Voice mis-transcription mobile app
my theory of being radical was shattered and BTFOd
since Nov 2020, especially peak total fail during February 1, 2023 through and February 14, 2023 when I explained how I was obliged to take the radical extreme position of asserting that the Canterbury Psalter image F134 row three middle blue crater is to collect psilocybin
— BUT I colossally totally failed to coherently also say that Therefore the grain dispensary bin bin the two bins filled with grain and bucket distributing pouring grain must be cubensis
which it turns out that it explicitly blatantly is
I had between November 14, 2020 and March 19, 2023 — two years and four months of failure to be radical
I was only inconsistently radical
and in fact left not just a quarter inch gap but I left an 8 feet wide massive giant gap for evil future me to completely demolish and utterly humiliate dumb present me at the time
and so evil future me of March 19 (give or take a day , see the date I announced that the grain bins and bucket explicitly depict liberty caps and cubensis )
which I embarrassed announced that the dumb guy happy at the grain dispensary green dispensary grain wheat grain dispensary was no such thing , and I fallen into Eadwine’s pit of falling for the trap of the initial surface impression
and my gullible way off-base misreading of dumb guy between November 2020 through into March 2023 yesterday was totally and completely wrong and off and it utterly failed to be had utterly And totally failed to be radical Or esoteric by any measure
it was the most rankest of exoteric uninspired outsider those on the outside
I had read it exactly as those on the outside were to be tricked into reading
and I had fallen into the pit set for me for two years and four months despite being The definitive leading edge model of radicalness but
but I turned out to be the model of inconsistent incoherent radicalness instead , because I should not have been aiming to be radical; I should’ve aimed to be the model of being principled consistently thus coherently extreme radical
consistently coherently extreme radical; consistently radical
to do : copy to here my communication with Cyberdisciple November 2020 where I said I’m not going to analyze rows two and three of image F134 because they’re stupid and mundane and just merely show grain
and cyberdisciple replied something like you’re a fool , you have let me down you poser you uninspired exoteric esotericist
either:
black and white absolute assertion that psilocybin is the only way; transformation from possibilism to eternalism (while in the loose cognitive altered state eternalism experiential mode)
or else, the alternative is:
perpetual dead-end, status quo, vague model forever in perpetuity
And sprinkle on the casual incidental assertion of the ahistoricity of religious founder figures to top it off for good measure
no free will also by the way but don’t let on about this part of it Keep it on the down low; in the Unpleasant Experiences secret high-level dimension, in Shadow factor 13 (SHA) (which doesn’t exist),
with the shadow dragon monster item 54: “I was afraid to lose my self-control”;
and: “It was difficult to control my thoughts”, from the Rick Strassmann hallucinogen rating scale (HRS)
I created the Field of Cognitive Anti-Neuroscience
cognitive anti-neuroscience which is the Egodeath theory ; the Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence : the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism
is my approach
because the alternative is deleting cognitive replacing it by neuroscience
I am listening to the podcast episode , that’s a bit of transcribing number 236 at 50:00
non-integrated exoteric esotericism advocate Jan Irvin 2008 Deathmatch against exoteric exotericism Jan Irvin 2022
Jan Ervin at the end of day last night this morning new book 2022 takes a very lopsided scorched earth anti-drug approach he pours it on the heavily totally pours it on the most rank vulgar anti-drug Christian attitudes never mind did it totally contradicts his other book his companion book
his two books destroy each other he is in consistently radical
just like me
I am in the worst possible position to criticize him for marketing his positive radical assertion of logos equals Eucharist equals mushrooms in 2008 holding that book in my left hand while also Irvin 2022 logos equals Eucharist not equals mushrooms because deliver the most vulgar exoteric common place anti-drug attitude now is his new brand never mind that is directly self contradicting himself
no-free-will, but Keep this on the down-low and consistently only assert it during the altered state
And be low-key about this but also this means that during altered state there No free will is the case
but during the ordinary state Freewill is the case
metaphysically flip-flop inconsistent: i assert state-specific metaphysics, destroying and demolishing Chris Letheby’s one-dimensional, static, ordinary state based ; ie, what William James calls ‘pragmatism’ — see the book by Jonathan Bricklin: the illusion of will, self, and time: William James’ reluctant guide to enlightenment,
by which Brooklyn specifically means Jonathan Bricklin Specifically means enlightenment means eternity thinking ; eternalism-thinking
or else, the alternative is:
perpetual dead-end, status quo, vague model forever in perpetuity;
these are the options open to us.
Pick One and be consistent for God sake
The highest value is spiritual religious regeneration as 100% of everyone has always asserted
and
the only way for regeneration is Psilocybin
Voice dictation dictates to me that I am not permitted to use the word that begins with the letter C
or possibly I could be more narrowly hyper specific more narrowly narrowly Nero hyper specific by saying cubensis
this piece of sht voice transcription is going to help me stay with everyday language because it fails to transcribe that word that starts with the letter C and it successfully transcribes the word psilocybin
so that pretty much settles that
it says that that word which starts with the letter C is a typo so that settles that
Self contradictory Jan Irvin lectures us about logos which means consistent avoidance of self-contradiction
contradict yourself much, Jan Irvin , king of self-contradiction 🤡👑 easy to do when you have been a poser pseudo esoteric ; exoteric esotericism all he ever had and that is why it is so easy to ditch and contradict his 2008 book or his earlier mediocrity sterling mediocrity, uninspired
his childish kiddie Amanita powered airplane cannot get off the ground — see the book Astrotheology and shamanism
Jan Irvin lectures loss Jan Irvin lectures us about the word W word which means logos which means
reason logic and truth
Egodeath Mystery Show podcast episode 236 at 1:05:00
Irvin accuses Wallace enough asserting a falsehood when Wasson sometimes inconsistently says equates Eucharist and logos and with Mushrooms in this context 2022 book specifically psilocybin mushrooms yet somehow we are supposed to excuse and ignore the fact that Irving in 2008 book the holy mushroom asserts precisely explicitly and emphatically that which is the entire purpose of the 2008 book is to assert precisely that which he now
do you know expects us to find Wasson he now expects us to find Wasson guilty for having the audacity to equate and that Wasson is guilty of asserting a falsehood when Wasson asserts and equates that Eucharist equal and logos equals mushrooms which is precisely exactly what Irvin himself asserts in 2008 now I do allow him to change his mind as long as he meets my condition that he must explicitly discussed the fact that he has changed his mind
how can you now take
the rank vulgar outsider
He fails to reconcileThose on the outside anti-drug position without even mentioning that you’re in direct self-contradiction of yourself so so much for your logos again you are allowed to change your position but Irving in 2022 book the beginning of the book the recounts his changing trajectory got his religious conversion
But he fails to reconcile really the truth but may be in his hands the shallow truth in 2008 book THM The holy mushroom that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
yet in 2022 book he asserts that Wasson is guilty of asserting a falsehood in asserting that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
2022 book demands of us demands of the reader that the reader must hold a rank exoteric run-of-the-mill Christian moralist anti-drug perspective attitude never mind that does exactly 100% contradicts the truth which is presented by his 2008 book which correctly asserts that Eucharist and logos equals mushrooms
My reaction and my response is to triple down and be an absolutist by principle, on principle
be consistently radical; be radically clear, and be radically consistent
please accuse me of being wrong, but for god sake never accuse me of being unclear or inconsistent!
although — here’s the rub — I totally was inconsistent and failed to be consistently radical in November 2020-Mar 19 2023 and esp in February 1-14 2023
my consistently radical clear-cut position statement that I marry and wed : call me wrong, but do not call me inconsistent, and do not call me unclear
The ultimate and highest value is religious regeneration from possibility branching model to pre-existing eternity model
and the only way to do this is through psilocybin
and this means what the Bible says, those who have been turned and converted; those on the inside ; the elect ; the chosen; fished out by God
cyberpunk who is Cybermonk the inconsistently consistent radical who never lets the evil future may get a little toe in — but instead throws the door wide-open 8 feet wide gigantic opening for the evil future me to come waltzing right in limbs fully splayed and completely to come waltzing right in and completely BTFO the dumb present me
Irvin as inconsistent as king David
Cybermonk Teaching the Pure Eternalism Control-Stability Eucharist to the Cubensis Providers
Cybermonk 7:34 a.m. March 24, 2023
Addendum March 23, 2023
18:00 4824.wav I have the following quite a good voice recording– I have the following text that,
I did this voice transcription in parallel with doing a voice recording of all of the below
The second phrase of the title of the article my 2023 main article is psychedelic eternal of the eternal living eternity
pre-existence of control thoughts
this means punchy definition of that phrase that term means:
no Freewill and
pre-existence of future control thoughts and
you don’t control the source of your control thoughts and
ADDED LATER: you are vulnerable naked exposed and {you see that you are naked} ; you see that you are vulnerable to thoughts being thoughts being {forced into the female mind} from a hidden external higher uncontrollable source of control-thoughts, {coming into the walled city gate of its own volition from outside the local system.}
That smells like a major important key breakthrough I’ve got a hook into something I’ve got a fish on the line I’m fishing for thoughts I’m fishing upward and I’ve caught some thing I’ve caught an idea the Jesus enters into Jerusalem the political leader savior epiphany appearance outside the city gate wall
The political savior comes to the town of his own initiative saving from outside the system and then the people are brought out from their insular wall boundary through the gate transformed removing the garment removing their ego like possibility branching mental model garment and made to place that garment under the feet
midday addend cont:
you are vulnerable to overpowering déjà vu ; here is where you lose control and die as a control agent and now you perceive the hands crossed with the right wrist no visible no longer hidden by the left limb branching illusion
In other words
triple down on my most controversial and offensive concepts BUT they have to sound distinctive they can’t sound familiar familiar Arity is deaf they have to sound familiar in an otherworldly not that this sounds boring Lee familiar stupid questionnaires from the dumb big Pharma psychedelic industrial complex very boring and downer ideas not that kind of familiarity but rather an otherworldly kind of familiarity that this is ringing a bell from an altered state forgotten
I am thinking that the phrase no freewill is poison and the word determinism is poison because they are overly familiar in a very bad way
and do the same thing with the poisonous bad lexicon that all of the big Pharma psychedelic industrial complex
all of them use their hip to the lingo jargon that is instantly tiresome and a bummer, their stupid phrases their annoying phrases
familiar and frustrating and unsatisfying phrases
these are phrases that are used to delete cognitive psychedelic affects
these are phrases that are an attack that’s trying to remove Dionysus from Psilocybin experiential state state of consciousness
Their soul-killing lexicon
Get Real
A Complete Mystical Freakout
You Had an Authentic Complete Mystical Freakout
the soul killing term bunk terminology thats used to replace and delete and eliminate everything good in the Freakout peak true mystical Freakout break Roland Griffiths stupid Walter Stace 1960 book
break their wrong lexicon
their conceptual vocabulary is crap
They bring us a incomplete, non-mystical experience
and when they say “mystical”, every time they said they ruin the word , because what they mean by the word is not what real people mean by the word
real Mystics have nothing to do with this word mystic mystical experience as used, as Misused, as abused by Walter Stace 1960
And then taken up by Timothy Leary when he converted the book Mysticism and Philosophy into a bunk questionnaire or a set of 38 questionnaires Walter Panki 1962 April 20 became 1963 dissertation which you can read all 38 1/2 questionnaires in that dissertation which became the godforsaken so called mystical experience questionnaire
which is no such thing
in which no mystic whatever recognize
unicorns and rainbows
And Studeris 2010
refers to this single book but they do it in a dishonest way
they say “the scientific literature” such as end note reference citation number 20
this construction in the article is a way of hiding the fact that what they call it what they sell and what they falsely market with false advertising as the so-called “scientific literature”
when they say such as citation number 20 they’re hiding the fact that they only got one flimsy wrong bad book
We’re trying to sell this flimsy book and
they are trying to sell this flimsy book as this so called “the scientific literature on psychological experiencing including Mysticism”
scientific literature? get out of here!
scientific the
here’s our list of scientific literature such as this one book , 63 years out of date
some “scientific literature foundation basis” they have there:
the only way through which we have salvation regeneration and entering into heaven is through psilocybin
define in a crystal clear hard-core to the wall unsurpassable extremist radical pure
speak with purified lips
do not let Evil future me make more pure more consistent more firm tripling down assertions
no compromise
no weakening
no prevaricating
no watering down
no sugarcoating
but the more of the opposite, the better it will work and cohere
and I have learned my lesson from failing to look at row two right and only saying row three middle is a blue crater to collect cubensis
— but we’re still going to assert that Row 2 Right in image f134 Great Canterbury Psalter is merely grain
this is failure — failure to be consistently extreme radical
relevant to add the above to this morning’s post [done here now]
The Consistently Extreme Radical Psilocybin Position or the Perpetual Vague Muddle
the Theory of “Psychedelic Eternalism”
psychedelic eternalism : The second phrase in the article title is the excellent ultra powerful phrase Psychedelic Determinism — psychedelic eternalism.
in the article the solution to whether I should introduce con controversial topics assertions is to make them more concentrated, more condensed
in my definition of psychedelic eternity model —
aside: I need an alternative to the word a every day language alternative to the word eternal ism
Block universe eternity
preexistence of control thoughts
no Freewill
although I do feel that no free will connotes domino chain determinism
it is I feel I have this gut sensation
something has gone wrong when I open up an opening in my article to let in the unwashed outside world
for example if I were to even mention the phrase fatalistic determinism, I am welcoming now I’m bringing in polluted unclean concept labels and network connotations and this is harmful
I can feel it in my gut I can feel the harmful in my gut a harmful modes of thinking the ruts of thinking ruts the rut caught in a rut of thinking of thinking
and I have these meters I have these detection meters and I’m there meters of telling me bad things are happening when you say the phrase no free will
bad things are happening because you’re you’re alluding to an old unproductive failed dead-end cul-de-sac debate , when you bring in that concept label , you’re also importing an entire raft of confusion
the poison is not worth the chalice
The Egodeath theory 