Yes There Are Two Paths You Can Go By: The Prostitute’s Path, of Popebanker Censorship; or the Path of Psychedelic Eternalism, the Psilocybin True Reference

Michael Hoffman 6:00 a.m. Feb. 21, 2026

Crop by Michael Hoffman – Shardogged, fullscreen

Contents:

links work on desktop Edge/Chrome:

Shardogged Mosurinjohn

the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages … project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify … drugs … the desire for legitimacy … this pseudo-history … religious fundamentalism … the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed … erroneous view of history … This myopia … colonial violence

Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience (Sharday Mosurinjohn & Richard Ascough, 2025)
Crop by Michael Hoffman – Shardogged, fullscreen

Public Test of Moral Fiber, Integrity, and Credibility: Do You Say This Looks Like a Tree Branch, or a Mushroom?

Crop by Michael Hoffman

If You Answered “Tree Branch”

You are on Team Popebanker, with 100% conflict of interest, and zero credibility.

Thank you for clearly letting the world know that you are on the side of censorship (Wasson p. 180), anything-but-drugs propaganda, and have made a career out of being paid to lie.

If You Answered “Mushroom”

You are sane and honest and have integrity.

Public Test of Moral Fiber, Integrity, and Credibility: Do You Say This Looks Like a Tree, or a Mushroom?

Crop by Michael Hoffman

If You Answered “Tree”

You are on Team Popebanker, with 100% conflict of interest, and zero credibility.

Thank you for clearly letting the world know that you are on the side of censorship (Wasson p. 180), anything-but-drugs propaganda, and have made a career out of being paid to lie.

If You Answered “Mushroom”

You are sane and honest and have integrity.

Public Test of Moral Fiber, Integrity, and Credibility: Do You Say This Looks Like Wheat Harvesting and Grain Distribution, or a Cubensis Grow Op and Dispensary?

Crop by Michael Hoffman – fullscreen

If You Answered “Wheat Harvesting and Grain Distribution”

You are on Team Popebanker, with 100% conflict of interest, and zero credibility.

Thank you for clearly letting the world know that you are on the side of censorship (Wasson p. 180), anything-but-drugs propaganda, and have made a career out of being paid to lie.

If You Answered “Cubensis Grow Op and Dispensary”

You are sane and honest and have integrity.

The Anything-But-Drugs Religions Journal, Now Hiring Prostitute-Scholars in the Post-Immortality Key, Pop Scholarship Era

I guarantee that the fake Sharday Mosurinjohn gang will advocate whatever position on mushroom-trees is approved by their slavemasters in the anything-but-drugs agenda/ commitment/ academics/ propaganda/ academia.

F U, fake phony scholars for sale. Huggins Mosurinjohn & Ascough Greer: congrats for swindling control of a special issue of the Anything-But-Drugs Religions journal.

An Aztec Narcotic (Safford 1915) – Sharday Mosurinjohn is the next Safford: We looked real hard, under our real hard biased prejudiced lens, and successfully avoided seeing mushroom, because our slavemasters tell us that is the correct thing to not see.

Sharday Mosurinjohn (the religious fundamentalist, dogged denier of mushrooms in mystery religions and Christianity, and perpetrator of colonialist violence) is writing a book seeing psychedelics in Western Esotericism, because Wouter Hanegraaff paved the way and took the heat, for her.

Shardogged Mosurinjohn

the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages … project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify … drugs … the desire for legitimacy … this pseudo-history … religious fundamentalism … the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed … erroneous view of history … This myopia … colonial violence

Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience (Sharday Mosurinjohn & Richard Ascough, 2025)
Crop by Michael Hoffman

Shardogged Has No Position of Her Own, but Sells Whatever Position of the Day to Whatever Audience of the Day

Jesus f*cking Christ Shardogged, how about following truth and sense, instead of the trendy, shifting winds of Pop allowable shoclarship and anything-but-drugs academia scholarship.

Given her walkback but not walkback, “Don’t mis-hear me”, Shardogged proves that she HAS NO POSITION and will shift arguments on the spot, as needed, JUST LIKE A POLITICIAN will say whatever sells at the moment, no bother with integrity and consistency.

Is her position that Western entheogen scholarship is colonial violence and relig fund?

Yet she turns around and writes a book on psychedelics in Western Esotericism.

Crop by Michael Hoffman – Shardogged, fullscreen

God Blesses {balance scale} & Cubensis dispensary bins

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman, 4:45 p.m. Feb. 20, 2026, fullscreen

God Blesses {balance scale}, Cubensis dispensary bins, & {stable column base}

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman
“f134-bless-col-base.jpg” 878 KB 6:02 a.m. Feb. 21, 2026, fullscreen

Psychedelic Eternalism in the Book Led Zeppelin’s Led Zeppelin IV (33⅓) (Davis, 2005)

https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/02/17/led-zeppelins-led-zeppelin-iv-davis-2005/

Photo & annotations by Michael Hoffman

http://egodeath.com/MysticStateAllusionsLedZeppelinLyrics.htm — copypaste:

Led Zeppelin: “Stairway to Heaven”

Egodeath.com sucks: no dates, date fail

And if you listen very hard

The song will come to you at last

When all are one and one is all

To be a rock and not to roll

That verse is from what can be considered the peak of the ultimate Classic Rock song, Stairway to Heaven, by Led Zeppelin.  The full lyric and analysis:

Here is a partial analysis of the song:

And you know sometimes words have two meanings  [key terms of agency meaning-flip]

Sometimes all of our thoughts are misgiven [entire mental model transforms systematically]

And it’s whispered that soon, if we all call the tune

Then the piper will lead us to reason [entheogenic drunkenness is sober reason]

And a new day will dawn for those who stand long

And the forest will echo with laughter [Zen laughter at vanishing of delusion through meaning-flipping]

If there’s a bustle in your hedgerow

Don’t be alarmed now [self-control seizure panic reaction]

It’s just a spring clean for the May Queen [Isis, the uncontrollable transcendent controller, who rules over the cosmos even including Fate, is exorcising your freewill demon]

at 18:57 in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hLESLXqBLI&t=1137s
is “two paths”

18 * 60 + 57 = &t=1137s

Yes there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there’s still time to change the road you’re on

Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman
“f134-bless-col-base.jpg” 878 KB, 6:02 a.m. Feb. 21, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen

The line is precisely drawable with no guessing, per the artist. Align:

  • God’s blessing finger-pair.
  • The {balance scale} pivot.
  • Oxen guy’s hand grabbing invisible line, and pointing to the invisible line above his clutching fist.

todo: crop focusing on those 3 points ruler-alignment points.

Precedent for precise lines (a ruler was used by artist & by me) in this image: guy with blue vase looks at bins; see the image with looking-lines or pointing-lines.

this is a true not false dilemma

Yes there are two paths you can go by [egoic vs. transcendent thinking]

but in the long run

There’s still time to change the road you’re on [switch to the transcendent interpretive framework or mental worldmodel regarding self, world, change, time, will, and control]

And as we wind on down the road [a person’s labyrinthine worldline frozen in spacetime, contrastible with a “moving through time” perspective]

Our shadows taller than our souls [egoic mental contruct of ego as control agent looms large in perception, but there is no substance to it (soul is delusion, only spirit is our real being, per Valentinian/Pauline body/soul/spirit model]

There walks a lady we all know  [Queen of Heaven, or fallen Sophia]

Who shines white light and wants to show [white-light pure-awareness perceptual feedback]

How everything still turns to gold

And if you listen very hard [profound mental relaxation, true meditation, relax knot of accustomed thinking, perceive, and let the alternate, transcendent worldmodel/perspective on thinking and controllership leap into view]

The tune will come to you at last [the meaning of this song and the transcendent meaning-network remapping key terms about personal control agency]

When all are one and one is all [nondual unity consciousness]

To be a rock and not to roll [become aware of the Platonic, frozen timeless block-universe perspective rather than the Aristotelian, moving-through time perspective]

/ end copypaste from Egodeath.com, date of composition TBD, check Egodeath Yahoo Group Max Freakout Archives where no one ever returns

Greer Might Survive with Reputation Intact, Unlike Huggins, Mosurinjohn, & Ascough

But Greer is IGNORANT AS A ROCK:

Wasson, Hofmann, and Ruck violated law and schol decorum and used Amanita.

Christian Greer, newbie to the field, making his entrance by throwing fists randomly, hitting himself

There went all your credibility, Newbie Greer. Read a book, before presuming to enter a field.

Amanita Isn’t a Scheduled Substance, DUMBASS IGNORAMUS CHRISTIAN GREER

Greer continues making a laughingstock of himself:

“Wasson, Hofmann, and Ruck ([1978] 2008: 34) repudiated “armchair” scholarship and instead defied legal prohibitions and scholarly decorum by experimenting with Amanita muscaria themselves as a means of testing their hypotheses.

“They even went so far as demanding their detractors do the same before passing judgment on their arguments.”

— Ignoramus Christian Greer, toxic parasite dumbass: Amanita isn’t a scheduled substance.

How about you learn a little about the field you presume to invade, dumbass? GTFO of the way, there’s serious scholarship to continue being done here.

Christian Greer and Charles Stang conceded that we must PLAN on finding SOME Christians used psychedelics; they are ready to debate “mainstream”, I won that already, along with the Browns.

Mainstream is what I declare it to mean: high-quality Christian practice, say 1%, is what counts as influential therefore main, in best churches and manuscripts best paintings and best art.

If 99% not psychedelics, they define “low quality” Christianity, not “mainstream” but in a stupid headcount way, with no significance here.

A redemption arc for Huggins Mosurinjohn & Ascough exists: The Egodeath Apology Form for Deniers of Mushrooms in Christian History. They have to explain the replacement of writing/publishing/citation, replaced by just ellipses: . . . .

Popebanker Gordon “Perfect Conflict of Interest” Wasson, Soma, 1968, p. 180, ellipses covertly replacing Panofsky’s citation of Brinckmann’s book and Panofsky’s two attached “emphatic” mushroom-shaped trees – while in the very same paragraph, chastising and insulting mycologists for having failed to “consult”(?) art authorities who never wrote, published, or cited anything (except the “noted”, ie. censored, exception of Brinckmann’s “little” book) on this “special”, taboo topic. https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/img_5225.jpg

The prostitute Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔🤬 Wasson, perfect conflict of interest.

The long awaited Hopkins 2015-2025 faceplant at finish line MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST p. 17-18.

Who’s next?

Who’s Next? Hopkins Religious Leaders Study: Massive Conflicts of Interest by Prostitution Science

Throw Grifty’s CEQ-POS in Wouter “Star Destroyer” Hanegraaff’s REJECTED wastebasket.

Go back to Adolph Dittrich’s OAV1994 > Angst Dread DED dimension, ALL 21 Dread -DED questions.

OAV 1994 (Oceanic Boundlessness, Angst of/ Dread of Ego Dissolution, Visionary Restructuralization) psychedelic psychometrics effects questionnaire by Adolph Dittrich

Who’s Next? Shardogged

Shardogged Mosurinjohn

the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages … project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify … drugs … the desire for legitimacy … this pseudo-history … religious fundamentalism … the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed … erroneous view of history … This myopia … colonial violence

Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience (Sharday Mosurinjohn & Richard Ascough, 2025)
Crop by Michael Hoffman – Shardogged, fullscreen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cfu2thO2ye8&list=OLAK5uy_n84dSCHYhjQQ8ZbOULHydIxNQs5G2C2Kk —

Won’t get fooled again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jtb10ZwbReY

Screenshot
Crop by Michael Hoffman

The Exodus Is Here

Carl Ruck

Finger Height = Loss of Control

Crop and annotations by Cybermonk Mar. 14, 2023 fullscreen

God controls the {balance scale} per the blessing line giving {stable column base} pointed to; even the {stand on left foot} fool sowing Cubensis agrees.

Finger-Branching Theory in Development

todo: post my txt msgs that were sent to AM on Sunday a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

Corrections of theory are not a failure; they are a success. Correcting errors from … not errors; it is FIRST-PASS ANALYSIS, which exposes special-case errors, = sophistication increase.

Check out the two corrections on the annotated image:

  • psalter viewer L hand
  • swordsman’s L hand
Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman, “f134 row 2 finger classification theory in development.jpg” 9:43 a.m. Feb. 22, 2026, fullscreen
Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman. Mobile photo of screen. 283 KB: todo: replace & delete
Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman, 946 KB: todo: replace & delete
Crop and annotations by Michael Hoffman. Mobile photo of screen. 1 MB: todo: replace & delete

Solve by Finger Segment Inventory, Hand Hold Sword Sheath: Analysis Process Concluding (Show Your Work) IIY’, forming hand-shape pair: [Y’, IIY’]

mushroom king double pointing in f134, his hand is IIY’ via different segments.

Crop by Michael Hoffman, “f134 row 2 middle clutch sheath.jpg”, 37 KB, 11:01 Feb. 23, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
todo: copy to f134 page and Reference hand-shape page

https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/02/23/reference-hand-shape-pairs/#inventory-of-finger-segments

move from non-branching to branching;
tree: trunk to leaf
hand: forearm to fingertip

1 means displayed
0 means not displayed

v1: first pass: mixed up Index vs. Pinkie, ERROR:

  • 1 – Thumb segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Thumb segment 2 (tip)
  • 1 – Index finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Index finger segment 2
  • 1 – Index finger segment 3 (tip)
  • 0 – Middle finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 2
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 3 (tip)
  • 0 – Ring finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 2
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 3 (tip)
  • 0 – Pinkie finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 2
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 3 (tip)

Analysis:

Entire thumb displayed all segments EVEN THOUGH NOT ATTACHED; where the base seg of thumb attach palm is not shown, but,

DECISION MADE:

Displaying the attachment of a finger to palm is not important

Whether all segments of finger are shown is what’s important what counts, for “cut finger” or “not cut finger”.

Thumb = I
(not I’), because both segments are shown: base & tip. Attachment of base to palm: not shown, not important.

Index = I [sic; Pinkie]
(not part of Y’), all 3 segs are displayed. Attachment of base to palm: not shown, not important.

Middle/Ring/Pinkie = Y’ [sic; Ring, Middle, Index]
Each finger lacks base. The 3 are together grouped as branching; and, modified to Y’ together by omitting base segment from each of the 3 fingers.

Therefore the hold-sheath hand-shape is IIY’.

v2 corrected Index vs. Pinkie: Improved spacing format:

New! Condensed Finger Inventory Format

A complete hand, all finger segments displayed:

  • Thumb: 11
  • Index finger: 111
  • Middle finger: 111
  • Ring finger: 111
  • Pinkie finger: 111
  1. Thumb: 11
  2. Index finger: 111
  3. Middle finger: 111
  4. Ring finger: 111
  5. Pinkie finger: 111

Try other order, because fingers come before thumb, ie, possibilism-thinking (4 fingers) before altered-state discover eternalism-thinking (thumb).

  1. Index finger: 111
  2. Middle finger: 111
  3. Ring finger: 111
  4. Pinkie finger: 111
  5. Thumb: 11

Shorthand:

  1. 111
  2. 111
  3. 111
  4. 111
  5. 11

Streamlined:

  • 111
  • 111
  • 111
  • 111
  • 11

Order: Index through Pinkie, then Thumb.

Reference Y’ hand-shape (no thumb, no tips, no mid-segments; base of 4 fingers only:

  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 00

Example of Y’ via [100, 100, 100, 100, 00] (= base segment of each finger shown, no other segments)

That’s [,,] new notation!! 11:27 Feb. 23, 2026

Upper Hand: [111, 111, 111, 111, 11] (ie, all finger segments visible), Forming Y’, Forming Hand-Shape Pair [Y’, YI]

Thumb: Base: 1, Tip: 1

This was a less efficient momentary notation] prior to the GREAT, breakthrough notation [111, 111, 111, 111, 11]

Index: Base: 0, Mid: 1; Tip: 1 Thumb Tip 1

this is the Key but not the efficient condensed, [matrix flag bit set] to use in practice eg to print on top of art as overlay.

d/k how this “segment displayed” inventory notation works w/ the {splayed finger} motif. Usu the Index or Pinkie has a {splay {sf sf

keyboard shortcut

{splayed finger}
{sf

{grouped fingers}
{gf

Hypothesis: To fully describe, in shorthand, a hand’s shape, need two kinds of info:

  • if Index or Pinkie: splayed?
  • if thumb, 2 segments; finger: 3 segments:
  • 1) is base segment shown?
  • 2) is mid segment shown? (n/a for thumb)
  • 3) is tip segment shown?

How to add “is splayed” to this spelled-out verbose list? to the matrix notation?

Verbose Inventory of All Finger Segments, sans Splayed

  • 1 – Thumb segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Thumb segment 2 (tip)

instead, list Thumb last.
add “shown?” suffix
separate the fingers

  • 0 – Index finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Index finger segment 2
  • 1 – Index finger segment 3 (tip)

  • 0 – Middle finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 2
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 3 (tip)

  • 0 – Ring finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 2
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 3 (tip)

  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 1 (base)
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 2
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 3 (tip)

see the more developed, “splay” version below.

Shorthand Matrix Notation of All Finger Segments, sans Splayed: [111, 111, 111, 111, 11]

Verbose Inventory of All Finger Segments, Incl. whether Splayed

The hold-sheath hand, of swordsman, in GCP f134 row 2 group 2 (threateners/ relenters);

Skip for now his easy hand: Y’

To develop this inventory notation, analyze his difficult hand: hold sheath.

Verbose Inventory Notation for Hold-Sheath Hand, Emits Analysis Form Identifier IIY’

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 23, 2026
The hold-sheath hand, of swordsman, in GCP f134 row 2 group 2 (threateners/ relenters)
  • 0 – Index finger segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Index finger segment 2 (mid) shown?
  • 1 – Index finger segment 3 (tip) shown?
  • 0 – Index finger splayed?
  • 0 – Middle finger segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 2 shown?
  • 1 – Middle finger segment 3 (tip) shown?
  • 0 – Ring finger segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 2 shown?
  • 1 – Ring finger segment 3 (tip) shown?
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 2 shown?
  • 1 – Pinkie finger segment 3 (tip) shown?
  • 0 – Pinkie finger splayed?
  • 1 – Thumb segment 1 (base) shown?
  • 1 – Thumb segment 2 (tip) shown?

Assess based on the above inventory: goal: ID this hand-shape as IIY’.

  • Index, Middle, & Ring grouped, base segments missing = Y’
  • Pinkie shows all segments = I
  • Thumb shows all segments = I

from wrist to tip: IY orientation.

Therefore, this hand is: IIY’

ie, list Pinkie (close to wrist) first, 3 fingers 2nd. NOT Y’II; that would be wrong direction analysis from leaf to trunk; from fingertips to wrist (wrong).

Hand-shape pair for hold sheath: [Y’, IIY’]

/i

Shorthand Matrix Notation of All Finger Segments, incl. whether Splayed: [1111, 111, 111, 1111, 11] bitmask

The shape of the bitmask:

[1111, 111, 111, 1111, 11]

“Hand Segments & Splay” Bitmask Matrix Notation: [1111, 111, 111, 1111, 11]

Format/syntax of the Hand Segments & Splay bitmask:

  1. Index finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  2. Middle finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  3. Ring finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  4. Pinkie finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  5. Thumb: Base shown? Tip shown?

That is INADEQUATE to describe swordsman’s hold sheath’s {cut thumb} = important, rare I’ form. con’t w/ improvements after analyze Psalter Viewer hand-shape pairs.

Psalter Viewer’s hand-shape pair, Analyzed via Bitmask Matrix Notation (verbose then condensed)

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“f134 row 2 middle psalter viewer hand-shape pair.jpg” 202 KB, 12:20 p.m. Feb. 23, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
todo: add to f134 page, and hand-shape theory / inventory page
Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 23, 2026, f134 Psalter Viewer hand-shape pair
  1. Need a verbose (explicit) inventory list to fill in.
  2. Convert to bitmask matrix format.
  3. Characterize one hand.
  4. Characterize one hand.
  5. Characterize hand-shape pair.

Template Combining Verbose and Condensed Bitmask

  1. _ _ _ _ – Index finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  2. _ _ _ – Middle finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  3. _ _ _ – Ring finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  4. _ _ _ _ – Pinkie finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  5. _ _ – Thumb: Base shown? Tip shown?

R hand of Psalter Viewer (on Left)

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 23, 2026, f134 Psalter Viewer hand-shape pair
  1. 1111 – Index finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  2. 110 – Middle finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  3. 110 – Ring finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  4. 1110 – Pinkie finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
    IS THIS PART OF Y’, OR IS THIS AN I?? TRY I (new idea).
  5. 00 – Thumb: Base shown? Tip shown?

matrix bitmask notation:

[1111, 110, 110, 1110, 00]

Analysis: predict: IY’I (or, simplified analysis: IY’)

  • Index = I
    Index is fully displayed, and splayed far from the 2-3 branching fingers.
  • Middle & Ring = Y’
  • Pinkie = I
    All segments are shown. Not splayed, but, different than M&R.

R hand (on L) = IY’I

R hand-shape IY’I; like IIY’. Powerful.

L hand of Psalter Viewer (on Right)

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 23, 2026, f134 Psalter Viewer hand-shape pair
  1. 1110 – Index finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  2. 101 – Middle finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  3. 100 – Ring finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  4. 1000 – Pinkie finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  5. 11 – Thumb: Base shown? Tip shown?

Analysis: expect Y’II:

  • Index fully shown = I
  • Middle cut by index, Ring&Pinkie visually cut, = Y’
  • Thumb = I

Concl: general orientation / order (wrist-up): YI. Start left = Pinkie-Index-Thumb order:

Y’II

L Hand (on R) of Psalter Viewer: Y’II

Hand-shape pair of Psalter Viewer: [Y’II, IY’I]

Normalized Equivalent: [Y’II, Y’II] – same as Mushroom King in f145

List which hand list first?

Rule: List the less powerful hand first.

If power is equal, list Left hand first, or list lower hand first, on the principle of:

Sweep from less branching to more branching.

For the standard human form, this means sweep from feet, to lower hand, to upper hand.

The two hands in no order:

  • L hand: Y’II
  • R hand: IY’I

They have equal power; equivalent two different impl of same abstracted YI form.

[Y’II, IY’I]
[Y’II, Y’II] – Normalized.

Test this Analysis Process Against Mushroom King f145

Crop by Michael Hoffman
“f145 mushroom king hand shape pair.jpg” 557 KB, 12:55 p.m. Feb. 23, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom
todo: copy to f145 page and Reference hand-shapes page

L Hand (on R) of Mushroom King

  1. 1111 – Index finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  2. 111 – Middle finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  3. 011 – Ring finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown?
  4. 011 – Pinkie finger: Base shown? Mid shown? Tip shown? Splayed?
  5. 11 – Thumb: Base shown? Tip shown?

Assessment: Expect now (MAJOR REVISION DEVELOPMENT: 3 I’S!! [12:59 p.m. Feb. 23, 2026])

What order to list the assessment? Wrist-to-tip: L to R: IY; Index, thumb, 3 fingers… error. cram more detail; sep the Middle finger.

  1. Index assess: I
  2. Thumb assess: I
  3. 3 fingers assess: Y’

take 2:

Conclusion: hand-shape pair of Mushroom King: [IIY’, IIIY’]

If Ignore (Why?) Black Line at Index Base: [IIIY’, IIIY’]

Try the more precise, detailed assessment char’zn; respect the black line …. but, we determined that “missing segment” is definitive, while “seeing finger attachment to palm” is not definitive, eg swordsman (due to limits of art, when grab rod w/ fingertips shown to viewer).

If we are too eager to declare “that is a cut!” fine tune

Fine-Tuning What Constitutes “Cut”

Present hunch: if all 3 segments of a finger are visible, the finger is considered “not cut”, regardless of whether attachment of base of finger to palm has black line.

To confirm, assess various hands and hand-shape pairs. Generates too many I’s, too few Y’ assessments?

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Feb. 23, 2026
  1. Index: I
  2. Thumb: I
  3. Middle: I
  4. 2 fingers grouped: Ring&Pinkie. Y’

Result: IIIY’ is TRIPLE AFFIRMATION OF NON-BRANCHING (VIA I 3X) + AFFIRMATION OF NON-BRANCHING (VIA Y’ [RING&PINKIE])

That’s a hypothetical reading of motif {finger with all segments shown, wrapped around other digit}

L hand’s base of Index is not 100% shown, there is black line cutting base. R hand more powerful.

There’s an arg that the two Index fingers are different. L hand Index has cut base. So a totally viable assessment of L hand is:

I, I, Y’; II

Alt Char’zn of L Hand of Mushroom King = IIY’ (vs. IIIY’); weakens the king but preserves more detail, for the hand-shape pair

Decoded {entire Index finger wraps around Thumb} = I Form! Enables 3x Assertion of I!

ANNOUNCEMENT: MAJOR REVISION OF HAND-SHAPE THEORY: DECODED {entire Index finger wraps around Thumb}, ALLOWING 3X ASSERTION OF I

R Hand (on L) of Mushroom King

Same as L hand, but flipped. There IS a difference: L hand base of Index finger has black line; R hand lacks that. Even R hand has a minor splotch of black ink.

Inconclusive: Black line at base of finger = “cut”??

Cybermonk’s Abstracted Rules for Medieval YI Hand-Shape Theory

Rule: Normalize with Y first, I 2nd.

Rule: the abstracted YI form can swap 1st & 2nd eg YI ~= IY.

Y’II ~= IY’I ~= IIY’

notation: read ~= as “is equivalent to”

Major Re-Assessment of 4 Cut(?) Fingers, No Thumb: f134 {balance scale} Woman’s Lower Hand

w notation!! 11:27 Feb. 23, 2026

1:34 Feb. 23, 2026

Hypothesis Proposal: IY’ not Y’

Web Search: bitmask

https://www.google.com/search?q=bitmask – “A bitmask is a programming technique that uses bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR) on binary numbers to isolate, set, or toggle specific bits within a data structure.

“It efficiently stores multiple boolean flags in a single integer, reducing memory usage and improving speed.

Common uses include game development, device driver control, and handling file permissions, and medieval YI hand-shape theory.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mask_(computing)

Hand Hold Sheath = IIY’

Hand Hold Sword Handle = Y’

Swordsman hand-shape pair: [Y’, IIY’]

Crop by Michael Hoffman, “f134 swordsman hand-shape pair.jpg”, 552 KB, 2:04 Feb. 23, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
todo: copy to right pages

Given that the sheath-hand is IIY’ and

I’ = Qualified Eternalism-Thinking Is Depicted(!): Breaking the Bow of the {shadow dragon monster} threat

God retreats the experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control

By pushing on the pivot of the {balance scale} that the woman holds, God reveals his threat of loss of control, and reveals his ability to retract that threat.

Bowman breaking bow to not threaten loss of control: God retracts his threat; the bowman’s upper thumb is visually cut, as if to say non-branching snake is false. Not “false”, but, qualified.

Prime doesn’t mean simply “get rid of” or simply “false”. Prime means “qualified”.

notice there IS such a thing as I’; saying a falsehood; or, QUALIFYING the assertion of non-branching; like my year-ago principle “qualified eternalism-thinking”

txt msg 1 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

todo: images:

  • feb 21 9:30 am: f134 row 3 R: guy clutches God’s pointing-line white line
  • feb 22 8:51 am mobile photo of Great Canterbury Psalter local image work in progress on f134 row 2 attackers, but, didn’t strikethrough option 1 & 3 yet
  • feb 22 8:51 am sent Mushroom King f145
  • feb 22 8:51 am mobile photo of Great Canterbury Psalter local image work in progress on f134 row 2 attackers, strikethrough on option 1 & 3
Crop by Michael Hoffman
“f145 king demon.jpg” 605 KB, 12:13 a.m. Feb. 15, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f145.item.zoom, fullscreen

interesting pivotal technical problem to discuss

interp’n problem: 

when figure holds an item with fingertips aimed at viewer, naturally this cuts some fingers to some extent 

BUT not nece. all visual cuts are equal?  

it preserves more details/data, by asking “is the finger to be CONSIDERED as entirely cut (relatively cut), or not?”

general principle for interp. what counts as a “cut” finger or thumb

on what principle should we choose between descriptions of his Left hand holding sword blade sheath? 

IY’

IIY’ <– want to justify picking

I’Y’

if I pick the description IIY’

that means I & I & Y’

which is a very strong assertion of non-branching I & negation of Y branching 

that shares the same values/ message as the mushroom-tree artists have

strongly relevant Reference point: in folio f145, 

the mushroom king points with I I Y’ with each hand; 

twice affirming the I shape (non-branching {snake})      and repudiating the Y shape (branching {tree})

so, lean toward finding / seeing the IIY’ hand-shape 

proposal: pick the option which affirms “I” and “I” (double assertion of I) and negates branching; depicts Y’)

i have leniency of how to describe L fingers holding blade of sword

i have to choose between several options

i choose the option that the mushroom-tree artists favor

what counts as “limb visually cut” (finger cut, thumb cut (perish the thought!  I (non-branching snake worldline in block-universe) is altered-state Revealed Truth))

or “not all finger segments shown)

when the figure is holding a handle with figertips aimed at viewer?

txt msg 2 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

how to rule out option 1 & 3, for f134 row 2 Middle, for assigning a YI hand shape to swordsman’s L hand holding blade sheath:

option 1: IY’ 

thats a favored message but if we say these 4 fingers that {touch blade} are cut, we would – to be consistent – have to say this thumb is cut as well by same token — the cut thumb idea hurts; why say not-I?! perish the thought.

the whole message of the mushroom-tree genre is to affirm I / & qualify/restrict Y (we only affirm Y when we also emphasize I) 

option 3: I’Y’

again unacceptable, to claim I’.

The message is I, not ever I’.

altered-state Revealed Truth is I (not I’!)

that leaves my preferred option 2: I I Y’

and more sweepingly, this gives us an important, key interp. principle:

favor interp which asserts I and qualifies Y (asserts Y’)

txt msg 3 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

pivotal result, crucial decision for setting the interpn rules in medieval YI hand-shape theory 

txt msg 4 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

prior to that puzzle, this am i solved & made interesting correction, or improved more sound interpn of:

L hand shape of psalter viewer

saying just YI loses data

we can be more precise and powerful by char’ize as Y’II

iow, i officially commit to:

the Mushroom King principle:

there is such a thing as 

I *AND* I (AND Y’)

double-hand double I’s 

“I is the case.  I said, I is the case. and Y is not the case. this is what the blue fruit teach”

txt msg 5 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

todo: images:

  • feb 22 8:51 am mobile photo of Great Canterbury Psalter local image work in progress on f134 row strikethrough correction on Psalter Viewer/artist

! thats what’s signalled by L hand Middle finger tip showing

the middle finger is NOT = Index

relatively, entire Index is shown; Middle finger is strongly visually cut: 

the Middle fnger’s base & tip are separated by the Index finger.  u cant lump Index finger in w the 3 definitely cut “branching” fingers

that hand shape definitely shows the detail Y’II 

not simply YI 

this shows how strongly the Index finger often is used as I in contrast w Pinkie+Ring+Middle grouped as “branching”

while Index means “non-branching”

txt msg 6 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

todo: images

  • zoom detail on his L hand touching the Pssalter: the strikethrough and especially Middle cut by Index

an interpn pun:

I means Index finger

I stands for Index finger (so to speak, as a sophisticated joke)

Index finger CAN be grouped with branching Y fingers in some hand-shapes

or alt’ly, index finger, fully shown, is contrasted with cut grouped 3 fingers (Y’) 

txt msg 7 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

Index finger when fully shown (not cut) is read as I ; non-branching {snake}

rather than lumped in w the 3 fingers that represent branching (and qualified-branching ie Y’) 

txt msg 8 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

todo: images

Real progress!  🏆🎉

in extracting the mushroom-tree artists’ rules in the hand-shape language 

txt msg 9 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

images:

  • break bow. detail of entire bow and both hands.
Crop by Michael Hoffman. 204 KB
  • photo of manakin hand doing break-bow hand-shapes
Photo: Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com
Photo: Michael Hoffman, Egodeath.com. 500 KB

upper hand on bow – thumb cut(!), 
= I’ 
= negation of non-branching 
= {the threat of non-branching} retreats 
(experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control) 

Reassessment of What I’ve Been Classing as Y’ Might Be IY’ Instead! Because His PINKIE SHOWS ALL 3 SEGMENTS, AND EVEN THE ATTACHMENT TO PALM, = I – NOT Cut!

I hate mistakes – but, they are a sign of improvement.

My mistake was, insuff detail:

  1. Rough analysis first at overall hand shape.
  2. Then I “fixed” that crudeness by vaguely assessing each finger.
  3. Now I am fixing THAT crudeness, by inventorying all segments of all fingers.

Shall I not find, report, and fix bugs in the Egodeath theory’s Mytheme Analogy theory? This gives me flexy options.

I never get it right the first pass. My first pass of writing YI assessments indicators overlay on image crops, is BOUND to be crude and unrefined and wrong, like failing to perceive the {hand mushroom-tree} f107 row 2 R.

⚰️ Canterbury f107: Lifted from Ossuary by Right Arm, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f107.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f107.jpg, https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/01/16/canterbury-f107-lifted-up-from-ossuary-by-right-arm/

txt msg 10 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

Puzzle: Why Left hand so artificially contorted to break bow? 

(notes: breaking the bow} here represents receding threat of experience of the threat of catastrophic loss of control)

Solution: to depict cut thumb.

That is counter to usual; usu u would NEVER show cut thumb; bc thumb = snake shape = altered-state Revealed Truth of non-branching of possibilities (cut the branches) 

txt msg 11 to AM a.m. Feb. 22, 2026

there are no accidental items on God’s blessing-hand pointing line

therefore not coincidence a fist holding nothing as if a handle IS significant; artist certainly knowingly put fist clutching on that line

txt msg 12 to AM .m. Feb. 22, 2026

to confirm that the line also intentionally goes thru BOTH mushroom dipensary bins, the artist assures us the pointingline goes thru both bins deliberately.  god is signalled as DEFINITELY point at mushrooms and {stable column base} at bottom 

the fist is to align your ruler over mushrms and {stable column base} 

to help the goal, of maximum communication & the best teaching aid 

txt msg to AM/RL/ES 8:16 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026

God’s Blessing-Line Is Anchored by Oxen Guy’s Clutching Hand

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman
“f134 blessing ruler line anchors.jpg” 860 KB, 8:40 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen
todo: copy to f134 page

Oxen guy’s clutching hand holds Air and he Poins to the Invisible Line via YI fingers.

Pivot of {balance scale} Is at Midpoint of Line from God’s Blessing/Pointing Fingers and Oxen Guy’s Hand Clutching Air

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman
“f134 pivot is at midpoint of held line.jpg”, 607 KB, 8:37 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen
todo: copy to f134 page

Oxen Guy’s Hand Clutching Air (and Pointing with IY Fingers)

As I was positioning the line to make a crop from blessing fingers to clutching fist, I discovered that it’s easy to make the line precisely intersect the pivot point, which the artist has drawn in detail. Sent the announcement text message at [8:16 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026], had to make a special crop showing the editing-mode line with blue endpoint circles and green midpoint circle.

another discovery re: God’s blessing pointing-line in Great Canterbury Psalter folio f134:

the pivot point of the {balance scale} is precisely at the midpoint of the invisible line held by oxen guy 

the artist (Eadwine) provided evidence/ indicators that God’s blessing pointing-line intersects both of the Cubensis bins, via these anchors to align your ruler: (God’s blessing fingers & oxen guy’s fist clutching air)

artist confirms my hypoth that the line intersects {balance scale} pivot, which mechanism the artist draws in high detail 

we know that the pivot motif is important bc it is precisely halfway between the blessing fingers & hand clutching air

________

a similar, follow-on line:

guy in tree with fist clutching air holds a line intersecting {cut right trunk} and a Y’ hand on row 2 and another on row 3

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman
“f134 cubensis bins at midpoint of blessing and column base.jpg” 625 KB, 9:26 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen
todo: copy to f134 page

Two Lines Intersect at Cubensis Bins

Crop and annotation by Michael Hoffman
“f134 two lines intersect at cubensis bins.jpg” 689 KB, 9:45 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f134.item.zoom
fullscreen
todo: copy to f134 page

txt msg to self, 8:25 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026

you know im reliable bc i report that:

Woman Holding {balance scale} Has 3 Feet (3 Legs)

The woman holding the {balance scale} has 3 legs.

She stands on both feet, and additionally, she {stand on right foot}.

The {limbless maiden} has zero feet; 
she does not have 1 foot, 
it’s not her foot, 

it’s the woman’s 3rd foot / leg (she has YI-form legs)

a limbless youth is to her right 

been working on this puzzle since Nov 2020 😵‍💫

f109 Breakthrough: Two Pointless Groups of Guys

f109 decoding of the two groups of pointless guys on right, finally gave way last night, jackpot and completion into this morning 7:30 a.m. Feb. 23, 2026. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom

f109 Is Giving Way! Decoded asp-dog group of 7 Guys

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom

[11:07 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026] I had urge to try to again try to analyze their hand shapes because

There are only 3 hands among 7 guys not 14; 11 of 14 hands are missing.

#1 important more than hands: why is he looking up and what are they looking at?

they look at the guy who has hands OBVIOUSLY, i shouldve traced looking lines every time i puzzled over this group above asp-dog.

11:47 p.m. Feb. 22, 2026 L guy thumb / hold leash? finding: his other, 4 cut fingers hold a branch that has 4 cut branches

txt msg 1 to AM & YW 7:25 a.m. Feb. 23, 2026

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

todo: images:

  • f109 lower right group of 7 guys above asp-dog
  • von Trimberg my self-portrait w/ caption
  • “von Trimberg, upper part of figures 3 & 4”
Crop by Michael Hoffman
Crop by Michael Hoffman

von Trimberg to the Rescue: One’s a Fluke, Two’s a Pattern

von Trimberg to the rescue

f109 lower right above asp-dog arch, Great Canterbury Psalter 

{hand mushroom-tree} in upper left, maps hand YI shapes to tree YI form

Puzzle: Decoded f109 Group of 5 Guys

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

Puzzle: Decoded f109 Group of 7 Guys

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

group of 7 guys mostly hiding hands, looking in directions, one hand shows a thumb (non-branching Eternalism) only, holding lifted (phallic) garment (altered-state indicator).

Solution:

  • splayed Index finger (non-branching Eternalism) touch Right arm
  • 3 fingers grouped together (branching Possibilism) touch Left arm

= von Trimberg: 

  • fingers fully displayed (branching ordinary-state Possibilism) touch Left arm
  • thumb (non-branching Eternalism) touch R arm 

By convention in the medieval art genre of {mushroom-trees}, 

  • Left is mapped to branching possibilities, like Everett manyworlds
  • Right is mapped to non-branching Eternalism, like Minkowski absolute four-dimensional spacetime​; block-universe eternalism with preexisting future

many worlds (Left) vs. single block universe (Right)

txt msg 2 to AM & YW 7:45 a.m. Feb. 23, 2026

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

todo: images:

  • f109 asp-dog main guy looking up at {rock ossuary}
  • f109 asp-dog main guy: face & fingers

folio image f109:

two pointless groups of guys, finally solved last night! 

in such case, follow the damn instructions provided by the artist; looking-lines:

look at fingers YI shape; hand-shape theory 

& feet analysis

guys next to {no-left-limbs} {rock ossuary} have no left arm, or visually cut left arm

that is obvious now

the guy in asp-dog group making the von Trimberg gesture looks not at himself, but up at {rock ossuary}

solved his fingers touching face: 

pinkie is fully displayed, = non-branching Eternalism 

The 3 fingers not all segments shown = branching Possibilism cut 

thus the hand at face 

 is the IY’ classic form : 

affirm I non-branching Eternalism, 

rebut branching Possibilism

other lower hand:

IY

result: the classic hand-shape pair [YI, Y’I]

here shown as [IY, Y’I]

Q.E.D. 

{rock ossuary} [RO]

{rock ossuary}
{ro

txt msg 3 to AM & YW 7:50 a.m. Feb. 23, 2026

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

todo: images:

  • f109 Row 2 right: 5 guys and {rock ossuary}

touch-face guy looks up at rock ossuary

guys by rock ossuary have cut left arm

= rebut branching Possibilism; affirm non-branching Eternalism 

finally solved this damn puzzle, two groups of guys 

txt msg 4 to AM & YW 7:57 a.m. Feb. 23, 2026

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

todo: images:

  • f109 row 2 right: 5 guys: crop of the two contrasted hands
  • repeat of: f109 Row 2 right: 5 guys and {rock ossuary}

two guys form a classic YI hand-shape ​pair

[Y’I, YI] 

ie, fingers cut on one hand , displayed on the other hand

qualified possibilism-thinking – we are shown eternalism-thinking but we continue using possibilism-thinking 

Y’:

possibilism branching is not the case metaphysically, 

Y:

yet branching Possibilism IS the case phenomenologically 

Keyboard Shortcuts for f109

todo: continue the update / normalization project that’s at https://egodeaththeory.org/2026/01/24/idea-development-page-32/#keyboard-shortcuts-for-main-eadwine-images

f109 = Great Canterbury Psalter folio image url f109: 🤚 Canterbury f109: Hand Mushroom-Tree, Hell-Mouth, Net Rescue, Right-Limb Ossuary, Clean Temple, Cut-Branch Dog; https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg & https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom & https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/
f109c

Canterbury folio image f109: lifted up in ossuary by Christ, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f109.item.zoom, https://egodeaththeory.org/2025/05/25/f109-great-canterbury-psalter-hellmouth-net-ossuary-cloth-looking-out-from-temple/, https://egodeaththeory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/canterbury-f109.jpg

Might Decode in Detail f49 Next: Forge, Wheels of Fate

f49: Wheels of Fate, Forge, Threatened by Angel

Crop by Cybermonk
“Canterbury-f49.jpg” 660 KB [10:14 p.m. June 10, 2023]
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10551125c/f49.item.zoom#

Commentary & detailed crops

https://egodeaththeory.org/2023/06/07/eadwine-images-great-canterbury-psalter-catalog-gallery/#f49

just because it’s the first non-f11 image I saw, and I put it at wasson article gallery at Egodeath.com http://egodeath.com/christianmushroomtrees.htm#_Toc134497563 in 2006. It never clicked w/ me. Has good mushroom cluster. 2 vine-leaf trees , 2 mushroom-trees.

Why Does Huggins Call the Botanically-Matching Panaeous a “Tree”?

Because Prostitute Huggins Is Paid to Lie and Cover-Up, by Anything-But-Drugs Academia, Allied with Crooked Popebanker Gordon . . . .🔍🧐🤔🤬 Wasson

Great Canterbury Psalter f11 Day 4 plant 3

Grove of Tree-Sized Mushrooms

See Also

Site Map:

Shardogged Mosurinjohn

these writers’ dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages … project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify … drugs … the desire for legitimacy … this pseudo-history … religious fundamentalism … the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed … erroneous view of history … This myopia is rooted in colonial violence … the multi-year history of the rejection of the manuscript … is emblematic of the way … scholars fail to communicate around psychedelic history … The persistence of the belief that ancient Western religions were fundamentally psychedelic [is] … a myth … so intent on hanging on to this narrative

Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience (Sharday Mosurinjohn & Richard Ascough, 2025)
Crop by Michael Hoffman – Shardogged, fullscreen
Crop by Michael Hoffman

Mosurinjohn’s Dogged Avoidance of Perceiving Psychedelic Evidence, of Non-Branching in the Eternalism Experiential State

Sharday Mosurinjohn (the religious fundamentalist denier of mushrooms in mystery religions and Christianity, and perpetrator of colonialist violence who is overlooking Indigenous Shams by erroneously trying to write a book on psychedelics in Western Esotericism, instead) wrote and spoke on:

“We then explore how the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages contributes to the [pathetic, invalid, illegitimate, in-vain] project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify the use of stigmatized drugs and revitalize experiential religion.

“Although the desire for [fake] legitimacy and meaning is understandable [though foolish, erroneous, hopeless, and futile], the strategies used by the writers [not scholars or researchers] of this pseudo-history constitute a kind of religious fundamentalism [“and colonialist violence“].” PROJECTION MUCH?!

fullscreen

Asp-Dog Trying to Avoid Hearing about Non-Branching

Crop by Michael Hoffman, Folio image f109, lower right, fullscreen, f109 crops

Mushroom-Tree Next to YI Hand-Shapes

Crop by Michael Hoffman, in Folio image f109, upper left, fullscreen, f109 crops

The Asp Serpent Tries to Avoid Hearing Wisdom & Divine Truth

Crop by Michael Hoffman, fullscreen

“The Asp, or “aspido,” is a mythical creature in medieval bestiaries described as a snake that stops up its ears to avoid being enchanted by the music of snake charmers. It presses one ear against the ground and covers the other with its tail to ignore the charming, symbolizing a refusal to hear wisdom or divine truth.”

Web search: Asp blocks ear avoid musical enchantment

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is codex_manesse_suskind_von_trimberg-upper-body-oval.jpg
Michael Hoffman, B.S.E.E., explaining possibilism (lower fingers), altered-state eternalism (lower thumb); & integrated possibilism/ eternalism (upper fingers & thumb)

Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment