Idea Development page 26 (2025/03/12)

Michael Hoffman, new page started 7:30 pm Mar. 12, 2025, published 7:58 pm.

Michael Hoffman, ~1991, ink brush in blank art book

Site Map – Previous page – Next page

Contents:

  • Incoming Ideas – April 3, 2025 [100 sheets of 100] 💯
  • Foolish Sam Harris Ends with Merely no-free-will — The Egodeath TheoryTM Is a Way Superior Product, It Gives You Hyper-EternalismTM Compatibilism
  • New, Improved Product Marketing: Now with Hyper-EternalismTM!
  • Armillary Sphere
  • Hermetic Writing Title “The Eighth Reveals the Ninth” Proves that I Am Right
  • 4D-Transcendent Graduation Day for the Egodeath Theory
  • Upgrade Notice for Transcendent Knowledge PhDs: the PhD has been Upgraded so as to Include Hyper-Eternalism; doubled in value
  • Houot Withholds His Milestone Discovery per Rise of the Psychonaut: Guess: altered state aliens contact us
  • Houot’s Brand of (Immature, Irrational, Mentally Ill) Religion, Marketed as “Science”
  • Mythic-Plane Amanita, the Super-Psychedelic!!
  • Rise of the Psychonaut Uses Conventional Debate Position Terms that I NEVER Employ
  • Justin Sledge (ESOTERICA) Conversation with Wouter Hanegraaff about Entheogens in Western Esotericism
  • My Wussy Half-Truth in 1997 like the traditional methods of the mystics are non-drug entheogens
  • “Dizzy Doesn’t Count”
  • keyboard shortcut for my 2004 “Entheogenic Esotericism” post
  • When You Think of Psychedelics Extremism, Think Egodeath theory
  • h3 Top Pri Topics/Pages
  • Important Existing Draft Pages to Publish
  • Ideas for Branching-message mushroom trees Article
  • Hyper-Eternalism = Emphasize Eternalism & Transcend Eternalism
  • Transcend Eternalism
  • Mytheme decoding: {rider above donkey on path}
  • 3 Models to Summarize in Branching-Message Mushroom Trees Article: Psilocybin Transformation; Astral Ascent Mysticism; Mushroom-Trees
  • EgodeathTheory site is an Advanced, Leading-Edge, Working, Idea Development Site, Not Polished Publishing
  • News Flash! Houot’s Ship Taken for Ransom by Pirates, Dionysus Brings It to a Halt with Vines, Saves the Pilot Who Honors Dionysus; Lion & Bear Kill the Captain
  • h3 Sailing the Acid Trip Ocean, by Blizzard of Ozz band, 1981
  • Egodeath Mystery Show About Scientific Exploration Discovery Field Log Notebook of Visionary Technologies of Seeing Looking Using Astrolabe Armillary Sphere Compass Navigation Tools Rational Explicit Map of Cognitive Phenomenology and Illuminating, SUCCESSFUL SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF Psilocybin Hyper-Eternalism Transformation that underlies common-core mysticism and perennialism after you throw away the baggage noise and {lift the lid} to {reveal} the {veiled snake engine} and are {sacrificed to be made athanatos}
  • h3 No One at the Bridge, Rush, 1975
  • h3 Ride Captain Ride lyrics, by Blues Image, 1970
  • h3 Postmortem: Foolish Captain Wasn’t Equipped to Endure Psilocybin
  • The bifurcation even runs through the heart of Psychedelic Science at Hopkins (email to book club April 1, 2025)
  • Sociedelic Review of Rise of the Psychonaut (Email from Alan Houot, April 1, 2025)
  • Moving Past Bifurcation in Psychedelic Science (Email to Alan Houot, Apr. 1, 2025)
  • Houot’s Categories of 3 Approaches per Sociedelic Review: Healing; Spirituality; Science
  • Therapy paradigm lexicon
  • Mysticism paradigm lexicon
  • Technology paradigm lexicon
  • Hermetica as a Path of Initiation (Litwa, 2025)
  • Timothy Freke: Reconcile Individual & Nondual; eternalism & possibilism; altered state & ordinary state
  • Respecting & reconciling both Science & Spirituality (Email sent L 2:06 pm Mar. 30, 2025)
    • How to End the Mysticism Wars in Psychedelic Science (Letheby 2024)
  • Email to Timothy Freke Mar. 29, 2025 7:44 am – Su: Egodeath updates, rebirth into eternalism then transcending heimarmene in Late Antiquity [1 email in thread]
  • email to Timothy Freke: AM Houot’s book Rise of the Psychonaut advocates “Science”, doesn’t grasp Transcendent Knowledge – 8:12 am Mar 30 2025
  • email 2 Freke: Houot book Rise of the Psychonaut advocates Science, doesn’t grasp Transcendent Knowledge – 8:28 am Mar. 30, 2025
  • Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 9:25 am, Mar. 29, 2025
  • Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 9:38 am, Mar. 29, 2025
  • Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 10:32 am, Mar. 29, 2025
  • Two Distinct Audiences for Ahistoricity: Mythicists vs. Esotericists
  • Timothy Freke = Transcendent Freewill
  • Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 8:04 am, Mar. 30, 2025
  • Max Freakout Productions
  • Lion Snake in Mithraism & in Gnosticism
  • Development of a Given Religion (Gnosticism, Eleusis) in 150 AD
  • Mithras Is Killing / Sacrificing Eternalism
  • Fine Print in Late Antiquity Religion Marketing Materials
  • Video: The Demiurge, Marcion and the Corpus Hermeticum – Conversation w @m.davidlitwa
  • The Evil Creator: Origins of an Early Christian Idea (M. David Litwa, 2021)
  • Value-Flip from Positive Planets in Classical Antiquity, to Negative Fate Planets in Late Antiquity
  • Editorial Reviews
  • “The Devil Created the Eternalism Cosmos Prison; Christ Lifts Us to Escape the Prison of Eternalism, into Transcendent Possibilism” – Early Christianity
  • The God of the Egodeath theory = The God of Eternalism = Yaldabaoth Lion-Headed Snake, Hypercosmic Fire Breathing (Mithras Leonocephalic snake-wrapped)
  • the Egodeath theory 1997: Eternalism is the Only, Highest God / Coraxo 2000: There Is a Higher, Above Eternalism
  • ‘Yaldabaoth’ Means Control Instability Chaos: Non-Viable Control from Bad Model of Transcendent Personal Control System Transcendence During Psilocybin Transformation
  • Tree of Too Much Knowledge, Get Kicked Out Until Washed Robe and Can Pass Gate Eat Tree of life
  • The Creator of Eternalism Is Sus
  • Sledgeathon Listening Banquet Party – Videos to Listen
  • Email 3 to Timothy Freke 8:35 am Mar. 29, 2025 – Su: 2nd-phase Egodeath theory beyond 4D spacetime block-universe eternalism & beginner Unity glimpse
  • Email to Timothy Freke 9:10 am Mar. 30, 2025 – Su: 2nd-phase Egodeath theory beyond 4D spacetime block-universe eternalism & beginner Unity glimpse
  • Text Message Summarizing How Branching vs. Non-Branching Depicts Possibilism vs. Eternalism Models of Control-in-World
  • “Reach Fate” Achievement Earned! 🏆
  • REGAIN FREEWILL, ABOVE FATE
  • “Transcend Fate” Achievement Earned! 🏆
  • Tim Freke & Gandy Book & Videos
  • Max Freakout Triveryhigh [very, very, very high]
  • Houot tries to perpetuate the bifurcated war between the Psychedelic Mystics vs. the Psychedelic Scientists, which is a Retarded, Retarding Bifurcation – He Makes No Attempt to Bridge, But Only to Push Away [compare how I hate and push away Neuroscience, b/c that approach deletes/ eliminates a Cognitive approach]
  • Michael A. Williams Review of Litwa’s Book
  • 21 Books by David Litwa on Christian Origins & Religion in Late Antiquity, Hermetica
  • Evil Creator is at Audible, Book by David Litwa –
  • {display hand} Motif = Knowledge of Non/Branching (Email to Cyberdisciple Mar. 28, 2025)
  • New Page format id’d: the “Article Reaction Page” format
  • Recently Invented New Type of keyboard shortcut: Citation w/ Link
  • Brown 2016: keyboard shortcut
  • Brown 2019: keyboard shortcut
  • Samorini 1997: keyboard shortcut
  • Samorini 1998: keyboard shortcut
  • Huggins: Foraging Wrong – keyboard shortcuts
  • Hanegraaff – Hermetic Spirituality bk 2022 – keyboard shortcut
  • Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff book price: $148.84
  • SPIRITUAL LIBERATIONTM*
  • *PRODUCT CONTENTS MIGHT NOT MATCH PICTURE ON BOX
  • Dumped/ Developed Ideas in Rise of the Psychonaut page, moved to below
  • Generic Book Review by Cybermonk: “This book is not entirely bad; it has a couple good sentences”
  • Headings Outline of Rise of the Psychonaut
  • Announcing: Brown Virtual Gallery of mushroom imagery in Christian art [check name of db in 2019 brown article – not “committee”, failed idea]
  • Browns’ Dual Dogmatic Pitfalls
  • ALL YOUR MICA ARE BELONG TO US.
  • keyboard shortcut for The Holy Mushroom
  • The Holy Mushroom: Evidence of Mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity Paperback – October 29, 2008
  • Conclusions Section of Brown 2019: “Academically Irresponsible” Thug Bully Force Tactics to Deceive and to Try to Impede Scholarship – Take Note, Sleazy Huggins, DEFENDER of Panofsky-Wasson, the Bad Company You Hang With and Play Cover For: You Deniers Ain’t Lookin’ So Hot, Huggins
  • Conclusions Section of Brown 2019: “Academically Irresponsible” Wasson
    • Wasson’s Thug Bully Force Tactics to Deceive and to Try to Impede Scholarship
  • “Wasson’s Attempt to Force MICA Denial, Which Irvin Complains About? This Is Fine” – Huggins’ Foraging Wrong Article
  • Samorini’ s so-so typology of mushroom-trees
  • “Conjuring Eden”
  • New: YI Tree Branching Form Recognized in “Lot’s Wife Pillar of Salt Burning City” Stained Glass Window, March 25, 2025
  • Forcing Art to Fit My Theory
  • Wouter Hanegraaff, Dedicated Teenaged Mushroom Collector
  • THE DEFEATIST NARRATIVE TAIL WAGGING THE ENTHEOGEN HISTORY EVIDENCE DOG
  • Samorini’s Fabricated, Concocted, Narrative-First Framing, “Certain Christian communities used The Mushroom”
  • 2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm) is Anti-“Communities” of Entheogen Users
  • Darth Hanegraaff’s Alderaanization of the Fixed Stars
    🌌💥 🪨 🪨 🪨
  • ## What is the Egodeath theory? Summary
  • ## You probably told me already but what is the ego death theory?
  • #### Overview
  • ## Wouter Hanegraaff on Mushrooms
  • Email from Wouter Hanegraaff, March 24, 2025
  • My Email to Houot Mar 22, 2025
  • Email from A. M. Houot (“Ooh-Oh”) Mar. 23, 2025
  • email to houot may 24 2025
  • FATA from Cyberdisciple mar 22
  • reply to Cyberdisciple mar 23
  • My Oct. 1, 2018 Email to & from Erik Davis: Expanding Mind podcast: Eric Wargo discusses Block Universe “determinism” per the Egodeath theory
  • Oct 1, 2018 Email from Erik Davis
  • Announcement: April 17-20, 2025, Seattle, SpringMysteries.com
  • You Must Join My Cult: Sacred Garden Community church
  • Email to Erik Davis, March 24, 2025
    • Hanegraaff’s Inability to Place Fixed Stars in Sphere 8 Proves Rebirth Is into Fate, not Freedom
    • Zep IV book is missing crucial concept from Late Antiquity, “transcend heimarmene”
    • Erik Davis applauds Hanegraaff’s non-drug entheogens, therefore signs on board with proposing non-drug psychedelics
    • Led Zep IV Adding a 3rd Phase (Transcending Heimarmene): Details
  • Email 2 to Erik Davis, Mar. 24, 2025
  • Read Aloud Voice Recording of Houot: The Psychonaut’s Ship
  • Keyboard Shortcuts for my Website URLs
  • Rise of the Hubristic Psychonaut (Houot, 2025)
  • My Condemnation of Modern-Era, OSC-Based, So-Called “Myth” 👎👎
  • Yugler Exemplifies Characteristic Modern Corruption and Obscuring of Myth
    • Perseus Looks at Medusa’s Face
    • Medusa Is Invisible
    • Jungianism Sucks Because It Replaces, Not Clarifies, Myth
  • Correct Use of Analogy
  • St. Eustace Crossing the River (Chartres Cathedral)
  • Don’t Cross the Streams
  • Fav Article Title: J. Z. Smith: “In Comparison a Magic Dwells”
  • The Key Central Topic of Everything Is, Free Will vs. Determinism [Better: Possibilism vs. Eternalism]
  • The Term ‘presentism’ is relevant for psychedelic-state metaperception
  • Outdated Term in Egodeath Lexicon: ‘metaphor’ <– bad, say “analogy”
  • Presentism
  • the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control
  • Questionnaire Authors 1) Conjoined Impaired Control + Impaired Cognition into single factor; 2) placed item 54 fear of loss of control into ANX anxiety factor, why?
  • 1) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Made a Single Factor Scoped as ICC; “Impaired Control and Cognition”
  • 2) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Initially Placed OAV’s Item 54 “Fear of Loss of Control” into the ANX “Anxiety” Factor; Should Have Put It into ICC (or better, an IC) Factor Instead
  • 3) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Dropped OAV’s Item 54 “Fear of Loss of Control” into the ANX “Anxiety” Factor; Should Have Put It into ICC (or better, an IC) Factor Instead
  • 4) Griffiths Should Not Have Gathered Initial Item Pool from 11-Factors’s low level factors; Ought to Have Copied from OAV’s Angst Dimension DIRECTLY, to not overlook 8 broad effects items of 21
  • Alternatively, Grifty could have copied entire “Unpl Exp” hi-lev dim from 11F questionnaire, which includes the 8 “dropped from factors” items, as well as the 7-8 ANX items + 6-7 ICC items
  • What is Studerus Team Trying to Accomplish with their shiny new heavily marketed low-level “factors”, if those factors FAIL to capture “anxiety about control”??
  • What a COMPLETELY USELESS, POINTLESS SET OF FACTORS!!
    • todo: copy emojis
  • Subsets of Negative Psychedelic Effects that Make Up the 11F qair’s Unpleasant Experiences hi-level dimension (which = OAV’s Angst/ Dread/ DED/ Dread of Ego Death
  • DED = Dread of Ego Disaster
  • 11f; 11f-m; 11f-l – set of 3 verbosities of shortcut expansion
    • The Grifty Group & the Stud Group Are Marketing-Driven Psychedelic Pseudo Science
  • OAV’s Angst/ Dread/ DED Dimension (Dread of Ego Death)
  • Item 54, “anxiety about control”, Fails to Fit Only into Our “Anxiety” Factor or “Control” Factor — So, Simply Drop It!
    • todo: –> copy emojis
  • Griffiths Team at Johns Hopkins Dept. of Psychedelic Pseudo Science
    • Has Anyone Seen the Buddha Statue?? Matt? What Have You Done with It?
  • THUS THE MALFORMED 11F BEGAT MALFORMED CEQ, CREATING THE YALDABAOTH OF QUESTIONNAIRES
  • Low-IQ Chris Letheby/ Philosophy Department False-Dilemma Debate: “Which One Exists: Mind, or Matter?” – Irrelevant for the All-Important Control Transformation Experience
  • keyboard shortcuts: kws: from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake frozen in rock}
  • Phase: Blank Books Self Help Cajoling, vs. Binder Sheets + Acronyms Definition Notation like [MCP] with Pentel P205 Mech Pencil
  • Phase: Create Core 2-level Egodeath Core Theory: Reach Eternalism; Phase: Add Myth Analogy, History of Religious Myth; 3-Phase/3-Level Model (Transcend Eternalism)
  • 4-Hour Productive Voice Recording Sat. Mar 15, 2025
  • Slow, Buggy, Drainy App
  • Breakthrough: Wasson’s Private View vs. Wasson’s Public View (They Differ; He Is a Liar)
  • WordPress Mobile App
  • Pagels’ First 3 Books Compatible with the Egodeath Theory
  • Video: The Valentinians: Ancient Christian Gnostics? (ReligionForBreakfast, 2022)
  • Beginner Perennialism & Esotericism: 10% Beginner Unity Glimpse + 1% Advanced Unity + 0% Control Transformation Though That’s 95% Bulk of Transformation
  • Set of 3 Incoherent Assertions Made About Treatise on the 8th & 9th: Which Sphere # Contains the Fixed Stars (which are Fate), If Rising Above Sphere 7 Saturn = Rising Above Fate?
  • Wouter Hanegraaff & Followers: “Whether the number 8 should be included with the number 7 or should instead be placed after 7 remains an open question for me.”
  • Paul Davidson & Wouter Hanegraaff Can’t Count to 8, Contradict Which Sphere # Contains Fixed Stars
  • Motivation of this Page
  • Progress on Topics in Previous Page 25
  • The Pre/Trans Fallacy: After Learning the Egodeath Theory, Nothing Changes
  • Psychedelic Transformation Adds Eternalism-Compatibility to Possibilism-Thinking: Able to Stably Cope in the Altered State
  • Psychedelic Transformation Gives You Compatible Possibilism-Thinking & Eternalism-Thinking
  • Psychedelic Transformation Gives You Compatible Free Will & Determinism
  • The Losing Framing: A zero-sum fight between which is true: freewill, or causal-chain determinism
    • I hate irrelevant, causal-chain determinism! And freewill isn’t the case at the underlying level! A Lose/Lose Debate of Folly, Buffet of Folly
  • Neuroscience Is the Enemy of the Cognitive Phenomenology-Based Explanatory Framework Realm
  • Gain Split-Level Compatibilism (Better Characterization of the Outcome than “Gain Eternalism” or “Gain Qualified Possibilism-Thinking Including Eternalism-Thinking”
  • Recent Pages Created After Started idea development 25; Recent Posts 2025/02/25-2025/03/12

Incoming Ideas

Foolish Sam Harris Ends with Merely no-free-will — The Egodeath TheoryTM Is a Way Superior Product, It Gives You Hyper-EternalismTM Compatibilism

New, Improved Product Marketing: Now with Hyper-EternalismTM!

Armillary Sphere

from messages copypaste:

i integrate the Psilo assumption to the *extreme*.  

No watering down, countersignalling, or diluting.  

A book club complaint about Yugler’s book on psychedelics, myth, shamanism, & Jung was, where’s the psychedelics emph? weak, on that.  

I need this arm. sphere: must have zodiac band w animals, ideally on both sides of band , is the best art

https://www.scienceofgadgets.com/post/how-armillary-sphere-works – good pictures photos

bull facing right means you are looking from POV outside the cosmos , outside the sphere of the fixed stars.  per David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism.  

this hypercosmic POV = you are outside of & above Fatedness/ heimarmene/ cosmic frozen rock of 4D Spacetime, per Late Antiquity mystery religions via entheogenic experience of hyper-eternalism

if u have picture of u holding arm. sphere, it means u r enlightened w gnosis wisdom 

which u r, so.  


the sun & planets & sphere of stars revolves around a SPHERICAL earth. not around a flat earth!  😑

Like Hanegraaff, Paul Davidson (the video’s script author) can’t bring himself to mention his “precious” magic word ‘Ogdoad’ (cosmic sphere 8) in the same sentence as “evil” fate-soaked ‘fixed stars’ – a contradictory mess of a narrative results.  

Hermetic Writing Title “The Eighth Reveals the Ninth” Proves that I Am Right

Web search: “The Eighth Reveals the Ninth”
https://www.google.com/search?q=%E2%80%9CThe+Eighth+Reveals+the+Ninth%E2%80%9D

when u hang out 2000-2025 theorizing about transcend eternalism, and learn to stand on right foot in Psilocybin, using egoic personal control system (washed clean), to have stable control, you have then moved from … graduated from sphere 8 to sphere 9 the pleroma. –

Never since the album liner notes for Free Will seen such dubious triple-negatives:

http://gnosis.org/naghamm/discorse.html — son, write this book for the temple at Diospolis in hieroglyphic characters, entitling it ‘The Eighth Reveals the Ninth.'”

“I will do it, my <father>, as you command now.”

“My <son>, write the language of the book on steles of turquoise.

“My son, it is proper to write this book on steles of turquoise, in hieroglyphic characters.

“For Mind himself has become overseer of these.

“Therefore, I command that this teaching be carved on stone, and that you place it in my sanctuary.

Eight guardians guard it with […] of the Sun [David Ulansey’s Mithraism hypercosmic sun].

“The males on the right are frog-faced, and the females on the left are cat-faced.

“And put a square milk-stone at the base of the turquoise tablets, and write the name on the azure stone tablet in hieroglyphic characters.

“My son, you will do this when I am in Virgo, and the sun is in the first half of the day, and fifteen degrees have passed by me.”

“My father, everything that you say I will do eagerly.”

“And write an oath in the book, lest those who read the book bring the language into abuse, and not (use it) to oppose the acts of fate. Rather, they should submit to the law of God, without having transgressed at all, but in purity asking God for wisdom and knowledge.

“And he who will not be begotten at the start by God comes to be by the general and guiding discourses.

“He will not be able to read the things written in this book, although his conscience is pure within him, since he does not do anything shameful, nor does he consent to it.

“Rather, by stages he advances and enters into the way of immortality.

“And thus
he enters into the understanding of the eighth that reveals the ninth.”

“So shall I do it, my father.”

“This is the oath: I make him who will read this holy book swear by heaven and earth, and fire and water, and seven rulers of substance, and the creating spirit in them, and the <unbegotten> God, and the self-begotten one, and him who has been begotten, that he will guard the things that Hermes has said.

“And those who keep the oath, God will be reconciled with them and everyone whom we have named.

“But wrath will come to each one of those who violate the oath. This is the perfect one who is, my son.”

4D-Transcendent Graduation Day for the Egodeath Theory

apr 3 2025

Upgrade Notice for Transcendent Knowledge PhDs: the PhD has been Upgraded so as to Include Hyper-Eternalism; doubled in value

Litwa’s title for 8th/9th is very interesting: “The Eighth Reveals the Ninth”, supports The Egodeath Theory — now with Hyper-Eternalism!TM

Wisdom? not so much, in this video 😄

At least Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff admits he’s stumped, in a footnote:

“Whether the fixed stars should be included [with Saturn, sphere 7] or should rather be associated with the Ogdoad [sphere 8] remains an open question for me.” 🤡🌌

Hanegraaff thanked me for info about that, so ok 🤷‍♂️

ordered the new Hermetica I book – by David Litwa – & “Cosmology in Antiquity” book to further prove my model of astral ascent mysticism – bound for hyper-eternalism! 😇👼🚀 beyond fixed stars, in the Pleroma with the Aeons spirits.

x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COYJi9CKrGI


cosmic sphere 9 outside the sphere of the fixed stars is sometimes called “the Pleroma” it seems – same level as Mithraism’s precession of the equinoxes; = transcend no-free-will/ Fatedness; become spiritual, per Late Antiquity.

/ end of messages texts copypaste

Houot Withholds His Milestone Discovery per Rise of the Psychonaut: Guess: altered state aliens contact us

Houot’s Brand of (Immature, Irrational, Mentally Ill) Religion, Marketed as “Science”

Houot’s silly brand of science fiction religion with mental alien entities contact in your mind when tripping but selling/marketing/ advertising his tripping as “science explorer discoverer” – A CALL TO POSTURING.

Houot insults religion, yet delivers his own made-up flimsy religion that he calls “Science”, by which he means, take firm control of the wheel of the mental space ship, to steer through the branching manyworlds physical external cosmos and do trade with mental space aliens. T

The closest Houot comes to mentioning the true Physics religion of 4D Spacetime Mysticism is to mention “relativistic” then immed emphasize Quantum” because Houot worships Quantum Mysticism false religion

he believes in the religion of Quantum Mysticism , ignorant of the true religion of 4D Spacetime Mysticism includugin hyper-eternalism / transcendent compatibilism

transcendent compatibilism
tc
NOT a mere armchair, Phil dept position; it means you are able to endure Psilocybin and have been purified to stand on right foot and pass gate, finally keyboard shortcut for rev 22 14:

“Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city.” – Revelation 22:14 (the last page of the Bible), NIV

fkking awesome keyboard shortcut type! quotes hell yeah. far better than any mere psychedelic is Mythic Plane Amanita, the Super Psychedelic!! <– keyboard shortcut??

Mythic-Plane Amanita, the Super-Psychedelic!!

“Amanita muscaria is the most famous entheogen in the world that nobody uses. It is the supreme symbol of all entheogenic religion: of secret cults and societies of initiates and whispered lost knowledge.” – Dale Pendell, Pharmako Gnosis, first sentence of Amanita chapter
dpam

I HATE the 2nd part! Except when I am focusing on the Secret Amanita paradigm.

“Amanita muscaria is the most famous entheogen in the world that nobody uses. It is the supreme symbol of all entheogenic religion.” – Dale Pendell, Pharmako Gnosis
dpa

Pharmako Gnosis: Plant Teachers and the Poison Path
Dale Pendell

4D Spacetime Mysticism
fdsm ok
fsm ok
4sm fail

4D spacetime
fds ok
4s fail
4d fail

todo: add to Rise of the Psychonaut page this answer:

p. 254 – Houot withholds what he thinks the “grand gesture” will be. “what the defining grand gesture of the Psychedelic Age of Discovery will look like … what I think the grand gesture will be … what moment will define the coming Psychedelics Age of Discovery … to galvanized ppl around a crystallzn point re: exploration of Other Worlds, prize equiv to circumnavg world; traverse continent or solar system, XPRIZE of psychedelic exploration figuring out what?”

what the defining grand gesture of the Psychedelic Age of Discovery will look like … what I think the grand gesture will be … what moment will define the coming Psychedelics Age of Discovery … to galvanized ppl around a crystallzn point re: exploration of Other Worlds, prize equiv to circumnavg world; traverse continent or solar system, XPRIZE of psychedelic exploration figuring out what?

p 254, Rise of the Psychonaut , Houot

Answer:
Per
the Egodeath theory <- brand name
the Egodeath theory of psychedelic hyper-eternalism
the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism
the theory of psychedelic hyper-eternalism
the theory of psychedelic eternalism: <- descriptive neutral direct theory descriptor
brand name + descriptive specifier:
the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism

The “hyper-” specifier fits better in first sentence than in short name of the theory.

per the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism:

  • 1) We discover Jan 1988 that no-free-will = ego transcendence.
  • 2) We transcend eternalism. [i was writing about this in 2001, 2007 article integrates it, March 2025 I emphasize best kind of Compatibilism in Marketing framing introducing ppl to Egodeath theory]
  • 3) We figure out how to have stable self-control in Psilocybin. [I think of stand on right foot — when did i fully explain stand on right foot motif / technique? feel my March 2025 work on POSITIONING, characterizing. TO THE SAME EXTENT THAT I EMPHASIZE THAT NO-FREE-WILL/ ETERNALISM IS THE CASE, ALSO TO THAT EXTENT EMPHASIZE FREEWILL EXPERIENCING/ THINKING; VIRTUAL FREEWILL – = A BALANCED VIABLE MODEL & VIABLE FOR MARKETING / COMMUNICATING THE THEORY]
  • We reach cosmos sphere 9 the Pleroma above outside of eternalism.
  • We transcend no-free-will.
  • We reach the cosmic sphere of hyper-eternalism, penetrate through the sphere of the fixed stars.

Rise of the Psychonaut Uses Conventional Debate Position Terms that I NEVER Employ

“sacred” – I never write that word.

“divine” – I never write that word.

The fact that I never employ Houot’s KEY terms, is a big red flag and highly valuable clue that something is off-base — same exact situation within the Mysticism Wars:

“mystical” – I never employ that word in my core theory. I explain the mental dynamics that OTHER people label as “mystical”. I do an anti-Mystical approach to explain that which other ppl call “mystical”.

“naturalism materialism secular” – I never write that word.

“secular” – I never write that word. I never employ that word. I imagine if you search the present site and Egodeath Yahoo Group Max Freakout archive & Egodeath.com, 0 hits on ‘secular’ – it is literally not part of my vocab and CERTAINLY isn’t a part of my lexicon for core theory per

Is Egodeath theory — which is really,

the Egodeath theory is the
analogical psychedelic eternalism dependence
explanatory model of X

Note the form above:

<theory brand name> is the
<character descriptors key words>
explanatory model of
<referent explanandum>

<variable 1> is the
<variable 2>
explanatory model of
<variable 3>

the Egodeath theory is the
analogical psychedelic eternalism dependence
explanatory model of
ego transcendence [confirmed per 97 subtitle below]; satori [0 hits in 1997 spec – check 2007 main article]; enlightenment [7 hits in 1997]

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death (Hoffman, 2007 main article) http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/

2007 wording terms: theory of X:

“The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death explains what is revealed in religious revelation and in enlightenment, including the nature of personal control agency.”

“The essence and origin of religion is the…”

good wording there:

“Self-control stability is restored upon transforming one’s mental model to take into account the dependence of personal control on a hidden, separate thought-source, such as Necessity or a divine level that transcends Necessity.”

(“transcend Necessity” – i didn’t say you can transcend Necessity; i said GOD could perhaps do so)

the 2007 Summary/Intro conclusion para:

“Myth describes this mystic-state experiential insight and transformation. Religious initiation teaches and causes this transformation of the self considered as a control-agent, through a series of visionary-plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial(!) philosophy. Most modern-era religion has been a distortion of this standard initiation system, reducing these concepts to a weak interpretation that is based in the ordinary state of consciousness.”

around apr 1 2025, noted: Mithraic lion-headed gatekeeper figure — SNAKE HEAD IS ABOVE HIS HEAD!! David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism misses that? Supposedly the lion’s head is above sphere of the fixed stars ; above heimarmene – BUT, YET, the snake’s head is still ABOVE the lion’s head!

that 2007 article section cites (“Heimarmene or universal fatedness was centrally important in ancient astrological cosmology (Barton 1994), and was a major theme in Hellenistic-Roman astral ascent mysticism and religion (Cumont 1960). Transcending astral fatedness“):
https://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Astrology-Sciences-Antiquity-Tamysn/dp/0415110297/

Ancient Astrology
Tamysn Barton, 1994, Routledge
Part of: Sciences of Antiquity (9 books)
Blurb:
“An account of astrology from its beginnings in Mesopotamia, focusing on the Greco-Roman world, Ancient Astrology examines the theoretical development and changing social and political role of astrology.”

todo: check out: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415121833

Cosmology in Antiquity [ordered]
Rosemary Wright
Part of: Sciences of Antiquity (9 books)
“Examines the cosmological theories of the `natural philosophers’ from Thales, Anaximander and Anaximenes to Plato, the Stoics and the NeoPlatonists. Also discusses and emphasizes the importance of Babylonian and Egyptian forerunners.”
Chapters include:

  • Models, Myths, and Metaphors
  • Time and Eternity
  • The Cosmos and God

var3: see Self-control Cybernetics, Dissociative Cognition, & Mystic Ego Death (1997 core theory spec) (Hoffman, 1997) https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/30/self-control-cybernetics-dissociative-cognition-mystic-ego-death/ ) — title & subtitle posted in 1997:

title:
Self-Control Cybernetics, Dissociative Cognition, & Mystic Ego Death
subtitle:
The Cybernetic Theory of Ego Transcendence

x = ego transcendence

ego transcendence
et’c

Justin Sledge (ESOTERICA) Conversation with Wouter Hanegraaff about Entheogens in Western Esotericism

New page about this topic:
Justin Sledge (Esoterica) Conversation with Wouter Hanegraaff about Entheogens in Western Esotericism

I copied the below sections into that new page:

  • Quick paste from idea development page 26: Related Comments
  • My Wussy Half-Truth in 1997 like the traditional methods of the mystics are non-drug entheogens
  • “Dizzy Doesn’t Count”
  • keyboard shortcut for my 2004 “Entheogenic Esotericism” post
  • When You Think of Psychedelics Extremism, Think Egodeath theory
  • 🍄👑 King of the Ardent Advocates

What page did I add a bunch of stuff to top of? __ Davidson can’t place fixed stars

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgzuj1joXX0

at 1:20:00, Sledge rejects both errors (just like Brown positions themself as centrist by rejecting mushroom imagery in Christian art (St. Walburga tapestry, definitely not Amanita) and affirming it by also at the same time displaying that same art in beautiful gallery of awesome instances of definite Amanita imagery in Christian art):

  • Avoid psychedelics eliminativism – I agree, that is baloney.
  • Avoid DMT reductionism (“it’s always DMT”).

Sledge means: Avoid entheogenic reductionism; avoid saying that the way esotericists accessed the altered state of consciousness was always psychedelics.

Sledge is wrong. This is false centrism.

In fact, the way ppl had the altered state of consciousness sufficient for mental model transformation is always, exclusively psychedelics, no other method.

That’s my official firm position.

My Wussy Half-Truth in 1997 like the traditional methods of the mystics are non-drug entheogens

“There are multiple triggers for the dissociative cognitive state, including psychedelics, meditation, schizophrenia, sensory deprivation, hyperventilation, temporal-lobe epilepsy, UFO abduction, and near-death experiences.” – Michael Hoffman 1997

“the” dissociative state? maybe, but that is BS, in that it is not sufficient to cause mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism. “DIZZY DOESN’T COUNT” – Michael Hoffman slogan.

“Dizzy Doesn’t Count”

{balance scale} = BS

I give NO credit to claims of “the traditional methods of the mystics” that are allegedly non-drug.

Non-drug entheogens is academic balony, with ZERO substantiation. It is pure doctrinal positioning, a circle of academics pleasing each other, not reality.

I wimped and caved, in:

Self-control Cybernetics, Dissociative Cognition, & Mystic Ego Death (1997 core theory spec) (Hoffman, 1997) https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/30/self-control-cybernetics-dissociative-cognition-mystic-ego-death/

BEING SLIGHTLY DIZZY PROVES MY POINT:

Heavy breathing makes you dizzy – it does not cause mental model transformation, mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism. which is the only thing that’s relevant for this debate.

My authority: My leading-edge father in 1980 led me in Grof BS Breathing. It is way way way too weak. weak!

keyboard shortcut for my 2004 “Entheogenic Esotericism” post

Made a keyboard shortcut for my 2004 “Entheogenic Esotericism” post at the Egodeath Yahoo Group
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/18/hanegraaffs-inability-to-place-fixed-stars-in-sphere-7-or-8-proves-rebirth-is-into-fate-not-freedom/#Email-to-Hanegraaff-March-18-2025 links to:
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com/2021/01/09/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-66/#message3335

[aeee]

“Authentic esotericism is entheogenic esotericism. Entheogens are the key to esotericism. This is the simplest possible theory of esotericism, and the most natural, the least contrived and strained. Theories of esotericism that are not based on entheogens suffer from the problem of grandiose verbiage, unmet promises and claims, chronic vagueness, excuses for lack of potent and prompt efficacy, and no ability to deliver the experiences which are talked about. Drug-free esotericism doesn’t work; it is not effectively ergonomic.” – Michael Hoffman, Egodeath Yahoo Group, June 12, 2004

that lacks definition: “sufficient for mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism” – note also: hyper-eternalism

When You Think of Psychedelics Extremism, Think Egodeath theory

I agree, Justin Sledge, it is always Psilocybin, never DMT. Do not say it’s always DMT. It is always Psilocybin. (It is never Wouter Hanegraaff’s non-drug entheogens.)

Per hardline Egodeath theory:

  • No one ever had mystic experiernc any way other than Psilocybin.
  • Academics lie when they emphatically proclaim their DOCTRINAL STATEMENT OF FAITH that “there are many ways to produce same effect as Psilocybin” – LIARS CLUB. Fabricicated alt methods do not work, defined as: they do not produce sufficient effect. re strength or reliablility. note however, Cuebensis is not as reliable or ergonomic as blotter. Cubensis is hard to worrk with, for Psilocybin transformation.

Top Pri Topics/Pages

Important Existing Draft Pages to Publish

  • How Branching and Non-Branching Depicts the Two Models of Possibility and Control
  • Can We Have Stable Control on Psychedelics?

I want to take two pages out of Draft mode and publish them, then fill them in & move my sections of writing around, to cover the 3 topics that are listed in this existing page title:

What Did I Discover? Can We Have Stable Control in the Psychedelic State? Dionysus and the Pirates — move content from there to a set of new draft/dedicated pages.

Good page / good focus would be:

  • What Did I Discover? For Houot per Rise of the Psychonaut. i can draft that in above page.

I won’t ever publish the pages on tough/important topics if I wait til they are filled with content.

Recent fast and dirty way of working on idea development here at WordPress here: draft live first, clean up (move around) later.

This site ranges all the way from idea development pages that are freeform, yet have headings & toc, to formal polished articles.

Ideas for Branching-message mushroom trees Article

Not handholding of every instance of the 4 motifs.

Give the general interp theory, give separately the gallery, and point out a few selected things about each gallery picture; don’t even TRY to write at the level of indivdual pics.

LET THE DATA SPK FOR ITESLEF when accompanied by my 3 summary models.

Use more separation: over here the 3 summary models; over there the selected gallery of images.

NOT like present draft that’s a gallery OF COMMENTARY POINTS.

do not make the article a catalog of all, specific, paritcular commentary points.

Step back; let the execellent 3 system summaries do the work, indirectly.

don’t make the “obvious” points.

just give the top non-obvious, most interesting points about each image.

Hyper-Eternalism = Emphasize Eternalism & Transcend Eternalism

hyper-eternalism
hetm

hyper-eternalism is both transcend eternalism & emphasize eternalism.

Hyper-eternalism in two senses:

  • Emphasize eternalism.
  • Transcend eternalism.

Transcend Eternalism

  • I emphasize eternalism.
  • I deliver transcending eternalism: in 2 ways:
    • We always use donkey child possibilism-thinking (though quliafied).
    • Tight cognition returns after Psilocybin peak window.
    • virtual possibilism thinking; qualified possibilism-thinking.
    • The Best Kind of “Compatibilism”.
    • Knowing that no-free-will is the case, while acting apparently “like” freewill is the case.
    • Higher mind rider of donkey knows no-free-will is the case; lower mind donkey acts like freewill is the case.

Mytheme decoding: {rider above donkey on path}

The Best Kind of “Compatibilism”.

Knowing that no-free-will is the case, while acting apparently “like” freewill is the case.

Higher mind rider of donkey knows no-free-will is the case; lower mind donkey acts like freewill is the case.

3 Models to Summarize in Branching-Message Mushroom Trees Article: Psilocybin Transformation; Astral Ascent Mysticism; Mushroom-Trees

Structure of Branching-message mushroom trees article: Deliver 3 Model summaries, and then the gallery with minimal commentary.

  1. The Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism & Psilocybin transformation. Include hyper-eternalism.
  2. summary of astral ascent mysticism per the Egodeath theory.
  3. summary of mushroom-trees genre: branching-message mushroom trees; the combination of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs.
  4. Gallery, with minimal notes – just hints and announcements. Low wordcount. Sparse commentary; terse. Just the best – NOT routine pointing out of every instance/aspect of motifs of {mushrooms}, {branching} , {handedness}, and & {stability}. I’m more interested in just commenting on the advanced ideas, like {gate}, like {rider above donkey on path}.

EgodeathTheory site is an Advanced, Leading-Edge, Working, Idea Development Site, Not Polished Publishing

The content is neat and good in the Egodeath Yahoo Group archive, but, stuff gets lost there.

As messy as this WordPress site is, it seems more organized that the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

I never liked the organization threading arrangement at the Egodeath Yahoo Group.

WordPress here is more organized, even if less polished because

THIS IS A WORKING IDEA DEVELOPMENT SITE, not, mainly, a polished articles site.

Polished articles sites:

News Flash! Houot’s Ship Taken for Ransom by Pirates, Dionysus Brings It to a Halt with Vines, Saves the Pilot Who Honors Dionysus; Lion & Bear Kill the Captain

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/idea-development-23/#Pilot-Helmsman-Steersman-Begged-Dionysus – Find 32 hits on ‘dionysus’

Sailing the Acid Trip Ocean, by Blizzard of Ozz band, 1981

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGoQ6AZYfMc

https://www.google.com/search?q=s.a.t.o.+lyrics
http://egodeath.com/sablyrics.htm#xtocid229130 — Egodeath interpretation

Sailing the Acid-Trip Ocean
Lyrics by Bob Daisley —

Photo: Cybermonk
Photo: Cybermonk

Egodeath Mystery Show About Scientific Exploration Discovery Field Log Notebook of Visionary Technologies of Seeing Looking Using Astrolabe Armillary Sphere Compass Navigation Tools Rational Explicit Map of Cognitive Phenomenology and Illuminating, SUCCESSFUL SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF Psilocybin Hyper-Eternalism Transformation that underlies common-core mysticism and perennialism after you throw away the baggage noise and {lift the lid} to {reveal} the {veiled snake engine} and are {sacrificed to be made athanatos}

Photo: Michael Hoffman, B.S.E.E., Egodeath Mystery Show

Egodeath Mystery Show podcast episodes

The Egodeath Core Concepts catalog
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/17/glossary-for-the-egodeath-theory/

The Key Mythemes catalog
https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/11/15/mytheme-list/

Self-control Cybernetics, Dissociative Cognition, & Mystic Ego Death (1997 core theory spec) (Hoffman, 1997) https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/30/self-control-cybernetics-dissociative-cognition-mystic-ego-death/

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death (Hoffman, 2007 main article) http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/

No One at the Bridge, Rush, 1975

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70BgSKTBh9s

Ride Captain Ride lyrics, by Blues Image, 1970

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOKaSr3B_II

image: ship picture for blues image

Songwriters: Frank Konte / Michael Pinera

Seventy-three men sailed up
From the San Francisco Bay
Rolled off of their ship, and here’s what they had to say
“We’re callin’ everyone to ride along to another shore
We can laugh our lives away and be free once more”

But no one heard them callin’
No one came at all
‘Cause they were too busy watchin’ those old raindrops fall
As a storm was blowin’ out on the peaceful sea
Seventy-three men sailing off to history

Ride, captain ride upon your mystery ship
Be amazed at the friends you have here on your trip
Ride captain ride upon your mystery ship
On your way to a world that others might have missed

Seventy-three men sailed up from the San Francisco Bay
Got off the ship, and here’s what they had to say
“We’re callin’ everyone to ride along to another shore
We can laugh our lives away and be free once more”

Ride, captain ride upon your mystery ship
Be amazed at the friends you have here on your trip
Ride captain ride upon your mystery ship
On your way to a world that others might have missed

Ride, captain ride upon your mystery ship
Be amazed at the friends you have here on your trip

Source: Musixmatch

Songwriters: Frank Konte / Michael Pinera

Postmortem: Foolish Captain Wasn’t Equipped to Endure Psilocybin

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/idea-development-23/#Pilot-Helmsman-Steersman-Begged-Dionysus – Find 32 hits on ‘dionysus’

The bifurcation even runs through the heart of Psychedelic Science at Hopkins (email to book club April 1, 2025)

Alan Houot sent this book review from Sociedelic — I look forward to reading it:
https://www.sociedelic.com/rise-of-the-psychonaut-the-book-that-redefines-psychedelics-as-technology-not-therapy/

My email reply engages with Houot as a (predominantly) 1-sided cheerleader for “Rational Scientific Naturalism”, 

without fixating on Houot as if he invented the bifurcation (he reflects it); 

instead, keeping attention constructively focused on reconciling the split within the broad cultural field:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/13/idea-development-page-26/#Sociodelic-Review-of-Rise-of-the-Psychonaut

The bifurcation even runs through the heart of Psychedelic Science at the (former!) Griffiths/Johnson group at Johns Hopkins.

Hardcore “Science” advocate Houot visits a psychedelic church(!!) – Heaven forfend!

Sociedelic Review of Rise of the Psychonaut (Email from Alan Houot, April 1, 2025)

Hi Michael,

You asked why I mentioned surrenderism only four times in Rise.

I mentioned this concept only in passing.
[4 hits, according to Amazon preview Search]

I didn’t feel the need to repeat material that I already wrote about in my master’s thesis and The Psychonaut’s Ship.

I will continue the surrenderism thread in later books.

I leave you with the latest book review from Sociedelic.

Enjoy, and thanks again for your feedback.

https://www.sociedelic.com/rise-of-the-psychonaut-the-book-that-redefines-psychedelics-as-technology-not-therapy/

Best,
Alan [Houot]

Moving Past Bifurcation in Psychedelic Science (Email to Alan Houot, Apr. 1, 2025)

Hi Alan, 

Looking forward to reading my printout of the Sociedelic book review.

When I’m thinking smaller-picture, I focus on your advocacy being for Science, at the expense of Religion or suchlike – sometimes, you treat mysticism as mental illness, immaturity, and irrationality.

I guess I partly agree with that withering view: they are not fit for science exploration & discovery.  

That’s a hard part of your book to overlook.

I’m trying to evaluate your ideas beyond that sticking point.

I try to respect “both sides”.

But when I think on a bigger scale, it is remarkable how the entire field of Psychedelic Science right now is intensely split in a battle between:

A low-quality, narrow-minded “science” approach. Mascot: Matthew “Lose the Buddha statue” Johnson.
vs. 
A low-quality, narrow-minded conception of “religion” or “mysticism” or suchlike. Mascot: Roland Griffiths.

The takeaway lesson for my framing of my theory of Psilocybin transformation:

I love STEM, and I love esoteric religion but hate its garbled expression.

The main, highest job of Science, and a Science-type explanatory framework, is to explain the best aspect of religion or Transcendent Knowledge – and reject poor wording that esotericism or mysticism uses; aim for clear, textbook-style presentation instead.

* Chris Letheby (psychedelic Phil. dept) writes insultingly of mysticism – but in a way, so do I.  Letheby wrote an article titled: How to Win the Mysticism Wars.

* Matthew Johnson filed ethics violations complaints against his own Griffiths Hopkins team, which can’t ever(?) publish the 2016 Psilocybin research on religious professionals. 

Johnson accuses science of pushing newage spirituality; he sides with
hardcore extremist materialist naturalist scientists against mystical woo –
a bifurcation that you and everyone & I should reconcile.  That’s hard work, but:

Science is worthless and lazy and empty bragging, if it fails to explain Psilocybin transformation, and worse, if it fails to even TRY to explain the merit underneath the noise in religious revelation & mental transformation.

The Mysticism Wars = The battle within Psychedelic Science, between the Scientific Psychedelic Scientists (Johnson) vs. the Mystical Psychedelic Scientists (Roland Griffiths).

Matthew Johnson (Griffiths Hopkins group that blew up and is no more) participates in the article debate series “Moving Past Mysticism”.

Must-read, this chain of some 10 articles:  Check out the wording in the titles:

The “Moving Past Mysticism” debate & the “Mysticism Wars” in Psychedelic Science
https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/01/15/the-theory-of-psychedelic-eternalism-provides-a-scientific-explanatory-basis-for-mystic-state-experiencing/

  1. Gnostic Psychedelia (Erik Davis, April 2020)
  2. Consciousness, Religion, and Gurus: Pitfalls of Psychedelic Medicine (Matthew Johnson, April 2021)
  3. Moving Past Mysticism in Psychedelic Science (Sanders & Zijlmans, May 2021)
  4. Reconciling Mystical Experiences with Naturalistic Psychedelic Science: Reply to Sanders and Zijlmans (Jylkkä, June 2021)
  5. Working with Weirdness: A Response to “Moving Past Mysticism in Psychedelic Science” (Breeksema & van Elk, July 2021)
  6. Researchers Debate the Role of Mysticism in Psychedelic Science (Don Lattin [psychedelics relig. columnist], Sep. 2021)
  7. Mystical Experience Defines Psychedelics (Kilham, Oct. 2021)
  8. High Mysticism: On the interplay between the psychedelic movement and academic study of mysticism (Baier, 2021)
  9. Mystical experiences without mysticism: An argument for mystical fictionalism in psychedelics (Garb & Earleywine 2022)
  10. How to End the Mysticism Wars in Psychedelic Science (Chris Letheby [Phil.] 2024)
  11. The Most Controversial Paper in the History of Psychedelic Research May Never See the Light of Day: Was the Psychedelic Renaissance Led by Science or Faith? (Travis Kitchens 2025) – w/ help from my colleague Cyberdisciple – re: Hopkins’ 2016 Religious Professionals psil. sessions

— Michael Hoffman, EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com

See also:

todo: Re-title my “Moving Past Mysticism” page to the above wording; my current title is too special-purpose advocating my own theory as better than either of the two debate positions.

todo: make a “reference” subset page that is ONLY citations & excerpts, without my commentary. Need separate pages: 1 for citations, 1 for commentary.

Houot’s Categories of 3 Approaches per Sociedelic Review: Healing; Spirituality; Science

Rise of the Psychonaut: The Book That Redefines Psychedelics as Technology, Not Therapy
https://www.sociedelic.com/rise-of-the-psychonaut-the-book-that-redefines-psychedelics-as-technology-not-therapy/

Highlighter pen colors used on entire article.

These terms are via the review and not necessarily in Rise of the Psychonaut or author blurbs about the book.

  • blue = therapy
  • green = mysticism
  • orange = science

Therapy paradigm lexicon

  • curing
  • healing
  • health
  • medical
  • medicine
  • mental health
  • sick
  • therapeutic
  • therapy
  • trauma

Mysticism paradigm lexicon

  • ancient wisdom
  • cosmic
  • esotericism
  • historical/ethnographic sacred traditions
  • magic
  • mystical
  • mystical awakenings
  • mystical breakthroughs
  • mysticism
  • religion
  • religious ritual
  • return to Eden
  • saved
  • spiritual hype
  • spiritual language
  • spiritual seekers
  • spirituality
  • to obscure
  • transcendental

Technology paradigm lexicon

  • cartography of consciousness
  • cataloging
  • charted
  • cognitive
  • cognitive Phenomenology
  • compass
  • curiosity
  • discovery
  • explorer’s map
  • explorers
  • field log
  • field manual
  • illuminate
  • illuminating
  • know
  • look
  • looking
  • map
  • mappable frontier
  • mapping
  • maps
  • navigated
  • navigation tools
  • notebook
  • phenomenology
  • rational
  • rationalism
  • saw
  • science
  • scientific exploration
  • secular Age of Discovery
  • secular map
  • see
  • seeing
  • ships
  • technological
  • technologies
  • technology
  • the Age of Exploration
  • the Psychedelic Age of Discovery
  • tools
  • tools for disciplined exploration
  • visionary

the audacity & hubris of Houot claiming “see, saw, look, vision” for Science, not Mysticism – AS IF!

Hermetica as a Path of Initiation (Litwa, 2025)

todo: move or copy to book page, info about Hermetica I & Hermetica II
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/23/books-and-citations-for-the-egodeath-theory-of-psychedelic-eternalism/

Justin Sledge ESOTERICA YouTube ch interviews and recommends Litwa.

Timothy Freke writes comparable, popular spirituality books.

Hermetica I: The Corpus Hermeticum, Asclepius, and Nag Hammadi Hermetica Ordered as a Path of Initiation
M. David Litwa, January 2, 2025
https://www.amazon.com/Hermetica-Hermeticum-Asclepius-Hammadi-Initiation/dp/B0DS2CZKC3/ — He removed the junk random noise inserted by later writers, and arranged in order of initiation stages:

“The Hermetic corpus is a spiritual and intellectual treasure stemming from ancient Egyptian sages who could write and think in Greek.

“Since the Renaissance, this corpus has appeared in an order that does not fit the path of spiritual initiation suggested by the corpus itself.

“The present edition reorders the corpus—including the Latin Asclepius and the Nag Hammadi Hermetica—into four progressing parts: introductory tractates, general discourses, detailed discourses, and revelatory discourses.

“A short spiritual commentary follows each tractate.

“The book is written for all lovers of the Hermetica, but in particular for those who are willing, in some sense, to join the way of immortality.”

Timothy Freke: Reconcile Individual & Nondual; eternalism & possibilism; altered state & ordinary state

Freke’s adjustments late in theorizing are like mine.

Per Ken Wilber – “embrace and include” both views.

Respecting & reconciling both Science & Spirituality (Email sent L 2:06 pm Mar. 30, 2025)

Hi L,

Rise of the Psychonaut: Maps for Amateurs, Nonscientists and Explorers in the Psychedelic Age of Discovery (Houot, 2025) https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/ & https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DPSJGMFR

Houot in Rise of the Psychonaut sides with Naturalism Science against spirituality, which is – he says MOST of the time in Rise of the Psychonaut – irrational, immature, even mentally ill. 

He extremely (usually) takes sides.  

Houot is merely a symptom of the rift and bifurcation that runs through the middle of entire field of Psychedelic Science.

The “Moving Past Mysticism” article debate within Psychedelic Science.  

The mystic scientists vs the anti-mysticism scientists, within Psychedelic Science. 

Matthew Johnson filed ethics violations complaints against his Griffiths Hopkins team for introducing spirituality in the research.  

How to End the Mysticism Wars in Psychedelic Science (Letheby 2024)

translation: disrespect spirituality, grant us Materialist Naturalist Scientists the win.  Reject “any esotericism” (Houot p. 10).

Rather, instead, what are ways to reconcile forms of science & forms of spirituality?

Include Least Dogma & inclusiveness.

The problem is not Houot; he is a symptom of the divide.

_______

Polishing my presentation for Eric S, to put forth a model of Psilo maturation/ Psilo transformation

I cannot hold myself to too high of a standard here.  Have to cut myself some slack.  

I can’t shoulder all burden of reconciling the parties that fall into polarization.  

I will make an effort to reconcile, even as I put forth a specific, useful, clear model of Psilo transformation & myth & art motifs – 

I shall present two contrasting views together, that both have distinct, big parts to play as a sacred marriage of two ways of thinking – a specific kind of compatibilism of two distinct ways of thinking.  

— Michael

Email to Timothy Freke Mar. 29, 2025 7:44 am – Su: Egodeath updates, rebirth into eternalism then transcending heimarmene in Late Antiquity [1 email in thread]

Hi Timothy,

Be sure to see my 2020-era WordPress site, massive evidence for mushroom imagery in Christian art.

egodeaththeory.org =

EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com

Egodeath.com – 2007

The timing of Jesus Mysteries book & underground conversation w/ you & Gandy about censorship of entheogens, was perfect.

Nov. 2020 huge breakthrough in Great Canterbury Psalter and genre of mushroom-trees but so huge, it still continues in 2025:

Day 1 of creation – everyone is looking at this comic page in Great Canterbury Psalter since 2000 (Paul Lindgren found), but, only I in 2025 finally saw:

the pans of God’s {balance scale} in Day 1 of Creation are indicated as filled with mushrooms, b/c day 4’s mushrooms point up to {balance scale} pans:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#Proof-Day-1-Balance-Scale-Contain-Mushrooms

Dr. Jerry Brown, author of The Psychedelic Gospels – published Wasson’s censored Panofsky letters – thanked me, 

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/panofskys-letters-to-wasson-transcribed/comment-page-1/#comment-2446

Wouter Hanegraaff thanked me briefly:
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/18/hanegraaffs-inability-to-place-fixed-stars-in-sphere-7-or-8-proves-rebirth-is-into-fate-not-freedom/#Email-from-Hanegraaff

My fav of all discoveries, blew mind/ chills:

when Psalter reader lifts his R finger higher than L, he is attacked (loss of control);
lower R finger slightly lower than L, means relying on R foot to get control stability on Psilocybin / Cubensis, then the army threat backs off: control stability returns:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2022/07/19/psalter-rows/#Egodeath-Theory-Picture-Vortex

I’m trying to figure out if I have your Hermetica book 2008 and if that’s same as your 2022 Hermetica book. 

I heard back from Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff – I wrote “entheogenic esotericism” 8 years before his keynote of that title,

and I fixed his broken cosmos model / astral ascent mysticism —

his Hermetical altered states book is unable to place the stars b/c he is too against no-free-will / eternalism/ Fate. 

He can’t handle the shocking proposition of rebirth that is mainly into Fate/ heimarmene/ no-free-will/ eternalism (w/ only a bit, above that into transcendent virtual possibilism / virtual freewill power).

Listening to Demiurge / Archons vids on ESOTERICA Dr. Justin Sledge YouTube channel.  = eternalism and rising higher than the heimarmene-soaked stars that Wouter Hanegraaff can’t deal with.

Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita (Hoffman, 2006), http://egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death (Hoffman, 2007 main article) http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/

– Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com – the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism, & transcending a litle, into qualified possibilism (virtual freewill)

email to Timothy Freke: AM Houot’s book Rise of the Psychonaut advocates “Science”, doesn’t grasp Transcendent Knowledge – 8:12 am Mar 30 2025

Hi Timothy,

In his new book Rise of the Psychonaut, Houot (“Ooh-Oh”) perpetuates the rigid standoff between “Science” (good) vs. “Religion” or “Spirituality” (bad).

He’s really pushy about that, though at spots in his book, he makes slight reconciliatory noise.  

Hubristic, and he cautions against being closed minded but he is closed minded, identified as “naturalism” and materialism science

– count me out, that’s not the correct way to do STEM applied to Transcendent Knowledge & Psilocybin exploration.

The Mysticism Wars in Psychedelic Science: Stupid old standoff between bunk “science” vs. bunk “religion”:

Moving Past Mysticism: Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism Provides Scientific Basis, Superseding “Mysticism, Meditation, & Psychotherapy” Framework

Peak-state freakout questions – bottom has links to Houot’s 4 publications so far:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/29/my-questions-for-houot-at-psychedelic-church-book-club/

Detailed TOC of Rise of the Psychonaut (book pub’d Feb 2, 2025): all headings:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/#All-Headings

In a bad way, Houot is inspiring me to bridge Science-done-right w/ Religion-done-right. 

. . . . perceives him as autistic, no feelings, & churlish – socially not harmonious.

He will attend my psychedelic church book club meeting, connected w/ Erik Davis.

Led Zep IV book by Erik Davis 2005 covers my basic model that terminates in no-free-will / eternalism – he missed that I was then starting to work on adding Late Antiquity’s aspiration to “transcend heimarmene”.

Davis p. 118: astral ascent mysticism, but little sense of above the the sphere of the fixed stars per David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism, is higher level: precession of equinoxes, sphere 9, above fixed stars, = transcend no-free-will/ heimarmene (but only the spirit pokes through, that high up – subject to Fate still).

Davis p. 122 – the Egodeath theory – no indication that I was starting to add theme, “transcend heimarmene/ transcend no-free-will sort of”

Classical Antiquity Psilocybin transformation terminated in heimarmene and worshipped Necessity / block-universe determinism / block-universe eternalism.

Late Antiquity: Psilocybin transformation: culture then flipped against heimarmene and claimed to transcend Fate.  All brands claimed to transcend Fate.  Aim above heimarmene.  Still, rebirth really is into eternalism, 8/9 – then a little above that, in the Ennead, sphere 9. 

I explained for Wouter Hanegraaff b/c he cannot figure out where to put stars!  

Bridge STEM and satori revelation (Ramesh Balsekar: no-free-will = enlightenment):

As I’ve been doing forever: 1988, 1997 core theory outline; 2000 added myth, ~2003 added per Late Antiquity “transcend no-free-will”: 

Jan 1988 breakthrough, “here is what Satori revelation is ACTUALLY about, from STEM explanation successful.  

2000, started adding Psilocybin religious myth; 

2013 started adding art motifs, 

2020 added {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs – success & received lots of corroboration every step of the way.

— Michael Hoffman, the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism

email 2 Freke: Houot book Rise of the Psychonaut advocates Science, doesn’t grasp Transcendent Knowledge – 8:28 am Mar. 30, 2025

At my psychedelic church’s book club, author of Rise of the Psychonaut will join the meeting.

Houot is bad: he reflects the stupid battle perpetual standoff between junk “Science” vs junk “Spirituality”; which is reflected throughout the broad field including within the Hopkins Psilocybin group, which was split apart and terminated due to that dysfunctional rift.

Big news, implosion of field of Psychedelic Science & the Psychedelic RenaissanceTM: 

Matthew “lose the buddha statue” Johnson FILED ETHICS VIOLATIONS COMPLAINTS against his Roland Griffiths team, which DISBANDED – trouble in Psychedelic Science Land.

Hopkins Griffiths can’t ever publish their 2016 much-ballyhooed Psilocybin research administered to religious professionals?!  Written up in New Yorker a year ago.

Johnson accuses the mystical Psychedelic Scientists of corrupting Science research by pushing newage cult.  He wants extremist Naturalism – I reject their imbalanced notion of  Naturalist Science. 

Houot, key Question: Do you believe that Transcendent Knowledge exists?  

He does not; he disparages ALL ESOTERIC & SPIRITUAL, it is all immature trash to REJECT blanket; scorched earth.  

 The Moving Past Mysticism dust-up debate, fight; the Mysticism Wars in Psychedelic Science.

“Ending the Mysticism Wars” (by trashcanning & disrespecting all mysticism, declaring victory for the materialist psychedelics  scientists side) is the article title by mediocre psychedelics philosopher Chis Letheby, who sides with Matthew Johnson & the cartoon Materialist hardcore Naturalist Scientists CONDEMNING/ rejecting ALL THINGS MYSTICAL, in all ways — same as the author Houot who will join the book club meeting.

Solution at 3 levels:

tiny level: Teach author Houot to respect mysticism and reconcile science & religion.  

Reject the industry’s adversarial attitude of “us superior rational scientists vs you muddled immature mystics”.

local level: at my psychedelic church: per pastor: “Least Dogma” commitment: be inclusive and bridge the two warring half baked positions.

Big Picture entire field: reconcile culture standoff pitting junk Science vs junk Religion.   

— Michael

Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 9:25 am, Mar. 29, 2025

Hi Timothy, 

Before I’m contaminated by hearing your view on your topic you are interested in:

Perceptual Dualism: Matter Exists, and Mental Constructs Are Primary
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/17/perceptual-dualism-matter-exists-and-mental-constructs-are-primary/

The author took down his great article about the Egodeath theory & altered state perception:

Article: Cognitive Phenomenology of Mind Manifestation

I recently got the conference book that has the article, and I probably have copies on my drive.  I read-aloud on Egodeath Mystery Show podcast; read it a few times.  

Engineering key words: 

* Useful 

* Relevant

Unlike Phil dept.  Though Kant seems good.  I dislike continental Phen’y like Houot advocates, in dissertation & Rise of the Psychonaut. 

for blotter or Psilo loose cognitive state, of loose cognitive association binding.

— Michael Hoffman 

Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 9:38 am, Mar. 29, 2025

Hi Timothy, 

Article attached:

Cognitive Phenomenology of Mind Manifestation

2014

Excellent, ideal article, for basics of the Egodeath theory circa 1987.

Glad I found the article document.   Attached.  The article is published in this book – maybe there’s a YouTube video of the talk:

Breaking Convention: Essays on Psychedelic Consciousness

2014
Cameron Adams (Editor), David Luke (Editor), Anna Waldstein (Editor), Ben Sessa (Editor), David King (Editor)

Also my copy with more white space — though lately, I would do one sentence per paragraph – tons of white space, to read-aloud on Egodeath Mystery Show.

— Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com

Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 10:32 am, Mar. 29, 2025

Correction:
My followers/colleagues’ names of 25 years, maybe I will memorize them:

  • this article author. Bio at end of article.
  • https://cyberdisciple.wordpress.com
    Classics scholar & expert in the Egodeath theory.
    He is cited in article by Dr. Jerry Brown at Graham Hancock site rebutting Thomas Hatsis who is a denier of mushroom imagery in Christian art.

You have written about no-free-will, entheogens, ahistoricity, therefore can easily study the Egodeath theory.

— Michael Hoffman

Two Distinct Audiences for Ahistoricity: Mythicists vs. Esotericists

In an interview with Tim Freke, Derick Lambert at MythVision YouTube channel differentiates his TWO OPPOSITE AUDIENCES re: ahistoricity:

  • Mythicists – stunted. Jesus didn’t exist, yes he did, no he didn’t. DEAD END. Negative mythicism [my term].
  • Esotericists – what’s important is positive comprehension of religious myth in the Psilocybin state. Positive mythicism [my term].

Timothy Freke = Transcendent Freewill

Timothy Freke
tf

transcendent freewill
tfw

Su: Why I am a perceptual dualist: experiential realm relating to external world – email to Timothy Freke, 8:04 am, Mar. 30, 2025

Hi Timothy,

Please send me your thick chapter about entheogens that the publisher mostly deleted from the Jesus Mysteries book.

The Jesus Mysteries (Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy, 2000) https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/060960581X/
tf01

https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/060960581X/

UK, April 2000: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/0722536771/

I uploaded a study copy of that article about a useful altered-state perceptual model:

Cognitive Phenomenology of Mind Manifestation
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/29/cognitive-phenomenology-of-mind-manifestation/

Author is expert at the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism.  

My copy at my page separates each sentence, tons of whitespace.

Author removed article from Academia.edu.  

I’m sure he’s glad to have his great article online in some way.  

Article is Relevant to your video titles – we reject two polarized positions that the Phil Dept tries to restrict to:

Only cog phenom experiencing exists.

vs 

Only external material world exists.

Neither concern is very useful for Psilocybin transformation. 

Most useful is assume both exist– model that.  

todo: link to book that published the article, Breaking Convention psychedlics conference; copy book link into that page:

41k4Jp11JRL._BO30,255,255,255_UF900,850_SR1910,1000,0,C_ZA5,500,900,420,420,AmazonEmber,50,4,0,0_PIRIOFIVE-medium,BottomLeft,30,-20_QL100_.jpg
Breaking Convention: Essays on Psychedelic Consciousnessamazon.com

chapter: Cognitive Phenomenology of Mind Manifestation

— Michael

Max Freakout Productions

canterbury-f109-pulled-into-flames.jpg
Max Freakout: Writings and Podcastsegodeaththeory.org

Lion Snake in Mithraism & in Gnosticism

5:07 am Mar. 29, 2025 archons Esoterica episode: serpent lion yaldabaoth = Leonocephalic –

who has a snake body & lion head?

sledge doesn’t mention Mithraism and should.

  • Leonocephalic snakewrapped
  • Yaldabaoth lion head snake body

previous

Development of a Given Religion (Gnosticism, Eleusis) in 150 AD

I previously posted, in emailing T Fontaine, that Eleusinian mysteries lasted so long, they spanned the Great Pivot Point from aiming for ehim, heimarmene, to aiming a little above Heimarmene. Diddnt it mst have changed w the times per Marketing dept?

Diddn’t Sledge say in previous videio, Demiurge was neutral until 150 AD then Seth made Bad Archon, prison wardens, evil Demiurge – near end of Gnosticism 3 videio by ESOTERICA utoob ch. says that very popular in early Christianity was exterme anti-cosmicism ie extreme extreme EXTREME ANTI-ETERNALISM concept driving religion. Anti-Cosmic era of Gnosticvism = 150 AD = the start … the flip against grandpa’s heimarmene-worshhip = anti-eternalism, then the heresy hunters pushed against the extremely popular early form of Christianity that was themed extreme anti-eternalism ie anti cosmicism that held that the Creator of the Fate-ruled cosmoos was evil, world = prison, gnosis [3:00 in “What is the Demiurge – Ptt 3 – Simon Magus & the Gnostic Revolution] which i have to mention April D DeConick book The Gnostic New Age.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfG0w4k6EA8&t=200s – “prison, escape above outisde to our true home the spirit realm of hypercosmic light”- i mix in David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism. WAITING AND WAITING FOR SLEDGE TO MENTION Mithraism. HE NEVER mentions when I expect him to.

todo: Does Sledge video about Mithraism? yes
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=esoterica+mithraism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHq9SxgCvF0
aka
https://youtu.be/kHq9SxgCvF0

https://youtu.be/kHq9SxgCvF0

The Mithras Liturgy – Mystical Ascent in the Mystery Cult of Mithras
ESOTERICA
834K subscribers
Apr 9, 2021
“The Mithras Cult was among the most popular new religious movements of the Roman Empire though very little is known of its rituals or mythology. [“new” – compare end of Demiurge 3 ep he says i think, Prison Warden Demiurge version of Gnosticism started 150 AD]

“This episode explores the one of the only surviving texts – a liturgy for mystical ascent promising a mystical vision of the Mithras as a solar [no, hypercosmic sun] deity and nothing short of immortality.”

/ end of blurb – at 4:33 shows statue tauroctony where
left guy weight L non-bent leg, torch aim up
right guy weight R non-bent leg, torch aim down
proving the Egodeath theory is false, disconfirmed the science hypothesis so instantly abandon the hypothesis because BEEN DEBUNKED, that is how Science works, per the just-so story – that HISTORIANS (not pie-sky theorists) of science say is false.

According to grade-school tale of “how Science works”, when a theory is disconfirmed, you abandon it.

Acording to historians of science, when a theory is disconfirmed, you lie and make excuses and double down and force it on others until other people die and you are last one standing. in this case, THE ANCIENT STATUE IS WRONG, PROBELY HAS MITHRRAS LOOKING DOWN – FAIL. or, Entheos cover is reversed in fact, blurb of video recomm Clauss book, that has the cover reversed insanely – COSMIC FAIL. wrong POV on Taurus from below, supposed to be from above. Killing cosmic fate [5:40 am Mar 29 2025] – Mithras is killing heimarmene cosmic zodiac, he is born out head above the sphere of the fixed stars. When killing eternalism

Mithras Is Killing / Sacrificing Eternalism

Classical Antiquity , aim for eternalism: 2-level , 2-phase intiation: transformation from possibilism to eternalism. Sacrifice possibilism-thinking, gain eternalism, end of trajectory.

l-a d Late Antiquity , aim above eternalism ; 3-phase initaiton: sacrifice eternalism-thinking (after leave naive possibilism-thinking), gain qualified possibilism-thinking.
Marketing’s emphasis to mislead Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff is sell “transformation from eternalism* to **possibilism”
[*after the MAIN transformation: transformation from possibilism to eternalism]
**qualified. gain virtual-only possibilism. fine print. for entertainment purpose only. Not legal tender. Does not actually give possibilism. Only the ethereal spirit reaches outside/above heimarmene.

Fine Print in Late Antiquity Religion Marketing Materials

x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1wG4AHeEVM

Esoterica Live – Mithras Liturgy, Sheol and Other Topics – Q&A !
April 16, 2021 , incl:
0:23 – Mithras Liturgy
53:49 – The Hermetic Hangover
1:03:46 – Have You Ever Done Psychedelics
1:14:58 – Metal Music Is Esoteric or Occult

“we are like marionettes controlled by archons” 15:30 in Archons vid.

archons connot not “great emperor” but “petty governor”.

x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNABXyb9XUc

“21:00: “even talking about “communities” is highly conjectural” – I heard Wouter Hanegraaff say this, but now, mar 29 2025, occurs to me this sounds like my crit’m of 1st-generation entheogen scholarship (the Secret Amanita paradigm) – to erect their narrative they have to construct and fabricate “members-only, closed, secret communities” –

NEVER will Ruck EVER write about an individual who is among the mass population using Amanita; is it ALWAYS framed by Pope Ruck as “members-only, closed-walls, communities of heretical sects”. His secrecy-first premise — the secrecy tail wagging the Amanita-use dog — demands Ruck always must add and fagbricate his construction, his invention with no evidence, “underground heeretical sects”, which Andy Letcher shreds and disproves in 2006 book Shroom p 35-36 – by drawing upon 2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm) from Stamets & Gartz.

  • Sledge & Wouter Hanegraaff say: Heremetism might have been only individuals tripping and reading.
  • I say against Ruck & even Samorini: stop saying “sects, cults, certain communities”, say individuals in Christendom, used Amanita.

Video: The Demiurge, Marcion and the Corpus Hermeticum – Conversation w ‪@m.davidlitwa‬

The Evil Creator: Origins of an Early Christian Idea (M. David Litwa, 2021)

[hypoth: 150 AD, everyone flipped to be anti-cosmos/ anti-eternalism story/narrative – and we see this loud & clear in orig Christianity]

The Evil Creator: Origins of an Early Christian Idea
M. David Litwa, 2021
https://www.amazon.com/Evil-Creator-Origins-Early-Christian/dp/0197566421/

Blurb:

“This book examines the origins of the evil creator idea chiefly in light of early Christian biblical interpretations.

“It is divided into two parts.

“In Part I, the focus is on the interpretations of Exodus and John.

“Firstly, ancient Egyptian assimilation of the Jewish god to the evil deity Seth-Typhon [lion serpent?] is studied to understand its reapplication by Phibionite and Sethian Christians to the Judeo-catholic creator.

“Secondly, the Christian reception of John 8:44 (understood to refer to the devil’s father) is shown to implicate the Judeo-catholic creator in murdering Christ.

“Part II focuses on Marcionite Christian biblical interpretations.”

[Litwa thinks Classical Antiquity Hermetica … planets give good gifts. Corruption added in Late Antiquity: negative Fate planets inserted]

Value-Flip from Positive Planets in Classical Antiquity, to Negative Fate Planets in Late Antiquity

book blurb con’t:

“It begins with Marcionite interpretations of the creator’s character in the Christian “Old Testament,” analyzes 2 Corinthians 4:4 (in which “the god of this world” blinds people from Christ’s glory),

“examines Christ’s so-called destruction of the Law (Eph 2:15) and the Lawgiver, and shows how

“Christ finally succumbs to the “curse of the Law” [eternalism?] inflicted by the creator (Gal 3:13).

A concluding chapter shows how still today readers of the Christian Bible have concluded that the creator manifests an evil character.”

/ end of book blurb Litwa

Editorial Reviews

Review

“Nevertheless, the book offers an extremely helpful and compelling exploration of the various voices in the early Christian centuries who held this view, making clear that it was sufficiently widespread that it cannot be explained as a late anomaly.”

— James F. McGrath, Butler University, The Society of Biblical Literature

“It is a highly recomendable book which will introduce its readers in a world of practice and reflection on how people developed novel Jewish forms of life in the aftermath of the crisis of the first and second major Jewish revolts against the Romans, and the re-writings of these debates in later times.”

— Markus Vinzent, San Miguel de Abona

“The Evil Creator is a thoughtful and historically-responsible reading of the Bible.

“Examining the Creator Deity of the Bible through the lens of various early Christian interpreters who themselves long ago identified many of the same concerns that modern interpreters struggle with today makes this book not only a valuable contribution to the field of Biblical Studies but also important for modern readers who ponder the God of the Bible.”

— Kevin Sullivan, Illinois Wesleyan University

“David Litwa is to be congratulated for this book, which is both well-researched and thought-provoking.

“He compellingly delineates here how the idea of an inferior creator-God arose directly from what was said in some of the earliest and, for many, sacred Christian texts, including Paul’s letters and the Gospel of John.”

— Ismo Dunderberg, author of Beyond Gnosticism: Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus

“The Devil Created the Eternalism Cosmos Prison; Christ Lifts Us to Escape the Prison of Eternalism, into Transcendent Possibilism” – Early Christianity

[6:33 am Mar 29, 2025]

The God of the Egodeath theory = The God of Eternalism = Yaldabaoth Lion-Headed Snake, Hypercosmic Fire Breathing (Mithras Leonocephalic snake-wrapped)

the Egodeath theory 1997: Eternalism is the Only, Highest God / Coraxo 2000: There Is a Higher, Above Eternalism

Virtual Possibilism; Precession [got David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism book in e2001]

‘Yaldabaoth’ Means Control Instability Chaos: Non-Viable Control from Bad Model of Transcendent Personal Control System Transcendence During Psilocybin Transformation

ESOTERICA Justin Sledge “What is the Demiurge – Pt 3” at 33:33,

“the name Yaldabaoth means child of chaos, which doesn’t mean anything.” I am the only god. (?) not. tries to imprison per later accretions added.

lion headed serpent in early Christianity which = Sethian Gnosticism – compare Mithras lion, snake wrapped. head in the hypercosmic sun light. breathing fire.

cosmos-crafting demon, the eternalism block-universe eternalism cosmos/ heimarmene / Fate.

Tree of Too Much Knowledge, Get Kicked Out Until Washed Robe and Can Pass Gate Eat Tree of life

This a.m. had mar 29 2025 a.m. had insights on inversion tale of tree of knowledge in eden:

often feel guilt for taking too much sacrament, guilt and pleading, get kicked out from the state.

you think we have right to Psilocybin?

ok, ingest mass qty and see how wonderful your tree of knowledge is.

fear of Psilocybin OD = God prohibits sinners from eating from tree of life & having non-dying a-thanatos that mature ppl have

(Houot says so many half truths that need restatement, eg “immature”)

The Teacher of Rigtheousness kicks out of the garden gate fire blade angel guarded.

Don’t blame Bible God; blame The Teacher, the Golden Teacher kicked you out, unwashed immature control agent.

The Creator of Eternalism Is Sus

per Sledge end of Demiurge part 3 vid.

Sledgeathon Listening Banquet Party – Videos to Listen

Special focus: 150 AD, all brands of religion, including Mithraism & Christianity – not alien Gnosticism, but rather, anti-demiurge/ anti-cosmos / anit- anti-eternalism/ eternalism-transcending Gnosticism IS early Christianity.

Email 3 to Timothy Freke 8:35 am Mar. 29, 2025 – Su: 2nd-phase Egodeath theory beyond 4D spacetime block-universe eternalism & beginner Unity glimpse

Look forward to YouTube, your views on beyond nonduality.

I reject BOTH of Chris Letheby’s Phil-Dept options: he says when he is in altered state, he says only mind exists.

Sober, he says only matter exists.

Reject both, irrelevant.

Defining mysticism as “Unity” is for beginner glimpse only. 

Control transformation is more where it’s at, and “relational” mysticism; personal control system: from monolithic, autonomous control, to 2-level, dependent control.

Engineering is to provide a useful, relevant model of Transcendent Knowledge – ie, personal control system: control transformation. 

That is relevant, not “unity/ nondual realization” – that’s not real mysticism/ enlightenment, which is more relevant and practical. 

Control stability in Psilocybin state via mental model transformation.

from:

literalist ordinary-state possibilism with monolithic, autonomous control 

to:

analogical psychedelic eternalism with 2-level, dependent control 

row 1: held up by God, stand on right foot — not rams who stand on left foot in fire of the Psilocybin loose cognition state:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/03/12/4-horses-mushroom-tree-right-foot-balancing-great-canterbury-psalter-f177/

— Michael Hoffman 

Email to Timothy Freke 9:10 am Mar. 30, 2025 – Su: 2nd-phase Egodeath theory beyond 4D spacetime block-universe eternalism & beginner Unity glimpse

Hi Timothy, 

We both are refining and balancing and adjusting our mature expressions of Transcendent Knowledge. 

Compatible with religious myth & the ancient conclusions/ model: be sure to consider this time tested Psilocybin Wisdom, given that you are balancing your view.  This is the sure view to commit & articulate to ACTUALLY benefit everyone.  

Without this view, spiritual theorists are not actually benefitting ppl; such a malformed model fails the Reference Test given by Psilocybin, The Teacher of Righteousness.  

Wisdom = Respect illusory egoic freewill thinking. 

For stable control in Psilocybin state, the mental model of the personal control system is reshaped per 4D spacetime eternalism (your future course of thoughts is already set in stone): if do not affirm that, do not have stable control.  Fall down.  

But also affirm spirit rises above heimarmene-soaked fixed stars. 

 Even though Fatedness is the case and YOUR FUTURE COURSE IS ALREADY EXISTING IN FUTURE GIVEN TO YOU unalterable, set in stone;

king frozen powerless statue (king sees snake, is turned to rock statue); {snake frozen in rock}.

Surrendered to Heimarmene cosmic rock prisonkeepers archons at body & psyche level, 

ONLY THE SPIRIT rises above Fatedness, your future thoughts are frozen embedded in rock.  

You helplessly receive your control-thoughts, which are non-branching and already exist frozen in rock.  Experienced in altered state.

Use egoic freewill power of steering in APPARENT branching possibilities but repudiate that, too! in a way. 

 Completion of Initiation; perfection; purified & reconciled.  

Stable control in Psilocybin state.  The TEST OF TRUTH.

If you don’t repudiate freewill power claim steering in branching tree, unstable self-control.

Yet ALSO affirm the egoic personal control system; you must affirm compatible child + adult mental model. 

Use freewill child thinking AND repudiate relying on it: it is virtual only.  

CONSTRUCTIVE INTEGRATION OF REVELATION OF 4D block-universe eternalism w no-free-will but w 2-level, dependent control (relational mysticism ) rather than taking monolithic, autonomous control too literally like childish thinking:  

per the medieval art genre, Psilocybin heyday of mushroom-trees: 

Medieval had a fully developed use of Psilocybin, depicted via {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs ; mushroom-trees genre.  

keep your left foot, but rely on / stand on right foot ; use BOTH adult no-free-will AND child-like freewill thinking.

stand on both feet: virtual  freewill  AND actual no-free-will; virtual possibilism thinking AND mature, eternalism-thinking 

To be a-thanatos, immortal, no longer dying ego death / control instability, 

the resulting BALANCED combination of mental models is 

qualified possibilism-thinking👍🏆

Now you are washed clean, able to pass through guarded gate to eat from tree of life while stable viable personal control system.  Important end of Bible study Rev 22.  

Final 2 pages of bible – study; especially fav Rev 22:14 — 

Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city. 

logo_bg-sharing.png
Bible Gateway passage: Revelation 22 – New International Versionbiblegateway.com

Text Message Summarizing How Branching vs. Non-Branching Depicts Possibilism vs. Eternalism Models of Control-in-World

April 12, 2025: Copied this section to new page draft, “How Branching and Non-Branching Represent Two Mental Models of Control-in-World”.
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/04/12/how-branching-and-non-branching-represent-two-mental-models-of-control-in-world/

March 29, 2025, sent to Rick L, cleaned up here – todo: where else do I recently summarize this?

In advanced psil state, branching possibilities is revealed as illusion when see inner workings of the egoic personal control system who exerts power of steering in a branching tree to create the future

non-branching means non branching: snake shaped pathvof ur future life ; = enlightenment that one’s snake-shaped path in 4D spacetime, tgat path is seen frozen in rock, imprisoned in fate rock,  slave 

now you are a competed purified initiate enlightened.  honoring the gods.  no lomger turmoil & trespassing, bringing impurity that raises fury stormy anger of the insulted DISRESPECTED gods.  

the path for you is decided from outside your control, done deal, future path non-branching possibilities, only the path forward is real, stone-

NEXT, reincorporate the egoic personal control system, w adjustments cleansing child-thinking. 

Ken Wilber “embrace and include ” childish thinking of branching steering, and use the egoic personal control system which u now perceive & use all the time, corrected, purified, made mature 

“Reach Fate” Achievement Earned! 🏆

Treat this Isaac, your child thinking, like u r riding a donkey – ur BELOVED only son.  dont get rid of ego; use it, dis-indentify w it, egoic thinking was only an immature-phase, temporary level of identifying, it it always will be used; reconciling and” ride” egoic thinking.

Be inclusive: SUPPORT and love your egoic, childish, branching-possibilities, freewill thinking.

todo: image: Entry Jeru

todo: image: Isaac – Jesus head :: donkey head = Abr head :: Isaac head.

REGAIN FREEWILL, ABOVE FATE

no-free-will & 4D spacetime eternalism/ heimarmene is the case (else control instability during Psilocybin) – but also,

finally, above the heimarmene fixed stars per Mithraism & Late Antiquity, you kinda get freewill, monolithic, autonomous control again — but, merely VIRTUAL,

qualified possibilism-thinking , “set free from Fate heimarmene cosmic prison ransomed rescued lifted up – rise above fate(!)” 

“Transcend Fate” Achievement Earned! 🏆

With ALL of the elect, above the fate-soaked sphere of the fixed stars, be lifted up to poke head (spirit) in sphere 9 Mithraism : precession of equinox above the reach of the prison warden ARCHONS (petty governors).

as {adult}, {immortal}, Psilocybin transformation motif, in mushroom imagery in Christian art.

— Michael

/ end of text message summarizing branching motif

Tim Freke & Gandy Book & Videos

https://www.youtube.com/@TimFreke1/videos

The Egodeath theory is about control transformation, not Unity or nonduality: control transformation in light of block-universe eternalism, producing 2-level, dependent control; relational, transpersonal mysticism.

https://timfreke.com

50% chance I have this and have read it, or do not and have not <shrug>
https://www.amazon.com/Hermetica-Lost-Wisdom-Pharaohs-Unabridged/dp/1648371779/ — well wait THIS IS NEW BOOK?? 2022 THEN I SHOULD GET IT
The Hermetica: The Lost Wisdom of the Pharaohs (Unabridged) Hardcover – July 12, 2022 – THE PAPERBACK says 2008. hc says unabr. 2022.

paperback 2008 blurb:

“The Hermetica: The Lost Wisdom of the Pharaohs Paperback – December 26, 2008
by Timothy Freke (Author), Peter Gandy (Author)
4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars (2,641) 4.2 on Goodreads 1,851 ratings
See all formats and editions
The first easily accessible translation of the esoteric writings that inspired some of the world’s greatest artists, scientists, and philosophers.

Here is an essential digest of the Greco-Egyptian writings attributed to the legendary sage-god Hermes Trismegistus (Greek for thrice-greatest Hermes), a combination of the Egyptian Thoth and the Greek Hermes.

The figure of Hermes was venerated as a great and mythical teacher in the ancient world and was rediscovered by the finest minds of the Renaissance. The writings attributed to his hand are a time capsule of Egyptian and Greek esoteric philosophy and have influenced figures including Blake, Newton, Milton, Shelley, Shakespeare, Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, and Jung.

Providing a fascinating introduction to the intersection of the Egyptian and Hellenic cultures and the magico-religious ideas of the antique world, The Hermetica is a marvelous volume for anyone interested in understanding the West’s roots in mystical thought.”

— 2008 paperback 145 pages

hardcover 182 pages:

2022 hardcover blurb:
The Hermetica: The Lost Wisdom of the Pharaohs
(Unabridged) Hardcover –
July 12, 2022 [same as Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity (Wouter Hanegraaff, 2022)]
Timothy Freke (Author), Peter Gandy (Author)
4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars (2,641) 4.2 on Goodreads 1,851 ratings

Note that Freke wrote book passages asserting:

  • no-free-will
  • entheogens / psychedelics
  • ahistoricity
  • I met w/ F&G privately underground during The Jesus Mysteries book tour. We discussed, eg, censorship of entheogens writings.

2022 hardcover blurb of Hermetica by F&G:

“Explore the Essential Teachings of the Ancients

“Serving as a theological basis for major world religions such as Christianity and Islam, the Hermetica has had an influence on Western culture that cannot be overstated.

Max Freakout Triveryhigh [very, very, very high]

blurb con’t:

“The collection of Greek texts-attributed by some to the legendary Hellenistic god Hermes Trismegistus (literally, Hermes the thrice great) in second-century Alexandria-is said to represent the divine philosophical and mystical practices of the pharaohs of Ancient Egypt (around 3000 BCE).

In this creative, approachable introduction to the central ideas and essential teachings of the Hermetica, authors Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy offer a profoundly inspiring gateway to understanding and appreciating the profound wisdom of the ancients.

“Following an enlightening historical overview of the material contained in the massive Corpus Hermeticum, Freke and Gandy present a diverse sampling of Hermetic thought with extracts of Hermes’s beautiful, poetic writings on topics including

  • creation,
  • the cosmos,
  • human culture,
  • prophecies,
  • the Zodiac,
  • incarnation of the soul,
  • death, and
  • immortality
  • , and others.

Along with each free-verse extract, the authors provide helpful commentary that explains the original text and places it in context for modern readers.

An invaluable resource for initiates in Hermetic studies or anyone seeking a deeper understanding of human spirituality, mysticism, and consciousness [Houot rejects spirituality, rejects mysticism, DOES Houot REJECT PSYCHEDELIC STUDY OF CONSCIOUSNESS?] [whatever those are supposed to me],

“this book belongs on the bookshelves of any who seek a greater awareness of humanity’s place in the cosmos.
[that sounds like Houot and sounds like what Houot demonizes] [Houot tries to perpetuate bifurcation war between the Psychedelic Mysticis vs. the Psychedelic Scientists, which is a retarded bifuration]

Houot tries to perpetuate the bifurcated war between the Psychedelic Mystics vs. the Psychedelic Scientists, which is a Retarded, Retarding Bifurcation – He Makes No Attempt to Bridge, But Only to Push Away [compare how I hate and push away Neuroscience, b/c that approach deletes/ eliminates a Cognitive approach]

“Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy are also the celebrated authors of The Jesus Mysteries, Jesus and the Lost Goddess, and The Laughing Jesus, as well as many other books on world spirituality.”

Michael A. Williams Review of Litwa’s Book

“Readers interested in why so many ancient Christians concluded that the creator was evil have here in one book an extremely well-researched assemblage and exposition of evidence suggesting answers.

“Litwa reviews the role of

  • indigenous Egyptian myth,
  • Graeco-Roman philosophical argument, and above all,
  • interpretations of Jewish and Christian scripture.

His sobering concluding chapter reviews how ancient evil-creator doctrines live on today.

An important contribution on a perennial theological challenge.” — Michael A. Williams, University of Washington, Seattle

“This book should be taken in the context of early theological divisions between ancient Jewish and early Christian sects and used to deepen our understanding of the extreme changes theological positions can take over time.” — Rob Perry, Religious Studies Review

“M. DAVID LITWA is a scholar of ancient Mediterranean religions with a focus on early Christianity.

“He has taught courses at the University of Virginia, the College of William & Mary, and Virginia Tech.

“He is the author of recent publications including

21 Books by David Litwa on Christian Origins & Religion in Late Antiquity, Hermetica

All books by Litwa:
https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B00J5VOVCS/allbooks

litwa blurb con’t:

Desiring Divinity,

How the Gospel Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myth

, and

Posthuman Transformation in Ancient Mediterranean Thought: Becoming Angels and Demons

“He is currently Research Fellow at the Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry at Australian Catholic University in Melbourne.”

/ end of Reviews portion of Litwa book blurb

New Edition of Corpus Hermeticum by Christian Bilber(?) – mention Christian Bull, Wouter Hanegraaff, bilberg will be shocking and dismaying, he is removing glosses.based on Philological grounds. Love of Languages. Litwa thinks Bilb is right, hermetica is corrupted. Corp Hermetica 3 is FULL OF GIBBERISH. Copenhaver tried to make French translation make the gibberish sound good. Bilver is removing the junk. to reveal the meaningful text, be prepaered by taking Litwa’s course.

ESOTERICA
834K subscribers
Share
34,310 views
Sep 27, 2024
A conversation with my friend and colleague Dr. M. David Litwa.

Evil Creator is at Audible, Book by David Litwa –

https://mdavidlitwa.com

z https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEiwmhQdPPA

{display hand} Motif = Knowledge of Non/Branching (Email to Cyberdisciple Mar. 28, 2025)

I am starting to think that the {display hand} motif = Transcendent Knowledge of non/branching, because fingers are PERFECT to contrast/ depict non/branching; possibilism vs. eternalism.

Secret gesture password = indicate to me that you understand “branching vs. non branching”.

Cyberdisciple decoded “worships his god” image recently
Justin Sledge, part 3, 38:54 —
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfG0w4k6EA8&t=2333s – 38:54 —

image1.png

Just to show what I mean, I enclose two specimens: a miniature of ca. 990 which shows the inception of the process, viz., the gradual hardening of the pine into a mushroom-like shape, and a glass painting of the thirteenth century, that is to say about a century later than your fresco, which shows an even more emphatic schematization of the mushroom-like crown.

Left-hand Y-form mushroom :: Right-hand I-form mushroom = 
L-hand splayed fingers held away from ground :: R-hand single finger held close to ground

But even that is not very probable because even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification; if the artists had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree he would have omitted the branches altogether.

And I really recommend to look up that little book by A. E. Brinckmann.

/ end email to Cyberdisciple Mar 28 2025

New Page format id’d: the “Article Reaction Page” format

  1. In the case of a book: voice dictate all headings of the book.
  2. Make a page, containing all headings – dedicated to the book or article, so that the Find operation is constrained – Exception: yesterday for David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism, I made 1 page contianing TWO articles, which are related like a pair and so I can Find across both of his articles.
  3. in the case of an article, my page can have full text.

“Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Giorgio Samorini, 1998) https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam-alberifungo-1998.pdf & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/mushroom-trees-in-christian-art-samorini/
That was the first time that I created such a page, containing someone’s article, the purpose was not to add my markup & commentary; the purpose was to make his unreadable article pdf readable.
Adding headings.
Addidng whitespace.
Breaking up paragraphs.
Inserting better, color pictures.
Needed b/c he sent me article long ago, but not digestable.

I made such a page – I did this first with Samorini “Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Samorini 1998) b/c it is a hugely crucial article – not to overlook his shorter Wasson the Plaincourault fresco article in 1997.

Though Samorini sent me the print articles 97 & 98, they are b/w not color, and the 1998 article is far, far too dense to comprehend; my page format style is tons & tons of white space, adding I added headings by using each picture caption in Samorini article as a heading.

I ALWAYS badly need a toc for every book, that listas EEVERY heading, not just damn chapter title, usseless!

I cannot digest a book w/o the full toc of all headings.

One time a couple years ago, I dictated by voice, all headings of a book, I think, a few years ago, which book??
See site map, books section. Possibly an article it was.

it works well for portion of article, but that means, this way would work ultra great for entire article. eg it is very hard to digest:

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Ronald Huggins, 2024) https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case
rh24

If only I had my own post/page w/ full text of article – don’t need all formatting / b/c have pdf to READ.

I need a spot to WRITE and way to add format highlight.

WORKS GREAT! The most efficient way, works better for article than for book, eg I can easily work w/ Brown 2 bb19 gbut hard to work w/ Brown 2016.

The equiv page format for a book is: voice dictate the outline of all headings of book, in a page, and comment on each section heading.

Recently Invented New Type of keyboard shortcut: Citation w/ Link

Brown 2016: keyboard shortcut

The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity (Jerry Brown & Julie Brown, 2016) https://www.amazon.com/dp/1620555026
bb16

purchased July 22, 2016
published September 24, 2016
shipped on September 26, 2016

Brown 2019: keyboard shortcut

Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels (Jerry Brown & Julie Brown, 2019) https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.019
bb19

Samorini 1997: keyboard shortcut

The mushroom-tree of Plaincourault (Giorgio Samorini, 1997) https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam%20plaincourault.pdf
gs97

todo: copy to new page. then add page url to the keyboard shortcut. has a couple good passages, about the badness of Wasson, new date 1184 not 1291, a call — VERY GOOD HISTORICAL POINT IN TIME SNAPSHOT OF THE BIRTH OF 2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm).

Conventional citation, i don’t like for Web:

Giorgio Samorini (1997). The Mushroom-Tree of Plaincourault. Eleusis 8: 29-37. https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam%20plaincourault.pdf

  • page #s are noise – just jump to pdf on the web, pg # irrel.
  • journal name same; irrel noise.

The “Mushroom-Tree” of Plaincourault (Giorgio Samorini, 1997)

Samorini 1998: keyboard shortcut

“Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Giorgio Samorini, 1998) https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam-alberifungo-1998.pdf & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/mushroom-trees-in-christian-art-samorini/
gs98

Giorgio Samorini (1998). “Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art. Eleusis new series, 1:87-108. https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam-alberifungo-1998.pdf

Huggins: Foraging Wrong – keyboard shortcuts

Ronald Huggins
rh

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Ronald Huggins, 2024) https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case & https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/11/23/huggins-foraging-psychedelic-mushrooms-wrong-forest/
rh24
sweet b/c ultra easy to remember & type, & greedy result.

I hate talking on and on about a publication w/o giving damn link!

I need both the orig link & my own page link too, if i have a page link or anchor section of a page here at WordPress.

Easiest is: short keyboard shortcut, long expansion.

make the shortest keyboard shortcut do super long expansion.

default to greedy. least memz’n & guessing.

i can tweak the below keyboard shortcuts later.

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Ronald Huggins, 2024) https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case
rh24l

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Ronald Huggins, 2024) https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case
rh24m

Foraging in Wrong Forest
fwf

Ronald Huggins’ 2024 article “Foraging Wrong”
rhfw

imagine my book page for: Rise of the Psychonaut Houot
containing all the headings of the book. Awesomely useful.

Hanegraaff – Hermetic Spirituality bk 2022 – keyboard shortcut

Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity (Wouter Hanegraaff, 2022) https://egodeaththeory.org/2022/07/14/hermetic-spirituality-and-the-historical-imagination-altered-states-of-knowledge-in-late-antiquity-hanegraaff/ & https://www.amazon.com/Hermetic-Spirituality-Historical-Imagination-Knowledge/dp/1009123068/
wh22

Purchased: July 14, 2022
Published: June 30, 2022
Paid: $148.84
I was snoozing, ordered too late: 2 weeks. The Hane man snuck up on me. Price fear? All that $ and I received a bunk Ogdoad – THE THE SPHERE OF THE FIXED STARS BUT WITH THE STARS REMOVED – RIPOFF!

Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff book price: $148.84 🌌💥😱

Photo: Michael Hoffman

Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff

Ripoff: He sells you the sphere of the fixed stars (Ogdoad, sphere 8), but without any stars in it! He removed the fate-soaked stars and moved them to Limbo — not Saturn sphere 7, not in Ogdoad sphere 8 — just …. nowhere.

Over here, Hanegraaff’s cosmos model.
Over there, in null space, the fixed stars. not a SPHERE of fixed stars; rather, all of the stars, removed from the sphere which they defined, #8.

What a weird non-cosmos cosmos.

His book tells us about enlightenment of the Truth… but Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff delivers malformed Yaldabaoth instead.

Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity
by Wouter J. Hanegraaff

Blurb:

“In Egypt during the first centuries CE, men and women would meet discreetly in their homes, in temple sanctuaries, or in solitary places to learn a powerful practice of spiritual liberation.”

The Egodeath theory Marketing Department sells you “spiritual liberation” by making you a slave of Fate, frozen embedded {snake frozen in rock} — and then a half step higher raises merely only your tiny Spirit portion above Fate.

imagine my book page for: book Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity, by Wouter Hanegraaff, 2022 —
containing all the headings of the book. Awesomely useful.

SPIRITUAL LIBERATIONTM
*PRODUCT CONTENTS MIGHT NOT MATCH PICTURE ON BOX

Michael Hoffman, ~1991, ink brush in blank art book

“They thought of themselves as followers of Hermes Trismegistus, the legendary master of ancient wisdom.

“While many of their writings are lost, those that survived have been interpreted primarily as philosophical treatises about theological topics.

“Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff challenges this dominant narrative by demonstrating that Hermetic literature was concerned with experiential practices intended for healing the soul from mental delusion.”

“The Way of Hermes involved radical alterations of consciousness [THROUGH NON-DRUG ENTHEOGENS] in which practitioners claimed to perceive the true nature of reality [slave of Fate frozen in Rock, helpless puppet] behind the hallucinatory veil of appearances [virtual illusion of freewill steering among branching possibilities].

[illusion of branching possibilism w/ monolithic, autonomous control; freewill steering power illusion]

Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff
wsdh

“[Darth] Hanegraaff [DESTROYER OF STARS; STAR DESTROYER] explores how practitioners went through a training regime that involved luminous visions, exorcism, spiritual rebirth [FROM SATURN SPHERE 7 INTO OGDOAD SPHERE 8 THAT HAS BEEN DE-FATED; DENUDED OF ITS FATE-SOAKED STARRY CONTENT – ROCK FRAGMENT EMOJIIS], cosmic consciousness, and union [beginner Psilocybin users’ first-time experience] with the divine beauty of universal goodness and truth to attain the salvational [lift me above Fate, after you reconfig me for no-free-will, then a bit more to rise a little half step higher, to virtual possibilism-thinking] knowledge known as gnôsis.”

Dumped/ Developed Ideas in Rise of the Psychonaut page, moved to below

March 25, 2025 – I did random idea development in Rise of the Psychonaut page, moved to below.

  1. First, I drafted the below 20 sections within my Rise of the Psychonaut page .
  2. I ended up using the following 20 sections as a practice warmup run: I made a new page, Brown db of mushroom imagery in Christian art — and in that page, did some fresh write-up like the below 20 sections.
  3. Then moved the 20 orig warmup draft sections from Rise of the Psychonaut page to below.
Crop by Michael Hoffman
YI tree form branching discovered today March 25, 2025

https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/

Generic Book Review by Cybermonk: “This book is not entirely bad; it has a couple good sentences”

Scholarship is a matter of highlighting the good sentences and phrases, and ignoring the fluff.

What are the good points that Ruck, Huggins, Houot deliver, that have the potential to be a good idea after they are fundamentally repaired and transformed?

Houot is smart to propose battle over Great Canterbury Psalter: “All mushroom-trees mean tree, not mushroom, because they have branches.” I accept your terms of battle, given that mushroom-trees have cut branches.

At the moment I have the text of two articles David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism.

My task and scholarship strategy is to highlight the valuable words and delete the worthless words.

With Houot, my task is to vooice transcribe all headings into an out

Headings Outline of Rise of the Psychonaut

Which sections are valuable?

Which sections are worthless?

Which 3 sentences of the book are valuable, as opposted to the worthless remainder? This is the positive attitude a scholar must have especially in the field of entheogen scholarship.

My aim is to exemplify and be a model of constructive scholarship: which two sentences of Rise of the Psychonaut are not worthless? 😊👍

God: “I will relent from burning the book, if you can find one good sentence in it.”

Cybermonk reviewing Rise of the Psychonaut: [7:16 pm March 25, 2025] just noticed for first time – posted to my gallery Dec. 2020, i got this image possibly 2003, or a long time ago. If 2003, now 2025 – 22 years, possibly, I had this image before now realizing: YI tree form.

i got better on drive.. oh, i think this is a special printout of mine from 2003? on plastic??

“lots-wife-turned-salt.jpg” 74 KB, Mar 23, 2023
JPG url: https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/wp-content/gallery/bible-window/4624377321.jpg
Page: https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows
Image contributed to Brown Virtual Gallery of mushroom imagery in Christian art by Michael Hoffman, found maybe 2003, uploaded to WordPress / web Dec. 2020

Image contributed to Brown Virtual Gallery of mushroom imagery in Christian art by Michael Hoffman, found maybe 2003, uploaded to WordPress / web Dec. 2020

Announcing: Brown Virtual Gallery of mushroom imagery in Christian art [check name of db in 2019 brown article – not “committee”, failed idea]

Browns’ Dual Dogmatic Pitfalls

ALL YOUR MICA ARE BELONG TO US.

Browns forfeited their Psychedelic Gospels theory v1, because they identified it with their wise [foolish] rejection of Walburga tapestry which they are strangely glad to display crowning their brilliant gallery of MICA both in 2016 & 2019 – QUADRUPLE PENALTY FOR BROWN & BROWN 2016 & 2019.

Browns’ Dual Dogmatic Pitfalls; Browns Fell Into their Own Dogmatic Pit in that speccically, their Exhibit A – Bet The Farm, is, “Walburga is vial therefore not mushroom plus serrated base therefore can’t be Amanita”, is what they mean by “the dogmatic pitfall of seeing mushrooms everywhere”; when I caught this ~Nov 2020, that constituted Browns fumbling the ball, and I picked up their failed psychedelic gospels theory v1 and now i running w it away, my Psychedelics Gospels theory v1;
ALL YOUR MICA ARE BELONG TO US. They forfeited the Psychedelic Gospels theory v1 because they identified it with their rejection of Walburga

My finding of Browns’ Walburga error led to Prof Jerry Brown asking if Cyberdisciple & I wrote an article about compelling evidence & criteria of proof for identifying mushroom imagery in Christian art, so i did, in Nov 2020, which led to my huge breakthrough via f134 Eadwine’s leg-hanging mushroom tree image in the Great Canterbury Psalter. eventuating eg in my 2025 perception in the seemingly well picked-over, even by Huggins’ Foraging Wrong article 2024, f11 Great Canterbury Psalter comic panel – 6 Days of Creation + Eden, picked over by everyone since 2000 Paul Lindgren, yet, MASSIVE discoveries remained FAILED to see by me Nov … I failed since when d.. 2001 “Conjuring Eden” ? does it show 6 days? does M&M ARthur 2000 show 6 Days?? If so, I was blind to Day 3 branching forms progreession, & Day 4 4 mushrooms pointing to {balance scale} , since 2000: TOOK ME 25 YEARS , took entheogen scholars 25 years to open their eyes to see. “well picked over image” yet WE ARE BLIND. FFS IT EVEN SHOWS AN {OPEN BOOK}!

  1. M&M 2000 cover shows Day 4: III, IYI, YI, IY/YI. what other Great Canterbury Psalter images shown in book? ___
  2. “Conjuring Eden”, Ruck et al, Entheos 1, 2001 cr01 a Core Concept-entry
    https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/12/24/entheos-issues-1-4-mark-hoffman/
  3. The Holy Mushroom 200 ji08 The Holy Mushroom thml
    https://www.amazon.com/Holy-Mushroom-Evidence-Mushrooms-Judeo-Christianity/dp/0982556209/ – i acutally bought color FINALLY the other day stupiddly, shouulda bought in 2008 – stupid. bad decision.

x https://www.amazon.com/dp/1439215170 – i bought color, $43, so late, March 11, 2023 – embarrassingly late. I own Irvin a book review. Strong 5 stars, must-have., must-read. excuse: I was burned out re: Wasson after writing the article Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita (Hoffman, 2006), http://egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm — i stupidly assessed “there’s little to be gained from rehashing”. but there are so many great points and interesting contradications in The Holy Mushroom (the Amanita Primacy Fallacy; Irvin’s inconsistent disrespect for Psilocybin, which eventually led to him DEMONIZING Psilocybin yet remaining silent re: his pet Amanita idolatry)

keyboard shortcut for The Holy Mushroom

d https://www.amazon.com/dp/1439215170

The Holy Mushroom: Evidence of Mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity Paperback – October 29, 2008

Jan Irvin, Jack Herer


(Color edition)

“Christianity and the Piltdown Hoax (one of the largest academic scandals in history) share many similarities:

“In both stories the information was constructed and then salted into the information stream, and, through the word of noted scholars, presented as fact, the truth.

“Scholars have egos and once committed to their ideas through scholarly publications, faculty meetings, and conferences, have difficulty seeing, hearing, or even appreciating an adverse view.

“To waver from a strongly held opinion could spell academic ruin and withdrawal of acclaim.

This leads to lively debate, counter stories, and even character assassination if one side or the other is being out trumped in the symbolic mêlée.

Jan Irvin (The Holy Mushroom) has captured what we might call an “anthropology of clarification” regarding whether or not mushrooms, and mind-altering substances in general, played any role in the development of not only Judaism and Christianity but the total culture in play at that time.

It is now recognized in many academic communities (anthropologists, sociologists, psychiatrists, psychologists) that sufficient evidence exists of the importance of these substances, both textual and visual, to say “yes” in very large letters.

It is no longer theory.

“The questions Irvin asks are these:

“If mind-altering substances did play this major role, then how would this affect our interpretations of the Bible and the Qur’an?

“Would this shed light on the origins of mystical experiences and the stories, for example Abraham hearing voices and Ezekiel’s convenient visions?

“What would this suggest about the shamanic behavior of Jesus? [BROWN ERROR: DISPROOF OF BROWN LUMPING TOGETHER FALSELY CLAIMING THAT IRVIN SAYS JESUS DIDN’T EXIST; afaik, Irvin always held position: agnostic about if Jesus existed]

What impact would this have on organized religion?”

These are bold questions.

This is a very useful volume for those interested in the Holy Mushroom and the politics of truth.

Detailed and wonderfully illustrated;

great bibliography.”

~ Professor John A. Rush, Sierra College”

Conclusions Section of Brown 2019: “Academically Irresponsible” Thug Bully Force Tactics to Deceive and to Try to Impede Scholarship – Take Note, Sleazy Huggins, DEFENDER of Panofsky-Wasson, the Bad Company You Hang With and Play Cover For: You Deniers Ain’t Lookin’ So Hot, Huggins

Conclusions Section of Brown 2019: “Academically Irresponsible” Wasson

Wasson’s Thug Bully Force Tactics to Deceive and to Try to Impede Scholarship

Wasson’s Thug Bully Force Tactics to Deceive and to Try to Impede Scholarship – Take Note, Sleazy Huggins, DEFENDER of Panofsky-Wasson, the Bad Company You Hang With and Play Cover For:

You Deniers Ain’t Lookin’ So Hot, Not Looking Very Credible, Huggins – and where did you find about the two Panofsky letters, Huggins?

and why didn’t you credit Brown 2019 for pub’g them?

and why didn’t you help ppl find the letter so that everyone -NOT JUST YOU w/ your twisted misuse of them?

Browns wrote:

“due to Wasson’s preeminent position
as a leading authority on the study of entheogens and
religion, this lack of disclosure was especially damaging to
the nascent field of ethnomycology
. In effect, Wasson’s lack
of transparency
combined with his relentless personal and
professional attacks
on Allegro
stymied widespread scholarly
inquiry
into the study of entheogens and Christianity for
nearly half a century.” OH BUT HUGGINS PLAYS DEFENSE FOR THIS SCOUNDREL!

MICA Deniers = DEFENSE OF IMPEDING SCHOLARSHIP; Huggins in Foraging in Wrong Forest gives EXCUSE, “Wasson didn’t prevent entheogen scholarship from asserting mushroom imagery in Christian art after Wasson.”

What a pathetic excuse, Huggins, defending the con artistry by Wasson. What kind of scumbags are MICA Deniers? They stoop to censorship, and then they excuse it:

“Wasson’s Attempt to Force MICA Denial, Which Irvin Complains About? This Is Fine” – Huggins’ Foraging Wrong Article

“Yes, we MICA Deniers use deception and censorship, as Irvin claims, but that’s ok, b/c entheogen scholars asserted mushroom imagery in Christian art, after Wasson’s moves.”

Brown is correct: Wasson was ACADEMICALLY IRRESPONSIBLE, and Huggins takes the side of Wasson, running cover for Wasson’s DUPLICITY?!

Shame on Huggins!

Wasson also insulted and attacked the leaading mycologist too, AND ALL MYCOLOGISTS, Dec. 1953, John Ramsbottom in person, via letter, which Ramsbottom retaliated rightly in defense of mycologists, by exposing Wasson’s committed skeptic stance of “Rightly or wrongly, we are going to reject the Plaincourault fresco as Amanita”

– credit: Irvin, circa Irvin contributing research to the article Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita (Hoffman, 2006), http://egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm

Browns article has scathing coverage; read it all.

CONCLUSIONS

TODO: ADD TO MY DEMOLISHING OF the FRAUD Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔 Wasson:

“Revisiting the epic Wasson– Allegro controversy [thank God they didn’t write “debate” here] in light of new evidence reveals that Wasson did behave in an academically irresponsible manner in not publishing the second letter from art historian Panofsky that favors [BROWN IS WRONG HERE — unless! we are talking about Wasson’s PRIVATE knowledge, his PRIVATE view, that (fkking OBVIOUSLY) mushroom-trees mean mushrooms, as leaked by Ruck writing “Wasson’s conclusion” in “Daturas for the Virgin”] Allegro’ s interpretation of the 13th century Plaincourault fresco as a psychoactive A. muscaria  mushroom.

“During his 1952 visit to the Chapel of Plaincourault in Central France, Wasson mysteriously did not investigate the nearby Abbey of Saint Savin or the Church of Saint Martin de Vicq, which would have provided significant evidence of entheogens in medieval Christianity, thereby contradicting his [bullsh!t lying public fraudulent, deceptive, duplicitous, con-artist, scheming demon, designed to mislead ppl away from Brinck bk etc] claim in Soma  that their remote role in Judeo-Christianity ended around 1000 BCE.

“Wasson’s function at J.P. Morgan as the “ Pope’ s banker”  furnishes a [100% extreme CONFLICT OF INTEREST GREATER THAN ANY OTHER IN THE WORLD EVER] powerful financial motive for his refusal to pursue [and his alas successful effort to impede scholarship!] the thesis regarding the entheogenic origins of religion into Christian art and artifacts, as well as for his rejection and ridicule [yes, Wasson acted the rude, THUGGISH, insulting, bully, pr*ck, high-pressure tactics] of Allegro’ s writings in The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross.

“While Wasson’ s [*lyingly proclaimed fake public PROPAGANDA funded by the Vatican] views* [his pretended public “view” != his actual, private view] stymied research on entheogens in Christianity for decades [until finally THE BIG BANG OF 2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm): “Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Samorini 1998; 96; 97)] after the publication of Soma in 1968, a new generation of 21st century researchers [Brown lists Michael Hoffman of Egodeath.com first] has documented growing evidence of psychedelic A. muscaria  and a variety of species of psilocybin-containing mushrooms in Christian art, consistent with Samorini’ s typology of “ mushroom-trees.””

Samorini’ s so-so typology of mushroom-trees

I criticize Giorgio Samorini’s effort to typology, but ok.

Yes we must analyze forms of mushroom imagery in Christian art / mushroom-trees; branching form of mushroom-trees,

but Giorgio Samorini is merely an ATTEMPT and wrongly says the Dancing Man salamander bestiary’s mushroom-tree is Amanita, in his b/w article;

And, Giorgio Samorini badly tries to make our sacred the Plaincourault fresco — b/c its Amanita — the paradigm model for all typology effort.

DO NOT START WITH Amanita OR the Plaincourault fresco AS THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS FOR ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP & TYPOLOGIES ANALYSIS.

Start with {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs including mushroom-tree branching form analysis per my math article:
YI Tree Branching Morphology: Formal Theory of Fractal YI Scope of Analysis of Branching-Message Mushroom Trees – Day 3 of Creation in Great Canterbury Psalter is a great example, for teaching, as provided deliberately by Eadwine:

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/11/eadwine-images-in-great-canterbury-psalter-commentary-interpretation/#Branching-Form-Develops

“Creation of Plants” Branching Form Develops from III, IYI, YI, IY/YI

Crop and analysis by Michael Hoffman

“Conjuring Eden”

Conjuring Eden: Art and the Entheogenic Vision of Paradise (Hoffman, Ruck & Staples, Entheos 1, 2001)
mh01
cr01

Conjuring Eden: Art and the Entheogenic Vision of Paradise
Hoffman, Ruck & Staples 
Online gallery of ancillary illustrations
38 pages, 33 illustrations, 47 ancillary online illustrations cued to text.

at “dual dogmatic” quote brown, criticize brown:

Actually that looks more like Hanegraaff’s book, Hermetic Spirituality and Altered States after my review.

todo: upload a crop of the YI mushroom-trees of Lot window, and, the existing crop of the city burning b/c not finding in WordPress gallery.

New: YI Tree Branching Form Recognized in “Lot’s Wife Pillar of Salt Burning City” Stained Glass Window, March 25, 2025

https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“lots-wife-turned-salt YI tree.jpg” 5 KB, 7:53 pm March 25, 2025
https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows
Crop by Michael Hoffman
“lots-wife-turned-salt-collapse.jpg” 5 KB, March 23, 2023
https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows
I BET MY WordPress GALLERY HAS THIS IN MARCH 2023 FOLDER/GROUP – CONFIRMED, & has dup of the full pic.

I BET MY WordPress GALLERY HAS THIS IN MARCH 2023 FOLDER/GROUP – CONFIRMED, & has dup of the full pic.

Forcing Art to Fit My Theory

interp principle for contributing to Brown db of mushroom imagery in Christian art:

  • If the image that the “spot the mushroom” hunter contributed is YI tree, that’s correct.
  • If the image that the “spot the mushroom” hunter contributed is an IY tree, or, Jesus’ donkey stands on Left foot, that means the ignorant shlub screwed up and reversed the art.
not my photo
Photo: Michael Hoffman
  • lots-wife-turned-salt.jpg
  • lots-wife-turned-salt-collapse.jpg – crop of collapsing city – not finding in gallery, I am the one to contribute this YI mushroom-tree image to the Brown Gallery. Brown calls it what? see Brown 2019 article more than 2016. book, they call it: bad: they talk too much of Committee , which was a failure. Theres no committed. what there is is virtual body of shared images that I have contribute d to & j rush gallery & Irvin gallery &
  • Brown gallery etc. and
  • p. 14 of “Conjuring Eden”, Ruck et al, Entheos 1, 2001; & p. 56 of “Daturas for the Virgin”, Ruck et al, Entheos 2, 2001 – as galleries

Wouter Hanegraaff, Dedicated Teenaged Mushroom Collector


“As a teenager, I joined the Dutch Mycological Society and became a devoted collector of mushrooms. I found myself instinctively attracted to those twilight realms of the natural world that tend to be overlooked by biologists concerned with daytime creatures such as animals and plants… But while I enjoyed their fairy-tale aura of mystery and magic, studying mushrooms in fact gave me an early training in empirical research, attention to detail, and systematic scientific thinking from which I have profited ever since.”
https://www.wouterjhanegraaff.net/about

As a teenager, I joined the Dutch Mycological Society and became a devoted collector of mushrooms. I found myself instinctively attracted to those twilight realms of the natural world that tend to be overlooked by biologists concerned with daytime creatures such as animals and plants… But while I enjoyed their fairy-tale aura of mystery and magic, studying mushrooms in fact gave me an early training in empirical research, attention to detail, and systematic scientific thinking from which I have profited ever since.

https://www.wouterjhanegraaff.net/about

holy moly, Info on my file has url! Where i got it! https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/wp-content/gallery/bible-window/4624377321.jpg, https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows – Canterbury, whats that?

https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/bible-windows

https://www.canterbury-archaeology.org.uk/wp-content/gallery/bible-window/4624377321.jpg – Don’t we need to add Browns’ missing word: for the SECRET instruction of monks?
“The windows are called variously, the poor man’s bible, theological windows or typological windows as they were used as a [SECRET] teaching medium probably mainly for the [SECRET] monks.”

Per Ruck Committee, we need to correct the informational page: “The YI mushroom-tree indicates that this is a cult, secretly, oppression, hidden, secret cult, surreptitiously slipped in heretical Christian members-only sect, alien infiltration into the very heart of the institutional Church.”

THE DEFEATIST NARRATIVE TAIL WAGGING THE ENTHEOGEN HISTORY EVIDENCE DOG

The mushroom-tree in this image of Lot is yet another example of cult, secretly, oppression, hidden, secret cult, surreptitiously slipped in; heretical Christian members-only sect; alien infiltration into the very heart of the institutional Church.

Ruck Committee, hastening to wrap the mushroom imagery in Christian art in a barrier boundary jail to protect their driving, master, social drama narrative of “counterculture havers of The Mushroom, in perpetual defeat battling against the mainstream mass of organized Christian society” – music to the ears of Prohibition Profiteers – DEFEATIST NARRATIVE TAIL WAGGING THE ENTHEOGEN HISTORY EVIDENCE DOG

The Ruck Committee (1st-generation entheogen scholarship (the Secret Amanita paradigm)) hastens to quickly wrap every incoming instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art in THEIR narrative’s required barrier boundary jail, to protect their driving, master, social drama narrative of “counterculture havers of The Mushroom, in perpetual defeat battling against the mainstream mass of organized Christian society” – which is music to the ears of Prohibition Profiteers – the Ruck DEFEATIST NARRATIVE TAIL WAGGING THE ENTHEOGEN HISTORY EVIDENCE DOG. Which Andy Letcher demolished like David vs. Goliath using a single instance of mushroom imagery in Christian art that Ruck cannot possibly do his usual move on, of enwrapping one of Bern’s seven Liberty Cap mushroom-trees in a hermetically isolated barrier to protect the narrative of defeat, at all costs: gotta keep The Mushroom bounded-about, behind a protective barrier, to keep The Mushroom separated from the general population, BEHIND THE RUCK BARRIER WALL OF “HERETICAL CLOSED MEMBERS-ONLY CULTS/ SECTS/ GROUPS” and my God, even the releaatively good thinker Giorgio Samorini — FAILING to be a 2nd-generation entheogen scholar (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm) — in 1997 wrote “certain Christian communities”.

Samorini, why not write simnply, “some Christians” or “some people in Christendom?”

Why do you have to fabricate “certain communities” – citation needed; on what basis, Samorini, failure of a 2nd-gen entheogen scholar, do you pull out of thin air YOUR construction, “communities”.

On what basis do you pull out your word, “communities”?

Samorini’s Fabricated, Concocted, Narrative-First Framing, “Certain Christian communities used The Mushroom”

The “Mushroom-Tree” of Plaincourault (Giorgio Samorini, 1997)
gs97

“Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Samorini 1998)
gs98

Samorini, why do you have to attach your arbitrary word, your FABRICATED, CONCOCTED, NARRATIVE FRAMING, “certain Christian communities” used The Mushroom?

Where did you come up with “communities” instead of Christians, individuals mixed in with the entire community of Christendom?

What’s with your barrier wall, members-only, closed, exclusive boundary construction?

2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm) is Anti-“Communities” of Entheogen Users

ended up using the above 10 sections – drafted in Rise of the Psychonaut page – as a practice warmup run: Made new page Brown db of mushroom imagery in Christian art — and in that page, did some fresh write-up like the above.

March 25, 2025

Darth Hanegraaff’s Alderaanization of the Fixed Stars

  • 🌌💥 🪨 🪨 🪨

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/18/hanegraaffs-inability-to-place-fixed-stars-in-sphere-7-or-8-proves-rebirth-is-into-fate-not-freedom/#Darth-Hanegraaffs-Alderaanization-of-the-Fixed-Stars

What is the Egodeath theory? Summary

The entheogen content & my sites: Wouter Hanegraaff is trying to push the edge within stodgy academia.

My sites are breath of fresh air for academia & light years ahead: I’ve been extending my 1988-1997 core theory by adding myth & esotericism since 1998-2025.

You probably told me already but what is the ego death theory?

Nutshell summary of the Egodeath theory:

Psilocybin or blotter loosens cognitive associations, causing mental model transformation about the personal control system, from steering among branching possibilities as a monolithic, autonomous control agent, to instead, future control-thoughts already exist as if frozen in rock, killing ego; reveals 2-level, dependent control

analogy:  from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake frozen in rock}

You end up with qualified freewill thinking.

Nutshell summary of the Egodeath theory: Intro of my main article:

Mobile version of my 2007 main article:

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
http://egodeath.com/mobile.htm

Overview

The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death explains what is revealed in religious revelation and in enlightenment, including the nature of personal control agency.

The essence and origin of religion is the use of visionary plants to routinely trigger the intense mystic altered state, producing loose binding of cognitive associations.

This loose cognitive binding then produces an experience of being controlled by frozen block-universe eternalism (determinism) with a single, pre-existing, ever-existing future.

Experiencing this model of control and time initially destabilizes self-control power, and amounts to the death of the self that was conceived of as an autonomous control-agent.

Self-control stability is restored upon transforming one’s mental model to take into account the dependence of personal control on a hidden, separate thought-source, such as Necessity or a divine level that transcends Necessity.

Myth describes this mystic-state experiential insight and transformation.

Religious initiation teaches and causes this transformation of the self considered as a control-agent, through a series of visionary-plant sessions, interspersed with study of perennial philosophy.

Most modern-era religion has been a distortion of this standard initiation system, reducing these concepts to a weak interpretation that is based in the ordinary state of consciousness.

Wouter Hanegraaff on Mushrooms

https://www.wouterjhanegraaff.net/about

“As a teenager I joined the Dutch Mycological Society and became a devoted collector of mushrooms. 

“I found myself instinctively attracted to those twilight realms of the natural world that tend to be overlooked by biologists concerned with daytime creatures such as animals and plants.

“But while I enjoyed their fairy-tale aura of mystery and magic, studying mushrooms in fact gave me an early training in empirical research, attention to detail, and systematic scientific thinking from which I have profited ever since.”

Email from Wouter Hanegraaff, March 24, 2025

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/18/hanegraaffs-inability-to-place-fixed-stars-in-sphere-7-or-8-proves-rebirth-is-into-fate-not-freedom/#Email-from-Hanegraaff

My Email to Houot Mar 22, 2025

Monitor near
https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/#My-Book-Review-Draft-Notes
It is barely worth your reading now, but I plan to put ideas there b/c starting have good substantial ideas.

Can’t promise to spend time posting Amazon bk review:
Tip/Strategy: give 5 stars + give Pros & Cons & chapters desc.

Done 1st pass reading, listened 2x to Rise of Psychonaut. I now have a few ideas. Beginning to write them up or do voice recordings, idea development for critique of your book.

My newest writings at site are roughest – ranges from published journal articles through rough mobile shorthand idea development.

I really appreciate your good pronunciation & vocalization.

Room for improvement: PROJECT more, do not sound like you are quietly reading.

For psychological reasons, back off the mic.

Stand up, 2′ back from the mic, and PROJECT, to sound like you are talking to an audience in the room, not like you are quietly reading into a mic.

One person in book club said you got worked up too much and were shouting – in early part of book, saying some point he disagreed with.

I’m baffled by his claim.

In fact you err in speaking too calmly, and need to PROJECT like you are talking in a room to someone, during loud daytime.

I’m very happy w/ your voice recording and the UI of Audible.

Paid full $24 yikes, as well as bought your book.

Bonus: I am stunned to discover that just before my huge breakthrough in Great Canterbury Psalter, in early November 2020, I purchased Thomas Hatsis’ audiobook of Psychedelic Mystery Traditions.

So after I re-listen your book a few times, I will hear the clownish banana on skates [Roller Derby banana-suit coach who does scholarship like roller derby high-impact fisticuffs] – he is almost on my Block list, because he is quite aggressive, while giving confused utterances like “you’re not allowed to cover Psilocybin, because you come from Amanita Allegro theory” [false] and famously, “The shape of the liberty cap is anachronistic”.

I will enjoy listening to Hatsis’ book read by him.

I bought his print book AND ebook AND voice recording!!

Amazon ought to sell all 3 for slightly more than price of print book.

Email from A. M. Houot (“Ooh-Oh”) Mar. 23, 2025

Houot wrote:

Dear Michael,

Thank you for taking the time to read my book, to really comb through it.

I appreciate it.

My aim was to make readers think differently about these visionary substances, and I hope that something was sparked within you.

Regarding the audiobook:

I followed their lead since they were the audio/sound professionals. I simply sat and read.

It was harder than I thought, especially managing my breathing in between sentences while not having the microphone pick up every possible sound apart from the spoken word.

I’ve visited your website a few times.

It appears that you have enough material to write a book.

I encourage you to do so.

It’s a wonderful and challenging experience.

Best,
Alan

email to houot may 24 2025

I was impressed by the great vocalizing & result of audiobook.
good content
good vocalizing
good tech usage

Thankful that the book club leader talked about your audiobk format in conjunction with printed bk. It’s a great supplement to printed book.
the most $ , but UI & your execution is great.

I have ideas to rebalance my critiques / pros / cons to favor you, but my fingers need rest.

I think my book review template will work great, easy:
Summarize pros cons.
& key words for each chapter.

I wonder why you did not mention surrenderism 🤔🤔 except 4 hits, in Rise of the Psychonaut, given that you wrote a lot in dissertation & Psychonaut’s Ship article.

I am eager to read aloud, for Egodeath Mystery Show, your Psychonaut’s Ship article, which I have completely read on paper.

I scientifically identify the dynamics of surrender, the folk wisdom- compare your work to Michelle Janikian book that well expresses the folk crude wisdom of surrender to the experience – whatever that means– I specify in STEM terms.

You should’ve gone deep on the etymology of “cyber”, the most important thing, unstable self-control cybernetics leading to self-control climax & mental model transformation.

You halted at the wrong, mere Pop misusage of ‘cyber’; vs deep etymology myth history.

The Psychonaut’s Ship: Pairing Technologies with Psychedelics to Augment User Agency
Houot
2022, Psychedelic Press Quarterly Journal
https://www.academia.edu/78214256/The_Psychonauts_Ship_Pairing_Technologies_with_Psychedelics_to_Augment_User_Agency

See story of Dionysus & pirates, pilot, ship. Study a few tellings of this nautical ship analogy myth.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=dionysus+pirates

The best, recent writings on the myth: search my site:
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=dionysus+pirates

FATA from Cyberdisciple mar 22

copied to page where I wrote / show book cover showing FATA by Chris Brennan – https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/20/the-worlds-dumbest-footnote/#FATA-REGUNT-ORBEM-CERTA-STANT-OMNIA-LEGE

Cyberdisciple wrote: [March 22, 2025]

Brennan’s book cover shows a line of poetry from Manilius, 1st cent AD, author of Astronomica: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomica_(Manilius)

FATA REGUNT ORBEM, CERTA STANT OMNIA LEGE

THE FATES DIRECT THE WORLD, ALL THINGS DEPEND ON A FIXED LAW

Multiple valences possible that resonant with eternalism:

The noun FATA, which I translated as “The Fates,” can also mean “death.”

The verb REGUNT, which I translated as “direct,” can also mean “rule.” Latin for “king” is REX. 

The noun ORBEM, which I translated as “world,” can also mean “wheel.” 

The verb STANT, which I translated as “depend on,” can also mean “stand still” or “are motionless.”

The adjective CERTA, which I translated as “fixed,” could also be translated “determined.” It generally refers to something that is unchanging.

end of Cyberdisciple’s email

reply to Cyberdisciple mar 23

Glad I finally quoted Wouter Hanegraaff’s index entries on “Ogdoad” to get a good look at his assertions.

I only made it 1/3 through them, but it is clear that he is high on non-drug entheogens.

“the Ogdoad above heimarmene” 

🤦‍♂️
🤦‍♂️
😵

Where are you getting this, Hanegraaff??  Citation needed!! 

The fixed stars, you rightly say, are Fate; heimarmene (block-universe eternalism).

So where the heck do you put the fixed stars, including the zodiac constellations?

Into Hanegraaff’s Rejected wastebasket.

🤷‍♂️🌌–>🗑️

Hanegraaff is definitely wrong , he maybe latched onto some deviant text saying “above Saturn = above Fate”.

I LOVE TO SIT IN JUDGEMENT OVER ANCIENT systems or art:

Any ancient text that says the highest Fate sphere is Saturn is INFERIOR.  

Art that fails to support the Egodeath theory is BAD ART.  

Modern-era Entry into Jerusalem paintings:
Jesus’ donkey lifts the WRONG FOOT! 👎

ART FAIL.

Clueless artists & ancient writers getting it wrong.

The Bible is WRONG overselling Amanita.

The ancients are WRONG when they say Amanita is better than any mere psychedelic, that it’s a mythic realm, super-psychedelic that’s far better than mere Psilocybin or reality.  

After all, I’ve been saying since 1986: mystics are bad at writing, let me handle this, I have to do it myself, explaining usefully and clearly, since they are muddled thinkers and writers.

Myth that confirms to the correct standard of judgment — the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism — is superior myth.  

If the data don’t support the theory, too bad for the data, THE THEORY IS CORRECT. 😑

— Michael

My Oct. 1, 2018 Email to & from Erik Davis: Expanding Mind podcast: Eric Wargo discusses Block Universe “determinism” per the Egodeath theory

Erik Davis’ Expanding Mind podcast, episode September 27, 2018 with guest Eric Wargo, discusses Block Universe “determinism” per the Egodeath theory (around the final third).

https://expandingmind.podbean.com/e/expanding-mind-%E2%80%93-time-loops-092718/

“In part one of our conversation, author, blogger, and dreamer Eric Wargo talks about uncertainty, determinism, Zen, the evidence for “feeling the future,” and his brilliant and head-spinning book Time Loops: Precognition, Retrocausation, and the Unconscious.”

The discussion in the podcast comes close to comparing the “open future, branching possibilities” model to a *tree*, or a king steering in a tree, and to comparing the “block-universe with worldlines” model to a *snake*, or a snake embedded in rock.

The discussion comes close to mentioning the archetypal most-terrifying experience, of perceiving future control-thoughts as frozen in a pre-existing, snake-shaped rail embedded in spacetime with no change, or more exactly, no meta-change.  

Typhon, the father of all monsters, refers to experientially perceiving one’s *Block-Universe Worldline* in the mystic altered state, removing the sense of personal control power: encountering the dragon that guards enlightenment.

The dragon (a serpent as *the* monster) demands prayer, reconciliation, and sacrifice, which means repudiation of the premise of relying on personal control power steering in a tree into the open future, relying instead, consciously, on pre-given personal control-thoughts that were established by the hidden, uncontrollable creator of the spacetime block.  

The mind retains the original model of time and control, now qualified, and adds a new model of time and control, progressively revealed in the altered state in a series of purifying sessions of “mixed wine”, and eventually retained (conceptually, not experientially) in the ordinary state.  

This model of psychedelics and mixed wine emphasizes the psycholytic, cognitive loosening effect of psychedelics.

The series of sacred meals given by the god leads to an overwhelming feeling and experience of “remembering” an epic, mythic-scale climactic peak experience of control-seizure realization, forcing a dramatic mental reconfiguration, with sacrifice and rescue, transforming the mental model of personal control power and time.

There are two models of time (and implicitly, of control) in Philosophy, which are contrasted in mythology, and are experienced in the two states of consciousness:

o  First, the Tree model, called “Possibilism” in the Philosophy of Time, experienced and perceived in the ordinary state of consciousness, which has tight cognitive association binding.  More fully, this model is described by analogy as a king steering in a tree.

o  Second, the Snake model, called “Eternalism” in the Philosophy of Time, experienced and perceived in the altered state of consciousness, which has loose cognitive association binding.  More fully, this model is described by analogy as a snake frozen embedded in rock.

The contrast between the initial tree view vs. the later snake view (after initiation into the sacred meals given by the gods), is depicted in Hellenistic and Biblical mythology as a rigid snake on a debranched tree, and other combinations of king or tree, vs. snake or rock, such as:

Hellenistic religious mythology:

o  The staff of Aesclepius the healer (snake on debranched tree trunk).

o  A snake on a debranched tree trunk (sculpted in rock) on ossuaries (stone coffin, depository for the bones of the dead).

o  A snake on a debranched tree trunk (sculpted in rock) propping up statues.

Biblical religious mythology:

o  Moses’ healing brass snake on a pole (a tree with the branches cut off), to prevent death by snake bite (that is, restabilizing mental control after ego death that results from perceiving Block-Universe Worldlines).

o  The comparison of king Jesus fastened to wood (“hung on the tree”) to Moses’ brass snake lifted up on a pole, given as a “sign”.

Mythology describes psychedelics experientially revealing the block universe and no-free-will.

More generally, listing all the terms in the four key concept-categories:

{religious mythology, analogy, metaphor}

describes

{the altered state, psycholytics, psychedelics, entheogens, psychotomimetics, loose cognitive binding, loose mental construct processing}

experientially revealing

{Eternalism, Fatedness, Heimarmene, the block universe, frozen time, determinism, no meta-change}

and

{non-control, Cybernetics, control cancellation, self-control seizure, rail of control-thoughts, worldline, no-free-will, no meta-control}.

‘Determinism’ is an ok, familiar term for the Minkowski/Parmenides *Block Universe* with embedded pre-existing *Worldlines* of personal control, but ‘determinism’ amounts to a particular narrow theory about *how* it is that the future is pre-set: through domino-chain causality acting from one moment to the next. 

‘Eternalism’, a less familiar but more relevant term, doesn’t emphasize the supposed domino-chain causal mechanism acting through time, but instead emphasizes timeless pre-existence of the future, especially the most fearsome, destabilizing, and dis-empowering perception, the pre-existence of the future rail of personal control-thoughts, frozen, unavoidable, unchangeable, the snake dragon monster guarding the treasure of enlightenment and mental transformation.

The Possibilism (tree) and Eternalism (snake) models of time are depicted in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, though without recognition of the archaic mythology contrast {tree vs. snake}, or {king in tree vs. snake in rock}, which I recognized without the Philosophy terms ‘Possibilism’ vs. ‘Eternalism’ on November 23, 2011, and then with those terms on November 29, 2013 (announced December 1, 2013).

Diagrams: 

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Article: “Being and Becoming in Modern Physics” 

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-bebecome/#PresPossEter

Subject: tree, snake, mshr; tree-wrapped/-climbing serpent

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/5630

November 23, 2011

Initial decoding of {tree vs. snake} in mythology, though without the terms ‘Possibilism vs. Eternalism’

Subject: Deciphered: tree vs. snake means Possibilism vs. Eternalism

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/egodeath/conversations/messages/6340

December 1, 2013, reporting the discovery of November 29, 2013

Announcement of fully decoding {tree vs. snake} in mythology, including the terms ‘Possibilism vs. Eternalism’.  Confirmed by decoding various mythemes by mid-2014.

Expanding Mind podcast

Episode: Cybernetic Ego-death

January 28, 2016

“A talk with renegade religious philosopher Michael Hoffman about entheogens, determinism, and religious experience from an engineering point of view.”

https://expandingmind.podbean.com/2016/01/

https://expandingmind.podbean.com/e/expanding-mind-%E2%80%93-cybernetic-ego-death-%E2%80%93-012816/

— Michael Hoffman

October 1, 2018

Oct 1, 2018 Email from Erik Davis

Hi Michael,

I thought that conversation with Eric would stir you up!

This is a nutty week for me but I will read your post closely asap…

And get ready for part 2…

— Erik Davis

todo: figure out Part 2

Announcement: April 17-20, 2025, Seattle, SpringMysteries.com

https://www.springmysteries.com/ – one of the blurbs, I have not read anything yet: see also the sections: https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/25/idea-development-page-25/#Fontaine for an Eleusinian Mysteries group, https://thereveries.org

“The Mysteries Ritual Drama & Initiation Rites

“The Mysteries are concerned with the secrets the Goddess Demeter gave to humanity at the city of Eleusis in ancient Greece.

“No written records of the content of these rites exist and no oral descriptions were handed down save only fragments in vague and general terms.

“Eleusinian scholars from around the world have worked to recreate these initiatory rites anew, based on years of scholarship, and modern revelation.

“the spark of revelation that comes to each participant.”

todo: make page promoting

Dr. Secret & the Evil M. Hoffman plan to be there

Carl Ruck & Mark Hoffman, 1st-generation entheogen scholarship (the Secret Amanita paradigm)

http://www.sprin

You Must Join My Cult: Sacred Garden Community church

https://www.sacredgarden.life

Email to Erik Davis, March 24, 2025

Hi Erik, hoping that you and I check emails – I’m better at it lately.

I am a member of Sacred Garden Community church, we talk about you behind your back.

Hanegraaff’s Inability to Place Fixed Stars in Sphere 8 Proves Rebirth Is into Fate, not Freedom

I heard back from Wouter Hanegraaff today re my latest / best Hanegraaff page:

Hanegraaff’s Inability to Place Fixed Stars in Sphere 8 Proves Rebirth Is into Fate, not Freedom

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/03/18/hanegraaffs-inability-to-place-fixed-stars-in-sphere-7-or-8-proves-rebirth-is-into-fate-not-freedom/#Email-from-Hanegraaff

Zep IV book is missing crucial concept from Late Antiquity, “transcend heimarmene”

Zep IV book is missing crucial concept from Late Antiquity, “transcend heimarmene“, and that was not well developed at Egodeath.com in 2003.  

The book correctly represents Classical Antiquity, not Late Antiquity.  p. 118 & 122.

Hard to pick just 1 year where I added that – in 2000, Coraxo was right, my 1997 2-level model doesn’t work for Late Antiquity Gnosticism, and I immediately started theorizing about idea “transcend heimarmene”, but your book proves that Egodeath.com didn’t fully develop or present that idea – it is in my 2007 main article:

https://egodeaththeory.org/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/#Transcending-Determinism-Requires-Two-Jumps

or equiv url at Egodeath.com

Erik Davis applauds Hanegraaff’s non-drug entheogens, therefore signs on board with proposing non-drug psychedelics

You egg-on Wouter Hanegraaff’s monstrosity “non-drug entheogens”, but you’d sing a different tune were someone to propose equivalently, non-drug psychedelics.  

Yes, heavy breathing, active imagination, meditation “can/ could/ might/ may” give you AN altered state, but, that’s much too feeble to cause THE mental model transformation – the only one that counts.  

Meditation makes you dizzy – not discover self-transcendence of personal control system; cybernetic seizure & mental model transformation.

Chemist David Nichols agrees: meditation must have come from Psilocybin, that’s the only thing strong enough to cause religious myth dynamics.

ONLY Psilocybin (or modern era: blotter) is sufficiently strong to cause THE mental model transformation: transformation from possibilism to eternalism; causing terrorizing egoic claim to be my own source of control-thoughts. 

The latter goes unstable and discover vulnerability stairway to ascend, the control vortex, the gateway: the control-vulnerability is discovered in loose cognition state from Psilocybin, only — not sufficiently experienced via all these alleged, “the traditional methods of the mystics” other than Psilocybin.

Led Zep IV Adding a 3rd Phase (Transcending Heimarmene): Details

1. naive freewill thinking 

2. eternalism-thinking 

3. qualified possibilism-thinking

Rise above Fate-soaked the sphere of the fixed stars, lifted there by Mithras or equivalent in every Late Antiquity brand of Mystery Religion.  Spirit portion of mind, only, rises above heimarmene/ block-universe eternalism.

When you read Egodeath.com in 2003, I was starting to confirm that:

Classical Antiquity equated Transcendent Knowledge (Psilocybin transformation) with mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism, terminating in heimarmene/ Fate/ no-free-will/ {king frozen in rock}; eternalism – sort of like “determinism” but future already exists.

Late Antiquity inverted the values to the extent possible given that they still affirmed that heimarmene is the case, yet just only the spirit portion can sort of “transcend heimarmene”, transcend Fate; transcend eternalism.

I call this a cultural shift from revering heimarmene to selling instead, transcending heimarmene.  From a 2-phase model of Psilocybin transformation, to a 3-phase model.

Classical Antiquity:

1. naive freewill thinking; possibilism-thinking.

2. revelation of heimarmene; eternalism, valued positively.

Late Antiquity:

1. naive freewill thinking; possibilism-thinking.

2. revelation of heimarmene; eternalism, valued negatively.

3. transcend heimarmene; transcendent freewill.  

per Ken Wilber’s Pre/Trans fallacy, this looks like freewill thinking, but, has a different basis – I do not control the source of my control thoughts. 

Grow {beard}, {sacrifice child} (child-thinking), move through {guarded gate}, pay toll at rock/fire/blade {altar} to pass through the {gate} into land of — first, heimarmene, then – in Late Antiquity – proceed a little to sort of transcend heimarmene. 

David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism: born out from the cosmic rock, above the sphere of the fixed stars, reaching level of precession of the equinoxes.

I re-checked Zep IV p. 118 (astral ascent mysticism) & 122 (the Egodeath theory) — you just missed my 2004-era beginnings of forming the 3-level, 3-phase model, including “transcend block-universe determinism” better called block-universe eternalism. 

Actually around 2000, I started working on adding this level “higher than no-free-will”, or “higher than block-universe determinism” — NOT reflected in my 1997 outline summary of my 1988-discovered theory, which strictly terminates – like Zep IV book – at block-universe eternalism; heimarmene.

But in 2000, Coraxo in Gnosticism Yahoo Group, pointed out that my 1997 2-phase model (mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism) is unable to discuss Gnositicism’s goal of transcending heimarmene. 

— which was the goal of every brand of religion in Late Antiquity – in contrast to Classical Antiquity, which Zep IV book covers and Egodeath.com 2003 mainly emphasizes.

— Michael Hoffman, the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism 

Email 2 to Erik Davis, Mar. 24, 2025

Zep IV book accurately represents the emphasis on experiencing no-free-will, in Rock.  

We have not yet built above that the idea also of in a way, transcending no-free-will.

Late 20th C, Psychedelic Rock lyrics terminate in block-universe eternalism / block-universe determinism, unless you count Rush song Freewill as asserting “transcending no-free-will”.

Typical blotter Rock expresses tragic amazement at no-free-will revelation – not emphasizing “transcend determinism”. 

Song: Jump into the Fire:

You can climb a mountain, swim the sea
You can jump into the fire
But you’ll never be free, no, no

Lyrics: Jump into the Fire (Harry Nilsson, 1971)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfjNpgZ4C5Q

search this site & the Egodeath Yahoo Group for:
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=%22jump+into+the+fire%22
found it: see:
https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/12/13/egodeath-yahoo-group-digest-40/#message2008

“On a 1997 radio show “The History of Classic Rock”, I heard the apocalypse of the early 1970s, the day the music died; some 26 years earlier, freewill thinking took a fatal spearing of the heart, leading inevitably to its death. Through bubbling audio distortion, the full album Led Zeppelin IV played, time stopped, this passing age had been speared and the end was inevitably near for collective freewill thinking.”

https://www.google.com/search?q=jump+into+the+fire+lyrics

Songwriters: Harry Edward Nilsson
Jump Into The Fire lyrics © Golden Syrup Music, Bmg Mercury

You can climb a mountain
You can swim the sea
You can jump into the fire
But you’ll never be free

You can shake me up
Or I can bring you down
Whoa-oh-oh-oh-oh
Whoa-oh-oh-oh-oh

We can make each other happy
Oh, we can make each other happy
We can make each other happy
We can make each other happy

You can climb a mountain, swim the sea
You can jump into the fire
But you’ll never be free, no, no

My god I heard that on the Classic Rock station Dec. 1997 during an EPIC album history festival, what a journey.

That song struck me with confirmation of my recent, Feb. 1997, outlined/ summarized, original, Core, Phase 1 theory.

Not covering the history of religious myth and entheogen scholarship yet – that started 1998, my Phase 2, Mytheme theory work. 

By 2001, shown in the Egodeath Yahoo Group archive from Max Freakout, I was working on adding the concept of “transcend determinism”. 

I didn’t find the word ‘eternalism’ until the day after I finalized my Phase 2, main article, 2007 – though that was still missing comprehension of the art motifs of {branching} & {handedness}, figured out in 2013, 2015, and especially Nov. 2020… continuing into 2025.

My main article, in 2007:
http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

My Phase 2 theory, integrating religious myth, is summarized in my main article, September 2007 – the day before I switched from ‘determinism’ to ‘eternalism’.

That expanded outline of the Egodeath theory includes “transcend block-universe determinism”.

My 1997 Core theory terminates in block-universe eternalism, and lacks the idea of “transcend eternalism” – so that original-phase explanatory model (1988-1997) is “period-correct” — but is not adequate to discuss Late Antiquity’s project of “[in a slight sense] transcend Fate”.

If Coraxo hadn’t pointed out my theory’s limitation in 2000 (in the Gnosticism Yahoo Group), I certainly — inevitably; predestined — would have figured it out soon anyway, because in 1998 I started looking to religious myth to corroborate my 1988-1997 2-level, core theory.

I would have seen, as I did around 2003, that Late Antiquity emphasized in the Marketing dept. of every brand of religion: “Only OUR religion elevates you above Fate; all other brands make you a slave of Fate.”  

They all reified Fate even while selling transcending Fate.

1998-2007, I was reading all books on myth and religion with a focus on “determinism”/ heimarmene, and experiencing it after sacred eating and drinking.  If Coraxo hadn’t corrected me in 2000, something else would have, and did, anyway.

Coraxo’s point was a memorable explosion that started my differentiation between
Classical Antiquity (terminating in heimarmene); aim for block-universe eternalism.
Late Antiquity (terminating in transcending heimarmene); aim above block-universe eternalism (while yet affirming that block-universe eternalism is the case).

Coraxo was only one of many factors that corrected my 1997 2-level, 2-phase model, as soon as I in 1998 switched to scouring religious myth to corroborate my Core theory, 2-level theory.  

Late Antiquity created a “2-1/2 level” or “2-1/2 phase” model.

Consider the title “Treatise on the 8th & 9th / Ogdoad & Enneand) cosmic spheres: 

The initiate asks to be brought to the 8th & then 9th.  

First bring me to no-free-will/ block-universe eternalism, then, teacher, bring me, right after that, to its companion sphere: 

from the sphere of the fixed stars to above that, precession of the equinoxes (David Ulansey’s solution explaining Mithraism).

The MAIN Psilocybin transformation trajectory is transformation from possibilism to eternalism; rebirth into {snake frozen in rock} — exactly like Classical Antiquity said, the Psilocybin revelation is transformation from possibilism to eternalism – that is 8/9 of the “complete initiation” effort.  

It took me a lot of work, it has been requiring a lot of theorizing lately, to frame and sell and position my correct relation of 

“reach eternalism” vs. 

“end up kinda w/ same freewill as ever, transcending eternalism, sort of”.  

I’s been a lot of work for me to move above the sphere of the fixed stars into sphere 9, precession of equinoxes, born from the cosmic, heimarmene-snake-wrapped cosmos to reach the Empyrean, dwelling place of all the Elect.

The Elect are sort of in the sphere of the fixed stars, but more, they as spirits dwell above the the sphere of the fixed stars, in the 9th sphere, outside the Fate-soaked cosmos.

— Michael Hoffman, the theorist of Egodeath 

end of email 2 to Erik Davis

Read Aloud Voice Recording of Houot: The Psychonaut’s Ship

Clean up my Houot page.

Read aloud his article The Psychonaut’s Ship.

The Psychonaut’s Ship: Pairing Technologies with Psychedelics to Augment User Agency
Houot
2022, Psychedelic Press Quarterly Journal
https://www.academia.edu/78214256/The_Psychonauts_Ship_Pairing_Technologies_with_Psychedelics_to_Augment_User_Agency

My fingers need a rest. use voice dict or rec’g.

Keyboard Shortcuts for my Website URLs

Egodeath.com
eddc

http://egodeath.com
eddcu

EgodeathTheory.org
eto

https://egodeaththeory.org
etou

EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com
ewc

https://EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com
ewcu

Rise of the Hubristic Psychonaut (Houot, 2025)

March 22, 2025 – I am starting to add book review content near:
https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/#My-Book-Review-Draft-Notes

My Condemnation of Modern-Era, OSC-Based, So-Called “Myth” 👎👎

https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/12/24/rise-of-the-psychonaut-houot-2025/

Added info in the above page re: Simon Yugler’s extreme botching of Medusa myth, which confirms my condemnation of modern-era “myth”. https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=%22Simon+Yugler%22

todo: gather my “Jugler Medusa” criticisms.
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=Yugler+medusa+invisible

Yugler Exemplifies Characteristic Modern Corruption and Obscuring of Myth

Simon Yugler writes the myth accurately of Perseus vs. Medusa, and yet, he mixes in with it, his own, LUNATIC mythmaking that DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS THE BASIC IDEA of that myth, directly contradicting the actual myth and his own accurate telling of the actual myth.
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=Yugler+medusa+invisible

Perseus Looks at Medusa’s Face

This is an attempt to destroy myth!

Jugler writes “Perseus looks at Medusa’s face.”

NO, NO NO!!

You are directly contradicting yourself and the basic, essential idea of the Medusa myth; this is madness, Yugler!

WTF!! Are you insane?!

[todo: link to my detailed post at this site]
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=Yugler+medusa+invisible

As you yourself wrote just 2 paragraphs / pages ago, you cannot look at Medusa’s face and live.

Medusa Is Invisible

This is an attempt to destroy myth!

Juller writes “Medusa is invisible.”

NO, NO NO!!

You are directly contradicting yourself and the basic, essential idea of the Medusa myth; this is madness, Yugler!

WTF!! Are you insane?!

As you yourself wrote just 2 paragraphs/ pages ago, Perseus, not Medusa, wears Hades’ magic cap of invisibility.

PERSEUS IS INVISIBLE.

The notion that “Medusa is invisible”) is modern baloney psychobabble REPLACING the sound, coherent myth.

Jungianism Sucks Because It Replaces, Not Clarifies, Myth

Jungianism sucks: It adds its own, wrong, clueless, modern-era overlay on top of the pre-Modern myth, thus destroying and obscuring and directly contradicting the basic idea that’s expressed by the actual ancient myth.

Correct Use of Analogy

Houot book DOES mention correctly, analogy, vs. metaphor. chapter 10 at 33:22, 80% through. Section: Analogical reasoning, p. 165, simile & metaphor too.

The Jungian approach is an abuse/ misuse of analogy.

https://www.google.com/search?q=define+analogy

“An analogy is a comparison between two things in order to explain and clarify.”

Perfect for the Egodeath theory! This is like a description of the Egodeath theory, Phase 2, which in 1998 went to Mr. Jesus/Paul and instantly realized

Instantly realized that LITERALISM HISTORICITY ASSUMP FAILS TO CONFIRM the Egodeath theory; BUT AT SAME TIME, INSTEAD, GOOD INTERP OF MYTH AS ANALOGY DESCRIBING Psilocybin Psilocybin transformation IS PERFECT APPRORPIATE APPROACH THAT WILL VERY LIKELY SUCCEED and then by 2003, I felt that it worked: inddedd, myth is analogy describing Psilocybin transformation.

“Instantly realized” in 2001 thanks to Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy’s book The Jesus Mysteries, 2001, https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/0609807986/ & I met w/ them underground to discuss entheogens (semi-censored by their publisher) & myth.

Freke in another book asserts spiritual psychedelics. And no-free-will, like the advaita meditation guy – not Ken Wilber! – Ramesh Balsekar, who Andrew Cohen & Ken Wilber discussed in the magazine What Is Enlightenment?

Rubes Andrew Cohen & Ken Wilber were SHOCKED by Ramesh Balsekar saying (crudely) enlightenment = realizing no-free-will.

Like in 1995, all Christians rediscovered Calvinism / Reformed theology and were SHOCKED!

That was like 2 years after I discovered that confirmation of the Egodeath theory. I was a little ahead of that curve, the late late modern era rediscovery of Reformed theology. thus i say WE BADLY NEED BOOK: HISTORY OF *ALL* FORMS OF DETERMINISM.

Stop silo’ing that key, main, central topic!! Like Pagels badly silo’s in her 1st 3 books: “the topic of free will vs. determinism in no way is at all related to topic of predestination in theology“. “Don’t cross the streams.” says Pagels and everyone.

Ramesh Balsekar conjoins the interests of Kafei & the Egodeath theory.

Ramesh Balsekar is the common link that brought together Kafei & Michael Hoffman’s Egodeath theory.

Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy’s book The Jesus Mysteries, 2001 https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/0609807986/
tjm
Wow, awesome new type of keyboard shortcut! A refinement/ variant of the recent new type: keyboard shortcut for book/ article citation. Great idea: include my site’s link within the expansion! powerful! Can’t wait to try/use this approach!

Per the Egodeath theory,

  • metaphor is bad (literary, confusing writing).
  • analogy is good (comparisons for purpose of clearly explaining).

Like Wouter Hanegraaff says (per my reading of him) do not make myth-based pseudo-history the basis of academic scientific actual history of esoteric pseudo-history.

We are to write the actual scientific history of tales of esoteric pseudo-history. Don’t cross those two streams.

the Egodeath theory is not BASED IN myth. Previous explanatory frameworks failed b/c they were based in myth, hazy thinking & communication. the Egodeath theory utilizes myth as analogies for purpose of clearly explaining. the Egodeath theory is not based in myth.

The Egodeath theory explains and uses myth.

The Egodeath theory is based in clear STEM thinking & communication of explan fwk; a science-based (or, Engineering useful tech based) explanatory framework.

todo: try to construct a joke about St Eustace crossing river, awesome diagrammatic picture in cathedral.
https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/02/16/branching-message-mushroom-trees-psychedelic-eternalism-depicted-in-medieval-art-as-branching-mushrooms-handedness-and-non-branching/#Eustace-Crossing-River

St. Eustace Crossing the River (Chartres Cathedral)

Figure 1. Mâle, p. 3, The sky, water and trees. From the Legend of St. Eustace. Window at Chartres.

Don’t Cross the Streams

“Don’t cross the 3 plasma streams” is Ghostbusters movie.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ghostbusters+don%27t+cross+the+streams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4l7tq-_rZ8&t=60s

Fav Article Title: J. Z. Smith: “In Comparison a Magic Dwells”

https://classics.osu.edu/sites/classics.osu.edu/files/Magic_Dwells.pdf

That’s related to my above point, that Elaine Pagels’ books 1-3 acts like the topic of free will vs. determinism has NOTHING to do w/ theology topic of predestination. I hate how the history of versions of determinism is silo’d, preventing people from realizing:

The Key Central Topic of Everything Is, Free Will vs. Determinism [Better: Possibilism vs. Eternalism]

Why don’t ppl realize that the topic of free will vs. determinism is the key to everything?

Because the topic of possibilism vs. eternalism is has been fragmented and silo’d into 10 different separate fields AS IF they were unrelated topics, but really it is manifestations of the same topic/ concern/ Psilocybin transformation revelation.

eg in theory of time, off-track blind contrast discussions are off base: “presentism vs. eternalism”. Same in YouTube vids about “eternalism” – they wrongly say “eternalism is constrasted w/ presentism”. No!

From the most relevant and terrifying (during Psilocybin) personal control system POV, it is actually possibilism that’s contrasted w/ eternalism. I am forced to admit, from a non-focused POV, we must consider – in the Phil classroom — Presentism. and,

From the Psilocybin loose cognition POV/ state, yes, we have hyper Presentism of awareness.

But in loose cognition, most relevant for control stabiltiy, is transformation from possibilism to eternalism.

Not presentism, which is merely a Phil dept topic & also is one aspect of Psilocybin experience.

In the relevant, useful, exciting, non-boring Psilocybin state, the clash is not … the Psilocybin transformation is not from Presentism to Eternalism; it’s transformation from possibilism to eternalism. The mind is made to repudiate not presentism, in the sacriice for gate-passing-through, but rather, repudiate possibilism.

The first, childish, sacrificed, repudiated worldmodel, {king steering in tree}, is possibilism, NOT presentism. When that is repud’d, control cs results.

keyboard shortcuts not defined:
control stability [CS]
stable control [SC]
stable personal control [SPC]

expect c s = “control system”? but already defined are:
personal control system [PCS]
the egoic personal control system [EPCS]

cybernetic self-control seizure [CSCS]

from {king steering in tree} [= possibilism; NOT presentism!] through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake frozen in rock}

The mind does NOT transform from presentism, presentism is nothing but a stupid Phil dept notion.

Irrelevant to Psilocybin transformation.

otoh, possibilism is extremely relevant to Psilocybin transformation.

that’s why discussions treatments of “eternalism” are stupid and irrel even including effectindex.com Josie Kins’ treatment of eternalism, and YouTube MISSING THE PERTINENT POINT:

They wrongly pit the Phil dept notion of “Presentism” against a kind of Eternalism that fails to focus on the personal control system PROBLEMATIZATION OF PERSONAL CONTROL GIVEN ETERNALISM.

Sure, Wm James’ domino-chain cuauslity article 1897 has some points about cancelling personal control system, but , fails to relevantly integrate.

  • James fails to grasp/consider eternalism; he tries to get to eternalism from freewill-soaked notion of domino-chain determinism that Kafei rejected when Kafei misread my main article Sep 2007 final draft b/c only the following day did I discover and announce the words ‘eternalism’ and ‘superdeterminism’ – as conventionally defined, neither “determinism” nor “eternalism” nor ” superdeterminism” grasp the important points: problematization of control during loose cognition experience of eternalism, forcing to repudiate relying on possibilism – NOT repudiate presentism, which is just a stupid Phil dept notion invented by half baked Chris Letheby.
  • Our childish initial worldmodel – which we keep, by the way; we preserve it like Isaac and per Ken Wilber – we ride consciously , after enlightenment , the lower, childish Possibilism worldmodel.
  • Not ride & use childish presentism

possibilism [PSM] <– that April 1987 notation doesn’t make sense as “acronym”.

that’s the diff’c between keyboard shortcut vs. 1987-type shorthand acronym.

By avoiding mixed case, it’s possible to all caps by typing the keyboard shortcut in allcaps.

possibilism [PSM]
presentism [PRM]
eternalism [ETM]

the altered state of consciousness [ASC]
the ordinary state of consciousness [OSC]
ordinary state [O-S]

The Term ‘presentism’ is relevant for psychedelic-state metaperception

metaperception [MP]

psychedelic-state metaperception [PSMP]

https://www.google.com/search?q=metaperception

Outdated Term in Egodeath Lexicon: ‘metaphor’ <– bad, say “analogy”

We’re not doing muddle-headed literary writing; we are doing clarifying explanation, so [by definition] say ‘analogy’, not ‘metaphor’.

egodeath
ed

metaphorical psychedelic eternalism
mpe

Presentism

“presentism”, a mis-focused, irrelevant, ordinary state-based term from armchair Philosophy department/ dorm room tripper, having nothing to do with & not useful in any way for the ego death experience
prmj

“presentism”, a mis-focused, irrelevant, ordinary state-based term from armchair philosophy department (Chris “only mind exists” Letheby, late to class from tripping all night in his dorm room), having nothing to do with & not useful in any way for the ego death experience

Thomas Hatsis posted “Allegro is my fav author” in his blog, and then goes around attacking everyone by projecting his own #1 fanboiism of Allegro onto other entheogen scholars.

Hatsis projects his own personal childhood trajectory of folly onto everyone else, even me who is 0% influenced, in my intellectual trajectory, by Allegro.

I never heard of Allegro or his stupid Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory until AFTER my Feb. 1997 outline of my core theory.

Similarly:

Chris Letheby wrote (published) that when he’s tripping in his dorm room, he insists “only mind exists”.

He wrote that then, when he comes down, he flips and insists only “only material exists”.

Both are irrelevant positions. re the most important experience, control transformation.

The debate between whether “only mind exists” or “only material exists” is irrel to control transformation in Psilocybin state, & control instability that drives mental model transformation.

Max Freakout & I agree that the useful practical, relevant, useful model is:

We can’t know if the external world exists, beyond the wall of mental construct representations, but, it is useful to assume it does; useful for control transformation in the loose cognition state.

So, build a model on THAT foundation.

Pure distraction is Phil debate “only mind exists” vs. “only external material world exists”.

Irrel for control crisis; the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control.

the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control

the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control

etcloc

Dittrich’s OAV questionnaire Angst/ Dread/ DED dimension item 54: “I was afraid to lose my self-control.”

Why did Griffiths obtain the Angst items from 11-Factors’ re-factoring of OAV’s Angst dim, isntead of directly copying the 21 Angst items directly from OAV’s Angst dim?

b/c that way, he can “accidentally” overlook & exclude the 8 items – incl item 54 – that were too broadly powerful to fit exclusvely into either one of the new, low-level factors, ANX or ICC.

But why didn’t the B-tier, lower-IQ ppl on Stud’s team put — obviously, item 54, “anxiety about control” GOES INTO HALF OF THEIR HALF BAKED “ICC” LO-LEV FACTOR, “Impaired Control and cognition”.

Questionnaire Authors 1) Conjoined Impaired Control + Impaired Cognition into single factor; 2) placed item 54 fear of loss of control into ANX anxiety factor, why?

Why not into ICC factor initially?
3) “dropped” 54 from ANX.

I would have expected them to put 54 in ICC – impaired control – where there’s no way in they could’ve dropped it, and they woulda known obviously WE GOT A BIG PROBLEM.

Thats’ a Thomas Hatsis quote, confused about the position of Brown & me; the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm:

Hatsis 2020 assumes he can attribute Irvin 2008’s view onto Brown & me.

You guys got a big problem.

Imagine an alt, better reality of how Stud group ought to have defined neg Factors in the 11-Factors questionnaire: so as to prevent Grift from missing 8 negative effects out of 21, when concocting the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): What if this had happened:

  1. Stud group’s b team, who was assigned to make-up some lo-lev factors within their renamed “Angest” hi lv … goddamnit i have to voice recording. can’t type , MUST REST FINGERS. true, at 1:34 pm March 22 2025 I am pulling out from editing the present page.

1) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Made a Single Factor Scoped as ICC; “Impaired Control and Cognition”

2) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Initially Placed OAV’s Item 54 “Fear of Loss of Control” into the ANX “Anxiety” Factor; Should Have Put It into ICC (or better, an IC) Factor Instead

3) 11-Factors Questionnaire Should Not Have Dropped OAV’s Item 54 “Fear of Loss of Control” into the ANX “Anxiety” Factor; Should Have Put It into ICC (or better, an IC) Factor Instead

4) Griffiths Should Not Have Gathered Initial Item Pool from 11-Factors’s low level factors; Ought to Have Copied from OAV’s Angst Dimension DIRECTLY, to not overlook 8 broad effects items of 21

4) Griffiths Should Not Have Gathered Initial Item Pool from 11-Factors’s low level factors (thus overlooking 8 too-broad items), but Should Have Instead Drawn Directly the Complete Set of All 21 Items from OAV’s Angst/Dread Dimension –

By using the ill-formed middleman questionnaire 11-Factors, which is an overlay on OAV that makes change 1 & change 2 , Grifty overlooked 8 of 21 neg Psilocybin effects [and went on to arb delete 10 more, leaving only 3 of 21 neg Psilocybin effects, deleting 84%, magically reaining 3/21 = 14% of neg Psilocybin effects, yet p. 1 “the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is awesome b/c it is BROADER collecion of neg Psilocybin fx than SOCQ/MEQ & HRS & OAV/5D-ASC Combined!

Change 1: 11F renames OAV’s Angst/Dread/ DED dim as “Unpl Exp” and that becomes a hi-lev dim in comparison to their added shiny Mktg dept “factors” they add.

Change 2: 11F adds to the Angst dim of OAV, relatively lo-lev “factors”, but, they unconsciously create what i call Shadow Factor 13, (vs its complement i cal “Virtual Factor 12” within “Pleasant Exp” hi-level dim which = OAV’s O + V dims = Ocean + Vision dims). When they “drop” 8 items from their lo lev factors ANX & ICC, that means, the 8 items still remain, within their non-Marketed, non-Advertised, hih level “Unpleasant” dim which exactly = OAV ‘s A Dread DIM. The 8 items ….

Alternatively, Grifty could have copied entire “Unpl Exp” hi-lev dim from 11F questionnaire, which includes the 8 “dropped from factors” items, as well as the 7-8 ANX items + 6-7 ICC items

draw diagram: venn: OAV’s Angst dim = 21 items = 11F’s “Unpl Exp” hi-lev dim;

11F’s hi-level “Unpleasant Experiences” dimension consists of 3 groups of items: Studerus team unconsciously ended up defining 3, not just 2, low-level Factors within their renamed “Unpleasant Experiences” high-level dimension:

  • ‘S’ (Shadow Factor 13) – incl OAV’s item 54: Anxiety about Control
  • ‘ANX’ (Anxiety)
  • ‘ICC’ (Impaired Control and Cognition)

What a fkking mess! Studerus never explains:

  • Why we made 1 factor combining two different things: impaired control & impaired cognition.
  • Why we initially (temp’ly) placed item 54 (anxiety about control) into our Anxiety factor instead of into our Impaired Control factor.
  • Why we dropped 54 (anxiety about control) from any factor, either Anx or Imp Ctrl – they write “we dropped 54 b/c had too much cross-laoding across all of the 2 facotrs, ANX & ICC”). ie, kept in hi-level Unplease dim, but excluded from – LOST IN BAD MATH, THEY FORGOT WTF THEY ARE TRYING TO ACOCMPLICSH. IF 11-F SHINY NEW LO-LEV ADDED FACTORS, THAT THEY ADDED TO DITT’S WONDERFUL OAV A DIM, CANNOT FIT 54 “ANX ABOUT CTRL ” INTO ANY OF THEIR FABRICATED, MARKETED, NEW FACTORS, LO-LEV FACOTRS, WHAT IS THE FUCKKING POINT OF 111-FACTORS????? What is the purpose of 11-F questionnaire, i mean the purpose of its shiny new “factors”, if they cannot fit a major psychedelic effect, “anxiety about control”? What in the HELL is Stud team treying to accomp, w/ their shiny marketed lo-lev factors, if those factors FAIL to capture “anxiety about control”??????

What is Studerus Team Trying to Accomplish with their shiny new heavily marketed low-level “factors”, if those factors FAIL to capture “anxiety about control”??

What a COMPLETELY USELESS, POINTLESS SET OF FACTORS!!

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😵💦🔫

The Studerus Low-IQ, C-Team, Retarded scientists assigned by Mktg Dept to fabricate some low-level factors, that exclude, after fumbling around

see their phase 1 outline where they fumbled around, then their next appendix where they fumbled around more moving item 54 here & there, then see final result in outline of only the factors item —

BUT NOT the “dropped” 8 negative items whcih now have gone off the radar b/c only remain within the Unpl Dim but not in any lo-lev “factor’,

so become invisible from marketing pOv that Grifty gets suckered into when he copies only the neg factorss –

instead of copying entire neg Unp Ex hi-level dim – which exactly = the full set of 21 OAV/Angst items — from 11F into “initial item pool” for the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).

  1. OAV Angst dim exists w 21 items
  2. 11F copies all 21 as “Unpl” hi-lev dim, and iniitally puts item 54 (anx about ctrl) in ANX, not in ICC (imparied control). see apx 1 outline.
  3. 11F then removes item 54 from ANX, so it’s in Unpl but not in either ANX or ICC factor (8 Neg items become “grayed out” this way, not included in any low-level Factor).
  4. Along comes Grifty, gathering items for CEQ’s initial item pool, but he IGNORES THE NON-marketed hi-lev Unp dim w/ 21 items, (full set), and ONLY copies the low-lev factors items (21-8 = 13 items). we’re down to 13 of 21 Negative Psilocybin effects.
  5. in final item pool, Grifty deletes 10 more of the OAV/Angst items, retaining only 3 of the 21 items that are in OAV’s Angst dim or – identailly – in 11F’s hi-levl Unpl Exp dim. Mission accomp: Grift has deleted 8 and then 10 items, of the full set of Ditt’s 21 Angst items, dleeted 18 of 21 = 84% of Psilocybin challengiing effects, retaining only 14%.
  6. the LOL part: Grifty then writes the Hop marketing spiel on p 1 of the CEQ article, bragging: the reason CEQ exists is, we make a broader, more emcompassing list of negative psychedelic effects, than any other questionnaire;
  7. indeed MORE COMPREHSIVE THAN THE NEG FX OF SOCQ & HRS & OAV questionnaires, COMBINED! LOL!
  8. And no, the deleted 18 of 21 OAV items are NOT covered equivalently by the neg items that were drawn from the other questionnaire lineages, SOCQ or HRS;
  9. predictably, the same type of folly was applied by Grifty team to SOCQ & HRS as well.
  10. Final sordid results: see “Scoring Guide” appendix of the CEQ article. site map section:
    https://egodeaththeory.org/nav/#Psychedelics-Questionnaires
    https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/01/17/references-for-psychedelic-psychometrics-questionnaires/ <- alas my page fails to link to my other articles, but see Site Map section, for that.

Subsets of Negative Psychedelic Effects that Make Up the 11F qair’s Unpleasant Experiences hi-level dimension (which = OAV’s Angst/ Dread/ DED/ Dread of Ego Death

Dittrich’s “DED” actually means “Dread of Ego Dissolution“, not Dread of Ego Death, , but my Marketing dept. told me to accidentally slip.

Plus, psychedelic dread is not of dissolution, it is fear of cybernetic {death} ie loss of control;

dread = the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control. you could say, DED = the experience of the threat of disastrous loss of control.

DED = Dread of Ego Disaster

11f; 11f-m; 11f-l – set of 3 verbosities of shortcut expansion

Define a set of 3 keyboard shortcuts, by using pattern:
abbrv (a short expansion, as if abbrv-s but default to omit -s)
abbrv-m (a medium-length expansion)
abbrv-l (a long expansion)

short expansion:
the 11-Factors questionnaire
11f

A good, needed summary of 11-F, showing how it’s a malformed addition to OAV questionnaire:

med expansion:
the 11-Factors questionnaire, which is same positive & negative psychedelics effects items/questions as OAV questionnaire, but with incomplete low-level subset factors added
11fm

long expansion:
the 11-Factors questionnaire from Studerus group, has a high-level dimension that’s identical set of negative psychedelic effects as Dittrich’s OAV questionnaire’s Angst/ Dread of Ego Dissolution dimension, but with two low-level “factors” added — and also, problematically, an unconscious “Shadow Factor 13” factor because the two factors omit 8 effects items
11fl

11F’s “factors” are incomplete subsets, so i had to add their unconscious factors:
Virtual Factor 12 [items omitted from lo-lev factors in OAV’s Oceanic & Visionary dimensions]


Shadow Factor 13 [items omitted from lo-lev factors in OAV’s Angst/ Dread of Ego Dissolution/ DED dimension] –

includes item 54 “anxiety about control” which fit both the Stud malformed ill-designed factors, “ANX” Anxiety & ICC “Impaired Control

and so their GENIUS solution 🤔💡was to simply “drop” item 54, “anxiety about control” from these badly formed lo-lev “factors” entirely, only retaining such 8 items within the shunned, anti-Marketing, hi-levl Unpl dim.

b/c marketing purpose was:

Our new improved questionnaire, 11F, improves OAV by adding some lo-lev factors to the combination of Ocean+Vision dims, and Angst dim which we rename as the “Unpleasant Experiences” high-level dimension.

the official expansion of ditt’s Angst/ Dread of Ego disosluion /DED acro per the Egodeath theory is “Dread of Ego Death” – a faux expansion, for my Marketing purposes; as we see from Grifty.

Roland Griffiths team at Johns Hopkins Dept. of Psychedelic Pseudo Science

The Grifty Group & the Stud Group Are Marketing-Driven Psychedelic Pseudo Science

Similarly, the Egodeath Theory is driven by Marketing at the Expense of Science, so, I misstate:

OAV’s Angst/ Dread/ DED Dimension (Dread of Ego Death)

not dread “of Ego Dissolution”, per know-nothing, confused Adolph Dittrich listening to Acid Rush album Caress of Steel in 1975 when he formed v1 questionnaire, of his lineage, APZ.

Adolph Dittrich falsely claims that dread is of ego dissolution.

when he formed/ first id’d his in 1985 his 3 dim’s within APZ. these were v1 OAV sets of psychedelics fx items/questions, vs. v2 OAV in 1994.

psychedelics effects items/questions
peiq
when i say “items” i mean this.

The Dittrich lineage of questionnaires:

  • 1975: APZ
  • 1985: OAV dims (v1) of APZ
    • There’s also a stupidly named, irrelvant dimension or two — ie categs of a-s fx altered-state fx the altered state ychedelics about drug-specific non-psychedelic effects that is pointless and no one pays any attention to – that’s the other 2 dims of “5D” later.
  • 1994: OAV dims (v2) of APZ
  • year: 5D-ASC
  • year: the 11-Factors questionnaire – same items as – same psychedelics effects items/questions as OAV 1994, but combines Ocean+Vision to form “Pleasant Exp” high-level dimension, and mainly exists for Marketing dept to add 11 low-level “factors” but, they are incomplete subsets within Please or Unplea dims, the Pleaseant dim omiting like 16 positive items, and the Unpl dim omitting 8 neg psychedelics effects items/questions. thus i trump them all,
  • 2023: Cybermonk defines hidden in the 11-Factors questionnaire:
    Virtual Factor 12 [16 items?]
    Shadow Factor 13 [8 items]
  • SF13 includes – incl “control anxiety” which was dropped from Stud’s ANX factor & CTRL factor & ANX factor

The CTRL Factor – so to speak; actually it is named ICC, for “Impaired Control and Cognition”. God only knows why Stud combined Ctrl & Cog into a single Factor.

I am a dumb person on Stud team: hey i have great idea, lets divide Angst/Dread/ Unpleasent exp into Anxiety & Control.
problem: where do we fit OAV’s item 54, “anxiety about control” then?

item 54, “anxiety about control” goes in both Factors: ANX & ICC.

since item 54 “anxiety about control” fits both in our “Anxiety” Factor and in our “Control” Factor, we need to “drop” item 54, from out incomplete set of low level Factors, bc it (& 7 other psychedelics effects items/questions) fails to fit our model.

we’ll hide item 54, “anxiety about control” in our unconscious SHAD Factor instead

my made-up Factor name acro “SHAD” works better than my joke about ‘S’ factor abbr that’s snake-shaped.

Real Factors from STud group: ANX, ICC. (note the 8 items they dropped from those, in Unpl dim)

Fake factors per the Egodeath theory: fake descriuptions of Stud’s factors: SHAD; for Shadow Factor 13 i id’d as the BLIND SPOT IN psychedelic pseudo science: {shadow dragon monster}.

my pretend factors:

ANX, CTRL, SHAD – all neg items are placed in some lo lev Factor this way.

actual Factors

ANX, ICC – omitting 8 neg psychedelics effects items/questions

https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=Ghostbusters

theat works brilliant for teaching purpose:

The foolish Stud group, forming the 11-Factors questionnaire, said that Unpl exper divides into 2 (unconsciouly 3) Factors:

  • ANX
  • CTRL (actually named ICC)
  • [SHAD] <– unconscious

Given item 54: anxiety about control. Where put? Fits both ANX & CTRL factors. 🤔💡 i has idea: lets drop item 54, b/c it fails to fit only in ANX or only in CTRL. Item 54 is faulty b/c it fails to conform to our “ANX vs. CTRL” dichotomy, so we’ll simply drop it from any category — ie, place item … it in our unconscious SHAD factor, where Grifty group won’t see it when pickking items for initial item pool of teh questionnaire from Hell, the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).

🤔💡 Item 54, “anxiety about control”, Fails to Fit Only into Our “Anxiety” Factor or “Control” Factor — So, Simply Drop It! 🎉

😱🐉 –>🗑

That is exactly what happened, what was done by the B Team in Studerus group when fabricating the 11-Factors questionnaire.

The Griffiths group then came along, when crafting the the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) as directed by the Grifty Marketing team, ignored the 11-Factors questionnaire’s “Unpleasant Experiences” high-level dimension (which has OAV’s entire set of 21 negative psychedelics effects items/questions), and instead ONLY copied the two, shiny, heavily marketed, low-level factors — ANX & ICC — ~= Anxiety factor & Control factor — from which item 54, “anxiety about control” had to be dropped b/c it spanned both factors.

That’s EXACTLY what happened; that’s how Grifty omitted 8 of 21– MAGICALLY DELETED 8 OF 21 NEGATIVE Psilocybin EFFECTS by accidentally being confused by the Studerus’ 11-Factors questionnaire made by the Studerus Marketing team.

Now just 10 more to go, omitting 10 more of the 21 negative psychedelics effects items/questions, so Grift can end up w/ only 3 of the feeblest negative psychedelics effects.

To achieve goal of selling ordinary state Grief therapy, foisted as “CEQ is the world’s most comprehensive questionnaire of all known negative psychedelics effects” —

A positive-balanced set of all negative psychedelics effects.

Which is to say, the nullification and cancellation of negative Psilocybin effects. PRESTO!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presto_(album)

Rush Presto song lyrics:

What a fool I used to be

If I could wave my magic wand
I’d set everybody free

I’m not one to believe in magic
Though my memory has a second-sight

I’m just improvising
My illusion of careless flight

Roland Griffiths team at Johns Hopkins Dept. of Psychedelic Pseudo Science
grifty

Griffiths Team at Johns Hopkins Dept. of Psychedelic Pseudo Science

The Roland Griffiths team at Johns Hopkins Dept. of Psychedelic Pseudo Science:

Has Anyone Seen the Buddha Statue?? Matt? What Have You Done with It?

I have a sudden urgent need for the photo of the Buddha statue of Hopkins over whichMatthew Johnson reported ethics violations complaints, and the FORMER team blew up to smithereens.

https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=Hopkins+Buddha+statue – found it! —
https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/01/09/critique-of-griffiths-meq30-and-other-me-questionnaires-brown-thread/#CEQ-Deletes-4

Human Hallucinogen Research: Guidelines for Safety
Matthew W. Johnson, William A. Richards, and Roland R. Griffiths, 2008
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056407/pdf/nihms256719.pdf

Guidelines for Safety article, Figure 1: “The living room-like session room used in the Johns Hopkins hallucinogen research studies. …”

“Unpleasant Experiences” high-level dimension
uxd

“Pleasant Experiences” high-level dimension
pxd

item 54, “anxiety about control”
i54

item 54, “anxiety about control” (“I was afraid to lose my self-control”), from OAV’s Angst/Dread dimension
i54l

Shadow Factor 13
sf13

Virtual Factor 12
vf12

high-level dimension
hld

effects
fx

altered-state effects
ase

ordinary state
o-s

The Egodeath theory correctly says dread is of ego death, where {death} means cybernetic control instability.

cybernetic control instability
cci

control instability
ci

THUS THE MALFORMED 11F BEGAT MALFORMED CEQ, CREATING THE YALDABAOTH 🦁🐍🙈 OF QUESTIONNAIRES

Happy was the day the episode of Egodeath Mystery Show voice recording that defined those LOL factor names:

  • Virtual Factor 12
  • Shadow Factor 13

ie imagine:
11f-s –> the 11-Factors questionnaire
11f-m –> the 11-Factors questionnaire blah blah blah
11f-l –> the 11-Factors questionnaire blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

  • 8 items that are too braod to fit ANX or ICC lo-lev factors b/c “too much cross-ladng” loading across these SHITTILY DEFINED low-level factors. These do not reside in any lo-lev factor, so I point out they in effect have unconsciously defined a hidden, 3rd factor, i call “Shadow Factor 13“, abbreviated as S b/c shaped as snake, containing {shadow dragon monster} , fear of loss of control.
  • 7-8 items in ANX Anxiety factor. when you consider that FEAR of loss of CONTROL violates their bad categ schem b/c item 54 Fear of Loss of control fits both their ANX factor and their ICC “Impaired Control and Cognition” facotrs, they faced a question because of theeir stupid factors scopes: 54 fits both in ANX (because fear) and ICC (b/c re control), SO THEY SOLVED THE PAINTED INTO CORNER PLOB PROBLEM THEY CREATED, BY SIMPLY DROPPING ITEM 54 AND 7 OTHERS. which means, keeping those 8 items in the hi-lev Unpl dim, but exclusived excluding them from any low-level , highly Marketed, factor.
  • 6-7 items in ICC factor. “Impaired Control and Cognition” factor. subset of hi lev dim “Unpl Exp”.

Then sucket for sucker for Marketing, Grifty, comes along, ignores 11F’s hii-leve Unplease dim, he only pays attention to shiny Marketing low level added factorrs,

DO VOICE RECORDING OF ALT REALITY, WHERE STUD GROUP DOES NOT JOIN IMPAIRED CONTROL W IMPAIRED COGNITION,

AND DOES NOT INIT PLACE 54 INTO ANX FACTOR, BUT PUTS IT INTO “IMPAIRED CONTROL [IC] FACTOR,

THEN THEY COULDN’T POSSIBLY HAVE “DROPPED” item 54 B/C OF “TOO MUCH COROSS-LOADING across MULTIPLE of our FACTORS”

The wording in Stud article: “dropped due to cross-loading”: ie, these 8 negaive psychedelics effects items were too broadly powerful to fit into our shiny new narrow low-level factors, lo-leve groups within “Unpleasant Experiences”, ANX or ICC.

Subtle you must und: to “drop” the 8 items/effects, means, have them in the negative high level category [same identical set of 21 items in OAV’s Angst/Dread dim & 11-F’s hi-level dim “Unpleaseant Experiences”.

Low-IQ Chris Letheby/ Philosophy Department False-Dilemma Debate: “Which One Exists: Mind, or Matter?” – Irrelevant for the All-Important Control Transformation Experience

control transformation = ???? shortcut cx? use that for now.

c x = control transformation

Might want phrase:
the control transformation experience
cte

test:

c t e = the control transformation experience

c y b e t m = cybernetic eternalism

c t = the cybernetic theory

m t = the Mytheme theory

not idiotic irrel. Phil dept debate
“which one exists: external material world, or mind only??”

That debate is as DUMB as the low-IQ debate “Does God exist or not” — while it never even occurs to them to define; while NEVER defining their term ‘God’.

That doesn’t occur to them that we can define ‘God’ in different ways; instead, they take – thoughtlessly – for granted the most rank, crude, unreflective notion of ‘God’, taken silently for granted, and proceed to build their stupid debate on that irrelvant foundation basis. premise.

Houot does that kind of unthinking move, re: his assertion:
“myth = stupidity = woo; reject it.”

Presentism IS relevant for “metaperception” in the Psilocybin state. Thus: THE PROPER USE OF PHIL DEPT CONCEPT OF “PRESENTISM” IS NOT FOR CONTRASTING TWO MODELS OF TIME, BUT FOR METAPERCEP IN THE ALTERED STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

demo:

s m = critical rational scientific objective historiography methodology

whereas

S M = CRITICAL RATIONAL SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVE HISTORIOGRAPHY METHODOLOGY

My keyboard shortcut sucks for e d t = … Since it’s a mixed-case expansion, that prevents allcapping it. Demo:

edt = the Egodeath theory

EDT = the Egodeath theory <– FAILS to allcap.

sm = [critical rational scientific objective historiography methodology] –0
Is that term against [Matthew Johnson & Chris Letheby’s hardcore materialism-only position in [the Moving Past Mysticism debate in Psychedelic Science aka the Mysticism Wars]]?
No, that phrase is re: [Wouter Hanegraaff’s theory of historiography of esotericism].

the Moving Past Mysticism debate in Psychedelic Science aka the Mysticism Wars
mpmd

keyboard shortcuts: kws: from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake frozen in rock}

from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}

removed “puppet”, it is a net loss here.

kws

[KWS] <– my breakthrough notation of April 1987, for handwriting in binder sheets

I ditched blank books then, April 1987, because not expansive/ freeform / inviting open experimentation enough.

April 1987 when father died, I thus switched from a __ approach to a ___ approach, which i credit for my jan 1988 breakthrough. ultra fast figured out e-t ego transcendence b/c i had to. compare Ooh-Oh recounting the math grad student who solved impossible math problems because he didn’t know they were impossible/ unsolved.

I am the first to figure out ego transcendence , b/c i had to! EXTREME push by me, from phase 1 [relative phases defined only here}

Phase: Blank Books Self Help Cajoling, vs. Binder Sheets + Acronyms Definition Notation like [MCP] with Pentel P205 Mech Pencil

My minor, lesser sense of “my initial phases of dev’ing the Egodeath theory”.

sense 2: Phase 1 = create core the Egodeath theory; phase 2 = add myth analogies.

sense 1: Phase 1= Oct 26 1985 back to the future day through March 1987: the blank books self-help era. cajoling myself to stop thinking wrong and think correctly instead, stupid self! Gosh!; then, phase 2 = April 1987 binder sheets + acronyms for Loose Cognitive Science — loose cognitive binding [LCB], loose mental functioning binding , those sort of acro’s.

from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake frozen in rock}

todo: find a Windows app that = Mac > Preferences > Keyboard > Text, but, will lose sync w/ mobile, darn.

MAJOR PHASE 1: DEVELOP the Egodeath theory

Subphases:
*

  • 1985/10/26-jun 86: the first approach/vector
  • jun 86-mar 87: 2nd
  • apr 87-dec 88
  • jan 88 – feb 97: now that i have the grand breakthru new paradigm, write up, and read what ahu humans have written in all related fields.

Phase: Create Core 2-level Egodeath Core Theory: Reach Eternalism; Phase: Add Myth Analogy, History of Religious Myth; 3-Phase/3-Level Model (Transcend Eternalism)

My main sense of “my two phases of dev’ing the Egodeath theory”.

4-Hour Productive Voice Recording Sat. Mar 15, 2025

I found errors in Jerry Brown Psychedelic Gospels 2016. Do not lump together scholars , or you lack precision.

Brown says Clark Heinrich asserts ahistoricity Jesus- False.

Hein never heard of tgat, Str Fruit says Allegro said Jesus was leader of mushroom cult.

Brown is smearing competitors, fakely exaggerating his distance to make them look bad, But Brown’s view is close to theirs.

Posturing, Brown misrepresents competitors to make them look bad and fabricate pretended distance between him & them.

Slow, Buggy, Drainy App

old bug – sluggish, then dups block – not fixed still!

SLUGGISH mobile JetPack APP WTF 🐌🐢 and is burning up battery

Breakthrough: Wasson’s Private View vs. Wasson’s Public View (They Differ; He Is a Liar)

Mar 15: Ruck half truth – Hoffman Uncertainty Principle regarding deniers of mushrooms in art:

We cannot know what a mushroom denier’s private view is, we only know what their stated public view is. Exception: If you are pals like Ruck, you can tell that Wasson believed mushroom art.

As a peer reviewer for Wink the Journal of Psychedelic Studies article about Wasson i was wrong to say Wasson dod NOT believe mushroom art– [shorthand here]– the mediocre writer was correct saying

Wasson must have believed mushroom art.

Correct, we are safe to assume Wasson believed mushroom imagery in Christian art PRIVATELY while Wasson PUBLICLY LIED and pretended reject mushroom imagery in Christian art

I should have told the draft journal article author:

You must contrast Wasson’s PRIVATE belief vs his PUBLIC LIE about his view.

Conflict of interest: Wasson was the banker forcthe Vatican.

Ramsbottom 1953 leaked Wasson’s private affirmative view, by printing Wasson’s Dec 1953 letter in 2nd printing of book Mushrooms & Toadstools.

Wasson didn’t figure that out he was caught lying about his view, until 1970+ when Allegro busted him in endnote quoting Wasson 1953 Dec to Ram: “Rightly of wrongly, we are going to publicly pretend to not believe mushroom-trees mean mushroom.”

Brown says Irvin asserts ahistoricity. False i think, in AstroSham – i think irvin is agnosrltic and flexible about ahistoricity.

I explained to friend after recording, in just 3-4 minutes, why Hanegraaff botches astral ascent mysticism and cannot place fixed stars in their usual sphere level 8: because the initiate asks teacher to take them to sphere 8 & 9.

In fact initiate asks teacher to take them to Fate sphere (8, Ogdoad), which is the highest level of the Fate-ruled cosmos, 100% Fate; and AFTER that, after going THROUGH Fate, then reach level 9, freewill, a little bit, with your head / soirit poking outside of the Fate-cosmos,

I wish I recorded teaching all the basic points in just 3 min. I used extremely common words, no tech jargon.

I need to write and record like beginner/ outsider utoob videos.

i didnt even mention Saturn, maybe. Only talk about where to put the stars, in sphere 8, which is Fate, NOT freewill.

I first prepped friend by explaining who Hanegraaff is: in 1995 when I asked bookseller what book studies the esoteric roots of Newage, he said I should write it.

1995, Hanegraaff was writing his book Newage Mirror of W Thot.

As if Hanegraaff wrote the book for me, to order.

Thx for writing the book I asked for in 1995, Hanegraaff.

Hanegraaff thinks wrongly sphere 8 ogdoad is above fate , and he thinks one would want to avoid fate, not reach fate..

He thinks Ogdoad is fe freewill . but it is actually Fate, . his root problem preventing placing fixed stars. in sphere 8 ogdoad. Chaos results in his broken sytem. but i got big confirm my astral ascent mysticism model in 2014 from 2013 book N D L Cosmology & Fate, then yesterday Justin Slegdge Chris B

Ogdoad is fate and that is where the fixed stars (which Hanegraaff knows are Fate)

book Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity, by Wouter Hanegraaff, 2022

WordPress Mobile App

This page is still short, yet app slow.

data sync notes: I deleted “WordPress” mobile app, using now “JetPack” (WordPress) mobile app.

Be careful to check result in Desktop browser to not lose data/ writings.

Pagels’ First 3 Books Compatible with the Egodeath Theory

Elaine Pagels’ first 3 books resonate with the Egodeath theory. She divides traits into two contrasting sets of views, like in the book The Jesus Mysteries by Freke & Gandy:

  • “Orthodox” (exoteric): literalist ordinary-state possibilism with monolithic, autonomous control.
  • “Gnostic” (esoteric): analogical psychedelic eternalism with 2-level, dependent control.

My Amazon book reviews of Pagels’ first 3 books at:

  • Egodeath.com
  • EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com
  • Egodeath Yahoo Group – Max Freakout archive.

todo: make a page gathering those 3 reviews.

Video: The Valentinians: Ancient Christian Gnostics? (ReligionForBreakfast, 2022)

This section didn’t fit well in What is Hermeticism? (Paul Davidson) Can’t Place Fixed Stars so moving to here.

The Valentinians: Ancient Christian Gnostics?
ch: ReligionForBreakfast
Dr. Andrew Henry
Apr 19, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heJZ37l4yFM

“Valentinianism was a prominent variety of early Christianity starting in the 2nd century CE. Some call it a form of Gnosticism. But what is Valentinianism all about?”

960K subscribers
453,299 views

“Check out my favorite religious studies books by following this affiliate link to my Amazon page:
https://www.amazon.com/shop/religionforbreakfast – These books are Dr. Andrew M. Henry’s top recommendations. These are all scholarly books written by academics and experts in their respective fields.”

Further reading: [book info below]

  • Piotr Ashwin-Siejkowski, “Valentinus’ Legacy and Polyphony of Voices” [2022]
  • Geoffrey Smith, “Valentinian Christianity” [2020]
  • Ismo Dunderberg, “Beyond Gnosticism” [2008]

Piotr Ashwin-Siejkowski,
Valentinus’ Legacy and Polyphony of Voices
https://www.amazon.com/Valentinus-Polyphony-Routledge-Studies-Christian/dp/1032019352/
[2022]
“This book challenges the popular use of ‘Valentinian’ to describe a Christian school of thought in the second century CE by analysing documents ascribed to ‘Valentinians’ by early Christian Apologists, and more recently by modern scholars after the discovery of codices near Nag Hammadi in Egypt.

To this end, Ashwin-Siejkowski highlights the great diversity of views among Christian theologians associated with the label ‘Valentinian’, demonstrating their attachment to the Scriptures and Apostolic traditions as well as their dialogue with Graeco-Roman philosophies of their time. Among the various themes explored are ‘myth’ and its role in early Christian theology, the familiarity of the Gospel of Truth with Alexandrian exegetical tradition, Ptolemy’s didactic in his letter to Flora, the image of the Saviour in the Interpretation of Knowledge, reception of the Johannine motifs in Heracleon’s commentary and the Tripartite Tractate, salvation in the Excerpts from Theodotus, Christian identity in the Gospel of Philip, and reception of selected Johannine motifs in ‘Valentinian’ documents.

Valentinus’ Legacy and Polyphony of Voices will be an invaluable and accessible resource to students, researchers, and scholars of Early Christian theologies, as well as trajectories of exegesis in New Testament sources and the emerging of different Christian identities based on various Christologies.”

Geoffrey Smith
Valentinian Christianity
[2020]
https://www.amazon.com/Valentinian-Christianity-Translations-Geoffrey-Smith/dp/0520297466/ — “Valentinus, an Egyptian Christian who traveled to Rome to teach his unique brand of theology, and his followers, the Valentinians, formed one of the largest and most influential sects of Christianity in the second and third centuries. But by the fourth century, their writings had all but disappeared suddenly and mysteriously from the historical record, as the newly consolidated imperial Christian Church condemned as heretical all forms of what has come to be known as Gnosticism. Only in 1945 were their extensive original works finally rediscovered, and the resurrected “Gnostic Gospels” soon rooted themselves in both the scholarly and popular imagination.

Valentinian Christianity: Texts and Translations brings together for the first time all the extant texts composed by Valentinus and his followers. With accessible introductions and fresh translations based on new transcriptions of the original Greek and Coptic manuscripts on facing pages, Geoffrey S. Smith provides an illuminating, balanced overview of Valentinian Christianity and its formative place in Christian history.”

Ismo Dunderberg,
Beyond Gnosticism
[2008]
https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Gnosticism-Lifestyle-Society-Valentinus/dp/0231141726/ – “Valentinus was a popular, influential, and controversial early Christian teacher. His school flourished in the second and third centuries C.E. Yet because his followers ascribed the creation of the visible world not to a supreme God but to an inferior and ignorant Creator-God, they were from early on accused of heresy, and rumors were spread of their immorality and sorcery.

Beyond Gnosticism suggests that scholars approach Valentinians as an early Christian group rather than as a representative of ancient “Gnosticism”-a term notoriously difficult to define. The study shows that Valentinian myths of origin are filled with references to lifestyle (such as the control of emotions), the Christian community, and society, providing students with ethical instruction and new insights into their position in the world. While scholars have mapped the religio-historical and philosophical backgrounds of Valentinian myth, they have yet to address the significance of these mythmaking practices or emphasize the practical consequences of Valentinians’ theological views. In this groundbreaking study, Ismo Dunderberg provides a comprehensive portrait of a group hounded by other Christians after Christianity gained a privileged position in the Roman Empire.

Valentinians displayed a keen interest in mythmaking and the interpretation of myths, spinning complex tales about the origin of humans and the world. As this book argues, however, Valentinian Christians did not teach “myth for myth’s sake.” Rather, myth and practice were closely intertwined. After a brief introduction to the members of the school of Valentinus and the texts they left behind, Dunderberg focuses on Valentinus’s interpretation of the biblical creation myth, in which the theologian affirmed humankind’s original immortality as a present, not lost quality and placed a special emphasis on the “frank speech” afforded to Adam by the supreme God. Much like ancient philosophers, Valentinus believed that the divine Spirit sustained the entire cosmic chain and saw evil as originating from conspicuous “matter.”

Dunderberg then turns to other instances of Valentinian mythmaking dominated by ethical concerns. For example, the analysis and therapy of emotions occupy a prominent place in different versions of the myth of Wisdom’s fall, proving that Valentinians, like other educated early Christians, saw Christ as the healer of emotions. Dunderberg also discusses the Tripartite Tractate, the most extensive account to date of Valentinian theology, and shows how Valentinians used cosmic myth to symbolize the persecution of the church in the Roman Empire and to create a separate Christian identity in opposition to the Greeks and the Jews.”

Beginner Perennialism & Esotericism: 10% Beginner Unity Glimpse + 1% Advanced Unity + 0% Control Transformation Though That’s 95% Bulk of Transformation

Reality:

  1. initial glimpse of unity – 1% of the journey
  2. series of freakout Psilocybin transformation sessions – 98% of the journey
  3. final state of unity – 1% of the journey

How beginners mis-describe and mis-understand esotericism / perennialism:

  1. unity = 100% of the transformation journey

Beginners are the ppl who say heavy breathing can produce Psilocybin effects.

There is only a little overlap between Pop esotericism / perennialism and the Egodeath theory.

Set of 3 Incoherent Assertions Made About Treatise on the 8th & 9th: Which Sphere # Contains the Fixed Stars (which are Fate), If Rising Above Sphere 7 Saturn = Rising Above Fate?

is this in Fail Quotes page? https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/12/04/scholarly-fail-quotes-hall-of-shame/ – no.
This page has the quote: https://egodeaththeory.org/2022/08/03/the-hanegraaff-leap-over-no-free-will-eternalism-the-fixed-stars/ and several other my pages from search below might have it.

Whether the fixed stars should be included [with Saturn (sphere 7)] or should rather be associated with the Ogdoad [(sphere 8)] remains an open question for me.

Wouter Hanegraaff, footnote 114, p. 294, Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity, 2022

How in the hell can this be an “open question”?!

Ans: BECAUSE HE CONSIDERS OGDOAD GOOD IE ABOVE FATE, AND STARS BAD IE = FATE — SO HE IS STUCK. HE CANT PUT EM IN 7, HE CANT PUT EM IN 8 — so THROW UP ARMS, AVOID TALKING ABOUT THIS, <SHRUG>.

Can you not read the plain diagrams?

This is the most elementary given in the world!

Wouter Hanegraaff & Followers: “Whether the number 8 should be included with the number 7 or should instead be placed after 7 remains an open question for me.”

“Whether the number 8 should be included with the number 7 or should instead be placed after 7 remains an open question for me.” HOW SO? WTFF!!!

Whether the fixed stars should be included with Saturn or should rather be associated with the Ogdoad remains an open question for me.
[wtf r u talking about?! Saturn is a moving planet sphere!]

(infamous words by Wouter Hanegraaff, footnote 114, page 294, the book Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity, by Wouter Hanegraaff, 2022.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Mark_Henry – ReligionForBreakfast

search present site for “remains an open question for me”
https://egodeaththeory.org/?s=%22remains+an+open+question+for+me%22

  • The 7 planets = Fate.
  • The fixed stars aka constellations aka zodiac = Fate.
  • When you rise about the 7 planet spheres, you rise above Fate.

They equate Ogdoad and Ennead.

They say:

  • Fate is bad.
  • Rising above Fate is good.
  • Ogdoad is good; it is above Fate.

They say:

  • Fixed stars = Fate = bad.
  • Ogdoad = above 7 planet spheres = Good.
  • THEN WHERE DO THE FRIKKIN FIXED STARS GO IF NOT THE OGDOAD?

Paul Davidson & Wouter Hanegraaff Can’t Count to 8, Contradict Which Sphere # Contains Fixed Stars

Who contradicts themselves in this way:

PD has no website. I am looking at Paul Davidson site instaad to see if I can copy transcript from there instead of finishing format it myself.
search web Paul Davidson hermeticism
https://www.google.com/search?q=Paul+Davidson+hermeticism
might be his ch: “Over at his YouTube channel The Inquisitive Bible Reader, Paul Davidson …”

is this him? https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/about/another sketchy WordPress site, so avoid looking at, can’t be any good

alt approach, search web for “a gigantic body of ancient texts known as the hermetica” from the transcript
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22a+gigantic+body+of+ancient+texts+known+as+the+hermetica%22

YouTube vid:
“What is Hermeticism?
ch: ReligionForBreakfast
Paul Davidson, writer of the episode
Sep. 20, 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COYJi9CKrGI

“Special thanks to the writer of this episode Paul Davidson.
his blog “Is that in the Bible?”:
https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com

What kind of low-credibility hack uses WordPress?
I miss my underlying url https://EgodeathTheory.WordPress.com

I am going to email Wouter Hanegraaff & Paul Davidson and point out INCOHERENT SELF-CONTRADICTION:

If you rise above Fate as soon as you rise above Planet 7 Saturn & reach sphere 8 = Ogdoad, and the fixed stars = Fate, then what level # contains fixed stars, which are Fate?

It can’t be sphere 7, b/c moving planet level 7 is Saturn, which is Fate.

It can’t be sphere 8, b/c that (the Ogdoad) is above Fate according to you, but the fixed stars = Fate, according to you.

What have you done w fixed stars (Fate)? What sphere # do you put the fixed stars in?

The correct answer every schoolchild before 1600 knows: fixed stars are level 8, Fate, Ogdoad.

What is the lowest sphere that’s above Fate? You say 8, incoherently. Ans is 9, Ennead.

You say Ogdoad and Ennead are both above Fate, no real difference between them. YOU ARE CONFUSED and unablle to count to 8.

Ogdoad = Fate = 8th sphere = — the THE PICTURES IN YOUR OWN VIDEO PLAINLY SHOW THIS!! CAN YOU NOT COUNT TO 8?!! IE T

ie sphere 8 (Ogdoad) contains zodiac = fixed stars = constellations = Fate.

This is ULTRA elementary, so much, your diagrams plainly show this.

dummy: point in your diagram, point to zodiac sphere, tell me what # is that? Obv 8. WTF do you think the word “Ogdoad” means? 8th sphere. How in the hell do you keep saying “rise above Saturn sphere 7 to rise higher than fate”? but where are the fixed stars? Higher than Saturn! How are you so plainly inconsistent? WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU NEVER JOIN THE TWO FACTS:

  • FIXED STARS = FATE
  • FIXED STARS = SPHERE 8
  • THEREFORE SPHERE 8 = FATE. <– YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF SAYING THIS. YOUR SYSTEM IS BROKEN!

You are trying to “protect” level 8 Ogdoad from being Fate. In fact rising above Saturn (fate) puts you in Fate (fixed stars).

Reaching sphere 8 does NOT put you above Fate which you keep falsely, incoherently saying. ONLY sphere 9 (or higher) is above Fate. Level 8 is NOT above FAte.

quote Wouter Hanegraaff footnote “i cant figure out if fixed stars go in Saturn sphere or Ogdoad sphere”.

Are you incapable of looking at your own diagram and counting to 8 where zodiac are?

“Bibliography:
Christian Bull, “The Tradition of Hermes Trismegistus,” 2014. [quoted very heavily by Wouter Hanegraaff i finally mem’d title, 4 parts:
Hermetic Spirituality and the Historical Imagination: Altered States of Knowledge in Late Antiquity, 2023 ]
M. David Litwa, “Hermetica II: The Excerpts of Stobaeus,” 2018.
Wouter Hanegraaff, “Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism,” 2006.

00:00 Intro
1:39 Hermetica explained
6:01 Hermetic and Platonic Cosmogony
10:09 Fate and the Hermetic Human Condition
12:08 Ascension, the Way of Hermes, and Rebirth
19:30 Was Hermetism a Religion?
24:48 I included a bonus section about baboons in the Nebula version of this vid

Motivation of this Page

b/c 25 is 98 pages of 100, leave a little cleanup/ expansion room there. I am capping idea development pages at 100 sheets.

Be sure to see idea development page 25 now that it has reached completion 200 pages, 100 sheets.

Progress on Topics in Previous Page 25

Tied together by song Shock Wave by Black Sabbath
https://www.google.com/search?q=black+sabbath+shock+wave+lyrics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn8eNagiEvU

I can’t summarize how page 25 turned out, that would take evaluation.

Also, I developed some ideas within loosely associated recent pages (3-level vs 2-level), and older pages. It would be nice to list those stray sections – but probably all those sections are linked from page 25. So see page 25. todo: update top of TOC in page 25.

  • Wiki block-universe determinism articles.
  • Josie Kins Effect Index article: Perception of Eternalism.
  • A big jump lately, solved a major framing/marketing problem: Stop framing the resulting product as “eternalism”, nor frame it as freewill possibilism; frame the product you get from the Egodeath theory as 2-Level Compatibilism, or Split-Level Compatibilism

You end up not fighting between free will vs. determinism – irrelevant and poorly formed – but rather, end up with two ways of thinking: practical way of thinking (possibilism-thinking) & the factual way of thinking (eternalism-thinking). There is no functional conflict.

Eternalism is the case (eg hidden uncontrollable source of control thoughts), and possibilism is the way the mind experiences and the personal control system is shaped.

You hafta believe in eternalism! = no-free-will puppet slave embedded prison.

The Egodeath theory reveals that you are no-free-will puppet slave embedded prison, on the underlying level, and at the practical, experienced level, you always use possibilism-thinking, now washed clean, and now able to endure the Psilocybin state; loose cognition.

The Pre/Trans Fallacy: After Learning the Egodeath Theory, Nothing Changes

Except Gained Beard, & Crowned by God, & Sacrificed Child-Thinking, & Gained Ability to Endure Eat from Tree of Life & Pass Through the Gate Guarded by {flame} and {blade} to Get the Golden Apple Treasure of Transcendent Knowledge

You can go ahead a believe in egoic freewill branching steering! <– the Pre/Trans fallacy. You are just like an enlightened person, by using efw egoic freewill thinking! DO NOTHING – SAME AS ENLIGHTENMENT. ie, the Egodeath theory gives you nothing, no change.

Justin Sledge ESOTERICA YouTube channel argues: enlightenment is not worth the bother.

Before the Egodeath theory, chop wood carry water.
After the Egodeath theory, chop wood carry water.
Therefore the Egodeath theory is nothing; learning the Egodeath theory is same as not learning the Egodeath theory. You gain nothing. You change nothing.

Actually:

Psychedelic Transformation Adds Eternalism-Compatibility to Possibilism-Thinking: Able to Stably Cope in the Altered State

Psychedelic Transformation Gives You Compatible Possibilism-Thinking & Eternalism-Thinking

Characterizing What You Gain from Enlightenment as “Compatibilism of vs. “Eternalism” vs. “Qualified Possibilism”

More accurate than “gives you compatible free will & determinism”.

psychedelic transformation
p-t

Psychedelic Transformation Gives You Compatible Free Will & Determinism

The solution to free will vs. determinism is to shift the options, and instead deliver split-level compatibilism between possibilism-thinking & eternalism-thinking.

When shifting from “freewill” and “determinism” to instead, “possibilism-thinking” and “eternalism-thinking”, notice the shift of attention away from “matter vs. mind”, or “materialism vs. mysticism”, and instead, express in terms of Cognitive Phenomy: thinking, & mental models.

The Losing Framing: A zero-sum fight between which is true: freewill, or causal-chain determinism

I hate irrelevant, causal-chain determinism! And freewill isn’t the case at the underlying level! A Lose/Lose Debate of Folly, Buffet of Folly

We have two mental models. There is no conflict there, when worded in terms of mental models, rather than zero-sum fight between which is true: freewill, or causal-chain determinism

cognitive phenomenology
cp

DGAF what is the case in the ontological external world; irrelevant.

Neurosci is a losing concern.

Ontology is a losing concern.

Philosophy ruts bring nothing of value, just confusion and irrelevancy.

Neurofoo is entirely irrelevant.

Cognitive Neurobaloney is a ruse, to eliminate the cognitive by giving barest lip service.

Neuroscience Is the Enemy of the Cognitive Phenomenology-Based Explanatory Framework Realm

Cog Pheny is the winning realm of expression.

Gain Split-Level Compatibilism (Better Characterization of the Outcome than “Gain Eternalism” or “Gain Qualified Possibilism-Thinking Including Eternalism-Thinking”

the word ‘compatibilism’ is bad b/c implies combine domino-chain causality determinism, and freewill is real. It is more like compatibilism between possibilism-thinking & eternalism-thinking.

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/25/idea-development-page-25/#Split-Level-Compatibilism
split-level compatibilism
slc

Recent Pages Created After Started idea development 25; Recent Posts 2025/02/25-2025/03/12

Very few. 1.

Page 25 started on February 25, 2025 12:04 am UTC+0

Photo: Michael Hoffman, B.S.E.E., Egodeath Mystery Show, April 1, 2025. Recent voice rec’gs switched from EV 635A to 57 w/o windscreen; CAD E-100 shown on R; AT2020 on L. No rec’gs made yet w/ A2WS windscreen , it’s not even fastened on.

Egodeath Mystery Show podcast episodes

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment