The ardent advocates of the sun-centered Copernican model act as if all physics everywhere is reasonably fit to that model, an eager band of cosmologists and overly Ardent Advocates of their new theory, which they only embrace because it seems to support their theory.
But I consulted with the eminent top art historians, and these ignorant advocates of the sun-centered system, these blundering, isolated Copernicus advocates, have not adequately at all consulted the art historians on this matter.
In their unread ignorance, the Disciples Coperniiae have persisted in their blunder.
Presumably they are aware of the footnote in which I dismissed their misapprehension, which they have been under a misapprehension about this for more than half a millennium.
I demand a full engagement of this new theory, the Copernican sun-centered theory, needs to do a detailed, in-depth engagement of every last epicycle of every corrective patch that we put on our well-established, earth-centered, Ptolemaic cosmology system.
This field of entheogen scholarship must not be permitted to move forward until we have gotten full consensus from the Salvation Salesmen confirming that we have refuted every one of their water tight, super-convincing arguments in full detail, such as the impossible to refute argument that this one mushroom tree in Christian art cannot possibly mean mushrooms, because it’s not the only instance of this.
if only these idiots had known that there were other instances, they would’ve never have embarrassed themselves by suggesting that this one instance means mushrooms.
How are you ardent advocates of seeing mushrooms everywhere ever going to recover from this devastating argument??
And so you can see, your complete inability to refute our argument shows that you were just wrong in asserting that the Plaincourault fresco means mushrooms.
There is no way that you can argue against our “no mushrooms in Christian art” position, that the snake in the image means mushrooms, in a way …
The artist of this fresco had no inkling that by dumb coincidence, 1000 years before history (I am the first one to ever figure this out) but indeed the tree in the garden of Eden actually has a mushroom connection!! 🤯
You would never imagine such a thing, but my brilliance has brought this news to you, that there is actually a connection in the Plaincourault fresco image, through the serpent, which 1000 years before history began, used to be associated with the mushroom.
And so the stupid, ignorant painter, this especially ignorant craftsman, accidentally drew a mushroom-looking tree, unbeknownst to the painter, the mushroom-looking tree actually does have a connection with mushrooms – through the serpent, as known only to the very most astute historian (who is me) knows the ancient pre-history tradition that at one time, the serpent was actually considered the guardian and provider of the mushroom!
So this is why the new theory cannot be permitted to move ahead until the old theory is completely explained, to explain all the logic of the old theory, in full detail.
discussed in Egodeath Mystery Show episode 134c ~35:00
The Egodeath theory 