Diagram contributed by the Egodeath community for the main article, 2006.Diagram by Cybermonk, Dec. 2, 2013 “chalkboard-2013-12-02-processed.jpg” 446 KB [1:50 p.m. April 9, 2023]
Diagram by Cybermonk, Dec. 2, 2013 “chalkboard-2013-12-02-processed.jpg” 446 KB [1:50 p.m. April 9, 2023]
Art diagram by Cybermonk, around 1991, ink brush.
Motivation for Creating this Page
I need to see what terminology I used, but the chalkboard was buried in the Gallery at WordPress.
Psychedelic Christianity: From evangelical hippies and Roman Catholic intellectuals in the sixties to clergy in a Johns Hopkins clinical trial (McCarthy & Priest, 2024)
Reasonable expectations for replications of psychedelic-assisted therapy: The case for prediction intervals rather than P-values Mitch Earleywine and Philip Kamilar-Britt DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00219 Pages: 167–170
Effects of a single dose of psilocybin on cytokines, chemokines and leptin in rat serum Geoffrey M. Bove and David J. Mokler DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00230 Pages: 171–175
Registered clinical trials investigating ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review Madeline Brendle , Anya Ragnhildstveit, Matthew Slayton, Leo Smart, Sarah Cunningham, Mackenzie H. Zimmerman, Paul Seli, Michael Santo Gaffrey, Lynnette Astrid Averill, and Reid Robison DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00234 Pages: 176–187
Micro-dose, macro-impact: Leveraging psychedelics in frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic Andre Atoian , Harry Bowles, Sarah Gerhke, Suzy Atoian, Nigel Bowles, and Duraiyah Thangathurai DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00227 Pages: 188–190
Psychedelic-supportive psychotherapy: A psychotherapeutic model for, before and beyond the medicine experience Elizabeth Wolfson DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00192 Pages: 191–202
Recruitment discrimination of lifetime classic psychedelic users is unjustified: Evidence from employees’ motivation-based workplace absenteeism Benjamin A. Korman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00240 Pages: 203–210
Psychedelic integration challenges: Participant experiences after a psilocybin truffle retreat in the Netherlands Anna Lutkajtis and Jules Evans DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00232 Pages: 211–221
The content of complex psychedelic experiences resulting from inhalation of N,N-dimethyltryptamine Stephen Kagan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00209 Pages: 222–231
Publisher’s note to “Culture and psychedelic psychotherapy: Ethnic and racial themes from three black women therapists” Anne Vallely DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.10000 Pages: 232
Psychological effects and subjective experiences of ayahuasca rituals in participants of two neoshamanic centers of Uruguay Ismael Apud , Juan Scuro, Ignacio Carrera, and Andres Oliveri DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00202 Pages: 72–79
Psilocybin use patterns and perception of risk among a cohort of Black individuals with Opioid Use Disorder John M. Clifton, Annabelle M. Belcher, Aaron D. Greenblatt, Christopher M. Welsh, Thomas O. Cole, and Alan K. Davis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00214 Pages: 80–87
Apophenia, absorption and anxiety: Evidence for individual differences in positive and negative experiences of Hallucinogen Persisting Perceptual Disorder Alexander Irvine and David Luke DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00195 Pages: 88–103
Changing attitudes to psychedelic drug assisted therapy: The induction of empathy to enhance community support for innovative interventions in mental health Corey Botansky and John M. Innes DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00203 Pages: 104–110
Being no one, being One: The role of ego-dissolution and connectedness in the therapeutic effects of psychedelic experience Ada Kałużna , Marco Schlosser, Emily Gulliksen Craste, Jack Stroud, and James Cooke DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00199 Pages: 111–136 – “research should be carried out to determine the factors that enable individuals to enter ego-dissolution without fear. Preliminary findings suggest that traits of preoccupation, confusion, and apprehension are positively correlated with anxious ego-dissolution, while openness was found to be negatively correlated (Russ et al., 2019). Thus, future pre-session preparation techniques might be based on reduction of worry and promotion of openness.” But what’s actually adequate is specifically: Strict Requirements for Teachers, Initiation Guides, and Students, Prior to Initiation https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/24/strict-requirements-for-teachers-initiation-guides-and-students-prior-to-initiation/
Psychedelics and mindfulness: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chelsea Radakovic , Ratko Radakovic, Guy Peryer, and Jo-Anne Geere DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00218 Pages: 137–153
Use of snuff and its main constituents for religious purposes in an alternative community with shamanic practices in the south of Brazil Thais Guimarães Bourscheid, Leonardo Corrêa Cardoso , Marcelo Henrique Nascimento Santana, Letícia Cimó de Oliveira, Fernanda Ziegler Reginato, Michel Mansur Machado, and André Valle de Bairros DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00220 Pages: 154–165
Can psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy play a role in enhancing motivation to change in addiction treatment settings? Mark Kang, Lindsay Mackay, Devon Christie, Cody Callon, and Elena Argento DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00190 Pages: 5–9
Psychedelic assisted therapy for major depressive disorder: Recent work and clinical directions Annie M. McCartney, Hugh T McGovern , and Alexander De Foe DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00211 Pages: 10–22
Mystical experiences without mysticism: An argument for mystical fictionalism in psychedelics Bradley Armour Garb and Mitchell Earleywine DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00207 Pages: 48–53
Of pharmakon: Hallucination in Amerindian perspectivism and speculative materialism Ignas Šatkauskas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00212 Pages: 54–62
Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) response to inhaled N, N-dimethyltryptamine (N, N-DMT): A case report David Wyndham Lawrence DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00178 Pages: 63–68
Psychedelic treatment for co-occurring alcohol misuse and post-traumatic stress symptoms among United States Special Operations Forces Veterans Pratheek Mangini, Lynnette A. Averill, and Alan K. Davis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00176 Pages: 149–155
A Semantic Scale Network analysis of the revised Mystical Experiences Questionnaire: A call for collaboration Mitch Earleywine, Fiona Low , and Joseph De Leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00187 Pages: 156–165
Philosophy and classic psychedelics: A review of some emerging themes Chris Letheby and Jaipreet Mattu DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00191 Pages: 166–175
An experience with Holotropic Breathwork is associated with improvement in non-judgement and satisfaction with life while reducing symptoms of stress in a Czech-speaking population Malin Vedøy Uthaug , Natasha L Mason, Martha N Havenith, Michael Vancura, and Johannes G Ramaekers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00193 Pages: 176–189
Corrigendum: Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy for trauma-exposed patients in an outpatient setting: A clinical chart review study Alan K. Davis , Pratheek Mangini, and Yitong Xin DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.30000 Pages: 190
Is MDD the right target for early-stage psychedelic-assisted therapy trials? Benjamin R. Lewis and Kevin Byrne DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00180 Pages: 65–68
Racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of hallucinogen use by age cohort: Findings from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Zoe W. Jahn, Joel Lopez, Sara de la Salle, Sonya Faber, and Monnica T. Williams DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00166 Pages: 69–82
Lifetime use of psychedelics is associated with better mental health indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic Federico Cavanna , Carla Pallavicini, Virginia Milano, Juan Cuiule, Rocco Di Tella, Pablo González, and Enzo Tagliazucchi DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00172 Pages: 83–93
Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy for trauma-exposed patients in an outpatient setting: A clinical chart review study Alan K. Davis , Pratheek Mangini, and Yitong Xin DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00179 Pages: 94–102
Sub-acute and long-term effects of ayahuasca on mental health and well-being in healthy ceremony attendants: A replication study Kim I. van Oorsouw , Malin V. Uthaug, Natasha L. Mason, Nick J. Broers, and Johannes G. Ramaekers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00174 Pages: 103–113
Day trip to hell: A mixed methods study of challenging psychedelic experiences Petter Grahl Johnstad DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00155 Pages: 114–127 My References entry:
Johnstad, Petter. (2021). Day Trip to Hell: A Mixed Methods Study of Challenging Psychedelic Experiences, Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 5(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00155
Neurophysiological effects of various music genres on electroencephalographic (EEG) cerebral cortex activity Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez , Sarah Nath Zallek, Michael Xu, Jean Aldag, Lori Russell-Chapin, Tobias A. Mattei, and N. Scott Litofsky DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.027 Pages: 128–148
The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name Jerry B. Brown DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00170 Pages: 5–8 todo: list my points of agreement and disagreement. my Maximal Golden Teacher Cubensis premise.
Exploring the relationship between microdosing, personality and emotional insight: A prospective study Hannah M. Dressler , Stephen J. Bright , and Vince Polito DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00157 Pages: 9–16
Four individuals’ experiences during and following a psilocybin truffle retreat in the Netherlands Anna Lutkajtis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00162 Pages: 22–32
Have Norwegians tried psilocybin, and do they accept it as a medicine? Henrik Børsting Jacobsen , Audun Stubhaug, Bjørn Holmøy, Tor Morten Kvam, and Silje Endresen Reme DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00167 Pages: 33–36
Symptom specificity of ayahuasca’s effect on depressive symptoms Cody Sykes Gilbert , Mitch Earleywine, Maha N. Mian, and Brianna R. Altman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00165 Pages: 37–43
A narrative review of the pharmacological, cultural and psychological literature on ibogaine Martie S. Underwood , Stephen J. Bright , and B. Les Lancaster DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.00152 Pages: 44–54
Erratum: Making psychedelics into medicines: The politics and paradoxes of medicalization Tehseen Noorani DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2021.10000 Pages: 55
Culture and psychedelic psychotherapy: Ethnic and racial themes from three Black women therapists Monnica T. Williams , Sara Reed, and Jamilah George DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00137 Pages: 125–138
“Culture and psychedelic psychotherapy: Ethnic and racial themes from three black women therapists” Anne Vallely DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00139 Pages: 139–141
Ensuring the psychedelic renaissance and radical healing reach the Black community: Commentary on Culture and Psychedelic Psychotherapy Nicole T. Buchanan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00145 Pages: 142–145
Dr. Valentina Wasson: Questioning what we think we know about the foundations of psychedelic science Monnica T. Williams , Amy Bartlett, Tim Michaels, Jae Sevelius, and Jamilah R. George DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00140 Pages: 146–148
Novel treatment of opioid use disorder using ibogaine and iboga in two adults Claire Wilson, Trevor Millar, and Zak Matieschyn DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00133 Pages: 149–155
Behavioral effects of sub-anesthetic ketamine in a go/no-go task André Sevenius Nilsen, Bjørn Erik Juel, Nadine Farnes, Luis Romundstad, and Johan Frederik Storm DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00126 Pages: 156–162
Tripping over the other: Could psychedelics increase empathy? Emily Blatchford , Stephen Bright , and Liam Engel DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00136 Pages: 163–170
Entity encounters and the therapeutic effect of the psychedelic mystical experience Anna Lutkajtis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00143 Pages: 171–178 in this field, “mystical experience” means instead, “Stacean mis-imagining of mystical experience”; “Stacean mystical experience” (Complete Newbie edition), vs. actual M.E.
Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for depression: How dire is the need? How could we do it? Mitch Earleywine and Joseph De Leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00134 Pages: 88–92
The Novelty of Ayahuasca Scale and the prediction of intentions to use Brianna R. Altman , M. N. Mian, and M. Earleywine DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00117 Pages: 93–103
A comparison of reactivation experiences following vaporization and intramuscular injection (IM) of synthetic 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) in a naturalistic setting Malin V. Uthaug , R. Lancelotta, A. M. Ortiz Bernal, A. K. Davis, and Johannes G. Ramaekers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00123 Pages: 104–113
Inhaled 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine: Supportive context associated with positive acute and enduring effects Nathan D. Sepeda, John M. Clifton, Laura Y. Doyle, Rafael Lancelotta, Roland R. Griffiths, and Alan K. Davis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.033 Pages: 114–122
Erratum: Internet method for the extraction of N,N-dimethyltryptamine from Mimosa hostilis roots: Does it really extract dimethyltryptamine? Giordano Novak Rossi, Eduardo José Crevelin, Gabriela de Oliveira Silveira, Maria Eugênia Costa Queiroz, Mauricio Yonamine, Jaime Eduardo Cecilio Hallak, and Rafael Guimarães Dos Santos DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00001 Pages: 123
Diversity, equity, and access in psychedelic medicine Monnica T. Williams and Beatriz C. Labate DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.032 Pages: 1–3
The psychedelic renaissance and the limitations of a White-dominant medical framework: A call for indigenous and ethnic minority inclusion Jamilah R. George, Timothy I. Michaels, Jae Sevelius, and Monnica T. Williams DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.015 Pages: 4–15
Reflections on crafting an ayahuasca community guide for the awareness of sexual abuse Daniela Peluso, Emily Sinclair, Beatriz Labate, and Clancy Cavnar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2020.00124 Pages: 24–33
Making psychedelics into medicines: The politics and paradoxes of medicalization Tehseen Noorani DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.018 Pages: 34–39
I advocate total repeal of Psychedelics Prohibition, returning to eg 1912 non-existence of laws. Remove Psychedelics from the “schedules” and eliminate the “schedules”, like in 1912, and NO, we do NOT need “helpful laws”, nothing but an evil trojan horse; we did better during a million years of lacking such “helpful laws”. To Hell with “helpful laws”, “helpful Satan”. – Cybermonk
Culturally informed research design issues in a study for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder Monnica T. Williams, Sara Reed, and Ritika Aggarwal DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.016 Pages: 40–50
Race as a component of set and setting: How experiences of race can influence psychedelic experiences Logan Neitzke-Spruill DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.022 Pages: 51–60
Intersectional insights from an MDMA-assisted psychotherapy training trial: An open letter to racial/ethnic and sexual/gender minorities Terence H. W. Ching DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.017 Pages: 61–68
Considerations for psychedelic therapists when working with Native American people and communities Belinda Eriacho DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.030 Pages: 69–71
Psilocybin for depression: Considerations for clinical trial design Kelley C. O’Donnell, Sarah E. Mennenga, and Michael P. Bogenschutz DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.026 Pages: 269–279
Psychedelics and potential benefits in “healthy normals”: A review of the literature Sam Gandy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.029 Pages: 280–287
The influence of context on ayahuasca experiences: An analysis of experience reports Avery Sapoznikow, Zachary Walsh, Kenneth W. Tupper, Earth Erowid, and Fire Erowid DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.028 Pages: 288–294
A phenomenology of subjectively relevant experiences induced by ayahuasca in Upper Amazon vegetalismo tourism Tom John Wolff, Simon Ruffell, Nigel Netzband, and Torsten Passie DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.007 Pages: 295–307
“Go ask Alice, when she’s 10-feet tall”: Psychosocial correlates to lifetime LSD use among a national sample of US adults Robert Andrew Yockey, Keith A. King, and Rebecca A. Vidourek DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.014 Pages: 308–314
Issue 3.2; Volume 3, Issue 2 (Jun. 2019): Psychedelics in History and World Religions
Introduction: Evidence for entheogen use in prehistory and world religions Michael Winkelman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.024 Pages: 43–62
The oldest archeological data evidencing the relationship of Homo sapiens with psychoactive plants: A worldwide overview Giorgio Samorini DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.008 Pages: 63–80
The “Kamasutra” temples of India: A case for the encoding of psychedelically induced spirituality Meena Maillart-Garg and Michael Winkelman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.012 Pages: 81–103
Burāq depicted as Amanita muscaria in a 15th century Timurid-illuminated manuscript? Alan Piper DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.023 Pages: 133–141
Entheogens in Christian art: Wasson, Allegro, and the Psychedelic Gospels Jerry B. Brown and Julie M. Brown DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.019 Pages: 142–163
Ritual consumption of psychoactive fungi and plants in ancestral Costa Rica* José M. Rodríguez Arce and Marco A. Arce cerdas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.010 Pages: 179–197
The use of psychoactive plants by ancient indigenous populations of the North Andes Constantino Manuel Torres DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.015 Pages: 198–211
The entheogenic origins of Mormonism: A working hypothesis* Robert Beckstead, Bryce Blankenagel, Cody Noconi, and Michael Winkelman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.020 Pages: 212–260
Internet method for the extraction of N,N-dimethyltryptamine from Mimosa hostilis roots: Does it really extract dimethyltryptamine? Giordano Novak Rossi, Eduardo José Crevelin, Gabriela de Oliveira Silveira, Maria Eugênia Costa Queiroz, Mauricio Yonamine, Jaime Eduardo Cecilio Hallak, and Rafael Guimarães dos Santos DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.009 Pages: 1–6
Long-lasting analgesic effect of the psychedelic drug changa: A case report Genís Ona and Sebastián Troncoso DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.001 Pages: 7–13
Psychedelic-assisted therapy for anxiety and depression in the face of death: A critical review with an anthropological lens Jenna Varley DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.005 Pages: 14–18
Psychedelic therapy in the Czech Republic: A theoretical concept or a realistic goal? Zuzana Postránecká, Čestmír Vejmola, and Filip Tylš DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.003 Pages: 19–31
Intercultural, intermolecular: An ethnobotanical examination of the potential therapeutic value of LSD for the treatment of depression* Karsten Fatur DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.002 Pages: 32–34
A psychedelic education: How an initial encounter with LSD changed my mind and shaped my life and career* Ronald Lee Zigler DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.006 Pages: 35–40
The influence of therapists’ first-hand experience with psychedelics on psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy research and therapist training Elizabeth M. Nielson and Jeffrey Guss DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.009 Pages: 64–73
“Ayahuasca turned on my mind’s eye”: Enhanced visual imagery after ayahuasca intake in a man with “blind imagination” (aphantasia) Rafael G. dos Santos, Scotty Enyart, José Carlos Bouso, Òscar Pares, and Jaime E. C. Hallak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.008 Pages: 74–77
Motivational structure of ayahuasca drinkers in social networks Tom John Wolff and Torsten Passie DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.010 Pages: 89–96
Reply to “Ayahuasca turned on my mind’s eye”: A case of acquired versus congenital aphantasia, as evidenced with DMT use? David Luke DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.014 Pages: 97–98
An ontology of psychedelic entity experiences in evolutionary psychology and neurophenomenology* Michael James Winkelman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.002 Pages: 5–23
A phenomenological investigation into the lived experience of ibogaine and its potential to treat opioid use disorders Thaddeus James Camlin, Donald Eulert, Arthur Thomas Horvath, Steven F. Bucky, Joseph P. Barsuglia, and Martin Polanco DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.004 Pages: 24–35
Psychedelic therapy as a complementary treatment approach for alcohol use disorders Peter Eischens and William Leigh Atherton DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.005 Pages: 36–44
Mental health of a self-selected sample of psychedelic users and self-medication practices with psychedelics Natasha L. Mason and Kim P. C. Kuypers DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2018.006 Pages: 45–52
Perceptions of the medicinal value of hallucinogenic drugs among college students Jared I. Wildberger, Cassandra N. John, and Robert M. Hallock DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.008 Pages: 50–54
The hyperassociative mind: The psychedelic experience and Merleau-Ponty’s “wild being” Csaba Szummer, Lajos Horváth, Attila Szabó, Ede Frecska, and Kristóf Orzói DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.006 Pages: 55–64
Subjective effectiveness of ibogaine treatment for problematic opioid consumption: Short- and long-term outcomes and current psychological functioning Alan K. Davis, Joseph P. Barsuglia, Austin-Marley Windham-Herman, Marta Lynch, and Martin Polanco DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.009 Pages: 65–73
A phenomenological analysis of the subjective experience elicited by ibogaine in the context of a drug dependence treatment Eduardo Ekman Schenberg, Maria Angélica de Castro Comis, João Felipe Morel Alexandre, Luís Fernando Tófoli, Bruno Daniel Rasmussen Chaves, and Dartiu Xavier da Silveira DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.007 Pages: 74–83
Treating drug dependence with the aid of ibogaine: A qualitative study Eduardo Ekman Schenberg, Maria Angélica de Castro Comis, João Felipe Morel Alexandre, Bruno Daniel Rasmussen Chaves, Luís Fernando Tófoli, and Dartiu Xavier da Silveira DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2016.002 Pages: 10–19
The antiaddictive effects of ibogaine: A systematic literature review of human studies Rafael G. dos Santos, José Carlos Bouso, and Jaime E. C. Hallak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2016.001 Pages: 20–28
Detoxification from methadone using low, repeated, and increasing doses of ibogaine: A case report Clare Wilkins, Rafael G. dos Santos, Jordi Solá, Marc Aixalá, Pep Cura, Estefanía Moreno, Miguel Ángel Alcázar-Córcoles, Jaime E. C. Hallak, and José Carlos Bouso DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.005 Pages: 29–34
Anxiety, panic, and hopelessness during and after ritual ayahuasca intake in a woman with generalized anxiety disorder: A case report Rafael G. dos Santos, Flávia L. Osório, José Alexandre S. Crippa, and Jaime E. C. Hallak DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.01.2017.004 Pages: 35–39
Motivation for Creating this Page
I need a clean organized list and overview of all the articles. The beginnings of that is buried right now in Idea Development page 18.
I need to rank the articles to cite some in my article:
Explaining {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, {stability} and {non-branching} Motifs
The Focus and Boundary of Bad Paradigm of Entheogen Scholarship = Allegro/ Wasson/ Secret Amanita Heretical Cult with Plaincourault Fresco and Panofsky
(ignoring his hundreds of Psilocybin mushroom trees, because not Amanita, so irrelevant and of no interest)
Ruck tries to bestow undue credit on Wasson
Irvin Over-Credits All Mushroom Trees to Allegro, Instead of Just the Lone Amanita Tree of the Fresco
The “Thoroughly Familiar with Mushroom Trees” Art Historians — Who Wrote NOTHING AT ALL About Mushroom Trees – CITATIONS NEEDED, PANOFSKY & WASSON!!
Hand it Over, Jerks! Posers! Frauds! Liars! Fake History Fabricators, Cover-up Artists
Wasson’s Extremely Rude and Intensely Disrespectful Attitude Toward Everyone Else, and Ploys to Rob Credit from Everyone Else by Pretending Fresco != Genesis Text
Wasson Held Self-Aggrandizement as More Important than Truth and Investigation
Wasson Wrote “I Was Wrong” in 1952, not 1986 or 1968
Wasson’s Fabrication of Difficulty and False Claim of Higher Intelligence or Priority of Discovery
Art Historians’ “Familiarity” — with Lying and Covering-Up the Thousands of Mushroom Trees
Weasel-Word Whiplash Flipping of the Football Field Goalposts by John Lash & Carl Ruck: Asserting the Ubiquitous Presence/ Absence of Entheogens
True or False: Wasson Asserted that the Pre-history Origin of … ALL Genuine Religious Experience Is Visionary Plants (a Narrowing Qualifier Followed by a Broadening Qualifier)
The Return of the Wafflehouse Gang: They Are the Kings of Self-Contradiction Deserving Full Credit for Total Prevarication and Self-Contradiction and Stinginess Combined with Total Braggadocio
Reading Summaries of Loss of Viable Control, 4-Phase Development Model, the Old Steersman Did Lose Control
Cybernetic Death: You Will Definitely Die and That Kind of “You” Will Lose Control on that Day That You Will Eat the Psilocybin Fruit
Image f107 Detail: Lifted from Ossuary
Big Theme 1 of 3: Rightly Assigning Credit and Blame to Wasson, Allegro, Ruck, Samorini, Irvin, Rush, Brown
(Positive) Contributions, (Neutral) Limitations, and (Negative) Harms Caused
Big Theme 2 of 3: How Much the Topic of “Entheogens in Christianity” Amounts to {branching-message mushroom trees} and Panofsky’s “hundreds” of (Mainly Psilocybin!) Mushroom Trees
… which Every Entheogen scholar (including Allegro) Ignored Until Samorini 1997, because they aren’t Amanita
Fixation on Fresco b/c It’s the Only Amanita Tree
The Great Entheogen Scholarship Project, of Trying to Separate Mushrooms from Christianity
Entheogen Scholars’ “Absence and Suppression” Master Narrative that they Labor to Prop Up at All Costs: The Big Bad Church Got Rid of Mushrooms
Entheogen Scholarship has been False-Narrative Driven, Causing Prohibition
Salamander Contentious for Same Reason: Ruck Faceplants on it Because He Hallucinates that It’s Red & White
Big Theme 3 of 3 in these Sessions: How Art Motifs Depict this Model of Mental Model Transformation
Drafting the Abstract/ Intro/ Conclusions Sections of {branching-message mushroom trees} article
Mapping of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} Motifs to My 4-Phase Model of Mental Model Transformation: Summary of How It Works
Visibility of Right Wrist in f177 Shroud Ossuary: cybernetic control death = perceiving non-branching reality
Freeform Touring of Great Canterbury Psalter Hi-Res at Library with Commentary
STEM English plain direct model explanation, as a presentation method and approach to explanation.
My model of mental model developmental transformation from 1) tightcog possibilism, 2) tightcog eternalism education, 3) loosecog eternalism catastrophic demonstration of fatal loss of control of the possibilism type, driving transformation to the 2nd mode of viable control; 4) tightcog qualified possibilism-thinking.
Art motifs of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs, & {stability} motifs eg {fire}, {demon torment}, {scale balance}, {stable tower}, {stable column base}, {building doorway construction} {flames}, {sword}, {spear}, {blade}; cybernetic control death and reset and reconfiguration.
“Ep244a 🏵🪨 Rosetta Stone” 1:46:11
244a 0:00 – Intro, voice only. trk: “Intro no date no miking Apr 3 2023 VOX_TK_4869”
Explaining {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, {stability} and {non-branching} Motifs
244a 0:16 – “VOX_TK_4874” – April 4, 2023 — Gold Clip about motifs from previous episode (joined together into 8 minutes). Later in Ep244, I do some fresh coverage of that, for the Abstract, Intro, and Conclusion of {branching-message mushroom trees} article.
The 3 motifs, {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} [and {stability}] motifs, can be explained by interpreting them as depictions of mental worldmodel transformation from transformation from possibilism to eternalism, literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control to analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control, driven by control instability loss of control and reconfiguration of mental worldmodel of control,
per the Egodeath theory, which is the Theory of Analogical Psychedelic Eternalism Cybernetics; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism.
244a 7:47 – “VOX_TK_4877” … and {stable column base}. short. list of stability motifs.
244a 8:09 – Leading Edge. “edgeGood processed distanced normd VOX_TK_3112”
244a 8:16 – “VOX_TK_4881” (April 5, 2023, 640 MB) – Wasson wanted credit for discovering the idea of “tree of konwledge = Amanita” so he had to rob and insult and defame the French mycologists, by lying and falsely claiming (like Samorini) that we can and should think about Genesis Eden text as if completely different than the fresco.
As if no one understood either of these. As if it makes sense to recognize one without recognizing the other.
False elevation of Genesis text over fresco and pretending there’s weren’t THOUSANDS OF PPL FIGURED OUT BEFORE WASSON, tons of people who recognized both Genesis text & fresco as Amanita: eg. the 1900 AD French mycologists.
244a 10:00
244a 20:00
244a 30:00
244a 40:00
244a 50:00
244a 58:39 – Intro. April 6, 2023. Leading Edge. What am I up to? “VOX_TK_4882” Thinking about an article for review about stuff like Allegro & Wasson.
The Focus and Boundary of Bad Paradigm of Entheogen Scholarship = Allegro/ Wasson/ Secret Amanita Heretical Cult with Plaincourault Fresco and Panofsky
(ignoring his hundreds of Psilocybin mushroom trees, because not Amanita, so irrelevant and of no interest)
We must not treat Allegro/Wasson/Secret Amanita Fresco Panofsky as if they are the central focus and boundary of the field of entheogen scholarship.
244a 1:00:00
244a 1:10:00
244a 1:20:00
244a 1:30:00
244a 1:37:39 – Station ID: Egodeath Mystery Show. “intro VOX_TK_3442” Stereo dly, cut off at end.
Ruck tries to bestow undue credit on Wasson
244a 1:37:51 – “VOX_TK_4883” Irvin quotes, The Holy Mushroom, the “other stuff” chapter. Ruck tries to bestow undue credit on Wasson.
Ruck Restricts Mushrooms to Only Mystics and Heretical Sects
Irvin Over-Credits All Mushroom Trees to Allegro, Instead of Just the Lone Amanita Tree of the Fresco
244a 1:40:00 –
244a 1:42:30 – Leading Edge. “Lead good VOX_TK_3191”
244a 1:42:37 – Guitar. (VOX_TK_4868) 3 minutes guitar from end of past 2 episodes
244a 1:45:41 – Outro. “EDMS Left Right Wet Dry rvb80pctSpread”
244a 1:46:11 – End.
“Ep244b 🏵🪨 Rosetta Stone” 2:37:53
244b 0:00 – Guitar & voice Intro. trk: “VOX_TK_3088 from “Ep123 Moderate Theory Coercion.aup””
1:01 – “VOX_TK_4884” (2023-04-06 800 MB) – There’s a 3-phase deal of how we recog’d mushroom in Christianity:
1) Wasson: Amanita only, in Genesis 1000 BC text Eden tree only.
2) Allegro: Primitive Christianity 1 AD, very SECRETLY, and also inconsistently, Amanita in Plaincourault cult hereetical sect, ONLY. Allegro SHOULD GET NO CREDIT FOR SHIITE HE DID NOT ASSERT, IRVIN!
3) Samorini FINALLY follows up on Panofsky’s lead, “hundreds of [psil] msh trees” – why did no one do this 1952-1997?
Why the delay from Wasson’s lying deceptive censoring partial report of Panofsky 1952, until finally someone pounding on Panofsky’s door yelling “HAND IT OVER, THE CITATIONS AND MSH TREES THAT WASSON CENSORED!
The “Thoroughly Familiar with Mushroom Trees” Art Historians — Who Wrote NOTHING AT ALL About Mushroom Trees – CITATIONS NEEDED, PANOFSKY & WASSON!!
Hand it Over, Jerks! Posers! Frauds! Liars! Fake History Fabricators, Cover-up Artists
Wasson’s Extremely Rude and Intensely Disrespectful Attitude Toward Everyone Else, and Ploys to Rob Credit from Everyone Else by Pretending Fresco != Genesis Text
Wasson Held Self-Aggrandizement as More Important than Truth and Investigation
244b 10:00 –
244b 20:00 –
244b 30:00 –
244b 40:00 –
244b 50:00 –
244b 1:00:00 –
1:04:20 – Station ID: Egodeath Mystery Show “intro VOX_TK_3442”
1:04:32 – “VOX_TK_4885” Content. How to connect topic “correct attribution of degree of asserting Mushroom trees”
Then the topic “degree to which msh are normal to the church” is the middle, connecting topic.
244b 1:10:00 –
Wasson Wrote “I Was Wrong” in 1952, not 1986 or 1968
244b 1:20:00 – Errata correction: Wasson wrote the “I was wrong” passage that’s published in Persephone’s Quest not in 1986, nor 1968 per my 2006 article, but rather, in 1952, or whenever he first wrote anything about either Genesis Eden tree of knowledge & life in Gen 2 & 3, or Plainc fresco, whichever he wrote about first.
Intensive Harshing on Wasson at 1:20:00
I throw Wasson’s rude, insulting 🐴💩 right back at him – psychopathic jerk insulting “The Public”, he is totally disrespectful to everyone.
Insulting our intelligence with his garbage, kettle-logic, convoluted arguments.
1:29:26 – Station ID: Egodeath Mystery Show. “WoshShow IntroEmsEcho VOX_TK_3304”
1:29:46 – “VOX_TK_4886”. Content. Wasson a mean rude agent but also, immature, so casually insulting people while aggrandizing himself.
1:30:03 – “bullying like a sketchy
Radio.
Active.
A gent.
1:30:14 – … but outright immature. So easily nonchalantly insult the hell out of people while declariing yourself the first person in history, FLIMSY CLAIM to priority by smearing the French mycologists who BEAT HIM TO PRIORITY of discovery BY 50 YEARS.
Like Hatsis’ aggression, Wasson’s aggressive attacks are a sign of having a weak, confused case; it’s a package deal scheme.
1:32:26 – Many people feel Samorini is being ridiculous and unrealistic the way he claims:
Any sane person knows that OF COURSE if you think Genesis Eden text tree = Amanita then you also think Fresco means Amanita, AND ESPECIALLY, YOU THINK THAT LOTS AND LOTS OF OTHER PEOPLE KNOW THIS AWARENESS.
Wasson’s Fabrication of Difficulty and False Claim of Higher Intelligence or Priority of Discovery
But Wasson wants to PRETEND that ONLY HE has figured this “difficult” stuff out.
He’s exaggerating the difficulty of the whole topic and then claiming he’s such fkking BRILLIANT that ONLY HE was able to figure this stuff out and it’s SO HARD, we must SUBMIT to the “conclusions” of art historians on “totally different topic” (eye roll) of fresco.
Art Historians’ “Familiarity” — with Lying and Covering-Up the Thousands of Mushroom Trees
Art historians’ “conclusions” & “familiarity” = commitment to lies & coverup, dissimulation and kettle-logic fallacious 1-way argumentation; scholarly bullying by poser/ fraud art historians whose assigned job is to FABRICATE ART HISTORY THAT EXPLAINS AWAY — not covers, but rather, covers-over — the thousands of mushroom trees.
This is all Wasson confabulation and obfuscation, THE INVENTION/ FABRICATION/ manufacturing of pseudo-DIFFICULTIES, TO CLAIM TO BE SMARTER THAN OTHERS and to steal a false claim of Priority of Discovery from others such as French mycologists.
244b 1:30:00 –
244b 1:40:00 –
244b 1:50:00 –
1:55:00 – {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs
244b 2:00:00 – mushroom imagery in psalters a closed but flexible system with closure.
2:08:00 mushrooms were rejected late, when eso’m was rejected per W Hanegraaff.
244b 2:10:00 –
2:15:00 –
Weasel-Word Whiplash Flipping of the Football Field Goalposts by John Lash & Carl Ruck: Asserting the Ubiquitous Presence/ Absence of Entheogens
True or False: Wasson Asserted that the Pre-history Origin of … ALL Genuine Religious Experience Is Visionary Plants (a Narrowing Qualifier Followed by a Broadening Qualifier)
244b 2:20:00 –
The Return of the Wafflehouse Gang: They Are the Kings of Self-Contradiction Deserving Full Credit for Total Prevarication and Self-Contradiction and Stinginess Combined with Total Braggadocio
2:21:00 – How broad of credit to assign to Wasson, Allegro, Graves, Ruck? They assert out of one side of their mouth & one hand, and deny and remove with the other.
Wasson was the first to equate all religion with The Mushroom, in pre-prehistory ONLY.
Psalters Show Psilocybin More than Amanita
2:26:00 – trk: “VOX_TK_4887” I don’t see a strong emph of Amanita over Psil in the psalters. When did Psilocybin fall off in history?
Return of the Forgot Plots
3 plots start in upper left, end up in lower right. When falloff of Psil knowledge/usage?
244b 2:30:00 –
2:34:00 – article Abstract, mapping {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs to my 4-phase, control-instability driven model of transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
2:37:15 – Outro: You are on the leading edge of unbiased HALLUCINOGENS research, The Mushroom, Rock and Roll Lyrics. trk: “unbiased good VOX_TK_3192”
2:37:39 – Outro, reverb. Egodeath Mystery Show with Cybermonk, site domain.
244c 0:11 – Content. (VOX_TK_4888.wav) – read aloud the Abstract/ Intro/ Conclusions of my branching-message mushroom trees article.
Mapping {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs to my 4-phase, control-instability driven model of transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
A model of control-in-world.
from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}
244c 10:00 –
Reading Summaries of Loss of Viable Control, 4-Phase Development Model, the Old Steersman Did Lose Control
244c 20:00 –
244c 30:00 –
244c 40:00 –
244c 50:00 –
244c 1:00:00 – 3 topics: left topic: rightly assigning credit and blame or limitations to each entheogen scholar: Panofsky, Wasson, Allegro, Ruck, Samorini, Cybermonk, Irvin, Rush, Hatsis
middle topic: entheogens in Christianity amounts mainly to Psilocybin mushroom trees.
the Psilocybin effect: destabilizing control that’s based in possibilism-thinking and transformatin g the model to produce the eternalism model.
right topic: mapping branching-message mushroom trees and assoc’d motifs to my model of transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
from {king steering in tree} through {mixed wine at banquet} to {snake-puppet frozen in rock}
244c 1:10:00 –
Cybernetic Death: You Will Definitely Die and That Kind of “You” Will Lose Control on that Day That You Will Eat the Psilocybin Fruit
244c 1:20:00 –
244c 1:30:00 – How do we get from the 1st to 2nd mental worldmodel? how does the transformation process work, centrally involving cybernetic death and rebirth? What exactly occurs in cybernetic control death and cybernetic control rebirth? ego death, loss of control, did Bowie and Robin Zander lose control, did Isaac die?
God: “You will certainly definitely die on the day that you will eat the fruit.” Making God a liar? How was God speaking truth, that:
ADAM AND EVE DID INDEED DIE ON THAT DAY THEY INGESTED THE FRUIT OF GNOSIS.
The correct mode of reading is whatever mode of reading succeeds at reconciling God with snake. That’s how to know it’s the correct mode of reading.
Entheogen scholars call God a liar, therefore their reading is WRONG.
Entheogen scholars falsely say God is a drug prohibitionist and a liar.
Adam and Eve started standing on Left foot, ended up standing on Right foot, so they suffered catastrophic fatal loss of control. in the ossuary of cybernetic control death.
Image f107 Detail: Lifted from Ossuary
[2:15 p.m. April 8, 2023] I just realized that this means that in f177, the Shroud ego dead person = the guy balancing on right foot in that image, directly above Shroud.
244c 1:50:00 – the Egodeath theory replaces the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory which Allegro and Ruck and Rush push. Note [10:04 a.m. April 8, 2023]: Although Irvin 2008 calls to avoid “secrecy” “feeble presence” “mystics only” and “heretical sects” only, as Ruck pushes, unfortunately for Irvin’s Allegro-worship, Allegro is the very SOURCE of the Secrecy paradigm!
No wonder Hatsis mistakes Irvin as a “Secret Christian Amanita Cult theorist”! IRVIN NEEDS TO REJECT ALLEGRO’S Secret Christian Amanita Cult THEORY-ASPECT. REJECT Reject the the Amanita Primacy Fallacy and reject the feeble-presence, heretical-only, alien invasion of The Mushroom into Christianity theory (which = the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, which Irvin doesn’t realize).
Big Theme 1 of 3: Rightly Assigning Credit and Blame to Wasson, Allegro, Ruck, Samorini, Irvin, Rush, Brown
(Positive) Contributions, (Neutral) Limitations, and (Negative) Harms Caused
Big Theme 2 of 3: How Much the Topic of “Entheogens in Christianity” Amounts to {branching-message mushroom trees} and Panofsky’s “hundreds” of (Mainly Psilocybin!) Mushroom Trees
… which Every Entheogen scholar (including Allegro) Ignored Until Samorini 1997, because they aren’t Amanita
Fixation on Fresco b/c It’s the Only Amanita Tree
entheogen scholarship was reduced to Secret Amanita Cult theory, which Hatsis sees and he largely sees it because of Irvin’s book pointing it out.
Irvin fails to call out Allegro for causing the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Irvin fails to blame Allegro for creating the Secret Deviant Alien Invasion Heretical Sect.
the STINGINESS OF ALLEGRO just like Ruck, not much more generous than Wasson. Samo was the first to take up Panofsky’s hundreds of Pilzbaum and take slightly more generous than Allegro approach.
The Great Entheogen Scholarship Project, of Trying to Separate Mushrooms from Christianity
The field remained primarily stingy from Samorini 1997 through Entheos journal in 2003, when I DECLARED REVOLUTION AGAINST ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARS’ EXTREME STINGINESS IN OCTOBER 2002 & March 2003 when I announced the maximal entheogen theory of religion against evil M. Hoffman, Carl Amanita Promoter Ruck, Clark Heinrich — but I should have declared against the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, which is a package deal with the entheogen scholars’ main, master project and overriding objective that’s more important to them than repeal of Psilocybin Prohibition: the Great entheogen scholarship project of trying to separate mushrooms from Christianity.
John Lash tries to tear mushrooms away from Christianity.
EVERY entheogen scholar HAS BAD MOTIVES, FOR ALL TRYING TO REMOVE AND SEPARATE mushrooms from Christianity and minimize and neutralize them.
John Lash says Christianity is evil “salvationism” and therefore we cannot permit Christianity to be based on Psilocybin, but we must extract and remove psilocybin mushrooms from Christianity by erecting a firm barrier and wall in between “Christianity / salvationism” (bad) and Psilocybin (good).
Good job of fabricating false history guaranteeing that Psilocybin Prohibition remains in place forever, Lash and entheogen scholars.
Irvin rightly blames Ruck for stinginess and trying to separate mushroom from Christianity
Irvin fails to blame Allegro for a form of stinginess and trying to separate mushroom from real, normal, ordinary Christianity of the Middle Ages.
Entheogen Scholars’ “Absence and Suppression” Master Narrative that they Labor to Prop Up at All Costs: The Big Bad Church Got Rid of Mushrooms
Their Absence and Suppression Narrative: The Big Bad Church Got Rid of Mushroom and Didn’t Have Mushrooms, so every time, they always assert and EMPHASIZE it was a Secret Elite hidden cult sect heretical group, with “hidden, secret” mushrooms (The Mushroom 🍄 )
No wonder Hatsis says ditch the whole paradigm; kick out all these “Secret Christian Amanita Cult theorists” out of the field so we can begin doing serious, fact-based (not agenda/narrative-driven) entheogen scholarship.
Entheogen Scholarship has been False-Narrative Driven, Causing Prohibition
I simply say, Christians used mushrooms. Stop trying to sever this plain given! STOP SAYING “SECRET HERETICAL CULT SECT”!!
Which means also, Reject the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Salamander Contentious for Same Reason: Ruck Faceplants on it Because He Hallucinates that It’s Red & White
Big Theme 3 of 3 in these Sessions: How Art Motifs Depict this Model of Mental Model Transformation
Drafting the Abstract/ Intro/ Conclusions Sections of {branching-message mushroom trees} article
244c 1:53:03 – Guitar. (track note: “extended in Ep244c VOX_TK_3088 from “Ep123 Moderate Theory Coercion.aup””)
244c 1:53:56 – Outro voice. “Intro 3ch 210215_2033”
244c 1:54:21 – End.
“Ep244d 🏵🪨 Rosetta Stone” 2:18:08
244d 0:00 – Voice intro, April 7, 2023. “Intro VOX_TK_4889”
A Curious Myth
244d 0:20 – My Feb. 7, 2021 reading of Rolfe’s passage “A Curious Myth” from The Romance of the Fungus World (1925).
244d 2:08 – “VOX_TK_4889.wav” part 1 of 2. Reading draft of Abstract, Intro, and Conclusion (somewhere in these recordings vicinity).
Mapping of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} Motifs to My 4-Phase Model of Mental Model Transformation: Summary of How It Works
244d 10:00 – a classic YI motif, Y on left, with cut trunk or cut branch on right.
244d 20:00 – standing up in an ossuary, in f70? Great Canterbury Psalter. Site map: change from to “All Eadwine IMages in Great Canterbury Psalter.” An invnestory of all the images. Need a thumbnail of every Eadwin image in this page.
Visibility of Right Wrist in f177 Shroud Ossuary: cybernetic control death = perceiving non-branching reality
244d 30:00 – standing in ossuary held up by hand of Christ; king in ossuary, the pair of empty ossuaries in f177. Botched cross-under, the central focus on the visible right wrist of the Shroud ego-dead person – signifance, the non-branching reality is visbile when in complete ego death control seizure failure; cybernetic control death = perceiving non-branching reality.
244d 40:00 –
244d 50:00 –
244d 1:00:00 –
244d 1:09:22 – just the word “Cybermonk”, stereo. trk: “CybMk from Sites 0618_081327”
244d 1:09:25 – 🎸 Guitar. trk: “g196c VOX_TK_3667 DSTREC_2556.wav BlJr cab 635A 5′ miceqFlat monitorblockingcab” – basically the world’s record worst cab-miking ever, that can’t possibly work
🎉🥇🙉🎸🔉🎙
so it must sound awful, right?
244d 1:10:00 –
244d 1:10:06 – station ID: Egodeath Mystery Show. trk: “edmsEchoConst”
Freeform Touring of Great Canterbury Psalter Hi-Res at Library with Commentary
244d 1:10:18: “89b VOX_TK_4889” part 2 of the 2+ hour recording. f32 image, two guys in couches
244d 1:20:00 –
244d 1:30:00 –
244d 1:40:00 –
244d 1:50:00 – Panofsky said don’t overemphasize the deviant Amanita-based fresco; there are hundreds of Psilocybin mushroom trees. Clever question for Panofsky: Hey Panofsky in 1952: How many of your hundreds of mushroom trees are Amanita, and what percentage are Psilocybin?
Hey Panofsky: What Percentage of Mushroom Trees Have Amanita Elements, and What Percentage are Psilocybin Elements?
Allegro and Wasson were pushing the the Amanita Primacy Fallacy. They failed to be interested at all in Psilocybin or Psilocybin mushroom trees.
244d 2:00:00 –
244d 2:10:00 –
Ruck strives to restrict mushrooms to mystics and deviant, exceptional heretical sects.
John Allegro fails to be interested in mushroom trees, except the lone Amanita-based instance in the fresco.
John Allegro is a main source of the counterproductive Secret Amanita Cult dead-end, self-defeating paradigm that supports Prohibition.
John Rush, John Allegro, and Carl Ruck have all tried to restrict mushrooms to Amanita used only by deviant heretical sects or “elite”.
Instead, build theory around explanatory constructs such as the normal mainstream psilocybin Eucharist instead, as an effective, strategic, forward-driving explanatory construct.
Avoid explanatory constructs like secret, heretical, exotic cult sects from the exotic East.
Don’t strive to build a thick wall that separates mushrooms from normal Christianity, because that supports Prohibition.
Reject the Amanita Primacy Fallacy and the explanatory construct of Secret Christian Amanita cult.
Treat Psilocybin as the normal Eucharist, because that drives toward full repeal of Psilocybin Prohibition, and because it’s true, against the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
The #1 objective of entheogen scholarship is Transcendent Knowledge about how the mind works, and full repeal of Psilocybin Prohibition.
The Entheogen Scholars’ Project of Minimizing the Presence of Entheogens in Christianity
Their Master Narrative that’s Their Main Objective: Explain that Early Christianity Minimized Use of Entheogens, and Frame all Evidence to Prop Up that Narrative of Absence and Separation
Ruck appears to be Moderate, but he’s actually merely Minimal, and more stingy and restrictive than it appears.
Irvin 2008 appears to be Maximal, but he’s actually merely Moderate, and more stingy and restrictive than it appears.
Cybermonk, Egodeath Mystery Show, April 9, 2023
Original page title: Hatsis Mis-attributes Ruck’s Secret Heretical Sect Cult Paradigm to Irvin; Ruck and Lash Mis-credit Wasson as Asserting Mushrooms in Christianity
Lessons Learned from John Lash Over-Broadly Crediting Wasson, and Jan Irvin 2008 Over-Broadly Crediting Allegro
(the Dumb Word “the Fly-Agaric” Is to Blame, Somehow; I Just Know It)
People fixate on either Wasson or Allegro as a simplified universal mythic token representing the entire concept of entheogens.
Summary of Realizations: Rightly Assigning Credit and Blame to Entheogen Scholars
April 9, 2023
Gordon Wasson’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Wasson steered the field ahead:
Built on the research from Reko, Schultes, and Graves.
Wrote books asserting Amanita and some semi-general entheogen ideas.
How Wasson steered the field into a dead end:
Pushed the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, in the Europe context.
Intensive, active, repeated scholarly obstructionism, severe lies of omission, withheld the weakness of Panofsky’s citation list consisting of flimsy Brinckmann 1906 and attached images and at least two letters from Panofsky.
He put more priority on self-promotion than on pursuing the truth about mushrooms in Christianity.
Harassed and insulted pompously, mycologists, “rightly or wrongly”.
Insulted the Plaincourault artist, lying about that artist, falsely (for self-aggrandizement) stating the painter had “no inkling”.
Falsely brags about being the first to figure out Genesis Eden text tree means Amanita. French mycologists beat him by 50 years, and ignores the thousands of other people who read Genesis esoterically/correctly as mushrooms.
John Allegro’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Allegro steered the field ahead: Wrote a good book flap and book cover.
How Allegro steered the field into a dead end:
Secret Christian Amanita Cult.
Falsely presupposed Antiquity was Prohibitionist per unthinking presentism.
Failed to give a damn about the hundreds of psilocybin mushroom trees.
Brian Muraresku’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
Everyone is twisting my arm to read and review The Immortality Key. I read Cyberdisciple’s critical review.
How Muraresku steered the field ahead:
A popular strong, bold assertion of the general entheogen theory.
How Muraresku steered the field into a dead end:
Pushes the Eleusis/ ergot/ kykeon primacy fallacy.
Gets sidetracked, like John Lash’s Not In His Name, on the topic of patriarchy.
Carl Amanita Promoter Ruck’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Ruck steered the field ahead: Entheos journal, tottering tower of books, see praise by Muraresku.
How Ruck steered the field into a dead end: Pushes, hard, the Secret Christian Amanita Cult bad explanatory construct/ paradigm/ presupposition. Secret Amanita. Dr. Secret. Restricts the presence of mushroom in normal, real Christianity.
Jan Irvin’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Irvin steered the field ahead: expose of social engineering astroturf manuf’g of the psychedelic revolution. 2008 book proving normalcy of mushroom imagery within DNA heart essence of Eucharist/ Christianity.
How Irvin steered the field into a dead end:
The book the Holy Mushroom doesn’t contain the word ‘Eucharist’!
Irvin inadvertently continues to think from within the Secret Christian Amanita Cult paradigm (presupposition-set).
Even as he asserts in THM that “the mushroom” is essential of Christianity, not an alien addition to Christianity, Irvin fails to identify “The Mushroom” with the Eucharist.
He says Christianity comes from “the Mushroom”, but he neglects and fails to identify “the Mushroom” as identical with the Eucharist.
Therefore I should use the phrase “the Psilocybin Eucharist paradigm” as against “the Secret Amanita paradigm“.
When Irvin flipped against the 65 entheogen scholars he interviewed in 2012, he falsely pitted Logos against “the mushroom” by which he only thinks of Amanita, but should think of psilocybin.
Irvin falsely conflates the “suggestogen” social misuse of psychedelics as if that’s the cognitive mechanism of action. The actual action is loose cog.
As firmly as Irvin 2008 asserted normalcy of “The Mushroom” in Christianity, he still had a completely shallow, exoteric esotericism, which makes it easy for him to reject The Mushroom altogether.
Irvin doesn’t know the potential of psilocybin, so he easily underestimates it, in reductionistic way. Irvin is barking up the wrong tree anyway, continuing to overemphasize “The Mushroom” (picture kiddie Amanita 🍄 ).
He doesn’t even grasp that we are not talking about Amanita, but Psilocybin.
It’s easy to let go of “The Mushroom”, when you’re confused about what the word ‘mushroom’ means: the psilocybin Eucharist.
Irvin 2022 refrains from attacking directly the assertions of Irvin 2008. I have relieved Irvin from the labor of reconciling himself; the only one who can do that is me (or someone who applies my theory).
We can assume that Irvin 2022 (Logos Media Irvin) will avoid, and is not able to reconcile with Irvin 2008 (Gnostic Media Irvin).
Reconciling Gnostic Irvin with Logos Irvin: It’s a Matter of How Well You Use It
My Amazon review of God’s Flesh already solved the reconciling.
Irvin 2008 should be amplified to become Maximal, such that Eucharist/Logos = Psilocybin.
Psilocybin is ideally correctly used to its full potential, which Middle Ages Europe Christianity came much closer to than in the Americas.
Ideally, psilocybin usage is taught to produce efficient transformation from possibilism to eternalism, resulting in qualified freewill thinking.
Psilocybin should be used more like it was in Europe than in the Americas; then it reaches its potential to be the Eucharist.
Thus is Irvin 2008 “psilocybin is the Eucharist/Logos” reconciled with Irvin 2022 “psilocybin is the enemy of the Eucharist/Logos”.
It’s how you use it.
Psilocybin is a tool, that can be used or mis-used, used poorly or well, profitably or unprofitably.
John Lash’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How John Lash steered the field ahead: pushing psilocybin and criticizing Wasson for pushing Amanita & the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
How John Lash steered the field into a dead end: refuses to permit mushrooms to contact Judeo-Christianity b/c “salvationism”. Fails to cover Mithraism, which destroys his false narrative of mystery religions. Refuses to all Moses or Jesus or Paul to have used entheogens, because those figures are “salvationism” (which is bad, says Lash).
John Rush’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How John Rush steered the field ahead: gallery of broad-thinking evidence of mushrooms in Christian art.
How John Rush steered the field into a dead end: heavily pushing the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory/paradigm of absence; “presence = abnormal = absence”.
Erwin Panofsky’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Panofsky steered the field ahead: announced the “hundreds” and tried to cite Brinckmann and provide two mushroom trees in “the” letter to Wasson.
How Panofsky steered the field into a dead end: art historians plotted to carry out an information blackout, and forbid writing anything about mushroom trees, such that they ended up with only a single citation, Brinckmann (intensively repeatedly censored by Wasson).
Giorgio Samorini’s Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Samorini steered the field ahead: Finally followed up on Panofsky’s thousands of psilocybin mushroom trees.
How Samorini steered the field into a dead end: 1998 article’s Figure 20 disaster, multiplies the mis-use of the fresco as if a paradigm.
Still condones the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Browns’ Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Brown steered the field ahead:
2016 book
2019 publishing the Panofsky letters revealing major scholarly obstructionism and Wasson’s severe lying by omission.
How Brown steered the field into a dead end:
Trying to use St. Walburga tapestry to discard the galleries of Irvin & Rush.
Partially still being stuck in the “suppression and secrecy” paradigm which strives to separate mushrooms from real, normal DNA of Christianity / Eucharist.
Hatsis’ Contributions to and Harms to the Field
How Hatsis steered the field ahead:
Identified the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, the dead end of the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory.
How Hatsis steered the field into a dead end:
Conflates Amanita with “mushrooms”.
Claims no psilocybin in England before 1976.
Lifts Irvin’s call to stop the secrecy premise from Irvin without crediting Irvin, and then falsely claims that Irvin pushes the secrecy premise.
Very aggressive and clumsy industrial-scale strawmanning.
Hatsis should accuse Ruck and Allegro of pushing Secret Christian Amanita Cult, not Irvin.
Hatsis is poor at Theory; lots of fallacious argumentation eg. “neutral = naturalistic = firmly assuming ordinary-state” interpretation of esoteric art.
Pushes the “text trumps art” fallacy.
Anti-mushroom psychedelic witch.
Presupposition that antiquity demonizes mushrooms (presentism projection of Prohibition, copycatting Allegro’s error).
Calls to END the field, rather than correcting it. Conflates “Allegro’s Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory is wrong” with “therefore no mushrooms in Christianity”.
Heading
Against Jan Irvin’s claim, John Allegro fails to give a damn about Erwin Panofsky’s broad category of (psilocybin) mushroom trees; Allegro only cares about the one, deviant, Amanita fresco.
Wasson limited and restricted mushrooms in Judeo-Christianity exclusively to the Genesis Eden tree text, no further, no later, eg not in the book of Revelation, even though it mirrors the Genesis trees.
Carl Ruck (with Gonzalez per Irvin 2008) falsely tries to credit Wasson with asserting Panofsky’s “hundreds” (ie. thousands) of mushroom trees. That credit belongs to Samorini, not Wasson.
Jan Irvin ought to criticize John Allegro for setting up a DEAD END, against the attempt (as stated on the cover) of Irvin & Rutajit’s 2006 book Astrotheology and Shamanism to try to broaden Allegro’s theory.
Allegro’s Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory is inherently the opposite of broad; you’re trying to do the opposite of Allegro.
Allegro CANNOT be given credit for broad interest in mushroom trees. ALLEGRO DIDN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT MUSHROOM TREES, Irvin – he ONLY cared about the deviant, lone Amanita tree, in the one fresco, that’s it; that’s all.
Irvin, stop mis-portraying Allegro as a Samorini-type, Cybermonk-type broad embracer of Panofsky’s “hundreds” (ie thousands) of (psilocybin) mushroom trees.
Against John Lash, Gordon Wasson refrained from asserting mushrooms in Christianity, so Wasson cannot be given credit for the broad idea of entheogens as the origin and inspiration in all the religions.
Against Thomas Hatsis’ claim, Irvin 2008 calls for ending the “secrecy” premise and Ruck’s & Wasson’s restrictive aspects of the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory.
Irvin errs in condoning the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Hatsis needs to blame Allegro for fabricating the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory.
Hatsis needs to blame Carl Amanita Promoter Ruck for pushing the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory.
Jan Irvin needs to credit Giorgio Samorini, not John Allegro, for giving a damn about Panofsky’s hundreds of (psilocybin) mushroom trees.
John Rush — not Jan Irvin — pushes the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory. See my expose of Rush’s narrative, contradicting his evidence, of his 2022 2nd Edition book:
Crop & annotations by Cybermonk.Crop by Cybermonk.Crop by Cybermonk.Crop by Cybermonk. Proves mushroom hems mean mushrooms, not regular hem folds.Crop by Cybermonk. Upper left YI tree, I is good.Crop by Cybermonk.Crop by Cybermonk. Y part of YI touching demon corrector realm.Crop by Cybermonk. Critiquing others’ entheogen theories. Result:
YI tree, lower left
Bad Entheogen Scholars Pushing the False Narrative of Separation of Entheogens from Christianity: “Hidden, Secret” Images Reflecting “Heretical Sects” Using Entheogens
The Entheogen Scholars’ Project of Minimizing the Presence of Entheogens in Christianity
Their Master Narrative that’s Their Main Objective: Explain that Early Christianity Minimized Use of Entheogens, and Frame all Evidence to Prop Up that Narrative of Absence and Separation
Seen clearly in the 2022 2nd Edition book cover blurb and imagery by John Lash, which totally DOES push “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory” that’s condemned by Thomas Hatsis. Hatsis 2013 should be condemning Ruck and Rush, NOT Jan Irvin!
Hatsis falsely attributes Ruck & Rush’s actual position to Irvin!
Irvin 2008 doesn’t reject Amanita emphasis as much as he should. When Irvin tries to reject, calls for rejecting the Secrecy premise, he should have (ideally) realized and recognized how much the Amanita is identified with the Secrecy premise.
Irvin does cover psilocybin art, and his Index lists many page #s on psilocybin. But he doesn’t recognized how Allegro was terrible and wrong for latching onto Amanita conflating it with “mushrooms”.
Irvin wrongly attempts to grant credit to Allegro for all psilocybin and amanita mushroom trees, but we cannot credit Allegro for anything stronger or broader than Secret Christian Amanita Cult in primitive Christianity (30 AD) and a tiny sliver (incoherent) of Secret Christian Amanita Cult in 1291 in Plaincourault ONLY, as a narrow, stingy, (cite Irvin’s wording), rare, deviant, non-Christian, alien, exceptional, abnormal heretical cult from the East.
fact: Allegro was a huge part of the problem, the narrowing, trying to SEPARATE entheogens — ie, Amanita ONLY, from Christianity.
What Allegro asserted: Secret Christian Amanita Cult in primitive Christianity (30 AD) and Secret Christian Amanita Cult in 1291 in Plaincourault, ONLY.
What Irvin tries to credit Allegro for:
Samorini 1997 rightly gets credit for the full Panofsky “hundreds” of mushroom trees IN Christianity although most likely, Samorini habitually tries to SEPARATE as abnormal, psilocybin & amanita from real Christianity.
Irvin’s book emphasizes clearly, Christianity IS entheogen based; the DNA of Christianity is entheogens; entheogens are the essensce of normal, real Christianity.
Jan Irvin in The Holy Mushroom (2008) calls for entheogen scholars to stop trying to SEPARATE entheogens from real Christianity. Irvin is provably the OPPOSITE of “Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory” which sloppy Hatsis the sloppy lecturer about historiographical methodology, carelessly assigns Ruck & Rush’s position to Irvin.
Irvin’s flaw is to continue overemphasizing Amanita; Irvin ought to firmly switch from the Amanita primacy fallacy to the Psilocybin primacy premise.
todo: quote Jan Irvin’s book THM where he criticizes stingy Carl Ruck who thinks his job is to REMOVE mushrooms from Christianity by separating mushroom use as “sect” and “cult”, and deleting and separating mushrooms from Christian art by artificially labelling each occurrence as “hidden” and “secret”.
Ruck in fact is THE one who is pushing “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory”.
Irvin ought to criticize John Rush for pushing the same narrative of absence, or NARRATIVE OF SEPARATION OF ENTHEOGENS FROM Christianity.
In John Lash’s false telling, if you assert visionary plants in religion, you assert Wasson’s idea.
Lash over-broadens Wasson’s narrow limited idea, to falsely say in body of 2nd edition of Not in His Name, falsely claiming that Wasson wrote that “all authentic mystical experience is from entheogens.” todo: insert photo of that page.
Wasson wrote that the ingestion of visionary plants is the origin of all genuine religious experience.
John Lash, Not in His Image, 2nd Edition, p. 220, WAY over-crediting Wasson and mis-painting him as FAR more assertively asserting entheogens in all religion including Christianity — which Wasson never asserted, but refrained from asserting, and always consistently harassed and was obstructionist to people who did assert mushrooms in Christianity
VERY false statement from Michael Pollan’s book How to Change Your Mind; WAY over-crediting Wasson:
Irvin’s book THM is specificially to set the record straight to correct attribute narrow credit to Wasson only penetrating into Genesis text chapter 3 and no later, because Wasson never asserted in any clear definite extent, any later presence of entheogens in Judeo-Christianity. Irvin wants to give as much, as broad credit to Allegro as possible, badly wishes that we could give credit to Allegro for the entire general set of Panofsky’s “hundreds” (ie thousands) of mushroom trees. Citations available in THM, for my above assertions. I read aloud the passages to back that up, in Egodeath Mystery Show. But in the show so far, I was in process of doing the research. Now I have determined the situation and here are my conclusions.
Irvin DOES NOT assert Secret Christian Amanita Cult, but in fact, the opposite: Irvin REBUTS and calls for REJECTING Rucks’ (with Gonzales) …
(this makes me happy because in 2008, Irvin is criticizing Carl Ruck for much of what I in 2020-2023 have been (and maybe in Oct 2002/March 2003) rebelled against Ruck for: though I reject Amanita, specifically; Irvin doesn’t do that.
I condemn Ruck for pushing Secret Amanita …. let me now strengthen my condemnation, leveraging “sect” and “cult” :
Just like Ruck puts each msh image in a cage to remove it and separate it from real Christianity, he call / he labels and he neutralizes by labelling each image as “hidden” and “secret” though they are shown openly. similarly, Ruck jails each psychedelic user in Christian history into the jail-cell brick cell as “sect” and “cult”. Irvin has good wording here, todo: quote Irvin THM against Ruck.
wish i read before, The Holy Mushroom book’s beginning & ending.
Irvin supports with the best evidence my position against the Secrecy paradigm. And shows that the field has two opposed paradigms.
Irvin emphasizes msh were the origin and inspiration within Christianity, and calls to stop fabricating a brick wall between msh & real Christianity, as Ruck tries to do.
Irvin tries to credit Allegro with asserting msh trees, which i think is unjustified. Samorini is the first to assert that, in 1997, Afaik
voice rec’gs made
Next I want to make a voice recording and a post and update my introduction and conclusion to my branching message mushroom trees article to connect a series of three things number one rightly giving right credit and restricting the credit regarding Mushroom trees because mushroom trees is the same thing as emphasizing visionary plants in Christianity really amounts to Mushroom Tree’s
That is the middle point to discuss the first point to discuss is giving the right amount of credit to the right people and this also includes listing who tried to give the incorrect amount of credit to Giorgio Sam Marini or Gordon Wasson or John allegro or to me or to Professor Brown
And John Lash’s gets some specific credit for some thing and John Lash’s wrongly tries to give too much credit to Gordon Wasson but uncharacteristically John Lash’s does criticize Wasson — I am glad — for pushing the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, and failing to emphasize psilocybin instead.
I don’t know that Thomas Hatsis gets credit should get credit for anything but Thomas Hatsis tries to falsely assign blame not credit but blame wrongly assigning blame Tyonna irvin’s Jan Irvin when in fact that blame is rightly directed at Carl Ruck’s and Carl Ruck’s @that’s correct and at John Rush
And connect those two topics of assigning credit and assigning blame rightly and specifically together with the middle topic of equating visionary plants with specifically mushroom trees as announced by Erwin Panofsky in 1952 connect that with the third topic which is my introduction and conclusion of my branching message Mushroom trees article explaining the motives of stability motif and Branching Mushroom motif and handedness motif and non-branching motif and explain how those motives map to the developmental model of the mental world model developing from a child immature mental model of control and in world to an adult mature mental model of control in world.
Announcement: Wasson Wrote the Published-1986 Persephone’s Quest Passage about Changing His View, in 1952
(not in 1968), or whenever the very first time he ever wrote about Genesis Eden tree or the Plaincourault Fresco
It is actually very simple and I made it pretty mistake I made a pretty mistake and mistaken 2006
clearly it had to be long before the 1968 book SOMA, because he wrote in Persephone’s quest it has been he wrote ” I have not thought about Genesis Eden tree since I was a child and now I thought about the genesis Eden tree for the first time since I was a child.”
logically then, this is quite simple !
when did Wasson first think about
Wasson says this is the first time I have written about or thought about Genesis Eden tree since I was a child — we know that he was standing at the Plaincourault Fresco in June 1952 , and that he wrote with letters to Erwin Panofsky about the Fresco in May 1952 , which would necessarily mean — as an sane person would agree —
dup as backup of broken app:
Wasson says this is the first time I have written about or thought about Genesis Eden tree since I was a child — we know that he was standing at the Plaincourault Fresco in June 1952 , and that he wrote with letters to Erwin Panofsky about the Fresco in May 1952 , which would necessarily mean — as an sane person would agree –that Wasson must have thought about the genesis Eden tree when he was discussing the Plaincourault Fresco
that Wasson must have thought about the genesis Eden tree when he was discussing the Plaincourault Fresco
it is impossible to discuss the Plaincourault Fresco without thinking about the Genesis Eden text
therefore it quite it is very simple to prove that this passage must have been written in the era when Wasson visited and discussed the Plaincourault Fresco, 1952.
so now it is very simple: we can definitely date when he wrote the Persephone’s quest passage: it is whatever date that he first wrote anything about the Genesis 2 & 3 Eden text or the Plaincourault fresco.
QED!
initial writing of this secn:
Also very interesting I have pushed back this is an Errata correction of my 2006 article and a correction of Jan Irvin 2008 book.
My 2006 argument doesn’t quite reach coherence.
When did Wasson write the passage in the 1986 book Persephone’s Quest? The correct answer is before May 12, 1952 — whatever date that he first wrote anything about the Genesis 2 & 3 Eden text or the Plaincourault fresco.
0:00 – Start. (VOX_TK_4880.wav) Guitar and Voice Intro. The first segment was recorded last, April 5 for this April 4 show. It’s a “hot” recap of the slower-paced later segments.
0:46 – Content. The first segment was recorded last, April 5 for April 4 show. Shoving the carcass of Wasson and Allegro out of the way so the damn field can move ahead.
10:00 –
20:00 –
Maximizing of dysfunction, is this field of entheogen scholarship and psychedelic pseudoscience.
Attack the problem at a lower level underlying Wasson vs. Allegro, Irvin vs. Hatsis, Larry vs. Curly vs. Moe.
Need professional textbooks and methodology and strategy theory, to keep this damned field from heading straight for the weeds as it always does to the max.
The field of entheogen scholarship is a fallacious-argumentation generating machine.
Gold Clip 2a: Segment 2 [27:11-32:16] – Good 5-minute Abstract of my branching-message mushroom trees article’s thesis – combined with the 3-Minute Gold Clip at 1:10:41 in next Episode, Ep244
27:11 (VOX_TK_4874) No guitar.
The 3 motifs, {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs (+ {stability}), can be explained by interpreting them as depictions of mental worldmodel transformation from transformation from possibilism to eternalism, literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control to analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control, driven by control instability loss of control and reconfiguration of mental worldmodel of control,
per the Egodeath theory, which is the Theory of Analogical Psychedelic Eternalism Cybernetics; the Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism.
30:00 –
Segment 3 [32:16-1:05:56] (34 minutes) – Adds guitar 🎸⚡️🐍 behind voice while tape keeps rolling, 34s guitar-only at end
32:16 (VOX_TK_4874) guitar, we’ll be stuck with Allegro for eternity, need breakaway from Secret Christian Amanita Cult per Irvin has helped toward CLOSURE, to properly SIDELINE WASSON *AND* ALLEGRO. Get them the hell out of the way!
40:00 –
50:00 –
1:00:00 –
1:02:22 – Guitar outro (34s) of the above (VOX_TK_4874) track.
Segment 4
1:02:56 (VOX_TK_4875) No guitar. Critique of draft of an article.
Segment 5
1:09:01 (VOX_TK_4876) No guitar. Critique of draft of an article.
What does Irvin say about “where did Allegro get the idea of msh in Christianity?”
Not from Wasson, who only showed the fresco, nothing else later than Genesis 2-3 in the Bible text.
Allegro got research not mainly from Wasson, but mainly from Ramsbottom mycologist 1925-1953+, and Robert Graves, per Irvin.
1:10:33 – the Abstract of the Allegro article I’m reviewing, doesn’t exist. My Abstract of my branching-message mushroom trees article (not specified here).
Gold Clip 2b at [1:10:41-1:13:38] 🏆👑🎉🎶🎺🎺🎺 Summary of Abstract/ Conclusion/ Thesis of {branching-message mushroom trees} Article, Identified Missing Main {stability} Motif
Combine this with Segment 2 [27:11-32:16] – Good 5-minute Abstract of my branching-message mushroom trees article’s thesis.
1:10:41 – My Conclusion of my branching-message mushroom trees article.
According to this developmental model of the mind’s mental worldmodel of control-in-world,
The developmental model of the mind from immature form to mature form is specifically, according to this model, child to adult mode, from 1 way of thinking to a different.
Given we have two sides/ L & R limbs, in visual art we can use handedness to represent the two ways of thinking.
It’s easy to visually represent L & R limb of tree and body and animals, and it’s easy to visually represent the concept of branching contrasted with non-branching.
So here’s an arbitrary mapping of the intermediate analogy motifs:
non-arb: branching & non-branching
arb whether map to L or to R, but the key is, there are only two, contrasted directions. Also it’s a flexible mapping bc everyone knows it’s arbitrary. But everyone knows the important thing is, there’s two, and they are opposed.
2 degrees of abstraction: {handedness}; {left limb} vs. {right limb} 1 degree of abstraction: {non/branching}; {branching} vs. {non-branching} Ultimate referent pair: possibilism vs. eternalism.
so: {handedness} motif –> {non/branching} motif –> possibilism vs. eternalism
read –> as “refers to” or “describes by analogy, “
Now add in the TRANSITION DRIVER: Ultimate referent: transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
1:11:39 this mapping of the … We can then say in images: this mapping of the earlier mental worldmodel to the Left limb, and the later mental worldmodel to the Right,
An interesting major characteristic of the initial mental worldmodel is that when you employ that mental worldmodel when on pscilocybin, when we assert and exert and employ that model when in loose cognition from psilocybin, [1:12:10] there is control instability, loss of control , panic, flames, fire, monsters, demons torment,
so we want to communicate and depict moving from one mental worldmodel to the other, and we want to indicate that that transformation process is driven by control instability. so we have motifs then to represent control stability – IT SEEMS LIKE THAT’S A MISSING MOTIF, BECAUSE TWO MOTIFS IN MY TITLE COVER “BRANCHING”, BUT CONTROL STABILITY MOTIF ISN’T MENTIONED IN MY ARTICLE TITLE:
add to title the {stability} motif: [done]
{tower, weighing balance, flames} (mean the threat and in some sense, the actuality of loss of control), and a transformation of control from autonomous control, like king, to dependent control, like guy being held up by the right hand by God’s hand coming from the cloud.
dependent control and stable column base, weighing balance, balancing in tree, balancing on right foot, tower, cathedral construction, [continued in next clip]
Segment 6 [1:13:15-1:13:38] (38 s)
1:13:15 – (VOX_TK_4877) Summarizing the motifs including: and stable column base, weighing balance, flames, balancing in tree, balancing on right foot, stable column base, tower, cathedral building.
These are motifs that represent control stability; transformation to reliance to get control stability.
1:13:38 (VOX_TK_4878) Panofsky’s vigor of emphasis WE ARE SO, SO EXTREMELY, VERY FAMILIAR WITH MSH TREES, THATS WHY U KNOW FOR SURE THEY AREN’T MUSHROOMS (con artist confidence game)
— yet they can’t produce a single citation except pathetic Brinckmann from 46 years earlier, THATS ALL YOU GOT?
“You’re not supposed to ask questions of the Art Historians – you’re supposed to submit to their authority and not ask them to SHOW ME ALL OF THE HUNDREDS OF MUSHROOM TREES, WHAT BOOK HAVE YOU ART HISTORIANS WRITTEN TO GATHER AND DISCUSS THEM?“. <– ASKED NO ONE, until me in 2006 (Egodeath.com Plaincourault article).
THIS FIELD CHRONICALLY GENERATES FRESH NOVEL FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS; have to expand the catalog of all types of fallacious arguments.
The field of entheogen scholarship is a fallacious-argumentation generating machine.
1:20:00 –
1:30:00 –
1:30:23 (VOX_TK_4879) No guitar. “I once said fresco isn’t Amanita, I was wrong.” <– what everyone WISHES and FANTASIZES Wasson wrote.
1:37:05 – end of content. 5 minutes of Outro guitar:
1:37:05 – Guitar 🎸 (VOX_TK_4874) from an above voice track.
1:39:01 – Guitar 🎸 (3 minutes) (VOX_TK_4868) – from last episode, Ep242 end, but without abrupt voice at end, this time.
1:42:06 (“Intro no date no miking Apr 3 2023 VOX_TK_4869”) from end of Ep242, voice outro. “Show Egodeath Mystery. Leading Edge. Sites.” No guitar.
1:42:23 – End.
Filename “Ep243 🖼🍄🎨🖌👨🎨 Ceci n’est pas un champignon.mp3”
Song Title “Ep243 🖼🍄🎨🖌👨🎨 Ceci n’est pas un champignon”
Tech Notes
Input recordings:
VOX_TK_4880.wav – 2023-04-05 300 MB
VOX_TK_4874.wav – 2023-04-04 500 MB
VOX_TK_4875.wav – 2023-04-04 70 MB
VOX_TK_4876.wav – 2023-04-04 60 MB
VOX_TK_4877.wav – 2023-04-04 10 MB
VOX_TK_4878.wav – 2023-04-04 270 MB
VOX_TK_4879.wav – 2023-04-04 120 MB
Miking
Guitar 🎸⚡️🐍
song: Slow Spaghetti, Marshall Plexi, 57s angled on the 8″ cabs, big cabs facing vocal mics.
L: AT2020, R CAD M39, as before.
Images
Row 1 Middle – disrespects John Lash’s Ulanseyan Hypercosmic Liquid White Sun Light:
Crop by Cybermonk
f107: Sun & Opened Scroll in Right Hand Touching Right I Non-branching Branch, Moon Touching Left Y Branching Branch [April 5, 2023]
Crop by Cybermonk – f107Crop and annotations by Cybermonk
annotations by Cybermonk
Crop and annotations by Cybermonk
Ruck: OMG its a Secret Amanita tree! 🤫🍄🌳 😲 <– the dead-end gasp of death for this field
🤫🍄🌳 😲
f47 (dull old colors) i bet i could decode house of crumbling ego power on right, house of balance control stability on left
There’s a couple 30-second guitar clips. I mostly moved the guitar gathered at the end. Half these sessions are voice only, no guitar.
Teaching Control Re-Stabilizing
Crop and annotations by Cybermonk
Teaching and examining students about control re-stabilization prior to psilocybin banqueting, including advanced analogies of handedness and non-branching.
Great Canterbury Psalter image f134 row 1 left.
Length – 2:45:00 (long, stereo, big)
Filesize 248 MB
Filename “Ep242 Maximally Un-Strategic Anti-Science.mp3” (ought to have “Taboo”)
Song Title “Ep242 Maximally Un-Strategic Anti-Science” (ought to have “Taboo”)
Content/Timestamps
2 nighttime segments about Irvin The Holy Mushroom, 3 daytime segments about extreme/ exceptional Bad, Taboo’d Science against Phil o Sci, then Guitar from Nighttime
A couple quiet evening recordings about Irvin’s book The Holy Mushroom: verdict: Irvin does NOT assert Hatsis’ fabrication, “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory”.
Irvin had just been in heavy discussion with me in 2006, before this 2008 book — not about the Egodeath theory, but about assessing Wasson and Allegro.
Irvin’s intro is short and good and tight and he subtle OVERCREDITS ALLEGRO mis-portraying Allegro as if Allegro’s concern was entheogen scholarship.
Per Cyberdisciple, Allegro is NOT an entheogen scholar, and this from Irvin is a misrepresentation, just as Lash and Ruck and Ott try to glorify Wasson, Irvin over-glorifies Allegro trying to make it appear that Allegro asserted medieval mushrooms, which he barely, and inconsistently did, only.
Irvin exaggerates Allegro’s embrace of entheogen scholarship in the current sense eg like Samorini 1998.
Samo 1998 is extremely more full-fledged than Allegro 1970. Samo is the first AFAIK to truly propose inverting Panofsky re: pilzbaum, mushroom trees.
Did Allegro comment on Panofsky re: mushroom trees? Not just the Plainc fresco, but the whole category that Panofsky reported in 1952, communicated by Wasson in 1968 book Soma? And that Wasson told Ramsbottom (head mycologist) in 1953.
WHY DIDN’T RAMSBOTTOM AND GRAVES ASK PANOFSKY WHY HE HAS NO CITATIONS,
GIVEN THAT ART HISTORIANS CONFESS THAT THEY ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH MUSHROOM TREES, AND CALL THEM “MUSHROOM TREES”, AND YET, THE FACT IS, THEY HAVE NEVER WRITTEN ANYTHING ABOUT MUSHROOM TREES.
THIS COMBINATION OF FACTS AMOUNTS TO PROOF IN 1952 AND 1968, OF A COVER-UP OPERATION, CORRUPTION OF THE ART HISTORY PROFESSION, including training “competent” art students: “Do not write about the Mushroom Trees problem taboo that we have.“
Irvin accuses Wasson of “forcing” (end of book) entheogen scholars to submit to Panosky’s corrupt cover-up info blackout. I call BS against Irvin here:
Irvin, What Is Wrong with Entheogen scholars such that not one of them until samo 1997 and me in 2006, demanded “CITATION FKKING NEEDED!!” in response to Panofsky’s claim? Entheogen scholars have no excuse.
They FAILED to demand Citations, WTF??!! You can’t blame Wasson for “forcing” the entheogen scholars to accept Panofsky’s lying con artist cover-up operation, when they must be held responsible for eagerly lapping up Wasson’s bull shiite and not asking for citations like I immediately did in my 2006 article the moment I read “Panosfky says there are hundreds of mushroom trees and we are highly familiar with them.” I INSTANTLY demanded citation. What’s Rucks’s excuse, Ramsbottom’s excuse, Allegro’s excuse?
WHY DIDN’T ALLEGRO DEMAND CITATIONS FROM WASSON & PANOFSKY OF WHERE ART HISTORIANS COVERED MUSHROOM TREES??!!
WHAT’S WRONG WITH ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARS THAT THEY LAPPED UP THIS OBVIOUS B.S. COVER-UP INFO BLACKOUT? They should have yelled like I did, CITATION NEEDED!
WHY IS SAMO 1997 THE FIRST TIME AN ENTHEOGEN SCHOLAR WENT AGAINST WASSON “FORCING” THE PANOFSKY BOGUS (& SELF-CONTRADICTORY) CLAIM? (CONTRADICTORY B/C LACKS ANY CITATIONS)
If I were Ramsbottom or Allegro or Graves or Ruck, etc, I would have asked Panofsky,
“Where have you art historians discussed this very familiar topic of Pilzbaum?
0:00 – Intro. (VOX_TK_4867) with guitar. Nighttime. Track 1.
0:33 – Track 1 con’t. What Am I Up To: Crunching down the branching-message mushroom trees article. Nighttime.
10:00 –
20:00 –
30:00
38:00 – Walter Stace is mis-called by Studerus “scientific literature” — in this taboo-driven, energetically BACKWARDS field.
39:39 – outro Guitar, 37s.
40:17 – TRACK 2. (VOX_TK_4868) Preface by Jan Irvin,The Holy Mushroom. 2008. I read the start of the book, the positioning statements. His looseness re: “foundation of early Christianity” = 1400 AD.
50:00 –
55:00 – become aware your control is dependent. Guitar outro, short.
todo: crops of the Lash liquid sun light discs in Great Canterbury Psalter images f134 row 1 middle lighting up his Study while lifting dangerously his right fingertip
f177 4 horses mushroom tree comes with sun light attached to it.
Need Crops of Sun
todo: sun gallery section add to my f134 catalog page. how many?
Crop by Cybermonk
Row 1 Middle – disrespects John Lash’s Ulanseyan Hypercosmic Liquid White Sun Light:
Crop by Cybermonk
f107: Sun & Opened Scroll in Right Hand Touching Right I Non-branching Branch, Moon Touching Left Y Branching Branch [April 5, 2023]
Crop by Cybermonk – f107Crop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by CybermonkCrop and annotations by Cybermonk
Ruck: “OMG its a Secret Amanita tree! 🤫🍄🌳 😲 “
OMG its a Secret Amanita elite heretical alchemy tree! 🤫🍄🌳 😲
Carl Amanita Promoter Ruck
I was glad to see Irvin criticize STINGY RESTRICTIONIST RUCK. He tackles each finding to frame it in a jail of “heretical, rare” — Ruck says there was 2 guys at any point in time, no more. In the church. He loves to make msh as rare as he possibly can. That’s always the narrative. The moderate entheogen theory of religion = the minimal entheogen theory of religion (everyone moves between the two positions).
I’m maximal. They’re “moderate” aka minimal. Their emphasis is always rareness, secrecy, abnormality, deviance, heresy, elite only — AND IRVIN POINTS THIS OUT I was glad to see.
🤫🌳🍄 😲
Italian pine (pineus pinea) umbrella pine is host for The Mushroom
55:59 – Track 3 con’t “VOX_TK_4869” What Am I Up To? Confirming, Irvin does NOT assert “Secret Christian Amanita Cult” per Hatsis.
1:00:00 –
1:10:00 –
1:20:00 –
Turned room mics off: 1:26:40
Daytime (w/o room mics, noisy) 1:26:40
1:26:40 – TRACK 4 aborted. “VOX_TK_4871” Introduction of Irvin’s book The Holy Mushroom.
Irvin overstates Allegro AS IF Panofsky mentioned “hundreds of Pilzbaum” and then Allegro took up that assertion / coverage, when in fact, Allegro didn’t say any more than 1 SENTENCE; about Plaincourault only; and only in some copies of his book!
Only Samorini in 1997/1998 FINALLY went against Panofsky re: the “hundreds” (ie thousands) of msh trees.
Samorini rightly gets the credit, not Allegro. Def’ly NOT WASSON, as Ruck & Ott try to revise history.
Gosso in Samo’s journal (1st series) makes a totally bunk, bogus VAGUEST POSSIBLE CLAIM, “Wasson implicitly changed his view about mushroom trees.” <– meaningless jibberish, as Samo in 1997 Wasson 9-page article says. Irvin’s book destroys this B.S. 180-degrees rewrite of history. INVERSION of history. Deserves a fail-quote:
Wasson implicitly changed his view about mushroom trees. Mean, biased obstructionists refused to listen to him though.
History inventors Carl “Citation Fkking Needed!” Ruck, Ott, Gosso, probably Lash, etc — the Wasson Idol-Worshippers
Aborted rec’g to close door.
Daytime (w/o room mics, quiet; hi-fi) 1:27:13
1:27:13 – TRACK 4. Intro sections of Irvin’s book The Holy Mushroom (2008). High fidelity. “VOX_TK_4872”
1:30:00 –
1:40:00 –
1:50:00 –
1:57:00 – my Plainc article cites both Samo articles.
1:58:39 – TRACK 5. “VOX_TK_4873” This field combines all kinds of taboo badness among academics — extremely backwards field of entheogen scholarship & psychedelic pseudo science.
2:00:00 –
2:10:00 –
2:20:00 – Bad strategy is maximized, the way the field of entheogen scholarship is structured; defeat is baked into the fabric of the entire field.
WTF, WHY ISN’T THE FIELD OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP DRIVEN BY THE OBJECTIVE OF REPEAL OF PSILOCYBIN PROHIBITION??
The reason all entheogen scholars tell the false lying story and they try to get …
They all have a huge conflict of interest.
They don’t want to be charged with violating the Allegro taboo by asserting mushrooms within Christianity, so, they all use a directly self-defeating narrative commitment, “no msh in Christianity, b/c big bad mean church.”
They all get tricked and manipulated into defeating themselves.
We have to reveal the truth, plainly the simple presence —
FORBIDDEN WORD LIST: HERETICAL, SECRET, RITE, CULT, SUPPRESSED, HIDDEN, and
the Forbidden Narrative that I disallow is “The Church …
THIS IS THE FKKING MASTER NARRATIVE THAT ENSURES PERMANENT PROHIBITION CAUSED BY ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARS:
Entheogen scholars (eg T McKenna book Food of the Gods) are eager to neutralize, suppress, and remove mushrooms from Christianity to prop up their Prohibition-Compliant, anti-Allegro narrative (bad strategy), “The Church Removed All Mushrooms” aka “Please Don’t Call My Position ‘the Allegro Theory’“.
Entheogen Scholarship & Psychedelic Pseudoscience: Maximally Self-Defeating and Taboo-Driven, By Design
Bunk jargon pop lexicon INSTEAD OF explanation: “neuroplasticity, default mode network”, fear “of ego dissolution”, nondual beginner “unity” posing as “a complete mystical experience” PFFF! as if!
This is THE extremely malformed field, the worst, by design, by taboo.
This wannabe “science” field is designed to be as taboo and malformed as possible. So, the rules of Phil o Sci are N/A in this topical domain.
🍝 🎸
22 Minutes of Guitar at End (2:23:00), Featuring Room Noise
2:21:38 – TRACK 1 end again, Walter Stace’ “the scientific literature” per Studerus 2010, a tower falling over into the mud foundation. Includes the full long outro guitar. Copy of end of “VOX_TK_4867”. Errata: room noise in mics.
2:23:02 – 22 minutes of GUITAR 🎸 starts, for rest of episode. Effects. 22 minutes of guitar at end, based on input recording: Slow Spaghetti 🍝
2:29:20 – Guitar continues, now from track “VOX_TK_4868”. Slight effects.
2:40:17 – More guitar from 4868.wav.
2:43:00 – Outro: “Intro no date no miking Apr 3 2023 VOX_TK_4869” – copy of the non-guitar (daytime) April 3 Intro without date.
2:45:00 – End
Errata
One session was with no guitar, yet accidentally had the guitar cab mics on, not sure if it sounds boxy due to that.
Tech Notes
Uses recordings:
VOX_TK_4867.wav – 2023-04-02 ++630 MB
VOX_TK_4868.wav – 2023-04-03 +367 MB
VOX_TK_4869.wav – 2023-04-03 +402 MB
VOX_TK_4870.wav – 2023-04-03 830 KB
VOX_TK_4871.wav – 2023-04-03 –8 MB
VOX_TK_4872.wav – 2023-04-03 +420 MB
VOX_TK_4873.wav – 2023-04-03 +297 MB
Guitar
Guitar: Slow Spaghetti
Marshall Plexi, two SM57 mics on pair of 8″ cabs.
Voice: AT2020 L, CAD M29 Cardioid R, 80 Hz cut, Limiter on deck, eq 4.5 3 -15 L -10 R
0:00 – Start. Intro. “Intro Miking VOX_TK_4866”; copied from later track 4866, kept miking info
0:31 – Guitar. “Voice Removed, Start Boosted, VOX_TK_3088 from “Ep123 Moderate Theory Coercion.aup””
1:23 – Content. “VOX_TK_4863” An example of my “Domain Dynamics” is disentangling … weed ivy dragging down a seedling tree …
Neuroscience has been acting as a hostile parasite dragging down and killing, destroying, deleting, eliminating, subst’g for, removing Cognitive; Psychedelic Cognitive Science.
also Meditation has been coopted by a massive worldview agenda has been attached to the activity of mindfulness meditation. You get sucked into a giant worldview that’s all built on lies.
Mindfulness meditation has been co-opted by a gigantic worldview based on lies against psilocybin.
trigger word: “psilocybin is a shortcut to enlightenment”.
The Meditation Hucksters’ B.S. lying narrative:
“Meditation gives you enlightenment after 30 years (or ie, 10 years longer than however long you’ve been doing it). And psilocybin is a failed imitation that tries to provide an effortless instant shortcut.”
“We never promised to deliver enlightenment (except in all our marketing literature from us Meditation Hucksters).”
6:23 – We don’t have an “Old Theory” and mine is the “the New Theory”; rather, there are two alternatives, my Oct 1985 (38 years ago) or Jan 1988 (35 years ago my theory congealed).
What’s new: last night I finally comprehended Great Canterbury Psalter image 134 row 3 left, why is this one guy standing on both feet? Ans: scythe blade touches left foot, and {blade touching left limb} is a major mytheme in f134.
Crop by Cybermonk. Great Canterbury Psalter image f134
f134 various features, I talk-through. Walking stick, row 2 right.
10:00 –
13:48 – Content. “VOX_TK_4864” Oct 2022 was compared to Oct 1985 is 37.5 years ago I started developing the Egodeath theory. Work continues, thinking about cutting child thinking off.
We need to cut off, jettison Neuroscience which is a harmful parasite choking and killing and preventing the formation/ development of the field of Psychedelic Cognitive Science.
Neuroscience deletes Cognitive while pretending to cover Cognitive.
30:00 – Failure of today’s backwards “Psychedelic Science”, which is the opposite of science: cargo cult reductionist, reductionism, pretending to explain.
Brain scanners are bunk, no connection with the mind/ experience.
Article (a psychedelic science paper) says stop using phrase “ego dissolution”, b/c it’s uselessly vague.
Per YouTube videos by experts, default mode network (DMN) doesn’t actually correlate with reduced cognition/experiencing.
“Neuroplasticity” is irrelevant jargon, unhelpful for psychedelic cog sci.
Angst/Dread is not “of ego dissolution”, as OAV/ Dittrich / 5D-ASC dimension name falsely asserts.
Psychedelic Non-Science pretending to be science, pretending to constitute an explanation.
“Psychedelic Science” = Group-Level “Fake it Til You Make It”
Mis-calling the 11-Factors (which has 15 factors) “Studerus’ 5D-ASC”. What are the 5 dimensions, if OAV are covered by the 2 top-level dimensions? Gotcha: incoherent.
11-Factors replaces o/a/v 3 dimensions by only 2 dimensions (Unpleasant & Pleasant), so “5” becomes untrue if you use 11-Factors, you gotta rename it “Studerus’ 4D-ASC with 11-Factors” (which has 15 factors).
Q’airs literally don’t add up, in tallies.
39:24 – Intro & Content. “VOX_TK_4866” I failed to draw box on feet of image 134 Great Canterbury Psalter row 3 left Scythe guy, who has both feet down, left foot touching blade. His feet broke my pattern, like woman holding balance, I had to draw a blue box b/c her hands & feet are “wrong”.
Funnel hat sage pointing at feet in tree.
Psalter viewer’s right-hand fingertip at same level as right-hand fingers, dreadfully.
todo: DO BETTER ANNOTATIONS ON FEWER COPIES OF IMAGE F134 for article branching-message mushroom trees. Must be more efficient in explaining f134; more condensed, more clear, more to-the-point, more selective, more pointed, more savvy use of annotated image & summary explanations.
50:00 – God is superior in image f134 than in f145. Eadwine disliked some implementation elements in f145, and so designed f134 to improve upon f145. God signals far more distinctively / effectively in f134 than in f145. Improved signalling in f134.
1:00:00 – I was able to use Lash 2008 image 134 row 1 left 2/5. What if I had to work off Irvin’s THM book 2008 poor (over-dark) image of Dancing Man Salamander?
Get Irvin’s color book, not the b/w. I benefitted from Hatsis’ library copy of Dancing Man image, but I did not benefit from Hatsis’ discusssion of the image, nor from his research data about the image. I only benefitted from the library’s high-res image, which was the only positively valuable-to-me aspect of Hatsis’ Roasting the Whatever article.
I critique and read Irvin’s gallery chapter in his book The Holy Mushroom. A losing unprofitable game, I’m not playing “yes it is, no it isn’t a mushroom”.
The Principle of Artist Responsibility
1:05:00 – A very good, thorough discussion of The Principle of Artist Responsibility.
I talk through the argument: by definition, if artist didn’t mean mushroom, they would have to withhold msh imagery.
If you deliver mushroom imagery, then that inherently proves you mean mushrooms — an argument not from artist intention, but from viewer: the measure of “what does msh imagery means”, is:
DO WE AGREE THAT THIS IMAGE IS BOUND TO GIVE THE VIEWER A MSH IMPRESSION?
IF YES, THEN BY DEFINITION, OBJECTIVELY THE IMAGE MEANS MSH, REGARDLESS OF INCOHERENT CLAIMS THAT “ARTIST DIDN’T MEAN MSH”.
The art historians already lost this argument, they’ve tipped their hand, they already gave away the truth: art historians call them “mushroom trees”.
That’s an unrecoverable error and gap in the LYING ART HISTORIANS’ COVER-UP OPERATION.
“… the plant in this fresco has nothing whatever to do with mushrooms (which would indeed be surprising since it was the tree, and not the mushroom, of good and evil which brought about the transgression of the First Parents), and the similarity with Amanita muscaria is purely fortuitous.”
The object in this painting has nothing whatever to do with pipes, and the similarity with pipes is purely fortuitous.
1:20:00 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYWITI4fGJw – video title: “A Four Hour Conversation With Dr. David Nichols” – “Hamilton Morris” channel – I elsewhere post the timestamp, here it is:
Leading Chemist David Nichols Says Meditation Came from Psychedelics, Argues Against Meditation Huckster
1:30:00 – Loser project: “This article is to prove that there’s mushrooms in Christianity.” rather: Given that there’s a ton of psilocybin in Christian art, how to interpret the combination of {branching-message mushroom trees}, {handedness}, and {non-branching} motifs?
My mission is “Deliver theory/ proof that Christian art depicts psychedelic eternalism“, not “Proving msh in Christianity” , I won’t even MENTION the latter accomplishment. Not that there’s msh in Christian art; but rather, that there’s psychedelic eternalism in Christian art. I merely peripherally use the fact of msh in Christian art, to support my assertion than psychedelic eternalism is asserted in Christian art.
1:35:00 – my 2007 article charged 3 charges against Panofsky & Wasson:
There are no real citations of art historians positively covering mushroom trees.
Wasson is withholding citations BECAUSE they are so extremely pathetic and reveal/expose that the art historians have been doing a COVER-UP OPERATION.
Were Wasson to allow through any citation from Panof (I argued in my 2006 Plainc article), that would reveal the perverse & corrupt sense in which “we art historians are familiar with msh trees”: ie, they are familiar with performing a cover-up operation to AVOID writing about msh trees.
1:42:00 – “classical psychedelics” – why I am forced to say “Psilocybin”, not “mushrooms”, not “classical psychedelics”, not “mushrooms”, not “psychoactives”.
Saying specifically ‘psilocybin’ prevents robbing/stealing the spotlight from psilocybin, which is what everyone is trying as hard as possible to do.
Everyone wants to suppress psilocybin and compete against it and shut it out.
1:45:00 – ‘determinism’ specifically is defined by everyone as (possibilism-premised) domino-chain causality.
“determinism” is fundamentally different than eternalism, just like possibilism is opposite of eternalism.
1:46:00 – any worldmodel or metaphysics system per Letheby has on offer, if it’s not specifially eternalism, then it is by default, some flavor of possibilism. Letheby defines 13 versions of possibilism.
The “Unclean Lips” Principle: Every Word Written by Someone Who Hasn’t Been Converted to Eternalism-Thinking Is Drenched in that Person’s Possibilism-Thinking
eg all of the following notions/phrases are possibilism-based conceptualizations, and so are all of Timmerman/Letheby/ Robin Carhart’s 13 metaphysics positions, both their Physicalist and Non-Physicalist metaphysics views, ARE ALL THOROUGHLY BASED IN AND SATURATED WITH POSSIBILISM-THINKING.
My future has already been determined by fate.
No matter how hard you try, you can’t change your destiny.
Fate already has a plan for each of us.
What will be, will be-there’s not much you can do about it.
Whether we like it or not, mysterious forces seem to move our lives.
2:00:00 – More critique/ reading of the gallery intro in Irvin’s book THM to the gallery of msh images in Christian art.
salamander coverage in The Holy Mushroom; reading and commenting on Irvin’s gallery of images
2:05:00 – {flames} mean control instability in the loose cognitive state driving transformation from possibilism to eternalism. That is worth covering; useful, relevant, helpful.
But “salamander is a symbol for Amanita”, as Irvin asserts, is worthless and incidental at best.
2:10:00 – Irvin is typical, in his presentation of the 4 plants. Exactly like Brown, everyone starts on the right, as if we’re reading Hebrew: why? b/c it’s our favorite mushroom, Amanita (I think that’s the only mushroom that exists? 🤷♂️ that’s what expert Hatsis says).
Irvin wrongly says “Opium, Rue, Psilocybin, Amanita” – a popular wrong analysis from most entheogen scholars. And Irvin fails to mention — self-contradictory! — in the “God creates plants” plate, msh 2’s cap includes “little mushrooms” (liberty cap caps), yet Irvin points them out in the Tree of Knowledge plate from Eadwine immeditately below it on Irvin’s same page!
If the upper panel (God creates plants), plant 2, contains IDENTICAL “little mushrooms in the top”, then how can Irvin claim that that plant is “Syrian Rue”? Since when does Rue’s top have “little mushrooms” (liberty cap caps) in the top? Irvin doesn’t even mention this huge self-contradiction!
page 117, THM, Irvin 2008. Plate 6 (msh 2 of 4) vs. Plate 7 (tree 2 of 3) – contradictory interpretation.
If Plate 7’s msh/cap is msh, then how can the same identical cap in Plate 6 mean Syrian Rue?
God Creates Plants – Fresh Colors
I’m the only entheogen scholar to make a sensible identification of the 4 mushrooms as 4 mushrooms instead of stupid irrelevant random shiite and retardedly starting on the right b/c Amanita:
Get a clue, entheogen scholars: Correctly rationally identified by Cybermonk 2020: Left to right (not right to left): Panaeolus, Liberty Cap, Cubensis, Amanita imagery meaning psilocybin.
Get a clue, entheogen scholars: Correctly, rationally, SENSIBLY identified by Cybermonk 2020: Left to right (not right to left): Panaeolus; Liberty Cap; Cubensis; Amanita (imagery meaning psilocybin).
Not “right to left: Amanita, Psilocybin, Syrian Rue, Opium”, like the muddle-headed entheogen scholars wildly mis-guess. Focus, ppl!
Irvin re: God Creates Plants, plant 2 of 4: “It’s Syrian Rue:”
Irvin: “It’s a mushroom, note the little mushrooms in the top:”
Tree of Knowledge – Fresh Colors
This cap is identical in that it contains “little mushrooms” as Irvin’s caption note says, but here (in self-contradictory fashion), Irvin doesn’t claim it’s Syrian Rue:
2:17:16 – Guitar (57s). “g196j VOX_TK_3667 DSTREC_2556.wav BlJr cab 635A 5′ miceqFlat monitorblockingcab” – this is mod’ed in ep240 copied to here; that modded the start.
2:18:13 – Voice outro. “EDMS Left Right Wet Dry rvb80pctSpread”
2:18:45 – End.
Filename “Ep241 Non-Branching Stable Balance.mp3”
Song Title “Ep241 🍄🔪🌳🏛⚖️ Non-Branching Stable Balance”
Images
Tech Notes
See Also
My main page about each of the 3 images, main page containing organized crops:
The Entire Field of Entheogen Scholarship V1 Is Stuck Mis-Focused on the Wrong Debate: “Was There a Secret Christian Amanita Cult?”
Motivation for this Page: Debating Whether to Cite Hatsis’ Interestingly Poor and All-Too Representative Article “Roasting the Irvin”
Separation of Concerns: These Are Different Very Interesting Articles; This Very Interesting Article Is Not About These Other Very Interesting, Related Topics
The Disaster of Samorini’s 1998’s Figure 20: Using Plaincourault Fresco as if a Paradigm to Structure the Entire Field & Mushroom Tree Morphology eg Dancing Man in the “Plaincourault Tree Type” Column
Ruck’s Faceplant “This One Slam-Dunk Example of a Secret Christian Amanita Cult Mushroom Should Silence the Art Critics: Dancing Man Has a Red and White Cap”
The 20-pages-of-substance article “Branching-Message Mushroom Trees Explained; v2 of the Field of Entheogen Scholarship” vs. the OTHER, DIFFERENT topic article, “What Went Wrong in the v1 Field of Entheogen Scholarship: The Amanita Primacy Fallacy“
Why should my article (my particular article) that presents the successful, clear-thinking explanation of branching-message mushroom trees, cite this Hatsis article (which he ruined and broke and made unusable by scholars) that exemplifies everything wrong with the field of entheogen scholarship?
One of the problems with the Christian Mushroom Cult theory is that many of the supposed “shrooms” in Christian art look less like an Amanita than the tree on fol. 027v. What are we to think when we encounter these lesser-looking mushrooms?
Hatsis, Roasting the Something/Someone, 2013 or 2017
Hatsis thinks, and maybe Irvin & Ruck also mistakenly thinks, that the topic under debate is “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory”.
His article thinks it’s in the debate thread, debating “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory”.
Maybe Irvin & Ruck think the same.
The field is stunted, stuck in the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, a childish stunted developmental stage.
The Entire Field of Entheogen Scholarship V1 Is Stuck Mis-Focused on the Wrong Debate: “Was There a Secret Christian Amanita Cult?”
They are all participating in THE WRONG DEBATE.
“One of the problems with the Christian Mushroom Cult theory”
But is that even what we’re debating?
I don’t know what you guys think we are doing here, but the correct objective of the field of entheogen scholarship is: Extent Mushrooms Christianity.
To what extent mushrooms in Christianity?
That is (because you are particularly confused what the word ‘mushroom’ means):
To what extent psilocybin mushrooms (and Amanita imagery) in Christianity?
Hatsis continues:
“is that many of the supposed “shrooms” in Christian art look less like an Amanita”
[you just conflated (again) “shroom” with “Amanita” -cm]
“than the tree on fol. 027v. What are we to think when we encounter these lesser-looking mushrooms?”
Why do you measure all “mushroom” imagery and rate it specifically by how closely it “successfully” matches Amanita?
WHY IS PSILOCYBIN TAKEN TO BE “LESSER-LOOKING” THAN AMANITA?
Motivation for this Page: Debating Whether to Cite Hatsis’ Interestingly Poor and All-Too Representative Article “Roasting the Irvin” in my “Branching-Message Mushroom Trees Successfully Explained” Article
My Tight Crop (Ludicrous-Res) from Zooming at Bodleian Site
But my article “branching-message mushroom trees” is not a history article about the history of how I decoded branching-message mushroom trees. Out of scope: “how I decoded branching-message mushroom trees” – that’s a different article.
History of Entheogen scholarship Folly Around Dancing Man & the Amanita Primacy Fallacy
Separation of Concerns: These Are Different Very Interesting Articles; This Very Interesting Article Is Not About These Other Very Interesting, Related Topics
My present very interesting article is about:
Branching-Message Mushroom Trees Successfully Explained by the Theory of Analogical Psilocybin Eternalism Cybernetics
My present very interesting article is NOT about these OTHER, very interesting topics:
“How I Decoded Branching-Message Mushroom Trees: My Historical Trajectory”
“History of Entheogen scholarship Folly Around Dancing Man & the Amanita Primacy Fallacy”
The Disaster of Samorini’s 1998’s Figure 20: Using Plaincourault Fresco as if a Paradigm to Structure the Entire Field & Mushroom Tree Morphology eg Dancing Man in the “Plaincourault Tree Type” Column
What the hell is POINT of Figure 20? The only thing it proves is that your classificiations are so irrelevant that you can’t even find 3 examples of your “Plaincourault [ie Amanita] tree type”.
Calling a new class “the Saint Sauvin tree type” is a TERRIBLE idea!!
You’re taking everything wrong with the the Amanita Primacy Fallacy, and multiplying that error and doubling-down on the failed idea of using Plaincourault’s fresco to serve as the model paradigm of the entire field of entheogen scholarship re: mushroom trees.
Golden Psalter’s Wild Non-Mushroom Mushroom Trees
Are These the Plaincourault Tree Type, or the Saint Sauvin Tree Type?
Are These the Plaincourault Tree Type, or the Saint Sauvin Tree Type? Why Can’t Figure 20’s Classification Scheme Handle This Image? Then What’s the Purpose & Scope of Figure 20’s Classification Scheme? That Attempted (Failed) Scheme Is Irrelevant and Just Misleading into Confusion
The other trees in this same article — eg Dancing Man! — destroy your classification scheme right out the gate. Golden Psalter utterly wrecks the point of this table, I love the carnage wreckage caused by Golden Psalter’s wild non-mushroom mushroom trees.
Ruck crashes his ship on that rock. b/w vs. color image in Figure 20, Ruck is (as usual) basing his argument on the colors red & white — and doing a poor, failed job of that.
Ruck’s Faceplant “This One Slam-Dunk Example of a Secret Christian Amanita Cult Mushroom Should Silence the Art Critics: Dancing Man Has a Red and White Cap”
Hatsis’ Retitled/Truncated/Mis-dated article Roasting Foo an Exercise in Tilting at Windmill, All Authors Are Unprofitably Debating the Wrong Thing: “Was there a Secret Christian Amanita Cult?”
The .pdf Archive.org Hatsis citation I’m probably deleting from the above article: It’s a very interesting article to critique – for all the wrong reasons for my branching-message mushroom trees summary article:
There are multiple reasons not to cite that article in this branching-message mushroom trees summary article.
The title of the article is wrong at Hatsis’ later websites. It’s Roasting the Salamander, not Roasting Jan Irvin.
The new title of the article is TOO AMATEUR AND INSULTING TO PUBLISH/CITE. It’s a puerile childish personal attack, even the original title was too insulting.
The date of the article is wrong at Hatsis’ later websites. It’s 2013, not 2017.
I could INSTANTLY pound out a valuable article explaining everything wrong with the field and how that’s reflected in the Ruck / Irvin/ Hatsis thread of argumentation. [took hiatus June 2023 – Nov 2024 instead]
THAT is the article to cite Hatsis — NOT in my article on branching-message mushroom trees. Hatsis contributes nothing but … the exchange and debate between Ruck/ Irvin/ Hatsis , all discussion around Dancing Man image, is nothing but confusion and pulling … in the wrong paradigm of Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
The Ruck/ Irvin/ Hatsis trajectory of treatment of these topics is nothing but an exercise in Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Note Nov 29 2024: the Secret Amanita paradigm; Amanita-driven entheogen scholarship.
An article would be very interesting, about that, a different article, “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE PREVIOUS REPLACED QUASI-PARADIGM THAT RUINED THE FIELD OF ENTHEOGEN SCHOLARSHIP”
Hatsis’ article (& the surrounding publications by Irvin/ Ruck/ this field’s confused authors) is INTERESTING AND HISTORICALLY VALUABLE FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS.
I’m actally having to hold back from spending time writging a very interesting article that’s trying to come out while I write my OTHER article on the OTHER topic: branching-message mushroom trees.
Writing a Pair of Articles
Branching-Message Mushroom Trees: Psychedelic Eternalism Depicted in Medieval Art as Branching Mushrooms, Handedness, and Non-Branching
Roasting Entheogen Scholarship: How the Field of Entheogen Scholarship Was Malformed by the Amanita Primacy Fallacy
I recommend the article WHEN we are discussing the folly of the field of entheogen scholarship.
If I write an article about what WAS wrong with the OLD, REPLACED, Ptolemaic, non-theory, where Plainc fresco is mis-treated as defining the paradigm of the field’s explanatory fwk,
if my project in this article is to explain why Samo Figure 20 1998 is a total disaster,
if my article’s purpose is to explain why folk sub-science is garbled harmful confusion, and how the authors are confusing each other in their debate over Phrenology and Wm James’ scientific research in e.s.p., and 1904 theories of Phlogiston, -…
… then I recommend we must discuss the trajectory and revisions of Hatsis’ Roasting the Foo article, where he (eg) deleted the appendixes and says “see appendix”.
And where he changes the date from 2013 to 2017, and what that reveals about this would-be “historian”/”scholar” — and field overall.
The entire field is as dumb as Hatsis’ argumentation, and Panofsky’s.
Recognizing the {blade touches left limb} Motif in Canterbury Image f134
Another great show. Notable historical capture:
I capture on tape, figuring out that blades in this image touch left limb, at [1:23:32] in Ep240 of the Egodeath Mystery Show.
Length 2:29:38
Filesize 227 MB
Content/Timestamps
1:00:00, 1:09:00, control stability description of upside down guy.
0:00 – Start. Intro voice & guitar. “VOX_TK_3088 from “Ep123 Moderate Theory Coercion.aup””
1:04 – “VOX_TK_4860” Origin myth of the Egodeath theory Jan 11 1988 courses that I based the Egodeath theory on.
Ivy-covered computer lab.
Deadhead Mechanical Engineering friend from that dorm across from the computer lab.
Block universe + alt state + cancelling ego power + block-universe eternalism.
Late 1988 or 1989 lightning storm with door open while lightning storm while listening to album Diary of a Madman.
“determinism” people don’t know block-universe eternalism.
10:00 –
20:00 –
30:00 –
40:00 –
50:00 –
58:00 – CAUGHT ON TAPE! I discover while recording speaking spoken analysis, where I figure out and realize that “left-leg only” guy has blade touching left foot, and a blade touching his left leg/shin. Great Canterbury Psalter image f134 row 3.
1:23:32 🎉 – finally I get to Row 3 left: both feet on ground, left foot touches blade. caught on tape! you can hear my facepalm HOW DID I NOT FIGURE THIS OUT BEFORE? AS I SAID,
At 1:23:32, I FINALLY figured out the scythe guy Row 3 Left, solving that problem of why does this 1 figure, only, have both feet on the ground (ans: his left foot touches blade, negating {left foot on ground}.
[On playback just now, 25 minutes before this point in the recording, I was very impatiently waiting , while listening – GET TO THE DAMN SCYTHE GUY, RECORDING!! a traffic jam of jackpot decoding 18 things at once 😠 ⏳]
that the guy w/ both feet down scythe, blade is touching left foot, and that blades in this image are touching left limb. ATM, I’m only interested in finding the timestamp [1:23:32] where I get a clue about the problem “both his legs are on the ground, this is breaking my explanation so totally, I can’t even draw a white box on his feet!“
WHEN 200-IQ SCHOLARS HANDLE ENTHEOGENS –> IQ = 50
todo: which sequence of realizing that the blades throughout image touch Left Limb
1:27:34 – “VOX_TK_4861” f134 row 2 middle: her head angle gesturing at Cybercide’s right foot at the stable column base. Her ear points at Cybercide’s foot.
1:30:00 –
1:40:00 –
1:50:40 – “VOX_TK_4862” If I publish a science paper that’s 100 years ahead, that doesn’t follow “the rules”, that proves that the rules for science papers are BS. Per Paul Feyerabend, anything goes.
0:00 – Intro voice/guitar. “VOX_TK_3088 from “Ep123 Moderate Theory Coercion.aup””
1:04 – Condensed notation in article “branching-message mushroom trees”. Bad conventions for science papers. Inefficient verbosity.
Developing a condensed notation that’s effective for this Loose Cognitive Science.
“VOX_TK_4854” Quiet late-night speaking in first part of show, but pulled it off pretty well.
“Cognitive” posers!
I could give a F about materialistic physicalistic vs. brain-dead mysticism, a pox on both your houses that Chris Letheby falsely says are our two options.
The STUPID STANDOFF between the Psychedelic Scientists vs. Mystics.
Extremist IRRELEVANT physicalist neuroscience, Cognitive Neuro-Reductionism, it deletes the explanandum while PRETENDING to explain – while 40% bad trips continue in Griffiths’ optimal conditions.
Bunk MEQ, even bunker CEQ-POS questionnaire, FAD-plus Fatalistic Domino-Chain Determinism, Timmerman & Letheby’s “Metaphysical Beliefs Questionnaire” offers EVERY METAPHYSICS SYSTEM: all two of them: Physicalistic Possibilism, and Non-Physicalistic Possibilism.
aka “Naturalism”.
They think what’s important is materialism vs. foggy mysticism.
Neither of these worldviews is at all relevant to anything, eg control transformation in the ASC.
How the hell does Matthew Johnson pit “determinism” against “materialism”?
Vague & confused, and irrelevant & un-useful and unhelpful, just like his committee’s Yaldabaoth creation malformed monstrosity, the Challenging Experience Questionnaire – Psychometrics Operationalized Survey (CEQ-POS).
10:00 –
20:00 – end of quiet talking
26:36 – “VOX_TK_4855”
Keeping draft article extremely focused: every other kind of point I add, is directly requiring remove art and remove decodings of art. Zero-sum.
Strict limit of 20 pages. Fill 20 canvases with art only, and condensed decodings only.
NO DISCUSSION OF PLAINCOURAULT, SAMO’S AWFUL FIGURE 20, NO MENTION OF PREVIOUS BUNK SCIENCE ARTICLES, NO MENTION OF “PREVIOUS” IDEAS
The Egodeath theory is 37 years old: started October 26, 1985. Or, 35 years old, starting from the coalescence breakthrough Jan 11, 1988 — though today I continue art decodings.
Dysfunctional Philosophy of Science. Psychedelic Science is junk folk heap of error, not a theory to be replaced.
There is no “old theory” (in Psychedelic Science & entheogen scholarship), unless you count (in entheogen scholarship) the terrible idea that entheogen scholarship uses: use Plaincourault fresco as if it is a paradigm defining the entire field.
(Panofsky rightly points out: “You guys are just revealing your ignorance of mushroom trees, stop treating Plaincourault as your idol talisman special unique God.“)
Hatsis: “The entire field of entheogen scholarship aka “the Secret Christian Amanita Cult theory” stands or falls with this one fresco” – a grain of truth.
It’s true that SOMETHING stands or falls with this one fresco: your guy’s (Wasson, Allegro, Ruck, Heinrich, Irvin, Rush, Hatsis, M. Hoffman, etc) AWFUL framing of the field is what stands or falls.
“Psychedelic Science & Entheogen Scholarship” = the CEQ-POS questionnaire & the Plaincourault fresco paradigm (ie, the Amanita Primacy Fallacy) –>🗑
30:00 – very good discussion of Panofsky re: msh trees.
Poor Agent Wasson tried to tell us about all the msh trees, but mean, biased obstructionists wouldn’t listen to him 😥 (the outrageously revisionist history per Ruck & Ott, according to Irvin)
40:00 – “. Matthew Johnson, how is “fatalistic determinism” against Physicalism?
What do you know about philosophy of time & spacetime physics, and freewill vs. determinism debates, in the ordinary state & altered state? while you advocate “physicalism”.
Junk physicalism vs. junk mysticism, “we’ve got both of your options covered, you are allowed to pick one” — I’ll pass, on both of your bunk, irrelevant, unhelpful, un-useful options.
Chris Letheby & Matthew Johnson; confused & confuseder.
50:00 –
1:05:00 – all our 13 available metaphysical positions in Timmerman / Letheby article “Pyshcedleics Alter Metaphyiscal Beliefs” aka “the Metaphyiscial Believfs Q” MBQ — fall into two groups: Physicalism Possibilism, or else Non-Physicalism Possibilism.
1:08:00 – 3 Massive Errors of John Lash: has no credibility:
1) “Psychomimetics imitate the mind.”
2) “Allegro infamously asserted that Jesus was the leader of a mushroom cult.”
3) “Mystery religions are good b/c they are matriarchal.” MITHRAISM.
In strongly favoring psilocybin, John Lash is far more right than entheogen scholars, who preposterously claim that the engine of mystery religions and mixed wine symposium is Amanita.
Lash is obviously correct, rejecting Wasson’s Amanita and advocating Psilocybin as the primary paradigmatic entheogen, not Amanita.
Hanegraaff’s 5th-grade fallacious argumentation: deriving word meaning from etymology roots.
How can 200 IQ scholars be 50 IQ? Easy, happens ALL THE TIME, in entheogen scholarship; it’s the norm. IQ level of top scholars when they discuss entheogens: 50.
Hanegraaff’s cosmos model explodes into fireball when you add stars to it.
A cosmos-scale FAIL.
b/c he tries to avoid heimarmene; he tries to buy into Late Antiquity’s marketing-dept. invention of freewill fog build on abusing and misusing the catalog of mythemes.
Hanegraaff has two kryptonites: the fact that rebirth delivers you into heimarmene/ eternalism; and “entheogens/ entheogenic practices in the wide sense” (aka non-drug psychedelics).
ie the fact that MEDITATION DOESN’T WORK, because meditation comes from psilocybin.
1:18:00 – Canterbury image f134 updates, things I only figured out 5 minutes ago after my “complete” interpretation Nov. 2020 2.5 years ago.
Talk through the woman holding a balance in row 2 middle, f134. She represents the stability of control in the OSC by relying on possibilism-thinking in that mode.
Why this is the most basic natural compelling elegant reading of the woman holding closed scroll, wrong hands, wrong foot on stable column base — I TOO DUMB TO FIGURE OUT UNTIL MARCH 31 2023, since puzzling over her since Nov. 2020.
1:22:00 – Things in image f134 that I failed to recognize & comprehend from Nov 2020 – early March 2023 (2.5 years of decoding effort).
1:24:00 – slight BAD NEWS: my f134 Proof article 2020 failed to present the phrase “psychedelic eternalism” other than as a formal name for my theory, synonym of “the Egodeath theory” — an elaborated descriptors theory name, NOT used as a principle/ abstract thing.
So lately, “what art depicts is psychedelic eternalism” (the phrase “psychedelic eternalism” there is definitely NOT used as the name of my theory, there; that is — alas — only a recent usage/development of not just phrases, but USES of the lexicon.
So I now use a more elevgant flexibly used phrase. psychedelic eternalism — lately i am reifying this thing that’s called “psychedelic eternalism”. It’s something we discover. It’s a thing that exists.
It’s not called the Theory of Psychedelic Cybernetic Eternalism. it’s the concept of “psychedelic eternalism”.
it’s a psilocybin state, experiential mode from psil that produces and psychedelic eternalism is the mental worldmodel that is produced by the experiential mode, and a worldmodel that comes from the mode.
A state of … An experience within a mode. psychedelic eternalism is an experience, a mode of experience, and a worldmodel, that provides a different formation of control.
literalist ordinary-state possibilism with autonomous control. 1) an experiential mode. 2) an experience, a thing you experience. 3) a mental worldmodel. 4) a theory name.
analogical psychedelic eternalism with dependent control <– a transitional construction, where I was moving away from ONLY using “psychedelic eternalism” as a theory name, to broadening the usage of the term “psychedelic eternalism”.
1:20:00 –
1:30:00 – I have become HIGHLY AVERSE TO USING OTHER PEOPLE’S TERMINOLOGY, B/C terms are always a trojan horse.
In fact, other people’s phrasings are always a trojan horse. They speak and write with unclean lips.
the focus on Plaincourault reveals your ingnorance, as Panofsky says.
Figure 20 from Samo is “inner periphery” for my article. Innerr Core & Outer Core = all my own terms/lexicon.
I would not even say “the classical psychedleics” – the enemy wins, by not saying “psilocybin”.
Their goal is to tear the spotlight away from psilocybin.
“classical psychedelics” is a ploy to take the spotlight off of psilocybin.
Never take the spotlight off of psilocybin, as happens when you say “the classic psychedelics.”
F the classic psychedelics, I *ONLY* care about Psil, since the alternative is delete psilocybin.
Keep the spotlight LOCKED ONTO psilocybin, and do not allow the trick of diluting and broadening the spotlight so it becomes a floodlight instead of a spotlight.
When you add Amanita, you delete 50% of psilocybin. “I worship the glory of God and BOB and spaghetti monster” –> 1/3 worship of God.
1:39:00 – Late Antiquity was a backlash against psychedelic eternalism, made decadent marketing promises: just as eternalism is superior to possibilism, our brand of religion reworks myth to fabricates bringing you from hated eternalism, to hyper-possibilism.
Hanegraaff: “I’m all in! where do I sign up?!” (starts deleting all the stars) .
freewill fog is an inversion strategy.
Early Antiquity is no-free-will eternalism.
Late Ant’y is the era of reconfiguring the inherited base.
Hermeticism (invented in Late Antiquity) was a confused and confusing move to tell the narrative that the mind moves from eternalism to possibilism.
Mithraism had the best relationship with demiurge: Helios.
Probably b/c they were military, practice integration of the inferior. Mithraism had a Ken Wilber-type healthy incorporation of the inferior, the overpowered.
1:43:00 – avoid meta-discussion.
In what way to discuss The Theory, in my article branching-message mushroom trees?
Explain specific motifs. Only.
I’m bringing a theory, through applying the theory.
This means this, this motif means YI which is unstable…
remove a certain kind of meta-discussion of theory and demo’s what a pure, applied expressions.
Only applied theory; avoid … DO present the applied theory, DO NOT present meta-discussion of the theory.
1:47:00 – when i see Amanita imagery, “this depicts psilocybin effects”, I’m not pretending that Amanita indicates ingesting musimol.
No one gives an F about muscimol; people couldn’t care less about muscimol yet I’m still supposed to play along pretending…. you all pretend Amanita gives psilocybin effects.
So I am just doing more consistently what you are all already doing.
They ACT LIKE Amanita is a classical psychedelic, so I’m just going to coherently do what you all are already, but incoherently doing.
AMANITA IMAGERY MEANS INGESTING PSILOCYBIN. WHICH IS EXACTLY HOW ALL OF YOU ACT ALREADY, SO SUCK IT.
eg Brown acts exactly like Amanita gives Psilocybin effects, then he objects when I assert that Amanita indicates ingesting Psilocybin.
I could write “Amanita imagery indicates Psilocybin effects.” <– clever nuanced wording.
You hypocrites are all acting this way ALREADY, so F it!
I’m moving forward with what all of you are already tantamount to doing anyway, I’m just more honest and forthright than all of you are.
1:40:00 –
1:50:00 –
1:15:30 – great intro sentence: I am presenting the theory.
This is applied theory, not meta theory.
This article applies the 35 yr old theory of psychedelic eternalism … is applied to id motifs in med art depicting psychedelic eternalism .
This article maximizes that. application … this article exclusively applies the 35 year-old Egodeath theory
This article identifies motifs depicting psychedelic eternalism.
to provide and deliver a catalog of instances in which psychedelic eternalism has been identified.
The purpose of the article is to deliver a large number of features ….
This article identifies motifs depicting psychedelic eternalism in medieval art.
This article identifies motifs of psychedelic eternalism.
This article explains how these motifs depict through analogy psychedelic eternalism.
Defining psychedelic eternalism is out of scope. Discussing relationships with other theories is out of scope; see my 35 years of writings.
This article is specifically to identify motifs that depict psychedelic eternalism.
As a science building block within my field of science that I invented, my bricks that arrange into an actual structure. while you continue 40% panic attacks (under optimal conditions) without producing transformation.
2:00:00 –
2:01:00 – What kind of a phrase, what kind of a connotation network, is “psychedelic eternalism“?
2:03:53 – Intro, March 31 2023. “Intro VOX_TK_4858”
2:04:09 – “VOX_TK_4858” Writing strategy/style.
A very focused condensed pointing out how each specific motif of each piece of art depicts psychedelic eternalism.
Identify how msh trees depict psychedelic eternalism, for each particular motif in specific art works.
That’s the only mode of discussion in this article.
Keep only the inner core info: summarize/ specify, using short terms and medium-length terms, how the mind transforms in 4 stages.
That’s outer core, or inner core.
Also talk a little about the summarizing the rules of YI tree morphology.
Cite the worthwhile previous science papers, which are all by me.
2:10:00 – The Theory of Analogical Psychedelic Eternalism Cybernetics The Theory of Psychedelic Eternalism Cybernetics <– pretty good descriptor-based theory-name – next podcast title/ podcast name.
The article is not expected to newbies, don’t act like “new theory”; not a critique of wrong ideas; ACT LIKE NORMAL SCIENCE (in some ways) – DON’T ACT LIKE REVOLUTIONARY SCIENCE.
Miniscule downside of specifying “psilocybin” instead of “psychedelics” The Theory of Psilocybin Eternalism Cybernetics The Theory of Analogical Psilocybin Eternalism Cybernetics Analogical Psilocybin Eternalism Cybernetics
“classical psychedelics” jump off a cliff!
i refuse to reduce attention to Psilocybin.
The only thing that’s subject to debate here is whether liberty cap psilocybin vs. cubensis psilocybin…. only divide the spotlight among different species of psilocybin.
Amanita Psilocybe is the only Amanita I allow in the spotlight.
Psilocybe Amanita is Amanita treated as if its active chemical is psilocybin.
One of the …. Amanita treated as a psilocybin-containing mushroom.
The article is strictly interested in stating how each particular specific motif depicts psilocybin eternalism.
This article identifies motifs in art pieces depicting psychedelic eternalism. aka psilocybin eternalism.
2:20:00 –
2:30:00 –
2:40:45 – “VOX_TK_4859”
A state-based category error: people try to map lyrics, myth, and motifs to things in the ordinary state, but the referent is things in the altered state, especially THE psilocybin “effect”: transformation from possibilism to eternalism.
The Egodeath theory 