2 POVs Married: End Up Permanently Having Two Vantage Points of View, Across Both States of Consciousness

Michael Hoffman, August 28, 2025

Contents:

links work on desktop Edge/Chrome:

• Intro
• Who Provided the 2nd Mushroom-tree Instance After Plaincourault fresco: Ruck??
• History of Mushroom-Tree Scholarship: Was Ruck in-between the Plaincourault Fresco Brouhaha and Samorini Finally Getting Serious & Digging into Multiple Mushroom-Trees?
• Liberty Cap mushroom-tree 1 & 2
• Liberty Cap mushroom-tree 3
• Panels 1 & 2, Left & Right Door
• Panels 3 & 4, Left & Right Door
• Deniers of Mushroom Imagery in Christian Art Contribute a Fine Point of Detail, and then Pronounce: “Therefore, No Mushroom Imagery in Christian Art”
• Ecstasy = Stand Outside of personal control system perceiving it from outside
• The Sacred Marriage: You do not “destroy” or “do away with” the 1st POV! possibilism-thinking remains constantly present, now w/ 2nd add’l POV: eternalism-thinking — a holy pair of unified opposites in the adult mind; the child+adult mind
• After Ego Death, Ego Is Constantly Used, now as just One of TWO POVs: The egoic personal control system is Superseded in a Way, Yet Remains Ever-Present, Accompanied by a Revealed, Adult, “Outside” POV/ Vantage Point Looking at Egoic Control System from Outside
• Email Initial Phrasing/Writeup
• Date of Grokking Permanently Having Two POVs
• Church Reader Article Submitted to Editor w/ “2 POVs” motif Fakely Tacked-On at the Last Second – forced into the Mushroom motif category
• f109: Hellmouth Furnace Loss of Balance Caught by Net, Summoned to City Gate Entrance Past Ossuary Corpse, Stable Building Protected by Cloth Washed Clean
• f177:  Horses and Rightly Standing Balancing, {balance scale}
• f107: Lifted Up from Ossuary by Right Arm
• Aug 27 2025 processing of image files for Church Reader to finally Email w/ 1MB limit
• Dionysus & Ariadne Steering the Chariot in the Thiasus Victory Wedding Parade: The Triumph of Dionysus
• See Also

Intro

This does answer my

Q: Why does Adam seem clueless in “eat tree of knowledge” art?

Ans: At tree of knowledge, in art,

• Eve can = the outside-the-ego POV (eternalism-thinking), while
• Adam can = the inside-egoic-thinking POV (possibilism-thinking).

A breakthrough, to fully grasp this brilliant model / idea from before the Modern era.

From Antiquity and from Medieval art motifs, have concept of having, together, two POVs, like Rebis.

I was so glad to recently re-find this Y image [alchemical rebis art below]: but, recently, used this picture to grasp concept of: STOP DISPARAGING AND GETTING RID OF INITIAL POV AS IF A ZERO-SUM GAME.

You do not “destroy” or “do away with” the 1st POV!!

Who Provided the 2nd Mushroom-tree Instance After Plaincourault Fresco: Ruck??

todo. for so long, entheogen scholarship acted as if Plaincourault fresco is the only extant mushroom-tree despite 1952 Panofsky tip that censor-Wasson surprisingly, let “the public” see: “There are hundred…

I like my Recog article’s clearer, condensed extract of Panofsky’s tip that Panofsky gave in 1952 to Wasson, then was revealed in 1968 SOMA p 180, then FINALLY Samorini 1998 cashed in on the 1952 tip.

History of Mushroom-Tree Scholarship: Was Ruck in-between the Plaincourault Fresco Brouhaha and Samorini Finally Getting Serious & Digging into Multiple Mushroom-Trees?

1996: Stamets book & Gartz’ book show 1 of the 7+ mushroom-trees from Bernward: the “forbidden” tree of knowledge , Bennett makes stink over which panel, silly, he PRETENDS THERES ONLY 1 MUSHROOM-TREE to be discussed, he isolates the panel that Brown et al cites.

Refusal to think of the evidence, but “isolate and diminish”.

BENNETT MAKES A BIG FKKING STINK, AS IF DEMOLISH ENTIRE THEORY, MICA , YET, ERAL REALLY – SAME AS ALL DENIERS — HE ACTUALLY MERELY CONTRIBUTES A BIT OF MINOR CORRECTION.

Bennett “DESTROYS!!” Brown re: one tiny point that MAKES NO REAL DIFFERENCE to the positive theory.

I wouldn’t even grant that “Bennett wins the battle but loses the war”; Bennett doesn’t win any “battle” but MERELY corrects a detail.

Just like the contributions from all the Deniers.

So Big Fkkin Deal: Chs Stang stupidly says Day 3 is a bowl of mushrooms. No bowl, but still, mushrooms.

CONGRAT, Huggins — YOU CORRECTED AN ERROR by Affirmers, who remain correct.

Pat yourself on the back, it’s called scholarship that includes correction — correction of the correct theory: there’s tons of mushroom imagery in Christian art.

Huggins “DESTROYS” Stang – but that “correction” makes no difference in the end – they are still mushroom-trees, per the Affirmers.

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/10/the-seven-liberty-cap-mushroom-trees-of-the-bernward-doors-and-column/#liberty-cap-mushroom-tree-3 —

Liberty Cap mushroom-tree 1 & 2

Liberty Cap mushroom-tree 3

Bennett arg so thin, can’t remem. “Brown is a fraud! b/c [detail re: tree of knowledge]!!!”

I wrote: as bad by Brown: Claim that Bernward’s Blame panel depicts the tree of knowledge. — https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/02/03/conceptual-errors-misinterpretations-and-bad-argumentation-from-entheogen-scholars/#Brown — jesus chris, i can’t even SEE your point, hair-splitting. HOW IS THIS NOT THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE?? IN https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/29/idea-development-24/ i wrote: he overstates; I don’t agree w/ simple-minded “that tree is not tree of knowledge in the Blame scene.” Bennett article Fungi-Paraeiieaiiolia — i also wrote there:

a Lib Cap tree.

That’s fallacious argn by a MICA Affirmer. Bennett then acts as if pointing out Brown’s fallacious arg’n = disproving MICA.

The Fungi-Pareidolia of The Psychedelic Gospels
By Chris Bennett, August 5, 2021
https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2021/08/05/__trashed/
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/17/chris-bennett-entheogen-scholarship/#Pareidolia

Browns’ arg is fallacious, their interpretation of the scene’s Liberty Cap tree is wrong in important ways, yet, Browns’ thesis of mica MICA remains, in a way, completely untouched by Bennett’s disproof of Browns’ interpretation of the Blame panel.

Bennett is right: the Liberty Cap mushroom-tree in the Blame panel is different than the non-mushroom tree of knowledge in the “Eat from Tree” panel above the Blame panel, yet Brown conflates the two trees in the two panels and acts like the tree of knowledge (in Eat from Tree panel) is shown as a Liberty Cap mushroom-tree. Bennett is right, this tree of knowledge is only indirectly associated with the Lib Cap tree in the Blame panel below it.

/ end of copied

Concl: you cannot rebut Chris w/o showing together the 3 panels. do i have crop of 3 panels? not quite. Close, below.

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/05/27/bernward-doors-and-column-hildesheim/

from https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/05/27/bernward-doors-and-column-hildesheim/#conj-eden-count-bernward —

Panels 1 & 2, Left & Right Door

Panels 3 & 4, Left & Right Door

upper left: tree of knowledge.

lower left: blame scene.

Chris acts like the Blame scene is not the tree of knowledge.

His arg: Look at “eat tree of knowledge” tree. Then compare “blame tree” – it’s different than the eat tree of knowledge tree.

So, NO MUSHROOM IN TREE OF KNOWLEDGE.

Q.E.D.: BROWN = IDIOT/academic fraud (argues Chris).

That arg is typical of Deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art: potentially slightly legit, but totally wrong on the big-theory scale.

Gaslighting.

Given proximity of the two panels / events in the episode, it is rather ridiculous to make a big stink as if: “So, no mushroom.” When really C B merely contributed a fine point of detail.

Deniers of Mushroom Imagery in Christian Art Contribute a Fine Point of Detail, and then Pronounce: “Therefore, No Mushroom Imagery in Christian Art”

keyboard shortcut:

Deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art
d m i c a

Affirmers of mushroom imagery in Christian art
a m i c a

test:

Deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art 🎉

Affirmers of mushroom imagery in Christian art 🎉

How I word it:

The tree of knowledge that’s shown in “eat tree of knowledge” panel is not a mushroom-tree. (However, per Great Canterbury Psalter, still must pay full attention to branching form in all trees.)

The tree of knowledge that’s shown in “blame” panel is a mushroom-tree.

Features of the TOTALLY NOT TREE OF KNOWLEDGE in lower panel:

• More branching on L than R.
• Visually {cut right trunk}.
• {cut right branch}

A form of motte-and-bailey fallacy.

HA! YOU WROTE TEH INSTEAD OF THE.
THEREFORE, NO MUSHROOMS IN Christian ART! Gotcha!

I am the leading mushroom-trees scholar, yet, I have NO IDEA of this history. Read Samorini 98: who does he cite re: mushroom-trees other than damned Plaincourault fresco?

ppl fixated and halted at Plaincourault fresco b/c OMG its a kiddie Amanita! The uber-psychedelic!

The Plaincourault fresco is the only Amanita-based mushroom-tree (in effect). So, ACT LIKE it’s the only extant mushroom-tree, EVEN THOUGH Panofsky 1952 was reavealed in 1968 giving the lead: “hundreds”. https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/08/recognizing-mushroom-imagery-in-medieval-art/ —

Even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification; if the artist had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree, he would have omitted the branches altogether.

Panofsky, 1952, in Brown, Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels, Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 2019, tweaked by Michael Hoffman for grammar.

Wrong quote, get the one from my last week Hatsis book review: https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/17/psychedelic-injustice-how-identity-politics-poisons-the-psychedelic-renaissance-hatsis-2025/ —

“The Plaincourault fresco is only one example of a conventionalized tree type, prevalent in Romanesque and Early Gothic art, which art historians actually refer to as “mushroom tree” in Roman and Early Christian painting, and there are hundreds of instances exemplifying this development.”

Panofsky, 1952, in Brown, Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels, Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 2019, condensed by Michael Hoffman to highlight the positive tip that Panofsky meant negatively.

brouhaha means a noisy stir, uproar, or commotion, often with a lot of public interest or discussion.

Panofsky said “there are hundreds”, but he was a Denier of mushroom imagery in Christian art.
GIVEN: There are hundreds of mushroom-trees.
THEREFORE: Plaincourault fresco cannot possibly mean mushrooms.
(Pan skipped 2-3 steps, prejudiced, proxy arg.)

Who was the first MICA Affirmer to present positively, a mushroom-tree other than damned Plaincourault fresco? Carl Ruck??

todo: research – what scholarship was there on mushroom-trees, in between SOMA 1968, and Samorini 1998?? GOOD QUESTION!

Ecstasy = Stand Outside of personal control system perceiving it from outside

todo: copy from email yesterday to the Egodeath community

The Sacred Marriage: You do not “destroy” or “do away with” the 1st POV! possibilism-thinking remains constantly present, now w/ 2nd add’l POV: eternalism-thinking — a holy pair of unified opposites in the adult mind; the child+adult mind

You “circumcise” / qualify it. Do not cut it off; except the 1 aspect, of naive reliance on egoic personal control system.

Do not wholly get rid of egoic personal control system; only “qualify” it to death.

After Ego Death, Ego Is Constantly Used, now as just One of TWO POVs: The egoic personal control system is Superseded in a Way, Yet Remains Ever-Present, Accompanied by a Revealed, Adult, “Outside” POV/ Vantage Point Looking at Egoic Control System from Outside

Like a rider on a donkey; a sacrificial king, welcomed to the fate-gate by followers who put {cloak} mental model under the ruling king epiphany at the fate-gate of the Rev 22 city of the last page of the Bible, bookending {kicked out of Eden} Gen 2-3.

Abr & Isacc walked away together, to the youths, except missing mention of Isaaac there. don’t worry, he probably still lives, never mind the glaring absense of mentioning him

my keyboard shortcut lacks the sentence at end:

“The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?” Abraham answered, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering.” Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. But the angel of the Lord called out to him from heaven, “Abraham! Do not lay a hand on the boy. Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.” Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. And to this day it is said, “On the mountain of the Lord it will be provided.” “I swear by myself, declares the Lord, that because you have done this and have not withheld your only son, I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky. Through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me.” Gen 22:7-18 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=gen%2022%3A7-18&version=NIV

19: 19 Then Abraham [WHERE IS ISAAC??] returned to his servants, and they set off together for Beersheba. And Abraham stayed in Beersheba. [Where did Isaac stay — smoked on the altar? “because you have done this thing and not withheld Isaac”

todo: copy image to f134 page

Email Initial Phrasing/Writeup

todo: copy from email the other day to Loop Max Cyb about “two POVs”.

Date of Grokking Permanently Having Two POVs

NOT zero-sum game: “either you think one way, or, you think the other way”.

roots: not long ago, grokking Dionysus Victory parade — embarrassed in 2023 when went back to look at 2006/2007 main article, and only THEN, saw:

1. Ariadne hold branch in L arm
2. Day later, grasp that Dio & Ari are a pair – like a pair of POVs, in chariot.
3. emails yesterday to Loop, Max, & Cyb, seems like the moment when I grokked. ~Aug 26, 2025
4. Aug 28, 2025: drew white boxes after worrying about my final rev of Recog article submitted yesterday Aug 27 to editor of Church Reader: I forced into the article, into the 4 unrelated motifs, the least-bad fit: forced “two POVs” into the mushroom motif category. Aug 28 now, I woried, (few min ago) WHAT IF I’M CHALLENGED BY DOUBTER: SHOW ME WHERE THERE IS PICTURE OF TWO POVS SPECIFICALLY IN Great Canterbury Psalter, NOT JUST IN GOLDEN PS > “ENTRY INTO JERU” or other medieval Entr Entry into Jerusalem iomages.” https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/29/entry-into-jerusalem-two-sets-of-eyes-left-hoof-lifted-heimarmene-gate/
5. I mentally pictured some pairs in this picture = I AM A SCIENTIST MAKING AND THEN TESTING A HYPOTHESIS ACCORDING TO THE MOST STRINGENT 8TH-GRADER JUST-SO STORY ABOUT HOW SCIENCE THEORY DEVELOPMENT WORKS. “THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD = PREDICTION, HYPOTH, CONFIRM OR DISCONFIRM THE ENTIRE THEORY THE INSTANT YOU GET RESULT, WHICH IS TOTALLY CLEAR-CUT AND DEFINITIVE”.
6. Because I have ready-to-hand on the bench workbench ULTRA HIGH RES 20MB png files of the 5-6 pictures for Church Reader editor/Reader, easy to copy the 20MB f134 .png, ideal for annotating and then after, exporting as blurry jpg small 900 KB tiny file.
7. Took a LONG TIME to draw so many white boxes! Confirmed. THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULT WAS POSITIVE INSTEAD OF DISCONFIRMED, SO, THE THEORY IS PROVED TO BE CORRECT: THE PREDICTION WAS CONFIRMED. The same high standard used by the Deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art — the 8TH GRADE “THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD” [FLAT MOUTH “overconfident” EMOJI] DELIVERS THE GOODS YET AGAIN, EXACTLY SAME AS FOR COPERN, GALLI, NEWTON, AND Minkowski” 😑

Church Reader Article Submitted to Editor w/ “2 POVs” motif Fakely Tacked-On at the Last Second – forced into the Mushroom motif category

notes on yesterday’s sumittal of article: Editor wanted me to EMAIL the article to him, not using Word, so I provided the text (w/ hyperlinks) as .rtf file.

1. Email 1: The .rtf file. At end is 6 .jpg file names.
   great-canterbury-psalter-folio-1r-url-f11-rows-1-2-1mb.jpg
2. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-1r-url-f11-rows-3-4-1mb.jpg
3. x
4. x
5. x
6. x

i rather list the awesome giant pngs file names:

1. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-1r-url-f11-rows-1-2.png – 9.8 MB
2. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-1r-url-f11-rows-3-4.png – 9.5 MB
3. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-50r-url-f109.png – 10.5 MB
4. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-62v-url-f134.png – 20.4 MB
5. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-68r-url-f145.png – 16.8 MB
6. great-canterbury-psalter-folio-84r-url-f177.png – 14.9 MB

WHICH IMAGE TO LOVE & DETAIL NEXT?? F107 HAS SAME AS F177, it’s important for that reason, if nothing else.

Remember in 2021 spring, how it felt to be picking which 2nd, 3rd, etc. folio comic to analyze!

f134, then … f145? then f177?

then …

It took too long to make a webpage for the popular folio f11 “done to death, by entheogen scholars with eyes closed tightly shut”, eg Ronald Huggins flimsy treatment of Day 3 panel.

quick, Huggins, skip over Day 4 w/ 4 literal mushrooms, do not mention that!

It has no branches, RUN AWAY!

BURY IT LIKE AGENT WASSON BANKER FOR POPE BURIED PANOFSKY’S EXTREMELY STRONG MULTI-TIME RECOMM TO CONSULT BRINK’S BOOK. NEVER HAPPENED!

You failed to CONSULT THE ART AUTHORITIES, STUPID IGNORANT MYCOLOGISTS [as Affirmers of mushroom imagery in Christian art], p. 180 SOMA 1968 Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔 Wasson. …

Then I last month finally said:

MUST HAVE PAGE FOR IN-DEPTH DECODing of f109 “BUS” IMAGE, which at first, a year ago, i loved my crop of the fearful sages at the hellmouth but i didn’t konw where I got that crop, Ans: f109!

literally only yesterday aug 27 or last week, i finally memorized the folio url #: 109, 109, 109!!

107? i asked, two days ago. NO! 109, get it right!

The same folio image that has the bus!

and ossuary,

and stand on right foot below net to catch fall of control, etc.

and fear-sage hellmouth. and young jesus, and mysterious cloth which NOW I NAILED, TOT IN THE BAG; OBV WHITE CLOTH = REV22:14 —

“Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city.” – Revelation 22:14 (the last page of the Bible), NIV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=rev%2022%3A14&version=NIV

todo: list all Eadwine comic panels in order of coolness. try listing my 5:

1. f134 – Eadwine’s leg-hanging mushroom tree image in the Great Canterbury Psalter
2. f145
3. f177
4. f11 — popular since 2000, and Ronald Huggins declares proxy war over panel Day 3. Bet the farm on that, AND LOSE – THE NEW Plaincourault fresco , DECLARES Ronald Huggins, TO FIGHT OVER AND EXCLUSIVELY FOCUS ON. But, good: Ronald Huggins’ focus on Day 3 is not ridiculously isolated like Plaincourault fresco was, or Eleusis, or Secret Christian Amanita Cult narrow hyper specific theory to “bet it all” on, as proxy fight. Ronald Huggins covers more than ONLY Day 3, Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case (Ronald Huggins, 2024) https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case & https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/11/23/huggins-foraging-psychedelic-mushrooms-wrong-forest/
5. f109 – #1 or #5? great image, but later than above ones – i am mixed up: error in presnt page: which image has God directing Jesus lifting guy out of ossuary, w/ demon threatening at the oss?????
6. which image is the next-cooleest.

it is f107:
https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f107

f109: Hellmouth Furnace Loss of Balance Caught by Net, Summoned to City Gate Entrance Past Ossuary Corpse, Stable Building Protected by Cloth Washed Clean

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f109

f177:  Horses and Rightly Standing Balancing, {balance scale}

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f177

f107: Lifted Up from Ossuary by Right Arm

= f177 elements on Left

Aug 27 2025 processing of image files for Church Reader to finally Email w/ 1MB limit

I first exported from png to jpg as highest avail res. can’t email too big, would have to carry thumb drive to editor.

2nd export time: made the 6 ultra-res 20MB .png files expoert as 2MB .jpg. Still too big to email.

3rd export time: ” 1 MB. I was able to email, fine, AS CHAIN OF 7 EMAILS. 1 .jpg (1MB) per email.

It is great having the…. SOLVED A PROBLEM yesterday: I split f11 into row 1&2, and row 3&4 – following the comic page itself 1/2 = 6 days of creation, 3/4 = Eden. especially — as I discovered and emailed cyb a few days ago — PAIR day 3 > mushroom-tree 2 (Liberty Cap) w/ tree of knowledge 2 rows below. i been comparing them for past year, but, recently a few days ago, had clear idea to crop tightly those two trees and discuss how they work powerfully together. re: I posted here at WordPress few days ago, my recent breakthrough: two fruits = two caps; L & R arm/ cap of plant #2, and inside grid of tree of knowledge two rows below it. Both treees are surrounded / bracketed by other trees.

todo: crop f11 Day 3 tree 2 Liberty Cap and crop tree of knowledge , make a png that shows both crops in isolation. what else did i exclaim to Cyb, pair clever two things? f109 = f177.

todo: crop the elements of f109 & f177:

• demon = burning rams = fear threatened.
• god lifts up the balancing guy = god directs Jesus lifting guy out of rock ossuary.
• guy held up by R hand in both folios.
• hellmouth in both.

Image f11 is hard to crop for the 2-4-page church article for Church Reader, b/c it is Portrait orientation but my screen is Landscape orientiation.

f11 (the famous comic book panel from Great Canterbury Psalter since 2000 provided by mystery-man Paul Lindell who is credited at bottom of p 1 of “Conjuring Eden” 2001;

Day 3 on cover of entheogen scholarship books:

1. Arthur, Mushroom & Mankind, 2000
2. The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity (Jerry Brown & Julie Brown, 2016) https://www.amazon.com/dp/1620555026
   do i not have a page for that book? All of Brown works, = page.
3. John Rush 2011? or 2nd Edition?

The mushroom images from Great Canterbury Psalter were first used by James Arthur: Mushrooms and Mankind the Day 3 — Ronald Huggins DECLARES BATTLE WITH DAY 3 AS THE BET-IT-ALL PICTURE FOR THE ENTIRE DEBATE – NOTICE THIS REPLACED Plaincourault.

Take note that Ronald Huggins did NOT fixate on Plaincourault fresco; but instead, Day 3

my cool Lash articles: https://egodeaththeory.org/nav/#John-Lash

todo: List all the pictures from Great Canterbury Psalter from Lash.
Already done for Ronald Huggins’ 2024 article “Foraging Wrong”.

2008 May, i think, John Lash uploaded Great Canterbury Psalter images to web, right when I started hiatus 2008/01-2011/08. incl Day 3??

Recognizing Mushroom Imagery in Medieval Art
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/08/recognizing-mushroom-imagery-in-medieval-art/

Plaincourault fresco as the proxy = 1st-generation entheogen scholarship (the Secret Amanita paradigm)

Day 3…. good …. although Samorini 98 is the one who created 2nd-generation entheogen scholarship (the Explicit Psilocybin paradigm), Great Canterbury Psalter PAUL LINDELL Lindgren WASN’T DISCOVERED UNTIL 2000.

THAT’S WHY ALAS, Samorini DOESN’T SHOW DAY 3 (USED ON COVER OF AT LEAST 3 ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP BOOKS) …

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE FOR 1998 ARTICLE TO INCLUDE DAY 3. 2-YEAR DELAY.

FROM POV OF Ronald Huggins 2024 forging wrong article; the several threads ALMOST come together in “Mushroom-Trees” in Christian Art (Giorgio Samorini, 1998) https://www.samorini.it/doc1/sam/sam-alberifungo-1998.pdf & https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/mushroom-trees-in-christian-art-samorini/

ALSO Paul Lindgren IS CREDITED — DON’T SKIP OVER – INNER COVER OF ARTHUR. 2000.

Dionysus & Ariadne Steering the Chariot in the Thiasus Victory Wedding Parade: The Triumph of Dionysus

She was abandoned by labryrith guy King Theseus so that Dio could marry her.

https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/12/13/photos-of-amanita-muscaria-mushrooms-to-identify-mushrooms-in-greek-christian-art/#Amanita-Photos-by-Michael-Hoffman —

See Also

https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/08/29/entry-into-jerusalem-two-sets-of-eyes-left-hoof-lifted-heimarmene-gate/