most entheogen scholarship is conducted under the miss apprehension of defeatist suppression of entheogens that takes it as a granted takes for granted the absence, the abnormality of using visionary plants
you end up with reasoning based on false assumptions, like “pagans would have leapt at the opportunity to smear and defame Christians as users of the vile abnormal despicable Mushroom”
and we learn a lot about your thinking, and we don’t really learn anything about the ancients that you presume to be a historian of
The Moderate entheogen theory of religion is essentially a way of suppression
suppressing visionary plants now
for the purpose of suppressing visionary plants today
the more that you do such theory, the more you help suppress visionary Plants
good job, dumbasses
assume everybody always hated mushrooms
what a great start you’ve got us off to
Terence McKenna: Number one promoter of mushrooms, by declaring that everybody throughout history must hate and despised mushrooms.
“hate mushrooms”
hate mushrooms – the message from Terence McKenna
“religion is the enemy of mushrooms” declares Terence McKenna
good job, losers
Amanita a Low Value, High-Propagation Weed Among Entheogens
Amanita is a weed in the theory of entheogen history.
Parasite Phony Entheogen Scholars
There were no Psilocybin mushrooms in England before 1975. The shape of the Liberty Cap is anachronistic in Christian history.
Letcher Hatsis
Letcher Hatsis is a parasite trying to leverage Prohibition for his own self-promotion.
“Give me a reward pellet please, I have helped bolster Prohibition; see, I am a friend of Psilocybe Prohibition.”
What the hell has Hatsis done to help get rid of, to help repeal Psilocybin Prohibition??
What is Letcher Hatsis doing to help out here ?
Letcher Hatsis is a parasite invader of the field of entheogen scholarship, he is harming the cause, an enemy of drug policy reform.
Hatsis is striving and struggling to work as hard as he can to harm the cause of repealing Psilocybin Prohibition.
Hatsis lyingly claims that he wishes there were mushrooms in Christianity – but observe his actions, observe that he is trying as hard as he can, he is struggling and striving to support the prohibition of psilocybin.
Letcher Hatsis is harming the cause and he doesn’t care, as long as he can appear to self promote his anti-mushroom, Prohibition-compliant brand of idiot “psychedelic historian”, fabricating an anti-mushroom history story, right hand-in-hand with the Prohibitionists, working for the enemy, a Useful Idiot, he is an enemy of psychoactive mushrooms.
he has declared his enmity to mushrooms in Christianity.
he is fighting against the field of entheogen history and scholarship.
Show me where Letcher Hatsis has ever written a single positive word in support of repealing Psilocybin Prohibition. He has not.
The only thing Letcher Hatsis has written is that there is no mushrooms in Christianity, that Christianity is mushroom-free.
Hatsis falsely says – which no authentic witch would ever say – that pagans would be eager to smear Christians as vile users of the despicable mushroom – thus revealing his own, anti-witch values.
Hatsis is actually an enemy of real, authentic witches.
Hatsis is a POSER WITCH and a parasite invader of the field of entheogen scholarship, working for the Prohibitionists, a servile stooge dressed in witches’ costume.
Hatsis’ assumption that pagans are anti-mushroom reveals that he’s a false, fraudulent poser, a phony witch.
This is Hatsis’ twisted concept of what it means to be a “psychedelic witch”.
SINCE WHEN are witches against psychoactive mushrooms?
Hatsis is trying to spread a perverted imitation & inversion of authentic witches’ values.
Hatsis thinks that to be a witch means to help support Prohibition of Psilocybin.
Letcher Hatsis is actually a terrible failure of a witch, a sorry excuse of a witch, a disgrace!
👶🧙♂️
A real, genuine, authentic witch, instead of a fake, fraud, beginner and pretender and poser, would be strategically doing everything possible to help repeal Psilocybin Prohibition, and would work to study Transcendent Knowledge and western esotericism.
The Egodeath theory 
But isn’t the inclusion of only psilocybin mushrooms a form of suppression?
LikeLike
I include Amanita images and I consider Muscimol same as an extinct strain of ergot: a sheer possibility, nothing but a question mark, a complete unknown. Do you believe that Mystery Plant X was the main visionary plant? I can’t say any Meaningful statements about a completely unknown chemical about which the more we hear the clearer it becomes that it is unclear what the effects of this thing are it seems like 15 different effects all jumbled together. it’s just a wildcard ; could be anything. Amanita can produce any experiencing, any cognitive state. So, pretty useless for building a theory on. Too vague. I could construct an elaborate qualifier like to the extent that amanita produces loose cognitive association, without producing or requiring other, distracting, competing experiences – or to the extent that amanita is as high quality of a targeted cognitive loosener as Psilocybin, then we can treat Amanita the same as Psilocybin. which one is the benchmark point of reference upon which is a solid rock that we can build a theory on as a specific point of reference for its experiential effects is psilocybin. Then the question becomes: how efficient is amanita compared to the benchmark standard rock-solid point of reference, which is psilocybin? Do not make amanita the point of reference benchmark, like most scholars try to do. That role is reserved for psilocybin, which is completely determinate, completely known, and even used in today’s oh-so sophisticated clinics – tell me why don’t they use amanita, which is already legal? but anyway, amanita doesn’t need any defense or help; it can do just fine. It’s already way over-supported; we’ve got everybody except for Thomas Hatsis pushing and pushing and supporting and emphasizing Amanita at every possible opportunity, so it does not need my help, and it is a noxious weed that is actually shutting out psilocybin. In practice, 🍄 is functioning to displace and shut out Psilocybin, which is the good stuff that people actually want. Nobody wants 🍄 for the clinics. Amanita is already legal; if you want it, then go ahead and order it by the truckload. 🍄 doesn’t need any help. Functionally now, the way things stand, Amanita is the problem, not the solution. 🍄 is serving as a substitute, a low-value weed, that no one wants to ingest, to shut out the good stuff.
LikeLike