YI Hand Shapes of Woman Holding {balance scale} with Both Feet Touching {stable column base}

Michael Hoffman 12:04 a.m. Feb. 14, 2026

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 14, 2026, fullscreen

Contents:

links work on desktop Edge/Chrome:

Intro: Time of Discovery

She holds {balance scale}, which maps to psalter-reader’s relative finger-height:

  • {Left finger lower} = bad = ordinary-state possibilism
  • {Right finger lower} = good = altered-state eternalism

Per her upper hand, and both of her feet on ground at {stable column base}, the result is NOT I (the Eternalism mental model); the result is compound mental model: YI (specifically, Y’I; modify Y + add I)

Tjhis This discovery and page today is a SIGNIFICANT advance in interpreting her; compare my confusion and puzzling over “her L foot is wrong foot touching {stable column base}!” in Nov. 2020. if were Feb 2021, that’s 5 years ago.

2026/02
-2020/11
=

2025/14
-2020/11
= 5 years 3 months = 5.25 years ago.

5.25

5.25 Years to Solve “Why Does Her Wrong, {Left foot} touch {stable column base}?”

Actually her L AND R feet BOTH touch {stable column base}. Upper hand asserts not only I, but also Y. (read that Y shape as, specifically, modified-Y).

Showing YI is approx showing, accurately, Y’I.

  1. Y = the Possibilism mental model
    ypmm
  2. I = the Eternalism mental model
    iemm is taken: the integrated “eternalism” mental model (dubious value phrase)
    todo: reassign keyboard shortcuts to use here “iemm”
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (speaking simply/roughly)
    yipemm
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (speaking accurately/ more precisely)
    y’impemm

or change strategy: a single keyboard shortcut to define the 3 forms.

An Acronym to Define the Set of Shape-Names: Y, I, & YI (or Y’I): [YIYI]

Alt: [YIYIB]
The ‘B’ acro-suffix inserts “branching” or “non-branching”.

Y = the Possibilism mental model. I = the Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model. Or, more precisely: Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
yiyi

Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model. I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model. Or, more precisely: Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
yiyib

Those keyboard shortcuts are designed to lend well to formatting as a list, after expansion:

  1. Y = the Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    Or, more precisely:
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
  1. Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    Or, more precisely:
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.

The Mind End Ups with a Compound Mental Model: Two Complementary, Opposite, “Incompatible” Mental Models, Harmonized

2002 Core Theory Revision to “Transcend Determinism”,

+ 2025 Core Theory Revision to Harmonize possibilism & eternalism possibilism-thinking & eternalism-thinking, by abandoning Epistemology, Metaphysics, & Ontololgy, and Using Instead, Pure Cognitive Phenomenology.

The result is a compound mental model like chariot containing both Dionysus & Ariadne:

todo: image

Thiasus – Wikipedia-Triumph of Dionysus on a fragmentary Roman mosaic (3rd century, Sousse Archaeological Museum)

Figure 1. Triumph of Dionysus on a Roman mosaic (3rd century, Sousse Archaeological Museum).

Ariadne holds branch in

at first, around 2022-2023, i focused on OMG holds branch L hand, non-branching spear R hand

now since April 2025 different takeaway hi-value point: Dio doesn’t kill and repudiate Ariadne (branching thinking​); he WEDS her.

Isaac is repudiated and is affirmed and loved, by Abraham.

Abraham returned to his servants (did Isaac also return, or toasted on rock cut-branching fire altar?? bible is silent loudly on that point;

“BECAUSE YOU HAVE DONE THIS THING AND NOT WITHHELD YOUR SON”

The maiden Persephone dies and does not die. like (analogy) every year Persepho

  • Every year, the maiden Persephone dies.
  • Every year, the maiden Persephone is again alive.

Does the mind still “have” or “use” possibilism-thinking after psilocybin transformation?

Yes in a way, no in a way.

End up with a modified/ transformed Possibilism mental model.

Y’I ~= YI

Thus the mushroom-tree artists tell us BOTH together, that you end up with Y’I and that you end up with YI.

eg von Trimberg

  • von Trimberg’s upper hand’s shape is YI.
    That hand is displayed together with this other hand that points to it, connecting them:
  • student’s upper hand’s shape is IY’

12:32 p.m. Feb. 14, 2026 why point to Trim’s fingers instead of elsewhere? why avoid pointing to his thumb? because the point being comm’d here is,

negation of fingers on left (student’s IY’ hand-shape)
=
presence of fingers on right (von’s YI hand-shape)

Intermediate Work on the Acronym

outdated: semicolons are poor for formatting result as list:

Y = the Possibilism mental model; I = the Eternalism mental model; YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (more precisely, Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model)
yiyi; [YIYI]

Nice. Need alt to shoehorn-in branching vs. non-branching:

Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model; I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model; YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (more precisely, Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model)
yiyib; [YIYIB]

now use those keyboard shortcuts and then add formatting:

  1. Y = the Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    More precisely, Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.

to assist that post-expansion reformatting that’s needed, maybe replace ; by .

Y = the Possibilism mental model. I = the Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (more precisely, Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model).
yiyi

Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model. I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (more precisely, Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model).
yiyib

test: expand then reformat:

  1. Y = the Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    Or, more precisely:
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.

exposed problem; further revise needed, of final sent:

convert to concat string:

Y = the Possibilism mental model. I = the Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model. Or, more precisely: Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
yiyi

now try again: expand then reformat:

  1. Y = the Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    Or, more precisely:
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.

It is good. yiyi finalized. do same w/ yiyib:

Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model. I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model. Or, more precisely: Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
yiyib

final test: expand yiyib then format it:

  1. Y = the branching-Possibilism mental model.
  2. I = the non-branching Eternalism mental model.
  3. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.
    Or, more precisely:
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model.

It is good.

Review the component keyboard shortcuts: [never def’d above]
exist with “branching”?? [no form or variant form were def’d above]

Review w/o “branching vs. non-branching” inserted:

ybpmm – above i never impl’d the 3 term-expanders.
ypmm
the integrated “eternalism” mental model;
iemm didn’t expand to “I = the Eternalism mental model”, but to some other, lower-value phrase.
yipemm – didn’t define above. would expand to:
YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

iemm is taken: the integrated “eternalism” mental model (dubious value phrase)
todo: reassign keyboard shortcuts to use here “iemm”

  1. YI = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (speaking simply/roughly)
    yipemm
    Y’I = the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model (speaking accurately/ more precisely)
    y’impemm

It is perfectly valid (at a basic level) to say the mind ends up with the YI mental model. integrated possibilism/eternalism thinking.

It is valid and more accurate/precise, to say the mind ends up with Y’I mental model.

modified Possibilism/ Eternalism thinking
mpet

the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
mpemm

do i need keyboard shortcuts for the YI = equation?

*

Modify the Possibilism mental model and add the Eternalism mental model.

Modify the Possibilism mental model BY/WHEN ADDING the Eternalism mental model.

Michael Hoffman 12:04 a.m. Feb. 14, 2026 – the exact time at which I discovered this new reading of her feet and hands and {balance scale} mapped to en-LIGHT-ened Psalter Reader’s relative finger height/which foot down/ whether he’s threatened or not.

YI’ is the worst YI variant, because don’t want to demote I (the Eternalism mental model) to below Y (the Possibilism mental model).

Manesse Codex YI Hand-Fest
https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/02/10/manesse-codex-yi-hand-fest/#the-two-hands-in-holding-hands —

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 11, 2026 https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/02/10/manesse-codex-yi-hand-fest/#the-two-hands-in-holding-hands

Context (Situation) of Discovery

I was looking at the collection of 9 {balance scale} instances in my new page:

{blessing} Hand-Shapes
https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/02/13/blessing-hand-shapes/

When I noticed that her hand shape pair is the classic master Reference combination:

  • Upper hand YI
  • Lower

Her Upper Thumb Is Not Considered {visually cut} by the {balance scale} String, Which Would Form the Worst Form, YI’

Out of the 4 permutation combinations, YI’ is the worst.

YI’ is the most misrepresentative form of representing how the mind is transformed by altered-state eternalism experiencing.

  • YI – basic simple, but inaccurate, imprecise.
  • Y’I – accurate. end up with modified possibilism-thinking, + the Eternalism theory added.
  • YI’ – the worst form, it elevates Y over I; possibilism over eternalism.
  • Y’I’ – eg hold shovel w/ fingertips at viewer, todo: show example.

the mushroom-tree artists grappled with this problem:

  • YI – we COULD depict final state as YI. AS IF possibilism-thinking is wholly unchanged by ego death and rebirth! YI is true but only at a rough zoom out level first order of approx model like modelling a transistor or diode in a simplistic way:
    “A diode lets electric current flow one way but not the other.”
    (Ignoring the 0.7 V cutoff point; that complicating detail is covered in the 2nd-order model of a diode or transistor.)
  • Y’I – Or, we could more accurately depict the final state as MODIFIED branching thinking​, plus the new, the “eternalism” mental model.

Sometimes the mushroom-tree artists solve this representation problem by depicting the final state as BOTH via YI and via Y’I, eg von Trimberg + the student.

von Trimberg, Upper Part of Figures 3 & 4: the Mind’s Final State after Psilocybin Transformation Is Depicted as Both Y’I and YI

todo: draw white box around both of these upper hands, and around both of these lower hands.

  • Upper hands: Y’I & YI
  • Lower hands: YI’ & Y (ignore lower thumb; transitional state; his hands depict 3-stage progresssion:
  1. the ordinary-state possibilism mental model
    ospmm
  2. the altered-state eternalism mental model
    asemm
  3. the integrated possibilism/eternalism compound mental model
    ipecmm
    the integrated possibilism/eternalism mental model
    iepmm

Wrongly, Immaturely Expecting that the Final State Is Simply the I-Shaped Mental Model without the Y- or Y’-Shaped Mental Model

Wrongly, Immaturely Expecting that the Final State Is Simply the Non-Branching Eternalism Mental Model without the Branching-Possibilism Mental Model

Wrongly, Immaturely Expecting that the Final State Is Simply the Eternalism Mental Model without the Possibilism Mental Model

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

to keep part 3 clean, omit “qualified/modified/revised/transformed” Possibilism. imagine:

the Possibilism’/ Eternalism mental model

the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
mpemm

The resulting progression is then:

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
  • YI implies the Possibilism experiential model
  • Y’I implies the modified-Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

todo next: add white boxes to figure 3+4 of von Trimberg: …

file name on drive is like https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/img_9055.jpg – crap, mobile. must re-do from scratch on desktop now.

Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman, “Codex_Manesse_Süßkind_von_Trimberg-final-hand-pairs.jpg”, 41 KB, 11:32 a.m. Feb. 14, 2026, fullscreen

Bird’s Nest Mushroom

Photo Credit: Michael Hoffman, Nov. 30, 2025 – Bird’s Nest mushroom, fullscreen

Happiness Is: A Parallel Set of Keyboard Shortcuts (Acronyms): [PMM], [EMM], & [PEMM]

I quickly solved this erroneous thinking in just 2025-1995 = 30 years.

The 2000 correction from Coraxo in Gnosticism Yahoo Group, should’ve been indicator:
not change from possibilism to eternalism;
change from possibilism to modified-possibilism + eternalism
= transcend heimarmene / fatedness/ no-free-will / the frozen 4-D block universe.

Then again April/Aug 2025 I had to do same fix again essentially same:

Stop putting down possibilism-thinking. Stop devaluing possibilism-thinking, we use it ALWAYS, it is going away the day you literally bodily die, only then.

TO BE ALIVE IS TO EMPLOY POSSIBILISM-THINKING

To Be Alive, Before & After Psilocybin Transformation, Is to Use Possibilism-Thinking: Never Devalue It; Redeem It

I had to accomplish this REVISION OF MY CORE THEORY twice, in two major revisions!

  • in 2000 to handle Late Antiquity instead of merely Classical Antiquity; to handle a 3-level model. 1988-1997 I barely had any concept or hooks, toward a 3-phase model.
  1. possibilism-thinking
  2. eternalism-thinking
  3. integrated possibilism/eternalism thinking

or term’y “mental model”:

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. the integrated possibilism/eternalism mental model
    ipemm

todo: make capzn consis across that set of 3 keyboard shortcuts:

the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
ipemm
the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

try again w/ revised keyboard shortcut:

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

consider the word “compound”:

the integrated possibilism/eternalism compound mental model

todo: cap’z that expansion:

the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism, compound mental model
ipecmm

DONE. now try 1-3:

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism, compound mental model

too verbose 3rd step. shorter keyboard shortcut is:

the integrated Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

clarity accuracy would be:

the integrated QUALIFIED Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

qualified, revised, transformed, modified

Challenge: CLARITY & ACCURACY & SHORT; pick any 2 of the 3.

  1. the Possibilism mental model
  2. the Eternalism mental model
  3. expansion conflict:
    pemm = the possibilism experiential mental model
    i wanted:
    pemm = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
    which really means:
    pemm = the [MODIFIED-]Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model
    PROS/CONS of saying you end up with “one” “single” mental model, called possibilism/etm, as if Dionysus and Ariadne are FUSED in marriage , losing their opposite complementary relationship, bad. ok for shorthand elegance tho.

can we redef “pemm” to expand not to “the possibilism experiential mental model”? todo: uppercase possibilism there?

i REALLY want pemm to expand to “the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model”

emergency redef from:
pemm = the possibilism experiential mental model
to:
tpemm = the possibilism experiential mental model

to free up the keyboard shortcut to be instead:
pemm = the Possibilism/ Eternalism mental model

exists:

pem = the Possibilism experiential mode
eem = the Eternalism mental model

aghh inconsis. fix later. Address one need at a time! Hard work.

High tech that I invented when father died April 1987.

I am the inventor of what I call the “acronym“.

Y’ means the modified/ revised/ transformed/ reconstructed Possibilism mental model.

As if the Enlightened Mind Exclusively Uses the Eternalism Mental Model, without Anymore Using the Possibilism Mental Model

As if the the Possibilism mental model Has Been Gotten Rid Of and Is No Longer to Be Used

Avoid Scare-Quotes on “eternalism”

Revise the pair of keyboard shortcuts. Presently, bad:

  • emm = the “eternalism” mental model
  • pmm = the “possibilism” mental model

Use instead:

  • emm = the Eternalism mental model
  • pmm = the Possibilism mental model

DONE.

This related pair of keyboard shortcuts is similar; consistent:

  • emmtsc = the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control
  • pmmtsc = the Possibilism mental model of time, self, and control

Scare quotes are NOT usable, bc implies negation/ doubt/ skepticism.

Revised Acronyms (Keyboard Shortcuts) to have: [PT] = possibilism-thinking & [ET] = eternalism-thinking

problem w/ keyboard shortcuts, no eternalism-thinking though have a possibilism-thinking keyboard shortcut

pt = possibilism-thinking

??? = eternalism-thinking
e-t = ego transcendence – kinda retire this phrase? demote? reassign keyboard shortcut?
et = the Eternalism theory – don’t like this phrase much? what is the Eternalism theory?
yet
pt is not parallel to that:
pt = possibilism-thinking

new assigns:

  • the Eternalism theory
    tet = transcendent eternalism-thinking
    try using:
    etmt but taken!! FIRST TIME MAJOR CONFLICT OF KEYBOARD SHORTCUTS:
    etmt = eternalism theory of mental transformation – verdict: low value prhase

for gods sake can’t we have parallel?: ffs!

  • pt = possibilism-thinking
  • et = eternalism-thinking

currently the et keyboard shortcut is lame, et = the Eternalism theory , poor phrase, low value. NUKE this keyboard shortcut entirely. overwrite it w et.

DONE.

What Is “the Eternalism theory”?

Do I Own that Theory-Name? I do “the theory of eternalism” Low-Value Phrase, demote its keyboard shortcut

WRONGLY EXPECTING & CLAIMING THAT THE FINAL STATE IS SIMPLY ‘I’ INSTEAD OF (Y + I) OR (QUALIFIED-Y + I)

The problem with YI instead of Y’I or worst,
WRONGLY EXPECTING & CLAIMING THAT THE FINAL STATE IS SIMPLY ‘I’ INSTEAD OF (Y + I) OR (QUALIFIED-Y + I).

Overly basic, crude, isolated altered-state eternalism is the crude mis-expectation, “must get rid of, divorce, cast-away, abandon Ariadne/Isaac; eliminate erroneous possibilism-thinking!” – an immature, awkward, typical, half-baked attitude.

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

Two Hands, Song by King Crimson, from Beat Album

Two Hands
Song by King Crimson, from Beat Album
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78XxludpcH8 —

The Month-Long “Medieval YI Hand-Shape Theory” Jackpot Week Continues

I was pleased (not surprised) to notice at start of Val Day 2026 today, confirming my Science Hypoth Prediction, thus THE EGODEATH THEORY IS PROVED TO BE CORRECT, that her hands form the CLASSIC MEDIEVAL HAND PAIR SHAPE: {Lower hand Y’, upper hand YI}.

Confirmed the Master Shape for Hand Pairs is {lower hand Y’, upper hand YI}

you might say this is part of:

Decoded {lower hand Y’, upper hand YI} = Initial Mental Model = Possibilism, Final Mental Model = Revised Possibilism + Eternalism

{balance scale} adjacent to CUBENSIS [we must be specific in this panel: oxen hooved dung mushroom specifically is useful for safe ID’n of CUBENSIS to safely ingest.

Safe id’n of Liberty Caps / non-Cubensis, or Panaeolus: Fake Liberty Caps or fake Panaeolus have orange rust.

See Stamets 1996 book.

  • Dark purple-black spores are good.
  • Orange rust spores are bodily fatal death poisonous.

Intro

Val Day 2004: All Egodeath Yahoo Group posts from June 2001 start to Val Day 2004, got copied to Egodeath.com, but without dates – big mistake.

Yahoo Groups was terminated 2019 by Yahoo. I posted 2001-2019, I only copied 2001-Feb 2004, to Egodeath.com. Feb 2004-2019 posts at Egodeath Yahoo Group were NOT copied to Egodeath.com. The Max Freakout archive of Egodeath Yahoo Group is at:

Egodeath Yahoo Group: Max Freakout Archive
https://egodeathyahoogroup.wordpress.com.

This page delivers, from last night or this morning, a fresh reading of f134 row 2 middle woman {balance scale} pair of hands

Where I saw the picture: in new page __, I made a fresh, expanded, cleaner gallery of all {balance scale} motifs in Great Canterbury Psalter BUT TODO: MAKE a page just for the {balance scale} motif, because I have been sluggish in showcasing {balance scale} motif and counting, bumped count last night from 8 to 9 not bc I discovered another instance, but bc my counting was sloppy, halfassing it on this important motif.

what’s in the pans: possibilism vs. eternalism balanced relationship mushroom and the ordinary-state possibilism experiential mode

  • Upper hand
  • Lower hand: Y’, hold closed scroll, 4 partial fingers = 4 scroll segments

Read fingers same as read mushroom-trees, for a good helpful take.

  • the Cybernetic theory
  • the Mytheme theory

[CT]
[MT]

  • the Core theory, within the Egodeath theory
  • the Mytheme theory, within the Egodeath theory
  • the Phase 1, Psychedelic Eternalism theory, within the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism
    p1t
  • the Phase 2, Mytheme Analogy theory, within the Egodeath theory of psychedelic eternalism
    p2t

A Standard Hand Pair Shape: Lower Hand Y’, Upper Hand YI

another innovation tonight from 12:04 a.m. Feb. 14, 2026:

Decoded {both feet down} at {stable column base}

I misread as {stand on left foot}. wrong, bc

Right foot is NOT LIFTED; no gap between Right foot and ground.

Right foot is equated with Left foot, which touches {stable column base}.

{balance scale} mirrors his fingers height. which controls

his relative finger height maps corresponds to his feet height.

Balance integrated possibilism/eternalism thinking

balance possibilism-thinking & the e

balance:

  • the “possibilism” mental model branching possibilities
  • the “eternalism” mental model non-branching possibilities like thumb {cut right trunk}

Interpretation/Decoding Strategy: Finger Shape = Tree Branching Feature = YI Branching-Forms

How is this finger shape like mushroom-tree features?

The Term finger shape Means the YI form of {fingers vs. thumb}, or {3 fingers vs. slightly splayed-apart Index finger}, Across the Sequence of Two Hands

The shorthand term finger shape means the YI form of {fingers vs. thumb} (or {3 fingers vs. slightly splayed-apart Index finger}).

Use Formula: Finger Shape = Tree Branching Feature = YI Branching-Forms

upper hand:

  • {fingers} = possibilism
    balanced with
  • {thumb} = eternalism

her scroll is open to the Egodeath theory reading

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“f134 row 2 middle balance scale hand pair.jpg” 72 KB 12:28 a.m. Feb. 14, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen
todo copy to f134 page

Row 2 middle: Scale Balance & Closed Scroll

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

ordinary-state possibilism no mushroom

balanced with

altered-state eternalism mushroom

f134: {balance scale}

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

Dedicated page about f1

Row 2 Middle: Self-Threatening Psalter Reader

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

Finger Height = Loss of Control, with Egodeath Theory Picture Vortex

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

{fire light circle sun} motif: Lighting of Chamber of Self-Threatening Psalter Reader

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

See Also

Canterbury f134: Leg-Hanging Mushroom Tree
Row 2 Middle: Self-Threatening Psalter Reader
https://egodeaththeory.org/2022/07/19/psalter-rows/#Self-Threatening-Psalter-Reader – f134 row 2 middle, {balance scale} woman, fingertip

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is codex_manesse_suskind_von_trimberg-upper-body-oval.jpg
Michael Hoffman, B.S.E.E., explaining possibilism (lower fingers), altered-state eternalism (lower thumb); & integrated possibilism/ eternalism (upper fingers & thumb)

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment