I read this out on tonight’s recording of the ego death mystery show it’s 10:12 PM April 30, 2022 I read this out on tonight’s show recording as I realized it in real time :
I caught Panofsky saying falsehoods to Wasson.
Panofsky’s second letter brought to us by Brown , Brown, & Brown:
even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification; if the artists had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree he would have omitted the branches altogether.
Erwin Panofsky, 2nd letter to Gordon Wasson, May 12, 1952
Photo credit: Julie M. Brown, used by permission, Cybermonk May 4, 2022. Depicts artists SOMETIMES cutting off branches at Panofsky’s request, to form proper, branch-free mushrooms. Panofsky failed to account for cut branches, a definitive theme of Pilzbaum, all fully explained by the Egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control).
Artists SOMETIMES cut off branches, at Panofsky’s request, to form proper, branch-free Pilzbaum. that is:
Panofsky failed to account for cut branches, a definitive theme of Pilzbaum, all fully explained by the Egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control).
But I did a quick inventory of Canterbury Psalter and determined that about 10 out of 75 mushroom plants lack any branching or cut branches.
and my explanation of this is :
the mushroom imagery Christian artists do this to establish that, yes we are really talking about psychoactive Psilocybin Mushrooms, but the primary by far is ramifications, which Panofsky brittlely overstates.
and also the 2006 main Article begins with a literal mushroom Cubensis in a cathedral stained glass window that has no ramification traces, thus providing another example of how Erwin Panofsky is simply wrong and is making false assertions, when he says that every mushroom tree has ramifications to some extent.
that is simply not true
and these are all coherently artistically classified together, so you cannot claim that there’s a different type of image or object in the artwork; these are consistent subvariations within a generally uniform class, of mushroom plants in Christian art.
we consistently see
some 37% of mushroom plants have cut branches and
some 10% of mushroom plants have neither cut branches nor branching features added, but are morphologically literal mushroom shapes.
May 4, 2022 addendum
Pilzbaum Pairs (TM Cybermonk)
what the templates desire to show, which all the artists agreed which the artist wanted to show, was not “mushrooms”; what the templates and the artists wanted to show is the *combination of mushrooms and branches and cut branches*, in order to convey that mushrooms bring the state of consciousness (which Panofsky mentions as the mushrooms induce ecstasy despite him saying Christians in the middle ages would have no reason to want to show mushrooms, yet he contradicts himself saying that witches might want to ingest toadstools to induce ecstasy).
also Pulaski draws a false dichotomy between wanting to depict tree versus wanting to depict Mushroom.
in fact the artists and the templates wanted to depict mushrooms to induce ecstasy which reveals a move of experiencing from branching to nonbranching.
also if Panofsky argues that if artist want to depict mushrooms, they would leave off the branches
thats proven false, because why do art historians call these Pilzbaum ; Mushroom Trees?
Clearly the Mushroom Trees can have do have branches, and yet still looks so much like mushroom trees, that we art historians called them “Mushroom Trees”,
thus proving that it is not necessary to omit branches to still convey a Mushroom image
furthermore we have instances like Eustace window of the lion carrying the youth off , where are depicted pointedly and expressly depicted for us by the artist is what I have designated today a new discovery concept called which I call “Pilzbaum Pairs”.
“Pilzbaum Pairs”, Concept discovered yesterday and phrase coined by Cybermonk, May 4, 2022 , which against Panofsky’s final argument, shows that Mushroom artists depicted Mushroom Trees both with Ramifications and ALSO deliberately with no ramifications added in sharp contrast against each other because they wanted to show that contrast, like showing cut branches on a branching mushroom tree. Panofsky fails to mention that the distorted templates schematized tree schematizations don’t only have added branches. he failed to mention that they also have added cut branches as a defining feature these trees by definition the definitive feature is the contrast of branching versus not branching in conjunction with the Mushrooms that is what the artist wanted to depict and that is what the artist freely chose to depict by employing the distorted Diagrams which were deliberately distorted to look like mushrooms with both added branches and with cut branches in sharp contrast that was the whole message was the experiential contrast which is revealed by the Mushrooms. – Cybermonk
“Pilzbaum Pairs”, Concept discovered yesterday and phrase coined by Cybermonk, May 4, 2022 , which against Panofsky’s final argument, shows that Mushroom artists depicted Mushroom Trees both with Ramifications and ALSO deliberately with no ramifications added in sharp contrast against each other because they wanted to show that contrast, like showing cut branches on a branching mushroom tree.
Panofsky fails to mention that the distorted templates schematized tree schematizations don’t only have added branches .
he failed to mention that they also have added cut branches as a defining feature these trees by definition the definitive feature is the contrast of branching versus not branching in conjunction with the Mushrooms
that is what the artists wanted to depict and that is what the artists freely chose to depict, by employing the distorted Diagrams Witch were deliberately distorted to look like mushrooms with both added branches and with cut branches in sharp contrast
that was the whole message was the experiential contrast which is revealed by the Mushrooms. – Cybermonk
now I cringe when I hear my recordings of me only saying that she “holds” the branch, and I failed (for a day) to say which hand, so now I’m yelling at myself yelling “in which hand you idiot, in which hand, you idiot; you’re supposed to say holding it in her left hand!!
9:35 AM May 1, 2022 Dionysus left hand which steers the mushroom tigers also is in control of the branch which Ariadne presumes to hold and steer. 9:36 AM this means Dionysus’ left hand and Ariadne’s left hand are both on the branch that she holds, thus associating Dionysus’ left hand with branching.
major update to this page to add the handedness point that I was too blind to see before – even though I “deliberately looked” for it! 🙈
[🙄 skipping straight to the damn point: I was stupid until just now, I failed to see that: ]
Ariadne holds a branching branch in her left hand, and Dionysus holds a non-branching spear in his right hand.
even after deliberately looking at the mosaic specifically to look for handedness but I looked through a Carl Ruck type negative lens of negativity , or a hatsis mentality saying to myself something like “handedness would be anachronistic”
I was in that kind of a negative mood of “I don’t see their feet”
I just I didn’t look hard enough
the short story is, I didn’t look hard enough.
LOOK HARDER
I looked deliberately, but I did not look long enough.
I did not systematically inventory all of their hands and feet, and I missed out on the most important hand of all!
of course, obviously, what an idiot, how can I be so stupid?!
why did I not look to see what hand Ariadne is holding the branch with?!
and this is just after focusing on “Eve tempted by the serpent”: which branch is she holding her hand in ; which hand does she hold the branch with?
and then in that context of that first discovery (that Ariadne is holding a branch and that Dionysus is holding a spear
but why did it not yet occur to me to ask obviously which hand is she holding the branch in ?
how could I not think of that, given the context of my recent discoveries?
it doesn’t make any sense
why It would not occur to me to think of that
I talked about and I joked about and I showed image crops of Ariadne and her stupid branch
and yet it didn’t even occur to me , it didn’t even occur to me to ask , of course obviously: what hand?
are we able to see the hand ?
and the answer is yes , we are able to see the hand
we are able to see Ariadne’s hand
And it is her left hand.
are we able to see Dionysus hand?
the answer is yes.
which hand is it , guess which hand it is
it is his right hand, of course.
EGODEATH MYTHEME THEORY TESTED AND CONFIRMED YET AGAIN
after deliberately looking at the mosaic specifically to look for handedness – but I looked through a coral rock type negative lens of negativity or a hatis saying that “handedness would be anachronistic”
I was in that kind of a negative mood of “I don’t see their feet”
I just I didn’t look hard enough
the short stories I didn’t look hard enough
I looked deliberately but I did not look long enough
I did not systematically inventory all of their hands and feet
and I missed out on the most important hand of all
of course obviously what an idiot , how can I be so stupid
why did I not look to see what hand she was holding the branch with?!?! 😞😵
DUH!
Ariadne holds the branch in her left hand, and Dionysus holds the non-branching spear in his right hand.
– that’s this follow up announcement now after may be a day ago I noticed and announced that she’s holding a branch in contrast to the spear. it all seems so obvious now]
after I created this page just for no great compelling reason but just as a follow up having made the great breakthrough yesterday
but then as soon as I created this page, all of a sudden, I saw a major , major thing that I had completely screwed up and totally failed to perceive before, just after I finished complaining about how blind I’ve been and I realized –
I was taking an inventory Of each days breakthrough this week to see the trajectory
and this little mosaic slipped through the cracks because I had not created a page and I was complaining bitterly about how I had failed to see that she was holding a branch, all between 2006 and 2022 is the extent of my stupidity and blindness & cluelessness and imperception
and so a day afterwords after mentally grasping the import of the branch which means possibility thinking expressed with with the emphasis on the branching aspect, I realized that yes this was a significant interpr gap and therefore yesterday’s realization that she was holding a branch is major & does warrant a page
this is on the same order of magnitude as my other breakthroughs this week. BUT that was only regarding the branch versus Spear contrast; I still when I created “too late to catch the realtime breakthrough”, created this page a few minutes ago, I still – to this point a- had failed to even think of asking which hand she holds it in or whether we can see that – even though , even though I had deliberately looked at this mosaic maybe yesterday.
but I did a really sloppy job of that, a real failure of perception , which should really cast a strong doubt on my ability to assess these images – even though I am the expert 🤯
and after I created this page retroactively a few minutes ago for retroactive purposes then it struck me and I took another look and I am sad to say that I made a big discovery 9:34 PM April 30 2022 that even when I looked, and even when I’ve been telling you about this mosaic, how happy and mad I am that I saw this branch and failed to see it before, even when I’ve been telling you that for the past day or whatever, I still failed – I even looked at this –
get this:
I even deliberately looked at the picture the other day; I even did a deliberate handedness assessment of this mosaic the other day, and I came up empty-handed, because that is how embarrassingly blind and unperceptive I am
I said that “Alas, this favorite mosaic fails to employ the language of handedness ☹️”
I falsely concluded that after looking at the mosaic 🤯😞😵
now explain to me how in the hell, how in the HELL did I fail to see the crucial, central, important fact that the maiden is clearly, visibly, explicitly, holding the branch in her left hand??
9:34 PM April 30, 2022:
Ariadne holds branch in left hand & Dionysus holds non-branching spear in right hand
– there, I was full of sht : I said that “this mosaic…” a few hours ago and maybe the past day I said to myself that “this mosaic has no handedness theme 😢”.
I was wrong wrong wrong very wrong, obviously wrong, as wrong as I’ve been!
typing in timestamp here I just noticed handedness , at 9:34 PM April 30 , 2022
you have got to apply make yourself and force yourself to draw a grid over the image and don’t give me this casual sloppy eyes shut careless glossing over it
no you have to make a list , an inventory list
I want every damn foot, every damn hand,
every damn leg every limb every paw what an embarrassment the other day like yesterday I looked at this mosaic and came away empty
Panofsky Wrong (News Flash)
I wanted to tell the falsehood
I revealed Panofsky said something very very extremely false and extremely wrong I caught him in a major major error
Panofsky asserts in his second letter that all pilzbaum, all mushroom Trees PILZBAUM have ramifications
and I did a quick stats inventory a Canterbury Psalter 75 mushroom trees and determined about 10 of them have no branching attributes no ramifications 10 out of 75 which says that were Panofsky is 13.33% false and full of it telling a falsehood that all mushroom trees have ramifications that is not true
13 1/3% have no room ramifications and in fact the worlds least flawed Article my main 2006 article begins with a mushroom plant in Christian art, impeccable Christian Art –
Hatsis is the Ultimate Committed Skeptic Dogmatist Ideologue
There were no psilocybin mushrooms in England before 1975.
Letcher Hatsis
and Thomas Hatsis cannot do his dirty sleazy tricks to try to dismiss it is saying well this particular cathedral stained glass window doesn’t count because of some dumbass reason excuse I pulled out of my azz two seconds ago, post hoc, making up rules to desperately try to delegitimate one by one each isolated instance
1500 examples of psilocybin mushroom and he says
instance number 123 doesn’t count because some reason I just made up
and instance number 124 doesn’t count, because of this other reason that I just made up , that I’m going to arbitrarily label as “sound, tried and true historical method”.
and this post-hoc, make sht up as you go, continuously change the rules as needed, and set the rules for, 1500 individual rules fabricated on the spot, as needed, to dismiss each of 1500 instances of mushroom imagery in Christian art.
This is the “sound tried-and-true” level of quality that a Psychedelic Witch – or beginner fake witch, rather – tries to bring to, the extremist Dogmatist, the most dogmatic Dogmatist Ideologue of them all, Thomas Hatsis.
no matter what mushroom imagery you give him in Christian art, he will always be dedicated and fully devoted, fervently, dogmatically devoted to making sht up excuses & invent new rules one by one
invent and fabricate rules on the spot on a case by case, willy-nilly, arbitrary basis –
that this mushroom tree doesn’t count, because it’s not deemed by him as devotional,
and this one doesn’t count because that cathedral was too out-of-the-way,
and this other mushroom doesn’t count, because it’s in a cathedral, but the story that it’s telling isn’t of a relevant type of theology
and this other mushroom doesn’t count Because it’s shape is liberty cap – as I have already inserted in email personal communication to Cybermonk:
The shape of the Liberty Cap is anachronistic. You want to play with the big kids, so please consider that the “holy mushroom” fails all the safeguards of history that protect good ideas from ridiculous ones. If not, please explain your hypothesis in the following terms. 3. Anachronisms (y’all got a BIG problem here!)
in case you were wondering what the “sound, tried-and-true historical method” exactly is, that’s it right there: it means make sht up on an ad-hoc, case by case basis, driven by dogmatic ideologue fervor at any cost.
the new instant-rule doesn’t even have to make any sense, in order to strive to delegitimate and neutralize and remove Psilocybin from the Eucharist at any cost.
be as dogmatic as possible and never accept any mushroom imagery, no matter what, because if are a true devotee of Carlos Ginzburg, if you’re a true follower of Hatsis, this means adhering to a fervent, absolute commitment, a committed skeptic,
that you will do absolutely anything necessary to individually isolate each instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art
and do anything you can dream up, on an individual, make it up on a case-by-case basis, and label that intensively fanatical, doctrinaire, prejudiced bias as “sound, tried-and-true historical method”.
as long as you achieve the goal, the Great Mission of amateur, beginner Psychedelic Witch Thomas Hatsis: to delete Psilocybin mushrooms from the Eucharist, and replace them by scopolamine deliriants instead.
come up with any excuse you could possibly think of
spare no expense
don’t be embarrassed about the worst flimsiest excuses and pretexts
be extremely dogmatic and absolutely close minded
The motivation for creating this webpage is that in retrospect I feel that the magnitude of this comprehension and grasping and realization and perception is significant enough to warrant a tracking webpage to place the date timestamp and arrange to help arrange and track and keep track of these the sequence of breakthroughs about handedness and about branching versus nonbranching
Because it is a real head scratcher very puzzling to me
I thought that I figured out branching versus nonbranching hypothesis completely figured out October 2010
what did they announce in Thanksgiving 2011 if not this?
ditto 2012 and 2013 and 2015 and 2020 and March 2022 and
how have I gotten all the way here since 2003 building out my Mytheme catalog of comprehension and literacy
it is kind of kind of frustrating and puzzling and baffling and mystifying
I don’t understand how I didn’t perceive and realize and comprehend all of this
why are the scales still falling from my eyes at this late date?
how have I not figured out all of these things and perceived and comprehended all these aspects?
aren’t all of these aspects simply directly implied already from my breakthroughs of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2020, early 2021, March 2022,
and yet five hours ago, I finally grasped the main stump cut trunk
and this morning that eve holds branch in left hand, only finally at this very late day 36 years after the very late too late date when I begin Transcendent Knowledge development on back to the future day, October 26, 1985.
I don’t understand how I didn’t grasp the branch* with the left hand already November 2013 and October 2010 etc.
(*HUGE massive irony right here – the above sentence/ joking turn of phrase refers to “why didn’t I understand painting Eve tempted by the serpent where Eve is reaching up to hold the branch with her left hand”. You see, this section of this page was my initial pass of commentary, about a day after I recognized Dionysus’ victory ariadne is holding the branch. but the above & paragraphs were was written a few minutes before I realized “oh my God “holding a branch left hand” exactly describes Dionysus mosaic; the PRESENT art piece, as well! Ariadne holds (her own) branch with her left hand, just as Eve holds the branch of Tree of Knowledge! 🤯 so then I had to rush to truly make good use of this new webpage by adding the huge rest of the story to yesterday’s realization , yesterday’s half half-baked realization, the half of the half breakthrough, and I had to hasten to complete it now. )
I don’t understand how you can know so much and be so literate at the language of methane is Mythemese and yet fail to grasp these elementary basic fundamental observations
im praying to Paul Thagard Model: what the hell is going on ?
I don’t understand
what is involved when you build out a theory
what does it mean to revise Theory connections and strengthen theory connections
and it seems like I’m just discovering the same things over and over again trapped in a déjà vu loop , stuck condemned and cursed forever for making basic elementary Breakthroughs in mytheme Decoding
which all proves that I have not been basic literate; I have not achieved basic literacy
this kind of a
I should be discovering little details at this point; I should not be discovering major gaps that I was at fault for
anyway this immediate creating this page is because this Dionysus mosaic which is included in my 2006 main Article main article “the complete explanation of all transcendent knowledge” circa 2006
the ego death community contributed the Dionysus mosaic with ariadne holding a branch, right next to an exact parallel with in an exact parallel with Dionysus Dionysus holding a double tipped spear nonbranching
how did they go well what
first of all what is the date timestamp? it’s probably in one of the recent weblog postings and I need to copy it to here.
and then I need to update my discovery log my mobile version of my discovery log , webpage, and make a whole bunch of entries and
eventually what I would like to have and what I need to have:
I need to differentiate what is the difference between my breakthrough of say 2003, 2006 regarding Mythology Interpretation image art , 2010 Branching paths in the forest preserve ; branching paths, walking on the path
what is the difference in my November 2011 announcements and my 2012, 2013, 2015,; November 7, 2015 versus Christmas 2015
what did I not understand, and how did I not understand that , given the other things that I understood?
this is unclear
but I should be able to – and anybody should be able to explain it to me
what I didn’t know and why I didn’t know that particular angle, that connection, that aspect
Paul Thagard can help me out in his Models of Theory build out , Theory Development, Theory expansion, and theory revision, especially theory
especially the broad concept and model of theory revision
Paul Thagard the book conceptual revolutions is pretty much ideal for helping me in this head scratcher
I am undergoing Theory Development or rather he would say theory revision
I am experiencing firsthand theory revision , which is a very broad general term
and this is a puzzling experience
how can I know these ten equations That I discovered and yet it turns out that there’s 10 more elementary equations that go hand-in-hand that are almost just different angles on those very same elementary equations
this is puzzling to me
Isn’t handedness Mythology theme the same thing tantamount to the two mental models
didn’t i already literally announce everything ; “all about branching versus nonbranching and how that’s connected to handedness “?
didn’t I already cover all the main angles?
this is all elementary stuff
how is it that I’m still making elementary, beginner, basic observations at this late date ?
I don’t understand
I’m getting more signaling indicators that I’m illiterate, than that I am literate
but because I’m able to formulate this question, I do believe that there are straightforward answers that I can readily investigate, through Egodeath Yahoo Group posts for example
Spear of Destiny Right Side Wound
8:56 AM May 1, 2022 – the {spear} is to be understood in mythology as non-branching and ego death through experiencing non-branching in the Psilocybin mushroom state.
this includes Douris’ kylix (mushroom drinking saucer) of Jason serpent tree of the Hesperides of golden apples of imperishable immortality guarded by many-eyed Python,
with Athena holding the spear in the middle of the scene, gorgon breastplate aegis with bearded serpents. holds owl of Minerva (in left arm).
Sacrificed ram of golden fleece isomorphic with the sacrificed Jason steersman’s possibility-branching thinking.
Remember always inventory the hands of what they are touching and the feet and what they are touching:
Athena’s right hand holds the nonbranching spear and also Jason’s right hand touches that non-branching spear – 9:09 AM May 1, 2022
the spear does not mean time so much as the Morphology of the spear is non-Branching
so don’t think of the spear firstly as time, because that’s a little bit too abstract but emphasize instead the spear’s plainly visible morphology equals that of the vine and serpent.
What causes a fatal wound in the right side and the new rebirth is not time, but rather, specifically, non-branching of personal steersman control and of possibility in the world.
the snake is non-branching; the spear is non-branching; time and control and possibility are non-branching, and our future control thoughts are single and stationary and already always exist.
unfortunately I didn’t state a timestamp but the present time is 7:18 PM April 30, 2022 and my authoring app tells me that I created this page 3 hours ago which would make it approximately 4:19 PM and probably earlier than that, I realized that the trunk was cut not nearly like I mentioned Christmas 2015 not merely that the site ramifications were cut (in the statue-supporting trunks. but believe it or not , it wasn’t until three hours ago that I considered the meaning of the main trunk being cut
I had simply unthinkingly assumed that was for practical reasons of supporting the statue) but that the whole damn tree was cut!!
Although I wrote about cut branches it probably December 2013 in the wake of the Lucas Cranach “eve tempted by the serpent”, breakthrough , my branching formula breakthrough tree vs snake = possibilism vs eternalism (sans left vs right limb recog yet alas 😞😞 – my present reconstruction is that I got one step closer to that when I Christmas 2015 Roasting Salamander Dancing man I said Right equals eternity left equals possibility but I do not think I quite connected that with branching specifically the word Branching in the mental picture of branching like I don’t think I connected that to the tree depicting the mysterious meaningless anomalous Branching of the defective Mushroom Trees which I did not comprehend yet)
but I don’t think I quite saw the connection of the idea of the cut stump, the cut across the top of the stump that the statues lean against
I gained partial understanding of the anomalous frivolous meaningless Branching defect of mushroom trees in November 2020 and I pretty much fully decoded Canterbury main climactic image and yet still I feel my gut assessment it was only 2022 when I really actually truly got it that the branching frivolous meaningless defects of the trees were the entire message of the branching Message Mushroom Trees then I immediately discovered Branching
mandrake in the general theme of branching Message Trees and I did not get that all at once on Christmas 2015 even though I identified left equals possibility and right leg equals depending on eternity thinking but I did not surprisingly you would think that these are all the same thing but they’re not I did not understand the formula Christmas 2015 I believe I did not discover the formula which I discovered November 2020 that “left equals Branching illusion and right equals nonbranching revelation”. these are some reasons why only today or what was it an hour ago was it yesterday [ans: it was < 12 hours ago today, just this morning, 6:15am! At this point it feels as if I have known for a long time realized in comprehend it you will say it’s obvious now that I have done the hard heavy lifting work the Eve is holding onto the branch with her left arm which fits the pattern that {left limb equals Branching Thinking}] I think the time is a blur only today[true!] or yesterday or whenever
i finally recognize that Eve tempted by the serpent – I always said “she holds onto a branch, so thats a count of 4 branching signals” – but only today[true] or yesterday[no] did I say specifically, “she holds onto the branch with left hand, because left Lim equals Branching Thinking”
this explicit, pointed comprehension is a couple of steps beyond what I knew what I discovered in my great 2013 but limited – yes , limited incomplete – Breakthrough of 2013 November
And by likewise limited and still incomplete Breakthrough of Christmas 2015 dancing man right foot equals eternity thinking announcement, but still still did not pull all the pieces together
and even the Thanksgiving 2020 Canterbury Miracle Decoding, even then, I still did not pull all the pieces together!!
And so the saga continues, that I keep re-discovering the same thing/ breakthrough over and over every year, but deeper and I looked back and I say “oh I got it , but I did not adequately fully comprehend/get it yet”
I think I thought of that I know I –
This connection, this realization is comparable to my recent grasp of the lizard as a snake with legs in contrast to my December 2013 realization of that the lizard was vaguely equivalent to a serpent but I did not think of lizard, I believe, as a “snake with branching-off legs” back then.
offhand, (I think a few days ago late April 2022 , I got a really good grasp of “serpent as snake with legs”, although you could trace that back to maybe when I first observed lizard on statue stump , first noted that, maybe November 2020 in the Canterbury Psalter tree of knowledge with the snake with the snake with the rear leg
I have a picture here on a Post-it note from Egodeath Yahoo Group Where I discussed and I explained to a medical student the cut side branches off of the staff of Aesculapius the healer
but I do not think, as far as I know, I don’t remember grasping and comprehending why a statue leans against a stump, and the cut of the entire stump means an altogether elimination of branching.
https://entheomedia.net/Mithras_notes.doc – entheos: the journal of psychedelic spirituality: the cover with the awful reversed screwup image on the cover: YOU CANT DO THAT! 🤦♂️
✋🚫:
“A Roman relief in the National Museum of Copenhagen depicts him in his customary Phrygian attire, with the Mithraic Sol and Luna; he holds the pinecone in one hand, a staff, growing as a sheaf of grain, in the other. To his right, is the raven, with a fillet in its beak, perched atop a stump, up which coils the serpent, so essential for his cult, and also a lizard and a frog; a turtle nearby is between the god’s legs. Beside the raven is a caduceus, and the whole stump, raven, etc. culminate in a multi-branching vine with grape clusters like pine cones and strange funnel-shaped flowers, above which is the bust of Sol, with the Eucharistic cup in his solar aura. Balancing this configuration, on the left side, is the bull, pouring his blood into vessels and a ‘fiery’ drinking horn; above him is the Phrygian cap beside chiastic crossed rods or torches and the thunderbolt of Zeus, with whom Sabazios was also identified; and above that is Luna. On either side of the god’s head are additional caps surmounted by horns and a cross. In the gable is the solar charioteer, with the Dioscouroi and their stars on either side. Florets above the head of Sol and a balance scale above the head of Luna hint at an herbalist apothecary, as does the fungal object, perhaps a pestle, beside, or possibly in the hand, of Luna, as well as the additional floret beneath the vessels filling with bull’s blood at the bottom. There is a fly (not a bee) above the turtle between the god’s legs, and another one beside Luna’s fungal object, identifying it as the fly-agaric. Inverted cups or fungal caps are seen beside the raven’s stump. They may be both, an overturned cup and a (drained) cap, something that may have a parallel in the Liberty Cap used to collect food/alms (herbs?).”
The footnotes about the Mithras article also discussed pruning and pruning hook pruning and cut trunk – axe
oh yeah I was gonna say axe- the article notes talk about the axe in Mithras iconography
an axe to cut the tree stump cut stump with axe ; sword and blade to cut branching, and the youth cutting the mushroom tree branching
because the leaves are to be understood as vine leaf non-branching; branching-averse; tendency to not branch, leaves.
I speak on behalf of all clueless entheogen scholars when I say, when I express our feelings: This art is really letting us down. 😞
this is not what we signed up for
we did not sign up for stupid branches and stupid vine leaves and vines, and snakes
we’re not here for snakes, darn it (unless ingesting their toxin is really good).
That was totally the state of entheogen scholarship when I joined the field in 1999 to read the state of the literature.
why are vine-leaf trees in parallel with mushroom trees, when nobody wants stupid leaf trees, any more than people want Ariadne in the chariot with Dionysus is holding a stupid branch
🤔 what, did the Greeks have psychoactive branches?? Check Ruck to identify what type of psychoactive branch she’s holding.
what are all these stupid branches doing cluttering up our religious art, diluting our mushrooms 😠
NOTHING to do with psilocybin mushrooms. this is yet another “instance of the development process from Italian Pines”, as any first-semester art student knows from reading Brinckmann and Panofsky. 😑
I’m not finding the full complete mosaic through this view. I’ll have to switch to a different view to get the mosaic, the big complete picture, to appear.
We brilliant scholars (learned, learned!) have figured out the savage forebears’ crude, superstitious taboo, just like our latest theories of 1880 have carefully explained that they must have worshiped:
The Holy Branch
The Sacred Branch
The Holy Branch (the ancient Greeks must’ve had an extinct, special psychoactive variety of branch – that explains it!)
people want mushroom caps
why all these dud leaf trees in place of msh trees, same style?
why every time you see a mushroom-cap tree in the Canterbury Psalter, it’s always paired with a stupid, dud failure of a vine-leaf tree too?
very disappointed in Eadwine
vine leaves have nothing to do with Dionysus, fruit of the vine, I am the true vine
there is no grapevines in religious art nor is there any ivy vines in any Greek mythology
but if there were, it would indicate definitely the Greeks must’ve had psychoactive ivy.
If the ultimate meaning and reference of Greek mythology is the Mushroom 🍄 then we can just copy and paste our ingenious decoding and decipherment of the mushroom as the ultimate referent of mythology, to realize that every object in mythology must refer to a physical plant object that the ancients primitives worshiped this object:
The Mushroom 🍄.
or equivalently, because our theory of entheogens is so broad: the Datura plant object, Lilies for the Virgin: the sacred holy Lily object (considered in the crude, concretistic Ruck paradigm theory, dressed up with language that’s turgid, effusive, florid, not-even-English, to hide the fact that the Moderate entheogen school’s got no substance).
Entheos: the journal Of psychedelic spirituality, where ‘spirituality’ ultimately means:
and also the same school of art Interpretation explains that the reason why the snake is the number one religious myth theme is because of shedding its skin and because of its toxin – which shedding & toxin has been represented throughout religious art zero times.
despite the shape of the snake universally ubiquitously everywhere, and vine leaves and vine trees and vine grapevine Madness , Dionysus is overgrowing the ship of pirates, completely taking over the artwork
Dionysus’ victory wedding procession with ivy vines grapevines growing from the wine mixing krater
I forgot how many half hearted half-baked avoidance web posts webpages I’ve already made trying to avoid engaging with this extra burden
these damn vines growing all over the place taking over the whole ship
and they’re not even psychoactive 😠👎
But it’s as certain as Wasson and Ruck have deduced that the ancients must have had special, water-soluble ergot, that’s an extinct strain – yeah, that’s the ticket – just with that amount of certainty, we can be sure that the ancients must’ve had psychoactive ivy.
that totally explains why there’s ivy throughout religious art 😑
Photo credit: Julie M. Brown, used by permission of Brown, Brown, & Brown by Cybermonk, crop and enhancement by Cybermonk. From book The Psychedelic Gospels.
🔪🗡
Hypothesis, of interpretation of mushroom imagery in Christian art:
in Plainc fresco, we are to mentally contrast, holding up the mushroom cap, contrast the left ramification versus the right ramification.
The serpent head, and fruit that the non-branching serpent inevitably brings, are near the right ramification, and the left ramification is placed behind.
vine-leaf tree, Albert Brinckmann Plate 5, Y-branching morphology, with cut ramifications
From bottom panel of same picture as above, establishing the mushroom altered-state context of the green canopy tree above.
Against Letcher Hatsis’ assertion that we have no way to tell whether this is a dinner mushroom – that’s false, because we are shown John Rush’s celestial erection/ lifted garment, proving that Moses is indicated as in an altered state from Psilocybin, plainly depicted/indicated, together with three uniform mushrooms in Moses’ hem folds, but not in the other guys’ hem folds in the same panel, proving deliberate signification of psychoactive, Psilocybin mushroom.
Hatsis cant tell his left from his rightTo the right, not in this crop, identified by Cybermonk is the vine-leaf tree , representing non-branching contrasted with the trifold branching msh treeProbably from Giorgio Samorini’s Mushroom trees in Christian art article 1998
8:14 AM April 30, 2022 this gives me an idea, reading the posting that I just published Eve holds branch with left hand. Reading that paragraph in the previous post give me an idea a mental picture of the three ramifications there is a added left and an added to write the artist has added a pair of ramifications which consist of left versus right contrast the two to represent the two mental models and then the third the stem can represent nonbranching reality as well as the right ramification also representing that but more in a contrast so first mentally picture a non-Branching Trunk stem and then in contrast visualize the mushroom tree Mushroom caps which are held up by a Y configuration morphology
now overlay a Y configuration , which contrasts {left versus right} theme, overlaid on top of the simple non-branching Trunk/ stem/ pole.
regarding in that post i was reading my paragraph my paragraph in which I wrote that from memory you have to be able to describe the plaincruel msh tree else you are a loser and outsider and you understand nothing unless you are able to describe from memory you have to draw from memory
can you draw from memory the planecorral fresco mushroom tree
in fact if I really challenge you :
draw from memory …
you are not a genuine Mushroom arguer you are not
you are not participating in this scholarly slap fight for real in a serious way unless you are capable – but you are not, because you’re a poser – you are not capable of drawing the planecrop fresco from memory. 👎😠
I challenge to you losers you fake posers who pretend to slap fight each other but you do a terrible job of it
prove that you’re not a fake
prove that you know how to draw a Plaincourault fresco from memory
and when I’m grading your papers, here’s how I’m going to grade you:
did you show Eve standing on her right foot?
did you draw the three ramifications holding up the cap?
With the left ramification hidden behind the pole stem – Or does the snake head hide it?
because here Brown puts forth his incorrect Interpretation which has pushed me to one up him to show him who is the boss of art Interpretation Mushroom Christian Art and show that every time he makes interpretation I make the correct one that all he does is point in the correct direction unlike everyone before him he sets up the shot and then I get the ball in the hole or whatever shot and then I get the ball
Brown sets up the shot and then I score of the goal he talks about her ribs he makes the correct effort he makes the correct type of analysis unlike Carl rock with his stupid 1880 era outdated anthropology C cyber disciple.wordpress.com regarding the titles of webpage titled anthropology theories outdated equals John allegro John Allegro equals 1880 theory of fertility philosophy plus just add stupid jumbo kitty Mushroom Of infantile children’s books Ruck-level concretistic thinking Based on rocks crude primitive superstitious and taboo driven thinking that he employs and that he’s limited to
this was how the primitives tried to reason about how our bettors our ancestors created religious Mythology before we went Idiocracy mode and lacked inspiration from The Mushroom, Devo de-evolution, before the decline of IQ which produce the likes of Carl Rut with his primitive superstitious taboo 1880-era backwards crude concrete attempted explanation of what our superiors in the pre-modern era all knew, unlike us
and so I had to struggle for 1999 through 2022
that’s 23 years of my having to struggle to understood what all of our superiors earlier in history knew, that left hand equals branching = possibility thinking, and right hand equals nonbranching equals eternity thinking; pre-existence of control thoughts; the narrow way of Jesus the disappoints his followers they leave him and no longer follow him
but have I got to my point yet I doubt it
the three ramifications holding up the cap are left, middle ,and right
against Brown and his primitive Taboo superstitious backwards concrete childish thinking as we see manifested by the crude attempts of 1880 anthropology PhD professors in there backwards crude primitive and superstitious theorizing in the universities with John allegro says just add mushrooms and you’ve got the perfect witches brew of backwards superstitious misreading of our ancestors’ superior knowledge and comprehension and sophistication.
See cyberdisciple.wordpress.com Articles: John Allegro anthropology outdated theories of mythology
One day I will get to the point
the last ramification of the planecrawl Fresco Mushroom tree equals the left ramification equals possibility thinking, and the right ramification equals eternity thinking
because Brown, together with Brown & Brown, speculates on the meaning of the ramifications holding up the cap
And their meaning is wrong; Brown & Brown & Brown speculate that the ramifications holding up the cap represent the three dimensional perspective which these inept artists (or “some especially ignorant craftsman” per Art Historian Erwin Panofsky’s 2nd letter to Wasson) were incapable of representing, because they are crude and primitive and backwards and superstitious, and could not have understood anything as sophisticated as we do , that the left ramification represents the egoic delusion of possiblism; possibility-branching thinking, and that the right ramification represents eternity thinking
and whenever we have a trident or whenever we have a Y branching, which is very popular to hold up the mushroom cap of the mushroom tree with a Y branching
whenever we have a Y, we have the opportunity to say that the left – as in the Canterbury mushroom tree with two men and sword – left equals branching, and the right branch of the tree …
which is entirely cut off as well in the dancing man salamander Roasting Hatsis’ image, the right trunk is completely cut –
non-branching; the right ramification holding up the cap of the planecorral fresco mushroom tree atop the stem
and we know that the stem is not added
here’s a good point:
we know that the central stem which holds up the mushroom cap of the tree is natural
so then what has been artificially added, tacked on in an artificial way onto this tree, is the left ramification and the right ramification
what is the meaning, then, the artist asks us ; I have added a left ramification and I have added an artificial right ramification.
what is the meaning of the left and right ramifications which I have added to the natural stem of this mushroom tree
the answer is :
the left ramification represents egoic delusional ordinary state experience of the overlay the appearance which overlays the reality, the appearance of king steering in a tree; the possibility branching mental world model of self-in-world.
whereas in contrast, the right artificially added ramification represents the other, non-branching experiential mode & non-branching cognitive mode of thinking, eternity thinking, pre-existence of future control thoughts. witch most pointedly ergonomically and distinctively comes from ingesting Psilocybin mushrooms, far more than any other way, or alleged way.
6:16 AM April 30, 2022 breakthrough realization observation by Cybermonk: Eve holds on to branch ( = {branching} ) with LEFT arm/ hand/ limb (which equals branching-thinking; possibilism: the egoic mental model of {king steering in tree})
Major breakthrough discovery realization that seals my theory and proves everything; proves that branching equals left and then non-branching equals right.
if there were any doubt about that handedness association, it has died this moment. I failed to note handedness in November 29, 2013 and that is understandable, but there is no excuse really that I failed to note that immediately as soon as I posted on Christmas 2015 Decoding the Roasting Hatsis’ image from Bennett 1995 Green Gold book essay covered in Samorinis msh tree article 1998. I failed in that I did not on Christmas 2015 I should have returned to the book the power of myth Lucas Cranach painting Eve tempted by the serpent and I should have noted that she holds onto the branch with left arm not right hand 😞
I I have been carrying failure with me from Christmas 2015 until finally opened my eyes and got a clue April 30, 2022 that is 2021-2015 = 6 years January February March April equals four months totals of six years and four months equals 6 1/3 years Of failure to ask the ultra obvious question:
which arm is holding the branch?
🤔
But let’s see, did I actually understand specifically – Christmas 2015, did I specifically post in terms of saying ” left limb equals branching and right limb equals non-branching “?? 🤔
no I don’t think that I made that connection in terms of branching until the Canterbury miracle of November 2020.
if this is how my progress my progression of decoding proceeded then I have only been caring this particular stupidity and blindness from November 2022 April 2022 which is about a year and a half of failure to fold back my connections Discoveries into earlier art I have been failing to go back to earlier art to fold back the connections to revisit I’ve been resting on the laurels and failing to go back to that fruit of knowledge and squeeze that fruit more and get more meaning out of that picture
because it’s not enough
you didn’t finish decoding it
you didn’t finish decoding it !
you didn’t finish decoding it!! 😠
…
we have just received a very firm affirmation that this genre consistently asserts that:
branching equals left ramification limb, and non-branching equals right ramification limb
in this image, we do not rely on the legs, but rather on the arms, to convey the payload message – well or a portion of it – the portion of the message which associates Branching with left limb and non-Branching with Right limb
my speculations have been paying off asking why does the dancing man salamander Roasting image tree have four hands
and why …
a day or two before that I asked
look at a week ago when I asked, from memory
tell me from memory: how many caps does Plaincourault have?
and I failed to know
I had to guess
only a week ago, I failed to know the basic elementary answer to the question “how many caps”
tell me from memory, without looking, without cheating, no web search cheat allowed:
how many caps, or rather how many limbs
How many ramifications does the Plaincourault fresco tree have?
how many caps does the Plaincourault tree have?
which amounts to the question, it really is the question:
how many mushrooms jutting off to the side does the Plaincourault tree have??
are you too stupid to know how many limbs God created humans and animals with?
how many side caps does the Plaincourault fresco have?
you’re pretty damn clueless if you don’t know the answer
it’s four of course
Do you not know how many limbs the human has, how many limbs God created animals with, how many limbs a salamander has?
and so ideally if I can be greedy and say that November 29, 2013 only merely had me trembling for a week in breakthrough of realizing what people knew, both in Greek and Christian (Fritz Graff Greek mythology book and the power of myth Joseph Campbell ) well not Joseph Campbell, he didn’t know anything, but Lucas Cranatch , Painter of Eve tempted by the serpent,
Our superiors before us before the modern period knew about moving the mental model from branching to non-branching, and they associated that contrast, by convention, with moving from the left limb to the right limb.
and if I could be greedy now, I would say:
why did I fail, in my own hand writing I can see that I failed to note in 2013, I failed to take an inventory of HANDEDNESS
you’ve got to inventory the hands
inventory the limbs
you have to inventory the limbs
you have to inventory the limbs!
why could I not have had a total breakthrough November 29, 2013?
why couldn’t I have decoded the {handedness} mytheme at the same time? That waited until my Roasting Salamander Hatsis dancing man Bennett Chris Bennett image Chris Bennett 1995 the book green gold the essay which Samorini a Giorgio Samorini Article on Mushroom Trees mentions and depicts in the amanita column in Figure 20 , the table with two columns and four rows, Of the alleged two types of mushroom trees although my ego death theory enables a far my methane theory theory of myth themes Mythology themes enables us to move far far past Georgios Samorini typology of mushroom tree attributes and classifications for example I do a much much better job than Brown, Brown, & Brown in coming up with a classification scheme that makes sense there’s doesn’t even make sense it fundamentally doesn’t make sense it’s just a random uneven list it’s not symmetrical it’s not it’s not a usable they failed to even and they failed to provide a usable for category uniform buckets and it’s because of their terrible riding looked insane the brown and brown or crazy see what I mean that the old theory is always a train wreck mess and not even a Theory look how they list they go from right to left what the hell what the hell Brown no wonder you come up with a terrible classification scheme that’s not even a sensible uniform agrees why the hell do you inventory the trees from right to left that’s stupid and the result is stupid to my system is actually sensible left to right of course obviously and you provided with this terrible verbose paragraph awful format why don’t you use a bullet list , obviously; what a terrible, less-than-Theory!
great example of how the old theory is poorly expressed, poorly considered – you didn’t think it through
why the hell did you list the trees from right to left ?!
and never both super verbose ,messy very highly messy or too many words a terrible presentation
why didn’t you simply list your categoryagrees
why the hell do you inventory the trees from right to left , that’s stupid, brown, wtf
and naturally, the result is stupid too
my system is actually sensible: left to right, of course, obviously
and you provided with this terrible verbose paragraph , awful format –
why don’t you use a bullet list , obviously?
what a terrible less than Theory
great example of how the old theory is poorly expressed, poorly considered
you didn’t think it through
why the hell did you list the trees from right to left
and not the reverse??
super verbose, messy, very highly messy , too many words
a terrible presentation why didn’t you simply list your category scheme?!
We have very poor writing/formatting from brown, brown & brown, and of course together with that, naturally, hand-in-hand we have very poor classification scheme that doesn’t make basic sense at all as a classification scheme.
referred
I censored myself before, but I’m gonna say it now :
what Brown and Brown present us with is a so-called Chinese encyclopedia or what’s the expression the Chinese dictionary, where you have crazy asymmetrical classification scheme that doesn’t make any sense, and has no uniformity at all
they say mushroom type one is amanita Mushroom type
two is some Kinda Psilocybin
in contrast Mushroom type three is some kind of psilocybe,
meanwhile the spear shaped mushroom tree type is commences Cubensis (!) wtf
It’s a foolish less-than-scheme that brown brown and brown put /cobble sloppily together
more like a 2016 book & 2019 article by Clown, Clown, & Clown 🤡 🤡 🤡 – The SECRET history of HALLUCINOGENS 🍄 in Christianity 🤦♂️
my Canterbury Psalter Mushroom plant classification actually makes sense
Left to right (not idiotically sloppily listed right to left, like clown, clown, & clown do):
let’s see if I can do this from memory
yes I can
number one on the left is a Panaeolus and I have specimen photographs to prove it and Paul Stamets book correlates this to to prove that I’m right and they are wrong
number two is liberty cap Because they are spear shaped triangles especially if you look at that pattern in all 75 mushroom plants in the Canterbury Psalter
number three is Cuban sauce, of course because it’s blue and has the rounded cap
And mushroom tree plant number four which God created the four classes of sacred plants plant number four on the right of course is Amanita , which is
the only psychoactive 🍄 that existed in England, before it was artificially brought there in 1975, according to the great psychedelic historian Letcher Hatsis, who assures us that “the Liberty Cap shape is anachronistic” – that’s actually a direct quote of his inarticulate email; See my idea development page 12 for the incomprehensible quotes
articulate, comprehensible corrections invited, (don’t hold breath) – Looking forward to the for sure large huge insight that will arise once I’m corrected on exactly what they wrote; I’m sure it’s not just a varying, indeterminate blob of incomprehensible gibberish ha ha Ha ha ha
which is the jumbo oversized semi tractor truck of mushrooms jumbo kiddie-size infantile childrens book look mummy theres a 🍄 Ruck-level, Dr. Rut concretistic level of theory of crudeness physical object, “the sacred mushroom” as they clumsily say 🤦♂️, 1000 times more massive than a Liberty Cap mushroom, which is why the Amanita is the face of Psilocybin mushroom ingestion, and always will be.
Panaeolus
Liberty Cap
Cubensis
Amanita
PanaeolusLiberty CapCubensis🍄
it takes me to simply , elegantly, and correctly identify the mushrooms on the cover of Brown, Brown, & Brown’s book The psychedelic Gospels , using one hundredth of the word count that they use , in their insane, right to left, garbled, over-verbose, Chinese encyclopedia useless non-classification scheme, in which they get everything wrong
except Amanita 🍄 😞
it’s My idenitification classifivcation scheme is a genuine scheme, unlike their random, Chinese encyclopedia that they present us with, it’s of no use at all, and it’s completely vague, and they completely swap obviously the liberty cabs you see now
I have inventoried in my private-stock web post draft I have categorized every Individually to prove that the breakout is:
the triangle umbrellas of course our liberty And brown, brown & brown completely botched this
they say that the Liberty Cap is a Panaeolus
but when you inventory the whole Salter, as I have done for Over the course of A year maybe February 2021 through February 2022 ( because there are too damn many mushroom trees)
, clearly the triangle umbrellas are liberty cab, not paniolos
Why do I not know offhand how many caps on left and right tge plainc tree has??
oh I remember what I was going to ask here next:
why do I not know from memory whether my catalog of key Mythology themes has left hand and right hand?
but I’m pretty sure
from memory
but I’m pretty sure it does have that … whether my key concepts…
surely, certainly my key concepts catalog must have {right hand} /limb/ leg/ foot/ arm
and I hope the older realization that is there turning to look to the right equals remembering the vision of and retaining the vision of timelessness and mono-possibility, eternalism, lack of metaphysical steering power.
why did I fail to write on the power of myth page of the book
look what is not there
what is not there is my writing ” Eve is holding on to the branch with her left hand left arm”
LEFT HAND
LEFT ARM
LEFT ARM
LEFT ARM
imagine if I had come to the Canterbury main climactic comic panel in November 2020 knowing the mega import key ramification of handedness, the key meaning-convention of left limb vs right limb…
and imagine if I had seen the dancing man roasting Salamander image in leading up to Christmas 2015
imagine if I had already bothered opening my eyes in November 29, 2013 to ask a question:
“which arm is holding onto the branch???”
WHICH ARM IS HOLDING ONTO THE BRANCH
but in our culture, our conceptual lang vocab, metaphors, we have no concept of significance of handedness orientation
in fact we have the opposite
except that we do have the idea in our culture that right handedness is normal
but we try not to be biased
we try not to say the right hand is truth and left-hand equals foolish ignorant falsehood, assertion of a fundamental metaphysical falsehood
left hand guitarists
I swear 50% of top electric guitar us are left-handed
I think it might be 2/3
how come every top electric guitarist is left-handed
Actually, come to think of it, I can’t think of a single electric guitarist who is right-handed; they all play left-handed 🤔 🚫🎸
The theory of art interpretation: Rule #1: you have to inventory the limbs.
This Rule #1 of interpretation of mushroom imagery in Christian art: “Inventory which limbs”, is my total sum contribution to the Jerry Brown Committee of neutral, neutered, non-committal, passive, wimpy, ineffective, wussy, fair-playing, unbiased, being sure, above all, to avoid any whiff of Ardent Advocacy and taking a position.
In the section The Ardent Advocates, the first thing that Brown & Brown list in their 2019 article in the Journal of Psychedelics Studies: “Special Issue on Psychedelics and World Religious History”, the first thing they mention is Egodeath.com.
God fcking forbid we take a committed position, adhere to a Dogmatist Declaration, and stick to ours guns, AS DOGMATIC AS THE KING🛼👑 OF DOGMATISM HIMSELF, PSYCHEDELIC SCOPALAMINE-PUSHING, ANTI-MUSHROOM FANATICAL PROHIBITIONIST PSYCHEDELIC WITCH AND FABRICATOR OF PSEUDO-HISTORY THOMAS HATSIS and force the data to fit our theory of interpretation by sheer force 💪 🖼️🎨
The diamond hammer of interpretation WINS YET AGAIN.
Above: The Maximal (top), Moderate (middle), and Minimal (bottom left) entheogen theories of religion.
Horizontal axis: time.
Vertical axis: Amount of normal public mainstream use and knowledge of psilocybin mushrooms and understanding of mythology as analogy that vividly describes and communicates experiencing and the resulting ultimate mental model transformation.
What a ripoff the Moderate entheogen theory of religion is!
The Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion
The top plot above is my highly successful explanatory framework, the one that produced the Canterbury Miracle including 75 proven psychoactive mushroom trees (just for starters), what I give to you, what I bring, what the Maximal entheogen theory of religion brings.
Look how generous the Maximal theory is, and how maximally successful at revealing the heavy, normal presence – not absence or suppressed – Psilocybin Eucharistic Mixed Wine is throughout history, elegantly & explicitly communicated and described through branching-message mushroom trees.
Through the Maximal theory, there is extreme heavy-duty intensive presence of Psilocybin mushrooms, heavy-duty hard-core maximum extreme, tons and tons of it.
– along with 100% complete comprehension of Transcendent Knowledge, esotericism, Mystery Religion revelation and mental model transformation, redemption, full mystical realization of the Absolute; salvation, Gnosis, metaphysical enlightenment, Perennial Philosophy, satori, and full comprehension of the analogy-based language of religious mythology and mythological religious art.
The Moderate Entheogen Theory of Religion
Then below that, the middle plot is what Carl Rut (& the evil M. Hoffman) school brings to you – look at what a stingy bastard he is!
Stingy, stingy Dr. Rut’s got us stuck in a rut, going nowhere.
Look at how much he withholds from us.
This is terrible of him.
The Minimal Entheogen Theory of Religion
But if you think that’s bad, look at how it gets even worse with John Allegro, the hard-core Minimalist, together with the extremist super extreme minimalist, the worst person on earth, Terence McKenna.
What a stingy, stingy bastard Terence McKenna is!
He takes them all away from us.
His book The Food Only of the Gods serves to take away all of our psilocybin mushrooms.
That stingy, stingy turns McKenna takes all of it away.
He says that the big bad church prevented anybody at all from ever using Psilocybin ever.
The church completely got rid of any and all use of it.
Why isn’t Hatsis attacking, and Andy Letcher should, but especially Hatsis should be attacking Terence McKenna, enemy number one, taking away all of the psilocybin mushrooms, removing them all from history.
According to Terence McKenna, on day one, God created Psilocybin Mushrooms.
And then at noon on day one, God completely removed 100% of Psilocybin mushrooms, totally deleted from history entirely.
This is Terence McKenna’s awful story that was shockingly bad.
I bought his books and I read his books and I was incensed because McKenna says history does not contain any Psilocybin mushrooms at all.
and it’s his fault that the stupid Supreme Court falsely says the Indians are allowed to use mescaline because they have a history, a long tradition going all the way back to the year 1920.
But Europeans are forbidden from using psilocybin mushrooms, because everybody knows that there was no psilocybin in England until it was brought there from Central and South America in 1975, as the top historian Letcher Hatsis reminds us.
The judge read Terence McKenna’s books and the judge said who is the number one authority on psilocybin mushrooms, and everyone said it’s Terence McKenna.
and so the supreme court judges read Terence McKenna’s books.
The US Supreme Court learned from Terence McKenna that our own Christian European religion, and Old Testament and Bible, and our pre-history as far back as we can possibly trace it into the beginning of their archaic era never, ever had any Psilocybin mushrooms at all, according to the expert Terence McKenna.
What an idiot, idiot!
Could you possibly have any more of a disastrous strategy?!
This is like a weaponized bad theory.
Terence McKenna went to the ends of the earth to try to construct the most harmful, counterproductive, deadly self-defeating, totally self-defeating strategy of absolute negativity!
Terence McKenna is so bad, stingy, and defeatist, that compared to him, John Allegro is almost downright generous, in permitting 20 years of secret tiny cult of Christians to be permitted with the fourth-rate, dirty, Amanita barely functioning entheogen (which he then turns around and casually declares that Plaincourault shows was a old tradition that was still remembered 1,200 years later).
Then contrast Terence McKenna, who says that all throughout recorded history, never, ever did any European ever use Psilocybin or know about it, and no religion ever involved it at all.
Thanks a fcking lot, dumbass Terence McKenna! 😡
Thanks for completely telling the most negative, defeatist story you could possibly scrape together.
Terence McKenna asserts that never, except in pre-archaic pre-history was the only time that our own history ever had any psilocybin mushrooms
What an idiot!
What a harmful, harmful story to foist on us!
With friends like these, who needs Prohibitionists enemies?
The Minute When I Asked “What Foot Is Eve Standing on in Plaincourault Fresco?”
Found it!: The minute I said “waitaminnute what foot?”: exact quote:
“7:23 PM April 28, 2022 a little question 4 u – what leg is Eve standing on”
Jeez I’m slow — that’s 5 weeks after Brown showed the Marcia Kupfer passage (for the 3rd time) to me, upon which I replied writing for the first time, “branching-message mushroom trees”.
What was I doing, slacking…. actually, I had been pounding out art-decoding breakthroughs as fast as possible via voice dictation, during about March 15-May 15, 2022 (it’s looking like it was a 2-month-long nonstop jackpot) it seems.
— and then an hour later, at 8:50 pm, I finally realized the meaning of Ariadne’s branch! after more or less consciously, helplessly wondering abou that for 16 years, ever since 2006 main article that I published that image in (Dionysus Victory Procession mosaic).
copy/pasted to below:
… there is nothing hidden about it except our own stupidity
7:23 PM April 28, 2022 a little question 4 u – what leg is Eve standing on
7:23 PM April 28, 2022 a little question 4 u – what leg is Eve standing on
[voice dict on mobile:] confirmed at 7:29 PM April 28, 2022 – in the Plaincourault Fresco, I have determined that Eve is depicted standing with all her weight on her right foot/leg, with her left foot standing on top of her right foot, which further confirms my theory and further contributes to my major contributions to interpretation of the planecrawl fresco, further proving that plane crawl is mushroom psychoactives , given that mushrooms produce the experience of non-Branching, which is consistently associated with the right limb and especially right leg, across art including Tauroctony, and dancing man salamander Roasting, and Canterbury Psalter page mushroom tree with two men and a sword, and now add to that list the Plaincourault fresco. – Cybermonk –
/ end of copied from Salamander Tree page
Updating the Present April 29, 2022 Page on Feb. 16, 2023
[February 16, 2023] I am doing an update/ polishing pass of the present page, mostly to enable copy/paste from all the Plainc images in it. Maybe preserve the rough writeup in an Archive “do not mess w/ this!” section of this page.
OR, I could create and new fresh Plainc Fresco page and that way, not mess with this important historical archive page. There is much merit to that idea — but, extra time, so, no-go.
That’s it, all my WordPress Gallery crops/images of Plainc.
When I copy/paste a below image from this page and then you click that copy of the image, what URL should load? note you can also r-clk > open image in new page, no need repeat that func’y. It should load present page.
done: So, add a here-circular link to present page, on each image above.
Additional discovery 6:16 AM April 30, 2022: Lucas Cranach in painted “Eve tempted by the serpent” in the book The Power of Myth:
Eve is holding onto {branching} with her left hand.
left ramification equals branching thinking
Eve’s right hand holds the fruit of the tree of knowledge; the right limb equals knowledge of non-branching. experiencing of eternalism.
I was thinking about this for the past couple of days but in a weak, defeatist, not seriously way
I was not seriously engaging the problem
I was failing to force the data to fit my theory
I failed to hammer on his picture and force his picture to obey my dictate
but I finally got some vigor (just after double strength coffee TBH) and abandoned the weakling mentality and put some vigor into it and
after two days of half-assed non-serious dabbling half heartedly not really hardly putting any effort, failing to be aggressive about this painting, and finally I saw it,
because I was thinking about making a crop of the top of the image
and I was my final though was “this will not gain me any horizontal width”
(which is not exactly true ; if I turn the device then it will maybe I don’t know but anyway)
my final last thought was what if I were to make a crop of this top part of the picture
it would only show her left hand
what should be in the crop
my final last thought was:
THE CROP WOULD JUST SHOW EVE’S LEFT HAND HOLDING ONTO TO THE BRANCH-😵😵😖😵😵⚰️💀I AM AN IDIOT AND BLIND😞
so now I am obliged to make a crop of her damned left hand which I have only now figured out after I’ve been Decoding or I could say failing to decode ever since 7:42 PM
November 29 2013 neglecting and lax resting on my laurels giving up on doing anything productive with her left hand and I was disappointed that her feet or not doing anything interesting to prefer the right foot and with this Fievel fee
bowl and a half feeble and a half hearted dabbling in barely poking at this image
thing go back to every image
go back to re-read my planecorralled Article aloud this morning
I will be the first person to ever read this exhausting mega overkill article about allegro versus Wasson
go back
try harder
try harder dammit
try harder
interpret harder
😠 💪 *FORCE* THE DATA TO FIT THE THEORY!
I need a spotter to scream at me PUSH!! 😠 🏋️♀️
mithras as king steering in a tree of egoic possibility branching
branch, branching legs, & branching antlers, holding onto a branch with non-branching serpent – comprehended by Cybermonk 7:42 pm November 29, 2013. {tree vs. snake} = possibilism vs. eternalism, including autonomous vs. dependent control experiential mental models in the tight vs. loose cognitive binding state, as ideally induced by Psilocybin mushrooms.
Dionysus holding a non-branching spear (eternalism) married with/ next to Ariadne holding a branching branch (possibilism)
non-branching spear vs. branching branch
Franz Cumont Mithrasism bookMichel Bourey copyverdict: Bourey’s copy FAILURE to distinctly depict right foot lower, have to purely deduce
Eve is standing on her right foot, with her left foot being based on her right foot. She holds her legs together rather than branching them apart, so they are non-branching.
That is evidence that the planecorral fresco is intended to describe the loose cognitive state of experiencing that is known to be ergonomically, directly produced by Psilocybin mushrooms.
8:22 AM April 29, 2022
also note the proximity of the lower right limb of the mushroom tree next to her legs the ramification lower right is near her held together branching legs-
this is to be read as “the right leg of the mushroom tree is near Eve’s legs which carry the message of non-branching”.
The proximity of the right leg of the mushroom tree to Eve’s legs is telling the message “right leg is significant”.
The right leg of the mushroom tree is near Eve’s right leg, indicating that the message focuses on the theme of {right leg} being significant.
also in this genre per Canterbury Psalter, it Hass to be inventoried and pointed out that Eve’s left hand is higher than her right hand, and
her left foot is higher – or right foot is closer to the ground than left foot, and that
the left arm of the mushroom tree is higher than the right arm.
Original top of this webpage
orig timestamp orig top of page: Branching-message mushroom trees affirm non-branching and the right foot.
{relying on the right foot} means relying on the non-branching mental model of time and possibility and control, to produce stable control in the altered state.
see my previous web page post in which I discovered this a few minutes ago,
, titled something about four limbs or four legs of salamander and four mushrooms in both dancing man and in plaincoral fresco.
there are four ramifications
I am working on a speculation that it is four because the human has four limbs
left arm, right arm, left leg, right leg
the salamander has four legs
the bull has four legs
and this just now strikes me at 7:46 PM April 28, 2022 – a bit of a correction and modification of something I said the other day during the great Tauroctony breakthrough, I incorrectly said that the human has two legs and the bull has-
I said that the human has one pair of legs and that the bull has two pair of legs.
that’s not exactly true that the bull has more pairs of legs than a human, because the front legs of a bull are equivalent, similar, comparable to the pair of arms of a human.
the reason that this idea struck me just now as I was about to stay a few seconds ago I was about to say that:
I’m working on a argument that:
The reason why there are four ramifications, left and right trunk caps, two amanita to the left & two Amanita to the right in the plaincruel fresco, and the reason why there are four paws on the salamander tree, with a mushroom above each paw, is because we have four limbs.
this is true for birds and animals.
deer, cow, bull
the salamander is a snake with four legs.
some dragons have four limbs.
I am right now we’re in real time, I’ve got the microphone CAD E-100 supercardioid with bass cut, I’m doing double entry here, because this treacherous backstabbing technology wants to garbage-can my profundities 😠
I am working out right now an argument of why these two trees Mushroom Trees have 2 msh on L & 2 R.
OK I thought of something
I keep thinking of, it keeps flashing in my mind:
the Dionysus mosaic victory procession has four mushrooms in the hem of the maenad, one mushroom above each tiger.
the salamander tree has a mushroom above each paw.
One msh-tiger for each limb of the animal.
the animal has four limbs.
there are four mushroom tigers drawing the chariot of Dionysus.
Canterbury Psalter’s most important image, the grand masterpiece central image of the great Canterbury Psalter emphasized our two hands and two feet.
the Plaincourault Fresco has two mushrooms to the left and two mushrooms to the right – the same branching morphology as the human or animal.
So the idea that strikes me a minute ago in trying to interpret the salamander dancing man tree:
above each paw / ramification of the salamander tree is a mushroom.
MUSHROOM = LIMB = RAMIFICATION = BRANCH
= ultimately, the altered state loose cognitive assocn message of experience of non-branching
I took the helm so eagerly, and sailed for distant lands
Why must my crew desert me, when I need, I need a guiding hand
Why is Hatsis’ left foot touching Cyberdisciple’s right foot?? 🤔
Why is the super enlightened guy’s both feet off the ground, standing on neither?? 😟
Why does the guy attached to him have no limbs, like the hierophant and the father at the banquet table?? 🙂
so many questions
I just remembered
I can maybe do a Hi-Rez capture on the mobile device
and I think I finally manage to upload the reversed Tauroctony
next day update 6:41 AM April 29, 2022
this might not be this might not be self
evident so I spell it out that congratulations are due to me this might
not be this might not be self evident so I spell it out that congratulations are due to me
I can get this damn voice dictation in gear and get it to work
tried turning off the music player 123 test is this damn thing working
congratulations are due to me first of all when I was in the middle of working on another the previous webpage adding more pictures and then I for some reason add the added plane corral whatever that context was and then it occurred to me the question and I noted the date timestamp at which the question occurred to me and I said hey minor little question for you what leg is she standing on you see because it’s not it’s not clear it’s not obvious what like she standing on it’s blurry and there’s kind of a lot riding on this question to some extent every time the question occurs to me it’s putting my theory at jeopardy at risk it’s putting it to the test again what if my theory fails
what if the artist shows lackadaisical apathy what is the artist of this mushroom this important this most important Mushroom tree image shows complete apathy about left versus right this puts my theory at risk so congratulations to me for thinking of the question and congratulations to me for again I emphasize that it wasn’t clear it’s not obvious you have to go looking for it in this picture you’re not going to see a nobody mentions nobody ever mentions that she’s standing on 1 foot
so I am the first one to even perceive the question and so congratulations or do there are due to me there for having that a acuity to even think to ask the question because it’s not clear in this picture in the question will not occur to you unless you really go looking for that question so then it was the answer did not come immediately it might seem like it it might seem like it since I’ve pointed it out now it might seem like the answer is instantly forthcoming as soon as I ask what leg is she standing on but the
A little more complex than that not only which leg is she standing on but does the artist indicate that did they care does the artist indicate that it is significant which like she’s standing on and only after a few minutes and I have entered all of the timestamps to show how many minutes it took me some minutes of looking this is not nearly as trivial as it sounds there is a confirmation process involved it takes several minutes to put my theory to the test and to have the jury consider and examine Adickes
jury consider at extended duration whether she’s standing on her right leg and whether the artist considers that to be significant I did it was a reasoning process I’m reporting to you that this was not you can’t simply look the picture is blurry but not too blurry but it’s borderline blurry do you want to talk blurry look at Adams feet I can make a case that Adam stands on his right foot but really truly it is just so worn the images to warn you can’t conclusively prove but in contrast eaves blurry feet are clear enough so that you can prove and I had to go to the effort to spend several minutes to prove it was not a matter of glancing like for example the dancing man in the salamander image
there is zero analysis process required to determine that he’s standing on his right leg although even the word dancing will tell you this subtlety of interpretation that’s required is he balancing is he standing or is it dancing which one is it you have to prove that Chris Bennett is incorrect and using the word dancing and again that aspect would take several minutes of debate and interpretation analysis it is not self evident it is not instantly evident whether the man is dancing versus Standing Versus Balancing versus killing over dead as a Thomas Hatsis States keeling to keel over dead
similarly look at the kind of loaded words that I use when I ask is Eve standing on her right leg well what does that phrase mean what exactly precisely constitutes “standing on right leg “when you could describe and characterize her as standing on both legs because a naïve look which we take by default says that she standing on both legs one leg is in front of the other leg but she’s standing on both legs isn’t she can’t you make it this is the thought process that I had to go through for several minutes while my theory was being put to the test again
and congratulations to the Egodeath Theory of mytheme Turpin Tatian for passing this test that took several minutes of analysis to that’s similar to my describing how do we justify a description of a mythology scene image for example how do we justify saying that the salamander tree right trunk is cut when was showing if we fail to interpret it’s just a blob all data is theory bound and when I say and when I ask what leg is she standing on
The term standing on is problematic it is not obvious like the dancing man and I just explained how even the word dancing as a heavily loaded problematic word is he for example if I ask is he dancing on his right leg the dancing part is unclear but the right leg part is clear it is easy to describe while it is less difficult to describe the configuration of Eve’s legs but what is more difficult is to argue and prove that the career That the configuration of her legs and feet constitutes what we are looking for which is the mytheme of standing on right leg
what we do know and what we are the data
the raw data that we are given
first of all it takes some time to zoom in and get clear and get a clear look
first of all we have to assess and agree on what the raw data is , regarding where her right foot is and where her left foot is
at 7:09 AM April 29, 2022 I noted hear the recording file 3237 near 10 o’clock near 10 minutes her legs are squeezed together I asked a good question and which confirms nonbranching or can be interpreted thus.
first of all ask does this image depict the contrast between branching versus nonbranching and then secondly ask does this image depict the theme of favoring the right limb especially the right foot leg and then thirdly does this image express favoring nonbranching so I just associate nonbranching with Right foot and
favoring the right
does this image favor the right leg for the purpose of affirming nonbranching that is the ultimate question to ask of an image in the case of plane crawl we see no cut branching but we do see her legs tight together rather than her legs Branching a part
that is how that theme manifests, the theme how is the theme
a good way to ask the question is
this is the diamond hammer of interpretation
how to force your overlay and interrogate the mythology
come to the image with the preconceived
interrogating the image through the lens of where is the non-Branching in this image
where is the branching depictions in this image
where is the right limb favored in this image
it’s got to be in there somewhere or else the theory is a failure
we have got to see mushrooms everywhere
and we have got to see the contrast between branching versus nonbranching everywhere in these branching Message Mushroom Trees which favor right leg and favor non-Branching
where is the favoring of them
where is the favoring of the right leg in this image
we have to do a heavy-handed overlay of interrogating the image for this list of five questions
before you even show me the image I have already formed my interrogation lenses
five lenses
I am going to be in inventory and inventorying this image that you haven’t showed me yet
where are all the branching themes represented in whatever image
and where are all the non-Branching themes in whatever image and
where are all the right leg favored themes
in this image what you haven’t even shown me yet
where are all the Mushroom shapes in this image you haven’t even shown me yet and
where in this image does it indicate favoring the right leg and favoring nonbranching and
where in this image does it associate nonbranching with the right leg
and you could say that
when I remembered to look at the plane crawl fresco in the middle of yesterday in the middle of working on images in the previous webpage post, I remembered that I had forgotten to bring this list of interrogation questions to the plane crawl fresco
because
eaves legs would discourage you from even posing the question or seeing her very configuration of her slightly blurry legs but not too blurry feet discourage you from even looking at the image to interpret her leg configuration as expressing nonbranching with her legs together instead of apart
it is only when that
I found a couple minutes ago
it is only when you aggressively go out of your way to bring in and import to the question into the image that you can then confirm: yes indeed her legs do indeed carry the messagem
legs indeed are suitable to project onto it and read into the image that her legs do fulfill arguably and defensively, they do fulfill the theme of non-Branching
and yesterday I also discovered to make sense out of something that I had never made sense out of before:
why is Ariadne holding a stupid Branch?? what does a boring, super boring branch have to do with peak Mystic State Revelation?
now upon reflection –
do a side-by-side crop of Lucas Cranitch “Eve tempted by the serpent”
Eve has a branch in front of her branching legs, and stag with branching antlers behind her – in fact in fact it just occurs to me , the tightness of the connections specifically between the Lucas Cranitch painting Eve tempted by the serpent here is Eve standing on the right side of the tree of knowledge
the Question comes to me at 8:12 AM April 29, 2022: is Eve usually shown on the right side of the tree?
not that Adam is it is unimportant but rather the focus is all on Eve and
Eve has branching legs
given that Lucas Cranitch it is definitely significant that her legs eaves legs are to be seen as Branching or for that matter nonbranching but anyway
her body branches at her legs
and that is definitely significant in Lucas Cranitch painting
and therefore that corroborates reading Plaincourault Fresco as Eve’s legs are to be read as Branching or a message about Branching, rather.
these messages all tell us that “my message has/ is something to do with Branching.”
The peak mystic state revelation experience is regarding Branching but what about it
when you put a crop of Lucas Cranitch eve branch next to Ariadne holding a branch next to Eve holding her legs together left foot based on right foot the case is increased and more compelling connections are revealed.
next to a crop of ariadne holding a branch
none of this is self evident at all and emphasize none of this is self evident you have to go out of your way to import and heavy-handed forced reading we are all Lynn and fully
approve of a forest reading because that’s the only way you can possibly perceive we have to come to the pattern recognition with our patterns preset and then test them and maybe they will fail or maybe we will find the image has only very very weak support for favoring nonbranching or favoring standing on right foot for example the guy with both feet floating off the ground in Canterbury maybe one leg maybe his right leg is ever so slightly lower than his left what are the parameters tolerance is what are the tolerances is it sufficient for item A to be touching item be the answer is yes
in fact touching is extremely significant in this genre and also right leg is extremely significant and also mushroom shapes are extremely Mushroom imagery extremely important and also branching is extremely important and also the contrast between branching versus nonbranching is extremely important which I failed until yesterday to put my discoveries of genius brilliant breakthrough in a negative light I was stupid and blind until yesterday when finally the obvious Interpretation struck me after 1 billion years of looking at Dionyse is mosaic obviously Ariadne is expressing Branching and the artist is screaming at me could I make it any more obvious and explicitly self evident do I have to put big bat signs on everything Batcave sign saying she is holding a Branching Branch do you get my point my god what do I have to do to get through to you clearly what Dionyse is holding is non-Branching spear it’s made kind of useless because of the things objects on the near the blade end it expresses linear nonbranching right in short parallel against the highly Branching Branch Witch ariadne carries which is also long
once you know the language it’s obvious that you can read my words and understand as long as I don’t write like Hatsis and Wasson and Panofsky in a garbled way – and maybe some of my writing is garbled, like that where I put sentences within sentences to clarify everything until it is completely unclear
once you know that these are the five important questions, it seems deceptively obvious, now that I have done all the hard work for you you unappreciative people
why is it hard to appreciate the risk and the jeopardy that my theory endured yesterday
it was put to the test and I made a big discovery a big significant discovery that’s highly significant, that Eve is standing on the right leg – and also that her legs carry and express affirming nonbranching and that even when we rely on the possibility thinking left foot even then underneath whether we are conscious of it or not we are ultimately resting on (the underlying layer of code) is resting on right foot.
this doesn’t sound like something that could be a discovery you have any difficulty or of any import
you would think it would be obvious that she’s standing on her right leg but it’s not at all and it’s not at all clear that it is significant that she standing on her right leg and it is not at all clear that her legs affirm nonbranching by being squeezed together
The ramifications are obvious and left as an exercise for the reader
The Chris Bennett Dancing men Roasting Salamander tree has four hands or paws and four mushrooms , one above each
have to place a grid overlay to force ourselves to account for everything and list the number of ramifications sticking out
you can count 4 or 8 ramifications
each hand of the tree consistently has a mushroom ramification above each hand ramification
this is an official timestamp for this observation about the four hands combined with the four mushrooms and the fact that it the number, four caps there are four caps I only realize that now, at 5:55 PM April 28, 2022.
why have I been examining this picture since Christmas 2015 and earlier, and only now at this late date does it occur to me only now to envision mentally the fact that there are four paws, and above each of the four paws is a mushroom, and that that count of the number of mushroom caps ramifications is four, which is the same as the number of side ramifications on the planecorral Frisco, we didn’t notice either except it now that I have pointed out to you, you must admit it is blatantly extremely obvious
I know that you didn’t notice that, because I have ESP, which is a technique that I learned as a sound, tried-and-true historical method from the great & exemplary psychedelic historian, Thomas Hatsis, who knows that the fact that we disagree with him is immediate proof that we have not read his articles – he knows what we have read and have not read, because he uses historians’ methodology that we historians use to know what you have and have not read, which is a method called ESP😑
samorini y u no mention this
of course as usual, damn Carl Ruck if he’s going to try to describe & frame this as being “hidden “
there is nothing hidden about it except our own stupidity
hatsis’ left paw affirming a non-branching portion of the branching-message mushroom tree7:23 PM April 28, 2022 a little question 4 u – what leg is Eve standing on
confirmed at 7:29 PM April 28, 2022 – in the Plaincourault Fresco, I have determined that Eve is depicted standing with all her weight on her right foot/leg, with her left foot standing on top of her right foot, which further confirms my theory and further contributes to my major contributions to interpretation of the planecrawl fresco, further proving that plane crawl is mushroom psychoactives , given that mushrooms produce the experience of non-Branching, which is consistently associated with the right limb and especially right leg, across art including Tauroctony, and dancing man salamander Roasting, and Canterbury Psalter page mushroom tree with two men and a sword, and now add to that list the Plaincourault fresco. – Cybermonk
Which one is the tight cognitive association binding state and which one is the loose cognitive association binding state? 🤔
8:50 PM April 28, 2022 – I just noticed: Ariadne is holding a branching branch; in contrast, Dionysus is holding a non-branching spear. The person is like a single chariot that contains two contrasting mental models of possibility, time, and control: possibilism vs. eternalism. – Cybermonk
Alas I have to point out – I am obliged, burdened with having to point out more connections, or to bolster the previous realization at 9:00 PM – the chariot shows side-by-side contrasted:
Dionysus equals the altered state and there is a mushroom in his hem, and he holds a non-branching spear; the non-branching experiential state and mental model.
Ariadne has bound hair, meaning the ordinary state; tight cognitive binding, holds branching thinking; the branching experiential state and mental model.
Found a clueless morphology error in the diagrammatic msh tree on Allegro’s book
The cut branch is supposed to have an right angle cut, not a pointed spike.
they’ve lost the meaning,
this artist is illiterate,
The outsider doesn’t know what he’s doing, he doesn’t understand the message of Branching Message Mushroom Trees.
This artist is “an especially ignorant craftsman”, to use Erwin Panofsky’s words.
i’ve already posted the excuse and justification for the apparent round mound when I announced the salamander cut right branch trunk discovery
the other day I think it was April 3 no 13 maybe April 13 I don’t know but anyway I said that:
if you take the Canterbury tree and remove the white smile on the near part of the cut trunk, it would have the same rounded far part of the cut that looks like a mound.
if you were to draw a smile on the Cut trunk of the salamander tree, then it would appear, properly, as a cross-section cut.
this lack of a clearly drawn indicator of being cut is why I failed to notice the huge, important, cut right trunk of the salamander mushroom tree until the other day.
this spike error is comparable to the mythology-illiterate ambulances with the baseball bat with the serpent wrapped around it, which makes no sense, given that it’s supposed to be a tree trunk with cut branches: wide at bottom, narrow at top.
ok, who added the cut branch ramification?? 😠 [mis-drawn as a meaningless arbitrary spike 😖 ]
Follow the damn templates, don’t you know that all of the thousands of different varying variations of branching message mushroom trees, each one of them is based on a non-sentient craftsman mechanistically serving as a human copy machine, as the most influential (alas) art historian Erwin Panofsky explains to us in his two letters to Wasson that deliver the official cover-up bullsht story that expert PR propagandist Wasson is being instructed to parrot.
Gordon Wasson, father of ethnomycology cover-up operation of psiliocybin eucharist
Just like every first semester art student, the first thing they’re taught in the first day of class is:
here is the lie that we require you to tell to cover up the problem that we have – that there are too damn many mushroom trees 🍄🌳
The official party line is “fortuitously distorted templates” and all of these thousands of different artists all copied directly and mechanically, making exact photocopies of these distorted templates without any sentient, deliberate intention on the part of the artists” says the most influential art historian, and “every mushroom tree that you see is just further proof of our story tale” about, the opinion that you are required to have, as an employed art historian professional.
Panofsky demonstrates how well-trained his obedient docile art students are, how well they have been trained, like dogs:
Wasson, go ahead and ask any trained-dog art Student and ask them what our cover story is, and they will immediately, without hesitation, tell you that their opinion is:
distorted accidental templates, that coincidentally were embraced by every mushroom tree artist.
but not one of those mushroom tree artists ever fathomed or imagined in their wildest dreams that anybody would ever interpret their Branching Mushroom tree as intending a mushroom.
every one of the thousands of mushroom tree artists would be absolutely shocked, SHOCKED! at such interpretation!
Writing this webpage article is left as an exercise for the reader
I’m just trying to push the edge here at this theory website to see the URL blow up from too many punctuation and emojis and words in the title of the webpage , with luck maybe I’ll take the whole site down, in my experimentation
Brown and Brown in 2019 article in journal of psychedelic studies define a section heading called Wasson’s Paradox
paradox and they mention it as 1/4 of the purpose of the article, wassons paradox
Indefatigable he spared no expense to be ( give me a break!) the father of ethno Mycology – a.k.a. the father of self-contradiction; the father of self-defeating self-censorship, and self-limiting, and constraining himself
do not color outside the border
more like:
THE FATHER OF ELLIPSES BLOCKING US FROM SEEING THE CITATION THAT’S NEEDED
Brown defines whilst paradox wassons paradox as he claims to try to bring us knowledge of visionary plants and religious history but ironically indirectly self-contradictory form he works hard to prevent us from learning and investigating he tries hard to prevent and block and impede investigation into visionary plans in our own religious history this is the Wason’s paradox according to Brown and Brown similarly we can build out ramifications branching out the same idea copy paste just like
Thomas Hatsis is nothing but a copy paste of Andy Letcher when it comes to the subject of mushrooms in Christian history
The coral rock paradox is that his functional role that he serves that the system uses him to serve and fulfill the functional rule roll ROLE the role of coral rock he is to perpetuate ignorance and served to convert to do deflection through inversion of evidence that’s my phrase the pattern I noticed the pattern of in
the pattern of “deflection through inversion”
The salvation Salesmen have a problem too damn many mushroom Trees and Mushroom Imagery all throughout our own Christian artwork which are not veiled behind the word Eucharist which is the exact synonym just like in Hatsis is low IQ thinking the word Amanita and Amanita is an exact synonym for the word Mushroom similarly the word Eucharist is an exact synonym for Psilocybe and mushrooms
everywhere you see the word Eucharist, the writer intended to discuss Psilocybin Mushrooms and their mentally transformative effects described through analogy and metaphor because everybody – and this exactly contradicts Thomas Hatsis is completely unthinking, totally unimaginative Presupposition, his biased, Prohibition-Based error of presentism fallacy that he commits on an extreme scale, completely unthinkingly
he simply assumes, without giving it any thought at all , he assumes that all people in antiquity disparaged and insulted Mushrooms
when in fact, everyone so highly revered Psilocybin Mushrooms, all throughout every instance of banqueting, and every instance of mixed wine , and every instance of the Eucharist;
everybody in every mystery religion so extremely highly revered Mushrooms* as the food of the gods
*and I mean not his childish infantile reductionist 🍄 Mushrooms as a dumb object, concretistic , primitive thinking that the moderate paradigm uses, but rather, *Psilocybin* Mushrooms; the real deal, not the big giant jumbo infant sized oversized Lego blocks.
not the oversized infant sized red and white kiddie 🍄 Mushrooms;
no, I’m talking about the adult-sized Lego blocks, that the small Potent pointed and targeted the pointed liberty Pointy hat targeted adult type of mushrooms.
not the infantile Mushroom object found in children’s books which are jumbo size
noodle i said new line
Test wordTest word enter
so we have the paradox of the coral rock Moderate and entheogen paradigm where are you hand him as input a piece of positive evidence for the presence of visionary plants but then his bad paradigm takes that positive evidence and converts it to negative and deflect the evidence to neutralize a neuter your evidence and the more evidence you give him the more he changes it into proof of the absence of visionary Plants in the kind of religion that counts for him for his paradigm every piece of positive evidence is further proof of the absence of visionary plants the abnormality the suppression the forgetting
Always his emphasis on that in contrast to Jerry Brown and Brown book 2016 article 2019 which is simply positive framing -no if’s and’s or but’s
except for that awful word secret in the subtitle and the awful word Hallucinogens almost like he’s teaching in 1975 using prejudiced and biased words you can call this the brown paradox
Brown’s Paradox
“this book calls for an unbiased, non-prejudiced committee of interpreters, to interpret Hallucinogens – a secret team of secret Interpretation to secretly interpret Hallucinogens, in an unbiased way.”
“beware of ardent Advocates and dogmatists”, Jerry Brown carefully warns us , “don’t hang out with those egodeath.com & Young Irvin and John Rush types; they need to be corrected by our well-balanced and moderate (so moderate) entheogen paradigm. you should be like us : moderate, mild mannered, Middle of the road, compromising, self belittling, self-defeating, we’ll hit us ourselves for you, and self-defeating, and self limiting
and we’ll point out that there’s no way that that saint Walburga is holding Amanita, and this is proved because the tapestry depicts the base of the held object with serrations, but every child & beginner entheogen scholar knows that there’s no serrations on the base of an Amanita. so you should be reasonable and self-defeating like us brown and brown”
this paradox is that the Browns write a book which is in fact purely positive, in sharp contrast against the Moderate entheogen theory of religion, a school of self-contradiction and self-defeatism., self-neutralizing Order to sustain and prop up Psilocybin Prohibition and keep it going forever
“don’t worry, we are no challenge being offered from this little obedient docile school of servile servants of the psilocybin Prohibition Establishment paradigm”
The browns book does not participate in self defeatism – except that their book is self-defeating by subtitling it with the loaded intensely loaded term and problematic word the intensely problematic word ‘secret’, which the bad school of poor Scholars will leap on that word to heavily vigorously apply their heavy-handed Presupposition Matrix, in order to take these explicit Mushrooms and turn them into , through a distortion template conversion deflection process
heavy handed Presupposition Matrix in order to take these explicit Mushrooms and turn them into through distortion template conversion deflection process
They try to convert explicit Mushroom imagery for communication into its opposite: implicit, secret, hidden, in order to block and prevent communication, the conversion process erected by Carl Rut for the purpose of converting positive evidence of mushrooms into evidence for the absence of mushrooms – the Carl Ruck’s paradox.
Brown and brown write a book that straightahead asserts because they are ardent advocates and they are dogmatists they simply straightahead assert the presence and not the stupid secret suppressed usage no
not that
they do not do the Carl rut school, the moderate position’s misstep, which serves to suppress Mushrooms while pretending to be asserting the presence of mushrooms
the functional effect that the Ruck’s camp has is to emphasize with full vigor the abnormality of visionary plants in Greek and Christian religion – unlike Brown, because Brown instead , in sharp contrast, is an Ardent Advocate and a Dogmatist, by virtue of asserting simply the simple positive presence of mushrooms, without clamping onto them a protective barrier like the Carl Rut coral rock school, of the Moderate Entheogen Theory, who hastens to reframe evidence for presence of visionary plants as neutralized evidence for the absence of visionary plants from real religion.
See cyberdisciple’s article page cyberdisciple.wordpress.com page titled against suppression hypothesis
just like panofsky falls over himself to reframe Mushroom trees as “yet another instance of the development of the pine tree “, so that the more mushroom trees you hand over to Panofsky ( the manufacturer of fraudulent art history pseudo-History; the history of nonexistent “distorted templates “), the more that he outputs, in his deflective transformation process, he transforms Mushroom trees as the input, into pine trees as the output
here is how to neutralize Mushroom Trees, by intensive rhetoric garbled rhetoric framing and reframing aggressively deflection of the mushroom tree evidence, by converting it into pine trees while pretending as if ordinary state pine trees were the real original meaning that by fortuitous coincidence accidentally ended up being embraced by every single mushroom tree artist who gladly embrace these mushroom shapes with ramifications retained and added the real true story of the templates the true template against the liar Panofsky or maybe an idiot who knows who can know for sure the true story of templates is that the true bona fide template is the comprehension of added ramifications
Branching out from as a Panofsky points out every single mushroom tree has ramifications to some extent and if the artist had only wanted to correct the alleged distorted templates then the artist would have only drawn mushrooms but what every artist chose to draw instead of simply Mushrooms was mushrooms crossed with trees by added ramifications and I add cut ramifications to with the knife
The knives which brown and brown point out on the last supper table with the youth holding a knife cutting the ramifications off of the mushroom tree which is not a mushroom because it has added ramifications which the youth is busy removing with a knife trying to convert the tree into a non-Branching Mushroom to correct the distorted templates to restore the mushroom to its intended shape of non-Branching
the reverse of what panofsky claims to report
he claims that he is reporting a “development process” from pine tree to mushroom tree, but what he is in fact doing is that he himself has manufactured a distortion development transformation, “the process”, in order to do the *reverse* of what he falsely claims to have happened in history : Panofsky has designed a process of distortion, to convert (or appear to convert) Mushroom trees into neutered, neutralized pine trees.
Thus resolving the grave problem that the “art historians” (the people who manufacture false history) battle against, in order to neutralize art and get rid of the problem (Too Many Pilzbaum 🍄🌳) that Christian Art presents them.
dup para? The more that he outputs in his deflective transformation process he transforms Mushroom trees as the input into pine trees as the output here is how to neutralize Mushroom Trees by intensive rhetoric garbled rhetoric framing and reframing aggressively deflection of the mushroom tree evidence by converting it into the reverse of what he claims to report he claims that he is reporting a development process from pine tree to mushroom tree but what he is in fact doing
The Egodeath theory 
