i abandoned the idea of a v3.

v1 1:06:00 is poorer & longer, v2 46:00 is quite good & tight.

to hear the missing segment that I intended to add to v2 but got distracted, listen to the next episode: “Ep136 Third Foot”, starting 1:34:12, maybe main part starts 1:50:00 . info: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-Episode-126

no plan yet to make old episodes available.

I think it was the reading aloud next episode to hear my read aloud Brown’s question to me “where is my evidence what is my evidence that amanita in art means ingesting Psilocybin not Amanita” .

in my joke errata below, I wanted to include a mention: Panofsky calls any student who disagrees and any art historian who disagrees is implicitly smeared and slurred and defamed by Erwin Panofsky,

he is calling them, those who reveal the Mystery, he will impugn you as “some especially ignorant craftsman”.

so if you disagree with the (unfortunately) most influential (sorry to hear it) art historian Erwin Panofsky

and if you go against him and declare the truth and state the truth, which is that Mushroom Imagery Means Mushrooms then he says – he is announcing here in the letter to Wasson, he will smear and slur and defame you as a “some especially ignorant craftsman”.

You must conform to our professional standards and toe the line and tell the party BS fabricated false history.

you must comply; you must conform; you must assert our coerced conclusion.

iirc, in the next episode, i read my initial assertion *after* reading my final explanation that I immediately composed and sent to Professor Brown, invented on the spot, just like Hatsis “easily explaining away” and inventing specious arguments (aka “sound, tried-a-true historical criteria”, aka dogmatically just make sht up) one by one to dismiss each instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art –

remember, it only counts if hatsis makes up a rule on the spot, pulled out of his ass on a case by case basis as needed, that now suddenly it only counts if it’s what Thomas Hatsis, the greatest historian of all time, deems to be “devotional”.

see, you didn’t know , but we are strictly exclusively now talking only about devotional art.

art images in devotional documents, only.

that’s the new rule you have to follow because I just now made it up to save my pathetic failing case

and the salamander bestiary does not meet my brand new criteria I just made up two seconds ago, called “only ‘devotional literature‘ counts”.

therefore I have easily explained away your mushroom in Christian Art yet again

Also please note that your Canterbury Psalter doesn’t count either, because it doesn’t meet my theological criteria for typical Christian art documents , because it is an illuminated Manuscript thus neither fish nor foul; and it fails to meet cyberdisciple’s categories that you have committed to , which is a sharp distinction between texts versus art , but the illuminated manuscript is neither text nor art, so it doesn’t count. 😑

so subtract those 75 mushroom trees that you proved, because they don’t occur in authorized Christian art , but rather, in unauthorized illuminated Manuscript Witch doesnt count, because of the new rule I just made up two seconds ago on the spot on a case-by-case basis, as needed to bolster my failed case and try to save my sinking ship as my Hatsis Industries Witches Scopalamine Supply stock corporate value plummets into the ocean bottom

this is the great achievement and accomplishment & methodology of the Moderate entheogen theory.

I was as quick as that, in fabricating a response for Professor Brown, based on evidence from mushroom hunt and based on evidence from our contemporary experience ingesting both types of mushroom.

I did not yet have the head shop art analogy, when I replied to Professor Brown.

nd I read aloud my … actually I don’t remember if I read aloud my posting where I asserted as much and then I did read his no I don’t think I read his posting all of them mixed up all but anyway that’s in the next episode

aggh ERRATA – joke error !

I said that Wasson claims that “every flunking-out art student, beginning first semester flunking out art student knows that mushroom trees do not mean mushrooms”

that was a joke error

that was incoherent because I should have made the point that it is the A students, the passing students are the ones who “know” mushroom trees don’t mean mushrooms.

it is precisely the flunking students who assert that mushroom trees mean mushrooms (truth).

this is how the Persephone’s winnowing and filtering process works.

the students & the academics who assert that mushroom tree equals Mushroom are not employed, and the students to assert that do not pass.

only the art historians who toe the party line are allowed to be art historians

and only the art students who toe the party line are allowed to continue on to further classes

you’re not allowed to complete your degree if you tell the truth and reveal the mysteries

because remember, hint hint, “the punishment for revealing the mysteries is death”, which means, flunking and not getting the professorship.

maybe dup below:

– there’s a totally believable conclusions that the intellectual academics reach the conclusions that they are coerced and forced to reach which is why Panofsky brags to Wasson go ahead, ask any (employed, approved) art historian , ask any (passing) art student.

but please do not speak to the unemployed art historians and the failing students, who we are failing because they do not toe the party line and reach our coerced conclusions that we force them to reach.

joke error: I said that Wason claims that every flunking out arts to beginning first semester flunking out art student knows that mushroom trees do not mean mushrooms

that was a joke error that was incoherent because I should have made the point that it is the A students the passing students are the ones who know mushroom trees don’t mean mushrooms

it is precisely the flunking students who assert that mushroom trees mean mushrooms

this is how the Persephone’s winnowing and sorting

update: 11:52 AM April 24, 2022

my present feeling is that it’s the least work is to create a new episode 126 I have a ton of new fresh material this morning recorded and instead of ending it adding it to the end a pending it to episode 125 I have to just see how many hours of material it is though I do feel like my

Reading aloud of my response to Professor Jerry BrownProfessor Jerry Brown is kind of missing fromintended Reading aloud of my response to Professor Jerry Brown is kind of missing from

episode 125 above all out of the five to eat five or six or seven or eight segments that I recorded this morning , the one that seems missing from episode 125 is my reading of my reply to professor Jerry Brown explaining why amanita is the face of ingesting Psilocybin.

so I am deciding whether[no] to do official v3 release of episode 1 to 5 maybe just adding my reading and commentary about my reply to Professor Jerry Brown answering his question on what Evidence do I have for my conclusion that Amanita in christian art means and indicates the presence of ingesting Psilocybin.

if I add that segment[no] I will probably end up with a 1 1/2 hour episode 1 to 5 which I feel is more worthy

it’s a great great episode but a little bit on the short changed

Next Episode: The Series of Three Mental Models

Episode 126: Third Foot – segment starts ~55:00 https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Egodeath-Mystery-Show-Episode-126

my next material coheres very well with the 126 v2 short episode, and also has a heavy coverage of Canterbury Decoding, and advanced three-level model of , the three mental models, the series of three mental models.

I will now announce that , which I announced with an earlier time stamp in the voice recording a few minutes ago, but I will make another timestamp here in text form 11:57 AM April 24, 2022 a little bit different way of thinking of it then before the mind undergoes a series of three mental models which way we may describe as a sequence of three legs or three mental models in a series as follows

number one : NAIVE Possibility thinking

number two: eternity thinking; eternalism

NUMBER 3: QUALIFIED possibility thinking. I discovered during this voice recording a few minutes ago that we are posed with a second class exam instructor testing the student in row two of F134 image of Canterbury Psalter right side of row two we again have a exam scene in the marketplace the red initiate is being examined by the instructor you must interpret both of my feet above the ground well I have a John Rush while I have a John Rush celestial erection lifted garment and I have a solid good mushroom folded him per John rush which is as if growing out of the column base for control stability and the initiator says displays his left hand not his right hand this time and says interpret my left hand higher than my right hand displayed to you this time in this exam if the correct answer was right hand displaying the right hand in row one left exam scene scenery then what does displaying my left hand mean during the ordinary state after advanced initiation how is my left hand a good positive statement combined with having both feet off the ground and not having my right foot on the ground how am I in lightened given that I don’t have my right foot on the ground the answer is transcending eternity thinking

persephone lives after revelation of enlightenment when we return to the ordinary state persephone Queen of our underworld where we live as shadows and we continue to control and rule and reign and steer through virtual possibility branching in the ordinary state after full completed enlightenment and initiation the rest of our lives are entirely spent see Ken Wilber regarding states versus stages and regarding the pre-trans fallacy although we rely on possibility thinking in the ordinary state after enlightenment

no longer do so naïvely like before we were in lightened and redeemed out from the prison block rock universe and restored to the ordinary state like the bottom 2/3 that I didn’t finish cleaning up Max Freakout episode end of the episode debate about episode 28 summarizing the core Egodeath Theory debate about why cyber disciple restored to stable control upon prayer was it during the peak the answer is yes or was it because of

loose cognition wore off The loose cognition wore off and what do we do with the reality that we experience free will for the rest of our life in the ordinary state for the rest of our life steering like a king steering in a branching tree are we just naïve are we wrong because we ought to be experiencing in a way that is other than how the mind works are we saying that the mind is incorrect in the ordinary state?

orig; earlier

Notice: Scheming to create v3 of Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 125 – Leading Edge of Hallucinogens

I totally meant to read this good post and add it to the episode, and now that I found & brifly read it, it adds good points:

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Amanita-Imagery-Indicates-Psilocybe-Use

v2 of ep125 is NOT what I intended – I got distracted by phone call and forgot to locate that explanation writeup and record reading it.

I do like the resequencing and intensive fixes in v2 of short solid ep 125, but it is missing the intended segment. it’s good, but incomplete & too short. i prefer 1.5-hour episodes.

I also think that now that the sequencing is fixed, I could reinstate Cyberdisciple Autobio reading, which describes his long-standing passion for anthropological theory of Rock and Roll lyrics (due to its fascinating shamanism primitive beats 🥁 ); & Hallucinogens, esp. The Mushroom 🍄

& it would be nice to read his page asserting that the only mystery religion we should study is Eleusis – a strong, Hatsis-level sound, tried-and-true argument for the exemplary historiographical methodology of applying the Proxy Principle:

Instead of complicating the field, the effective approach is to cover only a single place location instance eg Plaincourault, or Eleusis, to efficiently cover-over & easily explain away the data which we study, so that we dont get our theorizing confused by introducing data, which just complicates the field of entheogen scholarship aka Psychedelic History, by which we mean the History of Deliriants.

We can just repeat & re-write the Witches Ointments book, as if it’s coverage of Greek & Christian mystical esoteric practices & traditions. it’s how we historians work.

1) add the above leadin to Cyberdisciple for context integration thematic

2) re-add the Cyberdisciple bio

3) add reading of https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2022/03/09/idea-development-page-13/#Amanita-Imagery-Indicates-Psilocybe-Use

4) could finish up by reading Cyberdisciple: Over-coverage of Eleusis , which he wrote for evil M. Hoffman, bc episode 125 is a roasting of trigger words way overemphasized ultra narrow Brian Muraresku

5) read the present page eg trigger words

I feel like I could really go off on the stupid ridiculous field, this comedy clown show of a field of entheogen scholarship

the field of entheogen scholarship is become reduced to a comedy routine, but don’t worry, Witch Hatsis is here to help 🤡

houston we have a problem

3:20 am April 24, 2022

this morning, less than 24 hours ago, about 6 AM April 23, 2022, I realized that:

my traditional fault-finding (since about 2006?) with the Mithraism book by Manfred clause fell quite short, because I only criticized Mithras’ head being made to turn to look to the left instead of the right – but I failed to criticize him for the huge massive extreme error of making Mithras stand on his left leg instead of on his right leg – a major violation of meaning!

yes, that error is along the exact same line as turning left versus right with the head, but the image is emphasizing everyone’s legs, not everyone looking to the right.

all five pairs of legs are what’s being presented, especially in this particular high-resolution image that I like of the bull slaying scene.

in this morning’s April 23 episode 124 of Egodeath Mystery Show at ~~25:00 (unreli timest) I discuss this increase of scope

in terms of… this increase of scope of theory revision and correction;

see the book conceptual revolutions by Paul Thagard regarding types of theory revision.

this would be a kind of example of increasing a point and increasing a correction of an old theory.

instead of just finding a smaller flaw with the old theory, I’m finding that it is 10 times bigger of a flaw.

The author of the book, right on his front cover, proves 10 times more than I thought/ previously realized, until April 23 (or essentially April 22, the initial breakthrough day), that Manfred Clauss doesn’t get it at all, and he has big-time grotesquely failed to interpret the iconography of the bull slaying scene – unlike my superior, successful theory, the new theory.

A similar idea is that the people describe the twins as having “crossed legs”, when the crossing is not really the point, and they have the legs crossed in such a way that their weight is entirely on one leg it is not symmetrical as is implied falsely by the term “crossed legs”.

Egodeath Mystery Show Episode 124 ~~38:00 (but totally not trustworthy timestamp from this app), I mention and discuss “legs crossed”, how that’s not the correct interpretation.

“equally /symmetrically crossed legs” is not depicted and is not the theme.

throughout the five pairs of legs, rather, the theme throughout the five pairs of legs is the question of which leg your weight is resting on; which leg is carrying you, that you are based on as your basis, which is to say, which mental model of time and control and possibility branching you consciously hold and are relying on.

that gives me an idea…

Academia forces you to write in a self-canceling way – this is total BS!

my God it is so tired, the Carl Rut approach

just like Andy Letcher says and just like Thomas Hatsis says, the field of entheogen scholarship, led by his good buddy Carl Rut is a joke and a laughingstock, it is a self-parody (it’s Jan Irvin’s fault – he’s left the field, but thats ok, we can just use Jerry Brown & Cybermonk as proxies for Jan Irvin, to keep deflecting attention from the real culprit, Carl Rut)

we have Jan urban exposing the agency is all directing these clowns to get stuck in a rut

steering us into a ditch, going around in circles, circling planet Amanita stuck trapped locked in trapped in orbit around planet Amanita forever and ever stuck in antiquated 1906 anthropology theories which are as primitive as the savages that they tried to study when they talk about “the Mushroom”

🙄

after 30 years of scholarship, he managed to accomplish switching the little amanita and the big amanita in the lower left corner of the popular children’s book from 1976 , A golden guide: Hallucinogenic Plants, recast as the 2006 book titled The Sacred Mushroom: Secrets of Eleusis 🍄🍄 by Carl Rut

Trigger Words 😱

Eleusis

secret

Amanita

Good Friday Experiment Good Friday Experiment did we mention Good Friday Experiment be sure to summarize Good Friday Experiment

every article ever written about visionary plants has to be sure to recount yet again Good Friday Experiment

did we mention Good Friday Experiment

Good Friday Experiment, Good Friday Experiment

like a parrot

🦜

the mushroom

Allegro

Plaincourault

Wasson

Carl Rut

hallucinogens

the traditional methods of the mystics

marijuana (speak English!! the word is ‘cannabis’, not “maria juan”, an ethnic slur, lunkheads!