Contents:
- Historical Date Entries
- Purpose of this Page
- Date Questions to Research
- Announcement Date of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion
Historical Date Entries
[October 27, 1985] or 26; Back to the Future: OCT 26 1985.
[April ~14, 1987] Binder sheets, optimized concept-labels, acronyms.
[January 11, 1988] Discovered the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence.
~1993 Rock Lyrics Decoding (precursor of Mytheme theory)
Feb ~7, 1997 Core Theory Spec at Prin Cyb site
1999 Jesus corrob’d Cybernetic theory, as hoped – by not existing.
[? 2002] Announced the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
[? ?, 2003?] {snake} = worldline
[2006] main article at Egodeath.com. See Yahoo.
[November 2011?] Decoded {rock}.
[November 23, 2011] prelim nonbranching, control-thought inserter/receiver.
[November 29, 2013] {tree vs. snake} = possibilism vs. eternalism.
[December 2, 2013] Announcement lecture video.
[~March 9, 2014] Moses brass serpent on pole & Asclepius. See coffeehouse guestbook entry.
[x x, 2016] WordPress site v1 incl Summary page
[October ~28, 2020] WordPress site v2
[November ~14, 2020] Canterbury Psalter “mushroom tree/ hanging/ sword”
[January 3, 2021] Canterbury Psalter: Pink initiate’s palm up & expression.
Purpose of this Page
I need a notation to indicate % certainty.
format? for now, [January 3, 2021]
1 line per entry. no essays. SHORT FORM. just enough to DIFFERENTIATE, not to DEFINE.
these are to be official.
This page is the centralized place to store & look up official dates for Transcendent Knowledge development history; history of the Egodeath theory.
design format purpose usage concept: motivation: i need a page where i can quick lookup “on what date did i solve {snake}? {right leg } = eternalism-thinking ? ”
Left colum: date only. the time is a mere optional detail in right col.
Date Questions to Research
WHEN DID I CREATE the Mytheme theory ? (problem: “the Mytheme theory ” is more of an abstruct bucket/container, than a theory. it is a *group* of theories. or a system of theories.
the Mytheme theory INCLUDES: AHIST, ROCK LYRICS, MYTHEME DECODING(WHEN? AFTER THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION?SEE: {SNAKE}, AS PROXY.
Did I ever “announce as such, …. something like “theory of mytheme decoding” — or, is there only, … when did I “wrap” my system of myth-decoding, with a NAME OF A THEORY, as I 98% did with “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”?
What is it about the maximal entheogen theory of religion that enabled me to announce it at mone m one moment in time with great fanfare, with a proper Title, that held up for 18 years — wheras in on contrast, my theoyry o f mytheme decoding ,
the theory of mytheme decoding [tmd]
Can I now announce the theory of mytheme decoding with great fanfare (as an exercise), following the 2002 pattern of announcing the maximal entheogen theory of religion with great fanfare? Restrospectively, WHEN DID I CREATE — REGARDLESS OF NAME & ANNOUNCEMENT & FANFARE — WHEN DID I FIGURE OUT HOW TO DECODE MYTHEMES? Subquestions: When did I decode each of the top-10 mythemes? king snake rock tree. the problem is, for some reason those were spread out.
Why Did I figure out “the maximal entheogen theory of religion” all-at-once (enabling me to announce it, By Name, with Great Fanfare, at One Point in Time), while in contrast, I figured out “the theory of mytheme decoding” piecemeal, scattered over the yeras, and failed/neglected to ever announce it as snappy-named, marketed/hyped, PR-propagandized Official Theory by Trademarked Product Name? I hastened to Go On Record with each *individual* mytheme decoding, but why didn’t I “patent” / “trademark” / “Productize” my METHODOLOGY of “how to decode mythemse”?
To what extent can my subtheory, “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”, stand-in for the entire the Mytheme theory?
clearly the way to proceed toward answering that, is to list the components subtheories of the Mytheme theory, and date each one of them.
- the Egodeath theory
- 1988 the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence
- 2003 the Mytheme theory, aka “Phase 2”. <= 2006 main article.
- 2002 the maximal entheogen theory of religion
- 1999 ahistoricity
- 1993 Rock Lyrics decoding
- 2003 mytheme decoding
- 2003 snake
- tree
- king
- wine
- rock
- tree
- death
- 2013 {tree vs. snake} = possibilism vs. eternalism
- 2020 Psalter: L/R, mercy/compassion/judg., sword
I fear I might not have announced by name, “the Mytheme theory “… it’s arb’y how you break out the subtthoreis. I announced vrious theoryies both by name and not by name. It ‘s It’s artiificial, especially during the course of scientific theory develop, to how to “break up” or “divide-up” and lreat relate, various areas. The entire outline above, is artifiail divind-up of reality/explanatory fwks and sub-theories. Yes my outline per this verison of my outline, might be THE MOST JUSTIFIEALBE, — BUT STILL, ARB’Y. When did I invent concept of “Phase 1 & 2”? I did lots of hardw ro work around 2008-20011 to slice-and-divide and group my various solutions to develop the above outline. Right now, when I say “the Mytheme theory ” , the context/ conntations are LOADED withthe above outline. YES, IN THE CASE OF the maximal entheogen theory of religion , yeah there, I have a frikknig 6-page and then 14-page mega announcement ARTICLES PUBLISHED, in effect. A BFD. but, that’s not always the case! I susspect, hate to say, that maybe, the closest thing to a announcement big, big ro a big, proud annoumcnet w/ fanefare, might be nothing more than side-notes implicitly, WITHIN my Official Anouncement of the maximal entheogen theory of religion. And, my 2006 main article, which divided into 4:
cybernetic self-control
determinism/heimamene (eternalism , pre-existence)
dissociation; loosecog ; the altered state (loose cognitive binding); psychedelics, entheogens.
metaphor (analogy; mythology , mythemedecoding)
My terminology evolves, and , my utline-divinded my outline dividing evolves. the case of the maximal entheogen theory of religion is very unsuaul: i have gripped griped about how it took me a dman damn year + 2mo, to finally say cleanly, “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”. but with this leading edge science, it’s reare to get SO CLOSE to a literal formal announcement of a theory with a literal exact name that continues to be used decades later. I should be thrrilled to find SO CLOSE to a Perfect Case of announccing in 1 URL, a new theory, AS a “gtrand grand new theory”, properly includign a real Name, AND , have that name stay same 18 years 19 years later. very unsuall to be so close to a perfect case of annoucing a new theory, with proper name. More typical, perhaps, is a messy ragtag…. you see, I solved mythemes ONE – AT – A -TIME. NOW I *DID* do an instance of “BFD Announcement” in the case of 2013 {tree vs. snake} = possibilism vs. eternalism. That’s kinda like my announcing “the Mytheme theory “. but, clearly, it’s a merely a “further condensing”/ packing, of the 2006 main article. it seems, the maximal entheogen theory of religion — like the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence — crashed together at a moemnt in time. but, oppoite end of the specture, trum, decoding each key mytheme, alas, was separate breakthroughs, so there was never one point in time where (ignoring 2013) where … what DIDNT happen, was one day, I post:
What Didn’t Happen: One Day, I Found an Approach, and Used It to Decode the Top 10 Mythemes (but that sort of DID happen, around 2003, kinda in conjunction w/ the maximal entheogen theory of religion. almost inseparable. that’s why the heap of subtheories is grouped toghetrer, as (ppor name?) “the Mytheme theory “. does it even make any sense at all, to have “entheogen tehory” placed as if under the umbralla of “the Mytheme theory”? “the Mytheme theory” in the BROAD sense = Rock Lyrics + enth history + Ahisty + … in order peeps!
1) Rock Lyrics,
2) Ahisty,
3) Entheogens History,
4) Mytheme-decoding.
“the Mytheme theory ” in the NARROW sense = only 4) mytheme-decoding.
so, a solution to avoid ambig’y prob, is, genero- “Phase 2”. “The Egodeath theory phase 2 Stuff”. aka :
the Egodeath theory Phase 2 Sh*t
but, PHsase 1 is well-known to have bad naming problems issues too! “the Cybernetic theory ” is problmatic! doesn’t even mention loosecog , wtf!!
ans: Explation: Jusf’n: always discuss product names in terms of Short + Long version. “the Cybernetic theory” is, BY DESIGN, shorthand. “the Mytheme theory” is, BY DESIGN, shorthand. Remember that. THE FULL title of each is X, and Y. (d/c rn). Lately I keep feeling that the Cybernetic theory = the big ideas I commbined Jan 11 1988: block-universe determinism, loosecog , 4-5 other topics. noncontrol…
HEY EVERYONE, TODAY I SOLVED SNAKE, KING, ROCK, TREE, WINE, B/C I DISOCERS DISCOVERED THE INTERP POV , OF, HEY I BET IT’S ALL JUST ANALOGY FOR THE ALTERED STATE (LOOSE COGNITIVE BINDING) FOR DISCOVERING the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence IN THE ALTERED STATE (LOOSE COGNITIVE BINDING). I KINDA DID THAT WITH MY BIG… WHEN …. what date did i buy all my myth books? i tell ya, …. THE SAME ACT/ TIME AS A FORMED THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION. 2002. SPIRITUALLY, MY DISCOVERY AND ANNOUNCEMENT, OF “HOW TO GO ABOUT DECODING MYTH”, IS THE SAME THING AS THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION. IN EFFECT, my annoucement of “the maximal entheogen theory of religion ” seems to be …. implicitly embeeded in it, is …. iwanted to write here, “the Mytheme theory”. but the’at that’s against my outline nesting. problem: the label “the Mytheme theory ” coveres too distinct stuff. does it make sense to lump … it’s like:
- the Mytheme theory
- the maximal entheogen theory of religion
- the Mytheme theory
- the maximal entheogen theory of religion
it’s like that. its like there’s a BROAD Sense of “the Mytheme theory” , and ambigly, also, there’s a narrwo. SO WHAT DOES IT EAVE MEAN EVEN MENA; I HAVE TO DIFFIERENTE *TWO* QUESTIONS:
WHEN DID I CREATE & ANNOUNCE — IN ESSENCE — THE WHOL BROAD SY7STEM: (ROCK LYRICS, THE MAXIMAL ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION, MYTHEME-DECOINGD, …. .. 4THINK 4 things:
- 1993 rock lyrics
- 1999 ahisty
- 2002 entheogens
- 2003 mythemes
that’s almost like asking, when did I formulate this complex nesting with sub-theory formal-names, when did i announce this OUTLINE of theories; …. we have here a part vs whole problem. lately (5 minutes ago; nov 2020) I call this whole set of 4 things, “the myteheme theory”. you’re seeing me in realtime, pertty much, re-outlining an dre-
One One Hand, Bundling Is Nothing, it’s not work or invention at all
re-branding and re-bundling. its like this is my “Gold deluxe Tool Suite” branded as “the Mytheme theory” — who cares? thats stupid surface branding. some guy had to do the real work, the hard…
otoh, Bundling and Outlining a System of Theories Is Very Hard Wrok, Invention, & Innovation
ok, yeah, granted, bundling shit well, is hard work. true. You can’t say “merely bundling the various substho sub theories of the Egodeath theory”. Sculpting subtheory outlines is damn hard, very hard.
VS. when did i
When did you invent the parts for a car?
When did you invent the car?
When did you invent Car Brand X Model Y?
Phase 1 Shit
block-universe determinism
loosecog
noncontrol
1997 core spec ~9 topics. egoic thinking vs. transcendent thinking
a HUGE problem, the huge prob, 1988, 1997, 2006 – was, HOW MANY PRINCIPLES ARE THERE IN “THE THEORY OF EGO TRANSCENDENCE”? I KEPT TRYING 12, UNWIELEDY. U KNOW IN 2006 I WAS LIKE WE got to make few number, of an intermediate level!
1988: 12 equal princieples.
1997: 9 ???? equal principles.
2006: 4 major areas. each containig “buncha topics”, freeform. That felt like a breakthorugh and very hard work to move from 1997 ~10 “rpintiplce principles”, to the quite different 4 aras. funny: 1997 only had to cove r50% 50% as much surface area (of explantory scope) as 2006:
1997 covered 50% of scope, with 10 princpeles
2006 covered 100% of scope, with only 4 … main areas. each area, containing “buncha topics” freeform. That was the ticket. FEWER (FORMAL AREAS/DIVISIONS) IS BETTER. IN A WAY,K 2013 compressed the overcomplicat…. insteer interesting:
Phase 2 Shit….
1988: 12 “printiples”
1997: 9 “principles”
2006: 4 “areas”
2013: 2 “models”, containing buncha topics, freeform (let the noise of the subtopics divions fall where it may, no one cares, THE IMPORTANT THING IS NOT 12 NAMED PRINCIPLES; (SHADES OF WILBER’S COMPLEICATIONS) THE IMPORTANT THING IS MERELY TOGGLE FROM A TO B.
LITERALIST ORDINARY-STATE POSSIBILISM
ANALOGICAL PSYCHEDELIC ETERNALISM
Notice those each (by very careful design andVERY HARD WORK OF “MERE BUNDLING SOMEONE ELSES’S TECH THEY CONSTRUCTED” (that is, by me, earlier). These each have, Both of these gorups, worldmodesl, have … are divided by me, into 3 , contrasting “handles”.
1a 2a 3a
vs
1b 2b 3b
total: 6 things.
Back to topic of “when did I announce the Mytheme theory “
ambig. broad vs narrow sense.
broad “the Mytheme theory ” = Rock lyrics, Ahisty, Entheogen Hist, Mytheme Decoding.
narrow “the Mytheme theory” = only Mytheme Decoding (not Rock Lyrics, not Ahisty, not Entheogens Histy).
man where the hell’s the list kept, need better place. i know it’s in History page. list of topics came together in 1988 jan. block-universe determinism, lcog, … so:
- the Egodeath theory
- the Cybernetic theory (broad sense)
- block-universe determinism
- loosecog
- nonctrl/cyb(narrow sense)
- x
- x
- the Mytheme theory (broad sense)
- Rock Lyrics
Rock lyrics [rl] - ahistoricity
- entheogen history
- mytheme decoding
- Rock Lyrics
- the Cybernetic theory (broad sense)
STOP. DEFINE DAMN [ACRO]/KEYBOARD SHORTCUTS FOR THE SUBFIELDS OF / SUBTHEORIES …. LIKE, 4 SUBTHEORIES OF the Cybernetic theory; + 4 OF the Mytheme theory. BE ACRO-DRIVEN, IN SLICING REALITY (the Egodeath theory) AND THEN, ASKING DATE QUESTIONS.
Rock lyrics, ahistoricity, entheogen history, mytheme decoding
so:
IMPORTANT LIST OF the Cybernetic theory AS 4 SUBTHEORIES + the Mytheme theory AS 4 SUBTHEORIES (NEXT, TRY TO FIT CORE CONCEPTS
NEXT, try to fit the Core Theory Phrases from https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/17/glossary-for-the-egodeath-theory/#Nav-Core-Theory-Phrases into this 8-subtheory outline.
- the Egodeath theory
- the Cybernetic theory
- loose cognition
- block-universe
- no-free-will
- control cancellation
- the Mytheme theory
- Rock lyrics
- ahistoricity
- entheogen history
- mytheme decoding.
- the Cybernetic theory
DONE: Next, go retrieve the components of the Cybernetic theory that came together jan 11 1988: from the History of the Egodeath theory page:
IS THIS ragtag list it?? where the f is loosecog? damn it. this can’t be the right list. too verbose, too prose, no loosecog wtf.
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/12/history-of-developing-the-egodeath-theory/
As a simplified outline of the diverse conceptual resources and influences I had by January 1988, I combined concepts such as:
o Block universe from the Modern Physics university course.
o Ground of Being from Ken Wilber.
o Sudden mental model transformation from Alan Watts (his term is ‘satori’, in The Way of Zen).
o The cognitive approach from Marvin Minsky (Society of Mind) and self-help & the Human Potential movement.
About page has the better mabye the clean list: (less of a historical recounting, more resulting-theory-driven:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/about/ —
formulated New Theory of Ego Transcendence combining:
dup? no-free-will
- TYR PUTTING THE CORE CONCEPTS ITESMS INTO A 4-ITEM OUTLINE. WHAT ORDER?
- the pre-existing block universe
- eternalism (what? this … problem: “eternalism ” spans two concepts, block-universe determinism & cy…. several .
LESS IS MORE. don’t look at outline at:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/17/glossary-for-the-egodeath-theory/#Nav-Core-Theory-Phrases —
Core Theory Phrases – don’t look here. KISS. what are the 4 leverage-points that drag all 12 principles along?
- Self-in-World Models
- Names of Theories
- Theory Summaries
- Personal Control System
- Levels of Control
- Seizing Self-Control <- cybernetics
- Possibility Branching
- No-Free-Will <– no-free-will
- Block Universe, Frozen Worldlines < block-universe determinism
- Mental Model Transformation
- Meta-Awareness <– lump loosecog
- Mental Construct Processing < — lump loosecog
- Loose Cognition
- Entheogen Scholarship <– phase 2; the Mytheme theory (broad sense)
- Mythemes, Esotericism History <– phase 2; the Mytheme theory
Test: in theory, should be able to fit the 15 items above into 4 subtheories of the Mytheme theory, and 4 subtheories of the Cybernetic theory:
- the Egodeath theory
- the Cybernetic theory
- loose cognition
- block universe
- no-free-will
- control cancellation
- the Mytheme theory
- Rock lyrics
- ahistoricity
- entheogen history
- mytheme decoding.
- the Cybernetic theory
assume keeping the Cyb items. check my [acro]/keyboard shortcuts for the the Cybernetic theory items:
loose cognition the block universe the block universe the block universe no-free-will no-free-will control cancellation control cancellation c control cancellation
loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation [lbnc]
loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation
Rock lyrics, ahistoricity, entheogen history, mytheme decoding
the Egodeath theory = the Cybernetic theory, the Mytheme theory
the Cybernetic theory = loose cognition, the block universe, no-free-will, control cancellation
the Mytheme theory = Rock lyrics, ahistoricity, entheogen history, mytheme decoding
[January 4, 2021] test: try to fit the outline of Core Concept phrases into the outline of phase 1 4 items + phase 2 4 items
- the Egodeath theory
- the Cybernetic theory
- loose cognition
- block universe
- no-free-will
- control cancellation
- the Mytheme theory
- Rock lyrics
- ahistoricity
- entheogen history
- mytheme decoding.
- the Cybernetic theory
- Self-in-World Models
- Names of Theories
- Theory Summaries
- Personal Control System
- Levels of Control
- Seizing Self-Control <- cybernetics
- Possibility Branching
- No-Free-Will <– no-free-will
- Block Universe, Frozen Worldlines < block-universe determinism
- Mental Model Transformation
- Meta-Awareness <– lump loosecog
- Mental Construct Processing < — lump loosecog
- Loose Cognition
- Entheogen Scholarship <– phase 2; the Mytheme theory (broad sense)
- Mythemes, Esotericism History <– phase 2; the Mytheme theory
Announcement Date of the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion
- When Did I Announce “the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion”? Precursor; Announcement; then Fine-Tuning the Phrase/Usage
- Similar Precursors to the Maximal Entheogen Theory of Religion by Previous Writers
- 1. 6-page Discussion of “the maximum presence of entheogens we can possibly imagine in religious and Christian origins”, & ‘the “maximal influence” case’: October 16, 2002
- 2. Mention of “the maximal-influence theory of the entheogen origin of religions”: January 28, 2003
- 3. 14-Page Announcement of “a maximal entheogenic theory of religion”: March 12, 2003
- 4. First Mention of “the maximal entheogen theory of religion-philosophy-myth”: September 4, 2003
- 5. First Use of Exact Phrase “the maximal entheogen theory of religion”: December 6, 2003
I never realized all the theories within the Theory. Incredible really, until we realize all the things in the Egodeath Theory that need their own system of ideas for understanding.
I wish that the Theory within the Egodeath Theory that discusses the shift from OSC into the Holy Spirit could be sent to the Pope with diagrams and photos, to let him know in great detail, that this is the true meaning of Transubstantiation through the Eucharist and how wonderful it would be for the Cathoic Church to come forward with the truth. The whole truth and nothing but the truth!
LikeLike