Cybermonk, started article on desktop Dec. 11, 2024; added random content on mobile Dec 12, 2024, haven’t added article commentary yet.
Contents
links work on desktop Edge/Chrome:
- Intro
- Citation and Link
- Dizzy Huggins’ Salamander Article (Dancing Man)
- 🔥
- The Fungi-Pareidolia of The Psychedelic Gospels (Bennett 2021)
- Highest Art, Highest Art Interpreter
- snake shaped worldline frozen in rock
- pilzbaum Affirmers Are Partly Wrong
- Conclusion of Bible Promises 13 Species of Amanita
- Unpleasant Experiences
- Roland Griefiths
- 🧾
- Does Huggins Fixate on “Secret”, Absolutely Conflating It with Mushrooms in Christian Art?
- Can Huggins comprehend gen2, the Explicit Cubensis paradigm?
- Kupfer’s out of her state
- 😑
- Resuming Using Idea Development Pages, shorter? (page 20)
- Items Equated by Looking-Lines in Image f177
- 🍄🟫
- Sequence of Dance Steps: Bennett 1995, Samo 1998, Hatsis 2013, Huggins Jan 2022, Brown Feb 2022
- Dedicated to Dancing Man
- Scholarship on Mushrooms
- 🌳
- 👶
- Should Rest from Typing
- See Also
- Author: egodeaththeory
- Leave a comment Cancel reply
- Post navigation
- Recent Posts
- Nav Menu
- Recent Posts
- Recent Comments
- Pages (wide articles)
- Untitled
- Untitled
Intro
Cut Right Trunk in Salamander Bestiary Image (Dancing Man, Roasting Salamander in Bodleian) – my main page about this image
todo: I need to redo from bloated hi-res png to jpg and make sure this picture appears still
posts nearby:
Miking & Voice Recording Successes for Rapid Idea Development
Citation and Link
Dizzy, Dancing or Dying? The Misappropriation of MS. Bodl. 602, fol. 27v, as ‘Evidence’ for Psychedelic Mushrooms in Christian Art
Ronald Huggins, 2022, 25 pages, FRAGMENTS Journal 1.1 (2022): 1-25
History of Christianity, Western Esotericism (History)
https://www.academia.edu/74021123/_Dizzy_Dancing_or_Dying_The_Misappropriation_of_MS_Bodl_602_fol_27v_as_Evidence_for_Psychedelic_Mushrooms_in_Christian_Art_
Dizzy Huggins’ 😵💫 Salamander Article (Dancing Man)
Huggins Dizzy Jan 2022 article wasn’t able to cite Brown’s February 2022 rebuttal to Hatsis.
Nov. 23 2024: See today’s logical fallacies brain dump:
When looking for logical fallacies, the best field is pilzbaum (mushroom trees).
Please use the German term, pilzbaum, to keep this on the down-low; we don’t want to mislead the ignorant by openly writing “mushroom” trees.
Mr. Natural! What does it all mean? It don’t mean 🐂💩🍄🟫🔵
pilzbaum (mushroom trees) mean trees. The distinct mushroid impression is due to clumsy accidental inept artists slipping up without purpose or intention, helpless slaves of the templates that developed for no conscious reason.
This art impression of mushroom is not purposeful; artists broke the prototypes carelessly copying and botching the prototypes that developed toward mushroom for no reason, no purpose, random accident really.
Artists lack control and responsibility here.
Kill the artists into machines, to save our denial.
on this topic, only, remove all will and intentionality from our subjects under study, the under-developed Dark Ages artists.
They don’t mean mushrooms, because they have branches so it doesn’t look like a mushroom.
It can only be one or the other: mushroom or tree.
pilzbaum have branches, therefore not a mushroom but a tree. Interpretation complete.
A mushroom contains branching, effects.
Golden Teacher Cubensis teaches psychedelic eternalism: how to not lose control.
Psil = Eucharist = teaches submitting to higher controller, you a horse ridden from higher lvl ctrllr / serpent.
The Eucharist recognized as mushrooms
plant teacher = 11:48pm nov 23 2024 teacher in f134 = the teaching aspect of the mushroom, the Golden Teacher of Righteousness.
psychedelic eternalism teaches the two models: branching vs non-branching. psychedelic eternalism, from possibilism-thinking, which is retained and relied on though disproved, virtual-only control agency.
You are the horse being ridden by creator God the higher controller, puppet of the frozen snake.
Brown’s Feb 2022 article defeating Hatsis at Hancock site:
Hatsis the failed witch, the medieval historian who interprets esoteric art literally and reductionistically, and thinks what’s under debate is “whether there was a secret Amanita cult” – stuck in 1970 forever, trapped back in the Dark Ages of entheogen scholarship.
[8:35 pm Nov 23, 2024] CONFIRMED a speculation from about a week ago: when I was inventorying the tree’s mushroom & frond branches: we are to read the item held by Dancing Man as {removed branch held in Left hand}, holding the stem of the mushroom-branch exactly like shown attached to the Left side of the tree – see Huggins’ Red Shift pair of images p 22 in Dizzy article.
[9:07 pm Nov 23 2024] Why cross two branches, under the cap/ crown? To visually “cut” the right branch, to form the standard {cut right branch} motif — like I discussed in tree morphology eg Great Canterbury Psalter f177 🐴 horses trees & f134 🙃 leg-hanging mushroom tree ~2022. f177:
So add to my branching-message mushroom trees article: {cut right branch} as well as huge {cut right trunk}!
[9:31 pm Nov 23 2024] viable interp: I now am repeating my ~2022 analysis of his fingers: R fingers are splayed (branching) like {clueless Peter} in Golden Psalter, L fingers held together in contrast (because occupied grasping the stem of the removed mushroom-branch).
Peter in Golden with splayed Right fingers, like Dancing Man:
🔥🦎🦎🍄🌳🍄🟫🕺🏼
hi-res Dancing Man image:
By “confirmed” re: {holding removed branch}, I mean I weighed now all I know about the standard common trope motif of {hand + removed branch} and realized that it adds up here.
The artist decided to employ the trope of “removed branch in L hand”, here with the {removed branch} represented as a mushroom branch matching the mushrooms attached on the tree.
We can’t see the mushroom stem in his hand, but the stem/ branch is implied, wrapped in his left hand.
Against Ruck and everyone, he is not holding the mushroom to indicate that he ate it, but more, to instantiate and hearken to the important common standard trope of {Left hand holds removed branch}.
Sometimes the {removed branch} is shown in R hand, as a flexible artistic option, but it’s still the same system of meaning either way: conjoining {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs.
[9:41 pm nov 23 2024] it occurred to me for the first time to di something I should have always been diing before: check for visually cut right branch in Plaincourault: CONFIRMED: there are two instances of {cut right branch}, visually cut by the serpent:
Huggins mentions Bennett’s article:
The Fungi-Pareidolia of The Psychedelic Gospels (Bennett 2021)
By Chris Bennett on August 5, 2021
https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2021/08/05/__trashed/
Highest Art, Highest Art Interpreter
The highest art is Great Canterbury Psalter Eadwine images
The highest artist is Eadwine.
The highest art interpreter is Cybermonk. the Egodeath theory is compatible with the pilzbaum genre of {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs , mapped to psychedelic eternalism with dependent control
snake shaped worldline frozen in rock
A Josie Kins video covers eternalism.
But, Kins mis-equates eternalism with domino-chain determinism – which is merely the egoic, possibilism-premised notion of transcendent thinking; an idea of eternalism that’s framed within possibilism.
Future control thoughts already exist waiting timelessly and are forced into the female mind thought receptor driven steered by the uncontrollable higher level mystery marriage controller.
pilzbaum Affirmers Are Partly Wrong
Ruck in “Datura” 2001: “Pilzbaum look like and are mushrooms AND NOTHING ELSE.”
Elasticman Ruck the vague poet is wrong in two ways:
1) pilzbaum have branches, so deniers are right, they don’t look just like mushrooms.
2) pilzbaum look like mushrooms, but also look like branching, which is more their main message than “mushroom“.
Conclusion of Bible Promises 13 Species of Amanita
this list mixes affirmers of Plainc, Dancing Man, etc:
pilzbaum asserters Gen 1: Rignoux ~1890, Marchand & Boudier 1910/1911; Allegro 1970; Bennett/ Osburn 1995
too hard to list deniers, gen1 affirmers, & gen2 affirmers.
Bennett switched to denier; i guess pilzbaum mean cannabis, like the 12 different fruit crops of trees of life (+ healing leaves) in Rev 22:2 mean 12 uses, of Hemp, per his bk Drugs & Bible.
By this logic, Heinrich essentially is writing in SF 1995 that Rev 22’s “trees of life” means 12 ASPECTS of THE HOLY MUSHROOM, Amanita.
And “healing leaves” must mean our Amanita too, given the leaf shape associated with our sacred Amanita worshipped by our SCHOLARLY CULT.
Unpleasant Experiences
This is a high-level dimension in 11-Factors psychedelic psychometric questionnaire, contains the factors.
You have to fact check what I say in this recording,
BUT the only place to fact-check me is this very website of mine, because this dirty “science” of psychedelic psychometrics questionnaires based on Walter Stace 1960 based on William James 1902 labelled as “science” is entirely undocumented!
Based on the pollyanna wrong, false model of “mystical experiencing” mis-defined by James 1902 & Stace 1960.
Michael Pollan in How to Change Your Mind had to write “NA” when filling in the MEQ, Mystical Experience Questionnaire made by Timothy Leary’s student Walter Pankhe in 1962 because it was framed the opposite of his toad venom experience.
Pollan experienced timeless ETERNITY extremely, but it was AWFUL, so, when happy-framed MEQ (= Stace’s bad model) asked him “Did you experience eternity?”, Pollan felt the question was meant too positively, so he felt he had to answer NA! not applicable!
CEQ = Challenging Experience Questionnaire
MEQ and CEQ alike – as Charles Stang effectively said to Griefiths – are “not applicable” to actual mystical experiencing!
FAIL = MEQ.
Bunk science, undoc’d. Make up what science is.
This is made-up science; MEQ has been DISCONFIRMED!
Stang got Griffiths to ADMIT ON FILM THE MEQ IS BUNK! and Griefiths pointed to the CEQ to catch negative experiences — but CEQ is EVEN MORE BUNK than MEQ!!
Roland Griefiths
voice recording 6250, not uploaded? 6:00 of 2:18:00, good; Dec. 6, 2024: psychedelic science
This made-up “science” of Panke/ Leary’s Mystical Experience psychometrics questionnaires, including misbegotten CEQ, is dragon-infested with the shadow dragon monster.
A high-level dimension in 11-Factors psychedelic psychometric questionnaire, contains the factors:
ANX: Anxiety
This factor in 11-Factors q’air contains a number of items; questions about psychedelic effects.
ICC: Impaired Control and Cognition
Why lump together? No one knows 🤷♂️
S: Shadow factor 13 🐍
Consists of unpleasant effects that are MORE IMPORRANT than items in factors ANX or ICC.
Adolf Dittrich’s Item 54 “I was afraid to lose my self-control” from the Angst/Dread dimension of his OAV q-air 1994 was TOO BROADLY FITTING IN BOTH ANX AND ICC, SO WAS “dropped” from the ANX factor by Studerus from such narrow “factors”.
Instead, in the final version of 11-Factors, item 54 “I was afraid to lose my self control” was placed DIRECTLY in the high-level dimension “Unpleasant Experiences” – where Griefiths then IGNORED these 8 effects too broad to fit into a factor they fabricated.
Griefiths ONLY considered, for inclusion in CEQ q-air, the ANX and ICC effects (effects which are so narrow, they fit well within a distinct “factor”).
The very effects that were so broad that they couldn’t fit into any one, narrow Factor, were IGNORED when making the CEQ. “gather init pool” (why from those 3 q’airs: hrs socq which is meq plus distractor items NOT challenging items
Why draw from SOCQ? that’s the MEQ (all positive effects; “mystic=positive”, Stace-based Science) plus distractor items. States of Consciousness Questionnaire
HRS – old man Brown’s “hallucinogen” rating scale
i need to see & analyze the distractors again.
The most powerful unpleasant effects, are those 8 like item 54, that are too broad to fit in just the ANX factor or ICC factor.
So my Shadow factor 13 (abbr.: S 🐍) is MORE important than ANX and ICC factors.
CEQ IS A DISASTER OF THE FIRST ORDER. MEQ not much better; same bias, Mystic Unicorns and Rainbows.
🧾☑️👨🔬🦄🌈😊 🐉 🍽️
My binary split of camps here doesn’t work well. More important is 3 groups:
1) pilzbaum affirmers first gen, the Secret Amanita paradigm scholars
2) pilzbaum deniers – defeat the Secret Amanita paradigm
3) pilzbaum affirmers second gen – defeat deniers, defeat the Secret Amanita paradigm
First Gen Affirmers (of Purposeful Pilzbaum)
Second Gen Affirmers (of Purposeful Pilzbaum)
deniers (of Purposeful Pilzbaum)
gen1 affirmers
deniers
gen1 affirmers
3 teams:
amanita asserters
amanita deniers, taking aim at 🍄🌳
cubensis asserters
Samorini 1996/1997/1998; evil Hoffman/ Ruck/ Staples 2001; good Hoffman 2002/ 2006/ 2020/ 2023; Brown 2016;
gen 1 entheogen scholarship
gen 1 deniers
gen 2 entheogen scholarship
1) “Secret Amanita paradigm” pilzbaum affirmers
2) pilzbaum deniers
3) “Explicit Cubensis paradigm” pilzbaum affirmers
Does Huggins Fixate on “Secret”, Absolutely Conflating It with Mushrooms in Christian Art?
does Huggins perceive a change / pivot at Samo in 1998, from the Secret Amanita paradigm to the Explicit Cubensis paradigm?
Can Huggins comprehend gen2, the Explicit Cubensis paradigm?
As pilzbaum deniers, i dont mean Marcia Kupfer not a pilzbaum denier but is subject to critique eg by brown.
Kupfer re: Saint Martin frescos. tho can critique Kupfer. Thanks for the branches, man(!!) clamors up tree
Kupfer’s out of her state
Marcia Kupfer calls a youth a man in St Martin church: A youth cuts left hand-held branch w knife in right hand above gate of Jerusalem.
[12:45 am dec 13 2024] cutting/ renouncing branching autonomy = gate key
to be brought through the gates, you are made to lose branching autonomy, redeemed to pseudo autonomy; non-branching dependence.
I list pilzbaum Deniers, who specifically explicitly deny purposeful mushroom imagery in Christian art.
The lowest art interpreters are the art historians Erich Brinckmann, Erwin Panofsky, Letcher’s Henrietta Leyser, and their followers (pilzbaum deniers) Gordon Wasson, Andy Letcher, Thomas Hatsis, and Ronald Huggins.
Panofsky is the greatest, most competent art historian.
Mycologists must reach out and consult Panofsky, on matters of art.
Not consult Panofsky’s writings; Panofsky wrote nothing on pilzbaum, except two suppressed letters to Wasson in 1952.
Give him a call, stopwatch in hand, to “consult” how quickly he disavows pilzbaum. ⏱️
Then you can add, like Letcher in Shroom, a WORTHLESS citation to pad out your book, while lecturing pilzbaum affirmers about your superior, tried and true historiographical methodology for “explaining away” (Hatsis, written proudly & smugly) each isolated pilzbaum, using whatever ad hoc rule you need at the moment, such as:
It’s totally a standard, commonplace parasol of victory. Don’t you know anything?
😑 🏆🏅💰 🚫🍄🌳
Resuming Using Idea Development Pages, shorter? (page 20)
Most of the time, I need to do spot-development of ideas, and need to capture timestamps of realizations, logged. I
If anyone wants to track me daily, we would need to either:
Approach: Post a daily log post. I have not used WordPress blog posts this way; daily. Might be a good idea to try.
The page title could show date + theme.
Ultra long pages have cons.
Mobile app is especially poor there.
Approach I used: very long Idea Development page; you’d have to check it periodically, to follow my idea development. Poor for authoring in mobile app.
Items Equated by Looking-Lines in Image f177
🍄🟫🌳🗡️🐴⚖️⛅️🔍🔎🍁🌳
[5:20 pm Dec 12 2024] I wondered again about image f177 of Great Canterbury Psalter: row 1 middle, the Pointless Loiterers. I forgot their purpose, the other day I remembered their purpose again: their looking-lines tie together equating left tree and right tree.
Just now I recognized – for the 1st time? – that the horses looking both ways is LIKE the Pointless Loiterers looking both ways.
i think 1 yr 10 mo ago, Feb 2023, I figured out connection A & connection B, but not meta-connection C.
Evidence: I FAILED to crop just f177 row 1, amazingly – mistake!!
I failed to see the meta, C connection, bc my crops lacked the correct scope context: show entire row 1 only.
pun: C connection.
C is a meta-connection, connecting two connections.
Here now I articulate what the looking-lines crops show, sweepingly, in this subsequent phase of interpretation.
Connection A: The horses’ looking-lines equate non-branching (blue cap) with God holding up the guy standing on right foot; 2-level, dependent control, rather than autonomous control.
“[2:15 p.m. April 8, 2023] I just realized that this means that in f177, the Shroud ego-dead person = the guy balancing on right foot in that image, directly above Shroud”
ie, ego death = being made by the Creator to {stand on right foot}; be given the “eternalism” mental model of control and possibility-branching.
Connection B: Pointless Loiterers’ looking-lines equate row 1 left tree (that horses look at) with the dud pilzbaum on row 1 Right.
meta Connection C: now recognized: the connecting done by the horses is LIKE the connecting done by the Pointless Loiterers.
add image: f177 row 1
add f177 showing looking lines: need new crop w ONLY such 2-way looking lines.
aw, lame as row 2’s crutch:
says “Row 2 Entire – Not Made” – corroborates that my insight right now is new! Or set of insights, by [6:39 pm Dec. 12, 2024].
6:24 pm Dec. 12, 2024 per John Lash the White Light sun of peak Psilocybin experiencing touches the rightmost (non-branching) part of the pilzbaum.
The below image will suffice fine, but need re-analysis, re: equating of pairs of boxes (ie, what thing each pair (or group!) of lookers is connecting):
The horses in row 1 L connect boxed items x &y: nonbranching & dependent control.
Pointless Loiterers row 1 Mid connect boxed items x &y: Left pilzbaum, Right dud pilzbaum.
You say the Left pilzbaum isn’t Cubensis, because lacks blue-stained stems. FALSE!
The Right tree has blue stems and is equated with the Left tree.
So the Left pilzbaum does have blue assigned to its stems, and is therefore Cubensis. Q.E.D.
Conversely, you say the tree on R is a dud pilzbaum. FALSE!
The mushroom caps from the L pilzbaum are equated with the leaf crowns of the R tree, so the R tree is a pilzbaum.
Adding the features of the L & R trees together, gives the desired, f134-like, blue-stemmed (thus Cubensis) branching-message mushroom trees.
The cream-colored stems on the Left mushroom tree, along with the blue-stained stems on Right leaf-tree, are Cubensis stem attributes, conjoined by the looking-lines of the Pointless Loiterers, who are manufacturing Cubensis pilzbaum by connecting the attributes.
The Egodeath Community group in row 1 Right connects boxed items x & y & z & w; most boxed items in the image.
Eadwine takes a theme (a mechanism of motif connection) and develops it – we see Eadwine doing that in image f134 similarly, elaborating a theme.
If a group of two figures looking at two features equates those two features, then — developing that mechanism — a group of six lookers looking at six features of the image equates those six features. [6:08 pm Dec. 12, 2024]
The corpse carriers in row 2 Mid connect boxed items x &y.
The balancing guys in row 2 Mid connect boxed items x &y.
Sequence of Dance Steps: Bennett 1995, Samo 1998, Hatsis 2013, Huggins Jan 2022, Brown Feb 2022
Huggins Dizzy Jan 2022 article wasn’t able to cite Brown’s February 2022 rebuttal to Hatsis.
Dedicated to Dancing Man 🕺
Have a sack of Cubensis, Dancing Man
Foolish youth Eadwine’s weight is on the wrong, left foot, causing loss of control.
f134 is a teaching image.
The most true and authentic artist Eadwine develops this idea (motif mechanism) as puzzle levels of increased elaboration, in other figures in this image, culminating in hanging by one leg.
Eadwine specializes in developing permutations of the pilzbaum genre’s integrated combinations of the {mushrooms}, {branching}, {handedness}, and {stability} motifs.
Weight on L foot is mapped to possibilism-thinking, which produces loss of control.
Weight on R foot is mapped to eternalism-thinking, which restores stable control.
Michael A. Williams uses exactly this language about “restoration of stability”.
Williams, Michael. (1997). The Immovable Race: Gnostic Designation and the Theme of Stability in Late Antiquity. https://www.amazon.com/Immovable-Race-Designation-Stability-Antiquity/dp/9004075976/ Google Scholar: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Immovable_Race/RwrwgcHz1_MC
Motivation for this page: Gotta keep up on Dancing Man research, since Bennett 1990s.
Scholarship on Mushrooms
Overlap of Dizzy 2022 & Forage 2024 articles and bibliographies on mushrooms in Christian art.
This is a long-ongoing thread of research development,
pilzbaum Affirmers vs. pilzbaum Deniers, affirmers of Dancing Man since Bennett’s book Green Gold in the 1990s.
affirmers of Plainc since Abott Rignoux around 1890.
Since Samorini 1996, publishing in this direction, breaking away from the Amanita Primacy Fallacy.
Since 2002, I defined this approach, posting in the the Egodeath Yahoo Group:
Gen 2 pilzbaum Affirmers
the Explicit Cubensis paradigm
the Maximal entheogen theory of religion
the Cubensis Primacy truth
Amanita utilized to support the Cubensis-driven paradigm
Amanita utilized to give all glory to Cubensis
the greater mysteries 🌳🐍
🌳🐍
vs.
Gen 1 pilzbaum Affirmers
the Secret Amanita paradigm
the Moderate entheogen theory of religion
the Amanita Primacy fallacy
Cubensis utilized to support the Amanita-driven paradigm
Cubensis utilized to give all glory to Amanita
the lesser mysteries 👶🍄
👶🍄
Should Rest from Typing
todo: copy emails to posts
try to type gently, still, must rest – overuse.
need to rest from typing. Reading printed articles instead.
Highlighter technique is remarkably fast and effective, for faster reading comprehension than pencil or line-pens.
See Also
Cut Right Trunk in Salamander Bestiary Image (Dancing Man, Roasting Salamander in Bodleian) – my main page about this image
“Foraging” article, Huggins 2024 eg posts:
Deniers’ Logical Fallacies in the Pilzbaum (Mushroom Trees) Debate
Foraging for Psychedelic Mushrooms in the Wrong Forest (Huggins 2024)
Ancients Were Wrong in Pushing Secret Amanita Mysteries and Garbled Pop Physics Mysticism
The Egodeath theory 