7:46 AM day after Easter April 18, 2022
Hatsis argues that the church authorities are proved to not censor out visionary plants, because they permitted printing the words ‘Mandrake’; scopolamine plants, and other visionary plants.
Hatsis argues that Christians did not use mushrooms*, and we know that, because the word ‘Mushrooms’ does not appear in Christian writings.
*warning: Whenever Hatsis says the word ‘mushrooms’ in the context of Christian history, he always means and assumes exclusively Amanita.
He has explicitly said as much to me (personal correspondence) where he said (in an inarticulate way) psilocybin is “anachronism”, thus is of zero relevance to the argument.
I think his email is in my idea development page 13 or maybe 12 for the exact quote; search this site for ‘anachronistic’.
Hatsis says we know that the church authorities did not censor out mentions of visionary plants, because they permitted writing about some specific visionary plants.
My retort is, I am insulting plants dismissively, other than psilocybin.
I spit on cannabis [theory] and 🍄 & scopalamine plants; hard pass, thank you very much.
I insult and condemn Mandrake as being merely a deliriant hallucinogen mind scrambling; not sufficiently targeting loose cognitive association.
I put down wine alcohol.
I put down Daphne and whatever the hell weird random plants are mentioned in order to dilute our focus on the one real plant that actually matters: the 250 species of Psilocybin mushrooms.
Here’s an interesting idea:
You know my phrase the “anything but drugs” explanation and you know my phrase the “anything but mushrooms” explanation.
Well here’s a new phrase for you, 8:18 AM April 18, 2022 new phrase, which is always cause for celebration.
I am all about inventing phrases.
That is how I made my big breakthrough of January 1988, it was through concept labels, a certain technology for communication cybernetics communication about control, by inventing turns of phrase and labeling them with an acronym for speed fast efficient usage.
New phrase announcement:
Anything But Psilocybin [ABP]
new concept label:
the Anything But Psilocybin theory
the Anything But Psilocybin explanation
so therefore we know the reason why the word ‘mushroom’ doesn’t appear in Christendom’s texts, it’s not because of censorship like a McKenna type of persecution of the mushroom use, where the big bad church totally stomped out all entheogen explicit mentions in texts and all usage of Psilocybin as the Eucharist.
Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 119a near 2:30:00 (= end) + into the start of Episode 119b – the Church’s/ the Salvation Salesmen’s agenda:
keep mushrooms, (especially psilocybin mushrooms) non-explicit in texts, re: the Eucharist.
Hatsis says therefore the real reason we have ‘Eucharist’ but not ‘mushrooms’ in texts of Christendom is that people did not use mushrooms* at all.
*by which he of course stupidly thinks Amanita, being oblivious to the real, relevant type, which is Psilocybin instead.
People in Christendom are allowed to discuss only the ineffective plants; they are allowed to discuss wine, and cannabis, and scopolamine, and even ineffective Amanita.
but people in texts are not permitted by the Establishment (Salvation Salesmen & Meditation Hucksters) to explicitly discuss/mention Psilocybin mushrooms, because that, specifically, is the real Eucharist; Psilocybin mushrooms (250 species) is the one type of visionary plant which is actually effective, so that is why it is the one, specific type of visionary plants that explicit mentions of is mostly missing from the texts of Christendom.
The Salvation Salesmen are not competing against scopolamine (so those texts were allowed); they are competing consciously and strategically against the real Eucharist, which is a Psilocybin Mushrooms (so those text were not allowed this is why we have selective explicit visionary plant words in the Christendom’s Texts and
where we would expect to see mushrooms explicitly mentioned in the text what we have in place of that is the word Eucharist instead and so what we have is in text we have the word Eucharist and in art we have branching message mushroom trees which combined distinctive features of four types of psychoactive Mushrooms defined by Eadwine in the Great Canterbury Psalter:
Token presence of amanita, 🍄 is barely represented in gcp Psalter, because everyone who knows mushrooms knows that I am an idiot has the lowest effectiveness.
Above, voice dictation translated the word ‘Amanita’ to the word “I am an idiot”.
Amanita, liberty cap, Panaeolus , and Cubensis: these are the four plants types which God created.
That’s why Wassen and the field of the bunk field of the cover-up operation field of “ethno-mycology” serves the purpose of steering conversation away from the real, effective Eucharist, which is psilocybin mushrooms.
The big bad church actually tried to steer people away from explicitly discussing mushrooms in texts including Amanita, but it was psilocybin in particular that they had to steer people away from
That’s why we have substitute entheogen fake Scholarship locking us in orbit around amanita forever, to prevent us from getting all the way to the goal, which is psilocybin mushrooms, the true Eucharist, which is effective at transforming the mind, pneumatic spiritual redemption.
Redemption is free, just costing possibility-branching thinking.
2:04:00 Egodeath Mystery Show episode 119a : more commentary about how our Gordon Wasson revised Panofsky’s cover story to change it from Italian Pines which fails for three reasons that I identified fails
so Wasson picked a more vague and region-appropriate “Palestine tree type of a vague mythical form” and says that that is what the England Mushroom tree painters were struggling to depict in a stylized way in all of their mushroom trees
it is quite a major deviation from Panofsky’s cover story version 1, which is obviously post-hoc data plucking of obviously picking Italian Umbrella Pines aka Stone pine, purely for the reason that it was the most mushroom-looking shape that he could find.
But Wasson listened to my podcast episodes and realized what a flimsy, incoherent, and unconvincing cover story that is.
So Wasson replaced it by version 2 cover story that was strategically vague like Wason does, and strategically cocky and pompous posturing, with great officiousness and heavy, heavy Authoritarian writing style, pompous and filled with self-assured attitude, as a con-artist bluff, revising Panofskys Story,
in wasson’s later quotation which is in Samorini one of his two articles, quotes wasson telling his later version 2 cover story, which contradicts and deviates from Panofsky’s Brinkman cover-up story.
Wasson change the story from “southern Italy Italian pines” to vague “Palestinian mythical tree type” to address my three objections that
I laughed at Wason’s face at the ludicrous preposterous cover story of southern Italy Italian pines being the target of all mushroom trees – an obvious post-hoc fabricated cover story flimsy cover story.
So Wasson solved that problem by putting forth a more vague and region-appropriate “Palestinian garden of Eden tree type”
and tells us with extremely pompous total self assurance and very authoritarian way of writing
wasson tells us the revised cover story that as every idiot art student knows,
as every idiot art student knows
garden of Eden Trees follow a well-known well established tradition (we authorities know and so you amateurs need to butt out and stop asking questions, because we already have this all under control and handled).
as every C- art student perfectly well knows, but you mycollegests are idiots you mycologists mycology professionals are idiots and ignorant and uninformed.
I point out in this episode of Egodeath Mystery Show how Wason is always falling over himself to gravely insult and deeply insult the mycologists and tries to stop them from any coverage of “ethno-mycology”
he’s always calling mycollegests ignorant idiots who don’t even know what every freshman art student knows perfectly well, that every mushroom tree of course is meant to represent specifically the garden of Eden trees in Palestine.
and the reason you don’t agree with me is that you as a professional narrow-minded mycologist are so ignorant, that you don’t even know what every single freshman C- student of art history Knows that obviously, every mushroom tree is intended to represent the garden of Eden tree, which is of a well-known Palestinian tree type.
A hazy, mythical, highly variable non-specific, except that I am dubbing it by a specific totally vague name, “Palestinian tree type” and every single halfwit 50-IQ art student knows this perfectly well, so shut up and mind your own narrowed professional mycology business, and stop asking questions, and stop presuming to step into my turf , that I have invented, called “ethno-mycology”.
– the Father of Ethno-Mycology, aka stop asking questions about this plane corralled, it is none of your business, and you mycologists are not allowed to discuss Plaincourault in your Narrow field which I have narrowed, called Nero professional mycology;
be a professional and stop discussing Plaincourault within the field of mycology: this is unprofessional and inappropriate, so you need to stop asking questions about the mushroom tree in plaincrawled.
119a episode 2:06:00+
Poet Robert Graves as the Real “Father of Ethno-Mycology”; Wasson Failed to Credit Graves’ Discoveries
Egodeath Mystery Show episode 119a near 2:15:00
The banker faction the salvation Salesmen faction
the poets faction – Graves 1957
Research and review: what was the specific reason that Robert Graves was mad at Wasson for failing to give him credit?
the artists faction Who drew the Branching Message Mushroom Trees, indicating advanced Psilocybin expertise technique and comprehension full complete up to spiritual transformation from Possibility Branching mental Model to eternal pre-existing control thoughts non-branching model, of changing from {the king steering in the tree}, to {the snake frozen in rock}.
the mycologists faction Rolfe Ramsbottom Brightman
The art historian faction is the enemy of the artists faction, because the art historians are in cahoots with the Salvation Salesmen, Trying to cover up what the artists have revealed, and to try to spin the too-revealing phrase “Mushroom trees”.
spin doctors art historians are cover-up spin doctors afainst the message of the artists
The monks who drew the mushroom trees are allied with the poets and the mycology mycologists and the artists all asserting Psilocybin Eucharist for transformation redemption per the group of ideas which Elaine Pagles identified in her three books and which system was popularized by Timothy freak and Peter Gandy in their book the Jesus Mysteries who explain the two sets of views
in this episode, I said that the story begins in 1906 , the contention about Plaincourault and Mushrooms in Christianity
and now I say psilocybin in Christianity specifically
but really Elaine Pagles traces this old battle from the beginning of Christianity between exoteric versus esoteric
I am advocating generic typical definitive paradigmatic set of views that I am explicitly defining, including specifically Psilocybin mushrooms.
I am insulting and criticizing Amanita as being the official entheogens of the lying, exoteric, un-transformed non-transformed, lower, childish Christians entheogen is merely Amanita, which fails to transform.
and that’s why the establishment version of entheogen scholarship is a cover-up operation trying to prevent coverage of psilocybin and trying to sidetrack the investigation into ineffective Amanita Instead, as a fallback last-ditch effort to prevent conversation from reaching the target goal, of revealing that the Eucharist for esoteric high effective redemption, the effective redemptive Eucharist of Christ is psilocybin.
whereas in contrast, the lower, ineffective, non-transformative, pseudo-, children’s visionary plant entheogen is Amanita, which is (merely) Mr. Historical/Magic Jesus.
Jesus Salvation equals Amanita equals egoic possibility Branching thinking orthodox is Elaine Pagles term
‘exoteric’ is Timothy freak and Peter Gandys term and
the term of the ancient gnostics was ‘the Psychics’ to insult the lower type of Christians and explain them in terms of egoic possibility-branching delusion-premised moral control agency operating in a possibility-Branching world; king steering in a tree , goes to heaven or hell based on lower moral presupposition about the nature of good and evil.
whereas “eating of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” means gnosis/ esoteric/ the Pneumatics; Psilocybin.
Jesus vs. Christ = Amanita vs. Psilocybin = Exoteric vs. Esoteric = Orthodox vs. Gnostic = Salvation vs. Redemption[confirm per John Lash bk]
two competing Eucharist versions:
Jesus salvation exoteric orthodox Psychics equals Amanita.
Christ redemption esoteric gnostic Pneumatics equals Psilocybin.
The Egodeath theory 