Reading Aloud My 54-Page Article on Plaincourault Slap-Fight

Status EOD May 10 2022:

next section to read aloud/record / comment, 10 left:

Excerpts from Allegro on Ahistoricity, Mushroom Use, and Wordplay Motive

Old Orig page content:

help

😵

day 4: 37% complete 😞

rate of stopping to fulminate against deceiver Wassson 💪 2x per 15 minutes

wasson’s mission was to obstruct and prevent investigation while pretending to criticize mycologists for not reading the art historians, at the same time he deliberately deceives mycologists by censoring out the one and only place where the art historians have ever discussed pilzbaum, because Wasson is all threats and all posturing and all big claims and personal insults left and right

and the only thing they got is this one “little” book (as Panofsky unhelpfully describes it both times in both of his two (2), count them TWO, count them two letters) is all you got!!

One lousy flimsy small “little” tiny totally unconvincing book from Brinckmann

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/

it’s no wonder Wasson censored it out

his job was to prevent people from investigating and replace it by a smoke and noise and thundering of no substance

because they got nothin

and any investigation Wasson knew perfectly well that if he were to invite investigation that the Mycologists and Allegro would instantly totally win

and so Wasson could not permit an investigation, and he tried intimidation, bluster, & harassment tactics instead, to try to shut down the conversation and prevent any actual investigation of Pilzbaum such as Samorini and I and Brown have called for

and so he yelled at Mycologists for being ignorant and not reading the art historians’ many, many (nonexistent) articles & books critically considering pilzbaum & reaching sound conclusions as the Authorities that Mycologists must submit to

while at the same time he hid their one and only book where the art historians ever treated the matter of Pilzbaum

they got nothin

Wason was hiding the fact that they got no citations and that they only have one single citation, of the one, “little” book.

and obviously the Mycologists and Allegro would not buy it, and they would have won, if Wasson had passed-on the one citation.

Wasson knows that the Mycologists and Allegro were right (of course) and that they would have won.

and that is why he did not give the one and only citation available.

it’s all empty posturing, pretense, bluff, con artist propaganda, nothing but that.

wasson didn’t believe a single word he said

he was manipulating and unethically deceiving everybody about his conflicts of interest & rudely deceiving and misleading everyone, trying to pretend like he only had the one letter,

trying to berate mycologists for not reading the art historians, and then turning right around and censoring out the one and only citation that they got

because they got nothin

and Wasson knew that if he let the Mycologists see this one “little” citation, witch Panofsky hardly helps his own case by saying they got only one citation and it is little; he twice says ” little” – he would invite (guaranteed) victory for the Mycologists & Allegro, and he knew it.

Wasson knew the Mycologists were right.

he knew perfectly well, of course.

but none of this should come as any surprise.

we just are discovering the minor details of what we knew was lurking underneath the whole time as soon as these liars denied Plaincourault with their pompous name-calling, posturing, and insults.

we already knew that

we only merely had to discover the details

it was clear already in 2006 I already said that it’s quite clear that they’ve got nothing, because they didn’t provide any citations

and Brinkman’s book was infinitely far from accomplishing what Panofsky wished to use it for, and Wasson knew it.

Wasson knew that to invite investigation by the Mycologists – rather than just insulting them for being unread – would guarantee that the Mycologists & Allegro would win & Wasson would lose, pope buddy would lose, the art historians would lose.

they all were putting on a show, of course this should not be a surprise to anybody

but it is sure ugly and infuriating to see the ugly details of Wasson’s deception.

However I do need to dig out my copy of soma to see:

does Wassons books list Albert Brinckmann’s book Tree Stylizations in Medieval Paintings – you know, the book which Wasson hand wrote the author’s full name and full title on Panofsky’s first of two letters, TWO (2) LETTERS

Jesus! This article is ridiculously long!! 😵

it just never stops

but it’s not because of repetition or anything

there’s just really is this much to say

this is kind of the whole Egodeath theory: it’s just a ton to say

it shouldn’t be a surprise that there’s so much to say

Art Historians Got Nothin

i developed that theme, spoken, at about Egodeath Mystery Show ep134b ~12:00 (dubious timestamp)

this little Brinckmann book is all you got??!! – Mycologists & Allegro to Wasson & Panofsky after Wasson’s decades-long harrassing & namecalling them & aggressive hot-air posturing