I read this out on tonight’s recording of the ego death mystery show it’s 10:12 PM April 30, 2022 I read this out on tonight’s show recording as I realized it in real time :
I caught Panofsky saying falsehoods to Wasson.
Panofsky’s second letter brought to us by Brown , Brown, & Brown:
even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification; if the artists had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree he would have omitted the branches altogether.
Erwin Panofsky, 2nd letter to Gordon Wasson, May 12, 1952
Artists SOMETIMES cut off branches, at Panofsky’s request, to form proper, branch-free Pilzbaum. that is:
Panofsky failed to account for cut branches, a definitive theme of Pilzbaum, all fully explained by the Egodeath theory (analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control).
But I did a quick inventory of Canterbury Psalter and determined that about 10 out of 75 mushroom plants lack any branching or cut branches.
and my explanation of this is :
the mushroom imagery Christian artists do this to establish that, yes we are really talking about psychoactive Psilocybin Mushrooms, but the primary by far is ramifications, which Panofsky brittlely overstates.
and also the 2006 main Article begins with a literal mushroom Cubensis in a cathedral stained glass window that has no ramification traces, thus providing another example of how Erwin Panofsky is simply wrong and is making false assertions, when he says that every mushroom tree has ramifications to some extent.
that is simply not true
and these are all coherently artistically classified together, so you cannot claim that there’s a different type of image or object in the artwork; these are consistent subvariations within a generally uniform class, of mushroom plants in Christian art.
we consistently see
some 37% of mushroom plants have cut branches and
some 10% of mushroom plants have neither cut branches nor branching features added, but are morphologically literal mushroom shapes.
May 4, 2022 addendum
Pilzbaum Pairs (TM Cybermonk)
what the templates desire to show, which all the artists agreed which the artist wanted to show, was not “mushrooms”; what the templates and the artists wanted to show is the *combination of mushrooms and branches and cut branches*, in order to convey that mushrooms bring the state of consciousness (which Panofsky mentions as the mushrooms induce ecstasy despite him saying Christians in the middle ages would have no reason to want to show mushrooms, yet he contradicts himself saying that witches might want to ingest toadstools to induce ecstasy).
also Pulaski draws a false dichotomy between wanting to depict tree versus wanting to depict Mushroom.
in fact the artists and the templates wanted to depict mushrooms to induce ecstasy which reveals a move of experiencing from branching to nonbranching.
also if Panofsky argues that if artist want to depict mushrooms, they would leave off the branches
thats proven false, because why do art historians call these Pilzbaum ; Mushroom Trees?
Clearly the Mushroom Trees can have do have branches, and yet still looks so much like mushroom trees, that we art historians called them “Mushroom Trees”,
thus proving that it is not necessary to omit branches to still convey a Mushroom image
furthermore we have instances like Eustace window of the lion carrying the youth off , where are depicted pointedly and expressly depicted for us by the artist is what I have designated today a new discovery concept called which I call “Pilzbaum Pairs”.
Panofsky fails to mention that the distorted templates schematized tree schematizations don’t only have added branches.
he failed to mention that they also have added cut branches as a defining feature these trees by definition the definitive feature is the contrast of branching versus not branching in conjunction with the Mushrooms
that is what the artist wanted to depict and that is what the artist freely chose to depict by employing the distorted Diagrams which were deliberately distorted to look like mushrooms with both added branches and with cut branches in sharp contrast that was the whole message was the experiential contrast which is revealed by the Mushrooms. – Cybermonk
“Pilzbaum Pairs”, Concept discovered yesterday and phrase coined by Cybermonk, May 4, 2022 , which against Panofsky’s final argument, shows that Mushroom artists depicted Mushroom Trees both with Ramifications and ALSO deliberately with no ramifications added in sharp contrast against each other because they wanted to show that contrast, like showing cut branches on a branching mushroom tree.
Panofsky fails to mention that the distorted templates schematized tree schematizations don’t only have added branches .
he failed to mention that they also have added cut branches as a defining feature these trees by definition the definitive feature is the contrast of branching versus not branching in conjunction with the Mushrooms
that is what the artists wanted to depict and that is what the artists freely chose to depict, by employing the distorted Diagrams Witch were deliberately distorted to look like mushrooms with both added branches and with cut branches in sharp contrast
that was the whole message was the experiential contrast which is revealed by the Mushrooms. – Cybermonk
End of May 4 2022 addendum
The Egodeath theory 