Voice transcription quick idea
for one thing there are different inclination assumptions of what when we say the word interpreting Hatsis always thinks we mean interpreting plaincrawled and he wants to force the argument to only be an argument only about interpreting Plaincourault he wants to stop and prevent interpretations of other mushroom trees him the more he feels he thinks that the more that we limit our interpretation of what we are trying to interpret the more that we neroli limited to plane corral the better so he’s trying hard he’s trying very hard to narrow and reduce the scope of what we are interpreting
in contrast Dr. Brown is completely inclined to set the scope and range as being all mushroom trees all of them not with hand and Dr. Brown does not want to put any special focus on plane corral Dr. Brown wants to follow the historical criteria number one the top most historical criteria according to the top historian who is a historian of Art Irwin Panofsky who tells who’s trying to yell at Tom how to saying the number one historical Criteria for Plaincourault is it is not unique it is not unique did you hear me it is not unique Plaincourault is in no way special that’s principal number one the top most Estás
top most topmost number one historical criteria for interpreting Plaincourault is that first of all above all other historical Criteria Thomas Hatsis is that plane crawl is in no way unique in no way special and you are totally unjustified and ignoring the number one historical criteria from the number one top art historian who is a historian a real historian
pan up Panofsky told you Tom hatters stop pretending that plane crawled is unique the number one historical criteria according to the number one top historian is trying to tell Hatteras you are directly in error contradicting the top historical criteria which is above all plain cruel is utterly not unique or special in anyway it is exactly typical it is not a typical it is typical that is historical criteria number one according to the historian number one the top criterion from the top historian is that there is nothing at all special adult Plaincourault it is not a typical it is typical
therefore you are profoundly without any excuse or basis for striving to frame plaincrawled as unique when it is the exact opposite of being unique so there is absolutely no justification and you have no excuse at all for trying to force the field to be restricted to only interpreting Plaincourault Panofsky says we have to do not single out playing crawled like you’re trying to do but rather that we must do what Dr. Brown does Panofsky says that Dr. Brown is correct in interpreting the entire set of all mushroom trees and that has it is extremely incorrect in trying to isolate Plaincourault as if it is a tip A typical when in fact the historical criteria number one above all other criteria is the principle that plane crawled is typical rather than unique therefore I shall firmly state here
in full agreement with Dr. Brown’s when we talk about interpreting when we say just the isolated word interpret, we follow the top art historian in discussing interpreting the scope of interpretation is by definition the correct scope of interpretation is all mushroom trees, not singling out Plaincourault.
The original motivation for this webpage was a quick note originally I didn’t have any funny names for the roller derby team that puts forth the interpretation of art historian Panofsky I called them the art historians but there are three names now
the presupposes Presupposers and the question beggars and now also I am adding the popes
the name of their team is the poops the popes sorry apologies for voice transcription errors
the Popes interp = Brinckmann Panofsky wasson
dr. Brown has published a question:
why does the the team called the witches ally with the team called the popes
what a strange alliance between the team called the witches and the team called the popes.
why does the witch Hatsis act like he is a flunky a henchmen for the pope
why is Thomas how to say henchmen for the pope who is competing against Mushrooms and trying to do a cover-up story to cover up the mushrooms are the real deal and that the pope is an imposter
why is the witches in collusion with the pups??
The Egodeath theory 