8:58 a.m. March 11, 2023 Cybermonk

_{Site Map}

Contents:

• Intro
• I Almost Halted and Published Only the Isolated Mushroom/Standing Panels
• “Announcement: I have now will have decoded the image, congratulations, what a relief , I am so glad to have will have decoded it 🎉🎉” 🤨
• Citation Fkking Needed!!
• Pointless Loiterers Problem
• The Pointless Loiterers are Subtle Pointers
• Pointless Loiterers Redux
• YI!!
• See Also

Intro

mobile shorthand

I Almost Halted and Published Only the Isolated Mushroom/Standing Panels

I Almost Gave Up after Solved Just Two Panels – But 5 More Days of Hard Work Solved Entire Image

todo: check/confirm how many days to solve Row 1 panels 1-2, vs. now completed at [10:56 p.m. March 11, 2023] (my grand finale was tons of white lines & blue boxes).

[Est. timestamp for the following: 11 a.m. March 11, 2023]:

I remembered the one other missing point I wanted to add in this post:

again I will say

I was only going to include only the upper left part of this image in my 2023 article branching message mushroom trees

this was so pathetic, it is so sad to hear me but my plan was to only include the upper left, because I gave up way too soon I gave up way too easily.

I really felt the tide turn when I started thinking in terms of applying my grid analysis technique.

If I break up this image into panels — but be careful, you need to include some two-panel crops as well — certainly you’re not so stupid that you’re unable to say anything?!

come on , you’ve got to say something about each panel; don’t just give up, like Terrence McKenna!

It was pretty fkking hard — but my grid technique is very powerful. my magical tool from the gods, like the diamond hammer of interpretation.

🔨💎🪄

There is no hope, its too hard 😭😭 it will take YEARS to decode this image !!

in his 1994 book food of the gods , he says “do not under any circumstances open your eyes and attempt to look and see mushrooms in our own religion

they’re not there

don’t look

give up

instead you need to morally grandstand about how you are superior to that awful big bad church

that’s the important thing is to elevate yourself above it

that’s what it’s all about

That is what our mission and objective needs to be , he tells us — not, what strategy is going to be effective to repeal prohibition

no he doesn’t care about that

he pushes us to adopt the most anti-strategic , defeatist, Self-defeating, give up, don’t even try at all mentality

just declare defeat from the beginning, make that our brand, and commit to that position of defeat, permanent commitment to permanent defeatedness

that is McKenna’s Strategy For Repealing Psilocybin Prohibition

thanks a fkking lot McKenna

with allies and leaders like these, who even needs prohibitionist opponents?

defeat is built right into Terrence McKenna’s attitude:

That was my immediate reaction as soon as I got his book maybe 2004 and read it: I was shocked at his defeatism, I knew he was completely wrong.

I knew it because look at the religious mythology: you can tell there’s Psilocybin mushrooms effects depicted all throughout; it’s all about analogies describing Psilocybin mushroom effects — so there’s no way that they could’ve been removed there’s every sign of them, Psilocybin mushrooms.

It’s right in the religious mythology.

“Announcement: I have now will have decoded the image, congratulations, what a relief , I am so glad to have will have decoded it 🎉🎉” 🤨

My enthusiasm for seeing a way through that WOULD surely enable me to decode the image led me to strangely post a misleading post title 5 days ago: worded a bit prematurely; future pov: “Decoded Entire 4-Horses Image (Canterbury Psalter)”

In that post, https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/06/decoded-entire-4-horses-image-golden-psalter/

my most memorable standout line (showing what status the post is about) was “see previous Bubble post for the strategy – clearly its in the bag“.

Row 2 Right Buildings

Row 2 Middle Right

addl note [10:07 a.m. March 11, 2023] I am glad and satisfied to see fortunately (this is a relief) the two bags are at the same angle!

which proves that whatever he’s putting in the Thomas Hatsis honorary potato lockbox is the same thing as we are weighing out 5 g of dried french fries for Thomas Hatsis as his reward for his excellence in historiographer historiographical methodology excellence.

HERE YOU GO HATSIS 🎉🎉

🏆🏆🥔🥔🥔🍟🍟🍟🥇🏅

I was celebrating having found an attitude and strategy that would certainly enable me to, near future, come up w something to note on all panels of the image.

NOW I can accurately actually speak in past tense, that I have solved this Puzzle #2 image. It feels exactly like I have completed a video game Eadwine designed.

I wonder now how many panels in Great Canterbury Psalter are like this puzzle quality?

I sure have new eyes now to look at the images in Great Canterbury Psalter now that I am thoroughly conversant with how to read two full Eadwine images. f134 & f177

Largely the solution to this puzzle was ITS THE EYES AIMING!!

eg with the shroud ego-dead person, the trick is to look at the EYE DIRECTION of lifters, not at their bodies only.

Same as horses, its not about the horses, its about the object of — target that they are looking at.

Then cancel horses out and instead draw line between the two targets they are looking smiling at.

Ignore lookers & Draw lines connecting the looked-at items.

In shroud person case, looking connects again two– wow good idea, meta the above lines: draw lines [8:40 a.m. March 11, 2023] between the 4 items being pointed to by the horses and ego dead lifters of the Psilocybin clinic guides.

Equating those pointed-to targets. Those are:

• blue lone nonbranching cap of msh tree
• God’s right hand holding his standing srlf control from falling over LOSING BALANCE, God level of control prevents losing balance falling into the sacrifice monster chute (I have to develop my explanation of how balance of control is saved by being made to sacrifice anamial shorn rams)
• pink key tree topic of {branching contrasted with non-branching} (that we move from branching ie possibilism to non- ie eternalism )
• the balance-balance guy but especially the crutch and [combined with like a minus sign] stability of left (“?!!?”) heel on column base

in summary: looking-targets means:

non-branching (eternalism instead of possibilism) = stable balance of control in advanced high dose Psilocybin

now I’m in the state of scouring for anything i missed, and, quite hard is clearly discussing how exactly the dynamics of repudiating animal thinking sacrificing child-thinking works

including Egodeath.com instructions section on how to self-threaten to demonstrate/ test/ put on trial/ put to the test, cybernetic eternalism

Row 2 Left

this next panel by itself is not adequate for some purposes– MUST do some MULTI-PANEL CROPS, is a lesson-learned takeaway:

Row 2 Panel 2

why the exact number of columns, what is purpose of each column? metaperception layer?? bc they are looking through the solid columns IN BOTH ROWS Of looking-pairs.

Refers to (by analogy) levels of abstraction in perception?

It took too long to perceive the two guys looking right: stop looking at THEM and look at their EYES exactly as if “look at the moon, not the finger pointing at the moon”.

If Eadwine drew a man pointing, would you stare only at the man pointing, or wouldnt u pay attn to “whats he pointing at?” !!

who would be so dense for the past 3 days? 😞

Row 1 Right

the Egodeath community WHAT R THEY LOOKING AT

u r supposed to look at that & connect the targets of looking eg left tree like right tree, and right leg of rightly standing guy not losing his balance of control stability on high dose Psilocybin from the Hatsis “a naturalistic reading is always neutral and correct” potato reward lockbox

here u go, Mr. Naturalistic:

🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔🥔

Here is the kind of reward your “We Historians’ Methodology” deserves.

as i wrote at very start of this site Oct 2020: you dumb and dense committed mushroom rejectors, FOR YOU, IT IS INDEED POTATOES, u r so right, good for you.

Row 1 Left with Winnowing Basket

the point is: right side guy WHAT IS HE LOOKING AT??? and not shown–

here is a bit of a new idea 914 am a.m. March 11, 2023] A new angle we have multiple pairs I’m thinking and it’s increasing as I talk, the number the count is increasing:

how many places in this picture do you have a pair of people who are looking at two different things?

row one middle of which you only see the left hand guy above, that serves to conjoin the two different things , the targets of what they are looking at

A LOOKER PAIR, how many in this– 9:16 am OH! a name for this image: THE LOOKER-PAIRS IMAGE

• horses
• ego-dead lifters (row 2 middle-left) Psilocybin AUTHENTICALLY, ACTUALLY QUALIFIED session guides
• the pointless loiterers (row 1 middle)
• the Egodeath community (row 1 right)

Left Tall: Standing on Right Leg, Chute, Shorn Rams and Monster Furnace

point: show rightly standing guy & monster sacrifice child-thinking chute

Is he not looking at the tree?!

am I insane?? 🤯

🖼🔍🔬🧐

Am i seeing things, like Julie “X-ray Vision” Brown following in John Rush’s bad-influence footsteps “Here we are clearly being shown mushrooms clearly being handed out” (in the entry into Jerusalem scene in Saint Martin church).

And re: the Great Canterbury Psalter “God Creates Plants” famous image:

“Jesus holds” — I think even Jerry Brown maybe makes this mistake this big mistake of saying

I don’t know who I don’t know who all makes this mistake but

“Jesus[sic] is gesturing at the Mushrooms inviting us to ingest the mushrooms” and “God Holds an object, probably a mushroom, in his hand”– but the image clearly in fact shows that God’s hand is completely empty

but when you take the same hallucinogens that these scholars are taking, then you can clearly see it

Row 2 Right: Lockbox

Row 2 Left: Panel 2 & 3

Row 2 Left, Panel 2 & 3, with Looking-Lines

Historical note; ie how the discovery sequence went:

notice how this was itself a breakthrough just seeing this one guy in isolation looking by the way through the column he’s looking through the column so we might have meta-perception

just this one recognition that he is looking at this tree is a big deal, that’s a big breakthrough — but I had not yet connected, I had not yet even thought of asking: what about the left-hand guy:

what is the left-hand guy looking at?

and ultimately in the end, after it occurs to me to draw more lines, finally the whole picture unfolds and I perceive and recognize the entire intended set of looking lines.

and then ultimately a few minutes ago above, I realized that the entire image is largely characterized by the the grouping of these pairs of people looking at different targets, so as to connect all of those targets.

Row 2 Right: Lockbox, Buildings

Here is where I started to figure out that the the three tower mushroom caps the round Towers all of them indicate stability and so we are being shown a big building, but the little tower next to it is saying “the point of this building is stability” just like the other two tower buildings

connector usage of motifs

and an interesting John Rush point:

yes indeed of course all of the mushroom cap towers with the top that looks like a mushroom cap , of course it’s a given that they all do mean mushrooms — but you haven’t , you have not explained very much yet.

Because the point of this art genre is not mushrooms

so you really have not finished ; you’ve barely begun, you have barely begun to explain the image when you say that these are mushrooms these mean mushroom caps the top of the towers mean mushroom caps

well you have not actually explained the image yet.

The ultimate reference of the image is not mushrooms or mushroom caps.

in fact you’ve just barely begun because the question is:

what are the Mushroom caps being used to teach us about Psilocybin effects?

THAT is the REAL question not merely Jerry Brown’s dead end project of trying to make a database for scholars to debate whether this imagery means mushrooms or not

that is not the challenge that we have

the real, more further, more-developed challenge is:

what is the mushroom imagery being used to communicate???

That is where the true difficult big-brain work is that I’ve been doing.

all of that work is opened up by the given assumption that all of this artwork — like John Rush says — all religious art means mushrooms — but you’ve only gotten started at that point; congratulations, you’ve begun playing the game

The game is not “spot the mushroom” or Thomas hatsis debate whether it is a Mushroom or not

this is not it is not about debating whether it is a Mushroom or not

and that was the game that Jerry Brown was still thinking that he’s playing

he’s thinking he’s still playing the infantile beginner-level game of “spot the mushroom” (meaning, of course, kiddie Amanita 🍄 ) 😞

but I am doing the advanced level, next-level, which is:

If you are looking for Amanita as if that is “mushrooms”, that immediately indicates that you were at a beginner infantile childish beginner level of playing the game

If you are looking for Amanita as if that is “mushrooms” — Hatsis admits & advocates doing exactly, literally this, to the full extreme;

he tells me that Brown and I are not allowed to assert Psilocybin; that we are being inconsistent and self contradictory, and we are not allowed to leave the John Allegro jail cell which Hatsis has ensconced himself in.

I hasten to emphasize:

I never was in that cell. — in extreme contrast to Thomas Hatsis , who still says his favorite book is sacred mushroom and the cross (don’t know why; it’s not that great of a book) —

I never was a follower of Allegro,

I never even heard of him until after I had finished my core theory,

And when I finally got his book, I was just disappointed — except for the part of no historical Jesus and I followed that up through other authors: Freke & Gandy, whose book The Jesus Mysteries is WAY, WAY better than SMC.

I am not “leaving Allegro”, because I never started from allegro!! or “considerable departures from”, to quote John Lash’s equivalent confused as hell , projection wording.

My thinking is certainly not a “departure from”; I have never “departed from” Allegro, and I most certainly never “departed from” being a follower & worshipper of the false god Wasson, like Hatsis and Lash stupidly assume everyone is, just like them.

Stop projecting your stupid intellectual autobiography trajectory onto me!!

I did not “come from Allegro”; in 0% does my theory come from allegro.

Or from Wasson, for that matter, John Lash: Wasson your god and idol can SUCK IT, John Lash!

my first involvement with incorporating coverage of Wasson into my theory was to write a 64-page article saying how he’s totally full of shiite and contradicts himself constantly,

and i accused him in 2006 of withholding what pathetically nonexistent citations of art historians covering pilzbaum.

Citation Fkking Needed!!

A single book, that Panofsky calls “little”, 50 years outdated by the time of the 1952 letter [excuse me, LETTERS], 117 years outdated now; only 86 pages (see the present website); no one bothered to translate it from German to English; and it’s got the word pilzbaum only five times?!

this is pathetic!! is this is all you got ha ha ha ha

where are the art historians’ allegedly, supposedly claim and pretend “we have thoroughly discussed and thoroughly published and written and studied exhaustively all about these mushroom trees”

GREAT, THEN LETS SEE IT–

It’s bizarre

why didn’t the entire world yell at Wasson “great I’m glad to hear that Panofsky covered that’s good news where is the books?”

where are the books?

we’re really looking forward to looking at these books

why didn’t the whole world get interested and look into it and investigate ??

where was the pushback?

did everybody just cave, what the hell?!

The first thing I ever wrote or thought about Wasson, when I deigned and stooped and lowered myself to acknowledging his existence, was to tell him and Panofsky the art historians:

bullsht!! you did not do any of that!

where is the fkking citation?!

where is the goddmn citations — and it better be a huge, towering stack of citations of your coverage.

it needs to be at least as tall as the tottering tower of Carl Ruck books

the adult game is psilocybin little brown mushrooms

given that every one of them means mushrooms, then what???

and in fact that was precisely the theme of the first book review that was posted which was my book review the first review of Jerry Brown’s book made exactly the point:

yes they are all mushrooms, so what,

now what, what’s next??

where do we go with this fact

Row 2 Middle Wide

In this crop (last night or the turn of the day beginning of the day midnight)…

The scope of this crop was to include both of the targets the both of the ego-dead lifters are looking at, to group them and ultimately to connect those two targets.

Super ultimately, to connect all 4, 5, 6 … targets of all of the looking pairs

I guess I have to pay tax to John Rush now that I’m drawing confusing lines on blurry Internet images pointing to things that I still have no idea what John Rush, what the hell am I supposed to be looking at in this picture?

this is terrible communication, it’s completely confusing, I have no idea what you’re even talking about

The John Rush Experience 🎸

Alas I know that you all know what I am talking about about this experience:

” great !!! a wonderful new book, ton of mushroom pictures, right? uh… what the hell am I even looking at here??”

Row 2 Middle Wide with Looking-Lines

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f177-row2-middle-looking-lines.jpg” 370 KB [2:04 a.m. March 11, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f177.item.zoom#

Row 2 Middle Right: Balance

Confusingly — it really kept me on my toes trying to explain how I knew when I had the correct reading of the lame left leg of

The very challenging thing here is the left heel is being shown as stable , which is a self-contradiction.

Everyone knows that left leg means unstable self control during psilocybin , so why are we being shown left heel as being stable??

That doesn’t make sense.

but then you look at his crutch Which serves t

he best analogy I have is that it serves as a negative sign

but I don’t like the way that I jump from saying “the crutch is like a negative sign “, and then I bring in this idea of the lame left leg , and then I say “there I have clearly explained how the left heel , which means not stable, means stable”

then this feels like it too rough, too jumpy and rough of a way of explaining it then too suddenly I bring in the motif of the lame left leg, which everybody is thoroughly familiar with from king Oedipus

so I am still working, laboring to clarify how can you use the unstable left heel to represent stable control

so I spoke for an hour in my voice recording last night about that, trying to smooth out that explanation

I hope that I have captured all of my thoughts that arose while posting this quick short little one minute re-announcement

10:03 a.m. March 11, 2023 Cybermonk

Pointless Loiterers Problem

Man this is lame I still don’t have a crop of the pointless loiterers if you look at the pointless loiterers I just noticed something that because I’ve been analyzing their hands of course I’ve been analyzing their fingers a lot and covering the hands of revealing and showing the hands well I just noticed something something

10:49 a.m. March 11, 2023] The guy who’s looking left is showing his hand and left and the guy in the middle of showing both hands aimed in two directions, and the guy on the right is aiming his hand to the right hand tree

the mindset just now, the mindset that I used to perceive that was:

imagine that they are subtle agents standing on the street corner, and they give the appearance that they’re not doing anything, but actually they are messaging: they are signaling; they are sending a signal through their eyes… [BUT WAIT: THERES MORE!!] 🔪🔪

The Pointless Loiterers are Subtle Pointers

👈 👈👉 👉

But the moment that I took that perspective (more vividly than before) a minute ago, I then realized: I looked at their hands, and then I saw the pattern of the meaningless–

the problem (considered the past cpl days) was that there was no meaning in their hands, of which hands they were showing.

but I just realized that as signal– is

their function is to signal looking in this direction — or looking — [then ⚡️it struck me]:

or pointing by revealing which hand (??!!)

As is often the case, perhaps as is typically the case, I am not fully confident yet about hands as pointing, it is still the initial “am I crazy” phase

🤔 🤔 🖼🔬🔍🧐

I am still at the phase called “am I crazy, or could it be??”, that we have found and identified a function, a purpose for which hand is being shown??

and then what usually happens, what normally happens is, I make a few little corrections: I didn’t quite get the angle quite right,

but then soon this hypothesis, this scientific explanatory hypothesis then becomes tested as a network-integrated connections over the next days.

and then after this proceeds for a couple of weeks, then it becomes an obvious fact:

of course they’re pointing with their hands, are you dull?

of course they’re pointing

obviously they’re pointing with their eyes , this is all well-established fact, that you can then build on for further decoding of additional images.

Pointless Loiterers Redux

[12:39 a.m. March 11, 2023] addendum – i just tra Realized that by discovering a few minutes ago the symmetry of the three loiterers left both right left hand both hands right hand this gives them a distinct boundary of that function because yesterday I had been puzzling over there’s no difference between the ego death community roll one right versus the pointless loiterers row 1 middle.

I do not think that this is a big functional difference, but it is a very distinct very identifiable difference– I know!! 12:46 pm — I think I’ve got it — the Egodeath community crowd represents the viewers audience solving the puzzle, whereas the pointless loiterers are to be considered as part of the art to be decoded. 🎉🎉🏆

this explains — if I recall from memory — one of the columns, because I asked yesterday: what exactly is the specific function of each column? 🤔🤔

YI!!

Why the Crowd Has No Legs

I just [11:47 p.m. March 11, 2023] solved a mystery of why the crowd has no legs, extend / build on my solution (build on/ network on) my realization that the crowd = people represents viewers of the art, whereas Row 1 middle is part of the art for the viewer to analyze – different levels of art/viewing being represented.]

The new aspect/ connection now is (this is “building out network connections” per Paul Thagaard) answers something I puzzled over the past couple days:

Why no legs – because we mostly are not to apply same analysis to them … they don’t participate that way in this image; the are “outside the image”, functionally, mostly, relatively.

The crowd doesn’t have legs, in order to remove them mostly from the referent features main features to be analyzed.

There is only one hand displayed in the crowd of “viewers of this image”: the apprehensive viewer …. compare the self-threatening psalter viewer inso far as he’s “meta”, shown viewing the psalter.

See Also

Site Map > Great Canterbury Psalter > Horses & Right-Leg Balancing (Image f177)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#f177