Idea Development page 21 (2024/12/13)

Michael Hoffman, Dec. 13, 2024 – Dec. 29, 2024, overlaps next page

Crop by Cybermonk

Site Map – Previous page – Next page

Contents:

list above is complete as of Dec. 28, 2024, Noon

Incoming Ideas

Received Houot 2025 book Rise of the Psychonaut already, Dec. 29, 2024

Surprised it arrived two months sooner than expected, bc Amazon said I was pre-ordering a Feb 6 2025 book.

Rise of the Psychonaut: Maps for Amateurs, Nonscientists and Explorers in the Psychedelic Age of Discovery (Houot, 2025)

The book doesn’t actually exist, and you can’t order it. That’s the first thing I learned from this book.

Alchemical Rebis Holding a Y

Thanks to Rick for helping finally re-find this, tho he used the search string I suggested yesterday off the cuff on Dec 27 2024.

Crop by Cybermonk
“Y held by rebis.jpg” 171 KB Dec. 28, 2024

Obtained from Marten Kuilman https://www.flickr.com/photos/quadralectics/7454458960

DOC13/1770 – Omnes Concordant in Uno, qui est bifidus

FRICK, Karl R. (1972). Michael Maier’s ‘ Symbola Avreae Mensae Dvodecim Nationvm’ (Facs.) Akademische Druck- u Verlaganstalt, Graz, Austria.

The Dragon Hunters: Placing the Control Transformation Potential at the Center of Psychedelic Discovery

[December 28, 2024, Noon]

Asp (Aberdeen Bestiary)

Does the Egodeath theory say that you are guaranteed to run into loss of control, control vortex seizure? No, can’t say that. The point is that:

The most interesting and compelling and threatening POTENTIAL to discover is the gate, shadow dragon monster, control-threat engagement.

Your goal might be to avoid negative experiences.

Or, your goal might be to get the particular prize: the ability to go through the gates to get the tree of life, goal framed per end of Bible, Rev 22:14.

The Egodeath theory is for Loose Cognitive Science to be equipped to go through the gate and endure in the vulnerable state – not to simply “avoid” the threat, but to specialize in and focus on this potential of this threat-gate.

Not to avoid the shadow dragon monster, but to vanquish or pin or control this monster, to focus on mapping this monster.

Reliability of each motif in {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

{mushrooms}

highly reliable but bc branching is more the main ultimate message than mushrooms, later genre images omit mushrooms and have branching instead,

eg mushrooms at base of Splendor Solis image of Philosophers Beside the Tree, one version.

{branching}

Reliable, showing non branching vs branching. main message, expect often.

{handedness}

The least reliable, the least consistently used/present.

It’s just an intermediate connector idea/motif:

There are two mental models.

There happen to be two directions: left, right.

So, we can map left to one mental model, and right to the other – but the mapping is arbitrary, and

the message is not “left vs right”, the message is “branching vs nonbranching”,

so, often, handedness is not used / not present.

{stability}

motifs – these are open-ended.

Eadwine in Great Canterbury Psalter uses:

  • stable column base [typically right foot touching; sometimes left]
  • stable building;
  • scale balance;
  • being threatened (by
    • angels,
    • demons,
    • army,
    • blade [spear, arrow, sword, knife, plow, scythe],
    • fire/flames,
    • lion).
  • smooth brow vs. furrowed brow

b/c open ended, less reliability of being present and definite, in the pilzbaum genre.

The Psychedelic Pseudo “Science” Community CONSISTENTLY IGNORES AND SUPPRESSES the Negative Mystical Effects of Psilocybin

todo: add to CEQ page

  1. James 1902 FAILED to include negative mystical effects.
  2. Stace 1960 FAILED to include negative mystical effects.
  3. Pankhe 1962 MEQ/SOCQ/PES FAILED to include negative mystical effects.
  4. Richards 1975 MEQ/SOCQ/PES FAILED to include negative mystical effects.
  5. Griffiths CEQ 2016 FAILED to include negative mystical effects.
  • MEQ is garbage.
    • “Mystical experiences are positive. Negative experiences are by definition non-Mystical.” Charles Stang got Griffiths to admit on video that the MEQ is bullsh!t. Griftiths’ excuse: “We catch negative effects in the CEQ.” False. CEQ omits 18 of 21 Dread effects, instead delivering irrelevant worthless feeble giant Grief category. BUNK as F!
  • PES/SOCQ is garbage. SOCQ = MEQ + distractor items.
  • CEQ is garbage.
  • OAV is solid.

HRS has some decent negative effects (review them).

SOCQ doesn’t have any negative effects? Review them.

Idea Development pages title pattern

Old naming pattern:

Idea Development page 21

“New” naming pattern, equivalent to past private text files named like “TK 2010-03.txt”:

Transcendent Knowledge 2024-12-13

that was ok for me privately; i knew the content of such text files is freeform.

or new naming pattern:

Idea Development 2024-12-25

for the audience, “Idea Development” is clearer than “Transcendent Knowledge” to communicate that this is freeform content. like saying:

that’s short for saying the title:

Transcendent Knowledge Idea Development page 2024-12-25

Moving Past Mysticism

todo: add to Moving Past Mysticism page:

todo: add to SOCQ/MEQ page:

article:
Psychedelic Mysticism and Christian Spirituality: From Science
to Love
Ron Cole-Turner, Published: 26 April 2024
Citation:
Cole-Turner, Ron. 2024. Psychedelic Mysticism and Christian Spirituality: From Science to Love. religions 15: 537.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050537

That article cites:

The Psychedelic Experience Scale (PES) (Stocker 2024) – add to SoCQ page

Search web:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Psychedelic+Experience+Scale+PES

https://www.psypost.org/an-intriguing-psychedelic-assessment-is-back-from-the-dead-thanks-to-swiss-scientists/

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kurt-Stocker/publication/376315029_Supplement_5_PES-scoring-keydocx/data/6572eecd6610947889a9e350/Supplement-5-PES-scoring-key.docx?origin=publication_list
In “Supplement-5-PES-scoring-key.docx”, top, seems typo, “MEQ40” should read: MEQ43.

“The Psychedelic Experience Questionnaire/Scale (PES), also known as the States of Consciousness Questionnaire [SoCQ]“

CLOSED SCIENCE: The POS, I mean PES Questionnaire: Article about History of MEQ, by Stocker 2024, including a “Distressing” subscale

Expect yet another travesty of “science”.

I bet this article never actually SHOWS you the questions constituting their fictional nonexistent “PES”.

100% totally CLOSED “SCIENCE”.

See Also:

todo – important: create clearly titled page that is simply a summary of basics: what the CEQ is. done:

CEQ – Challenging Experiences Questionnaire (Griffiths 2016) – 2024-12-27

List my CEQ pages, then: which page is a summary of basics? Improve its title. [done, above]

The Revival of the Psychedelic Experience Scale: Revealing Its Extended-Mystical, Visual, and Distressing Experiential Spectrum with LSD and
Psilocybin Studies
Stocker, Kurt, Matthias Hartmann, Laura Ley, Anna M Becker, Friederike Holze, and Matthias E. Liechti. 2024.
Journal of Psychopharmacology 38: 80–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cole’s article says about that work, “a helpful review of the history of the MEQ from its earliest complete form in 1975 until the present version“

Abstract
Background:

Research with the Psychedelic Experience Questionnaire/Scale (PES) focuses on questions relating to mystical experience (Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ)).

The psychometric potential of the non-MEQ items of the PES remains largely unexplored.”

Translation: the non-MEQ items of PES aka SoCQ are worthless noise never meant to be anything more than “distractor items” to hide the MEQ.

Compare SOCQ [to PES], about which I asked same question.

I asked: Why did CEQ draw from SOCQ, given that SOCQ is MEQ (all unicorns rainbows) + dummy “distractor items”?]

Confirmed: “The Psychedelic Experience Questionnaire/Scale (PES), also known as the States of Consciousness Questionnaire” – my question remains solid after I saw:

Factor 8: Distressing Experience

  • Item 13. Emotional and/or physical suffering.
  • Item 16: Feelings of despair.
  • Item 28: Sense of being trapped and helpless.
  • Item 45: Experience of isolation and loneliness.
  • Item 52: Experience of fear.

My recent reasoning/analysis: guided by my question: What is the justification, when creating the CEQ, for drawing effects question items from these particular 3 q’airs: SOCQ, OAV aka 5D-ASC; HRS?

Especially unjustified seems SOCQ, which is the absurdly positive MEQ items + some random(?) filler fake junk sawdust questions, the “distractor items”.

These non-MEQ items within the SOCQ were not meant to complete the range of psychedelic effects by supplementing the “mystical” MEQ effects; they merely were “distractor items”.

My hunch there was confirmed today Dec 27 2024, upon seeing the poor “Distressing” category.

I CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND THE ONLY NEGATIVE Q’AIR QUESTIONS WORTH A DAMN ARE DITTRICH’S ‘A’ ANGST/ DREAD dimension of OAV aka 5D-ASC.

Yet those 21 items, only 3 are retained in CEQ!

In their money-driven zeal to fabricate a fake Grief subscale, Griftiths simply DELETED 18 of the 21 challenging fx from the Angst/Dread dimension of OAV.

86% of negative psilocybin effects (per OAV’s A/Angst/Dread dimension) were simply deleted, removed, omitted, by Griftiths team, from the CEQ that brags about being comprehensive and broader than other q’airs re: negative, challenging, unpleasant experiences effects items.

Stocker continues:

“Aims:

We investigated whether the PES also yields subscales besides the MEQ30 subscales.

Methods:

Data from 239 PES measurements (140 healthy participants) from six studies with moderate to high doses of lysergic acid diethylamide and/or psilocybin were included.

New subscales (with items other than MEQ30) were created and validated as follows:

(1) theoretical derivation of candidate items;

(2) removal of items with rare experiences;

(3) exploratory factor analysis; and

(4) confirmatory factor analysis.

Correlations of subscales within the PES and between the PES and the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Scale (5D-ASC) were performed.

[That’s Dittrich; highest quality, includes OAV’s A = Angst / Dread dimension]

In addition, a cluster analysis using all items (except rare experiences) was performed.

Results:

The reliability of the four original factors of the MEQ30 was confirmed and four additional factors for the non-MEQ items were revealed:

paradoxicality,

connectedness,

visual experience, and

distressing experience.

The first two additional factors were strongly correlated with the MEQ30 mystical subscale.

Adding the new subscales to the MEQ30 subscales increased the explained variance with the 5D-ASC.

[not following; MEQ is absurdly positive; 5D-ASC ie OAV has A = Angst/Dread, which is a good dimension]

The cluster analysis confirmed our main results and provided additional insights for future psychedelic psychometrics.”

[future psychedelic psychometrics: trashcan the CEQ – and MEQ while you’re at it — and replace CEQ by my ECQ, Eternalism and Control Questionnaire]

Conclusion: ITS “VALIDATED” SO U KNOW ITS TRUE SCIENCE NO MATTER HOW MALFORMED AND MAGICALLY ASSEMBLED OUT OF THIN AIR while under the guidance of a totally fictional and imagined notion of “mystical experience” that contradicts historical reports of mystics according to Charles Stang when interviewing Griftiths.

Stace 1960 “Mystical Experiencing”:

🦄💨🌈

Stocker continues:

“The study yields a new validated 6-factor structure for extended mystical experience (MEQ40: MEQ30 + Paradoxicality + Connectedness) and covers psychedelic experience as a whole more comprehensively than has hitherto been possible within a single questionnaire (PES48).

[that EXACT claim. “more comprehensive”, was made for CEQ, then CEQ threw all negative effects in trashcan totally arbitrarily, and replaced them by fake fabricated “Grief” category]

The entire PES (PES100) can also be used for further future psychedelic-psychometric research.”

Keywords: LSD; Psychedelic experience; mystical experience; psilocybin; psychometrics.

end of Stocker article

todo: see how bad PES sucks, re: “Unpleasant Experiences” [lingo per 11 Factors/ Studerus] – does it match my way-superior ECQ?

Since I’m Already Accused of Bullying; “Mine is the Only Way”, I Might as Well Assert That

jeezus! Unbelievable.

Feel free to make any statement and claim about what I claim. No need to quote or cite me.

Drive-by garbage posts “about” the Egodeath theory.

Max Freakout and I every time are stunned by this nonsense, where do they get this? https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/12/24/max-freakout-writings-and-podcasts/#Posts — that links to: https://www.psychonaut.fr/threads/whats-happened-to-michael-hoffman-from-egodeath.13721/ —

“I admire his unique take, but not his insistance that ONLY his theory is the truth/right way”

citation needed! liar!

“his insistence that only his theory is the right one, is what I couldn’t get behind.”

citation needed! liar!

It might be possible to make a case to substantiate the above claims, but you need to do your work, to support your CHEAP LAZY DISMISSALS and CLAIMS.

What passages do you mean?

Any fool and idiot is free to write any vague nonsense “about” the Egodeath theory that is not even actually ABOUT the Egodeath theory.

Given these VAGUE, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, I might as well write:

The Egodeath theory is the only right way to think. If you don’t agree with my Egodeath theory, you are wrong and your thinking is wrong.

Michael Hoffman wrote that somewhere, according to lazy careless person

Also, any idiot could write the same thing about any writer. Fill in the blank.

“I admire Newton’s unique take, but not his insistance that ONLY his theory is the truth/right way”

“I admire Ptolemy’s unique take, but not his insistance that ONLY his theory is the truth/right way”

“I admire Maxwell’s unique take, but not his insistance that ONLY his theory is the truth/right way”

Are You an Idiot? Lazy? Low IQ? No Problem, Just Fill in the Blank – No Substantiation or Specifics Required!

Sound Profound and Upright, for Free! Say Nothing of any Substance, yet Congratulate Yourself on Your Substantive Point!

“Copernicus’ insistence that only his theory is the right one, is what I couldn’t get behind.”

“Samorini’s insistence that only his theory is the right one, is what I couldn’t get behind.”

“McKenna’s insistence that only his theory is the right one, is what I couldn’t get behind.”

Here is HARD WORK: *specify* the contributions and limitations (errors) of a given writer or book. Where’d everyone go?

Hatsis site is down, Death of the Internet?

: (

Praying for John Rush clinical anthropology site to return.
clinicalanthropology.com

Praying for Thomas Hatsis site to return.

https://psychedelichistorian.com/ – 404 on Dec. 26, 2024.
Archive 2024/04/05:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240511023142/https://psychedelichistorian.com/
I get the impression Hatsis removed articles.
My Hatsis Bibliography links to articles:
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/10/31/psychedelic-mystery-traditions-hatsis/#Hatsis

https://psychedelicwitch.com/ – 404

“Death of the Internet”
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Death+of+the+Internet%22

Outside the Cosmos, Taurus Is Reversed

see picture of bronze gold armillary sphere but doesn’t show pictures of zodiac pictures eg bull perspective handedness Ulansey per –
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy#/media/File:Ptolemy_1476_with_armillary_sphere_model.jpg

picture from AstroSham 2006, lower left – upper left would be nice too to get hi res

Aristotle holding an armillary sphere and pointing to the heavens as he teaches a group of clerics

BMR163108 Ms 3458 fol 62vo

Historiated initial \’D\’ depicting

Aristotle holding an armillary sphere and pointing to the heavens as he teaches a group of clerics

from Western Europe (pen and ink and tempera on vellum) by French School, (13th century); Bibliotheque Mazarine, Paris, France; (add.info.: from the treatise on cosmology by the Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322) \’On the Heavens and the World\’ (\’De Caelo et Mundo\’); the transmission of this work via Arabic scholarship is highlighted by the depiction of Aristotle in a turban; Lettre ornee avec un Philosophe enseignant;); © Bibliotheque Mazarine ; © Archives Charmet.

https://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-US/french-school/ms-3458-fol-62vo-historiated-initial-d-depicting-aristotle-holding-an-armillary-sphere-and-pointing/pen-and-ink-and-tempera-on-vellum/asset/163108?offline=1

Great Canterbury Psalter image f109 Analysis [Caught in Hell-Mouth Furnace Net, Summoned to City Gate Entrance Past Ossuary Corpse, Stable Building Protected by Cloth Washed Clean]

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f109

Crop by Cybermonk

The action in entire image is from lower left to upper right.

[10:22 pm Dec. 23, 2024]:

right blue guy: left foot straight = weight on it = bad;

upper demon stands on Right claw (good);

lower demon in “weight left” stance (bad);

middle guys: right leg lifted/bent = weight on Left foot (bad), display left hand (bad; pulled into {fire}).

Guy behind them is rescued by angel b/c stand Right, into gated God-protected cloth-protected city;

[10:34 pm Dec. 23, 2024]: corpse in ossuary lacks left limbs. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom

Rise of the Psychonaut – Book Cover, Houot

“Rise of the Psychonaut.jpg” 130 KB , png is 9:06 pm Dec. 23, 2024

Splendor Solis – Philosophers Beside the Tree – Importance of Discovery Nov. 7, 2024

my comment reply to wrmspirit on my splendor solis page:

wrmspirit comment:

“Your discovery on Irvin’s book is incredible.

“The branch held by left philosopher between both philosophers in picture of ‘philosophers beside the tree’ looks like a divining rod.

“The words Irvin writes to you in his signing of the book is prophetic to the discovery.”

my comment reply:

Yes, agreed, I experienced this discovery as a much appreciated confirmation, recognizing most of the 4 motifs (handedness, branching, stability) in this version of this image.

I’d like to do a detailed writeup on what this was like to get this particular confirmation, stumbling across it, at this point in time, November 2024, after a hiatus since June 2023.

Irvin & Rutajit (2006) rely on red and white clothing to serve as the mushroom motif.

I found two more versions of this image:

one valuable because it has the {cut right branch} which I expected for the basket to hang from,

one valuable because it has the apparent mushrooms on the ground, not just red and white clothing – and also has bathers sculpted and the “gateway” framing foregrounded.

I plan to include the set of 3 pictures in the “branching-message mushroom trees” article for the Journal of Psychedelic Studies​, but I’ll need to minimize text analysis in that article.

A picture’s worth a thousand words.

There’s sure no room in that article for covering a history of scholars’ folly regarding mushrooms in Christian art, though Cyberdisciple pointed out that a literature review and history of that scholarship, telling the story of dispute and discovery, would be interesting.

Comment Posting Dec. 23, 2024 at Cyberdisciple site: Breaking Convention Book 20214 Covers the Egodeath Theory

Comment posted at
https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/new-books-received-the-holy-mushroom-failed-god/

The essay
“Cognitive Phenomenology of Mind Manifestation” (2013)
covers the Egodeath theory, in the book
Breaking Convention: Essays on Psychedelic Consciousness (2014)
https://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Convention-Essays-Psychedelic-Consciousness/dp/158394771X/

The Holy Mushroom by Jan Irvin 2008 is a must-have for entheogen scholarship. That book is a new purchase for me in March 2023, because I was sick of the foolishness in the non-debate between Wasson and Allegro, after the 2006 article “Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita”.
http://egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm

I lack the Failed God. I have both editions of Rush’s book about how Christianity entirely got rid of The Mushroom (🍄), as proved by the tons of mushroom imagery all throughout Christianity, per the Secret Amanita Cult paradigm and the Moderate (aka Minimal) entheogen theory of religion.

Mushroom Branches Prove Mushroom Trees Aren’t Mushrooms

Paul Stamets, crop by Cybermonk Dec. 22, 2024

Plant 2

Crop by Cybermonk
Plants 1 and 2
Crop by Cybermonk

Magic Mushrooms Around the World: A Scientific Journey Across Cultures and Time: The Case for Challenging Research and Value Systems (Gartz, 1997)

Magic Mushrooms Around the World: A Scientific Journey Across Cultures and Time: The Case for Challenging Research and Value Systems
Jochen Gartz, 1997
Paperback – September 1, 1997
https://www.amazon.com/Magic-Mushrooms-Around-World-Challenging/dp/0965339904/

mushroom trees, cited by Ruck 2001 Apples of Apollo

Error in Apples of Apollo, says “Goertz” but German books in Author page show “Gartz”

Books by Gartz: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Jochen-Gartz/author/B00455MKHC

Book referenced by Ruck’s Apples of Apollo re: Mushrooms Trees.

Apples of Apollo has “Goertz 1996”, Error?

in book Apples of Apollo, page 256 Biblio entry & p. 176 referenced re pilzbaum, incorrectly says Goertz along with English title & says 1996.

“Gartz”, according to book cover 1997 English printing.

Blurb:

“The first new book on psychoactive mushrooms in 10 years.
[which mid-1980s book does he mean?]
[0-1 years: Stamets 1996 Psilocybin Mushrooms of the World: An Identification Guide]

“Introducing a rich variety of psychoactive mushrooms from around the globe -including some rare and little-known species – the author describes dozens of species and covers a broad range of mushroom- related topics, from distribution maps to comparisons of cultural attitudes to laboratory analyses of active ingredients.

“One of the book’s most remarkable features is its multi-disciplinary approach: chemistry, botany, biology, history, anthropology, religion, pharmacology, medicine – all of these are among the fields contributing a diversity of data, questions and information that are assembled into one of the most comprehensive and intriguing portraits of psychoactive mushrooms ever created.

“Lavishly illustrated, well-organized and enriched by numerous accounts of mushroom experiences, this book explores the psychoactive mycoflora on five continents and reconstructs a continuity of psychoactive mushroom use throughout history, from as early as 10,000 years ago to the present day.

“You will also find detailed chapters on mushroom cultivation techniques, psychotherapy applications, the bluing phenomenon, the dangers of accidental poisonings caused by misidentification of species, and more.

“A treasure trove of information, illustrations and magnificent color photography, the book contains much novel information as well, such as the first report on the psychoactivity of baeocystin and up-to-date findings on the use of plant growth hormones to accelerate growth.

“Jochen Gartz has made an outstanding contribution to the field of mycology by embracing the Magic Mushrooms of Germany and from around the world and by pursuing their scientific study and investigation.” – Christian Ratsch, from his Introduction

130 pages, 8″x11″, sturdy softcover

30 color plates

36 black & white illustrations

3 maps of geographic distribution patterns

10 tables

18 reproductions of historic source materials and citations from the early mycological literature Bibliography of 250+ citations and sources FROM THE TABLE OF CONTENT:

Contents:

“Who Was the First Magician?” – Foreword by Christian Ratsch

1. Introduction

2. Fancy of Fools or Flesh of the Gods: Reflections on the History Study of Magic Mushrooms

3. The Current State of Knowledge About European Species

What About Cubensis in Europe? Blind Spot per ToC; Probably No One Has Ever Thought to Look for Cubensis in Europe/England

3.1 Psilocybe semilanceata – The Classic Psychotropic Species of Europe

3.2 Psilocybe cyanescens – Potent Mushrooms Growing on Wood Debris

3.3 Panaeolus subbalteatus – Mycology & Myths about the Panaeolus Species

3.4 Inocybe aeruginascens – Fast-Spreading New Arrivals

3.5 Gymnopilus purpuratus – Magnificent Mushrooms from South America

3.6 Conocybe cyanopus – Tiny Mushrooms of Remarkable Potency

3.7 Pluteus salicinus – A Little-Known Wood-Inhabiting Species

4. Mushroom Identification: The Potential for Deadly Mistakes

5. The Bluing Phenomenon and Metol Testing – Reality vs. Wishful Thinking

6. Mushroom Cultivation – Classic Findings and New Techniques

7. Psychotropic Mushroom Species All Around The World

7.1 Spotlight on North America and Hawaii

7.2 Mycophilia in Central and South America

7.3 Australia’s Mycoflora Attracts Attention

7.4 European Customs and Conventions

7.5 Japanese Experiments

7.6 Intoxications and the Oldest Known Mushroom Cult in Africa

7.7 Usage in Asia and Oceania

8. Remarks About Effects of Mushrooms from the Category Phantastika

9. Psychotherapy

10. Outlook

11. Bibliography (Reference Section with over 250 entries)

Fool’s Sponges: Psychoactive Mushrooms Around the World (Gartz, 2004)

Fool’s Sponges: Psychoactive Mushrooms Around the World(Narrenschwämme: Psychoaktive Pilze rund um die Welt)
https://www.amazon.com/Narrenschw%C3%A4mme-Psychoaktive-Pilze-rund-German-ebook/dp/B01C3YSFM0

Translated blurb by Cybermonk using https://www.google.com/search?q=translate

“Gordon Wasson, Albert Hofmann and Roger Heim researched the psychoactive Psilocybe species of Mexico in interdisciplinary collaboration in the 1950s.

In addition to ethnobotanical and mycological research, the psychedelics psilocybin and psilocin were isolated and characterized as effective principles of mushrooms.

Over the next few decades, these alkaloids were increasingly detected in fungal species from other genera around the world.

Jochen Gartz researched all aspects of mushrooms on a scientific basis for more than 15 years.

He discovered several “new” species, which he named together with other researchers, such as the highly psychoactive mushrooms Psilocybe azurescens (USA) and Psilocybe natalensis (South Africa).

Favored by his previous work in drug research and his many years of involvement with all areas touched upon by such psychoactive substances, he is re-presenting this interdisciplinary standard work on psychoactive mushrooms here, completely revised and updated.

Based on historical aspects, this describes competently and yet generally understandably all areas of knowledge in which the species are networked in a mycelial manner.

The mycology and chemistry are described in just as much detail, including many color and b/w photos, as the individual culture processes.

Purely toxicological and medical-psychotherapeutic aspects have been linked to a large number of detailed descriptions of the effects of individual mushroom species at different dosages around the world.

The danger of confusion with deadly poisonous mushrooms is pointed out, as is the possible use of color reactions to differentiate individual species.

The interdisciplinary work is finally rounded off by an extensive bibliography with several hundred citations from a wide variety of areas.”

Psilocybin Mushrooms: New Species, Their Discovery and Applications (Gartz, 2018)

Psilocybin Mushrooms: New Species, Their Discovery and Applications
Gartz, 2018
https://www.amazon.com/Psilocybin-Pilze-Neue-Arten-Entdeckung-Anwendung/dp/3037885688/

Psilocybin-Pilze: Neue Arten, ihre Entdeckung und Anwendung
Paperback – December 17, 2018

Translated blurb by Cybermonk using https://www.google.com/search?q=translate

“Psilocybin and psilocin are highly potent natural tryptamine psychedelics and close relatives of DMT, 5-MeO-DMT and other molecules.

The active ingredients can be found worldwide in mushroom species of various genera and have accompanied people in their search for meaning and spirituality for a very long time.

Through the work of the Mexican curandera (healer) Maria Sabina and the founder of ethnomycology, R. Gordon Wasson, psilocybin-producing mushrooms became known as psychedelic catalysts.

Today they are becoming increasingly important in psychonautical and medical applications.

This book portrays the psilocybin mushrooms newly discovered and described by the German mycologist Jochen Gartz and colleagues since 1983 in monographs and describes their history, occurrence, possible applications, chemical nature and more.”

Pilzbaum Deniers: Brinckmann, Panofsky, Wasson, Letcher, Hatsis, Huggins

Similarities and Differences

Book: The Witches’ Ointment – “[Andy] Letcher’s debunking [in Shroom 2005] was poorly theorized and limited (see: 
http://egodeath.com/ViewsOnEntheogensInReligiousHistory.htm#_Toc164518582 and 
http://www.egodeath.com/ShroomLetcher.htm), and
I intend to see whether Hatsis shares those limitations and can be grouped with Letcher or should be considered an independent position.”

Equate Letcher, Hatsis, Huggins;
Identify their Differences

Mostly overlap of Letcher, Hatsis, and Huggins are the same guy, same voice.

todo: Identify the slight differences if any between the three poor reasoners on this particular topic, else biggest brains in universe on all other topics.

Letcher, Hatsis, and Huggins just the same: The 3 Masters of Fallacies grotesquely malformed Logical Fallacies, Yaldabaoth: Lion Head Snake Body monster.

threatened control by {lion head} {snake body} monster {demanding sacrifice of the ruler}

be brought through the seizure-transformation gates

{pass through the {seizure-transformation gates} into the holy city of the clean who have the right} {wash your robes} {blessed} {have the right to {go through the gates} into the city} and {eat from the trees of life} become non-dying, non-ephemeral, non-temporary; lasting, mature, final form; perishable, imperishability, imperishable, become like us: imperishable

imperishable life: we who have been transformed from possibilism to eternalism with 2-level dependent control by the god mystery higher controller unknowable mysterious source of control-thoughts dependent upon.

transformation from possibilism to eternalism.

each Tree of Live has 12 different religious fruits crops every month, and leaves heal nations.

Trees of Life are on both sides of the River of Life with the Water of Life.

drink of the water of life

the tree of life is on both sides of the river

🚫😵

Rev 22, last page of the Holy Bible of Truth [🌳…🌳]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rev%2022&version=KJV
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rev%2022&version=NIV

Your reward for eating the scroll in the hand of the angel who told you to eat [fact check that todo] – does he demand:

GIMME YOUR AMANITAS NOW 🍄 angel dude
i prophecy you will hand them over
to make my stomache hurt, then delirious deliriant delirium style of writing, like scopolamine

Look into “whether Hatsis shares those limitations and can be grouped with Letcher or should be considered an independent position.

  • poorly theorized;
  • limited explanatory power
  • limited relevance
  • not very helpful or useful
  • review the descripotions by Michael Hoffman at Egodeath.com –
  • i included this book in recent cross-literature study of the Amanita Primacy Fallacy

The book Shroom is a must-read mixed bag:

  • “Bernward door art is not hidden, therefore, can’t be mushrooms (there’s no other possible explanation anyone could possibly come up with to counter my overwhelming storytelling power mixed with every fallacy all at once)”
  • “the Blame panel, not the Eating panel shows the literal liberty cap specimens – so, DOESN’T COUNT”

Goal posts now are here, cloer in, as i RUN from Baily assertion to worthless retreat to worthless Motte assertion thats not even contested, you win the fail medal of dross, Fools Medal for giving US the win by your defaulting on the relevant smartly defined position that we must be focusing on: THE MOST INTELLIGENTLY DEFINED POSITION OF ASSERTION EG the Explicit Cubensis paradigm

not the kiddie, lesser, deliriant theory

the delirious theorizing & delirious argumentation from Hatsis the witch, high equally well on Datura scopolamine or, interchangeably, the deliriant Amanita muscimol ibutenic acid.

the Amanita Primacy Fallacy

  • the Secret Amanita paradigm
  • the Explicit Cubensis paradigm

Psilocybin put in service of the glory of king Secret Amanita the frikkin GOD of entheogens 🙌 🤫🍄

👶 🤫🍄 😯

Cyberdisciple page about Transcendent Knowledge podcast Episode 10, my 2018 Comment Failed to Note Amanita Leopard Fountain

My Comment Dec 20 2024 posted on page:

Episode 10, Transcendent Knowledge Podcast: Plato – my comment dec 20 2024: OMG I can’t believe that Psilocybin fanatic with his single-plant fallacy was blind to the spotted leopard’s balancing Amanita kylix fountain, both in the 2006 article and 2018 comment above.

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/defining-compelling-evidence-criteria-of-proof-for-mushrooms-in-christian-art/#Identifying-the-Leopard-watering-Bowl-as-Amanita

What is this world coming to! Never trust an entheogen scholar. Ariadne would shake the removed branch held in left hand, at such folly.

But first I need to read the text that this mosaic is illustrating and accompanying, to check what species of branch Ariadne is held to hold, according to the backstory that we are required to know, to drive and constrain our interpretation of this imagery.

Look what success Brown & Brown had with such a research approach, in their strenuous, big-brained textual research on the backstory of Walburga – turns out she’s known to hold a vial – who would’ve known! Therefore, not mushroom.

Huggins 2024: These pilzbaum have branches, which make these not look like mushrooms at all

I copied the below images and metadata to
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#f11-row-1-right

Just look at these branches that disqualify these pilzbaum from looking anything like mushrooms

Crop by Cybermonk; branching morphology analysis: 🔱🔱 YI IY
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right
discovered by Paul Lindgren 2000
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Crop by Cybermonk
Look at these branches, which prove that these mushroom-looking plants that the art historians describe as pilzbaum do not look like mushrooms.
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 1 Left Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 1, left branch
“f11-row1-right-msh1-left-branch.jpg” 23 KB, 10:42 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 1 Right Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 1, right branch
“f11-row1-right-msh1-right-branch.jpg” 16 KB, 10:43 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 2 Left Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 2, left branch
“f11-row1-right-msh2-left-branch.jpg” 16 KB, 10:44 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 2 Right Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 4, right branch
“f11-row1-right-msh2-right-branch.jpg” 24 KB, 7:54 PM, Dec. 20, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 3 Left Branch [none]
Plant 3 Right Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 3, right branch
“f11-row1-right-msh3-right-branch.jpg” 19 KB, 10:46 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 4 Left Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 4, left branch
“f11-row1-right-msh4-left-branch.jpg” 20 KB, 10:47 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom
Plant 4 Right Branch
Crop by Cybermonk
Great Canterbury Psalter, “Creation of Plants”/”third day”, f11 row 1 right, plant 4, right branch
“f11-row1-right-msh4-right-branch.jpg” 16 KB, 10:48 am, Dec. 21, 2024
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f11.item.zoom

Huggins’ article “Foraging Wrong”

fact check treasure hunt: of my earlier writing. [8:39 pm dec 19 2024 ] development phase seeing how close the author comes to writing exactly this argument. I hope there is one paragraph containing these contradictory points.

find ‘branch’ in Huggins’ article “Foraging Wrong”. found the quote! twisted!

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/11/23/huggins-foraging-psychedelic-mushrooms-wrong-forest/

Does Huggs say “mushroom trees have branches, therefore dont look like mushroom? what do the branches look like?

In a roundabout twisted way, yes.

Funniest point: 

Each of the plants in the third-day scene also has branches. The mushrooms the PMTs wish to identify them with, however, do not.

Ronald Huggins, “Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case”, p. 17

Great Canterbury Psalter > Creation of Plants / Third Day.

On Dec. 13, 2020, I identified the 4 plants, straightening out out Browns’ mess: Pan Lib Cub Ama

Mushroom Branches Prevent Looking Like Mushrooms

The branches that prove pilzbaum are not mushrooms look like mushrooms.

Crop by Cybermonk

Panofsky/Huggins in “Foraging Wrong”: “These Pilzbaum have branches, so, not mushrooms.” What do these pilzbaums’ branches look like? Mushrooms.

hilarious, realized yesterday:

Ronald Huggins in “Foraging Wrong” 2024 says of “Creation of Plants” in Great Canterbury Psalter, aka “third day”,

the 4 pilzbaum have branches, so no way they can mean mushroom

🌴🚫🍄‍🟫😑 🥺🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫

me: what do the branches look like?

the branches look like mushrooms

now theres 11 not 4 mushrooms

🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫 🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫🍄‍🟫 👕👕 🍄🍄🍄

Posting Strategy

This page uses mobile app message post format.

I must post shorter webpage posts, more often.

Idea Dev pages need to be much shorter than the desktop-made pages 1-20. Long pages hang on mobile.

This brand new idea development page 21 is short, yet mobile app authoring is already unresponsive, bogged down!

Worst case, I’d have to change from title pattern “Idea development page 21” to date-based title pattern “Transcendent Knowledge ideas 2024-12-20”.

I plan to post shorter idea development files, more frequently.

Init Caps is too hard to type on mobile; headings need to change to lowercase.

Cubensis Lockbox Bins

I added this f221 image crop to my f145 page, at:

https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2023/03/17/canterbury-f145-king-orders-shipments-of-blue-fruit-to-storage-lockboxes-with-blue-stemmed-mushroom-tree/#f221-Row-2-right

Crop by Cybermonk – Great Canterbury Psalter f221 row 2 left, Spain painters, not Eadwine

My 3 fav Great Canterbury Psalter images are the only 3 that have Cubensis lockbox bins.

My high-res poster of f134 145 & 177 is almost ready. The lockbox images.

Huggins’ “Foraging Wrong” Article

Huggins in “Foraging Wrong” has some counts of pilzbaum in Great Canterbury Psalter i want to contest/ inventory/ count.

Huggins’ article’s subtitle scope proposes to bet the farm on “The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Test Case”

— like Browns did with their non field research during their field research, to NOT see firsthand the Walburga tapestry – & hugely lost their bet-the-farm proxy bet (to advocate the mild middle moderate position/ assessment of pilzbaum)

I dont do proxy bets; “test case” ok Hugs, but what is this, Plainc 2.0? I am MOST HAPPY to accept your offer, Hugs.

yes let us art historians publish written articles that scholars can ACTUALLY “CONSULT”; put down your telephone and stopwatch mis-“consulting” art historians, LetHatHug. You say text matters?

I HEARTILY AGREE that scholars in the debate (pilzbaum; mushrooms in Christian art ) need to “consult” “texts”:

IF ART HISTORIANS WANT TO DESERVE BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY, THEY MUST PUBLISH, IN WRITING; IN LIBRARIES; IN BOOKS, IN ARTICLES — NOT POSTURE AND DENOUNCE “WITH IMPRESSIVE CELERITY” like trained seals owned by the lying establishment

eg Wasson the Censor of Brinckmann and Panofsky (awkwardly condoned by Huggins).

👎🖼️🚫🍄 ⏱️

You’re a bit slow to disavow pilzbaum – are you sure you are a “competent” art historian? 🤨

Hatsis decrees: “every claim of mushrooms in Christian art stands or falls with the Plainc fresco” – the Proxy fallacy.

Deniers’ Logical Fallacies in the Pilzbaum (Mushroom Trees) Debate

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Huggins 2024)

wrmspirit wants myth coverage, which is fun & rewarding, but doesn’t see how Big-Game-Hunting the psalters & pilzbaum are.

mushroom trees are the main mushroom imagery in mushrooms in Christian art

my white boxes on images f134 145 177 show how many various mushroom shapes are there.

Victory, successful decoding, requires full vigorous engagement; tepid treatment of pilzbaum won’t cut it 🗡️🔥

wont cut these possibility branches, to get through the eternalism gate, to get the treasure of altered-state compatibility

I continue to find basic points of connections / interp in Great Canterbury Psalter.

Huggins the notable thing is his weird sneaky handling of the censored Panofsky letters & Brinc cit as if NOTHING REMARKABLE HERE, pan told wass about Brinck WAY BACK IN 1952″ – sure huggs

BUT WASSON CENSORED THAT CIT; HOW THE HELL DO YOU ACT AS IF WE HAD THAT CIT SINCE 1952 or 1968??!!

Why do you fail to cite Brown 2019 where we got Pan’s letters?

WHERE WHEN DID U FIND PANS TWO LETTERS YOU ARE CASUALLY USING AND WHERE DID U HEAR OF BRINC CIT?

“Sect”, “Cult”, “Community”

Walled-off Communities: Barrier Construction narrative tale-telling

Arbitrary moral narrative of suppression driving the storytelling, done by entheogen scholars, to Prevent Diffusing Entheogens throughout Christianity.

To prop up their fabricated moralistic tale, entheogen scholars have to keep The Mushroom [picture kiddie amanita 🍄] from mixing within the entire mass body of all Christendom.

the boundary of presence|absence of The Sacred Mushroom [🍄 🚫🤔] secured by entheogen scholarship

as a wall to keep The Mushroom from being within Christianity as an entire whole “community”

with The Mushroom used now and then by whatever Christians in that inclusive mass body of everyone.

Not “sect”, that’s a forbidden word ; not “cult”. Everyone; anyone.

Stop fabricating tale-spinning, storytelling narrative focused on boundary construction, the “groups” to which YOU, Ruck, confine the poor Amanita

Pope Ruck decrees, ex cathedra — HE is the only one who is calling ancient Amanita users “heretical GROUPS or SECTS”;

Ruck never frames ancient Amanita users as freely mixing individuals, now and again, here & there, within the set of EVERYONE.

I report evidence of mushrooms in Christian history as an entirety, not just by “certain Christian groups“, as Samorini in 1997 wrote.

I proclaim a 10-year hiatus on even THINKING about the wrong, blinding, stupefying, Prohibition-constructing question “where is the boundary wall between presence vs absence of The Mushroom [👶🍄]?

Ruck always emphasizes enclosing users within his walled “heretical sects” construction.

“CERTAIN Christian GROUPS” – Samorini 1997, “The mushroom-tree of Plaincourault”

“The mushroom-tree of Plaincourault” 1997 Samo:

p 31: “… initiating a series of new investigations on the relationship certain Christian groups in the middle ages may have had with entheogens.”

why not just say “some people”?

Why “groups” or “sects” or “cults” or “communities” , or whatever boundary-constructing terms you use interchangeably, like you’re making it up

BOUNDARY-CONSTRUCTING, NARRATIVE WALL-BUILDING, TO ISOLATE “THE MUSHROOM”

the Ruck cult of SECRET (amanita)

To what extent mushrooms in Christendom?

‘mushroom’ meaning mainly Cubensis; Amanita as symbol of Cubensis

Cubensis, along with its supporting-role Panaeolus & Liberty Cap types, with Amanita serving its standard function as signage indicating Psil mushroom ingesting, per Pharmako Gnosis by dale pendell :

“Amanita muscaria is the most famous entheogen in the world that nobody uses. It is the supreme symbol of all entheogenic religion.”

AMEN, nailed

Amanita is a deliriant thats used as a symbol for psychedelics.

Amanita is a symbol that means Cubensis.

Datura is a good substitute for Amanita, according to Ruck.

Amanita’s suitable replacement by Datura scopolamine, a comparable deliriant – per Ruck “Daturas for the Virgin” 2001 Entheos 2 p. 56

it is not one sentence, but split across two+, because he writes an an indirect poetic way

he might in my mind sound like he’s making an argument for the usual story of replacing Aman by Psil but no, here he is setting up to change from Aman — the real deal — to the mere adequate substitute Datura – (not to Psil, which is the usual tale of substn , eg in Heinr SF )

unfortunately, our glorious sacred Amanita got replaced by different plants, that we do not care about, that play a mere minor, supporting role here:

they settled for psilocybin, as a makeshift lesser substitute. 🙁

they settled for Datura, as a powerful substitute for Their Msh [🍄]. 👍

Psil was used in a minor supporting role, to prop up our grand/ master narrative, Secret Amanita storytelling.

entheogen scholarship is all about mythmaking storytelling, folk fiction factoids.

First-gen entheogen scholarship was not about Psilocybin advanced use throughout society at large.

In society, Psil was used at an advanced level.

Proved by pilzbaum‘s combin of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

In certain closed-off separate sects, or groups, or cults, or closed communities, Psil was used at an advanced level.

in the society — not “certain Christian groups … may have had … entheogens” Samo p31 1997, “The mushroom-tree of Plainc”

the Ruck (& here Samo) moderate-to-minimal entheogen theory of religion at work

After Samo’s field trip and then the famous 1998 broad pilzbaum article, delivering tons of mushrooms, would Samo still write weakly, “CERTAIN Christian GROUPS”?

presence means absence;

groups had; but therefore the whole mass lacked The Mushroom

only CERTAIN GROUPS had The Msh, no one else; society lacked, Christianity lacked The Mushroom

No individual person ever used or knew The Mushroom — only “sect” members, or call em whatever; doesn’t matter:

“cults, heretical community groups, exclusive collectives”

it’s STORYTELLING TIME, myth-based historiography.

see W Hanegraaff on why not to do this.

entheogen scholarship is Myth-based historiography, warned against by Hanegraaff.

LetHatHug is right on this, they smell storytelling mythmaking misguided by all

Psilocybin Abused in Service of Giving All (Stolen) Glory to Amanita

the bad, abusive, disrespectful attitude that the Secret Amanita paradigm has against Psil, as if Aman is better than Psil rather than the reverse

Aman steals credit from Psil

Hatsis : “nevertheless, we shall employ those lesser ones, “lesser looking”

Tom “Secret Amanita Cult” Hatsis writes, “these lesser-looking mushrooms|trees”, he says of non-amanita pilzbaum.

check quote , search here

Amanita serves as a symbol, the signage of Cubensis, per std lang hdshop art

put to use the poor-to-ingest, pretty, deviant type, 🍄 USED as signage of Psil 🍄‍🟫

no more 🍄‍🟫 in service of 🍄

that’s backwards, as normal in this field of entheogen scholarship. rightly,

🍄 in service of 🍄‍🟫

{spots on mushroom} means trip; psil | blot

{spots on msh} in art gives no thought of Amanita ingesting — pass , i’d rather be straight

I have a mushroom art calendar, maybe rendered, that has almost no spots in the caps, surprisingly, avoids that dominant stylization standard visual language

the calendar artist is an activist against the Amanita Primacy Fallacy

4x Error Penalty for Brown & Brown 2016 & 2019

re: “Creation of Plants” image, poor identifications by Brown:
x2 penalty bc both Browns, & x2 penalty when they duplicate the same mistake in book and article.

Both Brown AND Brown both made a certain mistake twice, double penalty — or quadruple penalty, in the case where both authors in both publications (book and article) made the same mistake.

eg serrated base folly Walburga tapestry is both botched in 2016 book SECRET Hallucinogens in “Certain Christian Communities”, by both Brown & Brown.

Samorini wrote the awful phrase “certain Christian groups” in 1997, a red flag: note the boundary-construction wall-building labor by Samorini: “cult, closed group, walled off community, sect walled off”.

Wound in Right Side

5:42 pm dec 19 2024

the pieces fit this time thru:

eve born from rib in adams side: wound in right side = ctrl seizure/ tc transcendence birth passageway gate = become Female Semele, helpless overpowered thought receiver

Gen 2:21-23

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%202%3A21-23&version=NIV

Poster of Images f134 🙃, f145 👑, & f177 🐴

Similar to webpage https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2024/12/13/great-canterbury-psalter-images-f134-f145-f177/

Poster, made higher res than ever, 3 crops stacked: f134🙃 f145👑 f177🐴

Huggins’ sleazy use of Panofsky’s Brinckmann 1906 cit (missing in Hugs Biblio) & pan’s 2nd letter from Via Brown 2019 NOT CITED IN BIBLIO but footnote strangely. no mention of two attached pics. Hugs is Acting strange around Panofsky cover up wasson deception, why not credit Brown? Why not cite Brown 2019?, who published both panofsky letters (tho not the two pics)

hugg says brinc cite way back in 1952

how did you find it? bc wasson hid 5 things for 1952 to 1968 to 2019 Brown exposed the hidden leads

citation

two pictures

Panofsky’s 2nd letter

2nd strong urging to see Brinckmann citation, consult cit.

wasson, deceit tactic

The two legs of the Egodeath theory: The core theory & the mytheme theory

the core theory, & the mytheme theory

directly represented, & analogy represented transfn to psychedelic eternalism compatible; mature form. demon cleansed

Rev 22:14

blessed are those who wash their clothes that they may gave the right to the tree of life and may pass through the gates into the city

The Core theory: Psychedelic eternalism with non-branching possibilities & dependent, 2-level control

the core theory of mental model control transformation not using analogy

the psychedelic eternalism dependent non-branching theory

The mytheme theory: Myth is analogies describing psychedelic eternalism; the “psychedelic eternalism” theory of myth

myth is analogies describing loose cognitive phenom ,

psychedelic transfmn of control mental model

Being a Theorist

You are on the leading edge of altered state theory.

I am a theorist. No one understands my mode of approach.

The Egodeath theory is a useful theory that’s effective at leveraging myth to prove the Egodeath theory

I construct a useful theory that’s effective at leveraging myth to prove the theory.

the Egodeath theory = Direct theory + analogies

the cybernetic theory + the mytheme theory

analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control

the Egodeath theory

mental model transformation

from

literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control

to

analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control

psychedelic eternalism

from

branching-steering autonomy with loss of control

to

non-branching steering dependency with stable control

the Egodeath theory has two legs

one leg is analogy

one leg is direct clear theory

the Egodeath theory is a useful technology to amplify mental control power– to the point of control instability, loss of viable stable control

per Houot, donning his wings to fly up to the sun.

☀️

Icarus

Cyberdisciple Articles

New section of site map: https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/nav/#Cyberdisciple

local pages:

At my site map, added “Cyberdisciple Articles” section, listing all my Cyberdisciple pages (lacks the sections about Cyberdisciple that are within my Idea Development pages).

  • Updated my site map page of Cyberdisciple site.
  • todo: In my site map page of Cyberdisciple’s site, indicate my favs/ freq used.
  • todo: post Comment at a Cyberdisciple site page about Letcher and Hatsis wondering if Letcher is same as Hatsis – now, add Huggins.

See Also

pending

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment