Egodeath Mystery Show Chock Full o Clever Laffs
there are so many good little short clips buried in these two-hour long episodes
Last night I was again reading aloud my March 2003 posting defining the Maximal entheogen theory of religion, and it turns out that I *did* integrate the mytheme theory, *but* because of my focus at the time, I extremely emphasized ahistoricity of founder figured as my example of “myth is analogy describing experiences in the altered state”, not my 2006 or 2020 catalog of mythemes like {snake, tree, rock}, which was very thin and still just had the character of “initial early tentative hypothesis yet to be proved/ confirmed”, rather than fluent mastery of the language of Mythemese at the time, in 2003.
well this is working out pretty well because I was starting to ask in the past couple of days when am I going to discuss the relevance of the Allegro Interlocked Taboo Pair of the subject of {Jesus didn’t exist or Big Bang versus gradual confluence theories of the formation of the Jesus figure} which we must it is required for us to do drug policy reform
it is required that we be expert at debating and discussing these interconnected topics tangled locked
The bad guys in the status quo think that they have us trapped and locked because we cannot alter any one piece of their false puzzle because we would have to alter all of the rest of the pieces of their false puzzle and
they think we’re too stupid and don’t have the balls to call bullsht on every one of their fake puzzle’s pieces all at the same time
they think that they have everyone in an interlock trap because nobody has the imagination like allegro did to challenge more than one presumption Presupposition Simultaneously in conjunction in an integrated way
This is an aspect of Allegro that we have to discuss aspect number three – not only mushrooms; not only no historical Jesus; but rather, specifically, the fact that Allegro combined these two positions/ interpretations in conjunction.
we have to discuss combining multiple fields’ alternative positions in conjunction, like Allegro did. this is and it’s brought in general form the allegro move regardless of which topics we are talking about we have to do an Allegra move we have to follow allegros lead and do a multi field integrated shift of imagining new propositions across more than one field stop arguing only as if intelligence is an isolated field and that our interpretations strictly reside within a hermetically sealed off, isolated field of visionary plants , completely separated from the field of mythology which Dr. Ruck’s teaches each roller derby team interpretation each interpretation of Mushroom Imagery and christian art Simultaneously Involved
what is your interpretation
please state – your homework assignment essay:
please state what is your interpretation of mythology,
Tom Hatsis the Witches
the Salvation Salesmen
Dr. Secret and
the Monks
these four interpretations of mushroom imagery in art simultaneously interlock with:
what is your interpretation your teams interpretation of mythology
like look at the great historian Tom Hatsis on every other Thursday, he holds the position – he is also a theologian regarding Eve and the serpent, and that is the real message of the Fresco – *not* nonbranching and revealing Eve’s underlying reality of the eternalism model of time and control, which
the Monks assert the latter interpretation within the interlocked field of mythology and of course theology, because as Tom Hatsis has pointed out, you cannot interpret the fresco without also bringing a proper theology Interpretation.
and so you have to be an exemplary historian of theology, following in the footsteps of the great Tom Hatsis, who explains the meaning, the real meaning and intention of the fresco through Interpretations in multiple Interlocked Fields – and mycology is not one of those relevant fields, according to the team interpretation from the Witches.
We need to discuss this aspect of Allegro that nobody discusses, because the entheogen scholars are too blind and stupid, like Clark Heinrich 1996 was blind and stupid, like John Lash blind and stupid and ignorant, saying that allegro “infamously” asserted that Jesus used mushrooms.
Have you considered taking a quick look at Allegro’s book to see what his position is, dumbasses, before you open your mouth and confirm what everyone suspected, that you have no clue what the hell you’re talking about?
I just heard from Egodeath Mystery Show episode 103B 1:05:00, a really quick impromptu riff on “John allegro does Buddhism”:
I described what what his story would be if you transfer his historical recounting from Christianity to Buddhism, including the Buddhist version of the Plaincourault Fresco, which indicates that in the Japanese Middle Ages, this image provides strong proof that everybody had a dim distant memory of what they had forgotten, which they still vividly remembered, which is proof that they had forgotten, and so therefore by that point in history they had completely forgotten the original Amanita Buddhist cult where Buddha didn’t exist, and the original generation of Buddhist were a secret Amanita cult, but the later Buddhist had forgotten, that as proved by the mid-period Buddhism painting of the Amanita mushroom tree, proving that they remembered that they had forgotten early in their history that they had originally used “THE MUSHROOM” 🍄
Someone better let him know that author that Chris Bennett is dunking on who wrote that relatively recent book about entheogens in Buddhist history
Mike Crowley? or am I getting the names mixed up again?
I have transcended mere facts and factual correctness, I have become, like Ken Wilber, trans-rational 😑
dammit now because I hastened to make a joke first, I forgot my great point I was going to make 😡
egodeath Mystery show episode 102 I think is where I spoke a lot about Theory no data is the rebound when we interpret the evidence this concept of the so-called evidence there is no evidence without interpretation all evidence is interpretation bound what presuppositions and what premises do you covertly
or explicitly bring to the so-called evidence so I became intensely skeptical about the evidence if you according to the article for Dr. Brown in the title I hated the title because the title condoned looking at the evidence or thinking about the evidence from the default Interpretation I said goddamnit this is not fair because as soon as you say the word evidence instantly the default presuppositions system clamps on and so you don’t even get a chance to provide a different interpretation the so-called Evidence
is in practice very very forcefully clamped around it covertly they say they’re handing you the evidence but what they are actually handing you and discussing is the evidence with their invisible default deceptive and convert Presupposition matrix wrapped around each piece of evidence
and every time I read aloud the article titled the original title my gut was sick because I could obviously tell what was guaranteed to happen is it as soon as you mentally picture the so-called piece of evidence like a plain cruel fresco mushroom tree for example instantly it is already pre-interpreted for us by the default covert implicit Presupposition matrix
so then the problem in changing the title of the article to defensively weaponize it
you have to put on the roller derby rink armor for the dust up the combative unfair biased as hell dirty real world battle of interpretations which in which you are guaranteed instant defeat because the match is already pre-decided and I call bullshit on Dr. Brown’s assignment so to speak but his assignment is guaranteed to fail it’s guaranteed to lose ahead of time
UNLESS special defensive measures are vigorously applied so that the enemy Interpretation will suffer instant death and instant came over instead of the default which happens every single time which is that the Challenger the Challenger is given every handicap and disadvantage is loaded onto the challenging team and then the winning the reigning team is given every single advantage including they get to prepackage the so-called evidence with the covert transparent secret bias pre-baked into it into the so-called evidence but what we are given in fact
we are not given the evidence we are not given the Dr. Brown database of art what we are given is the evidence with a secret covert hidden transparent dirty cheating pre-interpretation that’s guaranteed to mean instant game over for the challenging upstart interpretation across multiple fields and so the correct discussion of interpretation must begin as it kind of does in my article the first thing you have to say in the article as I reject your bullshit pre-framed
default pseudo Evidence what you guys are pretending to be the data under evaluation is fraudulent
you’re not giving us the mushroom art images what you are in fact giving us is your predefined covertly sneaky that the judges have already decided in the favor of the reigning team they have already welded around each piece of evidence they have welded a whole system of preset interpretations all covered and sneaky and dishonest and cheating and unfair across four different fields and so when I enter
so the correct approach is to enter the room for debate to enter the debate room
the only correct approach to fulfill Dr. Brown’s assignment is that the first word of the title of the submission of our teams Interpretation
the title must declare that we have already won and put forth our specific interpretation and
I refuse to write a generic article for Dr. Brown that is neutral and toothless and guaranteed to lose because because it is simply neutral and simply fair and simply rational
but the world that we live in it’s none of those things
it is a mud wrestling
brown he says he doesn’t want to do mud wrestling
well welcome to the mud wrestling pit Dr. Brown
that’s the reality where we are and
I have to rewrite the title make slight tiny changes to the article
I have to revise the title to aggressively fight back against this mud wrestling world that we actually live in
the world does not need a neutral reasonable toothless guaranteed to fail assessment of how to fairly assess evidence that will be of equal use by every competing team in the roller derby
I refuse to put forth a neutral system of fair judgment that is guaranteed to lose because the world of debate is the opposite of fair
I will indeed fulfill the homework assignment of specifying a rational and fair system of the evaluation
but the main emphasis of the article of necessity Hass to be 100% biased in favor of my team and
our interpretation are very very specific interpretation of all across all four fields Field and
then as a subsection within that article I will deliver the assignment of the fair assessment of how to compare for Competing Interpretation systems across for field
but the title of the article must announce that we have one and we’re not going to take it any more of your bunk fraudulent pre-packaging of the so-called evidence and then
what we are given is not the evidence but instead we are given a very heavy-handed and yet very invisible default deceptive pre-interpretation across for interlock fields well our title analysis we are here to shatter that move like
I enter the debate room and I loudly proclaim:
“you’re not going to get away with it this time, your covert presuppositions
we’re calling you out
I am exposing you right here I am stating the heart of the specific interpretation right now
my article is biased as hell to guarantee that you have already lost”
i’m taking your dirty moves which would cause me to instant lise, instant game over
and I’m announcing that it is instant game over for you , because of non branching comprehension recognition in the art
because we are here to talk about depictions designed to communicate non-branching and expose you guys and expose your fraudulent pre-interpreted evidence because surprise! mofos , we are announcing from the very title of our article that
the truth is non-Branching
and that non-Branching depictions in art are the proof that you guys are already the losers and that it
today no more of your instant game over for us
today I’m announcing that due to non-Branching Revelation, it is game over for *you*!
for your team’s fraudulent Sudo Interpretations, your sleazy pre-pre-interpretation of the evidence, that dirty move
I am announcing in my sentence number one in the very title of my submission
I am announcing that it’s game over for you , because I’m calling out your bullsht of your pre-interpreted fake evidence that’s not even the evidence
you’re trying to substitute the evidence for pre-interpreted pseudo-Evidence
and I’m announcing right there in the title
it is impossible for you make for you to make your usual one and only dirty move that you always try to do
you have failed, you have already achieved game over – FOR YOUR COVERT PRE-INTERPRETATION NETWORK, exposed right out of the gate, before I even sit down in my seat, losers!
and make it pre-biased in my favor instead of it being the only other alternativeand every time I read aloud the article titled the original title my gut was sick because I could obviously tell what was guaranteed to happen is it as soon as you mentally picture the so-called piece of evidence like a plain cruel fresco mushroom tree for example instantly it is already pre-interpreted for us by the default covert implicit Presupposition matrix so then the problem in changing the title of the article to weapon eyes it and make it pre-biased in my favor instead of it being the only other alternative
if I don’t pre-bias and weapon eyes and pre-package the piece of evidence what is guaranteed to happen is that the status quo default unconscious Presupposition matrix interpretation will automatically be applied and I will suffer instant death game over before it is even started it is impossible to even put forward my interpretation because the default is so forceful and so unconscious so I had to retitle the article to be extremely biased in my favor and break their mental habit
and I needed to make that title not one isolated field I had to make the title cover for different fields here is my interpretation across four fields not one
The Egodeath theory 