Voice transcription awkward workaround to try to solve the double entry text problem is to do voice transcription in a separate simple text app and then copy and paste into this page in this weird WordPress mobile app – pretty awkward, but it would prevent double entry of voice transcription text.
Thomas Hatsis can you pass the test which the comic panel presents to you which the top artist Eadwine presents you with a puzzle he presents you with a test of interpretation
can you pass the test
prove that you are qualified to open and flap your jars on the subject of mushroom trees and I’m sure you will have no problem explaining as you say “” easily explained away the key tree using sound, tried and true historical criteria all right Mr. authority on criteria prove to us prove it prove you’re not full of baloney prove that you can apply your historical criteria what are your what are your sound what and be specific this time not like your piece of shit book that was arm waving be specific what exactly are your sound tried and true historical criteria that enable you to easily explain away the pink key treatprove that you are qualified to open and flap your jars on the subject of mushroom trees and I’m sure you will have no problem explaining as you say “” easily explained away the key tree using sound, tried and true historical criteria all right Mr. authority on criteria prove to us prove it prove you’re not full of baloney prove that you can apply your historical criteria what are your what are your sound what and be specific this time not like your piece of shit book that was arm waving be specific what exactly are your sound tried and true historical criteria that enable you to easily explain away the pink key tree That is attached that is what the top artist is directly asking you Thomas Hatsis asking you and asking all the five students the top artist Eadwine the famous illuminated manuscript leader is asking you :
Tom Hatsis: what is the meaning of the pink key tree so as to prevent you loss of control on commences Cubensis so as to prove that you are qualified to banquet and to lead this field of entheogens scholarship And hang best positioned balanced and hanging in mushroom tree number 71 so that you are best position to judge whether Plaincourault with snake and branching and underlying structure of Eve’s body revealed prove that you are best position to judge on plane crawled being a mushroom, witch Hatsis? – Eadwine
I hereby announce the criteria to test who is qualified to lead the field with entheogens scholarship the top Christian artist Eadwine in one of the hundreds of images which Panofsky tells us that the number one data we need to consider and take into account is the fact that there are hundreds of these mushroom trees in Christian art
given that the top artist is eatwine in the genre of these mushroom trees, then you must prove that you are well-positioned to judge on plaincrawled being a mushroom : you must pass the test which the top mushroom tree artist presents to you
can you explain the meaning of the pink key tree can you explain the pink initiate positioned in the Cubans his tree in the red initiate positioned in the mushroom tree number 71 can you prove that you are best position to lead this field by passing the test
Can you pass the test the pink key tree test which ate one present to you the bearded man in the upper left a Canterbury Psalter a Alleg Hanging Mushroom Tree comic panel he is asking you a question can you answer the question can you pass the test to prove that you are best position to judge on plane corralled can you explain the pink key tree and how to not lose control on commences Cubensis.
that is the test and the riddle and the communication encoding Decoding scheme which the top artist Who are the people that the top artist shows in his comic panel the top art historian Panofsky is in that picture he is a failed student with a furrowed brow
Dr. Brown is the passing student with the lifted garment passing the test who is able to explain the pink key tree that is attached to mushroom tree number 71 out of 75
Dr. Brown is permitted therefore to dine at banquet at the initiation banquet where he is carried by the angel and then Dr. Brown is balancing sitting Balancing in the mushroom tree one of Panofsky’s mushroom trees touching the sword of God best position to explain the pink Branching and non-Branching Chi tree you have to prove this and I have identified I am announcing that I have identified the means by which we test investigative journalist Emma her claim of who is best position to judge on plane crawled being a mushroom here is the test to test who is best positioned the writer of the book on Romanesque art or Dr. Brown who has taught University university course on cultural anthropology a visionary plants in the edge and use since 1975 and who is able to explain Branching and non-Branching in the cut branch motif in the hundreds of mushroom trees which Panofsky urges us to above all number one when interpreting Plaincourault specifically when interpreting Plaincourault we have to start by considering the mushroom trees here is a mushroom tree to consider which will prove who is best position to judge on plain curled being a Mushroom Tree which was the purpose of Podolski urging us that the number one given data that historical criteria sound tried and true to easily explain away the pizilaum data
mushroom tree one of Panofsky’s mushroom trees touching the sword of God best position to explain the pink Branching and lypzlnon-Branching Chi tree you have to prove this and I have identified I am announcing that I have identified the means by which we test investigative journalist Emma her claim of who is best position to judge on plane crawled being a mushroom here is the test to test who is best positioned the writer of the book on Romanesque art or Dr. Brown who has taught
Who are the people that the top artist shows in his comic panel the top art historian Panofsky is in that picture he is a failed student with a furrowed brow.
Dr. Brown is the passing student with the erect lifted garments passing the test who is able to explain the pink key tree that is attached to mushroom tree number 71 out of 75
Dr. Brown is permitted therefore to dine at banquet at the initiation banquet where he is carried by the angel and then Dr. Brown is balancing sitting Balancing in theEadwine
The Conversation in this Field has Moved on, Has Moved Past the Mere Question of Sheer Presence of Mushrooms; we Are now Graduated to Focusing on Explaining the Meaning of the Given Data, that There are Ubiquitous Mushrooms as Panofsky Emphasized: Explain the pink key tree attached to mushroom tree number 71 and then get back to me, students of entheogen scholarship
Hatsis and Ruck and the other mushroom minimalists are still stuck back in the remedial class for the slow students with the furrowed brows, the failed students that can’t pass and graduate to the adult level of engaging in this field of entheogen scholarship.
insert picture upper left mushroom 71 examining the students candidates for further initiation
Hatsis is flunked, he’s not permitted to banquet on the right side of row one because he fails to comprehend the prerequisite topic of non-branching for avoiding loss of control on psilocybin mushrooms as brilliantly communicated with double check parity check pink key tree
tell me Flunked students Ruck and Hatsis: what does the pink key tree mean underneath Mushroom tree number 71 in the Great Canterbury Psalter please explain that to me or else you flunk and you’re not allowed to continue to lead and mislead the field of entheogen studies?
nobody who is unaware of the pink key tree is allowed to lead The field I passed the test Dr. Brown passes the test call rock failed a test and has failed the test you’re not qualified to lead the field of intelligence scholarship because you cannot answer the question solve me the riddle what is the meaning of the pink key tree attached to mushroom tree 71 what is the meaning of touching God sword what is the meaning of touching your base your foot to the column base explain the meaning of John rush raised Garment of the passing student on the upper left of the comic panel explain to me or else you prove you failed to be in the best position explain that to me
journalist Emma who pontificate on who is best position to judge Plaincourault meaning Mushroom author of the book on Romanesque aren’t you brilliant expert who are best positioned to lead the field and point your thumb in a downward direction about plaincrawled tell me this then if you are allegedly best position surely certainly you can explain to me what is the meaning of the pink Creek key tree attached to mushroom tree number 71 out of 75 mushroom trees which Panofsky of the sizes above all first of all the first piece of given data that is crucial to interpret plaincrawled Panofsky urges us the given data is and the momjournalist Emma who pontificate on who is best position to judge Plaincourault meaning Mushroom author of the book on Romanesque aren’t you brilliant expert who are best positioned to lead the field and point your thumb in a downward direction about plaincrawled tell me this then if you are allegedly best position surely certainly you can explain to me what is the meaning of the pink Creek key tree attached to mushroom tree number 71 out of 75 mushroom trees which Panofsky of the sizes above all first of all the first piece of given data that is crucial to interpret plaincrawled Panofsky urges us the given data is and the mom
Wasson who rejects Plaincourault tells us that the number one top expert art authority Panofsky who thumb down plane crawled Panofsky the authority who we must believe suppose we believe the data he reports to us the data and he tells us that this is the number one most relevant Panofsky tells us that the number one most relevant given data is the fact that mushroom trees are ubiquitous there are hundreds and hundreds of them so tell me then who is best positioned to put their thumb in an up or down direction regarding Plaincourault which Panofsky is telling us that the number one relevant fact given fact to interpret plaincrawledWasson who rejects Plaincourault tells us that the number one top expert art authority Panofsky who thumb down plane crawled Panofsky the authority who we must believe suppose we believe the data he reports to us the data and he tells us that this is the number one most relevant Panofsky tells us that the number one most relevant given data is the fact that mushroom trees are ubiquitous there are hundreds and hundreds of them so tell me then who is best positioned to put their thumb in an up or down direction regarding Plaincourault which Panofsky is telling us that the number one relevant fact given fact to interpret plaincrawled
so then we have to do with Panofsky told us to do we have to start reasoning from the given data that there are hundreds of mushroom trees for example let us discuss what John lash discovered and uploaded the picture to the web where I then decoded the meaning of the picture which John Lash uploaded of the Canterbury Psalter then interpret me this interpret this to me you expert in Romanesque are so expert that you wrote a book then I’m sure you’ll have no problem because you are best position to judge on plank Road that must mean that you know about branching mushroom trees please explain to me to prove that you are in the best position to judge on plane girl The plane corralled fresco Plaincourault fresco you have to prove that you’re in the best position to judge can you pass the test in the upper left can you pass the test which Edwin Edwin in the great artist famous if the top art historian is Pulaski then the top Christian artist we agree that the top Christian artist for illuminated manuscripts is eat wine and eat wine tells us you have to pass this test can the Roman ask book author pass this test can the alleged leader or miss leader of the field entheogens and Scholarship Pearl rock he fails to pass the test exploit Carl rock you have to prove that you are best position and the writer of the Romanesque art but you have to prove what the journalist Emma claims is best positioned Thomas Hatsis you have to prove that you are best position because of your great credentials that you’re the paradigm attic perfect ideal historian historian then prove that you are the ideal the story by explaining to me all of you can you pass the test that the top artist Eadwine of Great Canterbury Psalter
The proof that Dr. Brown is best position to judge Mushroom Trees is that Dr. Brown is able to pass the test he is able to explain the puzzle more of the communication check the communication parity check which eatwine the top artist presents to us in one of the instances of the mushroom trees which Panofsky says the number one thing that we have to consider the given data is the fact that there are hundreds of these mushroom trees exactly like this mushroom tree so can you pass the test to prove that you are in best position to judge on plain cruel Mushroom tree with the serpent and the branching multiple Mushrooms Branching out from it
here’s the here’s how to tell who is leading the field with you to the scholarship if a person has no coherent explanation for the pinkie tree which is attached to mushroom tree number 71 if you cannot explain that pinky tree then you are a fraud at leading the field of intelligence scholarship the true authority who is best positioned upside down hanging in the tree deliberately touching God’s sword with their leftwhat does the pink key tree mean underneath Mushroom tree number 71 in the Greg Canterbury Psalter please explain that to me or else you flunk and you’re not allowed to continue to lead and mislead the field of intelligence studies nobody who is unaware of the pink key tree is allowed to lead here’s the here’s how to tell who is leading the field with you to the scholarship if a person has no coherent explanation for the pinkie tree which is attached to mushroom tree number 71 if you cannot explain that pinky tree then you are a fraud at leading the field of intelligence scholarship the true authority who is best positioned upside down hanging in the tree deliberately touching God’s sword with their left Lim to cut and negate the branching premise here unlike the investigative journalist Emma here is my alternative explanation of how to pick which scholar is “best positioned” to lead the field to give their thumb up or thumbs down on plain cruel meaning Mushroom here is who is best position I would reckon that the red initiate hanging upside down by the non-Branching serpent stem Bluestem commences stem of the tree number 71Lim to cut and negate the branching premise here unlike the investigative journalist Emma here is my alternative explanation of how to pick which scholar is “best positioned” to lead the field to give their thumb up or thumbs down on plain cruel meaning Mushroom here is who is best position I would reckon that the red initiate hanging upside down by the non-Branching serpent stem Bluestem commences stem of the tree number 71 his best position to judge that red hanging initiate I propose is in the best position to judge whoever can explain the meaning of the riddle whoever can answer the riddle of what is the meaning of the read initiate positioned hanging from the Cuban system of mushroom tea number 71 next to attached to the pinky treat the person who is in fact best positioned to lead the field of intelligence Scholarship and give their thumbs up and thumbs down on plain crawled fresco here is the criteria on which to judge here is the missing criteria which the investigative journalist Emma failed to provide when she claimed that the Romanesque art scholar was best positioned and that Dr. Jerry Brown was not best positioned but I am going to teach Dr. Jerry Brown the meaning of the red initiate positioned in gods tree cube and stem hanging upside down and Dr. Jerry Brown is that red initiate and I reckon that he is best position because he passed the exam on the left side of row one and he was permitted to banquet and the angel carry Dr. Brown and placed him hanging upside down in tree number 71 deliberately touching gods swordhere is the missing criteria which the investigative journalist Emma failed to provide when she claimed that the Romanesque art scholar was best positioned and that Dr. Jerry Brown was not best positioned but I am going to teach Dr. Jerry Brown the meaning of the red initiate positioned in gods tree cube and stem hanging upside down and Dr. Jerry Brown is that red initiate and I reckon that he is best position because he passed the exam on the left side of row one and he was permitted to banquet and the angel carry Dr. Brown and placed him hanging upside down in tree number 71 deliberately touching gods swordhere is the missing criteria which the investigative journalist Emma failed to provide when she claimed that the Romanesque art scholar was best positioned and that Dr. Jerry Brown was not best positioned but I am going to teach Dr. Jerry Brown the meaning of the red initiate positioned in gods tree cube and stem hanging upside down and Dr. Jerry Brown is that red initiate and I reckon that he is best position because he passed the exam on the left side of row one and he was permitted to banquet and the angel carry Dr. Brown and placed him hanging upside down in tree number 71 deliberately touching gods sword dr. Brown touching God sword cutting his Branching thinking and explaining the meaning of the pinkie tree Dr. Brown and I hanging from the tree we are best position that is my proposal now who are you going to believe are you going to believe investigative journalist Emma when she says that the Romanesque book writer is best position or are you going to hold and believe that Dr. Brown and I hanging upside down in gods mushroom tree number 71 while we explain to you the meaning of the pink tree we are best positioned here are the criteria to judge who is best position to give a thumbs up or thumbs down ondr. Brown touching God sword cutting his Branching thinking and explaining the meaning of the pinkie tree Dr. Brown and I hanging from the tree we are best position that is my proposal now who are you going to believe are you going to believe investigative journalist Emma when she says that the Romanesque book writer is best position or are you going to hold and believe that Dr. Brown and I hanging upside down in gods mushroom tree number 71 while we explain to you the meaning of the pink tree we are best positioned here are the criteria to judge who is best position to give a thumbs up or thumbs down on Plaincrawled being mushroom or not ask the serpent in the Branching Plaincourault Frosk oh tree ask Eve who is covering her Branching crotch with the mushroom cap and showing her snake shaped 14 ribs which we can see through the veil the abs temp the temporary volatile eventually roasted away flesh of temporary childish childish Hatsis like Carl rock type of childish infantile thinking who are in capable of explaining the read initiate who is best positioned in God’s Mushroom Tree to touch gods sword of loss of control yet retaining stability while in the psilocybin statePlaincrawled being mushroom or not ask the serpent in the Branching Plaincourault Frosk oh tree ask Eve who is covering her Branching crotch with the mushroom cap and showing her snake shaped 14 ribs which we can see through the veil the abs temp the temporary volatile eventually roasted away flesh of temporary childish childish Hatsis like Carl rock type of childish infantile thinking who are in capable of explaining the read initiate who is best positioned in God’s Mushroom Tree to touch gods sword of loss of control yet retaining stability while in the psilocybin state
Allegro’s Theory: No Historical Jesus
I agree with John Allegro: the “gradual coalescence” of the Jesus figure (the “no historical Jesus” position), not the “big bang” origin of Christianity (the “historical Jesus” position).
The Year Called “1525 A.D.” is 800 Years After the Year Called 1 A.D.
Edwin Johnson’s chronology revisionism, 1890. Subtract some 725 years. To learn about Historiography Criteria, see “Edwin Johnson” at http://egodeath.com .
The Extreme Opposite of Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck’s Idiotic “Secret Mushroom” Thesis: The Eucharist Was Universally Recognized as Psilocybe Mushrooms
There are some interesting potentials in analysis resulting from the secrecy premise that Thomas Hatsis and I are both attacking.
We are allied in attacking certain elements around the secrecy premise.
We are both absolutely and totally attacking the secrecy premise.
It’s got to die; it’s got to go.
… although we are coming to it from entirely different angles and I with the greatest force possible they say I insist that:
The only whiff of secrecy that exists at all is that:
Our real nature as control agents is temporarily slightly veiled, until the moment the psilocybin is added and then that secrecy is completely gone.
That’s the only sense of secrecy that I permit, in the maximal entheogen theory of religion.
I am out to destroy and remove and delete as the most harmful thing that’s harming, stunting, blocking, impeding, and retarding terribly, the field of entheogen scholarship.
We are both absolutely and totally attacking the secrecy premise, it’s got to die, it’s got to go.
… although we are coming to it from entirely different angles.
With the greatest force possible, I insist that:
The only whiff of secrecy that exist at all is that our real nature as control agents is temporarily slightly veiled, until the moment the psilocybin is added, and then that secrecy is completely gone.
That’s the only sense of secrecy that I permit.
I am out to destroy and remove and delete Ruck’s “secret mushroom” dogmatic assumption, as the most harmful thing that’s harming terribly the entheogen scholarship field.
We’ve got the Carl Ruck and Jan Irving & Allegro “secrecy” mental jail cell that shackles the mind.
Throw off their mind-destroying, extremely wrong, and self-defeating mental shackles of the ‘secrecy’ premise.
Ruck’s notion of “secret mushroom” is the exact opposite of the truth!
Thomas critiques or exposes the flaws of the secrecy premise.
The field of scholarship has absolutely got to get rid of the Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck’s stupid damned “secrecy premise” from hell has got to die!!!
For the love of Christ, Carl stop, just stop writing the word secret!!
My god, what’s wrong with you?! , stop writing the word “secret”!
Don’t ever write that word again in your life.
For God’s sake, for the love of God, Ruck, fcking stop writing ‘secret’ every other fcking word!
Ruck, what is your insane obsession, your absolute obsession with the word ‘secret’?!
I don’t give a f about secret mushroom use; I only simply care about use!
Why do you insist on forcing us to always frame use as secret?!
Stop framing sheer use as ‘secret’.
Stop it.
You’re self defeating, and you are directly self-contradictory.
Carl Ruck versus Carl Ruck: “Secret use is absolutely everywhere; every single person in the entire town is all secretly using mushrooms.”
You are totally incoherent; you are totally self-contradictory, Dr. Ruck.
Stop contradicting yourself.
You’re harming the entheogen scholarship field.
Stop framing all mushroom use as “secret”! Stop it!
You’re making me have to go obsess on it in order to hold it and stop it.
It’s not me who’s introducing the word ‘secret’; it’s me who’s yelling against the word ‘secret’, to make you shut up and stop writing ‘secret’, every other word.
if I did a word-count analysis, the giant big huge bold word in the middle of coral rocks writings would be the word ‘secret’; he just completely is fixated on that.
I think Ruck gets paid, the Pop Sike Agenda agency pays him by doing a word count: a thousand dollars for every time he writes the word ‘secret’.
What the hell?!
Thomas Hatsis and I do everything we can to write against the secrecy premise, though from a different mindset, in a different angle; a different vector than I do
I have some different reasons than Hatsis.
There’s an overlap and it’s a complex multi way fight.
I have come to realize and identify that Carl Ruck is part of the problem because of his One dimensional brainless framing of every single instance of mushroom uses always always secret, every single time.
No matter how many hundreds and thousands of instances of mushrooms are found in art, he always insists on framing as “secret”.
What is your justification for framing it a secret?
I watched Ruck’s video too; I heard you sing with your own voice with your own dramatic framing that you’re dramatically framed it in a whisper a secret.
That is the carl rock paradigm, the foundation stone; the cornerstone of the Carl Ruck paradigm is “entheogen secret” scholarship, not entheogen scholarship.
in Carl Rex’ world, there is no such thing as an Entheogens, there is only one single thing, and it is called “secret entheogen”.
so much so that Ruck deletes the entheogens so that he can have the only thing that he cares about is secret.
He’s not interested in entheogens; Carl rock is only interested in “secret” –
And he doesn’t even understand the real meaning of the word secret! which is the non-branching nature of the world and self is the hidden secret.
Carl Ruck is totally obsessed, impeded, blocked, and developmentally stunted in an infantile fixation on the word ‘secret’ – and he doesn’t even understand the basic mystic standard meaning of it.
One-dimensional, brainless framing of every single instance of mushroom use is always, always secret, every single time.
No matter how many hundreds and thousands of instances, he always insists on framing as secret.
What is your justification for framing it a secret?
I watched Ruck’s video too, I heard you say with your own voice, with your own dramatic framing, that you dramatically framed it in a whisper, as “secret”.
That is the Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck paradigm, the foundation stone, the cornerstone of the carl rock paradigm is “secret entheogen” scholarship, NOT entheogen History scholarship.
Ruck is trying to replace the history of entheogens by “secret entheogens” instead.
Ruck replaced entheogens by ‘secret’ and secrecy; that’s what he really cares about.
Ruck only cares about “secret”; he doesn’t care about the plants, he doesn’t care about mystic revelation, he doesn’t care about understanding the secret of the mind that’s revealed in the altered state.
All Ruck cares about is that the mushroom itself must be kept secret at all costs, to protect the false Pope story, the lie of what Christianity is about, the lie that normal, real Christianity lacks and must continue lacking mushrooms.
Ruck’s job is to keep Christianity lacking mushrooms; he cares only about secrecy and keeping mushrooms separate from and out of real, normal Christianity.
In Carl Ruck’s world, there is no such thing as entheogens, because there is only one single thing, and it is called “secret entheogens”.
So much so that Ruck deletes the entheogens so that he can have the only thing that he cares about is secret.
Ruck’s Strategy of Deflecting All Mushroom Evidence through Negative Reframing, to Protect the Evil Lie of “Real Christianity Wasn’t Based on Mushrooms”
Carl Ruck practices and exemplifies that bizarre move of deflecting evidence through inversion framing, negative framing:
Every time you find evidence, be sure to emphasize, above all, that it was abnormal, deviant, and is absence.
Each proof of presence of entheogens is there by inverted and deflected to become converted into proof of the *absence* of entheogens from normal, real Christianity.
Thanks to Dr. Secret, we can never win, and we’re guaranteed to always lose, because he makes it so that the more evidence we find, the louder that he tells his story, his false lying story, that Christianity cannot ever and must not be allowed to have mushrooms.
Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck defines Christianity as by definition, he dictates that real, normal Christianity is not permitted to have mushrooms.
No wonder we can never win with a loser what a losing game:
The more mushrooms that you give to Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck, the stronger and more intensely he tells the lie, that he says “this proves that Christianity – real, normal Christianity – has the *absence* of entheogens.
Dr. Secret’s evil braindead puerile strategy is to convert the presence of entheogens in Christianity, to warp and twist and negatively reframe it, so that what Carl Ruck ends up giving us at the end of his negative inversion production line is:
We put mushrooms in, and then what we get out is Christianity with all the mushrooms removed – good fcking job, Ruck, loser, you’re blocking all progress, you’re pretending to make progress, but what you’re doing is actually preventing and blocking progress.
You’ve put up a brick wall for the field, we can never win, thanks to your stupid loser rules and defeatist strategy of self-contradiction that you keep saying that mushrooms were everywhere, and this proves that there were no mushrooms in our religion.
You’re just a total self-contradiction – some kind of “leadership” there; good job that you’ve set up, where the more mushrooms we give you, the stronger you tell your lying story that real, normal Christianity lacks mushrooms.
Good fcking job, way to lead us into a cul-de-sac of failed strategy.
Great leadership job there.
What the hell, get the hell out of the way.
Ruck is not interested in how the altered state works, or what it reveals, or how it transforms the mind, and his fake book falsely titled as “consciousness” doesn’t have a single sentence about consciousness, or change of mental model, so why does the title have the word ‘consciousness’?
False advertising!
It deserves deducting many stars. When rating a book, the worst thing a book can do is fail to accomplish what it is intended to accomplish.
In Ruck’s so called “consciousness” book is nothing except infantile-level, superficial kiddie books’, children’s books pictures of puerile red and white third rate mushrooms that are like the rejects from your mushroom-hunting haul, that you give to your stupid kid brother while you ingest the good ones instead, the psilocybes.
See if you could get your gullible kid brother to drink his pee while you’re at it.
Carl Ruck is only interested in “secret entheogens”, not entheogens or consciousness.
Anyone who advocates the “secret mushroom” theory and writes the word ‘secret’ at every possible opportunity is the absolute enemy of Christian entheogen scholarship, and we must totally reject with maximum force and figure this evil, satanic lie from Hell, this literally demonic, anti-Christ premise of “secret mushroom” theory.
There is NOTHING secret about Jesus’ flesh being the psilocybe Eucharist.
EXPLICIT Branching-Message Mushroom Trees
Every single artist knew that the Eucharist is psilocybe mushrooms; it was on billboards; it was broadcasted everywhere, with breathtaking efficiency in the incredible motif that they engineered for pictorial communication: the explicit branching-message mushroom tree.
8′ tall mushroom the Plaincourault fresco branching mushrooms and non-branching snake, seeing through Eve’s superficial flesh of volatile, temporary possibility-branching thinking, which vanishes when the light of mushrooms reveals the actual underlying non-branching, snake-shaped (or rib bone shaped) structure that’s hidden underneath the surface layer of volatile, temporary childish thinking.
Too bad we are illiterate in the basics of pictorial communication, for all our false pride of foolishly expecting text which nobody reads to explicitly (in addition to implicitly every time it mentions the Eucharist) talk about mushrooms.
Why do we have to have explicit in addition to the implicit discussions of the Eucharist as mushrooms in the text, when we already have explicit depictions of the mushroom together with its transformational effects clearly and plainly depicted for everybody openly in the standard common language of pictorial forms?
We already have right there, 8′ tall right in front of you, 5 branching mushrooms & non-branching snake Inevitably bringing the mushroom carrying the payload of the message that we see plainly communicated in the explicit branching mushroom tree openly right in front of our eyes, seeing through Eve’s flesh, to see her branching rib cage – except you see no branching, but only her snake-shaped ribs, her 14 non-branching individual rib bones are shown by the mushroom but not her branching spine, while she is covering with a mushroom cap her inability to generate control thoughts.
And why don’t we see, why does she cover and negate with the mushroom cap her branching at her legs, we can’t see her legs branching apart from her body, she is negating that and yet revealing to us her snake-shaped non-branching individual rib bones which match the color and curvature of the arms of the mushroom tree.
I already proved November – Thanksgiving 2013 in the book The Power of Myth, by Joseph Campbell (and Fritz Graaf’s Greek Myth book cover showing Jason’s torso with Python non-branching serpent body protecting / guarding The golden apples of immortality non-dying timeless fruit of the tree of the garden of the Hesperides, The snake with the extreme excessive ability to see and perceive everything about branching and everything about the branching model of oneself moving steering through time too much ability to see how your mind works guards the tree of the apples of inmortality , driving away those who are not worthy by making them lose control in front of the non-branching vine tree Even more scrawny than Charlie Brown’s pathetic Christmas tree with the sacrificed golden lamb skin fleece hanging watched and controlled by Demeter
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/14/greek-egodeath-mythology-images/
In The Power of Myth with eye opened, I was restricted to being shown by Campbell only one quarter of Cranach’s painting (no color allowed to me, no Adam on the left side of the painting) allowed to me only the tree and serpent and Eve standing next to the tree: in front of her branching crotch, she held a branch, and behind her is a stag with branching antlers – proving that Eve’s legs are the branching theme which she in Plaincourault is covering with a mushroom cap. – Cybermonk, 9:09 p.m., March 28, 2022,
in the popular normal communication medium of art pictures that everybody could plainly read together package together with instructions on adopting the non-branching model, the snake-shaped future course of your pre-given control thoughts in order to, in the mushroom state, have spiritual regeneration to a new world and a new soul as a re-generated king, now with knowledge of God through the psilocybe mushroom Eucharist.
This was common knowledge; normal, real, ordinary Christianity; that was the normal standard main stream standard knowledge everywhere.
… broadcasted; they did everything- the artists did everything possible to depict the glorious mushroom Eucharist along with non-branching motifs (including nonbranching serpent) to instruct and communicate to the entire populace how to retain control stability while undergoing mental transformation.
I don’t know if the agency is telling Ruck to do this as a strategy to to try to make mushroom seem exciting by the strategy of always framing mushrooms as deviant.
That’s a Jan Irvin analysis/explanation of why would Carl Ruck be doing what he always does, his signature move.
Carl Ruck’s assigned role in the Pop Sike Agenda is to go track down every instance of mushrooms in Christian art, and then sever and cut each one apart from its contacts in real Christianity, and try to frame and tell a story that real Christianity never includes and cannot ever include mushrooms.
This causes mushrooms to seem exciting, according to the Jan Irvin’s analysis of the Pop Sike agenda; this will cause mushrooms to seem deviant and exciting.
Like Christopher Partridge in his obsession, his stupid false conflation of esotericism with being counter-culture Carl Ruck’s job is to go find mushrooms that come from the culture (meaning real normal Christianity) in the middle ages.
Ruck’s job is to sever and split apart real, normal, standard Christianity from mushrooms.
The perverse interesting dynamic I have identified is deflection of evidence through inverting, through an *inverted framing of the evidence*:
The more mushrooms that you give to Carl Ruck in Christian art, the more strongly he emphasizes that real Christianity cannot ever include mushrooms.
By definition, according to Carl Rock, any instance of mushrooms in Christian art further strengthens the proof that there is not – that there is the absence of mushrooms from Christianity – by which he would implicitly mean normal, real, standard Christianity.
Ruck is trying his hardest to go round up each mushroom instance and separate it from real, normal Christianity.
That way, it makes mushrooms seem exciting and appealing, to push the Pop Sike Agenda.
Thomas Hatsis’ research against the premise of secrecy offers some interesting potentials from a different angle.
Hatsis’ question:
If mushrooms are broadcast on every billboard everywhere in the middle ages as mushroom trees ubiquitous, as the top art historian Panofsky urges us to keep in mind above everything else, then why don’t people such as Eadwine artist group write about it in their illuminated manuscripts and church father texts,
Why don’t they explicitly use the word ‘mushroom’ there when they are writing about the Eucharist, why do they always talk about the Eucharist and describe its psychoactive properties and its transformative altered-state effects of the Eucharist but according to hatsis , they don’t explicitly write the word ‘mushroom’.
Who cares about texts; the people didn’t read text; the people read pictures, pictograms, pictographs.
Hatsis’ question:
“if mushrooms were the Eucharist,…”
Hatsis doesn’t word it as intelligently and emphatically as this, but what he should be asking, the way he should accurately be asking it –
Every time the church fathers are talking about the “Eucharist” or Lord’s Supper, they are always intending – what they have in mind when they write about the Eucharist is that they always mean Psilocybin.
Not Mandrake, not Amanita.
Every time the church fathers write the word “Eucharist”, they are always talking about and intending to mean that they are describing psilocybin.
Not cannabis, not scopolamine plants, but specifically, Psilocybe.
Hatsis’ question:
Why would mushrooms be openly depicted in art, but not mentioned (supposedly) in texts, or at least not mentioned explicitly?
Psilocybe mushrooms are constantly, all the time, in the center of all Eucharist writings.
All Christian texts, every Christian text is centered around discussing Psilocybe.
Every Christian text about the Eucharist is description of the effects of psilocybin.
Hatsis says we have no texts explicitly reporting mushrooms used in Christianity.
Hatsis asks “Why no explicit mention of mushroom in Christian texts?”
Jan Irvin recent podcast episodes, two of them, seem to be quoting a Christian passage that included the word Mushroom.
I don’t know whether or how often christian text contain the word ‘mushroom’.
I don’t know how often they *explicitly* talk about mushrooms.
Every Christian text about the Eucharist is talking about mushrooms, through talking about the effects; the psychoactive mind-transforming effects of Psilocybe mushrooms.
Branching-message mushroom trees: comprehending them; comprehending branching; comprehending mushrooms
Comprehending the branching elements of Christian mushroom trees is far more sophisticated and is the only real comprehension of the mushrooms, and proves the “mushrooms” identification
I have proved through my extremely sophisticated decoding of extremely sophisticated art based on pictographic, highly structured, extremely coherent, extremely structured pictographic letter written to us by Eadwine, he discusses through pictographic form, he explains to us that:
Every mushroom tree with branching anomalies is psychoactive mushrooms, along with (more importantly than mushrooms) psilocybe mushrooms’ mental transformative effects about loss of control and transformation of our control model regarding branching possibilities and how to retain control stability and avoid loss of control.
Normal, mainstream public Christianity was explicitly based on explicit depictions of mushrooms on billboards broadcasted, loudly broadcasted as loudly and clearly as the artists were able.
The artistss made a science out of communicating to the non-literate Populace, in the primary Communication Medium of the populace, which was not text, but rather art/pictures.
So art is more important and definitive than text, for evidence of mushroom use in Christianity.
Art through mushroom branching motifs communicated to the non-literate populace how to take the mushrooms and retain self control and prevent loss of control by adopting the non-branching model of your future path of thought, and by relying on the creator and being rescued from outside of your system of personal control from outside by Jesus.
I have proved that normal mainstream Christianity explicitly was based in mushrooms and that the artists tried as hard as they could to convey that effectively and outdo each other in their effectiveness of conveying not merely Mushrooms, which is what how to gets fixated on and that he is limited to.
We must go past, we must graduate past merely looking for mushrooms.
We finally accomplished the real answer about mushrooms by not stopping at mere sure use of mushrooms, and sheer existence of mushrooms in art, nor even halting at recognizing the Eucharist as psilocybin mushrooms.
We need to do better; we need to push further, to reach some knowledge that truly matters and is truly relevant for religious revelation and mental transformation, from one definite model to the other specific model.
We must not halt at mushrooms.
To get the mushroom story truth, we have to aim past the mushroom question and grasp and comprehend …
… of your system of personal control from outside by Jesus
I have proved that normal mainstream Christianity explicitly was based in mushrooms and that the artists tried as hard as they could to convey that effectively and outdo each other in their effectiveness of conveying not merely Mushrooms, which is what Hatsis & everyone gets fixated on and that he is limited to.
We must go past, we must graduate past merely analyzing merely looking for mushrooms , and then we will finally accomplish the real answer about mushrooms, by not stopping; we must not halt at mushrooms.
To get the mushroom story truth, we have to aim past the mushroom story truth and grasp and comprehend.
The full meaning, remember, is non-Branching serpent and cut branches on a mushroom tree where the motif of branching tree is fused together with motif of the mushroom shape – now we have a real complete coherent sensible relevant religiously relevant conception one of what we’re talking about when we’re talking about mushrooms, we should be talking about the effects, the transformative effects, the religious transformative effects and how those effects are depicted, together with depicting the mushrooms in art.
We need to learn to read; stop being illiterate about pictures the language of pictures start being literate with visual mythemes.
I have laid out a whole catalog of this entire language (key mythemes page at top of wordpress) in which I have translated to English plain, common everyday tripper English; common standard tripper parlance just like everybody talks and relating directly to what everybody reports loss of control instability of personal control frozen time etc. etc. being a helpless doll subject to a hidden controller – all that standard, normal everyday tripper parlance language thats found in every trip report; utterly commonplace, standard top 10 list of effects that every single mushroom trip reports, exactly depicted in art and in theology centered around the Eucharist and its altered state, mentally transformative experiential effects.
What we have in art mainly is not mushrooms.
We do not have mushroom images; what we have instead is branching messages, mushroom trees accompanied with just enough literal mushrooms simple Mushroom images, just enough of them to establish that yes these strange branching and cut branch mushroom trees are mushrooms but there is much much more to the story than that we are not showing you simply mushrooms.
Mushrooms, pictures of mushrooms, and even ingesting mushrooms, is merely just the message’s carrier wave, the envelope.
The payload message – the heart of the message, the real message, is not mushrooms now along the way yes along the way we will prove the truth:
There are mushrooms all throughout normal, real Christianity, against Carl “Dr. Secret” Ruck, who tries to cut apart mushrooms from real, normal Christianity.
The real way that we will know the proof that mushrooms are proved, is by proving something even more, and something more specific than merely the sheer presence of mushrooms.
In order to prove that less important fact (there are mushrooms in normal real Christianity), we have to do something much more profound and recognize that these are not merely Mushrooms; these are specifically Branching Mushrooms, I emphasize again that …
branching Mushroom Trees together with non-Branching Serpents with legs added, expressing Branching verses nonbranching.
That is the revelation of our nature as controllers revealed in the loose cognitive state from the psilocybin mushrooms, which are explicitly not secretly, not Covertly, not veiled, but explicitly, openly, publicly depicted and emphatically communicated, not in texts, which nobody can read, but in art pictures, which everybody reads.
Who cares about texts?!; nobody reads.
These artist do not want to stop communication; they want to do communication.
Hatsis’ limited thinking would argue:
The proof and the evidence, the compelling evidence that these cannot be mushrooms in Christian art, is because they have anomalous branching.
in fact they emphasize that.
Added branching & non-branching elements is the primary stylization of what we have in these mushroom-like shapes that prevents them from actually being mushrooms.
The primary stylization that we have is that these mushroom shapes have added branching, which makes them no longer mushrooms, and have added cut branch motifs.
The Egodeath theory, my theory, explains “analogical psychedelic Eternalism and dependent control”, and how that mental transformation happens when loose cognition through Psilocybin to transform our legs that we stand on from dancing or standing on our left leg (unstable) vs right leg basis (stable).
Our {left leg} is branching thinking, where are you picture that your thoughts move your control thoughts into the future our steering among branching possibilities into an open, nonexistent future, so that you become the creator of your future.
Our mind is transformed by mushrooms’ loosened cognitive association binding.
Psilocybin Eucharist loosens to transform our mental model of control-steering within possibility branching in the world through time.
The actual message of the mushrooms, the non-mushroom mushroom shapes because in Christian art they add the add anomalous branching.
The actual message, the actual –
What we have evidence for is not merely mushrooms, but rather, a peak religious experiencing message.
These pictures communicate instructions to us through non-literary means appropriate for…
The primary communication medium is art, not text,
In a non-literate society, these non-Mushroom – or mushroom plus these mushroom plus images mushrooms plus branching and cut branches, serve to communicate instructions on how to to things how to avoid loss of control and maintain stable self control, like your right foot on a column base-
so much retaining control, that you are able to touch God’s sword blade edge with your left limb and cut off your branching-dependent, branching-based thinking about personal control agency power across time.
Explicit branching mushrooms, which we have throughout normal mainstream real, NOT deviant secret counter-Christian art, serves to communicate the twofold thing:
not merely to communicate “mushrooms”, but specifically, much more, far more profoundly, and far more specifically, how to use mushrooms to do two things, or while doing one thing while avoiding or gaining the other:
How to retain stable control, and gain transformed mental model or spiritual regeneration.
“spiritual” essentially meaning, fundamental to our concept of what we are and how the world works, how the world is structured, and how we as personal control agents are structured within that world that spread across time.
The mushroom pictures are depicted with branching features, to communicate to us not merely the sheer use mushrooms, but rather, much more profoundly, and totally way more to the point- the point is not mushrooms; the point is:
Using mushrooms to induce loose cognitive association binding, to enable the mind to perceive & probe how its control system works, and perceive a different experience and a different model of time, a different experience and model of control, and then transform the mental model, as if to see through Eve’s flesh standing to the right of the Plaincourault tree; how to see through her temporary surface flesh that may be burned off like the salamander roasting burns away the surface initial thinking, which is in terms of branching possibilities and a control agent who steers supposedly through the supposedly branching off possibilities.
The mental model is transformed from- to give the formula:
using mushrooms to induce loose cognitive association binding, to enable the mind to perceive & probe, test & observe how its control system works, and perceive a different experience and a different model of time, a different experience and model of control, and then transform the mental model –
as if to see through Eve’s flesh standing to the right of the Plaincourault tree, how to see through her temporary surface flesh, that is burned off like the salamander roasting burns away the surface initial thinking, which is in terms of branching possibilities and a control agent who steers supposedly through the supposedly branching possibilities.
and the mental model is transformed from to give the formula formulaicly
formulaic expression meant the mushroom Trees with Branching features depict and
these trees are firm nonbranching and they negate Branching
the explicit branching-message mushroom trees communicate that branching thinking equals death and going unstable and losing control and not being a viable control agent; whereas in contrast, by learning a new way of thinking, we learn the non-branching way of thinking about control personhood and possibility branching in the world.
The message of the mushroom trees that contain nonbranching serpent or a long non-Branching Mushroom stem that you hang by your right leg from in order to touch – cut off – your branching thinking and no longer depend on it is:
mental model transformation in the loose cognitive association state that’s induced by psilocybin mushrooms, from the mental model of:
literalist, ordinary state (which is tight cognitive binding), possibility Branching, with autonomous control ;
to:
analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control with future control thoughts being a single set of thoughts already existing cast in stone in the future like a brass bronze rigid snake shaped world line frozen into the block universe
See the Stanford Ency Phil site article about philosophy of time, contrasting possibilism versus Eternalism – but then add the two, commensurate versions of personal control: autonomous control steering in a possibilism world, versus dependent control (Jesus’ “narrow way/path”) frozen in eternalism.
The deluded way of the world is broad in fact it’s branching into open possibilities.
The way of Jesus is narrow and fixed and monocoursal and pre-given, which means loss of control – at least, loss of egoic pseudo-autonomous control, but a new form of control, involving trust in the creator of your preset, pre-given, personal control thoughts that are lying ahead on the worldline and you have no power to steer away from them, but have to trust, just as the control thought creator and source already brought you this far, and you have no choice anyway but to depend on them
You are given a new stable control; you are fished out by the fisher of men; you are fished out from your egoic point of view of your steering agency , and you are forcibly given a new mind from outside of your system.
reframe all personal actions as passive tense: receiving salvation; receiving a new model; being given a return to stable self-control; being rescued; being lifted up – all passive-tense of wording.
You do not rescue yourself; the Savior, uncontrollable higher Controller X rescues you and gives you a new mind.
Just like God gives you and leads you to through a snake-shaped course of your life brings you to the mushroom, brings you to ingest the cognitive loosening agent, and you have no choice over that from a metaphysical point of view.
How do you trust; rather, how are you given trust.
Not how do you generate and muster up ; it’s not a matter of you inventing the ability to trust.
The Savior gives you trust, and causes you to become stable and avoid catastrophic control loss of control seizure from your being made to test and probe and put on trial your system of personal control now that you are able to probe and test and override and violate and break , and cause your control system to fail – be made to cause your control system to fail, the spear of vulnerability in the right side giving new birth.
Probe and test and make fail and observe the personal control systemand in this loose cognitive associations state that is from the salvific psilocybin mushroom Eucharist which causes rebirth into a new restructured world as a new restructured person.
Lifted Garment Indicates the Psychedelic Altered State
Probing the loosened personal control system and being able to observe it and override and bypass it and make it fail to put the blade through the two smiling cybercide guys with the right foot on the stable base
the lifted garment John Rush the lifted garment theme exactly matches Dionysus’ Victory Procession mosaic and also the many lifted-garment images in the Canterbury comic book novel by the Eidwine group, art picture motif identified by John Rush as indicating the (loose cognitive) altered state explained by me in full, complete detail, completely explained.
Why don’t we have a written letter in text from the Eadwine group? They were literate.
Why did Eadwine not write in the illuminated manuscript “all normal real Christians these days by definition ingest the Eucharist, which is psilocybe mushrooms”?
The Eucharist is primarily and normally Psilocybe.
Amanita is an honorary pseudo-Psilocybin, but is known to be third-rate when anyone who gathers their collection of hunting mushrooms and they will then sort their mushrooms into first rate and third rate.
Give the third rate Amanita to the low value slave the low ranking slave.
and give the desirable first rate mushrooms to the head of the household the king give the good mushrooms the king and then
Used mandrake in the off-season when you don’t have the desirable type of mushrooms in the off-season mandrake scopolamine deliverance as a lesser rate I don’t know if it’s second rate or fourth rate.
Applying the same principle from art to text:
Realistic principle of art: any entheogen in art represents the use of respect for and knowledge of the entire set of all visionary plants.
Similarly, the presence of visionary plants in text, the presence of a specific visionary plant in text is evidence for the use of all visionary plants, whatever is available and ready to hand.
Implicitly suggests that we read art instances of visionary plants in the same way this way we break the firm division just like the Canterbury Psalter with the 75 mushroom trees which fail to be mushroom trees, because they have, in the self-defeating fashion, after drawing the mushrooms, the artist added branches, destroying the right mushroom shape, in order to add the real point of what to do with the mushroom, or what change results from the mushroom is:
transformed mental consciousness about branching, about control, about possibility branching across time, and whether or not we can steer, and how to avoid loss of control, and regain a new mode of control for a revealed nonbranchjng reality based understanding of the world, a new structure, a new configuration of control power that accommodates the non-branching experience.
– Cybermonk
The Egodeath theory 