Writing this webpage article is left as an exercise for the reader
I’m just trying to push the edge here at this theory website to see the URL blow up from too many punctuation and emojis and words in the title of the webpage , with luck maybe I’ll take the whole site down, in my experimentation
Brown and Brown in 2019 article in journal of psychedelic studies define a section heading called Wasson’s Paradox
paradox and they mention it as 1/4 of the purpose of the article, wassons paradox
Indefatigable he spared no expense to be ( give me a break!) the father of ethno Mycology – a.k.a. the father of self-contradiction; the father of self-defeating self-censorship, and self-limiting, and constraining himself
do not color outside the border
more like:
THE FATHER OF ELLIPSES BLOCKING US FROM SEEING THE CITATION THAT’S NEEDED
Brown defines whilst paradox wassons paradox as he claims to try to bring us knowledge of visionary plants and religious history but ironically indirectly self-contradictory form he works hard to prevent us from learning and investigating he tries hard to prevent and block and impede investigation into visionary plans in our own religious history this is the Wason’s paradox according to Brown and Brown similarly we can build out ramifications branching out the same idea copy paste just like
Thomas Hatsis is nothing but a copy paste of Andy Letcher when it comes to the subject of mushrooms in Christian history
The coral rock paradox is that his functional role that he serves that the system uses him to serve and fulfill the functional rule roll ROLE the role of coral rock he is to perpetuate ignorance and served to convert to do deflection through inversion of evidence that’s my phrase the pattern I noticed the pattern of in
the pattern of “deflection through inversion”
The salvation Salesmen have a problem too damn many mushroom Trees and Mushroom Imagery all throughout our own Christian artwork which are not veiled behind the word Eucharist which is the exact synonym just like in Hatsis is low IQ thinking the word Amanita and Amanita is an exact synonym for the word Mushroom similarly the word Eucharist is an exact synonym for Psilocybe and mushrooms
everywhere you see the word Eucharist, the writer intended to discuss Psilocybin Mushrooms and their mentally transformative effects described through analogy and metaphor because everybody – and this exactly contradicts Thomas Hatsis is completely unthinking, totally unimaginative Presupposition, his biased, Prohibition-Based error of presentism fallacy that he commits on an extreme scale, completely unthinkingly
he simply assumes, without giving it any thought at all , he assumes that all people in antiquity disparaged and insulted Mushrooms
when in fact, everyone so highly revered Psilocybin Mushrooms, all throughout every instance of banqueting, and every instance of mixed wine , and every instance of the Eucharist;
everybody in every mystery religion so extremely highly revered Mushrooms* as the food of the gods
*and I mean not his childish infantile reductionist 🍄 Mushrooms as a dumb object, concretistic , primitive thinking that the moderate paradigm uses, but rather, *Psilocybin* Mushrooms; the real deal, not the big giant jumbo infant sized oversized Lego blocks.
not the oversized infant sized red and white kiddie 🍄 Mushrooms;
no, I’m talking about the adult-sized Lego blocks, that the small Potent pointed and targeted the pointed liberty Pointy hat targeted adult type of mushrooms.
not the infantile Mushroom object found in children’s books which are jumbo size
noodle i said new line
Test wordTest word enter
so we have the paradox of the coral rock Moderate and entheogen paradigm where are you hand him as input a piece of positive evidence for the presence of visionary plants but then his bad paradigm takes that positive evidence and converts it to negative and deflect the evidence to neutralize a neuter your evidence and the more evidence you give him the more he changes it into proof of the absence of visionary Plants in the kind of religion that counts for him for his paradigm every piece of positive evidence is further proof of the absence of visionary plants the abnormality the suppression the forgetting
Always his emphasis on that in contrast to Jerry Brown and Brown book 2016 article 2019 which is simply positive framing -no if’s and’s or but’s
except for that awful word secret in the subtitle and the awful word Hallucinogens almost like he’s teaching in 1975 using prejudiced and biased words you can call this the brown paradox
Brown’s Paradox
“this book calls for an unbiased, non-prejudiced committee of interpreters, to interpret Hallucinogens – a secret team of secret Interpretation to secretly interpret Hallucinogens, in an unbiased way.”
“beware of ardent Advocates and dogmatists”, Jerry Brown carefully warns us , “don’t hang out with those egodeath.com & Young Irvin and John Rush types; they need to be corrected by our well-balanced and moderate (so moderate) entheogen paradigm. you should be like us : moderate, mild mannered, Middle of the road, compromising, self belittling, self-defeating, we’ll hit us ourselves for you, and self-defeating, and self limiting
and we’ll point out that there’s no way that that saint Walburga is holding Amanita, and this is proved because the tapestry depicts the base of the held object with serrations, but every child & beginner entheogen scholar knows that there’s no serrations on the base of an Amanita. so you should be reasonable and self-defeating like us brown and brown”
this paradox is that the Browns write a book which is in fact purely positive, in sharp contrast against the Moderate entheogen theory of religion, a school of self-contradiction and self-defeatism., self-neutralizing Order to sustain and prop up Psilocybin Prohibition and keep it going forever
“don’t worry, we are no challenge being offered from this little obedient docile school of servile servants of the psilocybin Prohibition Establishment paradigm”
The browns book does not participate in self defeatism – except that their book is self-defeating by subtitling it with the loaded intensely loaded term and problematic word the intensely problematic word ‘secret’, which the bad school of poor Scholars will leap on that word to heavily vigorously apply their heavy-handed Presupposition Matrix, in order to take these explicit Mushrooms and turn them into , through a distortion template conversion deflection process
heavy handed Presupposition Matrix in order to take these explicit Mushrooms and turn them into through distortion template conversion deflection process
They try to convert explicit Mushroom imagery for communication into its opposite: implicit, secret, hidden, in order to block and prevent communication, the conversion process erected by Carl Rut for the purpose of converting positive evidence of mushrooms into evidence for the absence of mushrooms – the Carl Ruck’s paradox.
Brown and brown write a book that straightahead asserts because they are ardent advocates and they are dogmatists they simply straightahead assert the presence and not the stupid secret suppressed usage no
not that
they do not do the Carl rut school, the moderate position’s misstep, which serves to suppress Mushrooms while pretending to be asserting the presence of mushrooms
the functional effect that the Ruck’s camp has is to emphasize with full vigor the abnormality of visionary plants in Greek and Christian religion – unlike Brown, because Brown instead , in sharp contrast, is an Ardent Advocate and a Dogmatist, by virtue of asserting simply the simple positive presence of mushrooms, without clamping onto them a protective barrier like the Carl Rut coral rock school, of the Moderate Entheogen Theory, who hastens to reframe evidence for presence of visionary plants as neutralized evidence for the absence of visionary plants from real religion.
See cyberdisciple’s article page cyberdisciple.wordpress.com page titled against suppression hypothesis
just like panofsky falls over himself to reframe Mushroom trees as “yet another instance of the development of the pine tree “, so that the more mushroom trees you hand over to Panofsky ( the manufacturer of fraudulent art history pseudo-History; the history of nonexistent “distorted templates “), the more that he outputs, in his deflective transformation process, he transforms Mushroom trees as the input, into pine trees as the output
here is how to neutralize Mushroom Trees, by intensive rhetoric garbled rhetoric framing and reframing aggressively deflection of the mushroom tree evidence, by converting it into pine trees while pretending as if ordinary state pine trees were the real original meaning that by fortuitous coincidence accidentally ended up being embraced by every single mushroom tree artist who gladly embrace these mushroom shapes with ramifications retained and added the real true story of the templates the true template against the liar Panofsky or maybe an idiot who knows who can know for sure the true story of templates is that the true bona fide template is the comprehension of added ramifications
Branching out from as a Panofsky points out every single mushroom tree has ramifications to some extent and if the artist had only wanted to correct the alleged distorted templates then the artist would have only drawn mushrooms but what every artist chose to draw instead of simply Mushrooms was mushrooms crossed with trees by added ramifications and I add cut ramifications to with the knife
The knives which brown and brown point out on the last supper table with the youth holding a knife cutting the ramifications off of the mushroom tree which is not a mushroom because it has added ramifications which the youth is busy removing with a knife trying to convert the tree into a non-Branching Mushroom to correct the distorted templates to restore the mushroom to its intended shape of non-Branching
the reverse of what panofsky claims to report
he claims that he is reporting a “development process” from pine tree to mushroom tree, but what he is in fact doing is that he himself has manufactured a distortion development transformation, “the process”, in order to do the *reverse* of what he falsely claims to have happened in history : Panofsky has designed a process of distortion, to convert (or appear to convert) Mushroom trees into neutered, neutralized pine trees.
Thus resolving the grave problem that the “art historians” (the people who manufacture false history) battle against, in order to neutralize art and get rid of the problem (Too Many Pilzbaum 🍄🌳) that Christian Art presents them.
dup para? The more that he outputs in his deflective transformation process he transforms Mushroom trees as the input into pine trees as the output here is how to neutralize Mushroom Trees by intensive rhetoric garbled rhetoric framing and reframing aggressively deflection of the mushroom tree evidence by converting it into the reverse of what he claims to report he claims that he is reporting a development process from pine tree to mushroom tree but what he is in fact doing
The Egodeath theory 