Images Upload

Michael Hoffman, draft started Aug. 2025, accidentally published Dec. 1, 2025

Contents:

links work in desktop Edge/Chrome:

• White Boxes on Pairs of Hands-Including Both Hands of the {hand mushroom-tree} This Time!
• -Tree’s Lower Cut Trunks : Upper YI Branching
• Non-Motivation of this Page
• Bird’s Nest Fungus
• Huggins’ Inane Argument: Great Canterbury Psalter Day 3 Can’t Be Mushroom, b/c Has Branches – That Exactly Match Cubensis
• Great Canterbury Psalter, Day 3 of Creation, folio f11: Tree 1 & 2
• Huggins’ Brazenly Biased “Conclusion” Section: Every Mushroom Tree Has Both Tree Features and Mushroom Features, Therefore It Must Be a Tree, Not a Mushroom
• Alan Houot: Mystics Bad, Shamans Good; Masters Thesis: PASS
• Hatsis 2025: Psychedelic Injustice, p. 260: Totally Omits Scholarship when Summarizing the Pop “Suppression of Psychedelics” Premise
• God Is the Creator of Evil; Radical Monotheistic Hyper-Calvinism; Universal Puppetmaster
• Transcendent Knowledge (Enlightenment) Is About Vulnerability, the Pedestal and Serpent of Vulnerability on a Pole
• Neoplatonic Advaita
• f107
• f107: Lifted Up from Ossuary by Right Arm
• f60: Double {balance scale}, Lion Den, Two Tables
• Little Dolls, Diary of a Madman, LP liner sleeve lyrics
• Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 1, by Church Leader
• Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 2, by Church Leader
• Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 3, by Church Leader
• Karl Baier Article High Mysticism p. 366: Features in f107, January 18, 2026
• See Also

Incoming

which artist?

Douce Apocalypse

Pulled-from-Banquet guy

heading

Soma p. 180 & 181

Zep Book

von Trimberg

4 sets favor upper hand — 9:02 p.m. Jan. 30, 2026

stand on right foot all 4

subtle jewhat {left foot lifted} like/ corrobs

subtle favor upper hand

Guild

a.m. Jan. 30, 2026

The Psychedelic Gospels (Browns 2016)

Mushrooms and Mankind (Arthur 2000)

Entheos Issue 1 – The Journal of Psychedelic Spirituality – Entheogens and the Judeo-Christian Mysteries 

Sharday Mosurinjohn

“Conjuring Eden” First Page, Crediting Paul Lindgren

“Conjuring Eden” Endnote 134 Crediting Paul Lindgren

Mushrooms and Mankind Crediting Paul Lindgren

White Boxes on Pairs of Hands-Including Both Hands of the {hand mushroom-tree} This Time!

I should have included wings. d/k why i didn’t, b/c known already.

11:02 p.m. Jan. 24, 2026: L wing touch moon, R wing touch god cloud

Eadwine got me. Too dumb to pattern-match despite clearly trying. I tried, I failed. Welcome to this puzzle-genre, or encoding-to-communicate and teach, genre.

THE MAIN IDEA AND CHALLENGE IS TO EXPALIN THE WTF TRUNKS. TEACHER DOESN’T EXAP EXPECT ME TO IMMED GET IT, 1ST TIME. MY TECHNIQUE WAS A SUCEESS, REQUIRING TWO PASSES — I LITERALLY PLANNED SOME SORT OF 2-PASSES ATTACK APPRAOCH, WHICH PAID OFF. After the sort of … In a way, I planned a 2nd pass; when I drew white boexs last night p.m. Jan. 23, 2026 , i was thinking: invest in this straetgey , to flush out something interesting. i spent next day drawing on the tree correctly, then I came back to fix this 1st-pass whole image.

1. Draw white boxes, miss the trunks though. they are not hands, but are like hand of guy.
2. I figured out the 4 trunks, created zooms 3 of them! of best way … an hour ago i decided best to simply 4 white boxes on guy + tree.
3. I came back to this 1st pass entire pic, gave it thought 40 minutes ago, “yea, i HAVE to apply my solution and go back to v1 entire pic, and fix it.
4. So, strategy worked, as planned.

I only thought of the boxes as a setup for discovery; in that sense, my failure was a planned success. Obviously missing lower right white box.

Below, the more I thought about it, I had to proceed w/ my sort of planned 2nd, correction pass.

The purpose of the white boxes 1st pass was exactly to flush out the right decoding, in a subsequent pass, so, my overall strategy is effective, just not immed.

I certainly did not think I was completed.

I KNEW I was missing something. That’s kind of a given, I have learned.

I never claimed or EXPECTED the 1st pass to be complete. I at that ttime, REGISTERED 4 TRUNKS AS PUZZLE UNSOLVED, TO BE SOLVED, which I immed did. I take It takes time to propagate my findings / corrections by making and fixing my annotated crops, in f107 page of crops. and here. It’s in this images upload page where I realized the first pass is so gappy, must fix.

This picture is embarrassing not having a white box on the 4 trunks lower right = lower hand of guy – this feeling of embar and missing the mark in those boxes, confirms to me that, re: successfully interp this puzzle / pattern match training device, a MAJOR requirement is {4 cut trunks} = 4 fingers of guy’s lower hand.

I SHOULD HAVE PUT WHITE BOX AROUND ENTIRE TREE WHICH STANDS FOR ISMOROPHICALLY, PAIR OF HANDS: UPPER + LOWER HAND.

Hey idea — 10:17 p.m. Jan. 24, 2026: Idea for what to do with the small {cut right branch}, was “dangling” unaccounted for, halfway up: map it to guy’s hidden thumb of lower hand.

-Tree’s Lower Cut Trunks : Upper YI Branching

hand = tree; {hand mushroom-tree}

Non-Motivation of this Page

This page is a utility page to upload images from mobile device.

Dec. 1, 2025 – published this utility page by accident. Draft started August 2025.

Before that, to upload images from mobile device, I used the following page which I started, then thought too negative, then eventually published:
The World’s Dumbest Footnote: Ruck Committee: Why We Can’t List Allegro in the References Section, but Only in This Footnote

Bird’s Nest Fungus

https://www.google.com/search?q=bird%27s+nest+fungus&udm=2

Web image search: strange mushrooms
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=strange+mushrooms

Huggins’ Inane Argument: Great Canterbury Psalter Day 3 Can’t Be Mushroom, b/c Has Branches – That Exactly Match Cubensis 🤦‍♂️

This is infinitely weak of an argument, just like every argument from the deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art, but they try to make up for it in quantity.

An infinite number of worthless arguments.

Great Canterbury Psalter, Day 3 of Creation, folio f11: Tree 1 & 2

Huggins’ Brazenly Biased “Conclusion” Section: Every Mushroom Tree Has Both Tree Features and Mushroom Features, Therefore It Must Be a Tree, Not a Mushroom

Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest: The Great Canterbury Psalter as a Medieval Test Case
Ronald Huggins, 2024
https://www.academia.edu/118659519/Foraging_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_the_Wrong_Forest_The_Great_Canterbury_Psalter_as_a_Medieval_Test_Case
https://egodeaththeory.org/2024/11/23/huggins-foraging-psychedelic-mushrooms-wrong-forest/

Screengrab of top of “Conclusion” section of article: soak-in the badness of arg’n:

“noted” = censored by the lying, bully, academic obstructionist & fraud Wasson, banker for the Pope; world’s record for maximum Conflict of Interest.

The “Conclusion” section’s argumentation backfires left and right:

Mycologists (affirmers of mushroom imagery in Christian art) must trust the art authorities (deniers of mushroom imagery in Christian art) because:

The art authorities never wrote anything about trees, which are unimportant and merely peripheral (argues Huggins)

The art authorities never wrote anything about mushrooms, because Christians have no reason to think about mushrooms (argues Panofsky via Wasson).

The art authories are expert in related matters (ie, are NOT expert, in fact are utterly ignorant, on THIS topic). – Wasson’s gaslighting phrasing.

The censored – I mean, “noted” – exception, the lone exception, is a flimsy, thin, old book, which doesn’t say what Panofsky claims it says, and only mentions pilzbaum a few times, before knowledge of psychedelic mushrooms.

Even if the book were to claim what Panofsky says (over time, the images shift from umbrella pine to “emphatically” mushroom-shaped imagery), that shift would in no way indicate that the mushroom form was unintended and accidental, and implies the opposite: intentional use of mushroom imagery.

Tree Stylizations in Medieval Paintings (Brinckmann 1906)

Erwin Panofsky’s Letters to Gordon Wasson, Transcribed – “emphatic” sentence:
https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/panofskys-letters-to-wasson-transcribed/#Sentence-1-7 –

Just to show what I mean, I enclose two specimens: a miniature of ca. 990 which shows the inception of the process, viz., the gradual hardening of the pine into a mushroom-like shape, and a glass painting of the thirteenth century, that is to say about a century later than your fresco, which shows an even more emphatic schematization of the mushroom-like crown.

Erwin Panofsky to Gordon Wasson, May 2, 1952

Alan Houot: Mystics Bad, Shamans Good; Masters Thesis: PASS

Hatsis 2025: Psychedelic Injustice, p. 260: Totally Omits Scholarship when Summarizing the Pop “Suppression of Psychedelics” Premise

See my book review, which is scathing re: this passage:

Psychedelic Injustice: How Identity Politics Poisons the Psychedelic Renaissance (Hatsis, 2025)

God Is the Creator of Evil; Radical Monotheistic Hyper-Calvinism; Universal Puppetmaster

Experiencing this can so contradict egoic thinking, risk of psychosis in psychedelic peak state.

This experiential perspective is a major strain on the immature, daily mental model.

What’s There to Be Afraid Of? Identifying the Shadow Dragon Monster

Transcendent Knowledge (Enlightenment) Is About Vulnerability, the Pedestal and Serpent of Vulnerability on a Pole

Greater knowlwedge and wisdom is of vulnerability. Merkavah palace 6: regardless of your knowledge and wisdom, ANGEL 6 GUARD MIGHT KILL YOU RANDOMLY.

image: Great Canterbury Psalter > king holds open scroll in left hand from God/ of God [God-shaped knoweldge; the harsh shaping = {angel harassing mystic}], open scroll in right hand to lion threat … the threat-vulnerability gate.

To comprehend that clear knowledge of cybernetics = know where the boundary line is forming two 2 2-level, dependent control – Eastern Advaita sucks b/c lacks structure, [long long list of bad things about Adv]

CAn we make long list of suchlike badness in W relig or phil of religion or theory of mysticism eg Neoplatonism overlaps – even advaita articles say The One… not only was Vivek guy forced through Christian schools, Greco Roman Christian, actually, including Neoplatonism; likely, this Theosophy Advaita nonduality incorps Neoplat; these writers studied Neoplatonism and then studied Advaita into the frame of Neoplatonism, the One, inarticulate,

• the One [recast as “nonduality”]
• nonduality Advaita
• ineffable
• apophatic mysticism [recast as “Eastern ineffability”]

Is Neo-Advaita Orientalized Neoplatonism? First, intensively study Neoplatonism. Afterwards, study Neo-Advaita, into the lens frame of Neoplatonism. Neoplatonic Advaita

Neoplatonic Advaita

It’s the same badness: overfocus on self/other boundary, along w/ inarticulate glorification of inarticulate and lacking structure in important areas of psychedelic experienceing.

• Neoplatonism: insufficiently coming from psychedelics; coming from Pop armchair unaware of psychedelics, subst’g non-drug meditation instead, building up timeframe expectations, 70 years of meditation required. Expectations are unhinged.

pass through gate = comprehend inherent cybernetic vulnerablility threat.

f107

f107: Lifted Up from Ossuary by Right Arm

Commentary & crops

open scroll = understand vulnerability; being threatened; PEAK THREAT / PEAK DIVINE MADNESS;

Merkavah: the child studied too young and died, threatened to death.

12:36 a.m. December 2, 2025 – hand shape, nonbr thumb against open scroll, fingers off scroll, turn look right, L hand hand shape

demon has almost hook in guy rescued, others have open scroll

i need entire panel analysis: https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f107

Sanitized Neoplatonism, battle transformation instability realization of cybernetic vulnerability omitted like the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) omits 18 of 21 Angst/Dread effect items from OAV 1994.

OAV (ideally) is a (sometimes called 5D-ASC, which is conflated w/ — i should call it 13 FActors since they so, so weakly brand the Studerus questionnaire. 15 Factors = Studerus, != 5D-ASC which contains OAV (3 hi-lev dims) + 2 other irrel dims no one cares about, that vary per substance.

15 Factors starts w/ OAV, combines O & V into Pleasant hi-lev dim, A = Unpleasant hi-levl dim, and ADD sub-dimensions (factors), eg in A, add sub-dims: ICC; ANX; and Shadow Factor 13.

f60: Double {balance scale}, Lion Den, Two Tables

awareness of inherent vulnerability cybernetic: open scroll touching lion. youths learn YI hand shape (2 POVs) and are starting to discover the vulneratibility threat; they know 2 POVs but — although they are experienced psychonauts — they have not yet wisdom about inherent vulnerability threat.

youths know YI contrast but not yet baby lion threat sleeping baby lion, youths not yet awakened to the peak climax threat:
Dread ETCLOC
the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control by being made to focus on vulnerability threat, driving control transformation.

Commentary & crops

Little Dolls, Diary of a Madman, LP liner sleeve lyrics

Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 1, by Church Leader

Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 2, by Church Leader

Block-Universe Eternalism Slide 3, by Church Leader

Karl Baier Article High Mysticism p. 366: Features in f107, January 18, 2026

From this hardcopy, I transcribed the notes about features of f107 in my new dedicated page about f107.

[re-inserted from gallery]
Why did the picture, uploaded from mobile, go missing? Could be a version conflict between devices, I’m on desktop rn.

Sharday Mosurinjohn

See Also

pending