Below are listed the:

• Scientific objectives
• Mental health objectives
• Integral psychology completion of human development objectives
• Psychedelic Cognitive Science objectives

1. Scientifically explain transcendent knowledge.

2. Minimize turmoil in the altered state by explaining it and explaining the intended healthy development sequence.

3. Enable people to easily have complete mental development by healthy integration of possibilism- and eternalism-thinking.

4. Enable cognitive scientists & everyone to freely go in and out through the gate into the garden of psilocybin eternalism. Freely eat from the immortality fruit million-eyes serpent-guarded tree. Fully access the loose cog state.

https://effectindex.com/effects/ego-death#fear%20of%20losing%20control

https://effectindex.com/effects/perception-of-predeterminism – causal-chain possibilism-shaped thinking here prevents grasping the mystic-state eternalism experiential mode.

The first step to enable Psychedelic Cognitive Science is the Egodeath theory: integrate psilocybin eternalism. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/12/possibilism-vs-eternalism-2-models-of-time-and-control/

The Highest Value

Axiom: Transcendent Knowledge is more valuable than anything else.

Ego death is our most desirable climax potential, our mental capability to have the most valuable knowledge and full proper well-formed full development into our mature form. a la Ken Wilber.

The Psilocybin Primacy axiom

Axiom: The Psilocybin Primacy axiom, replacing the false, Amanita Primacy axiom in the field of entheogen scholarship.

Amanita means Psilocybin, in pop cult and in Christian art.

Amanita is the billboard of Psilocybin.

Challenge Ruck: Tell me: What are the effects of Amanita?

You assert the Wasson/ Allegro/ Ruck/ Heinrich/ Irvin/ Rutajit/Rush Amanita Primacy axiom, yet you can’t even identify what the hallmark effects of Amanita are.

As Letcher Hatsis calls out, the Amanita Primacy axiom is making folk myth the foundation for a would-be scientific historiography; like what Hanegraaff warns is the religionism error.

🍄

In his recent article on entheogens in antiquity, M. Hoffman asserts that entheogen scholars ought to start considering psilocybin in Western religious history, instead of only Amanita.

Everyone’s Reaching the Same View: Better-Articulate the View

Everyone agrees and asserts the same phenomenon about levels of control submitting, surrender, reconcile, transform the mental model to conform to what’s perceived behind the lifted veil.

The problem here is not how to refute people who disagree.

The problem is to formulate a helpful specific model to organize what everybody is already asserting.

The goal is to define a field of cognitive science: loose cognitive science, and that is defined.

How to do that correctly is defined by the Egodeath theory as exemplary paradigmatic instance/ model – its analysis style, its lexicon, its value system, its manner of expression, its concerns, its domain of concerns, and the way that the Egodeath theory treats all other domains and links to them.

That is definitive of the field of loose cognitive science, or this psychedelic eternalism subfield of cognitive science.

I, via the Egodeath theory, define the field of Psychedelic Cognitive Science: https://www.bing.com/search?q=psychedelic+cognitive+science

Cognitive scientists are more interested in this domain, this topic within cognitive science, than any other topic, because this is the most valuable topic.

My 1987 objective was: Fix our buggy thinking, gain the expected non-dysfunctional cross-time self-control. Aided by Transcendent Knowledge.

My father reported to me that the leading edge was Ken Wilber and we didn’t have anything better than that, along with Alan Watts.

Then he put it into my hands to more clearly and usefully articulate Transcendent Knowledge than Ken Wilber and Alan Watts.

I participate in the psychedelic renaissance, therapy model, therapy clinic session guides:

I teach clients and facilitators how to reduce turmoil and give healthy, well-formed mental development from Psilocybin, to successfully and healthfully integrate eternalism and to understand religious myth as metaphors describing this successful development completion process.

Explain religious revelation experiencing.

Scientifically (clearly and directly) explain the intense mystic altered state.

Scientifically explain how myth describes mental transformation/ development through psilocybin eternalism.

What is revealed, and how is the mind transformed, what are we shown?

What do we become able to perceive?

Here is how the mind is supposed to develop into a healthy religious formation.

Here is what religious spiritual transcendent transformation is, how it is supposed to work in a healthy form.

Science now understands this.

Psychedelic cognitive science explains this.

The Egodeath theory is the field of psychedelic cognitive science.

Science now has understanding of Transcendent Knowledge, and Science now explains transcendent knowledge, now having the Egodeath theory.

Problems with marrying scientific understanding of Transcendent Knowledge to the word ‘evolution’

I have practiced talking-through this critique of “evolution” and this critique of Jan Irvin’s warnings and cautions about agendas.

These warnings are needed, but they come from someone whose thought-style is “absolute lopsided”, not an integrated view.

Irvin’s lopsided view flipped, in an undigested, incompleted fashion that’s indeterminate and undefined.

Irvin is probably not going to be defining what his coherent, resolved view now is on the merits of Psilocybin. https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Flesh-Teonanácatl-History-Mushroom/dp/1387872133/

See what this book has to say about the potential benefits of Psilocybin:

John Lash condemns anyone who would use his ecology as a pretext for nefarious ends, to co-opt the earth. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/?s=john+lash

The book by Jahan Kham seh za deh, the psilocybin connection, about psychedelics and transformation of consciousness also his degree is in evolution.

What agenda are we being asked to support? CIIS.

CIIS & astral ascent mysticism

I like CIIS, though I have no particular detailed knowledge, but I have a good general picture of the org.

I admire their connection with David Ulansey cosmos model mystic astral ascent mysticism, and they even have the word cosmology and consciousness in their major field names.

I want to interview Earl Fountainelle shwep podcast https://shwep.net/podcast/ because we are enthusiasts of astral ascent mysticism, earth-centered altered-state cosmography.

1. Explain mental developmental sequence across states and mental models.

2. Explain the earth centric cosmos model.

3. Explain use of that cosmos model to describe psilocybin mental development.

4. Explain the Parmenides/ Minkowski block universe.

5. That leads to: Explain why Hanegraaff moves the fixed stars to below (= before) the ego death & rebirth gate.

Explain why Hanegraaff goes so far as to present a cosmos model with no stars, in his desperation to prevent revelation of eternalism, where fate-archons, heimarmeme wins.

Wouter Hanegraaff quotes in his own translation of the hermetic text, the woman sacrifices in honor to submit and surrender to the planetary archons to stop fighting against them.

This is how the mental turmoil is fixed, by surrendering and honoring the planetary archon rulers, and the ruler who is in the eighth level the fixed stars; heimarmene no-free-will/ non-branching of possibilities, given that the future is closed and your control-thoughts pre-exist.

Hanegraaff first gives us the accurate hermetic text in his own translation, where it says that the woman sacrifices in honor of the planetary archon fate-rulers.

This hermetic text, because it comes from late antiquity, already has advanced-level, ironic, confusing facility with using mythology at an expert level, to strive to now express the Late Antiquity theme of “I hate fate”.

… against what our fathers in Early Antiquity bequeathed to us: the worship of puppethood, eternalism.

That historical twist of mythic meaning forms a treacherously confusing pit for egoic freewillist Hanegraaff to fall headlong into.

Luther H. Martin tracks the trajectory from Early Antiquity’s idolizing of psilocybin eternalism, to Late Antiquity’s anti-hiemarmene fabrication of free will. That direction ultimately led us to 1985’s total forgetting of our starting point in psilocybin eternalism.

Then the ordinary state was too oppressive, and the pendulum swing produced the Egodeath theory: The Integral combination of ordinary-state possibilism + psilocybin eternalism.

… But then on the next page, Hanegraaff paraphrases what he just translated and he mis-paraphrases the hermetic text: he now claims that the woman got rid of the archon rulers like “cancer”, by vaguely “offering sacrifice”, in honor of no one, sacrificing to no one, surrendering to no one.

“Source, I respect you, and I loathe eternalism.”

We must instead honor Helios-Mithras; transcendent eternalism-possibilism.

As far as Hanegraaff’s broken, misrepresentative paraphrase, he thinks that the archons surrender to the maiden, the initiate.

What’s in his Rejected wastebasket? Eternalism.

Hanegraaff thinks that transcendent knowledge is about eliminating and exorcising the “negative psychological trait” which is fate.

That explains why he moved the stars to below the Saturn gate of rebirth.

“Evolution” 🤨 the MYSTERY-AGENDA

Before you sign on board the MYSTERY-AGENDA marketed as “psychedelic evolution” – Won’t get fooled again, Who’s Next

url https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who’s_Next#/media/File:Whosnext.jpg

Won’t Get Fooled Again – Van Halen https://youtu.be/uIF6bkxCmbc

Take into account the invaluable, albeit absolute lopsided, expose and incoherent/unformed/ un-resolved expose from Jan Irvin.

This is a schizophrenic line of reasoning from Jan Irvin: he removes all agency from you and grants all agency to evil Agent Wasson who is all-powerful and who controls your thoughts and constructs your session’s experience.

All of that assertion is folded into Irvin’s malformed concept of, his false claim, – this is a schizophrenic line of reasoning from Jan Irvin, he removes all agency from you and grants all agency to evil Agent Wasson, who is all-powerful and who controls your thoughts from the grave.

All of this is folded into Irvin’s malformed concept of, his false claim that cognitive looseners are rightly called “suggestogens”.

Irvin’s word ‘suggestogen’ commits a social reductionism; this is reductionism of psychedelics to the social realm.

That’s what in Jan Irvin is going on here when he calls psychedelics “suggestogens”.

Irvin insultingly tells you that you have no ownership of your own thoughts, you have no agency – but conversely, all the bad guys who fabricated the myth that psychedelics give you mystic experiencing,

They are controlling your thoughts, they are constructing your experiencing.

They have agency, but you do not have agency.

They control your thoughts, they engineered your mystic experience, but you don’t have control over your experience in the altered state, says Jan Irvin to you when he employs his false term “suggestogens”.

if you agree to his term-replacement, then you agree that you have no agency, but yet nevertheless, Wasson and all the bad guys who invented and fabricated the false claim that psychedelics give mystic revelation, they have all agency, but you have no agency.

You are incapable of correctly interpreting the experience from Psilocybin.

Your experience is completely controlled and created by the bad guys.

This reminds me of John Lash, who says that every idea in your head, every idea that you thought about religious use of psychedelics, all of your ideas are owned by Wasson, and he is their owner and inventor, and he put them into your head – because even if you have a theory which “departs from” Wasson’s theory, still Wasson owns every idea in your head.

Jan Irvin’s absolutely lopsided characteristic style of thinking ends up making you agree that you do not have agency, but Wasson controls your mind from the grave.

Irvin’s concept of “suggestogens” is an outright schizophrenic-form conclusion.

It might be true that there is a degree of suggestibility, but this is not in fact the primary cognitive mechanism of operation which is, loose cognitive association binding – not suggestibility.

Nor should we be reductionistic like later Jan Irvin and reduce the field of psychedelics to the social domain.

That’s based on his April 2022 three video podcast episode with Steve Jones, Jan Irvin shows -…

Irvin in effect says there are no benefits of psilocybin toward Logos.

Also read his new book on history of mushrooms in the Americas.

… which one client said is Christian propaganda.

Jan Irvin’s new book probably is a warped anti-psychedelic version of pushing his conception of “Logos”.

We can be confident that Jan Irvin has not formulated a coherent take on psychedelics at this point, and he might never do that, because that is not his constitution.

Irvin is no good at balancing pros and cons in any analysis of anything.

His head will explode if you ask him what are the pros and cons of anything.

What are the pros and cons of psychedelics?

Irvin ought to read my article on Wasson and Plaincourault and Allegro, where my main point was that we should not do what Jan Irvin does:

We should not have a lopsided reading of each scholar, but we should always ask the pros and cons of each scholar.

But Irvin is not constitutionally able to do this, he is not interested.

It is not his style of thinking to balance the pros and cons of anything, including psychedelics.

So we will get a wildly flopping-about incoherent positive and then negative reading, all hazy and under-digested from Jan Irvin.

The development of the mind across history to finally have the intended healthy combination of possibilism and [-eternal wisdom] eternalism

Here is the equivalent of my theory of “evolution”, and how to see through anybody’s deception agenda to try to turn the science of Transcendent Knowledge into their own pet evolution project agenda.

1. Early Antiquity produced an immature, malformed mind, excessively valuing psilocybin eternalism at the expense of possibilism, and they failed to invent modern science rationality technology (ego, ord state, “rationality”) as Ken Wilber criticizes for their failure to invent these good things.

2. Modern Enlightenment-era Natural Science, based in ordinary-state possibilism-thinking. The ultimate STEM achievement it produced: the Egodeath theory.

3. Post-Modern era: now we stand developmentally complete, with both “legs” distinct and integrated, qualified possibilism-thinking and eternalism-thinking.

This is the future agenda social project of the Egodeath theory: a successful midwife technology that now enables everybody to, without dysfunction, have a religious completion of the mental model.

Smooth, well-educated, science-based development into the mature form of the mind.

Only now, having the Egodeath theory (psilocybin eternalism comprehension) can we claim to match the hierophants.

The immortality key book was hubristic, a bit premature, in its claim that we clinic session guides (sans the Egodeath theory’s explanation of the eternalism experiential mode) are superior to the hierophants.

The dishonest trick that they used to try to get away with this claim as they remove the psychedelics by deleting psychedelic peak-experiencing high-dose.

We trained psilocybin facilitators remove transformation, and we remove danger, and we replace it by a dizzy feeling, momentary beginners’ unity consciousness feeling.

And we congratulate ourselves that we are superior, we have delivered the same product as the hierophants.

We, too, deliver “a mystic experience” 😑

The dirty truth is that the reason why our psychedelic sessions are safer is because we rob you of the transformation, we rob you of 99% of the mystic experience, and we rob you of actual mental transformation.

How complete is this mystic experiencing which these under-prepared session guides so safely give, while they pride themselves on being superior to the hierophants?

The beginners’ version of ego death is mere suspension; dissolution. Trespassing, unearned taste of stolen fruit, whose poison will lead to immortality via sacrificial abandonment of relying on childish possibilism-thinking.

The advanced version of ego death is formal demonstration of self-transgression of control limits when the two-level mechanism of control is revealed in the eternalism state of consciousness, which comes from psilocybin and experientially equivalent chemicals.

Comment on “Key Paradigm Shift for Academics”

My comment at page:

https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/key-paradigm-shift-for-classics

Prohibition Press now signals the green light for hidebound, mentally slow academics.

The rulers now direct you to push the psilocybin agenda.

o The totally organic authentic grassroots popularity of Michael Pollan’s book How to Change Your Mind.

o The surprising accidental popular successful book The Immortality Key, Muraresku.

o Wouter Hanegraaff’s book on non-drug entheogens in Western Esotericism.

Now Hanegraaff brags that meditation measures up to the gold reference standard, which is understood now by every sensible, educated person to be psilocybin.

Hanegraaff has his hands full just laboring to convince academia that religious “theology” texts involve the mystic altered state. He uses redefinition-to-death of the word ‘entheogen’ toward that victory.

Invest in Psychedelic Renaissance stocks now!

Training courses are in session: learn how to reify client expectations of amplified egoic control power by leveraging your God-consciousness.

Become an under-qualified trip session guide: enroll in our new course for psilocybin therapy facilitators, taught by using Martin Ball’s experimental techniques, whatever they are.

___

The dragon has been chained, by the Egodeath theory. 🖋

Magical Theurgy Ritual Action to Force God to Give You Control Stability

Theurgy is physical formal ritual action to guide the mind through psilocybin eternalism.

Stand on your right leg, lift your left leg. God will be magically forced to do your bidding.

That’s the full extent of the Egodeath theory’s official ritual practice.

No bowing; stand on right leg.

Comment

A Cyberdisciple page

Thats proof right here:

Writing is an entheogen.

That’s sound, bc someone made a sheer claim that “I use intense theorizing and study to induce an altered state of consciousness”, therefore we definitely have here an entheogen that can, might, could, & may produce the exact same effect as psilocybin.

QED: Theorizing is therefore interchangeable with heroic psilocybin, where the too-perceiving drakon guarding the gateway threatens and demands sacrifice of the princess maiden when you’re getting the climactic treasure.