In the past day or two I came up with a general concept of framing the two articles and the art database relating the two articles to each other and to the database in one scheme one framing scheme I came up with was
that the first article is theory and the second article is applied that doesn’t work that doesn’t make sense that does not accurately describe the actual content or the process that was used in actuality the first article was packed filled with application and it was in fact I wouldn’t even say application driven it was driven by applied theory and so if I call the first article theory I would the theory of interpreting and the theory of debating and critiquing end of building arguments and of examining explicitly Presupposition matrices
and revealing explicitly making explicit what the implicit premises are it’s a theory of that that is proper theory but but the first article was never ever abstract theory cyber disciple helped me too construct the engine the theory engine of it being the division into techs versus art and literal versus stylized versus effects which I feared was missing I feel like cyber disciple kind of helped save the article as far as it achieving that goal of please lay out this
Brown asking me please lay out the theory of interpretation and what the word compelling means what the word evidence means what the word proof means and I was afraid that I am I took off running to describe and explain our images left and right I interpreted are images left and right and I was afraid that the article would fail to meet Dr. Brown’s basic essay requirements I was doing a great job of doing interpretation but I feared that I had not written anything actually about the theory of interpretation and then I really honestly I hate to say it but I really felt like cyber disciple saved the day for that stated mission, for the assignment requirement as stated in the specification the specification assignment was not to do interpretation but rather to explain interpretation this tells you the reality is that that article is 90% doing interpretation and yeah a lot of that is applying a particular system of premises in order to achieve consistent successful interpretation and so it’s more of a demonstration the article except for the engine that cyber disciple helped structure and helped identify aside from that it is far more
first article is really in essence is not talking about it’s not defining criteria and it is not defining proof and defining what is compelling how we are to judge compelling where I should write essays about explanatory coherence for example the fact that I can apply the same interpretation and expect certain themes in both Hellenistic and cross decode between Hellenistic or cross interpret between Hellenistic and Christian art
but that article doesn’t really go matter like that Dr. Brown specified that the article should go matter it should be a discussion of the techniques not just applying to techniques and doing interpretation but that’s what the article really is and was is it demonstrates the application of my ego the Theory a analogical Psychedelic Pre eternalism and dependent control to various art pieces to show how they can be consistently and a lot of the article is it does contain a lot of new breakthroughs big and small breakthroughs including for example I kind of went back to that article and added my photographs of the Amanita improved in the course of writing the article one of the many things that the article accomplishes as far as doing new successbut that article doesn’t really go matter like that Dr. Brown specified that the article should go matter it should be a discussion of the techniques not just applying to techniques and doing interpretation but that’s what the article really is and was is it demonstrates the application of my ego the Theory a analogical Psychedelic Pre eternalism and dependent control to various art pieces to show how they can be consistently and a lot of the article is it does contain a lot of new breakthroughs big and small breakthroughs including for example I kind of went back to that article and added my photographs of the Amanita improved in the course of writing the article one of the many things that the article accomplishes as far as doing new success
successful breakthroughs of interpretation one example is the Dionyse is victory parade procession mosaic of providing positive identification of what was previously in my head was merely a hypothesis that I was uncertain of was identifying the leopard drinking fountain as Amanita and I came to realize I could put my photographs my specimen photographs of the holy grail next to the multiple pictures that I added into the article multiple different photographs of the mosaic
and then I I don’t know when that happened if that happened before or after the Canterbury breakthrough or during probably during the Canterbury breakthrough but it is if I want to have an article where one of them is theory and the other is applied that is not what I have and I am not interested in writing brand new heavy heavy weight articles what I actually have in fact it just occurred to me and gave me the inspiration for starting this webpage that I have a beneficial the benefits Dr. Brown I have a beneficial different approach a different framing that is actually aligned with the real true nature of these two articles and it isn’tand then I I don’t know when that happened if that happened before or after the Canterbury breakthrough or during probably during the Canterbury breakthrough but it is if I want to have an article where one of them is theory and the other is applied that is not what I have and I am not interested in writing brand new heavy heavy weight articles what I actually have in fact it just occurred to me and gave me the inspiration for starting this webpage that I have a beneficial the benefits Dr. Brown I have a beneficial different approach a different framing that is actually aligned with the real true nature of these two articles and it isn’t
and it is an alignment with the actual process by which the second article was generated I mean like given birth given birth to and before getting bored getting pregnant pregnant and then giving birth just station the gestation of the second article
it is extremely significant and noteworthy that the actual character of what goes on in the first article is exactly the same as the nature of the second article both articles have about 5% or maybe 10% theory of interpretation but both articles or you can tell the written by the same mind because both articles are the same kind of stuff it is not the case that one article has one kind of thing they only are different scope they’re only different in which images they treat that’s really the only one that’s really the only real difference between the two articles
The mode the mode or nature and what is demonstrated in both articles is exactly the same and they both contain a bit of theory but both of them are far more driven by demonstration of the success and various breakthroughs along the way in real time as I wrote the two articles but the main point for this current webpage
is that the second article was literally born out of the first article and I mean the second article took shape like in the womb of a section within the first article the only reason I had to break out a second article was because that section became too big as the jackpot giant mountain of jackpot overloaded the first article and very quickly it became like 11 pages long section and so is Shirley for practical matters of of scaling the section length was the only reason I broke out the second article but the essence
character than nature the balance of 90% applied and 10% theory except it applied to the technique that I use and employ is the technique of applying a giant huge theory which is the core ego the theory and my work on rock lyrics which is the foundation for my missing theory mytheme Theory
so in fact the actual character of the content of the two articles is the same and and so for historical reasons and in terms of the nature of the the content it is very true to say that the second article is actually contained in the first article like imagine I’m not sure if it’s structured like this but where where was the second article born which section heading in the first article is the location or the section in which the second article had its gestation gestation of baby
then mentally picture the second article as fitting into a section of the first article that provides a far far more realistic and true to character description of the two articles like look at any of the applied demonstration sections of the first article not the cyber disciple section of laying out the categories of evidence but look at the more typical sections in the first article and recognize that the entire Plaincourault mean the entire the entire Canterbury article literally is simply the same exact kind of decoding that demonstrate the door interpretation techniquesthen mentally picture the second article as fitting into a section of the first article that provides a far far more realistic and true to character description of the two articles like look at any of the applied demonstration sections of the first article not the cyber disciple section of laying out the categories of evidence but look at the more typical sections in the first article and recognize that the entire Plaincourault mean the entire the entire Canterbury article literally is simply the same exact kind of decoding that demonstrate the door interpretation techniques
that are demonstrated all throughout the first article the second article in a very kind of literal way literally speaking the second article is a section a typical section of the first article that got so big it had to be be present it on a separate webpage but like other other than the sheer fact of size the second article can really literally and honestly be described as a section just a very big section of the first article it is not that the first article is theory and the second article is applied both articles are 90% applied and 10% theory except unless you count the ego the theory itself is being massive in which case it would
from that point of you I guess you could say like if the Egodeath Theory it’s self is a kind of a theory of interpretation which I guess it is ha ha then we could say maybe that both articles are 50% theory of interpretation and 50% demonstration of the theory both articles are equally all-around equally him in both directions are equally characterized their equally characterized as theory and applied
I will then revisit the question of the the title of the first article imagine that the title of the first article should include the scope of the second article like literally picture what should be the title of the first article if imagine that I move the second article back to where it used to be to be a section within the first article like a big I don’t know how many pages 20 page section of the main article like imagine if I move which I don’t really plan to do but
This app keeps on alternating between losing my text and then recovering my text again and I never know what’s going on
The eagle theory is a theory of interpreting well at least the missing portion phase 2 portion of the ego the theory is exactly already what Dr. Brown’s assignment says to do oh I remember against his assignment scope well I it’s not against the scope it’s my interpretation method is precisely to go beyond his premise and I answer him
dr. Brown here is the best technique to interpret the question of mushrooms and Christian art is to interpret and analyze Hellenistic art he wants to know what are the rules for interpreting the Dr. Brown database of art by which he means Christian art with mushrooms and my answer to him the answer is don’t limit it to Christian add Hellenistic and add the ego to theory of the Stanford articledr. Brown here is the best technique to interpret the question of mushrooms and Christian art is to interpret and analyze Hellenistic art he wants to know what are the rules for interpreting the Dr. Brown database of art by which he means Christian art with mushrooms and my answer to him the answer is don’t limit it to Christian add Hellenistic and add the ego to theory of the Stanford article
on the two models of time possible of them and eternal of them and then add what the ramifications for the two models of control and this is not I’m not saying that this was the historical trajectory that I used I’m just saying this is one way of looking at the current resulting model
and so given these considerations that effective proper compelling interpretation of mushrooms in Christian Mark requires that you analyze side-by-side Hellenistic art and apply the ego the theory of an illogical psychedelic eternal isn’t and dependent control instead of literalist ordinary state possibilism possibility Branching with autonomous control and transforming from one to the other by Luz cognitive Association from Psilocybe and Mushrooms Luz cognitive Association binding that is my answer when he asked me what
How do we assess compelling proof and evidence for Mushrooms in christian art and now without realization that the second article is contained within the first article and that the whole compound article is the instructions to his art database but I tell him he hast to include Hellenistic art he’s not doing proper interpretation of the evidence appropriately unless he includes Hellenistic
and we can remind key words: mixed wine & Mushroom trees
so although I keep tending to think of the article the giant compound article consisting of both webpages I tend to keep thinking of it as it’s 90% applied and 10% theory but that’s not true given that my my little theory that I’m applying to many many examples is actually a gigantic Theory called the Egodeath Theory the specifically the mytheme Decoding portion phase 2 of the ego the theory bolstered by phase 1 that is my explanation of appropriate emphasis on appropriate measures of what makes a theory compellingso although I keep
tending to think of the article the giant compound article consisting of both webpages I tend to keep thinking of it as it’s 90% applied and 10% theory but that’s not true given that my my little theory that I’m applying to many many examples is actually a gigantic Theory called the Egodeath Theory the specifically the mytheme Decoding portion phase 2 of the ego the theory bolstered by phase 1 that is my explanation of appropriate emphasis on appropriate measures of what makes a theory compelling
which interpretation is compelling how do we know the interpretation or that we have compelling evidence or that we have prove the answer is essentially the ego the theory is the answer now take given that given go back and ask what should be the title of the article which is the instructions on the expanded Dr. Brown database which has been corrected against his error it has been corrected to enable convincing persuasive evidence by adding Hellenistic art and analyzing the true dick cross cross interpreting and cross critiquing interpretive theories across Christian and Hellenistic art now go and tweak the title of the first article
to make it non-neutral(?) we can see that when we attach the database to the article and then when we attach the second article into we restore the second article back into the first article we can then see that the real nature the real title of the first article should be what
Given this article and it’s contained second article and applying mytheme theory from the Egodeath Theory and serving us instructions on how to use the art database expanded our database then what is the title of the first article?
how much more of an announcement here is well I guess you could say I am now announcing what the criteria turned out to be it’s it’s it’s now retrospective the article title has the shift to become retrospective how did we positively assess mushrooms how did we positively identify the leopard fountain as Amanita how did we accomplish what were the criteria that succeeded at definitively interpreting the Plaincourault fresco redo the title to be a retrospective announcement here is that interpretation that we used to solve the problem including every example in the first article and the entire G of the second article including the whole Canterbury comic book as part
I have the first article
part of the first article
The Egodeath theory 