I had a vision from God or one of Hanegraaff’s daimons: like often with academics, Hanegraaff is more likely not writing out of masterful contrarianism, but out of mere ignorance building preposterous sky castles without realizing that the result flies in the face of David Ulansey’s established standard cosmology model.
Hanegraaff simply doesn’t realize that his proposal is contradicted by the standard cosmology per Eudoxus, Hipparchus, & Ptolemy (regarding that the fixed stars define the 8th cosmic level) and Christians, Mithraists, Hermetists/Theurgists, and Gnostics (and Ulansey, myself, and Erik Davis) (regarding that the 8th cosmic level is heimarmene).
It’s incredible that when he got to that point- the fixed stars- and didn’t know where to place them, that he thought he could place them anywhere, or not at all, as if he founded them, and was in control of their destiny.
That’s scary and makes me wonder how much of recorded history through translation, has been left out or rearranged.
And isn’t that what the modern world does, by erasing parts of history that it can’t deal with?
He has shed much light, but there remains much darkness within the backwards underworld of academia where they are filled with superstition and taboos.
This morning I proved that he is making his radical assertions out of mere complete ignorance, rather than out of some kind of a masterful transcendent bravado.
He simply does not realize that what he’s proposing contradicts literally everybody.
And so the situation is not that I am debating against a master of the subject, but rather, I am teaching a rank newbie the basics.
Hanegraaff needs to read David Ulansey’s book and hypercosmic articles.
I proved that Hanegraaff is writing out of pure mere ignorance.
The proof that he asserts his malformed and unscientific cosmos model out of mere ignorance is the fact that he never shows any evidence of realizing that what he’s proposing is completely non-standard, regarding effectively placing fixed stars at planet level seven, and then declaring level eight to be above cosmic heimarmene.
I will be making superficial corrections of this set of errors that he makes, but the deeper error is his too negative attitude towards heimarmene, which will produce control seizure/ instability.
We must surrender to heimarmene (God’s divine creation) in order to have control stability in the altered state.
And then after getting right with cosmic heimarmene/ block-universe determinism/ non-control of our source of control-thoughts, then we can slightly transcend heimarmeme after that.
He needs to say level nine is above heimarmeme, not level 8.
The fixed stars go in level 8 per the standard model. He needs to reference Ulansey.
The Egodeath theory 
Maybe that’s what Hanegraaff thinks he can do by moving the fixed stars out of their position.
LikeLike
I had a vision from God or one of Hanegraaff’s daimons: like often with academics, Hanegraaff is more likely not writing out of masterful contrarianism, but out of mere ignorance building preposterous sky castles without realizing that the result flies in the face of David Ulansey’s established standard cosmology model.
Hanegraaff simply doesn’t realize that his proposal is contradicted by the standard cosmology per Eudoxus, Hipparchus, & Ptolemy (regarding that the fixed stars define the 8th cosmic level) and Christians, Mithraists, Hermetists/Theurgists, and Gnostics (and Ulansey, myself, and Erik Davis) (regarding that the 8th cosmic level is heimarmene).
LikeLike
It’s incredible that when he got to that point- the fixed stars- and didn’t know where to place them, that he thought he could place them anywhere, or not at all, as if he founded them, and was in control of their destiny.
That’s scary and makes me wonder how much of recorded history through translation, has been left out or rearranged.
And isn’t that what the modern world does, by erasing parts of history that it can’t deal with?
LikeLike
He has shed much light, but there remains much darkness within the backwards underworld of academia where they are filled with superstition and taboos.
This morning I proved that he is making his radical assertions out of mere complete ignorance, rather than out of some kind of a masterful transcendent bravado.
He simply does not realize that what he’s proposing contradicts literally everybody.
And so the situation is not that I am debating against a master of the subject, but rather, I am teaching a rank newbie the basics.
Hanegraaff needs to read David Ulansey’s book and hypercosmic articles.
I proved that Hanegraaff is writing out of pure mere ignorance.
The proof that he asserts his malformed and unscientific cosmos model out of mere ignorance is the fact that he never shows any evidence of realizing that what he’s proposing is completely non-standard, regarding effectively placing fixed stars at planet level seven, and then declaring level eight to be above cosmic heimarmene.
I will be making superficial corrections of this set of errors that he makes, but the deeper error is his too negative attitude towards heimarmene, which will produce control seizure/ instability.
We must surrender to heimarmene (God’s divine creation) in order to have control stability in the altered state.
And then after getting right with cosmic heimarmene/ block-universe determinism/ non-control of our source of control-thoughts, then we can slightly transcend heimarmeme after that.
He needs to say level nine is above heimarmeme, not level 8.
The fixed stars go in level 8 per the standard model. He needs to reference Ulansey.
LikeLiked by 1 person