The high quantity and quality of my previous writings

Rummaging through the Egodeath Yahoo Group archives, it’s, as always, very impressive – lots of really top-quality: good writing, good theorizing, and massive quantities of it, and not filler material.

I always underestimate the quality and maturity that I expect to see in my earlier writings, and I find the opposite of Inferior; the opposite of lower quality;

I find I was aiming & hitting extremely high, and making a lot of, doing a lot with what I knew at any given time.

My old posts are best-case, not shambles that pale.

If anything, reading my Plaincourault article and archived posts makes me fear that my recent sloppy voice dictation and recent ideas lack innovation, and pale compared to my previous writings and breakthroughs.

there is a low degree of theory revision or correcting mistakes that’s needed.

instead, what I see is a building out; accumulation; extending; adding to; adding yet more.

it is not the case that the older ideas are lower quality and they have to be improved in their quality, but rather, they just have to be added to.

we could express this in terms of Paul Thagard’s book conceptual revolutions and his model of different types or categories of ways in which a theory is modified.

There is little correction needed of my previous theory, except only in the minor sense that I need to “correct” my ideas because they were not complete enough.

for example, Nov 2011 I said that I completed translating the language of mythology.

but that was false, because everything I translated so far was solid and valuable, of lasting quality, but just not complete.

for example, my dictionary at that time lacked adequate expansion of ideas about {left vs right equals branching vs non-branching}; or {left heel lifted}.

more than “posts”

describing them as “posts” I think is underestimating or under-selling them; they’re not just “posts”.

just like what I write now are not “web blog / blog entries”.

that is merely the medium for my expansive writing.

a so-called “post” or a so-called “discussion group post”, or a so-called “weblog/ blog entry” is not really what you find in my writing;

my writing transcends these little bucket designs.

Found a pre- Egodeath Yahoo Group, re-post of my March 2001 post to the Entheogens Yahoo Group: a massive, long, well-written, mature post.

My “posts” are consistently solid writing, consistently solid content.

It’s remarkable how much quantity of solid-quality work is necessarily involved, to match the ancients’ rather advanced language of Mythemese, which I have written the whole dictionary to translate this entire foreign language – no small, no mean endeavor!

A lot of sweeps across repeated themes (especially funny how my “very latest” points are made 10 years ago, the exact same points), but tangible accumulation of forward progress over the years, undeniably.

Motivation / focus of the present webpage

motivation for creating this webpage: a place to answer the mystifying question: what the heck did I announce on

Thanksgiving 2011 and

Thanksgiving 2012

if not duplicate of what I announced and discovered on

Thanksgiving 2013

or vs my first thinking of the branching question:

“isn’t branching vs nonbranching a major theme in mythology?” maybe October 2010, during hiatus from public posting at the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

not to mention discovering the formula {left vs right = branching vs non-branching} in the context of Canterbury Psalter, in November 2020.

March /April 2022

and the redundant duplicate realization of that same thing March 2022.

2015

not to mention dancing man {right foot equals eternity thinking} announced on Christmas 2015.

not to mention, the precursor to that announcement, posted on November 7, 2015.

Posts November 2011

Subject: Mythic metaphor code fully cracked

https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-110/#message5622

focus: male thought/injector vs female thought-receiver. not {branching}, here.

Posts November 2012

Su: Re: Key dates: Nov. 21, 2011: Deciphered metaphor “psyche = female”

https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-118/ – Says I did some {branching} work in 2011 & built on that in 2012. Commentary on building connections – the mountain range model.

Posts November 2013

incl dec 3 2013

Good indicator of what I did and didn’t figure out in 2013: the word “left-hand/ left arm” is missing, woefully 😞

from discovery of two seconds ago ( yesterday, or the day before) I realize the degree to which we have to ask:

is her {left heel lifted}?

i’m listening to the podcast Egodeath Mystery show from only two episodes ago extremely recent, I still failed to grasp obviously, Ariadne Holds branch specifically in left hand.

this is still this elementary kindergarten level realization of the obvious

regarding my mosaic Dionysus picture in my main article climax 2006, I only figured it out two seconds ago, and my most recent voice recordings still fail to realize that!! 🤯

🤯

she holds a mythical stylized palm branch.

here’s the kicker – even in the context of my hitting my head saying “why didn’t I realize that Eve holds the branch in her left hand” then I mention Ariadne – my failure to notice that she holds a branch or my failure to grasp the branching meaning of holding the branch – even in that context, I failed to realize that Ariadne holds the branch in the chariot specifically in her left hand (& contrasted with Dionysus Holding nonbranching Spear in right hand).

also at the moment in time just yesterday or couple days earlier, when I realized the Ariadne holds a branch or branching, did I at the same time contrast that against Dionysus holding a non-branching spear, or was that an hour or a day later??

and even then – here’s another thing that you would think that I would instantly simultaneously realize, that:

I failed to mention until an hour or a day later:

also if we’re going to be talking about Ariadne’s left hand, are you going to stupidly fail to mention her clothing held in left hand?

yes answer: yes, you are going to stupidly fail to mention at that same time, that not only does she hold a branch in her left hand, she also holds clothing in her left hand, which of course obviously demands interpretation; is a question that faces us.

what is the question that demands answering or else

how can you say I had a realization about the mosaic, if you fail to mention the clothing at the very same time that you mention holding her holding a branch?

how can you fail to mention at the same time that she’s holding her clothing?

and that obviously this mosaic demands elementary explanation of the clothing Theme.

you would have to be really pretty much affectively blind to fail to mention the clothing, at the same breath in which you mention holding Branch (also; along w clothing) in left hand.

Cybermonk 🙈 Examining Mystical Mythology Art 🚫👁

Even though clearly, {touching} is a major mechanism of this genre

🤦‍♂️

well I wouldn’t expect to realize that right away, since it was only the other day Christmas 2015 frickin six years five months ago 😖

it’s just a stupid cartoon drawing, which Thomas Hatsis explains shows a man overdosing from keeling over due to taking those noxious mushrooms that he warns us against

Hatsis the Fake Witch spreads his intense Anti-Mushroom Prejudice Bias

The Fake Witch Thomas Hatsis has an anti-mushroom prejudice bias.

Hatsis idiotically expects pagans to demonize Christians for ingesting the noxious and vile, despicable mushrooms.

His argument for how we know Christians did not use mushrooms is that pagans did not smear and defame Christians as users of mushrooms, therefore Christians must not have used mushrooms or pagans would have taken advantage of this moral defect.

– which reveals and exposes that Thomas Hatsis thinks that ingesting mushrooms is a moral defect.

and that he thinks (ie he UNTHINKINGLY ASSUMES; total failure to do historical thinking; fake historian) that pagans in antiquity thought the mushrooms were despicable and suppressed.

Hatsis’ implicit, evident, unthinking presupposition exposes & reveals that Hatsis is just another fool pushing the Suppression paradigm that’s typical of this rotten field of self-defeating failure; the loser field of entheogen scholarship.

Hatsis projects his own severe anti-mushroom prejudice onto pagans.

a fake witch, fake fake fake

Hatsis the good little Prohibition-compliant obedient trained lapdog 🐶 trying to cash in on the anti-Mushroom Psilocybin Prohibition scam fraudulent racket

Dancing Keeling

so it shouldn’t take more than maybe five minutes to analyze this silly Bestiary non-devotional Christian art, that doesn’t count as example of mushrooms in Christian art, because it’s non-devotional (according to the great esoteric theologian Thomas Hatsis), so it doesn’t count.

so it shouldn’t take more than about five minutes to analyze.

it certainly won’t require 6 1/2 years to realize the elementary basic elements of this simple cartoon picture 😑