3-Phase “Transcendent Possibilism” vs. 2-Phase “Eternalism” (Transcendent Egoic Thinking)

Michael Hoffman, February 18, 2025

Crop by Michael Hoffman

Site Map

Contents:

Page status: This page is “complete” in that it contains my recent writings on this topic. Need to re-organize.

Conclusion

Instead of selling “eternalism” and “no-free-will/monopossibility”, it’s clearer and more successful to sell/frame what you get, and what you have to believe in.

Wilber: Don’t Dissociated from egoic control thinking; embrace, include & extend mental model to embrace and include egoic control thinking

Transcendent use of egoic thinking {rider above donkey on path, right foot down}

cut mushroom trees with right hand, branch held left hand

splayed/together fingers

splayed/together sticks and feathers

Images: Entry into Jerusalem

Photo credit: Julie M. Brown
why diamond important

10:54 pm Feb. 25, 2025 – i need fresh up to date analysis of Entry into Jerusalem – Saint Martin’s.

Awareness has risen up to the level of the God-aware rider above the donkey. Ego thinking is a given frozen in rock.

Awareness perceives that the loosecog-revealed level has revealed a different model underlying the surface
garment
cloak cleaned
outer shell
control agency
egoic locus of control
not yet perceived as virtual-only
virtual monolithic, autonomous control
transcendent egoic thinking: you do egoic thinking and you see that the egoic personal control system,
snake-basket lid has been lifted
snake in rock
snake frozen in rock
your worldline snake frozen in rock
the egoic thinking shell
the egoic control system
egoic control thinking
the egoic personal control system

  • king above donkey on path
  • guy behind king: L hand forms IY
  • epiphany of the ruler from outside the gates open the gates to the incoming ruler welcome.
  • pass through the {gate} of {city walls}
  • Garment: egoic thinking, now seen from aside up above behind you POV; remove a garment. clean right foot of donkey / jesus = cleaned garment mental model. rectified
  • Diamond frond dud mushroom-tree. No mushroom features, so increase interpretation of {branching} form & {L vs. R}.
  • Psilocybin mushroom-tree.
  • Right foot forward.
  • Cleaning impure lips w/ heaven coal burning from angel {fire}.
  • dud mushroom-tree, diamond tree: IY.
  • R hand holds the lone I branch of diamond frond. Right = non-branching.
  • L hand holds the branching branch of diamond fronds. Left = branching.
  • Non-branching is favored.
  • right hand on I of YI tree.

Egoic thinking is always used, incl peak window, though now see it from outside of it from Wilberian POV employing child thinking but distanced perceiving the egoic control system and its suppositions/ model that is always expereienced except during loosecog and evne then you totally use your egoic thinking donkey.

During peak window we above donkey see the child thinking following its path; we see that from the remembered and modelled vantage POV outside “look up, look behind you, see ram substitute instead of the young man, the efficacious analogy idea of sacrifice your child thinking.

Did I not write all of these points a couple years ago?

I see it differently now – I am experiencing reading the above image from a greater level of facillty

Immediately see branching form of diamond frond {branching tree}. IY or I-trident.

Apply the latest BRANCHING-FORM theory model lens.

Crop by Michael Hoffman

Copy of the set of images from below in this page, on Feb 25 2025 copied.

The rider has a point of view being able to now perceive the egoic control system and see its virtual-only nature and its interesting control-climax death birth transformation

Good Marketing & Communication: Affirm transcendent possibilism & eternalism, repudiate naive possibilism

You must accept transcendent possibilism.

Good news: enlightenment is simple. Enlightenment or Transcendent Knowledge is merely transcendent possibilism; possibilism qualified by/ informed by/ modified by factoring-in no-free-will/monopossibility as a momentary, transformative revelation of the underlying level, under the personal control system.

Poor Marketing & Communication: Affirm eternalism & transcendent possibilism, repudiate naive possibilism-thinking

You must accept no-free-will/monopossibility.

Good news: enlightenment is simple. Enlightenment or Transcendent Knowledge is merely eternalism; no-free-will/monopossibility.

Personal control agency is a helpless puppet controlled by the uncontrollable source of control-thoughts.

The helpless thought-receiver vs. the unavoidable thought-inserter, in relation per 2-level, dependent control.

About the image at top of this page

The set of 3 figures of concern here are:

  1. Fool = naive possibilism-thinking.
  2. Youth = eternalism-thinking [without factoring-in possibilism-thinking]
  3. Beard = qualified possibilism-thinking. [= eternalism with factoring-in possibilism-thinking]

If there were only figures 1 & 2 (a 2-phase depiction), there would be a different analysis/ meaning of each figure:

  1. Fool = possibilism-thinking, of a type that’s wholly unaware of eternalism.
  2. Wise = eternalism-thinking, including factoring-in possibilism-thinking. Possibilism-thinking that includes the revelation of eternalism.

You can divide-up the progression to enlightenment into 3 phases, or differently, into 2 phases.

In the group of 3 figures, figure 1 & 2 are obvious. The puzzling figure is figure 3, Beard. f134 is a puzzle game set-up.

Eadwine the artist, sets up puzzle: given that Fool = possibilism-thinking; and Youth = eternalism-thinking; what then does the Mature guy mean?

It’s a 3-phase image, not framed as 2-phase. A 2-phase version of this image would omit Beard guy.

The question of this article is: Should we name {the mental model that you end up with} after Red Youth, or Beard?

Should we label Beard figure as “possibilism (w/ eternalism)”, or “eternalism (w/ possibilism)”?

Imagine 2 versions of this image.

The image we have is 3-phase; group of 3 figures.

Imagine alt version of this panel that omits Beard guy.

Image would simply mean: move from possibilism to eternalism. Story: the Egodeath theory gives you eternalism – sort of saying, gives you fatedness / heimarmene/ block-universe eternalism, helpless puppethood, seems to be what we end up with.

That’s a poor representation of what we end up with. 2-phase is crude, confusing; IT IS SO VERY ABBREVIATED, IT IS CONFUSING and implies we end up w the way of thinking that strikes us down during peak window intense mystic altered state.

Such 2-phase model is only partly accurate & helpful.

The Egodeath theory or Transcendent Knowledge gives you: eternalism-thinking. That seems to say “no free will is all-important and the final view you end up with“.

That is true in a way, but crude and lacks nuance.

Confusing. Oversimplified; misrep’ve.

Beard, Figure #3, is eternalism-thinking in the broad, inclusive sense — we can call this either “possibilism (w/ eternalism)” or “eternalism (w/ possibilism)”.

idea for all pages:

I wish to explain or comment on the image at top of article, but cannot clutter that spot.

Like front matter of book, explain the book cover.

This is Great Canterbury Psalter f134 row 2 Right.

On the left is cubensis dispensary, not of central interest here; I am not discussing the LEFT-HAND GUY (Jesus the dispensary clerk), he is not part of the key group of 3 figures.

I’m only focusing on/ defining “the 3 guys” to be: fool, youth, beard bearded floating guy is the unclear part.

Ever since I finished analysis of Row 1 in Nov 2020, and started finally looking at row 2 & 3 after that, I immediately knew Left foot fool = possibilism-thinking; Right foot youth = eternalism-thinking – and I puzzled over Floating Beard guy; the meaning (or really, ramification) of the floating pair of feet.

I was more puzzled over his floating feet, than the idea of expressing the Egodeath theory / Transcendent Knowledge as 3 phases. See my Nov 2020 writings/pages. Recently I figured: “floating feet” does not have meaning; but rather, ramifications: it serves to prevent you from easily assessing his stability.

The Genre Question: Folio Image f134 is an instructional game puzzle (of highest order)

floating feet means you are prevented from simply reading which foot down, during assessing the control stability of every figure in f134.

Also floating feet connects him to leg hanging guy in tree.

And to the Row 1 L class of 4 guys, you cannot see feet of 2 of them, who he looks toward.

Floating feet serves as factor in game puzzle solving that the artist/ teacher set up for us to study handedness motifs.

Intro/Motivation for this Page

This page contains some new idea development, and contains sections moved out from yesterday’s article explaining the meaning of 2 or 3 branches/beams holding up the crown of some mushroom-trees.

Over the past couple of days, I went back & forth re: whether 1 page or 2:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/17/y-branches-under-mushroom-tree-cap-two-legs-for-psychedelic-virtual-freewill/

1 page clearly is too long, and the two topics are not THAT closely associated/ interconnected. Resuming orig. plan: 2 sep. pages.

I moved the content about describing Transcendent Knowledge as yielding/ ending up giving you “a form of possibilism” instead of simply extremist pure “eternalism”, from that page to this page.

Titles of this page

This is a standard section for all new pages.

3-Phase “Transcendent Possibilism” vs. 2-Phase “Eternalism”, as a clear, non-confusing description of what we believe in

The transcendent ego remains after enlightenment; after loose-cognitive mental model transformation.

I am NOT telling people to believe in eternalism – because that word has both a narrow & a broad meaning, ambiguous.

‘eternalism’ might mean extreme exclusive eternalism w/o factoring-in possibilism-thinking; OR, might mean eternalism including factoring-in possibilism-thinking.

The great name/phrase/ concept-label “transcendent possibilism” solves such problems pretty well. The name “eternalism” SEEMS TO IMPRISON YOU IN NO-FREE-WILL/MONOPOSSIBILITY which is a poor description of the mental model we end up with.

Learned from Kafei – it is DEATH/failure for the Egodeath theory, to rely on a word (concept-label) that is confusing & misleading. Not an option!

Even Josie Kins f’d up the def’n of ‘eternalism’ and degrades it to mere egoic-soaked domino-chain determinism, which is how Kafei (mis-)read my custom-redefined term “determinism” in 2007 main article. [that expeirence inventory site was down]

Josie Kins Effect Index Site Is Back Up

it was 404 around Dec 2024.

https://www.effectindex.com/effects/perception-of-eternalism

https://www.effectindex.com/people/josie

https://www.effectindex.com

The day after I finalized my main article in Sep. 2007, I found the terms ‘eternalism’ and ‘superdeterminism’.

“Perception of Eternalism” page at Effect Index

https://www.effectindex.com/effects/perception-of-eternalism

https://pub-879bfd45a9774f1c80a8b77aca1f0aee.r2.dev/Time_is_connected.png —

https://pub-879bfd45a9774f1c80a8b77aca1f0aee.r2.dev/Time_is_connected.png

Caption:

The image above represents how a person under the influence of this component would view themselves as an organism.

This is often described as being a singular structure which stretches through the physical dimension of time alongside of all other identically behaving structures which the universe as a whole is entirely comprised of.

—

Perception of eternalism can be described as the experience of a major alteration of one’s perspective of the fundamental mechanics behind the linear continuity of time moving from the past to the present to the future.

During this state of mind, it feels as if all points across the timeline of existence are equally “real” and are occurring simultaneously alongside each other.

Every point in time is felt to exist regardless of the person’s current position within the overall timeline, much as all points in physical space persist regardless of the observer’s location.

—

While all moments are felt to be equally real, the directional flow of time is felt to be maintained, with the present always being the moment which is currently experienced.

All moments in time are still felt to be linked together by causality, the past necessitating the present, which necessitates the future, and so forth.

—

A common conclusion that is reached during the experience of this state is that although one’s life inevitably will end, it will apparently persist forever within its own timeframe and is therefore perpetual despite not being infinite in its length.

Birth and death are therefore seen as merely the start and end points of the range of time that a person exists in eternally, if not experiences eternally.

—

This sudden change in perspective starkly contrasts with the standard perception of time in which only the present is felt to exist, while the past no longer is and the future is yet to be.

—

Perception of eternalism is often accompanied by other coinciding transpersonal effects such as unity and interconnectedness and feelings of interdependent opposites.

It is most commonly induced under the influence of heavy dosages of psychedelic compounds, such as LSD, psilocybin, and mescaline.

Kins’ commentary

Perception of eternalism is one of a handful of subjective effect components that has had a substantial impact on how I view myself and the universe around me.

I first experienced this effect during a state of level 4 unity and interconnectedness while under the influence of a heavy dose of Ayahuasca.

It was one of the most profound experiences of my entire life.

I truly felt that not only was I the entirety of existence experiencing itself through this body, but that this moment and all other moments would continue to exist eternally within their specific time frames.

Although I am acutely aware of how it is impossible for me to genuinely know if this is true or not, I have found it to be a perspective that is very difficult to shake off after having this experience a number of times.

—

Before experiencing this effect, I had never considered or even heard of the various similar metaphysical schools of thought that exist as relatively mainstream concepts within the field of philosophy.

However, after having had experienced this state of mind numerous times, I happened upon a large number of relevant concepts that include ideas such as eternalism, four dimensionalism, growing block universe, perdurantism, and the b-theory of time.

Each of these concepts have their Wikipedia articles linked to within the See Also section of this page.

—

As an intellectual concept, the B-theory of time is especially interesting to me as it is relatively well supported by the physics community.

In summary, B-theory posits that the flow of time is an illusion, that the past, present, and future are equally real and that time is tenseless.

Its support is seemingly due to its apparent compatibility with theoretical physics and the fact that many theories such as special relativity, the ADD model, and brane cosmology are considered to point to a theory of time similar to B-theory.

However, I feel that it is important to note that I do not have a remotely in-depth understanding of theoretical physics and that although these theories are in support of notions similar to this experience, I am not entirely sure that their ontological implications can be asserted within science and outside the realm of philosophy or metaphysics.

—

Regardless of whether or not the nature of time is genuinely illusory, it is truly fascinating to me that without any prior knowledge, myself and many other psychedelic users can experience incredibly specific states of mind that seem to line up with entire philosophical theories.

This holds true for a number of transpersonal effects and is something that I’m deeply passionate about doing my absolute best to both document and discuss without descending into any degree of pseudoscience or hippy babble.

/ end of paste from fx index

Cybermonk commentary

The above includes discussion of DOMINO-CHAIN DETERMINISM – as least as an experience, if not as a metaphystical/ ontological assertion definition by Kins.

Carefully assessing/disputing what Kins is asserting here, is relevant for my present article.

During & after enlightenment, the mind’s experience is shaped in the form of egoic domino-chain causality– well, actually, it’s shaped as branching into open future ie possibilism branching.

RELYING on that model & its personal control model of virtually monolithic, autonomous control, is unstable.

Does relying on domino-chain determinism produce loss of control?

Board of Egodeath can’t agree on title wording except a few key words, so use those as the title

Since the article-naming committee cannot agree on any terms except these, make the title short that way.

This site (prior to this page) does not contain the phrase “Board of Egodeath”. I probably said that phrase in a voice recording; Egodeath Mystery Show.

Origin of the Board of Egodeath: Egodeath Mystery Show early episode(s). The show template page has a segment about the meeting agenda for the Board of Egodeath, titled “Esoteric Agenda”.

Highlighting 3-Phase Model Ending with “Transcendent Possibilism” Better than 2-Phase Model Ending with “Eternalism”

The basic problem: Should the Egodeath Theory be labelled as a kind of eternalism, or a kind of possibilism?

The basic problem: Should the Egodeath Theory be labelled as a kind of eternalism, or a kind of possibilism? pros & cons – IN ANY CASE, FORM THE BEST POSSIBLE label in terms of 2-phase eternalism.

What’s the best possible label in terms of 2-phase eternalism?

It may be that throughout my writings, I have been developing this wording.

What’s the best possible label in terms of 3-phase possibilism?

It may be that throughout my writings, I have not been developing this wording enough, and should favor this wording over wording in terms of “you end up with eternalism-thinking” and “you gotta agree there’s no-free-will/monopossibility”. — “you gotta agree there is eternalism, of a certain type that takes into account possibilism“

Wrong to Overemphasize Eternalism and Underemphasize Possibilism

Must Balance and Put forth the cominbation of Both

The Egodeath theory gives you a combination of possibilism & eternalism; gives you a kind of compatibilism. (Not to imply, though, that you end up with a kind of domino-chain determinism.) the Egodeath theory as a system of mental model transformation does NOT include domino-chain determinism.

Psychedelic mental model transformation does not produce a kind of domino-chain determinism, as from the Phil dept armchair spec’n.

Moving beyond a 1-word name of the Egodeath theory, 1-word name of what you end up with, YOU END UP WITH ETERNALISM AND POSSIBILISM BOTH.

What kind of possibilism and eternalism combination do we end up with?

What kind of “compatibilism” do we end up with?

My error was hyping / overemph / overselling eternalism, and underselling possibilism.

I am lately proposing that it’s better to push “you gotta agree there is possibilism, of a certain type that takes into account eternalism / no-free-will/monopossibility”.

If we describe the Egodeath theory as a kind of eternalism, it seems as if YOU GOTTA AGREE WITH ME THERE’S NO-FREE-WILL; TRAPPED IN HEIMARMENE PRISON HELPLESSLY.

That is the criticism that Late Antiquity had of Early Antiquity.

Early Antiquity framed Transcendent Knowledge as giving you a kind of eternalism, emphasizing fatedness, no-free-will, puppethood enslaved by the gods.

Late Antiquity made a project of instead framing Transcendent Knowledge as liberating you from the prison of eternalism.

Our grandfathers gave us religion that emphasized no-free-will; heimarmene. But we want religion that emphasizes a kind of freewill end-result.

Periodization: The Year When These Were Formed: Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, Hermeticism, Christianity, Mithraism

The era of Gnosticism, Neoplatonism, Hermeticism, Christianity, & Mithraism.

Each Competitive Marketing Dept. Promising to Lift You Above Fatedness; Selling the Transcending of Heimarmene

Late Antiquity
lant

Early Antiquity
eant

The concept-label problem that I’m solving by this analysis

Concept-labels are more important than anything else. Connotation networks; lexicon, framing, positioning, marketing; of predominant importance.

Kafei was misled by my abnormal use of ‘determinism’ in 2007 main article — that shows how predominant the theory’s lexicon is.

CONCEPT-LABELS ARE OF TOPMOST IMPORTANCE.

There are basically two options for framing the resulting mental model:

  • Call the resulting mental model “eternalism-thinking” and explain how that’s modified by including possibilism-thinking.
  • Call the resulting mental model “possibilism-thinking” and explain how that’s modified by including eternalism-thinking.

Briefer wording:

  • Call the result “eternalism” and explain how that’s modified by possibilism.
  • Call the result “possibilism” and explain how that’s modified by eternalism.

The disadvantage of summarizing the Egodeath theory in terms of the 2-level model is, it SOUNDS like you end up with pure, simple, extreme eternalism.

In this approach for summarizing, the word ‘eternalism’ is forced to have two scopes: narrow, pure, extreme eternalism; and, broad, nuanced eternalism that includes possibilism-thinking. Confusing.

Pros & cons of 2-level framing, saying you end up with a type of eternalism

Expressing as 2-level model is thus simple, and confusing.

If you only draw from 2 levels, the 2nd level is forced to highlight the word ‘eternalism’ But in reality, you end up using possibilism-thinking all the time, so it’s confusing to label that as ‘eternalism’.

Pros & cons of 3-level framing, saying you end up with a type of possibilism

The most basic question: “described” here means picking a 1-word or 2-word label for the Egodeath theory. Favor which term: eternalism, or possibilism?

In a 1- or 2-word description or name or characterizing of the Egodeath theory, should it be presented as giving you “eternalism” (eg: “qualified eternalism”; eternalism modified by possibilism), or giving you a kind of possibilism? eg “qualified possibilism; possibilism qualified by eternalism)?

In a 1- or 2-word description or name or characterizing of the Egodeath theory, should it be presented as giving you “eternalism” (eg: “qualified eternalism”; eternalism modified by possibilism), or giving you a kind of possibilism? eg “qualified possibilism; possibilism qualified by eternalism)?

Should the Egodeath theory be described – in briefest summary or naming — as

Expressing as 3-level model is more verbose and complex, but less confusing.

This way, the middle phase can highlight ‘eternalism’ and the 3rd, final phase can be described as highlighting ‘possibilism’, modified by eternalism-thinking.

Should we summarize (as a label for the Theory) in terms of the important, middle phase – the peak window of intense mystic altered state; the moment of ego-sacrifice?

Or, should we summarize theory in terms of the practical daily mental model you end up with, which appears as if possibilism-thinking?

3-Phase Model Ending with “Transcendent Possibilism” Better than 2-Phase Model Ending with “Eternalism”

The 3-Phase Model of Transcendent Knowledge Transformation, Ending with a Kind of Possibilism, Not Emphasizing Eternalism

3-phase; rejecting simply “eternalism” / “no-free-will/monopossibility”

3-phase; do not sell “eternalism”; sell “transcendent possibilism”; transcendent freewill.

2-phase sells poorly: 2 problems:

  • you push no-free-will; block universe prison – and,
  • it’s not useful, b/c in practice, we HAVE to use freewill thinking.

In the 2-phase model, the final phase is no free will; helpless dependent control.

The 3-phase model is better: its final phase is freewill of a qualified type, and that is how we always have to practically conduct ourselves even when eternalism is revealed in the peak window of the intense mystic altered state.

Qualified possibilism/ transcendent possibilism

more colloq’ly: familiarly: transcendent freewill….

Every Term is of Limited Usefulness

“eternalism”, “possibilism”, “egoic”, “transcendent”, “freewill”, “determinism”; “branching”, “non-branching”, “psychedelic”, “entheogen” – all are tech terms w/ special usage, and with some greater or lesser degree of familiarity in popular standard common language usage.

Moderately technical terms – PROS AS well as CONS, like always.

The term “transcendent freewill” feels too limited/ too narrowly focused on old entrenched ruts, “the debate in Philosophy about free will vs. determinism”. I do not want to trigger that connotation network.

Rebranding/ Selling/ Marketing the Egodeath Theory as “Compatibilism” instead of Eternalism/ No-Free-Will Is a Breakthrough Solution: How to Have Possibilism and Eternalism Both

as if emphasizing possibilism-thinking at the same time as emphasizing eternalism-thinking

yesterday feb 15 2025 was a breakthrough –

far from “new” topic in all respects

that’s how it goes with annual breakthrough on the exact same new-not-new , new-old breakthrough again for 1st time.

The concepts succesfully usefully came together to solve a problem of “hard sell no-free-will/monopossibility/ heimar prison – GOOD NEWS! —

“GREAT NEWS EVERYONE! ENLIGHTENMENT IS SIMPLY THAT THERE’S NO FREE WILL; YOU’RE STUCK POWERLESSLY AND HELPLESSLY IN A FATEDNESS PRISON FROZEN BLOCK UNIVERSE!”

Buy my book!

I FIGURED OUT Transcendent Knowledge: IT’S NO-FREE-WILL, YOU’RE FROZEN IN BLOCK UNIVERSE HELPLESSLY, THAT’S WHAT Transcendent Knowledge IS ABOUT! SIMPLE AND EASY! BUY MY BOOK!

🤑💰

Like I reject “only mind exists” vs “only matter exists”, I also reject extremist eternalism-thinking — posting title: 3-PHASE BEATS 2 PHASE like late anti’y beat early antiqy which is 2-phase and worships eternalism-thinking. the Egodeath theory does not – in my mature phase now – solely push eternalism-thinking.

Studying Psilocybin mushrooms was often unprofiable BUT one time I was rendered speechless b/c my lips are impure; cannot say to myself “Self, you should think thus & sucxh way” — b/c that cajoling is egoic thinking – so how can I think, my thinking is inherently egoic! even during enlight of eternalism-thinking!

Strictly eternalism-thinking is not an option! And I cannot presnt my theory to my church by pushing extremeist unbalanced eternalism-thinking.

  • 3 phase beats 2-phase. eternalism-thinking is NOT the end. fixed stars fatedness hiem snake is NOT the end.

Christianity — but ASLO late phase Hellenism , all the competing brands — rejected 2-phase worship of trict strict eternalism-thinking , and everyone in late Ant’y switched to 3-phase model where snake sfr {sr snake frozen in rock is NOT the final phase of maturation. In mushroom imagery in Christian art, expresses 3-phase:

We late-phase msystics have a hard nuanced job, the angels anxiously debating no-free-will/monopossibility til end of time: we must not only figure out eternalism-thinking — we must go BEYOND THE [fixed stars, Hanegraaff! not the 5 planets!!] STARS, to BOTH AFFIRM ETERNALISM-THINKING AND (QUALIFIED) POSSIBILISM-THINKING.

a big change, i solved a huge roadblock problem to teach my church. months ago, hiatus, a few months ago, nov 2024, I was stuck.

As if: I must force my church to agree no-free-will/monopossibility.

Before that, I wrote here I was afriad to approve possibilism-thinking bc/ pre/trans fallacy, ppl would think i approve of freewill thinking and they fail to transform.

Solution, today feb 17: assert qualified possibilism-thinking .

Not an entirely brand new solution but i feel it now, Wm James is right; the 3-phase model is right; eternalism-thinking / fixed stars level 8 is not the end.

My 3-phase read is superior to Bricklin’s good 2-phase book on Wm James.

Bricklin is wrong or insuff clear: enlightenment is NOT eternalism-thinking.

James (transformed by the Egodeath theory) is correct, “practical” philosophy; we end with enlightened eternalism-thinking, ie qualified possibilism-thinking.

In a way, we, the completed purified initiates, emphasize eternalism-thinking AND in a way, we emphasize practical, qualified possibilism-thinking.

But we do not push naive freewill thinking. we reject THAT. pre trans fallacy (not that that term is part of my offiial lexicon…

Pre/Trans Fallacy: The Egodeath Theory Gives You Egoic Freewill Empowerment*

👑🤴💪☸️🌳 🚫🐍

*qualified possibilism-thinking

“Pre/trans fallacy” is an approved guest phrase — unlike “neuroplasticity” which is evil b/c replaces/ eliminates an actual Cog Phen approach.

Pre/Trans Fallacy concept does not delete the theory of psychedelic eternalism — but now at this time i need better, I need a 3-phase term that is equivalent to “psychedelic eternalism” — for my shyster deception scheme con game pretext marketing sales dept scam.

I need to fool the Egodeath community into thinking the Egodeath theory affirms possibilism-thinking: Egodeath Huckster Cybermonk.

As duplicitous as Wasson re “consult” art authorities; I am even triplicitous.

The Theory of Qualified Possibilism;
Psychedelic Qualified Possibilism
Psychedelic Virtual Possibilism 😇💪☸️

Psychedelic possibilism; the theory of psychedelic possibilism

psychedelic possibilism
pp

the theory of psychedelic possibilism
tpsm

transpersonal psychology
tp

the theory of qualified possibilism
tqp

I went to market to sell eternalism — no sale.
I went to market to sell virtual possibilism — many sale.

🤑💰 🤥👖🔥🤞

Egoic Free Will Power Is . . . .🔍🧐🤔🤨 the Answer and the Truth!

The Egodeath theory will make your ego’s steering power more powerful than God

virtual possibilism
vp

virtual possibilism thinking
vpt

the theory of virtual possibilism
tvp

psychedelic virtual possibilism
pvp

Qualified Eternalism

3-phase equivalent name for essence of Egodeath: psychedelic eternalism, the theory of psychedelic pre-existence; psychedelic qualified possibilism-thinking

New idea: qualified eternalism!

2025/2/17 9:37

qualified possibilism-thinking

the theory of qualified eternalism

psychedelic eternalism

psychedelic possibilism – wont do [note from Sales dept.: we’re going w/ that, anyway – IF BROWN CAN ADD “SECRET” TO SUBTITLE, AND DOUBLE-POSITION ON WALBUWALBURGA, WE CAN LIE TO the Egodeath community ], but:

psychedelic qualified possibilism – 3-12 months ago I feared ego would leap upon this and conclude ego freewill power, un-transformed (I wrote 1-2 years ago here, of that worry]

I have fixed that risk, now.

psychedelic eternalism = psychedelic qualified possibilism
pqp

Marketing Deception Dept.: Psychedelic Eternalism, fakely framed & advertised as Psychedelic Qualified Possibilism

Add pretty girl = Amanita, to complete this photoshopped picture.

Psychedelic eternalism = psychedelic qualified possibilism 🍄💪☸️👑 🚫🐍 – the treasure you gain by the Egodeath theory is egoic freewill empowerment*

*qualified; eternalism-thinking = qualified possibilism-thinking

Qualified possibilism-thinking ~= Egoic Freewill Empowerment

Wasson is merely duplicitous; Cybermonk is triplicitous, snake oil “qualified possibilism-thinking”- don’t give money to Zen Master Brad, I am the true light of egoic freewill empowerment

Buy My Book to get ego power freewill God power of (qualified) possibilism-thinking; end up with [joke] “naive qualified possibilism-thinking”

Christianity is right – late antiquity is correct — the 3 phase model beats the 2-phase model: beyond the stars, as Hanegraaff clumsily wrote re: in recent book Hermeticism.

He’s wrong that we go from eternalism-thinking to possibilism-thinking – insuff. model.

We actually go from naive possibilism-thinking, to eternalism-thinking, to QUALIFIED possibilism-thinking.

“Balance” Depicted as Both Feet on Ground

wrmspirit wrote Feb 17, 2025

“Your post on “perceptual dualism”:

“What I love about the Egodeath Theory is allowing minds to live with both feet on the ground where balance is vitally important.”

[Per 2-phase model, only have {right foot down}.
Per 3-phase model, end up with balance = both feet down.]

“If I live with just my right foot on the ground I will eventually fall over. 

“If I live with just my left foot on the ground I will eventually fall over.

“With both feet on the ground I can live within balance through the essence of both worlds alive in my heart.”

People not defining their terms

“I don’t have to define God. Definitions are  boundaries placed around words where meaning has been decided upon.

“So instead I can feel God through my beating heart and breath which moves through a spatial flow between and within  both worlds with  thankfulness for the Egodeath Theory.”

/ end email

Which Foot Down, in Tree of Knowledge

email 1: feb 17 2025

While eating from tree of knowledge in Great Canterbury Psalter f11 (the main folio) row 3 right, Eve & Adam’s feet are definitely, pointedly together, compared to definite Right Foot Down prior to that.

They went from having Transcendent Knowledge while with God saying Do Not Eat, to having instead, both feet on the ground, smiling looking up at the grid of Lib Cap trees in the crown.

Eadwine the artist tells us to make of that what we will.

By using a 3-phase/ 3-level model (late antiquity) instead of simple 2-level/ 2-phase model, gives us much flexibility in interpretation.

Also if Eden is a reversal of our actual sequence (emphasize that Eden is reversed by Rev 22), gives flexibility of interpretation.

  1. naive possibilism-thinking. egoic the personal control system; egoic thinking.
  2. extremist hardcore eternalism-thinking, only; repudiation of freewill thinking. sacr. of Isaac. “do not eat”. The moment you realize truth of eternalism and rely on it to survive and get the treasure. but that’s not the end!
  3. balanced, realistic, truly mature: qualified possibilism-thinking also with, by the way, eternalism-thinking. “eat from tree of knowledge”.

Right Mode of Interpretation, with Flexibility

email 2

The right mode of interpretation is more important than the particular details of interpretation.

This principle enables profitable side-by-side comparison of the panels around tree of knowledge in Great Canterbury Psalter vs. Bern. door.  

The which-foot-down changes, from panel to panel, differ, by Eadwine vs. Bernward — but, same mode of interp applies.

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#f11-row-3-middle-and-right

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/05/27/bernward-doors-and-column-hildesheim/#Left-Door-Panel-3

The purpose of entheogen scholarship — it seems, alas, is to fixate on crybabying about “God took away entheogens”  
😩😩😭😭👶

— that’s too simplistic, need nuance (for starters, entheogen scholars, stop ignoring Rev 22 just bc fixated on bellyaching about God forbidding entheogens.  There’s more opportunity for interp than simply “do not eat”.  

If God and his forbidding = extremist no-free-will/monopossibility makes adam & eve not happy, in f11 row 3 middle, “do not eat” — they are Right foto {right foot down} and they are with God and they are not happy. row 3 R tree of knowledge they are happy, and BOTH feet down.
— like red guy f134 row 2 right where you have [below list of 3 phases]

Crop by Michael Hoffman

1. At the dispensary case, the foolish youth (young Eadwine enthusiast) receiving filling bag with Cubensis = naive possibilism-thinking.

2. Red youth = extreme simple eternalism-thinking.

3. The mature bearded 3rd guy, to the right, both feet floating, = realistic, sophisticated.

Phase 2 is insufficient; we can’t simply exclusively rely on “pure”, “purist”, “too pure for the world” — the red youth = dogmatic simplistic “YOU MUST AGREE WITH HARDCORE NO-FREE-WILL/MONOPOSSIBILITY!”

Eternalism is a hard sell, because it doesn’t describe our experience as control agents.

William James refused to accept purist eternalism-thinking. He argued from *practical*; = balanced, like smiling Adam Eve in “eat tree of knowledge” panel of Great Canterbury Psalter. 

Unblocked by Framing Transcendent Knowledge as More Experiencing Possibilism than Eternalism

Interaction w/ the Egodeath community has been helpful as always.

As of today, I am unblocked and solved (sufficiently deeply) some blockages. 

Now I am able to lead / teach a group at my church the Egodeath theory, no longer overemphasize eternalism/ no-free-will/monopossibility. 

It Took from 1985-2025 to Form an Adequate Model

I feel bad that it took me from 1985 to 2025 to develop the Egodeath theory to this well-balanced form.  But, it was really hard to work out these recent nuanced points.

Marry freewill thinking & no-free-will/ eternalism-thinking: 3-level Model of Transformation

email 3: Feb. 15, 2025, 9:15 pm [3-level]

marriage of freewill thinking & no-free-will/ eternalism-thinking – interesting framing.

______________

The decision has been already made, sitting frozen in spacetime on the worldline ahead, merely waiting to be discovered – not created by the local control agent (the personal control agent) from among branching possibilities.

However, my focus today is, like Wm James tried to emphasize as “common sense” — the shape of our experience remains “effortful” as if carrying a load/burden; we experience the hard work of making a decision.

Even during the peak window of the mystic altered state, egoic freewill type thinking is used (practically).

Even during the peak window of the mystic altered state, when lid is lifted and hidden snake is revealed/ made perceptible [so that the maidens recoil in terror upon seeing their father with snake leg and fling selves down rocky mountain to their death], even then, egoic freewill type thinking is used (practically) (“I speak with impure lips”), even while experiencing no-free-will/ eternalism.

______________

Mystic esoteric ironic reversals or twists in Eden tree story: Bernward Door & Eadwine Great Canterbury Psalter folio f11 might both show that before “disobedient eating of fruit”, Adam & Eve were enlightened, then they gained non-enlightenment by eating the fruit, which cast the out of Eden.

Rev 22, last 2 pages of Bible, shows the actual, non-reversed… well that chapter is a twist, too [first noted now]: you are not allowed access to the fruit of tree of life / immortality until AFTER you wash robes, which requires ingesting fruit of tree of life / immortality.  

So both Gen 2-3 & Rev 22 have an ironic twist compared to the actual sequence.  [the following is expressed as myth, not literal/direct]:

Actual sequence, ironically tweaked in Gen 2-3 & Rev 22:

1. First, be predestined by snake to ingest fruit.

2. Repeat til robe washed, so that:

3. You are granted the right to go through gates to eat from tree of life.

Rev 22:14  

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=rev%2022%3A14&version=NIV

Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city.

Progression through active/ passive tenses, re: Pharoah vs. God

Compare the famous progression (twists) through active/passive tenses, re: Pharoah vs. God: 

“they hardened their heart against God; 

their heart was hardened against God; 

so God hardened their heart”.

Might be worth study:

https://www.google.com/search?q=pharaoh+hardened+his+heart

Exodus 7:13-8:19

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%207%3A13-8%3A19&version=NIV

Other example: Romans?  Famous, Bible says it contradicts itself: 

“You have free will, even though is God omnipotent, and even though those two are contradictory.

If you don’t like that, who are you, the clay/puppet, to argue against the potter/puppetmaster?”

Bible has that type of ironic twists of contrast between possibilism vs. eternalism, b/c both are true in some way/sense.

Affirming freewill thinking, in a way [transcendent freewill; 3-level]

Interesting, winning possibilities for a kind of “compatibilism” (eternalism + using, but not “relying on”, possibilism-thinking).  Latter part = “qualified possibilism-thinking”.

One might profitably ask: “What kind of compatibilism does the Egodeath theory assert?”

It’s as if we move from Possibilism (egoic thinking) to Possibilism — with Eternalism also added, so that even if – in practice – we end up with seemingly 100% possibilism all the time, nevertheless that qualified possibilism-thinking is profoundly qualified and different, fundamentally not the same foundation as naive possibilism-thinking.  

There’s a subtle pre/trans fallacy; a significant, major (even though subtle) distinction between the type of autonomous freewill thinking that we start with, vs. the adult-type virtual, qualified freewill thinking that we end up with.

I’d be a liar misleading people, were I to just say “The Egodeath theory repairs your freewill thinking, to make it work successfully”; “Adopt the Egodeath theory, because it gives you freewill thinking.”

But is seems maybe the truth comes surprisingly close to that or looking like that.

This is good, solves a problem: 

If the Egodeath theory = rejecting freewill thinking and committing to eternalism (no-free-will) instead, many people will reject the Egodeath theory. 

And that rigid conceptualization of the Egodeath theory clashes with the actual experience – like when I criticize a scholar (or criticize myself), that wrongly implies possibilism-thinking/ freewill thinking.  

Inconsistent!  Giving more attention to affirming freewill thinking (but in a qualified way) resolves that inconsistency.

My Marketing department can instead sell the tune, “You want the Egodeath theory, because it gives you a simple, great kind of Compatbilism.”

Have cake & eat it too.

Why be enlightened?  Birds celebrate you?  Liberated from labor?  No.  More subtle.

In a way, practically, the Egodeath theory (psychedelic eternalism) gives you freewill thinking like always — like we instinctively desire — yet also affirms and gives access to, and usably provides as a tool – eternalism-thinking; no-free-will/monopossibility.  

The Egodeath theory teaches you to USE freewill thinking but not RELY on freewill thinking during the mystic altered state.  

Rely on eternalism-thinking instead – even while, in either state, “using” freewill thinking; “harm not the child” b/c you use child-thinking all the time, before & after & during enlightenment transformation.

We learn to – you could say — “use” freewill thinking and yet at the same time, when in the peak window of intense mystic altered state, we learn to “rely” on eternalism-thinking and repudiate (relying on as a foundation) freewill thinking.

/ end of email 2

Thinking About Controllership Uses Mostly Egoic Thinking [3-level]

Seemingly “little” transcendent experiences or puzzle revelations that are profound: for example:

I was rendered “speechless” in the mystic altered state, “speaking w/ impure lips”, I realized, when I first thought:

“Here’s how you need to think about control” and then I retorted “Who is this ‘you’ — an egoic control agent — I’m presuming to talk about and give advice to?”

There’s no escape from child-thinking; the egoic personal control system – even while the mind adds mature, more developed thinking.

Ken Wilber says we retain child developmental structures (that would be the egoic personal control system) but dis-identify from them (bible: Abraham angel: “harm not the child”) and always continue to use freewill thinking.

Deny and Affirm Egoic Freewill Branching-Steering Control Power

Transcendent Knowledge empowers Your Free Will; Revelation

You Are the Freewill-Powered Creator of Infinite Universes [freewill; 3-level]

Is freewill the case? Yes and no, in some specific way.

Very much yes, freewill is the case; the egoic personal control system is what we always use – chop wood/ carry water/ use egoic thinking, after just like before enlightenment; even after the enlightenment/ revelation that egoic thinking is kind of false in a way.

I can, sort of insincerely, leverage the popular love of freewill thinking, by emphasizing how we are always experiencing in the form of freewill model, even when no-free-will/monopossibility is revealed.

It feels insincere like I’m promising ppl egoic freeewill power – but there’s much practical truth or reality or presence of freewill local control agency.

Eventually we employ that way of thinking yet – in Ken Wilber “transcendence” fashion – we disidentify from that lower way of thinking.

I retort to Ken Wilber, “who is this ‘we’ that dis-identifies with childish developmental structures?” (a 1986-1987 era question of mine).

I instead speak in terms of “the mind models x” rather than “we think thus & such way” or “you learn x” or “you revise your model”.

My main point about freewill: I can – with a little bit of insincere motive? – leverage & take advantage of ppl’s love of freewill thinking, by emphasizing or hyping the fact that after revelation experience of block universe no-free-will/monopossibility, we ALWAYS rely on childish thinking, like a donkey; there simply is no other practical alternative.

That’s the shape of experience, that we’re given; that is not going to change, not even during peak mystic state.

Thus my phrase — nuanced & complex: “qualified possibilism-thinking”.

I give you — grand delivery — QUALIFIED freewill, which we use after, during, & before revelation of eternalism; revelation of the cosmic heimarmene-prison, fatedness, no-free-will/monopossibility; block-universe eternalism.

We end up w/ both legs/foundations/ world models.

Even in the altered state/ loose cognition, even in the midst of lifting lid of basket to reveal snake engine level underneath, the cista mystica basket of the Mysteries, even then, practically we HAVE to say to ourselves “I need to think of the world this way”, which is saturated with “unclean lips”, egoic assumption network; our experiencing is always in the form of an egoic, autonomous, freewill based controller – even during revelation of 2-level control & no-free-will/ block-universe eternalism ({snake frozen in rock}).

freewill: quantum mysticism is folk magic. Some hilarious slides in video, showing that QUANTUM = MAGIC [= naive freewill thinking, = branching possibilities w/ autonomous control though the reality is 2-level control & monopossibility non-branching]

Key question: WHY do people make a religion out of Quantum Physics? What is the MOTIVATION for the popularity of Quantum Manyworlds Branching? Ans: freewill empowerment/ reification. as if: “THE GRAND MYSTIC REVELATION OF FREE WILL EGOIC EMPOWERMENT”; AT EVERY MOMENT, YOU ARE CREATOR OF INFINITE UNIVERSES”.

I’m pretty sure critics have exclaimed & pointed out: quantum manyworlds is the insane extreme of egoic inflation!

Take the untransformed egoic personal control system (naive freewill thinking) and tell it “you have the power to create infinite [ie branching] universes at every moment”.

I’m glad when I hear the word ‘branching’ used during a critique of Quantum Manyworlds.

I recently finally got Minkowski’s book, and his 1908 spacetime model (that developed a math formalism for Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity aka theory of invariance), and it is striking how the iron block universe model has no trace of manyworlds branching; Minkowski spacetime = non-branching.

It is remarkable how perfectly/ cleanly:

* Minkowski spacetime = nonbranching eternalism. I suspect 4D ideas from late 1800s = same; non-branching.

* Quantum Manyworlds = branching possibilism = naive* freewill thinking.

*note, though, in a qualified way, after enlightenment, we end up with VIRTUAL egoic branching-steering power, egoic personal control system — but now consciously recognized as virtual-only.

After mental model transformation, our thinking remains “thoroughly” egoic; branching; autonomous control re: how it’s shaped, how we subjectively experience – yet, THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.

See Wilber concept “pre/trans fallacy”.

After enlightenment, and during enlightenment transformation in the peak window of very very very loose cognition, the mind always uses the egoic personal control system — but, now qualified by the revelation of cista mystica snake hidden in basket, the SECRET MYSTERY REVELATION of the uncontrollable higher controller / the uncontrollable source of control-thoughts/ the control-thought inserter.

The mind’s fountain in a rock cave in the mind, wellspring of thoughts observed during authentic meditation which is none other than Psil. meditation, is “mystery”.

The challenging thought, leading to the treasure of maturation: What control-thought will emerge from the wellspring source of thoughts? A terrifying dragon guard gate keeper?

It’s a mystery; THE SOURCE OF OUR CONTROL THOUGHTS IS THE REAL SECRET MYSTERY.

What year the seminal book The Dancing Wu Li Masters?

I was surprised Prof. Dave said Quantum Mystm took off in 1990s – wrong, Ken Wilber was separating pychospiritual development from Physics (quantum or otherwise) way back in 1980s – Wilber’s books cautioning about Physics vs. spirituality.

Few years ago was looking at book in store, kind of wish i got it, about the Pop reception of QM; the history of Pop Quantum Mysticism, and how some Physicists resented co-optation of Physics by Pop Spir’y.

Egoic freewill vs. transcendent freewill

The 3-level Model beats 2-level Model — in which respect?

re: describing the reesulting mental model? even that’s an overgeneralization.

When I picture advocating 2-level / “eternalism”, i envision advocating no-free-will.

instead: best: (?): advocate “eternalism and possibilism“. –> “compatibilism”

On one level (we consciously come to know), eternalism is the case. On one level (the shape of our experience), our experience is shaped in the form of possibilism. Teh eternalism part of the mind is revealed , underlying the mind. there are THREE things: matter; eternalism; consciuosness.

Boring Philosophy says there are 2 levels/ layers/ planes/ options:

  • matter
  • consciousness

Cautes: {right foot down}, torch up he is making fatedness visible; pointing flame to fixed stars.
Cautopates: {left foot down}, torch down making percepitble egoic thinking left foot down. able to perceive egoic thinking, from transcendent vantage point.

Cautes: {right foot down}, torch down– that is bad but i can force it to be up by other tauroctonies, and he’s making visible right foot.
Cautopates: {left foot down}, torch down

nobody ever notes that “crossed legs” = bent legs! 8:54 pm Feb. 18, 2025

I can use these correlections of which leg corssed and torch up vs down, to force other images to be what i want:

cista mystica snake basket engine under the hood, kills “you” when see it yet “you” fully remain

Ken Wilber writes “When you reach the next level of psychospiritual development, you no longer identify with your previous-level mental structure” / psychospiritual structure.

psychospiritual development
psd

“you” “no longer identify with” that “you” as foundation.

HARD TO DESCRIBE! how egoic thinking dies and yet lives… resurrects, and no longer dies. [good roll there – right vector]

MY EGOIC THINKING DIED AND DISPROVED AND REPUDICATED AND YET MY EGOIC THINKING LIVES ON. i have been redeemed, purified, waashed clean – i still have my dirty child thinking as if possibilism –

i am no longer in my sin and yet my thinking is same egoic as ever, yet qualified; guilt is there but not there, we are fallen sinful yet we are forgiven … i forgive my still using egoic thinking.

I get full enlightenment including the realizztion that i inherently always think in terms of egoic, just must REALIZE that you are alaways using false egoic thinking, but that is now ok – wasn’t before, but is now —

i have changed my relationship to my sinful nature; my sinful nature remains, now without pollution.

I now bring my egoic possibilism-thinking into/ through the guarded gate doorway requiring passage sacrifice payment, into city palace garden kingdom, inherently dirty yet now pure, without pollution, my egoic false possibilism-thinking

I was dirty and dirty, but now i am dirty and cleansed.

I had egoic thinking and was not aware of that, but now I have egoic thinking and am aware of that. Therefore I am pure. You never get rid of egoic thinking! You merely qualify it. I try remembver theology terms….

I spoke with impure lips. Now I speak purely because I am aware that I speak with impure lips, thus my lips are pure and I speak only the words that God puts in my mouth.

Balaam Image

Features:

  • {right foot down} , = donkey rear feet down
    • bad, L foot of angel not down; donkey front legs not down.
  • blade in R hand
  • donkey turn look right = remember
  • donkey is made by angel to look / see higher self riding it
  • {mushroom hem} in balaam, 3 in angel
  • R wing/limb touches L side of Bal’s head
  • Bal perceives riding donkey
  • vine yard path no way to turn L or R, cannot steer away from fated encounter w angel of death

Psalters have Balaam.

Mytheme Notation: {nested braces}

9:47 pm Feb. 18, 2025 world’s first first-time use of {nested braces {nested mushrooms 9:48: 0 sec world’s first exact-second timestamp — bird nest Eadwine folio# which is used in Huggins’ Foraging Wrong article.

a short form:
Foraging in Wrong Forest
fwf

long form:
Ronald Huggins’ 2024 article “Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case”
hug2024

short form (best):
Huggins’ Foraging Wrong article
hfwa

3 horses with {right foot down}

Crop by Cybermonk
horse {right foot down} x3

3 {riding horse {right foot down}} eternalism revelation {right foot down}

WHEN CHOOSING BETWEEN TYPING VS. VOICE RECORDER to do idea development, BEST of all IS VOICE RECORDER READING ALOUD WHAT I TYPED.

The revealed alternative to mental constructs is eternalism, not “matter”

I say 3 things / levels / layers/ realms are at play, and what is shockingly alternative to mental constructs is not matter, but rather, revealed eternalism:

  • matter
  • mental constructs
  • hidden eternalism underlying possibilism-shaped mental constructs.

The contrast of import is NOT mind vs. matter, but mind vs. underlying level producing mind; by which don’t mean “matter”, but rather, source of control thoughts, lift lid of cista mystica to see {snake frozen in rock}.

What’s revealed by loose cognition is not “matter”, but rather, eternalism. todo insert image: Mithras dining with

Use Egoic Thinking but Repudiate it as the Source of Thoughts

Voice Recording

Feb. 18, 2025: good voice recording today, file “VOX_TK_6305.wav” (short): we totally repudiate possibilism, and yet, our thinking remains, at the main level, thoroughly, totally completely possibilism-premised.

{altar temple sacrifice priest clean hands child ram ox at the door guard payment price of entry}

The price of passage through the maturation/transformation gate: your first childish self; the personal control system model, which YOU NOW USE AND CONTINUE TO USE AFTER ENLIGHTENMENT.

CHILD THINKING – Ken Wilber: Transcend and include very centrally the lower child-self egoic thinking.

EGOIC THINKING is NOW SEEN FROM ABOVE:

YOU CAN SEE YOUR PLEADING CHILD MODEL from a higher than usual vantage point.

RIDING THE DONKEY

now made to stand [??eg f177 row 1 middle?]

You make your lower child self work while realizing aware of the helpless thought-receiver.

We always have to use personal child mode of thinking, yet matured too, YOU HAVE BEEN FORGED IN THE FIRE.

You have been purified in the flames.

The salamander/ mind ENDURES FIRE BY TRANSFORMING into PHOENIX.

Ronald Huggins’ 2022 article “Dizzy, Dancing or Dying?”: Huggins argues: The man is trying to kill the salamander by roasting it in the flames.

The salamander endures fire by dying and transforming into a phoenix.

The phoenix is the salamander: child-thinking continues always, but transformed to account for eternalism; the helpless thought-receiver, a conduit for the uncontrollable source of control-thoughts: the control-thought inserter.

Now you are SAME OLD YOU; you are a control agent as always, in a kind of autonomous virtual agent, now recognized consciously to be virtual-only.

kind of mode.

Afterward, the mind also knows that revealed, the hidden secret level underlying under the hood, is eternalism-based. Our the personal control system is eternalism-powered possibilism-thinking.

  • The way in which 2-level beats 3-level: it’s simpler: gnosis = enlightenment = satori = Transcendent Knowledge = transformation from “possibilism to eternalism”.

How to fully repudiate child thinking, repudiated relying on it in a certain way.

2-level, dependent control
2ldc

monolithic, autonomous control
mcac

CHANGE THE WAY I RELY ON 2-level control autonomous changed to conscious of virtual only local power underneath is now known the snake engine frozen in rock.

You that THE SNAKE carved IN ROCK; a rock-carved CISTA MYSTICA SNAKE BASKET, representing YOUR LIFE WORLD LINE OF CONTROL THOUGHTS REVEALED TO BE HIDDEN IN the fountain in the rock cave

Transformed, qualified MENTAL MODEL

The LOWER CHILD control SYSTEM IS PERCEIVED AND causes A CERTAIN TRANSFORMATION OF CHILD THINKING.

Retain and use, but transcend, the egoic personal control system.

The more the Mystery Religions reveal no-free-will, fatedness, the more they obsess on way to transcend fatedness.

How to sacrifice the lower child temporary via the holy deep capability potential that the mind has inbuilt , the main effect of Psilocybin mushrooms transformation from possibilism to eternalism.

Always you rely on egoic control , cut off stab bull cut off, repudiate, cut branches, cut off the child way of thinking.

That way of thinking GROWS a BEARD; you are the same guy, but now have grown a beard; the boy matures into man, it’s the same person.

Puberty transformation: Ganymede = you on your way to Psilocybin maturation transformation to a mature Psilocybinized, Psilocybin-transformed.

I’ve been psychedelicized; experienced; loosecog’d.

Cognition loosened, awareness lifted and moved back, to see your lower, PLEADING CHILD SACRIFICED SELF, WILLING CIHLD MADE OVERPOWERED.

image: Saturn with scythe over child in quadriga.

Ganymede beautiful youth being now brought to climax altar control formal demonstration of child power ending revealing adult eternalism-thinking.

Adult thinking retains and uses egoic childish thinking, but add beard now and always, riding RIDING EGO DONKEY originally, above the donkey.

Mind wasn’t perceiving king Jesus riding the egoic childish thinking donkey spread through time along rock snake.

NIV Isaac: “Do not lay a hand on the boy”

KJB Isaac: “Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him”

Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2022&version=KJV

2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

3 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his ass, and took two of his young men with him, and Isaac his son, and clave the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went unto the place of which God had told him.

4 Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off.

5 And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.

6 And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and a knife; and they went both of them together.

7 And Isaac spake unto Abraham his father, and said, My father: and he said, Here am I, my son. And he said, Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?

8 And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.

9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.

12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.

14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: [The Lord Will Provide] as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.

15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,

16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:

17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.

19 So Abraham returned unto his young men, and they rose up and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham dwelt at Beersheba.

What is involved in repudiating something while entirely relying on it?

5 And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.

6 And Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Isaac his son; and he took the fire in his hand, and a knife; and they went both of them together.

7 And Isaac spake unto Abraham his father, and said, My father: and he said, Here am I, my son. And he said, Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?

{king hung from branch} more specific than {king hung from tree}

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f25

Prince Absalom Hung from a Tree/ BRANCH, not tree, branch IF [11:04 Feb. 18, 2025] forget “king hung from tree”; it’s king hung from branch
[11:04 Feb. 18, 2025]

https://www.google.com/search?q=Prince+Absalom+Hung+from+a+Tree&udm=2

That search found the image:

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail crop.jpg” 183 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#/media/File:Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#:~:text=by%20hanging%20himself.-,Battle%20of%20Ephraim’s%20Wood,was%20riding%20ran%20beneath%20it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#/media/File:Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail.jpg —

Features:

  • horse {right foot down}
  • prince hung left tree branch of YI tree
  • cut right branch

[11:49 pm Feb. 18, 2025] blade is pre – spear Jesus’ side focus on {blade}, & especially EXPECT blade somewhere in piciture; CAN U FIND THE CEREAL BOX PUZZLE: IN THIS IMAGE CAN YOU FIND:

  • {branch}:
  • {blade}:
  • [YI}:
  • L vs R:
  • stability:

The “Motif Inventory” POV: Count the Key Motifs, eg {blade}

= {blade} is present? you Y or N?

checklist: the checklist POV game technique view

  • has a {blade}? __ Y
  • has a {fire}? __ Y
  • has a {king|prince}? __ Y
  • has a {snake}? __ Y
  • has {wood}? __ Y
  • has {YI}? __ Y new usage type. similar to earlier tonight {foo {bar}} nested nested mythemes; implies mytheme chain like

kts
from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}

good one: king wine snake means what?

king wine snake
k…w…s

from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}
kws

Next, add nested braces:

from {king {steering} in tree} through {mixed {wine} at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}

11:54 pm Feb. 18, 2025 – notation.

{rock child ram altar priest clean temple}

YES we have a {clean} motif: white sheet at temple walls door – IT MEANS CLEAN! Pure, not polluted.

FROM “motif collection” POV!

That’s really what I now discovered: the motif inventory POV, like done in the branching-message mushroom trees article for each picture.

We Must Assume Medieval Artists Have Complete Understanding of Psilocybin Transformation

Medieval Artists Fully Understood Psilocybin Transformation, and Mytheme Motif Analogies Describing It

pilzbaum artists fully understood Psilocybin transformation

I won’t use ‘pilzbaum’; use common words; mushroom-trees.

Mushroom-tree artists fully understood Psilocybin transformation and {mushroom hem}

but true hallmark is mushroom-trees they are a sure constant guide unlike walburga 1-off themes healing motif is present yes or no?

In what way is the {healing} motif present?

In what way is the {branch|wood|tree} motif present?

In what way is the {blade} motif present?

{fire} motif is present yes or no?

{child of ruler} motif is present yes or no?

{branch} motif is present yes or no?

{cut branch} motif is present yes or no?

{tree} motif is present yes or no?

Is the compound motif {king hung on branching tree while {right {foot} down} present?

[compound, nested braces, etc] – & pov, is motif x present in a list and a group

  • king
  • child
  • blade
  • fire
  • tree
  • branch
  • rock
  • dead
  • sacrifice
  • altar
  • doorway gate guarded gate

The list of every motif & combination & chained & nested subsets in total mental construct m-c myc myh To what extent mushrooms in Christianity? the egodeath lexicon haha ok b/c only claims KEY motifs, not ALL: https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/11/15/mytheme-list/ and the name i am looking for is

the Key Mythemes catalog
kmc

so:

list every motif that’s in the Key Mythemes catalog then POV checklist is each motif present in this art image?

Is mushroom-tree present yes or no? __

Is branch cut YI present yes or no? __

Expect {fire}, is {fire} motif present in any form yes or no? __ yes naturally ype yep, found it in the form of __

Also along with that I expect {blade}, is {blade} motif present in any form yes or no? __ yes of course In what form? __

more extreme framing of qQ Q

The Egodeath Motif Lens for Viewing Mushroom Art

Great Format POV: The Egodeath Motif Lens for Viewing Mushroom Art.

12:12 am Feb. 19, 2025

What form does the {fire} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {blade} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {dead} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {kill} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {ruler} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {ruler} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {ride donkey|horse} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {king’s son} motif employ in this image? __

[ah! why not say prince very much? b/c king’s son is superior myth – what make… ruler prince king’s son riding donkey.

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail crop.jpg” 183 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#/media/File:Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail.jpg

Features: / kreREADO AS PREFAB LIST CHECKLIST

rock?

FEATURES

template:

take Psilocybin in order to sacrifice the child on the rock altar disprove its foundation source, disempower yourself by revealing eternalism to yourself lift the lid YOUR CHILD DIES BECAUSE YOU LIFTED THE SIDE. LID.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#:~:text=by%20hanging%20himself.-,Battle%20of%20Ephraim’s%20Wood,was%20riding%20ran%20beneath%20it.

  • prince Absalom
  • son of king
  • son of king David
  • ruler
  • beautiful
  • Israelite

Absalom (Hebrew: אַבְשָׁלוֹם ʾAḇšālōm, lit. ’Father of Peace‘), according to the Hebrew bible, was an Israelite prince.

Born to David and Maacah, who was from Geshur, he was the only full sibling of Tamar.

He is described in the Hebrew Bible as being exceptionally beautiful, as is his sister.[2] I

Ideal Prompting checklist for top-10 mythemes to expect / anticipate & inventory in Crucifixion art

Checklist for top-10 mythemes to expect in Crucifixion art

  • How is the {see} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {mushroom} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {branching} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {handedness} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {stability} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {rock} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {stand on right foot} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {stand on right leg} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {snake} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {non-branching} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {ram} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {lamb} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {son} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {wood} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {fire} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {branching} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {king} motif present? ___________
  • How is the {{key mythemes}} motif present? ___________

condensed form once you get the damn point:

Redefine “Features means the list of expe

Features:

  • {see}:
  • {mushroom}:
  • {branching}:
  • {handedness}:
  • {stability}:
  • {rock}:
  • {stand on right foot}:
  • {stand on right leg}:
  • {snake}:
  • {non-branching}:
  • {ram}:
  • {lamb}:
  • {son}:
  • {wood}:
  • {fire}:
  • {branching}:
  • {king}:
  • {key mythemes}}:
  • : they are key, therefore, hafta have em all b/c they are “key” i thought you wantsed “i only n I ONLY NEED TO LIST THE KEY [MOST KEY OF KEY OF KEY, OP a top-10 mytheme a top-10 mytheme
    t t m
  • a top-10 mytheme

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#:~:text=by%20hanging%20himself.-,Battle%20of%20Ephraim’s%20Wood,was%20riding%20ran%20beneath%20it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absalom#/media/File:Weltchronik_Fulda_Aa88_286r_detail.jpg

What form does the {immature} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {child} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {ram} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {snake} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {cut, repudiate} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {son|ram} motif employ in this image? __

branch caught power horns of ram helpless CAUGHT no power because of its power

that’s differnt grammar in brace ever used. {cut, repudiate}

What form does the {branch} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {cut branch} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {cut right branch} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {left vs. right} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {handedness} motif employ in this image? __

What form does the {tree} motif employ in this image? __

offering: ram, ox, first child

Psilocybin transformation

Psilocybin transformation
px

possibilism-thinking

{mushrooms}

{branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

{mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

{mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

{mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

{mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

How to hang your prince ruler king on a tree on branch, king hung from a BRANCH

king, youths, cut branch, sacrifice lamb ram child king on tree branch branching cross trident L beam of wood cross R beam eternalism balance is center King of the Jews the metaphysical jews by interpreting correctly the motifs all are

Psilocybin transformation analogy-land

As my Dec. 2, 2013 chalkboard video: being analogically Jewish in your heart is a state of mind.

To say I am Jewish: Paul’s circumcision of the heart in analogy-land.

I my spirit body circumcised broad general populace in hellenism wanted God fearer.

God-Fearers Circumcised per Paul: We Are Grafted into the Vine of the Promise to Abraham We are spiritual children analogous to Abraham Christians are Jewish by cirm of heart by transformation from possibilism to eternalism

Late dating of Jewish writings like 400 BC. Not 1000 BC; 400 BC.

We assert to be Jewish is to read mythic analogy of correctly interpret Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, that’s the thing that matters to be analogically children of Abraham, to be in the promise.

Bodily circcumcision does not matter.

Literal bloodline doesn’t matter.

Esoteric interpreters who comprehend analogy for Psilocybin transformation are {children of Abraham}.

That is the only {law} and we {sacrifice our son} Isaac.

We are in Isaac we are in Jesus the son lamb of God will be provided for us

God will provide the sacrifice.

The IDEA OF / correct interpretation, grasp conceptual analogy, grasp {rock altar w/ snake carved in it} (with {fire branches} & {knife blade}), snake on a T cross.

Those who believe that being jewish is state of mind = Christianity , no temple, no worship, no service, no altar, no priest, no sacrifice other than:

Sacrifice = Repudiate treating the illusion of monolithic, autonomous control as anything more than virtual experience

Repudiate treating the illusion of monolithic, autonomous control as anything more than virtual experience.

Christians Seen as Atheists because no temple, no worship, no blood sacrifice, no sermons, no service, no priest, no rock altar with snake carved

FLAMES AND BLADE + FLAME + BLADE CUT BRANCHING CLEAN HANDS blade cuts brandhcing {blade} {fire} {cut} {branch} king hung from branch:

given that key motifs are:

  • king
  • death
  • tree
  • branch
  • outcome: dead king hung on a branch

TREE IS KEY MOTIF.

BRANCH IS KEY MOTIF
KING IS KEY MOTIF.
DEATH IS KEY MOTIF.

HOW TO JOIN?

Jesus did way once for all analogical psychedelic eternalismis it’s js just a tale those who know it is a tale about transformation from possibilism to eternalism Jesus we are in Jesus’ analogical sacrifice.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2022&version=KJV

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2022&version=NIV

Absalom = 2 Samuel 18:9-17

NIV Prince Absalom Dead Branch Donkey wood lover paralysis king in bed from wood-loving mushrooms:
Do not lay a hand on the boy

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f25.jpg” 670 KB [9:05 a.m. April 4, 2023]

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2018%3A9-17&version=NIV

… servants, “Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you.”

Below, I’m not serious that all these motifs are present; the point is this mentality/ POV:

  • {donkey}: CHECK.
  • {blade}: CHECK.
  • {lamb}: CHECK.
  • {child}: CHECK.
  • {doorway|gate}: CHECK.
  • {doorway|gate guarded}: CHECK.
  • {gate guarded monster}: CHECK.
  • {treasure}: CHECK.
  • {branch}: CHECK.
  • {doorway}: CHECK.
  • {worship}: CHECK.
  • {phallic garment}: CHECK.
  • {mushroom hem}: CHECK.

Need to cut off the child thinking fully to be clean thinking, consistent, perceptive, coherent thinking on a new basis source of control thoughts power overpowered by the creator of my control thoughts infinite years outside of time

Sanctification, justification of egoic thinking cleans; THE RIGHTEOUS EGO.

The Righteous Ego: Gain righteous justified sanctified purified ego power possibilism-thinking, virtual freewill, via Psilocybin transformation

VIRTUAL FREEWILL POWER AUTONOMY CONTROL egoic steeering among branching possibilities virtually justified.

BECOME JUSTIFIED IN USING EGOIC THINKING.

  • {worship}: CHECK.
  • {rock}: CHECK.
  • {rock altar}: CHECK.
  • {fire}: CHECK.
  • {clean pure no pollution}: CHECK.
  • {snake}: CHECK.
  • {mushroom}: CHECK.
  • {YI}: CHECK.
  • {YI}: CHECK.
  • How is the {circumcision cut branch branch tree phass phallus as branch tree coming from phallus branching from cut the to cut the branch is to I as God declar swear by myself I see your child thinking I see your giving being made

“I see that YOU DID THIS THING”

I see that YOU DID THIS THING OF WILLING TO DESTROY

You accessed the capability of climax to perceive and disrupt/disprove the CHILD — THE PERSONAL CONTROL SYSTEM — ON THE {FIRE ALTAR BLADE CHILD RAM CAUGHT IN BRANCHING THICKET}; dead power.

{gate, pay the price of passage, offer the child = lamb on altar as payment at the temple clean curtains doorway to be in stable structure of rock } motif present: CHECK.

Bible con’t: Isaac

6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?”

“Yes, my son?” Abraham replied.

“The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?”

8 Abraham answered, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them went on together.

9 When they reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and arranged the wood on it.

He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. WOOD SPOTTED! FIRE AND BLADE! 11:24 pm Feb. 18, 2025

{fire, wood/branches, blade, child, rock}

Isaac

Skull of Adam at Base of the Cross

Piling Up Major Bible Motifs & Figures at the Cross

Lamb motifs tie-in Isaac theme. Moses sign brass serpent lifted up: PILING UP MAJOR MOTIFS:

  • Adam: skull at cross.
  • Isaac: Jesus = lamb of God.
  • Jesus = God’s son, sacrificed, giving life like ram caught in thicket gave life and enlightenment co-existing, for Isaac.
  • Moses: Jesus must be lifted up like Moses’ brass serpent on a pole.

Sacrifice the Son: Is there a rock at the cross? [yes in some diagrammatic art]

Where was base of cross Jesus where was Jesus crucified at Calvary (calvaria; latin for ‘skull’); Golgotha, which means {place of the skull}

calvaria latin skull – the word {skull} in latin

the latin word that means skull is Calvary whicvh is English for calvaria which means skull.

the place of the skull =

the place of the calvaria

let’s go to Skull ie the place of the skull

Pictures of cross diagrammatic

https://www.art.com/products/p53615790751-sa-i1751513/allegory-of-jesus-crucified-surrounded-by-relics-and-other-symbolic-attributes.htm —


https://imgc.artprintimages.com/img/print/allegory-of-jesus-crucified-surrounded-by-relics-and-other-symbolic-attributes_u-l-q1hd3lh0.jpg?artHeight=550&artPerspective=n&artWidth=550&background=fbfbfb

trimmed:
https://imgc.artprintimages.com/img/print/allegory-of-jesus-crucified-surrounded-by-relics-and-other-symbolic-attributes_u-l-q1hd3lh0.jpg —

Features:

  • {shroud of turin}: CHECK.
  • {snake}: CHECK.
  • {rooster}: CHECK.
  • {rock}: CHECK.
  • How does the {fire} motif appear? lantern, field of flames into the sky
  • How does the {lantern with square liberty cap top with mushroom topper} motif appear? It appears in the form of a lantern with square liberty cap top with mushroom topper.
  • How does the {Amanita} motif appear? apple
  • How does the {snake} motif appear? snake bringing apple
  • How does the {rock} motif appear? obelisk / stone whipping post
  • How does the {clean} motif appear? shroud –
  • How does the {ladder step phases climibing to stars} motif appear? ladder sky
  • How does the {blade} motif appear? sword, spear
  • How does the {right foot forward} motif appear? _________
  • How does the {foo} motif appear? _________
  • How does the {obscure fatedness} motif appear? dice
  • How does the {death} motif appear? skull
  • How does the {king} motif appear? INRI

x https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/18381/meaning-behind-skull-at-the-base-of-a-cross —

“There seems to be two interpretations of the meaning of the skull at the base of the cross, the first is more symbolic and the second is more historical:

“The skull represents Adam, the first man, along with original sin. Jesus was sent to Earth to absolve [jusify, make ego righteous, make ego absoolved, the egoic personal control system.

Make the the egoic personal control system righteous/ justified/ absolved of childhood branching autonmoouy thinking] us of our sins through His death.

Jesus’ blood is washing away our sins by flowing across the skull of Adam and that Jesus is above sin. (Source: http://ricklobs.blogspot.com/2009/03/have-you-ever-noticed-skull-at-base-of.html)

“The hill that Jesus was crucified on was called Golgotha, or Skull Hill.

“This is where Adam was reportedly buried and the Lord was crucified where Adam lay.
(Source: http://mysite.pratt.edu/~wburg/paint/p3skull.html)
(Source 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golgota)”

https://restoredtraditions.com/products/crucifixion-christ-artist-flades

https://ceskamincovna.cz/en/silver-medal-our-lady-of-seven-sorrows-the-crucifixion-of-jesus-on-mount-calvary-sk-stand-456-15679-d/

https://www.google.com/search?q=jesus+calvary&udm=2

https://www.google.com/search?q=Crucifixion+of+Jesus+on+Mount+Calvary&udm=2

{fire}+{wood}+{blade}+{child}+{rock}

f177 row 2 – clean cloth shroud OSSUARY DEAD CHILD RAM LEFT FOOT OPPOSITE ARM CROSSED FROM TREE, contradicting teh good ctb. cut right branch row 1 L and in row 2 so let’s trashcan the row 1

https://www.google.com/search?q=absalom+hung+from+a+tree

Crop by Michael Hoffman – sop carsophagus stone ossuary clean cloth shroud corspe. DEAD: CHECK. COUNTERING CORRECT BRANCHING? CHECK. LEFT ARM OCCULDED, OPPOSITE OF right visually cut branch row 1 L row 2 L.

Conjoined motifs: {mushroom} {secure building stable}

store your mushroom Cubensis locked in stable building tower take weigh 2 bowls of Cubensis to finish being completely cut off dead coffin

ossuary clean cloth shroud corpse arms signalling opposite of tree YI tree row 2 L by fire monster ram stand left foot connected opposite/ inverse to standing stand on right foot held up by God.

Lay not thine hand upon the lad –
Do not lay a hand on the boy

NIV Isaac

10 Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son.

11 But the angel of the Lord called out to him from heaven, “Abraham! Abraham!”

“Here I am,” he replied.

Do not lay a hand on the boy

Do not do anything to him You have not withheld from God your only son

Now I know that you fear God

KJB Isaac: “Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him”

NIV Isaac: “Do not lay a hand on the boy. Do not do anything to him.”

NIV: “Do not lay a hand on the boy. Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.

Do not lay a hand on the boy. Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.

Do not lay a hand on the boy. Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.

12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram[a] caught by its horns.

He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son.

14 So Abraham called that place The Lord Will Provide. [VS SKULL THE PLACE OF THE SKULL GOLGOTHA CALVARIA SKULL and cross bones of Adam, and the apple and snake.

CALVARY ] [THIS PLACE IS CALLED “THE LORD WILL PROVIDE” IN Psilocybin LOOSE COGNITION TO SHORT CUT OFF CHILD THINKING CUT BRANCH FUTURE TREE CONTROL STEERING CIRCUMCISE BRANCH OF FUTURE CUT OFF CHILD HARM NOT…

And to this day it is said, “On the mountain of the Lord it will be provided.”

15 The angel of the Lord called to Abraham from heaven a second time 16 and said, “I swear by myself, declares the Lord, that because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son,

17 I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore.

Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, 18 and through your offspring[b] all nations on earth will be blessed,[c] because you have

God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering

8 And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.

9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.

Do not lay your hand upon the boy.
the donkey

Do not to anything to your child thinking.
your donkey

because now I God know that you fear God, seeing you did not withhold your only son –

and theres a ram lamb caught in thicket boy child steersman foundation king hung from tree prince ruler steersman hung FROM BRANCH on branch of tree

Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

Lay not thine hand upon the lad,

Neither do thou any thing unto him:

for now I know that thou fearest God,

seeing thou hast not withheld thy son.

seeing you

{seeing}

{father sees son}

awareness high elevated to see from a different, higher vantage point, the lower, child thinking, and its capability of hang dead sacr king in on branch tree rock fire blade tree ruler child ram ox rock altar temple priest

{clean, pure, not polluted}

{see, look, perceive, revealed, revelation, not occulded} {lift lid} {look inside} and because of what is seen, {die} involving {snake, rock, fire, blade}

egoic possibilism-thinking — ram caught in thicket; child thinking caught in branching steering tree; sacrificed on the altar of wood fire rock blade.

{rock altar at temple door clean hands clean cloth curtains drape walls cut branch {ride donkey|horse}, looking

the donkey is looking rider looking angel of message-entity agent angel being of death the message of death of child thinking and message of continued always thinking in child terms now & future harm no– NIV ANGEL : HARM NOT:

NIV: Harm not the lad:

KJB: Harm not the lad:

thine only son from me.

(Thou hast not withheld thy son from me.)

12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.

14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.

15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,

16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:

What Is “done this thing” such that BECAUSE you have — i promise by me — done this thing [done to you by me]

because you did this thing and did not withhold your only son —
solve for “this thing” done to you that you did

this thing that you were made to want to do

what is this thing you did, you willing to kill your son to control integrity upon being be abel to see son as lower seen from vanta SEEING CHILD THINKING FROM ADULT RIDING VANTAGE POINT seeing

savior figure lifting his chosen up out from rock cosmos

that you were made to want to doas maturation control climaxtic death of child self as foundation and ?WIL b wil kw ken vil ken wilber covers??

17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.

19 So Abraham returned unto his young men, and they rose up and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham dwelt at Beersheba.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2022&version=KJV

Psilocybin mushrooms
pcm

Psilocybin
psil

x https://www.google.com/search?q=rock+snake&udm=2&sa=X&sqi=2&bih=942&dpr=2

https://www.google.com/search?q=rock+snake&udm=2

https://www.google.com/search?q=rock+snake&udm=2

Transcendent Freewill

The Personal Control System’s Thinking Is freewill-shaped and eternalism based; no-free-will based

freewill shaped and no-free-will based: purification = revelation of the no-free-will basis of freewill, and freewill expeirencing is the personal control system ;

the personal control system is freewill shaped, and no-free-will based — whether you are …

Summary

In the enlightened mind, the mind is aware that the freewill-shaped personal control system is based on no-free-will.

In the unenlightened mind, the mind is not aware that the freewill-shaped personal control system is based on no-free-will.

the donkey ridden = the freewill-shaped personal control system based on no-free-will

the {rider} = the part or aspect of the mind that becomes aware that the freewill-shaped personal control system is based on no-free-will.

Images: Entry into Jerusalem [1]

Photo credit: Julie M. Brown
Crop by Michael Hoffman

Entry into Jerusalem
eij

In the unenlightened mind, the freewill-shaped personal control system is not conscious of being based on no-free-will.

freewill experiencing based on no-free-will

quite good egodeath theory lexicon 👍 7:56 pm Feb. 17, 2025: egoic freewill, transcendent freewill — the day i invented “transcendent freewill”

A 2-phase model:

  1. egoic freewill
  2. transcendent freewill

A 3-phase model:

  1. possibilism
  2. eternalism
  3. qualified possibilism

conceptual vocabulary / lexicon: ‘lexicon’ is a tech term. ‘vocab’ is better, usually.

egodeath theory lexicon

control vortex

explanatory framework

quickly efficiently juggling shortcut assignments [keep for historical record – my devmt of such technique has been crucial]

Qualified Possibilism; Transcendent Possibilism

Transcendent Possibilism transpersonal psychology transpersonal psychology the theory of psychedelic possibilism

psychedelic transcendent possibilism

Amazing: I entered 20 terms today, but not this one?! This term is it! qualified possibilism

transformed possibilism

psychedelic possibilism

the most direct and speciiific : transcendent possibilism — b/c “qualified / modified/ transformed” is vague.

even “psychedelic” is vague.

transpersonal psychology =
t p BAD, REASSIGN
trps
[keep, historical record; don’t clean up or delete]

give priority to egodeath theory lexicon conceptual lexicon, not external terms.

transcendent possibilism
tp

even, ETERNALISM POSSIBILISM
IE
“ETERNALISM -QULALIFIED POSSIBILISM”

ETERNALISM-QUALIFIED POSSIBILISM

  1. POSSIBILISM
  2. ETERNALISM
  3. ETERNALISM-POSSIBILISM
  1. possibilism-thinking
  2. eternalism-thinking
  3. eternalism possibilism thinking ;
    eternalist possibilism thinking – con: no one knows the term ‘eternalism’; everyone knows – generically – ‘transcendent’

transcendent freewill
tf

Highly Developed use of acro’s/ keyboard shortcuts is powerful, in April 1987 & Feb. 2025 – Substantive, not a mere convenience

egoic freewill
ef

naive freewill thinking
nft

‘egoic’ is more specific than sheer disparagement-sounding “naive”

pretty good terms:
egoic freewill, transcendent freewill

more specifially/ technically:

possibilist freewill vs. eternalist freewill
those are tech terms/ jargon

we sacrifice egoic freewill to gain transcendent freewill

ok short term; ok long term:

we sacrifice egoic freewill thinking to gain transcendent freewill thinking

freewill
fw

Frame Transcendent Knowledge as “virtual freewill”/ transcendent freewill, instead of eternalism as the final mental model

The Egodeath Theory Gives You Freedom of Choice

Crop by Cybermonk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimpnVuXZa0 –

Crop by Cybermonk
Crop by Cybermonk

See Also

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/16/egodeath-theory-as-compatibilism-instead-of-no-free-will/

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/17/y-branches-under-mushroom-tree-cap-two-legs-for-psychedelic-virtual-freewill/

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment