I think I may have figured out how to get voice dictation to work well without duplication and going insane, to do voice voice dictation into wordpress: I think I simply need to keep each text entry paragraph block short.
drawing diagrams, photographing and uploading the diagrams; I no longer use text to communicate or voice recordings, but instead I communicate all by diagrammatic pictograms now, it’s more efficient 😑 🍄🌳🐍
to communicate Mystic state mental transformation writing texting words or speaking and then having a secretary turn scribe that to words on then speaking and having the town crier repeat the speech or playing back recording voice transcription acting like a drunken secretary to transcribe speech and then having to clean it up with a little bit with the soft keyboard but that’s very inefficient and better to do the cleanup with the hardware keyboard
📝📚📕✉️
Erik Davis book tech gnosis technologies the technology of pictograms to express mythemes in efficient ways fusing together the wine with the tree through mushroom with added branches subtract the rock keep the snake subtract the king keep the branching
Another different format to that I was working on and I kind of moved away from it around 2018 and 2019 200 character summaries
recent weirdness with the key mythemes Page: no entry for this perhaps compound mytheme branching Message Mushroom Tree there is an entry on tree and there’s a category for branching but there’s no entry there’s no entry corresponding to the concept which was the key central most important king of the concepts in the middle ages Christianity the grand invention of branching Message Mushroom Trees the great Christian invention which communicated it packed
it packed an incredible amount into elegant remarkably condensed format of the mushroom image conveying the cognitive loosener then you have branching features added onto it and sometimes a snake serpent contrasting we have both branches added and we have neatly cut branches and sometimes the serpent carries the fruit in which sort of doubles or repeats or multiplies the mushroom theme here’s the snake serpent bringing the mushroom the serpent is in the mushroom tree which has bread
branching but adding the serpent does get a little bit busy and is no longer the extreme of simple of elegant extreme total data compression you’ve got that important factor of the mushroom that’s got to stay and you’ve got branching and cut branch features that’s got to stay and you’re done that’s all that you really need that’s the minimum you need a different combination is a sneak in a tree or some kind of a contrast of a snake type shape like the salamander roasting dancing man image we could almost call it the Sam Marini Bennett Irvin Hatsis Hoffman salamander roasting dancing man image the decoding of which directly gave an immediate result to disk decoding the center of Canterbury and from there the first row of Canterbury and then the remainder of Canterbury
and that solution came through a trajectory of the core theory 1988 first identifying the true nature of ego transcendence is cognitive loosening check the 1997 summary adopting the block universe that would be the keyword keyword number one keyword would be Luz cog and then block universe to summarize 1988 revelation of the true nature of ego transcendence it would be loose cog block universe and get a high score on the physics exam
my trajectory just the high points to try to connect it to that had to urban salamander Canterbury trajectory which led finally to to the production of I think my Greatest con sept number six I have a giant pile of greatest concepts this greatest concept is the branching Message Mushroom Tree and I will note the branching message Mander a tree which I am the discover of and the generalized concept branching message in theater in tree but The classic I would absolutely pixel also but I had to say I took it took exactly precisely two seconds to think and decide what to say about amanita forget it how many to makes for great art absolutely give us salsa be any day ha ha Ha Psilocybe babe Psilocybe any day
The classic is not the amanita mushroom tree as far as an Canterbury wins here Canterbury wins list the pros and cons we were talking about playing Carol versus Canterbury for the crown the king of classic mushroom shapes the classic the king instance of branching Message Mushroom Trees is Amanita or Psilocybe he the winner there is a loss to be because it’s clean efficient no preparation close
and definitive classic affects Canterbury loses points for being over elaborate although it had to be done fully spilling out both with elegance and great detail as well what’s a good typical example if I pick a good typical example the Canterbury cannot be a good typical example of the branching Message Mushroom Tree also of note is the roasting roasting salamander dancing man is a worthy candidate with features to discuss of branching the salamander serving as theand definitive classic affects Canterbury loses points for being over elaborate although it had to be done fully spilling out both with elegance and great detail as well what’s a good typical example if I pick a good typical example the Canterbury cannot be a good typical example of the branching Message Mushroom Tree also of note is the roasting roasting salamander dancing man is a worthy candidate with features to discuss of branching the salamander serving as the
The burning away theme burning way possible isn’t thinking burning way possibility transient ephemeral possibility branching thinking or illusion gets burned away by the flame of the mushroom what is that flame the flame is the mushroom flame is fire fire gives light illumination ability to perceive and you roast it for a period a period of immersion and exercising and doing conducting tests and experiments within the Luz cog state repeatedly being in the fire for sometime then transforms the salamander and then it becomes a snake serpent shape lined placed nonbranching Place side-by-side with the branching mushroom in the salamander
roasting dancing man image the man stable on right foot left foot floating right foot I think stable and head and left foot flooding in front of chest left left hand floating in front of chest right hand firm on face is it safe to take a naïve reading of his facial expression it may well be it makes good sense debt it’s it looks like me it looks like me when I decode the Canterbury Psalter it makes me feel stupid and I face palm
every breakthrough I have I have to reduce my estimate of my IQ level how did you not realize this before dark five IQ points doc dark points
I like voice recording better but I keep trying to do voice exercises of reading aloud passages and I can’t because every single time I try to read a passage I go off on a flight of critique
I am not able to do my voice reading exercises I’ll have to pick a very dull extremely don’t read the phonebook I have to pick a very dull passage so that I don’t go off I have to read the ingredients list off
why I prefer I’m I’m most find a voice recording but this voice transcription although it’s half broken it’s a full 50% broken and I have to mop up the mess afterwards but this is really resonating with the back to the future day October 26, 1985 idea development session one where I took up the pencil for the first time to capture the flight of ideas so that I could see it
and review it and this voice transcription approach really accomplishes that well especially if I keep track if it’s mistakes it’s the mistakes really don’t cost me too much trouble while I’m in the midst of speaking out ideas and then alternating with reading the script the sketchy the sketchy transcription is plenty sufficient though I do object I’ll have to put post this prominently I do object to the double double or maybe even triple repetition that it often does that’s a problem
it might be aand review it and this voice transcription approach really accomplishes that well especially if I keep track if it’s mistakes it’s the mistakes really don’t cost me too much trouble while I’m in the midst of speaking out ideas and then alternating with reading the script the sketchy the sketchy transcription is plenty sufficient though I do object I’ll have to put post this prominently I do object to the double double or maybe even triple repetition that it often does that’s a problem it might be a
there’s a large chance that some of the double transcription it’s because I’m doing transcription into this awkward non-standard word press editing interface might be causing the double transcription but aside from all these breakage is though I’m what I’m saying is that this format works so very well I can really concentrate on thinking more than when I use keyboard I suppose I just wish that I were making a voice recording but I
i’m afraid the merits are so great in this voice transcription approach that it this is a good problem to have I have three terrific formats keyboard typing of webpages works extremely well and voice recording doesn’t exactly work well I wouldn’t say it works well but I I like it and in some ways it does work while you you run the tape recorder and you speak and you get a result so it’s very easy as far as producing information although you can’t see your thoughts and it has its downsides of course you have to clean up the results and youand potentially you could hook up transcription to it so that you do end up with both that’s a strange thing that’s a weird thing right now is that I have to pick between either doing a voice recording or doing voice transcription why do I have to pick between them can I have the tape recorder running while I do this voice transcription I doubt it
yep confirmed as soon as I start doing voice transcription it stops the voice recording
To continue the best thought from above tracing the trajectory trying to get a nice summary overview of my trajectory we have and I’m picking really only the tall like my top three if you look at my top three breakthrough suppose and then let’s see let’s see it leads up to branching Message Mushroom Tree so how do we get I almost treat well I guess branching Message Mushroom Tree is part of my November I think the best way to position it is that it’s a fall out from the November 2020
just like November 2013 I had fallout jackpot all the way through into my May 2014 similarly I had the Canterbury breakthrough in November 2020 and that continued playing out until February and then now a year after that a year and a half later you could say that you could very much say that my concept of or my concept phrase my phrase my label of branching Message Mushroom tree is nothing but a packaging of my November 2020 breakthrough that seems like the most reasonable way to frame or position I I don’t
my current feeling about this week this past week and the breakthroughs jackpot is that it’s largely about packaging however packaging is very important that we cannot underestimate packaging merely a matter of packaging packaging is a big big deal it’s like communication communication formats or communication channels part of this past week breakthrough while assessing the magnitude of it is to further develop the concept which I is based in my November 2020 but I continue to play it out of really
really interpreting the middle ages branching Message Mushroom Tree pictoral grams is a public communication format emphasis on public understood is the opposite of secret it is a public communication for the highest knowledge very elegant very public very visible how do we think about and I guess I’m kind of break
i’m kind of breaking away from thinking of mushroom trees in terms of evidence I guess I feel like I’ve graduated beyond evidence in some sense in someway like that I don’t think that I don’t like that perspective that I had just prior to the Canterbury breakthrough I was starting to list I want to arrange breakthroughs in a certain way right now per above arrange breakthroughs in in relation to this weeks decoding as such of branching Message Mushroom Trees which I feel like I have to make a nod to my mandrake breakthrough
looking for any humorous ideas about labeling branching message hat sis mandrake Communication Trees Siri something like that Theory Hatsis because I won cannot think of mandrake trees and the fact that I identify them not him and the fact that I decoded it to connect it successfully and remarkably with the branching Message Mushroom Trees which I had just like hours earlier
only hours after I formulated that powerful phrase branching Message Mushroom Trees hours later I recognized branching Message Mandrake Trees and therefore the higher order construct of the or the generalized construct of branching Message Entheogens Trees which plainly is evidenced I don’t like I had kind of a week I feel like I had a defensive and weak stance regarding evidence and the very concept of evidence seems like a disempowering idea my feeling about the word Evidence right now is it is it it is a disempowering idea if you want to feel disempowered think in terms of evidence as a rule the concept of
as a rule the concept of evidence seems to be disempowering and it’s dismissive as soon as you’re talking about as soon as you talk in terms of evidence you lose you become disempowered the evidence is taken away from you while chanting the word evidence I am anti-evidence I am against evidence evidence equals blindness that’s my current feeling is it like the title of the article before the Canterbury article proof of evidence when you’re talking in those terms you’re a loser it’s a proposal to enter debates that are set up in a fraudulent way that nobody can win I don’t believe in evidence I believe in interpretive frameworks
I take a framework first theory first approach evidence second and I fear that the title of an article which puts the priority on the word evidence makes the mistake it should be more like instead of instead of criteria of evidence and proof it should be more worded in terms of interpretive frameworks and explanatory theories where the Hells of the theory you can’t talk about evidence without talking first and foremost about theory how are you supposed to perceive evidence if you’ve got no theory the theory is the lens through which you are become able to perceive and take in evidence if you don’t have a theory then you cannot have evidence I feel like that’s really the whole art
Compelling evidence ? criteria of proof?
those sound like bunk BS terms their terms that have been deliberately corrupted and disempowered before you even begin
there is no such thing as compelling evidence out of context
there’s no such thing as criteria of proof out of evidence
the theory makes the data
the theory makes the evidence
there is only theory based evidence
it is nonsensical to talk about evidence without first talking about theory.
suppose your hold unacknowledged theory premise that non-Secret Mushroom use is an impossibility and a contradiction in terms an incoherent idea then how could you ever perceive or admit data evidence that’s publicly visible evidence would be prevented it is impossible to have evidence if you hold a theory with premises the shots out that evidence
at this point I need to read ten books that are a critique of the concept of evidence and proof
What happens when you take a wheelbarrow full of evidence and you bring it to someone and they say:
“I reject your premises, i don’t believe your premises, your promises are preposterous, I don’t believe your premises, I don’t believe your interpretation, therefore you have no evidence.” 😑
suppose we have a trajectory I’m thinking of for things plus hats this is article well the main thing I think about when I think about houses articles is the dancing man so let’s the roasting salamander so let’s take my big three breakthroughs and then add bracket Canterbury add one thing before Canterbury and one thing after Canterbury in that case I would be it would be let me start the way this easiest by listing years I am off and less you’re like very often less years is a great great short hand
1988 1997 2003 2006 2010 2013 2016 because I got confirmation that the dates are weird on houses articles and that they have the dates have been moved to a year later I still have yet to look up my first mention of the word Hatsis but I would perceive it as a episode two of Andy Letcherthere is a ton an absolute overwhelming ton upon ton of very interesting postings in the Egodeath Yahoo Group with very interesting dates very interesting history of trajectory very interesting postings it’s valuable your elves links it is a real gold mine filled with gold at this point I am still left with going on my gut intuition I don’t believe the dates that I’m seeing on the Hatsis articles I am seeing all indications that I was very early in following Hatsis I have every reason to believe as I recall and I can easily confirm the spot ha ha I can
I could confirm this faster than I can talk it through but right now I feel like I’m going with my earlier memory the 2016 I believe 2016 is the year when did I decode salamander I believe I it was when I was reading a good book on Greek myth art and I was decoding the limp limping mytheme using the salamander image and I believe that was 2016 specifically I believe that I used taxes copy of the salamander in 2016 and this is easy to confirm at Yahoo Group
provisional provisionally let’s say 2016 is the year that I decoded the salamander image which was about left foot versus right foot and it was not expressed in terms of branching I don’t think and I don’t think I perceived that mushroom tree as a branching Message Mushroom Tree I saw it’s branching as pure anomaly puzzle it was a puzzle the branching the mysterious branching was it I read it as a puzzling branching and I would say that hi
I could maybe disapprove this but I feel like I feel like until yesterday the branching on trees was still the branching on mushroom trees was still a puzzle to me I feel like despite my decoding it earlier I feel like it was still puzzling to me there was still a puzzling aspect of it that I finally resolved the puzzling aspect yesterday by which I mean a couple days ago that’s my subjective experience which is often wrong because often I forget an earlier breakthrough of the same thing but let’s say suppose I decoded left foot right foot and limping her Festus
The Smith in the underworld and Greek mythology which enabled me to decode Canterbury and I want to lead up to the question of when did I solve the puzzle I’ve branching message mushroom trees this despite my despite my writing about this in 2020 I want to say that this week I solve the puzzle of anomalous branching on mushroom trees it’s kind of a matter of degree à la Paul Thagard theory revision although in November 2020 I wrote two paragraphs on this topic I did not
merit solving the problem I did not have a complete solution I feel like I assess and I judge that I did not have a “complete solution” of the anomalous puzzling branching features of the salamander roasting dancing man image until now yes I decoded the dead left and right legs in 2016 but there was there was still highly provisional highly tentative highly provisional decoding of the legs it was only when I came to Canterbury Canterbury provided me the confirmation
Canterbury tree 71 provided me in 2020 with the corroboration of my hypothesis theory of interpreting the dancing man salamander the dancing man of the salamander image in 2016 and so on the one hand it’s a two-way thing corroboration is a two-way thing I like to corroboration in 2016 for my dancing man hypothesis about left and right legs and I use that hypothesis that tentative hypothesis in 2020 to ask could this tentative hypothesis from 2016 possibly provide a solution to the puzzle
i’ve Canterbury leg Hanging and Balancing and it did and therefore I received proof of my 2016 hypothesis about salamander dancing man in 2020 and on the other hand conversely my 2016 hypothesis corroborated and gave authorization to my tentative 2020 Canterbury decoding it’s a two-way corroboration that’s healthy reconfirmation works purple Thagard Paul Thagard that’s how theory confirmation and theory revision works and theory revision
I have written similar thing about the core theory phase 1 circa 1997 and also refined in the main article 2006 that needed corroboration where am I going to go to get corroboration first I looked to historical Jesus Jesus please corroborate my theory but he vanished Allegro took him away from me Allegro through John King because I learned about no Jesus through John King and some other books which I have cited the Egodeath.com Allegro took Jesus away from me
but I was needing Jesus to corroborate and confirm my ego the theory so where am I going to look to get confirmation or corroboration for my theory in the sort of sense of Paul Thagard theory or metatheory the answer is religious mythology including image pictograms of branching Message Mushroom Tree the more developed the left leg of my theory the more it corroborates the right leg of my theory and vice versa it’s kind of like saying what can I do to develop the core theory answer
develop the other part of the theory the methane theory if I ask what can I do to improve and develop my missing theory the answer is develop the core theory how do we know the course he is right how do we know the core theory is true because it is corroborated by the mytheme theory how do we know that the missing theory is true because it is corroborated by the core theory the core theory and the missing theory are able to corroborate each other because in so far as they are two different things to different bases which stabilize each other and strengthen each other how do I know that
how do I know that the salamander dancing man has significant left foot versus right foot and how do I know that my interpretation of the branching mushroom tree and the fire and the serpent salamander how do I know my reading of that is valid also how do I know that my reading of mushroom tree number 71 is valid with the balancing and hanging and sword a big answer is permissive decoding the way that you have connections woven interwoven across so that decoding admit theme is not a matter of saying this missing equals this principle it’s not a one for one decoding mytheme is harder than that to do a complete job because to complete your dickhow do I know that the salamander dancing man has significant left foot versus right foot and how do I know that my interpretation of the branching mushroom tree and the fire and the serpent salamander how do I know my reading of that is valid also how do I know that my reading of mushroom tree number 71 is valid with the balancing and hanging and sword a big answer is permissive decoding the way that you have connections woven interwoven across so that decoding admit theme is not a matter of saying this missing equals this principle it’s not a one for one decoding mytheme is harder than that to do a complete job because to complete your dick
it is a network weaving you have to weave the network to decode mytheme is a matter of weaving a network of connections Allah Paul Thagard Paul Faggard similarly how do I know that I’ve decoded image a and that how do I know that I have decoded image be I find the isomorphism and I find that the same interpretive theory that makes sense and resolves the puzzle of image essay and it also makes sense of unresolved the puzzle of image be then my solutions to the two puzzles enter corroborate each other they cross corroborate each other
theory confirmation involves cross corroboration when you have corroboration that weaves throughout the system is the component a confirms component be in component be confirms component essay so instead of stupidly talking in terms of naïve simpleton isolated bits of evidence like my self-defeating article title please provide criteria of proof and compelling evidence these are kind of idiotic questions and their defeat as they’re hopeless you can’t win because evidence doesn’t work that way evidence involves systemic coherence of interconnections do we have systemic can
do we have systemic coherence of interconnections then yes then we have evidence but we cannot have evidence if we don’t have systemic coherence of interconnections our mental model of what evidence is is messed up evidence is not granular atomic isolated pieces there is no theory free data there is no theory free evidence and the problem with these numbskull deniers and deflectors
they defined the rules of the game and situated is impossible to win there is no evidence because there is not permitted to be evidence because they don’t allow an appropriate interpretive theory to allow the evidence to come through they won’t let the evidence speak they neutralize the evidence they are trying to neutralize the evidence not to merely test it they’re trying to ignore it and erase it and deflect the evidence instead of reading or measuring it they’re not interested in measuring the evidence they’re interested in explaining away that evidence as Hatsis brags about his awesome accomplishment of that he that he has accomplished waving awaythey defined the rules of the game and situated is impossible to win there is no evidence because there is not permitted to be evidence because they don’t allow an appropriate interpretive theory to allow the evidence to come through they won’t let the evidence speak they neutralize the evidence they are trying to neutralize the evidence not to merely test it they’re trying to ignore it and erase it and deflect the evidence instead of reading or measuring it they’re not interested in measuring the evidence they’re interested in explaining away that evidence as Hatsis brags about his awesome accomplishment of that he that he has accomplished waving away
easily explains away through our mushroom trees and Christian Mart or easily explained away through sound tried and true this is meant through memory I am memorizing his passage his “of shame the supposed mushrooms in Christian Art are easily explain the way through sound tried and true criteria which adherence of the theory he freaking fails to even see what stupid theory he even has in mind terrible writing why should I memorize it rotten writing
The supposed mushrooms in Christian Art are easily explained away through sound tried and true historical criteria which the followers of the theory parentheses including significant variations of it) or oblivious or unaware of or else they would or simply unaware of
that’s very close to an accurate quote from memory!
infamous Thomas Hatsis quote of anti-scholarship extreme scholarly fail, from memory
The supposed mushrooms in Christian art are easily explained away through sound, tried-and-true historical criteria, which the adherents of the theory (including significant variations of it) are simply unaware of.
– Thomas Hatsis, anti-scholar (from memory)
in the page of his book where he is supposed to be providing a list of criteria not pompous bullsht claiming to have such criteria; what the fck are the criteria???
state them here and now, I paid $15 for this POS pathetic rag of a book amateurish as hell
cough up the damn criteria or else at least give me specific citations pointing directly to the exact paragraphs pompous amateur idiot
The Egodeath theory 