Set the Controls for the Heart of Ultra Simplicity of Explanatory Theory

What’s greater than Truth? An elegant Theory.

If the Truth doesn’t agree with the Theory, then too bad for the Truth; the Theory is correct. 😑

Religious myth that doesn’t fit the Entheogen Eternalism Mytheme theory is not proper, well-formed, inspired myth.

The Egodeath theory is 100% successful at explaining inspired myth.

Corollary: If a myth doesn’t match the Egodeath theory, then that myth is manifestly uninspired. 🤷‍♂️

The Diamond Hammer of Interpretation is always successful, because anything that doesn’t fit its forced, Procrustean form is therefore deemed objectively malformed.

You have to vigorously commit to an explanatory model to sincerely do everything possible to contort the data to make it fit.

Add as many corrective epicycles as needed, and discard and ignore 5/6 of the evidence types, like Thomas Hatsis does: the end (the Theory) justifies the means (selection bias).

For every isolated bit of data that refuses to conform to the dictate of my Theory, I’ll outdo even the master himself, the anti-mushroom Psychedelic Witch, and invent an ad-hoc, invented on -the-spot, specially devised “new rule” fabricated just to explain-away each individual case, like:

“That mushroom tree in a Christian document doesn’t count, because, ah… um… It has to be a “devotional” Christian document. Yeah, that’s the ticket!”

Square peg data neatly fits into round hole theory, if you smash the evidence-base with the right magic hammer.

This is where I learned my powerful, unstoppable theorizing from.

Book TWICE recommended to Gordon Wasson by Erwin Panofsky’s PAIR of letters, censored multiple times by the FRAUD Wasson as proved by Browns’ 2019 article.

https://www.academia.edu/40312824/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels

Wasson’s own handwriting of accurate Brinckmann book title that he looked up but then censored, multiple times, from “the public” and the mycologists (leader: John Ramsbottom).
https://www.academia.edu/40312824/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels

Brinckmann’s book cover, Wasson would agree with Hatsis, shows parasols of victory.

url https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/

This identification is even more certain than in other images, because a triple parasol of victory! 😲

You just can’t cut with Occam’s razor any more than that! Cut off all unneeded branching overgrowth.

Photo: Julie M. Brown, crop & processing by Cybermonk

This type of medieval painting cannot represent psilocybin mushrooms, because:

The image means a tree, and therefore, cannot mean mushrooms. In medieval art, an image can only have a single meaning (except in the case of, anything other than mushroom imagery).

There are branches. If the artist had wanted to deliver the impression of a mushroom (for what we art historians say delivers to us an impression of mushrooms, per our describing them as “mushroom trees”), the artist would have omitted the branches altogether.

Erwin Panofsky, the most influential art historian

Panofsky’s SECOND letter to Wasson
https://www.academia.edu/40312824/Entheogens_in_Christian_art_Wasson_Allegro_and_the_Psychedelic_Gospels

Panofsky’s watertight reasoning proves that the left mushroom plant doesn’t look like a mushroom, because it has branching, and therefore the right mushroom plant cannot look like a mushroom either, because it looks like the left-hand, branching mushroom.

Yet another instance of alleged mushroom imagery explained away in fine historiographical methodological Hatsis fashion.

Anyway, this Eustace window image from Chartres Cathedral depicts a story that was later deemed heretical, therefore it doesn’t count as Christian art.

All mushroom imagery in Christian art is easily explained away by tried and true historical methodology, which I allude to somewhere in my online blogs.

Hatsis, Psychedelic Mystery Traditions

The anti-mushroom Psychedelic Witch’s theory is saved again! 😓

url https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/10/31/psychedelic-mystery-traditions-hatsis/

Photo: Julie M. Brown, crop by Cybermonk.
left arm = branching illusion, branching cut by right arm.
Photo: Julie M. Brown, crop by Cybermonk
Photo: Julie M. Brown, crop & processing by Cybermonk.

Right arm = non-branching possibilities; the psilocybin eternalism revelation that’s the initiation from youth to adult.

Unless you are Brown, in which case, it means “holding a slightly curved sword” (by its blade).

The shape of the liberty cap is anachronistic. (You guys got a big problem!)

Hatsis, pers. comm.

Cubensis doesn’t grow on bovine dung IF (year < 1976) AND (region = England).

Paul Stamets: Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World: An Identification Guide, and Letcher, and Hatsis
Eadwine’s image

Ya Think?

🤔 Hey i have an idea, someone oughtta look for psilocybin in Western religion.

M Hoffman, director of entheogen scholarship since 1976, in 2015 article

https://www.academia.edu/44235520/Entheogens_Psychedelic_Drugs_and_the_Ancient_Mystery_Religions_Mark_A_Hoffman

See Related Papers.

“1976” joke because his article’s typo says “1976” but should instead say ‘entheogen’ was coined in 1979.

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment