battling against demon-possessed voice dictation that makes me always speak with impure lips

mobile app is so buggy, i cant even correct typos without it deleting text, so must send this as-is.

Teacher of Right Thinking About Control

Force Eyes to Aim and See

FORCE EYES TO AIM AND LOOK AND SEE

its unlikely this shows mushrooms bc theres no reason for this grain-centered religious image in Great Canterbury Psalter to think of mushrooms. Argues Panofsky the most influential art HISTORIAN (who else utters such wisdoms and markets himself as wanna be historian? 🤔 )

From the same unlikely-to-think-of-mushrooms image:

so you see per the art historian historian Panofsky the historian you can see that we have no reason to expect the bins to be distributing mushrooms, to

to justify such an expectation, you would have to require something like a gigantic 10 foot tall mushroom tree depicted in the same image

along with mushroom effects depictions in the same image such as ego death loss of control adjacent attached to the bins

But even if this one image did have a giant 10 foot mushroom tree and depiction of loss of control threat that gives that’s contradicted by the fact that none of the other images in this book include such motifs and depictions

Horses & Right-Leg Balancing (Image f177)

Main page containing all of my crops:

4-Horses Mushroom Tree Right-Foot Balancing (Great Canterbury Psalter f177)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/12/4-horses-mushroom-tree-right-foot-balancing-great-canterbury-psalter-f177/

Condensed summary of Features of this image:
Article title:
Branching-Message Mushroom Trees: Psychedelic Eternalism Depicted in Medieval Art as Branching Mushrooms, Handedness, and Non-Branching
Section heading:
Standing on Right Leg Supported by Right Hand (Canterbury)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/16/branching-message-mushroom-trees-psychedelic-eternalism-depicted-in-medieval-art-as-branching-mushrooms-handedness-and-non-branching/#Extreme-Standing-Right-Leg

What is wrong with me that in 2.x years of looking, scouring this Canterbury psalter image f134, though I would have LOVED nothing more to to see mushrooms in the bins, it never ONCE even OCCURRED to me to OPEN MY EYES AND LOOK in this direction?

I’m always yelling at McKenna for telling us in 1994 book Food of the Gods, do not attempt to look for Psilocybin in Christianity; it’s a given that it’s not there, because look how morally superior I am, in my glorious loser defeatedness, to the Big Bad Church who eliminated all entheogens.

Isn’t it just terrible the Big Bad Church for having done that? he asks.

And I am the same.

The only rational explanation for my inexplicable neglect, I couldn’t be bothered to ever ONCE just simply aim my eyes in the direction of the bins:

God prevented me from looking in the direction of top of bins.

If you look at eye-tracking record of what spots I aimed my eyes at in this image, i never aimed my eyes at the bins.

God made me so disappointed that the bins contents are not visible and can only be crudely drawn hay bins of disappointing grain, that it — I am reporting remorsefully but intriguingly the fact — WE MUST TAKE A LESSON FROM MY FAILURE TO AIM MY EYES — that it never once occurred to me to ATTEMT to LOOK zoom in on too of bins.

this point is independent of playing the old spot the mushroom childish game debating about whether the liberty cops images in the Benz actually represent wheat.

regardless of whether you claim that the top of the bins shows liberty cabs or wheat grains being distributed the fact remains that I did not even attempt to look it did not even occur to me to try to look and to zoom and to simply look at can we see what’s in the bin and the answer is yes we can see quite a lot of detail of what is in the bin

why in the hell — this is inexplicable — why in the hell did it never occur to me to aim my eyes & zoom in the direction of the top of the bends to see what is being distributed?

This is so basic so elementary but of course I’m drawing an analogy to the entire field what is wrong with people such that when Panofsky said bunch of cockamamie pseudo reasoning that can’t stand up to two seconds of pushback why did everyone simply cave I would expect 1000 people knocking at his door in 1970 with the book Soma reporting Panofsky said that we are historians know all about Mushroom trees I don’t understand why didn’t the entire world stop all of their business

And say “wonderful terrific! this is the best news ever! you art historians have thoroughly studied mushroom trees! wonderful!

please give us the stack of citations!!

I’m sure you must have a lot more than a single 46-year-old book (now in 1970, 64 years outdated) that’s only 86 pages long, and only mentions the word pilzbaum five times, and that nobody’s bothered to translate from German to English.”

What is wrong with everybody in 1970 that they didn’t instantly beat down Petoskey’s door eagerly demanding citations from him to find out all about where exactly specifically did art historians treat this topic please show us the books filled with these mushroom trees discussions between the scholars and how they proved that Italian pine, an Amanita host, has naught to do with Amanita?

this is completely inexplicable

why people didn’t simply open their eyes and simply look, at msh trees ?

why I didn’t simply think of hey why not look at the bin

and this is the same pattern as the inexplicable impossible to explain in Paul Stamets 1996 book psilocybin mushrooms of the world,

Why is there no section heading called all about the copious psilocybin mushrooms that we are Certainly to expect, that we have every reason to expect tons and tons of cubensis and liberty cap and Cubensis in Europe and in England and In the Mediterranean

where does he discuss this obviously the most number one most interesting topic of all regarding psilocybin mushrooms of the world is our high expectation that certainly there must be a lot as he told Graham Hancock in 2007 of course there are always been tons and tons of them and so there must be a lot of evidence for them

where is the section where he discusses this number one top most important interesting question?

he never has such a section

His book amounts to an information black out he delivers only a half of a phrase careless here and a side of mention hear bits and fragments but he never looks he never turns his eyes in the direction to make a statement or explain the expedition that they vigorously may did the research he never describes where he sent out letters to all people mycologists

Asking please send in your reports that there are Cubensis all over you up and that there are liberty cap all over England and please send in your reports he never describes asking that question

why not

Why is everybody constitutionally incapable of asking the question: where is the expected Cubensis and Liberty Cap in England and in Europe and in the Mediterranean