Mobile Idea Dev page

people have suckered themselves into playing the grid game they have set up these artificial boundaries that don’t exist in nature and they don’t exist in practice and they don’t exist in peoples values these hard cut and dry distinctions that are upheld by all kinds of false assumptions we greatly exaggerate the separation of the Pharma Copia not only did I argue to Dr. Brown in practice when you go mushroom hunting you come across all of the varieties in a change in configuration year toChanging configuration year to year in the same spot and you take what you are dealt one year nature deals you more psilocybin one year nature deals you more amanita then you can fall back may be on an annual on a perennial mandrake even if you have your own ranking or even if you objectively have an objective ranking that that psilocybin is objectively more desirable and the amanita is objectively less desirable except the shape is honorable and that mandrake you might consider to be third of a3 rate that it’s more of a deliriant although it does have visionary practice properties to that would be extremely justify it extremely rational extremely extremely rational extremely reality-based extremely-based and solid real world experience the decision about which plant to represent in your art is distinct from the cards that your adult each year buy a mushroom patch or a garden a secret garden of whatever the Apoxsee theory has available that year or that month we need to really break and sever like like and that one dimwit professor is helping us out when he argues that mushrooms in our do not represent mushrooms because the mushroom in art does not represent anyone species and we can leverage that it’s child’s play to totally destroy his argument or destroyextremely rational extremely reality-based extremely-based and solid real world experience the decision about which plant to represent in your art is distinct from the cards that your adult each year buy a mushroom patch or a garden a secret garden of whatever the Apoxsee theory has available that year or that month we need to really break and sever like like and that one dimwit professor is helping us out when he argues that mushrooms in our do not represent mushrooms because the mushroom in art does not represent anyone species and we can leverage that it’s child’s play to totally destroy his argument or destroy we can easily it’s child’s play to destroy his bunk conclusion that mushrooms don’t mean not shrooms and we can totally turn out against him easily and because we are based in reality this argument is based in reality and so it can easily destroy his false conclusion which is not based in reality the reality is that at one point in time you have to make a decision of which plant you choose to represent in your art but that’s a separate conversation point from what visionary plants are available to you this month and next month and next year and which ones do you end up using for whatever reason that is distinct and separate from the question and so I think it is part of this fallacy where this fallacy is coming from where is this fallacy is coming from is minimalist presuppositions the presupposition that visionary plants are rare and are unavailable and are used only secretly and are almost never used and that anyone who uses one would only use that one type that one species and the given person would only be aware of one when you take all of these like skewed crazy set of negative long long list of negative presuppositions that is what’s behind this big huge mistake where we grossly underestimated the amount of understanding of the visionary plants that art represents and we greatly underestimate the amount of usage and we also greatly underestimate the range of Pharma Copia part of the maximum entheogen theory that I am now here spelling out is that we need to in the maximal entheogen theory a principle of it is assume that any image represents valuing and understanding and using every type of visionary plant that would be that’s an extremist position by by design that’s deliberately an extreme position if you see a mandrake in Christian art let’s say like Monte Cassino that is evidence of meaning and intending and respecting and understanding and ingesting every visionary plant in contrast the minimal presuppositions of the minimal entheogen theory are that and how many to here here is the kind of warped twisted thinking that the minimalist mind hurts when the minimalist mind sees mandrake they will attack it with the whole set of range of the most negative presuppositions that they can think of at the art for one thing the artist who drew the mandrake didn’t realize they were drawing mandrake and it was heretical and no one else recognize the meaning and it’s use with secret and they only did it once and the artist who drew it was working for someone else until the artist had no idea what they were drawing and the person who drew it does use mandrake but that’s the only thing that they use as far as visionary plants and length of artist would not have known because people were stupid back then the artist who drew mandrake we can constantly assume that they were unaware of any other visionary plans other than mandrake and we can assume confidently did the person who drew mandrake is a strict adherence of only using mandrake and never using any other in visionary plant that is the twisted mind of the neck of the minimal entheogen theory of religion end of art interpretation in fact you can see my s

my strategy here is to define in contrast at the same time to contrasting positions take the defined the minimalist position let’s take this hypothetical abstract simplified scenario given Christian art showing mandrake what are the forceful interpretive lens of the minimal theory versus contrasted against the maximal theory what does the mind of the minimal theory perceive given a single mandrake image in Christian art and then in contrast what does the mind of the maximal theory perceive when it is shown a single mandrake increasein Christian art the minimalist mind will see secret atypical heretical use of only mandrake no other visionary plants and only by the artist and nobody else in contrast what the maximal theory will perceive by that same data is that image indicates the understanding and using and valuing and adjusting of every single visionary plan whatever is available from moment to momentAnother weird twisted angle is the strange self-contradictory way that allegro frames plane crawl as plain cruel proves the incisions were forgotten completely because it’s evidence of remembering what has been forgotten according to Alegres theory that said that mushrooms were immediately forgotten at the beginning of Christianity and therefore plain curl represents the remaining remembering of the forgotten how many days it directly self-contradictory position it’s plainly and directly self-contradictory so in allegros minimalist kind of mine because his theory of vintage and throughout history is a minimalist theory he and his theory is my minimal see if he says that tAnother weird twisted angle is the strange self-contradictory way that allegro frames plane crawl as plain cruel proves the incisions were forgotten completely because it’s evidence of remembering what has been forgotten according to Alegres theory that said that mushrooms were immediately forgotten at the beginning of Christianity and therefore plain curl represents the remaining remembering of the forgotten how many days it directly self-contradictory position it’s plainly and directly self-contradictory so in allegros minimalist kind of mine because his theory of vintage and throughout history is a minimalist theory he and his theory is my minimal see if he says that the early Christians only the first generation is laminate it and then people immediatelyhen people

My strategytrategy here

9:04 PM March 23, 2022 I have identified an important variety of the single plant fallacy and this is based on the common place understanding of the concept I am here agreeing with the commonly understood realization of the idea of the Pharma Copia it is the we have to establish the principle of the interchangeability of the Pharma Copia a picture of mandrake is evidence for the use of psilocybin a picture of amanita is evidence for ingesting cannabishear the rigid brittle unrealistic single plant fallacy of this type is the idea that a depiction in art of one particular entheogen directly and rigidly and necessarily represents the literal ingesting of that particular entheogen and that is a fallacy that’s not how values work people who value the visionary state value all the various visionary plants and they use them theyre

there is only a general or rough approximate correlation between an image of a particular entheogen and the use of that exact entheogen in reality there is a looser fairly loose somewhat looser connection for example it may be that everybody all of the infusion adapts agree and they all recognize that the most desirable visionary plant is psilocybin that it is the most efficient the most visionary the most religious the most efficient and focused

suppose that is true suppose that all religious users a visionary plants suppose if they all agree that psilocybin is the most desirable also that community would agree that the other visionary plants have value as well and you would have people for various reasons for practical reasons sometimes using visionary plans other than psilocybin but in the special case of Saul Simon you would expect those people to prefer depicting Psilocybe and even though the reality is that they do not always have Saul Simon available and saw that throughout the year in practice they are likely to use things other than psilocybin but yet they are likely to depict into prefersuppose that is true suppose that all religious users a visionary plants suppose if they all agree that psilocybin is the most desirable also that community would agree that the other visionary plants have value as well and you would have people for various reasons for practical reasons sometimes using visionary plans other than psilocybin but in the special case of Saul Simon you would expect those people to prefer depicting Psilocybe and even though the reality is that they do not always have Saul Simon available and saw that throughout the year in practice they are likely to use things other than psilocybin but yet they are likely to depict into prefer

depicting so Simon and we can think of similar reasons why people might choose to desire to depict Amanita even if that very same person knows the truth that psilocybin is more efficient and cleaner and more effective the person may still choose to depict Amanita for artistic and tradition reasons and pious reasons Pius Pius reasons even one might say for religious reasons someone might choose to ingest or rather someone might prefer and desire to to use psilocybin butThat same person might and practice use amanita at least sometimes due to issues of availability or one could even see you in a vague broad sense for religious reasons because it is depicted in Ezekiel and revelation

8:40 PM March 23, 2022 reconceptualizing and mentally re-categorizing and remapping mytheme I don’t know do I consider Mushroom Trees as a mytheme does my existing catalog of myth themes even list mushroom trees do I consider a mushroom tree to be a myth theme I don’t even know and mind you at this point I consider my catalogs to be complete they are adequate representations of all the major significant mytheme’s that I’m aware of and yet I have dealt strangely it is very strange to consider that I seriously doubt that Idesignated the concept of a mushroom tree as a mytheme I know I have designated miss seems like branching a non-branching and snake and I am I might have I don’t know where do I have mushroom do I in the name of my methanes do I have any math themes or missing categories with the word mushroom and especially do I have a mytheme called mushroom tree and if not why not what methanes do I have in my catalog that are the most similar to my latest concept first I was trying the concept of a problem Mattick mushroom tree problematic mushroom tree a few days ago and then in the past may be 24 hours I’ve had to break through on a scale it’s unclear what the scale of breakthrough is one definitely significant part of that breakthrough was I was mocking Tom Hatsis as always having a field day which is all too easy to do and I was joking about him associating him with deliriant in contrast to associating myself with it entheogens Ha Hah Hah Hah and I said that I am better at identifying mandrake in art than he is so I was talking again about my Monte Cassino pair of images of the mushroom tree on the left with the mandrake tree on the right which I am the one to identify the mandrake tree and then I thought in my mind I mentally pictured weedI made podcast voice recording where I pointed out that I have the fact that I’m better than hats and identifying mandrakes in art because I had identified mandrake trees but with all this work I’ve been doing on mushroom trees lately and the morphology particularly the branching morphology in particular of mushroom trees and so then in my recording I didn’t think of it at the time they didn’t immediately strike me at all while I made the I think it was a couple of recordings were one or two recordings I mentioned that I am the one to decode the mandrake Trees enter positively identify them and then afterwards I guess when I was listening yes when I was listening to a recording from today or yesterday where I mention Mandarin Chinese proba

probably today’s recording I pointed out that I had I am the one to identify and positively identify mandrake trees unlike Hatsis and then I was listening to that recording today and and so therefore I was picturing the mandrake trees and with all the work I’ve been doing on branching morphology of mushroom trees I thought in my mind wait a minute aren’t they’re broken aren’t they’re cut branches I’m changing my terminology from broken to cut aren’t there cut arms I remember in my mind in my mind Zai I think I seem to recall that the mandrake tree has cut branching and today I confirmedConfirmed that and so the big surprise was that the branching theme I have been demonizing mandrake as a deliriant but now I saw that the branching theme was deliberately applied to Mandry to because come on how artificial had this would immediately dismissed the mandrake treat can’t possibly be a magic because everyone knows that Amanda is not a tree and furthermore it has cut branches so it’s a poor tree and so it just feels and I’ll kinds of ways and I’m saying that I’m taking what he would reject I am what he would reject as a bug and a failure and a negative identifier I am identifying it as a a positiveConfirmed that and so the big surprise was that the branching theme I have been demonizing mandrake as a deliriant but now I saw that the branching theme was deliberately applied to Mandry to because come on how artificial had this would immediately dismissed the mandrake treat can’t possibly be a magic because everyone knows that Amanda is not a tree and furthermore it has cut branches so it’s a poor tree and so it just feels and I’ll kinds of ways and I’m saying that I’m taking what he would reject I am what he would reject as a bug and a failure and a negative identifier I am identifying it as a a positive positive identifier that straddles the categories of stylized entheogen and stylized mushrooms and depictions of the effects of infusions and this would even include intelligence in the broader sense broadened so as to include scopolamine broadened so as to include mandrake so I got today I received a few surprised unexpected bolstering from a direction that was a little bit unexpected and I have been thinking of course while I have been mocking making fun of hats is associating him with that he’s trying to replace the philosophy Eucharist by deliverance

deliriant naturally that joke raises the question of what is the visionary nature of deliverance deliriant plants versus classic philosophy psilocybin effects and I talk about the pharmacopia I talk about the broad Entheogens pharmacopia I think of deliriant plants similar to how I think about amanita or even cannabis visionary flightsand it is like I said about the realistic valuing of multiple different intensity levels like from a narrow minded point of you you might see that only psilocybin is worth anything and only at level 10 out of 10 whereas in contrast I’ve argued with Dr. Brown that in practice you’re going to use the Pharma Copia this is this is a pretty familiar pretty common place argument that people don’t just only use one plant they use whatever is available and all them and I would refine something that I argued to him that even if depictions of amanitaThe

transcription missed a bunch of my words come on thing workThe transcription missed a bunch of my words come on thing work

I think I need to start a new block which is carriage return periodically missed a bunch of my text dammit I debated with Dr. Brown I said that amanita represents the use of psilocybin but more insightful and even more realistically is that any visionary plant in religious art actually and practice represents the actual use of the entire broad pharmacopia and I some of the text that got missed the brain dead argument at Emma’s journalisthack article that put down Dr. Brown because he has no expertise but merrily has taught cultural history with agents for 1 million years which doesn’t count for anything is not relevant in this hack article has a stupid bow tied guy who’s arguing that a given Mushroom in christian art does not represent a single species with his implied result is that therefore mushrooms don’t mean mushrooms but the truth of what he’s saying despite himself is that I can almost take the unconscious truth and then amplify it any given christian and Mushroom depiction in our represents and indicates it’s an indicator of the use of every kind of visionary plant that’s available therefore the specious argument I’d flip it against him and I did this kind of thing with Dr. Brown I can flip the argument against the bowtie clueless professor who’s who said who argues he argues that a specific Mushroom and christian art does not represent a specific species of mushrooms and I am turning that against the professor and saying that’s right any particular Mushroom in christian art indicates and means and represents and is intended to represent the use of any and all visionary plan and every type of psychoactive mushroom including Amanita and the various psilocybin and indicates the use of mandrake and cannabis and opium and etc. and so for example what specifically does amanita represent in Christian Art it indicates the ingesting of every type of visionary plant including Psilocybe and Mushroom then we can ask given a Psilocybin image in Christian Art what does that represent the answer is it represents using amanita and psilocybin and mandrake and opium and cannabis etc. this is a realistic viewand every type of psychoactive mushroom including Amanita and the various psilocybin and indicates the use of mandrake and cannabis and opium and etc. and so for example what specifically does amanita represent in Christian Art it indicates the ingesting of every type of visionary plant including Psilocybe and Mushroom then we can ask given a Psilocybin image in Christian Art what does that represent the answer is it represents using amanita and psilocybin and mandrake and opium and cannabis etc. this is a realistic view and together with that realistic view is that people who use the pharmacopia let’s call them adept at using the pharmacopia know that the very most desirable or efficient visionary plant cognitive loosening agent is psilocybin any mushroom represents all mushrooms and knowledge and represents knowledgeable mushrooms so I would modify my retort on my reply to to Dr. Brown and say that instead of saying what I posted at his article at Academia.edu you instead of my assertion that amanita image represents Psilocybe and use what I should say instead is thatand together with that realistic view is that people who use the pharmacopia let’s call them adept at using the pharmacopia know that the very most desirable or efficient visionary plant cognitive loosening agent is psilocybin any mushroom represents all mushrooms and knowledge and represents knowledgeable mushrooms so I would modify my retort on my reply to to Dr. Brown and say that instead of saying what I posted at his article at Academia.edu you instead of my assertion that amanita image represents Psilocybe and use what I should say instead is that

and how many to image in Christian Art in fact represents the use of psilocybin and amanita and what does whatever visionary plants are available and you have to understand about mandrake and the scopolamine plants is it they are extremely potent and extremely common place available year-round is how we should think of them whereas the psilocybin mushrooms as far as actually adjusting it by Christians in Christian history it’s a delicacy it is a it is the most desirable it is recognized and revered as being the most desirable but to pick

images of either a Panaeolus or cube Ensis or liberty Or amanita any one of those represents the entire set of them and also represents using and indicates and is evidence of using mandrake had been scopolamine plants cannabis opium visionary plants in general and so it is non-specific actually it is a big fallacy is the assumption and see I can turn the professors argument against him who says mushrooms and or don’t mean mushrooms because no no particular mushroom in art represents one singleSpecies and therefore mushrooms in art never mean mushrooms because a mushroom in art does not represent one single species I turn that argument against him and I say any mushroom in art and it’s a given that we’re focusing on Greek and Helen Instacart any mushroom in art represents using all all types of mushrooms whatever’s available

8:39 PM March 23, 2022 this time I am adding text into a proper paragraph instead of the title of the page it would be nice but hard to do consistently after the timestamp to state a heading I am now going to have an insight about topic ask are you going to tell you that ahead of time I’m about to change my direction unexpectedly to the subject of X

8:38 PM March 23, 2022 experimenting with log entries with voice dictation with a timestamp approach that seems like it could work very very well Except that didn’t work very well because it ended up transcribing directly into the title of the page instead of a paragraph take to take two

8:36 PM March 23, 2022 voice transcription experiment usage experiments con’t the way because I enter new text at the top of the page but then I work down it works down words it fills in the words down words and then I’ll do a separate session of transcribing a few minutes later at the top of the page so I’m not sure how I think if I just use it consistently if I use a consistent approachThen it will be comprehensible of which timestamp goes with which text because I miss I really miss having the timestamps @yahoo groups when I post it all the time starting around 2010 any post that I did well that was 2011 late 2011 I started posting in between then and 2013 until Yahoo stopped my normal way was to use my typical way was to use voice dictation and on mobile and post that way in fact I found it kind of hard to operate the desktop one I got really good at the mobile use her in her face

heading 8:31 PM March 23, 2022 it is convenient to continue talking this format works really well I think for me it’s a great compromise ever since 1985 I have needed to see my thoughts and then lay out more thoughts in tangible form and generally this transcription works well enough even though it’s broken it’s overall a really good compromiseVoice transcription allowing it to be even if I allow it to be raw I have all the advantage of speaking combined with much of the advantage of being able to see my words or most of my words or a semi broken collection of some of my words in a garbled somewhat partially garbled format is good enough so that overall the effect is very powerful the advantage of being able to just speak without typing I’ve I told you how I’ve broken my fingers and broken my keyboard literally and you know that recording podcast works for me very well but producing them is pain staking and there are special times when there may be a special times like during a jackpot perhaps of decoding mytheme’s where speed of speaking or speed of generating text is more important than accuracy of that resulting text all I really need is a rough representation of the words that I said works sufficiently well and it’s worth the breakage is worth theAdvantage of being able to voice dictate though I really have to wonder why the voice dictation doesn’t work better I enunciate extremely well and I’m realistic to I’m reasonable about it I find that the meeting transcription software seems to work a lot better than this software maybe server based recognition works better than mobile device based recognition speech recognition transcription

Maybe I should make timestamp headings here that would be good because I’m dictating an essay at the top of page then I’m dictating later another essay at the top of page above it I think I need timestamp headings

heading 8:30 PM March 23, 2022 I don’t make a promise this is not for determinate down to the minute rather it’s just periodical periodical timestamps there will be ambiguity I may put text above or below the timestamp it’s I need to keep it simple it’s very important to keep it simple but I do need some kind of divisions between the different essays that I dictate

earlier….

Is The myth theme, how broadly applicable or narrow, is identifying the purpose and message and payload of the mushroom trees that the message is branching and that the purpose of the images of mushroom trees is revealed and decoded and discovered to be non-branching.

how broadly valuable is that decoding?

is this only narrowly valuable? is the master mytheme – it is debatable that the master mytheme is branching versus nonbranching . whats “master mytheme”? there are isolated individual mytheme’s there are missing stories that are kind of a compound mytheme’s and then there are missing contrast to decode a mytheme there are different types of machines they’re not all the same shape they don’t all serve the same function in relation to other men themes

there are relationship there are types of real relationships among mytheme’s

it may be a debatable theory of myth themes to say , to assert that the master mytheme is nonbranching versus branching

what is the implicit theory, there, of how mytheme decoding or myth theme mapping works?

you definitely need to remember to look at everything in the world of religious imagery through a heavy lens of branching versus nonbranching ; always inventory every element that you see in terms of contrast of branching versus nonbranching and looking to inventory all aspects that are branching or non-branching.

for example, the decoration Greek around the border Meanderz of two types there is essentially in effect a contrast between the branching type of meander versus the non-branching type of meander

I feel a cluster of insight, I sense a gold nugget around my bringing together in the past day, the Plaincourault is extra valuable as a mushroom tree because it has the non-branching snake; the snake is bringing a message, the snake is a messenger,

imagery communicates / transmits a message; an image is inherently A transmitted a transmitting of a message

we should look for rock, Rock can be forced into the category of non-branching

A question is here on the narrowness or broad wealth of value

how broad is the value of recognizing that the message of the mushroom trees is branching concerns branching it’s about branching it’s a branching message it’s a message of branching it’s a message about branching

the message is tangibly depicted as having branching features such as cut off limbs cut off branches stumps or gratuitous extra unnatural added branches

the snake brings the message in plain corrault fresco in the snakes mouth brings the fruit which is the message

the package of the message the mushroom tree and the mushroom is the package and the image of a mushroom is the package and

people mistake the finger for the moon

people mistake the mushroom as the envelope package container they mistake that for the message which it transmits the fruit is both the package the mushroom but

ultimately though the fruit is the message that’s contained in the package

that message is knowledge of nonbranching which implies indirectly other key myth themes such as rock

rock is a depiction of non-branching

if we sort all myth themes into master categories – if possible – falling on the side of nonbranching or branching,

how much can we actually use non-branching versus branching as the two master categories and then organize everything else underneath those two master categories?

a question that must be narrower is specifically the theme of non-branching as it is represented in mushroom trees where Mushroom Trees depict branching so that the mushroom is the package or envelope and the message conveyed and transported and transmitted is non-branching and

the snake emphasizes that because then you have a nonbranching snake and then organize everything else underneath those two master categories

then a question that must be narrower is specifically the theme of non-branching as it is represented in mushroom trees where Mushroom Trees depict branching so that the mushroom is the package or envelope and the message conveyed and transported and transmitted is non-branching and

I think there is some duplicated voice transcription here ; seeing the same garbled transcription twice

the snake emphasizes that because then you have a nonbranching snake contrasted against a branching mushroom tree, so that the shape of the snake works together with the shape of the branching artificially branching mushroom tree

the feeling I have I feel like it was especially when I saw Dr. Brown’s Plainc roll fresco Julie photo with the snake, I felt like the ideas locked in at about the same time, of identifying the specific theme and purpose, and seeing how the message transmission works, of differentiating between The mushroom as two layers the envelope versus the message unravel those two layers that are complicated interpenetrating the shape of the mushroom the branching shape of the mushroom the mushroom it’s self its own shape of the physical shape of the mushroom is used to transmit the message and so in a sense the physical surface form of the mushroom is the medium and the message at the same time it physically embodies or depicts the message with it which is transmitting so that the cognitive effects from the Mushroom deliver the message and the visual morphology of the surface form of the mushroom is artificially made to transmit and embody the message of that a profound ultimate point is being made about branching I have not discussed both of you we can’t avoid discussing it sooner or later isof the mushroom is the medium and the message at the same time it physically embodies or depicts the message with it which is transmitting so that the cognitive effects from the Mushroom deliver the message and the visual morphology of the surface form of the mushroom is artificially made to transmit and embody the message of that a profound ultimate point is being made about branching

I have not discussed both of you we can’t avoid discussing it sooner or later is of course one reason I haven’t discussed it is because it’s kind of self evident is

there is an irony: what they want to convey what mythology wants to convey visually is non-branching, but you can’t – we are limited in how we can convey {the positive assertion of non-branching} .

one way to do that is a serpent, which is why the plane corral fresco is of special value

what is special about the plane crawl fresco is that it contains a serpent.

in the case of plane corral fresco, what we have is not only a mushroom tree ; what we have is a mushroom tree with the usual branching artificial branching

but what we especially need to realize that we have don’t keep these in isolated unrelated mental compartments

how does a Mushroom relate to a serpent?

the answer is that a mushroom has branching, but a serpent does not have branching

how is a mushroom the compliment of a snake? answer: mushrooms half branching they have branches or they have branching features such as carefully cut off limbs or cut branches where is snakes usually don’t have legs

except I know of one mushroom tree that has a snake that has legs: in the Psalter

if we could flip the question it would be like:

how is a snake the complement of a mushroom? answer: mushrooms don’t have branching, but snakes have legs and therefore snakes have branching

in this case we’re doing the opposite we say:

How is a mushroom the opposite of a serpent? the answer is: a Mushroom has branching, but a serpent is non-branching.

I guess the big breakthrough here and I’m not sure how broadly it applies, The last time I was in this situation was in the midst of decoding the Salter image the situation of it is a breakthrough but I don’t know yet I have no way of knowing yet the extent of it well the problem I’m facing is it it feels like a kind of a universal sort of completely wide sweeping broad breakthrough yet the skeptical view is that this merely a local decoding breakthrough which we often see that I’ve often had that like when filling in my math theme catalog it is common to have sort of a localized limited scope Jack part of what do I mean jackpot is in terms of Paul Thagard model of theory development and theory transformation it’s about connections it’s about the number of re-connections per minute or whatever and the question is those re-connections they propagate and they take a while to propagate and it’s hard to predict how broadly the re-connections will propagate for example first ID coded Hatsis salamander which was treated by three scholars before him and I didn’t know that that would eventually be the key isomorphic with the Canterbury Balancing Hanging tree which was several more years for maybe four years later or even look at the strange trajectory that every November I would have a breakthrough about branching and then the next November I would have what would seem to be thereconnection

seemingly the identical same breakthrough again on the same decoding subject again the next year and that’s how the deepening of connections works in practice decoding a missing name is not it has aspects that are immediate and instant or local they are at one moment in time or maybe one minute or one hour even but the actual reality of decoding a myth theme is that it often takes two days or seven days as the connections the changes ofconnections propagate throughout the system and it’s like a fractal spreading or something they take days to affect each other and cross map each other across the whole body or a portion of the body of myth theme mytheme you wouldn’t necessarily know that when I decoded the salamander dancing man from Hatsis clearly that did apply to some themes I was trying to apply it to like the limping God her fester Festus the God Pluto the Smith the engineer Smith who had a bad leg I applied the salamander decoding to the bad leg back then in 2016 but you wouldn’t know necessarily that that would hold the key to decoding the out of context leg hanging tree and then you wouldn’t know ahead of time that eventually I would recognize that in general Mushroom trees always have as a hallmark not just a random thing but as a definitive defining hallmark of the type type a logically these are always branching mushrooms to the point that when we see a nonbranching Mushroom that is a special deviation and is abnormal that’s the irony is that non-branching mushrooms are actually abnormal in Christian this genre of art maybe you can call it medieval art Medieval Christian Art nonbranching mushrooms are abnormal they are atypical that’s the words they are a typical whereas a mushroom tree typically and I mean the word typically in a strong sense paradigm medically The typology is that these mushrooms in Christian Art as a rule or in general or as a type a logical rule they always have branches and it is a abnormal atypical exception when the mushroom does not have branches in fact we can see the non-branching realistic mushrooms serve to if they serve a special rule they served establish that we really are talking about mushrooms but that there’s something special about the other mushrooms that have branching the The nonbranching Mushroom is a subservient utilitarian communication function it says yes we really are talking about mushrooms but there’s more to it than that see the branching mushrooms where the actual messages because there is no the only message that’s conveyed by a nonbranching Mushroom in this genre the only message there is a Nero utilitarian message message that yes we really are talking about mushrooms but there’s much more to the story than that see the branching mushrooms for explanation this is why we can expect to see some plain scientific Mushroom images in art but their message is very narrow they serve they are like the pink key tree they are plain simplified key to to lock in the meaning to give it sort of a reference point but they are not really where the action is that and I don’t even think that they are serving to vigorously message the lack of branching I don’t think that’s the function of the simple mushroom serve in this genre in practice the only functions served by simple nonbranching mushrooms in this genre is to simply establish that yes we are really literal mushrooms but that’s not the point this little simple Mushroom is confirming that yes we are talking about mushrooms but it is also signaling that the message is not mushroom that you’re missing the point if you’re just focusing on mushroom that’s missing the point it is the other branching mesh branching mushrooms that are actually conveying the real point the simple Mushroom merely establishes that yes we really are talking about mushrooms but the message the real bulk of the message the payload is conveyed by the branching mushroom not by the simple literal depictions of mushrooms it is in fact here’s Noteworthy a timestamp worth the development 8:15 PM whatever date oh it’s March 23, 2022 the category of evidence that we have labeled as stylized ha ha that way there’s a failure there we need to achieve more success we have to point out emphatically what is the number one thing when we say stylized what is by far the most significant and profound Stylizations so-called stylization is branching the theme of branching and not brick branching and cut branching The evidence category name that we have called stylized is clueless and not worth he as soon as we say stylized to get 100% score on the exam we have to provide the keyword there immediately after we say stylized the first word that we have to put is branching to the point where to a large extent we could almost replace the category name of stylized by the category name of branching then the categories would be named live literal simple mushrooms branching mushrooms and effect and now I have problem and ties are three categories because given that the stylization is about branching all the sudden we have broken our district division between category type two and three because effects the mushroom causes a cognitive affect of moving from branching to non-branching the stylization number one above all is branching features which is effects so I have just broken and transgressed and fused together are category number two and three which we have which we have called stylized in a vague unintelligent a way we have called it in an in articulate way we have simply labeled it vaguely as stylized but what is the number one most important style is the stylization feature Brinckmann’s’s book title is tree Stylizations in Medieval arent what is the most profound thing to say about these so-called style tree Stylizations for one thing the tree Stylizations are mushroom trees but they these mushroom trees are mode most notable in that they have artificial branching features especially where they look like mushrooms but they are thin artificial and unnatural because they are mushrooms that that emphatically have branching their mushrooms that cannot be mushrooms because they have branching which prevents them from representing mushrooms so they have what I first we could go I was thinking in terms of problematic branching I don’t know if I have daily daytime stamps but you can see if you can find a date at which I was talking about problematic branching of mushrooms and arguing in a podcast recently that we must reject all mushroom trees because they allmost notable in that they have artificial branching features especially where they look like mushrooms but they are thin artificial and unnatural because they are mushrooms that that emphatically have branching their mushrooms that cannot be mushrooms because they have branching which prevents them from representing mushrooms so they have what I first we could go I was thinking in terms of problematic branching I don’t know if I have daily daytime stamps but you can see if you can find a date at which I was talking about problematic branching of mushrooms and arguing in a podcast recently that we must reject all mushroom trees because they allFail to match mushrooms because they all have branching and therefore they cannot possibly be mushrooms because they have problematic branching but the whole message is that branching is problematic the branching of the mind and personal control across time in the mystic state is problematic so I was jokingly starting to re-categories maybe a week ago I was starting working on the problem of re-categorizing and adjusting my mental category how are we to think I was starting to work on the problem how are we rightly to think about like we’re trying to get the right angle here there’s there’s something that we need to see if there’s something that we need to perceive and recognize about the problematic quality that these mushrooms are all bad and failures because they have branchingFail to match mushrooms because they all have branching and therefore they cannot possibly be mushrooms because they have problematic branching but the whole message is that branching is problematic the branching of the mind and personal control across time in the mystic state is problematic so I was jokingly starting to re-categories maybe a week ago I was starting working on the problem of re-categorizing and adjusting my mental category how are we to think I was starting to work on the problem how are we rightly to think about like we’re trying to get the right angle here there’s there’s something that we need to see if there’s something that we need to perceive and recognize about the problematic quality that these mushrooms are all bad and failures because they have branching so my first attempt to reconceptualize or two in Rich and build out in a new direction my conception instead of having a kind of stupid clueless in articulate mental category and is oversimplified concepts and conceptual category of simply mushroom trees that’s not adequate because the branching is too strange and marketed and it is clearly a primary feature and not just definitely not just to make the mushrooms look like trees it is more like they go out of their way to make the branching awkward and unnatural and to stand out like a sore thumb if these are mushroom trees that have branching to make them look like trees how come the branching instead stands out like a sore thumb these are really painfully awkward trees and that’s true of the weird vine tree like in Jason coming forth from python with a Fina and there’s a scrawny vine ivy tree that has no visible branching these are painfully emphatically strenuously awkward kind of bro branching that is depicted to us the artist go out of their way to depict strenuously awkward branching features that stand out like a sore thumb it’s the main thing you what the first thing you recognize is it these are mushrooms but the very next thing that you recognize is the accentuated highlighted painfully called out branching then when you add the snake you’re really set up now to talk about the contrast between the nonbranching snake versus the vigorously amplified artificial branching theme that stands out such as on the plane corral fresco

I’m in the phase right now of the jackpot the jackpot is flowing fourth and I don’t know how big that this jackpot is I don’t know how broadly applicable this breakthrough is , is it only a local decoding?

Need simple durable format wo high risk of losing data, low overhead.

Voice misrecognition errors, so you compensate

Why did pre moderns all recognize routinely the nonbranching mytheme, but in today’s late modern era, it requires a mega ultra super genius with sweat from the brow; extreme resources, sacrificing all other focuses in order to to throw it insane Asperger’s levels of of attention to crack the code?

why is the problem so infinitely intractable for us?

why are we late moderns the slow and dull-witted ones that are unable to figure this out ?

is it just because the tradition has been lost , the language has been lost, a symbolic language

how is it that every two -bit mystic chapel and unknown anonymous artist all knew about the branching Nonbranching message, but for us –

ooh look out, bow down, everyone; here comes a late-modern person!! oh what a genius level, they’re so smart, by virtue of the number of the year that they were born in!

All of evolutionary history has let up to wonderful us , were so smart that we’re even able to figure out after just freaking 30 years what every 2 bit Mystic knew: that the whole payload message of the mushroom shapes was the “non-branching” message/payload being communicated.

it took like from 1985, or 1999, through 2022 to get to the level of grasp that all of the pre-modern’s routinely had

the short answer is because it requires the key , the cognitive loosenet Knowledge.

well also also people before us probably had higher IQ ha ha ha ha

ICanterbury Psalter image always made me feel retarded and slow and dull-witted

like how come I pride myself on being a smart late modern Denison of science and modern savvy so impressive

and yet it took a full week even bring expert level decoding Artillería took a full week to decode that image

you just make me feel slow and dull-witted and I feel that way about branching about fully perceiving the message layer as such

yes I’ve investigate I’ve recognize the theme in general across mythology the general master theme of non-branching since 2010 walking on reserves nature preserves paths branching paths in the forest patch in Octobers

but why did it take me this long to specifically perceive and recognize as such the specific branching message as the message of the branching mushrooms sometimes combined with the snake

why did it take me this long given that in 2006 given the great resources of comprehension I had then why did it take 22-6 is 16 years to get from there to here to be able to perceive what every two but mushroom artist knows that they’re in on the joke is there an on the message and I wasn’t getting it I wasn’t really comprehending or recognizing the message layer that message as the distinct thing in itself that these are specifically branching message mushroom trees where the main feature of the mushroom trees is not the mushroom, but the main primary central highlighted feature three yelling at me “branching! were signaling branching versus Nonbranching !

were signaling that’s what these arms mean that’s what these weird three arms holding up the Means that’s with all this branching what what more could we have done to inundate you and positively drown you in mass quantities of branching imagery and cut branches in fact never ragged always carefully precisely cut branches

we’re shoving the theme in your face with all of our figures of cleanly cut off branches, and the most cleanly cut off branch of them all is the is the leg Hanging Mushroom tree on the right with Gods sword right there (the handle strangely)

and I’m only the other day I was still referring to them as broken branches and only the other day did I correct my error and change it from broken branches to cut branches cleanly intentionally intelligently cut not just sloppy random “they happen to be broken “

so this makes me feel stupid

how does it feel to have decoded the message that every 2 bit Mystic knew ?

It makes me feel stupid and mentally slow