Idea Development page 20 (2024/11/25)

Cybermonk, first posted November 25, 2024

Site Map – Previous page – Next page

Contents:

Incoming Ideas

see the new Incoming Ideas entries at bottom of this article.

Friday Dec 13 2024 i must create idea dev p 21, bc 20 is too long, hung.

when entering text at top, line wrap on mobile takes 10 sec, unresponsive.

try new page, test responsiveness line wrap.

switched from desktop to mobile authoring, data loss?

i will date entries.

The First Scholar to Identify Mushrooms in Greek Religious Myth: Robert Graves, “What Food The Centaurs Ate”, Shortly After June 27, 1957, in New Yorker

the present section was copied to page “Robert Graves’ Writings About Mushrooms”, https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/robert-graves-writings-about-mushrooms/ as the master copy there:

Who was the first scholar to assert that mushrooms powered Greek religion and myth? When, where? Answer: Robert Graves, in the article “What Food The Centaurs Ate”, which was first published after June 27, 1957, in New Yorker.

I drove this research, pointed out the two conflicting claims in two versions of a Graves article in Atlantic later in Difficult Questions book, about where & when Centaur article focusing on Dionysus & recipe for ambrosia first appeared.

Then Cyberdisciple found this huge lead: Graves’ diary: https://robertgraves.org/diary-search — 1957: June 27th. Thursday: “Finally got What Food The Centaurs Ate off to New Yorker.”

So, against Graves 1970 Atlantic article & 1973 book Difficult, the Centaur article was first published around June/July 1957 in New Yorker.

Not August 1956 Atlantic (no Graves article).

Not the Aug 1957 Atlantic article “Mushrooms, Food of the Gods” (barely mentions Dionysus; this is NOT the Centaur article).

https://www.newyorker.com

Conclusion Section of “branching-message mushroom trees”: Don’t Reverse Art

Samorini’s Bernward doors pic in 1998 article is backwards! corrupts handedness. Stop doing this.

Correction! First Assertion that Plaincourault fresco Is mushrooms is ~1890-1910 by Abott Rignoux; also J. Rouge 1909

Also Huggins’ “Foraging” 2024 article lists:

Rougé, J., “Folk-lore de la Touraine”, Nouvelle Contribution, Gazette médicale du centre (Oct. 1, 1909), pages 213– 216

That’s a 4-page article in a journal – wish article had a link! Article is vague, no details at all.

The below don’t necessarily have 216 pages:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Folk_lore_de_la_Touraine/N3H_JOg_xzIC?hl=en – find “1909” or “Gazette médicale” or “Plaincourault” – doesn’t include “plain”.

Web search: https://www.google.com/search?q=Roug%C3%A9+%22Folk-lore+de+la+Touraine%22 – 26 pages, not 4, no page 216.

ABE Books:
https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/author/jacques-marie-rouge/pics/

Amazon reprint:
https://www.amazon.com.au/Folk-lore-contribution-traditions-populaires-arrondissement/dp/B0BFVWJNM9

Samorini article “The mushroom-tree of Plaincourault”, 1997, Eleusis journal, p 34 90% down & p. 35 67% down:

“in a description of the small chapel made at the … end of the previous [century] by a certain Abbot Rignoux, … Rignoux described the tree as “a mushroom with several heads”. “

YI crop by Cybermonk thxgv nov 28 2024 7:40 pm.

nov 29 2024 note: Blue plant has minimal / less branching than red plant; the blue plant is cleaner of branching

Red plant reversed into in std YI orientation: braching on the Left (possibilism is mapped to Left),
no branching on the Right (eternalism is mapped to Right).

smooth red ball on Right (less branching)

segmented blue cap = relatively more branching than smooth blue ball; IY here.

tan & salmon mushrooms mirror each other too.

A single instance is an Anomaly. Two instances is a Pattern.

Cybermonk

fresh good recording after reread Hanegraaff book Esotericism and the Academy 6246.wav Good outline of my broad article “Cubensis-driven entheogen scholarship”. 1.5 hours.

my motivation purpose for visiting the field of entheogen scholarship: i needed myth to confirm the Egodeath core theory: analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control.

Ruck integrated myth and entheogens.

f&g book The Jesus Mysteries: we met & discussed entheogens, the authors were mostly censored.

I NEEDED a greedy approach; i needed & declared the maximal entheogen theory of religion in 2002, was vindicated Thanksgiving 2020 by the Great Canterbury Psalter.

Ruck motive: construct identity secret heretic boundary utilizing Secret Amanita to fabricate narrative of us suppressed heretics. the great secret is amanita.

it helps ruck to restrict enth, storytelling Suppression framing laboring to construct a heavy boundary barrier wall separating our good secret amanita from then the big bad suppressors.

john Lash: “i cannot allow evil jesus/ moses to have had entheogens”

Ruck presents a crudely defined incoherent confusing & confused crayon tale of boundary wall defining Them Establishment Prohibitionists vs Us Heretic Counterculture Sects – same p 56 , Daturas Virgin, Ruck screws up , attributing mushroom trees to Wasson as if he publicly agreed affirmed them, infuriating me & Irvin.

Irvin falsely attribg them to Allegro-/ who never wrote affirming pilzbaum all mushroom trees purposelfully meaning mushroom features as well as tree features (non/branching).

all world religious myth is description of peak cubensis experiencing.

i broke ways w ruck after entheos 2nd issue.

i followed the direction of “Conjuring Eden” article 2001, but using an Explicit cubensis-focused approach, not Secret (Amanita).

post Samorini 1997&1998.

i don’t care for p 14 Ruck’s invented, myth-type tale of boundary identity construction.

In 2002/2003 i declared Ruck merely moderate, but we / i need the maximal entheogen theory of religion, to confirm my core theory, analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control.

Hanegraaff’s History of Deleting Fixed Stars Heimarmene Level 8

book Esotericism and the Academy page 176: magia of different types for each level:

1) sublunar: natural magic.

Moon: skipped.

2) celestial magic = above the moon, below the fixed stars. ie the planets; Mars Venus Sun Mars Jupiter Saturn.

Fixed stars: skipped.

3) ceremonial magic – above the fixed stars.

What about at the level of the moon?

What about at level 8: the fixed stars/ heimarmene/ Fate/ eternalism?

The Dissolver of ‘Entheogens’, Hanegraaff, on Faivre’s Traits of Western Esotericism Being Employed to Dissolve Rather than Usefully Demarcate a Field

Hanegraaff defines ‘entheogen’ as any practice or substance that ‘CAN‘ produce the same effect as psilocybin – for example, imagination, breathing, sneezing, singing, or literally anything at all: light bulb, oven, car engine: I explained how these items are all entheogens by his infinitely lenient, excessively good-faith definition.

Anything you can name meets this wide-open definition of ‘entheogen’, and is elevated to the same level of efficacy as psilocybin, through this magic trick of definition and the falsely binary word ‘can’ (which is actually a matter of degree & likelihood).

rather than demarcating a field, it [Faivre’s definition of ‘Western Esotericism’] ends up dissolving its boundaries. [bc it’s too easy for any practice or belief to meet Faivre’s checklist criteria] … only the scantiest evidence [is] sufficient to magically turn [anything] into species of “esotericism”.

p360, Hanegraaff book “Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture”, 2012

The Pre-Paradigm Phase of the Field of Transcendent Knowledge

VOX_TK_6240.wav, 45:00 –
See the produced result:
Egodeath Mystery Show Ep261 Competent Art Historians Wrote Nothing (Nov. 17 & 26, 2024)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/12/01/egodeath-mystery-show-ep261-competent-art-historians-wrote-nothing-nov-17-26-2024/

Relative to the fields of theory of religion/ Cog Sci/ Mysticism/ Spirituality/ Mythology, prior to the Egodeath theory, there is no “previous paradigm”, just a heap of “secret” exoteric-esoteric formless mush and eager pop anti-rationality.

Within entheogen scholarship, the Old Paradigm is Secret Amanita; the new paradigm is Explicit Cubensis.

Using My Voice Recordings

Too much time is required to produce & upload & textually summarize my voice recordings.

My voice recordings have good content; good delivery; & good miking.

I simultaneously play back a voice recording while recording new commentary.

I profitably listen to my nice voice recordings.

Room Miking Setup

Easygoing about background noise (appliance, ventilation) when using room mics.

When the room is more noisy, I use the center close-mic only, with a noise gate — no stereo room mics & far center-miking, then.

Long-term miking setup to date:

Left room mic AT 2020 (a MDC) w dead cat 😵🙀 4′ aimed at rear Left guitar cab 12′

Center mic E-V 635A “omni” dyn 6″ or 3′

Right room mic CAD E100 (a LDC) aimed at rear Right guitar cab 4′ (12′)

compressor on 3 mics, noise gate on Ctr mic, 80Hz bass cut & Limiter on the deck.

i have my ideal miking dialed in – stereo room mics + center mic.

My Electro-Voice 635A center mic is now officially Vintage, bc no longer manufactured 😭, this tv interviewing mic, no proximity boominess (“omni”), an RF- quiet dynamic mic.

“Reach out and Consult the Competent Art Historians; I Was Impressed by the Unanimous Celerity of Their Disavowals” Is a Totally Improper Farce & Travesty!

Not Academic Standard Practice!

The “Special-Case” of Pilzbaum (Taboo), Completely Absurd and Abnormal; the Deniers Lost this Debate

Great funny exasperation voice recording segment: VOX_TK_6240.wav Nov 26 2024, 10:00-20:00
See the produced result:
Egodeath Mystery Show Ep261 Competent Art Historians Wrote Nothing (Nov. 17 & 26, 2024)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/12/01/egodeath-mystery-show-ep261-competent-art-historians-wrote-nothing-nov-17-26-2024/

TOTALLY IMPROPER!! academic approach: “I reached out to consult the top competent art historians to interrogate how quickly they disavow & deny pilzbaum.”

I reached out to consult the top competent art historians to interrogate how quickly they disavow & deny pilzbaum.

Huggins, Wasson, even Brown re: Marcia Kupfer

BECAUSE THEY WROTE/ PUBLISHED 0 SENTENCES on this topic, and are thus manifestly not competent; more like A COMPROMISED ART HISTORIAN.

A dirty posturing move, a fallacy. Arg from authority.

6204.wav also has very good miking/ delivery/ content: 59:25 len.
See the produced result:
Egodeath Mystery Show Ep261 Competent Art Historians Wrote Nothing (Nov. 17 & 26, 2024)
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/12/01/egodeath-mystery-show-ep261-competent-art-historians-wrote-nothing-nov-17-26-2024/

Paradise Pilzbaum / trees subset of Pilzbaum. Panosky critical reading of letter 1. uncensored. & 2. Directionless Ruck entheogen scholarship, not Psil Repeal.

Was there a Cubensis tradition in Christianity? An unthinkable question during the Secret Amanita paradigm of entheogen scholarship 1952-2020.

The new paradigm (2002-2020+): Explicit Cubensis, my thinking framework since I announced the maximal entheogen theory of religion in 2002.

U CENSOR U LOSE

Cough up the flimsy Brinckmann citation & 2 photostats, Wasson, LOSER OF DEBATE.

Pics to add to branching-message mushroom trees article

4 plants / Creation of Plants – Great Canterbury Psalter / Paul Lindgren 2000; blue is Correct / preferred YI orientation.

Red has improper/ nonstandard IY orientation, though plausible deniability.

Eadwine insults the Red mushroom, praises/ affirms the well-formed Blue mushroom.

Tauroctony – bent legs x4 , bull = lower Sol impurity thinking cleansed

3 versions of Splendor Solis – Philosophers Beside the Tree: Gate below R foot; Cut right branch/ basket; Amanita at feet.

Creation of the 4 Plants

surprisingly, lacks Great Canterbury Psalter’s version of the scene: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/02/16/branching-message-mushroom-trees-psychedelic-eternalism-depicted-in-medieval-art-as-branching-mushrooms-handedness-and-non-branching/#God-Creates-Plants-Golden

🥘☂️🍄‍🟫🍄

Dec 13, 2020: I identified “Creator of Plants” in GCP as Panaeolus, Liberty Cap, Cubensis, Amanita

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/idea-development-page-7/ – Find “liberty”

Four years ago. It’s now Nov 25-26, 2024;

Now I bolstered looking from pov of the branching morphology language of this genre;

I looked for the first time today at “Creation of Plants” from the pov of Branching morphology.

The mushroom eternalism genre

The Cubensis eternalism genre

I first identified Creation of Plants in Great Canterbury Psalter Dec 13, 2020, a month into my Great Canterbury Psalter research (not counting my 2006 gallery of pilzbaum for my Plaincourault article, which included a Great Canterbury Psalter image).

“Creator of Plants” was discovered by Paul Lindgren, a credited picture on the 2000 cover of James Arthur’s book.

Mushrooms and Mankind: The Impact of Mushrooms on Human Consciousness and Religion. James Arthur, 2000. Cover: Inkjet choppy pixelated “Creator of Plants”.

I had phone convs w Arthur after reading his book in 2000. I have a bk rvw at Amaz. He agreed with all my theory.

Browns’ 2016 book cover has nice good, best presentation of the 4 mushroom pic from Great Canterbury Psalter:

The Psychedelic Gospels: The SECRET 🤫 History of HALLUCINOGENS 🍄 – Brown, Brown, & Brown

[8:20 am Nov 26, 2024] L pair 🔱 mirrors & R pair mirrors each other YI IY

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom#

[10pm Nov 25 2024] should’ve written timestamp: at what moment did I ask:

wait, is Blue uniquely YI; the only of the 4 that’s missing the Left arm/ branch?

Predicted and confirmed.

What made me think consciously to seriously analyze branching morphy in this pic? memory of inconsistency had been growing bigger, and it bothered me more that the trident shape is not meaningful. as if all 4 had boring symm trident – but not the case! Blue seems Special, most Correct like horses’ tree blue crown is the Correct one.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#f11

scroll down to 4-mushroom crop

Concl: this is another example of indicating Cubensis as Eadwine’s fav of the 4 mushroom types.

in f177, in the horses tree, the Correct cap is blue fruit.

In f134, the leg-hanging (balancing) tree is Cubensis, per shape and per cattle row 3.

In f145, king orders gathering and securely storing blue fruit.

blue: YI

red: IY, more branches, elab’d / emphd

tan, salmon: balanced L/R arms

Eadwine likes Blue, not Red.

🔱 🔱 YI IY

10am Nov 26 2024:

Given: YI = Correct/good, & IY = Incorrect/bad:

Eadwine ranks the 4 trees: Tan = neutral; Salmon = neutral; Blue = Good; Red = Bad.

i wasn’t planning on including Creation of 4 Plants pic in branching-message mushroom trees article, but realized there are some signif branching forms to point out

this is a famous pic on two book covers: 2000 (discovery pic from Paul Lindgren), 2016 (Browns)

Blue (mushroom 3) is unique, special, & “Correct”: no Left limb/ branch / arm, resulting in YI (the favored) form.
🍄‍🟫🔵👍 🌳🐍 YI

Blue (#3) form mirrors Red (#4) form. Red’s form is “Wrong”, IY form; ie red has branching on the right, which is backwards. an insult to Red
🍄👎 🐍🌳 IY

This art genre does not always equate “Right limb = non-branching”, (= good, for stable control) but it’s understood to be the standard normal mapping convention.

God L hand is IY, Red is IY

plant 1 & 2 mirror each other and reinforce/ confirm that 3 & 4 are contrasted as a mirrored pair .. like St Eustace Crossing River has two pairs of contrasted-form plants.

i might put these two pics grouped together in the article.

Creator displays different L & R finger shapes, highlighting think about L vs R ie {handedness} motif

artist = the Blue brotherhood in a pop Red msh world

Hatsis’ Theology Reductionism Reading: Pilzbaum Denier bc Theology?? 🤔🤔🤷‍♂️

Huggins complains that pilzbaum affirmers dgaf about the background info about the scene and mundane basic facts about the scene and textual context.

eg the theology context helps interpret Plaincourault. how is that theo context put against pilzbaum? might modify and expand pilzbaum. not to deny pilzbaum. theol cant deny pilzbaum.

ITS NOT A MUSHROOM 🍄 ‘COS FALL OF MAN; QED.

🤔 🤷‍♂️

todo: review Hatsis’ arg in light of recent devmt- which logical fallacies is this manner of argn

Review how Hatsis uses a theology arg or perspective to deny pilzbaum.

Which logical fallacy is behind that? Is it a right perspective?

im always shocked & puzzled, baffled, by the strange arg vectors taken by pilzbaum deniers.

in his book, i have ebook good Search, but need print too, to see how bad the brief treatment, trailing off bafflingly at “see my online writings”. $ Bk was somewhat a ripoff for me, bogus, barely any discussion of the evidence fir for pilzbaum, m

Made it difficult to deduce what he might mean, where in his web of vagueness – hey Hatsis shut up your smokescreen distraction-lecture on methodology: reach a basic standard of academic writing and stop self-righteously lecturing us while thin delivery.

i an shocked at Rolfe 1025, writing “the fall of man!! 😱🤯 ” Plaincourault fresco

id call it “the tree of knowledge” scene, not “OMG THE FALL OF MAN!!!” scene.

Hatsis turns the pilzbaum interp to base on Theology, surprising me.

Motivation for this page

i often need to log a single idea without creating a whole article.

idea development page 19 is short, 6 sheets of print preview 2-sided, not 60 sheets per average for idea development pages 1-18.

6 2-sided sheets is about the right length for this limited mobile app that becomes unresponsive.

date range in page 19 is mar-jun 2023, dont want to add Nov 2024 content in that era’s batch.

need short page #20 for mobile.

mobile WordPress app gets bogged down at like 20 pages.

hiatus is bad bc there’s no record timestamp of when i thought of ideas, other than voice recordings’ metadata or spoken date stamp.

LSD was Free and Legal Between Oct 1966 – ~Jan 1970 in U.S.

LSD was legal to possess and use.

Illegal to make or sell, ie ppl were legally required to give away free.

So there was WAY more use & strongly encouraged use than I realized.

Was legal through late 1960s into 1970.

I misunderstood it as illegalized in Oct 1966.

Ambiguous Hoffman vs Specific Cybermonk

“Hoffman” in entheogen scholarship = Mark & Michael.

“Cybermonk” specifically is Michael, since like 1995.

Decoded Blue Bones in “Creation of Plants”!

[7:15 Nov 25, 2024] Cubensis stems are white bones that stain blue.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#f11

Scroll down a few pages to the 4 plants isolated picture crop.

This explains the blue bones in crown/cap of the blue plant 3.

i just now finally thought of a successful interp for {blue bones} in blue cap, white stems blue, to finish my proof of my identif of “God Creates Plants” (Panaeolus, Liberty Cap, Cubensis, Amanita).

My categories identifications 100% make sense.

They match my many photos of live specimens, unambiguously lining up with the 4 plants.

James Arthur was way off, poppy pod & rue?! no! not even close!

Browns got plants 1&2 mixed up – another elementary mistake, like their major, embarrassing screwup re: St. Walburga tapestry, “Amanita doesn’t have a serrated base” 🤦‍♂️

Browns based their whole narrative on rejecting that art piece, then flubbed it colossally, a newbie error. A useful error to note as a good example.

Browns’ identification of the four plants is likewise mixed up: dock double penalty, because both Brown AND Brown signed off on this irrational identification — quadruple penalty, because twice published.

Browns point to plant 2, the triangle semi-spear parasols with gill striations and nipple, and say “Panaeolus”, astoundingly, when clearly it is Liberty Caps in the crown/cap.

Could Browns be so drastically mistaken, making such a basic newbie error?

Yes: “Amanita doesn’t have a serrated base.”

-4 points, because the obvious mis-identification of plant 2 as Panaeolus was asserted by:

Brown 1 in 2016 – error

Brown 2 in 2016 – error

Brown 1 in 2019 – error

Brown 2 in 2019 – error

That’s the same elementary error made 4 times.

James Arthur is driven by a Soma mix theory, 5 plants.

Eadwine’s (artist’s) 3 varieties of Psil msh thus get reduced to only 1.

Arthur and Browns (3 authors!) both start Right to Left starting with Amanita, which gets way too much attention, directly at the expense of Psilocybin mushrooms.

I have a LIST of examples where the Amanita Primacy Fallacy causes deletion of Psilocybin evidence and blindness — NOT OK!

Amanita is a bully weed wiping out superior Psilo.

Europe culture history is wrong in focusing too much on Amanita, when the best myth and effects came from Psilocybin.

Pop cult runs now after Quantum Mysticism.

The same people previously went crazy for 2nd-rate Amanita, throughout European history, overshadowing Psilocybin.

Amanita entheogen scholars abuse Psilocybin by forcing Psilocybin mushrooms to serve their advocacy of Amanita as “the” Holy Mushroom, suppressing Psilocybin into a mere supporting role in service of false King Amanita.

The best, superior art & mystics knew Psilocybin is the brains behind the operation.

We are the elite minority brotherhood of Blue, against the low-quality superficial Red mushroom, with its pop exoteric esotericism. John Lash, Eadwine, Cybermonk.

Paul Lindgren in 2000 only pursued the Amanita pages in Great Canterbury Psalter.

Irvin writes in The Holy Mushroom book, Psilocybin mushrooms are irrelevant.

😇🍄🥾💥🍄‍🟫➡️🗑️

Eadwine’s favorite mushroom is Cubensis, not Amanita. (This got confirmed at end of day when inspected branching in Creation of Plants.)

Y’all claimed the 2nd-rate single-plant fallacies, and left me to settle for owning the BEST single-plant fallacy: Cubensis.

Ok, I’ll take the Cubensis single-plant fallacy, including all 300 psilo’s in a supporting role, along with Amanita placed down in a supporting role, for headshop art decoration marketing.

It was left for Lash and me to discover all the Psilocybin mushrooms in Great Canterbury Psalter, because the only pages that the pop Amanita fanatics cared about was the pages which had “the” mushroom, Amanita.

The pop entheogen scholars – exoteric esotericism – insulted that page’s Psil mushrooms as just a bonus footnote of lesser interest.

“First, starting from the right, we have Secret Amanita, the Holy Mushroom.” — all entheogen scholars bewitched by the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.

Hatsis refers to non-Amanita mushroom trees as “lesser looking”.

Challenging puzzle for pop Amanita fans:

I am revolting against that suppression of blue, that Amanita is doing. 🍄‍🟫>🍄

Arthur used to phone me, but I hadn’t formed my identification yet to discuss this picture (Great Canterbury Psalter: Creation of Plants) as 4 types of mushroom.

I identified the four mushroom types a few years ago; search my posts to determine the date.

In Pop Cult, Psilocybin = Cubensis, No Awareness of Liberty Cap or Panaeolus

9:30 pm Nov 25, 2024

Friend advised me to label and market the blue paradigm as:

psilocybin-driven entheogen scholarship

the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm

instead of my terms:

Cubensis-driven entheogen scholarship

the Explicit Cubensis paradigm

My favored terms/ labels I’m advancing are to go up against terms:

Amanita-driven entheogen scholarship

the Secret Amanita paradigm

friend says no one knows the word “Cubensis”, but everyone knows the word “Psilocybin”.

Ironic and interesting that the more technical, modern, molecule name “Psilocybin” is universally known, while no one knows the more specific concrete species word, “Cubensis”.

But friend didn’t know that I am crafting a PAIR of labels.

The parallel of “Amanita”, to effectively go up against “Amanita”, is not “Psilocybin”, but “Cubensis”.

The parallel of “Psilocybin” is not “Amanita”, but “Muscimol (and Ibutenic Acid)”.

“Cubensis” is the species name that can go up against “Amanita”.

Penis Envy strain is Cubensis.

Schedule 35 in Colo is ground Cubensis capsules.

Psil mushroom extract capsules is Cubensis.

Our best art evidence is Cubensis, depicting advanced skill and comprehension — not Lib Cap, Pana, or Aman.

Oss & Oeric book 1970s was how to cultivate Cubensis.

St. Eustace Crossing the River window is Cubensis.

Great Canterbury Psalter best panels f134, f144, & f177 are Cubensis.

Practically synonyms: “Cubensis” = “psilocybin mushrooms”.

See Also

nothin, just Wasson’s ellipses … do NOT “consult” any writings published by the competent art authorities:
Tree Stylizations in Medieval Paintings (Brinckmann 1906)

Instead, when “consulting” the expert authorities, you have to have “pers. corr.” like Huggins and Letcher, with stopwatch in hand to see if the authority is sufficiently quick in disavowing pilzbaum.

⏱

Doesn’t get any more credible than this, just like Wasson’s ellipses … about which Huggins says nothing, and fails to celebrate Brown 2019 for blowing the lid off censorship of Brinckmann by the pilzbaum deniers since 1968 in SOMA by Wasson.

Incoming Ideas

Testing line wrap speed at bottom of long page to tell whether it is responsive – SLOW as 🐮

15 seconds delay in UI

mysterious super long delays

yet cursor blinks while hung

WAY too slow long page on mobile fail must create Idea Dev p 22

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment