173.61
Chapter 19: Entheogenic Exotericism
Wouter Hanegraaff

Errata, and Why I *Must* Stop Interrupting Reading-Aloud a Paragraph to Prematurely Switch to Critique/Praise Mode
  • I claimed that Hanegraaff was good for using the word ‘natural’ for some psychoactives. In fact, this topic has nothing to do with the fallacy of “traditional mystics’ natural, non-drug methods”. At least I did realize that – chastened — at the very end of my commentary; I ended up having to retract my interruption point. My dislike of ‘artificial’ for synthetics is valid, but I conflated two different domains. SHUT UP AND READ-ALOUD, fool.
    • solution: step 2, “paraphase”, is simply re- read-aloud of the paragraph, w/o filler words and 5-syllable words. That’s the time to set-up for a critique. thinkin’:
      1. Step 1: read-aloud, strictly. no interrupting.
      2. Step 2: Loose read-aloud. Critique/interruption allowed, this time/ during this pass.

Production Info

  • Mic: Shure SM57, ~3.5″, 45 degrees off-axis, no pop filter or windscreen.
  • Mic preamp/mixer: XENYX302USB
    • Bass ~-2dB, Treble ~+2dB (2-band).
    • GAIN: 1:30, MIC: 1:30, MAIN MIX: 10:30.
  • Recorder: TASCAM DR-05. Mono, 16 bit, 44.1 kHz. Input level: 0 of 90.
  • Tracking file: 210203_2212.wav
  • Project file:

ATTENTION ALL COFFEEHOUSES OF THE SOLAR FEDERATION – WE HAVE BREWED ESPRESSO

How Brown Asked Whether Egodeath Community Wrote About Criteria of Proof

I Remembered How Brown Asked Whether the Egodeath Community Wrote About Criteria of Proof; Leading to Criteria Article; Leading to Psalter Proof Article, Proving 70 Psychoactive Mushrooms in the Heart of Christian Art

It’s about my having disproved a certain Moderate Entheogen Theory argument about a vial…

Defining “Compelling Evidence” & “Criteria of Proof” for Mushrooms in Christian Art

The Vial Can’t Be Amanita, Because the Vial Has a Serrated Bulb – HAHAHHAHA

todo: even better, the cover image!! haha

Added Golden Guide page to my Vial rebuttal section, SWEET! thx Mr. Schultes

Page: Psychedelic Mystery Traditions (Hatsis)
Section: An Attempted Argument for the Moderate Mushroom Theory of Christianity: The Vial that Looks Like Amanita
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/10/31/psychedelic-mystery-traditions-hatsis/#aaaftm

😄 🍄

“Looking closely at the photo, Julie disagreed with this description.
“Jer,” she said, calling me over to the hotel room window to examine the photo in the light. “Look closely, there at the bottom. That’s a straight edge, not the round bulb of an Amanita. And furthermore, this white “bulb” is serrated all over with regular grooves. That’s not a mushroom she’s carrying, but a white vial with a red top probably holding her healing oil.”

Serrations on Amanita base.
From the book Hallucinogenic Plants (A Golden Book), by Richard Evans Schultes, 1976 (0th Edition of Plants of the Gods)

Hallucinogenic Plants – A Golden Guide (Richard Evans Schultes, 1976)

Hallucinogenic Plants (A Golden Guide)
Richard Evans Schultes
(1977-02-23) (1976?)
Kindle Edition
http://amzn.com/B08R7TD35Y

I managed to retrieve from email inbox this nice, clean PDF of the book.
Hallucinogenic-Plants-A-Golden-Guide.pdf

Psalter: It’s That Time Again – Facepalm Time

agghh this accursed image! making a fool out of me, month after month! what next?!

The entheogenic banqueter (the red initiate) who has taken off is supported and pulled by the angel of God by his {right arm}, emphatically not by his {left arm raised up floating} in the air, nor by his {feet} in the ordinary state on the right-hand side of the column, where we are blocked from seeing God’s power.

[10:32 p.m. February 2, 2021] – Correction. I finally recognized now that his feet are not to be read as “floating”, but clearly can be read and are to be read as “right foot on column; left foot floating”. This image embarrasses me month after month; this image continues to reveal “obvious” things that I was blind to and dense about. I added the following observation and struck my incorrect statement above, “supported … nor by his {feet}”. Below, I now added a zoomed, cropped image of his feet to look again. I did look intently before, specifically at his feet, and failed to figure out the reading of his feet; now it is obvious — why couldn’t I figure out the obvious reading, before? I think I evaluated his feet very early on, in my November interpretation pass.
The red initiate’s right foot rests on the stable column, and his left foot floats in thin-air, giving no purchase or support. Here’s what’s different this time:

  1. When I started decoding this image, I looked at his feet, and they didn’t seem to be firmly, sufficiently resting on the base, nor floating.
  2. I decoded all feet in the entire image, but didn’t re-look at these feet enough.
  3. Much later, after evaluating and thinking about all the feet in the image, I took another look, casually, at his feet, and finally now saw – based on the “rules” of how “foot resting on base” is depicted throughout the image – that his feet clearly fit the pattern; his feet are sufficiently on or off of the column base. I had to develop a solid, reliable basis and grounding for judgment on this matter, after comparing all other feet in the image, to see what constitutes “resting on the column base”. -mh, Feb. 2, 2021.
Added crop [10:32 p.m. February 2, 2021]. Right foot rests on stable column base, left foot floats in thin air – thus following the pattern of this overall image.
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom

Egodeath Show (2021-02-02b) Reading of Article “Entheogens (Psychedelic Drugs) and the Ancient Mystery Religions”: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-02b.mp3” 1:01:27 (Episode 8)

Egodeath Show 2021-02-02b – Reading of Mark Hoffman’s 2019 Article “Entheogens (Psychedelic Drugs) and the Ancient Mystery Religions”, with Per-Paragraph Paraphrasing

https://www.academia.edu/44235520/Entheogens_Psychedelic_Drugs_and_the_Ancient_Mystery_Religions_Mark_A_Hoffman

Production Info

  • Mic: Shure SM57, ~3.5″, 45 degrees off-axis, no pop filter or windscreen.
  • Mic preamp/mixer: XENYX302USB
    • Bass ~-2dB, Treble ~+2dB (2-band).
    • GAIN: 1:30, MIC: 1:30, MAIN MIX: 10:30.
  • Recorder: TASCAM DR-05. Mono, 16 bit, 44.1 kHz. Input level: 0 of 90.
  • Tracking file: 210202_2208.wav (outro: 210202_2209.wav)
  • Project file: /Users/michaelhoffman/Music/TK/2LevelModel/MarkHoffman/Mark Hoffman Article.aup

The Old, “Secret Entheogen” Paradigm vs. the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm

2.5 hour voice recording. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Old-Secret-Entheogen-Paradigm-mp3

Hanegraaff’s chapter “Entheognic Esotericism”,
my 2002 critique of the Old Paradigm,
the Secret Entheogen Paradigm being incorpog Entheogen Diminishment fallacies, self-defeating.
Critiques of Pop Sike from Letcher/ Hatsis/ Irvin/ Kent/ Ball.

are there written critiques of field of entheogen scholarship? meta level.

Field of Western Esotericism ,
field of the egodeath theory,
field of entheogen scholarship.

Martin Luther’s 99 Thesis that demolished the church door to smithereens w/ gigantic nail (Hollywood Epic version).

Brown’s book subtitle has the evil word “Secret”, a sign of the Old Paradigm (Secret Entheogen), bring him to the New Paradigm.
tie-in my page:
“Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” to “Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”

fav idea of this recording:

egoic vs. transcendent mental worldmodel ::
Old vs. New paradigm of entheogen scholarship

egoic-thinking : transcendent thinking ::
the Old, “Secret Entheogen” Paradigm : the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm.

Quotes from the Great Mystics of Egodeath

Site Map

Contents:

Kafei

Illusion of movement:

Determinism, what Plato called “the moving image of eternity,” is the illusion of time and space.

As Max Freakout described it: as a holographic illusion that’s created within the block universe.

Determinism refers to the illusion of movement in matter.

Kafei

Determinism within eternalism:

I see determinism within the model of eternalism.

Kafei

Experiencing the block universe:

The mystic state is a direct experience of the block universe.

The mind fuses with the block universe; the mind becomes “the All”, becomes the block universe.

There is no time to unfold, because everything is occurring at once, simultaneously.

That’s the vision inside the experience.

When you return to the baseline of consciousness, you return to space and time, the egoic illusion.

You still have in your memory banks, the vision of where that ego death happened, where there was no longer an ego but there was still awareness there.

It’s that awareness that you could recall from your memory banks.

Kafei

Max Freakout

Moderate entheogen theory as peak self-contradiction:

But the more that Ruck pushes in that direction of broadening the scope of where you can identify entheogens, the more that his overall picture starts to look like a blatant self-contradiction, because what he’s saying is:

Absolutely everybody everywhere knew about entheogens and was tripping, but it was all kept secret – it was all a secret, and nobody really knew about it.

But you know, which one of those is true?

Max Freakout, Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 3, 57:00 

Totally not mystics: 👽

The three of us are not mystics.

People who are not mystics, are the people to whom the Egodeath theory is relevant.

We are not mystics here.

We are not mystics; we are not in that special class of people.

We are not mystics; why would we be so interested in a theory about people who we are never going to be like, who we can never know what it’s like to be those people?

I’m not going to comment on whether I’m a mystic, or an aspiring mystic, or a non-mystic.

Max Freakout, Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 26

Cyberdisciple

Control vortex:

Martin Ball’s going to inevitably run into the Egodeath theory. And in a way, he probably already has; Ball talks about ‘the shadow’, or something like that, this kind of New-Agey term: but, that is the problem; the threat of ego death looming, in the altered state.

We can help show – in addition to the critique of Pop Sike, make it constructive and show them how they can move closer to the Egodeath theory, why the Egodeath theory is a more attractive option than their current paradigms, intellectually speaking: just for coherence; and, for providing the fullest model of what goes on in the altered state.

Because that’s really what draws us, what has drawn us to it; there’s nothing that really compares to the depth of explanation; that actually, pushing through towards the ego death, and not trying to skate around the outside and use the sacrament for some other purpose.

Cyberdisciple, Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 3 (19:00)

Cybermonk

Theory vs. adherents:

My followers are taking something that is the epitome of simple and clear, and then they’re applying their big-brain analysis to it; and quickly, by the time they touch it, they leave it a smoking complicated ruin and wreck, that’s all complicated and broken, and the opposite of what it is.

Cybermonk, the very beginning of episode 1 of the Egodeath Mystery Show (“2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3″)

You have to fact-check everything I say:

Everything I say in my recordings is tentative and needs a fact-check.

The book “The Illusion of Will, Self, and Time” is claiming that William James made a death-bed retraction, and that he approved the block universe on his death bed – something along those lines.

Like all of my bogus voice recordings, you’ll have to fact-check everything I say. The feeling I have is correct, even if my statements are completely false.

Cybermonk, “Two Models of Control.mp3”, 56:30, 59:50

Facts:

I don’t know this for a fact.

But who cares? We don’t expect me to say facts.

I have transcended mere facts.

Cybermonk, Egodeath Mystery Show 2021-02-04b, 2:14:33

Remedial Pre-School Prep Version of the Egodeath Theory

Site Map

Contents:

Introduction

Remedial Pre-School Prep Version of the Egodeath Theory – Simplified 1st-Grade Reading Level

For slow learners or insane people who layer tons of their confusion on top of my couldn’t-be-simpler words stating dirt-simple points.

This page is particularly needed and is required, for over-educated, post-doc students.

Screening Exam

Question 1: Which domain does the Egodeath theory apply to?

A. Refrigerators

B. Mysticism

Question 2: Which state is the Egodeath theory based in?

A. the ordinary state (tight cognitive association binding)

B. the altered state (loose cognitive association binding)

Question 3: Which model of causality does the Egodeath theory assert?

A. free will quantum ineffability

B. domino-chain determinism (unfolding-in-time determinism; temporal causal-chain determinism)

C. block-universe determinism (eternalism)

Question 3 ½: Which model of time, possibility, and control agency does the Egodeath theory assert?

A. branching-universe possibilism; possibility-branching; open future with yet-to-be-created future control-thoughts

B. block-universe eternalism; monopossibility; pre-existence of control-thoughts

Question 4: Do the writings of mystics explicitly advocate high dose?

A. Yes; mystics write about their intensity level, such as: “The previous time, I was really in the Holy Spirit, but this time, I was really, really, really in the Holy Spirit” (that is, intensity level = 3 Really’s, on the Really scale).

B. No; mystics write that either they were in the Holy Spirit, or not in the Holy Spirit.

Question 5: Which people does the word “everyone” mean?

A. Some people, but not others.

B. All people.

Question 6: Who is the Egodeath theory for?

A. Some people, but not others.

B. All people.

Question 6 ½: What does the word ‘mystics’ mean?

(Open-book exam question)
https://www.bing.com/search?q=define+mystics
https://www.bing.com/search?q=mystic

A. The conjectured set of people who merge ASC & OSC, who are beyond explanation, who are ultra-special and have alien minds 👽, who ordinary people cannot ever be like, for whom the Egodeath theory is irrelevant.

B. People who experience ASC multiple times, and who understand things like the Egodeath theory.

Question 7: Match the Pictures

(Advanced level; most leading art authorities and amateur history bloggers fail this one.)

Which of the following pictures matches the items in the above pictures: Picture A, Picture B, or Picture C?

Picture A:

Picture B:

Picture C:

Question 8 (essay question): What’s the difference between block-universe determinism vs. block-universe eternalism?

Write your explanation here: __________.

Question 9: Which model of time does David Bohm’s “non-local hidden variables” interpretation of Quantum Mechanics fit?

A. branching-universe possibilism

B. block-universe eternalism

Question 10: How many levels or positions are typically contrasted in the Egodeath theory? (Such as models of Myth; State of consciousness; Time; & Control)

A. Two.

B. Three.

Question 11: Which level of religion are most books about entheogen scholarship focused on?

A. High esotericism. (Analogy-based religion based in the altered state, explaining myth elements in terms of cognitive phenomenology observed and experienced in the altered state.)

B. Low esotericism. (Physical, literalist religion, focused on things that are observed and experienced in the ordinary state.)

C. Exotericism. (Literalist religion based in the ordinary state.)

/ end of exam

Voice Recordings for this Page

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Audio-Voice-Recording – get it (2 mp3 files) while u can

this mp3 file hosting approach requires me to re-upload after a week

There are 2 download links near there, to get 3 voice-recording files:

  • A link to get 2 .mp3’s for Jan 20:
    • “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
    • “3-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
  • A link to get 1 .mp3 for Jan 21, 2021:
    • “The Great Mystics of Egodeath.mp3”

This Page Advocates a Simplified, 2-Level Model; Beware of Subtly Mixing-in Some Type of 3-Level Model

This page implicitly advocates a simplified 2-level model.

Be careful covertly mixing-in possibly malformed 3-level models, into the primary, 2-level model of the Egodeath theory.

The problem of where to fit domino-chain determinism in a simplified 2-level binary model

Domino-chain determinism implies a type of 3-level model:

  • free will
  • domino-chain determinism
  • block-universe determinism

Domino-chain determinism doesn’t obviously, clearly fit into one of the two, contrasted, reference positions that are defined in the primary, elementary, first-order, simplified, 2-level model of the Egodeath theory:

  • possibility-branching free will
  • block-universe eternalism no-free-will

domino-chain determinism usually is close to egoic possibilism-thinking, although it implies non-branching. domino-chain determinism implies non-branching by a very different mechanism than block-universe eternalism.

domino-chain determinism doesn’t match “branching universe”; it matches “block universe” — yet, domino-chain determinism tends to be closer to possibilism-thinking than to eternalism-thinking:

branching universe
vs.
block universe [domino-chain determinism fits here]

possibilism-thinking [domino-chain determinism largely remains here]
vs.
eternalism-thinking

Short Summary Statements of the Egodeath Theory

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/31/summary-statements-of-egodeath-theory/

Anti-Amanita Manifesto

Site Map

Contents:

  • Amanita Prevents Understanding of Psychedelics
  • They Even Got the Emojis; Need the World’s Most Visually Boring Psilocybe Emoji
  • Psilocybe & Amanita in Greek Art
  • 70 Proven Psilocybe Mushroom Trees, for Peak Religious Experience, in the Very Heart of Christian Art

Amanita Prevents Understanding of Psychedelics

“The sheer existence of Amanita has set back entheogen scholarship and understanding of psychedelics by decades.” – Freakout

They Even Got the Emojis; Need the World’s Most Visually Boring Psilocybe Emoji

psil🍄cy⚡️bin ⛈mushr🍄🍄ms

Move from “Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” to “Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”

Psilocybe & Amanita in Greek Art

Photo by: Cybermonk (Egodeath)
Photo by Cybermonk (Egodeath)

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/defining-compelling-evidence-criteria-of-proof-for-mushrooms-in-christian-art/#Identifying-the-Leopard-watering-Bowl-as-Amanita

1 hem Psil, 4 hem Psil, 1 Amanita, 4 mushroom-shaped grape-baskets, 1 krater grapevine pot – identified by Cybermonk (Egodeath)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiasus

70 Proven Psilocybe Mushroom Trees, for Peak Religious Experience, in the Very Heart of Christian Art

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom

Proof that the Canterbury Psalter’s Leg-Hanging Mushroom Tree Is Psilocybe

Idea Development page 10

Site Map

Contents:

Incoming Ideas

Egodeath Show (2021-02-02) Trajectory of 4 Announcement Articles 1997, 2002, 2003, 2006:
“Egodeath Show 2021-02-02.mp3” 1:09:50 (Episode 7)

  • Filename: “Egodeath Show 2021-02-02.mp3”
  • Download URL: https://we.tl/t-OwGfM4UugT
  • Length: 1:09:50
  • Mic: Lightning earbud (casual)
Selected Errata
  • I retract describing this as a “utility” recording; ignore that claim at the start.
  • Also what’s tracked in this analysis is the 4 sections of the 2006 main article:
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/
  • the Egodeath theory (2006)
    • the Mytheme theory (pre-announced 2002&3, ~includes: Ahis. & W Eso’m & Enth Hist):
      • Section 1 = Metaphor = quadrant 1 of puzzle diagram
    • the Cybernetic theory (1997) = quadrants 2, 3, 4
      • Section 2 = Dissociation
      • Section 3 = Determinism
      • Section 4 = Cybernetics

This episode has well-spoken Egodeath theory development realizations about my 4 announcement articles, (1997, 2002, 2003, 2006).

This milestone episode also has a good reading of M. Hoffman’s article, first couple pages straight-through, and I demonstrate my new “subsegment” approach, in which I shut up and just read-aloud, and separately, at end of page, I then stop reading and comment instead – repeating statements sometimes, for ideal vocalizing (almost no commenting this time, though). I am now ready to do a *good* reading-aloud of this article, later.
[2021-02-06: apply today’s Chastening ENUNCIATION REVELATION that I had been doing a terrible job and need to step it up by 2 orders of magnitude high awareness… DO hyper-enunciate (smooth naturalness will automatically happen). Pronounce every word, every syllable, every letter of M. Hoffman’s article.]

Tone King 🎙 🎶 👑

Completed the Quest for the Multi- Holy Grail

🍄 🏆 🍄 🏆

Photo: Cybermonk 10:10 a.m. 10/10/2010
  • throat health
  • good tone
    • zero overhead/ 2nd nature
  • incisive critique/analysis

Trademark vocal exercise: “It is impressive and admirable, the consistent dedication to falsehood which the Exoteric paradigm has.”

🎙 🙃 😄

Take 9 of this episode of the Egodeath Show – talking about Egodeath theory development.

I used the great professional voiceover “repeat statements” technique to fix the Tone of speaking.

New key words:

  • Utility
  • Segment
  • Tone
  • Repeat statement <- the universal solution to all vocalization problems

Changes to Format & Conventions for the Egodeath Show

What I thought was lo-fi / gear malfunction, is actual gravelly sound in my voice.

Pros & Cons, for overhead, of doing the following:

  • outline of content
  • description of content in filename.
  • saying date.
  • saying ep. number.
  • episode numbers
  • intro/outro script – I will say these informally/ off the cuff. No need for computer screen with text.

Pros & Cons of other options:

  • ZERO overhead.
  • I will only type here, the filename and download link. Nothing else is promised.
  • I might, optionally, state at start: “this is planned to be a [episode type] episode.”
  • During the recording, I will state the next segment type (eg the next half-hour plan):
    • Theory development
    • Read-aloud
      • sub-segments:
        • Reading 1 page (but not commenting) — includes re-reading selected sentences, for clarity. These writings have errors and confusing (& inconsistent, self-countering) wording – my reading aloud, will help.
        • Separate, “commenting” sub-segments. At end of page. Include re-stating sentences from text as needed, for context.
  • Vocalization practice
  • Vocalization theorizing
  • Utility eg discussing show format

A goal is to reduce typing.

Despite switching to voice rec’g, I still have to reduce writing show notes/contents.

Book: High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World (Partridge)

Book:
High Culture: Drugs, Mysticism, and the Pursuit of Transcendence in the Modern World
Christopher Partridge, 2018
http://amzn.com/0190459115 –

“History is littered with evidence of humanity’s fascination with drugs and the pursuit of altered states.

From early Romanticism to late-nineteenth-century occultism and from fin de siècle Paris to contemporary psychedelic shamanism, psychoactive substances have playedcatalyzing people.

Yet serious analysis of the religious dimensions of modern drug use is still lacking.

The use of drugs and the pursuit of transcendence from the nineteenth century to the present day.

Beginning with the Romantic fascination with opium, it chronicles the discovery of anesthetics, the psychiatric and religious interest in hashish, the bewitching power of mescaline and hallucinogenic fungi, the more recent uses of LSD, as well as the debates surrounding drugs and religious experience.

This fascinating and wide-ranging sociological and cultural history fills a major gap in the study of religion in the modern world and our understanding of the importance of countercultural thought, offering new and timely insights into the controversial relationship between drugs and mystical experience.”

Egodeath Show (2021-02-01) Episode 6:
“Ep6 Episodal Breakdown.mp3” 3:18:59

  • Filename: “Ep6 Episodal Breakdown.mp3”
  • Length: 3:18:59
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-xoughzNogA
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
  • Source file: 210201_2196.wav
  • Mic: TASCAM DR-05
Errata
  • I have de-committed to listing errata. You get what you get.
  • As promised, I made errors as well as solid, good points, when critiquing M. Hoffman’s article / writing, which I mis-called “Carl Ruck, tell me what you…”
Intro Script
  • This is episode 6 of the Egodeath show, February 1, 2021, with Cybermonk.
  • Topics may include:
    • Figuring out how to coordinate the Egodeath Show & the Egodeath Warmup Show, how to number episodes, what if longer than rec’g limit of 3:22?
    • Readings (chopped up into teeny tiny bits w/ overheated commentary) from articles by Hanegraaff, Ruck, M. Hoffman, Christopher Partridge.

Currently lacks Intro segment, b/c I was thinking of this rec’g as just continuation of Ep5. acreate created (quiet) Intro later, prefixed.

  • Currently reading-aloud Christopher Partridge chapter in same book as Hanegraaff’s article Entheogenic Esotericism: book: Contemporary Esotericism.
  • Spent ~15 minutes discussing/figuring out the “rules” for recording my show(s) and numbering the episodes.
  • The master rule: record episodes. That’s the only thing that matters; don’t let any thing (prohibitive standards) block this.
    • If it’s “High Production Standards vs. Generating Content”, go w/ content, don’t block on Perfectionism, or on conventional expectations.
    • fav recorder halts before 3:22:00. Add an Outro to the end.
    • The next recording = the next episode. Produce bulk produce multiple episodes — two recordings = two episodes. > 3 hours, = a new, different episode. (It’s possible to patch-on an Intro or Outro afterwards.)
    • Record (speak) during the day. Produce/upload/type at night.
    • *try* to separate the egodeath theory content into a different recording than off-topic content; an egodeath recording should be >90% on-topic.
      • Maybe separate creating the Intro/Outro as a separate production step.
      • Streamlined definition of “show” – this show is an idea-development working session for passive consumer couch potatoes (= future-me).
      • I’m not thrilled with my erratic jerky read/stop/comment/random/ … I wish there were longer contiguous reading periods, MORE STRUCTURE of my reading/commentary sessions.
      • Finding: I need to sometimes read sentences twice, to understand them.

Egodeath Show (2021-02-01) Episode 5:
“Ep5 The Wafflehouse Gang.mp3” 3:12:21

  • Filename: “Ep5 The Wafflehouse Gang.mp3”
  • Length: 3:12:21
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-pyVjmVOMi2
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
  • Mic: TASCAM DR-05
  • Source file: 210201_2195.wav
Intro Script
  • This is episode 5 of the Egodeath show, February 1, 2021, with Cybermonk.
  • Topics may include:
    • The Graves/Ruck Wafflehouse Gang, their default anti-plant paradigm, lack of the egodeath theory as base of operation is obvious.
    • New way of measuring self-countering , counter-signalling, and compromise w/ default paradigm/mindset/worldview.
    • Triple holy grail: smooth vocalization, voice apparatus later in day, incisive critique.
    • Mystics episode
    • H/H articles
Outro Script

no outro bc was thinking this would be mp3 1 of 2 for the episode (bad idea). DONE: copy the outro from ep6 wav 210201_2196.wav,
didn’t copy 210201_2193.wav (we have assumed control, seems gravelly – gear broken?)

  • This was the Egodeath show, with Cybermonk.

Egodeath Warmup Show (2021-02-01) Episode 2: Accidental Profundity

  • Filename: “Ep2 Egodeath Warmup Show.mp3”
  • Length: 2:52:21
  • Content: ~67?% Egodeath theory development (review of last night’s work), the middle 1/3 might be vocalization analysis, have to skip over it in big jumps. I should chop up the recording into Egodeath theory content vs. vocalization parts.
  • Download url for 1 week:
    • https://we.tl/t-sviZUF3Oje (Bitrate: 170-210 kbps; suspected slightly more swishy/unsteady 🤷‍♂️ inconclusive so far) Since the original .m4a file had Lossy Cmp turned on, doubt this re-export rate is high enough. 124.4 MB
    • https://we.tl/t-YlPTilRPqK (bitrate: 320 kbps export) 413.7 MB (3.33 times as much data)
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
  • Bitrate: Trying 170-210 kbps. The orig was w/ Lossy Cmp, so this could be swishy/excessive. Redo @ 320 kbps if so.
  • Mic: Lightning earbud mic dangling
  • Tracking file: renamed to “Ep2 Egodeath Warmup Show.m4a”
Critique
  • Hyper – eagerness to analyze yesterday’s work/theorizing, sounds like 1.5x speed playback. hurried – that’s a bad habit. S L O W I T D O W N – C H I L L , or, decide what I’m doing: fast-as-possible Transcendent Knowledge development?
  • Not enough actual vocalization practice / exercises
  • “too much” (relatively) spazzy theorizing about vocalizing
  • tons of the Egodeath theory development, hasty frenetic pacing – not helping voczn habits 🤨
  • 2:18:00 typing – instead, practice pausing – save tape! (& poor listeners’ sanity)
  • 2:18:00 sniffing – bad. 22245 finally paused & fixed.

“Content”

  • ~2:23:15 sing briefly 2112 by using bad vocal tics (um, that, slike, y’know)

Some extended portions have good Egodeath theory content (failed to be on-topic with Voczn, violated the rules and did Egodeath theory devmt; supposed to be an airhead ditzy morning show – FAIL) [Ackshually, it’s supposed to be vocal practice, not unfocused entertainment OR Transcendent Knowledge development ]

Quest for the Triple Holy Grail

🍄🏆🍄🏆🍄🏆

  • good vocalization while off-the-cuff speaking
  • voice apparatus in good state later in day
  • incisive critique/ critical thinking. “everything you said is wrong” (smoothly spoken)
Intro Script

[skipped/winged it]

  • This is episode 2 of the Egodeath Warmup show, February 1, 2021, with Cybermonk.
Outro Script
  • This was the Egodeath Warmup show, with Cybermonk.

morning show ep2 – double holy grail vocalizing yesterday, but too long recordings made semi low fidelity.

in this show I screwed up and did 45+ minutes (read: 2 hours) of Transcendent Knowledge development [correction: ego death theory devmt] reporting on yesterdays model i created, WAFFLEHOUSE GANG GRAVES/RUCK. — THEIR HALLMARK: THEIR WRITING INCLUDES COUNTER-MESSAGING (aka “self-contradiction”). also phrase “counter-signalling themselves”. which i don’t do! and i was shocked that they did it – whoa you guys , and I, are NOT COMING FROM THE SAME PLACE! PROBLY BC i’m coming from *having* the egodeath theory core circa 1997, I’m much more CONFIDENT in plants than they are. I’m coming from top-down vector/place, where Transcendent Knowledge & plants are a GIVEN REALITY; whereas they’re comgin from bottom-up vector/ base of operation, ie, doubt, uncertainty, tentativeness; the received, anti-plant, denial paradigm.

THE GRAVES/RUCK MODERATE PARADIGM = COUNTER-MESSAGING (in their messages), which I don’t do and therefore i noticed intensely <- my 2002 accusation, i have now pinpointed!

the Graves/Ruck Waffle Dance: sometimes they are strategically trying to soften their message. First pretend to agree with the dominant presumption-based Exotericism fallacies, to win the audience and get them to nod along with you, then once the audience is on board, counter and turn and bring them in the other direction. Body of article vs. footnotes — how to make self-contradiction (mixed message, counter-messaging oneself) not count.

Email to M. Hoffman

Has anyone written about this image?
Proof that the Canterbury Psalter’s Leg-Hanging Mushroom Tree Is Psilocybe
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/proof-canterbury-psalters-mushroom-trees-are-psilocybe/
proof of 70 psychoactive mushroom trees in the heart of Christian art

fyi —

Your article appears to be really good & entheogen-positive, good enough so I’m trying out some critical analytical tools on your article.
https://www.academia.edu/44235520/Entheogens_Psychedelic_Drugs_and_the_Ancient_Mystery_Religions_Mark_A_Hoffman

My “Hermeneutics of Suspicion” tools may need more calibration:  

“You wrote the word ‘The’. 🤨 What’s that supposed to mean?  Are you covertly insinuating & committing an anti-entheogen, entheogen-diminishment fallacy?”

I’m trying to inspect word-usage in nominally entheogen-positive writings, which actually contain self-countering, counter-messaging that is anti-entheogenic.  

I’m looking for some 11 distinct entheogen-diminishment fallacies that can cloud & compromise the thinking and manner of writing, in supposedly entheogen-positive writing.  

Entheogen Diminishment Fallacies
http://www.egodeath.com/#_Entheogen_Diminishment_Fallacies_1

My own view is 100% “playing to win”; extrme plant-positive, consistently.  

My position is hardline “religion = visionary plants, and that’s ubiquitous”.

Ever since I entered the field of entheogen scholarship around 1999, I’ve naturally been based in a top-down perspective (religion = visionary plants), against the culturally predominant tendency to start from the bottom; that is, start from the extreme plant-negative presumptions like Panofsky (“all mshrm trees in Christian art are Italian pines”) and then reluctantly bump-up from there, one’s estimate of the extent of visionary plants in religious history.

I consider my view (my paradigmatic assumption-framework) to be the purist, Esotericist view, against the anti-plants Exoteric paradigmatic assumption-framework.  

No compromise: I’ll change my opinion if… never.  

So many writers seem so eager to compromise and concede and soften their position until I can’t tell what their position is, or (sometimes it feels like) I can’t tell any difference between their view and the hardline entheogen-deniers like Panofsky.

Here’s a hypothetical example of thinking/writing that’s compromised by received-view prejudices from the Exoteric dominant paradigm: 

“the natural methods that mystics used, as opposed to visionary plants”.

The angels who wrote Ott’s book The Angels’ Dictionary disapprove of that biased, presumption-based usage of the word ‘natural’.

Hope I don’t spiral (further) into word-usage paranoia 😵

— M. Hoffman

Proof that the Canterbury Psalter’s Leg-Hanging Mushroom Tree Is Psilocybe
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/proof-canterbury-psalters-mushroom-trees-are-psilocybe/
proof of 70 psychoactive mushroom trees in the heart of Christian art

Defining “Compelling Evidence” & “Criteria of Proof” for Mushrooms in Christian Art
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/defining-compelling-evidence-criteria-of-proof-for-mushrooms-in-christian-art/

Gallery of Mushrooms in Christian Art
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/13/images-of-mushrooms-in-christian-art/

Show Episodes Recorded Today So Far

(none produced/uploaded yet)

  • Morning show ep2 [episode 2 of the Morning show]
  • Egodeath show ep5 (I didn’t record outro)
  • Egodeath show ep6 (I didn’t record intro)

Egodeath Show (2021-01-31) Episode 4: Deny Waffle Assert (parts [a], b, &c)

Egodeath Show (2021-01-31) Parts 2 & 3 of 3 of 7-hour session the other day (part of Episode 4)

From long working session, the ~7-hour session the other day, where I created the extreme version of the “Minimal/Moderate/Maximal entheogen theory of religion”, where the recorder chopped the recording into 3 parts.

Working session to invent
the “Deny/ Waffle/ Assert” model of entheogen theories

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Egodeath-Show-Episode-4c –
created the download link on Feb 3.
Recorded Jan 31 end of day.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/idea-development-page-10/#Egodeath-Show-Episode-4b –
link created Feb 3 good for 1 week.
Recorded Jan 31 almost end of day.

Egodeath Show (2021-01-31) Episode 4c:
“Ep4c Deny Waffle Assert 3.mp3” 29:21

3. Short 3rd segment, voice quieter & quieter, Outro. 210131_2192.wav

  • Filename: “Ep4c Deny Waffle Assert 3.mp3”
  • Length: 29:21
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-ZQoR8UERWi (link created Feb 3)
    • recorded Jan 31
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
    • No intro.
    • Quiet speaking at night. Voice is nice and resonant – which means more bass, which means more leaking and need to be quieter.

part 3 of 3 of the ~7-hour session the other day when I made the more extreme version of the “Minimal/Moderate/Maximal entheogen theory of religion”, where the recorder chopped the recording into 3 parts.

Egodeath Show (2021-01-31) Episode 4b:
“Ep4b Deny Waffle Assert 2.mp3” 3:22:48

  • Filename: “Ep4b Deny Waffle Assert 2.mp3”
  • Length: 3:22:48
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-TTWugDTo0i (link created Feb 3)
    • recorded Jan 31, mid-late evening.
    • Nice voicing.
    • Sudden end at end due to excess length.
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.

good voicing, moderate tech flaw, developing the “Deny/Waffle/ Assert” model of Entheogen Theories

DONE: upload this before it gets lost in the shuffle. 3:22:00
has tons of typing? edit-out??
no intro or outro
(after that evening, i decided that episode number should in future, increment whenever i hit the 3:15:00 mark) An episode should not be multiple long mp3 files. 1 mp3 file = 1 episode, then increment the ep#, in the future.

undecided: upload recording 3? (jan 31 2021 end of day) started talking quiet, there. ~45:00. has the outro.

  • Not sure about Part 2 (intensive working session, probably with annoying typing) or Part 3 (super quiet voice)
  • 1. Recording auto-switched to new file after 3:30:00 210131_2190.wav
  • 2. Recording auto-switched to new file after 3:30:00 210131_2191.wav
  • 3. Short 3rd segment, voice quieter & quieter, Outro. 210131_2192.wav

Egodeath Show (2021-01-31) Episode 4: Deny Waffle Assert
“Ep4 Deny Waffle Assert.mp3”

  • Filename: “Ep4 Deny Waffle Assert.mp3”
  • Length: 3:22:48
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-W6WTZA0j7r
    • Nice voicing.
    • Sudden end at end due to excess length.
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
Content
  • Main, middle part (recording part 2, not uploaded) was a long, like 6-hour working session – even devolved to typing while recording! – revising and tightening
    the “Minimal/ Moderate/ Maximal” Entheogen theories of religion to form
    a new set of more descriptive, self-documenting terms to more clearly & explicitly separate the 3 positions – er, the middle is a “non-position position” marked by extreme prevarication & lack of firm commitment; ‘position’ is highly misrepresentative – so instead, “the 3 camps”.
    Renamed or re-characterized the 3 “positions” as the 3 “camps”:
    the “Deny/Waffle/Assert” Entheogen theories of religion
  • 1:41-1:48 quieter & reverby part – weird audio from 18″ away, during a break – this is why we don’t do this: weird room reverb.
  • 1:47:00 (the end portion of the break) trying to vocal-match “We have assumed control”, 2112.
  • Not included in the first 3.5-hr part: Very end (hour 7?) was M. Hoffman article about Psychedelics in Mystery Religions, & then Hanegraff’s article.
  • I offloaded the Vocalization-work segment, except:
    • I still do a “Vocalization Checkup/Lock-in/Re-securing” 5-minute segment every hour, to retain resonance and protect health and to be able to extend & guarantee continued good results.
    • Ep3 was a voice-health egodeath loss of control; lost it (but as I recall, some great content: strong vigorous principled forceful assertion of commitment to Asserting Plants, I think is in ep3(?)). I want to hear that passage again, wherever it is. “Go ahead and deny plants – We won’t take you in good faith; AS FAR AS WE ARE CONCERNED, u r DECEIVRS IN A COVR-UP OPRATION, not to be taken seriously.”
    • Ep4 (1st half) a major success – holy grail achieved.
  • I read-aloud Cyberdisciple’s info about Graves, on-point. Whose side is Graves’ on, anyway? 50% assert + 50% deny.
  • I read/comment on Hanegraaff article “Entheogenic Esotericism”.
    • I read his later article titles in hour 7 of this episode: there’s no more recent article.
  • microcassettes, failed dream of vocal rec’g. vs. text idea development.
  • 4 fields:
    • myth (overlaps w/)
      • Western Esotericism
      • entheogen scholarship
      • ahistoricity
  • HOLY GRAIL for off-the-cuff vocalizing, even later in the day – Got.
    • Vary pitch
    • Bass pitch
    • Bass spectrum (resonance)
Recording log

This recording hit a limit at 3:22:00 and automatically terminated and started a fresh .wav file.

  • Not sure about Part 2 (intensive working session, probably with annoying typing) or Part 3 (super quiet voice)
  • 1. Recording auto-switched to new file after 3:30:00 210131_2190.wav
  • 2. Recording auto-switched to new file after 3:30:00 210131_2191.wav
  • 3. Short 3rd segment, voice quieter & quieter, Outro. 210131_2192.wav
Intro Script
  • This is episode 4 of the Egodeath show, January 31, 2021, with Cybermonk.
  • Keywords or possible topics: [30 seconds max, unique purely to differentiate episodes; plan to add more later on in the show] (worked great!)
    • new show, the “egodeath warmup show”
    • Cyberdisciple’s comments about Graves’ uses of ‘secret’
    • Hanegraaff’s full article “entheogenic esotericism”
    • 1995 use of microcassettes for voice idea development
  • The microphone is TASCAM DR-05.
Outro Script (Used in Hour 7)
  • This was the Egodeath show, with Cybermonk.

The “Deniers, Wafflers, Asserters” Model of Entheogen Theories, to Tighten-Up the “Minimal/ Moderate/ Maximal” Model of Entheogen Theories

Characterizing the MMM Buckets
  • Vague/Vague/Vague
  • Flexible/Flexible/Flexible
  • Broad/Broad/Broad
  • Blur/Blur/Blur
  • 3 largely overlapping sliders
  • Requires reading 11 webpages of definitions to make the model determinate; to disambiguate.
    • The concept-labels are not self-documenting, but are dependent on separate, external definition essays. Even then, highly subject to debate. Hard to place a writer on a point on a spectrum from 0 to 100.
Characterizing the DWA Buckets
  • Counting the ratio of “plants present” words & “plants absent” words makes it straightforward to place a writer on a point on a spectrum from 0 to 100.
    • Deniers skew hard toward 0.
    • Asserters skew hard toward 100.
    • Wafflers aren’t close to 0 or 100.
      • “Wouldn’t want to be extreme.”
      • “The truth is always in the middle.”
    • The Oreo model:
      • two “hard”, inflexible groups on the outside, with a “soft” “goo” or “mush” group that’s clearly separate from the cookies, in the middle.
      • IT’S REAL EASY TO TELL THE COOKIES FROM THE GUNK IN THE MIDDLE. NOT HARD AT ALL; it’s *super-obvious*.
      • THE COOKIE *EASILY* RECOGNIZES THAT THE GOO IS ALIEN, “THAT’S DEF NOT ME!”
      • Cybermonk 2002: “Whoa, I thought you were with me, but *clearly* you’re not! I never would have waffled & ceded ground like that! Whose side are you on??” 🤨
  • Hard/Soft/Hard
  • Endpoint/Squish/Endpoint
  • Ultra-Rigid/ Ultra-Flexible/ Ultra-Rigid
  • -/?/+
  • 0/?/100
  • 0/indeterminate/100
  • constant/variable/constant
  • fixed/variable/fixed
  • stationary/moving/stationary
  • stable/unstable/stable
  • no-compromise/compromised/no-compromise
  • playing to win/ playing to lose or draw/ playing to win
  • fully committed/ hedge your bets/ fully committed
  • Narrow/ Ultra-Flexible/ Narrow
  • Narrow/Broad/Narrow
  • Radio Button A/ Slider/ Radio Button B
  • Extreme/ Waffle/ Extreme
  • Hardline/ Indeterminate/ Hardline
  • Inflexible/ Ultra-flexible/ Inflexible
  • Invariable / Variable/ Invariable
  • The D/W/A model (the Fully Deny/ Waffle (Prevaricate)/ Fully Assert model) requires 0 pages of definitions; self-documenting concept-labels.
  • By defining the endpoints as ultra-simple extremes, the only hard part is characterizing the middle as the very opposite: extremely variable, indeterminate, waffling, indecisive, contradictory.
    • The middle non-position: MIX OF “PLANTS PRESENT” & “PLANTS ABSENT” WORDS/STATEMENTS/POSITIONS.
    • At the two extremes: no mixture. Simple assertion of total presence or total absence; in terms of words/quotes:
    • Purely “plants present” words, or
    • Purely “plants absent” words.
  • Scientific way to analyze any passage in any entheogen book/article:
    • Highlight all the “plants present” words one way, “absent” other. eg Cyberdisciple’s markup of Robert Graves’ statements.
  • Deniers: Panofsky’s writings:
    • ~100% “plants absent” statements/words.
    • SIMPLE FIRM COMMITMENT. STABLE.
    • Eager to press the point and make hardline statements that challenge people.
    • Character of prose: consistent hardline, pure & unmixed.
    • Motto: “Real religion lacks plants.”
    • “Evidence of presence” should be treated as-if evidence for absence.
  • Asserters: Cybermonk’s writings:
    • ~100% “plants present” statements/words.
    • SIMPLE FIRM COMMITMENT. STABLE.
    • Eager to press the point and make hardline statements that challenge people.
    • Character of prose: consistent hardline, pure & unmixed.
    • Motto: “Real religion is from plants, and is ubiquitous.”
    • “Absence of evidence” should be treated as-if evidence is still expected and is practically present and should be assumed to be present.
      • “Absence of evidence” = “virtual presence of evidence”, by extension or by argument-from-paradigm. Status = “expected, merely not-confirmed”. Impossible to disconfirm. All mystics *must* have used plants. Lack of evidence simply means we haven’t been able to prove, what we already know must be true. Fully willing to commit to (paradigm-premised) faith-based assumption that plants must have been used.
      • A paradigm-based positive stance that’s equivalent to as-if full evidence confirmed. Confidence not dependent on “hard direct evidence”; indirect evidnece fully suffices. Additional evidence of additional types is “nice to have, and appreciated”, but not, strictly speaking, required. The Theory stands confidently, data be damned. WE DON’T NEED MORE DATA; WE HAVE A PLETHORA OF DATA EVIDENCE ALREADY, TO REASONABLY & CONFIDENTLY & SUFFICIENTLY SUPPORT THE THEORY.
      • Confidence is supported by the productive demonstrations that this position has produced, of a solid & impressive track-record of making corroborative data perceptible. This paradigm-commitment has been effective/ productive in producing / leading to evidence.
  • Wafflers: The “Quantum Indeterminacy” Graves/Ruck non-position position.
    • ‘secret’: “plants present but absent” – “but ask me again tomorrow.”
    • COMMITMENT TO PREVARICATION. UNSTABLE.
      • Commitment issues.
    • “My position heavily overlaps with the Minimalists… and with the Maximalists.”
    • “Entheogens are ubiquitous in Western religious history, but No Mushrooms In Christianity.”
    • Commitment & strategy: mixed message, self-contradiction.
      • Always couch assertions in doubt and qualification and restrictions.
        • “X was present but…”
        • “In most cases, plants present.”
        • “Secret plants-present”.
    • Motto: “WITH ONE HAND THEY GIVE, WHILE WITH THE OTHER HAND, THEY TAKE AWAY“.

The “Deniers, Indeterminates [Self-contradictories/ Hesitators/ Wafflers], & Asserters”

The New Model to Transform[/Replace] the “Minimal/ Moderate/ Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion” Model: Key words – New Conceptual Vocabulary

A simpler, more extreme model that’s more determinate in ways, and draws a much more definite, striking, SHARP CONTRAST between the 3 camps, than the old, “MMM Model”, which used vague terms that required many pages of disambiguation and hwihc in practice, led to so much overlap, as to be meaningless. —

~Nov 2020, I started to express doubt in the utility/applicability of the MMM scheme, saying “If my dubious categories (M/M/M) are meaningful“.

(outcome of 4-hour working session)

Names of the New Model for the 3 Entheogen Camps

todo: add numerous times here, the words “presence” & “absence”.

  • the 3-camps model
  • the “ADI Model” (unlike the “MMM Model”, this set of terms is unambiguous/ self-defining)
  • the “asserters, deniers, & indeterminates” model
  • the “asserters, deniers, & self-contradictories” model (complementary term)
    • Question: “Which meaning of the word ‘indeterminate’?”
    • Answer: YES.
  • the “Indeterminate” entheogen scholarship school/position/camp
  • the “Indeterminate” entheogen scholars
  • the Indeterminate Entheogen Theory 😄
  • the Self-Contradictory Entheogen Theory
    • the Egodeath authorities have already discussed & are unanimously agreed upon the self-contradiction of Ruck (with impressive celerity!)
The Litmus-Test Question (So Telling!)

“Does scholar X assert visionary plants?”

  • In the case of Cybermonk: “TOTALLY! HE’S CRAZY, ASSERTING LEFT & RIGHT!! DAY & NIGHT!”
  • In the case of Ruck school: “well, … not sure what the question means…” -> they are INDETERMINATES, EXPOSED!!! 😄 hem , haw, i wouldn’t want to be inaccurate in my characterization of his nuanced positionality, … hm, its complicated 🤔 🤔 😵

The “number of words” test: How many words are required to define the scholar’s position?

  • the deniers: 2 words: plants absent.
    • PLAYING TO WIN (team Panofsky)
  • the asserters: 2 words: plants present.
    • PLAYING TO WIN (counter-Panofsky team)
  • the indeterminates: 200+ words. plants present but absent. (it’s never enough, need more words…)
    • PLAYING TO LOSE; THEY’D RATHER DIE ON THE HILL OF PRECISION; WAFFLING, PREVARICATION, COMPROMISE; NO ALLEGIANCE, SHIFTING, INDETERMINATE, SELF-CONTRADICTION (hm, sound familiar?), MIXED MESSAGE
The 3 Camps
  • the plant asserters (a camp that “replaces” problematic term “Maximal Theory”)
  • the indeterminates (a camp that “replaces” problematic term “Moderate Theory”)
    • aka “the self-contradictories“
    • aka WHAT THE HELL SIDE ARE YOU GUYS ON, ANYWAY?! (whose side)
  • the plant deniers (a camp that “replaces” problematic term “Minimal Theory”)
The Key Words that Manifest All at Once, the 11 Entheogen Diminishment Fallacies
  • “plant-assertion” words (example: see top of Mark Hoffman article, has only these)
  • “plant-denial” words (example: see Cyberdisciple’s emphasis-added Graves quotes)

Robert Graves’ Use of the ‘Secret’ Concept

Re: the secret field of entheogen scholarship, which is careful to have no impact whatsoever on the Exoteric Hegemony in public consciousness, despite adding 1 book per year onto the pile of entheogen scholarship books.

Cyberdisciple wrote:

Hi Cybermonk,

Listening to your voice recording “Ep 1 Secret Grid Game.mp3”:

It sounds like you are including Graves in your criticism of the “secret” school primarily because he censored himself. [ie stopped writing about entheogens]

I would assert more directly that Graves contributed to the “secret” school of entheogen scholarship by his content: he wrote directly that mushrooms were used at the origins, but then were made taboo and secret, and knowledge of them lost.

From my summary assessment in 2017:
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2017/03/22/assessing-robert-graves-1950s-psychedelic-scholarship-on-greek-mythreligionart/
(sketchy, needs revision and quotations from Grave’; emphasis added):

“Graves is the true origin of the middling moderate entheogen theory of religion, as defined here:
http://egodeath.com/ViewsOnEntheogensInReligiousHistory.htm
psychedelics were used commonly in the origins of religion, but later became more and more restricted to select occasions or a select group, until finally they became so secretive that common knowledge of their role was lost; the role of the scholar is to unveil the presence of plants in religious myth and ritual.”

“In ‘Centaur’s Food, Graves claims:

  • The taboo on mushrooms in some cultures is a sign of their earlier use in sacred ceremonies
  • That Greek priests later banned the use of the mushroom and that Greek myth reflects this change by depicting the punishments of figures for serving ambrosia to mortals”

“‘The Poet’s Paradise’ claims:

  • Amanita was used in Europe, but reserved for the priesthood and taboos were used to deter others from having it; the taboo hung on long after rites were over; Amanita was initially used, but later the more common panaeolus and psiloybe used; Mushroom use was secretive and reserved only for those of a certain integrity; No Christian or Jew consumed mushrooms; despite Christian peyote churches, predicts that Catholics and Protestants cannot accept visionary plants and will lead Prohibition, in cahoots with tobacco and liquor industries”

[end of excerpts from Cyberdisciple’s 2017 post]

As an indication of how little the “secret school” has progressed, Graves writings in the mid-50s read like Carl Ruck’s latest books 🙃

– Cyberdisciple

New Marketing/Branding Plan: the Egodeath Theory = “a Panic-Stricken Psychotic Trip to Hell” 😱 🔥 🐉 💎 🏆 😄

[get exact quote Transcendent Knowledge podcast ep27 ~47:29]

Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 27

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI

The Mystic 👽 Episode – Issues that came up after the last podcast with Cyberdisciple and Jimmy. Topics:

  • The meaning of the word ‘mystic’
  • Precise definition of mystical transformation
  • Setting the bar for attaining mystichood
  • How special are mystics?
  • Idealisation of mystics
  • The relevance of mystics to the egodeath theory
  • Mystics tripping frequently
  • Comparable concepts such as gnostics, hierophants and prophets
  • Verbal communication compared to written communication
  • The relevance of Ramesh Balsekar’s thinking compared to other self-help gurus
  • Fusing the two states of consciousness; joining vs blending
  • Hesychasm as a natural means of accessing the altered state
  • The incompatibility between Jimmy’s book knowledge and his experiential knowledge
My commentary
  • AGGGHH ~46:20, uses ‘natural’ to mean non-drg. SEE JONATHAN OTT’S BOOK The Angels’ Dictionary. 🍄 <– Ott defines this as natural. Isn’t this usage, employed by Max, an entheogen diminishment fallacy?
    • ~33:50 “ancient mystics who trip by natural means” <– the word ‘natural’ is highly ambiguous, I don’t know what’s being said, by “NATURAL”. ??? 35:30 contradicts, he says “forest ancients who trip”. is max saying they (Kafei’s fantastical notion of ‘mystics’) are “natural”, or that they “trip”?
  • The word ‘gnostic’ is recently controverted. April D. DeConick defends its use, in her book The Gnostic New Age. Reclaiming and redefining it better.
  • Like Max said here, I too have a tepid idea about the usefulness of the term ‘mystics’, it’s kind of a joke, not a respected concept to me.
  • ~”none of them impress me that much. … What’s impressive [re: brands of mysticism] when you’ve got the Egodeath theory ? … Ramesh weak compared to.” 24:44 quotable
    24*60 + 44 = 1484s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI&t=1484s
  • “jimmy is a mega advanced mystic” ~29:00 “but i don’t like the concept of ‘mystic'”
  • he wants something more than, perhaps, a panic-stricken psychotic trip to Hell” ~47:29 todo: audio clip.
    47*60+29 = 2849s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmpbFAAJXI&t=2849s
    • That gives me an idea for a new marketing/branding plan:
      the Egodeath theory = a panic-stricken psychotic trip to Hell

Egodeath Warmup Show (2021-01-31) Episode 1:
“Ep1 Egodeath Warmup Show.mp3” 2:24:31

☕️ 🎙 🎶

  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-hPNk0E8h2q
  • Filename: “Ep1 Egodeath Warmup Show.mp3”
  • Title in player: “Ep1 Egodeath Warmup Show”
  • 2:24:31

I might discover and say the ultimate SECRET of the universe in this show, but Egodeath content is not the intention.

This show-series offloads Vocalization content from the main Egodeath show. Little Egodeath theory content – but, per my WordPress policy, “if you have an idea, say it right here wherever you are.” Therefore, *possible* Egodeath theory content; I do *not* have a policy in this show of “no Egodeath theory content is allowed.” That’s just not the *intention* of the focus/purpose of this show. If you hang w/ me, u *might* be subjected to Egodeath theory content.

Content
  • Designing the Morning Vocal Warmup show
  • Throat Coat tea (expensive, save for evening when needed). Traditional Medicinals brand http://traditionalmedicinals.com – hoping this works in evening. https://www.traditionalmedicinals.com/products/throat-coat-lemon-echinacea/ –
  • Super looking forward to playing w/ different microphones
  • Defining more accurate than “bass pitch”. Key words:
    • Vary pitch
    • Bass pitch
    • Bass spectrum <- newly specified; pushing pitch down is distinct from opening-up the bass spectrum, tho pushing pitch down is the main way to open up the bass spectrum
  • Editing-in my field-recorded, my recordings of choir warmup exercises in this show or in a vocal segment in the main Egodeath show (if I retain the Vocalization segment there).
  • CONCEPT/ metaphor/ visisualization: “Triangle goal”:
    reading script -> target voczn <- off-the-cuff
    Maybe rename as “convergence to the perfect middle/target“
  • Coffee brewing technique pourover / variable concentration

The first thing that appeared at the tea/lozenge site, is “community”:

Hanegraaff has exposed the New Age euphemism “power plants” as a euphemism for visionary plants. 🍄 <- a power plant

Offloading Vocalization Content from the Egodeath Show to the Morning Vocalization Warmup Show <– BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE MYSTIC FOUNTAIN OF DUMB IDEAS

My vocal apparatus had a loss of control ego death last night; sounds hoarse and sick, it doesn’t even sound like me; sounds high and nasally. Someone recommended hydration – which brings up topic of:

  • Voice Recordings
    • “Technical/ Equipment” component
      • Voice Health
        • hoarse, hydration, warmups, warmup exercises to correct the vocal apparatus

aka “the Egodeath [Morning Vocal] Warmup Show”

Completely low (no) priority for the Egodeath [theory] community. (Almost) NO DIRECT RELEVANCE FOR THE EGODEATH THEORY.

Intro Script
  • This is episode n of the Egodeath Warmup show, January n, 2021, with Cybermonk.
Outro Script
  • This was the Egodeath Warmup show, with Cybermonk.

Egodeath Show, Episode 3 (2021-01-30):
“Ep3 Entheogenographical Breakthroughs.mp3” 2:45:39

  • Filename: “Ep3 Entheogenographical Breakthroughs.mp3”
  • Track name: “Ep3 Entheogenographical Breakthroughs”
  • Length: 2:45:39
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-Kjjb6f0Ine
    • No login or email needed. Magnifying glass = in-browser player.
  • Source file: Likely 210130_2187.wav, which has same path as previous show which is 210129_2186.wav (which see).
Content
  • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
    • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
      • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
        • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
          • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
            • Discussion of possible topics, starting with:
              • TIME’S UP
  • History of breakthroughs in entheogen scholarship. Just a biblio?
  • Impression of my being centered in field of entheogen scholarship. What about other topics balance?
  • I read 85% John King’s book.
  • For the vocalization segment: what diff smooth vs angry. Enuniciation – over-en can read as anger or potentiate” (multiply x degree actual anger * degree of enunciation)
  • Hanegraaff article — i did read. Talk through it more.
  • Doubts about critique of entheogen scholarship – how to concretely ground it, in 2002?
  • Found my Ruck myth book review 2002.
  • Rating my previous recordings as 10/10. What does that mean to me?
  • Egodeath Yahoo Group 10/10. What does that mean?
  • Art Authorities comedy piece in last show.
  • Emails with Mark Hoffman & Cyberdisciple
    • Cyberdisciple explained the basis of my comedy – Allegro & Eleusis serve as barriers, not entryway.
  • Philosophy of public posting of email content.
Intro Script
  • This is episode 3 of the Egodeath show, January 30, 2021, with Cybermonk.
Outro Script
  • This was the Egodeath show, with Cybermonk.

History of Breakthroughs in the Field of Entheogen Scholarship

How to list breakthroughs w/o simply being a chronological bibliography of the field?

  • Salvert ~1840 (minor)
  • Blavatsky (minor)
  • Manly Hall 1924 (minor)
  • Robert Graves – 1956 – Centaurs’ Food essay – major milestone. firm statement of printicple (todo: quote that clear, firm, boldest, most general assertion like “All ancient Greek & Hellenistic religious initiation & mythology was always from psychoactive mushrooms; mystery-religion initiation, mixed-wine banqueting, symposium drinking parties too.”)
  • Wasson – russia/soma, accomplished __. Identified __.
  • Allegro – ahistoricity + Amanita in primitive Christianity , firm statement of proposal.
  • Heinrich – 1995, Strange Fruit. Rev 10 & Ezekiel scrolls = Amanita.
  • Road to Eleusis 1979
  • ??
  • Samorini –
  • Plaincourault article
  • Entheos 2001 issue 1
  • John Rush lifted garment theme
  • ??
  • 2016 Brown – The Psychedelic Gospels
  • Ruck – ??
  • 2006/2020 – Cybermonk – identified 6 mushrooms in Dionysus Thiasus Victory Triumph – image provided by the Egodeath community in the Egodeath Yahoo Group ~2006 by __ (todo).
  • November 2020 – the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image decoded by Cybermonk

Vocalization Fine-Tuning

THIS ANGRY TONE OF VOICE HAS GOT TO STOP!!

😡

I think the root problem is overemphasizing the attack of each word, which “reads” as anger, like spitting each word. A form of over-enunciation. Cure: SMOOTH. Yeah I think it’s over-enunciation — there’s no way I’m as critical as it sounds like.

The problem is not only overly criticizing (as an emotional attitude); the problem is that, wrapped up together with distinct problem, of over-enunciation. The problem is several distinct component-errors that work together in one direction.

My precise thinking, is getting transformed into either anger, or a tone that reads as-if anger.

The really well-vocalized mp3 just before yesterday’s Episode 1 – “Old Secret Entheogen Paradigm.mp3” – now that I’m attuned and listening for it – has a lot of harsh, angry tone of voice – I’m quite surprised. I totally didn’t notice it before, several times when I listened.

  • It’s freaking me out that I have been speaking with that tone.
    • Also, along w/ that, or as part of that tone:
      • speaking too fast,
      • emphasizing too many of the words with a sharply criticizing tone.
  • It’s freaking me out that I didn’t hear that I spoke with that tone, even after repeated, supposedly “critical” listenings, until now.
  • I had my hands full correcting the many other flaws (eg word-choice, “So, Um, you know, “; cussing; etc.).
  • I am pleased & happy with my many repairs and improvements so far.
    • I have high confidence now in my ability to spot problems and then monitor for those problems and correct them.
      I have a cybernetic correction loop set up now:
      • Set goals.
      • Monitor more effectively while live/ performing.
        • Monitor the source of suggested thoughts.
        • Monitor the sound of words just-now spoken.
      • Evaluate more effectively during playback afterwards.
      • Set new goals.
    • Embarrassing: I backed out of appearing on Hatsis show partly bc his adversarial tone. While I have had the totally critical (seemingly non-stop) tone.
  • Too bright. Position mic more off-axis.

To get the right mindset for vocalization (voice recordings) i need signs:

ON AIR

Chill

  • On Air https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=on+air
  • Chill Dude / Smooth Calm Pacing (regardless of gaps)
  • YOU! DONT! HAVE! TO! EMPHASIZE! EVERY! SINGLE! WORD!
  • [… i was gonna say “step up the pace”… which is ironic ’cause often I’m saying “slow it down, spazzo!” ] — it seems that regulating speed is more of an issue than I realized. I’m often going too slow or too fast, or, long gap then a burst… gap, burst, gap, burst….
    • fallacy: to compensate for a gap when I’m looking for the next word, deliver a burst“. <– how about not! true solution: SMOOTH CALM PACING. I’m not saying “don’t have gaps”; I’m saying “Don’t deliver bursts as if that compensates for the unfort gaps.” rather, after a gap (when looking for next word/phrase), compensate by smooth pleasant delivery when resume talking.

Egodeath Show, Episode 2:
“Ep2 Ourgument from Authority.mp3” =
“2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority.mp3” 2:48:05 – Re-uploaded Feb. 20, 2021

If you wanted to download the file (because you didn’t get to download the original file
“Ep2 Ourgument from Authority.mp3”,
or if you want the new title-pattern to appear in your music player:
“2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority.mp3″
to be possibly more readable), there is/was an updated download link:

  • Version 2 of making same episode available as .mp3 file:
  • Download/preview link for 1 week after 2021-02-20:
    https://we.tl/t-fh3H2RvWS1
  • Length: 2:48:05
  • Filename: In the re-upload, I changed the filename from:
    “Ep2 Ourgument from Authority.mp3”
    to:
    “2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority.mp3”
  • changed display-title to:
    “2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority”
  • description:
    • Solid Egodeath content from start to end, including first 47 minutes satire.
    • See Content, below.
  • filesize: 403 MB 🐷 (385 MB just like the orig version, according to WeTransfer site), bitrate is genuinely straight-up, full-on 320 kbps, channels = Mono.
    • Idea:💡🤔 I could upload two different sizes/fidelities… you would get to pick… [March 6 note: that works ok, but I need to do some effective testing of bitrates for degree of swishiness.]

This episode has solid content, starting w/ a 47-minute piece (that switches between Art & Grid Game), which I might “clip” in some way.

One reason the first episodes were so down-to-business, was that I mounted the self-contained field recorder on a mic stand. “handheld recorder” approach, but stand-mounted.

I remember how very attached I was, to that approach; I was reluctant to switch to the SM57 microphone. I switched from all-in-one DR05 to the SM57 separates-approach, at start of Idea development page 11 Feb 2.

I discovered a slurring/lisp after I switched from omni (dr05) to cardioid mic (sm57).
The bright omni mic somewhat masked the slurring.
The dark cardioid mic revealed/accentuated the slurring.

My inconsistent voicing is due to:

  • slurring
  • changing mic
  • changing miking position
  • changing mic eq
  • time of day (voice condition + quiet speaking)
  • hyper-enunciation
Content

Comedy from the Art Authorities: todo: extract 0-0:47:00 as clip, to embed in a future show? what’s the .wav/.aup?

  • Start: “This is episode 2 of the Egodeath Show, January 29, 2021, with Cybermonk. The microphone is TASCAM DR-05. I plan to discuss: post-show ideas after the last episode…” See “Intro Script” to see the developing origination of the structured show format.
  • 0:00-47:00 Comedy from the Art Authorities (but need to dis-entangle the Art vs. Grid segments)

🍄 🙃 🎨 😄 🌳

  • Ideas I developed while listening to the last episode:
  • THE ESOTERIC ART AUTHORITIES ALL AGREE WITH EACH OTHER (WITH IMPRESSIVE CELERITY!) THAT REAL RELIGION ALWAYS INVOLVES PLANTS, UBIQUITOUSLY.
    • As supporting evidence, a list of names of esoteric authorities is available, and is bigger and more impressive than the Wasson/Panofsky list of authorities, thus proving that we are right.
    • *Our* argument from authority is superior to *their* argument from authority.
    • I would cite a little book from 46 115 years ago, to show our evidence … <– but I’ve replaced that embarrassingly WEAK and unpersuasive citation by ellipses, per the Wasson argument.
    • Against your bedtime cover-story, here is *our* story:
    • WHEN AN ARTIST DRAWS A MUSHROOM SHAPE, THE ARTIST MEANS PSYCHOACTIVE MUSHROOMS USED FOR RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE.
    • BY FIAT AND THE ESOTERIC ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY, THE PERENNIAL ESOTERIC COMMUNITY DECLARES:
  • THE ESOTERICISTS HAVE DECLARED THEIR WIN: THE SCORE TALLY IS +200, BECAUSE THE ESOTERIC AUTHORITIES SAY SO.
  • REAL RELIGION = VISIONARY PLANTS, WHICH ARE UBIQUITOUSLY USED. TAKE THAT, PANOFSKY & POPE WASSON’S “ALL THE TOP, EXOTERIC, APPROVED ART AUTHORITIES AGREE WITH EACH OTHER, WHO ALL SPEW THE UNANIMOUSLY AGREED-UPON COVER-STORY (WITH IMPRESSIVE CELERITY!)”
    • The anti-plant ppl try to assert by sheer force, a score of -200 by Fiat. Real religion never = plants. Hatsis: an unreasonable committed skeptic re: msh in Christianity. I’m similar: I am an “unreasonable”, committed believer in plants.
  • For Hatsis, no evidence ever could count. For me, no lack of evidence could ever count – the data be damned; the Egodeath theory’s Maximal Entheogen theory is correct.
  • Allegro is admirable in that he’s committed & totally explicit.
  • Hatsis (like Panofsky & the approved exoteric art historians) has announced that he cannot be reasoned with, that there is no possible way he could ever be persuaded except by text explicit statements. He has announced his watertight historical methods that in all cases, always explain away all (art) evidence. Cybermonk’s methods always explain-away the LACK of evidence.
  • Panofsky: Brinckmann’s little book shows that ALL mushroom trees are Italian Pine trees; all mushroom trees are explained away as “accidentally distorted templates, artists have no control of or responsibility for their mushroid product.
  • The Template Made Me Do It.“
  • Part 2
  • This is a night show episode, quieter voice, roll-up-the-sleeves working session, than a morning-drive radio DJ show. I miss the daytime construction noise.
  • Summary of the Grid Game. The grid of “evidence” for plants in all religions/ regions/ eras. Strategies used by the Minimal/ Moderate/ Maximal entheogen theory.
Converging 4 fields to Construct Esotericism: Western Esotericism, mytheme decoding, ahistoricity, entheogen scholarship
  • errata: re: When did I start mytheme decoding? In particular, for this question, I should mention Ruck’s book on Greek Myth, which I read ~May 2002. That answers that, pretty well – that’s as good a date as any.
    THE STORY IS BECOMING CLEAR:
    I STARTED PHASE 2 FOR REAL AROUND 1999, SEMI-MATURE BY OCT 2002.
    Ruck has a good way of formatting to call out [themes] in mid-sentence when discussing mythology:
    The World of Classical Myth: Gods and Goddesses, Heroines and Heroes
    Carl Ruck
    August 1, 2001 [just after I started the Egodeath Yahoo Group]
    http://amzn.com/0890895759
    On August 9, 2002, I wrote the first review of this book at Amazon, and for a long time (9 years), it was the only review:
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RHXKUHURUF5KW/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0890895759

Proof that the Egodeath Yahoo Group is magical: everything is magically connected.
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-16-2002-04-28/#message798
suggested that I read Ruck’s Mythology book by May 2, 2002. Mentions my decoding {limping king}, & {king} at that fairly early date, supporting my “big bang” theory that in 1999, I read some books and instantly (4 years later) had already formed my Phase 2, ahistoricity / mytheme decoding / entheogen scholarship / Western Esotericism theory (all of that under the umbrella of: the Mytheme theory).

  • ~1:10:00 book cover of A Christian View of the Mushroom Myth by John King, in the context of my reconstructing my intellectual autobiography re: the related 4 fields (entheogen scholarship, Western Esotericism, ahistoricity, mytheme decoding):

worship
a
magic
mushroom
yesterday

wow, not 1 pic of King’s book online – so here is mine!

Correction: I’ve read about 85% of the lines in this book, 1x, since I got it recently some years ago, maybe 2014. way better book review format than me or anyone:
Gist/focus of ch 1: __
Gist/focus of ch 2: __
etc

photo: Cybermonk, Jan 30 2021, Egodeath.com / https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com
cover art: Jefferson Godwin, 1970
  • 1:25:00 Listing the ways those 4 fields have tried to connect to each other to construct/constitute (high, bona fide) Esotericism.
    • These fields sometimes reach out to each other, and then get slapped back.
    • The forces of Exotericism that try to prevent that convergence/construction of Esotericism.
    • Richard Carrier’s book Jesus from Outer Space: What the Earliest Christians Really Believed about Christ
      vs.
    • Earl Doherty’s 2nd edition Jesus: Neither God Nor Man: The Case for a Mythical Jesus.
  • Analyze the relation between these 4 fields and get a feel for the forces holding them back from converging to High Esotericism.
  • Mocking and ridiculing and inverting and countering the Wasson/Panofsky Exotericism Hegemony.
  • My intellectual autobiography re: the 4 fields I’m analyzing to get them re-centered and re-directed to form Esotericism
  • Exercise: If I’m editing a book w/ 4 chapters:
    • Have Hanegraaff write the chapter on re-centering / redirecting the field of Western Esotericism.
    • Have Clark Heinrich write the chapter on re-centering / redirecting the field of entheogen scholarship.
    • Have Timothy Freke write the chapter on re-centering / redirecting the field of ahistoricity.
    • Have [Timothy Freke??] write the chapter on re-centering / redirecting the field of mythology/ mytheme decoding.
      • Why is this field so different? Who is the “mytheme decoding community”, or the “mythology community”?? 🤔 Who would I write this webpage for, calling for them to connect their Myth field to the other 3 fields (entheogen scholarship , ahistoricity, Western Esotericism)? odd-man-out question: why is the field of mytheme decoding so different?
  • THE INTERACTION BETWEEN 4 FIELDS: My intellectual autobiography re: (in historical order):
    • (0. Rock lyrics – ~1992 – precursor to mytheme decoding)
    • 1. Western Esotericism – 1995 Gnosis, 2000s?? mytheme decoding comes in.
    • 2. entheogen scholarship – mytheme decoding eg ‘entheogen’ coined by Ruck 1979
    • 3. ahistoricity – mytheme decoding comes in. found accidentally during entheogen scholarship 1999. met w/ f&g, whose ahistoricity book had entheogen scholarship . Acharya in ahistoricity field praised Allegro; Price crit her, i wrote entheogen scholarship article for him.
    • 4. Mytheme decoding – got myth books ~2003. also: Up From Eden 1988 had myth attempt.
  • Todo : create 4 webpages to converge high esoteric’m:
    • These 4 webpages are directed to the four “communities”, but who is the “mytheme decoding community”??
    • I’m pushing these 4 fields to converge to form High Esotericism, which goes against these fields and pressures them to push against THE EXOTERICISM HEGEMONY
  • Done: Re-read Hanegraaff’s article “Entheogenic Esotericism” re: cultural hegemony).
  • Appreciating the forces that dissuade entheogen scholarship from joining forces with the fields of ahistoricity , Western Esotericism , & mytheme decoding, which would form High Esotericism and conflict w/ the Exotericism Hegemony.
  • Compare how Pop Sike is “pro-Reform” yet they are reluctant to conflict with the Prohibition Hegemony; they try to LIMIT THEIR REFORM EFFORTS so as to NOT CONFLICT WITH THE PROHIBITION HEGEMONY.
  • Similarly, the Field of entheogen scholarship tries to LIMIT THEIR EXPOSURE OF THE PRESENCE OF PLANTS so as to NOT CONFLICT WITH THE ANTI-ENTHEOGEN HEGEMONY.
  • The field of ahistoricity disallows entheogen scholarship. Examples:
    • Freke’s publisher of book the Jesus Mysteries
    • Robt Price vs. Acharya praising Allegro) tends to block writing about entheogen scholarship.
    • German researcher’s website putting disclaimer re: entheogens when linking to my ahistoricity content.
Feb 20 Experiments / Notes re: bit rates for Lossy Compression
  • 403 MB, exported as nominally 320 kbps (computer music player info : File: says simply “320” (no “vbr”, no weird lower-than marketed bit rate – conclusion: selecting 320 kbps probably sounds much better than monkey business from selecting the nominally “sort of 260 or sort of 210 but not really” options. SORRY FOR GIANT FILE BUT THIS “INSANE” BIT RATE OF 320 KBPS ALREADY HAS ENOUGH AURAL ARTIFACTS, AND THE 260 & 210 OPTIONS ARE ACTUALLY FAR MORE AGGRESSIVE BIT-DELETING OPTIONS.
    • this new codec produces a bigger file than before: 403 MB, when 320 kbps. [I’m re-exporting @320 to see if it’s still 403 MB. b/c filesizes seem inconsistent… this episode is 10/10 quality and deserves 320 kbps like the orig version. yes still 403, too big. go w/ the 260.]
    • “220-260 kbps”: 185 MB (computer music player viewing the device says Info: File: bit rate = “146 kbps (VBR)”, channels = Mono)
    • 210 kbps: 140 MB –
      • see if computer music player still says the file on device is channels = Mono. Yes.
      • the 210 new file says bitrate = 111 kbps var, tho ui said “170-210”. what does the orig file say? ans: 320 (not “var”) 🤨
      • does 210 sound swishy?
  • length: 2:48:05 (same as orig)
  • created audio project file on 2021-02-20:
    “2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority.aup”
  • 2nd mp3 export & re-upload pass, on 2021-02-20:
  • done:
  • create new audio project
  • connect recorder drives
  • determine wav
  • import wav
  • nuke L ch
  • center bal
  • limiter
  • normalize
  • export mp3 (experiment w/ bit rates)
  • transfer mp3 to music player
  • upload mp3
  • copy dl link to this Download section
  • test the dl link/preview, make sure correct file
  • announce v2 of the mp3, available for 1 week, and that I might clip the 47 minutes in some way.
  • Orig download mp3 data on 2021-01-29:
  • Download url for 1 week after 2021-01-29: https://we.tl/t-o3N0SKQPNJ
  • Orig filename: “Ep2 Ourgument from Authority.mp3”
  • Orig display-title: “Ep2 Ourgument from Authority”
  • Orig bitrate: 320 kbps
  • Orig mp3 filesize: 384.8 MB.
    • channels: Mono (according to computer’s music player showing data for file on mobile device).
  • Length: 2:48:05
  • Night episode; volume constraint.
  • Outro: “This is the end of the show.” (Barely had Outro concept yet.)
  • Sleuthing on Feb 20, 2021:, b/c might clip the good first 47 minutes comedy piece, though the entire show seems solid from start to end. I’m retroactively creating an audio project file, using latest filename pattern:
    “2021-01-29 Egodeath Mystery Show – Ourgument from Authority.aup”
    .wav filename: 210129_2186.wav – found, on green SD card Kingston named “TK Audio”, path: “/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/DR-05 TK Voice starting 2021-01-26”
    • 210129_2186.wav – contains: “This is episode 2 of the Egodeath show…” len: 2:48:05. this is the wav file.
    • 210130_2187.wav – then what is this file? it’s jan 30. it’s long. likely it’s the next day’s episode.
    • 210129_2188.wav – short
    • 210129_2189.wav – super short
    • previous episode: 210128_2185.wav
    • a next episode: 210131_2190.wav
Intro Script
  • This is episode 2 of the Egodeath show, January 29, 2021, with Cybermonk.
  • I plan to discuss: [outline items merged into “Content” section]
Outro Script

Don’t do end of show from memory – read this script, instead:

  • This was the Egodeath show, with Cybermonk.

Contest: Which Has Made Less Impact on Public Consciousness?

A. the Secret Field of Entheogen Scholarship, brought to you by Graves (“hey Bob, you better stop covering entheogen scholarship, or something bad might happen to your poetry book sales” – Pope Wasson) & Carl “Mr. Secret” Ruck

B. the Egodeath theory

Egodeath Show, Episode 1 (2021-01-28) Track Title: “Playing the Grid Game of Entheogen Scholarship”
“Ep1 Secret Grid Game.mp3” 2:09:56

  • Filename: “Ep1 Secret Grid Game.mp3”
  • Episode title: “Playing the Grid Game of Entheogen Scholarship”
  • Length: 2:09:56
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-EIG6ZMV2r8
  • Rating/recommendation: 10
  • Start: “This is the Egodeath Show, Episode 1, Cybermonk, about the show format, changing from the concept of a Header, to the concept of an Intro segment, topics, date, mic; topics can get verbose… That gets out of the way the Technical [portion of the Header].” “timing & sequence of the vocalization segment.”
Topics
  • Defining the Grid:
    • each grid cell is 1 religion in 1 era in 1 region.
    • each grid cell can have multiple layers, aka multiple attributes eg
      • 1. are the plants avail (yes, given)
      • 2. is Peren Phil avail (yes, given)
      • 3. do x number of ppl use those plants & phil? (yes, given)
      • 4. how many ppl? what evidence?
    • Value for each grid cell: has a starting value of + or – or maybe ?
    • A cell value can flip from – to +, or – to +(-) as the Graves/Ruck school of “self-diminishment” does as represented by the word ‘secret’, and by Graves’ total censorship of himself by stopping at 85 pages of coverage.
      • Per the extreme-Minimal strategy, score starts at -200, and stays there no matter what, b/c REAL RELIGION NEVER = PLANTS. Final score always = -200.
      • Per the typical-Minimal strategy, starting score is -200, final score = between -200 and 0, tending low.
      • Per the Moderate strategy: maximum success = score of 0. Least = -200. Score starts at -200, then when Ruck’s framework is all complete, the score reaches 0 in best-case; somewhere between -200 & 0.
      • Per the Maximal strategy for playing the game, cells start as + and can flip to +(-) <– we looked hard, cannot find any trace of evidence for plant use in that cell — worst case score = 0. best case = 200. Score starts at 200 (perhaps). After Cybermonk is all done with researching all religions/eras/regions, the score is somewhere between 200 & 0, tending high. My trajectory starts at +200, and grudgingly, barely ever trends downward.
      • BY FIAT AND THE ESOTERIC ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY, THE PERENNIAL ESOTERIC COMMUNITY DECLARES:
        THE ESOTERICISTS HAVE DECLARED THEIR WIN: THE SCORE TALLY IS +200, BECAUSE THE ESOTERIC AUTHORITIES SAY SO.
        REAL RELIGION = VISIONARY PLANTS, WHICH ARE UBIQUITOUSLY USED.
        • TAKE THAT, PANOFSKY & POPE WASSON’S “ALL THE TOP, EXOTERIC, APPROVED ART AUTHORITIES AGREE WITH EACH OTHER, WHO ALL SPEW THE UNANIMOUSLY AGREED-UPON COVER-STORY (WITH IMPRESSIVE CELERITY!)“
      • Strategies for tallying the score; for “scoring” / tallying the number of +’s and -‘s.
        • The anti-plant ppl try to assert by sheer force, a score of -200 by Fiat. Real religion never = plants. Hatsis: an unreasonable committed skeptic re: msh in Christianity.
          • I’m similar: I am an “unreasonable”, committed believer in plants.
        • For Hatsis, no evidence ever could count.
          • For me, no lack of evidence could ever count – the data be damned; the Egodeath theory’s Maximal Entheogen theory is correct.
        • Allegro is admirable in that he’s committed & totally explicit.
        • Hatsis (like Panofsky & the approved exoteric art historians) has announced that he cannot be reasoned with, that there is no possible way he could ever be persuaded except by text explicit statements. He has announced his watertight historical methods that in all cases, always explain away all (art) evidence.
          • Cybermonk’s methods always explain-away the LACK of evidence.
        • Panofsky: Brinckmann’s little book shows that ALL mushroom trees are Italian Pine trees; all mushroom trees are explained away as “accidentally distorted templates, artists have no control of or responsibility for their mushroid product.
          The Template Made Me Do It.“
      • Size of grid: 20 col wide, 10 rows tall. 200 cells total.
    • Hanegraaff article : entheogenic esotericism
    • the two specific flaws – bracket-aside the abstract, paradigm perspective.
      • Error 1: The grid starts, loaded w/ -‘s vs +’s. or +(-) at best.
      • THE SECRET FIELD OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP (GEE, WHY HAS OUR SECRET FIELD OF SECRET ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP HAD ZERO IMPACT? WHAT A SURPRISE! HOW PUZZLING!) the grid (entheogen scholarship)
      • Error 2: Negative framing of findings. Graves/Ruck way of playing the Grid Game : flipping – to +(-). My way of playing the Grid Game to win, start with +’s, the very worst outcome possible is: +(-). ruck should be scoring 2 points by flipping – to + but instead he gains only 1 point, by flipping – to +(-) by framing secret proof of secret presence of secret visionary plants,
      • The extreme sub-position within the minimal entheogen theory of religion is:
        REAL RELIGION NEVER USES VISIONARY PLANTS.
      • My position:
        REAL RELIGION ALWAYS USES VISIONARY PLANTS, and real religion is ubiquitous.
      • Error 3: Failing to explicitly frame & articulate their list of paradigmatic commitments/axiomatic assumptions.
    • diminishment fallacies

Errata/Critique

Content: 10
Vocalization: 9
  • Work on ‘that’. Gentle ‘a’.
  • Not “thet”
  • Not hyper-vocalized “THAT”.
    • Hit it out of the park, due to the “radio show/ voice-actor/ script/ show” mentality/consciousness.
    • Always room for improvement, but I’m definitely above the threshold. Solidly radio-ready – or really close and heading fast in the correct direction.
    • Choppy spazzy near the end where I discuss copying postings to website & haven’t read website. Watch for / guard against choppy spazzy – do smooth, not fast/choppy.
  • Still has many overemphases running throughout my speech, all over the place. Smooth it out; relaxed.
Audio tech: 7
  • Hammered the mic w/ wind. 💨🎙💥
    • Re-position. Monitor clip light.
  • Need less mouth noise.
    • Move away to the side, in-between phrases.
  • Annoying typing.
    • No typing allowed. Must use pause every time.
Production Notes
  • Mic: TASCAM DR-05
    • Miking: 3.5″, no pop filter, right mic, desk stand/clamp, gain 55/90, Stereo mode.
    • Production: Load straight from device, split L/R, discard Left, Center the balance, export 320kbps mp3, transfer to mobile, upload to wetransfer.com.
  • orig .wav file name: 210128_2185.wav
Intro Script
  • This is episode 289 of the Egodeath show, June 14, 2023, with Cybermonk.
  • The microphone is Shure SM57 | TASCAM DR-05 | Apple earbud mic
  • I plan to discuss:
    • topic
    • topic
    • topic
Outro Script
  • This was the Egodeath show, with Cybermonk.

You Are Now Part of the Egodeath Community

yes it is meaningless. don’t be so literal

Actually, in 2006 I felt that the the Egodeath Yahoo Group helped me with the hardest task: compress my main article.

Several people in the Egodeath community, like 4 people, literally did help me with that extremely challenging and epic article.

Vocalizing: Work on Tone/ Mood/ Pace/ Over-Energy

also: Stuttering at start of statement like those crazy spazzy Germans I heard on YT.

  • todo: continue re-listening to my voice recordings, noting more flaws (poor energy/speed/hurried/shouting; stuttering).

JEEZ DUDE WHY DONT U HAVE LIKE 6 MORE CUPS OF COFFEE

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

dude i can’t even follow your point, you are so distractingly overintense and hyper and critical and angry toned. Your tone — and your general HYPERNESS — is detracting/ distracting from your message. MELLOW OUT!!!! You have fade back… make the vocalization fade back so that the message comes to the fore. The voczn should step back, to deliver the message.

What’s weird is that I didn’t notice this pretty extreme tone, usually, when I listened to this rec’g before. weird! i listened to this passage like 1-2 days ago and didn’t even notice how … uptight/intense it “reads”. Now that I’m attuned to the tone issue here, I can hardly believe it’s the same passage I heard the other day when I didn’t notice the tone. I only remember the content from the previous listening, not at all the tone.

over-articulating; hyper-articulation

todo: Vocalization monitoring concern: hyper & critical & weirdly intense & angry tone in jan 24 beginning of “Two Models of Control.mp3”. Think more about “tone”/mood. Pretty sure this is the rec’g I mentioned a couple days ago as “shouting”. How to become aware? easy: listen to start of “Two Models of Control.mp3”, as a negative example. Is it pleasant tone to listen to?

todo: listen to my large collection of my voice recordings, judge favorite tone/mood. maybe make a list here, with judgings.
more of a prelim todo is: outline the timestamps for all of my .mp3 files. (March 3, 2021)

Voice Recording 16 with Header (2021-01-28):
“Positive Bias Crucial.mp3” 1:37:00

  • Rating/recommendation: 8.5. really good, but u might not make it a top pri? but it’s solid content. See its text representation below, in any case; same thing.
    • Content: 9
    • Vocalization: 8 (speaking quieter)
    • Audio tech: 9
  • Audio tech
    • TASCAM DR-05 right mic, 55 of 90 gain
    • position: desk stand. 3.5″.
    • orig .wav file name: 210128_2182.wav
  • At the start: “This is a intellectual biography. I’ll skip the vocalization [in this phase, i’d summarize what aspects to focus on], the technical notes: I always need to know the microphone, I plan on using many different mics. … the end of recording would work to state which mic… this is the dr-05, only one mic, throwing away other channel. Bad result if mono, blah blah blah blah… cut one of the wires… blah blah blah hah hah hah, engineering with a hammer, and the date finally for the technical portion of this header. I found a couple interesting things: when hiatus, amnesia…” <– you can hear this becoming a structured “show” format instead of a “voice recording … with header… with prelim remarks: blah blah blah [bantering a la show-mode/ consciousness/ spirit]…”
Errata
  • ~32:00 i said Hanegraaff tries to attract students to the entheogen scholarship dept, i meant to the Western Esotericism dept.
  • It is debatable that the “neutral position” is supported by Reason. Is it reasonable to imagine that religious experiencing occurs without visionary plants? I don’t think so. I think the so-called “positive bias” is supported by Reason. Have to carefully define the so-called “neutral” position to make it actually defensible.
  • There’s asymmetry in the relation between the New Paradigm vs. the Old Paradigm. Also, differentiate the work of defining a paradigm vs. work done under… the work done by applying that paradigm.
    • The Old paradigm might do a *ton* of developmental work, then after that, standing on that, the New Paradigm merely needs to slightly adjust the Old Paradigm. You can’t compare the magnitude of accomplishment of specifying or creating the Old vs the New paradigm – they are two different kinds of accomplishments.
      • the work of specifying the old paradigm
      • the work accomplished by using the old paradigm
      • the work of specifying the new paradigm, including specific critiques of the old paradigm <– what I’ve done
      • the work accomplished by using the new paradigm
Content
  • How I was able to enter the the field of Western entheogen scholarship (/ ahistoricity/ mytheme decoding) in 1999 starting “from zero” (hardly!) and in less than 4 years, recognize that entheogen scholarship is negatively biased and needed to instead be positively biased.
  • THE RUCK SCHOOL *SHOULD HAVE* ANNOUNCED in 1979 “We’re going to strongly assume, to help us see visionary plants, against today’s negative bias in 1979, is by EXPECTING THE EVIDENCE AND POSITIVELY STRONGLY ASSUMING THE EVIDENCE IS THERE, SO WE CAN MANAGE TO SEE IT, AGAINST THE OBSCURING FORCE OF THE REIGNING NEGATIVE PARADIGM.
  • … and when we successfully prove the *expected* visionary plants in that grid-cell, we’re certainly *not* going to discount & diminish our winnings by framing them as “secret”! (non-real; side-show; heretical, deviant; ie proves the rule – our finding of visionary plants, framed as deviant and secret, reinforcing that our religion history lacks visionary plants)
  • book “Astrotheology & Shamanism” as Low Esotericism. James Arthur: “Mushrooms & Mankind”.
  • Interactions of fields: Western entheogen scholarship, Western Esotericism.
  • Why are New Age bookstores and Theosophy bookstores mostly blind to mystery-religion initiation, AND entheogens?
  • Intellectual autobiography — here’s the sense in which I “started from zero” in the field of entheogen scholarship in 1999:
    • (side note: hazy 2018-early 2020)
    • main point: need to reconstruct March 1997-June 2001-Oct 2002-March 2003 (todo). break into periods:
      • March 1997 – Jan 1999
      • Jan 1999-June 2001 (started the Egodeath Yahoo Group)
      • June 2001-Oct 2002, March 2003
    • rock lyrics decoding ~1992, CybTrans.com 1997~ shows that (check)
    • Gnosis magazine all issues ~1995. Then each new issue after.
    • late 1986: strong desire to know which entheogen in Revelation 10, did a little research then in the field of Western entheogen scholarship.
    • late 80s, early 1990s: read the issues of High Frontiers, Reality Hacker, Mondo 2000.
    • ~1988-1993: Leary books, Robert Anton Wilson
    • 1988: Journal of Consciousness Studies / similar journals
    • Jan 1988-Feb 1997 wrote intensively the cybernetic theory (modern high esotericism, w/ very little mytheme decoding/ analogies).
    • Christians didn’t use entheogens in 1950? Really? What do you really know about it? Just how informed are you, really? Are you sure you are as informed as you think you are? Are you negatively biased? Is there a chance you could be wrong?
    • What happens if, on firm paradigmatic principle, we commit to being positively biased, and then look?
    • What will you say if I hold that 25% of people in all congregations in history use visionary plants, and then, by my holding & investing in that INSANE UNSUSTAINABLE premise, my insane assumption-investment pays off MASSIVELY in the form of THE BIGGEST BREAKTHROUGH OF ALL TIME IN ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP – EG CANTERBURY PROOF OF 70 MSH TREES in the heart of Christian art?
  • Interesting discussion of the negative bias and footnote trickery and Hanegraaff’s self-contradiction and inconsistency:
    • IN THE BODY OF chapter “ENTHEOGENIC ESOTERICISM”, HE CONFORMS TO THE SEVERELY NEGATIVE BIAS, RECEIVED VIEW (“VISIONARY PLANTS VS. THEURGY”), BUT/ and yet,
    • IN THE FOOTNOTE, HE TAKES SOMEWHAT PARTLY NEUTRAL VIEW “WE DON’T KNOW IF THEURGY = VISIONARY PLANTS”.
      How convenient: he gets to have it both ways; he gives himself an out — CHICKEN 🐓
    • post-show commentary: Cyberdisciple’s Revolution of the Footnotes
  • Discussed this commentary/analysis from the previous recording:
  • Paradigm 1 (Negative Bias): Hanegraaff and the Old, “Secret Entheogen” Paradigm holds: We should assume Theurgy doesn’t use visionary plants. Biased against visionary plants.
  • Neutral* paradigm: Neutral Reason dictates*: We should hold that we don’t know whether or not Theurgy uses visionary plants. However, in an unfair fight, taking this position will lead to the received view (anti-plants) winning automatically.
  • Paradigm 2 (Positive Bias): Cybermonk and the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm: We should vigorously commit, invest, expect, and assume Theurgy uses visionary plants. Biased in favor of visionary plants.
    • The Old Paradigm of entheogen scholarship didn’t adopt this strong contrarian position, so they were slaves of the received view; the Ruck school (“the Secretists”) were weak and were dominated by the received, anti-plant bias.
    • The Ruck school – the Old Paradigm – was stuck wavering somewhere between Neutral and anti-plant biased.
    • I feel that the word ‘secret’ indicates/connotes/ is a sign of, the negative bias.
  • the minimal entheogen theory of religion = negative bias
  • the moderate entheogen theory of religion ~= neutral bias (but moderate is strikingly negative biased!)
  • the maximal entheogen theory of religion = positive bias

*It is debatable that the so-called “Neutral paradigm” is supported by Reason. Is it reasonable to imagine that religious experiencing occurs without visionary plants? I don’t think so. I think the so-called “positive biased Paradigm 2” is supported by Reason. Have to carefully define the so-called “neutral” position to make it actually defensible.

How Reading-Aloud One’s Text Helps Discover and Fix Problems in the Text, Improving the Text

2018 feedback loop – reading aloud simplified summary statements of the egodeath theory –

  1. write / gather/ clean up statements.
  2. Read aloud the statements. possibly recording.
  3. discover that the statements sound poor, as exposed by reading them aloud.
  4. rewrite the script so it will sound better when read aloud.
  5. read aloud the revised script. possibly recording.

Voice Recording 15 with Header (2021-01-28):
“Old Secret Entheogen Paradigm.mp3” 2:34:51

  • Filename: “Old Secret Entheogen Paradigm.mp3”
  • Length: 2:34:51
  • Download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-3eXJP1q4Zs
  • Rating/recommendation: 10 out of 10
    • Content: 10
    • Lifetime voice actor fake script reading: 10
    • Audio tech: 10
  • Audio tech
    • TASCAM DR-05 right mic, 55 of 90 gain
    • position: desk stand. 3.5″.
    • orig .wav file name: 210128_2181.wav

type of recording: standalone voice recording, header to state the type of mic (dr-05). note: history of dev’ing the Egodeath Mystery Show: a main motivation for adding a “header”, was to state which microphone.

Content
  • Purpose of this recording: Clarify / specify/ identify my criticism of entheogen scholarship in 2002 that gave rise to my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
  • Martin Luther’s gigantic railroad stake driven into the massive church door (all alone), with a sledgehammer, demolishing the entire entryway to the church.
  • Robert Graves’ 1956 essay Centaurs’ Food is probably a myth; no one has ever seen it, though that essay can be considered the start of the first-generation, Old, “Secret Entheogens” Paradigm, which I took up and transformed and repaired to form the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm.
  • The Old Theory, in the field of entheogen scholarship, has the 11 Entheogen Diminishment Fallacies baked-in; the game is defined from the start, as impossible to win.
  • My various claims to proof that my New Paradigm is superior, faster, has greater explanatory power, was in 2002 more likely to succeed, is more explicitly & properly defined, is more vigorous & can-do, and in the end, proved itself by the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image — both perceiving the Psalter as a problem to solve, and, solving that problem. My New Paradigm — together with my New Paradigm’s ability to incorporate Western Esotericism & the 1997 Egodeath(?0 theory (ie, the Phase 1, Cybernetic theory, plus my Phase 2, the mytheme theory, started 1998, writing in October 2002) — made the greatest breakthrough of all time, in the field of entheogen scholarship…
    • post-show question: can you say that my the mytheme theory yet existed in Oct 2002? well on its way]
    • HOW FAR DID I GET IN DEFINING MY PHASE 2 (THE MYTHEME THEORY) BY OCT 2002? Answer: PRETTY FAR, b/c I had a huge head start. I did *not* “start from zero” in 1999 — closer would be, roots, “started from ‘zero’ Feb 1997… yeah reight, but that had full decoding of Rock lyrics, and full the cybernetic theory … and my 1997 monocoursal labyrinth vision, = BIG MAJOR BEST-CASE RUNNING-START IN “1999”.
    • In 1999, I came onto the scene of entheogen scholarship / ahistoricity / mytheme decoding , LIKE A ROCKET AT FULL SPEED.
    • COMPARE: in tiny short period Oct 1985-Jan 1988, I started from zero, to creating the cybernetic theory.
    • Is it possible for someone to enter the field of ahistoricity/ entheogen scholarship / mytheme decoding in 1999, and then by Oct 2002, already have a superior theory / paradigm of entheogen scholarship better than the Ruck school? No – unless (highly unlikely), that person has decoded rock lyrics, and has published a theory-spec of the cybernetic theory, and a couple years earlier, had a vision of monocoursal labyrinth.
    • To answer/ judge that:
      • In Feb. 1997, possibly constituting the earliest start of Phase 2, I had the mature Cybernetic theory spec. (= the entire Egodeath theory except for history, myth, & ahistoricity). Included:
        • 1. rock lyrics (holding the place of Metaphor)
        • 2. loose cognition
        • 3. eternalism/ no-free-will/ block universe
        • 4. control cancellation / transformation
      • I had modest yet spot-on vision of monocoursal labyrinth in 1997 – a Phase 2 insight during a seeming null period of Transcendent Knowledge development
        • Todo: reconstruct history of the transitional period Feb 1997 – June 2001 – that period was the first part of my Phase 2 of Transcendent Knowledge development — forming the … my point: Feb 1997 = 5/8 of the egodeath theory.
        • Phase 2 only was 3/8 of the Egodeath theory devmt, not 1/2 of the egodeath theory devmt. Pretty significant realization now [8:37 p.m. January 28, 2021].
        • the egodeath theory
          • the cybernetic theory
            • loose cognition – 1987
            • block universe – 1988
              • no-free-will – 1987
            • control cancellation – 1988
          • the mytheme theory
            • rock lyrics – 1992
            • mytheme decoding – 1999+
            • ahistoricity – 1999+
            • entheogen scholarship – 1999+
  • I started Phase 2 = myth, ahistoricity , entheogen scholarship ~1999.
    • See the Egodeath Yahoo Group June 2001 – Oct 2002; probably largely evident by then; my paradigm skeleton formed by then, “fleshed-in” & “tested adequately” by 2006 (my main article).
  • After we have a needed, interesting discussion / debate of the concept of a “breakthrough in the field of Western entheogen scholarship“.
  • Meditation
    • watching thoughts,
    • writing as thought-capturing/ thought-watching,
    • watchdog/ guard gate on the vocalization-source, and
    • watchdog on words-just-now-spoken.
    • Non-drug meditation is good. Lying to steal credit from visionary plants is bad.
  • Created new page:
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/28/old-secret-entheogen-paradigm-vs-new-explicit-psychedelic-paradigm/
  • 2nd half: Hanegraaff’s chapter “Entheognic Esotericism”
  • my 2002 critique of the Old Paradigm
  • the Secret Entheogen Paradigm being / incorporating Entheogen Diminishment fallacies, self-defeating.
  • Critiquing the valuable & needed critiques of Pop Sike Cult from Letcher/ Hatsis/ Irvin/ Kent/ Ball.
  • Integrating fields and defining them sensibly:
    • Field of Western Esotericism
    • Field of the egodeath theory
    • Field of entheogen scholarship.
  • Martin Luther’s 99 Thesis that demolished the church door to smithereens w/ gigantic nail (Hollywood Epic version).
  • Brown’s book subtitle has the evil word “Secret”, a sign of the Old Paradigm (Secret Entheogen), bring him to the New Paradigm.
    tie-in my page:
    “Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” to “Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”
  • Philosophy & History of Science – my contributions to that field:
    • the Old Paradigm generally is poorly articulated, is only informal seat-of-the-pants:
      • Like the book The Road to Eleusis failed to make strong statements of paradigm commitment, and
      • Like Robert Graves failed to make a strong position-statement like Allegro’s compelling and solid book-flap text), and
      • Like the bull in the Tauroctony (monolithic autonomous control-agency, simplified informal model or “initial theory”);
      • Childhood-thinking as a poorly articulated Old Theory with vulnerabilities built-in.
      • Like egoic thinking, the egoic childhood-suited model of control agency (self-in-world) as {king steering in tree} and creating one’s own future.
  • Favorite idea of this recording:
    • egoic vs. transcendent mental worldmodel ::
      Old vs. New paradigm of entheogen scholarship
    • egoic-thinking : transcendent thinking ::
      the Old, “Secret Entheogen” Paradigm : the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm.
Post-Show Commentary
  • Are there written critiques of the field of entheogen scholarship? meta level.
  • I don’t know if Hanegraaff later writes the phrase “non-drug entheogens”, or discusses that concept in a later article. Maybe that’s my (justifiable) takeaway characterization of his view in this article.
  • Hanegraaff appears to equate ‘entheogens’ with only contemporary religion, therefore not entheogen ancient-history scholarship.
  • Hanagraaff commits an all-too-common fallacy: since we don’t have evidence that Theurgy is visionary plants, we must continue definitely assuming that Theurgy is not visionary plants. A fair conclusion, instead, would be neutral: we don’t know whether or not Theurgy uses visionary plants.
  • 3 positions a priori; 3 paradigms or possible position-commitments: Doing research involves committing to, or betting on, positions; you need to make a good investment-bet (per Feyerabend’s philosophy/theory/model of how science actually, realistically works):
    • Paradigm 1: Hanegraaff and the Old, “Secret Entheogen” Paradigm holds: We should assume Theurgy doesn’t use visionary plants. Biased against visionary plants.
    • Neutral paradigm: Neutral Reason dictates: We should hold that we don’t know whether or not Theurgy uses visionary plants. However, in an unfair fight, taking this position will lead to the received view (anti-plants) winning automatically.
    • Paradigm 2: Cybermonk and the New, “Explicit Psychedelic” Paradigm: We should vigorously commit and assume Theurgy uses visionary plants. Biased in favor of visionary plants.
      • The Old Paradigm of entheogen scholarship didn’t adopt this strong contrarian position, so they were slaves of the received view; the Ruck school (“the Secretists”) were weak and were dominated by the received, anti-plant bias. The Ruck school stuck somewhere between Neutral and anti-plant biased.
  • Hanegraaff uses the words ‘entheogen in the narrow sense’, ‘magic’, and ‘manipulation’ as theory-couched terms for using visionary plants.
    • Maybe he’s not trying to hide visionary plants, but is trying to speak in terms of theories as contexts.
My Assessment of this Recording After Listening to It
  • Content: 10
  • Vocalization: 10
  • Audio Tech: 10
    • 10 10 10 or close to that, therefore I don’t need to any longer give such ratings and discuss these aspects explicitly, in the recordings.

🎙 📻 🎉

Holy Grail: got.
ie off-the-cuff speaking while remaining mindful of pitch varying.

Specifying the Exact Difference Between the Moderate vs. Maximal Paradigm of Entheogen Scholarship 🤨 🤔 (Found my claims / characterizations/ accusations – more examples needed, Quotes Needed)

http://www.egodeath.com/#_Entheogen_Diminishment_Fallacies_1

https://www.google.com/search?q=moderate+maximal&sitesearch=egodeath.com&btnG=Search

http://www.egodeath.com/weblog.htm#_Toc73583104 ”  The existing entheogen scholars are operating on the unjustified unconscious unstated assumption that entheogens were only used in spots, in religion.  They are mistaken.  Entheogens were the norm, not the exception … The minimalist theory is based on poor, unjustified assumptions.  That assumption prevents, in practice, even the entheogenists from seeing the obvious presence of entheogens: they blind themselves to the ever-entheogenic nature of the Eucharist, and they blind themselves to the presence of any plant species other than their pet species they become fixated on to the exclusion of all else. They think they can found their research career on the assumption that only one plant was important … [todo: find why brown database no-go]

“Posturing at being “conservative, slow-to-concede, safe and cautious” scholars translates in practice to wearing blinders and putting on the brakes and yelling 3 cheers for the currently predominant paradigm: the minimal entheogen paradigm.  I object to scholars so crippling themselves and supporting today’s bunk set of assumptions.  I’m putting the pedal to the metal to leap into a truly different way.  If you have any chance of finding evidence, you have to put on the mentality that it is there in abundance. 

“Avoid speculating?  Speculating well is the real strategy that has a chance for success.  Of course there is speculation involved, in spades.  It is pointless pretense to hide that.  Only being cowed by the currently predominant paradigm scares scholars into pretending that the evidence is hard to find and hard to interpret.

“There are too many benefits of the radical, maximal paradigm, that scholars are losing by adhering pointlessly to the merely liberal paradigm, which is the minimal entheogen theory of religion.”

Voice Recording 14 (2021-01-27): “Breakthrough Entheogen Scholarship.mp3” 1:04:06


.wav file name: 210127_2176.wav
mp3 filename: “Breakthrough Entheogen Scholarship.mp3”
Length: 1:04:06
download url for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-mXfzBzqX0O
TASCAM DR-05 right mic, 55 of 90 gain. handheld.

No header at start.
At the start: “This’ll be a quick handheld casual recording, talking through the question What’s the greatest breakthrough in the field of entheogen scholarship?” <– answer/retort Feb 20: Oh, you mean the field of Spot the Mushroom: since the field omits the higher level; omits Spot the Mushroom Effects

“Limitations in Entheogen Scholarship.mp3” – reserve that filename to after I research the topic to specify the limitations that I broke out of.

Contents
  • todo: look up my postings on Golden Book. What limitations of writing did I complain were self-defeating limitations in the the field of Western entheogen scholarship?
    • https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/?s=%22golden+book%22
      • oldest good hit: https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-124/ – “Bunk unexamined assumptions [that are huge needless self-defeating limitations baked into the field] a la Schultes’ Golden Book on Psychedelics: if a culture has writing, it doesn’t have entheogens; only if a culture lacks writing, it might have entheogens.”
      • https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-144/#message7436 – “Can’t you academics do anything other than posture and put out waffling self-contradictory doubletalk like Richard Evans Schultes’ Golden Book of Denial of Visionary Plants in Western Religion?” (quotes / citations needed)
      • next 2-3 hits: todo.
      • https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-161/#message8573
        “Richard Evans Schultes just-so story, his Golden Book of Hallucinogens, is also a propaganda spin-job, ready for deconstructing, that simultaneously points toward revealing that the Eucharist was understood as mushrooms while also simultaneously contradicting itself, steering all the reader’s thinking away from that idea. Per my posts in the early 2010s. / Savage subhumans in Central and South America equated the Catholic Eucharist with psychoactives, but genuine, European Christianity throughout our own history, OF COURSE (needless to say; there’s no need for critical discussion here, move along, these aren’t the mushroom trees you’re looking for) doesn’t draw any connection between mushrooms and Christian mushroom trees, and if we were to find any such connection being made in Western history — such as the Plaincourault frescoe of which a version appears in both Wasson and Allegro’s book — without comment but a footnote or minimalist, diminishing, fire-dousing caption at most — that would only prove the rule, that only one or two non-Christian, deviant outsiders, at rare deviant isolated points, ever connected our own, real Eucharist to psychoactives.” [quotes needed todo]
      • https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-163/#message8671 “Hanegraaff’s unbelievable spin and incoherence around the term ‘entheogen’ is like in Richard Evans Schultes’ _Golden Book of Just-So Stories About How Others’ Religions Use Hallucinogens, Unlike Us_.”
  • Graves wrote 2 pages about Allegro’s book: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/robert-graves-writings-about-mushrooms/#Jesus-as-Toadstool
  • what’s the greatest breakthrough in the field of Western entheogen scholarship?
    • why unanswerable? / unthinkable? until you add “book/article”?
    • What’s the greatest book / article in history of the field of Western entheogen scholarship ?
      • brown 2016 The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret– NOOOOO!!! 😱 😵
        • Asking entheogen scholarship to not write the word ‘secret’ (& thus shoot themselves in the foot, self-defeating) is like asking Kafei not to quote mystics – ain’t gonna happen. Constitutionally incapable of stopping being self-defeating. Why not just yell in the street, “ENTHEOGENS ARE NOTHING BUT A SIDE-SHOW! NOT REAL! RARE! DEVIANT! ABNORMAL! DOESN’T COUNT!“
      • Road to Eleusis – was that a breakthrough??
      • graves centaur food 1956
    • “Holy Grail”
      • Muraresku’s great breakthrough would be psil traces in near mystery-religion initiation site.
      • my “holy grail” was the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image .
Quality Assessment
  • Content: 9
  • Vocalization: 8.5 (casual off-the-cuff)
  • Technical: 8.5 – -1 for fan
  • if i keep up this level, there won’t be a reason to do these assessments any more.
Critique
  • Fan is pretty awful – just whitenoise , but highly audible BE SURE TO TURN OFF FANS.
  • I could’ve held mic more on-axis. Probably real good anyways, 45 degrees, closemic.
  • I skipped saying a formal Header (topics planned, voczn planned, technical eg date statement) but I did the most important: stated the topic, and actually stuck to it.

Voice Recording 13 with Header (2021-01-27) Reading of 2003 Announcement of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion:
“Maximal Entheogen Theory.mp3” 3:08:37

210127_2175.wav – export as:
“Pre-Filled Entheocism Grid.mp3”
“Maximal Entheogen Theory.mp3”
3:08:37
https://we.tl/t-mQDhRnJdB1
1 week to download
no login, email, etc required.
magnifying glass icon = in-browser preview.

  • At the start: “Recording header: consists of 2 points about the content, 2 points about the vocalization (aiming for bass 3/10, vol 3/10), then technical. A straight-through reading of…”
Finished Read-Aloud 14-page Announcement of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion -> “Maximal Entheogen Theory.mp3”
Content
  • 2:54:00 “I reckon that my decoding of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image is the greatest breakthrough in the past & future history of entheogen scholarship.” What would be the contenders? 🤔
    • drawing a blank. An unfamiliar perspective. Has anyone asked this question before now?
    • What is the greatest breakthrough in the history of entheogen scholarship?
    • Can the field of Western entheogen scholarship talk in terms of its “breakthroughs”? 🤔 Not used to that framing.
    • Why does the question sound so odd? Is that a sign of the field’s failure, or disappointing type of success?
    • Intriguing question. todo: discuss. centuar food
  • content: 1:56:00 i recite a mouthful:
    • “I am announcing the paradigm of assuming the ubiquity of the entheogenic theory of religion” also at …
    • reciting is at: 2:33:00 like below:
    • 2003 essentially: “I am announcing the paradigm of assuming the ubiquity of the psychedelic esotericism perennial philosophy”
  • 2:00:00 Max: I grant you’re right, “obv” the 1950 church ppl didn’t use plants. But still, I’m right:
    • my photos prove there are mushrooms growing on that church property
      • Ratsch & entheogen scholarship proved that visionary plants (the plants themselves) are ubiquitous.
    • and I uploaded photos of the msh in that church’s stained glass windows.
    • I proved that entheogenic esotericism (= the perennial Philosophy) is available at that church at that time.
    • That merely leaves the detail question: how many people used the available msh and the available Phil at that church?
  • 2:42:23 Resume reading the rest of the 14-page posting. The final 1/3.
  • I wrote in 2003 “no one discusses freewill in religion.” ha ha that was just before the Reformed Theology resurgence/ rediscovery heyday around 2005, following behind me.
  • 1:12:00 (during the extended reading-break) voice-actor comedy mocking Muraresku “Jurassic Park meets Mystery Religion freakout”, dragon safely in cage. defanged mystery-religion initiation.
    • What happens when you commit to the New Theory paradigm that entheogen-use is constant, that ALL CHURCHES EG IN 1950 HAVE 25% OF THE CONGREGATION USING ENTHEOGENIC ESOTERICISM. What “evidence” do you become able to perceive? vs. self-defeatism of the Ruck school’s “secret, deviant, suppressed, heretical, cult, consprcy, NOT REAL” assumption-set.
    • The word ‘secret’ (= the establishment version of “the entheogen theory” paradigm = represents the entire defeatist, blind, BAD PARADIGM. They start with the 3-layer grid assumed to be all empty until evidence forces to concede “ok, that layer of the grid-cell is not entirely empty”.
      • It’s a bunk “entheogen theory” that’s biased against entheogens!
      • Compare the bad paradigm “secret msh cult theory / Allegro / Amanita cult”.
    • Did the Ruck school write anything about the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image? If not, why not? Answer: He’s using a bad paradigm.
    • 1:33:00 WHY DIDN’T RUCK WRITE ABOUT CANTERBURY IN 1979???
      [Dec. 31, 2024 note: Why didn’t 1998 Samo article cite Great Canterbury Psalter? Because the discoverer Paul Lindgren didn’t contribute the image until 2000 & 2001. James Arthur book Mushrooms & Mankind (2000), front matter credits Paul Lindgren. Wish I asked Arthur, in our conversations, about Lindgren: how did he find Great Canterbury Psalter mushroom imagery? 2001 article ConjEden credits Lindgren.]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Dec. 31, 20124: keep this 2020 capture as a historical record; has dark palette before library saw my galleries and brightened the palette by March 2021. On my mobile device, see date of first Great Canterbury Psalter capture done on mobile device, eg March 2021, which is how/when I discovered their updated psalter with brighter colors. Click image to go to improved source.
  • todo: have the grad-student slaves write Ruck to ask him. ask M. Hoffman.
    • You have to fact check me on this. (You’re behind on that.)
  • Middle of recording during break from reading the super long posting:
    • Large bragging rights – how my New Paradigm proved superior to the Old (“Ruck”) Paradigm
    • The “evidence” be damned – the Theory is correct!
      • btw, the evidence supports the theory.
      • also, the theory’s ability to perceive the puzzle, and, the theorys ability to solve that puzzle, both corrob the Theory. eg the ability to do these 3 things/accomplishments:
      • decode religious myth &
      • decode the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image &
      • PROVE 70 msh trees in heart of Christian art
    • … each corrob the Theory; the maximal entheogen theory of religion & the egodeath theory.
    • At start, I read the posting (I hit a tough spot at the 16 religious views, and I plow through that, mentioned below)
  • I read entire 14-page posting. It would be possible to edit this voice recording to extract a clean professional reading of the posting. (But it would be faster to just re-record – with no construction noise.)
  • Discussion of 16 (12 non-self-contradictory) different positions permuting the answer-combinations to these 4 yes/no questions:
    • Did Jesus exist?
    • Did Jesus use msh?
    • Did orig Christians use msh?
    • Did later Christians use msh?
    • Flaws: It took awhile to figure how to vocalize the binary 0110 as “No Yes Yes No -> jesus didn’t exist, Jesus used msh, orig followers used , later not.”
  • The construction of the postings is probably brilliant; I’d have to talk-through that: was my set of 4 questions and discussion (in the post) of paradigms brilliant? Assume yes.
  • My pair of postings is brilliant, and that is evidenced by my decoding of Montecassino and Canterbury. tho Canterbury gets into my distinct theory of Cybernetics; control-transformation. ie, my entheogen scholarship field breakthrough partly rests on my Cybernetic theory; overlap of topics/ areas of breakthroughs.

3-layer grid:

  • visionary plants available ubiq’ly ; all cells pre-filled
  • perennial entheogenic esotericism phil’y assumed ubiquitous (all places, times, relig’s) avail
  • the only ? remaining is: HOW MANY PPL *USED* THE AVAIL PLANTS & PEREN PHIL?
  • That church in 1950:
    • FACT: visionary plants were available.
      • So fill-in the entire grid, bottom layer.
    • FACT: the entheogenic esotericism perennial philosophy was available.
      • So fill-in the entire grid, middle layer.
    • UNKNOWN: how many people used the available plants & Philosophy?
      • Start filling-in the top layer of the grid. WE’RE IMMEDIATELY BLOWING-BY THE RUCK SCHOOL. eg when I read 2002 Entheos mag, and I saw Mandrake tree on right of Monte image, and no text in the mag mentioned that! BLIND! BY THEIR OWN BAD PARADIGM.
        • As always, you have to fact check me. Did they mention the tree on the right?

That paradigm, my 2002 paradigm, proved to be be diff’t & superior to the Ruck school paradigm which assumes grid cells empty aka key words exposing his paradigm: “secret / heretical / not real / suppressed/ conspir.” Proved by mandrake tree which their paradigm, the Ruck paradigm, proved to be blind to, & by the failure of the Ruck paradigm to look at Canter Psalter HIWHC WIC WHICH *I* PROVED 70 PSIL MSH TREES IN HEART OF Christian ART. THUS PROVING THAT MY PARADIGM IS DIFFERENT THAN RUCK SCHOOL AND PROVING THAT MY “MAXIMAL” PARADIGM IS THE SUPERIOR THEORY/ EXPLANATORY FRAMEWORK.

P.S. I HAVE UNLIMITED LIFETIME BRAGGING RIGHTS ON MULTIPLE FRONTS/DOMAINS.

Estimated Predicted Quality
  • Content: 10 (if ignore 10% junk & re-takes)
  • Vocalization:
    • 68% through, real good miking & voczn. 9/10. a bit much mouth noise, but nicely dry (v close miked); slightest touch of room reverb. probably back off the mic slightly & state the mic distance more often.
    • close-miking picking up mouth noise — you can tell i didn’t monitor in headphones. picking up breath wind. -1. You can tell signs that I didn’t use formal equipment: popfilter + headphones. It’s casual, amateur, not professional quality.
    • When reading script: 9.5 (cut slack for lack of pre-practice)
    • When off-the-cuff speaking: 7.5 (don’t kid self; much room for improve)
  • Technical: 9 (construction noise, fan, else, good miking/mic-use).
  • Why does it sound like I’m holding a lozenge in the side of my mouth sometimes when i relax?? keep tongue centered when relaxed speaking.
Errata/Flaws/Critiques
  • The end of the 14-page posting has a classic mis-wording: it only says “origins”, and fails to say “ongoing wellspring” or “throughout its history”.
  • I said that Kafei and I agree on real mystics used plants. It’s an understatement that Kafei and I agree on (just) that. Kafei and I agree, on the whole. Like james arthur told me he agreed with my entire system of positions.
  • annoying talking typing segment: “just 2 sentences” – 15 minutes later… debatable. Does this suck?
    • make myself listen again to the annoying typing: SHOULD I HAVE PAUSED RECG WHILE TYPING?
    • the words I’m typing are Great Words, but…
  • Bad thing: some parts should be edited out. Good thing: there are tons of good parts; ie, you could edit out my discussion of vocal technique, and my false takes, 90% of the content is 10 out of 10 solid content. I’m handing the producer a GREAT tracking file, he just needs to delete some parts 10% and what’s left is pure gold.
  • I expect the technical reocrding is 10 except construction noise & fan. Hope little wind hitting mic.
  • The vocalization – while reading script and while off-the-cuff — is maybe 8 or 9.

Announcement Postings I’m Reading Aloud

2003 14-page posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-28/#message1391

2002 6-page posting: DONE
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-23/#message1162
My posting is a reply inspired by ppan’s good posting above it.

Errata/Critiques: Troughs in Voice Recordings, Slow Parts = Things I’m Still Working Out for “Show Production”

Overhead Junk That I’m Still Working-Out

It is clear that I’m not over/past the hump yet.

I’m still working-out:

  • how I’m going to read postings aloud.
    • written words i don’t want to say
    • skipping text
      • my job is to take junky writing, on-air live, convert it / how to present rough text as if polished.
    • critiquing wording of someone’s post – some of this is important.
    • what part of the posting header to read. answer: most.
  • The problem with bassy voczn (loud).
  • I had forgotten that reading text aloud ideally requires a pre-run practice run throwaway.
  • Think I’m done figuring out how to close mic w/o wind hitting mic. start 3″ on aixs, then move it off axis.

Yesterdays recordings are largely slow-paced – I could analyze what I mean htere.

I am I experience them as often too slow-paced. Need to pick up the pace; too chatty, try to tighten that up a little – maybe? Realistic?

In RevShift, at the end, I finally get to the damn point – I finally break through to “get it”, the spirit of 2002/2003 paradigm shift to the “default to filled-grid” not “empty grid” – assume that our RECOGNIZING entheogens has empty cells, but REALITY is entirely filled-cells.

But come on, I can’t do 10/10 cashout all the time. There are going to be troughs and peaks.

What are the troughs/ slow points in my rec’gs? Any meta-discussion of shows, voczn, technical, is “slow”. Discussing how to read people’s postings, what to skip, is “slow”.

Voice Recording 12 with Header (2021-01-26c) “Revolutionary Paradigm Shift.mp3” 3:16:22

  • Filename: “Revolutionary Paradigm Shift.mp3”
  • Length: 3:16:22
  • Download/preview: https://we.tl/t-TUQX5Dsffg
    • Download link for 1 week.
  • At start: “third effort, simple read-through of postings from 2002/3, this is the header, vocalization : the usual, I’m not going to do any commentary, unpracticed read-through, no repeating,.. dr-05, 4″ [interesting! same distance as I ended up doing w/ sm57 cardioid mic ~ Feb 18] to let in room reverb, dr-05 on desk mic mount, bright”

Production notes:

  • Tracking file: 210126_2173.wav

Good content.

  • 2:41:00 remembered the bad situation of entheogen scholarship in 2002. Ruck school was playing the game poorly as “start with empty grid” , “tend toward empty grid”; default to empty, SECRET, absence. I brought full theory, asserted all religions, all origins, all through history, assume ubiquitous, look through that lens, use that lens to perceive data later.
    Read 2002 announcement posting – Subject: “Entheogen use constant in religion”. Figured out what the 2003 Revolutionary Paradigm Shift was. Only *started* reading the 2003 announcement posting (of the maximal entheogen theory of religion), near the end.
  • See the section below: Content in “Revolutionary Paradigm Shift.mp3”

entheogens = Not Real Christianity

58:00 rialcnis post below 14-page announc, his reply that day, I read his full post. “those famous guys didn’t propose the idea directly like my 14page supposedly does.

2:41:00 +the good part. Itslike: Max’s discussion of the entheogens conference books display, the Grid, filling-in the grid. the entire set of religious is based on entheogens. – theory-driven. not the darn piecemeal approach, data driven. Substance.

The “Ruck” (et al) 2000 paradigm as a “default empty grid” approach, vs. the Egodeath theory is a “default filled grid” paradigm. Moderates vs the Maximals.

  • The Moderates are stuck in a “default empty grid” paradigm assumption framework.
  • The Maximals operate from a “default filled-in grid” assumption framework.

The Moderates: with one hand they give, while with the other hand, they take away.

There, I just saved you from having to listen to the 3:16:22 voice recording from hell.

Content in 3. “Revolutionary Paradigm Shift.mp3”
  • Read the 2002 Oct 6-page posting, Rialcnis’ reply (to 2003 posting?), ppan’s pre-posting.
  • Musical ice cubes. <– the highlight of the show ~2:18:00
  • 2:20:00
  • 2:33:45 Start reading 14-page posting. Allgro was 1970 not 1967, had to go check date in 40th anniv printing.
  • Quantum Kafei’s claim: “The Egodeath theory uses the word ‘heimarmene’ as a neologism. But it doesn’t.” Stably unstable position.
  • A couple other posts.
  • Read the 2016 post where I turned against the word ‘entheogen’.
  • Much of this “show” (easier to type than “voice recording”) is about word connotations of ‘psychedelic’ & ‘entheogen’. And subtle variants of wording around “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”.
  • wrmspirit’s context-less poem.
  • Part of my posting about defining what “on-topic” means.
  • Description of Ott’s book (Entheogenic Reformation; the Angels’ Dictionary).
  • I could easily create a 3-hour recording every week eg by reading postings or books, promising I won’t do commentary, and then doing commentary. Over the hump, for bringing togher Content, Voczn, & Technical.
  • Read part of 2003 announcement of the Maximal Entheogen Paradigm. Against the Moderate or “empty-grid” paradigm. Didn’t get far before I figured out the answer, the nature of my Revolutionary Paradigm Shift, the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
  • BUT THATS NOT ALL!!! Also the earlier pre- recording [2 of them!], about the weakness of the word ‘entheogen’.
  • These two shows are a nice blend of casual, formal, random, and thematic/ cohesive.
  • Quadrant levels: (1 = min, 10 = max)
    • Mythemes – 1
    • Loosecog – 2
    • Eternalism – 1
    • Control transformation – 1
    • cuts across quadrants:
      • Western Esotericism – 3
      • entheogen scholarship – 10

Voice Recording 11 with Header (2021-01-26b):
“Entheogen Diminishment Scholars.mp3” 25:14

  • Filename: “Entheogen Diminishment Scholars.mp3”
  • Length: 25:14
  • Download/preview: https://we.tl/t-Wimb6So3N8
    • download link for 1 week

At the start: “Header: The structure of the recording header is: 2 points about the content plan …; 2 points about vocalization, and 2 points about technical.” Done stating header info at 3:30.

Content
  • discusses ‘psychedelic’ vs. ‘entheogen’ connotations, pros/cons.
  • unsure what this is, it has some good content. what’s the diff between these 3 rec’gs? SKIP INTRO??
Production Notes
  • 210126_2172.wav – shorter
  • sub-par voczn?
    Slightly much room reverb?
  • Voice recording, defines the planned “recording header” format: “Header: The structure of the recording header is: 2 points about the content plan, which is always turns out wrong; 2 points about vocalization, and 2 points about technical.”
  • It takes until 3:10 to finally finish stating the particular header info; I failed here to consider, that the Header needs to be finished by 0:30.
  • Has a “content header” (precursor to becoming a “show”): starts liuterally: “Header: The structure of the recording header is: 2 points about the content plan, which is always turns out wrong; 2 points about vocalization, and 2 points about technical. [nonliteral:] the plan is much reduced amibition; i’tm blaha blah 2002 posting reading blah blah…”
  • At 2:18 I finally say: “Vocalization: my voice’s bass will be too loud and will leak, so aim for pitch 3 out of 10 (not 1 of 10), and at that point, my volume of voice needs to then be 3 out of 10. A bit of a wrinkle/catch/ limitation. Technical is it’s January 26, 2021, speaking into the TASCAM DR-05 Right mic in Stereo mode, discard Left channel then remember to Center the Balance….”
  • I finish that Header statement at 3:10, but that should have been finished at 0:30! That was the concept!
  • “I won’t say the planned length of the recording, or how much longer I’ll be recording, because that’s always wrong.”

Voice Recording 10 (2021-01-26): “Non-Drug Entheogens.mp3” 1:30:11

No “header”, but opens with a Description of content. “with Minimal repeating because I’ll have to go fast. I do want a vocal warmup practice. I’ll repeat-phrase during the off-the-cuff commentary.”

pretty sure this is good quality content.

Tracking file: 210126_2171.wav

THE PSYCHEDELIC THEORY OF RELIGION
1. “Non-Drug Entheogens.mp3”

[January 26, 2021] – very probably the below is assoc w/ the first of the 3 recordings for Jan 26 uploads. ended up as “Non-Drug Entheogens.mp3”, I think. Below is notes I typed just after recording it, I think.

  • I made a remarkable (and debatable) idea development voice recording just now, about why THE WORD ENTHEOGEN IS DOOMED TO FAILURE as we saw in 2000 that made me try to bandaid it with ‘maximal’. Or forget stupid recording, see text below.
  • episode 25, 54:30 Why did Strange Loop and Max Realize that the Only Possible Word Was ‘Psychedelic’ and that ‘Entheogen’ would fail, in preventing corruption of the 1-sentence def’n/summary of the egodeath theory. Transcendent Knowledge podcast, episode 25 – link to that recording I just made.
  • figuratively speaking, in 2002, I TOLD YOU SO! I WARNED THE FIELD, I TOLD YOU, HANEGRAAFF WOULD COME ALONG AND STEAL THE WORD ‘ENTHEOGEN’ AND DILUTE IT TO EMPTY IT OF ALL POTENCY. IT WAS INEVITABLE THAT THE WORD ENTHEOGEN WOULD BE TOOTHLESS AND WOULD BE COMPLETELY NEUTERED AND CO-OPTED, AS ALREADY HAPPENED BY 2000.
    • 1:09:00 Say “the state of consciousness that is exclusively elicited by Psychedelics” <– why not ‘entheogens’??? how bout some of Hanegraaff’s “non-drug entheogens”?
    • Max: “I see your point; by specifying only “the Psychedelic state of consciousness”, you lose this crucial point, which is that the psychedelic state of consciousness [ie authentic esoteric religion] can only be elicited by drugs.”
      • Why didn’t Max say ‘entheogens’? look at the feeble “entheogen” scholarship books of 2000 for a hint, a sign. Entheogen = WEAK Vulnerable word, easily diluted, diminishment. I don’t have a full transcription, but todo: LISTEN TO STRANGE LOOP PLUG THE GAP, Episode 25, NOT W/ ‘ENTHEOGENS’ BUT W/ ‘PSYCHEDELICS’:
        1:08:00 = 68*60 = 4080s
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCqCGpOwDYA&t=4080s
        1:08:30 <– Strange Loop points out shutting out the Meditation argument. Listen to their conversation about 1-sentence summary, not sure of time stamp. 54:30 is the start of part of that conversation. It’s split into 2 parts?
        54:30 = 54*60 +30 = 3270s
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCqCGpOwDYA&t=3270s
      • Do they even consider the word ‘entheogens’? 🤔 😄 😳 why not?
    • Word hit count at https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/25/commentary-on-transcendent-knowledge-podcast-episode-25/
      • entheogen – ~16 <– puny feeble vulnerable co-opted watered-down moderate secret abnormal alternative heretical;
        ENTHEOGEN = NOT REAL RELIGION; merely an alternative
      • psychedelic – ~76 <– ANY QUESTIONS?
        THE PSYCHEDELIC THEORY OF RELIGION
        NO “MAXIMAL” NEEDED. HEY HANEGRAAAFFF HOW BOUT THAT “NON-DRUG PSYCHEDELICS”, HM? DID U KNOW, HITTING YOUR THUMB W/ HAMMER “CAN” EMULATE THE EFFECTS OF PSYCHEDELICS.
  • WHERE ITS AT IS NOT THE LAME-AZZ “THE ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION” (THUMBDOWN EMOJI), IT WAS ALREADY WRECKED IN 2000, NOW HANEGRAAFF HAS DONE WHAT I PREDICTED, OR REPORTED, IN 2002. “NON-DRUG ENTHEOGENS” = 100 TRADITIONAL METHODS, VS. PLANT ENTHEOGENS WHICH IS ONLY *1* METHOD – AN UPSTART – SO, ENTHEOGENS ARE SECRET, AS SECRET AS THE SUBTITLE OF BROWNS’ BOOK: THE PSYCHEDELIC[GOOD SO FAR, BUT….] GOSPELS: THE SECRET [AGHHH FAIL SKULL EMOJIS 💀 😵 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL] HISTORY OF HALLUCINOGENS IN Christianity”. “MODERATE ENTHEGOEN ” IS REDUNDANT. MODERERATE, DIMINISHMENT, IS BAKED-INTO THE WORD ENTHOGEN. I TRIED TO SAVE THE WORD, BANDAID “MAXIMAL”, I WROTE “ENTHEOGENIC ESOTERICISM” THEN 8 YRS LATER HANEGRAAFF WROTE CHAP W/ THAT TITLE, THEN … “NON-DRUG ENTHOEGENS”. “MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN” FIALED. TOO LITTLE TOO LATE, I TOLD U SO.
  • MAY HAVE TO SWITCH TO: “THE PSYCHEDELIC THEORY OF RELIGION“, FOR SAME REASON STRANGE LOOP AND MAX REACHED FOR ‘THROUGH PSYCHDELICS ONLY’, INSTEAD OF PATCHING THE OPENING W/ “THROUGH ENTHEOGENS ONLY”. SEE EP 25. 1-SENT SUMM OF THE EGODEATH THEORY . WHY THEY USE “PSYCHEDELIC” NOT “ENTHEOGEN”?? ‘PSYCHEDELIC’ HAS BAGGAGE – BUT the word ‘ENTHEOGEN’ HAS A MASSIVE OPENING, AS WE SEE W/ HANEGRAAFF EXPLOITING, DILUTING, “NON-DRUG ENTHEOGENS”. I TOLD U SO IN 2002, THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN. “THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION” MEANS: ENTHEOGENS ARE QUITE LIMITED, ABNORMAL, SECRET, RARE, MINIMAL. CHUTES & LATTERS, DEFLATION OF THE “MAXIMAL ENTHEGOEN” POSITION DOWN TO LEVEL OF “MODERNATE ENTHEOGENS ” DOWN TO LEVEL OF … the incredible shringking Entheogen Theory. The tire has a flat tire. the word ‘entheogen’ has a puncture. Pump it up w/ “maximal”? It’s flat again in 5 minutes. i told u so. tried to warn u. “Secret Entheogens” = No Entheogens.
  • What’s the maximal amount of entheogens in religion? Not Very Much. Subtle contradiction/ backfiring built-in. “Maximal” connotes “very limited”.
  • Let’s see Hanegraaff try the fallacious etymology-based argument on THIS word, the P word: Hi, my name is Hanegraaff, and I propose, “Non-Drug Psychedelics”, and I have a theory, called “the Psychedelic Theory of Religion”, in which, I assert that psychedelics were merely one of 200 traditional techniques, like smashing your head repeatedly against a brick wall “CAN” emulate the effects of psychedelics.

Warmup Recording, Halted by Chip Filling Up

Jan 26 2021

  • Memory chip filled up – can’t remember, what was I recording then? Do I have 4 recordings to upload? I don’t THINK I was working on an important recording.
  • Not uploaded or exported to mp3:
    older chip – what was I voice-recording when it filled up and stopped?
    Funny warmup, 14:xx , jumpped in, 210126_2170.wav.
  • Contents:
  • 0:00 Max shipped the mystics & their books to Mars. Probably a reading-aloud of the written joke below.
  • I rightly predicted the chip would fill up.
  • How to learn: listen multiple times, read multiple times. How to underline books. Wasson book photographs of my markup. Need to set up printer to properly read Hatsis’ (eg) articles – or my postings. Or my WordPress pages. Underlining / highlighting in Kindle, ebooks suk.
  • Funny ending: “This is probably going to be a throwaway recording, and in line with that, ” — right then, the tape runs out.

I’m Never Wrong, But When I Am, Go Big: Lower Ambitions for My Read-Through of Announcements of the Maximal Fail Theory of the Word ‘Entheogen’

  • My big error isn’t that “maximal entheogen” turns out to be hopeless futile bandaid for diminution of the presence of plants.
  • I merely mean: my expectations for this voice recording were way, way too high. I FORGOT THAT TO READ Cyberdisciple’S ARTICLES ALOUD, I DID A PRACTICE RUN-THROUGH READING. I’M NOT GOING TO READ MY POSTINGS TWICE. SO, I WON’T BE ABLE TO COMPREHEND WHAT I’M READING, AND I’M BARELY GOING TO BE ABLE TO ADEQUATE READ-ALOUD.
  • FORGET ABOUT ME COMPREHENDING WHAT I’M READING-ALOUD,
  • FORGET ABOUT ME DOING ANY COMMENTARY (OR VOCALZN PRACTICE OF THAT).
  • IT WILL BE A HUGE CHALLENGE TO DO A DECENT STRAIGHT-THROUGH READ-ALOUD RECORDING, SINCE NO PRACTICE READ-THROUGH. OOPS. FORGOT THAT DETAIL.

Next Voice Recording: Reading-Aloud My 14-page 2003 Announcement of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion. Goal: Repeat Phrases During the Rare Moments of Commentary

  • Guiding questions to keep an eye out for:
    • How does the maximal entheogen theory of religion relate to other component-theories of the egodeath theory?
      • Western Esotericism scholarship
      • mytheme decoding
      • Ahistoricity
      • the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence
    • Why is this Theory 3-level? (min/mod/max)
    • Are my complaints more elevated than “Ruck should multiply his qty of entheogens spotted by 2x”?
      • What are the qualitative rather than quantitative complaints causing me to formulate this Theory?
    • Is this Theory specified in terms of “min mod max”?
    • Could this Theory have been 2-level?
    • How to relate this model to the 2-level models in the 2002 or 2021 version of the Egodeath theory?
  • Recording plan:
    • Read-aloud almost straight-through, my 14-page posting of my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
    • Occasionally re-reading sentences.
    • With a little off-the-cuff commentary.
      • The top priority: Repeating sentences of my commentary, demonstrating re-pitching.
    • Definition/criteria of success: There is only 1 goal, constituting success vs failure of this recording: Did I repeat phrases during my commentary?
      • Yes: Success.
      • No: FAIL.

2002 6-page posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-23/#message1162
My posting is a reply inspired by ppan’s good posting above it.

2003 14-page posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-28/#message1391

Confirmed: The 2002 & 2003 announcement postings are both copied to Egodeath.com, b/c they are before Valentines 2004.

My voice is poor at this time of day, and I have to be quiet, so, this might just be practice for: too late, ain’t happening til tomorrow.

  • a great redo in the late morning (more background noise, better voice, louder speaking allowed).
  • right now: no background noise, poor voice, near-whisper soon.

This 14-page posting looks dauntingly well written and well-considered (and I probably slammed it out in a single burst within an email application), but otoh, no subheadings or TOC (terrible; fail).

  • Next, right now, I plan to read (almost) straight through recording reading-aloud my 14-page announcement posting of my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion, with a *little* occasional re-reading of phrases, and a *little* off-the-cuff commentary that I will *definitely* — the top priority — repeat vocalizing my off-the-cuff commentary. Only a *little*, or else I’ll never complete the task.

Voice Recording 9 (2021-01-25):
“Demo of Repeating Phrases.mp3” 2:20:22

Filename: “Demo of Repeating Phrases.mp3”
Title in music player: “Demo of Repeating Phrases”
Length: 2:20:22 – CONTENT STARTS AT 5:10
Download link for 1 week: https://we.tl/t-6ocbApzfUE
Raw tracking file: 210125_2168.wav
Date: 2021-01-25
Mic: TASCAM DR-05, rec lvl 55 out of 90, stereo/ right-only / pan to center/ desk stand/arm/clamp

  • starts with a “content purpose” statement, not yet a “header”; not yet a “show”.
  • Supposedly not a real episode. Do you trust me on that? I don’t.
  • A Scratch Voice Recording – “Demo of Repeating Phrases.mp3” – Kafei Quotes, Ppan’s Post & My 2002 Reply Forming the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion

“This show is purely throwaway. … It does contain some good solid content/ points/ analysis.”

A Scratch Voice Recording – “Demo of Repeating Phrases.mp3” – Kafei Quotes, Ppan’s Post & My 2002 Reply Forming the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion

Content:
  • CONTENT STARTS AT 5:10 or 8:30 after “against room treatment” – Commenting on Pull Quotes. I comment in depth on and on, about like 4 sentences from Kafei, in terms of ambiguous terms, 3- vs 2-level models, how I would re-write his pull-quotes to make them proper and clear.
    • 28:15 At this point, he doesn’t differentiate causal-chain determinism vs. block-universe determinism. Which is really important, since Kafei is making misleading statements, assertions, and insinuations about which position the Egodeath theory takes.
    • 33:33 summary of 3-level model on right vs 2-lvl model on right.
      “I see determinism within eternalism.”
    • 35:00 analysis of “The mind becomes one with the block universe.”
    • 38:00 step outside the block universe. If “all” means block univ, we’re going “outside the all”. block universe = prison; need release (apolytrosis); we need to leave the block universe – in 150 A.D., lots of Transcendence Salesmen will gladly sell you their brand of religion promising to pull you outside of the iron block universe prison.
    • 45: 50 “It’s a direct experience of the block universe”. -> The mystic state is…
    • The mind becomes “the All”, … the mind becomes the block universe … Wording improvements.
    • 49:15 Asking me to stop saying “logical connector” utterances, is hopeless. It’s like trying to get Kafei to form a thought without quoting some damn mystic or other – not gonna happen; constitutionally incapable. Max tried shipping all the Great Mystics off to Mars 👽 🛸, with all their books, but to no available; he still quoted them, even when people merely asked if he had the time of day. And so, therefore, now, I keep saying logical connectory-sounding utterances before every, single, statement.
    • 57:00 discussion of popping mic, plosives per minute. Level drops, b/c I move mic away.
      • 1:01:10 tech discussion: how to achieve the impossible: ultra close mic w/o pop filter.
      • #1: mouth popping.
      • #2: nose wind aka nostril wind
      • #3: clogged-nose sound due to aiming at mouth not nostrils when close-miking. Conflicts w/ #2, when ultra-close miking.
  • 1:07:30 I spot-read part of the really solid and concise 2002 posting from ppan1031 that inspired me to write my 6-page, apparently good posting announcing the maximal entheogen theory of religion in Oct 16, 2002.
    • 1:11:45 ppan says egodeath block-universe determinism = UNFOLDING, but i fail to comment on that.
    • 1:13:00 the audio industry is idiots w/ their damned 6″ plastic garbage-design pop filters.
    • 1:15:00 Course in Miracles – ppan wonders if L25 inspiration. Did Hanegraaff expose that? maybe in his article Entheogenic Esotericism.
    • ppan had a successful Amanita session where he wondered that.
    • 1:16:00 real solid post from ppan: if enth, why church? out of biz. … If, then why join a church?
  • My 2002 6-page posting
    • ~1:23:00 – I literally read aloud a sentence 3x from an announcement posting, then I comment (wisely, about the benefit of reading a sentence aloud 3x) 3x. so, the purpose of this practice recording is fulfilled; a success.
    • 1:26:00 My previous writing is intimidatingly good. Daunting. I’m smart now, and of course I was dumb back then. <- previous me: “Yeah u wish, you burned-out oldster.”
    • Found my 2002 announcement posting (of the maximal entheogen theory of religion) at Egodeath.com, weird page title, “‘Outmoded’ Fallacy – Diminishment by Portraying only Ancients & Primitives as Using” – straight out of Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode on James Kent.
      The whole webpage = the 6-page 2002 announcement:
      http://www.egodeath.com/OutmodednessFallacy.htm
    • Fix my Egodeath.com “Home” link going to wrong site. todo
  • I comment on my 2003 posting.
    • It’s clear these postings will be good to read & read-aloud.
    • 1:34:00 A cpl tiny spot-comments about 2003 post.
    • Conflict of goals: Speak bassy. vs. Don’t be loud.
    • 1:50:00 – 2003 posting: really impressive FAILURE of an “article”, no one knows what’s in it, b/c lacks headings/TOC.
      • So it is indeed a really good idea / rewarding to now do a nice reading / recording/ commentary of this loose set of postings.
    • Reading a sentence 3 times is totally justifiable, to comprehend them.
    • 1:59:00 Hatsis totally conflates Amanita with the word ‘mushroom’, just like John King in 1970. He’s confused about what his position is. Just like Letcher. Hatsis and Letcher are feeling confused. They show signs of dizziness, they are hazy and confused about what exactly their positions are. What exactly are they asserting? They don’t know.
    • 2:03:00 too wild, I post 4 questions, permutations I characterize:
      • Did Jesus exist?
      • Did Jesus use msh?
      • Did primitive Christians use msh?
      • Did later Christians use msh?
    • 2:04:00 In rec’g, I discuss 4 degrees of Swoon Theory, which I’ve id’d. I dont think anyone else permuted these.
      https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/?s=swoon
    • Planning reading of the 14-page posting. Will have to go fast or will never complete the reading.
    • 2:13:00 ice cubes. after drink, higher pitch ice cubes.
Concerns:

A mix of TOXIC GARBAGE & Gold… Is there as much pitch practice as intended? The goal was “toxic”, not “gold”; the goal was purely voczn practice.

The entire & only goal of this rec’g I made, is to practice reading aloud (technique: 3 takes of each sentence), and to practice off-the-cuff commentary that repeats each phrase eachtime. I almost never literally do that, in this recording.

  • Expect mic popping.
    • Confirmed: Super close miking like 3″ eliminates room reverb, a remarkable achievement in untreated room. Almost too dry.
  • Nose wind — very high chance that nose wind completely ruins this whole recording. b/c I’m super close miking nearly on-axis with no pop filter.

Next Voice Recording: Reading-Aloud My 14-page 2003 Announcement of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion. Goal: Repeat Phrases During the Rare Moments of Commentary

Since it’s too late at night to read aloud, I’ll probably instead upload my scratch practice 2-hour recording I just finished, further below. To see how bad the close-miking attempt turned out. It has the *potential* to have some content worth hearing — in-between technical troubleshooting. But, I don’t plan to provide timestamps; YMMV.

  • Guiding questions to keep an eye out for:
    • How does this the maximal entheogen theory of religion relate to other component-theories of the egodeath theory?
      • Western Esotericism scholarship
      • mytheme decoding
      • Ahistoricity
      • the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence
    • Why is this Theory 3-level? (min/mod/max)
    • Are my complaints more elevated than “Ruck should multiply his qty of entheogens spotted by 2x”?
      • What are the qualitative rather than quantitative complaints causing me to formulate this Theory?
    • Is this Theory specified in terms of “min mod max”?
    • Could this Theory have been 2-level?
    • How to relate this model to the 2-level models in the 2002 or 2021 version of the Egodeath theory?
  • Recording plan:
    • Read-aloud almost straight-through, my 14-page posting of my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
    • Occasionally re-reading sentences.
    • With a little off-the-cuff commentary.
      • The top priority: Repeating sentences of my commentary, demonstrating re-pitching.
    • Definition/criteria of success: There is only 1 goal, constituting success vs failure of this recording: Did I repeat phrases during my commentary?
      • Yes: Success.
      • No: FAIL.

2002 6-page posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-23/#message1162
My posting is a reply inspired by ppan’s good posting above it.

2003 14-page posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-28/#message1391

Confirmed: The 2002 & 2003 announcement postings are both copied to Egodeath.com, b/c they are before Valentines 2004.

My voice is poor at this time of day, and I have to be quiet, so, this might just be practice for: too late, ain’t happening til tomorrow.

  • a great redo in the late morning (more background noise, better voice, louder speaking allowed).
  • right now: no background noise, poor voice, near-whisper soon.

This 14-page posting looks dauntingly well written and well-considered (and I probably slammed it out in a single burst within an email application), but otoh, no subheadings or TOC (terrible; fail).

  • Next, right now, I plan to read (almost) straight through recording reading-aloud my 14-page announcement posting of my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion, with a *little* occasional re-reading of phrases, and a *little* off-the-cuff commentary that I will *definitely* — the top priority — repeat vocalizing my off-the-cuff commentary. Only a *little*, or else I’ll never complete the task.

Quotes of Great Mystics – You Have to Fact Check Everything I Say

I created a pull quote of the following, at:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/quotes-from-the-great-mystics-of-egodeath/#You-have-to-fact-check-me

“The book “The Illusion of Will, Self, and Time” is claiming that William James made a death-bed retraction and that he approved the block universe on his death bed, something along those lines.

Like all of my bogus voice recordings, you’ll have to fact-check everything I say. The feeling I have is correct, even if my statements are completely false.” – Cybermonk 59:50, “Two Models of Control.mp3”

Podcast Ideas – Models of Time: Wm James & Iron Block Universe

I added the following search link to “Podcast Ideas” page, “models of time” section:

Looks like relevant results:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22william+james%22+%22iron+block+universe%22

16 Thinkers on 16 Models of Time, Causality, and Determinism

added the below section to https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/ideas-for-podcast-topics/#Philosophy-of-Time –

Research tasks for grad student slaves:
What did Hermann Minkowski, William James, Ramesh Balsekar, & Sam Harris say about:

  • block universe
  • iron block universe
  • eternalism
  • block-universe eternalism
  • block-universe determinism
  • possibilism
  • branching-universe possibilism
  • worldlines
  • worm theory
  • timelessness
  • no-free-will
  • pre-existence of future control-thoughts

  • parmenides
  • einstein
  • popper

Translation of the Move “The Egodeath theory isn’t about mystics”

It’s pretty clear that Max didn’t exactly mean it when he strategically claimed “the Egodeath theory isn’t for/about mystics👽.” It was not a good strategy; it was confusing – b/c it was not direct argumentation; it was indirect; a proxy. Seeming to argue about X, when you’re really arguing about Y instead.

That was a proxy (substitute) for saying “For the 20th time, shut up about quoting mystics, we don’t care, they’re ‘not relevant’ so to speak; you’re abusing quoting mystics, as a way of avoiding the subject – talk about core concepts of the Egodeath theory!”

Consistently Inconsistent

I suppose if I use 1 word to characterize Kafei, he comes across as INCONSISTENT. quantum inconsistency.

At this moment, the concept of timeless (or whatever) is the same thing as the particular label “the Absolute”. Then I re-probe his position 30 seconds later; now, his position is: the phrase “the ground of being” is synonymous w/ the phrase “the Abs”.

??? wtf, be consistent dude. Your position keeps shifting and changing and contradicting itself every 2 seconds.

Max in episode 26, says like “You keep changing your characterization of the Egodeath theory: flipping between …”: machine quote:

Max: “right so i think that the uh a point of confusion that happened in our last conversation is that when you were reflecting your understanding of the ego death theory sometimes you seemed to be um attributing causal chain determinism to michael hoffman’s view michael hoffman’s theory, but other times you seem to say that michael hoffman is expressing uh the other kind of determinism determinism block universe eternalist model of time” <- NOTICE MAX SAID “OF TIME” NOT “OF CAUSALITY”. HERE max is inconsistent – he didn’t say “block-universe determinism”, said “block-universe eternalism”.

STANF ARTI TITLE IS “METAPHYSICS OF TIME: POSSIBILISM VS. (BLOCK UNIV) ETERNALISM”

CONCLU: we need to differentiate / discuss block-universe determinism vs block-universe eternalism .

next thing that happens: Kafei directly contradicts himself (seems to) -AGAIN.

Max: “well i mean okay do you agree or

Kaf: “i i well there is something that you said you mentioned because you said that um you mentioned that ramesh and michael hoffman are are concluding the same exact* point so i kind of you know uh figured that maybe you know michael was referring to a [“uh uh”, not “a”] causal determinism in some way through the block universe that you know that we yes <- he says neither “block-universe determinism” nor “block-universe eternalism”!

[*probably not exact same – does Ramesh agree w/ the Egodeath theory’s pre-existing timeless block-universe eternalism, that the future exists? including future control-thoughts pre-exist. -cm]

everything’s uh determined we have you know um in the in the p experience itself you don’t uh you know the mystic no longer identifies with the material body [??? what u mean?? huh? what logical arg structure?? why bring in this point? what does material body ahve to do w/ detm??] because they see themselves as all events occurring uh you know all time past and future collapse into the moment and so you know they have no identity

Max: “so which which model of determinism would that be then that what you’ve just uh explained?”

he doesn’t answer

he doesn’t answer

start of pullquote source

Kafei: i i consider it like the way i was sort of thinking about it and is like a direct experience of the block universe or or the mind fuses with the block universe like it becomes all it becomes the block and you know so there is no time you know to unfold because you know everything is occurring at once simultaneously um

but that’s the vision inside the experience

but when you come and you return to the baseline of consciousness you return to space and time and egoic the egoic illusion you know uh but nevertheless you still have in your memory banks the vision of where your that ego death happened where you know there was no longer an ego but there is still awareness there uh and it’s and it’s that awareness that you know you could recall from your from your memory banks

Pull-quote of the above:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/quotes-from-the-great-mystics-of-egodeath/#Experiencing-the-Block-Universe

BEAUT. BUT – LITTLE MINOR DETAIL: YOU DIDN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION.

Max: “so which which model of determinism would that be then that what you’ve just uh explained”

💎🏆 I’m Golden – Just Remember the Idea “Repeat Phrase”, to Deliver “Professional Voiceover Artist”-Quality Voice Recordings

The key to professional vocalization is repeating phrases.

You don’t need to actually repeat phrases, so much as, remember the idea/mindset, of repeating phrases.

change of policy: if i cuss, or say “So, “, or use high pitch, don’t comment on that. Repeat phrase.

Takeaway, prize, treasure: 🔥🐉💎🏆

Repeat phrase.

Repeat phrase.

I’m So Close, to this Gold, Mining this Audio Gold, to Produce & Explore Wonderfully Musical Vocalizations

  • GOLD idea: Repeat phrases multiple times, exploring different pitch musicality variations. (The standard professional voiceover recording technique.)
    • GOLD idea: Repeat written phrases multiple times, exploring different, varied pitching, then repeat off-the-cuff commentary phrases multiple times, exploring varied pitching.

Big embarrasing announcmnet to light the fire under myself to push mysefl to get over the hump, to FINALLY bring the pieces togheter, to explore musically the full range of pitch. Upload next: idea-dev rec’g with range of pitch- ie REPEAT PHRASES MULTIPLE TIMES, pushing down, varying. Leverage success at reading script/text: read aloud ….

Musically (= pitch varying) read aloud a sentence 3 times (the std professional Voiceover Artist technique), from the maximal entheogen theory of religion posting, then freeform comment on it maybe re-saying the commentary 3 times WHILE EXPLORING THE VARYING OF PITCH, variations.

Fantastic idea-developmt ideas about recordings

There are TWO watchdog points/places:

  • Watch the source of thoughts (subtle: including proposed pitch’ing)
    • Watch and critique the “source of [PITCH-]thoughts“.
  • Listen to (critcailly) the words (& pitch/voczn) I just-now spoke.
    • Watch and critique the PITCH OF the newly spoken words.

rapidly alterenate betw reading aloud and speaking.

Start Every Voice Recording with a Structured Header

don’t explicitly TALK about the headder; just only say the key words of it.

every voice rec’g start w a HEADER:

2 POINTS ABOUT INTENDED POSSIBLE CONTENT THEMES

2 POINTS ABOUT INTENDED VOC’ZN PRACTICE EMPHASIS:

  • #1: REPEAT PHRASES. <– THATS THE KEY! ALl of my sucessfull techniques since 2007 are due to the key thing, which is: REPEATING (PHRASES).
  • PUSH PITCH DOWNWD
    • experiment: electronically pitch my voice lower it down, hear what that sounds like.
  • VARY PITCH MUSICALLY

2 POINTS ABOUT TECHNICAL:

  • DATE
  • MIC

Voice Recording 8 (2021-01-24) “What I Learned About Eleusis.mp3” 5:30

No header at start.

  • Filename: “What I Learned About Eleusis.mp3”
  • Length: 5:30
  • Download/preview: https://we.tl/t-TsmO3f9Pb0
    • Download link for 1 week only
  • Master tape: 210124_2165.wav – a copy is in:
    • Found “What I Learned About Eleusis from Muraresku.aup” at Kingston 64 GB SD card “TK Audio”: “/Volumes/TK Audio/Music/TK/Egodeath Mystery Show/What I Learned About Eleusis from Muraresku”

Context: Cyberdisciple is tired of the overemphasis on Eleusis, as if nowhere else had sacred meals.  Cyberdisciple says Ruck is correctly broad-focused in Road to Eleusis. I haven’t read Muraresku’s book (PR campaign) myself, so I don’t know just how badly he commits that fallacy.

Topics
  • Plan: ridiculing and hard rejecting the scholar-clowns’ B.S. coverup of mushrooms in Christian art.
  • Christianity + Greek religion considered together. I was just starting to say, entheogen scholarship should consider Christianity as a brand of Hellenistic Mystery Religion, and then cover mushrooms in Hellenistic Mystery Religion – not mushrooms (code-word exclusively meaning Amanita) in “Christianity”.
  • Sidetracked, magically switched to topic of:
    What I Learned About Eleusis from Muraresku
Points I Meant to Cover in this voice rec’g
  • We don’t care what your stupid f’ing official bedtime cover story is. Last time, it was “the mushrooms are all Italian pines”, now they’re all “Parasols of Victory”.
    • You proved one thing: that you are morons, fools, deceivers, and are insulting our intelligence & that of artists.
  • The authorities agree with each other – telling the latest cover-up story “with impressive celerity!” Wasson’s textbook case of argument from authority, by citing Panofsky’s 1952 letter — while censoring Panofsky’s citation of Brinckmann’s book, replacing that by ellipses. Repeatedly.
  • Per Pope Wasson, don’t look at this sole, “little” (Panofsky’s word) book on which we rest our entire case against any mushrooms in Christian art: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/
  • Yeah, the art historian scholars met to debate – to debate in what way they’d cover-up their Big Problem.
    • But, their big problem wasn’t mushrooms.
    • Their Big Problem was that Esoteric Christianity was evident, the competitor religion, evidenced by the too-many-mushrooms that were signalled by Esoteric Christianity. The mushrooms you see aren’t mushrooms, especially not the self-blading of branching psalter viewer leg hanging balancing in the mushroom tree. No, those are definitely NOT mushrooms. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/proof-canterbury-psalters-mushroom-trees-are-psilocybe/
    • The exoteric art authorities agree with each other – with impressive celerity! – they debated about and agree upon the latest cover-up story to hide esoteric religion. The newest cover-up story: they’re all Parasols of Victory. Apparently our previous cover-up story to explain away (as Hatsis brags) the signs of esoteric Christianity, has been revised.
  • We firmly reject the bedtime cover-story the scholars are trying to foist, we don’t care about your stupid position & arguments, we see right through the – not just mushroom – but the Esoteric vs. Exoteric tension … broader than just mushroom “Conspir@cy” per title of Hatsis’ 2022 book. If we’re going to use the C word, if we must frame situation as a C, who then would be the parties? The C is “Exotericism vs. Esotericism”. That’s closer to the accurate reading of the positions. 3-level model? There are 3, not 2, battling groups:
  • Lowest level: exoterics
  • Highest level: esoterics <- few make it this far in late modernity
  • Stuck-in-the-middle level: exoteric esotericists <- pile of rebels stuck just accumulating piling-up in middle bucket/level, they’ve hit a dragon-guarded gate fire wall 🔥🗡👼 {the shadow} 🔥🐉 💎🍄🐍🌳🍎🏆

    A top-10 common mytheme: {professor deny mushroom}

u complained 3 1/2 hours is 2 long?! forget u! here’s 5min

Email to M. Hoffman

Hi M. Hoffman,

I’m looping-in Cyberdisciple because he’s become a pretty heavyweight critical scholar, with a background in ancient literature and high esotericism phenomenology (a la Benny Shanon).  He has written a series of intensive analysis and critique weblog articles about Muraresku’s book and about Allegro’s impact.  (Allegro the magically charged proxy token, or Allegro the actual person & book??)
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/?s=muraresku
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/?s=allegro

I think Cyberdisciple has listened to my tendency-exaggeration piece “What I Learned About Eleusis.mp3”, so maybe Cyberdisciple can answer your question, on a more moderate scale:
“Who argues various points you mention?”
“You mention Samorini as one who argues that the likely Eleusinian ergot strain is ‘extinct’?”
“Who pushes the idea that entheogens were only used at Eleusis, among the Mysteries?” -mh

I recently saw some writing by Samorini that is pretty compelling in favor of the ergot hypothesis.  I don’t recall whether Samorini actually made claims that the Eleusis strain is extinct; he probably didn’t, but I can imagine certain parties wishing for such a story, to restrict-to-death and bury the whole matter of entheogens in “our own”, Western history.

I’m characterizing that as a tendency, a kind of wish, that I imagine, on the part of the “minimal entheogen theory of religion” Establishment. 

As Cyberdisciple has written, it seems as if there’s a project to corral all attention onto Eleusis in order to remove attention from entheogens everywhere else, in order to stay in denial of entheogens in Western history, on the whole.  

Cyberdisciple reports that tendency, in Muraresku’s book The Infinity Key – a book which seems more like a PR project than scholarship, trying to use Mystery Religions to achieve an end, rather than to learn about them.

“My experience is that this field is mostly ignored – and much less theorized about – than in the manner you seem to suggest. I do agree that Eleusis is romanticized in various ways that aren’t helpful. I think it’s focused upon because it provides the most evidence via the ancient sources.” – mh

Cyberdisciple read Road to Eleusis more recently than I did, and probably more closely.  

My mp3 voice recording was comedic exaggeration of the situation as Cyberdisciple has subjectively described the situation.  My recording was based on my own feelings as well, from reading Road to Eleusis maybe around 1999, of “What the heck relevance is this weird ergot hypothesis? Can’t we find anything of broader relevance in the whole of Mystery Religion?”

I hold the extreme position; the maximal entheogen theory of religion: 
mixed-wine = Psil. wine, all throughout Western history.  
That’s my single-plant fallacy (“doesn’t count – it’s multiple Psil species!”).  
If you’re gonna commit the single-plant fallacy, pick the best one, thankyou very much.

Entheogen Books from Ruck/Hoffman et al

Thanks for the book recommendations.
https://entheomedia.net/books.htm
Conceived in Drunkenness is on my wish list.
Great Gods of Samothrace
Dionysus in Thrace – largely about the Mysteries <- this looks of top interest to me, w/ my anti- (Amanita/ Allegro/ Christianity) push.

My anti-(Amanita/ Allegro/ Christianity) push is because those are a false center of emphasis of the field, as evidenced by Letcher (Shroom) and then Hatsis trailing along in the exact same vein, using the weakness of that false center, to try to dismantle the field of Christian mushroom scholarship, in the Popular view.

I see Hatsis’ book Psych. Mystery Traditions as using a “divide and conquer” approach by separating the Greek chapter from the Christian chapter, split far apart in separate sections of the book.  I’ve had success after success by cross-decoding Greek + Christian side-by-side at the same time.  

Hatsis’ view on Psil in Greek religious history is just a fog, a few “maybe’s” – indeterminate; he has no real position there, it seems.  And his caption for a snake-basket is so far off… just forget it; he’s not a serious, qualified writer on this subject. I’ve encouraged him to put his historian skills to constructive use – pls engage skilz.

I only have his darn e-book, not a real copy of his book, and my interest has become very narrow and specific, so I’ve only spot-read his book.  Cyberdisciple has Hatsis’ Witches Ointment book; I’ve not seen that.

I consider ebooks only good for Find, not for reading.  Whenever I get an ebook that I like, I just feel I want the print version, the real version, so I can actually read the book for real.

– M. Hoffman

Book:
Dionysus in Thrace
Carl Ruck, Editor
2017
https://entheomedia.net/books.htm
1587902834

“This book concerns the role of psychoactive mushrooms [Psilocybe? or the red & white kiddie mushrooms? 🍄] in ancient Greek religion.

It brings together an extraordinary team of experts to present key archaeological discoveries and to attempt to place them in their historical, religious, and mythological context.

Yes, there were mushroom cults in antiquity, and they were involved with some of the most memorable achievements of the Classical tradition, not only in works for the Theater of Dionysus, but also in the visionary experiences of some of the greatest philosophers and mathematical theorists. In the form of Orphism, a warrior initiation of the ancient Thracians was strengthened in the seventh century by contact with similar rites of the Persians and reinterpreted and given a mystical dimension that assimilated even Judaism and Christianity.”

Voice Recording 7 with Header (2021-01-24):
“Two Models of Control.mp3” 3:11:46

Filename: “Two Models of Control.mp3”
Length: 3:11:46
Download link for 1 week only: https://we.tl/t-0IFsT13fI1

At the start:
Content: “I’m reading, mostly as practice, vocalization and recording technique, especially vocalization practice, reading the maximal entheogen theory of religion announcement of October 16, 2002.”
ID/Date: “Cybermonk. Today’s date is January 24, 2021.”
Miking: “Notes for myself: this DR-05 TASCAM field recorder right mic, 4.5″ away, mic stand mount desk mount. No provision for popping; expect heavy popping, I’m not monitoring in headphones.”
Vocalization: “Mental notes for myself: the theme of this vocalization practice is to push the pitch downward, including when emphasizing. This is reading aloud, which is much easier to do a good job vocalizing.”

Created January 24, 2021.

  • Predicted content rating: 10/10 – confirmed.
  • Predicted voc’zn rating: 8/10 – confirmed.
  • Predicted technical rating: 8/10 (expect plosives, a little drifting off-axis)
    • Actual technical rating: 9/10. Plosives, surprisingly, are barely audible.
    • Gold takeaway: angling mouth slightly past the mic reduces plosives below the threshold.

Mic: TASCAM DR-05 stereo mode, discarded left channel. on axis, no popfilter, 4-5″. No fan; quiet background.

Topics in this good, 3-hour Voice Recording
  • Commentary on book The Illusion of Will, Self, and Time: William James’ Reluctant Guide to Enlightenment, about William James against the iron block universe. Portions were published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies, & Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. Book & chapter drafts were reviewed by Ramesh Balsekar & Benny Shanon.
  • 3-LEVEL VS. 2-LEVEL models. IN FIELD OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP VS. (LEVELS OF) RELIGION. LEVEL 2 IN ANY 3-LEVEL SYSTEM ALWAYS = PEAK SELF-CONTRADICTION MISHMASH. HALF-BAKED PSEDUO-ESOTERICISM.
    • But, the world is very much structured this way w/ the masses stuck in the middle bucket, so any model of Transcendent Knowledge *must* account for the “failure to pass through the gated wall” to reach the “higher of the (alleged) ‘two’ positions.”
    • Ken Wilber kind of wins: fact is, ppl have ended up stuck at an evident undeniable level 2 out of 3 – in multiple topics that are related to Transcendent Knowledge/ the Egodeath theory.
  • ~1:27:00 – put away Wm James book, start: Concisely Naming the Two Opposed Models of Control; Explicitly Breaking out Control from “Possibilism vs. Eternalism”. See resulting phrases below.
  • 1:38:00 ice cubes in glass.
  • ~1:46:00 i spend 10 minutes repeating in 15 ways, “i don’t know when i first coined the term “esoteric exotericism“. 60 seconds search answered it. https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-45/#message2254 – yikes, looks real good, as if i had time to read. if i need some junk to practice reading aloud.
    Sep. 8, 2003. soon after 14-page announce the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
  • 2:00:00 interesting discussion of why everyone piles up in front of the gated wall, far on right side of the Eternalism zone (moving left to right) just short of dragon gate wall, and why so few … it’s like a rain shadow, rain accum on one side of moutntain range, dry desert on other side – the Control Transformation gate, to the right is Esoterictericism, the Dependent Control zone, few make it into this garden. Many make it to myth & loosecog. Fewer make it into beginners spacetime nonduality (spatial & temporal nonduality). even fewer
  • ~2:28:00 Hatsis separates Greek vs Christian chapters. No thought at all, on treating them together.
  • THINK OF Christianity AS JUST ANOTHER BRAND of Hellenistic Mystery Religion, then treat the entire range of Hellenistic Mystery Religions including Christianity (the Hellenistic Jewish styled brand of Mystery Religion).
    • Isis, Osiris – The Egypt-themed brand of Hellenistic Mystery Religion.
    • Demeter, Dionysus – The Greek-themed brand of Hellenistic Mystery Religion.
    • Christianity, Jesus – The Jewish-themed brand of Hellenistic Mystery Religion.
    • Mithraism, Mithras – The Persian-themed brand of Hellenistic Mystery Religion.
  • I think i was on the verge of making the above point in my next, Comedy recording, but took a turn to Eleusis.
  • 2:33 Exoteric Esotericism (see earlier too) https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-45/#message2254 – 2003, posted that phrase.
    ETERNALISM-nonduality IS FOR BEGINNERS, CYBERtransformation nonduality IS FOR ADVANCED.
    3 levels: [duality; spacetime block universe eternalism nonduality (pop) HIT THE BRAKES HERE!😱🔥🐉🗡️👼🧱💎🏆; Cyber transformation nonduality (unpop)]
Errata/Critiques
  • Tone – My criticism Jan 28 after doing great voice work: 0:00-30:00 or so, or 45:00 – Very poor tone & pacing! hyper, angry, shouting tone. Fast, hyper – MELLOW OUT!! 😫 TONE DUDE TONE. too fast, abrasive, criticizing, yelling tone. Sounds angry. jeez hope it gets better later. By 45:00 I think it mellows out to normal.
    • Don’t sound as if overstimulated, scary, shouting, & angry. tone/mood! 😡
  • At the start, I claim:
    I’m going to read announcement postings of the maximal entheogen theory of religion. <– FALSE (as always)
  • PLOSIVEnventory 💨🎙💥
    • ~47:17 – I say “pop the mic” and good example here.
    • ~1:30:30
    • ~1:33:45 at H of “Hermes”
    • 2 33 43 whateVer
    • 2:33:51 no *f*ree will
      • there, mannly hall book The Secret Teachigns of All
  • Note for lecturing professors:
    near 1:35:00
    where I say “… horn of mixed-wine mushroom wine“,
    be sure to say: “… horn of mixed-wine. It is NOT mushroom wine.“
  • As I formally state in the rec’g: MY VOICE RECORDINGS HAVE ERRORS OF FACT, it’s not viable to correct the recordings. EVERYTHING I SAY IS FALSE.
  • By design, I expect [<– you were WRONG yet again] popping the mic with plosives: I did on-axis, no pop filter, for maximum brightness. I want to see how bad the plosives are.
    • Finding/result: like…. NONE (almost) 🤯 🎉 💨🎙💥
      There’s enough of them to list them 🤨 (must be amateur newbie, ignorant beginners mistake) bleh i want a better mic filter, the sight of that one i have is unpleasant plastic blocks my whole dam field of view, bad industry conventions, their product design ideas are cr@p. frakly:
      • I’d rather pop the mic than
        the torment of using today’s awful horrible pop filter design – hard reject,
        brought to u bubbled up the Fountain of Dumb Thoughts,
        the next thing bubbling out is a
        {dragon that roasts itself with its own flame and is cancelled out}
    • OMG SO MUCH BRIGHTER (CLEARER) NOT MUDDY LIKE THE FAIL LAST TIME. 🎉
  • “Journal of Consciousness Studies is a euphemism for visionary plants” – that’s an oversimplifying statement.
  • Typing: good. Paused during the major typing. Brief spot-fixes only, in rec’g.
  • Cuss count: low.
    • doesn’t count: “Hanegraaff’s evil idea from hell, 👹 of ‘non-drg entheogens’ 😈 ” 1:52:30
    • 1:49:45 “damn”, angry tone of voice noted/caught (previous time had trouble nav’ing to Hanegraafff’s acad pg.
    • ~1:51:30 – junk transition word / fountain-fishing word “Now, ” – “strike that/ retract that “Now, “.”
  • Pitch climbing? No. Watchdog caught.
  • Not *great* voc’zn, but, did keep high mindfulness; didn’t fall into “good idea dev, totally lost control of voc’zn”.
  • There’s a bit more room reverb than I like. If I move mic closer, to get rid of room reverb, plosives will become a problem, and high variation of treble will occur (hypersensitivity to moving my head slightly). Solution: would be, absorp material aka “room treatment” — it’s a miracle there’s not more room reverb’n — lots of hard surfaces. At 1:18:15 I mention I’m bringing the mic closer. The mic got pushed away when I was reading book. It sounded good again (dry) when returned mic to the close position.
  • Can do a lot better – I’m seeing quite a bit higher potential; there’s high success further ahead in this direction… I would love to listen to “best of 3 takes”, per-sentence re-reading of this material. bottom line: give me any sentence here, I could vocalize a much better take of any sentence — it’s exploration of each senetnce, what are the possible elocutions , voiceover takes. GIVE ME 10 DIFFERENT ASSORTED VOICEOVER TAKES TO PICK FROM, I COULD PICK AN interesting set to listen to. idea: I WANT TO
  • Todo: Read the theory-announcement articles aloud, THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION, NOW THAT I’VE RAISED QUESTIONS about those announcements: why couldn’t I have modeled entheogen scholarship as 2-level, why was i forced to divide the field of entheogen scholarship into 2 levels, in order to demote today’s half-baked entheogen scholarship into a new, lower level of esoteric truth.
    “ESOTERIC WISDOM”, KIDDIE-MUSHR🍄🍄MS STYLE.
    GET THE 💎
    don’t look at that 🔥🐉 DRAGON
Notes that I used to Guide the 2nd Half of the Recording

Discuss: make 4th contrasting terms:

  • literalist ordinary-state possibilism controlfooism [autonomy]-mous ctrl
  • analogical psychedelic eternalism controlfooism [dependence]-ent ctrl
The Fruit of the 2nd Part of the Recording (Naming the Two Opposed Models of Control; Explicitly Breaking out Control from “Possibilism vs. Eternalism”)

Solution: Breaking Out Control on the Advanced, Right Side of the Control Vortex Dragon Wall Separated from the Unwashed Pop Sike Masses Who Form and Force a 3-level model w/ control-transformation on the advanced, right side of the wall, leaving half baked “transformed from Possibilism to Eternalism BUT w/o being transformed from Autonomy to the Dependence model of control”

3-level model of the egodeath theory Core Theory (the cybernetic theory ):

3. Cybernetics – the egodeath theory resides at this advnaced level on the right, far side of the dragon gate fire wall
2. Eternalism/Determinism/No-free-will/ Block Univ < Pop Sike masses & uninspired Esotericism scholars; Ruck; Hanegraff b4 his Entheogens articles
1. Loosecog <- super beginners

that’s truly, objectively a 3-level system.

Solution: 🎉 The two contrasting models of control are: “Autonomous Control vs. Dependent Control”, aka for short, “Autonomy vs. Dependence”

Subject to change but this is the idea good enough implementation suitable.

Solution: 🎉 The two contrasting models of control are: “Autonomous Control vs. Dependent Control”, aka for short, “Autonomy vs. Dependence” – forming these 4-term equivalents of “analogical psychedelic eternalism”, breaking out Cybernetics from Eternalism, as a Separate, later, higher stage after passing through the dragon fire sword gate wall

Short Form
  • literalist ordinary-state possibilism autonomy
  • analogical psychedelic eternalism dependence
Long Form
  • literalist ordinary-state possibilism autonomous control
  • analogical psychedelic eternalism dependent control
The Gated Wall Separating the Space-time Nonduality Eternalism Masses from the Control-Nonduality, Control-Transformed Elect
  • literalist ordinary-state possibilism autonomous control
  • analogical psychedelic eternalism 🗡🔥🐉 dependent control

Side note: “control transformation” remains a useful idea/phrase.

Postings Announcing the maximal entheogen theory of religion

6-page precursor posting:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-23/#message1162

“Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” = LEVEL 2 OF 3.
“Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”

14-page main posting: https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-28/#message1391

Cleaning Up Podcast Pages

I’ve started cleaning up podcast pages.

  • Delete or move to Drafts hidden area, most of the critiques verbiage.

Testing Page to Test Your Knowledge of the Egodeath Theory

The Exam page is a huge success, build-out that approach more. Tutorial modules w/ integrated testing.

Page title:
Remedial Pre-School Prep Version of the Egodeath Theory
Subsection: Screening Exam
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/20/remedial-pre-school-prep-version-of-the-egodeath-theory/#Screening-Exam

Needs more a mix of 3-level models & 2-level models. eg

  • the maximal entheogen theory of religion was defined as 3-level, since its start in 2002.
    • I had to adjust the 2-level model of religion per Pagels/F&G “exoteric vs esoteric”, b/c of the 3-level entheogen scholarship model, especially b/c of: “move from “Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” to “Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”
      • esotericism is not in the field of entheogens, but religion – but, I had to change the model of religion from 2- to 3-level, to repair the field of entheogen scholarship.
      • Middle level = mixed mismash peak self-contradiction
        • causal-chain determinism ; domino-chain determinism ; unfolding-in-time determinism. Neither fits w/ possibilism nor eternalism, as 2 opposed models of time.

Solution Outline for Vocal Technique

  • Content (#3 problem area)
    • Topics
      • Prepare two written lists of topics to talk about (eg).
      • Maybe analyze & improve this area later.
      • Read a myth aloud from a webpage straight through, then go back and comment on it.
    • Words/utterances
      • Watchdog the root cause of saying fake connector words (“So, “)
        • watchdog = mindfulness watching of thoughts bubbling up from the Fountain of Dumb Thoughts.
      • Watchdog cussing.
        • upstream: watchdog the mindset behind cussing.
    • Typing: Pause
      • For now, no typing while recording; Pause. b/c talking then is too slow.
      • Maybe later, try to work on talking fast & smooth while typing.
        • Part of problem is that typing includes a ton of revising-while-writing – which is choppy.
  • Vocalization (#1 problem area)
    • Pitch (#1 pri)
      • easy exercise: read written text aloud, focusing on pushing pitch down.
      • hard exercise: idea development, focusing on pushing pitch down.
    • Speed (#2 pri)
      • watchdog dropped syllables and too-fast talking.
    • Volume (#3 pri)
      • don’t sound as if overstimulated, scary, shouting & angry. tone/mood! 😡
      • don’t sound as if mumbling & tired.
    • emotional tone: neutral to happy; not angry.
    • prepare icewater, when Chris Bennett school of meditation.
  • Technical [= usage of recording technology] (#2 problem area)
    • Aim for “on-axis” (loosely).
      • Not “aim for corner of mouth” (that idea extremely failed).
      • Later, fix the resultant popping (easy to reduce).
    • Watch the recording light & screen (by slightly off-axis).
    • Pause (or mute) every few minutes to dry nose.

Vocal Technique – Rapid Progress to Fixes & Excellence

Huge Improvement in Brightness / Major Correction in Mic Position

Huge improvement in mic position for much brighter sound. I was delusional about correct mic position with this difficult-to-hold recorder.

How I figured out the problem: look in mirror, see where I had been trying to aim mic:

I was holding the (active) mic of this awkward (stereo) recorder UNDER MY CHIN pointed at adams apple – “gee why does it sound muddy?”

Coming Up Next: Pop Fest

I’m going to do POP FEST — hold mic literally on-axis , I’ll be popping the hell out of it – which is extremely easy to fix.

The 3 Attributes of a Voice Recording

Iimprovements of recordings by leaps and bounds — by outlining the attributes of a voice recording, and the do’s and don’ts of each attribute:

  1. content
  2. vocalization
  3. rec’g technology
My Worst Problem Areas of the 3 Attributes of Voice Recording

my flaws (re: major attributes of a rec’g), in order:

  1. bad voc’zn < worst of my probs
  2. bad technical [tech’y] < mud-fest
  3. bad content <- least of my probs
The 3 Attributes of Vocalization

The attributes of vocationization, in pri order:

  1. pitch
  2. speed
  3. volume

Voice Recording 6 (2021-01-23):
“Books Voice Practice.mp3” 2:08:29

Content
  • What Is the Promised State that’s Reached by Passing Through the Gateway of Control Cancellation?
    • What are the benefits of Transcendent Knowledge for daily life?
    • What are the benefits of Transcendent Knowledge for higher life? EG FOR GOD, FOR CHRIST, FOR THE TRANSPERSONAL LEVEL OF ONESELF?
    • What were the benefits of Transcendent Knowledge for Mystery-Religion Initiates? & THEIR GODS
      • Gave higher meaning? NOTE that’s the lower, personal (not transpersonal) POV.
    • benefits of knowing about the gateway of control cancellation
    • benefits of passing through the gateway of control cancellation
    • How does the god (or transpers lvl of oneself) benefit by bringing the initiate through the control transformation gateway?
    • What are the benefits of Esoteric religion?
      • to god? to one’s higher self? to the gods?
      • Compared to the benefits of Exoteric religion?
      • Compared to having no religion?
  • 0:00 – Why is Transcendent Knowledge valuable -> why is anything valuable?
  • Why does God value bringing you to Transcendent Knowledge?
  • What benefits does God get by giving you Transcendent Knowledge?

I didn’t nuke the typing (of the below text) at the end of this 2-hour voice recording. I have to make my decision on whether typing is forbidden or can work, while recording.

[8:04 p.m. January 23, 2021] I just finished a 2-hour recording that’s 90% content, 10% practice. producing… 2:08:29. 7 minutes just to export to mp3? ANY DAY NOW

🕰

Content con’t

Which areas in the egodeath theory are 3-level?
eg entheogen scholarship min/mod/max — or, say Ruck is a poor version of Esoteric religion. or of Maximal, vs Minimal theories. (that’s looking at entheogen scholarship from 2 -level pov.)

Because of Ruck, I had to mess up the 2-level “exoteric/esoteric”model: exoteric, low esoteric, high esoteric . THX ALOT RUCK

SIMILARLY, APRIL DECONICK (The Gnostic New Age) IS EITHER CATEGORIZABLE AS
“SUCCESSFULLY, FIRMLY LOW ESOTERICISM” (PER A 3-level model) OR
“A LOUSY, DISAPPOINTING INSTANCE OF ESOTERICISM” (per a 2-level model). = “exoteric esotericism” <– a way to turn a 2-level model into a 3-level model.

The new, “2-level + 3-level” model of the Egodeath theory:

  • HIGH: ESOTERIC IE. “esotericism in theory” aka FANTASY <- how ppl are supposed to be
  • mid: DISAPPOINTMENT W/ REALITY FAILING TO LIVE UP TO THE 2-LEVEL MODEL. aka “esotericism in reality” the poor crop of the best of the failures
  • LOW: REALITY OF where ppl are at

Conclusion: REALITY COULDN’T LIVE UP TO MY IDEALISTIC 2-LEVEL MODEL, SO I HAD TO INVENT A 3-LEVEL MODEL & DEMOTE THE WOULD-BE, HALF-BAKED ESOTERICISTS DOWN INTO THE MIDDLE LEVEL.

🤷‍♂️

CAUSAL-CHAIN DETERMINISM implies a kind of 3-level model. compare “moderate entheogen theory”, or “exoteric esotericism”

Level 2 of 3 is for the half-completed initiate; the pregnant woman harassed by serpent. PURGATORY. PURIFICATION PENDING… 🔥 🕰

“half baked mishmash”; “referring to domino-chain determinism, in some way, through the block-universe”

Errata/Critiques
  • Failed to do pitch-varying practice. Work harder on make actually do pitch-varying exercises.
  • Conclusion: Pause recording while typing. Unpleasant, not the desired audio content, pacing, etc. This passage is interesting tho, u hear me typing the below – commentary while typing; commentary on the text that I type below.
  • Technology: the mic sounds off-axis, muddy.
    • [finding: mic was under the chin, aimed at adams apple; the fix is easy: aim for roughly “on axis” and damn the popping, then reduce the popping later (easy)]
    • Sounds like proximity effect, regardless of whether it’s omni polar pattern or cardioid. Especially when going through books. Try more on-axis. <- THATS IT! Production: Make sure throw away left, center the right mic. When reading books, make extra sure to keep mic in position – close to on-axis. Also rig a mic stand for field rec’r.
  • Fail: battery died and I didn’t catch when it happened. Check recorder screen more often. <- on-axis will fix that.
Successes
  • Surprised how good I gotten at catching almost all my junk vocalizations.

Battery ran out so not quite sure what got dropped, but I re-said some good points, made progress.

2nd Practice Recording of the Day: Idea Development Vocalization (Content: Minkowski’s Theory Branding)

Not available for download.

I just finished the 2nd voice recording practice of the day, 1:54:02, long segment on Minkowski’s poor PR branding of his “Minkowski’s Theory of Eternalism” or block universe or block time, such that Minkowski ended up reduced to a mere explanatory element within household famous hot new theory name “Einstein’s theory of relativity*”.
*incorp’g Minkowskian block time

Does Minkowski use this lexicon? –

  • block universe
  • eternalism
  • pre-existence of future control thoughts
  • iron block universe (wm james)
  • possibilism
  • rock, snake
  • worldlines
  • todo: Review Minkowski’s lexicon, just like yesterday doing word hit-count on Stanford article “The Metaphysics of Time”
  • my driving question: is the name of Min’s theory “Minkowski’s theory of block time”? WHAT IS THE NAME OF MINKOWSKI’S THEORY?! like “Einstein’s theory of relativity”.

*the* challenge for me for decades is, to reliably do vocal recorded idea development, (hard in itself), while also, controlled vocalization (hard in itself).

The ultimate challenge:

  • consistently combine:
  • vocal recorded idea development
  • controlled good vocalization

in short: idea development vocalization; <– very hard, an aspiration for decades, to do that consistently.

My next recording, after produced, could be filename:
“Idea Development Vocalization.mp3”
commenting on myths.

What Is the Promised State that’s Reached by Passing Through the Gateway of Control Cancellation?

todo: voice recording about this set of topics.

also connects w/ “Does ALTERED STATE give benefits when return to THE ORDINARY STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS?

what happens AFTER control failure? connect that to: WHAT ARE BENEFITS OF Transcendent Knowledge? WHAT IS THE GOAL AND BENEFIT OF CONTROL CONTROL AGENCY CONTROL CANCELLATION ? WHAT IS THE DESTINATION? THE PROMISED LAND THROUGH GATEWAY OF CONTROL CANCELLATION ?

1st Practice Voice Recording of the Day

Not available for download.

I just finished my first vocalization practice recording of the day, [January 23, 2021] , 55:20, rec’g #6 – more of “specifying exactly what to practice”, than actually practicing. travelling upstream to police not only… 4 levels:

  1. police the saying of a particular junk conjoiner word (so)
  2. police the saying of any junk conjoiner word (so, like, now, well, )
  3. police the thinking of a particular junk conjoiner word (so)
  4. police the thinking of any junk conjoiner word (so, like, now, well, ) – advanced level, furthest upstream toward the Fountain of Dumb Thoughts (‘dumb’ connoting words or utterances that are not-yet-spoken, but are being recommended by the mind to be spoken)

Updated Pages and Voice Recordings, About Mystics, Determinism, 2- and 3-Level Models of Mystic Transcendent Knowledge

  1. “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” 53:00
  2. “3-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” 41:00
  3. “The Great Mystics of Egodeath.mp3” 51:00
  4. “Books on Mystics in Main Article.mp3” 2:00:00
    ~ 5 hours of audio content

No News Is Bad News

I’ve read that women can’t deal w/ being challenged and dispute; guys know how to work things about, dispute, testing, challenging… yes I remember it was re: PhD thesis challenge.

Guys claimed that women were wrecking the process of challenging the candidate. “How could you so put that poor woman PdD candidate under such forceful scrutiny? Why can’t we all just give everyone the benefit of the doubt?” So, quality standards plummetted (the claim was).

When things went smoothly, Max Freakout produced excellent, ideal podcasts with Cyberdisciple and then stopped. There were 2 years (1 year, 10 months) of no podcasts due to too much concurrence, because there was too much agreement between Max & Cyberdisciple.  

2019 05 12
– 2017 07 19
=
2018 17 12
– 2017 07 19
=
2018 16 42
– 2017 07 19
=
1 yr, 9 mo, JESUS XHRIST THE WORLDS MOST FKKING RECALCITRANT CALCULATION WTFF
23 days
1 year, 9 months, 23 days ~= 1 year 10 months. Check:

2017 07 19
+ 1 9 23
= f it, just do a rough check:
2017 07
+ 1 10
= 2018 17
= 2019 5 CORRECT.

The excessive agreement between Max & Cyb was a case of “No news, is bad news”.  

Then Max tried doing episodes that had more of a contrast between him & guest (Kafei).  

Max has judgment as a broadcaster, audio content producer, podcaster.  

Max is wondering if he should have first educated Kafei on the basics, Core Concepts of the Egodeath theory, (in episode 12 & 13) rather than focusing those entire first two episodes w/ Kafei on Ahistoricity, leaving Kafei ignorant of some of the most-basic concepts, putting newbie Kafei in a situation of… “having to” guess based on:

“Max said that Ramesh & the Egodeath theory reached the exact same view on no-free-will” – probably a half-truth – “so I guess maybe the Egodeath theory is therefore referring to Ramesh’s temporal causal-chain determinism in some way, through concepts of the block universe.” (paraphrase)

Updated page:
Remedial Pre-School Prep Version of the Egodeath Theory
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/20/remedial-pre-school-prep-version-of-the-egodeath-theory/#bud-vs-bue
Simplified 1st-Grade Reading Level

  • Question 8 (essay question): What’s the difference between block-universe determinism vs. block-universe eternalism?
  • Question 9: Which model of time does David Bohm’s “non-local hidden variables” interpretation of Quantum Mechanics fit?
  • Question 10: How many levels or positions are typically contrasted in the Egodeath theory? (Such as models of Myth; State of consciousness; Time; & Control)
  • Question 11: Which level of religion are most books about entheogen scholarship focused on?

Heading

Kafei said he wants more coverage of mystics. I provided more coverage of the topic of mystics.

My latest adjustments to WordPress pages, and my latest voice recordings, have a successful Resolution / resolving trajectory.

productive tension

Clearly the productive output of developments is a jump forward, looking at how incoming, alien 3-level models interact w/ the Egodeath theory’s simpler, 2-level model(s).

Max a couple days ago provided the text transcription of episode 26, so we are able to get a good accurate look at the huge quantity of content in that episode.  There’s more quantity of substantive content there, than I can process.  

There are some additional sweet passages in there that I want to extract – we only just the other day got ahold of the machine transcription — my HANDS are at risk of overuse, typing too much.

Such as now our new ability to do a Find of “not mystic” revealing that Max 5 times declared “we are not mystics” (or close variants) — and then said (in effect) “I’m not going to comment on whether (we) are mystics.”  😄 😄   
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/22/quotes-from-the-great-mystics-of-egodeath/#Totally-Not-Mystics

You Are Not a Mystic

Max said about Kafei, “we three are not mystics” and Kafei replied “I consider myself an (aspiring) mystic.”  

Which raises interesting questions about Max’s framing of the whole subject of ‘mystics’.  

Max went to a mystic – Kafei – and told that mystic, “You are not a mystic.”  The mystic replied “Yes I am.”  

💥 😱 😳 🤨 🤔

Clearly something went off-track, TO BE CONTINUED…

🚫 😴

Kafei said he wants more coverage of mystics. I provided more coverage of the topic of mystics.

You’re Still Stuck at the Beginner Level of Decoding the Analogies in those Basic Mythemes? What’s Wrong w u, Slow?

My Model of the Process of Decoding Needs Correction to Match the Data Observation of How the Decoding/ Connection Process Actually Works… Punctuated Equilibrium over *years*, while *also* “overnight breakthrough(s)”

interweaving mythemes & direct tech theory is good, effective, really can describe things that are observed and experienced in the altered state well by freely combining fluent analogy expression + direct scientific modern clear explanatory model.

todo : voice rec for practice vocalization: comment realtime on myth online pages. (the priority beeing vocalization, not myth decoding contnet)

several mythes i want to memorize and comment on. every time i look at a myth desc, it explodes in payout, falling over a log easy to make connections. it’s really more about increating … SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG IN MY MENTAL MODEL OF PROGRESS & BREAKTHOUGH AND DEVMT OF A NEW THEROY …. DECODING MYTH IS MORE A MATTER OF DEGREE OF % OF IMPORTANT MAJOR ANLAOGIES. OR ACTS LIKE IT IS. HAVE TO REFRESH, STRENGTHEN, MODIFIY MYTHEME CONNATION CONNECTION MAPPINGS, ITS MORE COMPLEX , NEURAL NETS , NOT USUALLY 1-TO-1 SIMPLE AS IF YOU CAN SAY “SNAKE = WORLDLINE” AND SAY “DONE! SNAKE IS DECODED!”, ADDITIONAL CONNECTIONS ARE INVIOLVED, PERSPECTIVES, SHINE THE TORCH LIGHT THROUGH THE THE DIAMOND HAMMER OF INTERPRETATION AS YOU TURN THE GEM, CATCHING NEW MAJOR ANALOGIES THAT YOU “HAVE” TO KNOW ABOUT OR U POSER

CADUCESU 2 SNAKES, WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ANALOGY? 2ND MOST? 3RD MOST IMPORTANT ANALOGI OF ‘Y’ SNAKE PAIR. WHAT 5 MYTHEMES DOES THIS SNAKE MAP TO? THAT WORK WAS UNACCOUNTED FOR IN MY 2011, 2012 ….

I BELIEVE:

I MADE HUGE PROGRESS OF DEGREE OF MAPPINGS / CONNECTIONS / DECODING TREE VS SNAKE ETC IN NOV 2011, & IN NOV 2012, & IN NOV 2013…

I CANNOT SAY THAT DECODING A MYTHEMES OR A SET OF MYTHEMES HAPPENS AT A SINGLE POINT IN TIME. HAVE NEW grad student slave report what connections I developed nov 2011 vs nov 2012 vs nov 2013. what’s the diff?

feel like I’m trying to graduate, i’m still re-figuring out elementary analogies I should have realized in 2006. MAYBE THERE’S MORE TO THIS MYTHEME DECODING BUSINNESS…

AIN’T SO EASY TO BE FLUENT IN MYTHEMESE OVERNIGHT

I’M CONSTANTLY EMBARRASSED BY NOT SEEING MAJOR ANALOGIES IMMEDIATELY, maybe i just don’t have aptititude in Mythemese. I’m slow. In the myths, ppl get instant enligthenment about all things mystic. <- i think i meant to type mythic.

They all know all the major analogies between all their myths and things that are observed and experienced in the altered state.

What I have accomplished is

  • proving 70 mushroom trees in Cant Psal. proving that Esotericism has always Rocked the church. proving 70x Esoteric Christianity, mixed-wine banqueting ,
  • fully explaining the Mystery Religions
  • fully explaining mystical enlightenment,
  • fully explaining how myth works, what deocdoing a mythem entails (more complex a language than you thought, takes time to absorb). Wrote dictionary of decoding all major mythemes. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/15/mytheme-list/

Maybe I am … I AM SLOWER THAN THEY WERE BC I HAD TO CRACK THE *WHOLE THING* IN clueless late modern. and fit in my fluency w/ Mythemes into a modern explanatory framework – anncients didn’t . you cannot compare how long its taking me to decode basic analogies (decades, in some cases) , to how long it took mystics in antiquity.

The evidence indicates i’m not advanced, i feel insulted. The fact that I only figured out some connections recncetly, some basic connections, calls into quietion my exper… advanced level fluency at Mythemese.

it’s frustrating: dammit what’s wrong w me that i didn’t see that major analogy until now. but i been raking busy in the jackpots everywhere.

Where every direction I turn, to see another myth, it taunts me by showing me super obvious things that I should have already finished connections mapping. these successes have a tone of less than, what didn’t why didn’t u see that b4 whats wrong r u slow

Greek Myths Book by Robert Graves

maybe buy a good looking copy of Robt Graves Greek Myths book, it is standard.

http://amzn.com/B00E86921K

But I have unread myth books. Like right hear, Brick Greek Myths paid off so far, 1 reading session gave 2 decodigns.

Voice Recording 5 (2021-01-23):
“Vocalization Troubleshooting.mp3” 2:31:51

Content

quite a bit of solid content toward the end. if you want some addl on-topic Egodeath theory audio content, you could listen to this, skipping by using the timestamps below. the voice-technique content is pretty separated from the the egodeath theory content. eg the burp terminates the high content toward the end.

  • 5% ego death, 95% developing corrective techniques/exercises for vocal recordings of idea development.

The kind of voice recordings that I’m talking about creating, are not instructive modules lectures, but live idea devmt, eg commentary on my website pages,

1:45:00 how to beat on the Fountain of Dumb Thoughts to force it to knock it off with spitting-out “So, ” at every possible opportunity.

There’s no problem in the world that the “So, ” isn’t the perfect fix for. Every time any thought comes forth, the “So, ” virus is patched on the start, before the thought comes forth to be spoken. The thought is packaged within a “So, ” framework, every time.

like the perma url suggestion autocomplete on the dragon emojipedia website page. “Welcome back, we know you want dragon, bc ew we forced it upon you 83 times now, so we know u really really love that one — we’ll be sure to recommended it as hard as we can all the time, ur welcome”

1:50:00 Hatsis, amanita false center of field.

I’m based in [Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism]; I am not based in [Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism].

I’m only visiting in Amanita land, to bring people back to better Psiloland. I need [acro]/keyboard shortcuts for those two phrases…. ie i need to practice the [acro]/keyboard shortcuts that i defined. simple: it is: [ap] –

Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism
Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism

1:58:00 egodeath content: control cancellation, ctrl transcendence , transcendent control. pros / cons

transcendent control –

2:02:00 folk psycholgoy : nerves, you need rebalancing of your humours. (today: energy vibrations). my nerves are shot.

YOUR ENERGY VIBRATIONS ARE OUT OF TUNE AND NEED RE-TUNING.
the control-cancellation threat = dis-harmonious energy vibrations producing dissonant noise.

2:05:00 Hatsis’ 2022 book titled “Conspiracy”. Re-centering the field from Amanita. Not just “Amanita cult” suppression — the suppression he should treat is the supporession of analogical psychedelic eternalism – ie
the conspiracy to suppress Esoteric Christianity
– not just to suppress “the mushr🍄🍄m”.

2:09:00 the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image control transcendence , not loss of ctrl a half a story. half truth.

control transformation – most neutral

sales pitch: “control transcendence” -> control is bad, we must do away w/ it, it is demon.

sales pitch: “transcendent control” -> ALL CONTROL-POWER IS MINE!

2:11:00 Cant Psal peak ….type of control foo. control disproof (negative). need a word to carry initial negative phase and the positive followthrough phase? SMILES ON CYBERCIDE GUYS the goodness of the new reivsion controrl transformatmion transcendence <– neg overtones.

1:17 CHALLENGES WHEN TRYING TO DO IDEA-DEVELOPMENT VOICE RECORDINGS W/ CHRIS BENNETT MEDITATION

HIGHly listenable voice recording about voice recording, w/ some ego death leading theory thrown in as audio tech test data

Errata

don’t you want to say “So, ” now? and now? i’m sure you want that word again now. May I suggest a word, here it is: “So, ” – I cn tell thats what u need

  • probably should increase gain later at night in long 2.5-hr. rec’g.
  • correction: there ARE speed issues — TALKING TOO FAST. practice speed variation deliberately. Not just pitch varying practice.
  • 2:21:00 burp in middle of super profound discussino of ctrl / transcendence connots
  • typing my Mindfulness List can be annoying to listen to. too slow! funning of valuable points mixed in? skip SECTION SKIP? 1:36:00 — todo: write start/end time here. WHEN WILL IT EVER END? THE TYPING AGGHHH I CANT …. FAST FWD THIS CHOWDERHEAD WTF end of torment at 1:38:00 i finish typing it up, and express extreme psychedness of this excellent plan.
  • f-word at 1:09:16
    • pissed off at my mind for bubbling up the word “So, ” at every opportunity. STOP! Stop suggesting “Don’t you need to say So , again, here? Here you go!”
      verbal tic bubbling up from the now made visible Fountain of Dumb Thoughts
    • I don’t think I have the “so, ” virus. A matter of degree I guess. Now I’m on patrol:
      • CORRECTIVE PUNISHMENT: EDIT-OUT ALL OCCURRENCES OF THE WORD “SO” THAT STILL SLIPPED THROUGH THE POORLY GUARDED GATE. (pls no!😱)
      • Hey Joe Average beginner mystic, the Dragon is asleep on the job, go ahead and just SNATCH THE TREASURE UN-EARNED, EVEN W/ MALFORMED UNSTABLE EGOIC THINKING – LIKE THE WORD “SO”.
      • I lifted the lid to see the snake normally hidden, and the rock-carved worldline {snake coming out from the fountain} of control thoughts, told me: HERE’S THE WORD YOU WANT, I’M SURE: “SO, “
  • realized around 1:07 that I screwed up the acronym for Pitch, Speed, Vol as PSD.

The output or payout of this recording is a custom prescription task assignment for my next couple practice recordings

The small % of ego death content is solid:

  • Predictions about Hatsis “Mushroom Cult Conspiracy Debunking” book
  • Important development of phrases: pros and cons of: (you can read this instead of listening):
    • control transcendence (too negative)
    • transcendent control (too positive)
    • control transformation <– top candidate, canterbury fits.
    • control cancellation (too negative: it’s the doorway, yes. to what?)
    • control seizure – negative, dangling, incomplete story.
    • control vortex – “

Recording #5: Voice Technique: “Skip” Recording – Not Recommended, But Good for What It Is. Voice Recording Technique.

Some 5-10% on-topic egodeath discussion, 90% off-topic (93% of this rec’g is about vocalization technique, not how to do live on-topic content, not how to equipment technique, not much actual ego death content <- 6%)

Audio technique =

  • vocalization technique + <- tons of discussion about this.
  • equipment technique + <- some discussion of this
  • on-topic content. <- very little… want more, but wasn’t a goal for this recording.

The output or payout of this recording , 2:31:51, is a custom prescription task assignment for my next couple practice recordings:

The Next Practice Voice Recordings to Create (#6)

The next couple voice recordings need to be entirely focused on:

MINDFULNESS TASK ASSIGNMENT: Make a few recordings next, with this focus:

  • keep the mic in optimal position.
  • continuously be practicing all the time, varying the pitch.

Background focus, drawn along by the above:

  • Every recording, prep water.
  • Every recording, check level, stereo mode.
  • Frequently practice Pause/Resume (w/o saying so).
  • Vary the speed. Area to improve: Limit the speed. No hyperspeed for effect; no dropped syllables. Foreign lang spkrs are listening!
  • Vary the volume. [any room for improvement here?]
  • Drop connector words (um, you know, well, so, now, let’s see). Showcase silence.
  • No cuss.
Voice Recording Practice Focus –
TASK ASSIGNMENT
  • Make practice recordings with primary focus on these exercises:
  • PRIMARY MINDFULNESS TASK: Continuously practice varying pitch. lock mic in optimal posn.
    • Use that primary task to drag along the secondary tasks, which are:
    • prep water,
    • check lvl, stereo mode.
      • practice pausing the recording, silently.
    • vary speed
    • vary volume
    • no connector words, (so, you know, now, um, let’s see, just)
      • silence is highly desirable.
    • no cuss

Completely Different Emojis in Edit vs Rendered Mode

What the emojis look like in Edit mode:

What the emojis look like in Rendered mode:

👹 🌪️ 🐉🐍⚡️💥😱

Technique to Get Big Emojis

Look how hi-res & detailed emojis are on various platforms
https://emojipedia.org/dragon/

how many platforms have the dragon holding treasure? only 2
how many platforms have the dragon w/ flames? only 1-3

https://emojipedia.org/tornado/

Screen cap, paste as image:

Heading

todo: put 2 cybercide crop images from the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image next to 2 tree-sitting crops: imagine tree-guys smiling.

Voice Recording 4 (2021-01-22):
“Books on Mystics in Main Article.mp3” 1:58:26

  • Filename: “Books on Mystics in Main Article.mp3”
  • Length: 1:58:26
  • Download URL: https://we.tl/t-Rg6xTP1BAp
    • No login, signup, or account of any kind is needed, to download this, from WeTransfer site.
Screen Capture of the Download Screen, with Preview

To preview (listen) directly in the browser at the WeTransfer website without downloading, click the magnifying glass.

I do this transfer process:

  1. Download the file to the desktop file system.
  2. Transfer file from file system to desktop music player, into my Egodeath playlist.
  3. On mobile device, wake mobile device. Desktop & mobile device are connected to same wi-fi network.
  4. In desktop music player, transfer file to mobile device’s Egodeath playlist – either from the desktop file system or from the desktop music player’s Egodeath playlist.
Topics Include
  • 0:00-16:30 – topic: Elocution. either SKIP, or, listen to the world’s best discussion of a few topics (listened 2x, not too off-topic).
    • The start sounds tinny b/c miked a previous phone recording.
    • Listen to the vocalization stumble a little, at the start:
      “You… burn…. in … hell…”
    • Elocution: its historically largely visual aspect, but I’m interested in only the spoken elocution of sentences.
    • Against the visual aspect of Rock
    • At the end (near 15:00): Kafei’s effective elocution of the key contradictory sentence.
    • Complicated sentences impossible to read-aloud with meaning.
    • Against music videos, against KISS/Alice Cooper/Hair Metal’s visual theatrics, in favor of pure audio music
    • Exception: foldout 12″ vinyl art is good.
    • Elocution was for cultivated visual stage-act presentation, but also, in my purely audio, voice-recording context:
    • Elocution to deliver a sentence meaningfully re: varying the speed, pitch, & volume to best convey the meaning of the sentence.
  • 16:30-~29:00 – 5 book titles cited in main article, about mystic.
    • Fumbling to find the list, which – ERRATA: I should have loaded before recording.
    • I should have rattled off quickly reading all 5 titles.
    • I slowly go through the 5 book titles, w/ many on-topic diversions along with way.
    • 23:00 I count the number of times the phrase “ego death” appears in 1997 article & 2006 article.
    • errata: cuss count: sh*t 1x, damn 1x
    • errata: turning head away from mic when looking at John King book on bkcase.
  • Naming of theory-specifiers. Considerations. Standard word-usage (possibilism, eternalism, block universe).
  • Architecture of 1-sentence formulation of summary of the egodeath theory.
    • Need the word ‘control’, not just analogical psychedelic eternalism. control cancellation. the control vortex. control transcendence. THROUGH control vortex TO destination state which is CONTROL TRANSFORMATION or state of having TRANSFORMED CONTROL. The gate != the destination. Don’t just market the gate; market the destination: Loose Cognitive Science.
    • A peak point: 31:50 & 36:00. “I caught a glimpse of interesting threat, must get closer look, looks serious, important to probe the vulnerability, I better test this closer, I better threaten…” the control testing probving vortex. The King’s Paranoia. the vulnerability attractor vortex

👹 🌪️ 🐉🐍⚡️💥😱

  • The 5 book titles with “mystic” in the title, from Bibliography of 2006 main article.
    • This is only a “deep” discussion of the titles of the books, not of the content of the books.
  • In the context of episode podcast 26, Max was sound, in saying
    “causal-chain determinism vs block-universe determinism”
    instead of switching the latter word to ‘eternalism’.
    A good system of phrases for distinct contrasts:
    • Opposed models of time, possibility, & (implicitly, but clear enough for Wm James to object:) control agency:
      • branching-universe possibilism vs. block-universe eternalism
    • Opposed models of causality:
      • domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe determinism
        (There’s also freewill; Caution: be cognizant that this forms a kind of 3-level model)
  • I have to be more cognizant, aware, and careful about
    “block-universe eternalism” vs.
    “block-universe determinism“.
    And use the correct variant strategically for best communication in the current context.
  • Is nonlocal hidden variables a kind of domino-chain determinism, or a kind of block-universe determinism?
    • i’m thinking nonlocal hidden variables = block-universe determinism, and rejects domino-chain determinism.

I felt I could’ve used longer recordings to listen to, more like the 2-hour length of Transcendent Knowledge podcasts. So I let this rec’g go to near 2 hours; it felt complete, tho didn’t delve into the books.

Errata or Commentary on Listening to the Recording
  • 1:25:00, & mentioend in 1:27:00 to followup – as follows. – I lost my thread – I was talking about “the scholarly coverup of mshrms is broader than just mshrooms; it’s of analogical psychedelic eternalism.” I was going to make a point looking for Hatsis’ new book title “Conspiracy”, he’s going to focus on a mushroom coverup op, but the op was broader: to coverup Esotericism (analogical psychedelic eternalism), of which psilocybin mushrooms is only one component, to push literalist ordinary-state possibilism (by the Exoteric, salvation salesmen & meditation hucksters)
  • 1:45:00 i argue that from mytheme POV, the two models of time in phil-o-metaphysics, should be called “tree vs. rock/snake“, not “tree vs block”. I should note: when I say “block”, it is shorthand for- corroborating my recording — block universe AND WORLDLINE. What the Snodfart’s Jr. Academy article calls “block”, they should instead call “block and worldline“. “Tree, vs. block/worldline“. block/worldline = rock/snake.
    {king in tree; wine; snake in rock}
  • 1:50:00 ? what about it
  • SLOPPY WORDS! BAD! Relaxed tone is good but not at the expense of chopping words! goal for next rec: enuciate every word. no cuss. keep mic in position.
  • the sniffing problem- – focus: PRACTICE: pause to dry nose.
  • PRACTICE: continuouls #1 practice focus
  • errata: burping while talking. what to do?

Heading

The Block-Universe Type of Determinism, not the Causal-Chain Type of determinism, which is only a minor transformation of mental model from possibilism-thinking.

The mental worldmodel changing from egoic naive freewill thinking to egoic causal-chain determinism is one step toward Transcendent Knowledge.

possibilism-thinking vs eternalism-thinking are two different mental worldmodels of {time, self, possibility, and control}.

The possibilism vs. eternalism mental worldmodels of:

  • time
  • self
  • possibility
    • left limb = the “possibilism” mental worldmodel, leveraged visually
  • control
    • self-blading
      • red init touching gods sword blade w/ left hand while touching the main cut debranch w/ right hand and he’s avoiding using his left leg to support himself, “I must not rely on branching possibiliteies thinking, that is unstable.

Branching-possibilities thinking is unstable.
The egoic personal control model is premised on branching-possibilities thinking, which is unstable and transient, lasting only until loose cognition sessions immersions fire roasting the king’s child every night holding by heel to make the king’s son immortal.
The salamander has been made immortal, immune to fire, by avoiding the known-to-be-unstable, possibility-branching premised thinking.
The initiate has been made immortal, immune to fire, by avoiding the known-to-be-unstable, possibility-branching premised thinking.

The mind is roasted in fire to of altered state to make the mental model transform dissolve coagulate transform, then the transformed mind is placed in serpent form, roasted serpent next to Y mshrm tree that I identify as a 3-family hybrid mushroom.

Late 2020 I wrote that the salamander tree is combines 3 mshrm fams:

Folio 027v (Bodleian Library, Medieval Bestiary)
Analysis: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/13/compelling-evidence-criteria-of-proof-for-greek-bible-mushrooms/#tftssa

how easy to depict visually the above advanced Transcendent Knowledge elements? easiest to depict branching, possibility-branching, limbs, arms legs feet hands trees. cut off branching on right limb, your’ well grounded/foundation is good, the not the egoic foundation of sand that gets it virginity taken by the giants lusting after the virgin maiden daughters of men who are overpowered and taken and impregnated by the giants immortals
“mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image

What Version of
Determinism
Fits with
block-universe eternalism

block-universe determinism

the block-universe type of determinism

causal-chain determinism
block-universe determinism

The type of determinism that is compatible with
block-universe eternalism
is
block-universe determinism.

the block-universe type of determinism
the causal-chain type of determinism

Copied to new page Quotes from the Great Mystics of Egodeath

I just found this in ep26:

Kafei Seeing Determinism within the Model of Eternalism

Kafei: i kind of see uh determinism uh in in within the model of eternalism uh

I kind of see determinism within the model of eternalism.

Kafei

That’s remarkably similar to what I said in today’s recording, wondering what kind of determinism could fit w/ eternalism. todo: identify what kind of determinism or QM could fit w/ eternalism.

… compare what he said later:

maybe you know michael was referring to a causal determinism in some way through the block universe

Content to Cover in a Next Recording
  1. whirlpool – a rapidly rotating mass of water in a river or sea into which objects may be drawn, typically caused by the meeting of conflicting currents.synonyms:eddy · vortex · maelstrom · swirl · whirl · suckhole · Charybdis
    • a turbulent situation from which it is hard to escape.”he was drawing her down into an emotional whirlpool”

Cry out supplication
For the maelstrom is near

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/16/rock-lyrics-corroborate-egodeath-theory-entheogen-mytheme-theory/#No-One-at-the-Bridge-Rush

Voice Recording 3 (2021-01-21):
“The Great Mystics of Egodeath.mp3” 51:47

  • Filename: “The Great Mystics of Egodeath.mp3”
  • Length: 51:47
  • Download URL: https://we.tl/t-BAzTd4g9rA
    • Good for 1 week. Uploaded on January 21, 2021.
    • There’s a nice preview/pre-listen interface in that webpage. Click the magnifying class to the right of the filename, in the popup dialog box in that webpage.
Content
  • Is domino-chain determinism *necessarily* mutually exclusive with block-universe eternalism? They disagree re: whether future already exists.
    • *IF* I have to pick a brand of QM, I’d pick and root for and work for — as I’ve done in the past — a determinism solution to QM. eg nonlocal hidden variables, David Bohm, James T. Cushing; anti-Copenhagenism.
    • What version of QM is most compatible with Minkowski’s block-universe eternalism? Non-local hidden variables?
    • What is the relation between domino-chain determinism & non-local hidden variables (per Bohm/Cushing)? Perhaps:
      • domino-chain determinism is mutually exclusive w/ block-universe eternalism
      • Is non-local hidden variables compatible w/ block-universe eternalism??
      • is domino-chain determinism mutually exclusive with non-local hidden variables (per Bohm/Cushing)?

🤷‍♂️

I Don’t Know
Daisley/Ozzy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNm6bucMPmY

Content con’t
  • Recently noticed (& very recently added to Proof article) the Exam-Passing Student’s lifted garment in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.
  • We Are the Robots (or: Mystics)

🤖 🤖 🤖 🤖

Errata
  • I forgot to read the 5 book titles with “mystic” in the title, from Bibliography of 2006 main article.
  • In the context of episode podcast 26, Max was sound, in saying
    “causal-chain determinism vs block-universe determinism”
    instead of switching the latter word to ‘eternalism’.
    In such context, my recent contrast
    “domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe eternalism” isn’t so good.
    A good system of phrases for distinct contrasts:
    • Opposed models of possibility & control agency:
      • branching-universe possibilism vs. block-universe eternalism
    • Opposed models of causality:
      • domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe determinism
        (There’s also freewill; so Caution: be cognizant that this forms a kind of 3-level model)
  • I have to be more cognizant, aware, and careful about
    “block-universe eternalism” vs.
    “block-universe determinism“.
    And use the correct variant strategically for best communication in the current context.
  • Is nonlocal hidden variables a kind of domino-chain determinism, or a kind of block-universe determinism?
    • i’m thinking nonlocal hidden variables = block-universe determinism, and rejects domino-chain determinism.
    • So, I may have mis-spoken when I said “I hold the nonlocal hidden variables interpretation of QM, so therefore in the field/context of QM, I hold domino-chain determinism.”
  • Stop saying “maybe I’ll end the recording soon”.
    • Unnecessary, misleading, confusing, probably false statements. Halfway through the party, announcing “the party is over” = party foul. It just screws up and falsifies and confuses the flow.

For listening -options and downloading, today’s download is simpler than the previous pair of mp3 files, being a single mp3 file – no .zip file involved. WeTransfer.com, no login or email address needed, to download this voice recording.
No distortion this time!

When I (as a test) download that file, the filename that gets downloaded is:
“The Great Mystics of Egodeath.mp3”
Nice – no .zip file involved, so this mp3 file should be very easy to work w/ & listen to, in several ways, even from a mobile device.

I accidentally, for the first time, copied the mp3 straight from desktop file system to mobile device’ music app (within the desktop music app).
Usually I first transfer the .mp3 file from the desktop file system to the desktop music app’s local-drive Playlist eg “Egodeath” playlist, and then do a transfer within the desktop music app, copying the mp3 file from the desktop’s “Egodeath” playlist to the “Egodeath” playlist that’s on the mobile device.

ToDon’t

note about todo’s: it is good to log todo items in pages and in the Todo page, but there is no implication I will ever do these things, or the pri lvl. it’s always “possible todo item”, not an announcement of my commitment.

logging a todo item does not imply commitment.

Errata for 2-Lv & 3-Lv audio recordings

I’ve Been Conflating “domino-chain determinism” (possibly part of a 3-level scheme) with “possibilism-thinking” (part of a 2-level scheme) b/c both are contrasted w/ “block-universe eternalism” –
instead, domino-chain determinism & possibilism-thinking must be contrasted w/ eternalism in 2 different ways
  • In criticism of Kafei’s “maybe” statement, I wrote that block-universe eternalism is mutually exclusive w/ domino-chain determinism, but I was instead thinking of the stark contrast mutually excl betw eternalism vs. possibilism.
    • block-universe eternalism is different than domino-chain determinism — I wouldn’t quite call them “mutually exclusive”.
  • Sometimes I say “domino-chain determinism” [= level 2 of a 3-lev model] where maybe I should instead say “possibilism; possibility-branching” [= level 1 of a 2-lev model].
    • I conflate domino-chain determinism w/ possibilism-thinking. b/c both of those are not block-universe eternalism. This conflation on my part demonstrates the danger of conflating & mixing 2- and 3-level models.
    • contrast domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe eternalism
    • contrast possibilism vs. eternalism
    • Those are two different contrasts! todo: assess: does max make same mistake in ep26? No, it seems. Does Max say “domino-chain determinism” (causal-chain determinism ) when he could or should instead say “possibilism-thinking”? doubt?
    • My criticism of domino-chain determinism is that it is overspecific about the mechanism how the fixed future comes about, and that domino-chain determinism is heavily colored with egoic possibilism-thinking.
    • The idea of domino-chain determinism is the egoic replacement/ substitute for the proper idea, of block-universe eternalism. the person who is half transformed, may assert domino-chain determinism. Domino-chain determinism is one kind of half-baked view – partway between Possibilism & Eternalism. Domino-chain determinism expressed by beginner mystics like Sam Harris, is a middle level in one type of 3-level model.
  • A “2-level vs. 3-level scheme” conflation error I may have made in my ep 26 critique of Kafei saying “maybe the egodeath theory is referring to domino-chain determinism through block-universe eternalism”:
    • the opposite of eternalism is possibilism, not domino-chain determinism.
    • roughly, we can think of 3-level
      • possibilism , freewill thinking
      • domino-chain determinism, still possibilism-colored. ie a conversation about domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe eternalism is inherently a 3-level model
      • eternalism, no-free-will thinking
  • I should have attributed Kafei’s mis-statement partly to ignorance of the main concepts of the egodeath theory, not only to over-analysis (ie, importing a 3-level model into the 2-level model).
    • “b/c u said the egodeath theory = ramesh, I guess the egodeath theory asserts domino-chain determinism through the language of block-universe eternalism.”
Minor
  • I said “mystics aren’t parroting their intensity level” , I probably meant “parading” their level.
  • 40:00 2Lv.mp3 – SKIP SCENE – delete coffee scene (but that would throw off timestamps). “pause to blow nose” — don’t say such things. headache discussion was needed, don’t add more non-content junk than that. Pausing is totally invisible, undetectable – don’t vocalize why need to Pause recording.
Defining Terms When?
  • I seem to put people in a can’t-win situation; my seeming self-contradiction: At start of 3-lv.mp3, I criticize having to define basic terms. In episode podcast 26, I criticize the Grea🍄 Mys🍄ics of Egodea🍄h for failing to stop and define a coherent set of basic terms (‘mystics’, ‘ordinary ppl’, ‘everyone’).
    • You could say I’m criticizing ppl for “Why are we stopping to define a coherent system of basic terms after the episode 26, instead of properly stopping to define a coherent system of basic terms at the start or middle of the episode ?”

todo: minimal timestamp outline would be nice – but not needed. various solid content.

👽

16:45 Lv3.mp3 – the covertly added 3rd level of people, “mystics”, = Aliens

well richard carriers new book does state that Jesus is from Outer Space

30:00 in 3-lv.mp3: Wasson’s argument from authority, Plaincourault as proxy for all big prob of mushrooms, coverup, bedtime cover-story by Panofsky of skewed templates. wasson censor brinckmann.

35:00 2-lv: the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image requires 0 words, but high decoding/transcription work, i’m still look how recent i perceived the lifted garment of student passing exam.

mid nov mid jan 2 months by me an expert decoder/transcriber to play out this image.

How image depicts highest religious experiencing intelligently w/ high coherence, an image packed w/ highest info effectively communicated but the high requirement to receive the message; the message has to be sent in a way that the sender knows for a fact is decodable to his nearby newcomers.

Image was designed eg pink key tree to give breadcrumb clues path network to confirm decoding, eg why show 2 cybercides not 1? More is higher confirmation. Is the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image an example of simplicity of communication?

PICK THE CORRECT LIMB: LEFT BRANCHING, OR RIGHT NONBRANCHING? THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS ONLY. SIMPLE BINARY MODEL OF Transcendent Knowledge, EXPRESSED THROUGH IMAGERY.

THE EGODEATH THEORY IS NOT half-baked, but, it is simple 2-level model, it is a 1st-order rough simplistic model. high relevance, not the highest preceision. It is possible to justify a 2nd-order approximation model: ie, a well-formed 3-level model, maybe a provision for chaos mixture in the middle level, the Ramesh/Harris half-transfor…

ha ha the Muraresku half-baked graduate, half-completed initiate, given “a” profound experience. A 3-level model, w/ Muraresku in the middle mixed-up level.

Successful high-quality pair of rec’gs. I could do more, I need to do more – I could learn good technique from these this pair of recordings. Solid content.

i almost want to post commentary on the two mp3s.

  • Berating ppl for overcomplicated models of Transcendent Knowledge.
  • Pleading w/ ppl to be less precise and more relevant.

18:45 2lv.mp3 – quoteable “they left a broken smouldering ruin”

Ppl are stumbling over their 3-level schemes mixed in w/ simple 2-lvl Egodeath theory. Toward a well-formed 3-level version of the Egodeath theory to shut out bad.

quoteable at 15:00 in 2-level recording. “there are malformed theories, but the egodeath theory is not one of them”

Beginners’, Spatial Nonduality vs. Advanced, Control-Nonduality

At OSC, Kafei typically brings-in the phrases “skin encapsulated ego” and “identifying with the material body“.

Those are not constructs that I’ve incorp’d into, or explicitly mapped to, the Egodeath theory.

Those are spatial, beginners’ nonduality concepts; the Egodeath theory moves past beginners’ spatial nonduality, to advanced, cybernetic nonduality.

Voice Recording 2 (2021-01-20):
“3-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” 41:22

  • Filename: “3-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
  • Length: 41:22
  • Download/preview link, for 1 week from Jan. 20, 2021:
    https://we.tl/t-E8IKyYdwK4
    • “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
    • “3-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
  • Production notes:
    • Source file: “210120_2147.wav”
    • Mic: TASCAM DR-05, Right

WeTransfer site. No account creation or signup of any kind is needed, no giving email. I’ve never seen any signup required, as far as download.
Probably having an updated browser helps.

I uploaded as two separate .mp3 files – I think the benefit is you have nice Preview listening at the wetransfer site. I did test download: instead of individual files, I got the auto-named zip file “wetransfer-8acda0.zip”.

Content
  • end: Hatsis, Wasson, Brinckmann, scholars’ cover-up of mshrooms in Christian art. 70 mshrooms proved in the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image.

Audio File Podcast Prep Ranting and Raving – How Can Everyone Completely, 180-Degrees F Up the Most Easy, Basic, Simple, Elementary, Essential Nature of What the Egodeath Theory Is and Asserts – a theory of refrigerators?

hello is anyone in the class listening? IS THIS THING ON?

  • Successful solid, top-quality content in the 2, Level.mp3 recordings. The recordings are a success. Interesting and compelling analysis.
  • music player on desktop only used to xfer to mobile, by music app sync, playing fine on wireless JVC good buds. Distortion’s not too bad.
  • Useful solid analysis of the 2-level simple primary standard default Egodeath theory trainwrecked by covert, uncontrolled mixing-in of some mismanaged 3-level model.
  • todo: define a well-formed, distinctly defined 3-level model of the Egodeath theory that:
  • 1) doesn’t suck and
  • 2) doesn’t conflate with the 2-level primary simple model,
  • Define a proper 3-level model of the Egodeath theory, purely to shut out bad 3-level versions of the Egodeath theory that produce bad output, at least when conflated w/ or snuck into the simple 2-level version of the Egodeath theory, producing:

🦁🐉

{monster offspring}

Production Notes

excited daytime voice, gain level 65 of 90 (pretty high), so – DISTORTED⚡️a little.

TASCAM DR-05 field recorder, small dia cond mics (right). Stereo. use Right ch only. Not too bad for casual.

AT AT LEAST I DIDN’T DO WHAT I ALWAYS DO WHICH IS TALK ABOUT AUDIO RECORDING TECHNIQUE INSTEAD OF CONTENT.

i’ll take distorted + solid content, any day,
over hi-fi w/ poor content eg discussion of audio technique.

Voice Recording 1 (2021-01-20):
“2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3” 53:44

  • Filename: “2-Level Egodeath Model.mp3”
  • Length: 53:44
  • Download or preview (magnif. glass): https://we.tl/t-E8IKyYdwK4
  • Production notes:
    • Source file: “210120_2146.wav”
    • Mic: TASCAM DR-05, Right

Idea-development, so the ideas or critiques aren’t as well-expressed at the beginning. I’m more on-point as time goes on.

I start by talking in terms of the egodeath theory being a 2-level model; I develop the idea – by the end of the rec’g – pointing out the possibility of adding a well-formed 3-level model of the Egodeath theory. By the end of the rec’g, I develop a clear idea of:

Don’t conflate a valid 2-level model of the egodeath theory w/ a valid 3-level model of the egodeath theory (or, conflate an invalid 3-level model, even worse).

The distortion sucks, but it’s a minor nuisance. Bigger problem is the early points are sometimes weak; by the time I figured out things at the end; … this is an idea *development* recording.

My arguments at the start of the recording are less correct than at the end. Ah well some recordings have off-base statements, that’s life. All books have flaws, bugs.

By the end of this first rec’g, I dev’d idea of that:

  • covertly bringing-in a (bad version of) a 3-level model into the default 2-level model of the Egodeath theory, was a common source of garbage results, garbage output.

The Egodeath Theory Is a Simplest-Possible, Binary, First-Order Model – Not a Complicated, 3-Level Model

  • The 2-level model of the egodeath theory
  • The 3-level model of the egodeath theory

Conflating the 2- and 3-Level Models of the Egodeath Theory Produces Garbage Output

  • DO NOT CROSS THE STREAMS; do not conflate and jumble the 2- and 3-level models.

Normally, the egodeath theory is expressed as the 2-level model.

When people covertly, silently brought-in a 3-level model into the primary, default, 2-level model of the Egodeath theory, garbage output (opposite-of-truth) was produced:

🗑

  • “The Egodeath theory is irrelevant for mystics.”
  • “The Egodeath theory is not based in experiencing block-universe eternalism.”
  • “The Egodeath theory asserts domino-chain determinism.”
  • “Always try to increase the d0se. Last time, I feared for my life; I thought I was gonna die.”

🗑

Defining a 3-Level Version of the Egodeath Theory

It is possible to define a 3-level version of the Egodeath theory:

  • The Egodeath Theory Expressed as a 3-Level Scheme
    • Do Not Conflate 2-Level & 3-Level Models
    • 3 levels of binding intensity (OSC, low dose, high dose)
      • Refined explanatory power of the egodeath theory when cast as 3-level scheme:
      • Egoic thinking does develop in shaman cultures, b/c children are only given low-dose
      • That real-world detail doesn’t fit the conditions-of-applicability of the simple, first-order, 2-Level Egodeath theory model
      • King of Hubris Muraresku’s CYA move: “we provide a profound experience safely”: his deceptive compromise: he attempts to invent a halfway version of Mystery Religion, premised on “we’ll half enlighten you” <– 😄 😄
        “It’ll be a quick trip, That never ends” – Journey to Tyme
        https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-16-2002-04-28/#message773
  • 3 models of time and control (possibilism, impurity, eternalism)
  • 3 levels of initiate (child, partway, completed)
  • 3 levels of freewill: naive freewill; no-free-will; transcending no-free-will

Informally Merging a 3-Level Scheme into the 2-Level Egodeath Model Produces Confusion

The Egodeath Theory Is a Simplest-Possible, First-Order Model; a Simple Binary Model – Stop Sneaking-in a Complicated, 3-Level Model Before Getting Clear on the Basic, Simple, Binary 2-Level Model

The Egodeath theory is a simplest-possible, 1st-order approximation model; it is the simplest, roughest model. And is sufficient and elegant and clear.

Only 2 Levels of Cognitive Binding: Tightcog vs. Loosecog; not “High Dose” (a Covert, Confusing, 3-level model)

In the normal, primary, 2-level model of the Egodeath theory, there are only 2 states: OSC vs. ASC.

  • ASC = experiencing block-universe eternalism.
  • OSC = experiencing causal-chain, unfolding-in-time, temporal causality.

In the normal, 2-level model, there’s only 2 states – not 3, not 1, not 12.

  • No “really, really, really, really high” like Max strains at;
  • not “high d0se” like Kafei obsesses on as he flies into the flame and bursts w/ a puff;
  • not the “intense” mystic altered state like I’ve written — wrecking, confusing, and complicating the elegant theory.
  • In the normal, primary, 2-level model, there’s no need for a complicated model of “intense” mystic altered state; it’s simply, the mystic altered state.

I DELETED MY [ACRO]/KEYBOARD SHORTCUT FOR “THE INTENSE MYSTIC ALTERED STATE” – PPL ARE USING THE WORD ‘INTENSE’ TO CONFUSE THEMSELVES (PRODUCING TRAINWRECK “GARBAGE” OUTPUT), TRYING TO USE A CONFUSING, MANY-LEVEL MODEL BEFORE THEY ARE CLEAR ON THE BASIC SIMPLE 2-LEVEL MODEL.

There’s nothing wrong w/ the 3-level model of the Egodeath theory.

What’s disastrous is conflating the 2- and 3-level models of the Egodeath theory.

Reminds me of Wilber’s intensive cautions about the pre-trans fallacy. In a 3-stage scheme, it’s easy to confuse stages 1 & 3. In my normal, 2-stage scheme, there is no way to confuse stages.

Only 2 Models of Time & Control: Possibilism vs. Eternalism; not “Referring to Causal Chain through Block Universe” Half-Baked Mishmash (a Covert, Confusing, 3-Level Model)

Only 2 Models of Time & Control: Possibilism vs. Eternalism (domino-chain determinism vs. block-universe eternalism); not “referring to causal chain through block universe” half-baked mishmash (covert 3-level model)

Only 2 Sets of People: Non-Initiates & Initiates; not “3rd Group of Ultra-Special, 1-State People” (a Covert, Confusing, 3-Level Model)

Caveat: see my page section about myth sometimes depicts mental worldmodel transformation as instantaneous, sometimes as gradual.

Theory of Mythemes page.

{god revealed his power and the mortal woman instantly died}

{woman during pregnancy was harassed by serpent, child killed serpent}

Remedial Pre-School Prep for Egodeath 101 Day 1 Lecture 1 Elementary Basics

&%$@#%$??!!

Remedial Pre-School Prep Version of the Egodeath Theory
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/20/remedial-pre-school-prep-version-of-the-egodeath-theory/

Me: “I Am Worlds Best Communicator. My Followers Are Super-Geniuses who Read My Spectacularly Clear and Simple Words.”

Max: “According to my logic, the Egodeath theory has nothing to do with mysticism. Or ego death.”
Kafei: “Interesting. According to my logic, the Egodeath theory asserts domino-chain determinism, expressed as block-universe eternalism. Thats because its based only in the OSC.”

🤯 😱 😵 🔫

Ozzy: “Never heard a thing I said (dead, dead dead)”

Flying High Again
3:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXonmlNCQ3o&t=210s

🤯 😵 HOW CAN ANYONE POSSIBLY SAY THE EGODEATH THEORY DOESN’T APPLY TO ‘MYSTICS’, IS NOT ABOUT ‘MYSTICS’, DOESNT EXPLAIN ‘MYSTICS’, IS NOT FOR ‘MYSTICS’ 🤯 😵

  • My 1997 core theory-spec, in the title of the entire Annotation, equates ego death with the word ‘mystic’:
    Self-control cybernetics, dissociative cognition, & mystic ego death
    http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Annotations/PHILOSI.0.html –
    • “Schizophrenia and mystic rapture both present the sense of being remotely monitored and controlled”
    • “Acid-rock mysticism vividly alludes to and resonates with ego death and the dissociative cognition that leads up to it.”
  • The 2006 main article discusses mysticism:
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/
    • “The essence and origin of religion is the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered state, producing loose binding of cognitive associations.”
    • “Myth describes this mystic-state experiential insight and transformation.”
    • “Leading mystics throughout the history of various religions have used visionary-plant sessions on-demand, with mystic-state experiencing that was largely rationality-oriented (Merkur 2001).”
    • “Early Christianity involved mystical, religious, visionary experiencing, including the experience of the transformative, transcendent power of the Holy Spirit at Eucharistic agape meals (Johnson 1998).”
    • “The figure of Paul the Apostle is portrayed as a shamanistic mystic (Ashton 2000), and the apostles are portrayed as adepts in altered-state mystic experiencing (Pilch 2004).”
    • “Solving the riddle of the original mystic-metaphorical meaning of Christianity requires also understanding the surrounding metaphorical altered-state initiation systems throughout Christian history. These altered-state initiation systems that were related to Christianity, include Roman religion, Neoplatonism, Western Esotericism, and astral ascent mysticism.”
    • “The New Testament editors utilized the era’s standard mastery of mystic-state metaphor and the altered-state experience of communal unity to direct the Jewish mystic-metaphor system into the figure of Jesus. This combination of Jewish themes, mystic-state metaphor, and the communal altered-state unity experience enabled…”
    • “Mystic revelation about the nullity of self-will was routine in antiquity. Roman imperial theology utilized this routinized mystic-state revelation to legitimate the Roman sociopolitical arrangement. Christianity became popular as a polemical counter-narrative about how the entheogen-accessed mystic revelation should be used for sociopolitical concerns. The figure of the ‘king on the cross’ in the New Testament is a depiction of the mystic-state insight of non-autonomous control, in service of a rebuttal and alternative to Roman imperial theology.”
    • “… a long-term standoff between mystically neutered religious literalism versus exclusively ordinary-state-based Science. “
    • “The ability to mystically climax is inbuilt, as is the mental model that is revealed, although the useful metaphors and systematic explanation that are necessary to retain the revealed mental structure must be a product of human effort.”
    • “Mystic metaphor both endorses and disparages the realization of determinism, because determinism is only an intermediate destination on the path to salvific regeneration. “
    • “Fatedness and Control in Astral Ascent Mysticism – Heimarmene or universal fatedness was centrally important in ancient astrological cosmology (Barton 1994), and was a major theme in Hellenistic-Roman astral ascent mysticism and religion (Cumont 1960).”
    • “Astral ascent mysticism centers around the dangerous gateway or “fatal” boundary crossing – the sphere of the fixed stars – representing the apprehension of Heimarmene and its control of one’s thoughts.”
    • “The defeat of egoic autonomy and power in the mystic ecstatic state was similar to the defeat of rebellious nations.”
    • “In mystic metaphor, misunderstanding moral agency is considered the fundamental sin and immorality; God was most angry about the king’s rebellious worship of idols…”
    • “Mystic-state ‘compassion’ and ‘rescue that narrowly averts divine wrath’ means that that which ultimately gives you your thoughts is intimately united with you and is good or benevolent toward you,…”
    • “… is found in the Roman Saturnalia and in the mystic allegory of Jesus’ trial; …”
    • Arbel, V. Beholders of Divine Secrets: Mysticism and Myth in the Hekhalot and Merkavah Literature. Albany: SUNY, 2003.
    • Fishbane, M. The Kiss of God: Spiritual and Mystical Death in Judaism. Seattle: University of Washington, 1994.
    • Freke, T.; and P. Gandy. The Complete Guide to World Mysticism. London: Piatkus, 1997.
    • Merkur, D. Gnosis: An Esoteric Tradition of Mystical Visions and Unions. Albany: SUNY, 1993.
    • Merkur, D. The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical Experience. Rochester: Park Street, 2001.
  • Every one of the 183 digest files of the Egodeath Yahoo Group postings contains the word “mystic”.
  • et cetera

Conclusion – You Skipped the Philosophy Step, Which Is: Define Your Terms

Who Asserts that “Mystics Are the People who Fuse the ASC with the OSC”?

Kafei seems to assert a more moderate position than Max attributes to him.

I’m wondering if Max is responding to writings of Kafei that I haven’t seen, that assert “mystics are the people who fuse asc w/ osc”.  

I’m not hearing Kafei assert that extreme position, or definition of ‘mystics’, in the podcasts.

Kafei’s position expressed in the podcasts is not so extreme as Max makes it seem.  

In the podcasts, Kafei asserts the 2-state model, not the 1-state model.  

Not sure who in the world is asserting the 1-state model.

From whom is Max getting such a strong impression that the word ‘mystics’ is commonly defined as “the people who fuse asc w/ osc”?

I guess I can see that notion a little bit, in the pop field.  

The pop field is more like, hazy on this matter, rather than taking a definitive stand.

Draft Email for Max

Where does Kafei assert a 1-state model of ‘mystics’; that ‘mystics’ fuse asc w/ osc?  

I’m not seeing where Kafei much asserts that.  Maybe some text exchange, outside the podcasts?

I’m puzzled why in ep26 you’re fighting so hard, expending so much energy, to promote the 2-state model, when Kafei is *also* asserting (90% of the time) the 2-state model.  

Who are you fighting against?

Who defines ‘mystics’ as 1-state, such that you ended up saying like “the Egodeath theory doesn’t explain mystics and isn’t written for mystics’??

Maybe I need to read the writings of the Great Mystics, to find where it’s asserted that “mystics are the ppl who fuse ASC w/ OSC”.

— Mystified

Machine Transcription of Entire Podcast Episode 26

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#Machine-Transcription – For my commentary, find “cm”. The full machine transcription is currently the 2nd half of the webpage.

Bending Time in Semi-Representational Art

It’s sort of essentially the same guy, Pink initiate, in the top row of the Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword” image , in the same pic at same time, representing 3 diff times.

  1. passing the exam <- not allowed to banquet yet, so how come he already has a lifted garment, which indicates the altered state?
  2. finished 2 bowls at banquet
  3. in asc, sitting balancing in the tree

So we have established the principle that a figure can appear twice in one image, meaning, different points in time. It’s not a snapshot of a point in time; it’s a storyline within an image; it’s like panels in a comic page.

“There are 6 supermans on this page!” “no, it’s 1 superman, at 6 points in time, each frame is a snapshot at a different point in time.”

Similarly, an allowance can explain this contradiction:

  • The image depicts a strict requirement of “candidates for initiation are required to pass an exam, before allowed to banquet”.
  • the Passing student on left end, currently being examined, already has a lifted garment, indicating the altered state
  • the altered state can only happen through banqueting; “mystic contemplation to induce the altered state” is untrue.

Pink has passed the exam at that point, but hasn’t gone on yet to sit at right side of top row and finish ingesting 2 bowls.

Solution

I interpret Pink’s lifted garment, on left end of the row as meaning, “destined for the altered state”; I do not read him as being in the altered state at the time of the exam.

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom

Email to John Rush

http://www.clinicalanthropology.com

Hi John,

Lifted Garment & Mushroom Folds in Christian & Greek Art, Indicating the Ecstatic Holy Spirit Altered State
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/13/lifted-garment-mushroom-folds-in-christian-greek-art-indicating-the-ecstatic-holy-spirit-altered-state/

I haven’t got around to my page: Greek billowing cloth gallery yet, doesn’t seem very challenging; too easy.  

This ‘ecstatic state’ indicator theme is a bit hard to spot in Christian art (lifted garment); while the equivalent in Greek art is falling-over-a-log commonplace, explicit.

The {wind} = asc theme is almost hard to notice in Hellenistic art, b/c it’s so commonplace: billowing cloth, revealing the invisible wind/spirit, indicating ecstatic state/ mania/ frenzy/ possession by the spirit.

That’s how ubiquitous the mystic state is in Hellenistic art: you can’t see it, because it’s everywhere, completely normalized into invisibility like mixed-wine.

— Michael Hoffman, the theorist of ego death 

The Word ‘Eternalism’ Doesn’t Spotlight Control-Foo

It’s almost greedy to seek an even better theory-specifier phrase; it’s amazing that such a complex theory has already been so simplified in naming & presentation.

Context: needing a compact specifier of which theory this is; for example in a 1-sentence definition of the Theory:

The Egodeath theory is the theory that “analogical psych’c eternalism” describes mystics’ enlightenment and all equivalents.

The problem w/ that 3-term phrase: ‘eternalism’ doesn’t say Control-Foo, even though the most important part of the theory/experience/phen’y is Control-Foo.  

An ideal specifier-phrase, for the Theory, ought to cover 4 things, and the most important thing is Control-Foo.

  • Metaphor/ analogy
  • o  Loose cognition / alt-state / dissoocation
  • o  Eternalism / heimarmene/ block universe w/ worldlines
  • o  Control-Foo   <– the most important of the 4 parts/ theory-specifiers.   (control vortex, non-control, control cancellation, control transformation, control seizure)

I don’t have an elegant 3-word solution like analogical psych’c eternalismthat explicitly says Control.

Given that Control is the ultimate topic, experience, and transformation, that means, ‘Control’ (or Cyberfoo) must, or should, be one of the main words for the name of the Theory.  

No matter how the word ‘Eternalism’ or ‘Heimarmene’ was or is defined, the primary meaning of Eternalism isn’t Control – that’s a problem, to solve if possible.

The best I have at the moment is 4-term identifier-phrase for the Theory:
the “analogical psych’c eternalism controlfoo” theory solves x y z.

equiv:the “mytheme alt-state pre-existence controlfoo” theory solves x y z

eg

the “myth altered-state pre-existence of control-thoughts” theory explains mystics’ enlightenment and all equivalents.

“analogical psych’c eternalism” is very strong, packing a lot into 3 words, that are — for the complex theory — relatively commonplace.

Pretty ideal search results, on my machine:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=eternalism

so: minor problem: ‘eternalism’ is tech jargon (but no more than is ‘determinism’)

problem: ‘eternalism’ doesn’t highlight its main phenomenological referent (experiencing block universe & worldlines)

Problem: ‘eternalism’ doesn’t spotlight/foreground the very most important thing, Controlfoo (control vortex, non-control, control cancellation, control transformation, control seizure).

For the 3rd term of a 4-term phrase, ‘Eternalism’ is a good single-word label.
But the word ‘Eternalism’ can’t “cover” for Control-Foo; nothing really could, given that Control-Foo is the most important of the 4 parts of the Theory.

Re: term #1: ‘Metaphorical’ is a common word, that is grammatical here; while ‘Analogical’ is not a common word.

Metaphorical Psych’c Eternalism
Metaphorical Psych’c Pre-existence

Strange Loop’s Characterization of the Import of the Egodeath Theory

now apply this to the topic “Why Transcendent Knowledge Is of Highest Value”

Strange Loop wrote:

“You are not comprehending/appreciating the GRAVITY of the Egodeath Theory. 

This isn’t another book that you read or new philosophy or scientific discovery… This is a complete PARADIGM shift. 

It is the AXIOM by which EVERYTHING else is measured.

I hope that you can see the treasure you have in your hand.

The theory boils down to the recognition (in ASC) of the ego, being based on a logical paradox.

This understanding of higher logic culminates in what is often described as death/dying(egodeath) – and is then reconciled by a deeper understanding of what the ego essentially is ie, a logical paradox and the ramifications of this knowledge ie. the shift from Possibilism-thinking to Eternalism-awareness. 

This is the branch of the Theory known as the Cybernetic Theory of Ego of Transcendence.

[ = the Egodeath theory minus Myth/history/lyrics; ie:
Loose Cognition, Block Universe, Control Transformation; but not Analogy. -cm]

Michael Hoffman, the genius that he is, has made clear the previously murky waters.

With his sword of logic he has cut through the thicket and has created a clear and defined path for us.

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f12.item.zoom

And if that wasn’t enough… He has given us the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion!!!!

An unparalleled exposé of what Religion is ALL ABOUT.

It’s RADICAL… It turns the modern interpretation of Religion ON ITS HEAD, with no apologies!

With this knowledge in hand, we are now intrepid explorers in the previously unrecognizable Myths of the ancient worlds.

I do hope you can learn to recognize this…

Sean Carroll, Michio Kaku, Brian Greene will be mere footnotes in the history books, forget them, forget Balsakar, forget Zen, forget McKenna, forget Many Worlds theory, String theory and whatever else theory you hold dear.

YOU HAVE THE ONLY THEORY YOU NEED RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.”

– Loop

Quantum Ineffability

def’n of ‘mystics’

Theme of Balance in Dionysus Triumph Mosaic

the god of balance you shall be

balanced leopard dish

need better photo

Photo by Michael Hoffman (ego death),
10:10 a.m. 10/10/2010

The Egodeath theory holds that
analogies of altered-state, block-universe, control-transformation
explains:
spiritual regeneration; mystic enlightenment; satori; gnosis; initiation; esotericism; and equivalents.

Myth, ASC, Block Universe, Control Agency
control agency [ca] control agency

The Egodeath theory is that myth describes altered-state, block-universe, control-agency transformation; which explains mystic enlightenment.

Have the 4 areas (Myth, ASC, Block Universe, Control Transformation) 4 theory home pages?

Home Page for Each Quadrant of the Egodeath Theory: Myth, Altered State, Pre-Existence, Control Vortex

writings on Entheogen History (summary)
could Entheogen History include cog-phen, psil, grk+Christian , High Esoteric’m?
vs.
writings on Entheogen Scholarship (method). answer: aim in-between Entheogen History & Entheogen Scholarship. neither reductionist timeline, nor meta-methodology commentary written specifically for entheoboffin historical research-scholars

entheogen history – i do scholarship, but the topic, from aud’c pov, is history. some audience want entheogen scholarship (more meta- eg critique of where the field is centered and what frwk, whether cog-phen or reductionist pseudo-esoteric; fallacies of the field to avoid, tyupical mistakes of the field.

  • Announcement: The Mytheme Theory; the “Analogical Psychedelic Eternalism” Theory of Religious Mythology
    https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/08/announcement-the-mytheme-theory-analogical-psychedelic-eternalism-religious-myth/
    • the mytheme decoding methodology (narrow) < component-theory home
    • applications of the mytheme decoding methodology
      • religious mythology
      • entheogen history
        hot: Psilocybe; Greek + Christian; Cognitive Effects; High Esotericism
        not: Amanita; Christianity in Isolation; Surface Forms; Low Esotericism
      • some audience want entheogen history – the findings, not the techniques commentary.
      • ahistoricity
      • popular culture

My Book Reading Technique w/ Gordon “Citation Needed” Wasson Book Photos

“ALL US AUTHORITYES UNINIMASOULY AGREE YOUR MUSRHOOM TREE IS ANYTHING BOUT BUT MUSROOOM, ITS A ITALIAN PINE TRUSST US CASE CLOSED B/C ALL THE AUTHORITIES AGREE ITS SETTLED”

BRAZEN ARG FROM AUTHORITY!

WHERE’S YOUR CITATIONS, BLOWHARD, POPE WASSON

NICE ELLIPSES YOU GOT THERE, WHATCH GOT BEHIND HTOSE … TO UPPER LEFT OF BOURY’S PLAINC FAX PAINTING? Why don’t you give any citations? Why did you twice censor the one citation that you have? Why are you able to name authorities, but not state their arguments to support their findings, and their corrsepondence, in criticial discucssion of the matter. BALD ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY. UNLESS U COUNT PANOFSKY’S BEDTIME JUST-SO STORY, THAT IT’S AN ACCIDENTAL COINCIDENCE THAT ARTISTS ARE INCOMPETENT IDIOTS WORLKING FROM SLOPPILY RECOPIED ETEMP TEMPLATES MY AZZ TEMPLATES THAT *JUST HAPPEN BY COINCIDENCE FOR NO REASON TO LOOK MUSHROOMS* BUT THE ARTIST WOULD BE SHOCKED – SHOCKED!! – IF U ID’D THEM AS PSY MUSHROOMS.

CASE CLOSED.

WE HAVE A BEDTIME COVER-STORY BY PANOFSKY SO THAT PROVES THAT ALL THE AUTHORITIES ARE RIGHT … <– DON’T LOOK AT THIS BRINCKMANN LITTLE BOOK FROM LONG AGO PLS, ITS JUST SOME DOTS

*CITATIONS NEEDED*
– NOT “REPLACE BRINCKMANN CITATION BY ELLIPSES”

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/

WOW, THAT’S THE *ONLY* CITATION YOU HAVE, AND YOU CENSORED IT EVERY TIME?

WEAK ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY

my reading technique I developed. No technique in 1989. It’s been ongoing technique devmt. A curve hill.

That’s a research and book-inspection question.

Could be 1992, my approach is discernable, to book markup – I already uploaded Wasson photos, where? Egodeath.com images of markup SOMA book.
Instantly found by search site for soma -> http://www.egodeath.com/wassonsomaannotatedpages.htm

Book: Gnostic New Age

You Only Read that Book, Every Line, Cover-to-Cover, a Single Time? Poser

i read it just the other day like 2016 (hardcover), re-reading it looks good but like I don’t really remember the passages; iow I could benefit from reread. Refresh; 7th time to … wo the Way of Zen by Alan Watts covered like 5 times in 1987, but I am way better at reading-thoroughness techniques, did I write notes in it? or underline anywhere? I had not developed my

structured content, but no TOC, the headings short & vague

The Gnostic New Age: How a Countercultural Spirituality Revolutionized Religion from Antiquity to Today
April DeConick, 2016
http://amzn.com/0231170777

Vague TOC; Do I need to manually extract the outline, maybe to level 2?

GOOD: THERE ARE MANY SECTION HEADINGS, SO IT WOULD BE READY TO EXTRACT THE OUTLINE.

I read this book cover to cover probably new, one time, no review, no detailed toc. 2016 hardcover. DO A QUICK UNDERLYIN LINING OF H2 HEADINGS. I’T IT it

The headings design structure is a flat sectioning eg:
10 equal headings in every chapter.

Like the toc ch titles, USELESS ultra-short headings.

Terrible wording of ch’s & headings — too short, too meaningless.

Sections are broken up (good), poorly labeled.

The sections are organized but very poorly vaguely labelled. So, extracting outline and adding hint-words is needed and would have certain value to guide 2nd reading of this book.

ANNOYING USELESS TOC ONLY HAS VAGUE CH TITLES, THANKS A LOT LOW IQ PUBLISHER WTF COLUMBIA WHAT A *USELESS* TOC!

Chaff

chaff thresh winnow straw wheat husk hull fruit

Plainest 1-4 Outline of the Egodeath Theory

  • the Egodeath theory
    • Myth
    • Altered State
    • Block Universe
    • Control Vortex 🍄🐍💎🔥🐉🤯 DRAGON FIRE EGODEATH GATEWAY

One thing that was throwing off my Site Map outline design balance, is that two topics are heavily, disproportionately covered at this WordPress site:

  • mytheme decoding
  • entheogen scholarship

Specialty at each Egodeath Site

  • CybTrans.com 1997 = the cybernetic theory (with rock lyrics analogies) (v1 of the Egodeath.com content, carried fwd forming superset)
  • Egodeath.com = the mytheme theory
    • recently mature, integrated with the cybernetic theory.
    • A full snapshot of 2007 content, it’s only missing the the Egodeath Yahoo Group postings Feb 14 2004 – 2007. Has June 10, 2001-Feb. 14, 2004.
    • Topics:
      • Mytheme decoding
      • Religious mythology
      • Ahistoricity
      • Entheogen history
      • Rock lyrics
  • EgodeathTheory WordPress site – mytheme decoding, entheogen scholarship
    includes EgodeathYahooGroup WordPress site with ~full set of postings June 10, 2001 – Dec. 15, 2020.
    • Myth
      • mytheme decoding
      • entheogen scholarship < i am entheogen scholarship

Those two topics fall within the Myth quadrant of the egodeath theory. Other topics within Myth are not covered much at this WordPress site:

  • ahistoricity
  • rock lyrics

A corollary or side-effect of that recent focus on mytheme decoding & entheogen scholarship, is that I’m not in the mindset to break out the other 3 areas (only Myth):

  • Altered State
  • Block Universe
  • Control Vortex

1-4 Outline of the Egodeath Theory for Site Map

Now Try Reworking Site Map for 2006 main article’s 1-4 instead of 1-2-8 outline

  • the egodeath theory
    • analogy – ie the Mytheme theory
    • loose cognition – 1/3 of the Cybernetic theory
    • eternalism – “
    • cybernetics – “

reading downward u get the Theory Sepcification:

analogical psychedelic eternalism cyberneticism

the egodeath theory is the theory that
analogical psychedelic eternalism controllership
explains all of the following:

  • religious mythology
  • esoteric Christianity initiation
  • mystery-religion initiation
  • mysticism
  • gnosis
  • satori
  • mystical sacred marriage
  • mystical revelation
  • spiritual transformation
  • the power of the Holy Spirit to regenerate
  • enlightenment
  • immortal life
  • completed initiate
  • mixed-wine banqueting
  • agape meals
  • ancient banqueting tradition
  • high rock lyrics
  • ahistoricity
  • esoteric esotericism
  • high esotericism
  • dragon mode mysticism
  • cybernetic mysticism
  • analogy, dissociation, block universe, control cancellation

New Outline of the Egodeath Theory

THREE WORDS are INSUFFICIENT.

CONTROL MUST BE FOREGROUNDED TOO, NOT JUST ANALOGY, LOOSE COGNITION, & ETERNALISM.

The word ‘Eternalism‘ cannot sufficiently give attention to the MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT, CYBERNETICS.

It Is Not Necessary to Display Applications of Mytheme theory in 1-4 outline, it is necessary to show Cybernetics at top level 1-4 outline, cannot just show Eternalism/ Heimarmene.

Cybernetics is the most important subject:

Importance of subjects: 4 main areas:

cybernetics – 10

block universe – 8

loose cognition – 6

metaphor – 1

The official sequence is the reverse:

  1. Learn the language of mythemes.
  2. Engage the ASC.
  3. Experience the block universe.
  4. Experience the control vortex.
  • the egodeath theory
    • myth
    • altered state
    • block universe
    • control vortex

the altered state (loose cognitive binding) [aslcb]

Metaphor’s out – 1 – (HUGE CHORUS: METAPHOR IS SOOPER IMPORTANT!!) ME: didn’t need it 1988. METAPHOR PROVED TO BE OPTIONAL. WHEN I WAS SAVED BY PSIRITUAL CHRIST VISION, ~1995, I WAS STILL A HISTORICIST when baptised. 1999, read King’s response to Allegro, STORY: I WENT TO MR. JESUS TO BLESS THE EGODEATH THEORY. MR. HISTORICAL JESUS CHOSE TO GET HIMSELF CRUC’D, WHY???

HE’S THE WORLD’S MOST RATIONAL MAN.

HOW CAN I GET JESUS TO CONFIRM AND BLESS THE EGODEATH THEORY?

FINDING: NO MR. HISTORICAL JESUS.

SPIRITUAL CHRIST IS WHERE ITS AT.

GET MR. CHRIST TO CONFIRM THE EGODEATH THEORY

How does ahistorical Jesus confirm and support the Egodeath theory?

The Egodeath theory received confirmation in the esotericism dimension.

In 1998, start of Phase 2, 1999, I didn’t know how I’d use Mr. Historical Jesus’ scriptures to prove support, corroborate the Egodeath theory.

Scripture when give a key, ahistoricity, meaning-flipping, Mythemese fluency, supports the Egodeath theory. When leverage psilocybin mushrooms in Greek & Christian religion; when span & conjoin a pair of centers of focus: Greek + Christian,

center the focus on the pairing:
{Greek + Christian}

Thx Mr. Christ for blessing the Egodeath theory.

poitn is, Cybernetics is #1 import so WHY FOLD IT INTO ANOTHER AREA

REMINDER FOR STUPID PEOPLE: ‘CYBERNETICS’ IS the most important area of all – so why think can slip it into demote Cybernetics and just hide it fold it into eternalism / block universe / determinism , Heimarmene cannot HIGHLIGHT Cybernetics. Eternalism cannot HIGHLIGHT Cybernetics.

analogical psychedelic eternalism cyberneticism

agh i might as well wrok generate a fresh here we go from scratch:

first, list out the certainly distinct 4 main areas, the natural division of the theory for correct balance: and sequence – rather than which word (it’s sets of wrods, in 4 items) A 4-item list of sets of terms or subgtopics/applications.

Label of this Outline Draft: 1-4, sequence, the mytheme theory is collapsed into one quadrant; no-free-will is collapsed into block universe (eternalism; determinism, fatedness, heimarmene, worldline of the control-thought inserter & receiver intertwined, carved in rock relief)

  • the egodeath theory – keep
    • the Mytheme theory –
      • collapse ‘mytheme decoding’, promote it, merge it into the parent node, which is “the Mytheme theory”; but,
      • suppress the application nodes. while
      • religious mythology – added this new sub-theory node,
        as an application of the mytheme theory, an application like
      • ahistoricity and
      • rock lyrics and
      • entheogen history, which are other applications of the Mytheme theory. don’t list applications in this 1-4 outline; keep all focus on the 4 topic-areas: analogy, loose cognition , eternalism , cybernetics (in that order)
    • loose cognition
    • block universe <– demote over-discussed “no-free-will”, fold it into distinctive
    • control cancellation

ok i’m adding it to the list, no-free-will is now officially over-used, over-focused, like Amanita, in Christianity , Eleusis, Kykeon, ….

by putting all attention on a limited set of topics, it makes the field blind to other entheogen history.

SPREADING ATTENTION RIGHTLY, IS KEY.

Attention spread between 4 areas,

  • Fold the cybernetic theory a little,
    • no-free-will folds into one of those main areas (block universe)
  • fold metaphor a lot
    • don’t show ahistoricity, entheogen history, or rock lyrics, in the 1-4 outline; fold those in as applications of Metaphor. Only when you zoom/open that main-area node, then show those applications/topics.
    • explicitly add a 4th application within the mytheme theory: religious mythology (like entheogen history, rock lyrics , ahistoricity)
  • There are now multiple outlines in series, shown in Site Map.
  • Make a 1-4-4 outline:

Pattern:

  • the egodeath theory
    • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x

correct seq of main areas:

  • the egodeath theory
    • Analogy
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • Dissociation
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • Block Universe
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • Control Agency
      • x
      • x
      • x
      • x

Next, fill-in the leaf nodes, called them component-theories, but some are applications of a theory: applied to:

how the Mytheme theory is applied to:

  • trading cards
  • comics
  • rock lyrics
  • religious mythology
  • movies
  • literature
  • ahistoricity
  • entheogen history

Fill-in 4 leaf nodes in each of 4 main areas:

  • the egodeath theory
    • Analogy
      • religious mythology
      • entheogen history
      • ahistoricity
      • popcult
    • Dissociation
      • x = todo: check outline of main article
      • x
      • x
      • x
    • Block Universe
      • no-free-will
      • worldlines
      • fatedness, heimarmene
      • x
    • Control Agency
      • control cancellation attractor destructor vortex climax potential reaching Civilized status, Attaining the Reference Caduceus Message of Eternalism Not Possibilism .
      • x
      • x

analogical psychedelic eternalism cyberneticism <– check it out, appending explicitly “cybernetics” to the phrase “analogical psychedelic eternalism”, results in the same ideal order sequence as in the main sections sequence of the main article.

Which Bad Outline of the Egodeath Theory Is Correct?

From ~Jan 16, 2021 Site Map page:

semi-unhelpful finding: all leaf-nodes in both outlines are praised. List of 4 + 4, + 4 leaf nodes/ component-theories:

1-(4+4+(4)) OUTLINE, flat version, orig order:

  • THE EGODEATH THEORY
    • LOOSE COGNITION
    • BLOCK UNIVERSE
    • NO-FREE-WILL
    • NON-CONTROL
    • MYTHEME DECODING
    • ENTHEOGEN HISTORY
    • AHISTORICITY
    • ROCK LYRICS
    • DISSOCIATION
    • ETERNALISM
    • CONTROLLERSHIP
    • ANALOGY

Next, sort/group all items:

  • ALTERED STATE; DISSOCIATION; LOOSE COGNITION
  • ETERNALISM; BLOCK UNIVERSE
    • NO-FREE-WILL – not required primary pull-point
  • CONTROLLERSHIP, NON-CONTROL; CONTROL CANCELLATION
  • ANALOGY; MYTHEME DECODING; METAPHOR;
    • ENTHEOGEN HISTORY – math tells me this is not a required pull-point. ie NOT A PRIMARY THEORY-AREA FOR THEORY …” THIS ISN’T A WEIGHT-CARRYING BEAM”; IE IT’S A GOOD SUBTOPIC OR COMPONENT-THEORY WITHIN THE ANALOGY THEORY COMPONENT-THEORY.
    • ROCK LYRICS
    • AHISTORICITY
v3 of combined outline: cleaned up
  • The Egodeath Theory
    • ALTERED STATE; DISSOCIATION; LOOSE COGNITION
    • ETERNALISM; BLOCK UNIVERSE
    • CONTROLLERSHIP, NON-CONTROL; CONTROL CANCELLATION
    • ANALOGY; MYTHEME DECODING; METAPHOR
  • The Egodeath Theory
    • Altered State
    • Block Universe
    • Controllership
    • Analogy

Aside from word-choice, are those the 4 main idea-areas?

CURIOUS, in the article titled The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death, the puzzle quadrants are:

Cybernetics

Dissociation < 25% of entheogen history

Metaphor < 75% of entheogen history

Determinism

Nowhere is listed Entheogen History .

In “entheogen history”, what does History mean?

What’s my Meta-Theory of How to Do ENTHEOGEN HISTORY, entheogen scholarship

a component-theory of the egodeath theory: Meta-Theory of How to Do Entheogen History Scholarship – what does the subject of “entheogen history” consist of?

entheogen history < NOT Christian Ratsch universalism.

Why the Egodeath Yahoo Group Postings Are High Average Quality

Posting-Centric Modular Composition

Having this messy staging area can contribute to cleaner pages separated-out.

So All the Content Works Modularly Together Everything Plugs Right Together

b/c — as hinted in url “/postings/” nav page URL at CybTrans.com wayback 1997 site, (= v1 of Egodeath.com), I’VE BEEN FOR A LONG TIME COMPOSING POSTINGS WITH A PLAN TO COPY THEM AS-IS TO CONSTRUCT A GOOD WEBSITE.

Unlike the chaose in these idea development pages, here which are not carefully restrcited… iow,

IT WAS HARD WRITING MY POSTINGS, WHERE I HAD TO RESTRICT MYSELF TO WRITING REUSABLE POSTINGS AS COMPONENTS TO CONSTRUCT A WEBSITE FROM LATER W/O MODIFICATION/CLEANUP REQ’D.

That produced the very high average quality level of content you see at the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

That content, at 1997 CybTrans.com & v2 = Egodeath.com, was composed as postings, with the constraint of being reusable modules of content for a website webpages. At WordPress here, I have… A RANGE OF SLOP.

From fairly neat flagship articles, (short of print-publication ready) — but breakthrough content – to these idea development pages, somewhat freeform especially at top of page.

I’ve been doing this mode of writing-thinking since

See the source image

when the muse inspired me to take up the pen.

SURPRISING FINDING: 🤯
THE GREAT MYSTICS OF EGODEATH
HAVE HEAVY PSYCHOLOGICAL HANGUPS AROUND THEIR MAGICALLY-CHARGED WORD ‘MYSTICS‘, and so Are Unable to Coherently Converse About this Mythical Alleged Group

SURPRISING FINDING: 🤯
THE GREAT MYSTICS OF EGODEATH
HAVE HEAVY PSYCHOLOGICAL HANGUPS AROUND
THEIR MAGICALLY-CHARGED, EVER-UNDER-DEFINED WORD ‘MYSTICS‘ 🪄, AND SO ARE UNABLE TO COHERENTLY CONVERSE ABOUT THIS MYTHICAL EPIC ALLEGED GROUP TO WHICH THEY MAY OR MAY NOT SECRETLY ASPIRE TO PUT ON A MORE OR LESS HIGH PEDESTAL AND THEN CONJOIN THEMSELVES WITH, AFFIX THEMSELVES TO

These adherents to the word ‘mystics’, these who style themselves
the Grea🍄 Mys🍄ics of Egodea🍄h
mistakenly think that they desire
to develop the Perennial Entheogen Philosophy,
but that pursuit is just a substitute wish fulfillment project;
their actual wish is to __ on fire, per Freud, who people should stop laughing at
🛋🪑😢 <- 😄

State Your Positions on the Distinct Questions (Everyone, Consistently) –

You Have to Accurately, Explicitly and Clearly State Your Own Position, and Accurately State the Opponent’s Position which they Actually Hold (that applies to Max, Kafei, Letcher, and Hatsis) – don’t just imply, don’t just insinuate.

Confirm , listen, actually check (not just w/ leading questions to steer the other person away from their actual position).

“Am I accurately describing your position, or am I mis-framing your position?”

Do you agree *or disagree* with this particular premise: are there non-ordinary mystics, or not?

*IF* so, in what sense do you hold that special mystics are non-ord?

Are all mystics these special mystics?

Is there a separate group of extra-special mysics?

What is the difference between a lower mystics and a higher mystic?

ARE SOME MYSTICS MORE SPECIAL THAN OTHERS?

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF MYSTICS HAVE PERMA-ASC, OR, AREN’T SUBJECT TO THE REUTRN OF THE ORDINARY STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND EGOIC EXPEIREICNG?

WHICH MYSTICS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE RETURN OF EGOIC-MODE EXPEIRENCING?

My answer: my definition of the difference bwteen naive possibilism-thinking vs. qualified possibilism-thinking. Look up the technical difference between … let’s see how well my sh*tty Glossary works.

‘Naive Possibilism-Thinking’ vs.
‘Qualified Possibilism-Thinking’

wtf is “naive possibilism-thinking”?? speak english, your theory is way too complicated

wtf is “qualified possibilism-thinking”?? i know, SIMPLY LOOK IT UP in the Egodeath Concepts Collection(TM)!

Core Concepts
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/17/glossary-for-the-egodeath-theory/ –

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/17/glossary-for-the-egodeath-theory/#naive-possibilism-thinking

Podcast Episode 26 Commentary

Definition of ‘Everyone’, ‘Ordinary People’, and ‘Mystics’ [copied to episode 26 Commentary page]

  • everyone is the universal set.
    • ordinary people have less than some level of theoretical knowledge + mystic experience.
    • mystics have greater than that level of theoretical knowledge + mystic experience.

The Egodeath theory explains everyone and applies to everyone, including ordinary people and mystics.

Set of definitions by Cybermonk.

Definition of “Everyone”, “Ordinary People”, and “Mystics”

Do not conflate the universal set ‘everyone’ with the subset ‘ordinary people’

Here’s an artificial simplified model, for conversation purposes.

Here’s the artificially simplified model that I’m willing to converse using.

The set ‘everyone’ consists of two mutually exclusive subsets: ‘ordinary people’ and ‘mystics’.

If you say “everyone, not mystics”, that is meaningless; you are violating the term-definitions and are contradicting yourself.

The phrase “ordinary people; not mystics” makes sense; it’s a valid group-label.

Do not misuse the word ‘everyone’ to mean a subset of the universal set.

The word ‘everyone’ means not a subset, but rather the universal set.

To refer to a subset of the universal set, use either the term ‘ordinary people’ or the term ‘mystics’.

The Egodeath theory applies to and explains everyone; which is to say, the Egodeath theory applies to and explains ordinary people, and the Egodeath theory applies to and explains mystics.

  • everyone
    • ordinary people
    • mystics
What the Egodeath theory asserts about the set of who it applies to and explains
  • everyone <- the egodeath theory explains and applies to
    • ordinary people <- the egodeath theory explains and applies to
    • mystics <- the egodeath theory explains and applies to
What it seems like Max is asserting about the set of who the egodeath theory applies to and explains
  • everyone <- Egodeath theory explains & applies to a subset of
    • ordinary people <- Egodeath theory explains and applies to
    • mystics <- Egodeath theory doesn’t explain and apply to

Definition of ‘Everyone’, ‘Ordinary People’, and ‘Mystics’
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#Definition-of-Everyone

We don’t need a formal-styled set of definitions; we merely need an explicit set of definitions of the 3 terms together. done:

Definition of ‘Everyone’, ‘Ordinary People’, and ‘Mystics’
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#Definition-of-Everyone

Ignore schizophrenics, who have perma-ASC, or uncontrolled entry into loose cognition.

A person is either an ordinary person, or a mystic; ‘ordinary people’ is mutually exclusive with ‘mystics’.

‘Ordinary people’ …. Everyone is divided into two mutually exclusive subsets: ordinary people, and mystics.

The difference between ordinary people vs. mystics is, the intensity and frequency of loosecog.

The problem:

  • Max more or less consistently uses one set of definitions of the terms ‘everyone’, ‘ordinary people’, and ‘mystics’.
  • Kafei more or less consistently uses one set of definitions of the terms ‘everyone’, ‘ordinary people’, and ‘mystics’.
  • Cybernetics more or less consistently uses one set of definitions of the terms ‘everyone’, ‘ordinary people’, and ‘mystics’.
  • Prescription: everyone needs to discuss as a set, definitions of the terms ‘everyone’, ‘ordinary people’, and ‘mystics’, along with stating their own position on defining this set of terms. CAN WE OR CAN WE NOT AGREE ON THIS SET OF TERM DEFINITIONS?
  • everyone
    • ordinary people – 99%
    • mystics – 1%

Suppose ‘everyone’ is 100 people.

  • 99 people are ‘ordinary people’.
  • 1 person is a ‘mystic’

A person is either an ordinary person, or a mystic.

Stable Reference Definition of ‘Everyone’

The universal set. There is no person outside the set ‘everyone’. There is no set ‘mystics’ that’s outside the set ‘everyone.’.

Stable Reference Definition of ‘Ordinary People’

A subset of ‘everyone’. Let us suppose that there are in some sense, to be defined, two

Stable Reference Definition of ‘Mystics’

‘Everyone’ is the Universal Set, Which Therefore Includes the Subset ‘Ordinary People’, and which Therefore Includes the Subset ‘Mystics’

Every person, whether in the set of ‘ordinary people’ or ‘mystics’, is included in the set ‘everyone’.

Never conflate the term ‘everyone’ with the term ‘ordinary people’.

‘Ordinary people’ is a subset of ‘everyone’.

‘Everyone’ = the universal set. No one exists who stands out side the set ‘everyone’.

‘everyone’ means the universal set.

No matter how we define ‘ordinary people’ and ‘mystics’, the word ‘everyone’ includes all ordinary people and includes all mystics.

There is no group that is outside of the set ‘everyone’.

The word ‘everyone’ is not exclusive; it is the universal set, not a subset.

There is no set of people of which ‘everyone’ is merely a subset.

Do not use the word ‘everyone’ to conflate it with only the subset ‘ordinary people’.

Max Asks: Do You Hold that Mystics Have Perma-ASC? Kafei answers No; Transient. Only More Frequent than Ordinary People [copied to episode 26 Commentary page]

Do You Hold that the non-ordinariness of mystics is that they have perma-ASC? Kafei *clearly* said “NO, MYSTICS’ ASC IS A FEW HOURS ONLY, THEN OSC RETURNS. THEY JUST ASC MORE frequently.

(Kafei also makes an additional, different argument, based on bugs.)

PRESCRIPTION: EVERYONE, STATE YOUR CURRENT POSITION EFFECTIVELY. MAKE SURE THE OTHER PERSON ACCURATELY UNDERSTANDS YOUR CURRENT POSITION. CONSISTENTLY.

THE LETCHER ERROR: FAILURE TO EXPLICITLY SPECIFY VARIOUS POSITIONS AND ARGUE IN AN EXPLICIT, PLANNED, STRUCTURED WAY IN REFERENCE TO THOSE POSITIONS ON DISTINCT TOPICS/QUESTIONS.

[1:05:00] +1 for Kafei – Who Is Constructing-by-Definition a Group of Perma-ASC Non-Ordinary Mystics? [copied to episode 26 Commentary page]

At 1:05:00 ep 26, Kafei does well – Max has been striving to match-up Kafei with an extreme position Max asks with openly leading questions, Max is striving to try to lead Kafei into an extreme position, and Kafei rejects that extreme position.

1:07:22 Max emphasizes the Egodeath theory as 2-state model. Which means Max is agreeing with the position which Kafei just asserted (naturally in the form of a citation of a Non-Ordinary, Mystic Person – the Great Mystic Wm James, who said…
The ASC for mystics is ephemeral.

The ASC for mystics is ephemeral. <– Kafei’s explicitly asserted position, which he supports by citing William James.
Kafei directly and straightforwardly answers Max’s question, in the Negative.

My Prescription:

First, look up definitions of ‘mystics’. Reality-check with Webster: you need to discuss proper definition of “mystics” and how you think of mystics as being “non-ordinary” in some sense that you hold.

TELL US: WHAT DO
IN WHAT SENSE DO YOU THINK MYSTICS ARE NON-ORDINARY. PERMA-ASC?
Kafei: “No.” <– ok, so what we
Max: “No.” <– have is agreement.

THEREFORE NO ONE IS ASSERTING AND DEFENDING THE POSITION THAT
“WHAT MAKES MYSTICS NON-ORDINARY IS PERMA-ASC.”

Who Is Asserting that Such a Group Could Exist, in a Definable Way?

What Does “Mystics” Mean?

Are There Such “Mystics”, Defined that Way?

Who Is Taking that Position?

Who Is Defining and Who Is Asserting that Position?

What Does Max think Kafei’s position is, on the the question “Is there a special group called mystics? if so..”

If so, in what way are “mystics” special; non-ordinary?

Is there a non-ordinary set of people called mystics?

What’s Max’s position on that question?

What’s Kafei’s position on that question?

What position does Max think Kafei holds, on the question of whether there exists a group non-ordinary called mystics?

What position does Kafei think Max holds, on the question of whether there exists a group non-ordinary called mystics?

What position does Max think Kafei holds, on the question of:
In what way are “mystics” “non-ordinary”?

What position does Kafei think Max holds, on the question of
In what way are “mystics” “non-ordinary”?

1:07:22 Is Max Pressuring Kafei to Assert “Mystics Have Perma-ASC”? [copied to episode 26 Commentary]

Is Max Asserting that Mystics Have Perma-ASC?

Kafei: Mystics are only different from ordinary ppl in frequency. The ASC is transient for mystics; mystics soon return to OSC, per Wm James citation (so, a defensible position).

Max: “the Egodeath theory doesn’t apply to mystics who have perma-ASC. the egodeath theory only applies to ordinary people; that is, everyone – except your proposed group of perma-ASC non-ordinary, mystics.

Kafei: “wut? I just said, per citation, the altered state is transient for mystics; that mystics do NOT have perma-ASC.”

Max: “The Egodeath theory doesn’t apply to special mystics, who have perma-ASC.”

Who is asserting that position: that perma-ASC mystics exist? Kafei is not asserting that mystics have perma-ASC.

Is Max asserting that mystics have perma-ASC?

Is Max asserting that the Egodeath theory doesn’t apply to mystics, and that there is a group of people called mystics, who have perma-ASC?

So we have the conversation:

Max: “So you think mystics have perma-ASC, right?”

Kafei: “No, like Wm James, I believe mystics, like ordinary ppl, have ASC only for a few hours and then return to OSC.” 1:07:22 ep 26.

Max: “I shall now deliver a lecture asserting that the Egodeath theory only applies exclusively to ordinary people who have ASC only for a few hours and then return to OSC. (Unlike mystics – defined a certain way, “having perma-ASC” – that I’ve assigned to you.)

“And,

“my main point is simply that
the egodeath theory applies to everyone, not to some special, different, non-ordinary group, that I’m assigning to you.”

Kafei: “Truly your logic is dizzying.”

Is Max there using the word ‘everyone’ to mean ‘not everyone’? The word ‘everyone’ always means the universal set. If you mean to refer to a subset of the universal set, either say “ordinary people”, or “mystics”.

Do not use the word ‘everyone’ to mean ‘ordinary people’. ‘Ordinary people’ is a subset of ‘everyone’.

The conversation ought to be focused on why the heavy reliance on the magic word “mystics”. What are Max’ and Kafei’s HEAVY PSYCHOLOGICAL HANGUPS around the magic-charged word ‘mystics’?

Discuss why Kafei thinks these dudes are worth reading.

What does Webster say about it?

IN WHAT WAY DOES KAFEI CONSTRUCT THE CATEGORY, “MYSTICS”? FORGETTING WEBSTER, WHAT DO THESE “MYSTICS” MEAN TO HIM?

IN WHAT WAY DOES FREAKOUT CONSTRUCT THE CATEGORY, “MYSTICS”? FORGETTING WEBSTER, WHAT DO THESE “MYSTICS” MEAN TO FREAKOUT?

they are CROSS-TALKING ACROSS EACH OTHER B/C MAX IS TRYING TO CONSTRUCT A DEFINITION OF “MYSTICS”, WEBSTER HAS DEFINED “MYSTICS” DIFFERENTLY ALREADY

KAFEI SAYS MYSTICS ARE NOT SPECIAL, AND YET HE TREATS THEM AS IF A SPECIAL GROUP – BUT NOT TO THE EXTREME DEGREE THAT MAX REPEATEDLY TRIES TO ATTRIBUTE TO KAFEI, AGAINST KAFEI’S REPEATED REJECTIONS

WHY DOES KAFEI SO VALUE “MYSTICS”?

IN WHAT SPECIFIC WAY ARE MYSTICS NON-ORDINARY?

I’d like to see more, in ep 16&26, prescription: STATE YOUR POSITION ON.

1:17:30 Freewill Protective Fog of Quantum Multiworlds Magic Steering Power to Create the Experienced Future While Moving Through Time in to the Experientially Open Non-Existent Multi-Quantum Future – Quantum Egoic Thinking, Steering with Power in the Multipossibilities Tree [copied to episode 26 Commentary]

Is Kafei merely defining, or Asserting Possibilism Here?

Kafei said here he had previously an idea like branching worlds worldlines:
1:16:54 the impression of causal determinism
(todo: transcribe)

1:17:30 ep 26 Everything’s fixed in time

Is this freewill thinking sneaking back in through the multiworlds worldmodel?

I am King Steersman Among the Multiworlds!

I Control the Future Worldlines Timelines Master of Reality Future

/ end of sections to copy to 26

Letcher-Hatsis Not Stating Their Position on Distinct Questions

This goes for letcher-hatsis too, but Hatsis a different scope.

Letcher = Amanita. Hatsis = entheogens w/ mushrooms covered-over, removed, suppressed.

Letcher’s book = Amanita scope – Definitive of Pop Field Scope , while Hatsis is broader scope. It is asymmetrical to say “Letcher-Hatsis”.

Letcher = Amanita.

Letcher’s book’s scope is specific, limited to:

  • Allegro-Amanita Pop Spir’y
  • anti mushrooms in Christian religion history
  • pro contemp mushrooms.
  • Doesn’t cover entheogen scholarship broadly. Limited to Amanita, limited to Pop Cult/ Low Esotericism/ surface form, no cognitive phen’y oops detail

Hatsis’ scope:

  • anti mushrooms in Greek & Christian religion history
  • the maximal-minus entheogen theory of religion, A WEIRDLY UNBALANCED VERSION OF THE MODERATE ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION:
    • “SELLING” SCOPOL,
    • DENYING WHAT I JUST SOLIDLY PROVED, AND 70-FOLD (Psilocybe mushrooms used for religionus exp’g positively identified as such). What type of art-evidence do u want, see my GALLERIES OF TYPES OF ART EVIDENCE FOR psilocybin mushrooms in Greek & Christian ART.
      MUSHROOMS IN GREEK PSILOCYBIN MUSHROOMS PMGCA. PMGCA psilocybin mushrooms in psilocybin mushrooms in Greek and Christian history
  • He’s little-read on Greek incl entheogen history entheogen scholarship;
    He’s a real newbie to this field of mushrooms in Greek history, he comes stumbling up the entryway to grade school, on this topic.

Transcribe

todo: transcribe all Transcendent Knowledge podcast episosds, coffeetable book companion to printouts

I want full transcription of all Transcendent Knowledge podcast episodes. Like the Egodeath Yahoo Group, solid gold.

Try to find junk passages in Transcendent Knowledge podcast episodes:

The staple must be perfectly vertical. ppl assume it was machine-stapled.

List of Junk Passages in Transcendent Knowledge Podcast:

Talk about Hypatia’s Ideas, Everyone; Leave So-Predictable Low, Reductionist, Materialist Esotericism, Switch to High Esotericism, Cog Phen’y

  • HERE’S AN EXAMPLE OF LOW ESOTERICISM, SURFACE FORM, LOSING SIGHT OF HIGHER MEANING – actually a substantive Cringe Moment, it truly is a bad thing to do: everyone does this, but Kafei wins the laurel wreath crown of victory, outdoing them all.

Everyone, please: stop reducing Hypatia to the physical tale.

Just like everyone else, so predictably, Kafei goes on and ON about nothing but the physical.

His treatment – or ignoring of her ideas – it’s as predictable as 1998-2009 books by the Allegro-Acharya-Arthur-Ruck — sterling med’y.

There’s Nothing Wrong with Pop Sike Scholarship Except Oops Left Out all the the Cognitive Phenomenology, pidin pidgen pigin Mythemese a stundted grunting-based, physically reductionist telling of what esotericism is about:

STAND BACK EVERYONE I’M GOING TO REVEAL THE FEARSOME AWESOME TREMBLING REVELATION:

🤯AMANI🍄A⛈MU⚡️HR🍄🍄M⚡️😱😵😴

The problem with Pop Sike Amanita Santa esotericism is not that this pop scholarship is factually incorrect about history; more importantly, the problem is that this approach is physicalistic, reductionist.

The lack of cognitive phenomenology description is a fatal gap in the pop sike scholarship approach and the pop rebuttals at that same vulgar level of the non-initiates, misses the target, remains in sin, childhood-mode thinking.

The first order of business of low esotericism.

The first order of business of high esotericism.

AMANITA PSEUDO-ESOTERICISM PRESERVES EGOIC THINKING

NOT THAT THEY ARE WRONG; I could GAF about whether Santa is Amanita <shrug>

Go Santa Amanita!

I’m on Team Traditional Secret Amanita Shaman Cult of Santa Worship.

THE ALLEGRO-AMANITA-LOWESO’M-SURFACEFORM TEAM ALLEGRO INCLUDING EVERYONE WHO CENTERS THEIR THINKING ON THE PHYSICAL NON-COGNITIVE REALM.

IT’S ESOTERICTERICISM MINUS THE COGNTIVIE PHYEN. BUY $20 BOOKS OF STERLING MEDIOCRITY BRILLANT SHALLOWNESS FLATLAND DOES MYTHEMELAND; MYTHEMELAND REDUCED TO THE PHYSICAL NON-COGNITIVE REALM, LIKE TRPPING BUT W/O THE COGNITIVE PHEN’Y ASPECTS OF LOOSE COGNITION.

the loose cognitive state

What are Hypatia’s allegedly good ideas?

So predictably, just like everyone else, the only thing Kafei has to say about her is death.

Definitely SKIP THAT SECTION of this Transcendent Knowledge podcast.

Are there any other podcast episode sections you should skip? No. It’s just so predicable that on any show, when Hypatia is mentioned, it’s always

skip Good Friday (not serious) – every damn book pads a chapter with yet another recounting of good friday experiment, add it to the OVER-COVERED LIST:

Over-Covering X in Entheogen Scholarship Means Under-Covering X’, or Covering-Over X’

Good Friday Experiment 😴 😴 god here we go again, padding, filler, fluff, SKIP

SKIP ALL AMANITA ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP (except for my own breakthroughs, needless to say, in this “centrally” important topic)
Must move the center — *not* widen the center of focus, *move* the center of focus, FROM amanita, TO psilocybe.

ANY COVERAGE OF AMANITA MUST BE FRAMED AS “CIRCUS SIDE-SHOW” not as the central supporting beam of “the sacred mushroom theory” <– what an obnoxious label the anti-amanita Christian history crowd attach to the position. Where do they pick up this weird phrase? Didn’t they invent it themselves?

Letcher: “We couldn’t find a weak enough theory for us to be able to critique, so we had to concoct and patch together the worst, particular instance we could synthesize & artificially fabricate, and promote, and then heroically shoot it down. It was hard work. d/k why the prize is made of straw”

Over-Covered Topics in Entheogen Scholarship
  • Eleusis
  • Plaincourault <– officially OVERCOVERED to cover-over
  • Amanita
  • in Christianity
  • Surface Form – mushroom’s shape = constellation, 8th grade science lab depiction of esotericism
  • Low Esotericism, 3rd grade level, sterling brilliant scholarship of the first order, presenting Mythemese – at a 3rd-grade level. And I’m not talking the advanced prep-level of 3rd-grade class. Not naming names; I’ll just call him Mr. Secret.

I need [acro]/keyboard shortcuts for the two positions: pop sike shallow amanita, high esoteric/ actual esoteric – psilocybin mushrooms, in Greek and Christian history

article title:

Move from “Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism” to “Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism”

Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism
Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism

Main Article Sections Sequence: Metaphor; Dissociation; Determinism; Cybernetics

Now I See How Main Article 4 Sections are: Metaphor; Dissociation; Block universe; Cybernetics

Non-obviously, the first of the 4 sections, titled “The Entheogen Theory of Religion” in fact covers Metaphor. Evidence: that section:

  • Introduces metaphor
  • Asserts Ahistoricity.
  • Notes Rock lyrics as analogical psychedelic eternalism.
  • Covers entheogen history.

Sections 2-4 are explicitly titled:

The Four Top-level Section Headings Mapped to the Puzzle Piece Labels

  1. Not obvious: the first section could be titled “Metaphor” – it’s labelled “the maximal entheogen theory of religion” — implying that the title of entire article, matches to puzzle piece label “Metaphor“. I titled the article specifically for an entheogen magazine.
  2. Obvious: the 2nd section is literally titled “Dissociative” like the puzzle piece “Dissociation“.
  3. Not obvious: the 3rd section is titled “block universe”, but the puzzle piece label is instead, “Determinism“.
  4. Not obvious: the 4th section is titled “self control”, but the puzzle piece label is instead, “Cybernetics“.

Why the Sequence Metaphor; Dissociation; Determinism; Cybernetics Makes Sense

“Metaphor” area of the theory is like a wrapper, API, the Communication layer of Cybernetics. There is strong logic to the above sequence.

  1. Metaphor – Teach the reader the language of Mythemese.
  2. Dissociation – How loosecog works.
  3. Determinism (Eternalism) – Initially, experience beginners’ nonduality: experience oneness with the banquet bench in Hades’ underworld kingdom, tied to the rock bench by serpents.
  4. Cybernetics – Discover the Attractor-Destructor-Transformer vortex climax potential; the Cybernetic revelation. Experience & realize non-duality specifically of the personal control system with the uncontrollable source of control-thoughts.

Article title:
The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
1st section title:
The Entheogen Theory of Religion (covers: theory of religious mythology; assertion/definition of Ahistoricity; assertion of Rock lyrics; entheogen history).
Therefore, the big section labelled The Entheogen Theory of Religion in fact, matches the Metaphor/Analogy puzzle-quadrant, and presents the 4 application-subtopics/instances of Metaphor: religious mythology (theory of; not examples of), ahistoricity, rock lyrics, entheogen history.

Curious, main article starts w/ Metaphor section/quadrant. Then Loose cognition , then block universe, then cybernetics. Article is for an entheogen magazine.

Article (1st quarter) doesn’t start w/ theory of Loose cognition; starts w/ explanation of religious myth (that religious mythology describes ENTHEOGENS (which lead to EXPERIENCES of block universe & control cancellation ), and simultaneously asserts applications: religious mythology, entheogen history, ahistoricity, rock lyrics (comics, movies, trading cards, novels, pulp Science Fiction, horror).

the egodeath theory as a 1-4 outline, #1-3 being the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence / core theory

  • the egodeath theory
    • dissociation (part of core theory/ Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence; my Phase 1 work)
    • block universe ( ” )
    • control cancellation ( ” )
    • metaphor (aka, the big-scale “the Mytheme theory”; my Phase 2 work)

the egodeath theory as a 1-2-7 outline:

  • the cybernetic theory
    • dissociation
    • block universe (incl. no-free-will)
    • control cancellation
  • the mytheme theory. applications/subtopics:
    • religious mythology
    • ahistoricity
    • rock lyrics
    • entheogen history

Improved 4-Component Outline of the Egodeath Theory

  • the egodeath theory
    • dissociation; altered state; loose cognition
    • block-universe eternalism; pre-existence; timeless determinism; no-free-will; heimarmene; fatedness
    • controllership; control agency; control cancellation; non-control; cybernetics
    • analogy, metaphor, mytheme decoding (instances/applications: religious mythology, entheogen history, ahistoricity, Rock lyrics)

That is the structure from the 2006 main article, clarified by adding synonyms and adding subtopic lists.

This simple 4-area structure has [ “the mytheme theory has a subtopic/ application, religious mythology” ]

that 4-area structure avoids too-subtle “parent-vs.-main-child” distinction like “the big-scoped Mytheme theory includes the smaller-scoped Mytheme Decoding theory as the most important subtopic”; instead, the “most important subtopic” – mytheme decoding – *is* the mytheme theory, and then there are 3 explicit applications + 1 implicit applications: rock lyrics, entheogen history, ahistoricity; and of course religious mythology above all.

Don’t collapse-up the outline so far that “block universe” and “cybernetics” get lumped together into vague overburdened term/concept “eternalism”. It’s crucial to keep Cybernetics highlighted, spotlighted.

The stage has 4 spotlights. What characters to place in those 4 spotlights? allocate one of the 4 spotlights to Ahistoricity? not quite.

Allocate one of the 4 spotlights, or display cases, for rock lyrics?

Here’s a showroom for the egodeath theory, and there are only 4 display cases. How to label the 4 display cases … and how to group all topics within 4 top-level groups? Would 1 of those groups be “ahistoricity”? no, thats a scope/elve level error.

If you take all 100 topics of the egodeath theory and divide them into 4 groups,

  • loose cognition (dissociation, asc)
  • block-universe (no-free-will, timeless determinism, eternalism, pre-existence)
  • cybernetics, control cancellation
  • metaphor <- the mytheme theory, & 4 application topics (religious mythology, ahistoricity, entheogen history, rock lyrics)

dont’ try to merge cybernetics & block universe eg into vague overstretched bucket “Heimarmene, don’t forget Cybernetics” or “eternalism, defined to include control cancellation”. Stretches concept of ‘eternalism’ too far. Cybernetics, control cancellation, the self-control seizure, self-control climax, must be tr… RQUIRE REQUIRES SPECIAL, MAJOR TREATMENT/PRESSENTATION. Cannot fold Cybernetics into Eternalism or into Heimarmene. THE AREA OF CYBERNETICS MUST BE EXPLICITLY PUT TO THE FOREGROUND. SAME W/ DISSOCIATION/ SAME W/ BLOCK UNIVERSE, SAME W/ METAPH.

compared to 1-2-8 outline:

no confusing “big scope the mytheme theory ” and also “small scoped mytheme decoding theory” contained within the big-scoped “the mytheme theory”. bad: “the mytheme theory contains 4 topics, the most important topic being the mytheme decoding theory. <– AWK dup’n confusing.

Instead, make the “broad” and “small” scoped the mytheme theory the same identical thing, but have / allows 4 subtopics/applications: rock lyrics, ahistoricity, religious mythology, entheogen history). under a top-level umbrella of “the Metaphor/ Mytheme theory”.

no mid-level the cybernetic theory or the mytheme theory ,

the cybernetic theory is items 1-3. the mytheme theory is item 4. the cybernetic theory = analogical psychedelic eternalism . <– tries to make “eternalism” cover both Heimarmene & Cybernetics.

in the 4-area outline, areas 1-3 = the cybernetic theory = dissociation + eternalism -> eternalism = block universe + control cancellation.

It would be more sure-footed to break out the 3 aspects of the cybernetic theory clearly, not lump two of them togethe into OVERBURDENED TERM ‘ETERNALISM’ trying to cover block universe & controllership.

Poor:

eternalism (covers block universe & controllerhip) — need to pull forward “block universe” & controllership.

Good:

the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence = dissociation, block universe, & cybernetics

the egodeath theory = the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence + the mytheme theory

= (dissociation, block universe, & cybernetics) + the mytheme theory

Heading

Section below this one, leaves question, is entheogen history a major area of the egodeath theory? no. entheogen history — like ahisty an ahistoricity and rock lyrics, are lower level than Metaphor.

1-2-8 is:

  • the egodeath theory < keep
    • the cybernetic theory < decrease use of. = analogical psychedelic eternalism
      • loose cognition < promote
      • block universe < promote
      • no-free-will < merge into block universe
      • control cancellation < promote
    • the mytheme theory
      • mytheme decoding < promote/merge w/ parent
      • entheogen history < keep demoted
      • ahistoricity < keep demoted
      • rock lyrics < keep demoted

Structurally Demoting No-Free-Will, Ahistoricity, & Rock Lyrics 

I was about to demote no-free-will, rock lyrics, and ahistoricity, then I noticed podcasts praised those topics.  but Max said he shouldn’t have started with Kaf w/ topic of ahistoricity, but should’ve covered core topics instead.

When Max praises the egodeath theory for covering “no-free-will”, that implies no-free-will is a major area.  But if already is a major area labelled as “determinism”, can fold no-free-will into determinism. 

Now suppose instad of Determinism, label the area as “Eternalism” – 
Does No-Free-Will fit within a big, primary topic that’s labelled as Eternalism, as well as no-free-will fits into big topic called “Determinism”?

As important as no-free-will is, it’s even more important to elevate above everything, CONTROL, Cybernetics.  

As far as primary main structure goes (ignoring word-choice), 2006 article got it right: you can reduce the egodeath theory into 4 distinct areas: none of the 4 primary, major structural areas of the egodeath theory are scoped to “ahistoricity” or “rock lyrics”.  

A different case to consider is topic No-free-will: 3 is too many, in (block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation). 

Main article doesn’t use “no-free-will”, or ‘eternalism’; main article instead uses “determinism”, and that is covered in the block universe section. 

So in effect, no-free-will in the main article is in section Block Universe.  not in Cybernetics section much.  

Therefore: no-free-will (too controverted to be a good primary structure) can fold into block-universe eternalism, better than into control cancellation / controllership/ cybernetics.  

Questionable whether want to frame 25% of the egodeath theory as “no-free-will” – in contrast, it’s certain want to frame 25% of the egodeath theory as block-universe eternalism, and 25% as control cancellation / cybernetics.  

Given that no-free-will is folded into block-universe eternalism, we then have a 1-4 outline:

Four level-1 primary theme-areas:

  • the egodeath theory
    • dissociation; altered state; loose cognition
    • block-universe eternalism; pre-existence; timeless determinism; no-free-will; heimarmene; fatedness
    • controllership; control agency; control cancellation; non-control; cybernetics
    • analogy, metaphor, mytheme decoding (instances/applications: religious mythology, entheogen history, ahistoricity, Rock lyrics)

Interestingly, that back-implies that the Core Theory of Ego Transcendence (the cybernetic theory; core theory, the 1988 or 1997 cybernetic theory of ego transcendence) has 3 main areas/themes: , master themes/areas of concern:

  • loose cognition
  • block universe
  • cybernetics

Then the article planned 1988 because became the very compact theory-spec of 1997, and

the highly dense 2006 article, packed with as many gems as possible, adds the 4th master theme / area of concern: Metaphor.

The primary master-area Metaphor has applications/subtopics: religious mythology, ahistoricity, entheogen history, rock lyrics.

topic of Ahistoricity adds little, topic of rock lyrics adds little (as far as primary strcuture of the theory),

Entheogen History: strictly speaking (define what “entheogen history” should mean), there’s not much “entheogen history” in the 2006 main article, except that ironically, entheogens are so ubiquitous in religious history, that the presence of religion is the presence of entheogens; to explain religion is to explain stuff that happened throughout Christian history.

So, no distinct “field” of “entheogen history” is visible, in my “Entheogen Theory” article main part (parts 2, 3, & 4 of 4).

entheogen history – strictly speaking – is only in 1st quarter of main article.

  • No-Free-Will -> fold into Block Universe (Eternalism; Determinism)
  • Rock Lyrics -> fold into Metaphor (Analogy; Mythemes); Rock Lyrics is an instance or application of Analogy, not a primary subject on the level of Metaphor that’s different than Metaphor.
  • Ahistoricity -> fold into Metaphor (Analogy; Mythemes); Ahistoricity is an instance or application of Analogy, not a primary subject on the level of Metaphor that’s different than Metaphor.  not a top-4 major component-area of the Egodeath theory.

From the top level of the Theory breakout, I was about to jettison, hide, demote, footnotize, these 3 theory-domains, component-theories:
These are not weight-bearing structures; these are topical leaf-nodes. 

As important as they might be, they are not the primary superstructure.

Too many weight-bearing structures, redundant:

  • block universe
  • no-free-will 
  • noncontrol

That set of 3, should be 2.  I don’t see 3 distinct idea-areas in those 3 items.

Those 3 items are a spectrum, with no-free-will is glue in the middle that connects block universe to noncontrol:

block universe <–> no-free-will <–> non-control

what about putting non-control in middle?:

block universe <–> non-control <–> no-free-will

2006 puzzle diagram

  • Dissociation
  • Determinism – article only has ‘free will’ here, 2x. article has ‘determinism’ 22x.
  • Cybernetics 
  • Metaphor

Determinism  (no-free-will ; eternalism ) < observe how naturally determinism, no-free-will, & eternalism group together, semi-interchangably: determinism is directly swappable w/ eternalism, determinism is directly equiv to no-free-will, block-universe eternalism entails no-free-will.  

Such a powerful phrase as block-universe eternalism can cover/incorp subject of no-free-will, given that there’s an entire quadrant dedicated allocated to covering Controllership/ Cybernetics / Noncontrol/ the personal control system / control cancellation .  Agency.  Control Agency.  

ARGUMENT:

Block Universe is mandatory, major/main idea

Non-Control is mandatory.  major/main idea. controllership; cybernetics, self-ctrl seizure.  

 No-Free-Will — this does more to inherent a ton of debate, than shed light. 

no-free-will is too complicated and controverted and elaborated in endless fractal debates. 

Concept “no-free-will” reads more like a debate, than a structural backbone for a Theory.

NO-FREE-WILL can’t live up to the level-1 front-and-center placement as much as its 2 closest competitors: BLOCK UNIVERSE & NON-CONTROL. 

Suppose 3 is too many, and one should be absorbed into another. 

Possible absorptions:

  • no-free-will -> block universe – best fit
  • block universe > no-free-will  – no, must keep block universe at lev1
  • no-free-will > noncontrol – no, keep ctrl firmly the center of attention
  • block universe > no-free-will  – no, must keep block universe at lev1
  • non-control > block universe – no, must keep non-control at lev1
  • non-control > no-free-will  – no, must keep non-control at lev1

Soundtrack: Fresh MacArthur Sermon: The Day of the Lord

  • the great day of his wrath
  • cataclysmic judgment by God on sinners
  • the culmination of God’s fury & wrath; it is climactic.
  • the kind of things that catapult people into eternity
  • the great day of God almighty
  • the day of visitation
  • the fury of God released on those who reject his son
  • always, always, something to fear

Re-Centering the Field of Western Entheogen Scholarship

WHERE IS THE CENTER?

THE CENTER IS COMBINED: GREEK COMBINED WITH Christian, is the center. argue about scope all day.

The important battle is the battle to set the center of the field.

Team Allegro strives to establish Amanita Low Esotericism, Physical Form, at the center.

Team Egodeath strives to establish
Psilocybe,
High Esotericism,
Experiencing Loosecog Phenomy,

Team Amanita

anyone who strives to establish the following as the center of the field

Amanita, Christianity, Surface Form, Low Esotericism

Team Psilocybe

strives to establish the following as the center of the field

Psilocybe, Greek + Christian, Cognitive Effects, High Esotericism


psilocybin mushrooms in Western religion
Western entheogen history

podcasts praised importantce of no-free-will. I was wanting to nuke it, as a weak link.

podcastts reported questioning of importantce of ahistoricity. I was wanting to nuke (fold-in, footnote-to-oblivion) Ahistoricity, from the 1-2-8 outline.

For historical dicsusion, I like Phase 1 vs Phase 2, where PHase 2 = metaphor.

But for the top-level structure/areas of the Egodeath theory — Metaphor is a single thing, not a container of 4 things; I like 2006 breakout: Metaphor is 1 topic, that enfolds Ahistoricity & Rock Lyrics, and the interpretive aspects of Entheogen History/ Entheogen Scholarship).

Cognitive Effects of Entheogen history go under “Dissociation”.

These areas so overlap and blur together in the Main Article, tho color highlighers could possibly separate the interwoven threads.

the Grea🍄 Mys🍄ics of Egodea🍄h

My Vocalizations as Reactions to Podcasts

Discuss analogical psychedelic eternalism.

Answer his question. Are you evading his question? Did you forget his question, or are you avoiding answering it because you don’t know what you’re asserting:

referring to something, in some way, through its mutually exclusive opposite

wut, explain what would that even mean. What are you asserting. DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU’RE ASSERTING?? thought not. maybe in some way up is down. maybe anything. maybe OATMEAL definitely

OATMEAL IT SEEMS

I have an idea that’s socially inept, likely to fail, overzealous, overconfident, and inconsiderate.

Record my spoken critical commentary while I listen to Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode 16, 26; also 14, 25, chop-up my reaction vocalizations recordings, affix clips to episode commentary page.

Contradicted yourself.

You’re not answering his question.

Not following structured conversation.

Using that common word wrong.

Using that tech term wrong – you’re mixing up ‘timeline’ and ‘worldline’.

You’re misusing ‘worldline’; that’s the wrong word, you mean ‘timeline’.

State the difference between ‘worldline’ and ‘timeline’.

You’re reaching again to tie the conversation to high dose.

Connect the conversation to the Egodeath theory’s terminology and concepts.

Connect the conversation to the Egodeath theory.

Don’t center conversation around high d0se. Assume two states only: tightcog, and loosecog.

Center the conversation on the Egodeath theory core concepts.

Learn to define the Egodeath theory’s core concepts consistently and correctly.

You contradicted yourself.

You didn’t resolve your pseudo-criticisim, your strawman misrepresentation of the egodeath theory freely conflating the egodeath theory with Ramesh.

todo 4 u: State the difference between Ramesh and the Egodeath theory. Kafei would be well-situated to do this accurately.

Max is trying to this in audio conversation format. How much text-based discusscion did Max & Kafei have, on these topics?

I mean: I’m workingi in the text format here. Audio conveo diff stds. We have here, via my Commentary page format, we hae a certain combination of text and audio convo.

Two of the Grea🍄 Mys🍄ics of Egodea🍄h interacting over years in various forums, and in text and broadcast streams and audio recorded convo.

wut (I Always Contradict Myself)

todo: find Kafei’s original statement (definitions of the 2 opposed positions) that Max is summarizing. They mention Kafei at start of this ep 26, that he was on another show, Kafei was talking about block universe. I haven’t heard that show.

Kafei’s Statement 1 (11:15)

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#11-15

Max: “I won’t use the term ‘hard determinism’; I will stick to the terms:

“causal-chain determinism” vs

“block-universe determinism, aka eternalism“.”

“A good distinction between them was contained in what you just said, I’ll extract it:

  • “In causal-chain determinism, you have a process of causation occurring in time, you used ‘unfolding’, that’s causal-chain determinism.”
  • “Contrast that with block-universe determinism/ eternalism: in that model of determinism, there’s no causation in time occurring, because all of the causation has already happened, everything has already unfolded, so you’ve got the full chain from the beginning to the end of time, or you could look at it as [length of your life] all existing at once, all in one go. So there’s no unfolding, there’s only something that has already eternally unfolded.”

Kafei: “Yeah, that [pair of contrasting position-definitions] definitely pretty much echoes what I said.”

Max’s Transitional Statement: Sometimes You Say A, Sometimes A’ (13:07)

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#13-07 –

Max : “A point of confusion that happened in our last conversation is that when you were reflecting your understanding of the Egodeath theory, sometimes you seemed to be attributing causal-chain determinism to mh’s view/ mh’s theory, but other times you seemed to say that mh is expressing the other kind of determinism; block-universe eternalist model of time.”

Kafei proceeds to do exactly that waffling and self-contradiction, next, but at the same time, together in a single phrase, without making any attempt to resolve or clarify his frank, outright, point blank self-contradiction.

Kafei makes a nice attempt at eloquently defining (again) the block-universe eternalism position; but he makes no effort to explain what he means by “maybe MH was referring to causal determinism in some way, through the block universe“.

What could that mean? Describing experiencing the block universe (for the 2nd time) is not a clarification of what this seemingly nonsensical phrase could possibly mean, “referring to causal determinism in some way, through the block universe“.

Kafei’s Statement 2 (13:47)

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/06/tk-podcasts-commentary/#Peak-Confusion –

YouTube timestamp-URL:
13:47 = 13*60 + 47 = 827
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ-xfMkHyuQ&t=827s

Kafei: “I well the reason that you said, you mentioned, ’cause you said that uh, you mentioned that Ramesh and Michael Hoffman are concluding the same exact point, so I kind of, you know, figured that maybe, you know, Michael was referring to, uh uh, causal determinism in some way, through the block universe, but you know that yes, everything’s determined, we have, you know, in the psychedelic experience itself, you don’t, you know, the mystic no longer identifies with the material body, because they see themselves as all events, occurring, you know, all time past and future collapsed into the moment, and so, you know, they have no identific…”

Max: “So which, which model of determinism would that be then, that, what you’ve just explained?”

He never answers Max’s question. How can Kafei agree that Kafei defined two opposed positions, and then go on to say, without any clarification, that “maybe” the Egodeath theory holds one of his positions, “in some way, through” holding the opposite one of his positions?

HOW DOES THAT WORK AT 13:47, GIVEN THAT HE AGREED at 11:15 THAT THEY ARE TWO OPPOSED, MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE POSITIONS?

DOES HE HAVE NOTHING TO SAY ON THIS, EXCEPT TO AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION, AND INSTEAD GO ON TO MERELY REPEAT DESCRIBING EXPERIENCING THE BLOCK-UNIVERSE POSITION, WHICH WAS ALREADY DESCRIBED AND DEFINED AND MUTUALLY AGREED UPON AT 11:15, TWO MINUTES EARLIER?

After Max’s question, here’s Kafei’s non-answer, which is merely a description of the block-universe eternalism position, with no explanation of how the Egodeath theory could “in some way refer to” domino-chain determinism “through” block-universe eternalism:

14:33 Kafei: “I consider it, like the way I was sort of thinking about it is like a direct experience of the block universe, or the mind fuses with the block universe, like it becomes all, it becomes the block, and so there is no time to unfold because you know, everything is occurring at once, simultaneously, but that’s the vision inside the experience, but when you come- when you return to the baseline of consciousness, you return to space and time, the egoic illusion, but nevertheless you still have in your memory banks the vision of where, where that ego death happened, where you know, there was no longer an ego, but there was still awareness there, and it’s that awareness that you could recall from your memory banks, …”

As eloquent as the above is, in terms of logical conversational or argumentation structure, the above “response” to Max’s question is nothing but repeating the position definition Max said at 11:15, which Kafei agreed with, to define the position of “block universe determinism”:

To repeat: Two minutes earlier, at 11:15, Max said:
“Contrast that with block-universe determinism/ eternalism: in that model of determinism, there’s no causation in time occurring, because all of the causation has already happened, everything has already unfolded, so you’ve got the full chain from the beginning to the end of time, or you could look at it as [length of your life] all existing at once, all in one go. So there’s no unfolding, there’s only something that has already eternally unfolded.”
Kafei: “Yeah, that [pair of definitions] definitely pretty much echoes what I said.”

Kafei LEAVES US WITH NOTHING BUT A SELF-CONTRADICTORY STATEMENT, OR MUDDLED INSINUATION ABOUT THE EGODEATH THEORY’S SUPPOSED POSITION.
Kafei: “I kind of figured that maybe Michael was referring to causal determinism in some way, through the block universe”.
Max: “So which position did you just define?”
Kafei: “I think of experiencing the block universe as follows….”

Kafei didn’t answer the question.

Which of his two positions does he think the Egodeath theory holds?

He agreed that the two defined positions are mutually exclusive. Therefore it should be a simple, A vs. B question: Which position does Kafei think the Egodeath theory holds?

A. domino-chain determinism (causal-chain determinism ; unfolding-in-time determinism)

B. block-universe eternalism

Which position does the Egodeath theory hold: A, or B?

IT’S NOT A HARD QUESTION, unless Kafei is asserting that the Egodeath theory has a half-baked, hybrid, tangled view like maybe Ramesh’s OSC-based conception of no-free-will:

C. referring to domino-chain determinism “in some way, through” block-universe eternalism.

Ok, but how could that Position C work? What position can that be? He agreed that domino-chain determinism and block-universe eternalism are opposite positions.

Kafei never said at 11:15 that there’s a 3rd option that combines the two mutually exclusive positions he defined. Is he now stating that there’s a third, hybrid position, which therefore demands some kind of description/definition?

Is he going to formally introduce such a third position (C), or just allude to such a position but wax eloquent re-describing position B instead? He does the latter.

Why the evasiveness? Is he unable to answer a basic question?

Has he no idea what the Egodeath theory asserts, so he invents, on the spot, some UNDEFINED combination of the two, defined, positions?

“in some way” <– what the heck is that supposed to mean? Sounds like meaningless, self-contradictory gibberish to me, until he defines what he could possibly mean by “in some way”. In what way?

A circle is, in some way, a square.
Up is, in some way, down.
A is, in some way, A’.
Ok, now he has to articulate, define, what he’s asserting.

“in some way” = WAVE ARMS VIGOROUSLY

Is Kafei asserting that Ramesh refers to domino-chain determinism through block-universe eternalism? That Ramesh is half-baked in that way?

Term ‘Causal Chain Determinism‘ BTFO’d

The phrease “causal chain” is hopelessly ambigious: do you mean “horizontal” (domino-=chain) causal chain, or do you mean a “vertical”, possibly holistic timeless vertical causal chain like this image?

Book Wilber criticized, The Great Chain of Being (I have it, don’t feel I read it.) The “great chain of being” is a master-concept for a school / version of Esotericism. https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22great+chain+of+being%22 – wiki –

“Adaptations and similar concepts – The American philosopher Ken Wilber described a “Great Nest of Being” which he claims to belong to a culture-independent “perennial philosophy” traceable across 3000 years of mystical and esoteric writings.

“Wilber’s system corresponds with other concepts of transpersonal psychology.[23]

“In his 1977 book A Guide for the Perplexed, the economist E. F. Schumacher described a hierarchy of beings, with humans at the top able mindfully to perceive the “eternal now“.[24]”

from 2006 main article, which purports to be
a theory of religion
an entheogen theory of religion
an entheogen theory of ego death
not a theory of religious mythology
not a theory of mytheme decoding

Limbo is the experience of how personal control-power is impotent in the face of cosmic determinism and fatedness.

The hidden transcendent thought-source has been depicted as a hand behind a cloud controlling the world-soul, whose spirit transcends material Necessity. The world-soul, in turn, wields a chain that controls creatures, who are subject to Fate.

It was left to me to somehow do what the Great Mystics were never able to accomplish: comprehensibly articulate Transcendent Knowledge.

Glad to see wrmspirit write:

>  not separating the mystics from the Egodeath Theory

>  that would be placing mystics into the same superior category and position that Kafei places them.

Let’s set up a higher, superior elite exclusive club, letting us (alone), stand in judgment in superiority over every other school: the Great Mystics of Egodeath are greater than the Great Mystics, an elite group which Kafei strives to raise up over everyone, and then, himself jump up into that group he’s constructed (jump up through his superior approach, which he assumes & imagines (with no evidence, among all his libraries of quotations, desperately searched) that they share with him his “high-d0se, high-ego” approach, aka The Absolute Overdose 😵 ).

(I somewhere essentially define ‘high-ego’ as used here; I battle against that bad Pop Theory, but the combined phrase is too good an epithet to pass by, here.)

The Egodeath theory is all about articulately explaining what mystics vaguely write about.

A low blow was Kafei placing Maria Sabina’s writings above mine (which he can hardly be bothered to read).

A Special Class of Mystics, Who Blend the Two States into One? Or Just, Anyone who so Tries?
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/ideas-for-podcast-topics/#Special-Class-of-Mystics

The writings of mystics aren’t much worth engaging with directly.  

The entire Egodeath theory is a rebuttal to mystics and a correction and clarification of what mystics are ineffectually writing about.  

Maybe 2000, I wrote about the perfect example of bad, UNHELPFUL writing of mystics – Bernadette Roberts.

The Path to No-Self: Life at the Center
by Bernadette Roberts  | Oct 18, 1991I have & read this.  Not worth commenting on.  Did I post a negative review?

The Experience of No-Self: A Contemplative Journey, Revised Edition
by Bernadette Roberts  | Mar 26, 1993
I have & read this.

What Is Self?: A Study of the Spiritual Journey in Terms of Consciousness
by Bernadette Roberts  | Jan 31, 2014
Supposedly new (ie, 7 yrs ago), I guess I haven’t read, tho sounds very familiar – maybe I did note her new book in 2014, if I can straighten out my sense of time-periods.  Found it! in < 60 seconds!  I posted a link to her new book on Jan. 11, 2015:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-131/#message6738
– brief but pointed, relevant commentary

Kafei wants the Egodeath theory to directly comment on mystics’ writings.

My critiques of Watts and Wilber should sufficiently cover mystics’ writings by extension, by replying to the superset that is Wilber’s Integral Theory.

That was my father’s professional recommendation to me: to learn the entire broad field (psychology, Human Potential, Transpersonal Psychology, self-transcendence), only requires engaging Wilber’s books + The Way of Zen by Alan Watts.

If you want me to directly comment on mystics’ writings, look for my comments about Wilber & Watts, effectively a superset of mystics’ writings.

THE EGODEATH THEORY STANDS OVER THE WRITINGS OF THE GREAT MYSTICS – NOT VICE VERSA.  
THE EGODEATH THEORY EXPLAINS MYSTICS, NOT VICE-VERSA.
THE EGODEATH THEORY SUCCEEDS, WHERE THE GREAT MYSTICS FAILED.

That’s the whole motivation for bothering to create the Theory of Ego Transcendence in the first place — that in 1985-1988, no one was delivering the helpful, relevant explanation that is needed by everyone.  Not Wilber, not Watts, not anyone, not the Great Mystics.

If the Great Mystics had written adequately, I wouldn’t have had to figure out the effective explanation, myself, by correcting Wilber & Watts.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/04/scholarly-fail-quotes-hall-of-shame/#Already-Achieved-What-Mystery-Religions-Couldnt

It was left to me to somehow do what the Great Mystics were never able to accomplish: comprehensibly articulate Transcendent Knowledge.

— Cybermonk

Why Switched from CybTrans to Egodeath Domain & Site Title Heading, thus Theory-Name

Cybtrans.com (1997)

CybTrans.com, Feb. 14, 1997:
Ego Death and Self-Control Cybernetics
https://web.archive.org/web/19970214094018/http://www.cybtrans.com/philosph/postings.htm
This Nav Page is a mini version of the 2007 Egodeath.com site.

At wayback machine, see ~1997 Cybtrans.com for end-of-Phase 1 snapshot (including rock lyrics), before the Egodeath.com site was “contaminated” by Phase 2 content: ahistoricity, entheogen history, & mytheme decoding (religious mythology).

Where the “Egodeath” Branding Came from ie Why Chosen

1:44:00 episode 4 Transcendent Knowledge podcast

My domain name around 1997 was cybtrans.com, the theory name was:

“the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence”

1988: “the theory of ego transcendence”

“cybtrans” was poor domain name. Needed punchy domain name. Realized — against others’ advice — that “egodeath” as domain name and theory name, is extreme punchy. I’m all about staking claim to the most extreme endpoint.

False Rarity of Variants of Entheogens

Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode 4, 1:29:30 — Ball uses strategy of glorifying 5MEO-, diminishing NN-.

I note: same thing was done with L25:

Some old-timers loved to scorched-earth discredit everyone, all users after them, by saying the original L25 is the only actual, legit batch.

All later batches were flawed, corrupted, lesser, not real, and not actual L25.

They take it to the absolute extreme:

“The batch we used was actual. Later, doesn’t count at all, and was completely not real. Later people have not experienced L25. They completely lack L25 experience. What they have is completely false, unreal, and doesn’t count at all.”

When Announced the Broad Mytheme Theory and Its 4 Component-Theories Especially Mytheme Decoding

What if I had titled the 2006 main article:

The Entheogen Theory of Religious Mythology and Ego Death
or
The Entheogen Theory of Religious Mythemes and Ego Death
instead of
The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death

That would’ve better delivered my [theory of mytheme decoding] as such.

The article strongly emphasizes “Metaphor”.

This theory of religion/ego death, is that religion & ego death are expressed as Metaphor that describes Dissociation, Determinism, & Cybernetics.

The article’s “entheogen theory of religion” and the article’s “theory of ego death” do emphaize this “new quadrant” – “Metaphor”, new compared to the 1997 core Cybernetic theory article, which only covered the other 3 quadrants, “Determinism, Dissociation, Cybernetics”.

The “new puzzle quadrant” that this article adds, this “entheogen / religion” article, is called “Metaphor”.

That puzzle piece represents my announcement of my theory of mytheme decoding.

Different ways of looking at “announcement of a theory” (or a theory-set, or a component-theory).

in effect, amounts to announcing my whole entire systemic demonstration of my new theory, of mytheme decoding. which is the main part of my broad Phase 2 theory, the Mytheme theory (incl: mytheme decoding, entheogen history, ahistoricity, rock lyrics).

Note: “entheogen history” or “entheogen scholarship” has distinct aspects, overlapping w/ loose cognition portion of the cybernetic theory:

  • entheogens functioning (= loose cognition), vs.
  • entheogen history (spot-the-mushroom game), vs.
  • entheogens connected to the other 3 parts of the core, Cybernetic theory: [
    • the block universe,
    • no-free-will,
    • control cancellation].

1. (1992, 1997) Timeline & Forms of Announcing My Theory of Rock Lyrics

Did the work around 1992.

Probably appears at 1997 v1 of egodeath.com before that domain name.

The Egodeath Yahoo Group posts about indiv songs —

Did I “announce my theory of how to decode lyrics” — YES, at Egodeath.com pages about lyrics, not about particular songs: look at my section title, “THEORY OF” — Good title:

Theory of Mystic-State Allusions in Rock Lyrics

some of this content, which I’m seeing as “announcement of my theory of decoding rock lyrics in terms of analogical psychedelic eternalism“) is likely to be postings that were copied from the Egodeath Yahoo Group, June 10, 2001-Feb 14 2004

Loftiness of Rock: The Authentic Popular Mystery-Religion of the Late 20th Century

Why Heavy Rock

Mystic Allusions

Encoding/Decoding of Mystic-State Themes in Rock Lyrics

Lyrical Techniques Conveying Mystic-State Phenomena

Books about rock lyrics

2. (2000, 2006) Timeline & Forms of Announcing My Theory of Ahistoricity

JesusMysteries Yahoo Group 1999-2000

GnosticSomething ” for the egodeath theory discussion prior to creating the Egodeath Yahoo Group. eg no-free-will debates re: gnosticism.

egodeath.com site through 2007, lots of ahistoricity r&d leading-edge research, then led to Chron Revision. I collaborated with JesusMysteries group contributors, these pages serve as “announcement of my theory of ahistoricity in terms of analogical psychedelic eternalism“, might include Egodeath Yahoo Group postings June 10 2001-Feb 14 2004.

3. (2002, 2003) Timeline & Forms of Announcing My Theory of Entheogen History

6-page 2002 then 14-page 2003 posting announcing the maximal entheogen theory of religion, the Egodeath Yahoo Group. Relatively clear-cut example of announcing a component-theory portion of the Mytheme theory portion of the Egodeath theory. = “announcement of my theory of entheogen history in terms of analogical psychedelic eternalism“.

4. (2003, 2006) Timeline & Forms of Announcing My Theory of Mytheme Decoding

This is my main question, of the four (of when I announced the 4 component-theories of the broad Mytheme theory: rock lyrics, ahistoricity, entheogen history, mytheme decoding).

What’s the story of my “announcement of my theory of mytheme decoding in terms of analogical psychedelic eternalism“?

Short answer: the 2006 main article = that. The 2006 main article amounts to announcemnt of the entire Egodeath theory now including expanded, true desired version of my 1997 aritilce, BUT, plus (not envisioned in 1988 or 1997 when struggling to write good article), the entire broad Mytheme theory including its 4 component-theories : ahistoricity a little, rock lyrics a little, entheogen history a moderate amount, and mytheme decoding a lot. Very intersessting perspective.

Takeaway: Although the 2006 main article is advertised as mainly adding entheogen history or entheogen theory of technical operation, to the 1997 core Cybernetic theory (= loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation), in actuality, the 2006 main article even more than adding entheogens to the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence, above all else, adds mytheme decoding to the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence. If 1997 is delivery vehicle for the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence, 2006 article is, above all, a delivery vehicle for my theory of mytheme decoding, even more than to deliver the maximal entheogen theory of religion. (debatable; 2006 leverages the mature the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence to deliver my theory of mytheme decoding, and also to deliver my the maximal entheogen theory of religion). I’ts all so integrated, can hardly separate them out:

  • the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence (loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation) – announced 1997 (Cybernetics site)
  • the maximal entheogen theory of religion – announced 2002 & 2003 (6- & 14-page postings)
  • the theory of mytheme decoding – fully announced & demonstrated via 2006 main article (aside from piecemeal top-10 decoding of individual mythemes <– as far as I presently can tell). As a visible whole theory, of mytheme decoding, I doubt — not sure – that there’s a posting in the Egodeath Yahoo Group , that serves to announce a whole systemtic approach to reading mythemes. Only piecemeal. Certainly, the 2006 main article, you can clearly see, perceive, and extract, a theory of mytheme decoding — even if the phrase “theory of mytheme decoding” doesn’t appear.
    • I especially feel the word “theory” of mytheme decoding is warranted since my recent late 2020 analysis of multi-way multi-mapping of a mytheme, to “fully” decode it – to the point of wondering lately, “can a mytheme ever be “fully” decoded?” 🤔
    • Famous last words, “I’ve fully decoded/ analogy-mapped, {caduceus}. Next statement will be: “Doh! I overlooked this totally obvious analogy-point!”

“My success at decoding this mytheme further, proves beyond any doubt that I’m a total idiot, for not immediately seeing the screamingly obvious analogy.”

2006 main article: how much did it cover the 1-2-8 outline’s component-theories?

1-2-8 outline of the egodeath theory: and how much (10 = lots) the 2006 main article announces each component-theory of the egodeath theory:

My 2006 main article is *NOT* presented as a general announcement of a 1-2-8 set of theories as such; the article is a popular article for a Salvia magazine.

The title of the article reads as an announcement of literally an “entheogen theory of religion”, not of a mytheme decoding theory.

Nor is the 2006 article framed as an announcement or expanded writeup of the 1997 Cybernetic theory of Ego Transcendence announcement-outline.

My 2006 main article CAN BE SEEN AS A FOLLOWUP TO THE 6-PAGE AND 14-PAGE 2002 & 2003 POSTINGS ANNOUNCING the maximal entheogen theory of religion.

title of article:
The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
(not the Cybernetic theory, not the Mytheme theory, not framed as a presentation announce of my mytheme decoding theory – though the article really is that). You could say, during 1999-June 2003, and during July 2003-Dec 2006, I was piecemeal developing my toeyr of theory of mytheme decoding , and that I officially announced my theory of mytheme decoding in the form of the 2006 main article, which is titled to focus on my (maximal) entheogen theory of religion. Salvia Div Mag is not about mytheme decoding; it’s about entheogens. THIS ARTICLE SOMEWHAT SERVES TO ANNOUNCE THE CYBERNETIC THEORY (BUT THAT WAS DONE 1997 IN PURE FORM), THE ARITCLE IS FRAMED MAINLY AS ANNOUNCING THE (MAXIMAAL) THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION, BUT SECONDARILY, SECOND OF ALL, SERVES TO ANNOUNCE AND PROVE AND DEMONSTRATE — IN FULL, SYSTEMICALLY, NOT JUST FOR A SINGLE TOP-10 MYTHEME — MY THEORY, AS SUCH(?), OF MYTHEME DECODING.

Purpose & Function of the 2006 Main Article

  1. Announce the maximal entheogen theory of religion. Stake claim to that.
  2. Announce my theory of mytheme decoding. Stake claim to that; use that success to spoort support my the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
  3. Reinforce the cybernetic theory of ego transcendence announcement of 1997.
  4. Tie-in strong but brief, my Ahistoricity theory, my ROCK LYRICS theory, and my

Consider this exaggerated ratings:

Curious notes:

  • the article actually has very little Ruck-style “spot-the-mushroom”; it has theory of loosecog, but “proof of enth history” aka “spot the mushroom” is dispatched briefly/quickly.
  • attention to broad-scoped top-level theories is purely implicit. all focus is on 6 of the 8 topical component-theories. (loose cognition, no-free-will, control cancellation, block universe; mytheme decoding, entheogen theory) (not much ahistoricity, rock lyrics. ) moderate amount of “spot the mushroom” eg Mithras’ leg, stained-glass window.
  • Fully presents / demonstrates mytheme decoding theory. probably doesn’t present that as a theory-announcement; that wouldn’t fit well w/ this entheogen magazine context.
  • Presents the maximal entheogen theory of religion (per article title), but not too much “spot the mushroom”,
  • Heavily presents the component-theories of the cybernetic theory, very integrated with mytheme decoding & the technical aspects of the (maximal) entheogen theory of religion – not too much the overly common “spot the mushroom” approach, just enough to show “I can surpass conventional entheogen scholars at this gradeschool-game.”
  • the article really does function as detailing teh 1997 article – but, it doesn’t explicitly state that it’s presenting an elaborated form of the 1997 core-theory aritcle.

Flagship Articles Often Formed By a Periodical as Format Venue

How many of my flagship articles were invited by someone, inspiring me? Many.

  • Bubble – my own iniative, for a zine.
  • Criteria article – suggested by Brown, not for a periodical.
  • Proof article – offshoot of above
  • Plainc article – suggested by Robert Price for Journal of Higher Critm
  • 2006 main article – suggested by eidtor of Salvia D magazine. I conjoined that with my since-1988 effort to write up an article for the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology — now, having done the 1997 spec-article of the cybernetic theory, and having confirmed my 2003 the maximal entheogen theory of religion and confirmed that mytheme decoding works for all myth, (eg 2002-2006), BY ADDING-IN MY MYTHEME DECODING AND THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION BOTH FROM 2002-2006, PLUS 1997 CORE THEORY ARTICLE, AND INVITATION FROM MAG EDITOR, I WAS FINALLY ABLE TO ARTICLEIZE MY JAN 1988 BREAKTHROUGH, BY ADDING-IN MYTHEME DECODING AND THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION by conjoining and leveraging both ways: make [loose cognition, no-free-will, the block universe, control cancellation] support [mytheme decoding & entheogens ], and conversely, use [mytheme decoding & entheogen history] to bolster & clarify & support my expression of [loose cognition, no-free-will, the block universe, control cancellation].
  • 2006 article uses the new, Mytheme theory (mostly just the mytheme decoding & entheogen history parts, not much the ahistoricity & rock lyrics parts (makes intensive compact forceful statements about ahistoricity & rock lyrics)), to support my writeup of the Cybernetic theory; and conversely, use the Cybernetic theory (all 4 parts) (loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation) to vigorously support the Mytheme theory (here mostly limited to mytheme decoding & entheogen history). It’s more loose cognition than entheogen history. Of the 4 component-theories of the mytheme theory,
    • mytheme decoding – 10
    • entheogen history – 6 (article is more about loose cognition theory than “spot the mushroom”) (title of article is “the entheogen theory of religion“
    • ahistoricity – 2
    • rock lyrics – 1

Findings/observations:

Though the article is titled re: entheogen history, the article as far as announcing the the mytheme theory with its 4 component-theories, doesn’t really much announce the broad the mytheme theory, but heavily adds and presents & leverages mytheme decoding — without framing it as a distinct theory in and of itself.

The article makes intense statement about ahistoricity , but without any focus on that.

The article firmly locks-in rock lyrics, but w/ even less focus. So:

Good Analysis, Ratings Tell the Story: Main Finding

What the 2006 Main Article Adds Is the Theory of Mytheme Decoding, Even More than Adding Entheogen History & Functioning as the Title Advertises
Adds Mytheme Decoding as “Metaphor Explanation of Religion”, by Demonstration and Inter-Explanation with the Cybernetic Theory’s Component-Theories, not Presented as “Announcing the Theory of Mytheme Decoding”

There are precursor annnouncemnets of the broad the mytheme theory and the narrow mytheme decoding theory, in the form of..

  • the announcement-postings of the maximal entheogen theory of religion,
  • postings of lyrics commentaries, and
  • announcmenet-postings of decoding particular top-10 mythemes.

The best form I have, of announcing mytheme decoding theory, is the 2006 main article. Prior to that, is postings of decoding particular top-10 mythemes, which was hard-won piecemeal like solving a difficult-level jigsaw puzzle wher eit where it never “usdden suddenly all comes together”, but is hard-won each step of teh way. afaik, the … there MIGHT be postsings that grandely announce “Heree Is How to Decode Mythemes”. What I’m presently aware of, instead, is the 2006 main article, which I have just [12:41 a.m. January 15, 2021] shown, served, above all, add and integrate mytheme decoding , to my 1997 article.

THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1997 & 2006 ARTICLES IS, ADDED (INTENSIVE) MYTHEME DECODING. I COULDN’T HAVE EMPHASIZED MYTHEME DECODING MORE, EXCEPT TO ANNOUNCE A THEORY OF MYTHEME DECODING, AS A NAMED THEORY. in contrast, obv i could have emph’d rock lyrics vastly more, and ahistoricity vastly more. Moderately, I could’ve emph’d entheogen history somewhat more – spot-the-mushroom game. 2006 article really isn’t an entheogen scholarship article at all. The article does a spectacular job of entheogen scholarship (spot the mushroom) when it does, but, far more focused on explaining loosecog.

NOT AS MUCH ADDING ENTHEOGEN HISTORY, OR ROCK LYRICS, OR AHISTORICITY – ONLY THE MIAN MAIN PART OF THE MYTHEME THEORY , WHICH IS, MYTHEME DECODING THEORY. (THE NON-MAIN COMPONENT-THEORIES OF THE MYTHEME THEORY ARE: AHISTORICITY, ENTHEOGEN HISTORY, ROCK LYRICS).

Here’s what the article feels like, in coverage emphasis:

What I highlighted above, ~= the 4 puzzle quadrants, which are:
Dissociation = “Loose Cognition” & “Entheogen History”
Determinism = “The Block Universe” & “No-Free-Will”
Cybernetics = “Non-Control”
Metaphor = “Mytheme Decoding”. 1997 lacked.

Bibliography section note:
“Michael Hoffman has been developing
the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence
since 1985, including
the maximal entheogen theory of religion;
see Egodeath.com.”

Conclusion: The 2006 Main Article Announces & Fully Demonstrates My Theory of Mytheme Decoding, as a “Metaphor & Entheogens Theory of Religion”

Not Phrase “Mytheme Decoding Theory” or Broader “the Mytheme Theory”
Mytheme Decoding Theory Is Intensively Demonstrated & Leveraged
Entheogen History Is Moderately Demonstrated & Leveraged, but Loosecog Theory Is Heavily Used & Presented, from the Cybernetic Theory’s 4 Component-Theories
2006 Article Has Minimal Presentation of My Theory of Ahistoricity, Theory of Rock Lyrics, & Broad “the Mytheme Theory”
2006 Article Mainly Announces “The Entheogen Theory of Religion”, Which Is One of the 2 Important Component-Theories of the Broader, Mytheme Theory, the Other Being the Mytheme Decoding Component-Theory
2006 Article Title also Announces “The Theory of Egodeath” and Mentions the Article Being Part of “the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence”
2006 Article Leverages & Re-presents the 1997 Core/ Cybernetic Theory Components, Bolstered This Time with:
Heavy Presentation of My Theory of Mytheme Decoding (as “Metaphor” Theory of Religion),
Moderate Presentation of My Theory of Entheogen History (Repeats Heavy Presentation of My Theory of Loose Cognition), and
Minimal Presentation of My Theories of Ahistoricity & Rock Lyrics
Minimal but Forceful Presentation of My Theory of Ahistoricity
Slight Presentation, Tie-in, of My Theory of Rock Lyrics

Theories Named in this Announcement-Article

“the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion”

In Bibliography lead-in.

“the Entheogen Theory of Religion”

In the first part of the title.

“the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence”

In Bibliography lead-in.

“the Theory of Egodeath”

In the second part of the title.

“the Entheogen Theory of Egodeath”

In the second part of the title.

NOW, with this outline & measurements, it’s possible to truly characterize, to answer the question: (I actually have from ~2011, color-highlighted printout … but I want to color-highlight rn: mytheme aspects, entheogens aspects, and lump together

Where is the announcement of my (narrow) theory of mytheme decoding — is it the 2006 main article?

The above question is not asking about announcement of the broader Mytheme theory, which would have to include rock lyrics and ahistoricity, as well as entheogen history & mytheme decoding.

Late 2003 Through 2006, Focus Was Confirming Mytheme Decoding Together with Entheogens & Heimarmene, Throughout Religious Literature

I remember what it was like, it’s coming back:

After my March 2003 announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion, which was before my personal transitional reference point of July 2003, (a phase milestone reference point, you can’t see in the theory development, but meaningful to me & my library),

When did I work with the editor of the magazine editor of Salvia Divinorum? Identifying that publishing forum gave the focus of writing-context venue that I needed, to create the 2006 main article.

I remember that after July 2003, I was still in a Confirmation Phase, confirming that entheogens are described in all mystic texts, confirming that heimarmene is described in all mystic texts, confirming… and all these confirmations I was doing between July 2003 (= start of part 2 of my Phase 2 work) and December 2006 (= main article), were needed in support of my official making the case in support of my theory of not just mytheme decoding, but also, in conjunction with that… that’s the key word: IN CONJUNCTION.

Between my announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion in March 2003, and my publishing the 2006 main aritcle (check the Egodeath Yahoo Group for month), I don’t know (offhand) if I posted any form of “announcing my theory of how to decode Mythemese”.

Check/ research in the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

What I do know, from direct memory recollection, is that in that 2003-2006 period, I was in confirmation-mode, all together (not of Rock lyrics; that was established, 1992, 1997).

I announced my Rock lyrics decoding theory, or system/approach, in my Egodeath.com pages about lyrics.

I announced (literally, explicitly) my the maximal entheogen theory of religion in the Egodeath Yahoo Group 2002 (6-pages) & 2003 (14-pages).

I announced my views on Ahistoricity in the JesusMysteries Yahoo Group around 2000. I continued to heavily research & development my theory of Ahistoricity (& then Chronology Revision) through 2007 at Egodeath.com & the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

That leaves 2 theories to assess: from 2003-2006, I had formed an approach to decoding mythmes, which shows up as “Metaphor” in my theory of religion, entheogens, and ego death).

It’s starting to come to me, the answer, the history, …

I was able to post a grand announcement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion in March 2003.

  1. One period is Jan 1999-June 2003.
    • That’s the first sub-phase of my development of the Mytheme theory.
  2. The next separate distinct period of my scholarly R&D is July 2003-December 2007.
    • That’s the second sub-phase of development of the Mytheme theory.

HYPOTHESIS: PRACTICALLY, THE 2006 MAIN ARTICLE *IS* THE OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT OF MYTHEME DECODING THEORY, WHICH IS PART OF THE EGODEATH THEORY.

But many precursor aspect-announcements: lyrics – check wayback precursor to egoodeath site

See other recent previous Idea Development page for Wayback domain name my before Egodeath.com, 1997 wayback v1 of egodeath site.

James Kent should like the v1 1997 of my egodeath site, not tainted with religion, history, “entheogen”, “sacred mushroom”, religious mythology. Only – maybe – rock lyrics decoding (check on that).

Precursors to the 2006 Main Article’s Announcement of My Narrow Theory Specifically of Mytheme Decoding (as “Metaphor”)

Easy to find (but still a PiTA to do this repeatedly) – the Egodeath Yahoo Group postings about decoding any one of the top-10 mythemes (snake, king, ivy, wine, tree, rock) – easy to find.

A hassle to find repeatedly. I’m REALLY TIRED of re-re-researching “when did I first decode {rock}?” That’s why I finally created the other day, Jan 2021, an official year-lookup page, to store these date-findings.

Hard to find: did I ever post “Announcement of my Theory of How to Decode Mythemes”?

Even with the relatively clear-cut example, of “when did I announce the maximal entheogen theory of religion”, it took hours to organize my findings of that trajectory.

I can now look up my findings, of “How long ft after my announcement of “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”, did I actually use the literal phrase as-is, “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”?

Answer: 1 yr, 2 mo. That “clear-cut” case, took a day to research and writeup!

The more complex question, “when did I announce my theory of mytheme decoding”, … takes days to answer.

That’s why I needed the other day, to do what … I DON’T KNOW offhand, in terms of “announcements” I did.

Existence of Egodeath.com = an announcement.

In any case, I NEED a home page for each component-theory of the egodeath theory, for many reasons.

Precursors to the 2006 Main Article’s Announcement of My Broad Mytheme Theory (Rock Lyrics, Ahistoricity, Entheogen History, Mytheme Decoding)
  • announcements of my theory of rock lyrics decoding: early egodeath.com site, lyrics pages. 1997, 1999, 2003, 2007
  • announcements of my theory of ahistoricity – my good leading-edge postings on JesusMysteries Yahoo Group. Not sure if I have copies of these. Or, how hard to retrieve those (probably possible).

Need 3 Things: Textbook Learning of Analogical Psychedelic Eternalism, and Cognitive Loosening Agent, and Ritual

In Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode 4, Cyberdisciple omitted an important point, I thought he was going to say it. He said people need both parts: the entheogen, and….

initiation ritual.

I expected him to say instead, the universal answer to everything:

knowledge of the egodeath theory.

Along those lines, 3 things could be needed, not 2:

  1. the Lesser Mysteries = textbook knowledge of the egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism); must pass an exam to graduate from candidate-initiate to full-on first-hand initiate.
  2. entheogen
  3. initiation ritual; the Greater Mysteries

One model is that the lower levels of initiation ritual are not ritual but are textbook study of the gods, the myths, the egodeath theory.

Historically, the Egodeath Theory (the original, Cybernetic theory) Doesn’t Explain “Religion”, So Much as Explaining Ego Transcendence

Kent should like the 1997 Cybernetic theory article much better than the 2006 Mytheme theory article.

In Transcendent Knowledge Podcast episode 22 (about James Kent) before 1:00:00, Max says Kent wouldn’t like the Egodeath theory’s angle, b/c the Egodeath theory explains religion.

But, the Core theory, the Cybernetic theory, per my 1997 spec/announcement, doesn’t exactly claim to explain “religion”, but rather, is framed as explaining ego transcendence.

Self-control Cybernetics, Dissociative Cognition, & Mystic Ego Death (1997 core theory spec)

That article is in the Site Map category: The Cybernetic theory. Not in the broader category the Egodeath theory, which includes the Mytheme theory.

1-Sentence Summary of the Egodeath Theory

The Egodeath theory holds that
analogies of altered-state, block-universe, control-transformation
explain:
spiritual regeneration; mystic enlightenment; satori; gnosis; initiation; esotericism; and equivalents.

The Egodeath theory holds that analogical psychedelic eternalism explains all of the following:
transcendent knowledge
religion
ego transcendence
mysticism
satori
gnosis
enlightenment
esoteric wisdom
mystic ul enlightenment
spiritual regeneration
esotericism
esoteric Christianity
higher-level Christianity
higher-level religion
mystic revelation
spiritual transformation
religious mythology
secret knowledge
elevated knowledge
esoteric gnosis
gnosticism
psychedelics
entheogens
the altered state
the intense mystic altered state
the ecstatic state
mental transformation
psychospiritual development
the perennial philosophy
ancient Greek & Hellenistic religion
salvific regeneration through the Holy Spirit
Mystery-Religion initiation
mixed-wine banqueting
high Rock lyrics
the figure of Christ the savior

John MacArthur – Strange Fire, Transcendent Knowledge
There is no:
“secret knowledge”
“esoteric gnosis”
“Transcendent Knowledge”

Be Conscious of Pattern in Summarizing the Egodeath Theory, “Foo is…” (“Religion is… “Enlightenment is…”)

The Egodeath theory is a theory of what? A theory that the nature of X is actually ABC. What is X?

The Egodeath theory is a theory that the nature of X is analogical psychedelic eternalism. What is X?

The egodeath theory holds that:
X = analogical psychedelic eternalism
What is X?

Implicit assumptions when summarizing the egodeath theory as (episode podcast 25 Strange Loop) as “Religion is….” <- implies that the egodeath theory is “a theory of religion” or a theory of what religion is.

That’s possibly true, that the Egodeath theory is a theory of religion, that “Religion is A, B, C”; but take stock of that, consciously & critically.

  • Is the Egodeath theory a theory of religion?
    If so, start by saying: “Religion is…”
  • Is the Egodeath theory a theory of transcendent knowledge?
    If so, start by saying: “Transcendent knowledge is…“
  • Is the Egodeath theory a theory of what ego transcendence is really about?
    If so, start by saying “I shall now summarize the egodeath theory in 1 sentence: Ego transcendence is…. analogical psychedelic eternalism.”
  • a theory of religious mythology ?
    If so: “The Egodeath theory is the theory that: religious mythology is psychedelics revealing noncontrol.”
  • a theory of the mind?
    If so: “The mind actually works & transforms as follows…”
  • a theory of the altered state?
    If so: “To summarize the the Egodeath theory in 1 sentence: The altered state is *actually* about loosecog revealing…”
  • a theory of psycho-spriritual development (Wilber)?
    Start by saying “Psycho-spiritual development is about (analogical psychedelic eternalism).”
  • A theory of what Satori is?
    If so, summarize the egodeath theory: “Satori is … analogical psychedelic eternalism.”
  • A theory of what psychedelics are really about?
  • If so, you’d construct the statement with ‘Psychedelics’ on the left: “I shall now summarize the egodeath theory in 1 sentence: Psychedelics loosen cognitive binding, revealing analogical psychedelic eternalism.”

The problem is, the egodeath theory is an explanatory theory of many things.

Summarizing the Egodeath Theory in 1 Sentence, as a Long List of Topics Solved, Followed by “is about analogical psychedelic eternalism”

The Egodeath theory holds that:

Religion, mysticism, religious mythology, Transcendent Knowledge, psychedelics, ego transcendence, mental transformation, the altered state, psychospiritual development, esotericism, the perennial philosophy, gnosis, Mystery-Religion initiation, mixed-wine banqueting, esoteric Christianity, entheogens, enlightenment, salvific regeneration through the Holy Spirit, high Rock lyrics, the figure of Christ the savior, and Satori, are about experiencing and understanding analogical psychedelic eternalism.

(the reversed list further above, “analogical psychedelic eternalism explains ABC…Z”, is more up-to-date than the above)

In October 1985 -April 1987 – December 1987, I didn’t exactly think of myself as working to form a coherent rational explanation of “religion”, but more, of “what ego transcendence is really about”.

Because I wanted to know about re-conceiving the ego – that would surely help support my project of fixing cross-time self-control integrity, a form of spiritual self-help.

Saying that the Egodeath theory is the solution to everything, is saying that analogical psychedelic eternalism is the solution to understanding or explaining everything high.

If we can lump all that together as “religion”, then Strange Loop and Max are right to summarize the egodeath theory in the pattern:
“Religion is [analogical psychedelic eternalism].”

Another good candidate is:

Summarizing the egodeath theory in 1 sentence:

“Transcendent Knowledge is analogical psychedelic eternalism.”

Some of the ep 25 formulations – I wasn’t quite sure what their final formulation ended up being.

The Egodeath theory is an explanation of what?

Strange Loop & Max don’t start with “Transcendent Knowledge is…”, but rather, “Religion is…”.

Selected formulation-sections from the Commentary page on Episode 25 (below is mix of titles by Strange Loop, Max Freakout, and Cybermonk):

1-Sentence Summaries of the Egodeath Theory, Mostly from Strange Loop & Max Freakout

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the psychedelic state of consciousness.

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the psychedelic state of consciousness via ego death control-loss.

Religion is a metaphorical description of tripping out and discovering Eternalism via the experience of panic-attack control-loss ego death.

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the state of consciousness that is exclusively elicited by Psychedelics, via ego death control-loss.

Religion is a metaphorical description of Psychedelics revealing Eternalism via loss of control and ego death.

The above item is Cybermonk’s formulation afterwards. But complaints:
‘eternalism’ is jargon.
“metaphor” is complicated vs “analogy/ies”.
“loss of control is “sort of”.
“ego death” is undefined.
2nd attempt:

Religion or ego transcendence is from psychedelics converting the mind to Eternalism through a transformed experience of time, self, possibility, and control.

That’s better, just have to replace the tech-jargon “eternalism”. pre-existence…

(The above were derived from de-linked section headings of podcast 25 (Strange Loop) notes)

Headings from Podcast Notes that Aren’t 1-Sentence Summaries

eternalism/possibilism – literalist antidrugs possibilism vs. psychedelic metaphorical eternalism

The 3 pillars (guest proposed): Determinism/ Eternalism, Self-Control Cybernetics, Psychedelics

Holistic everything-at-once atemporal acausal determinism

Misplaced Focus on ‘Psychedelics’; “Jesus Is a Mushroom” < the Resulting Phenomenology – but Still, Must Explicitly Lock-in Psychedelics, to Shut Out the Meditation Hucksters

Proof & Critieria of Inadequacy and Failure of terms ‘Entheogens’ & ‘Eternalism’

Say “the state of consciousness that is exclusively elicited by Psychedelics”

The 3 pillars: det/cyb/loosecog (fails to lock-in psychedelics)

Linked Sections, to Podcast 25 Notes

Summarize the Egodeath Theory in a Sentence

My review of the main parts of the theory, related to a single-sentence summary

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the psychedelic state of consciousness.

eternalism/possibilism – literalist antidrugs possibilism vs. psychedelic metaphorical eternalism

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the psychedelic state of consciousness via ego death control-loss.

Religion is a metaphorical description of tripping out and discovering Eternalism via the experience of panic-attack control-loss ego death.

The 3 pillars (guest proposed): Determinism/ Eternalism, Self-Control Cybernetics, Psychedelics

Holistic everything-at-once atemporal acausal determinism

Misplaced Focus on ‘Psychedelics’; “Jesus Is a Mushroom” < the Resulting Phenomenology – but Still, Must Explicitly Lock-in Psychedelics, to Shut Out the Meditation Hucksters

What Is the Final, Bulletproof Sentence Describing the Egodeath Theory?

Religion is a metaphorical description of discovering Eternalism in the state of consciousness that is exclusively elicited by Psychedelics, via ego death control-loss.

Religion is a metaphorical description of Psychedelics revealing Eternalism via loss of control and ego death.

Proof & Critieria of Inadequacy and Failure of terms ‘Entheogens’ & ‘Eternalism’

Say “the state of consciousness that is exclusively elicited by Psychedelics”

The 3 pillars: det/cyb/loosecog (fails to lock-in psychedelics)

In April 1987, I’d say something like:
“Transcendent thinking is about cross-time self-control integrity.” That was the Benefit that I expected from Transcendent Knowledge, in OSC daily life. Gaining cross-time self-control integrity, was the expectation that motivated me to create the Egodeath theory, which was sometimes titled as “The Theory of Ego Transcendence”, in 1988. So in 1988, I’d likely give this form of 1-sentence summary:
“Ego Transcendence is [analogical psychedelic eternalism]; [block universe, no-free-will, loose cognition].”

It’s harmless keeping the word ‘analogical’, since analogy – per Hofstadter – is ubiquitous; analogy (as his title of his 2013 book says) is the fuel and fire of thinking.

Hofstadter uses ‘Analogy’ & ‘Analogies’ in TWO Book Titles

Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking
http://amzn.com/0465018475
2013

Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models Of The Fundamental Mechanisms Of Thought
1995
http://amzn.com/0465024750