Michael Hoffman, started on mobile 9:30 p.m. Feb. 14, 2026

Contents:

• Canterbury f145: Blue Fruit Trade, Stored in Lockboxes
• Main Page about f145
• King Mushroom Demon
• Indicated YI Hand Shapes and Sequences
• New Fallacies Generated Faster, the More Deniers Lose
• You Blundering, Ignorant Mycologists, John Ramsbottom, Failed to Consult the Art Dictator Authorities – Popebanker Wasson
• Trust Gordon Wasson , Professional Cover-Up Propagandist and Criminally Obstructionist
• Panofsky Letter 2 2nd half
• Panofsky Acts Can’t Comprehend the Class “mushroom-trees”
• These Day 4 Trees Look Only Like Mushrooms and Not Even Slightly Like Trees: They Are not in mushroom-trees, nor trees, but, pure plain mushroom
• LOOK OVER THERE!! –>there are 5 smaller branching plants among the 4 trees, i call them trees because we are discussing mushroom-trees and i’m saying they are trees and heres some more trees oh lookit the smaller plants over there among the trees shown here:
• Conflict of Interest in Day 4 by Huggins: He Must Play Dumb that He “Doesn’t Notice” these Are OBVIOUSLY Mushrooms w No Branching – Not Trees oops FAKE ACCIDIENTALLY DECEPTION HE DOESN’T NOTICE, he lies and pretends to not notice, this is PROPAGANDA
• BIG ACADEMIA PROPAGANDA and Dissimulation, Intensely, Actively Biased to “Not Notice” 4 Plants in Day 4 Have No Branches and Are Exact match w/ mushroom
  • Fourth Day of Creation (ie Sun Moon Stars): Detail: 5 + 4 Plants, the 4 have no ramif
• multiple vs. single = grid-cap vs. simple cappossibilism vs. eternalism branching vs. non-branching {fingers} vs. {thumb} {fingers} vs. {index finger} {tree} vs. {snake} Y vs. Imany worlds vs. single block universe
• multiple-vs.-single ~= Y vs. I
• Heading
• Huggins Still Foraging Wrong
• First Hand / One Hand
• Second Hand / Other Hand
• Avoid Saying “from possibilism to eternalism
• Say “Add Eternalism to Possibilism”
• embrace and include the initial mental model
• Powerful King Pointing Hand-Shape
• 🔵🍄‍🟫 👈 🫅 👉 🍄‍🟫🔵
• See Also

Indicated YI Hand Shapes and Sequences

The Reference Hand-Pair Shape Is Given by God’s Hands: Y’ one hand, YI other hand

The problem of Extracting the Puzzle Statement

challenges:

1. Comprehending and recognizing THAT this is a puzzle.
2. Reading/understanding what the puzzle statement is.
3. Solving the puzzle ie explaining deviations from God’s Reference hand-pair shape.
4. Understand why initiated artists so much like and respect God’s Reference hand-pair shape: Y’ & YI.

The Profound Meaning of God’s Reference Hand-Pair Shape: Y’ & YI

• Y’ within the context of this pair of hand shapes, means:
• YI within the context of this pair of hand shapes, means:

todo: crop God upper right hands.

Use God’s Hand-Pair as the Reference Shape to Compare All Hand-Pairs To

A puzzle statement:

A huge part of the puzzle challenge is to read and recognize the puzzle challenge.

First hurdle: recognize that the hand-pair that God displays, is given to the viewer as the

The viewer is an honorary artist, and certainly includes as the primary audeince, other trained initiated artists initiated in the … keyboard shortcut???

keyboard shortcut: Artists Initiation Guild Mainstream Psilocybin Lockbox Education-Training in Motifs

Pretty sure i def’d a keyboard shortcut but really hard to deduce it.

What do I wish for in a keyboard shortcut for this?

That’s how to proceed in this situation: I wish to recall a keyboard shortcut acro that has the following attributes I desire I’m looking wishing for:…

key words for such a wished-for keyboard shortcut:

• guild
• initiation
• psilocybin
• mushroom
• lockbox
• {balance scale}
• mushroom sack
• artists
• mainstream
• training, education in motifs
• medieval
• {mushroom}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

Next, try arrange the key words gramm’ly w/ right emph:

• mainstream – MAINSTREAM!!!
• medieval
• artists – “artists initiation guild”
• initiation
• guild – “guild with mushroom…..”
• psilocybin
• mushroom
• lockbox – “lockbox, {balance scale}, & mushroom sack”
• {balance scale}
• mushroom sack – … “training & education in xyz motifs”
• training, education in motifs
• {mushroom}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs

Artists Communicated the Motifs Language to Other Artists and Displayed to All People

Explicit Educational Aids for Purpose of Communicating via This System of Motifs

An Articulate, Purpose-Built Communication Language

Decoded YII Pair of King’s Hands Double Pointing: {Y fingers cut}, {I Index finger shown}, {I thumb shown}

Puzzle: Not Fitting God’s Reference Hands-Pair Shape: Confused Guy Standing on Two Demon Legs

{stand on right foot} vs. {stand on left foot}

The following figures stand on one foot w/ other foot lifted.

{stand on right foot} = have Transcendent Knowledge

{stand on left foot} = lack Transcendent Knowledge, unbalanced

two senses of balance: have stable control; combine and rely on a combining of mature combining of {stand on left foot} & {stand on right foot} like f134 woman hold {balance scale} forming same as God hand pair shape:

Y’ one hand, YI other hand.

Canterbury f145: Blue Fruit Trade, Stored in Lockboxes

Main Page about f145

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/03/17/canterbury-f145-king-orders-shipments-of-blue-fruit-to-storage-lockboxes-with-blue-stemmed-mushroom-tree/

King Mushroom Demon

Powerful King Pointing Hand-Shape

king pointing is powerful:

Y’I&I

🔵🍄‍🟫 👈 🫅 👉 🍄‍🟫🔵

hand emojis i underestimated u

+1 for hand emojis

Heading

and equivalences and ranking and exceptions

trust the black line. white string doesn’t count as on her finger {balance scale} thumb cut by white thread but no black line so DOESN’T COUNT

joke re: doesn’t count:

… just like each isolated instance of mushroom mushroom imagery in Christian art ,

Thomas Hatsis pulls out of his nowhere an on-the-spot made-up, off-the-wall arg,

buncha noise and confusion about Secret Christian Amanita Cult

and he wonders why we are so adamant advocates of

the Secret Amanita paradigm
which is the same thing as
mushrooms in western religious history

“the topic of mushrooms in western religious history consists of nothing other than the Secret Amanita paradigm” – Thomas Hatsis

amazing nonsense he wrote us: u r not allowed to care about psilocybin, because you are faithful to your orgins [Hatsis projecting] in Deep Allegroism. [total projection]

d/k about Brown, Allegro had no influence on my scholarship entheogen scholarship just on the ahistoricity of religious founder figures. whw… Actually Allegro for me was the education along w/ Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy’s book The Jesus Mysteries, 1999, https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Mysteries-Was-Original-Pagan/dp/0609807986/

ABOUT THE AHISTORICITY OF RELIGIOUS FOUNDER FIGURES not about entheogen scholarship

Hatsis uninterested in ahistoricity !

if you advocate the topic of mushrooms in western religious history
that means,
you are pushing the the Secret Amanita paradigm, which IS the topic of mushrooms in western religious history ,

Proxy war: Everything stands or falls with the isolated Amanita mushroom-tree in Plaincourault fresco.

Huggins: Everything stands or falls with Day 3 panel Great Canterbury Psalter. They have branches [exact mushroom] so cannot mean mushroom that we have dubbed mushroom-trees because they look so very much like mushroom , per Panofsky 52,

“attached is a mushroom-like tree, & an even more emphatic mushroom shape”

x https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/panofskys-letters-to-wasson-transcribed/#Sentence-1-7 —

exact quote:

Just to show what I mean, I enclose two specimens: a miniature of ca. 990 which shows the inception of the process, viz., the gradual hardening of the pine into a mushroom-like shape, and a glass painting of the thirteenth century, that is to say about a century later than your fresco, which shows an even more emphatic schematization of the mushroom-like crown.

condensed copy:

I enclose two specimens:

A miniature painting 990 AD which shows the inception of the process, viz., the gradual

[“GRADUAL” therefore, sloppy accident unintentional by inept copyist-craftsmen, the art world came to accept the ever-more-mushroom like sloppy accident degradation TRUST WASSON BRO HES THE BANKER FOR THE POPE , ] 

New Fallacies Generated Faster, the More Deniers Lose

If I move from A to B gradually, that proves that I didn’t intend to end up at B; a meaningless accident with no import; degradation; fault of inept too dumb to read a prototype and figure if its a tree of it is or if it is a mushroom

Panofsky is comical in his slop letter to fraud propagandist PROFESSIONAL PROPAGANDIST AND POPEBANKER Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔🤬 Wasson THE C censor out 1 side mouth

You Blundering, Ignorant Mycologists, John Ramsbottom, Failed to Consult the Art Dictator Authorities – Popebanker Wasson 🤥👖🔥🤞

liemoji
🤥👖🔥🤞

Trust Gordon 🤥👖🔥🤞 Wasson , Professional Cover-Up Propagandist and Criminally Obstructionist

World’s Record Conflict of Interest Reddest of Flags

the Standard Smug, Condenscending Insults, Trademark of Deniers

“Doesn’t count, b/c Wasson didn’t Stop Irvin 2005 or Samorini 1993 from Publishing”

Typical Dumb Take by Huggies

Irvin is a radical exception, he is THE expert on Allegro Wasson, that shows how effetive t….

Elephant in room: Allegro attacked x’y Christianity

1. 1952 Erwin Panofsky writes two letters (including 2 mushroom-tree arts) to Wasson. Incl. branching arg which Huggins carries forward as their ultimate objection to mushroom-trees = mushrooms. The branches, which are an exact mushroom shape, prevent these mushroom-trees from meaning mushroom. Day 4 four mushrooms lack branches, I shall refer to them as ‘tree’, make sure picture is on diff page out of sight, though they — inconsis Huggins here — these look like a simple, whole-form match with mushrooms, not at all any branch or tree features AT ALL; these are easily stylized near-botanical exact mushroom Day 4 plant 3 is exact Panaeolus, by medieval or by any standards — pointing at… bending itself in order to point to L Pan of {balance scale} held by God, vaguely Omega {balance scale}, vs. A compass branching on left. grid-caps o lcgc lgc lc Liberty Cap grid-cap
2. 1968 – Popebanker Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔🤬 Aasson book SOMA p. 180: you dumbazzes failed to “CONSULT” the art authorities [same paragraph: censors mention of 2 arts + Bin citation strongly urged by Panofsky twice, went out of his way to provide the must-see citation, which evil liar Wasson fakely suppressed IT WAS HIS MANDATORY ACADEMIC DUTY TO PUBLISH THE BRINC CIT.
3. 1970 – John Allegro attacks and smears Christianity by mis-using mushroom, anthropology, & linguistics to fuse defamatory sex cult with the super-psychedelic mythiclevel fly aga Amanita , i mean, magical primivie lurid sex cult drug smear pop attack on Christianity via a tale of Secret Christian Amanita Cult which Ruck loved and it
4. 1976 – Carl Ruck: Allegro’s book’s motive inspired Ruck to create the field of entheogen scholarship.

x https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/panofskys-letters-to-wasson-transcribed/#Sentence-1-7

Liberty Cap grid-cap
lcgc
Liberty Cap grid-cap. the master model defining all of them is Eat From tree of knowledge etok eftok

eat from tree of knowledge f11 row 3 col 3 2 rows below Day 3’s four mushroom-trees #2 of 4 has Liberty Cap grid-cap defined in detail by panel
Liberty Cap grid-cap, of eat from tree of knowledge

Tree Stylizations in Medieval Paintings (Brinckmann, 1906) https://egodeaththeory.org/2020/12/11/brinckmann-mushroom-trees-asymmetrical-branching/

Panofsky Letter 2 2nd half

x https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/01/07/panofskys-letters-to-wasson-transcribed/#Sentence-2-4 —

nks for your letter of May 7. Unfortunately

I know very little of folk lore and witchcraft

… induce ecstasy by eating amanita or drinking some sort of decoction thereof

I have not the slightest idea as to whether the French witches also used … [Amanita].

However, even if so [even if witches use Amanita], I should be somewhat skeptical [that Plaincourault fresco = Amanita] because

the development from pine tree to “Pilzbaum” is so universal

[TOO MANY MUSHROOM-TREES! SO, IMPOSSIBLE TO MEAN MUSHROOM]

and takes place in so many representations other than the Fall of Man.

[Eden eat]

The only possibility I should be prepared to admit is that,

once the transformation [from pine to mushroom shape] had taken place [passive] and was generally accepted [passive] in art,

[switch to insult mode, de-personalization of artists]

some especially ignorant craftsman may have misu[n]derstood the finished product [mushroom shape eg in “the prototypes”], viz., the “Pilzbaum,” as a real mushroom.

But even that is not very probable because even the most mushroom-like specimens show some traces of ramification;

Panofsky Acts Can’t Comprehend the Class “mushroom-trees”

“even the most x instance still has teeny bit of …”

obv’ly, stupid Panofsky, BY DEFINITION, if tree has even a trace of ramif, it’s classed by you art historicans in the class “mushroom-tree”

so YES

duh

by defin,

EVERY AND ONLY ITEMS IN CLASS MUSHROOM-TREE HAVE AT LEAST TRACE OF RAMIF BRANCHING

If tree has trace of branching, or more, it’s classed by art hists as a mushroom-tree. IF IT DIDN’T IT WOULDN’T BE IN THE CLASS and gee we are given by the artist Day 4 plant 3: NO TRACE OF branching

(unless u r genius re grid-cap equiv’c to branching the equivalence to the grid cap motif is used as equivalent of branching )

Broadly: analogy scale:

single ~= non-branching = I
multiple ~= branching = Y

pattern is set in Day 3 progression/mapping

cross-map Day 1+4, Day 3, eat from tree of knowledge panel

eat from tree of knowledge panel
etk

the repeat the definition fallacy by Panofsky ?

[WAIT – CIRCULAR LOGIC TAUTOLOGY: ART HISTS DESIGNATE THE CLASS “MUSHROOM-TREE”,

“if the artists had labored under the delusion that the model before him was meant to be a mushroom rather than a schematized tree he would have omitted the branches altogether. “

u mean like four exact mushrooms in Day 4 panel? that Huggins refers to while rushing past diverting attn to the little plants among them,

Don’t notice that “trees” in Day 4 have abs NO branching so are NOT mushroom lokin trees, but

These Day 4 Trees Look Only Like Mushrooms and Not Even Slightly Like Trees: They Are not in mushroom-trees, nor trees, but, pure plain mushroom

which p. _ Huggins says is never the case in Great Canterbury Psalter , but Day 4 PLAIN AS THE SUN AND MOON HUGGINS, THESE ARE MUSHROOMS NOT AT ALL IN THE CLASS MUSHROOM-TREES but what are you suddently so focused

LOOK OVER THERE!! 🎩🐰 🤥👖🔥🤞 –>
there are 5 smaller branching plants among the 4 trees, i call them trees because we are discussing mushroom-trees and i’m saying they are trees and heres some more trees oh lookit the smaller plants over there among the trees shown here:

Julie Brown “I solemnly swear will only report what i see. i see the mushroom caps have been painted over and somehow made invisible”

I solemnly swear will only report what I see. I see the mushroom caps have been painted over and somehow made invisible.

Rush John:

Jesus is clearly passing out mushrooms, in Entry into Jerusalem in Martin Church. [no mushrooms]

God in Day 3 holds something maybe a mushroom in his hand. [no mushroom]

see my “errors of entheogen scholars” page

Michael Hoffman I see Ariadne in the chariot with Dionysus

The woman has wings (Nike).

Ariadne is a mortal, until Dionysus puts her immortal in the heimarmene-ruled fixed stars.

the heimarmene-ruled fixed stars
hrfs

Trees in Day 4, that have NO tree features but ONLY mushroom features

Day 4 doesn’t create plants, just sun moon stars.

Huggins, give me ONE REASON to refer to these, rushing past diverting attn, as “trees” in Day 4 Great Canterbury Psalter f11 row 2 left. Magic diversion trick BECAUSE IT DOEESN’T HELP Huggins’ CASE TO BE TRUTHFUL and careful – he is not steelmanning!

Conflict of Interest in Day 4 by Huggins: He Must Play Dumb that He “Doesn’t Notice” these Are OBVIOUSLY Mushrooms w No Branching – Not Trees oops FAKE ACCIDIENTALLY DECEPTION HE DOESN’T NOTICE, he lies and pretends to not notice, this is PROPAGANDA

BIG ACADEMIA PROPAGANDA and Dissimulation, Intensely, Actively Biased to “Not Notice” 4 Plants in Day 4 Have No Branches and Are Exact match w/ mushroom

THIS IS A BIG DEAL HUGE WRENCH IN MIDDLE OF 10 OF HIS ARGS

This DESTROYS 10 of Huggins’ statements and args. Day 4’s plain mushrooms contradicts all kinds of args by Huggins.

Suspicious AF. Huggins deliberately OOPS hastens by and is INTENSELY INTERESTED IN THE 5 SMALLER PLANTS among the four “trees” – IS THIS ALL THE ANALYSIS HE CAN MUSTER, OF DAY 4?

Fourth Day of Creation (ie Sun Moon Stars): Detail: 5 + 4 Plants, the 4 have no ramif

No ramif except equiv Liberty Cap grid-cap

multiple vs. single =
grid-cap vs. simple cap
possibilism vs. eternalism
branching vs. non-branching
{fingers} vs. {thumb}
{fingers} vs. {index finger}
{tree} vs. {snake}
Y vs. I
many worlds vs. single block universe

the acro key words:
list of contrasts of possibilism vs. eternalism [LCPE]
lcpe

Possibilism vs. Eternalism =

• {branching} vs. {non-branching}
• {tree} vs. {snake}
• {fingers} vs. {thumb} or {index finger}
• Y vs. I
• many worlds vs. single block-universe

multiple-vs.-single ~= Y vs. I

, a subtle, indirect indicator, not “branching”]

smaller plants among the trees [that have NO ramif’n]

mushroom lookin mushrooms.

since we’re talking about consecutive Day 3 panel and should be looking for contrasts and mappings among all 12 panels.

“In addition, religious mediaeval art at least had little reason to think of mushrooms at all. They do not occur in the Bible, so far as I know, nor in the legends of the saints.”

Heading

while lecture u for having failed to consult

the Art Dictator Authorities, trained dogs who bark “NO!” immediately.

when probed by the committee of academic faith belief statement proclamation of ideological committment to the anything-but-drugs agenda/ commitment/ academics/ propaganda/ academia

hardening of the pine into a mushroom-like shape.

A glass painting of the thirteenth century which shows an even more emphatic schematization of the mushroom-like crown.

a century after Plaincourault fresco

Huggins Still Foraging Wrong

Ronald Huggins’ Still Foraging Wrong article is my lowest pri

f145 a roaring success for hand-shape theory

mobile

roaring success looking at f145

image grin lion claws on face

really f’in in

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.image

medieval YI hand shapes is an extremely interesting purpose-built profound basic pattern language to represent psilocybin transformation mental model control transformation

from Y

to Y&I; Y’I

First Hand / One Hand

Y or Y’ or YI’

not: I

y dominates i

Second Hand / Other Hand

YI or Y’I

i dominates y

Y’I’ – holding spear w fingertips to viewer
todo: rare? keep eye out while add YIs to the images

YI form of each hand

sequence of two hands

equivalence of describing (simply, in diagrammatic art) the end state:

YI shape, or Y’I shape more specifically

Avoid Saying “from possibilism to eternalism

as if “get rid of” possibilism-thinking

highly Misrep’ve

Say “Add Eternalism to Possibilism”

Embrace and include the initial mental model (possibilism-thinking)

I never thought the Ken Wilber engine in the middle of his grand Integral Theory system was worth anything. Ironically I only thought his all-encompassing system was useful to plunder piecemeal like I DON’T want ppl to do with the Egodeath theory – my system is a swallow-entire, package deal, ACTUALLY integrated. This airplane actually gets off the ground.

Ken Wilber Transcendent Knowledge GOES NOWHERE, it never is able to deliver the promised goods. You’ll get some good useful ideas from Ken Wilber but you will NOT get what matters, eternalism-driven control-transformation.

Ken Wilber’s Popular Neo-Advaita Engine in Integral Theory Delivers a Low-Quality Altered State, Not the Classic, Best, Top-Grade Transcendent Knowledge: Eternalism-Driven Control-Transformation

I always held my nose and rejected his Advaita engine of integral theory 28-stage over-explanation that misses the transformative point.

Astral ascent mysticism has too many srages, at 8 but rly its 3:

1. planets
2. stars
3. beyond the stars*

*Above the planets (Saturn) is NOT “Beyond the Stars” like Hanegraaff’s terrible, INSANE heading in his Altered States book.

The Most Insane Heading in Western Esotericism: Hanegraaff’s “Beyond the Stars” Meaning Above the Planets, so the Fixed Stars are “Beyond the Stars”?! Model-Gibberish

The Fixed Stars Are then “Beyond the Stars”: MAKES ZERO SENSE!

Beyond the stars means precession; outside the cosmos.

The cosmos is not sphere 7 Saturn.

The cosmos is sphere 8 fixed stars. OBVIOUSLY

Hanegraaff f’d this up and caused all Western Esotericism scholars to duplicate his garbled confusion and self-contradiction incoherent.

Ken Wilber Popular Neo-Advaita

the positive unitive model of “mystical experience”

todo: keyboard shortcut for:
nondual unity boundary-lift

separate self, non-rational , ineffable, neg explanation inarticulate

elim separation separare self skinrncapsulated ego watts

boundary-change over-focus

WHAT SIZE IS YOUR EGO BOUNDARY

Transcendent Knowledge = stop mind constructing fake self other boundary

p u n b

BEWARE saying ever the misleading framing, carefull, bad connot : “

“mental model transformation from possibilism to eternalism”

beware misleading implicn u “get rid of” possibilism-thinking

you 100% retain possibilism-thinking used always.

simple: YI (one hand)

accurate: Y’I (other hand)

pairing of equiv end states

Heading

Medieval YI Hand-Shape Theory – example of adding 1 word adds N amount of clarifn + N amount of unclarity; NO NET GAIN BY ADDING a “CLARIFYING” WORD.

My skill technique of Lexicon Design.

YI hand-shape theory [YHST]

See Also

Site Map > YI Shapes of Hands & Trees
https://egodeaththeory.org/nav/#YI-Shapes-Hands-Trees