Late Antiquity Transition from Worshipping Heimarmene to Worshipping Transcending Heimarmene

Site Map

Contents:

  • The Main Point of Reference for Interpretation; the Main Referent of Myth: Non-Control of Your Control-Source
  • 2-Level Model of Mental Development per the Egodeath Theory
  • 3-Level Model of Mental Development per the Egodeath Theory
  • Depictions of the 2-Level and 3-Level Models
  • Contrasting 2-Level vs. 3-Level Models
  • The Pre/Trans Fallacy: Naive Possibilism-Thinking vs. Qualified Possibilism-Thinking
  • Contrasting Carvings: 2-Level vs. 3-Level
  • Timeline Dates of Geocentric Cosmology – 2-Level & 3-Level Versions
  • Discussion
  • Altar Worshipping Serpent God
  • Metaphysics of Time
  • Hanegraaff’s ‘Rejected’ Wastebasket
  • Erik Davis: Stairway to Heaven, per the Egodeath Theory & 2-Level Geocentric Cosmology

The Main Point of Reference for Interpretation; the Main Referent of Myth: Non-Control of Your Control-Source

The main point of myth is:

The loose cognitive state reveals that you don’t control the source and origin of your control-thoughts.

This is the point of {the sphere of the fixed stars}, level 8; the Ogdoad, in astral ascent mysticism.

Cybermonk

Reality check, point of reference: what these mythemes ultimately are modelling and expressing and discussing:

The loose cognitive state reveals that you don’t control the source and origin of your control-thoughts.

“TRANSCEND HEIMARMENE” ALL YOU WANT – THAT DOESN’T CHANGE THE BASIC REVEALED CONSTRAINT, THAT YOU DON’T CONTROL YOUR CONTROL-SOURCE.

2-Level Model of Mental Development per the Egodeath Theory

2) eternalism-thinking (= cosmic level 8)

1) possibilism-thinking (= cosmic level 0)

3-Level Model of Mental Development per the Egodeath Theory

3) qualified possibilism-thinking (= cosmic level 9)

2) basic eternalism-thinking (= cosmic level 8)

1) naive possibilism-thinking (= cosmic level 0)

Depictions of the 2-Level and 3-Level Models

The simple 2-level model vs. the confusing, advanced, 3-level model.

The simple 2-level model vs. the confusing, advanced, 3-level model.

Dumb + smart guy = the 2-level model – focuses on the basic contrast between the two models of control, time, and possibility-branching.

No-limb guy-pair = the 3-level model – focuses on qualified possibilism-thinking.

The mushroom tree and the bulk of the entire image focuses on the basic 2-level model, out of practical necessity.

The image also caters to advanced discussions which require understanding the 2-level model as a prerequisite.

2-level basic contrast.

2-level basic contrast. Viable self-control in loosecog requires eternalism-thinking; depicted via non-branching.

The above scene is an example of worshipping or focusing on and asserting eternalism rather than rhetorical emphasis on worshipping transcending eternalism.

The latter can sound like a denial that eternalism is the case; such a denial produces control instability by defaulting to the freewill-premised attempt to make control agency cross the Hofstadter levels.

Any way in which we “transcend” eternalism must affirm, not deny, that eternalism is the case.

Wouter Hanegraaff’s Hermetic texts do not deny that eternalism is the case, they assert eternalism and they rhetorically aspire to, in some compatible senses, “transcend” (while yet affirming) block-universe eternalism.

The ultimate point and constraint is: you don’t control the source of your control thoughts – regardless of advanced, confusing rhetorical claims and aspirations of “transcending fate”.

The Pre/Trans Fallacy: Naive Possibilism-Thinking vs. Qualified Possibilism-Thinking

The pre/trans fallacy is hearing advanced sophisticated rhetoric of “transcending fate” by “rising above the 8th level”, and gleefully thinking like Hanegraaff seems to, “a way to make heimarmene not apply to me!” or “a way to make Heimarmene not be the case!”

The advanced initiate’s “freedom from eternalism” is NOT naive possibilism-thinking; it is very different: qualified possibilism-thinking.

“TRANSCEND HEIMARMENE” ALL YOU WANT – THAT DOESN’T CHANGE THE BASIC REVEALED CONSTRAINT, THAT YOU DON’T CONTROL YOUR CONTROL-SOURCE.

To claim otherwise is the essence of {irreverence toward the Source}, and is correctively punished by control instability in the loose cognitive association state.

Entire image.

Links are at top section of my article:
Proof that the Canterbury Psalter’s Leg-Hanging Mushroom Tree Is Psilocybe

Contrasting 2-Level vs. 3-Level Models

2-Level

150 BC: 2-level system. Transcendent Knowledge = eternalism/ heimarmene/ fatedness/ block-universe determinism.

The emphasized goal is to reach level 8 (fixed stars, eternalism-thinking).

3-Level

150 AD – 3-level system: Transcendent Knowledge = transcending eternalism / heimarmene/fatedness/ block-universe determinism.

The (mainly rhetorically) emphasized goal is to rise above level 8 to level 9 (the Ennead, the Empyrian, outside the fixed stars seeing zodiac images from outside, qualified possibilism-thinking).

Per David Ulansey: looking at the celestial asphere covered with zodiac images implies you are outside of block-universe eternalism, outside the Fate-ruled cosmos in the Empyrian.

Contrasting Carvings: 2-level vs. 3-level

Envisioning heimarmene:
150 BC: Worship Snake Carved on Rock Altar

Envisioning transcending heimarmene:
150 AD: Worship Lion Torch Born from Snake-Wrapped Rock

Timeline Dates of Geocentric Cosmology – 2-level & 3-level versions

4th C BC – Eudoxus creates geocentric cosmology with 7 planets and the 8th level of the stars

2nd C BC – Hipparchus discovers precession of the equinoxes (wobble of earth’s axis of rotation)

2nd C AD – Ptolemy formalizes mathematically the geocentric cosmology

1989 – David Ulansey book Mithraism cosmology & hypercosmic online articles http://www.mysterium.com
http://www.mysterium.com/mithras.html – book summary

2003 – Cybermonk posts posting summarizing Ulansey’s precession/ transcendent cosmology mapped to a 3-level expression of the Egodeath theory

2005 – Erik Davis combines 2-level 1997 expression of the Egodeath theory with Cybermonk 2003 posting summarizing Ulansey’s precession/ transcendent cosmology to create a 2-level simplified potent astral ascent cosmology.

2022 – Wouter Hanegraaff deletes the stars from the 8th level that they had defined, and then moves the empty slot #8 fused up to the level 9 that was defined as being above it so as to transcend heimarmene/ fatedness/ eternalism. Discards the heimarmene-stars into his Rejected wastebasket & evil/repressed Saturn level, which is ruled by negative energies/ psychological traits.

Discussion

Ancients progressed from worshipping eternalism to worshipping the transcendence of eternalism.

The claim to “transcend eternalism” is largely advanced confusing (misleading) mystical rhetoric, per competitive b.s. marketing & wishful thinking & language-game magic, inventing the freewill fog machine of complex double-talk theology.

FIRST fully understand/comprehend early antiquity’s 2-level worship of eternalism.

THEN, distinctly from that, understand the twists from adding a relatively negative valuation to eternalism which was previously equated with mystic Truth enlightenment.

See my 2006 main article’s section:
Transcending Determinism Requires Two Jumps
https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/the-entheogen-theory-of-religion-and-ego-death-2006-main-article/#Transcending-Determinism-Requires-Two-Jumps

Mithras’ Mushroom Ladder to Heaven

Mithras’ Mushroom Ladder to Heaven Beyond the Stars Where Your Soul Is Left Behind by Your Spirit.

The fixed-stars level is the main point of reference, regardless of the number of levels above it.

The fixed-stars level is the main point of reference, yet Hanegraaff is unable to at all discuss the fixed stars in his theurgy cosmology model despite all his attention to “the Ogdoad” – why does he pretend like Ogdoad is something other than the fixed stars?

Hanegraaff and I agree that the center of concern is heimarmene, which I define and explain as referring to the transformative revelation of block-universe no-free-will; most ultimately and to the point, the loose cognitive state discovery that you don’t control the source and origin of your control-thoughts.

Elaborated 10-level system, note that the key point of reference is the fixed stars as level 8, regardless how many levels breakout above that.

threatened and purified by the threat of egodeath seizure

Threatened and purified by the threat of egodeath seizure, rescued by creator, the source of control thoughts. pulled out from the jaws of the threat of control-loss cybernetic instability death demonstration.


1) rescued from resisting heimarmene, AND,
2) rescued from heimarmene

Isn’t this image by Eadwine?

You are BOTH:
1) Rescued from resisting heimarmene by the revelation of heimarmene (considered positive) and fully grasping it.
2) Rescued from heimarmene (now considered negative) to be born out from the heimarmene-threat; lifted above fateness – or lifted out of the threatening aspect of fatedness by being given reconciliation with the omnipotence of the source of your control thoughts in relation to “you” the local control agent on the other side of the boundary/level/ control system domain limit.

pulled forth from control seizure

Lazarus is pulled forth from the rock tomb of block-universe determinism control seizure demonstration that purifies and removes pollution of egoic naive freewill thinking – psilocybin(-type cave drumming meditation under Zen Master Brad) reveals and demonstrates that you are not the source of your control-thoughts.

The god-possessed mind threatens and demonstrates

The higher, god-possesed mind in the psilocybin(-type cave drumming meditation under Zen Master Brad) altered state threatens and demonstrates vulnerability of lower, egoic freewill-premised thinking.

hypercosmic key, torch, scepter

Leontocephic figure: body wrapped in heimarmene serpent, torso above it, holds hypercosmic key, torch, and scepter.

Heimarmene-controlled cosmic egg

Entheogens Reveal Heimarmene in the Ogdoad – return to baseline tightcog = qualified possibilism-thinking = the Ennead level 9 outside the fate-ruled, heimarmene-controlled cosmos of block-universe determinism.

Books for Thanksgiving week, November 29, 2013 – open book is Joseph Campbell – Power of Myth.

Let’s check in on what i’m doing on November 29, 2013.

The open book is Joseph Campbell – Power of Myth.

OH SHT i must have two copies of 1000 faces now agghhh it happened again – MUST catalog my library!

Artist: Cybermonk around 1992, ink nib & ink brush

Artiste credit Cybermonk around 1992, ink brush.

My ink nib Liberte worldline block-universe snake.

Envisioning transcending heimarmene:
150 AD: Worship Lion Torch Born from Snake-Wrapped Rock http://www.mysterium.com/lionhead_jp40.jpg

copy caption here

Dionysus mosaic. Simple 2-level system – revelation = no-free-will/Eternalism.

Today on Egodeath Mystery Show Aug 17 2022 or maybe yesterday I connected Ariadne’s garment = branching-thinking = left limb.

We now in the psyche-revealing state perceive branching thinking like a removed explicit layer of clothing that hid the non-branching spear/serpent reality of monopossibility due to pre-existing thoughts.

The main crux point is non-control – BUT, a main thing experience that produces the experience of non-control is block-universe determinism / eternalism-consciousness.

The layer of illusory egoic thinking initially covers the underlying reality, exposed by the psilocybin mushrooms in the hem folds in this Dionysus mosaic.

Altar Worshipping Serpent God

Worship snake frozen in rock – what would Hanegraaff say re: the claim to transcend heimarmene?

Future control-thoughts are revealed by psilocybin to be pre-existing and arranged as a snake-shaped worldline frozen in the rock block universe.

What would Hanegraaff say re: the claim to transcend heimarmene? This alter sacrifices to Eternalism, block-universe heimarmene, Fate, non-branching, no-free-will.

It’s hard to represent transcendent non-control experience in visual art, but you can represent the altered-state experience of non-branching stability and worldline/block universe eternalism (via the morphology mythemes {tree, snake, rock, column base}).

Frozen snake in a rock cave – sacrificing the child-thinking.

Metaphysics of Time

Snodfart’s Junior Academy – Encyclopedia of Philosophy online article: Philosophy of Time.

Snodfart’s Junior Academy – Encyclopedia of Philosophy online article: Philosophy of Time. https://egodeaththeory.wordpress.com/2020/11/12/possibilism-vs-eternalism-2-models-of-time-and-control/

They are kinda dumb at that school: they fail to depict a tree under “tree model”, and they fail to show a worm/snake worldline despite all their yammering and schoolyard talk about “worm theory”.

🍄🔎🌳🐍

10-level standard cosmology with elaboration breakout of levels 9 and 10 as 9, 10, and 11. Key levels are 0, 8, 9. 0 = naive possibilism-thinking, 8 = basic eternalism-thinking, 9 = qualified possibilism-thinking. From a 2-level point of view/model, 0 = possibilism-thinking, 8 = eternalism-thinking. Elaborating the process of transition = levels 1-7. Elaborating the follow-through and return to tightcog/mundane daily life = levels 9-10 (or 9-11 in this diagram).

The cosmic heimarmene serpent is level 8.

By now, much of my thinking is slightly hard to cite citations now that I simply speak the conceptual language; “this is simply the standard usage/scheme” (shrug) and here’s what it refers to re: personal control revelation transformation.

The god of transcending eternalism makes pact with the god of eternalism.

Mithras, the god of transcending eternalism, makes a pact with Helios, the god of eternalism.

Hanegraaff’s ‘Rejected’ Wastebasket

The god of transcending eternalism makes pact with the god of eternalism – do not repress eternalism and get rid of heimarmene fixed stars level into the Rejected wastebasket like Hanegraaff’s project of book Hermetic Spirituality, the “thoroughly positive reading” of Theurgy Hermetic spirituality.*

*except for Heimarmene/fate; that’s unreal and a non-reasoning animal-like delusion. Get rid of your negative psychological traits that are associated with Heimarmene.

Hanegraaff the Hoodwinked by poet-mystics’ ironic inversions/ marketing literature.

You don’t get victory over the Fate-rulers torments by denying Fate, but rather, by sacrificing to Fate giving it due reverential honor same as you do the Source that Hanegraaff dualistically, dissociatively splits into “non-reasoning negative psychology traits associated with fate-rulers, vs. the great Source of all that exists.”

You don’t make peace with Fate by denying Fate is real; you make peace with Fate by affirming Fate’s power over your control-thoughts!

Cybermonk, against the Hanegraaff project

The ever-popular Freewill Fog project propelling eg Arminian Calvinism: 1) commit to propping up freewill egoic moral culpability premise. 2) claim to assert God’s omnipotence (but always limit that to not infringe on the most important thing, which is your moral project of propping up freewill moral agency, it’s your god-level duty to engineer and be the savior of freewill moral control power.

Abstruse complex theologies & moral-driven metaphysical philosophies are a giant project of saving freewill (the driving concern, the central god being worshipped) in the face of non-control and omnipotence and eternalism revelation.

(Wouter Hanegraaff:)

Be positive & enlightened like me: Embrace body, matter, nature, and cosmos 😊

except for Heimarmene/Fatedness/ no-free-will; that’s a demon possessing you since birth, by the archon planet rulers, get rid of that pollution and impurity, as fervently as a world-hating Gnostic dualistically rejects & escapes out from the material world, escaping into the pure realm of spirit, so we must do away with & get rid of Heimarmene

What’s in Hanegraaff’s own Rejected wastebasket? lets take a look…

🌌->🗑

OMG IT’S FULL OF STARS!

Moment of inspiration for the idea behind this page:
The Study of Greek and Roman Religions: Insularity and Assimilation
by Roubekas:
“the academic study of religion cannot and should not be confessional.”

The Egodeath theory is cultic worship of eternalism, we worship & confess the rock-carved snake god, per Erik Davis’ 2005 book Led Zeppelin IV pp. 118-119 & 122. Per Luther H Martin’s 2018 book Studies in Hellenistic Religions, how did religion change using the Hipparchus’ discovery of precession of the equinoxes?

Mental picture of glorifying block-universe determinism vs. “being born from the snake-wrapped rock” per Ulansey’s interpretation. Note that only the lion’s head (not body) and torch are outside block-universe determinism.

Erik Davis: Stairway to Heaven, per the Egodeath Theory & 2-Level Geocentric Cosmology

Book:
Led Zeppelin IV
Erik Davis
2005
http://amzn.com/dp/0826416586/

Astral ascent 2-level possibilism to eternalism per the Egodeath theory – pp. 118-119 & 122 are regarding the song Stairway to Heaven.

David Ulansey – The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries: Cosmology & Salvation in the Ancient World

This is a science book more than a spirituality book – provides a trustworthy foundation unlike the “scientific historian” Wouter Hanegraaff who struggles to prevent the fixed stars from being in the Ogdoad (8th sphere). Has Hanegraaff not read this book?

That’s quite possible, since as Luther H. Martin’s 2018 book (Studies in Hellenistic Religions) writes, scholars have disrespected Hellenistic-era religion and have been blind to astral ascent mysticism; spiritual ascent cosmology. Hanegraaff acts illiterate about theurgy when it comes to the fixed stars.

COOL! Amazon shows that I bought this book on February 16, 2001. The Egodeath Yahoo Group started June 2001. Posting #1 at the Egodeath Yahoo Group was 4 months after I read this book. Every posting at the Egodeath Yahoo Group is with the knowledge of this book.

https://www.amazon.com/Origins-Mithraic-Mysteries-Cosmology-Salvation/dp/0195067886

selected section of home page:

“My publications have focused on the ancient mystery religion of Mithraism. 

Summary of book: 
The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries: Cosmology and Salvation in the Ancient World 
(Oxford University Press, revised paperback 1991) – here

Appendixes for the book:
“Those of you who have read the book in English may be interested in several important appendices written for a translation of the book.
here

Book: 
Mysteria: The Ancient Mysteries and the Evolution of Consciousness
Based on a series of lectures presented at the C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco – here

Articles

The Mithraic Mysteries
published in Scientific American (December, 1989) – here

Mithras and the Hypercosmic Sun
here

The Eighth Gate: The Mithraic Lion-Headed Figure and the Platonic World-Soul
here

Cosmic symbolism in the Gospels
Journal of Biblical Literature – here

Cultural Transition and Spiritual Transformation: From Alexander the Great to Cyberspace
here

Errata

(bc i happen to be listening) – move to idea devmt page 14

  • Ep212c of Egodeath Mystery Show – ~59:00 – I hesitantly said “Bertrand Russell”, but I think it’s actually Karl Popper who called Minkowski “Parmenides”.
Unknown's avatar

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

5 thoughts on “Late Antiquity Transition from Worshipping Heimarmene to Worshipping Transcending Heimarmene”

    1. Thank you, that’s encouraging. I do believe the content is substantive and helps unravel the confusion that confronts us, because of Antiquity shifting from 2-level to 3-level rhetoric – advanced-level mytheme decoding. I finally did initial cleanup of this posting.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. It’s really clear now.
        And Transcendence can be seen as returning to qualified possibilism. – Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz…”there’s no place like home.”

        Like

  1. I keep saying Hanegraaff doesn’t know what to do with Heimarmene fixed stars/fate level for as as long as he doesn’t understand their magnitude.. If he knew the significance of Heimarmene fixed stars/fate he wouldn’t want to appear stupid by moving the fixed stars around. That’s something that just can’t be denied.

    Maybe one day he will get it right, just as Einstein says,
    “I think and think for months and years. Ninety-nine times the conclusion is false. The hundredth time I am right.”

    Like

    1. I need to compensate by putting extra-strong, very pointed emphasis on non-control, and why it is of the essence, and the real meaning the experience meaning of fatedness in the heimarmene-revealing altered state – and fixed stars is referring specifically to that.

      By him messing with the placement of the fixed stars relative to the rebirth experience, he is unknowingly messing around with the model of what the mind’s transformative experience is in the altered state.

      What is revealed most of all, above all, is timeless fate, block-universe no free will; non-branching possibilities.

      To really focus on the central point: it is revealed that you are not in control of your control thoughts.

      All of this analogy is really about that and nothing else, and we need to get that straight and then tell our analogy stories built coherently around that.

      This is the meaning of the fixed stars and where they fit in our trajectory of mental transformation process development process of moving from the first world model to the second world model, which is analogically mapped to the fixed stars, and then later, we talk about “transcending” that – but only in a certain limited sense, transcending fate – which means transcending the revelation that you do not control your own source of thoughts.

      That is the central point, the central altered-state revelation that is mapped to the central level: the most important, main, central level is the fixed stars.

      That (representing control power stability) is the central point of reference.

      So you need to be sensible in where are you place that: and that is the eighth level, as everybody held – especially in Egypt, especially at that time.

      Hanegraaff has gotten lost in late antiquity’s complex poetic ironic talk about “transcending”, and he has gotten lost about visionary plants and he needs to do a reality check back in, that we are talking about what are the effects of the plants on the mental model regarding control power, and then how do we map that to analogy centered around the stars – which means of course the real stars, not his fake, confused planet “stars”.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to wrmspirit Cancel reply